Slashdot Mirror


Best Wi-Fi Portable Browsing Device?

foxxo writes "I'm a library worker, so I get lots of questions about our collection when I'm out in the stacks. I'd love to be able to access our online catalog and give patrons more comprehensive guidance without directing them to the reference desk. What options are available for a portable device with Wi-Fi connectivity, full-featured Web browsing, and (most importantly) no cellphone-style activation and service fees? Size is important, too; I need something I can carry in my pocket, not a micro-notebook with full keyboard. (And I am a library worker, so low cost is key!)" One device that sounds interesting in this category is the GiiNii Movit (not yet released, but shown off at CES). What can you recommend that's out there now?

426 comments

  1. Nokia n810 by murph · · Score: 5, Informative

    No recurring fees, I just picked one up for $222.

    --
    I don't care about your karma, I don't care about what's hip. --Weird Al
    1. Re:Nokia n810 by Kamokazi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Seconded. Very nice device, and has a physical keyboard, unlike the other one likely to get mentioned a lot.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    2. Re:Nokia n810 by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Somebody who's just pulling up information might not want a keyboard. In which case the N800 makes more sense.

    3. Re:Nokia n810 by bluephone · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except the N810 is smaller than the N800, has 2GB of storage built in, and the kb slides out like many cell phones for text message addicts. It's an incredible package.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    4. Re:Nokia n810 by kabloom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A librarian is probably querying a lot, not just pulling up information from predefined bookmarks. I'm sure a keyboard will be greatly appreciated.

    5. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thirded. Either the N800 or N810. Little shirtpocket Linux computer, basically. Mine's good for 7 days in quiescent mode (instantly available), and about 6 or 7 hours of non-stop browsing with the backlight on low. 800 pixel wide screen, which unlike most cell phone devices, is suitable for browsing non-mobile versions of web pages.

      Only trouble: smallish fonts. You can zoom, but then you start having to scroll side to side on common pages. My aging eyes aren't waht they used to be. If you're young-ish, this might not be an issue.

    6. Re:Nokia n810 by monopole · · Score: 4, Informative

      Amen to that. I've got the 770, n800 and an n810. The n810 wins out for this app due to the keyboard, and the size which is small enough to put in your breast pocket or in a belt holster. WiFi is good and the display is fantastic. Onboard GPS sucks but otherwise an excellent device.

      Boot time is a bit long, but power management is sufficient to leave on for a long time.
       

    7. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > but power management is sufficient to leave on for a long time

      *nod* Mine runs 7 days at a stretch. Of course, if you run something in the background that keeps using CPU, it'll be a lot less.

    8. Re:Nokia n810 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      or in a belt holster.

      That's a good look.

      Nothing says "sex appeal" like a portable WiFi browsing device in a belt holster.

      But there's no law that says everyone has to get laid, so go ahead. Be bold.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Nokia n810 by despisethesun · · Score: 5, Informative

      The N800 also has the advantage of taking regular SDHC cards, rather than the miniSD used in the N810. The full size ones are cheaper, and the N800 can hold 2 of them. And they can be set up as part of the root file system, if you're technically inclined. Plus miniSD cards can be a pain to find in decent capacities, they're kind of the red-headed stepchild of the SD family.

      The on screen keyboard on the N800 is not bad either. Obviously not as good as a physical kb but more than adequate. It's tough to go wrong either way, though, as they're both excellent devices. Definitely the best handhelds available for their purpose.

      (Typed out on my N800. :)

      --
      This poo is cold.
    10. Re:Nokia n810 by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Keyboard or nor keyboard, not really the driver in the most appropriate selection. The main driver is how do you comfortably carry the device. Leaving the counter, carrying books, walking around the stacks tidying up etc. So obviously the most useful and cost effective device will be a typical netbook, getting it to the spot where it will be used, keeping in charged up between uses are the problem to be solved.

      So small enough to fit comfortable in a pocket will end up generally speaking to small to be really useful, large enough and with suitable input devices is awkward to carry in your hands while you want to do other things and certainly doesn't fit in a typical pocket. So netbook stored in some kind of comfortable wearable pouch, shoulder holster, apron, bumpack etc. combined with a docking station for quick convenient recharging now add in a pen styled, optical scanner/bar code reader and you are done.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    11. Re:Nokia n810 by murph · · Score: 1

      I had a 770, but dropped it just the right way to shatter the screen. This despite the hard plastic cover. I just waited for the right price on the n810 to replace it.

      --
      I don't care about your karma, I don't care about what's hip. --Weird Al
    12. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is that the internet in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

    13. Re:Nokia n810 by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Informative

      How has nobody in this thread mentioned the N810's built in GPS? Nothing says "I know where wifi is" than a list of geo-coords to back it up!

      Not to mention that the built in map program has a list of Gizmo (paid) wifi spots. There is also osm2go that allows you to edit osm maps (adding wifi spots, etc) on the fly in the field

    14. Re:Nokia n810 by despisethesun · · Score: 4, Informative

      You've clearly never actually used one of the Nokia tablets. They're plenty usable at their size and they fit easily in a pocket. I've gotten a lot more mileage out of mine than I expected when I bought it, and it's become an indispensable tool for managing the network at work. They are, without a doubt, exactly what foxxo was asking for.

      --
      This poo is cold.
    15. Re:Nokia n810 by maxume · · Score: 5, Informative

      The miniSD thing isn't that big a thing:

      4GB for $8:

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820211343

      16GB for $42 (which is only about $12 out of line with regular size SDHC)

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820134912

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    16. Re:Nokia n810 by dieman · · Score: 1

      Seconded, again. They are perfect for this. I've used mine at the Minneapolis library back in the stacks at least once too. :)

      --
      -- dieman - Scott Dier
    17. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An AC vote for the n810. I was late to the party and only got mine last December. Sweet little package. I'll give a nod to something like the iPhone for overall browser speed but the overall flexibility of the device more than makes up for it in my mind.

    18. Re:Nokia n810 by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Even an E70 makes sense (although it does have a fold out keyboard) - the important thing here would be a mobile phone with a half decent browser (eg. Opera) that can connect to WiFi. Probably every currently sold Japanese mobile phone would also fit the description.

    19. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found the Nokia 800 and 810 to be frustratingly slow. Much faster than the 770, but still very outdated by netbooks with more speed, versatility, and screen real estate.

    20. Re:Nokia n810 by carlzum · · Score: 1

      The belt holster is the pocket protector of the 21st century. But don't worry retro-nerds, the GP assures us it fits in your shirt pocket.

    21. Re:Nokia n810 by rindeee · · Score: 1

      I second that. N810. Hands down. Next.

    22. Re:Nokia n810 by QuestionsNotAnswers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Buy micro-SDHC cards and use an adapter (adapters are very cheap, and often come free with micro-SDHC cards).

      I now only buy micro-SDHC cards and use an adapter when necessary with older devices. (All my devices are SDHC compatible, not SD which is limited to 2GB and won't work with larger capacities).

      Bonus 1: Get a small USB<->micro-SD adapter for a few dollars and you don't need a USB key anymore either.

      Bonus 2: Can easily carry multiple micro-SD cards on you - normal SD cards are too bulky.

      --
      Happy moony
    23. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thirded. The n810 is a great device and a very solid platform. And yes, you will want the real keyboard. Additionally, if you're interested in running Android on the tablet (but can do without multimedia for now, including sound) the NITdroid project is actively porting Android to the product line.

      Android is also coming along on AT&T Tilt, but wifi doesn't work yet, so it doesn't count as "available now" per the poster's requirements.

    24. Re:Nokia n810 by fm6 · · Score: 1

      The specifically said be didn't want the either cost of a phone.

    25. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for adding exactly nothing to this conversation.

    26. Re:Nokia n810 by FlyingBishop · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would jump any woman wearing a WiFi browsing device in a belt holster in a second.

      Oh, I see what you mean. Nevermind.

    27. Re:Nokia n810 by lhommemagique · · Score: 1

      I agree n810 is the way to go. Even if he is just pulling up information he will likely want the keyboard to help type in the information to pull up. Web based library interfaces generally are not mouse or touch friendly. By the way I'm submitting this with my n810.

    28. Re:Nokia n810 by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's a 3 year old model so could be a low cost item.

    29. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I read somewhere that miniSD probably gets phased out in the not too distant future.

      But if that happens, you probably still can get a microSD adapter and you're good to go.

    30. Re:Nokia n810 by bluephone · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the SD card size is odd, but I jsut use microSDs which are cheap and plentiful and a miniSD adapter.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    31. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rtfs. netbooks don't fit in pockets unless youre wearing parachute pants.

    32. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the words of myself, I think... . j/k. I get like 9hours of battery life with my n800. Not bad for browsing, unless you look at porn with it; probably not acceptable at the library, with regard to common decency taken into consideration. Ok, back to the porn.

    33. Re:Nokia n810 by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The belt holster is the pocket protector of the 21st century. But don't worry retro-nerds, the GP assures us it fits in your shirt pocket.

      The belt holster is also the pocket protector of the 20th century, used by millions of geeks to carry their slide rules and later their HP calculators.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    34. Re:Nokia n810 by itomato · · Score: 3, Informative

      With the n810 you can have the best of everything (almost):

      - Full Debian installation, including GTK and KDE apps
      - Android
      - Newton OS via Einstein
      - Any platform where an emulator is available for ARM
      - Bluetooth, WiFi, Webcam, Skype, built-in GPS (lousy)

      All in all, it sounds like the ultimate development package. The major downside is the speed. Application response is a good 10% slower than it should be. A second negative point might be the GPS performance, which is widely reported to be weak, which I can attest to first hand, It's kind of fragile, and doesn't respond well to gravity checks, but the slide-out keyboard and brilliant flip-out stand/finger sling make it usable in a wide variety of situations - standing at a bar, sitting down, plus it comes with a novel vehicle mount. I assume the developers counted on the use of the device in its fulle GPS capacity. No doubt, it would be awesome, but it's just not quite there..

      Fifteenthed.

    35. Re:Nokia n810 by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Second that. I have an N800 and it's great. I have an external GPS device in case I need it ($50 at Geeks.com) but otherwise there is nothing I would need from the (more expensive) N810.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    36. Re:Nokia n810 by villindesign · · Score: 1

      Plus miniSD cards can be a pain to find in decent capacities, they're kind of the red-headed stepchild of the SD family.

      Also, there are adapters so that you can use your microSD. I only purchase microSD cards and use adapters for device that take full size of mini cards. I also recommend the N810.

      --
      loading [******___]
    37. Re:Nokia n810 by theillien · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or you can get an 8GB microSD with a miniSD adapter. I bought a Kingston kit which came with the microSD card, a mini adapter, standard adapter and USB adapter for $16 from Amazon. I believe the 16GB kit was $25 or so. That said, I thirded the n810 notion. I have the Wimax edition and I'm quite happy with it.

    38. Re:Nokia n810 by eean · · Score: 1

      Yea I got the 8gb kit at Christmas. Its crazy how small the microsd is. Its pretty much impossible to find miniSD, but given that the n810 is only speced to take up to 8gb I guess there's no point in miniSD anyways.

      And yea the n810 is precisely the answer to the question. I like to use it to listen to Internet radio stations around the house.

    39. Re:Nokia n810 by theillien · · Score: 1

      The OP wants something easy to carry and serves a specific purpose of looking up online information. How does a notebook (even a netbook) do that succinctly? An Internet tablet is the best solution in this situation: Pocketable even with a decent case, lightweight, provides a solution which isn't obtrusive with long boot times or excessive applications. I suggest you use an n810 before offering advice which is counter-productive.

    40. Re:Nokia n810 by theillien · · Score: 1

      Thanks for adding nothing^2.

    41. Re:Nokia n810 by xSauronx · · Score: 2, Informative

      indeed. i went from a thinkpad to a netbook for the sake of portability, the thinkpad was just a bit more than i needed on the go.

      i considered an 810, and thats what came to mind when i saw the front page post, but i need a new phone and expect to get a blackberry or something with internet access, and didnt want to basically end up carrying 2 devices like that on me, so i got the netbook which will let me be a little productive.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    42. Re:Nokia n810 by 5pp000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have not gotten the micro-to-mini SDHC adapters to work in my N810. Looking closely at the differences between the adapter and an actual mini-SDHC card, I see that the contacts on the adapter are slightly recessed, while those on the card are on the bottom surface. Apparently the little wires in my N810 don't come up high enough to reliably make contact with the adapters. I don't know if many others have had this problem.

      --
      Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
    43. Re:Nokia n810 by 5pp000 · · Score: 1

      I love my N810. I think, instead of "Internet Tablet" they should market it as a "Pocket Netbook". It has almost the same functionality in 1/8 the volume.

      --
      Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
    44. Re:Nokia n810 by carlzum · · Score: 4, Informative
      That's something I've never heard of, but according to Wikipedia people really walked around with slide rules on their belt.

      Some engineering students and engineers carried ten-inch slide rules in belt holsters, and even into the mid 1970s this was a common sight on campuses. Students also might keep a ten-or twenty-inch rule for precision work at home or the office while carrying a five-inch pocket slide rule around with them.

    45. Re:Nokia n810 by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Nokia 800 75mm x 144mm x 20mm 0.2 kg in my top pocket all day, no way not even for 10 to 20 minutes, side pocket bend over, forget it, back pocket hmm, is it bendy. So big enough to be useful, screen real estate and it doesn't really fit in your pocket like the normal accepted average size of a mobile phone which of course has been specifically sized to fit in nearly any pocket size.

      Of course if they are a military librarian then those big baggy thigh pockets are just the go, tablets, netbooks whatever ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    46. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      sd is 4 gig not 2

    47. Re:Nokia n810 by theillien · · Score: 1

      I'm often amazed at how something the size of a corn flake can hold that much data.

    48. Re:Nokia n810 by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Why not just get a palm TX?
      WiFi, Bluetooth, Opera Mini with a very little work, thousands of free useful apps, thousands of cheap useful apps, Watch TV on your breaks, listen to music, make Voip calls, grab a Bluetooth keyboard to keep at your desk, use it as remote for the TV's that always seem to be in libraries these days, etc, etc, etc.
      Just don't expect Palm to ever update it to work with CDMA phones. grrr.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    49. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTC 6700 or HTC 6800, both run windows, have wifi and an expansion slot. you can turn the radio off and not use it as a cell phone and they can be bought cheap on ebay. It also has a full keybpard that is relatively easy to type on.

    50. Re:Nokia n810 by Askjeffro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just realize that the n810 can only accept up to a 8GB card; 16GB will not work.

    51. Re:Nokia n810 by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bonus 2: Can easily carry multiple micro-SD cards on you - normal SD cards are too bulky.

      What the hell do you mean, SD cards are too bulky? I mean, FUCK! I know that the micro-SD cards are smaller, but even the normal SD cards aren't exactly massive.

      What else don't you carry because they are too bulky? Wallet? Car keys?

      Seriously, grow some balls mate!

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    52. Re:Nokia n810 by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      I have one in my side pocket most of the day, it fits fine, and they're dress slacks. I just don't put anything else in that pocket and shift it when I sit or crouch. It's a non-issue.

      --
      This poo is cold.
    53. Re:Nokia n810 by BUL2294 · · Score: 1

      I second this... It's a great little device and the stylus makes "typing" on the virtual keyboard a breeze. To add, it has a great screen (really dense pixels, so text is readable at teeny font sizes) and can be used horizontally or vertically.

      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    54. Re:Nokia n810 by magarity · · Score: 1

      A second negative point might be the GPS performance
       
      I have to know: where is this huge library do you go to???

    55. Re:Nokia n810 by 5pp000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Word on the Net is that the 16GB cards do work, even though Nokia hasn't updated their Web site to mention them. See for example Internet Tablet Talk for confirmation.

