Slashdot Mirror


HOWTO: Spend A Billion Dollars

shine-shine writes: "Forbes is running an article helping you figure out how to spend that spare billion you got laying around (don't you just hate when that happens?). Apparently, a geek would buy 500 black-market clones of himself, while the narcissist would most likely build "a monument similar in size and scale to Mount Rushmore, featuring his own face.""

508 comments

  1. Woohoo #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to spend a billion. I've gone through a million but a B-B-B-Billion would be cool.

  2. I know how you can spend a billion dollar too. by shadow0_0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just give the billion dollar to me! :)

  3. I would... by boa13 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... most probably spend some of it to go into space or to the Moon. Also, a big badass Beowulf cluster would be helpful to speed up those lengthy Gentoo emerges. Look 'ma, I'm compiling Linux faster than you're booting Windows!

    1. Re:I would... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ... most probably spend some of it to go into space or to the Moon.

      You should really try another approach: Start drinking Pepsi, and get a free ride into space...

    2. Re:I would... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, first I'd have to pay about $500 million to the government for taxes.

      Then I'd take $100 million and go on an insane buying spree.

      Then I'd take the remaining $400 million and invest it with the top hedge fund manager I can find. Live off a quarter of the yearly returns and re-invest the other 3/4 of the returns. Compound interest, baby. Nobody in my family would ever have to work again for dozens of generations.

    3. Re:I would... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "invest it with the top hedge fund manager I can find"

      If were good at math you would know that's not good investment. *cough* Anderson *cough*

      The safest investment is keeping the money under your bed mattress.

  4. whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    whores. more whores than charlie sheen and hugh grant combined could go through in a lifetime.

    1. Re:whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What have you done? Why do you need all those lawyers for ?

    2. Re:whores by 1nhuman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you have 1 billon$ you don't need whores. You will attract b*tches like hotmail attracts spam.

      --
      The glass is half-full. With poison. And there are cracks in the glass. The dirty, dirty glass.
    3. Re:whores by Perdo · · Score: 2

      You sir, are my hero.

      That has got to be the most fucked up post to ever be rated insightful.

      Scary part is, in this context, it actually is insightful.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    4. Re:whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A billion dollars could get you Dianne Feinstein riding your jock. She is without a doubt the biggest whore of them all. She has her legs wide open to big media while the people of California get fucked.

    5. Re:whores by Jherico · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If you have 1 billon$ you don't need whores.

      You do if you don't want to wonder if they're only interested in you for the money.

      --

      Jherico

      What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

    6. Re:whores by edgrale · · Score: 2
      If you have 1 billon$ you don't need whores. You will attract b*tches like hotmail attracts spam.


      Yeah well, that doesn't work for everyone! Look at Bill Gates - no hot chicks ;-)
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:whores by 1nhuman · · Score: 1

      Bill's problem is that he isn't interested in hot chicks, fast cars or fun for that matter. Personally I think this is the cause of many other problems he and his company have.

      --
      The glass is half-full. With poison. And there are cracks in the glass. The dirty, dirty glass.
    8. Re:whores by Arthur+Dent+75 · · Score: 1
      You do if you don't want to wonder if they're only interested in you for the money.

      As opposed to whores?

      --
      michael at slashdot.org: The real answer is that a couple of the slashdot authors are sick.
    9. Re:whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you mad. it's his crack-pipe-toting Ho's who are running the show at Microsoft...

      it wasn't a pc on every desktop he imagined it was PCP on every desktop.

      As for 640k - thats nearly a metric tonne.
      now if that ain't enough coke to wash back I don't know....

    10. Re:whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In which case you're not wondering.

    11. Re:whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does he buy fast cars, if he's not interested in them?

    12. Re:whores by bdeclerc · · Score: 1

      With whores you don't have to wonder about it...

    13. Re:whores by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Attracting bitches with money? I call 'em whores. Whether or not you actually say, "I will give you $xxxx to fuck me" or not is irrelevant.

    14. Re:whores by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      You're wrong on at least one count - he has a passion for Porsches. One of the alleged reasons he moved Microsoft from Albuquerque to Seattle was the frequent speeding tickets he used to get down there.

      And, he just might think playing Monopoly in a 1:1 scale is great fun. Especially when you've got a psychopath sidekick...

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    15. Re:whores by 1nhuman · · Score: 1

      Good point. But with 1 billion it's hard to tell if they are after your money or not. But should you really care?

      --
      The glass is half-full. With poison. And there are cracks in the glass. The dirty, dirty glass.
    16. Re:whores by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      Scary as it may be (and it is), Gates dated a lot of models in the eighties.

      Apparently money really can blind people. [shudder]

    17. Re:whores by operagost · · Score: 1

      Plus they won't trick you into marrying them and then walk off with half your billion, six months and several divorce lawyers later.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit. Lots of hotties to choose from.
      You can fuck'n'chuck one, throw her in the gutter and go get anudder.

    19. Re:whores by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

      This could be a famous quote, I'm too lazy to research it:

      "You don't pay prostitutes for sex, you pay them to go away afterward."

      Not to hijack the thread or anything, but is it amazingly silly to anyone else that prostitution is still illegal in almost all of the US? You can give it away for free, but you can't pay for it, and the illegality drives the pimp industry. It's absurd.

    20. Re:whores by Reziac · · Score: 2

      "Faster horses, younger women, older whiskey, and MORE MONEY!" -- Tom T. Hall, "The Meaning of Life"

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    21. Re:whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like women who are only interested in the money, then you wouldn't want whores, either.

    22. Re:whores by AgentTim3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know, I'd rather pay for the whores than risk attracting someone like Anna Nicole Smith...

    23. Re:whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clark Gable ---- "I don't pay them to stay with me during the night, I pay them to go away the next morning."

    24. Re:whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I first heard that on southpark, but I don't know if that's where it originated from.

      See? I admit I don't know! I'm not worthy!

    25. Re:whores by spudnic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man: Would you make love to me for $1,000,000?
      Woman: Yes!
      Man: Will you f*ck me for $50?
      Woman: You asshole! What kind of a woman do you think I am?
      Man: We've already established that. Now we're just quibling over the price.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    26. Re:whores by Cirvam · · Score: 1

      I heard that Winston Churchill said this to a lady at a dinner party when they were discussing the topic of whores

    27. Re:whores by sbjornda · · Score: 1
      I heard that Winston Churchill said this...
      I heard that it was George Bernard Shaw.

      .nosig

    28. Re:whores by mr_death · · Score: 2
      Another Churchill moment:

      to Liverpool socialist MP Bessie Braddock, who told him, "Winston, you're drunk.":

      "Bessie, you're ugly. And tomorrow morning I'll be sober, but you'll still be ugly." (http://www.jimpoz.com/quotes/speaker.asp?speaker= Sir%20Winston%20Churchill)

      --
      It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
    29. Re:whores by bagsc · · Score: 1

      Speaking of, Billy had a little girl the other day - only 18 years until I have a billion dollars!

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    30. Re:whores by DuranDuran · · Score: 1

      All the instances of this quote I've read read:

      "And you, dear lady, are ugly. But in the morning, I'll be sober."

      Sig.

      --
      "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
    31. Re:whores by kalk · · Score: 0, Troll
  5. Easy... by thumbtack · · Score: 2

    Buy a new P4 every time a new cpu is released, same with video cards, new hottest latest motherboard, and buy the fastest ram available in largest increemnts available.. Outdated driver? Buy a new system.

    Or sit down to try to get an interactive music license from the RIAA.

    1. Re:Easy... by Khaed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even better.
      Pay someone to buy a new P4, video card, et al. Preferably someone female with little to no inhibitions and a french maid outfit.

    2. Re:Easy... by Avenel · · Score: 1

      and have her put it together... What could be better then some hot chick (wearing next to nothing) installing a heat sink?

    3. Re:Easy... by zebs · · Score: 1

      You might be onto something here...

      I've never seen any pr0n with chicks building computers.

      I guess the sharp edges would burst their implants

    4. Re:Easy... by operagost · · Score: 1

      I could finally afford a workstation that Solaris would run smoothly on.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Easy... by ClickNMix · · Score: 1

      Outdated driver? Buy a new system.

      More likely, you'd have a system so bleeding edge none of the drivers work right together, and it crashes at all the wrong moments..

      Of course, you could always hire a team to fix those bugs for you etc...

      --
      I saw the light at the end of the tunnel... But it was just someone with a flashlight bringing more work.
  6. What would you do with your billion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    First, I'd buy a house. Then I'd pay off my car. I'd spend the remaining 999.5 million buying two senators and a representative.

    1. Re:What would you do with your billion? by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Funny
      two senators and a representative

      Yeah, it'd be worth $1b just to see the looks on Hilary Rosen's and Jack Valenti's faces when their paid for Senators told them to go and blow Cowboy Neal. Priceless!

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  7. Found a typo by rde · · Score: 5, Funny

    The average male uses about 600 pairs of underpants over his lifetime
    Obviously, this is meant to say 6.00 . I haven't grown in decades, so I haven't needed a new pair.

    And did you notice that the phrase 'take over the world' doesn't appear once?

    1. Re:Found a typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother looking for errors in spelling? Their math is atrocious! They seem to be able to punch the buttons on their calculators for individual items but when it comes time to tally the whole lot up and subtract it from $1B, to give the "remainder" comment, they screw up big time. I can't imagine a geek would plan on giving $250M to research when his bank account has less than $99M in it.

    2. Re:Found a typo by KILNA · · Score: 1

      For that matter their calculations for 50 year supply of Big Mac value meals ends up being $539.00 per day. I knew geeks had a stereotype of being overweight, but isn't this taking it a bit far?

      --
      Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
    3. Re:Found a typo by Gekko · · Score: 1

      Not to mention its not even a picture of a big mac, the most closely resembles a Marks Big Boy Burger.

      --
      I mod down any one who says "I'm sure I will get modded down for this"
    4. Re:Found a typo by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      Also, each live-in chef and masseuse pair cost a combined $1 million per year? Buying a supermodel and sending her to school for both seems the right way to do it.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    5. Re:Found a typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I mod down any one who says "I'm sure I will get modded down for this"

      Ditto. Hahaha!

    6. Re:Found a typo by inerte · · Score: 1

      I haven't grown in decades, so I haven't needed a new pair.

      Remove the SPAM filter and it shall grow!

    7. Re:Found a typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too, it just begs for it.

  8. Airline industry? by Primotheproton · · Score: 1

    Well I dont know how much United airlines is going for these days, but I'm sure you could pick up a few airlines cheap these days, what with their business way down, and we all know airflight will be popular again before too long.

    1. Re:Airline industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but the regionals and the budget airlines are killing the majors these days. United is trying like hell to stay afloat, while Southwest still enjoys profits. Your best bet would be to start your own no-frills budget airlines like a la JetBlue. The reason the majors are doing so poorly is they have too many different types of aircraft. Southwest, GoFly, and RyanAir only fly 737's, I'm not sure about JetBlue but I bet they're doing pertty much the same. Think about having to keep parts for 10 different types of planes and having to pay mechanics for 10 different types. If you can simplfy all that, you cut your costs DRAMATICALLY!

      Oh yeah, and if you do start your own airline, I'm currently furloughed and would LOVE to be flying again! Oh, and I'm type-rated for 737 *cough*hint*cough*

    2. Re:Airline industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JetBlue uses Airbus A320's....just looked it up. I'm not type-rated for that, but I'm willing to learn :)

  9. I'd never clone myself by ComaVN · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd clone my girlfriend (2 or 3 times should be enough)

    Imagine the possibilities!

    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    1. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have to buy a new one my current one lacks the quailities to merit cloning (horny and hot)

      Akira_SSJ

    2. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chop chop! Dig dig! Chop chop! Dig dig!

    3. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibilites indeed... Reminds me of an old argument my roomie and I used to get into back in the dorm. She swears (oh, lesbian btw) that if she was able to time travel she'd definitely have to have sex with herself. She insists that it would be the most amazing experience (that you get to live through twice) because you would each know exactly what the other wanted. SHE says this would just be masturbation, I say it would be freaking INSANE! I mean, ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!! Wouldn't that be like sleeping with your twin or something? :P

      Heh, just had to take the opportunity to toss that out there to the peanut gallery. Any opinions? (I'm right, say it! I'm right! ;)

    4. Re:I'd never clone myself by MikeDX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yep, thats a sure fire way of getting the money spent 3 times faster! :)

    5. Re:I'd never clone myself by efagerho · · Score: 1

      I'd recommend some caution when you do that. If you've ever had any problems arguing with your girlfriend, then thing about arguing with 2 or 3 of them...

    6. Re:I'd never clone myself by streetlawyer · · Score: 2

      Jesus, don't we have enough fat women in the world already?

    7. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd clone my girlfriend (2 or 3 times should be enough)

      Call me a narcissist, but if I could clone myself, who needs a girlfriend?

      Imagine the possibilities!

      Quite.

    8. Re:I'd never clone myself by bokketies · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of my girl friend!

    9. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather not.

    10. Re:I'd never clone myself by dirk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'd clone my girlfriend (2 or 3 times should be enough)

      Which brings up an interesting question. If you clone yourself, and have sex with yourself, are you gay, or is it masturbation? And if you clone you girlfriend, and sleep with them all, is it really cheating?

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    11. Re:I'd never clone myself by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

      and why is it that Doc Brown came up with the design for the flux capacitor after hitting his head on the toilet seat?! Too many questions!!

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    12. Re:I'd never clone myself by NSG · · Score: 1

      so you'd have 4 or 5 hands?

    13. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you clone yourself, and have sex with yourself, are you gay, or is it masturbation? And if you clone you girlfriend, and sleep with them all, is it really cheating?

      According to a previous girlfriend of mine, "yes" and "yes". Apparently sleeping with one of her triplet sisters was considered "cheating" in her mind. I don't see a clone being too much different than that. :(

      uh.. but dude, why would you want to have sex with yourself now?
    14. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think we need a few more...

      --
      Jesus

    15. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a crap response. You could at least have mentioned that sheep have already been cloned.

    16. Re:I'd never clone myself by admiralh · · Score: 1

      Check out the story "Nine Lives" by Ursula LeGuin.

      --
      Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
    17. Re:I'd never clone myself by fobbman · · Score: 2

      Two words: synchronized menstruation.

      You're the same type that thinks that being a gynocologist would be FUN. Ya gotta think these things through, bro.

    18. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A story you may find interesting:

      Circular Betrayal

    19. Re:I'd never clone myself by Virtex · · Score: 2

      You have a girlfriend? You're obviously not the kind of geek they're talking about, then.

      --
      For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
    20. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't be cheating in a contract, unless you've
      been told the rules, and most importantly have agreed to them. It seems girls come with a hidden EULA, among the lines of "by screwing this girl, you hearby agree to..."

    21. Re:I'd never clone myself by Creepy · · Score: 2

      I imagine there's some inbreeding in your family. Fortunately for us, it will end when you get your first billion.

      As for the original poster, can't get enough of the one you've got, 'eh?

    22. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SWEET!!!

    23. Re:I'd never clone myself by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
      I'd clone my girlfriend (2 or 3 times should be enough)

      Heh, then you'd have 2 people refusing to a 3-some :)

      Magius_AR

    24. Re:I'd never clone myself by schmink182 · · Score: 1

      Via dictionary.com (sorry about the messed up pronunciation key):
      masturbation Pronunciation Key (mstr-bshn)
      n.
      Excitation of one's own or another's genital organs, usually to orgasm, by manual contact or means other than sexual intercourse.

      Anyway, I don't see how you couldn't both be right...

    25. Re:I'd never clone myself by billd · · Score: 1

      A clone is a completely separate person who happes to have identical DNA.

      --

      -----

      For great justice!

    26. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, if they were identical triplets (or twins+1), then couldn't u claim that you couldn't tell the difference and that she was the one who seduced you?

      that would be sweet...

    27. Re:I'd never clone myself by SanGrail · · Score: 1

      Er, in many sci-fi stories, clones actually have your memories as well, they are pretty much you. Then there's those who are just genetic twins.
      If you both had the same memories, I'd consider it masturbation.
      (Question not asked, but anyway...) In both cases, technically it would be incest, but in the second case, more so?
      Seeing as people come in infinite shades between gay & straight: If the only same-sex person you ever wanted to sleep with was yourself, then you're still pretty damn straight, but it would count towards being a little more gay. But even then, would you be treating yourself (or twin) as a sex-toy, or would you want to like, marry them?

      Having the moral highground, if you could figure it out, may help your own ego if you sleep with your girlfriends clones, but it doesn't mean jack-shit. What matters is if your girlfriend thinks it's cheating.
      If she thinks it's not, then it's not.
      Although really, according to all the polyamorous people out there, if your SO knows about it and is ok with it, then it isn't cheating to begin with.
      If they had the same memories, you could argue that it isn't really cheating on her, it's not breaking up with one of her.

      The question is, if you sleep with your clone, is it cheating on your girlfriend?

      (Ha. I would, to all of the above. But then, I don't have a girlfriend - I am girl. And since I don't have a boyfriend at the moment, I'm fully willing to hypothetically break up with them over hypothetical scandals.
      Although many guys are into the idea of two girls together... But if I had a male clone - same answer.
      Wait, what if hypothetical boyfriend had clone?
      Meh, I'm not a hypocrite. Go ahead.
      (Growing realisation I'm a pervert...) Actually, I'd want to watch. And skip it being a clone.)

      --
      ---- I've fallen, and I can't get up.
    28. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up.

    29. Re:I'd never clone myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine your girlfriend reading Beowulf during a clusterf*ck!

    30. Re:I'd never clone myself by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      LMAO

      you should be ahamed girl!

  10. I'd buy a whole ton of those desktop tank robots.. by torpor · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... from ThinkGeek (I'd get the camera option, I think I can afford that), stick little fluffy penguins on top, and march the whole affair into Redmond during rush hour. I'm thinking about 400,000 of them.

    Okay, there'd be a lot of casualties, but for a billion bucks, I think I could afford a fleet sizable enough that eventually, one of my little robot warriors will plant themselves on Bills ass^H^H^Hdesk.

    Failing that, I'd just get an island in Thailand, a whole bunch of hot chicks, some serious nuclear technology, and I'd spend the rest of my life batting away hero types.

    Nobody touches my bitches.

    Nobody.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  11. Land, land, and more land by idiotnot · · Score: 3, Informative

    - Primary residence on North Carolina's Outer Banks
    - Vacation home in Northern Europe
    - Ski Chalet (Rockies)
    - Plot in a Banana Republic

    Of course, also I'd need...

    - Multi-million dollar yacht
    - Plane
    - Fleet of cars for each residence
    - 1967 AMC Ambassador SST

    Computers...

    I can't, really....several offerings from Sun, a top-o-da-line TiBook (every single time they release one that's better, I'd get a new one), Cray.....

    With the rest, I'd put it into a trust where the interest will be protected, and I'll live on the interest. At death, Uncle Sam will get a cut (unfortunately), and the rest will go to worthy causes of my choice (my alma mater, Debian project....)

    1. Re:Land, land, and more land by cscx · · Score: 2

      I'd be a little more creative, like Dean Kamen the Segway guy. Buy your own island, then secede from the union. Boom! your own country!

    2. Re:Land, land, and more land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your examples demonstrate exactly why you would never be rich.

      I would pay a hefty retainer for the worlds best assassin. ...then I would start.

