Head-held-high seems to work fine for giraffes, though I'll be the first to admit that I don't know the rate of occurrence of heart problems in that species.
Absolutely. It will be a relatively non-destructive, but noticeable consequence of his behavior that might break through to him. What, you'd rather that his failing grades and trashed degree/career pursuit be the wakeup call instead?
There are reasons to use Flash memory even at a higher $/MB, particular in power consumption, size, and fragility of spinning magnetic devices in portable contexts.
Bah, what a load of crap. If that happens, the BBS scene will come back up, mesh networking with good samaritan inter-city links will pop up, etc.
People will route around the problem. Right now, the problem of unusably expensive/capped service is starting to peek its head up, but if it hits critical mass there will be widespread innovation into providing better access because the market will demand it.
Look, nobody is saying that infringement is not illegal, just because (theft == illegal && infringement != theft). Infringement is illegal. However, the RIAA lawsuits and all the anti-consumer press around piracy equates copyright infringement with theft, using it as an emotional and incorrect ploy to try to rally support. It needs to be corrected.
but a group of friends doesn't want to grind, they want to play together.
Play what? Play how? Also, they don't want to grind, but they want to "play"? What are they going go play at besides grinding in a typical MMO? That pretty much encompasses the entire gameplay, unless you're talking about characters just playing dressup, chatting, and running around for the heck of it.
Some really get into plot & environment of their world, actually roleplaying within it. Others simply see game mechanics to exploit for greater achievement. Then you've got the griefers and trolls. "Let them play with each other" is a pretty meaningless statement. Defining what "play" is still needs to be done; which brings up what types of enjoyment can be had from it; which leads to defining the world's characteristics, available mechanics, and affectable facets.
Leaving that sort of design out leaves you with things like Second Life.
nearlyfreespeech.net. It's not free, but it costs only pennies and you don't have to endure any garbage. You get CGI in all sorts of nice functional languages, shell script access, and nice tools.
Ah, but later on in the Sharkticon pit they talk about "photon charges" with regards to their ammo, which could very well imply lasers. Since this is about robots and sci-fi-ish stuff, we must presume that it's all internally consistent!
Again, as I posted above, these are promises from a politician during a campaign. Why in the world did you believe them this time? It's no different than any other.
Politicians promise many things. Why on earth would anybody believe them? Where was the standard Slashdot cynicism before the elections with regards to Obama? His prior track record is consistent with his behavior today.
That's the problem with "anti" people. They generally don't stand for anything, and when push comes to shove they crumble and fall towards that which they're most familiar with (their target).
What Obama is doing is not surprising at all. He has not done any sort of 180 in comparison to his overall track record, and any independent who drilled down to specifics of his platform during his campaign to see what was beyond the feel-good generalisms of "change" and "hope" is not surprised in his direction. Surprised at his voracity yes, but not direction.
The issue here would be that if they can be demonstrated to feel pain... then there would be a demand for them to be "humanely" killed prior to being cooked.
but... _why_?
I'm sure we can all agree that if somebody gains sadistic pleasure from the act of inflicting pain itself, they're dangerous. But that's a diagnosis and extrapolation of the one doing the inflicting, not a problem of the presence of pain itself.
Not to mention that when a guilty man goes free, he'll probably be guilty of something later to nail him on anyway. The pruning will eventually "take".
It sucks when what they're guilty of is heinous, but it is the better option.
Having tracked down a lot about Cyc and messing with OpenCyc and talking to people in the know, I'm pretty sure Cyc has already been able to answer questions of this scope, with natural language as input.
Okay, they do preemptive code analysis inside the sandbox, too. Relevant portion of the PDF (section 2.2):
The inner-sandbox uses static analysis to detect security defects in untrusted x86 code. Previously, such analysis has been challenging for arbitrary x86 code due to such practices as self-modifying code and overlapping instructions. In Native Client we disallow such practices through a set of alignment and structural rules that, when observed, insure that the native code module can be disassembled reliably, such that all reachable instructions are identified during disassembly. With reliable disassembly as a tool, our validator can then insure that the executable includes only the subset of legal instructions, disallowing unsafe machine instructions.
This then happens inside a sandbox where CPU segments are strictly enforced and any OS calls are trapped.
They're asking for people who are familiar in low-level x86 security fields to point out any issues from their experience that could compromise their sandbox.
It's kind of cool that raw UV exposure is the commonly accepted culprit of yellowing, and the restoration process involves basking the gelled surface in UV as well.
Slashdot Mirror
Head-held-high seems to work fine for giraffes, though I'll be the first to admit that I don't know the rate of occurrence of heart problems in that species.