      --
      Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
    56. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude... this is a librarian we're talking about.

      All this means is she has to take off the belt holster before removing her glasses as the backlighting glistens playfully off her hair while she shakes it out in slow motion and two, maybe three blouse buttons come mysteriously undone revealing ample cleavage before the protagonist realizes that it wasn't actually the popular girl (whom, by the way the librarian had hatched a wacky plot to get the protagonist a date with, which turned out allright but in the end unsatisfying) he was in love with, but the librarian he was best friends with since they were six who everyone only THOUGHT was ugly because... umm... she wore glasses and kept her hair up in a bun. Bonus points if the chorus to Leonard Cohen's "Hallelujah" is playing, but it would probably be something corny like this song.

      Sheez. Haven't you ever seen a movie?

    57. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but Opera Mini sucks with it 184 or whatever char GET limit...

    58. Re:Nokia n810 by Warll · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Seriously, grow some balls mate!"
      They are also too bulky!

    59. Re:Nokia n810 by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      The on screen keyboard on the N800 is not bad either.

      It works well enough, but I ended up getting a Xema BlueKeyboard which folds up to be almost as small as the N800. With Abiword installed, it makes for a surprisingly capable word-processing kit.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    60. Re:Nokia n810 by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Interesting
      What the hell do you mean, SD cards are too bulky?

      Actually, I have balls and I sort of agree.

      SD cards are large enough to get cracked, scratched and broken when I keep them in my pocket. Micro SD are small enough not to be subject to the same damage.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    61. Re:Nokia n810 by lostguru · · Score: 1

      Because of course librarian is a job title that just screamed "clothes off NOW" until you added the belt holster

      --
      Jayne: "These are stone killers, little man. They ain't cuddly like me."
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smok
    62. Re:Nokia n810 by drb_chimaera · · Score: 2, Informative

      No problems here - I've basically standardised on using MicroSD cards here then adapting them to fit whichever device it needs, and have yet to have a problem.

    63. Re:Nokia n810 by amanox · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget a banana.. if anything, a librarian needs a banana!

    64. Re:Nokia n810 by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's something I've never heard of, but according to Wikipedia people really walked around with slide rules on their belt.

      And I was one of them. Having a belt holster for a straight slide rule (10-12 inch) was fairly standard among engineers then. I still have a couple of old slide rules at home: a good slide rule is something you don't easily part with.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    65. Re:Nokia n810 by Flossymike · · Score: 1

      Only when entering L space ...

    66. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two reasons not:

      First, historical. The netbook moniker didn't exist back when the 770 came out.

      Second, legal. The N810 is much closer to the Psion lineup (including the Psion NetBook), than most netbooks are, and Nokia doesn't want dragged into that mess, even though they'd "obviously" win.

    67. Re:Nokia n810 by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      SD cards are large enough to get cracked, scratched and broken when I keep them in my pocket. Micro SD are small enough not to be subject to the same damage.

      Put them in a pouch or tin. Keeps all the cruft out too (if the tin had sweets in, wash it first!).

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    68. Re:Nokia n810 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Read any science fiction from the '40s, and you will find confrontations between scientists where they both reach for their belt holsters and pull out their slide rules to resolve an argument. Either that, or they consult with the massive orbiting computer made out of millions of vacuum tubes...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    69. Re:Nokia n810 by redxxx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right. Nokia has only tested 8gb cards. I have a 16 which works just fine.

    70. Re:Nokia n810 by redxxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's just you. Have you actually tried more than one adapter? They cost a few cents to make, so I could see quality control not being a huge issue.

    71. Re:Nokia n810 by redxxx · · Score: 1

      The n810 technically has GPS, but it takes a very long time to connect and isn't very accurate. It should in no way be a deciding factor for anyone to purchase an 810 over a 800.

      You can pick up Holux bluetooth GPS unit for about $50 which will preform a lot better. The n810's built in mapping software is pretty weak, and you have to pay for navigation. Doubt many folks here would want to use it anyway.

    72. Re:Nokia n810 by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      ook.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    73. Re:Nokia n810 by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Well, he said he didn't want service fees, which wouldn't apply to Pay As You Go. The cost of the phone itself doesn't seem relevant, if it's no more expensive than other portable devices.

      Not sure about "cellphone-style activation" - presumably wifi phones can still be used without a phone network(?), but I've not tried it.

    74. Re:Nokia n810 by vrmlguy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Put them in a pouch or tin. Keeps all the cruft out too (if the tin had sweets in, wash it first!).

      Now you tell me! I was keeping my microSD cards in an Altoids tin. Then one day I reached for a mint and swallowed 8gb instead.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    75. Re:Nokia n810 by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      How has nobody in this thread mentioned the N810's built in GPS?

      I agree. The built-in GPS can really come in handy when you get lost back in the stacks.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    76. Re:Nokia n810 by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      10 PRINT THANKS FOR ADDING NOTHING.
      20 GOTO 10


      Isn't the capital letter filter just special?

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    77. Re:Nokia n810 by larrysingular · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Your mom likes the size of my SD card and doesn't mind when I store it in her pocket.

    78. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      SD cards do come with cases which protect them from said abuse. Also Micro SD are also subject to damage as they are thin as hell and are easier to lose.

    79. Re:Nokia n810 by CannedTurkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Untrue - They will work with at least 32GB. They are SDHC compatible. There's a guy in the 810 community selling MiniSD to SD adapters, so that if you're using the larger battery pack (with accompanying larger battery cover) you can install standard SD cards.

      --
      Ingredients: Turkey, Mechanically Separated Turkey, Water, Salt, Flavour.
    80. Re:Nokia n810 by mrops · · Score: 1

      Lets correct that, "I would jump any woman"

    81. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I accidentally 93MB of .RAR files.

    82. Re:Nokia n810 by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      a good slide rule is something you don't easily part with.

      Good slide rules are also quite collectible, and are worth a bit of money for the cognoscenti. But I really like the fact that they never break down and they never suffer from flat batteries.

      I never forgave my HP48 for throwing a hissy-fit in the middle of an exam back in the days when I was studying mechanical engineering. I made a point of bringing my old log-log trig decitrig slide-rule to exams after that. And when I could afford it, I bought myself a TI-89 which is faster and way more reliable. But I still miss RPN, the clicky keys and that big fat "Enter" button just where your index finger was meant to find it...

    83. Re:Nokia n810 by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      There is a 2GB limit for some devices - if they don't Support SHDC and/or they don't support FAT32, but generally speaking, anything that takes an 8GB chip should take a 16GB chip.

    84. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you find this for $222?

    85. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not an ipod touch?? Plus they can listen to tunes while wandering around the library.

    86. Re:Nokia n810 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      SD cards are large enough to get cracked, scratched and broken when I keep them in my pocket.

      So are my balls.

      Micro SD are small enough not to be subject to the same damage.

      Micro SD are small enough to fucking sneeze and lose one in the carpet forever. Mini SD isn't as bad, but still too small for human use. If the device has room for a real SDHC slot, you should always use it, because you can plug things other than flash cards into them. As has been mentioned previously the N800 has two SDHC slots, one inside and one out. That means you can get about 32GB of flash into the thing at once, which is pretty hot - on the other hand, who actually does that? Yo ho, me hearties.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    87. Re:Nokia n810 by infonography · · Score: 1

      Bulky? Ha! A real geek would think nothing of carrying about sheafs of good old reliable 5 1/4 in a holster alongside a sliderule so grow some nerd stones Mate!

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    88. Re:Nokia n810 by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Library. So big it doesn't need a name - just a great big "the."
      http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/The_Library

    89. Re:Nokia n810 by Orange+Crush · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ^and that's with the plastic outer casing. MicroSD cards could be made even smaller if there was a good reason to do so. As if it wasn't difficult enough to handle them. Especially when you're as clumsy and fat-fingered as I am.

    90. Re:Nokia n810 by sp3cialk79 · · Score: 1

      You had me at librarian.

    91. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is: Is there a tube in your pocket?

      Rimshot - ducks

    92. Re:Nokia n810 by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Read any science fiction from the '40s, and you will find confrontations between scientists where they both reach for their belt holsters and pull out their slide rules to resolve an argument.

      One of my favourite scenes in "Apollo 13" is when Hanks (as Lovell) is trying to calculate one of his burns (maybe the de-orbit burn, can't remember) and he asks mission control to confirm his math. We cut to the engineers at their stations all whipping out their slide rules to confirm his calculations are correct - "Looks good flight!"

    93. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0
      Syntax error in 10

      So that should be

      10 PRINT "THANKS FOR ADDING NOTHING."
      20 GOTO 10

      Posted anonymously, for obvious reasons.

    94. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, I miss Australia so much ;)

    95. Re:Nokia n810 by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      From personal experience, I've found that SD cards can get chewed up by a small dog but micro-SD cards pass through unscathed.

      Don't ask...

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    96. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real cool ones carried a circular slide rule and not the common "slip sticks" oh for those simpler days!

    97. Re:Nokia n810 by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Dude we are talking about a librarian. If it is a chick it doesn't matter if she is cute. If it is a guy well then it really doesn't matter.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    98. Re:Nokia n810 by monique · · Score: 1

      I know this may not be relevant to the OP, but can you run ssh on the n810, and if so, can you enter commands like "ctrl+a+4" to switch terminals in screen? It looks like you have to use function keys to type the number.

      --
      -monique
    99. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know not all librarians are women. Many straight men are in the profession as well.

    100. Re:Nokia n810 by sonicsft · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I just bought an N810 a few weeks ago. I wanted a wifi device to bring with me when I travel through France this May for twitter, email, photo uploads, and possibly a skype/SIP call or two. It ships with an app for the Boingo wireless service installed, it's US$7.95/mo and gives you access to Starbucks/McDonalds wifi in the states and bunch more in Europe. I got my N810 for US$250 with tax, shipped. I like the keys on my Blackberry better, but the touch screen is great, handwriting recognition seems good but I haven't taken the time to train it. The screen/picture looks great. It says it will only support an 8GB SDHC MiniSD card so thats what I picked up, recognized it right away. It runs linux and uses apt for package management.

      Bottom line, the touch screen works great for basic browsing and bookmarked browsing. It uses the MicroB browser (mozilla) and has Adobe Flash support. The slide out keyboard is really nice, but doesn't have a number row. It seems to have better wifi reception than my first gen MacBookPro. The N810 is a little on the heavy side and is thick/heavy compared to the current generation iPhone.

    101. Re:Nokia n810 by mencomenco · · Score: 1

      Right. Early 1960's Purdue & Rose-Hulman engineering underclassmen were required to obtain approved 12-inch slide rules at the campus bookstore and bring them to class daily. My MIT colleagues tell me they, too wore the Mother of All Jokes. However, as engineering salaries began to outstrip other majors the onus began to fade.

      That's something I've never heard of, but according to Wikipedia people really walked around with slide rules on their belt.

      Some engineering students and engineers carried ten-inch slide rules in belt holsters, and even into the mid 1970s this was a common sight on campuses. Students also might keep a ten-or twenty-inch rule for precision work at home or the office while carrying a five-inch pocket slide rule around with them.

    102. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a matter of efficiency.

    103. Re:Nokia n810 by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      Were you later able to retrieve the 8gb of data?

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    104. Re:Nokia n810 by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I paid $13 for an 8.0GB microSD that comes with miniSD and SD adapters.

      full size SD has the ability to clock faster than microSD and miniSD. but only a few brands of media actually make use of the fast modes.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    105. Re:Nokia n810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I was keeping my balls in an Altoids tin!

      The tingly sensation keeps me awake in meetings.

    106. Re:Nokia n810 by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "How has nobody in this thread mentioned the N810's built in GPS?"

      probably because it wasn't in the list of requirements?
      "...portable device with Wi-Fi connectivity, full-featured Web browsing, and (most importantly) no cellphone-style activation and service fees?"

      I also don't understand the 30+ posts arguing over storage space. Don't remember them saying "must have 2+ gb" or "support miniSD". I often search the library's online catalog from my phone while in the library and it doesn't require 2+ gb, just a internet connection.

      In my opinion, the Nokia N810 would be best since it has a real keyboard, decent cpu and 802.11g but they're still $200+. If you want something cheap you could look at a few Palms that are less than $100 but most only have 802.11b, and unless the library is small you might have trouble getting wi-fi way in the back. In you want cheap, portability and 802.11g I'd suggest Nokia 770. They're about $100 on ebay, but you'll have to deal with a onscreen keyboard.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    107. Re:Nokia n810 by lamapper · · Score: 1
      Good post.

      Also remember that you can use the foldable Blue Tooth keyboard with the Nokias (I know you can with the N800 and assume that you can with the N810).

      Do not forget about the FM chip in the N800, that plus it was more than $200 cheaper than the N810 were the deciding factors for me.

      Having two memory slots is great, right now I have two 4 GB Micro SD-in Adapter cards, plan to put in two 16 GB SD-in Adapter cards for a total of 32 GB of storage in my Linux PIM.

      While a little off topic, when traveling, I take the Most important about handhelds to me is WiFi access being MORE important then Cellular. With WiFi, I have no additional monthly charges when using VoIP. If I am not online, people can leave a telephone message for me. TCO for 1 year with Skype VoIP is only $100. A heck of allot better than the most reasonable Cellular plan.

      With my savings each year I can buy another handheld or netbook running Linux if I want, thus no forced obsolescence by anyone.

      --
      Is your Internet Throttled? Install DD-Wrt, OpenWRT or Tomato to learn the truth! Google: 1Gbps/1Gbps: 5 Communities
    108. Re:Nokia n810 by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Well, the horribly weak WiFi chipset, lack of 802.11g support, and lack of WPA2 without paying extra come to mind as reasons.

      The absolutely horrible browser (not bad for it's day, but compared to what is out in mobile devices today) comes to mind as well.

      The digitizer drift isn't fun either if you're one of the unlucky ones.

      If that doesn't get you, the NVFS issues will.

      I used to be a hardcore Palm guy, but the T|X really wasn't a good choice for Palm to end it's PDA line on a high note.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  2. Low Cost? by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

    iPhone or iPod touch, assuming what you want to access is browser based.
    Low price? Not so much, but if you have one anyway... Or were looking for a tax write off this might be the way to go.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    1. Re:Low Cost? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The poster did say nothing with a monthly fee.

      Since the library certainly has Wi-Fi already, the iPod Touch is a good possibility, unless he wants to input any queries on a regular basis.

      I love my Touch but I prefer real buttons to the virtual ones.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Low Cost? by mochan_s · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the iPod touch keyboard is really bad. Trying to enter an search string in iPod touch would be a nightmare.

      I think one of those slide phones with querty keyboard would be much better. I'm sure there are ones with wifi.

    3. Re:Low Cost? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      While it is true that no on-screen keyboard can ever match a physical keyboard in ease of use, I know of a lot of people who are quite fast and accurate at typing on their iPhones, I'm not a big fan of them either, but when you get used to them you can type decently

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    4. Re:Low Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone OS qwerty keyboard is a matter of personal opinion. I've learned to get used to it, and most people i introduce it to get quite comfortable suprisingly quickly.

      If you were using it all day long, i could understand the argument for a physical keyboard. Just don't go for one of those god damn awful blackberry style like 0.5mm wide keys that are just crowded onto the device and hard to locate.

      Also, not that it really applies to this case, using the iPhone keyboard after a few beers is a really bad idea, texting tends to get even worse :-/

    5. Re:Low Cost? by Simon80 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      maemo (on N800, N810) lets you pop up a full screen virtual finger keyboard that is pretty fast to type on, though the screen gets a bit dirty as a result. With the N810, there's a real keyboard, too, which is even better, I guess (I only have an N800, which was $200). I wouldn't get an iPod for browsing the web, especially if flash support is desired. For those who aren't following the tablets closely, however, it seems safe to predict that Nokia will be releasing a new version in about 3-5 months, based on the state of the next maemo release, and how long it's been since the N810 came out.