    3. Re:Land, land, and more land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then someone in the US administration takes a disliking to your state. You get labelled the next terrorist state, are clearly harboring somebody-or-other and get your ultimatum. Next thing you know, there's a bunch of soldiers conducting some live-fire exercises all over your little island, before retreating in the face of defeat at the hands of their own friendly fire, finally declaring you the next Castro, and your island a communist enclave (since everything on it is owned by its government, i.e. you, etc. etc.)

    4. Re:Land, land, and more land by victim · · Score: 5, Funny
      At death, Uncle Sam will get a cut (unfortunately), and the rest will go to worthy causes of my choice (my alma mater, Debian project....)

      Please let hitsquad@debian.org know when you get that billion dollars. The bequest acceleration team will take care of the rest.
    5. Re:Land, land, and more land by spike2131 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Way to post an unobfuscated email address on the net... better let hitsquad@debian.org know that they are in for a mountain of spam.

      of course, if the spammers can be tracked, they could make great target practice while waiting around for the bequest acceleration orders to roll in.

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
    6. Re:Land, land, and more land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you mean a multi million dollar yacht-submarine.

    7. Re:Land, land, and more land by azimir · · Score: 1

      I'd be careful running apt-get updates from then on.
      Unless you've tweaked the source yourself of course.

    8. Re:Land, land, and more land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone harvesting slashdot for addresses to spam is heading rather fast towards blacklists, counterattacks, and other technical niceties....

  12. How we southerners would spend it... by gnovos · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one would buy myself a space-shuttle, paint it with primer, and leave it up on blocks in my front yard...

    Either that or I'd do it the Bart Simpson way:

    Me: One billion dollars on black!
    Dealer: Aaaaand, it's red.. red is the winner!
    Me: Doh!

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:How we southerners would spend it... by Primotheproton · · Score: 0

      Well good reference, but I believe it was Homer who gambled away his family's million :)

    2. Re:How we southerners would spend it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was bart in a fantacy sequence, i think it was the trilion dollar bill episode.

    3. Re:How we southerners would spend it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Bart doesn't say "Doh!!"

    4. Re:How we southerners would spend it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the guy that spins the Roulet wheel is a croupier, not a dealer(no cards involved).

    5. Re:How we southerners would spend it... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Sometimes he does. If you want to know in which episodes exactly, ask the Comic Book Guy :-P

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  13. dumd by death+or+glory · · Score: 1

    wow, a thread about what you would do with a bunch of money. how interesting.

  14. Re:I'd buy a whole ton of those desktop tank robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Ala Booger in one of the Revenge of the Nerds movies, when he meets "Snot" and Snot out belches him.)

    Master!

  15. Not really spending it... by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 0

    But I think I would hit up the turkish exchange and convert my 1 Billion USD to 1,664,000,000,000,001.00 TRL

    Just to say I'm a Quadillionar (or what ever comes after trillionar)

    Then I would probable buy 1/5th of the world a coke

    1. Re:Not really spending it... by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 0

      also, does anyone find that the conversion works out to 1.664 quadillion and 1 TRL funny?

      also the exchange was done at
      http://www.xe.com/ucc/convert.cgi

  16. Bill Gates has a spare billion ... by dpt · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... or two!

    So what does he do with it? Answer: like most true geeks, on accumulating more wealth and power due to a massive inferiority complex.

    Has anyone ever even *heard* of poor old billg having any fun with all that money?

    Okay, he might be working on the clone thing. Except, of course, they'll be so slow, liable to freezing up, susceptible to viruses, and busy try to catch up with the features the *other* clones had since the seventies (like being able to think about more than one thing at once), that they won't be all that effective.

    1. Re:Bill Gates has a spare billion ... by forgoil · · Score: 2

      This is just a guess, but I think that good old Bill *IS* having a lot of fun, regardless of his money. He loves to run Microsoft, he loves what he is doing. I would have a ball if I could make Longhorn instead of Bill.

      Something tells me that he didn't do it for the money, really. As if anyone of you would say "oh shit, my company is starting to make money, I will open source everything at once and refuse to take money so I can be a cool "damn the man" guy who fights the establishment".

      Funny that I haven't seen any comment on spending money on Linux. Makes me think that even if a guy had a billon bucks he wouldn't spend it on Linux ^_~

      If I had a billon bucks I would have time to write my own OS, and I'll be damned if you could use it ^_~

    2. Re:Bill Gates has a spare billion ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates obviously at least started out in it with money being a very important factor for him.

      From what I've heard, he was raised to believe that winning (in business) is everything, which seems pretty consistent with his business behavior.

      Apart from his business behavior, he seems to be a perfectly decent, somewhat geeky person.

    3. Re:Bill Gates has a spare billion ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I know is Bill Gates owns a Porsche 959...and that's a pretty badass car. That new 911 GT2 isn't too bad either...$250k if you can even find one.

    4. Re:Bill Gates has a spare billion ... by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      I have heard stories of Bill Gates basically playing bumper car's with his Porshe in a warehouse. Sounds like fun to me!

    5. Re:Bill Gates has a spare billion ... by Cirvam · · Score: 1

      I heard he owns 5 or 6 959s, about 50% of all the ones that they made for the US. He also owns a few other various Porsche's, from a 930 to a 968, and probably tons more to fill up the 30 car garage that he has at his house.

    6. Re:Bill Gates has a spare billion ... by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      Okay, he might be working on the clone thing. Except, of course, they'll be so slow, liable to freezing up, susceptible to viruses, and busy try to catch up with the features the *other* clones had since the seventies

      I knew that cloning has not had alot of success but I did not realized how bad Dolly the Sheep really had it!

  17. Does it bother anyone... by billstr78 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... that 2 companies dominate with thier heirs or stock holders comprising of 8/10 of the top 10 richest persons in America. Also, it is slightly un-settling that Walmart alone keeps positions 4 to 8 in the list.

    1. Re:Does it bother anyone... by CBNobi · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Does it bother anyone... that 2 companies dominate with thier heirs or stock holders

      Considering Bill Gates is #1, I think the collective response to that is "meh."

    2. Re:Does it bother anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it bother anyone that whiny gimme gimme's can't stand the fact that other peopel are insanely rich and have done things to warrant/earn that money and are bitterly jealous that the richest people in the world don't feel the need to write checks out of sheer good-heartedness to every other person in the world until they run broke themselves?

      On a side note, every single "purchase" in that Forbes article is fucking STUPID. What idiot came up with that article? None were realistic, none interested me and absolutely none were even funny.

    3. Re:Does it bother anyone... by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 2

      What makes the article interesting is the fact that the purchaces are realistic. You can in fact buy all of the items listed.

      It also gives you an idea of how much a billion dollars really is.

      I also find it hard to imagine how anybody could really "warrant/earn" that much money. But that's more of a philosophical question.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    4. Re:Does it bother anyone... by floki · · Score: 1

      If you want to know more about the connections of the most powerful people to various companies you should look at the project They rule.

      --
      from the to-stupid-for-words dept.
    5. Re:Does it bother anyone... by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

      Well considering the Wal-Mart people got it from an inheritance, just kill them then their kids would have 6.6 Billion each and they would dominate the whole list.

      --
      This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    6. Re:Does it bother anyone... by StillAnonymous · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes it does. It's such a hideous imbalance in the economic system and I don't believe it can continue like this forever. You simply can't keep moving all the wealth in the world to a select few and expect everything to work out all right.

      And why does an individual NEED that much money?! Honestly, once you have a nice place to live, food to last you the rest of your life, a car (not even mandatory depending on where you live or what your lifestyle is), and a few luxuries (I'm not talking about billion dollar boats here either), what good is another billion dollars going to do you?

      Personally if I had that much dough, I'd give most of it, like maybe $950 million, away. The rest would take care of me and my entire extended family for the rest of our lives.

    7. Re:Does it bother anyone... by NineNine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're full of shit. You can't say what you'd do with $1B because you don't have it. Anybody can say, "Those rich guys are assholes. They should give it all away." I'm sure that homeless people are thinking that those rich assholes that make $100K/year should give all but like $20K/year away, because that's all you need.

      There's nothing wrong with the system, you're just whining.

    8. Re:Does it bother anyone... by NineNine · · Score: 2

      I also find it hard to imagine how anybody could really "warrant/earn" that much money. But that's more of a philosophical question.


      Well, all you gotta do is to read a Bill Gates biography. That'll tell you how someone can earn that much money. The basics are that he put together the most popular software packages in the world, and marketed them well.

    9. Re:Does it bother anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't bother me that people earn the money, but did Walmart heirs 1 through 5 earn anything, really?

    10. Re:Does it bother anyone... by thales · · Score: 2
      "Does it bother anyone..."


      Not in the least.
      Perhaps because I don't measure my selfworth against what others earn or have. That type of envy is a sign of personal insecurity.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    11. Re:Does it bother anyone... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      Not at all.

      The implication that these folks should do something (that YOU approve of) with their wealth, rather than doing whatever they are or are not doing with it.

      Some passing thoughts on the matter.

      1) They didn't *take* the wealth from anyone, by and large it was *created*.

      2) The $885 Billion is "on paper", what do you supposed would happen if the 400 tried to make it all liquid? The values of the underlying stocks would plummet and of what was left would be heavily taxed, for the most part, so it's not like these guys have billions lying around to give away - most of it is "at work" tied up in capital investments.

      3) If they did distribute the wealth, evenly amongst all of us earthlings, it would be (assuming no value loss, or taxes) $147.00 EACH. That might be nice for some of the mud-hutters of the world, but isn't going to change life for most of us. Of course, in the real world this wouldn't work due to #2, and the resulting inflation if everyone had some extra bucks, all of a sudden-like.

      4) So, I'd say the best thing that can be done with this wealth, is to leave it where it is, for the most part, and I am sure there is a fair amount of philanthropy going on, etc.

      more could be said, and probably has. Enough ranting by me.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    12. Re:Does it bother anyone... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > You simply can't keep moving all the wealth in the world to a select few and expect everything to work out all right.

      You may be assuming that the amount of wealth in the world is constant. A comparison of planetary population, hunger, literacy and mortality rates, and material standard of living from the year 1200, 1800, and 2000 should cause you to seriously question this assumption.

      > Honestly, once you have a nice place to live, food to last you the rest of your life, a car (not even mandatory depending on where you live or what your lifestyle is), and a few luxuries (I'm not talking about billion dollar boats here either), what good is another billion dollars going to do you?

      Notice how - even in the Forbes article - some of the more expensive things are items where another billion would make a difference? (Like, you could do twice as much work with 1000 clones instead of 500, or give Sally Struthers twice as much food to eat in the hopes that more of it might get to the poor when she's done filling up on cheesy poofs :)

      > Personally if I had that much dough, I'd give most of it, like maybe $950 million, away. The rest would take care of me and my entire extended family for the rest of our lives.

      (Nothing wrong with that approach - as long as you're giving your $950M away. Hell, I could live comfortably on $10M. Try to take someone else's $950M, and you're little more than a thug, however :)

      But why do you give $950M away in the first place? If your goal is to make the world a better place through philanthropy (feed the world) or through strategic investments (building space-based power stations and orbiting colonies), wouldn't the world be twice as good a place if you kept the $950M used it to earn another billion, thereby giving you and your heirs $1950M to build yet more Good Things?

      This scales down, too. If you've got a business plan that'll get you $1B in 10 years, but you only need $50M, and you start giving it all away when you hit $51M in your first year, you'll never make it to $1B, and the big projects - like developing a gene-h4x0r3d rice that grows in the Sahara, or fusion power, or cheap orbital launch capability - will remain forever out of your grasp.

    13. Re:Does it bother anyone... by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      And had a shit load of luck thrown in with it. I don't have a link, but there is a great site out there with a list of all the lucky breaks that Bill got before windows that made it possible for him to get there. There's nothing wrong with hating the lucky, so long as you don't act on it.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    14. Re:Does it bother anyone... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2


      No, it doesn't bother me. If you analyze the trends on the Forbes 400 over its history, no one stays on top forever. There's pretty rapid turnover -- the fabled 'old money' tends to fall into the hands of heirs who would rather spend their money than make more, and the 'new money' tends to peak and then fall off within a generation or two.

    15. Re:Does it bother anyone... by billstr78 · · Score: 2

      No it's a sign of econmic imbalance. I did'nt say that I wanted thier money, just that it was strange that only two companies dominated the top 10.

    16. Re:Does it bother anyone... by sbjornda · · Score: 1
      But why do you give $950M away in the first place? If your goal is to make the world a better place through philanthropy (feed the world) or through strategic investments (building space-based power stations and orbiting colonies), wouldn't the world be twice as good a place if you kept the $950M used it to earn another billion, thereby giving you and your heirs $1950M to build yet more Good Things?
      Ancient Chinese proverb: Beware man who says he wishes to become rich so that he can help the poor.

      .nosig

    17. Re:Does it bother anyone... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm not saying I'm not jealous of lucky people... I am. But that's how the cookie crumbles. Life ain't fair. But at the same time, you don't just get lucky into starting a company and growing it into one of the largest in the world in a span of 20 years. People get incredibly, astronomically lucky and hit a lottery, they become multi-millionaires. I've never heard of anybody "lucking" into a billion dollars, unless they were born into it. So yeah, I'm sure there was a good bit of luck thrown in the mix, but there you go. Someone asked how anyone could earn a billion bucks, and I'm just saying that Bill Gates is how you earn a billion bucks. There are plenty of other people, but he's just one of 'em.

      Another one is Warren Buffet. There's another way to earn a billion dollars.

      Jack Welch. There's another.

    18. Re:Does it bother anyone... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Ancient Chinese proverb: Beware man who says he wishes to become rich so that he can help the poor.

      Amen to that.

      Frankly, I think anyone who sets up a business and turns $1B into $2B will do a lot more good through the additional economic activity he or she creates (workers hired, software developed, new gadget invented and mass-produced), that the extra $1B in donations is a drop in the bucket.

      (Plus, as you point out, I'd trust a guy who says he wants to turn $1B into $2B so he can buy a yacht full of supermodels, rather than just so he can give away an extra $1B at retirement. The yacht fetisist can't be hiding anything :-)

    19. Re:Does it bother anyone... by octalc0de · · Score: 1

      The thing here is, if Bill Gates had a life of a third-world person living in say, China, he wouldn't ever have the chance to make his billions.

      But the opposite is also probably true. If you went and took over Bill Gates' life, you wouldn't have had the innovation/decisions that Bill Gates made and how he made his billions.

    20. Re:Does it bother anyone... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      I agree. Part of Bill Gates being lucky was that he was born in the US. Again, life ain't fair, but artifically limiting what people can do in the US is bullshit. What he had was a combination of luck, knowledge, and lots of hard work. But, if China were to become a republic and a place where private property is valued, I wouldn't doubt for a second that we'd see a ton of billionaires come out of China just due to that culture's work ethic.

    21. Re:Does it bother anyone... by thales · · Score: 2
      Econmic imbalance?
      No It's a sign that two companies tapped new markets with goods and services that a great many people wanted. Walmart owes it's sucess to bringing discount mass merchandising to rural areas that were ignored by K-mart and Sears. Microsoft owed it's early sucess to software that met the needs of the average user at a better price than the compittion, though they have since leveraged that sucess in an unethical manner.


      20 years ago different companies were in the top 10. 20 years from now Microsoft and Walmart will be out and people will be bitching about the owners of some companies that are small or non existant at the present.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
  18. No imagination by blincoln · · Score: 5, Funny

    What kind of marketing drones did they poll to make this list? Especially "The Geek." Big Macs and a Russian bride? Where are the orbital weapons platforms, zeppelins full of hot chicks, and house with audience chamber built from the actual Imperial throne room set from Return of the Jedi?
    And what's up with their "the cost to bail out the Catholic Church from pending sexual misconduct charges"? If they're going to equate being liberal with being a NAMBLA member, they could at least have tried going over-the-top to make it funny.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    1. Re:No imagination by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      zeppelins full of hot chicks

      Zeplin shleplin, I'd get me a house with a hot chicks room preinstalled! Not only that, but fund a mission to get the bucket of truth out of orbit to furnish the place with!

      Yes, I have watched the ucb a few times too many.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    2. Re:No imagination by blincoln · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be cool, but the advantage of having a zeppelin is that you can deploy the hot chicks to any location on the globe. Hot chicks in your Imperial throne room? Okay! Hot chicks on top of the Golden Gate Bridge, where everyone can see, but no one except you and other zeppelin-enabled billionaires can get to? No problem!
      Heck, you could deploy them as a smokescreen to cover your entry into otherwise inaccessible areas. Go to Area 51 and swipe some Switchblades! Install your favourite multi-monitor capable games on the computers at Cheyenne Mountain! The possibilities are endless. And only a zeppelin full of hot chicks can make it all a reality.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    3. Re:No imagination by dpt · · Score: 1

      zeppelins full of hot chicks

      Or a hovercraft full of eels?

    4. Re:No imagination by swfranklin · · Score: 1
      And what's up with their "the cost to bail out the Catholic Church from pending sexual misconduct charges"?

      No kidding... they only allocated $137 Million for that? They might be able to bail out a small midwestern archdiocese, but no WAY the whole Church!

    5. Re:No imagination by DTC · · Score: 1

      Wow! a Upright Citizens Brigade reference! And I thought I was the only one who watched it. :)

  19. MSFT Shares by unsinged+int · · Score: 5, Funny

    Enough voting shares to be a pain in their rear...especially all the write-in votes for Linus and CowboyNeal.

    1. Re:MSFT Shares by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 1

      Considering Microsoft already has several billion simply in liquid assets, I doubt a billion dollars of Microsoft shares are actually enough to be annoying. Don't forget just how much Mr. Gates himself is worth, and he's just one of many share holders.

    2. Re:MSFT Shares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Since MSFT is worth $254 billion, try these companies (and slashdot jokes) instead:

      Sun's market cap is $9.869B according to finance.yahoo.com. "That's a lot of Java!"

      Lucent's is $3.433B. "Imagine all the fiber..."

      Oh yeah, and VA Software (LNUX) has a market cap of $61M. Yes, $61 million. No joke needed.

    3. Re:MSFT Shares by lommer · · Score: 1

      and bill still owns controlling interest (even though it sometimes fluctuates to another guy for shot periods of time as the stock market goes up+down IIRC)

  20. I'd make a big statue by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've wondered about this: how come it seems like the age of big statues is behind us? Mount Rushmore, Statue of Liberty, those kind of things, doesn't seem like people do those much anymore. Yes, I'm aware they're still working on Crazy Horse, but that was started a while ago.

    I'd probably go the "Statue of Liberty" route, and make a big chick. Maybe I'd model it after Brooke Burke; that should be worth some poontang points with her.

    (Yes, I'm aware using the phrase "poontang points" is worth negative poontang points. But what the hell, in this fantasy, I'm a billionaire, I can pay the slashdot editors to delete this post so she never sees the evidence.)

    1. Re:I'd make a big statue by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 0

      Well there was the Colosus at Rhodes, that didn't turn out so well, maybe people fear history repeating.

      But in truth I think it's and issue of zoning. You relize how much people would bitch about a 200 foot Statue of some guy. Though brook burke might cause rezoning.

    2. Re:I'd make a big statue by jfmiller · · Score: 1
      how come it seems like the age of big statues is behind us?

      I'd like to point out that it's not. If you go to SD you will find that there is another mountian being carved right now.

      The Crazy Horse memorial

      Ths is really quite something to see, and it is being done on a budget of less then $1e9.

      JFMILLER

      --
      Strive to make your client happy, not necessarly give them what they ask for
    3. Re:I'd make a big statue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo! The parent mentions this and dismisses it so you contradict him by rementioning it! CONGRATULATIONS! YOU SUCK.

