Slashdot Mirror


User: CaseyB

CaseyB's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,066
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,066

  1. Re:*Spoilers* on Star Trek Nemesis Preview Online · · Score: 3, Funny
    to star Riker, Troi, etc (no Picard or Data).

    So, they took the inverse of the set of good TNG actors. Wonderful.

  2. Re:autoratation on Fanwing Planes? · · Score: 2
    Yes, I have autorotated meny times, it is something we practiced in flight school and throughout the time I was flying.

    Do you mean declutching and "gliding" for a bit in midair, or actually landing with no power? Is it that reliable a maneouver?

  3. Re:Bugtraq, not bugtrack, and other squibbling. on Controversy Surrounds Huge IE Hole · · Score: 2

    The asshat still has the advisory up on his web site too. The extent of his utter cluelessness is astonishing.

  4. Re:Marble Man on Bradley Trainer Support in MAME 0.62 · · Score: 2

    Wow. You beat me to it! I was going to post a reply saying the same damn thing. When it comes to rare, unreleased games, playing MM2 is at the top of my list.

  5. Re:Actually pretty cool... on Bradley Trainer Support in MAME 0.62 · · Score: 2

    Is that where they got that from? It's one of the very best arcade controllers ever. Totally natural UI for that style of game. Apart from a very small number of Atari games, no one used it again.

  6. Re:What happened to all those tribbles?? on Ask William Shatner · · Score: 2

    Didn't you watch the episode? Only some of the tribbles died. The remaining thousands were beamed over to the Klingon starship by Scotty --"Where they'll be no Tr-r-ribble at all!".

  7. Re:More jokes on Science Askew · · Score: 2

    No, a prime is any number whose only divisors are 1 and itself. Those divisors need not be distinct.

  8. Re:Yuck, Yuck, Yuck! on Science Askew · · Score: 5, Funny

    Three statisticians are out hunting. A duck flies overhead. The first statistician shoots, but misses by a foot to the left. The second shoots and misses by a foot to the right. The third shouts "WE GOT HIM!".

  9. Re:Yuck, Yuck, Yuck! on Science Askew · · Score: 5, Funny
    Why did the chicken cross the Moebius strip?

    To get to the same side!

  10. Re:Useful as the ext3 journal on Hard Drive of the Future: Ram Drive · · Score: 2
    Ok, but then couldn't you just buy yourself the same reliability (UPSes, etc) on a regular disk subsystem, and then turn off fsyncs? If you're not actually doing a real flush to disc, it's all just handwaving and hoping that the cache is reliable.

    I think "virtualizing" fsyncs is just a bad conceptual idea, because you are end-running the whole purpose of their existence. Just turn them off, and tell people the reliability of write-behind caching is good enough, or do them for real.

  11. Re:Useful as the ext3 journal on Hard Drive of the Future: Ram Drive · · Score: 2

    Then if you lose power after the fsync (and SMTP acknowledgement) and before the physical write occurs, you lose data. It's the same as using write-behind caching (no fsync) on a conventional filesystem. TANSTAAFL.

  12. Re:And you ask the /. community.. on Just One Page a Day · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know you're joking, but in reality it doesn't matter how good your spelling is. In fact, I would imagine that any spelling errors found in the text should be reproduced intact, in the interest of accurately representing the original work. This project is about correcting OCR errors, not spelling / grammar.

  13. Re:Bad for gaming? on New Display Technology to Compete with LCDs? · · Score: 2
    I'm the same way. People don't understand why I complain whenever I go over to their machines and look at their 60hz refresh. "Flicker? What flicker?" I find it literally painful to look at.

    75hz is noticeably worse than 85hz for me, but higher than that doesn't make a difference.

    If you're the type that is insensitive to refresh, you can get an idea what we're talking about if you try looking at the monitor out the corner of your eye at the different refresh rates. Persistence is shorter in your peripheral vision, and flicker is exagerrated.

  14. Re:Bad for gaming? on New Display Technology to Compete with LCDs? · · Score: 2

    Nonsense. Incandescent lightbulbs don't flicker when on a regular 60hz power supply, the filament decay is too slow. Besides, perceived refresh flicker gets worse when all the room lights are off, not better.

  15. Re:Apples and Oranges on Another J2EE vs .NET Performance Comparison · · Score: 2
    The original J2EE version of the Petstore application was meant as an EDUCATIONAL example for those new to J2EE. ... No one in their right mind would use J2EE or EJBs to implement the Petstore app.

