So how do all these other fake devices get through? I've read that the TSA has a lamentable record detecting test devices, and I imagine by test device they mean something that otherwise looks ordinary, because if the test device is a number of red tubes stuffed with trace amounts of dynamite with an alarm clock and curly wires taped to it I'm sure a photo would have emerged by now.
I'm sure the "so called" security experts you deride would point out that the S in HTTPS is not simply encryption spelled in a funny way. Security != Encryption and the role of the certificate is Authentication not Encryption. If it doesn't authenticate anything then it is worthless, and the whole bloody point of a public CA IS to be the internet's watchdog or there is no point in trusting them.
Or do they feel that the only role of an adult is to buy liquor for children ?
I was listening to Ryan on the radio talking about not rejecting the good because it was not perfect and accepting compromise etc. If the voice had been slightly different and the timing a year ago I could easily have believed it was Obama saying those things.
For that matter, if the opportunity had been better to run against Hillary in the primary I could easily see us looking at president Trump the Democrat.
What I want to see more than anything else is a healthy working opposition, not just everyone switching hats between a "Party of no" and the party of "cmon, let's just work together to get it done", but rather two parties promoting, contrasting, and building support for their ideas, but as it is, the opposition are not rewarded for co-operation or punished for blatant obstructionism it seems.
I think it depends on what's said on Fox in the morning. I don't think H1B reform is a hot button issue for its own sake, or for the sake of employers or visa holders, but if it can be co-mingled with outrage over someone who can be an easy target for blame and looks like they're getting a better deal than they deserve regardless of the facts then it will rise to be the next big thing. I doubt he's walked away from healthcare, there's plenty of rage left to be mined there.
It might be worth considering getting a degree from a European University, maybe spend 3 years there and then come back and enroll for a masters back home.
I can't say I understand it really, but I've always seen this as something that places limits on what we can measure. But can we use this phenomenon to force something to happen. That is, can we use precision clocks to force some weirdness to happen on a macro scale ? For example, can we make conservation of energy fail within a small volume if we measure time very accurately all around it ?
And yet I see among the first reactions to us having put misogynists and racists into power is "this is not who we are". Turns out it is who we are, we need to own it and find a way to collectively become better people.
"Person A" is not some guy off the street, it is an institution. They should have known better to begin with. If an open and inclusive society is what we want then this is the price. Ask the institution if they specifically wanted to exclude some people ?
Try the argument out in another context, eg. if a bank ATM is too high up the wall for a wheelchair bound user to reach it, should they make accommodations or should they grant a license to an able-bodied group to host their own ATM somewhere equally inaccessible.
I'm sure this group means well, but sometimes the only driving motive for things to change is for there to be some inconvenience and outcry about this valuable content becoming unavaiable.
Yes it is. At some point someone always seems to have to sue to get the right thing done. I may not like it, you seem not to like it, but the people who mirrored the content only prevented a proper solution being put into place.
There are lots of suggestions here that could have made the content more accessible, but they have been rendered moot because the content has been mirrored and the Universities can wash their hands of it knowing that it is still "out there" depriving these students of leverage to get the right thing done.
Employees can qualify for not having premiums doubled by simply removing an eye. It's not our fault, but our fiduciary responsibility to maximize shareholder value. And you'll still be able to see if you were responsible and maintained two healthy eyes prior to the program. It won't reduce our healthcare costs if you join the program, but it will reduce our payroll costs if you fail to qualify for the discount.
Rest assured that you can't be penalized under current law if the eyeball you submit for testing is defective in any way, but should the legal landscape change we may be forced to re-evaluate the policy.
Maybe it works, tell me about it when the control group is spending half an hour a day for 40 days trying to remember lists of words and doing something with them.
In my youth I provisioned phone service in a CO. I would take a batch of orders, memorize the numbers on them and then thread the cores and run jumpers to provision the service. I'm no savant, everyone in the office that had been there long enough could do just as well or better.
I could remember quite a few of them at a go. It took a couple of weeks to develop the capacity to do it and I have long since lost the ability through lack of practice.
There was no memory palace involved though, when I started the job it seemed impossible, but the facility came quickly with practice.
Trump has dozens of offices in many buildings, at some point in the last 100 years one of the residents in one of these buildings will have been the subject of a wiretap completely unrelated to Trump. This will be seized upon as verification that this was exactly the wiretap trump was talking about.
I googled this and I think you're making that up. The searches that I did (Barack Obama Number of tweets and Donald Trump number of tweets) said that Obama posted 15,400 tweets and realdonaldtrump has over 30,000 tweets archived. I agree that once you hit the 10s of thousands they are all the same, but why spread such nonsense when it is so easy to google.
Every government form should have chatbot assistance available. The purpose of the government form is to convey information accurately so that help can be delivered to the people that qualify and rule out assistance to people that should be denied - that is the government's intent after all.
If the chatbot helps imrorve the effectiveness of that process, and it seems there is evidence that it does as I have not heard that the 160,000 odd parking citations were overturned improperly, then all for the better.
Slashdot Mirror
for Microsoft
So how do all these other fake devices get through? I've read that the TSA has a lamentable record detecting test devices, and I imagine by test device they mean something that otherwise looks ordinary, because if the test device is a number of red tubes stuffed with trace amounts of dynamite with an alarm clock and curly wires taped to it I'm sure a photo would have emerged by now.
from the marketing geniuses that brought you "side effect pharmaceuticals", "cirrhosis malt liquor" and "divorce playing cards".