    4. Re:I'd make a big statue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the age of big statues comes and goes. How many really big celebratory images were made in the 18th century, for instance? Today's society prefers something like the Vietnam Veteran's quiet reminder of the scale of that war to the giantism of the Lincoln Memorial.

      But these things go in cycles. Maybe if Bush wins his war against Iraq he will get a SUPER-HUGE HEAD in the middle of the Mall, crowned with a laurel wreath of course. But then, maybe, Dick Cheney won't allow it and will send him to his room without supper instead.

    5. Re:I'd make a big statue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are so wrong. There is a monument being carved in South Dakota like that.

    6. Re:I'd make a big statue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can pay the slashdot editors to delete this post so she never sees the evidence.


      Yes, I'm sure Ms. Burke is likely to stumble on this site. I can picture it now: E!'s Wild On Slashdot, going to a crazy LAN party with CowboyNeal and observing michael modstorm in a fit of drunken fury.

  21. Mlutiple OC-3's right to my home! by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 2

    I'd become the ultimate LPB!

    If my home were on an island in the Carribean, some sort of banana republic where "copyright" means "duplicate correctly" (and it would be, given my enormous wealth), I could also start building the ultimate music archive using KaZaA!

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    1. Re:Mlutiple OC-3's right to my home! by BardicStorm · · Score: 1

      Multiple OC-3's? Man, you think small, I'd say at least multiple OC-48's, or even, multiple OC-192's.

      Maybe then one could build a site that may actually hold up to a slashdotting. Then I think I'd get huge amounts of storage and mirror the internet, just for fun.

  22. gratuitus beowolf cluster post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    subject says it all, and anyone say they would not is lying

  23. now... back to that going to space thing by lingqi · · Score: 2
    yeah... the

    buyout pepsi - get Britney spears as your *personal* secretary - meet her in space

    things...

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  24. I think I'd keep a few million... by N+Monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    for myself and family (frankly we don't need much) and then use the rest for a trust to do things such as buying wells for 3rd world nations.

    At least that might achieve something (which is probably better than the hot air generated at the "sustainable development" summit).

    S

  25. Couldn't resist... by CBNobi · · Score: 5, Funny

    1977 Star Wars poster: $400
    500 Black-market clones: $1,700,000
    Companionship: $40,000,000
    Being able to afford a Beowulf cluster of anything: Priceless

    There are some things money can buy, and then.. er, there's more things money can buy.

    1. Re:Couldn't resist... by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      California: The state that brought you Napster, and the RIAA.

      Shawn Fanning was born and grew up in Brockton, Massachutsetts, and wrote Napster while attending Northeastern University in Boston. California is just where his investors moved him to, long after Napster hit its prime.

    2. Re:Couldn't resist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Napster hit its prime (early-2001) long after Shawn moved to California.

  26. ever heard of buy-low sell-high? by lingqi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is what happens: when you buy a LOT of stock, you will artifically inflate the stock's price by a certain amount. the more the merrier. samething happens when you SELL a lot of stock. it will go lower.

    so if you buy and sell a certain stock, you can *always* make money from it, provided that you generate enough volume... so:

    if i really had a billion bux, i will go wash it in MSFT stock. a lot. it will completely fuck up their stock price, and i will get really rich (erm... even more so... heh)

    now... if only somebody will give me a job... (wall-street analyst or mutual fund manager, perhaps?)

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:ever heard of buy-low sell-high? by bezza · · Score: 1
      That stock thing was interesting but when you think about it it wouldn't work. Let me explain...

      1. You wouldn't be able to buy the whole amount from one seller so the stock price would incrementely rise as you buy stock in lots. The same thing would happen as you sold meaning you would make a gain on half of the stock but lose on the other half. On average you would come out worse because...

      2. There is always a bid-ask spread. You can never beat that.

      --
      WARNING: This sig does not contain a joke
    2. Re:ever heard of buy-low sell-high? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      To expand on what you said for the uninitiated:

      The only time this little game works is with stocks where you can totally saturate the volume of some tiny stock for the a few days, then use the rapid price increase to scam people into thinking that there is something worthy about a worthless stock, so that they buy in as you sell out. This is, of course, illegal. Some people were able to manipulate prices without much cash back during the dot-com days, they relied completely on other suckers's money to do the inflating of the prices

      That's what all those stock scam spams you get are attempting to do, they are almost always on stocks that trade less than $5, off major markets, and an average daily volume of a couple thousand shares. You would have to have some serious cash to pull it off on a major market stock, and traders would notice and suspect a hostile takeover bid if someone suddendly started buying up large chunks.... The SEC would also notice and keep an eye on you.

      To bring it back round to the topic at hand, 1 billion bucks would allow you to buy pretty much every public Linux company, for cash.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:ever heard of buy-low sell-high? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better idea: use most (but not all, leave a couple of millions for fun) of the money to buy MSFT shares. Then sell all of the shares for $1, and see their stock price drop.

    4. Re:ever heard of buy-low sell-high? by radish · · Score: 2

      Not only a spread, but transaction charges (unless you're a member of the exchange, and $1b isn't enough for that!).

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:ever heard of buy-low sell-high? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly recommend you study the laws regarding market manipulation before executing that plan...

  27. Speaking of Bill Gates... by cscx · · Score: 5, Informative

    This may sound a little simplistic, but Billy G. would give a billion away to charity.

    $1 billion over 20 years to establish the Gates Millennium Scholarship Program, which will support promising minority students through college and some kinds of graduate school.
    $750 million over five years to the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, which includes the World Health Organization, the Rockefeller Foundation, Unicef, pharmaceutical companies and the World Bank.
    $350 million over three years to teachers, administrators, school districts and schools to improve America's K-12 education, starting in Washington State.
    $200 million to the Gates Library Program, which is wiring public libraries in America's poorest communities in an effort to close the "digital divide."
    $100 million to the Gates Children's Vaccine Program, which will accelerate delivery of lifesaving vaccines to children in the poorest countries of the world.
    $50 million to the Maternal Mortality Reduction Program, run by the Columbia University School of Public Health.
    $50 million to the Malaria Vaccine Initiative, to conduct research on promising candidates for a malaria vaccine.
    $50 million to an international group called the Alliance for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer.
    $50 million to a fund for global polio eradication, led by the World Health Organization, Unicef, Rotary International and the U.N. Foundation.
    $40 million to the International Vaccine Institute, a research program based in Seoul, South Korea.
    $28 million to Unicef for the elimination of maternal and neonatal tetanus.
    $25 million to the Sequella Global Tuberculosis Foundation.
    $25 million to the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, which is creating coalitions of research scientists, pharmaceutical companies and governments in developing countries to look for a safe, effective, widely accessible vaccine against AIDS.

    1. Re:Speaking of Bill Gates... by torpor · · Score: 2

      Yeah, well, sure. He would do that.

      But I bet any money he's got one of those little tanks with the extra camera attachment from ThinkGeek ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:Speaking of Bill Gates... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      So when does he launch the Gates XP scholarship? ok, i'm going, i'm going....

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:Speaking of Bill Gates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, with all my whining about Microsoft sending people over in 1996 to tell us that windows would treat third party TCP/IP stacks like viruses and remove them from the OS, effectively obliterating companies like Netmanage and FTP Software and eliminating hundreds of jobs, I never realized what wonderful things Bill Gates would be doing with all the money he extracted from the rubble of companies that he crushed.

      Now I see that it was a Good Thing, and that the choices of charitable contributions from the companies that would have existed had Bill Gates not used his monopoly powers so wisely would probably have squandered the money on charities that probably would not have installed as many copies of Windows in so many economically deprived schools.

      Attitude &= ~SARCASM;

      Billionaires make charitable contributions because they can. That doesn't forgive everything they did to acquire those billions.

      My cousin attends a votec school that was equipped by Microsoft. Over the past year, he has become indoctrinated with the Microsoft Attitude. It saddens me to see a bright and technically capable fifteen year old go from being curious about everything to speaking negatively about Netscape and Linux; behaviours acquired purely from the people teaching at his Microsoft-funded school. Microsoft's education "contributions" are investments, plain and simple. Next time you see how much money Microsoft is pumping into equipping schools, remember that.

    4. Re:Speaking of Bill Gates... by stmfreak · · Score: 1

      This may sound a little simplistic, but Billy G. would give a billion away to charity.

      And without proper management and leadership, most of that money will be pissed away.

      --
      These opinions guaranteed or your money back.
  28. I think I would do that french thing by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    what do they call it... a manage a twah? Ya, Chicks dig money so I think if I had a billion dollars I could make that happen.

    office space owns.

    1. Re:I think I would do that french thing by dryopterix · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ménage à trois

    2. Re:I think I would do that french thing by 1nhuman · · Score: 1

      Dude... does it take 1 billion dollars before you will even consider the possibility of a Ménage à trois?

      What if I tell you it's possible now? Call 555-get-a-ego and learn all about it this amazing opportunity!

      --
      The glass is half-full. With poison. And there are cracks in the glass. The dirty, dirty glass.
    3. Re:I think I would do that french thing by Dexter's+Laboratory · · Score: 1

      How the heck is this funny? It's informative. The original post, now THAT was funny.

    4. Re:I think I would do that french thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only two people away from a threesome!!

    5. Re:I think I would do that french thing by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that, got the t-shirt & the pictures. And no you can't see them.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    6. Re:I think I would do that french thing by ramdac · · Score: 1

      Yep, they call it a "Ménage á Trois"

    7. Re:I think I would do that french thing by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

      heh, thanks :)

  29. I would buy a mountain of cheese dip! by Poppa_joe · · Score: 1

    Groo wondering: How much cheese dip can I buy for a million copins? Next since: Groo is sitting on a mountain of cheese dip. (An obscure comic book reference from Groo the warrior)

    1. Re:I would buy a mountain of cheese dip! by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      Oh my god, someone else actually reads Groo ?!?! He reminds me of Bush...

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  30. Can you say "Good bye tax obligations"? by devicenull · · Score: 1

    hmm, $1,000,000,000,000 eh? First step of course is to get rid of that funny thing called US citizenship and opt in to be an American National....no more taxes, you just got half your billion back into your hands. As for the money, it would have to go towards new systems every year, a personal OC3, and funding large open source projects. Not to mention the zepplin squadron needed to conduct feats of supervillainy on a Carmen Sandiego level. Just stealing the brooklyn birdge and hiding it egypt or j-random location.

    1. Re:Can you say "Good bye tax obligations"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the first thing you should do with your trill.. err billion is take a math class.

    2. Re:Can you say "Good bye tax obligations"? by jo.cool · · Score: 1

      That was my idea. You're getting too close, gumshoe.

    3. Re:Can you say "Good bye tax obligations"? by falzer · · Score: 1

      An AMERICAN math class!

  31. A giant city-destroying robot! by dpt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    C'mon, it's what we've all wanted forever ...

    Actually, I'd like two smaller ones. Zoltar's mistake in Battle of the Planets was that he always launched a different attack each week with one city destroying robot. G-Force would show up, and save the day. What he should have done was save up for two weeks, build *two* robots, and let them loose on opposite sides of the Earth. With only one G-Force, one has to succeed!

    So, one for Redmond, and one for ... let's say somewhere where lots of IP lawyers and media cartel execs hang out.

    1. Re:A giant city-destroying robot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok giant robot is a good idea. i think the people who wrote the article are boring. i mean comeon 1 billion dollars and the first thing is a starwars poster.
      how about a veritech or something...

    2. Re:A giant city-destroying robot! by rat7307 · · Score: 1

      Ahh.. Battle of the Planets.... I'd buy the G-Force Ship...

      G-FORCE......Transmute!!!!!!!!!!

      And I'd buy Astroboys boots
      And the Yamomoto from Star Blazers

      --
      Burma?
    3. Re:A giant city-destroying robot! by operagost · · Score: 1

      Fire or Ice configuration?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  32. Socks. by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    Lots of socks. Enough so that I could put on a fresh new pair every morning. Every night, I'd throw the used pair in a big bag which I'd give to the Salvation Army every so often, so the bums would all have warm feet, wearing bright white (barely used) socks.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  33. R&D by hpavc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if i had a billion dollars we would be 999 million dollars toward developing an affordable small village level water purification system, or sanitiation system. or possibly help engineer some sort of food/weed that will grown nearly anywhere. to ease the suffering of the people on this planet.

    dont need to figure out the human genome or anything fancy to get something done with that cash.

    --
    members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    1. Re:R&D by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hate to break it to you hpavc, but there already is a pretty good water purification system available to villagers. Perhaps you have heard of it, it's called distillation. Heck, simply boiling the water would be good enough in most cases, or the addition of a little chlorine. Even the poorest of the poor can afford to boil water. And we already produce more than enough food, too.

      You see, for the most part the problems of poverty have very little to do with moral problems like corruption. If there are people starving in Africa you can bet it is because someone in power there wants them to starve. Chances are good that they are working behind the scenes to get the donated food diverted to someone else too.

      I used to feel the same way you do, but then I spent some time in Peru, and I learned that Peru's problems stem from the fact that the people in power want to keep the people poor and uneducated so that they are easier to control.

      The only way to get out of this vicious cycle is the way that Chile has. Root out the corruption. Once you have cleaned up your government, getting investors to give you money isn't much of a problem.

    2. Re:R&D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hate to break it to ya, the poorest of the poor cannot afford to boil water thats just not true. additonally, we may produce 'more than enough food', but people in developing nations are still very much starving.

      i would like to see an example of foreign investment curing anyone problems as well. how about citing any examples from the imf/world bank's sucess stories (to which they address water and sanitation).

    3. Re:R&D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Here for example, no need to develop new ones. I suppose you could buy quite a few of them with a billion dollars (or better yet, buy the technology and mass produce them for a dollar per piece. :)

    4. Re:R&D by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 5, Funny

      > or possibly help engineer some sort of
      > food/weed that will grown nearly anywhere.

      It's called Marijuana. :)

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    5. Re:R&D by Jim+Morash · · Score: 1

      That's not true. Fuel for fires/stoves is in fact quite scarce in many poor regions, so you can't "just boil water" - plus it's generally inefficiently burned biomass. Can we say "pollution"?

    6. Re:R&D by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Yes, the boiling water crack was probably over the top. The problem with these people still stems more from corruption than it does from any technical problem. More to the point as long as the politicians in these areas are corrupt there is little that you can do in the long term to fix things. Corrupt politicians will always find a way to siphon off funds, appropriate donated food and goods, etc. If you build a water purifier they will make sure that only their friends benefit from the clean water. If the corruption disappeared in these countries then these people would even be employable. The /. folks frown on overseas "sweatshops," but I can guarantee you that the folks working in the sweatshops can afford to boil their water. And over time these economies become more and more modern providing more and better opportunities for people. The problem is that currently it is too risky to build factories in the poorest of the world's nations because the politicians will simply expropriate your investment and steal your hard work.

      Now, about the IMF. When I talk about "foreign investment" I am not talking about the IMF/World Bank. The World Bank is almost certainly part of the problem as they allow corrupt politicians to borrow in their country's name. Real businessmen would never loan these crooks money as they know that they are just planning on running the tab up on their countrymen. I am talking about the type of individual investment that comes when a country cleans up its act enough so that it is safe to do business in a country. The best example that I can think of is Chile under Pinochet. Don't get me wrong, Pinochet's methods weren't something I approve of, but there is no questioning the fact that he made a serious dent in the amount of corruption in Chile, and that was very good for the Chilean economy. The money that came into Chile to build the new businesses wasn't from the IMF. The money came from foreign and Chilean investors that realized that Chile was now a good place to do business. Factories were built, mines expanded, the agricultural business was geared for export, etc. In the end it made a huge difference for the Chilean people. They went from one of the poorest nations in the late 60's early 70's to the powerhouse of South America.

      As geeks it is easy to see poverty as a technical problems, but the fact of the matter is that it is generally more of a social or ethical problem.

    7. Re:R&D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this funny? Hemp is highly adaptive and can beused for any number of things. Stronger mud bricks, clothing, rope, smoked for a pain killer and mild sedative.

  34. a real SEALAND by chadw17 · · Score: 0

    Buy a island in internation waters. Declare sovernity. Stock it with serious military. Write a constitution on a napkin, and using a great connection to the net, stockpile, and encourage others to help you gather and distribute any material you see fit. Fight the good fight.

  35. there is also, always popular by lingqi · · Score: 2
    doomsday devices! and you can demand a million dollars (pinky to mouth) with it.

    hmm... actually they seem quite a bit more expensive than a billion... damn what's a guy gotta do to destroy the universe man...

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:there is also, always popular by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2

      I guess villans have small penises because at the bottom of that page they have links to Penis Enlargement, as well as online poker!

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  36. What about a narcissist geek? by garethwi · · Score: 1

    Apparently, a geek would buy 500 black-market clones of himself, while the narcissist would most likely build "a monument similar in size and scale to Mount Rushmore, featuring his own face.

    Would a narcissist geek build 500 monuments, one for every clone?

    1. Re:What about a narcissist geek? by chegosaurus · · Score: 2

      He'd build a gigantic monument to his 1337 c0d1n6 5k!llz

    2. Re:What about a narcissist geek? by dpt · · Score: 1

      Yes - engraved on the moon with a giant laser! Programmed in Perl, of course.

      Sadly, The Tick would show up to save the day, and he'd only get as far as "l33".

  37. A mark on this world? by lpret · · Score: 1
    I'd like to take this question (I think the discussion is "What would you do with a billion dollars?") to a somewhat higher level -- what could be accomplished with a billion dollars that would put your name in history books?

    Could you cure AIDS with a billion dollars? Probably not. Perhaps you could pay for one dose of every AIDS victim in the US alone, but a billion doesn't really dent that problem.

    Could you end poverty in the world? No, it'd probably get skimmed off the top by greedy bureaucrats in third-world countries. Perhaps you could pay for a single meal for every person under the poverty line.

    Could you change how computing is thought of? Possibly. Imagine if this billion dollars was used to fund several open-source projects, allowing the true innovators (those who weren't paid to program when they began) to develop a paradigm shift in the way we work with computers. If each programmer was paid $30,000 annually, we're talking over 650 programmers for 5 years. Do you think something would happen out of that? I would like to think so. If we could come up with merely ten things that shift our entire way of interacting with computers I think your mark would be left.

    It is only in history do we see similar types of philanthropy and science merging. The Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, even the civilizations of the Renassaince (sp?) would undertake such endeavours, many times with success. The only example I can think of off the top of my head is in the literature realm. King James stands out merely because he encouraged the new version of the Bible, allowing many scholars to dedicate their lives to translating Greek and Hebrew correctly and efficiently. Could it not be the same for us in this time?

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:A mark on this world? by silentbozo · · Score: 2

      The problem is, to do anything REALLY great, you've got to buy off loads of politicians and bureaucrats (not to mention the occassional judge or two.) Otherwise, the instant you try to buy land, launch a nuclear spacecraft, or affect foreign policy, you'll get hordes of know-nothings with too much time on their hands screwing with your operations.

      The cost of paving the way alone would consume a chunk of that billion, not to mention the tax investigators who would keep buzzing around to make sure you weren't hiding anything from them.

      I suppose you could conduct your operations in secret, but the instant you went public, the NSA and Congress would be all over your ass faster than ants on a picnic.

      Bill Gates has billions. Consider the uproar if he actually tried to directly influence ANYTHING. He's done the smart thing and let the foundations that he funds worry about keeping various palms crossed with silver.

    2. Re:A mark on this world? by cbuskirk · · Score: 1

      Yeh my favorite part of the correct and eficient translation was the 10 commandments. Almost every copy of the first KJV was burned, because the sixth commandment was, "Though shalt commit adultary".