    6. Re:Low Cost? by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm trying to figure out how someone manages to misspell "qwerty"?

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    7. Re:Low Cost? by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      I wouldnt call the iPhone 'low cost'...

      I think they might appreciate an Asus EeePC netbook. They're small, about 1-2 pounds and can fit in a purse/bag/backpack.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    8. Re:Low Cost? by Wanon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      lol, that's the first time I've heard the iphone's massive price tag spun as a plus!

      I'm glad it costs so much! I can get a bigger tax refund this way!

    9. Re:Low Cost? by socsoc · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of querty, but the on screen qwerty keyboard on an iphone isn't difficult to use at all.

    10. Re:Low Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He probably uses a querty keyboard, you insensitive clod.

    11. Re:Low Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the iPod touch keyboard is really bad. Trying to enter an search string in iPod touch would be a nightmare.

      I think one of those slide phones with querty keyboard would be much better. I'm sure there are ones with wifi.

      I'm trying to figure out how someone manages to misspell "qwerty"?

      Maybe someone is typing on an iPod touch?

    12. Re:Low Cost? by pokopoko3k · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're probably using a Dworak keyboard. (forgive any misspelling-- i'm using Qwerty, obviously)

      --
      there is only the door, the door, the door.
    13. Re:Low Cost? by icebike · · Score: 0

      You may not get a bigger refund, but you can certainly get an iPhone for free if you can write it off for your work. As for the price, at $199 its as cheap as many of the other suggestions posted in this thread.

      Its less than the much ballyhooed N810, but because it is a phone you actually can use it for more than a single purpose.

      The tax write off is just what the Doctor ordered for your portion of the Stimulus.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    14. Re:Low Cost? by Yold · · Score: 4, Funny

      Its the U.K. spelling you insensitive clod!

    15. Re:Low Cost? by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      480x320 resolution is not very good for general web use.

      The Nokias at 800x480 are phenomenal, much cheaper, can take memory cards, and have standard replaceable batteries.

    16. Re:Low Cost? by dokebi · · Score: 2, Informative

      He's probably using Dvorak, like me. I certainly find typing "querty" easier than "qwerty". Dvorak layout is so good that it even corrects qwerty's spelling mistakes! :)

      --
      In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
    17. Re:Low Cost? by anagama · · Score: 1

      Free? At best it will reduce your taxable income and worse still, you may have to depreciate it, i.e., spread out that reduction, over five years. It would rock if you could get a tax credit for such things but I don't think that's how it works, although IANAA (....Accountant).

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    18. Re:Low Cost? by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      While it is true that no on-screen keyboard can ever match a physical keyboard in ease of use, I know of a lot of people who are quite fast and accurate at typing on their iPhones, I'm not a big fan of them either, but when you get used to them you can type decently

      yeaf it[s grue - I am tyoinh on mu iPhone riggt now and I can ty[e p5etty fadt on tjis thing

    19. Re:Low Cost? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to figure out how someone manages to misspell "qwerty"?

      ...and even missed the common mis-spellings "qzerty", "qwertz", and "azerty".

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    20. Re:Low Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using a Dvorak keyboard?

    21. Re:Low Cost? by s1lverl0rd · · Score: 0

      He's using the iPod Touch keyboard, obviously.

    22. Re:Low Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, $200 ($230 for an iPod touch) is just *massive*. Sigh.

    23. Re:Low Cost? by lee1026 · · Score: 1

      the joke here is that if this was on the actual iphone, the spell correct would have figured it out.

    24. Re:Low Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, clod spells you!!!!

    25. Re:Low Cost? by Mooga · · Score: 1
      The Eee netbook's keyboard is horrid! It's too small for regular typing and too big for thumb typing.

      Unless you have tiny baby hands...

      --
      ~ Mooga
    26. Re:Low Cost? by tiny1877 · · Score: 1

      Unless it's disabled as it is on my Touch. It was always replacing words with the wrong word because the abbreviations I used weren't in the word list.

    27. Re:Low Cost? by icebike · · Score: 1

      They didn't look cheaper when I priced them.
      iPhones in the US cost $199.
      iPod Touch can be had for $175.

      N810 goes for 260 or better.

      How is this cheaper?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    28. Re:Low Cost? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Depreciate a section 179 expense? Are ye Daft man?

      You would be surprised what you can legally deduct as a job related expense.
      And yes, reduction of taxable income can amount to free, or nearly so, depending
      on your other deductions.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    29. Re:Low Cost? by chandar · · Score: 1

      I support this suggestion. You can then also use it for email and other management tasks, without being tied to a desk. I have begun using it for lectures and keeping track of tasks.

    30. Re:Low Cost? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      I think the iPod touch keyboard is really bad. Trying to enter an search string in iPod touch would be a nightmare.

      Have you used one?

    31. Re:Low Cost? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Yeah I really think the itouch could have done a much better job of implementing spell correct /auto complete. I don't really like that it defaults to making changes wthout a simple way to go back over them. And why the heck can't you select a word or group of words and hit delete? Annoying!!! The lack of copy and paste is the underlying problem here, and I have yet to hear a credible reason why Apple made the bizarre choice to disable that capability.

    32. Re:Low Cost? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      yeaf it[s grue - I am tyoinh on mu iPhone riggt now and I can ty[e p5etty fadt on tjis thing

      Actually, that's not very funny, because it's not very accurate. If anything, the iPhone auto-correct feature would replace your mistyped word with a real word (but probably not the one you wanted). You'd have to manually over-ride the auto-correct feature to get gibberish like you posted. That's ok--just shows you've never actually used that which you are trying to mock.

    33. Re:Low Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or really huge thumbs.

    34. Re:Low Cost? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      You do realize if you hit the 'x', then it will (eventually -- after I think 2 'x's) stop attempting to correct the unknown word, right?

    35. Re:Low Cost? by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      Plus, who wants to hear: "Click click clicky click click clickety click click!" It's annoying enough when the guy in the stall next to you in the bathroom sounds like he's playing an ascii text adventure.

    36. Re:Low Cost? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I wouldnt call the iPhone 'low cost'...

      I wouldn't call the Nokia n810 low cost either, but evidently it is low cost enough to hog half of this discussion thread.

      Asus EeePC netbook

      The person specifically disqualified such devices in the summary.

    37. Re:Low Cost? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Easy. QU is the normal english usage for 99.99% of the Q words.

      Therefore, querty.

    38. Re:Low Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's much easier to type the correct sentence than what you typed. In fact, it's always easy to type plain English. And much more difficult to type gibberish.

    39. Re:Low Cost? by jtgd · · Score: 1

      His spell checker probably insisted on putting a "u" after the "q".

      --
      J
    40. Re:Low Cost? by slashmo · · Score: 1

      >iPhones in the US cost $199.

      Yeah... $199 plus $360/year != low cost.

  3. Nokia n800 ain't bad. by OpenGLFan · · Score: 1

    My Nokia N-800 isn't bad. It's pocket-sized and has a decent web browser. I've switched now to an Android G1, so I don't know about recent developments. You do have to use the stylus to use the keyboard though. I've heard that the newer model has a pop-out keyboard, so that might be better.

    1. Re:Nokia n800 ain't bad. by despisethesun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you click the centre button on the dpad when the cursor is in a text field, it brings up a larger, more thumb-friendly on screen keyboard. Much nicer when typing more than a few words, such as for a slashdot reply.

      --
      This poo is cold.
  4. iPod Touch by erayd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gotta say the cheapest iPod touch is probably going to be a good bet here, particularly as it's a wifi-only device; you don't have to buy a whole cellphone at the same time.

    --
    Forget world peace, bring on -1 pointless
    1. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not sure if you've been to many library web sites... but they tend not to be heavy on Flash.

    2. Re:iPod Touch by erayd · · Score: 1

      The Nokia is a bit of a niche market though - the ipod has the benefit of being able to be used by your average joe for a zillion things, largely due to the app store. It's also cheaper, and has a faster CPU. Also... as most library sites don't use flash, this is very unlikely to be an issue.

      --
      Forget world peace, bring on -1 pointless
    3. Re:iPod Touch by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think "niche market" means what you think it means.

      What you mean to say is that the Nokia devices aren't well known or used by many people. It is QUITE easy to use the the N810 is excellent. I have one. The N800, however, uses memory cards that are more compatible. Both have bluetooth which means a folding bluetooth keyboard can be used on either device. N810 has GPS built in... but I am going off on a tangent. The N8x0 is very easy to use and a lot more web standards compliant than the ipod touch.

    4. Re:iPod Touch by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Not sure if you've been to many library web sites... but they tend not to be heavy on Flash.

      I dunno about that, we used to not have a lot of javascript crap on em either. The 'web designers' are killing the internet I tell ya. And you kids get off my lawn!

      The point being if you do much Internet searching you are bound to hit Flash, Java, etc. And the i* products aren't designed for real Internet access, just the stuff Apple wants you to do on them. The same locked experience as any other browser on a phone, only more from being locked and less from being lame and crufty.

      Compare to the Nokia I mentioned which runs a Mozilla based product with a real Adobe ARM port of Flash 9 on a display good enough (800x480) to display real web pages instead of a 'mobile phone' experience that often totally fails unless the site has a special reduced 'mobile' version. Sorry, Apple's stuff looks pretty but the tech is always second rate.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    5. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      iPod Touch (or else, Sony Mylo)

      1. $229 new from Apple, or you can get it cheaper used on eBay, Craigslist, etc.

      2. The screen is large and has great resolution.

      3. Contrary to what other commenters have said, the iPod Touch / iPhone browser is excellent. Very easy to use, and renders web pages very well. Even pages with a lot of Javascript work just fine. While true that it does not support Flash, I think that is fine - especially for the use you describe. Most importantly, it allows for very quick navigation to favorites/bookmarks, and allows for easy scrolling through lists, zooming, etc.

      4. Someone (you) could write a dedicated iPhone/iPod Touch App that does just what you want, potentially improving over the basic web interface. This is not necessary, but is a nice option to have. Alternatively, one can use the free iUI Javascript/CSS library to make the web app that you mention work even better on the device.

      5. It's here to stay.

      6. It has a decent camera. You could snap a shot of the ISBN number, cover, etc. if that turns out to be useful.

      Potential downside: If you need to enter a large amount of text, say for your queries, then you should test the device first and see if you feel comfortable with the on-screen keyboard. Personally, I don't like it much - if you do have to type a lot, then something with full QWERTY keyboard buttons might be better.

      Alternative: Sony Mylo

      1. $199 (free shipping from Sony Style)

      2. Full physical QWERTY keyboard.

      http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&categoryId=3711&N=4294965990

    6. Re:iPod Touch by icebike · · Score: 1

      > Nokia devices aren't well known or used by many people.

      Niche. Simple one word description.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Astroturfing is the cancer thats killing //./

    8. Re:iPod Touch by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      The only thing is the power consumption of the wireless access. You can't leave it running constantly. That said, it takes maybe two or three seconds for the iPod Touch to sync up with a known network.

      Just a few clicks and you're good. How much is the 16GB Touch now? I paid $299 for mine.

    9. Re:iPod Touch by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, but it's usage is exactly the same functions as ipod touch. It does more than ipod touch, but otherwise they are extremely comparable devices. A niche market is one that fits a limited range of use or purpose that isn't necessarily mainstream.

    10. Re:iPod Touch by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      > 1. $229 new from Apple, or you can get it cheaper used on eBay, Craigslist, etc.

      Yea and an N810 is $259 and a lot more usable AS A WEB BROWSER. Yes the iPod is probably a better music player but that wasn't the question.

      > 2. The screen is large and has great resolution.

      No. 480x320 is NOT high resolution. Few non mobile phone optimized pages are going to display on that. The N8x0 series has 800x480. Do the math. Hopefully Apple fanbois can still do simple X > Y type reasoning.

      > 4. Someone (you) could write a dedicated iPhone/iPod Touch App that does just what you want

      And the Nokia runs Mameo, a Linux based open platform. Besides writing a full GTK app you can program something up in one of the SIMPLE SCRIPTING LANGUAGES THAT APPLE FORBIDS. And you don't need to get anything signed by Apple before passing it around. So your point was?

      > 5. It's here to stay.

      Because we all know Nokia is tettering on the brink of insolvency.

      > Alternative: Sony Mylo

      Discontinued, no replacement mentioned. You really should LOOK at a URL before you post it. But it really looked like an interesting product, hope Sony does get around to refreshing the line.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    11. Re:iPod Touch by ceejayoz · · Score: 4, Informative

      These days no flash == broken.

      Uh, to many of us, no Flash == much more functional, not broken.

    12. Re:iPod Touch by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      These days no flash == broken.

      that's true.

      Even those library sites that aren't flash heavy are starting to have video clips.

      I still don't get why anyone would design a media browser that doesn't play flash.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    13. Re:iPod Touch by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      And the i* products aren't designed for real Internet access, just the stuff Apple wants you to do on them.

      Now you've done it.

      Every time you say something negative about Apple, you make Jesus cry.

      Shame on you.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    14. Re:iPod Touch by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      5. It's here to stay.

      The Touch?

      So was the Newton.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    15. Re:iPod Touch by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Uh, to many of us, no Flash == much more functional, not broken.

      Not at all. You just have to install the flashblock plugin so you have control over the crap and can still access the useful stuff.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    16. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      6. It has a decent camera.

      There is no camera. Only the iPhone has a camera.

      The camera is a lie.

    17. Re:iPod Touch by jmorris42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > I still don't get why anyone would design a media browser that doesn't play flash.

      Because Flash has enough functionality that, if it were the only way, people could write whole apps with it. And since the iPhone is a totally locked platform it had to go to close off that possibility. Because people would have done it, Apple was correct in their assessment of the risk to the App Store's monopoly. With Apple products you have to realize control is more important than being useful. It just has to look pretty, the Reality Distortion Field will sell the product regardless how many features are missing or how expensive it is.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    18. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      IMHO, neither ipod touch nor iphone have enough screen resolution to be a full fledged internet browsing device. ipod touch is only 480×320.

      Better to go with an N800 or N810 - you get an 800x480 pixel screen, so 2.5X the ipod, and it still fits in your shirt pocket. Plus, it runs open source software - lots of Linux apps have been ported. And it's open: no jail-breaks needed, and you can run whatever you want. It's even a pretty decent MP3 player. The audio quality through good headphones is as good as any dedicated mp3 player I've heard.

    19. Re:iPod Touch by Gizzmonic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Erroneus, despite your name, you're right. There's a difference between "niche" which means it can only appeal to a small audience (whether by design or inherent limitations) and "obscure" which implies it could appeal to a larger audience, but is not well known. Kinda like noise music vs. the MC5!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    20. Re:iPod Touch by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Compare to the Nokia I mentioned which runs a Mozilla based product with a real Adobe ARM port of Flash 9 on a display good enough (800x480) to display real web pages instead of a 'mobile phone' experience that often totally fails unless the site has a special reduced 'mobile' version. Sorry, Apple's stuff looks pretty but the tech is always second rate.

      You might consider actually trying the Safari browser on the iPhone or iPod Touch before commenting on the way it works. The browser displays exactly the same thing you'd see on your "real" computer, just smaller - unlike, say, the Windows Mobile version of IE (although even that is changing, finally). Most reviews of the web-browsing experience on the iPhone/Touch have commented on the true HTML rendering of mobile Safari - even those reviews that've lamented the lack of Flash.

      People do sometimes write special pages designed for the iPhone's smaller screen; but they could just as easily do the same thing for a Nokia phone or any other small device - and there's no requirement to do any of that.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    21. Re:iPod Touch by erayd · · Score: 1

      I did choose that word deliberately, and I'm still happy with it - what I think you missed was that I was using it in a comparitive sense, rather than absolute. The market for N800/810 etc is certainly a niche one when compared to the market for the iPod/iPhone.

