Slashdot Mirror


Calendar Bug Disables Older PlayStation 3 Models

JohnWilliams writes "The Sony PlayStation Network appears to be inaccessible to older ('phat') PS3 units. Players cannot play games that require a connection, even in single-player, offline mode, e.g. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. Also, the system date resets to January 1, 2000. Sony is 'looking into it.' Speculation abounds that it is a bug related to 2010 being incorrectly flagged as a leap year. The newer PS3 Slim models seem to be working properly."

342 comments

  1. y2k anyone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I for one, welcome our y2k10 playstation overlords.

    1. Re:y2k anyone ? by gerardolm · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you mean Y2.01K?

    2. Re:y2k anyone ? by cdpage · · Score: 1

      if it were an apple issue, it would be Y2.01.3K

    3. Re:y2k anyone ? by joaommp · · Score: 1

      This is Sony's way of enforcing users to update so they cannot crack the bitchmachine. Everybody was saying "don't update your PS3 if you want to be able to run linux and to crack the bitchmachine..." well, now you have it.

    4. Re:y2k anyone ? by drej · · Score: 1

      If it were an apple issue, it would be i2K .

  2. HA! by ZDRuX · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I hope Sony gets sued to absolute oblivion over this. Not being able to play games you have paid for is abso-fucking-lutely un-acceptable for any reason other than your console being physically broken. At least in my books.

    All these goddamn DRM schemes that backfire and companies never learn.. Let me have my toaster and my TV and my DRM-free games and I won't say anything. Just leave us alone!!!

    --
    The magical number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:HA! by sopssa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a bug. And it's not because of any kind of DRM system with the bluray games. It's because of the trophy system:

      It's the same story for other games that feature dynamic trophy support.

    2. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's because of the trophy system:

      rubbish. older downloaded PS1 games won't start either. they give a "invalid copyright protection" error message

    3. Re:HA! by sopssa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, that's why I said with the bluray games. Downloaded games obviously use a little bit different system.

    4. Re:HA! by dangitman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hope Sony gets sued to absolute oblivion over this. Not being able to play games you have paid for is abso-fucking-lutely un-acceptable for any reason other than your console being physically broken.

      Jesus fuck. Suing over temporarily not being able to play a game? The "sue everybody" mentality really has gotten ridiculous.

      All these goddamn DRM schemes that backfire and companies never learn.. Let me have my toaster and my TV and my DRM-free games and I won't say anything. Just leave us alone!!!

      What does it have to do with DRM? Calendar bugs have been a very common part of the computing landscape for many years.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    5. Re:HA! by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

      More likely, people will simply say "uhuh, it is broken, lets get new one", will go out and buy new one. This bug could end up being quite profitable: people will either come to service center and get software update (or just do get it done by friend) or they will buy new hardware.

      Which is same reason why DRM scheme issues are never issue for average consumer because it either works just fine or end up not being big enough deal. It is customers who never learn.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    6. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hope Sony gets sued to absolute oblivion over this.

      Jesus fuck. Suing over temporarily not being able to play a game? The "sue everybody" mentality really has gotten ridiculous.

      Thats why I dont want to live in the US. Instead of solving problems like civilized people everyone sues right and left and demands millions in damages if you even looked angrily at someone. I demand, I want, me me me money money money for me.

    7. Re:HA! by ZDRuX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What does it have to do with DRM? Calendar bugs have been a very common part of the computing landscape for many years.

      Sorry, but what do "computer landscapes" have anything to do with being unable to play my games due to a calendar screw up?

      I've been playing video games since Commander Keen was being sold as shareware on a 3.5 floppy at your local VHS rental store, and I have *never* had a single problem with my computer or video games because of a "leap year".

      The only reason I can see a video game not working because of mis-matched dates is because of DRM, there is no - and neither should there be, any reason why a game should be dependent on any date.

      --
      The magical number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    8. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I found the ps3 drm quite unintrusive. I just pop in a disc and it works. It doesn't even ask for a serial number. What's your problem?