  38. Disapointed well sort of... by red5 · · Score: 2

    When I first read the subject line I though that it was a pice about how IBM spent "1 billion dollars on linux". Anybody know what ever happened to that? Where did that money go?

    This story was quite amusing though. Didn't know you could buy your own town for the bargian price of 102 million. :)

    --
    I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
  39. What a buck's worth... by bazmonkey · · Score: 1

    Screw cars, houses and whores. Dial 10-10-220 and you could talk to Doug Flutie and Alf for 27,179.8 years!

  40. I think it's much more likely... by darkov2 · · Score: 1

    ... that the narcissist would buy 500 clones of himself and the geek a penis on the scale of mount rushmore

  41. What about us destructive types? by evilviper · · Score: 2, Troll

    Where are the people like me who would buy cherished works of art, and toss them in fire, just for kicks?

    Goodbye Mona Lisa! Won't have to hear about you again!

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:What about us destructive types? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this a troll? That is what he would do with 1 million dollars. It's o different than if I said I would buy an evil corperate company who dumps tocix waste just to shut it down. Two sides of the same coin.

    2. Re:What about us destructive types? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Hmm... Appreciate the support, but that should be 1 BILLION dollars. With a Million, you'd have just more than enough to live comfortably off the interest if you stuck it all in a bank.

      I don't think you could get many major works of art for a million, and you certainly wouldn't want to publicize that you've been destroying fine works of art, then expect to go back to work the next day...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  42. This is Forbes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand this is a humor piece but still...

    "buy himself a small lion farm and a couple a keepers"

    It's like seeing "supposebly" in print...sure, it could be a typo but, considering it's commonly mispronounced that way, it more than likely isn't.

    And try adding up all the numbers they give.

  43. You hardly need that much by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to opensecrets.org, they don't go for more than $7 million each. You could buy a few key states' worth and not have to worry.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:You hardly need that much by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      Dibs on Florida.

      Then again, it might be more interesting to buy your own nation. Anyone know any half-decent nations that might go for under $1 billion? I'd pay extra if my official title would be Magnificent One.

    2. Re:You hardly need that much by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      A more appropriate title is "Supreme Dictator for Life".

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
  44. What a billion *won't* buy you (Slashdot-style) by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2
    Here's a list of things that you couldn't buy with a measly $1 billion:
    • fixes for all the bugs in Microsoft's software
    • singing/musical talent for Britney Spears
    • a brain for the RIAA/MPAA
    • a beowolf cluster of Altair 8008's
    • a cure for the mysterious disease that regularly kills Author Stephen King.
    • love (goatsx style)
    • the "?" in "...?, profit"
    • desktop superiority for Linux


    Feel free to extend this list...

    1. Re:What a billion *won't* buy you (Slashdot-style) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +Fixes for all Microsoft bugs: while it's fully imposible to get all the bugs out anything, I'd say that a commit of 1B from Microsoft would make quality. Rephrase that as "Responsability from MIcrosoft execs", and 1B hardly would be enough, because Gates is worth already 43B.

      +Talent for Spears is highly subjective. What about buying valium for yourself? that would make you think that she is really the ninth wonder.

      +A brain for the RIAA... start your own media mafia, come on!

      +How much is an Altair now? Anyway an Altair cluster is not without reach with that money.

      +The ---? has already happened. Move along.

      +You can hire lots of good desktop designers with that sum...

    2. Re:What a billion *won't* buy you (Slashdot-style) by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Here's a list of things that you couldn't buy with a measly $1 billion:
      >
      >[...]he "?" in "...?, profit"

      Yeah, but that doesn't matter, I mean, the article's got it in the wrong order:

      1) ???
      2) Profit!
      3) Umm, someone at Forbes screwed up the joke.

    3. Re:What a billion *won't* buy you (Slashdot-style) by majestyk2000 · · Score: 1

      "singing/musical talent for Britney Spears"

      I don't think ANYONE here really wants Britney to 'display' her singing talent. Those two big talents in her shirt and the one in her pants are all that's necessary, thanks.

  45. Rule the world! by 1nhuman · · Score: 1

    I would build my own army and rule the world!

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA he he.... euh? one billion is not enough? Crap. Could I rule Columbia instead? That's where Shakira lives right?

    --
    The glass is half-full. With poison. And there are cracks in the glass. The dirty, dirty glass.
    1. Re:Rule the world! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does everyone think Shakira is from another country? She is American, it is just that she is a Spanish Language Celebrity I suppose.

      I believe she grew up in Cali or something...

    2. Re:Rule the world! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe she grew up in Cali or something...
      Or Columbia. Fucktard.

    3. Re:Rule the world! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cali is in Colombia. Shakira's mother is Colombian and her father is Lebanese-American or something like that.

  46. Spend it on open source development, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would use it as all the open source companies out there has used it, I would spread BS about alternative service&support business-model and spend billions on development without any possibility to get it back.

  47. If I had a billion dollars... by jbayes · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I'd buy you a thousand green dresses (but not a thousand real green dresses, that would be cruel).

    --

    "It sure was strange to see something on Usenet about me that didn't involve Klingon gang rape." -- Wil Wheaton

  48. My Billion? Easy... by alien_tracking_devic · · Score: 1

    fembots, fembots, fembots, FEMBOTS!!!

    1. Re:My Billion? Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why FemBots when you can get a FemFragger instead?

  49. Bill's donation schedule by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    [Dons his skeptic's hat]

    Guess what? You need Flash to even see the Gates Millennium Scholarship Program site. And when you do, it's strictly elitist. Bill's essentially trying to buy the allegience of the best and brightest students in America. Only. The kind of people who would probably succeed without his intervention.

    $750 million over five years to [...] the World Health Organization, the Rockefeller Foundation, Unicef, pharmaceutical companies and the World Bank.

    Looks more like an investment than a donation.

    $350 million over three years to teachers, administrators, school districts and schools to improve America's K-12 education, starting in Washington State.

    $200 million to the Gates Library Program, which is wiring public libraries in America's poorest communities in an effort to close the "digital divide."


    Specifically, to equip them with Windows?

    All those hundreds of millions pouring into the vaccination industry is getting a bit frightening, even if some of those are dupes. You don't eradicate most diseases by swamping them in vaccine, you eradicate them by improving people's living conditions. By and large, Bill isn't doing that.

    If he really wanted to make a durable name for himself, Bill could do a lot more for those poor countries by giving them cheap access to space industry with either a $5G seed donation or $10G to get the first one working.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Bill's donation schedule by cscx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All those hundreds of millions pouring into the vaccination industry is getting a bit frightening, even if some of those are dupes. You don't eradicate most diseases by swamping them in vaccine, you eradicate them by improving people's living conditions. By and large, Bill isn't doing that.

      Here's some food for thought: Have you caught any fucking POLIO lately? How bout some smallpox? Do you have any idea how many babies die each year because they weren't properly vaccinated? Living conditions is one thing, but to discredit vaccines is ludicrous.

      Specifically, to equip them with Windows?

      Not like he's putting Linux on them or anything. Jesus, he's trying to help out underdeveloped areas in our own fucking country, and all you can do is be skeptical, like it's all part of his evil plan for world domination. Would you rather have those libraries have no computers and still be checking out books from the sixties? Umm, don't think so.

    2. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "like it's all part of his evil plan for world domination."

      uh, YES.

    3. Re:Bill's donation schedule by sehryan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      $100 million to the Gates Children's Vaccine Program, which will accelerate delivery of lifesaving vaccines to children in the poorest countries of the world.
      $50 million to the Maternal Mortality Reduction Program, run by the Columbia University School of Public Health.
      $50 million to the Malaria Vaccine Initiative, to conduct research on promising candidates for a malaria vaccine.
      $50 million to an international group called the Alliance for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer.
      $50 million to a fund for global polio eradication, led by the World Health Organization, Unicef, Rotary International and the U.N. Foundation.
      $40 million to the International Vaccine Institute, a research program based in Seoul, South Korea.
      $28 million to Unicef for the elimination of maternal and neonatal tetanus.
      $25 million to the Sequella Global Tuberculosis Foundation.
      $25 million to the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, which is creating coalitions of research scientists, pharmaceutical companies and governments in developing countries to look for a safe, effective, widely accessible vaccine against AIDS.

      Taking out the ones that you bitched about, here is what is left. Still totals over $400 Million. How much have you given lately?

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    4. Re:Bill's donation schedule by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 0

      Well, that and its all tax deductable - so it doesn't actually cost him a penny (in fact it saves him money)

    5. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All those hundreds of millions pouring into the vaccination industry is getting a bit frightening, even if some of those are dupes. You don't eradicate most diseases by swamping them in vaccine, you eradicate them by improving people's living conditions. By and large, Bill isn't doing that.

      If he really wanted to make a durable name for himself, Bill could do a lot more for those poor countries by giving them cheap access to space industry [space.com] with either a $5G seed donation or $10G to get the first one working.


      Wow the stupidity of posts on slashdot never ceases to amaze...

      I won't even bother to explain why it is so retarded. It should be obvious to anyone with half a brain.

    6. Re:Bill's donation schedule by thogard · · Score: 1

      I've given more than 1% of whats in my checking account. How about Billy?

    7. Re:Bill's donation schedule by SlamMan · · Score: 2

      Bill's essentially trying to buy the allegience of the best and brightest students in America. And? Just because I'm not on wellfare doesn't mean I have money flowwing out of my arse. Hell, I'd love to not be sending myself to college right now. And so they do sometihng for the smart kids once in a while. That's bad? When was the last time you saw somebody start a program for tthe gifted and talented kids? Not in Maryland, you didn't. And people wonder why other countries are getting ahead of us in scince and technology. Try nurturing the smart kids for once.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    8. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...saving him money...world domination...grand plan...windoze...m$.....

      Why don't you give your whole salary to charity, maybe the "foster a fool foundation" you might just find the cash ending up in your own foster families bank account...

    9. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such a cocksucker. Get real, man. Bill Gates isn't evil incarnate.

    10. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Alomex · · Score: 2


      I've given more than 1% of whats in my checking account. How about Billy?

      He's endowed his foundation with close to 30% of what he's worth. So there...

    11. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Alomex · · Score: 2


      All those hundreds of millions pouring into the vaccination industry is getting a bit frightening, even if some of those are dupes. You don't eradicate most diseases by swamping them in vaccine, you eradicate them by improving people's living conditions. By and large, Bill isn't doing that.

      Could someone moderate down this idiot just on that statement alone.

      Diseases are eradicated by swamping in vaccines, as polio and smallpox have proven.

    12. Re:Bill's donation schedule by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      I agree that donations to the world bank (worst waste of money ever) and pharmaceutical companies are lame (and highly suspect), but the Rockefeller foundation is pretty much a class act. If I remember correctly, JDR made most of his donations anonymously, and was it his son that started the foundation? Stinking memory failure... :(

    13. Re:Bill's donation schedule by thogard · · Score: 1

      A foundation that will give money to people who end up buying his products for a long time. Thats not a gift, its a loss leader. The parent posts mentioned he's only given about 400 mil to charities where there is no long term financial advanage and even some of that could be questioned (like giving money for vaccines made by compaines he owns)

    14. Re:Bill's donation schedule by lobsterGun · · Score: 1
      Have you ever done your own taxes? Charitable donations are:
      • 1. only deductible to a point.
      • 2. DEDUCTIONS, not CREDITS.


      Here's the difference between deductions and credits: deductions reduce your gross adjusted income. credits reduce your taxes paid.

      Lets say I make $100 and the tax rate is 50%. I should owe the govt $50. If I give $20 to charity I reduce my income to $80, so I would only owe the govt $40. I am still out $10 (I spent $20 on charity, but paid $10 less in taxes).

      If charitable deductions were tax-credits the math would work out a little differently. That $20 contribution would reduce my taxes owed from $50 to $30.

      In both of these cases I still spent money, so the idea that donating to charity is saving me money really doesn't work out. Aside from sheer altruism, the only benefit to giving money to charity is that you get to decide how more of your money is spent.
    15. Re:Bill's donation schedule by swfranklin · · Score: 2, Funny
      A foundation that will give money to people who end up buying his products for a long time.

      I hope you didn't strain your back, stretching for that conclusion... Just because he saves the lives of countless people, world-wide, with his TWENTY THREE BILLION DOLLAR foundation endowment - Well, that's not charity because they might buy Microsoft Streets & Trips 2024 someday!

      This guy should be a writer for the X-files :-)

    16. Re:Bill's donation schedule by wurp · · Score: 1

      The really smart kids (or at least the ones who take tests well) have their college paid for anyway. If you take the SAT and score high enough, you get a full scholarship, at least for a state school. Combined with pell grants, you don't even have to work to get through college. I was really really poor growing up (I missed school for a week once because we couldn't afford shoes. I shit you not.) but my college was free.

    17. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Phant84 · · Score: 1

      Thats not hard to do when the average balance on your account is $50.00. You would be over your 1% just by giving the Salvation Army Santa a dollar at Christmas time. ;)

      --
      Jacob "If the manual is larger than one 8.5X11 sheet of paper, its not worth reading."
    18. Re:Bill's donation schedule by thogard · · Score: 1

      The MS page says 23b, the gates foundation says 4b.

      Top on the list of their current projects is UCSF. $28mil over 4 years. How much does MS make per year from UCSF?

      Number 2 on the list is a bit over a million a year for Columbia University. Whats their annual software budget? I'll give you a hit. Its over a million.

      Its one thing to give a donation that comes out of your pocket, its another when it comes out of the tax mans pocket. Remember where Gates got his inital big business contacts? His Mommy was big at United Way -- you know the people who come around every large US company and extort "donations" for their pet projects? I've known people that were let go because the company didn't get 100% of their empolyees to donate.

      With enough of his money going around, I'm sure some of it will do some good but considering most of the problems hes tring to solve (Education, feeding the very poor, immunization of children, aids education) are a result of political problems and nothing else, maybe his money would be better spent getting some of his United way buddies to get their act together-- they are responsible for many of the problems.

      So when was the last time you were in a third world country or do you just watch on TV?

    19. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      I give 50% of what I'm worth away.
      My standard of living goes down.

      Billy gives 50% of what he's worth away.
      He might have to settle for a destroyer for Christmas this year instead of an aircraft carrier.

      All you anal-retentive trolls keep away from the reply button. I'll say it here, I didn't check my math.

      Point still stands, though.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    20. Re:Bill's donation schedule by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Prove it.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    21. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because I'm not on wellfare doesn't mean I have money flowwing out of my arse.

      No, you've got jizz flowing into it. Shut up you spoilt bastard.

    22. Re:Bill's donation schedule by SlamMan · · Score: 2

      Not at University of Maryland, they didn't. You'd think at 1490 would have been high enough.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    23. Re:Bill's donation schedule by john82 · · Score: 1

      Taking out the ones that you bitched about, here is what is left. Still totals over $400 Million. How much have you given lately?

      Bill's money comes from people buying stuff from Microsoft. While the cost of hardware has fallen, has the cost of MS software? Therefore, I think one could say the we've all provided some of those funds. Even those of you who only use non-MS software. You pay taxes. The various levels of govt (local, state, fed) buy MS stuff hand over fist.

      Since this is a zero sum game, Bill is just engaging in a redistribution of our funds.

    24. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A zero sum game! So when I go to work and create new ideas or products that improve worker effeciency, it actually does NOT add to the total wealth of the world, but rather takes wealth away from someone? Damn.

    25. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya rockefeller only used the CIA as his personal milita for like 30 years in the 20th century. Easily two million probably more dead just to protect rockefeller interests in other countries. (In other words, overthrow the democratically elected government that threatens profits and install a dictator, and if anyone doesn't like it, kill em).

    26. Re:Bill's donation schedule by smithmc · · Score: 1

      A foundation that will give money to people who end up buying his products for a long time. Thats not a gift, its a loss leader.

      So it's a win-win situation, what the hell is wrong with that?

      The parent posts mentioned he's only given about 400 mil to charities where there is no long term financial advanage

      Sheesh. "Only". Where do you get off, anyway? When you give away $400M, then you can complain, 'kay?

      and even some of that could be questioned (like giving money for vaccines made by compaines he owns)

      Oh, gee, again with that whole "win-win" thing. How horrible.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    27. Re:Bill's donation schedule by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Well, that and its all tax deductable - so it doesn't actually cost him a penny (in fact it saves him money)

      Too bad this can't be modded -1: Please Smack With Clue-By-Four.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    28. Re:Bill's donation schedule by guttentag · · Score: 1, Troll
      ... he's trying to help out underdeveloped areas in our own fucking country...
      No, he's not. Let me repeat that. No, he's not.

      Bill Gates doesn't give a $*!# about anyone but himself -- he's the sort who believes that anyone who doesn't have enough money to survive should die of natural selection. Donating a billion dollars is "the cost of doing business" when you have as much money as he has. It's PR.

      Not like he's putting Linux on them or anything.
      Putting Windows-equipped computers in libraries is an intangibly-profitable business move. By increasing the number of environments in which people use Windows, he conditions people to use Windows. It's also an endorsement. They'll assume that if Windows is good enough for the library, it's good enough for them. So when they're buying a computer of their own or talking to someone who is about to buy a computer (for more people get their news/information via word of mouth than via news outlets), Windows will be the obvious choice. Or when their schools or businesses try to switch to Linux or Macintosh, the ignorant morons will complain: "We want Windows."

      Go back to Redmond, astroturfer.

    29. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Alomex · · Score: 2

      Prove it.

      Easy, the information is all public. Fortune magazine estimates Gates wealth at $43 billion, and the Gates foundation is endowed with $23 billion.

      Next.

    30. Re:Bill's donation schedule by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      the cia wasn't founded until after rockefeller died, idiot.

    31. Re:Bill's donation schedule by DCookie · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I care why he's doing it... if he's helping people that's what matters. He can help people to make money, then use some of that money to help more people to make more money, the use some of that ...

      What he doesn't donate, he can spend on whatever the heck he wants. But, he is doing more to help people (monetarily anyway) than I am and I'm guessing you are.

      Time to come down off your Gates-bashing and see that people are benefitting from his donations (sure.. this may include himself).

      -DCookie

      --
      My SIG is a SG-552 Commando
    32. Re:Bill's donation schedule by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty naive assumption to make: that Bill Gates himself gave the foundation that $23 billion-- and it's not a particularly useful number anyway. It's not like one day he gave 33% of his net worth to a charity. What we really need to know is: how much does he give away each year and how much does he make each year. Then we can draw useful comparisons to our situations.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    33. Re:Bill's donation schedule by Alomex · · Score: 2


      It's not like one day he gave 33% of his net worth to a charity.

      Actually yes, it was pretty much like that... It is quite clear that you don't have the facts regarding Gates donations. Either that or you are just trolling.

      O-O

    34. Re:Bill's donation schedule by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      If you have these facts, please point out where I might find just one of them. Otherwise I'm going to continue to assert that your analysis is incredibly simplistic and naive. It is definitely not the case that one day Bill woke up and cut a check for $23 billion dollars to the Foundation.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    35. Re:Bill's donation schedule by leviramsey · · Score: 2
      Could someone moderate down this idiot just on that statement alone.

      Nah... then he'd rant and rave about how Slashdot is the den of the godless and everyone should have been homeschooled as the Bible orders and all that shit.

    36. Re:Bill's donation schedule by PU1 · · Score: 1

      Quote:
      "trying to buy the allegience of the best and brightest students in America. Only."