      Does that clarify my meaning?

      --
      Forget world peace, bring on -1 pointless
    22. Re:iPod Touch by Donniedarkness · · Score: 2, Informative
      I dislike Apple for the most part, but I have to comment on #'s 1 and 2.

      1.It's actually got a very good web browser.

      2. If I understand correctly, it's the PPI that makes the Ipod Touch's screen so clear, not the resolution. I've owned one, and I was VERY pleasantly surprised by how clear things were on it.

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    23. Re:iPod Touch by shermozle · · Score: 1

      Methinks you don't know what you're talking about. Java is nothing to do with JavaScript, beyond the name which was something that came from Sun's marketing department.

    24. Re:iPod Touch by Foofoobar · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I have a Nokia and an iPod touch and the touch is far more intuitive and easier to use. I have a mans hands not girly fingers and so touching those tiny little keys is hard. The touch screen intuitively knows which key I meant to press based upon 'center mass'. So for people who have normal fingers and not childlike hands, the touch interface is far easier to type with and is far more intuitive of a device.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    25. Re:iPod Touch by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      As far as the web browsing goes, the iPhone is as open as reasonably possible. The lack of flash, java, etc. is not a monopolistic move - it's because flash, java, etc. are too much processor hogs to put on such a machine. My 2.8 ghz Celeron buckles under the weight of modern flash ads, to the point that Flashblock is almost a necessity for browsing the internet (that or simply removing flash.)

      I don't deny their app store is abominable, but their browser is as good as you could find looking for open, interoperable standards on the hardware tier represented by the iPhone.

      For reference, compare iPhone.facebook.com (custom designed for iPhone) in Safari, Firefox, Opera and IE.

      IE looks like vomit but that's MS's own damn fault. The rest are comparable and a shining example of interoperability.

    26. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPod Touch not only has a less capable browser than the Nokia n800 and n810, but the screen is smaller and has inferior resolution.

    27. Re:iPod Touch by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > 2. The screen is large and has great resolution.

      No. 480x320 is NOT high resolution. Few non mobile phone optimized pages are going to display on that. The N8x0 series has 800x480. Do the math. Hopefully Apple fanbois can still do simple X > Y type reasoning.

      Two words: multitouch zoom.

      Tap-to-zoom and stroke-to-pan beats the pants off of those little zoom buttons any day. And it really does make the (real) web usable on a lower-res screen.

      Yes, I know, I'm a fanboi, because I'm suggesting that human interface could have a bigger impact than specs. I'll leave you now.

    28. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I did choose that word deliberately, and I'm still happy with it - what I think you missed was that I was using it in a comparitive sense, rather than absolute. The market for N800/810 etc is certainly a niche one when compared to the market for the iPod/iPhone.

      Does that clarify my meaning?

      We understand what you meant. What you wrote clarified your lack of understanding of the word. A niche market product implies a product SUITABLE for only a narrow segment of the market. The Nokia 800/810 devices are suitable for anyone wanting to play music and surf the web.

      Nokia has a smaller relative MARKETSHARE for handheld devices (excluding, well, their billion or so PHONES) than the iTouch, in the US, but it is not a niche product.

      You're basically saying "Pepsi" is a "niche" product because it is not as popular as Coke, Water, Milk, Juice and every other beverage put together. It's disingenuous at best and, more likely, shows your ignorance of the generally accepted meaning of the term niche and unwillingness to admit when others are right.

    29. Re:iPod Touch by theillien · · Score: 1

      And the i* products aren't designed for real Internet access, just the stuff Apple wants you to do on them.

      Now you've done it.

      Every time you say something negative about Apple, you make Jesus cry.

      Shame on you.

      They're tears of joy. Jesus uses Linux.

    30. Re:iPod Touch by theillien · · Score: 2, Funny

      Funny, I have a man's hands and I've not had any problem using the keyboard on an N810. Perhaps you just try *too* much to be manly and push too hard. Have something you're trying to compensate for?

    31. Re:iPod Touch by theillien · · Score: 1

      4. Someone (you) could write a dedicated iPhone/iPod Touch App that does just what you want, potentially improving over the basic web interface. This is not necessary, but is a nice option to have. Alternatively, one can use the free iUI Javascript/CSS library to make the web app that you mention work even better on the device.

      Assuming, of course, that a) Apple approves such an application or b) the OP gives a rat's ass about writing applications more than just having a device that works out of the gate.

    32. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent has obviously never used an iPod touch or iPhone.

    33. Re:iPod Touch by Foofoobar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Surely, you just THINK you have mans hands. or rather... you just THINK you have mans hands, Shirley.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    34. Re:iPod Touch by mgblst · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ok calm down. First of all, the browser on the Nokia is shit compared to the touch. The touch is a lot slimmer device as well. Sure, the Nokia can do more, and does have flash lite, which can't do everything that flash can do.

      The touch is a great device, small, lightweight, with the best mobile browser you will find. Just go and try it out before you buy.

    35. Re:iPod Touch by foo+fighter · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's pretty clear you have never seriously used the iPod Touch for web surfing. I dispute your implication that it offers an inferior web browsing experience.

      Its 480x320 display is bright and clear. It's web browser is fantastic. I have never wished for or looked for the mobile version of a web site while using it. Its keyboard is good enough to let me enter this post.

      It's also important to recognize that the iPod Touch is much smaller than an n-series: about 20% shorter, 20% skinnier, 40% thinner, and 45% lighter. I often forget my iPod touch is in my pocket when going through security. When I evaluated the n800 i gave up trying to walk with it in my pocket.

      The merits of either platform are open to debate. I find the Mobile OS X platform to match my needs, but the submitter should look at both before making a decision.

      P.S. You come across as much of an immature fanboy as the gp. Please take the level of vitriol and sarcasm down a couple notches.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    36. Re:iPod Touch by theillien · · Score: 1

      Just don't expect me to fly this thing.

    37. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6. It has a decent camera. You could snap a shot of the ISBN number, cover, etc. if that turns out to be useful.

      True, if by "decent camera" you mean NO CAMERA AT ALL. No, not on iPod Touch.

    38. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey shit head .. who claimed that 480X320 was HIGH .. he said .. Great.

      you sound like one of them guys that would run a 15' crt at 1280X1024 just because the card supported that.

      Having text that is so small its unreadable isnt BETTER.

    39. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully Apple fanbois can still do simple X > Y type reasoning.

      I think there's an App for that...

    40. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kind of a tool, aren't u.

    41. Re:iPod Touch by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      you sound like one of them guys that would run a 15' crt at 1280X1024 just because the card supported that.

      Having text that is so small its unreadable isnt BETTER.

      I run my 21" CRTs @ 1856x1392. The text is not unreadable. If you find yourself working on a system where the text *is* unreadable, your system has no idea what the DPI of the display device actually is. (This is why Windows has the "on screen ruler" and X11 lets you enter the physical dimensions of your display devices into your xorg.conf.) [However, I *REALLY* wish that Windows allowed one to set the DPI on a per-CRTC basis. (to use the Xorg terminology)]

    42. Re:iPod Touch by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      I didn't expect to use my iPod touch for browsing so much (only bought it for development and other PDA uses), but I often leave the laptop and use my iPod for surfing on the go now.

    43. Re:iPod Touch by alexandre · · Score: 1

      1- Then again, the n810 has Canola, ukmp, and loads of crazy, finger scroll friendly music players... :)

    44. Re:iPod Touch by jamshid · · Score: 1

      Agreed, iPod Touch has a great mobile browser, see Jakob Nielsen's study of mobile browser usability below.

      It's very easy to create a simple thumb-friendly site which is formatted well for the small screen using the "iui" javascript/css library: http://code.google.com/p/iui/

      http://www.useit.com/alertbox/mobile-usability.html
      In practice, however, most of the other [non-iPhone] full-screen devices we tested had usability that was so weak users didn't browse the Web much better with them than they did with regular smartphones.

    45. Re:iPod Touch by arikol · · Score: 1

      I would have to second that, unless you need Flash to work for some reason. The Apple devices are in some ways more limited than some of the competition but the ease of use is unparallelled. Webpage rendering is good and navigation is surprisingly easy on such a small screen. The netbook ideas are probably not so good. Battery life and boot times are just not good enough for what you are talking about. Nobody is going to wait around for between 30 seconds and 3 minutes while you start the thing up, only to find that you need to recharge. A small, cellphone like device is probably the way to go, and the iPod Touch is the nicest to use of those that I know of. No phone bill, no activation or other bull..

    46. Re:iPod Touch by Warll · · Score: 2, Informative

      @2: Correct, which is why the Nokia_N810's will look clearer, 225 > 163.

    47. Re:iPod Touch by marsu_k · · Score: 1

      The Nokia browser is called MicroB, and is Gecko based so I'd hardly call it shit. You can get adblock for it as well. And the N8x0 support Flash 9, not lite.

    48. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, and it clarifies you're also mistaken on the meaning of the term market.

      The N800/810 market isn't a niche market compared to the iPhone, because it's the SAME MARKET; the mobile phone market. A niche market is a one with a small overall number of people to sell to, usually of a specialist item or designed for people with particular means, but "mobile phones", even with web browsers, don't fit this description at all. What you're saying is that the Nokia N800/810s have low SHARE in this big market compared to the iPhone... which as clarified by someone else, doesn't make the market niche, it makes the N8x0s obscure.

    49. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm not Apple fanboi, but I own a touch. I'm sorry, but I have yet to run into a (non-flash) website that doesn't render well enough to be usable, and usually, it's quite nice. The reason is the ability to zoom in on any portion of the page quickly via auto-zoom that re-renders the text in the amount of room you have. Just double-tap on the portion of the screen you want to focus on. CSS flows, you know.

      I used to sit in class all the time and read wikipedia on this thing. Trust me, the Touch is perfect for what she's asking.

    50. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The camera is a lie.

      What? Nobody take up this new meme? Let's cakelieroll Slashdot with this meme until it sticks!

    51. Re:iPod Touch by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      They're tears of joy. Jesus uses Linux.

      Yes, and he pronounces it GNU/Linux :D

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    52. Re:iPod Touch by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you're wrong. Javascript and Canvas/HTML5 have just as much functionality as Flash, if not more, and Apple openly promotes and encourages development of Javascript apps, even though they bypass the App Store.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    53. Re:iPod Touch by remmelt · · Score: 1

      And I wouldn't even call that a camera.

    54. Re:iPod Touch by cbhacking · · Score: 3, Informative

      Heh... Flashblock is nice, but the REAL killer plugin for a handheld web browser is AdBlock Plus (yes, it's available for n800/n810 - there's a plugin repo, and it uses the standard ABP filters). Faster load times, less clutter on the screen (800x480 is a good resolution for a handheld but you still don't want to waste space on ads), and no crappy flash ads at all.

      This feature alone makes the n8x0 the best handheld browsing device I'm aware of right now, though I suppose it's only a matter of time until there's an Android browser with ad-blocking.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    55. Re:iPod Touch by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Rubbish, you have clearly never used the iphone browser.

      The Nokia browser is jerky, slow, and unresponsive. Zoom doesn't work that well, like most mobile browsers.

      Look, you can hate apple for a lot of reasons, but the browser on the iphone is great.

    56. Re:iPod Touch by supersocialist · · Score: 1

      Jesus christ, even Reddit doesn't downvote dissent so virulently. Somebody remind me: why'd I bother coming back here?

    57. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      woo, someone ate an extra bowl of Bitch Flakes this morning.

    58. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare to the Nokia I mentioned which runs a Mozilla based product with a real Adobe ARM port of Flash 9 on a display good enough (800x480) to display real web pages instead of a 'mobile phone' experience that often totally fails unless the site has a special reduced 'mobile' version. Sorry, Apple's stuff looks pretty but the tech is always second rate.

      You might consider actually trying the Safari browser on the iPhone or iPod Touch before commenting on the way it works. The browser displays exactly the same thing you'd see on your "real" computer, just smaller - unlike, say, the Windows Mobile version of IE (although even that is changing, finally). Most reviews of the web-browsing experience on the iPhone/Touch have commented on the true HTML rendering of mobile Safari - even those reviews that've lamented the lack of Flash.

      People do sometimes write special pages designed for the iPhone's smaller screen; but they could just as easily do the same thing for a Nokia phone or any other small device - and there's no requirement to do any of that.

      We have both the iPod touch and the Nokia 810, and the N810 browser is way better. I can view almost all web pages, including a webmail page, on the N810. Can't even log in to the webmail on the iPod.
      Both are better than my Blackberry, though.

    59. Re:iPod Touch by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      If it's dedicated, why would you be releasing it on the App Store? Just use ad-hoc distribution.

    60. Re:iPod Touch by sanjosanjo · · Score: 1

      I third this. I had an N810 but the interface was sluggish and the keyboard was "squishy". All in all, very unsatisfying. Sold it on eBay. The iPod Touch is a big improvement, IMHO.

    61. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an owner of the Nokia n[810,800,770] as well as an iPod Touch, I must say the iPod Touch provides the superior experience for many reasons, the least of which is the multi-touch screen.

      The materials used to make the iPod are superior, I won't list them here but you merely need to look at it. It is also significantly smaller, more lightweight, and easier to handle. The iPod has impressive 3D acceleration (which, last I checked, the n-series tablets don't have) to boot, if gaming is your thing. Oftentimes, I VNC into a computer which I have running a special resolution of X, formatted just for the iPod, such that I can get the effect of running PC applications with it.

      Did I mention that the battery life is superb? I can use it for weeks and it'll keep going (given I turn off Wi-Fi when I'm not using it), and even when WiFi is on the entire time, I can use it for many hours on end. The iPod I purchased also only cost me ~$200, which is dirt cheap.

      Now that I think about it, it would seem to me that the iPod Touch is better than the Nokia n810 in just about every way, except that the Nokia n810 has more of a sloppy, down-trodden look to its UI, which may be more appropriate for the more introverted readers out there.

    62. Re:iPod Touch by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Well she-males like yourself are only 0.01% of the populace.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    63. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The market for N800/810 etc is certainly a niche one when compared to the market for the iPod/iPhone.

      Does that clarify my meaning?

      Wait, so the market for handheld devices is smaller than the union of the market for handheld devices and the market for phones? Shocking!

    64. Re:iPod Touch by M-RES · · Score: 1

      Have you SEEN the price that Newton's command these days? Oh believe me, they're still around. Oh, and the newest models are still being manufactured - I think they call them the iPod touch/iPhone now instead. I don't know, these Graphical User Interfaces - just a fad - they'll never catch on! ;p

    65. Re:iPod Touch by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Yes and Mac and Linux and Windows all have exactly the same functionality too. But they don't. Hence why Linux makes better server, Mac makes better multimedia computers and Windows makes better zombies for botnets.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    66. Re:iPod Touch by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Displaying exactly the same rendering would be a lot more useful if the resolution wasn't lower than any modern web page is designed for. The 800x480 resolution of the n800 is high enough that, in full screen mode, you can easily see as much as you would on a windowed browser on a desktop computer (many web pages are designed to display correctly at 800 pixels wide).

      By comparison, the iPhone/iPod Touch screens are just too small to display a full page. The scrolling/zooming features work well, but you have no choice but to use them - it's miles better than the next-best (your average smartphone) but not nearly as good as the desktop-like experience you can get on the n8x0.