    9. Re:HA! by XAD1975 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The only reason I can see a video game not working because of mis-matched dates is because of DRM, there is no - and neither should there be, any reason why a game should be dependent on any date.

      Which leaves me pondering of Ubi Soft's move to enforce online connection to play their latest games. Yes, this is a sidenote, but it seems eye-opening of potential issues and customer relations for this DRM model.

    10. Re:HA! by ZDRuX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a bug. And it's not because of any kind of DRM system with the bluray games. It's because of the trophy system:

      So you're saying it's ok for me to be locked out of my games because Sony's servers don't feel like giving out achievements at this time.

      --
      The magical number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    11. Re:HA! by diamondsw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While people are far too quick to yell "sue" needlessly, it is a legitimate complaint that otherwise offline, single-player games should be unusable due to this glitch. Whatever happened to gracefully handling failure? A network connection has no business being a requirement (to the point of failing to play without it) for a single player game.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    12. Re:HA! by sopssa · · Score: 0

      If it would be intentional, I would side with you. But all those games work normally even if you don't have an Internet connection, so it's obvious it's currently caused by the bug and not loss of connection to PSN network. Sometimes bugs happen.

    13. Re:HA! by sopssa · · Score: 1

      But this case has nothing to do with DRM. All those games work just fine even if you don't have an Internet connection.

    14. Re:HA! by ZDRuX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dude, did you even read the article? SOME GAMES CANNOT PLAY OFFLINE. Lookup what offline means, its opposite of ONLINE.

      --
      The magical number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    15. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely, people will simply say "uhuh, it is broken, lets get new one", will go out and buy new one. This bug could end up being quite profitable: people will either come to service center and get software update (or just do get it done by friend) or they will buy new hardware.

      Profitable for who? They still sell ps3s at a loss.

    16. Re:HA! by dangitman · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only reason I can see a video game not working because of mis-matched dates is because of DRM,

      Well, if that's the only reason you can think of, you're not thinking very hard, are you?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    17. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      last I checked sony were still losing money on the PS3 due to the last price cuts or at best they are breaking even, so this can only cost them money even if people go out and buy new ones.

    18. Re:HA! by mweather · · Score: 1

      Sometimes bugs happen.

      And sometimes they lead to lawsuits.

    19. Re:HA! by dangitman · · Score: 1

      A network connection has no business being a requirement (to the point of failing to play without it) for a single player game.

      But that's not the problem. On my PS3, an internet connection is available - I can browse the web just fine, but I can't log in to the Playstation Network.

      Also, a network connection is not normally required for these games. The problem appears to have something to do with trophies - games that would normally work offline just fine, give an error if you have previously been connected to the network. It now tries to "sync trophies" and fails. If you had been playing purely offlinem I don't think this big would affect you.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    20. Re:HA! by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      We are talking about electronics and software here, It all has bugs and potential failures, you don't sue when your fridge breaks down, you don't sue when your TV shorts, you either return it under warranty or if out of warranty you buy a new one or get it repaired. I hate sony with a passion, but for christs sake it's a mass produced piece of electronics, it is gonna have bugs. People are just lucky they will probably get this fixed for free, now if sony refuses to fix it THEN we can talk about suing.

    21. Re:HA! by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What does it have to do with DRM?

      The DRM for games purchased on PlayStation Network seems to require that it be able to phone home and validate everything before it lets you play the game. This is impacting all of the games I've tested so far which were purchased from the PlayStation Network. Many of them just fail with an inscrutable error message ("Error HEXADECIMALSOUP") and refuse to start up. Others give you "demo version" mode and behave like you need to purchase the full product still.

      Calendar bugs are one thing, but DRM which fails and locks you out of a bunch of stuff you paid for in the presence of such a bug is another thing entirely. If Sony gives me a nice discount voucher or PSN credit by way of apology for this inconvenience, I'll be less peeved, but I get the feeling that Sony (and their ilk) consider their self-rights-protection technology to be so damned important that no amount of inconvenience on the part of their paying customers is too much to ask. They'd be more concerned if a calendar bug allowed you to bypass all that license-key crap.