      Have you heard of the Gates Cambridge Scholarship? I thought not. It is for, and I quote again: "scholars of outstanding academic merit and leadership potential from every country of the world other than the United Kingdom"
      http://www.gates.scholarships.cam.ac.uk/about.ht ml

      I truly dislike MS, but misinformation does not help anyone.

    37. Re:Bill's donation schedule by cobar · · Score: 2

      It's quite doubtful he's doing it primarily to increase Microsoft's business. I'd guess rather, that he's buying immortality. When all is said and done, Bill is gonna die and then what's going to matter to him - Microsoft's stock price? What he cares about is that people will go hey Bill Gates put eleventy-billion dollars into various charities or hey, there's the Gates museum of technology.

      FWIW, Bill has said that his son won't get much. Virtually everything goes to charity when he dies.

      He's following the Carnegie model which has worked quite well. Carnegie amassed his fortune then checked everything out in a few days and he began donating to charity. Carnegie's name got plastered on numerous concert halls, libraries, etc. and lots of useful buildings got built that help society. All in accord with Carnegie's belief that his talents for making money were to amass wealth and spend it in worthwhile ways.

      What would you expect Bill to do anyway? If he's going to give people PC's, it's to be expected they're going to run Windows since that's his company and he thinks it's the greatest thing ever.

    38. Re:Bill's donation schedule by wurp · · Score: 1

      Hmm, it was the National Merit scholarship that I got; it's federally funded. I don't remember my score for certain; I think it was 1440. I certainly would have thought 1490 would be high enough.

      It was based on percentage placement in the population, though, so maybe there were lots of high scores in the year you took it. I think the National Merit paid $2k per semester (of course, that was 14 years ago). That combined with the Pell left me working only part-time, basically for spending money. Actually, I got something called the Arkansas Scholarship that would have paid for my room, board & tuition for the full 4 years, but I screwed that one up after the first year :( but, on the other hand, I had a lot of fun in college :)

      If those programs have ended, that's a very sad thing.

  50. I'd start a Weblog.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd start a weblog called....slash...

    No, wait, slashdot. Yeah, slashdot.org. Yeah...and then I'd recycle links and get authors like Jon Katz to write...

    Wait......damn, it's been done!

  51. Wrong topic?? by Prowl · · Score: 1

    shouldn't this come under "Ask Slashdot"?

    (like everything else around here does...)

    --
    That man tried to kill mah Daddy
  52. Strange omission... by be_all · · Score: 1

    It's interesting that they put in a Limosine Liberal, but no Conservative Fat Cat (even though he's most likely to have an extra $1 billion laying around).

    It would probably go something like this:

    • put $500 million into the lobby for tobacco and oil;
    • poured $300 million into acquiring White Sands Missile Range for the NRA;
    • added $150 million in campaign contributions for his state and federal elected golfing buddies;
    • and spent the last $50 million into raising an All-American Family with Great Values and getting his son a seat on the board at Forbes Magazine.

    ...oh. Wait. Now I see why they didn't include him...

    1. Re:Strange omission... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh cry us a malarial swamp, liberal!

  53. Wrong by Avenel · · Score: 1

    supermodels turned whores. more supermodels turned whores then charlie sheen and hugh grant combined could go through in a lifetime.

  54. I'd buy by Associate · · Score: 1

    I'd buy the writers over a Forbes a sense of humor.

    --
    Someone hates these cans.
  55. 1.150122944 billion??? by LordDragonstar · · Score: 1

    An original 1977 poster print of Star Wars. $344

    500 black-market clones of himself. At $1.7 million a pop..., that's $850 million.

    ...Total cost for companionship? $40,005,050

    Fifty-year supply of McDonald's Big Mac value meal: $9,836,750.

    Pays $280,800 to have his mother-in-law overnight borscht every week for 60 years

    Gives rest of fortune ($250 million) to a nonprofit scientific research organization...

    Maybe the geek should have been smarter than a Forbes editor and bought a beo cluster to keep track of their (non-sexist language added intentionally) 1 billion so as not to overspend it by $$$150,122,944.

    However, that's just me...

    --
    sig: There are two mistaakes in this sig.
    1. Re:1.150122944 billion??? by spectatorion · · Score: 1

      actually, both the geek and the "limousine liberal" overshoot by quite a bit. but it's a stupid article to begin with.

  56. hire people to track down spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and then have their hands and kneecaps broken

    1. Re:hire people to track down spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you should suggest this...

      I was dreaming about the prospect of becoming a spammer-hit-man.

      For a "donation" I'd hunt down the sender of spam forwarded to me and go administer some smarts to the side of their head with a big stick.

      Sounds good eh? Travel to new places, meet new people, and bash the snot out of them for spamming.

      A dream job really.

      I think I'll send out 2 million "targeted" emails to see what level of interest there is ;-)

  57. Obligatory Office Space quote by Flounder · · Score: 5, Funny

    Peter Gibbons: What would you do if you had a million dollars?
    Lawrence: I'll tell you what I'd do, man, two chicks at the same time, man.
    Peter Gibbons: That's it? If you had a million dollars, you'd do two chicks at the same time?
    Lawrence: Damn straight. I always wanted to do that, man. And I think if I had a million dollars I could hook that up, cause chicks dig a dude with money.
    Peter Gibbons: Well, not all chicks.
    Lawrence: Well the kind of chicks that'd double up on me do.
    Peter Gibbons: Good point.
    Lawrence: What about you, what would you do?
    Peter Gibbons: Besides two chicks at the same time?
    Lawrence: Well yeah.
    Peter Gibbons: Nothing.
    Lawrence: Nothing, huh?
    Peter Gibbons: I'd relax, sit on my ass all day, I would do nothing.
    Lawrence: Well you don't need a million dollars to do nothing, man. Just take a look at my cousin, he's broke, don't do shit.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    1. Re:Obligatory Office Space quote by taphu · · Score: 1

      So with 1 billion $ you could do 2000 chicks at the same time.. right?...

    2. Re:Obligatory Office Space quote by MsGeek · · Score: 2
      Lawrence: What about you, what would you do?
      Peter Gibbons: Besides two chicks at the same time?
      Lawrence: Well yeah.
      Peter Gibbons: Nothing.
      Lawrence: Nothing, huh?
      Peter Gibbons: I'd relax, sit on my ass all day, I would do nothing.

      Seriously, aside from enjoying my life at leisure, here's what I'd do:

      1. Buy a house in Santa Monica or Santa Barbara. Near the beach. That would kill about $10 Million right there.
      2. Driver and car worthy of my new status. Driver would also double as a pilot. I'm thinking a Hummer H2 and a Gulfstream. Driving in LA sucks and so does flying on commercial aircraft, particularly post 9/11.
      3. OC3 bandwidth to my own private NOC. Almost zero latency. Even with my less-than-leet skillz I'd 0wn in deathmatches.
      4. Hire Morimoto Masaharu as my private chef.
      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    3. Re:Obligatory Office Space quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about america, but in london
      your average, 1 hour, 2 girl session at a bothel
      is under £250. So with a million pounds you
      can do that 4000 times, i.e. every night for
      nearly 11 years.

    4. Re:Obligatory Office Space quote by bagsc · · Score: 1

      Ah - You forget the beauty of two economically important issues - interest and buying in bulk. At a conservative 8%, one BILLION dollars gives you i=pe^rt=$219,000 per diem. Plus, you could always save up for a year and buy a pair of gorgeous twins for $83 million. Replace every 5 years (buy at 18-23, sell at 23-28. even gorgeous twins get old). Lifetime (60 yrs) cost: a paltry $1 billion. Paltry because 1E9e^.08*60=$12.15 billion.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  58. With a lot less than $1 billion .... by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 1
    ... I'd buy myself a senator.

    -----
    bling wallpapers australia bling

  59. slahsdot..yeeaah by tanveer1979 · · Score: 2

    I would bribe TAco and Neal and then capture slashdot. All the geeks would have to read the stories of what i do and and what I want.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  60. Re:I'd buy a whole ton of those desktop tank robot by jsse · · Score: 1

    nuclear? By then you'll have to face Bush's military threats, unless you giving up your superpower weapon to UN; but everybody knows Bush's real target is your bitches repository.

  61. Gengineering by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    possibly help engineer some sort of food/weed that will grown nearly anywhere

    How do I say this?

    Cane toads, foxes, rabbits, dieback, doublegees and other species introduced and/or spread by human activity are destroying the Australian Outback and in some cases farms. Gengineered crops are destroying the livelihood of farmers even in the `good ole' USA. ENOUGH WITH THE BIO-ENGINEERING ALREADY! It's not a silver bullet, it's a lead balloon!

    What would be truly useful is to provide these people with a system of morality that gave them a future, a reason for doing anything, the guts and insight to no longer fight each other or be suckered into stupid political deals, a humble but incredibly resolute attitude and a will to work. And then stand clear.

    Dubyah's arrogant version of Christianity won't do it, similarly arrogant Roman Catholicism has had centuries to do it and failed miserably, Islam and other fatalistic systems have no chance and Atheism even less.

    Oh, yes, and we'd also need make the IMF and a few other choice `helpful' organisations thoroughly extinct to stop them stuffing things up.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Gengineering by phaze3000 · · Score: 2

      What would be truly useful is to provide these people with a system of morality that gave them a future, a reason for doing anything, the guts and insight to no longer fight each other or be suckered into stupid political deals, a humble but incredibly resolute attitude and a will to work. And then stand clear.

      Dubyah's arrogant version of Christianity won't do it, similarly arrogant Roman Catholicism has had centuries to do it and failed miserably, Islam and other fatalistic systems have no chance and Atheism even less.

      You seem to be mistaking morality with religion, when in actual fact the two are completely disparate. Atheists can and do have morals; there are a great many believers who exhibit amorral traits. This does mean that their (a)theology is wrong.

      Whilst I certainly agree that morals are necessary, I believe you have made a flawed assumption in the way morals work.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    2. Re:Gengineering by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      yeah, that was funny when those chazwozzers destroyed your eco system.

    3. Re:Gengineering by karmawarrior · · Score: 1
      I'd add that most atheists I know are more moral than most non-atheists I know. Non humanists can usually point at some passage in a holy book and justify any behaviour from it - atheists are on their own.

      You don't see crowds of atheists lynching homosexuals, or trying to get government to divert public money to religious institutions. Atheists do not prevent potentially life saving science being studied because it involves cells that might once have had the potential to turn into a human being. Atheists do not, as a rule, refuse to save lives because they consider the transfusion of blood to be against the will of a supreme being. And I don't recall atheists murdering 3000 people, or even considering such a thing, because they've reached the point that they consider the views of an entity they've never seen to be more important than the lives of ordinary people.

      This is not to imply that all believers are always immoral or that all atheists are decent human beings, but I just don't see the divide that believers claim - I see it in reverse. I see the evils of the world being done, by and large, by people who can find excuses to do it, and religion is one of the major sources of those excuses.

      --
      KMSMA (WWBD?)
  62. Spend a billion dollars.... by lexcyber · · Score: 0


    I would give 990 million dollars evenly to the
    countries in most poverty in the world. Directly, and
    then spend the last 10 million to travle around and
    see what it did good and make them show me what
    they spent my money on.

    ps. I would buy a racecar to.

    --
    - To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion -
  63. Slashdot Editors & 1 billion! by phunhippy · · Score: 2

    I think if i had a billion bux i'd send all the slashdot editors to a Journalism school..

    Then i'd just waste the rest on good kind bud and booze(only top shelf) and women :)

  64. Even easier... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    One _being_ a heatsink? (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Even easier... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      I a hot chick wearing next to nothing would install a heatsink on my new P4.... I bet that I will need a heatsink myself!

    2. Re:Even easier... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > > What could be better then some hot chick (wearing next to nothing) installing a heat sink?
      >
      > One _being_ a heatsink? (-:

      Go beyond a heatsink. How 'bout a hot chick with a pair of peltier coolers?

  65. Build my own country by... by DraconPern · · Score: 1

    ..constructing an island in the Atlantic Ocean. I am sure these guys can help out. Then lay fiber to USA and europe, become the next global crossing, earn another billion while paying no tax. Repeat in the Pacific. Finally, dominate the world information system.

    1. Re:Build my own country by... by mazg · · Score: 1

      You don't need to build the island. Just take iceland, it's practically in the middle and the fiber is already there.

      Since Iceland doesn't have an army, all you you have to do is spend about half the money to get Iceland kicked out of NATO, the rest on mercenerys to overtake the country.

      Profit

  66. 1 Billion Dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had 1 billion dollars I would either a) Put a man on the moon b) Buy a country c) Buy a big boat (Think USS Enterprise) e) Create a moon base f) Fund alternative enegry research

  67. Caves of Steel by nagora · · Score: 2
    I'd film the Caves of Steel, Alice in Wonderland, and The Lord of the Rings properly. The change would be "spending money"!

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  68. your wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see subject

    1. Re:your wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see the subject. But it should be "you're wrong", nimrod.

  69. WDW by Anonymous+Squonk · · Score: 1

    I would permanently rent the best suite in Walt Disney World, and spend my life there!

  70. So... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...you're a Masochist then, are you? I should think that one woman nagging you would be more than enough. :)

  71. buy a record company by tahpot · · Score: 1

    modernise it and turn my 1billion into a hundred or so

  72. I would.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would pleasure myself at work like this woman.

  73. Diedrich Bader says...... by yack0 · · Score: 2

    "I tell ya what I'd do, man. Two chicks at the same time, man."

    Well, his CHARACTER, Lawrence, in Office Space said it.

    http://www.bullshitjob.com/officespace/million1. wa v

    "Fsckin A, man!"

    j

    --
    -- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
  74. cool, a BNL reference by jx100 · · Score: 1

    don't forget the thousand K-Cars and treehouses!

    1. Re:cool, a BNL reference by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      You could not possibly forget the Kraft Dinner! :)

    2. Re:cool, a BNL reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With dijon ketchup!

    3. Re:cool, a BNL reference by EricWright · · Score: 2

      I want my pre-wrapped bacon!

      (Trying to type slowly to avoid the /. stupidity)...

  75. Wow! back up a second. by Niadh · · Score: 1

    #1, Gates, William H III

    46 , self made
    Source: Technology, Microsoft (quote, executives, news)

    Net Worth: $43,000 mil down
    Hometown: Seattle , WA

    Marital Status: married , 2 children


    WOW! when did bill get some?

    1. Re:Wow! back up a second. by PerryMason · · Score: 1

      A few years back he hooked up with some young exec-type working for him in Redmond (cant remember her name) and got married.

      At the time there was speculation that his settling down and having kids might slow the MS juggernaut as he wouldnt be at the wheel so much......

      No such luck. :(

      --
      "I'm tired of all this 'Aren't humanity great' bullshit. We're a virus with shoes" - Bill Hicks
    2. Re:Wow! back up a second. by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      He hooked up with the brain behind Microsoft Bob. Melinda french....now Melinda Gates, formerly head of the MS Bob project.

      Yes, it is true.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  76. trained attack monkeys to get Osama by Sonicboom · · Score: 1

    I'd buy about 1,000,000 monkeys - and fund the millitary to train and equip them with flamethrowers, rocket launchers, and other implements of destruction, and then have them airlifted into Afghanistan to get Osama.

    With the rest of my money... hmmm imagine the beowulf cluster I could put together! *lmao*

    --
    [Connection closed by foreign host]
    1. Re:trained attack monkeys to get Osama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. You sound like a loser. Only losers say 'lmao'.

  77. Forbes ? WTF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forbes ? Sheesh ! Not long now before we start seeing stories from AryanNation on the front page...

  78. There exists a novel on this topic by alhague · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some years ago German SF-writer Andreas Eschbach came out with a novel entitled "Eine Billion Dollar" (which actually means a /trillion/ dollar). It features the young son of a poor italian shoe maker, who suddenly turns out as the heir of a 16th century merchant (go igure: centuries are the time by which small fortunes grow into really big ones) and is meant to "change something". The novel, however, has IIRC not yet been translated into english.

  79. This is the second part of the HOWTO right ? by theefer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where is the first part ?
    The one entitled "HOWTO: Get A Billion Dollars"

    --
    theefer
    1. Re:This is the second part of the HOWTO right ? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 3, Funny

      No problem: I can send you that one for the small fee of 100$.

  80. Asimov's first law by Perdo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Through inaction....

    It would take an obscene amount of money to feed everyone that is starving in the world, provide the infrastructure necessary to send the food everywhere it needs to go, and insure that they will be able to provide for themselves in the future.

    3,000,000 people die each year from starvation/malnutrition.

    Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, Warren Buffet, Paul Allen.

    These are the men with just enough "obscene amount of money", but have failed to act.

    Bill Gates alone makes more money in a year than the bottom HALF of the united states combined.

    3,000,000 counts of manslaughter per year.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:Asimov's first law by sql*kitten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It would take an obscene amount of money to feed everyone that is starving in the world, provide the infrastructure necessary to send the food everywhere it needs to go, and insure that they will be able to provide for themselves in the future

      Actually, that all exists already. There is already way too much food in the world - the US and EU destroy millions of tonnes of it every year. After all, food surpluses are a precondition of population growth, not the other way round, and the population is growing.

      Growing the food is easy - our civilization understood farming centuries ago. Distributing the food is easy - logistics is a well-developed science, practiced by Walmat, UPS and the Marines, you can even do a degree in it. The difficult part is purely in the realm of the political. So long as tyrants like Robert Mugabe use starvation as a tool of population control, or nations like Somalia keep feudal civil wars going, famines are inevitable.

      These are the men with just enough "obscene amount of money", but have failed to act.

      The Gates Foundation has given billions away. Literally. What have you done?

      3,000,000 counts of manslaughter per year.

      If you really believed that, you wouldn't have a computer to post to /. from, or indeed any other posessions. You would have given every cent to charity and right now be working for free on a subsistence farm in the third world. But you'd rather sit on the sidelines and run your mouth about things that are far beyond your understanding.

    2. Re:Asimov's first law by bokketies · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, Warren Buffet, Paul Allen.

      These are the men with just enough "obscene amount of money", but have failed to act.
      Gates has donated over 5% of his net worth to charity. How about you?

    3. Re:Asimov's first law by Creepy · · Score: 2

      um, you're talking about someone with nothing but spare change (all of 'em).

      Bill giving money to charity is no big deal, though, 'cause he can write it off his taxes just like I can (I'm sure he itemizes).

      5% of his net worth yearly, or ever?

    4. Re:Asimov's first law by jafac · · Score: 2

      I would hire the worlds best assassin. Then I'd start going down the list of the worlds worst tyrants (and overpaid executives).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    5. Re:Asimov's first law by lightcycler · · Score: 1

      "There is already way too much food in the world - the US and EU destroy millions of tonnes of it every year."

      The alternative being to give some of it to the 3rd-world, thus ensuring that african farmers can't possibly make any money because they're competing with a free product?

      Trade defecits: they're good, right?

  81. Thanks for using it to make the world better. by Bozovision · · Score: 1

    Thank you.

  82. Over the Moon by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    most probably spend some of it to go into space or to the Moon

    You'd almost certainly have to form a consortium to get that far up. In which case funding this is probably a better idea.

    After the philanthropy had worn down, I myself would tile a wall with these these and hook them to a few of these. And I would go absolutely nuts with other technotoys.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Over the Moon by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Funny
      No, he can get as far up as the Moon fairly easily. Any geosynchronous launch technology can reach the Moon (years ago Hughes actually sent a geosynch bird around the Moon to move it from an accidental orbit to a more useful orbit).

      Oh, you want him to reach there alive and to return? That's going to require more mass. I thought he was going for distance...