      It should go without saying that the Gecko-based HTML/CSS/JavaScript rendering is easily good enough. It won't pass Acid3 any time soon but it will run Gmail or Slashdot just fine. It would be cool to have a WebKit-based browser, but it's not essential. Besides, the ability to port Firefox extensions is awesome. On an 800x480 screen, AdBlock Plus is incredibly helpful. I can't imagine mobile browsing, especially on a smaller screen (but with full render capability), without it.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    67. Re:iPod Touch by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Yes the iPod is probably a better music player but that wasn't the question.

      Possibly true, if you're only interested in using it with headphones, but the comes with a decent media player (OK, the browser definitely isn't AS good, but it's not terrible) and has external speakers as well. On your desk, in your pocket, or when sharing something with friends, the n8x0 series works quite well.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    68. Re:iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own two iPhones and an iPod touch (and many other Apple products) and I think the Nokia N810 is the right solution here.

    69. Re:iPod Touch by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Few non mobile phone optimized pages are going to display on that. The N8x0 series has 800x480. Do the math.

      There's no math involved. Web pages look great on iPhones, even when browing the non-mobile phone optimized pages. Diminishing returns much? More importantly, the quality of individual pixels is more important than the number of pixels, unless you want to spend $1000 for a 10megapixel point-and-shoot camera because of its high pixel count (regardless of its poor image quality).

      Besides writing a full GTK app you can program something up in one of the SIMPLE SCRIPTING LANGUAGES THAT APPLE FORBIDS. And you don't need to get anything signed by Apple before passing it around. So your point was?

      I believe his or her point is that there are thousands of apps available for iPhone, and there are maybe a thousand people who have actually heard of a Nokia n810. (I kid, I kid...)

      Yea and an N810 is $259

      ..which is misleading, because I see it from $222 all the way up to $500.

    70. Re:iPod Touch by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      The reason some people are reverting to making iPhone specific web sites is because there is a large enough user base to justify the time. I think it's a waste of time, considering the iPhone displays normal pages just fine. I really hate the fact that sites like cnnsi.com "detect" that I'm browsing from a mobile phone so it delivers a watered-down version of the main page.

    71. Re:iPod Touch by CrystalX · · Score: 2, Informative

      From what I've read, the reason that Apple didn't allow Flash on the iPhone was because Adobe couldn't produce a version of it that didn't consume a lot of power. Apple very much values the battery life of the iPhone, and putting an inefficient Flash port on the iPhone would threaten this.

      Look here for a proper discussion:
      > http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/01/31/adobe_apple_working_together_on_flash_for_iphone.html

    72. Re:iPod Touch by diqmay · · Score: 1

      You should be able to pick up an 8GB for $299

      With a little bit of google work, you might have learned that you can find the 8 GB model at a few stores for about $70 less.

      First one I'd recommend is this one:
      http://store.apple.com/

    73. Re:iPod Touch by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      That's disingenuous. At least mention the "official" reason stated for the omission of Flash, which is for performance / power usage considerations and Apple trying to get something more functional than Flash Lite out of Adobe. Besides, flash apps are hardly a substitute for native software, anymore than AJAX web apps are, and those are fully supported, including new support for offline use and data storage, which empowers web apps and goes against your argument that Flash was left out for control reasons. If it was a case of wanting to maintain control, it's directed at not wanting to be dependent on Adobe, not at limiting end users.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    74. Re:iPod Touch by qoncept · · Score: 1

      Your points are valid, but they don't change the fact all of the time I spent reading through this thing I wanted to punch you in the face. Your contempt for this guy is obvious, but I see no reason to treat him like an idiot because he recommended the most obvious and perfectly acceptable answer to the question asked. I also don't understand why you would (apparently) be so emotionally invested in whatever it is you're talking about. Your comment read like it was the 5th reply in an argument that's slowly turning toward namecalling. Grow up.

      --
      Whale
  5. Sony PSP... by powerlinekid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Surprisingly its my PSP that I usually break out in situations where I need to browse the web but can't be at the computer. Yes its a game system but the wifi\browser are fairly decent if you can live without WPA2. I'm not too sure what else is out there, but a PSP can be purchased in the $150 to $200 range.

    --

    can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    1. Re:Sony PSP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2nd'd

    2. Re:Sony PSP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the PSP supports WPA2. The Network Settings area on the PSP doesn't mention it, but I have my router set up on WPA2 and the PSP syncs with it without any problems.

    3. Re:Sony PSP... by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      Mine does't like AES, it will only do TKIP. I know that when I had my router set to WPA2 my PSP sees it but grays it out under the pretense that it is not compatible.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    4. Re:Sony PSP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. We don't have a library run wifi node but have several competing telecoms with theirs installed at our Library. One of them provides free access to our web cat that works fine with a PSP in the stacks. Probably the cheapest option.

    5. Re:Sony PSP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. We don't have a library run wifi node but have several competing telecoms with theirs installed at our Library. One of them provides free access to our web cat that works fine with a PSP in the stacks. Probably the cheapest option.

      BUT no keyboard so text entry is txt style (but slower using D-Pad and X) Probably not a biggie for a librarian doing a online catalog browse... and did I say cheap :)

    6. Re:Sony PSP... by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      Or a DS. Get a flash cart, and use it along with some of the homebrew programs (like the browser). The PSP is faster by a bit, but the DS has a touchscreen & better organsation possibilities. Plus it's cheaper (although depending on the flashcart and microSD card used it can be just as bad).

      If you have a server-side application with a simple web front, the DS would be good, especially with its great battery life (in GBA mode I get like 23+ hours on lowest brightness, so I'm sure you could get a good 20 hours on a single charge using just a browser)

    7. Re:Sony PSP... by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Opera browser you can buy for the DS is fairly decent, or wait until late April for a DSi. It's not an ideal solution, but it's fine to browse slashdot with so I guess it would be ok for a library catalogue. Seems like the only solution with built in handwriting recognition at least, admittedly primitive as it is, but the stylus + kb combo isn't too bad. Better than the PSP inputs in any case.

    8. Re:Sony PSP... by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on that - although I'm more into hacker/homebrew stuff.

      Browsing on a device without a keyboard seems inefficient to me. I'm waiting for the Pandora to get manufactured, since it'll have a thumb-keyboard, and I want some of that 800x480 goodness.

      I might use it to play back movies too. It does 720p, so why not?

    9. Re:Sony PSP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG - have you actually got to grips with the wacky virtual keyboard on the PSP?!

    10. Re:Sony PSP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is WPA2 on the psp...

    11. Re:Sony PSP... by boxner1 · · Score: 1

      My Sony PSP, with firmware 5.02, uses WPA2 Personal just fine. The NetFront browser is not bad at all.

    12. Re:Sony PSP... by thehater · · Score: 1

      The PSP's browser is horrible, at least on the first gen PSPs. Half of the pages you try to browse to will throw a "Not enough memory" error. You type using an interface exactly like a phone's 12 button keypad (2 - abc, 3 - def, etc). There is no zoom in / zoom out feature. You get to choose from three "size options", all of which render pages incorrectly. The browser has tabs... but only three? Scrolling through a page is horrendously slow, especially while the page is still loading, which is also slow. Browsing the web on the PSP is a waste of time.

    13. Re:Sony PSP... by PayPaI · · Score: 1

      FWIW the DSi browser (while still not supporting flash) is much better/faster than the DS browser. The keyboard as well as the handwriting feels much more responsive and accurate compared to the DS, but that may be just in my head. An iPod Touch would only be about $50 more than the DSi and would probably be a better choice however.

  6. Define 'portable'? by fractoid · · Score: 4, Informative

    For sitting in a wifi coffee shop, I'd say my Eee 900 is a great compromise. Then again, having watched my friend playing with his iPhone I'd have to say that, for ultraportable / ultraconvenient / always with you access, the iPhone (or iPod touch) are probably the best you can get.

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    1. Re:Define 'portable'? by EvanED · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Define 'portable'"? Is "I need something I can carry in my pocket, not a micro-notebook with full keyboard" (FTFS) enough of a definition?

    2. Re:Define 'portable'? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Wait, there's a summary? O.o

      But seriously - it depends what they want to do. An iPhone/iPod Touch is great for reading mail but anything smaller than the Eee is absolutely useless for entering any more text than you'd put in an SMS. If you want something that's ultra-convenient apart from input, I don't think you can beat the iPhone style devices.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    3. Re:Define 'portable'? by preacha · · Score: 1

      my gf has the EEe-PC has finds it quite useful, great for general browsing in bed but it's a little too small for using it as a laptop and a little too big for portability (imo).

    4. Re:Define 'portable'? by fractoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the problem is that we have two strongly conflicting design criteria here. The device needs to be both small enough to put in a pocket (ie. around the size of one of your hands) while simultaneously being big enough to type on (ie. at least as wide as both of your hands put together with fingers slightly spread).

      Maybe a rollup keyboard would be suitable but the third constraint (that of convenience) kinda dictates that the device not be multiple parts that you have to assemble. Until we have an e-paper plus rolly keyboard arrangement for a fully flexible subnotebook-sized device that rolls up to fit in a pocket, it's going to be hard to fit the bill.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    5. Re:Define 'portable'? by jadedoto · · Score: 1

      Heh, my Eee701 fits just dandy in my cargo pocket :)

    6. Re:Define 'portable'? by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      Heh, my Eee701 fits just dandy in my cargo pocket :)

      Nobody's gotten laid in cargo pants since 'Nam.

    7. Re:Define 'portable'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree about the EeePC (I love my 901 and take it many places, but it doesnt' fit in my pocket) or the iPhone, but the post specifically requested NOT something as large as the EeePC and not a cellphone.

      I recall an old Palm device a friend had, that did WiFi quite well, could fit in a pocket, had a very fast OS and good battery life, and would be damn cheap 2nd hand now!

    8. Re:Define 'portable'? by jadedoto · · Score: 1

      S'ok, my boyfriend wears them too.

    9. Re:Define 'portable'? by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      I guess you haven't seen Superbad.
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0829482/

  7. Best Wi-Fi Portable Browsing Device? by thethibs · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nokia N800.

    Handheld Linux machine (the nerd's iPod). Small enough to go in a pocket. Mozilla browser. Big bright 800x480 screen. WiFi. ~$200 if you can find one.

    --
    I'm a Programmer. That's one level above Software Engineer and one level below Engineer.
  8. palm 200tx by Ice+Station+Zebra · · Score: 1

    Work with wi-fi.

  9. Simple and old school construction by kseise · · Score: 1
  10. PDA by Da+Cheez · · Score: 1

    The iPAQ 110 is fairly new and if you replace pocket IE with something a bit better like Opera Mobile it would work pretty well. You can get it for around $200, depending on where you look.

  11. Nintendo DS Browser by xiitone · · Score: 1

    If you have a Nintendo DS Lite, you can pick up the Nintendo DS Lite Browser cartridge that runs Opera for about $70.

    --
    Elegance is for tailors. -A. Einstein
    1. Re:Nintendo DS Browser by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...I tried using that... it was, painful, to say the least. The iPod touch does a much better job of browsing and can be found for about the price of the browser + DS.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  12. refurb ipod touch by fermion · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A refub 1st gen iPod touch might be a good bet. As long as there is a wifi connection, it will be able to browse. Under $200.

    On another note, I think this is where Amazon really missed the market for the Kindle. If it had wifi, and had a web browser, then the kindle would be one of the greatest pieces of hardware on the market, and perfect for this type of application. Of course if it had wifi, then Amazon would certainly lose revenue on book sales and would not be able to pay the cell phone bill that currently allows wireless delivery.

    In any case, there are a number of option out there, but wifi without cell phone there is no choice, and most other options are twice the price fo the touch.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:refurb ipod touch by spandex_panda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Web surfing and particularly flash web surfing takes up a bit of CPU, so I reckon this is why ipod tough etc. don't have flash. How does the N810/800 go with flash games etc.? I reckon the Kindle would crumble before most web pages when the bloody flashing adds start playing.

      --
      like phosphorescent desert buttons singing one familiar song
    2. Re:refurb ipod touch by kabloom · · Score: 1

      You're wrong when you say there's no choice for Wifi without a cell phone. There's the N810, and all sorts of netbooks.

    3. Re:refurb ipod touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Kindle does have a browser, albeit a primitive one. The CPU is so slow though that anything other than just very basic pages are painful on it. This coming from someone who does most of his browsing on a 6+ year old notebook.

    4. Re:refurb ipod touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      need something I can carry in my pocket, not a micro-notebook with full keyboard. (And I am a library worker, so low cost is key!)"

      n810=$250.

    5. Re:refurb ipod touch by jhp64 · · Score: 1

      On another note, I think this is where Amazon really missed the market for the Kindle. If it had wifi, and had a web browser,

      The Kindle has a web browser, albeit a primitive one.

      --
      This is the way Bi-Coloured Python-Rock-Snakes always talk.
    6. Re:refurb ipod touch by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you.
      I would add the Nintendo DS with Opera as well and the Sony PSP. Also a netbook could be an option.
      All depends on our website really.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:refurb ipod touch by nsayer · · Score: 1

      The trouble with web pages on the Kindle is that the eInk is greyscale and very, very, very slow to update (so animated gifs would be teh suck). That, and because it's expected that you're going to spend most of the time looking at static pages of text, the battery would walk the plank in a universe where you were surfing over wifi on it.

    8. Re:refurb ipod touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the Kindle's "e-paper" display, web pages would not work very well. It's lots of quick clicking/downloading/changing. Whereas a book works well since it's much less dynamic.

    9. Re:refurb ipod touch by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      Low cost relative to the needs. What's a better solution, a free cell phone with a $10/month data plan?

    10. Re:refurb ipod touch by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      You *can* play Flash games on the n8x0 (although a complex one will take ages to load), but I don't recommend it. It does hurt the battery life to do so, but more importantly the interface (physical pressure touch screen) just isn't designed for it. There's virtually no way to move the "pointer" without clicking, for example. Lack of a hardware keyboard on the n800 is also a problem, although this may be less of an issue with the n810.

      I mostly used Flash on my n800 for listening to Pandora.com, but I'd watch the occasional YouTube or such. One of the first packages I installed was AdBlock Plus for MicroB, a port of ABP to the browser used on the n8x0. No Flash (or any other kind of) ads to deal with at all!

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    11. Re:refurb ipod touch by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      And a color display, which would totally kill its battery life. Browsing the web in monochrome with a somewhat laggy e-ink display would be... interesting.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  13. I'm hoping the Pandora's a good one... by ckblackm · · Score: 4, Interesting
    1. Re:I'm hoping the Pandora's a good one... by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      I would've ordered one, but my country's exchange rate is shit right now. :(

      I'll probably impulse buy it when the reality of the delays between batch #1 and batch #2 finally hit me.

      It seems to me it's been put through more testing than most large-scale commercial products. It's already on revision 4, I think? And the first hardware revisions were done over a year ago? I wouldn't worry - it'll probably work flawlessly.

    2. Re:I'm hoping the Pandora's a good one... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would've ordered one, but my country's exchange rate is shit right now

      Wow, where are you that has a currency doing worse than the pound at the moment? It's fallen by around 25% against most other world currencies in the last six months.

      The Pandora does, indeed, look very shiny, but they sold out within 8 hours of accepting orders, so I don't imagine they will be easy to get for a while. In January, Freescale launched the i.MX515 CPU, which is similar to the OMAP3530 found in the Pandora but runs at 1GHz+ and costs about half as much in bulk. The next couple of months are likely to see quite a few interesting devices released using these chips.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:I'm hoping the Pandora's a good one... by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      It'll take a while for the i.MX515 to mature. It does look very powerful, but power isn't everything.

      Some of the posts from the Pandora devs suggest that the biggest perk of the OMAP3530 is the "lack of binary blobs" - having working linux drivers for all the hardware is a big perk, and necessary before efficient/advanced software can be developed for a device.