I'm sure the "so called" security experts you deride would point out that the S in HTTPS is not simply encryption spelled in a funny way. Security != Encryption and the role of the certificate is Authentication not Encryption. If it doesn't authenticate anything then it is worthless, and the whole bloody point of a public CA IS to be the internet's watchdog or there is no point in trusting them.
Or do they feel that the only role of an adult is to buy liquor for children ?
What do the other elite forces think - what do the seals use ?
They usually want point of sale integration too - so they can look at "no sale" cash drawer openings.
I was listening to Ryan on the radio talking about not rejecting the good because it was not perfect and accepting compromise etc. If the voice had been slightly different and the timing a year ago I could easily have believed it was Obama saying those things.
For that matter, if the opportunity had been better to run against Hillary in the primary I could easily see us looking at president Trump the Democrat.
What I want to see more than anything else is a healthy working opposition, not just everyone switching hats between a "Party of no" and the party of "cmon, let's just work together to get it done", but rather two parties promoting, contrasting, and building support for their ideas, but as it is, the opposition are not rewarded for co-operation or punished for blatant obstructionism it seems.
I think it depends on what's said on Fox in the morning. I don't think H1B reform is a hot button issue for its own sake, or for the sake of employers or visa holders, but if it can be co-mingled with outrage over someone who can be an easy target for blame and looks like they're getting a better deal than they deserve regardless of the facts then it will rise to be the next big thing. I doubt he's walked away from healthcare, there's plenty of rage left to be mined there.
I see Pepe's keeping steering clear of anything shady since his recent bad choices then.
why would it be a loud bang
That's why they asked for used itunes cards in low denominations with no sequential serial numbers, so they couldn't be tracked.
No they built the train to tow the electric glider into the air
my inability to read or type anything without moving my lips is a security bonus.
It might be worth considering getting a degree from a European University, maybe spend 3 years there and then come back and enroll for a masters back home.
Impressive that being shot to death in office didn't seem to slow him down much (and still doesn't).
Just not the ones they set out for
I can't say I understand it really, but I've always seen this as something that places limits on what we can measure. But can we use this phenomenon to force something to happen. That is, can we use precision clocks to force some weirdness to happen on a macro scale ? For example, can we make conservation of energy fail within a small volume if we measure time very accurately all around it ?
And yet I see among the first reactions to us having put misogynists and racists into power is "this is not who we are". Turns out it is who we are, we need to own it and find a way to collectively become better people.
"Person A" is not some guy off the street, it is an institution. They should have known better to begin with. If an open and inclusive society is what we want then this is the price. Ask the institution if they specifically wanted to exclude some people ?
Try the argument out in another context, eg. if a bank ATM is too high up the wall for a wheelchair bound user to reach it, should they make accommodations or should they grant a license to an able-bodied group to host their own ATM somewhere equally inaccessible.
I'm sure this group means well, but sometimes the only driving motive for things to change is for there to be some inconvenience and outcry about this valuable content becoming unavaiable.
Yes it is. At some point someone always seems to have to sue to get the right thing done. I may not like it, you seem not to like it, but the people who mirrored the content only prevented a proper solution being put into place.
There are lots of suggestions here that could have made the content more accessible, but they have been rendered moot because the content has been mirrored and the Universities can wash their hands of it knowing that it is still "out there" depriving these students of leverage to get the right thing done.
The eye gouging program is entirely voluntary.
Employees can qualify for not having premiums doubled by simply removing an eye. It's not our fault, but our fiduciary responsibility to maximize shareholder value. And you'll still be able to see if you were responsible and maintained two healthy eyes prior to the program. It won't reduce our healthcare costs if you join the program, but it will reduce our payroll costs if you fail to qualify for the discount.
Rest assured that you can't be penalized under current law if the eyeball you submit for testing is defective in any way, but should the legal landscape change we may be forced to re-evaluate the policy.
Have a nice day
Maybe it works, tell me about it when the control group is spending half an hour a day for 40 days trying to remember lists of words and doing something with them.
In my youth I provisioned phone service in a CO. I would take a batch of orders, memorize the numbers on them and then thread the cores and run jumpers to provision the service. I'm no savant, everyone in the office that had been there long enough could do just as well or better.
I could remember quite a few of them at a go. It took a couple of weeks to develop the capacity to do it and I have long since lost the ability through lack of practice.
There was no memory palace involved though, when I started the job it seemed impossible, but the facility came quickly with practice.
Trump has dozens of offices in many buildings, at some point in the last 100 years one of the residents in one of these buildings will have been the subject of a wiretap completely unrelated to Trump. This will be seized upon as verification that this was exactly the wiretap trump was talking about.
I googled this and I think you're making that up. The searches that I did (Barack Obama Number of tweets and Donald Trump number of tweets) said that Obama posted 15,400 tweets and realdonaldtrump has over 30,000 tweets archived. I agree that once you hit the 10s of thousands they are all the same, but why spread such nonsense when it is so easy to google.
Every government form should have chatbot assistance available. The purpose of the government form is to convey information accurately so that help can be delivered to the people that qualify and rule out assistance to people that should be denied - that is the government's intent after all.
If the chatbot helps imrorve the effectiveness of that process, and it seems there is evidence that it does as I have not heard that the 160,000 odd parking citations were overturned improperly, then all for the better.