  83. Clones? by Inominate · · Score: 1

    BAH. What a waste of money, the clones would just want your money, cause all kinds of problems, etc.

    How about permanent residence, and your own module on the ISS?

  84. Buy the politicians!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would buy all the politicians in Washington and make selling CDs illegal and make the RIAA have only an online P2P offering of their music, each song = 25 cents!

    And then throw that dog Hillary Rosen a bone, I mean $1 million... to shut her trap of course.

  85. Sex. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sex-tards. Where are our sex-tards ? You would think that with all the money that's been ploughed into biotech in the last few years that we would have fully functioning (in a manner of speaking) sex-tards by now......but no! What have our scientist been wasting their time on ?

    Now, with a billion to spend on a private research project, decent sex-tards could be in the shops within a year !

  86. Prepare to wait... by morie · · Score: 2
    ...for 18 years for the clone to grow.

    Please supply the exact same conditions your girlfriend had growing up, since you can never be sure what was nature and wat was nurture...

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    1. Re:Prepare to wait... by ComaVN · · Score: 2, Funny

      So? When the current one gets old and ugly in 18 years time, I got 3 fresh ones coming up. That's even better.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    2. Re:Prepare to wait... by morie · · Score: 1

      Indeed. You, Sir, are a genius (just do the nature/nuture thing right though...)

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    3. Re:Prepare to wait... by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      Now here is the thing. You get someone who looks like her but has been trained to obey your every whim. In other words you get the perfect 18 year old. Cute and lives to do you. Perfect.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  87. Money Can't Buy Me Love by clickety6 · · Score: 2


    but a billion dollars would buy me something near enough and lots of it too! :-)

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  88. I would like to clone Bill Gates by the+cleaner · · Score: 1

    ...ang give hime the (also cloned) brain of Richard M. Stallman.

    And then swap those two.

    --
    Could be worse. Could be raining.
  89. What I would do by Dexter's+Laboratory · · Score: 1

    I would build my own interplanetary spaceship! Damn that would be great. Oh, and I would also buy a harem ;)

  90. Spending != Investing by JPS · · Score: 2

    It is strange that Forbes confuses spending and investing. Most of their examples are actually investments, not expenses.

    I believe is it in fact very hard (except through donations) to spend a billion dollar, while it is extremely easy to invest them.

    1. Re:Spending != Investing by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I believe is it in fact very hard (except through donations) to spend a billion dollar, while it is extremely easy to invest them.

      You must be that South Park guy who got trapped in ice in the early 90s.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  91. if I had... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IF I had a billion dollars
    I'd buy you a green dress,
    but not a real green dress that's cruel!

  92. I'd buy the Catholic Church... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Microsoft (Aren't they the owners yet??)

    1. Re:I'd buy the Catholic Church... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a big desire to diddle young boys?

  93. Limousine liberal? by Heynow21 · · Score: 1

    "To feed the 31.1 million Americans living in poverty a $6 tofu turkey sandwich with organic sprouts, tomatoes, non-dairy Swiss cheese on whole-wheat bread, the limo liberal spends $186.6 million. " Is Forbes affiliated with Foxnews? Anyway, he forgot to include Compassionate Conservative, who would spend a few hundred million establishing a monarchy in the USA and then using it's military to settle old scores.

  94. HYPE MACHINE! by squaretorus · · Score: 2

    I'd go on a hype exercise. I'd buy a big old plot of land (pref. with some crop circle history) in an area with a history of dodgy politics.

    I'd whack up the biggest fucking fence youve ever seen, and hire a binch of goons to patrol every hour of the day. The uniforms would have a little logo - probably based on a foot.

    Then I'd have a fleet of big limos that come and go at all hours, getting busier when theres a conference on in a nearby city. Helicopters would fly in and out from time to time.

    There would be fires set which were JUST visible from outwith the fence. Only ever on days when my star sign said I'd be in a bad mood. I'd seed a couple of rumours of deaths in 'the park' which were covered up.

    The tabloids would love it!

    5 years later I'd offer Oprah an exclusive tour of the place, having hired those Jim Henson dudes to create a smurf like alien for us. They would only be able to eat little rabbits - and would talk with a slight slur.

    That would BITCH!

    1. Re:HYPE MACHINE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I wanna party with you!

  95. author of that article is right by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

    I simply hate when i have one billion lying around uselessly, it's simply outrageous.

  96. Things to spend money on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * FSF so they can continue their good work and the GNU software. And to pay some patent lawsuits that are bound to come.
    * Someone to make Gnome and KDE the best desktops around.
    * A few donations to the *BSDs.
    * Pay some deveopers to produce an even better/faster gcc.
    * Pay someone to develop a decent distributed /office filesystem. WITH good security, and desktop intergration.
    * The rest should go to whomever got some business to sort out in a court with Microsoft.

  97. xboxen by ultrafunkula · · Score: 1

    Why not buy 5 million xboxes?
    With the money Microsoft lose on each box that will sure teach them a lesson.
    (yes, I realise that it would be better not to buy them at all...)

  98. To all geeks that have girlfriends! by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you are a geek with a girlfriend (a rarity), don't forget her to tell her that she is worth $40,000,000. It's one heck of a compliment, and now you have proof of in with this article ;-)

    1. Re:To all geeks that have girlfriends! by CaseyB · · Score: 2
      He might also have listed $1,000,000 to buy a new car.

      That doesn't mean his current car is worth that much.

    2. Re:To all geeks that have girlfriends! by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I think mine would be insulted if I valued her at only 40,000,000....

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:To all geeks that have girlfriends! by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
      Right... But on the other hand gaving a girlfriend is probably worth more than even those 40Mio$. I was actually just trying to make a point that you should value what you have.

      Take your car example... I have a 35000$ car, and it is more worth to me than that. Perceived value is often different from the real value.

    4. Re:To all geeks that have girlfriends! by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Point taken... A love one is worth more than any money on this world, but I thought it was a funny way to give a honest compliment. Besides, you just should use the compliment while referring to the article. See: you could turn it like that... Any geek that doesn't have a girlfriend would have to spend 40Mio$ and I have you which is way better. Something like that.

  99. Think of the time... by Burning1 · · Score: 2

    Remember that any clone must start out as a infant. Imagine the jail time, dude. : )

    1. Re:Think of the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Imagine the jail time, dude. : )

      You forgot about the superimposition of b*tches principle, whereby, for instance, 3 6 year olds add up to one 18 year old. =D

    2. Re:Think of the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all, just space them out by 15 years or so and everything works great. (Just gotta find a way to 'dispose' of the old ones =;-P)

    3. Re:Think of the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares, chuck 'em. Leave them in a mall or something.

  100. Spend it, no problem! by miffo.swe · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would build an army of fluffy penguins on the redmond lawn infront of the main entrance. Just to see the reaction on the PHB's when they get to work. Maybe with some nice voice abilitys too and make them chant

    "developers! developers! developers!"

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  101. hmm by MrNop · · Score: 1

    I will buy a computer able to play doom 3 medium details ! :)

  102. Already outdated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Marital Status: married , 2 children

    According to my local newspaper, Gates Jr. Version 3.0 (a daughter) is out.

  103. CEO deathsquad by dswan69 · · Score: 1

    That the world desperately needs. Torture them until they pay back what they stole, then shoot them in the back of the head.

    Might be worth getting a better trained monkey to be president too.

  104. Thanks forbes by tburkhol · · Score: 1
    Thanks for planting the idea that of a monument similar in size and scale to Mount Rushmore, featuring his own face.

    I'm not looking forward to staring at Bill Gates' face carved into Mt Ranier.

  105. If I had a billion dollars... by Ari+Rahikkala · · Score: 1

    I would buy a server and 'net connection that can withstand Slashdotting...

  106. Get a Fab by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2
    When it comes to being a nerd, most of you leave your nerdiness at the door when it comes to large amounts of money. I would get a fab. I would use 1 billion as existing capital, and look for investors to supply the rest of the finances. I would then find clientelle.

    Fabs pay for themselves within a few years. I'd say it's a hell of an investment.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  107. Swinging with the Big Dicks, more like... by torpor · · Score: 2

    This investment strategy:


    $750 million over five years to [...] the World Health Organization, the Rockefeller Foundation, Unicef, pharmaceutical companies and the World Bank.


    Seems more like he bought a ticket with the Trilateral Commission, more than anything else.

    Betcha any money ol' Billy Boy has some strange, Egyptian-like architecture in his big cityhouse. Stuff that looks surprisingly like a big floating eye over a pyramid.

    Damned cult members. Taking over the world, and not letting anyone else play along ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Swinging with the Big Dicks, more like... by leviramsey · · Score: 2
      etcha any money ol' Billy Boy has some strange, Egyptian-like architecture in his big cityhouse. Stuff that looks surprisingly like a big floating eye over a pyramid.

      I coulda sworn I saw BillG at my last Lodge meeting.

  108. Monolithic Domes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had a billion dollars I would build 10s of thousands of monolithic domes around the country to be used as Storage Containers, Schools, Churches, Homes, and Emergency Shelters.
    I would also start a mortgage company that would help people build monolithic domes.
    Think round, build a dome.

    1. Re:Monolithic Domes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      monolithicdome.com
      Build your own Star Wars set.
      Forget ATT long line bunkers!!!
      With a few mods a monolithic dome IS a bunker.
      Tornado drills???? What's that? We just keep on playing.
      Check out 'Eye of the Storm'. One of the coolest homes ever built.

  109. can you imagine a... by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 2

    Seriously, you'd get a big fucking cluster for $1 billion.

    --

    "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

  110. Never work again by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    How comfortably could you live off interest/investments from 1bn? (assuming you don't do anything risky) Don't forget, your going to need to pay wages for your servants and techs (your not going to maintain your 500 machine LAN yourself, especially when you have LAN-parties to host) and that big mansion doesn't come cheap. How much is aviation fuel these days?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Never work again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avatiation fuel: Very expensive.

    2. Re:Never work again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aviation. Oops!

  111. Loosing by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    I would be soo paranoid of loosing 1bn dollars. There are so many things that could go wrong. Well.. just like everything else in my life

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  112. Hrmm by athlon02 · · Score: 1

    Well I know I could never spend a full billion on myself alone, I'd end up giving most of it to my congregation to use on mission works and such, but one of the first things on my list would still be a fully decked out dual 1.25GHz powermac with two 23" apple displays, YUM! :)

  113. 5 Bills by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2


    I'm a narcissistic thrill seeking hedonistic liberal geek.

    So where do I collect my 5 Bills ?

    1. Re:5 Bills by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2

      I'm a narcissistic thrill seeking hedonistic liberal geek.

      So where do I collect my 5 Bills ?

      Paying the worlds poor to watch me bungie jump from mount rushmore into a vat of beer !!!

  114. Ultimate Warez server!! by MongooseCN · · Score: 2

    I could setup the ultimate warez server!! Terabytes of disk space!! An OC3 just for myself!!

    What? Just buy the games instead?

  115. Bring back Looking Glass by MongooseCN · · Score: 2

    I would use the money to bring back Looking Glass. The people who made the games System Shock, Theif and all those other amazing classics. Even if the games sold at a loss, who cares, a billion dollars will keep everyone in business for a while. It's sad to see quality games get stomped out because of lack of profits...

  116. I would by HashDefine · · Score: 1

    do 2 chicks at the same time

    1. Re:I would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice office space ref. But you don't need a billion dollars to do that. ;)

    2. Re:I would by HashDefine · · Score: 1

      So you mean apart from 2 chicks at the same time

  117. Re:I'd buy a whole ton of those desktop tank robot by G-funk · · Score: 2

    Hmmm.... a billion dollars...

    Well, I'd buy myself and my family / close friends house + car etc....

    And then, I'd hire geeks.... about 30. Good geeks... And then I'd fix up everything I think is wrong with linux, and create a totally new kick-ass desktop system ala OSX. And then i'd give it away, under the GPL.

    I'd spend the rest of my life at my beachfront house, fishing, drinking beer, driving around in my cool cars, and generally having a good time :)

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  118. Waste of bits by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    Did it strike anyone else that the Forbes article was a complete waste of bits?

    Where did the author get these ideas? Did he actually do any research - contact some N geeks, narcissists, etc., and ask them? Or was the entire article removed from the author's nether orifice, and slapped still dripping onto the Forbes website?

    While an article like this might have seemed at home on The Onion, or some other humor site, for a magazine like Forbes it seems wildly out of place.

    For example, let's look at the geek items. Clone yourself 500 times? That sounds more like the narcissist to me. A true geek would first secure his future, then buy his way onto the top ten supercomputer list (followed shortly by achiving the top ten on SETI and DistributedNet), donate large sums to the FSF, EFF (and depending upon the particular geek the NRA or HCI), buy several top programs and then OSS them (Delorme, anybody?) (Or better still, fund the development of OOP DCOM for Wine).

    Or how about donating a large amount of money to your alma mater, on the condition that they terminate all athletics programs? Now that seems a geekly thing to do, IMNSHO.

  119. Must have been a slow month at Forbes by xidix · · Score: 1

    I guess there's only so many times you can run the story, "CEO Steals Candy from Baby" before it all just sort of fades into the static.

  120. HOWTO: Get a Billion Dollars by jasonrfink · · Score: 1

    Hire Arthur Anderson to do your taxes . . .

  121. How I'd blow a billion by hrieke · · Score: 2

    Open a pinball company.

    Buy a personal train.

    Buy Iceland.

    Go into space - maybe even have a special trip for two (be one of the founding member of the orbit club...).

    Buy Clear Channel.

    Pay someone to teach Ms. Spears to sing.

    Buy a few Congress Critters and a president, have them pass a law outlawing money in politics.

    Sue all media companies for failing in the public trust (this could be interesting).

    Give the money to the Endowment of the Arts, National Public Radio and National Public Television and tell them all to piss off everyone.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  122. Give to charity by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

    You can donate your money to the "give Billly Gates some money" fund. Or better yet if you can donate some nice computer equipment. I wouldn't mind one of these babies as a portable and this as a dream workstation. If you had a billion lying around that you want to get rid of then I am your man. Infact I will make a deal. You post here on slashdot and I will always mod you up. No matter how trollish or lame the comment is. I will do it for life for just a fraction of your worth.

    Seriously if I had a billion dollars, I would donate $100 million to EFF. I would donate another $100 million to lobby all the politicans to outlaw pallidium and repeal the DMCA. Today's government serves money anyway and not the people. I would then buy Trolltech and gpl all the api's for all platforms and give Microsoft a headache.

    If I had $10 billion instead of $1 billion I would purchase autodesk and gpl autocad and 3d studio MAX. Also if Microsoft effectively kills linux on x86 all thanks to palladium, I would invest $250 Million in apple under the condition that Steve Jobs requires all macs to have an option dual boot or linux only boot by default besides just macosX. I would convince Steve Jobs to write a letter to the opensource community about making the mac an ultimate linux box. The number of macs sold would increase astronomically from all the pissed off linux and windows users. I would also gain my money back quickly. I remember hearing that linux is beginning to catch up to macosx in desktop usage. Apple could almost double their marketshare.

  123. Re:I'd buy a whole ton of those desktop tank robot by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's pronounced "Nucular"...

    --Homer Simpson

    --
    You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
  124. Does anyone else feel... by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    like this article was written (well, could have been) by bratty little kids in middle school during lunch? I know it's supposed to be a joke, but the answers all seem so juvenile. Substitute a few middle-school cliques for the categories forbes selected, and you have a article for the school paper. This article seems pretty poor journalism even for forbes.

    --
    AccountKiller
  125. IT-nerd would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do what sonera did and buy 4.3 billions worth of air from germany in form of UMTS-licenses

  126. Congress by SlamMan · · Score: 2

    How about the 2 senators and a congressman or 2 from a small state?

    --
    Mod point free since 2001
  127. I know what I'd do with $1,000,000,000, Man by Marijuana+al-Shehi · · Score: 1

    2,000 chicks at the same time, man.

    --
    "I think all foreigners should stop interfering in the internal affairs of Iraq"
    -- Paul Wolfowitz, 7/21/2003
  128. A billion dollars by NetGyver · · Score: 2

    After reading some of the comments and after thinking seriously what I would do with a billion dollars, I'm not sure i would do anything different then what i am doing now.

    That's not to say that i'm really financially well off or anything. Or that I have The Good LifeTM but the more i focus on the question "what would I do with a billion dollars." the more i sway to the conclusion that money isn't everything.

    It would be nice to own a beautiful home, an exotic car, help the world by donating all of it to chairity...the options are endless when money becomes less of a factor.

    Sometmes people forget that money isn't worth the paper it's printed on and that some of the best things in life are free. Some things you just can't place a monitary value on, like a loving relationship, a caring family. How could any one of you place a monitary value on your chlid's head, for example? I know I couldn't and I'm only 22 without children.

    I was asked a simular question once before: "what would you do with an x amount of dollars", by my guidence counselor back when i was in high school. The question was supposed to get you to focus on what you wanted to do with your life if you didn't have to worry about money.

    Could I donate it to help those in need? Sure it would help greatly, but would it have any lasting effect? I think it would only for the short-term.

    Could I by one or a lot of products that makes me happy? Sure I could. I could name a few things I'd like to own that would make me feel happy. But how long would that happiness last? Once you get used to the item you bought for a little while, it just eventually becomes a thing you own. Again, short-term.

    it's all how you define value and what you consider real happiness to be i guess.

    To me, you can be dirt poor or filthy rich and be truely happy. In this context, money really doesn't matter at all.

    Yes, i know money pays for food, water, shelter and a lot of people say you need at least these 3 things in order to survive. I agree. my point isn't that I think money means squat, it's that money is grossly overrated and the simple things in life that don't require money, are often times over looked.

    *shrugs* There's a meaning in there somewhere.

    A penny for my thoughts? Here's my two cents. I got ripped off!

    --
    A Penny for my thoughts? Here's my two cents. I got ripped off!
  129. The High Frontier by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2
    I'd run my own damn space program. I figure a billion should grease enough wheels to get the stupid laws about space off the books. Then make an O'Niell colony or three and start moving people up there.

    Start making solar power satellites and such. Our energy needs didn't grow as fast as they predicted in the 70's, partly because of better computer controls and automatic regulation. But if we could make electricity cheap enough we could save the petroleum for plastics.

    See O'Neill's The High Frontier for how to do it with 1970's tech. Imagine what we could do now. We've discovered that it's not trivial to build a small, closed-loop ecology (Biosphere II wasn't run well, but it still learned a few useful things) but we don't have to worry about making it closed-loop from the start.

    Heck, if there's water ice on the Moon like they think, it'll be even easier. A billion ought to get things started, no problem.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  130. Re:I'd buy a whole ton of those desktop tank robot by pr0t3uS · · Score: 2, Funny
    Bush's real target is your bitches repository.


    That would be Bill Clinton. Bush is a gay who's father buyed the elections so the real Texas man would stop making fun of him.
  131. I feel a song coming on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had a million dollars, if I had a million dollars
    I'd buy you a house, I would buy you a house
    If I had a million dollars, if I had a million dollars
    I'd buy you furniture for your house, yup, like a chesterfield or an ottoman
    If I had a million dollars, if I had a million dollars
    I'd buy you a K-car, a nice Reliant automobile
    If I had a million dollars, I'd buy your love...

    If I had a million dollars, I wouldn't have to go to the store
    If I had a million dollars, we'd take a limosine 'cause it costs more
    If I had a million dollars, we wouldn't have to get Kraft Dinner
    (but we would get Kraft Dinner. Of course we would, and get reeely expensive ketchup to go with it [mmMMmmmm!])