      I'll keep my eyes open for i.MX515 stuff in late '09. :)

    4. Re:I'm hoping the Pandora's a good one... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Some of the posts from the Pandora devs suggest that the biggest perk of the OMAP3530 is the "lack of binary blobs"

      Not sure where you're getting this from. The PowerVR SGX core that is the GPU on the OMAP3530 only works with a blob. Until about a month ago, the Pandora team didn't even have distribution rights to this blob, so they could use 3D on the prototypes but no one else could.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:I'm hoping the Pandora's a good one... by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      From reading their boards. On the whole, it seems to be a very open platform.

      Closed-source 3D drivers are fine by me, as long as they don't utterly suck. (bug-free, good performance, well documented)

  14. Used HTC MDA by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 3, Interesting

    should be available cheap, put on the opera mobile browser
    and you are all set to go.

  15. TMobile G1 by Nephroth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I absolutely love mine. The browser is excellent for a mobile device, the hardware is robust, and the physical keyboard/trackball makes browsing a breeze. The browser supports java, and will also soon support flash, you really can't ask for more.

    --
    Our greatest enemy is neither a single man, nor is it a nation, it is, as it has always been, our own greed.
    1. Re:TMobile G1 by jmorris42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > I absolutely love mine.

      We can tell. Even though the question specifically excluded CELL PHONES you had to pimp your G1 anyway. The dev version is $400 so is probably out of this guy's budget so that would leave him with a contract with a cell carrier he doesn't want.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:TMobile G1 by kohaku · · Score: 1

      Even though the question specifically excluded CELL PHONES ...

      Naw, what (s)he said was (and I quote):

      (most importantly) no cellphone-style activation and service fees

      An unlocked, sim-free G1 would meet these requirements. It's still pricey though.

    3. Re:TMobile G1 by Nephroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry you took such offense. I do feel the need to defend myself by pointing out that the G1 functions just fine without a sim card and is more than happy to connect to a WAP. Secondly, you can pick up a gently used G1 on ebay for about the cost of an iPod touch and it's an open platform which is something I think most people on slashdot would approve of. Finally, the poster said "no cellphone-style activation and service fees" which simply means that they don't want a contract, just a wap device and most of the devices discussed here are within the 300-400 dollar range anyway so I guess I don't see why it was necessary to be so rude.

      --
      Our greatest enemy is neither a single man, nor is it a nation, it is, as it has always been, our own greed.
    4. Re:TMobile G1 by Zerth · · Score: 1

      If you're going to go that route, why not get a "gently used" blackberry. Some of them have wifi/full keyboards and work without cell access as well. They can go as cheap as $50-100

    5. Re:TMobile G1 by CyberDog3K · · Score: 1

      Actually, (s)he excluded devices which require activation or service fees. The G1 can be used with Wifi connectivity and no cellular contract... obviously it won't make calls, but all the other functions will work (browsing, email, etc) as long as you're within range of a trusted network. I could even see the barcode scanning functionality being useful to someone working with all those books. Price is the only real variable for this device as far as I can tell.

    6. Re:TMobile G1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how Mr. Morris was such an asshole even when he was wrong.

    7. Re:TMobile G1 by GreenCow · · Score: 1

      The question excluded cell phone service charges. An unlocked G1 can be had for about $400 with no contract or service charges, and it can be used as a wifi device without a sim card (I just tested this on mine). I can browse the web, use email, download apps from the market, download music, use maps, skype I'm assuming.

      It's a bit high in the price range at $400, but the size and keyboard are nice and the app library is great and growing. G1 is usually $180 with a contract (min. $55/mo for 2 years)

    8. Re:TMobile G1 by u38cg · · Score: 1

      It's widely accepted within technical circles that if you do have to point out another's error, the correct method for doing so is to flame them to within an inch of their useless, miserable lives. The main reason for this is the lulz generated when the flamer turns out to be wrong and the flamee correct.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    9. Re:TMobile G1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the ... was that modded offtopic? I have a G1 without a sim card, connect it to a wireless access point, and the browser will work just fine. In fact the browser works better than any other cell phone I have tried (which of course doesn't say all that much).

    10. Re:TMobile G1 by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      most of the devices discussed here are within the 300-400 dollar range anyway

      Most of the discussion seemed to concern the n800, n810, and iPod Touch. Of those, the base prices are variable, depending on capacity and new vs. used, but all are available for $250 or less. Some are available for under $200, especially if you don't need to purchase SD cards to expand the n8x0 devices' capacity.

      Just saying... cost is an issue, and the contract-less G1 isn't cheap.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  16. Look for a used cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Samsung SCH-i760, which has Wi-Fi capability (B/G) and a slide out full QWERTY keyboard and I put Opera Mobile on it (though it does have IE since it's a WinMobile device).

    I'm sure you could find someone you know that has a cell phone they no longer use or about to up-grade that has similar capabilities and use that. Hell, my friend just gave me his Blackberry 8330 when he got the Storm, and I'm sure you could find someone willing to just hand-off a Wi-Fi enabled phone.

  17. iPod Touch. by MrCrassic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if there is one device that has absolutely nailed the portable web browsing category, it's the iPhone. I've used Blackberry devices, Windows Mobile smartphones, a bit of Symbian and Palm, and nothing could render most of the web as good as Portable Safari has been able to.

    Additionally, they can be found for under $200.

  18. Yay Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just found this on wikipedia:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handhelds_with_WiFi_connectivity

    1. Re:Yay Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL... and Apple has only 2 products on the list. What lusers!

    2. Re:Yay Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      the article is dated and missing a lot of information. I've re-added the technical details that some muppet removed, but the page still isnt all that useful.

    3. Re:Yay Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to go, AC!

  19. 800 pixel wide screen a must by Freedom+Bug · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a Nokia N810, and think the 800 pixel wide screen is its killer feature. With an 800 pixel screen you can run any web site and not be stuck in the "mobile ghetto".

    1. Re:800 pixel wide screen a must by itomato · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plus you can zoom back to 80% for really expansive sites, or in to 120% for narrow/small ones.

  20. iPod Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPod Touch is the obvious choice. It won't give you flash, but otherwise it has a great browser and is incredibly small. You'll be able to reference things quickly and you can use it for music as well.

    I would go with second gen iPod Touch because it is slightly faster than the first gen and iPhone. You should be able to pick up an 8GB for $299, it will be a good investment if you take the initiative to really use it.

  21. Nokia 770 by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

    I own a nokia 770 and it works quite nicely for simple browsing, I can imagine it would be just fine for a simple library webpage. they can picked up for not too much if you keep your eyes open on ebay, around $50 maybe. The only problem with it is having to use the stylus for the keyboard. If that isn't acceptable to you, then the ipodtouch is probably your best bet with it's better on-screen keyboard.

    1. Re:Nokia 770 by terbo · · Score: 1

      Yea, an 800/810 is a little nicer, and the 810 with the keyboard might make for better typing,
      but also could remove one handed operation. Carry a few extra batteries and its pretty nice for
      web browsing (flash is a bit slow) and quite killer for remote desktops (mstsc better than vnc here..)

      --
      If you're interested in facts I'll tell you what they are and I'll give you sources - Chomsky on The Big Idea
    2. Re:Nokia 770 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If you're just browsing, I'd recommend the 770. It's a lot cheaper than the N800 and N810 at the moment, and the next generation (OMAP3-based, finally) is due soon, so they are likely to drop in price.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  22. MIssing Info from Question by mcspoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Think the question missed an important point: does she want to be able to search from a web-enabled OPAC or does she need to use Windows in order to access a ILS system? As an example: Sirsi uses software called "Workflows" to access the actual ILS (Integrated Library System) in order to search the catalog, place, holds, order items, etc. The only approved OS's for this software is Windows XP (and Vista... just barely). This discludes just about any Android or Linux enabled device, but her mileage may vary by what ILS her library relies upon. If that's the case, then you can find examples of this at libraries around the nation. As an example, South Lyon Library in MI has "Roaming Reference" capability through the use of Tablets. Some of the newer Netbooks are likely more than capable as well, if not quite as portable.

    1. Re:MIssing Info from Question by jayrtfm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      but she can run vnc on the nokia to access her desktop

    2. Re:MIssing Info from Question by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      I believe they have Win 2000 and OSX clients too. It supports a web front, though I'm not sure how much functionality is exposed. The OP probably has web access though, hence the request for a browser so no worries really.

    3. Re:MIssing Info from Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think most people would just use their library's web based catalog. They're all this way by now aren't they? If not they're usually accessible by telnet... do any libraries still run terminal based apps for the public?

    4. Re:MIssing Info from Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I VNC from my Ipod Touch quite regularly.

    5. Re:MIssing Info from Question by mcspoo · · Score: 1

      Depends upon the ILS. If you were still stuck on DRA, then yes, that was all Telnet based. Modern versions of Sirsi Workflows REQUIRE Windows XP or Vista primarily because they run Java and require a specifically modified Java library to work properly. They can also be configured to work by web browser as well, but that's an expensive add-on product. Again, it depends on the ILS, which is why it's "missing info" :)

  23. Get a Cheap Used Palm Tungsten C by CAOgdin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Put in a cheap WiFi Router in the Library (set for 802.11b only; the Palm can do 802.11g), and WEP for security (if you must; why not let others use the same database?). Cost: About $35 Now, buy a used Palm Tungsten C from eBay (about $75), and make sure the seller guarantees the WiFi will work (many don't). Now you have, for roughly $125, your own link to the network, and no further monthly expenses. I've got lots of clients where we do this; I use my Tungsten with those system almost every day.

    1. Re:Get a Cheap Used Palm Tungsten C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every library I've been in for the past few years is already a free hotspot.

    2. Re:Get a Cheap Used Palm Tungsten C by alanh · · Score: 1

      If you go this route, find a download for the old IBM Java MIDP and install Opera Mini. Blazer is an awful web browser. I used a T|X for a while and now own a PalmOS Treo. Opera Mini improves things greatly.

      That said, I also own an iPod Touch and it is leaps and bounds better than either Blazer or Opera Mini.

      --
      - AlanH
    3. Re:Get a Cheap Used Palm Tungsten C by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      Full-featured web browsing was one of the requirements, so no.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    4. Re:Get a Cheap Used Palm Tungsten C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just renember that PalmOS doesn't have a decent browser and he wants it for browsing.

      There is Opera Mini, but it doesn't work that well in PalmOS.

    5. Re:Get a Cheap Used Palm Tungsten C by aap · · Score: 1

      Hard to beat the price as you've laid it out, but the web browsing experience on the T|C is not very satisfying by today's standards. The combination of 320x320, 802.11b (not g) and PalmOS makes me normally prefer to cross the house to use a desktop PC. Though it is convenient for ssh access to try to restart gdm or cleanly reboot a machine whose screen and keyboard has locked up for some reason.

  24. WiFi network Type. by gabebear · · Score: 1

    You need to keep in mind what kind of wireless network is available.

    My school dropped 802.11b a year ago (only 802.11g now), so some devices(i.e. Sony Mylo Com-1) simply can't see the network. The network is secured via 802.1x/WPA2, so some devices that can connect don't have the software to authenticate(i.e. Sony PSP).

    Borrow a friend's iPod Touch and see if it fits the bill. It's the obvious choice to me unless you require Flash.

  25. Follow-up question: iMac internet sharing by ciaohound · · Score: 1

    I keep my iMac's built-in Airport turned off because, sadly, I have nothing else to connect to it. (Yes, I too am on a budget). But an iPod Touch or similar device would be nice. I've read in David Pogue's "OS X Missing Manual" that you can share the Mac's internet connection to computers using Airport. Seems simple enough; I'm just curious if anyone is doing this.

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    1. Re:Follow-up question: iMac internet sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wifi at my university (my employer) sucks, so several of us have banded together to share the same SSID from our iMacs. Now we've got access on a couple floors and don't have to jump through hoops (university SSID isn't broadcast, has to be selected).

    2. Re:Follow-up question: iMac internet sharing by teg · · Score: 1

      I've read in David Pogue's "OS X Missing Manual" that you can share the Mac's internet connection to computers using Airport. Seems simple enough; I'm just curious if anyone is doing this.

      I've occasionally done it with my macbook, on hotels where they have wired internet and no wi-fi. It works well. Too bad the laptop can't share wifi, to handle all those stupid pay schemes on various hotels with strange authentication mechanisms. Paying once per room should be enough, I'm not paying double to use my ipod.

    3. Re:Follow-up question: iMac internet sharing by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I've read in David Pogue's "OS X Missing Manual" that you can share the Mac's internet connection to computers using Airport

      Did you really need a missing manual to tell you how to click on the Enable Internet Sharing button in System Preferences?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  26. Zaurus? by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've got a Sharp Zaurus 6000 that has all of the features you're looking for: built-in wifi, a physical keyboard, and a sharp and bright touchscreen. The later zauruses might be even better with the clamshell design and better battery life. The only drawback is that they're not as easy to find since Sharp discontinued selling them in the US.

    If you don't mind getting the WiFi from a compactflash wifi adapter instead of being build-in, the older 5500's turn up frequently for a reasonable price.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  27. What kind of browsing? by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm surprised no one's suggested Kindle yet. From what I've read, it would fit a few use cases.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:What kind of browsing? by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      Might not fit the low cost requirement and the fact that they are looking for wifi(Pretty sure the Kindle connects with Edge or 3G, although so far Amazon does not charge for it). If they really want a Kindle for other uses (they do work for a library, so its possible they enjoy reading), then the browser would probably be sufficient for browsing the library website. Otherwise, they could probably get a Nokia 800 or 810 for a bit more than half the cost of a Kindle and have a much better browsing experience. I'd bet a Nokia 770 goes pretty cheap on ebay as well.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    2. Re:What kind of browsing? by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      the 3G on the kindle 2 seems to only be usable to download purchased e-books (and to verify their DRM occasionally) via Sprint, there doesn't seem to be any way to connect to normal wifi or even browse the net from it however.

    3. Re:What kind of browsing? by Zerth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The kindle2 does have a web browser. It is, however, worse than a cellphone browser for anything other than relatively plain text pages.

      And since it uses the cell network, if you don't have signal, you're outta luck.

      Plus it's expensive compared to older web tablet types that would be more functional.

    4. Re:What kind of browsing? by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      Go into "experimental" to get to the web browser. It is pretty bare bones (I'd rather use links or lynx than it, I wonder if there are any hacks to get a different browser on there), but it would probably do for the submitter's needs if the library website is not graphically intensive. Although, unless the submitter wants an ebook reader first, with the ancillary function of very light web browsing, then they would probably be better off with a much less expensive internet tablet.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  28. Older Palm Pilots by trainsnpep · · Score: 1

    Some older Palms have Wifi with decent browsers. I'm fairly sure they support Javascript. They'd be nice and cheap, but their battery life is limited.

    --
    --<Mike>--
    1. Re:Older Palm Pilots by ian_mackereth · · Score: 1
      The TX has a reasonable battery life, especially given that your wi-fi access is likely to be in short and sporadic bursts, not 'always-on' like a cellphone.

      The screen's the same res and similar size to an iPhone and the built-in browser's adequate, or you can run Opera Mobile for a few more bells and whistles.

      Oh, and it apparently can be used for other stuff like movies, MP3s, addresses, tasks, ebooks, etc., etc.!

    2. Re:Older Palm Pilots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a TX right up until I got my new phone (nokia e65) and a eeepc 1000h. It was great and I loved it but I could never get the TX to work with the e65 and the battery sorta died anyway (I got a replacement but you cant charge a fresh battery off the USB charger, and I seem to have lost my wall charger along the line)

      Anyway, its now E65 when just need something quick (has wifi for hotspots and im also on a data plan when i cant get a hotspot) and eee when i have time to sit down and type (either though its wifi or through the e65 as a data modem via bluetooth).