    Wrong. Pet Store was built as a demo illustrating the "best practice" implementation of J2EE. It's Sun saying "This is how you should build YOUR apps.". As such it's fair game (and the perfect choice) for platform performance comparisons.

    From the site:
    "The JavaTM Pet Store Demo is a sample application from the JavaTM 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition ("J2EETM") BluePrints Program at Java Software, Sun Microsystems. It demonstrates how to use the capabilities of the J2EE 1.3 platform to develop flexible, scalable, cross-platform enterprise applications.

    The JavaTM BluePrints Program program helps developers create robust, scalable, and portable applications by providing guidelines, patterns, and code that illustrate best practices on how to build end-to-end applications using Java technology.

  16. Re:The resolution still isn't up to par... on LCD Round-up · · Score: 2
    Buying a CRT now is essentially investing in obsolete technology.

    Unlike LCDs, which are all easily upgradable to larger sizes, higher resolutions, and new display technologies!

    If you're worried about "investing in obsolete technology", LCDs are the worse option. The industry is far more likely to dump and orphan the existing DVI spec than they are VGA, and that's about the only "investment" risk there is.

  17. Re:Good to have 'em back. on Lik-Sang Back Online, Minus Modchips · · Score: 3, Funny
    It's a catch-22. If you don't market them as "XBox mod chips", people don't know what they are and won't buy them. If you market them as "XBox mod chips", you are admitting their primary function is to mod an XBox, and will be sued since it is illegal to market them.

    So advertise them as:

    Motherboard extender - WARNING: THIS PRODUCT IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN PLAYING BACKUP GAMES ON THE MICROSOFT XBOX(TM) GAME CONSOLE."

  18. Re:hmm? on Streaming DVD Video over the Internet · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry, here's your reference.

  19. Re:hmm? on Streaming DVD Video over the Internet · · Score: 5, Informative
    If that was the case, no one would be happier tha me but as far as I know an AC3 (encoded Dolby 5.1) stream (48kHz, 16bit) uses roughly around 1.5 mbs of bandwidth

    AC3 streams use lossy compression. They can use as much as 640kbps, but typical DVDs use either 384 or 448 kbps.

  20. Re:Yet more speculation running as news. on No More Mac Tweaking? · · Score: 3, Insightful
    But the areas where things can cause instability in the OS should not be left wide open for people to change in an uncontrolled manner.

    Why? These people aren't modifiying the shrink-wrapped boxes Apples sells in the store. They're modifying their own machine as they see fit.

    This has nothing to do with stability. It's all about dictating to people how they can use a product they own by adding arbitrary restrictions.

    Standardized controls are what makes OS X much easier for newbies to use than other operating systems.

    Newbies aren't the ones doing this. Give your head a shake.

    Let people change the look of their computer, but not the feel. That's the right strategy and the one apple seems to be following.

    Why is it reasonable for a company to restrict the way we use the product? This isn't Apple designing a product to be consistent, this is Apple locking down an existing product that people are using is a way that they didn't anticipate, because the creativity these users are demonstrating angers them.

    "Think Different" indeed. Try "Think the way we want you to think.".

  21. Re:945 pages! on Professional PHP4 XML · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This sounds promissing!

    With very few exceptions, the value of a programming book is inversely proportional to it's size.

    e.g. K&R C, vs. "Unleashing C in 21 days for idiots."

  22. Re:Did I just see what I thought I saw? on Firefly Premieres Tonight · · Score: 2

    I thought it was the best part of the whole show. Anti-star-trek indeed.

  23. Re:To all geeks that have girlfriends! on HOWTO: Spend A Billion Dollars · · Score: 2
    He might also have listed $1,000,000 to buy a new car.

    That doesn't mean his current car is worth that much.

  24. Re:11mp is waaaay too many (for most people) on Canon Mistakenly Announces 11-Megapixel Digital Camera · · Score: 2
    with lens photography there is infinate amount of raw data

    Ah, the classic fool's argument for analog over digital. It's the same one that the vinyl audiophiles make. "There's no digital quantization, so the data is infinite."

    Wrong. It doesn't matter if your medium can store an infinite range of values if the data is drowned in noise. So while there is indeed an "infinite amount of data" stored in the arrangement of molecules in an analog medium, most of it has nothing to do with what you were trying to capture, and hence isn't really data in this context.

    The error induced by emulsion quality, development processes, printing processes, etc. is every bit as real as that caused by the quantization of a digital capture device.

  25. Re:Try it at home! on Perpetual Motion Delorean? · · Score: 2

    I guess the reconditioning is to mint condition, because you can buy old Deloreans for less than $10K.