    Hear the song
    One version of the lyrics (there are many)

  132. I second the whores comment by AssFace · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd spend it all on booze and whores and then just waste the rest.

    Friends and family would know how to find me - just follow the trail of dead strippers.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:I second the whores comment by tomzyk · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Spending it on anything other than booze and whores IS a waste of money!

      --
      Karma: NaN
    2. Re:I second the whores comment by srvivn21 · · Score: 2

      Scott? Is that you?

    3. Re:I second the whores comment by AssFace · · Score: 1

      this chick in that cartoon is hot.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    4. Re:I second the whores comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Best, is that you?

      "I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered."

      "They say I slept with seven Miss Worlds, I didn't. It was only four. I didn't turn up for the other three."

  133. Who's rich? by pr0t3uS · · Score: 1

    The richest man is not the one who has the most but the one who needs the least.

  134. LEGOs! by jhines0042 · · Score: 2
    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  135. A word and a number by Xanlexian · · Score: 1

    Anachronox 2.

    --
    "Congratulations, Boots. Your robot has become self-aware. You're a daddy now." -- Dr. Rho Bowman
  136. Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With $1 billion, I could actually afford a dual G4 Mac. Hell, with that much money I could probably afford two.

  137. Jet Pack Research Laboratory by EnglishTim · · Score: 2

    I've always said that if I had that kinda cash I'd set up a Jet Pack Research Laboratory.

    And I would, too.

  138. I love being a crank :) by Lonath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would use it to stop software patents.

    How you ask?

    Since software is abstract thought and since abstract thoughts are a dime a dozen, I would get a bunch of geeks and lawyers together and every day we would look at new software patent applications that get released. (It's nice that they release the applications early on now...so that you don't have as much of a chance of them extending their patent before you get your application in...)

    Out of those applications, we would take the most promising and novel ones (usually from smaller companies) and get umbrella patents that surround whatever little idea they have with a bunch of "novel and nonobvious" extensions.

    When I say "novel and nonobvious" I mean not only extensions made by daydreaming and thinking about the problem a little bit, but also extensions that are computer generated. For example, if you have IRC bots and MUD bots and chat room bots, then it's "novel and nonobvious" if you come up with the idea of an IM bot. Therefore, it's also probably nonobvious to come up with cellphone text messaging bots.

    I think you see where I'm going with this. If someone patents something for "IM" then the "nonobvious" extensions would be for wireless networks, chatrooms, PDAs, cellphones, IRC and so forth. This could be algorithmically generated with a database of "related ideas" and "dongles" you can add to any invention.

    It wouldn't just be for that one part of the invention, either. You have to look at products that exist and follow the "dongle and feature" web (where if at any time a version of feature1 was used with a version of feature2 in a product, then you adjoin all possible ways of having feature1 and/or feature2 in your "novel and nonobvious" extensions) to adjoin as many different features as you can think of. Then say you will use a "plurality" of these things within the invention. Have you noticed how patent lawyers love the word "plurality"? Heck, we could probably get rid of patents altogether (which I don't support) if we made the word "plurality" illegal. They wouldn't know what to do. :P

    But anyway, you watch them when they release their products and if they add any of your "nonobvious" extensions, you sue them, not to make money, just to force them to cripple their products and remove them from market. Since "self-help" features that remotely shut down software for copyright reasons are or will become legal, I'm sure you could force them to invoke these features and shut down their products until they stop infringing on my valuable IP space.

    Eventually, the government may wake up and realize that abstract thought patents can cripple innovation and perhaps we can get back to a time when we had the right to express our thoughts and use our property without getting sued. Or they might just not let me get any more patents.

    Also, you should note that we wouldn't be writing software during this time. That's because if you understand software and you understand the breadth and triviality of software patents you know that you can't respect software patents and write software at the same time. So, in order to respect the patents, I would have to stop writing software. But it would be nice to try to crapflood the USPTO.

  139. A narcissist and Mt. Rushmore by thefoobar · · Score: 1

    Sheesh...a Mt. Rushmore sized Larry Ellison face. Talk about tacky...

    --
    ------------------ D. A. Davenport: http://www.firebin.net
  140. fuzzy math by th1nk · · Score: 1

    Fifty-year supply of McDonald's Big Mac value meal: $9,836,750.

    So a mere $539 per day for value meals? I haven't been to McDonald's in a while, but that seems steep.

  141. how about a worthy cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Like train 5000 people to clean up all the land mines around the world. Articles like that are the ones that make people in the third world mad at the US. Of all the things we could be doing to help make the world a better place we're buying 40million dollar jets?

    How freakin happy would you be if your child had both legs blown off by land mines produced in the US. To add salt to the wound, the US then claims we had nothing to do with the poor kid getting crippled. Yeah, that is really ethical and upstanding of American citizens. Before you start flaming, I am an American, but I disagree with a lot of the messed up stuff we do to other countries in the name of "progress". You think people would be feel the same way if the kid's father was George Bush, Dick Cheney, or some other fat politician. I seriously doubt it. People need to wake up and smell the damn fire. No one is innocent here. I'm not excluding myself from it either, since I just another guy getting screwed by our government.

  142. for a billion by digitalsushi · · Score: 3, Funny

    for a billion dollars, i could finally pay for half of the stuff I stole off Kazaa!

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  143. Clones: Cheaper by the dozen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For 2 reasons:
    1) Some of that cost is fixed - lab equipment, training etc.
    2) Volume. All the clones will need simillar processing.

    So that cost is not accurate. A clone army will cost less than that.

  144. Rich by f00zbll · · Score: 1

    Why in the world are we still defining "rich" in monetary terms? It's obvious the only thing extreme wealth leads to personal troubles. Look at the studies about lottery winners. Or better yet, look at the statistics about the divorce rate of the top 5%. You may have more toys, but people also hate your god damn guts because for every expensive car that's a couple starving families in America. Go ahead and flame away, because there's no good reason for any person to have 1 billion dollars.

  145. Well... by PygmyTrojan · · Score: 1

    Based on the next story, I'd put 66 satellites into geo-synchronous transfer orbit to start a global porn version of HBO. Then with the remaining $10 mil, buy up all the porn I can, and hit play. For $10 a month you can enjoy all the porn your heart desires.

    --

    Trying is the first step towards failure.

  146. If i had a billion dollars... by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

    I'd do two chicks at one time.

    --
    100% Insightful
  147. For the good of the community... by AlexMax2742 · · Score: 1

    Just use the billion dollars to buy ourselves a few congressmen. Just imagine if we had this a few years ago, the DMCA would have been a joke amongst ourselves. Well, maybe it doesn't take a TON of money to buy one, but the more the better....aw heck with it, jsut buy the baddest Beowulf cluster you can with the remaining funds. I know I would.

    --
    I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion
  148. The Software Executive by rocjoe71 · · Score: 1

    ...Would spend $1 Billion dollars five times over to make his operating system "trustworthy"!

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
  149. The Tournament by HappyPhunBall · · Score: 1

    I would form my corporation, Liandri Mining Corporation and immediately begin a serious weapons research program. At the same time thousands of scientists and doctors would be perfecting my re-animator device. Once several factory locations were complete, I would invite over all of my friends ( I would have a lot 'cause I'm rich remember ) for an afternoon of fun and frolic. Once I achieved Godlike status and my "friends" were reduced to a steaming pile of gibbs, I would invest in hardier prison stock from well, actual prisons. I would be willing to commute their sentences by buying out their term with suitable pentance to the state and victims, and they would finally have a suitable place to live, work, and play.

  150. I'd pay the Indian Government.... by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

    To make me Moon Base. Hell! If they can lauch to geostationary orbit for a mere $15 million they can surely make a moon base for $1 billion.

  151. Narcissist... by alexandre · · Score: 1

    I wonder why isn't the geek actually the one designated as narcissist... :-)

  152. I wouldn't buy a bunch of hot chicks by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

    I'd have my body and face completely reshaped into forms that no woman could resist. Let them come to me.

    1. Re:I wouldn't buy a bunch of hot chicks by Schemer · · Score: 2

      I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to spend the rest of my life as a cute little puppy.

      --
      A buddhist walks up to a hot dog stand and says ``Make me one with everything.''
  153. I would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    clone Natalie Portman and wait 18 years...

    And I'd buy a large number of monkeys and place themm behind the Slashdot Editorial typewriters.

    Wait no difference!

    Buy Microsoft

  154. My monument wouldn't be of me by bluGill · · Score: 2

    A large monument in the mountains sounds like a good idea, but not with MY face on it. I can think of several girls who would be worthy of the honnor of having their face in my personal monument. With any luck I could convince one to be my wife and skip the russian mail order thing. (Okay, a lot of luck, but it could happen. I'm still budgeting for the russian bride program though)

    I think most of my money would be spent on randomlly paying for math education. I've always wanted to go bake to my school and for one quarter pay the tuition for every math class, with the only requirement that you get a C, and the class be difficult. (calc or above, Algebra is high school not college) I would at random go to schools and pay for it, but the announcement would not be made until after the last day to register for class.

  155. Re:nerft poft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hot hot hot hot hot grits

  156. this was so cheesy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That article was awful. It looks like it was written by a 65 year old who doesn't know his ass from his mouth. The choices he made were awful, and weren't in the least bit funny or interesting.

  157. Some stats for the Netherlands by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

    The richest people in the Netherlands are quite diverse.

    Number one is a family that is, among other things, into confection (that means clothes) in the El Cheapo category.

    Second, true to our nation and people, is Freddy Heineken, whose last name is quite possibly familiar.

    Third is the family Van Oranje (Of Orange). Also known as 'The Royal Family', because these are our Queen, Princes, Princesses and other assorted royalty.

    I find it pretty depressing to note that even beer gets more money than the royal family ;-)

    1. Re:Some stats for the Netherlands by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      There's a plain and simple explanation for that: part of what the royal family gets, they spend on beer. Hey, why do you think Willem Alexander is so popular?

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  158. Easy. by LePrince · · Score: 0

    I would buy NORTEL (NT) stocks. They are worth 0.88$ now. They used to be worth 120.00$ (CAN money). They SURELY will get to 20$ again, so it'll be approx. 2500% profits. ;-)

  159. I would buy Slashdot a clue by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

    That should take about a billion.

  160. Master of his domain? by tomzyk · · Score: 1
    For the narcissist:
    2. ... Cost for being master of his domain: $102 million.

    Why pay $102 million when you can just take some advise from the Geek and get a mail-order-Russian bride to take care of that obsession for you? (It'll only cost ya $5,000 per lady!)
    --
    Karma: NaN
  161. Save the children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Limosine Liberal:

    3. Adopts 50,000 children for $24 a month for 50 years in Sally Struthers-sponsored Save the Children program. Cost: $720 million.


    Sadly enough, not one childs life would be much better than it is now.

  162. What a tedious article... by GangstaLean · · Score: 1
    I gotta say, what a tedious article. Maybe I'm just getting older and don't engage in wild speculation as much any more, but it seemed like a load of cliches. A much more interesting article would have been an analysis of how people who actually have large amounts of money to spend decide to use it.

    Isn't the age of irony over? How about engaging our leaders rather than marveling at their egos?

    --
    -- Bird in the Bush: The Renewable Energy Blog http://www.birdinthebush.org
  163. Not really by David+Price · · Score: 2

    There are bound to be a few privately held (or public but still with heavy family ownership) companies out there that started small and grew rapidly. It's simple statistics; these folks are way off on the right side of the bell curve, and the amazing wealth is going to be spread around the family and the company.

    Explosive companies produce noveau riche, because the money and prosperity doesn't have as much time to diffuse throughout the economy as it does with a slower-growing firm. The natural result is a temporary concentration of wealth in the hands of a few people. Once the company ceases its exponential growth, the money begins to diffuse. The first appearance of the name "Rockefeller" on the Forbes list, for instance, appears in the 73-spot, with $2.5 billion - still a lot, but a far cry from the man who still holds the inflation-adjusted record for the biggest fortune accumulated.

    The fact that there's a concentration of money isn't a problem, because the money naturally goes away after a while as it's spent and donated and split among multiple heirs who eventually have to take real jobs.

    We don't have an aristocracy here. We have money, and money moves from place to place. Sometimes a lot of it settles on one person. That's the economy for you.

  164. Zoning Shmoning! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    I'd buy a block in the middle of a major city and knock down all of the buildings in it and turn it into a cow pasture. I can picture it now, office workers with their $tarbuck$ coffee shuffling by cows lazily chewing their cud.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  165. No... no they wouldn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps your stories would be all that's posted... but that, by no means whatsoever, guarantees that *anybody* is gonna read 'em.

    Besides, what the hell is a "slahsdot?"

  166. oxfam estimates by aminorex · · Score: 2

    Oxfam estimates that it costs $20 to save a human
    life, via rehydration and nutrition programs.
    So a billion dollars translates to 50 million
    people (although I think that's a bit optimistic).
    Given a billion to spend, I think I'd undo the
    human suffering of World War 2.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  167. Here's how to spend that kinda cash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After using half of it to lobby Congress in favor of Open Source, there are only three things worth spending that kind of cash on:

    Beer, Pizza, and Hookers!

  168. Harcourt Fenton Mudd! by tlambert · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Harcourt Fenton Mudd! Have you been DRINKING?!? ..."

    -- Terry

  169. Obligatory Office Space quote by runlvl0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Peter Gibbons: What would you do if you had a million dollars?
    Lawrence: I'll tell you what I'd do, man, two chicks at the same time, man.
    Peter Gibbons: That's it? If you had a million dollars, you'd do two chicks at the same time?
    Lawrence: Damn straight. I always wanted to do that, man. And I think if I had a million dollars I could hook that up, 'cause chicks dig a dude with money.
    Peter Gibbons: Well, not all chicks.
    Lawrence: Well the kind of chicks that'd double up on a dude like me do.
    Peter Gibbons: Good point.

    --

    Carthago delenda est!
  170. Things I'd do: by falzer · · Score: 1

    ...Bosendorfers with Gold/Platinum key tops.
    Two of them. (One with inverted key colors.)

    A castle made out of stainless steel, or hard-anodized alunimum. With a fully equipped lab/machining shop. And a cutting laser.

    A unimog, and a porsche.

    The rest will be for goofing off and for making projects.

  171. Offer: Wanted Dead or Alive by Jesterr · · Score: 1

    Start putting prices on spammer's heads. 1 Billion might not be nearly enough to get them all, but it might make that "cost of doing business" a bit more expensive than "it's free."

    And forget buying the island... I want an aircraft carrior... Start taking on refugees... Teach them some gibberish to say to reporters.

  172. I'd buy... by jjsjeff · · Score: 1

    ...a giant frickin' laser. Too big for even mini-me to hump. :)

  173. Quick & easy way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy Internet stocks.

    Wait.

  174. Pyramids! by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    That's the trouble with the world today, nobody's building enormous, useless monuments any more.

    That's why I'd buy some land out in the middle of the Mojave Desert, and build a new pyramid that's twice as big as the Great Pyramid in Egypt! Yeah! Of course, there'd be hidden passages and rooms inside, guarded by fiendish traps... and if you made it past them all, you'd find the prize: Geraldo Rivera!

    The other thing I'd do is build a gigantic statue of Bruce Campbell (with chainsaw on one hand, shotgun in the other) standing astride Los Angeles/Long Beach harbor. It'd be the Colossus of Groovy!

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  175. No... by airship · · Score: 1

    Here's the plan:
    (1) Steal Underpants.
    (2) ????
    (3) A Billion Dollars in PROFIT!

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  176. I'd buy a country.. by Reziac · · Score: 2

    ...and then I wouldn't *need* to buy any Congress-critters!!

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  177. Empress of [nation name] by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

    What I would do:

    1. Turn myself into a Fembot
    2. Become Empress of a nation
    3. Get a set of fanatical followers

  178. Re:I love being a crank :) by wizard992 · · Score: 1

    What is this? You are being PRACTICAL? Jesus...

    Someone call in the geek re-education coucil.

  179. Not quite a billion by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    I had an casual friend at University who inherited a lot (between 10-50 million USD) while at university.

    This was in the late 1970's

    He took his best college buddy (also dorm room buddy) and bought a house on the beach in Hawaii, where he dedicated his life to surfing, and, er, other activities.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  180. I'd buy Forbes magazine.... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2

    If I had a billion dollars, I'd buy Forbes magazine, fire the staff, and hire some writers and managemnet who had some imagination.

    What's with the crap that they're writing: McDonalds Hamburgers? Haircuts on the LAX runway? Dollywood? BOOORRRING!

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  181. Competitions Sucks by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2

    Why buy 500 clones of myself? That means 500 more competitors! I'd rather have 500 clones of my girlfriend!

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  182. WTF by banka · · Score: 0

    did anyone notice this:

    "Fifty-year supply of McDonald's Big Mac value meal: $9,836,750."

    That's insane. do the math. 9836750/(50*365*3) = $179.66 per meal.

  183. Castles by metoc · · Score: 1

    How about a faery tail castle (or some similar structure) in the Rocky's. Ideally visible from roads and highways up to 20 miles away, or better yet, from space. Could also be in the Seattle/Denver/Vancouver area where the entire city could see it.

    Another possibility is the Zanatos building in the Gargoyles tv series.

  184. HOWTO: have a billion dollars by drivers · · Score: 2
    First get a job with $200,000 take home salary. Next, live off $5,000 a year. Invest to make 10% annual interest. After 67 years you will have a billion dollars.


    (On a more realistic note, if you can take home $50,000 a year and live off of $10,000 a year, invest in 5% interest investments you can quit paid employment completely in only 6 years.)

  185. Fusion Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of it.

  186. Brewster's Billions? by majestyk2000 · · Score: 1

    I'd have to say that it would be impossible for someone to actually spend $1 billion, assuming some limitations were set:

    1.) No military vessels (i.e aircraft carriers).

    2.) No buying up small nations.

    3.) No space stations on the Moon.

    Given those limitations, I don't see how one person could possibly spend $1 billion at a rate faster than it would accrue interest (assuming only three percent or so for argument's sake).
    Let's see, you'd have to have a house. Maybe something like this? I've heard that it would probably cost $75 million to reproduce it. That would drop you a little, but in the time it would take to build it, your interest would likely make up for the entire construction cost.

    Okay, now that you've got a house, how about a car? You could buy ten of each of the Bentley Azure, the Lamborghini Diablo, the Mercedes CL600 Coupe, and throw in a few million dollar 'collector cars' from here, and still not spend more than you'd make back in interest in the time it took for you to drive each one 1,000 miles.

    How about some toys? Maybe a nice Gulfstream, since every billionaire must have one? How about two, since they only cost $40 million each? Maybe a yacht? This one is a mere $68 million for a 244 footer! Remember, once you've made your yearlong cruise of the world you've almost made up for the cost!

    I can't personally think of much else, since the cost of a 'fine companion' to share this with could be any cost...;-). The point is, however, that unless you sought the goal of actually spending $1 billion and being left with nothing, you would probably be shocked as to how easily that pesky money would re-create itself as you were trying to spend it.