    3. Re:Older Palm Pilots by tkohler · · Score: 1

      TX works great for this. I use it around my house for the same purpose, portable web browsing. A several year old model used regularly still has a battery life of several days. Don't count on any support from Palm though. You can probably even get a few good reference apps, like the Dewey decimal index or something. Nice big screen and shirt pocket-sized. eBay has several.

  29. samsung delve by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    psycho-phone with full web browser.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  30. Archos 5 is my current favorite by russg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have a look at the Archos devices. You can pickup some of the older models with Wifi as refurbished.
    My Archos 5 is my, surf, watch movies, store data, listen to music, and play games device. The current 5 and 7 are called "Internet Media Tablets".
    With Opera as the browser and flash support its really a nice internet experience for a small device.

    1. Re:Archos 5 is my current favorite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree absolutely, now that they've put decent processor power in there.

      Great choice for this need.

      Not the only choice, but definitely a great one.

      Watch out, though. The 605 wifi and older aren't even close to as good as the current line.

  31. iKit by Sam36 · · Score: 0, Interesting

    The iKit is pretty cool http://www.comsciences.com/product.htm

  32. *NO* for Windows Mobile devices, thats for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mobile Internet explorer is useless. The best you can get on windows mobile is Opera Mini. But that mimics iphone/ipod touch behaviour, so it's better to have a iphone instead.

    1. Re:*NO* for Windows Mobile devices, thats for sure by XDirtypunkX · · Score: 1

      Skyfire is pretty good on Windows Mobile as well.

      But there are some good reasons to get a Windows Mobile phone (or Nokia) over an iPhone.

      1) Full Qwerty physical keyboards if you want them.
      2) Screen size/resolution. N800/N810 on the Nokia side and the HTC Touch HD/Toshiba Portege G910 all sport 800x480 screens.

      Owning both the HTC Touch HD and the iPhone, the HD is a far superior device for web browsing, simply because of the screen (and the well integrated Opera browser). On the Touch HD, you rarely have to zoom to view a page, but as it's not available in the US cheaply, it's not really an option here.

      However, the Nokia 800/810 are available, in a similar price range and have the screen. Once you get used to the high res, you can't go back to browsing on the iPhone.

  33. iPod Touch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really believe this is your best option given current info. In any event on any given day there is likely to be somebody in the library with one. So you should be able to verify quickly if it is up to the task. I don't have a Touch myself but rather an iPhone which works fine at the local library.

    As others have mentioned the Nokia N800 series is a good possibilty if not a bit bulky. While I hate to even bring this up I suspect that the iPod Touch will perform better overalll. Also if you are thinking beyond the library Nokia kinda screwed up with the latest N810 in that they where far to stingy with respect to built in Flash. If used a a single task device though you might be able to live with it.

    The other manufacture to consider is Archos but I have very little info to pass on about their devices. Like any of the above you really want to check it out on your network. There are other manufactures of suitable hardware but names escape me right now.

    Though things are constantly in flux I would have to say that Safari on Apples devices is the most well developed mobile browser. However don't even think that it is comparable to a desktop browser as it is very far from that.

    Dave

  34. Archos 605 Wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want a great multi-purpose device, check out the Archor 605 Wifi. It is also 800x480 like the Nokia, with a vibrant touch screen. It is bigger than an iPod, but also has 160 gigs of storage, great music / video player support, Opera browser with Flash support up to version 9, and other great features. Also, cheaper than an iPod, and I'd highly recommend getting it with the docking station, which basically turns the thing into a TiVo.

  35. Touch Pad by skippybosco · · Score: 1

    How about a "Touch Pad" from Always innovating. They claim a 10 - 15 hour battery life. Can operate as a netbook style device or slide out the monitor from the keyboard for tablet style interaction. http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/

  36. Need full browser support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For serious browsing, you need the full scale browsers. For this reason, the cheapest and most reliable tool is either a UMPC or a Netbook like the Aspire One. The Samsung Q1U is also a nice device but somewhat pricey.

  37. Ninetendo DS + Opera by Dr_Ish · · Score: 1

    I often do something fairly similar. I'll go to pick up something and end up cruising in the stacks. There I will browse. When browsing I'll often see something I want to read. The question then is do we have it? With the Opera Browser loaded into my Nintendo DS, I can login to the WiFi link and pull up the catalog. When I'm done, I shut the DS, drop it into a pocket and move on. It works like a dream! Also, even if the kit is bought new, it is pretty cheap too. I bet with second hand equipment, it could be got for under $100. Oh yes, the few students who have seen me do this seem to think that it is pretty cool too.

    1. Re:Ninetendo DS + Opera by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      I used DSorganize with my DS. It's a full-featured PDA with an integrated browser. If you do get it, the best version is 3.1129. The developer got upset about something, released a buggy 3.2 version, and dropped development. It's closed source freeware, so don't expect any patches but 3.1129 has always worked for everything I've needed.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  38. Archos 5 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using an Archos 5 120 gig internet media tablet that gives full Internet accessibility, no monthly fees, and you can sneak into a quite corner and catch up on your favorite TV show that you DVR'd the night before. Down-side? A bit spendy. The 60 gig version is around 340 and the 120 gig version is 399. The upside: you can download an entire (small) library of books in pdf format and they read beautifully on the device's 5 inch screen.

  39. I also have all three and prefer the 770 by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 2, Informative

    The keyboard on the n810 is almost perfectly flat with a hairline space between keys. Hitting multiple keys is extremely easy, and it is necessary to look at the keys while carefully clicking with my fingernails. The thumbboard on my Tungsten C is a fraction of the size, but far more useful. Even the popup stylus keyboard on the 770 is less trouble. The 770 automatically goes into suspend when the metal cover is flipped back on - unlike the slide button on the n810 that can get triggered accidentally - and it doesn't insist on wearing out the screen while charging.

    1. Re:I also have all three and prefer the 770 by green1 · · Score: 1

      and it doesn't insist on wearing out the screen while charging.

      I doubt very much that the screen will die early enough to matter from that issue, but if you are really worried, simply tell it not to keep the screen on when charging, it's a simple option in the settings.

    2. Re:I also have all three and prefer the 770 by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's an option for "Device Stays Lit" that can be set to either "when charging" or "never"... but it still turns on the display, only to block almost all of the screen as black and show the text "charging" along with an animated icon. Apparently, this can even cause it to lose power while attempting to charge by USB.

    3. Re:I also have all three and prefer the 770 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Only if you shut it down to charge!

      (Specifically, if you tell it to shut down while it's on the charger, or put it on the charger while it's shutdown, it goes to runlevel 5. This runlevel just runs X with the display always on to indicate charging (and charges, of course). You can hack it to run xmatrix instead of displaying a giant battery icon... you could probably also hack it to turn the display off, but I found xmatrix more interesting.)

      But if you have it powered up normally (runlevel 2) and connect the charger, the display will time out and blank as usual, unless you have the screen set to stay lit when charging.

    4. Re:I also have all three and prefer the 770 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Best you keep it charged, as if it ever runs down to flat, you risk the "white screen of death" - damaging the screen permanently.
      After that, let's hope you're good at blind tapping the screen to try and get your data off your new paperweight.

      Don't buy a 770.

      Sooner or later you will lose the russian roulette and the screen will die - permanently. Flashing will not fix it.
      I got bitten by this one and it was only persistence and luck that I recovered my data.

      (http://www.teleread.org/2007/08/11/nokia-n770s-white-screen-of-death-the-lowdown-from-internet-table-talk/)

      Rant over.

      Wi-fi Browsing? Decent battery life?

      Check out the Pandora (http://openpandora.org/)

    5. Re:I also have all three and prefer the 770 by honestmonkey · · Score: 1

      I have the 770. It is a POS. Battery life is crappy, it's picky about Wi-Fi, slower than anything and shuts off or crashes seemingly at random. I don't even push it that hard. I've had so much trouble with mine, I'd be very leery about trying an 810. But of course, YMMV.

      --
      Everything you know is wrong, Just forget the words and sing along.
    6. Re:I also have all three and prefer the 770 by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Never had any problems with my 770. But then, it's a lot less finicky to put into sleep mode than the n800 or n810.

      As for the Pandora, have they actually shipped any of those, or is it a scam? They cancelled my preorder, and I was refunded 40 bucks less than I paid due to the exchange rate changing. How convenient. They keep pushing me to give them my bank account information to make a transfer. Fat chance.

  40. an nth for the ipod touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i would have to recommend the ipod touch...since screen size was not a requirement you mentioned i believe the ipod will fit your bill. a new one is only 229 assuming the wifi is already in place and the things you can do with it are long(shame on apple for once again going the closed route!...big surprise right?) inspite of that shortcoming the ipod has proven to be the best device i've ever pony'ed up for... i have few doubts the iphone would be better if i could afford paying a monthly fee for wi-"max" which to me is a connection nearly everywhere i go. nough-said

  41. N800 + Hiptop by preacha · · Score: 1

    my hiptop 3 phone is great for very simple websites on the road (although it is slow - but cheaper than being on a next-g plan and more coverage in austrlaia). I use the N800 in my bed just for looking at youtube, etc also a great alarm clock (although an expensive one if you were to use it just for that). I'm using the N810 OS for it atm because it proved to be much smoother for youtube streaming etc. I upgraded this over a year ago but haven't done any recent updates (cbf'd). There is also many useful apps for these devices too.....

  42. price point by CheshireFerk-o · · Score: 0, Informative

    the upcoming nintendo DSi has a built-in browser, touch screen keyboard, SDHC, and ability to play games. and at 170$ is much cheaper then an i* or a silly phone.

  43. Touch by shmlco · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Use the Touch with Google's free search app, and you can SPEAK your search term into the system. Works extremely well.

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    1. Re:Touch by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds perfect FOR A LIBRARY! I'd love my concentration to be interupted by the googling of the librarians

    2. Re:Touch by argiedot · · Score: 1

      That certainly is interesting, but I wouldn't want to be in a library sitting next to someone going, "The New York Times", "Google", "Slashdot" and other such stuff. Could get annoying.

    3. Re:Touch by Walker_Boh_Druid · · Score: 1

      Any library I've used has designated 'study' or 'quiet' areas for people looking for silence. Not saying the vocal searching is a good idea, but the fact it's a library hardly makes it any less useful.

    4. Re:Touch by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      The poster is obviously already communicating with someone to figure out what it is they're looking for. Saying an extra word or two is hardly going to be a problem.

    5. Re:Touch by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      Librarian: "DEWEY DECIMAL PR0N"
      Google: Does not compute. Please say again.
      Librarian: "DEWEY DECIMAL PR0N!!!!"
      Google: Does not compute. Please say again. ...

  44. n810 Keyboard by itomato · · Score: 1

    The n810 keyboard is pretty bad - the keys take serious effort to use, and the layout is counter-counter-intuitive.

    I find it faster to use the on-screen job with my fingers than the keyboard, but I have fairly large digits.

  45. Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Products by weston · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... that bugs.

    It's this habit that the anti-fanbois -- a population much more rabid and present on Slashdot than actual strawman fanbois bandied about here -- have of insulting anybody who has decided the Apple products meet their needs best.

    Apple Fan: I really like my iProduct! It fits

    AntiFanbois: Pshaw. *MY* favorite product had the features I prefer two years earlier! I see no value in iProduct! People who buy it are stupid and easily distracted by shiny things!

    Apple Fan: You're kindof a jerk.

    AntiFanbois: See? Apple Fans can't take well-reasoned criticism of their beloved products! It's a cult!

    Apple Fan: I'm not sure we can be friends.

    AntiFanbois: See? They isolate you socially! Totally a cult!

  46. Pocket PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a used pocket pc from ebay with built in wifi. I have a Toshiba e740 and it has been able to surf the internet for years.

  47. Palm T|X by unkiereamus · · Score: 1

    I carried a Palm T|X for quite a while, and in fact used it as my primary internet access device for a while. It worked rather famously for me.

    It has a nice, large screen (Both physically and given the ability to hide the input area, resolution wise, it's a usable QVGA), 802.11b (Do you really need g for this application?), takes a SD card (Though if all you're using it for is the stated purpose, that's beside the point.), easily slips into a pocket and there are three browsers that I can think of off the top of my head, so the odds are good that you can find one that will play well with your ILS site.

    I've seen them on eBay for 50-200 dollars,, though I might suggest being wary of the lower end of the cost spectrum, given that there are some issues with the power button on them.

    The other thing I'd suggest if you go this route is to pick up one of the aluminum hard shell cases (About $45 last time I bought one.). I carried my T|X in one for three years, in a highly physical profession and never had any damage to the device itself, though I did have to replace the case once. (You try crawling into a car wreck and lying on a iPhone for 45 minutes, tell me how well it holds up.)

    (Unkie) Reamus

    --
    I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
  48. Don't do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't do it. It's a library trap. If the chief librarians wants this then have chief librarian buy them. You'll make the other POOR librarians mad since they will have to buy their own.
        -former librarian.

  49. The iPod is overrated. Consider a "touchbook". by leoc · · Score: 1

    IMHO, the iPod Touch is a terribly overrated device. It's too small, slow and buggy to be useful for anything more than light use as a web browsing device.

    If you like the Movit, you might also consider the AI Touchbook.

    --
    STFU about slashdot bias.
  50. Nokia N810, got mine on ebay for 185 by mooneypilot · · Score: 1

    N810, I second it..I mean, 516th it.

  51. Safe to say... by theillien · · Score: 1
    It would seem that a majority of us put our support behind the N8x0 range of devices as they meet the needs laid out by the OP without providing or requiring extra services or fees. The iPhone/iPod Touch are nifty devices. They even have about 60% of the wireless web traffic. But again, they require more in fees than the OP wants.

    It's all well and good that you may like these devices but please, pay attention to requirements and stop acting like systems engineers.

  52. CONSIDER an iPod touch... by sootman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... because, unlike the Nokia, you probably know someone who owns a touch or an iPhone and you can test it before buying! Or, if the online resources are web-accessible (as opposed to only available in the library) you can just go to an Apple store (if there's one nearby) and check one out there. Not that I have anything against the Nokia, but there's no reason to buy something sight-unseen if you don't have to. If it looks like the iPod won't work for you, you can consider alternatives. The Nokia tablets have larger screens but the iPod's pan-and-zoom system works pretty well and its small size is great.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  53. Re:Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Produ by Phroon · · Score: 4, Funny

    First we had Fanbois; but they went out of control and we were forced to create the AntiFanbois.

    But the AntiFanbois too went out of control, and here we see the development of the Anti-Anti-Fanboi.

    I fear this arms race will never end.

  54. Get an iPhone and don't activate it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get an iPhone and don't activate it. Instead, provision it for development (you can do so by downloading the iPhone SDK) and you'll be able to use it without activation.

    That's what I did (I inherited my iPhone from a friend who decided to move on the the iPhone 3G) and it's been a solid little WiFi device ever since.

  55. Re:querty by Xilo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Uh, maybe he's got a Dworak layout?

    --
    Read; Write; Execute
  56. Affordable devices? by dacarr · · Score: 1
    A few options here.

    First, a note - if you just need a curses or other CLI based interface, theoretically, any PDA device or PDA phone should work.

    Palm Tungsten or TX devices work OK, and Blazer works decently on the "mobile" version of King County (WA) Library's online catalog. It has a time parsing the full website however. Tungsten E2 devices run about $150 on Ebay. Note, too, that Tungstens and Tungsten E2s require a device to be added on through the SD card port on top to achieve wifi - beyond that, the line I think has inbuilt wifi.

    Windows Mobile devices work OK, but Pocket IE is going to have the same issues parsing sites that Blazer does on the Palm devices.

    From there, the Nokia tablets work incredibly well, and parse web pages better than the above PDA devices.