Absolutely. It will be a relatively non-destructive, but noticeable consequence of his behavior that might break through to him. What, you'd rather that his failing grades and trashed degree/career pursuit be the wakeup call instead?
There are reasons to use Flash memory even at a higher $/MB, particular in power consumption, size, and fragility of spinning magnetic devices in portable contexts.
Plus, any reasonably short copyright term tied to the author's lifetime is incentive to off the author. You really don't want that.
Bah, what a load of crap. If that happens, the BBS scene will come back up, mesh networking with good samaritan inter-city links will pop up, etc.
People will route around the problem. Right now, the problem of unusably expensive/capped service is starting to peek its head up, but if it hits critical mass there will be widespread innovation into providing better access because the market will demand it.
Look, nobody is saying that infringement is not illegal, just because (theft == illegal && infringement != theft). Infringement is illegal. However, the RIAA lawsuits and all the anti-consumer press around piracy equates copyright infringement with theft, using it as an emotional and incorrect ploy to try to rally support. It needs to be corrected.
Play what? Play how? Also, they don't want to grind, but they want to "play"? What are they going go play at besides grinding in a typical MMO? That pretty much encompasses the entire gameplay, unless you're talking about characters just playing dressup, chatting, and running around for the heck of it.
Some really get into plot & environment of their world, actually roleplaying within it. Others simply see game mechanics to exploit for greater achievement. Then you've got the griefers and trolls. "Let them play with each other" is a pretty meaningless statement. Defining what "play" is still needs to be done; which brings up what types of enjoyment can be had from it; which leads to defining the world's characteristics, available mechanics, and affectable facets.
Leaving that sort of design out leaves you with things like Second Life.
nearlyfreespeech.net. It's not free, but it costs only pennies and you don't have to endure any garbage. You get CGI in all sorts of nice functional languages, shell script access, and nice tools.
Ah, but later on in the Sharkticon pit they talk about "photon charges" with regards to their ammo, which could very well imply lasers. Since this is about robots and sci-fi-ish stuff, we must presume that it's all internally consistent!
This could finally explain the scene at 8:05 of this clip!
These are lawyers who performed illegal and unethical actions in gathering and presenting their claims in court. It doesn't matter who the client is.
Again, as I posted above, these are promises from a politician during a campaign. Why in the world did you believe them this time? It's no different than any other.
Politicians promise many things. Why on earth would anybody believe them? Where was the standard Slashdot cynicism before the elections with regards to Obama? His prior track record is consistent with his behavior today.
That's the problem with "anti" people. They generally don't stand for anything, and when push comes to shove they crumble and fall towards that which they're most familiar with (their target).
What Obama is doing is not surprising at all. He has not done any sort of 180 in comparison to his overall track record, and any independent who drilled down to specifics of his platform during his campaign to see what was beyond the feel-good generalisms of "change" and "hope" is not surprised in his direction. Surprised at his voracity yes, but not direction.
but... _why_?
I'm sure we can all agree that if somebody gains sadistic pleasure from the act of inflicting pain itself, they're dangerous. But that's a diagnosis and extrapolation of the one doing the inflicting, not a problem of the presence of pain itself.
Not to mention that when a guilty man goes free, he'll probably be guilty of something later to nail him on anyway. The pruning will eventually "take".
It sucks when what they're guilty of is heinous, but it is the better option.
How does that work? Maybe they meant "hazardous chemicals" or something.
Having tracked down a lot about Cyc and messing with OpenCyc and talking to people in the know, I'm pretty sure Cyc has already been able to answer questions of this scope, with natural language as input.
480x320 resolution is not very good for general web use.
The Nokias at 800x480 are phenomenal, much cheaper, can take memory cards, and have standard replaceable batteries.
Or you could get a 30" flat screen for your desktop, a nice audio system, and a comfortable chair and not have duplicate media setups.
For bonus points, put a couch behind your chair & move the chair out of the way when you have guests.
Okay, they do preemptive code analysis inside the sandbox, too. Relevant portion of the PDF (section 2.2):
This then happens inside a sandbox where CPU segments are strictly enforced and any OS calls are trapped.
They're asking for people who are familiar in low-level x86 security fields to point out any issues from their experience that could compromise their sandbox.
Not affiliated with any company? Your only choices are pay to self-host (and that means affiliating with a hosting provider), or go P2P.
Remember, Akamai is a company, too.
It's kind of cool that raw UV exposure is the commonly accepted culprit of yellowing, and the restoration process involves basking the gelled surface in UV as well.
DRM mostly. Video/audio lockout at continually lower levels, "authentication" stuff that tends to break, etc.