  187. Wealth IS a "zero sum game" by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

    You are full of shit At any given time there is a limited amount of money on this planet. Money decides what gets done. If I break my arm and don't have any money, I'm SOL. What kind of society do we live in when a person with a broken arm can't go to the nearest hospital and get it set? Something is very wrong with the system.
    I don't have a problem with someone making 100K/year. Really, I don't. Some people are acutally worth that much. Ex: Doctors, really good engineers, etc.
    What I have a problem with is people who are worth 10 billion dollars. When one person has the economic and (arguably) the political influence of 10,000 people making 100k/year, something is fucked up.
    What this country needs is a cap on individual wealth. Set it at say $20 million dollars. Assuming the average person makes $2 mil in their lifetime, this person can support himself and his family very well off half of that money. The other half he can use to buy 5 perrsonal slaves. What's that you say, slave ownership is illegal? Technically, yes, but if he has enough money to pay someone to do his whims for their entire life, they're basically his "economic" slave. Yes the specfic person could quit and go work somewhere else, but he would just hire someone else and own half of two lives. Remember that this person has enough money so he himself will never have to do any work to contribute to society at all.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
    1. Re:Wealth IS a "zero sum game" by NineNine · · Score: 1

      You are full of shit At any given time there is a limited amount of money on this planet. Money decides what gets done. If I break my arm and don't have any money, I'm SOL. What kind of society do we live in when a person with a broken arm can't go to the nearest hospital and get it set? Something is very wrong with the system.


      I'm assuming that you're talking about the US? If any hospital turned you away for having a broken arm, then you need to contact some federal or state group of some kind. If you've EVER been in a hospital (and I doubt you have), you'd see a BIG HUGE poster in the triage room that says (in several languages, usually), "If you don't have money, you are still entitled to basic health care. You cannot be turned away."

      Moron.


      I don't have a problem with someone making 100K/year. Really, I don't. Some people are acutally worth that much. Ex: Doctors, really good engineers, etc.
      What I have a problem with is people who are worth 10 billion dollars. When one person has the economic and (arguably) the political influence of 10,000 people making 100k/year, something is fucked up.
      What this country needs is a cap on individual wealth. Set it at say $20 million dollars. Assuming the average person makes $2 mil in their lifetime, this person can support himself and his family very well off half of that money. The other half he can use to buy 5 perrsonal slaves. What's that you say, slave ownership is illegal? Technically, yes, but if he has enough money to pay someone to do his whims for their entire life, they're basically his "economic" slave. Yes the specfic person could quit and go work somewhere else, but he would just hire someone else and own half of two lives. Remember that this person has enough money so he himself will never have to do any work to contribute to society at all.

      Wow. You obviously have no education whatsoever, or if you do, it didn't go past high school. Economics is NOT zero sum. I don't have the time to explain it, but suffice to say that everybody's standard of living has increased very dramatically over the past century, making EVERYBODY wealthier. So don't give me this zero sum shit. Pick up an Economics 101 textbook. You can find 'em in junior high schools all across the country.

      A personal cap on income? That's just plain stupid. You don't want wealthy people in this country contributing to income taxes, buying things (sales taxes), and running large companies that employ thousands of people? Well, that's what you'll get. A country full of subsistence farmers.

      Oh yeah, and who the fuck are you to decide how much money everybody can make, you fucking pretentious, gas-bag? Who made you God? Go fuck yourself. If you wanna live where everyone's salary is set by the gov't, try Cuba. After all, it is a "Worker's Paradise". So's North Korea. And the USSR. Notice how well those turned out? Your ideas are selfish, idealistic bullshit which has already been tried and has failed miserably.
      And I know your type. Let me guess... either academic or student, or perhaps failed, bitter techie? Everybody in the US has the right to make it on their own if they want to. If you don't want to make any more than $20 million, fine. But don't step on my rights to do so.

      Asshole.

    2. Re:Wealth IS a "zero sum game" by ninkendo84 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that growth in wealth is exponential. A rich person can make money at a much faster rate than a poor person with out working nearly as hard. At that point, millions of dollars will come in at the same time that a less fortunate person will make one thousand. While at the same time, at the other end of the world, 1.3 billion people live on the equivalent of less than one dollar a day.

      But that doesn't mean we have to get rid of all corporation ownership and stock markets, and make everything a huge communist collective. Elitism and the 'richest 1 percent' are things that you have to deal with in a capitalist country, and for all the advantages capitalism brings, it's worth it.

      --

      $ make love
      make: don't know how to make love. Stop
    3. Re:Wealth IS a "zero sum game" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *feels the greed*

      -oogle

      *reads the important stuff at the bottom of the page as he waits to reply*
      Wtf is and illegal comment?

  188. Office Space by goodhell · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Two Chicks at one time!"

    "Two chicks?"

    "Yeah sure, a guy like me'd need money to get that thing on."

  189. With my Billion Dollars... by TellarHK · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would build my $200,000,000 fortress of evil, nestled in the rockies. It would have a fake nuclear missile silo full of Apple Xserves running as a cluster to freely host worthy websites (and maybe some porn) over a dual T3 connection. I would carve a sheer rock wall out of the mountainside to project movies and television onto for my viewing pleasure, and that of any neighbor within fifty miles. I would encourage people to create a commune near my home where people would be encouraged to program OS X software by being provided with decent housing, three meals a day, and accesss to a Dual-G4 1.25Ghz tower. My sub... er, the programmers would be provided plenty of caffeinated beverages and weekend-long LAN parties for those who submit something credible to the CVS repository on site.

    My evil would be wholly subjective, as I would dedicate $100 million to pushing back the Microsoft monopoly by donations to not just one or two, but a few dozen Open Source projects in key areas that Microsoft has yet to defeat. I'd drop ten million or so to the EFF, keeping plenty in reserve for ongoing expenses and the defense of my enclave against the BATF even though there wouldn't be many guns on site. (Unless ESR dropped by, then I'd be in trouble)

    I would be a kind ruler, yet my iron fist would be felt across the globe. I wouldn't fight hunger, or disease, or educational flaws - other people with more of a conscience do that. My fleet of monochromatic black Suburbans would be well-known as they drove through cities and towns handing out black CD's loaded with the latest distribution of the Linux distribution dubbed "Overlord Linux" that I would have created in order to serve the desktop user with my "Obsidian" user interface (heavy on the black) and...

    Okay, okay, okay, I'll take my damn ritalin. Shaddap already!

    1. Re:With my Billion Dollars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do I send my donation to your cause?

    2. Re:With my Billion Dollars... by theNeophile · · Score: 1

      "Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter"

  190. Evil plans to take over the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd use it to build my secret underground "Moon Base" purchase a giant "Laser", aim it at the Earth, and threaten the heads of states to give me "One Billion Dollars" to replace the money I lost building the "Moon Base" and the "Laser", then fire the "Laser" at the Earth anyway. I would call it "The CowboyNeal Project" (raises pinky to corner of mouth, emits diabolical evil genius laugh).

  191. Oracle by sharkey · · Score: 2

    With one billion dollars, I could have the State of California get me enough Oracle licenses for my wife, my daughter and myself to connect to an Oracle database, and still have enough left over to to see a first-release movie at night.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  192. LAME!! by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    Whomever wrote that article was LAME! c'mon - why do they think that we would eat a lifetime suppy of Bic Fscking Macs!!!

    Buy a russian bride?!

    Losers are the people who have that vision of geeks.

    At least I know I am not as narrow minded, prejudice and retarded as that writer.

    If I had a billion I would buy that fool a clue....

    oh - wait I wouldn't be able to afford it.

  193. Re:whores? what about the Entourage and Drugs?! by anastus · · Score: 1

    What?!

    No one has suggested a life sized "Death Star" ride on your mansion property?? Your own multiscreen theatre in your house? No renting a few companies of Spetnatz commandos, squadron of MiGs, a few platoons of T80's, Airlift and logistics and take over a small 3rd world nation and call it Corusant and set yourself up as Emperor Palpatine the 1st? Fsuk the poor! in my land the poor would be just as ceushed under my iron heel as they ever previously, but I'd slash taxes, have American firms come into my land to exploit the population and pay me large amounts of cash, then tell Dubyah we were fully behind the
    Hell, I'd buy the "Auryn" off of Steven Speilberg, have supermodels flown to my posh home, snort coke of their emaciated bodies and make them dress up as my favorite female characters from anime and do terrible things to them. *Of course, that'd mean dumping my gf for a "trophy whore" and getting myself a bigger entourage than Louis Farrakan or Puff Diddy* Did I mention having an OC3 or DS3 pipe and running the mother of all warez and pr0n servers?

    I have no doubt money like that would completely corrupt me in mere moments....wow, my moral compass is spinning just thinking about it!

    --
    Calvin:"It takes an uncommon mind to think of these things Hobbes" Hobbes: "I'm afraid I'd have to agree with that."
  194. Companies to Own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PLA - Playboy MktCap $200 Mill
    ATI- ATI MktCap $550 Mill
    Omahasteaks.com Reported to be worth $150 mill

    Got your whores, monster video games boxen, and a big fat steak. With enough to buy a 0.1% of the shares in M$.

  195. Random thoughts... by southpolesammy · · Score: 2

    First things first -- I'd take $100M of it, buy new houses for all my friends and family, pay off everyone's debt, and put the remainder of it in investments that guarantee me and my family a comfortable life off the interest/dividends for the rest of our lives. Now, with the remaining $900M.....

    I'd go to Las Vegas and play Blackjack with $1M bets at a time.

    I'd pay the transportation staff for Art Modell to drop him off in downtown Cleveland just before the Browns-Ravens game.

    I'd buy Lichtenstein.

    Free as in beer. For real.

    I'd invest in donut shops. Because donuts taste good.

    I'd invest in heart disease foundations. Because donuts taste good.

    I'd book the most expensive suite aboard the Grand Princess cruise ship and renew every week for a year.

    When cow-orkers ask what I'd like for lunch, I'll tell them Philly Cheesesteak, in Philadelphia. Tomorrow, New England clam chowder, in Boston. The day after, Jamaican jerk chicken....you get the picture.

    One billion shares of Lucent stock.

    There's many, many more....

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  196. not this geek by Servo · · Score: 1

    If i had a spare billion.. I'd hire assassins to kill off those 500 black market clones of myself.. damnit, there can be only one!

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  197. Become a media magnate and run for president by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    How about buying a magazine and a few news papers to peddle my pet political theories. Then, try to buy enough votes to become the US president while peddling a flat tax scheme?

  198. 3 steps to making a billion dollars by aeverspa · · Score: 1

    1) Steal Underwear 2) ... 3) Profit!

  199. Re: Only your philosophy bothers me.... by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    First of all, what is money? That's the first thing one has to grasp. Money is simply a symbol of your labor. If you can agree with me there, then why does it seem logical to put artificial limits on how much money someone can earn for themselves?

    Furthermore, it's an accepted practice that if you so choose, you can transfer these tokens of your labor to anyone else you see fit. Therefore, although you might find it upsetting somehow that rich business owners hand their wealth down to future generations - it's perfectly sensible and equitable.

    Given our current system of government, those with large sums of money *do* end up forcibly giving some of it away every year. Either they're hit with high taxes, or in efforts to dodge such taxes, they have to spend some of it on charities and donations. (Why do you think Bill G. gave away that billion dollars so far, and will keep on doing so? I highly doubt it was simply because he had a sense of guilt, or just wanted to be a "nice guy" all of a sudden.)

    At the most basic level, it's pretty easy to determine how much money someone "needs" to survive - but you have to look at it on a case-by-case basis. What's the cost of living index where the person currently resides? Do they have any special medical needs? Once you come up with that dollar amount, the rest is "unnecessary" - but most of it helps us live more fulfilling and enjoyable lives.

    Don't forget, that guy with "too much money" who buys an expensive boat is helping other people make a living, too. Someone made a commission selling it to him, and certainly he'll employ maintenance people to fix the engine, etc. when it breaks down. Factory workers built everything in and on that boat, and somebody had to build the dock it's kept in. Still others are employed to do such things as dredge the rivers and lakes, so boats such as these can navigate through.

  200. Buy a small country by Graymalkn · · Score: 1

    There are two ways to go about doing this but both require access to a poor (but lovable!) country. Let us say, for example, Guyana.

    First and most socially acceptable, simply agree to purchase a small island. Not just to own, though- you want to actually secede, gaining not just property rights but complete legal autonomy and independence. You could perhaps enter into a set of treaties with the former-government to make it more palatable, such as non aggression and fishing rights, but the land would be completely and totally yours.

    The second -and for some reason more frowned upon- option would be to buy the presidency. This could be done either in one of the old fashioned, underhanded ways (such as forming a rebel army or bribing officials to rig the election) or in a much more honest way: publicly offer the people of the country your entire fortune in exchange for the post of dictator-for-life. The money could be put into the national coffers, used to make public improvements, or distributed directly to the citizens. In the case of Guyana, this would come out to about $1400 for every man, woman, and child in the land. Assuming parents got their kids' money, this would be right around the half the annual income for an entire family. If nationalized, this would be more than the entire governmental budget for four years! Such an offer would be hard to resist for such a poor nation, and they may well look upon you as a national savior -perhaps even a god- should you choose to rule benevolently.

    So one billion dollars can buy you a nation, with an option for godhood.

    --

    *******
    "What good is science if no one gets hurt?!" - Professor Chromedome

  201. Well duh by Omote · · Score: 1

    I'm late to the party but after reading all the other comments, I can't believe no one said this:

    I'd figure out how to build a lightsaber. More accurately, I'd pay *other* people to figure it out. I just want one.

    Although I'm not sure this could be done for a billion but it'd sure be fun to try.

  202. Charity from Bill before the Gates Foundation by MobyTurbo · · Score: 2
    The Gates Foundation has given billions away. Literally. What have you done?
    The Gates Foundation is a public relations ploy. I recall that Bill Gates before it's founding admitted in an interview that primarily gave money in the form of computers donated to public libaries. (I couldn't find the interview, I did find this pre-gates-foundation article however.) His chartitable giving then according to Salon in '97? "85 percent in donated Microsoft computer software."
  203. CRENOSPHERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would build the world's very first crenosphere.

  204. Carlin: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selling is legal.
    Fucking is legal.
    Why isn't selling fucking legal?!?
  205. Rich excentric geek? by opposume · · Score: 0

    Well, one billion dollars, if you look really hard at it, isn't really that much. I mean, look at bill gates. all of 43Billion he's got? You'll still be small time in the grand scheme of the richest people in the world. But hell, when you keep yourself in the fat fiber pipes and the fastests game servers out there, what more do you need? Just invite a couple friends over and LAN for eternity! Damn everyone else!

    --
    I haven't lost my mind. It's backed up on disk somewhere.
  206. I'd emmigrate ... to Triton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That should be far enough away from humanity.

  207. terribly inefficient by fishexe · · Score: 1

    Apparently, a geek would buy 500 black-market clones of himself,

    No geek I know would waste money on 500 clones, when one or two would do the job (or maybe five or so for multiply redundant backup purposes) and the savings fromt he other 495 could be put toward mainframes, building a sattelite network, an underground lair, mirrorring the internet, possibly getting a low-end fighter jet, or lots and lots of Jolt. Just to name a small subset.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  208. I'd buy my way out of the human race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A billion dollars is enough cash to cover a lifetime worth of food, water, air, energy, tools and toys and move it all to a remote location outside of society's influence.

    I've wanted to drop out of the human race for a long time (since I was 8 or so). Similarly, much of the human race has wanted me to go away for the same length of time. It's a win-win proposition. ;)

  209. Re:I'd buy a whole ton of those desktop tank robot by theNeophile · · Score: 1

    No, it's pronounced chowder!

  210. Add much? by Fissure_FS2 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone besides me notice that the geek spends $850 million on clones alone and still has $250 million to donate to scientific research? That's $100 million over the limit right there!

    --
    My life's goal is to get a score of +3!
  211. Espionage is not to be underestimated by bagsc · · Score: 1

    A true geek knows he should spread his spending out and keep good investments. @10% interest, i=pe^rt=$274k per day, off interest. Top Secret documents go for $20k to $100k, so Non-disclosure source code would probably sell on the order of unity. Two commercially viable programs a day...
    Or, if you've played Jagged Alliance, you know the worlds best mercenaries go for $10k a day - a 100 man strike force, including adequate h4x0rs, with $1 million in gear, in a town named Redmond, and a CD pirating factory in Tiajuana ($1 million) and more mass mailed cds than AOL. A few million can go a long way.
    Since you bought a Cayman Island, when the Federales come kicking down your door, you can revert to banging models and counting your off-shore assets.

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  212. Build a stairway to heaven... by Milk+and+Cookies · · Score: 0

    Well, not quite. I'd wait until it's possible to build a space elevater, then build a hotel up there. That just might cost more than a billion, though.

  213. I'd buy 3D Realms ( "Make them an offer they couldn't refuse" ) and make them finally release Duke Nukem Forever.

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  214. Construction Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would build an upside down Great Pyramid

  215. america's cup? by tahpot · · Score: 1

    i suppose i could enter and have a 50/50 chance of winning

  216. You are wrong by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

    Entitled to basic health care my ass, you have obviously never gotten a bill from a hospital.
    And you are never going to make $20 million.
    Yes people WORKING add to the sum of wealth in the world, but people sitting on their ass and earing interest does not. The money that they get as interest is actually just part of the wealth that people doing work and creating things has made.
    Technically, economics is not zero sum, and so perhaps my title was misleading but a lot of other things that it is a mere abstraction of are. For instance, land ownership. Too many of you guys seem to forget that. I took Econ 101 at an Ivy-League University and got an A, but I know the difference between a model of reality and reality itself and I don't really care where either one of us was/wasn't educated. Your ideas you be able to stand on their own. Since you think where I was educated is what really matters, now that you know I expect you to bow in respect and awe at the size of my massive penis :)
    Too many of you right-wing nutjobs think that because new wealth can be created, that any wealth someone gets is new. If I buy something for $10 and sell it for $100, I've just made $90. That doesn't mean I've contributed $90 worth of wealth to society. The thing existed both before and after I sold it and that $90 didn't appear from nowhere. Think about that for a while.
    I didn't say corporations couldn't exist. They just wouldn't be controlled by a handful of ultra-rich people.
    I don't think you have a right to unlimited personal wealth. Why should you be able to own all the land/oil/etc in the world? Do you honestly think it is your right to own more than you could ever possibly need and have the rest of the world leasing/buying it from you, while you sit on you ass and do nothing? I think my right to earn a living beats your right right to own whatever you want at some point.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  217. Here's How by ROBOKATZ · · Score: 1

    Strippers and Blackjack.

  218. Re:your cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, think about it...nothing would get done.

  219. Statue of me by SpikeACE · · Score: 1

    Forget rushmore. The statue of liberty would be the Statue of Me!!! Either that or I'd take 49 of my closest friends into space.

  220. Cool Russian dudes, Wasteful diamond cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2. In a rash act of generosity, pops for idol Lance Bass' trip to the moon on a shoddily made Russian rocket ship. Cost: $20 million.

    I'm sick of all these snaps on the Russian space dudes. Those Russkies are cool and have forgotten more about space than we (the West) know.

    4. He'd wear diamonds on the soles of his shoes. Assuming a price of $800 to $900 per carat and covering the soles of his shoes with 3.5 ounces of diamonds, he'd spend about $422,450. Wearing diamonds on the soles of 50 pairs of shoes would cost him about $22,122,500. Keeping a lifetime supply of $67-an-ounce caviar: $490,000.

    This is overpriced. There is no reason why the Hedonist would need gem-grade diamonds. He/she could use industrial-grade rocks and save a bundle.

  221. Recast the hull by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    Hay don't be cheap. Recast the hull and update other parts as well.
    Maybe a lazer upgrade.

    Then your army reaches intact.
    Unless they send in the millitary. So you want the final battle to happen at MSHQ... :)

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  222. Ten dollar bills by KnowledgeFreak · · Score: 1

    I would cash it into one hundred ten dollar bills each day and then spend my life impulse shopping and over tipping everyone.