    Going up in price, of course, you have the newer web-enabled phones - T-Mobile offers the G1, Samsung Behold and Memoir (the latter of which is just a Behold with a good res camera stapled to it), and other carriers will offer similar devices. Note, though, that at this point we're entering into the realm of cellphones - so this is probably going to be more than you need, especially since most libraries that I know of frown upon people using their cellphone inside their buildings.

    Didn't mention the iPhone (aw, dammit!) because the keyboard interface...well, it's not a full keyboard, it's a keyboard-like interface that you would require one finger for. Two and that means that you have dropped the phone, put it on a table, or are good with your index and middle fingers. The iPod Touch is right out in that regard - the iPhone is basically a iPod Touch with a GSM phone in it.

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:Affordable devices? by kehren77 · · Score: 1

      I have a Palm TX and I have to say that the browser is far from useful. I wouldn't even say it works OK. If all you are loading is plain text pages with just HTML, then maybe. Anything more than that, like javascript or css and you need something else.

  57. As an Ipod Touch / N770 / Netbook owner.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have to say that it sounds like an Ipod Touch is what this person needs.

    The reason why I'd recommend the touch over the Nokia Tablets is simply its a bit thinner and smaller and can fit easier and more comfortable in pockets. Although the Nokia tablets have a built in keyboard and higher resolution, I prefer putting the Ipod Touch in my pockets far more often because of the size of it. Also, the resolution on the Ipod Touch doesn't seem as big of a problem as I thought because the zoomming features of the built in Safari web browser is actually really really good. In my opinion, it works better than the Opera browsers on the Nokia devices. But if you need Flash, then the Ipod Touch wont work for you.

    This being said, I use my Dell Mini9 netbook most of the time I go places. Simply it allows the most functionality with a somewhat typeable keyboard.

  58. OLPC! by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

    I brought an OLPC with me on vacation. With XBuntu the thing rocks! No moving parts, Water-proof when closed. Super wi-fi antennas. Hi-res daylight readable screen. Super light and easy to carry around.

    Only prob is it's not too slow to run flash but a bit too slow for flash video :(. If they fixed that it would be a total dream though.

  59. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  60. Library web sites demand the n810 by DingerX · · Score: 1

    I do a lot of work in libraries, and the n800/n810 wins here.

    Say what you will about Apple's nice toys, the n800/n810's 800x480 screen is key for library catalogs (I use a n800, but I gather the n810 is what you can get these days). If you've been to many libraries, you know that catalogs tend to display a lot of information that is handy to have on the screen at the same time (such as title, call number, status), and they don't usually format it for a mobile browser.

    I'm sure the iPod Touch has a prettier browsing experience, but for running this sort of work, the n810 wins.

    Some library sites do run flash, by the way. And I can understand why Apple wouldn't implement Flash: that crap can chunder a slower device into tiny pieces. Apple's aiming for a consistent user experience; Nokia's letting their users take the device to the limit and beyond.

  61. Re:Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Produ by memoryhole · · Score: 2, Funny

    If only they had thought of the Anti-Anti-Anti-Fanboi! The fools! When will they ever learn?!?

  62. Re:Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Produ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I fear this arms race will never end.

    Which will result in quite some arms...
    Soon, the world of swimming will be dominated by former slashdoters.

  63. despisethesun by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    You've ended your comments with these sentences:

    • They are, without a doubt, exactly what foxxo was asking for.
    • It's a non-issue.
    • Much nicer when typing more than a few words.
    • Definitely the best handhelds available for their purpose.
    • (Typed out on my N800. :)

    You must be an advertiser, copywriter, lawyer, toastmaster, or simply someone very experienced with writing conclusions. You write very well.

    My admirations.

  64. Flash is Slow by quibbler · · Score: 1

    Flash is a interpreted programming environment using its own video rendering, its own code-base, and in most cases, its own internal language-within-a-language API-set to make matters worse. All of this runs floating high atop the application-layer. Even Java, as a language, has the *possibility* of JIT and hooking native graphics/text engines.

    Flash is simply the most inefficient way to build anything today. Yes, all that inefficiency buys compatibility, but at a tremendous cost that no portable-device hw engineer should have to bail-out. I don't blame Apple in the least for baring the biggest sham bloat-ware to hit the internet to date. Flash is a shining example of all thats wrong with the computer industry today. Kudos to Apple for realizing this.

    (Now, the fact is that I've not seen this said here, so either the Adobe Flash Gestapo has mind-controlled the slashdot mod's or else there's not true OSI-wielding code monkey left in these parts, sad.)

    1. Re:Flash is Slow by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Flash is simply the most inefficient way to build anything today.

      Yes because it would be so much more efficient to hire a bunch of programmers to develop rapid e-learning one line of code at a time. Flash, in opposition to your belief, is one of the most efficient ways to build training, simulations and demonstrations, which to me, all count as "anything today".

  65. Re:Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Produ by MattskEE · · Score: 1

    Lisa: "But then we're stuck with anti-anti-fanbois!"

    Skinner: "When wintertime rolls around, the anti-anti-fanbois will simply freeze to death"

    See, it's simple!

  66. Kindle 2 by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    Doesn't use WiFi, it uses the mobile 'phone network, but you don't have to sign-up and you pay nothing for access. You can browse the web, subscribe to blogs, access wikipedia and it has a built in copy of the US OED. And the battery lasts for days with the 'phone connection turned on and weeks with it turned off.

    Oh and you can download and read books on it as well. (Quite a few classics on Amazon are free. As in beer.) ;)

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  67. TechCrunch by BIBO_LV · · Score: 1

    Tablet - not yet for sale but hopefully will be some day. Cheap and portable device is their goal, but will not fit in you pocket.
    http://search.techcrunch.com/query.php?s=TechCrunch+tablet

  68. As somebody that has worn a belt holster.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and has never had problems to relate to women, I can only suggest that maybe it is not the holster's fault, neither the look of the wearer what is putting ladies off.

    I do exercise regularly, can play piano at concert level standards, can run half marathons, can have passable conversations about arts, politics, literature and science, and can even have a go at fixing a Windows machine.

    I posit the holster didn't get on may way to many pleasant , ahem, relationships, and here is the sting in the tail of this post: I am not even that good looking.

  69. The best portable wifi it is the openmoko by far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The openmoko gta02 phone, www.openmoko.com or www.openmoko.org is an open phone, which gives you freedom, for example using debian you can run firefox 3, and for voip asterisk, twinkle, linphone, ekiga, and speak freely, and others.
    for network you can use 802.11 b/g, or connect over a usb cable, it is one of the very few phone in which the usb port can be used a a client, or a host. For voip it works well with g711u, or gsm if compresion is needed, for high compresion lpc10 works fine also, there is some echo on the calls when using voip.

  70. iPhone by Collinp6 · · Score: 1

    Try the iPhone or iPod Touch (iPhone without the phone), both very good for what you need.

  71. iPod Touch by Etherized · · Score: 1

    I have to second the iPod Touch. The browser is substantially more responsive and functional than that of the Nokia Internet Tablets, and the device is much smaller as well. For this application the only real downside is the lack of a physical keyboard.

    I used maemo devices for a long time, and I like them well enough, but honestly the iPod is going to provide a much better user experience if all you want to do is use a web browser. The maemo devices can certainly do *more* things, but none of those things are going to be useful in this case.

  72. Computers in the stacks by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    Why not suggest to your manager that it would be useful to have a some computers out in the stacks?

  73. Experia X1 by Noodlenose · · Score: 1
    I have the Experia X1. Nice keyboard, more functions than you can shake a stick at, Bluetooth, wifi, quadband, IR, Windows Mobile 6.1.

    I would have never thought I'd be happy with a Windows Mobile device, but the X1 is stylish, rock solid and syncs well with my Linux work stations.

    NN

  74. I like my nokia 770 by Uzik2 · · Score: 1

    Look around and you can have it for about $200 new

    --
    -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
  75. Re:Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Produ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll build Bigger Boards, with Bigger Nails in them!

  76. Re:Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Produ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me fix this for you...

    Apple Fan: I really like my iProduct! I bought it the first day it was released and I just new it would do everything I wanted even before I powered it up for the first time. Apple invented this and I've been waiting for something with this functionality for years. Leave it to Apple to finally make something like this. This is exactly what I need, Apple really knows me!

    AntiFanbois: Pshaw. *MY* favorite product had those features two years ago! If you really needed this functionality, why did you wait for Apple to make one? I see no value in iProduct because this one is cheaper, more flexible, and has even more features if I choose to use them. I actually use the device, I don't just need something shiny!

    Apple Fan: You're kindof a jerk. Your product is not slick. I don't need a replaceable battery, that is stupid. Like I said, Apple was the first one to make this. I've never heard of that thing you use so it must not work. Wait until Apple releases version x+1 of my product, even though I have no complaints of my version x and I think it is absolutely perfect and does everything I need, I will be the first person in line to get version x+1 when they release it.

    AntiFanbois: See? Apple Fans can't take well-reasoned criticism of their beloved products! It's a cult! All they keep saying is that it is slick. What the hell does that even mean? They claim the Apple product is the best but yet can't even name a similar product from another company. What is your BEST statement even based on? You never even looked at anything else.

    Apple Fan: I'm not sure we can be friends.

    AntiFanbois: See? They isolate you socially! Totally a cult!

  77. 'let me google that for you' in real life by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I'm a library worker, so I get lots of questions about our collection when I'm out in the stacks. I'd love to be able to access our online catalog and give patrons more comprehensive guidance without directing them to the reference desk."

    Okay, but how does your supervisor feel about that idea?

    A reference librarian's entire job is to help patrons find relevant information, and they had to earn a graduate degree in the field in order to get that job. A "library worker", who has been tasked with re-shelving books in the stacks, is not a capable substitute. Even if he/she has a wifi-enabled PDA.

    I've worked as a page myself, I know that patrons will always approach the first member of the library staff they spot. But when somebody has a reference question, the only appropriate response is to direct them to a reference librarian for assistance

    1. Re:'let me google that for you' in real life by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Or maybe a "library worker" with wifi-enabled PDA is a capable substitute.

      Just because a job requires a degree, doesn't mean a trained monkey couldn't do it. (Not meaning to imply that a trained monkey could do the job of a Librarian.)

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    2. Re:'let me google that for you' in real life by ElDaffo · · Score: 1

      (Not meaning to imply that a trained monkey could do the job of a Librarian.)

      Oook?

  78. No iPod touch? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "I'm often amazed at how something the size of a corn flake can hold that much data."

    I'm surprised I pretty much hit the bottom of the page before I saw the iPod Touch mentioned. While a lot of people here just don't like anything Apple, it does seem to be a good choice for what this librarian wants. Heck, there might be some good free apps she could download and use too for the library?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:No iPod touch? by theillien · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume the librarian is a she?

    2. Re:No iPod touch? by vishbar · · Score: 1

      Maybe because there's not really an applicable gender-neutral pronoun in the English language and the majority of librarians the GP has come in contact with are female?

      --
      Ride the skies
    3. Re:No iPod touch? by theillien · · Score: 1

      It's possible to make generic statements in English: "Heck, there might be some good free apps she could download and use too for the library?" could easily become "There might be some good, free apps that can be downloaded for use in a library." Sometimes I hate English because it is more often lazier than it should be.

    4. Re:No iPod touch? by vishbar · · Score: 1

      True, he could have phrased his statement differently (and I guess I could have phrased this statement differently as well to avoid the gendered "he"). However, there are slight nuances to the meaning and tone of the statement that don't quite carry over when no pronoun is used.

      Not disagreeing with you at all--in a formal situation avoiding a gender-dependent pronoun is a definite best practice ("he or she" can sound ugly sometimes)...I don't think (if this was the implication) that it's indicative of some bias against females (or against librarians, for that matter).

      --
      Ride the skies
  79. Re:Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Produ by M-RES · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and nobody's thinking of the children!!! :O

  80. Nokia N800 by lefticus · · Score: 1

    Plenty of people are talking about the Nokia Internet Tablet series, but I actually have one for sale right now. It's a great device, but not quite what I was looking for. I now own an Acer Aspire One.

  81. Openmoko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Openmoko Freerunner, ~250

  82. Palm T|X. Without a doubt by jezor · · Score: 1

    The Palm T|X is among the most flexible, portable, Wi-Fi enabled devices out there, and should fit your needs really well. If you can find one, of course. {ProfJonathan}

  83. Shhhhhhhh! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Use the Touch with Google's free search app, and you can SPEAK your search term into the system. Works extremely well.

    Shhhhh! He works in a LIBRARY, you insensitive clod!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Shhhhhhhh! by shmlco · · Score: 1

      So how is the patron asking the question he wants her to answer? Sign language?

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  84. Nokia N800 or N810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently purchased a N810 for $220 brand new but think that was limited time sale at buy.com .

    I think the Ipod Touch would be horrible for this person's needs: no slide out keyboard, I assume like the Iphone there is a set limit to the number of browser windows opened, what about replacing the battery, and the Ipod Touch would probably be higher up on a thief's list.

    Also, I noticed in many of the above comments the librarian was referred to a "she" or woman. Was that mentioned in the posting? :) I worked in a public library in college and employees of the reference department was 50/50 in terms of gender.

  85. iTouch is a good option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If all you want is wifi, the iTouch is probably a good option. no fees or strings attached and while you are rummaging around in STACKS, you can listen to music too.

  86. Nokia N800's on-screen keyboard by evaddnomaid · · Score: 1

    My Nokia N800's on-screen keyboard constantly disappoints me. I may trade to the N810 just for a decent way to do quick text entry. (For document editing with my N800 I use an Apple Wireless Keyboard.)

  87. Devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't there a new netbook based on an ARM coming out that was supposed to have a detachable LCD panel that could act as a full tablet for c. $300? It was announced the other week, but I've forgotten the name.

    There was also that independent hardware project, also based around an ARM of some type, that was mentioned here a few weeks ago. That one had only gotten to a beta stage IIRC with no immediate plans for production other than they would like to, and was expected to be $300-400 in production IIRC.

    Another alternative could possibly be something like the Open Pandora? Another ARM/linux based device, yet small and has a keyboard, c. $450?

    Only other things that aren't cellphones would be one of the new iPod Touchs, c. $200-300? Or maybe an Ultramobile PC (UMPC), but those are kind of expensive IIRC.

    Flat out tablet PCs don't seem to have very good pricepoints to me from when I did a q&d check the other week.

  88. Nokia Internet Tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currently in pocket browsing, it doesn't get any better than this:

    http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?sku=A1325264

  89. Re:Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Produ by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    You forgot to throw some homophobic line in there for the AntiFanbois--because when you disagree, call somebody gay.

  90. Re:Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Produ by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Products

    Of course it's not. But that doesn't stop an outpouring of anger whenever someone even suggests that there is some small area in which Apple products can be improved.

    I've seen people flamed here because they thought the iPod Touch is too expensive.

    I'm sorry, pal, but your efforts to turn Apple Fanbois into victims just isn't going to fly.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  91. Re:Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Produ by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    throw some homophobic line in there

    Do you know what homosexuals call Apple Fanbois?

    Gay, but not in a good way.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  92. PDA with no cell access but Wifi Access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any mobile phone really...

    BB Bold for one...
    Since your not using the cellunar netwrk, dont put a SIM card into it.
    By default everything should connect via wifi, once you've set the wifi up to connect to the libraries wifi network.
    Then the browsing will work. its got a full keyboard buit fits in your pocket...

    Outright purchase costs are approx $400 US.

    1. Re:PDA with no cell access but Wifi Access? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Too bad the BB Bold's software stinks compared to Maemo and Android.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  93. Re:Actually, it's not the criticism of Apple Produ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdotters tend to be critical of all products. The fact that you think you're being singled out for your love of all things Apple wreaks of fanboyism.

  94. HELLO! Ipod touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with wifi enabled, and a ton of different applications you can download for free, it's the win