      --
      proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
    22. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      The only games that can't be played offline are those that have some PSN component.

      In other words, this ONLY effects games with online components, like trophies, or that require an active PSN account due to DRM (like downloaded PS1 games).

      Offline-only games are completely unaffected.

    23. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does involve DRM.
      The internal hardware clock has a fault, the hypervisor is now seeing completely screwed date - one that has decreased in value.
      Login to PSN network involves checking the internal clock time - and you're kicked out if the value if 'out of range'. That's easy enough to fix, but it won't fix everything. You'll find that your downloaded content is no longer accepted (hypervisor DRM issue) and your PS1 games won't work either (hypervisor DRM issue)

    24. Re:HA! by Your.Master · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And sometimes they shouldn't.

      This was an accident that is ultimately harmless, particularly in the long term, and will more than likely be resolved within a day or so.

      A lawsuit is ridiculous at this point. Maybe if they let it go on for weeks, or if it actually destroys their peripherals.

    25. Re:HA! by ZDRuX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I understand your explanation of the bug, I'm just arguing that a game shouldn't be crippled by a simple bug that should be trivial to game avaialability offline. I'm just saying a game shouldn't be crippled by the system date. And the only reason I can think of why someone would want the date sync'd or the game made non-working due to changed system date was because of some form of DRM.

      Maybe I'm wrong but this is the only reason I can think of. I just can't find it easy to accept their explanation for this, that's all.

      --
      The magical number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    26. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paid for product rendered unusable remotely. What's not suable about that?

    27. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all DRM is dependent on an internet connection... *sigh*
      Just because Ubisoft and others are using newer more anal DRM requiring the internet, does not mean all DRM does.
      I've had lots of trouble with DRM long before an internet connection was required.

      If DRM sees something (or thinks is does) it doesn't like, it shuts you down.
      I was playing SW:KotOR many years ago, and suddenly it decided I had Daemon Tools on my computer and refused to run.
      Thing is, I hadn't changed anything, I didn't have Daemon Tools (didn't even know what it was until the DRM told me it didn't like it).

      Seems like more effort is expended making games not work than work.

    28. Re:HA! by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Fair is Fair.

      If game producers can sue users when they play games they don't own, then user can sue game producers when they cant play games they do own.

      If they want to sell software as a service and use trophies to boost first sale value, it better freaking work whenever people want to use it.

    29. Re:HA! by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      I think it's completely fair. If game producers can sue users when they play games they don't own, then user can sue game producers when they cant play games they do own.

    30. Re:HA! by ZDRuX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I view this a bit differently. If the drive-door fell off or the gears on the tray broke I would't suggest suing.

      However, if your fridge doors locked and prevented you from using it each time you set the date wrong on the fridge, yes I would suggest suing.

      I am not mad at the PS3 breaking, I am mad at the fact that rather trivial issues prevent people from playing fully functioning games on a fully functioning console system.

      --
      The magical number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    31. Re:HA! by mweather · · Score: 1

      And sometimes they shouldn't.

      Of course. When you can't win, you shouldn't sue. Otherwise, why wouldn't you? Sony sure as hell wouldn't hesitate to sue someone if they thought they would win.

    32. Re:HA! by mweather · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Instead of solving problems like civilized people everyone sues right and left

      How do two parties in disagreement over financial liability solve things in your country?

    33. Re:HA! by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do not worry, if someone does sue, Sony will come to the UK and put a super injunction in place so nobody will hear about it.

    34. Re:HA! by batkiwi · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does affect consoles that have never had a network connection and never will.

    35. Re:HA! by dangitman · · Score: 1

      If game producers can sue users when they play games they don't own, then user can sue game producers when they cant play games they do own.

      That's fucking retarded. The two have nothing to do with one another. Copyright infringement is prohibited by law. Computers/consoles/software are not guaranteed by law to work all the time.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    36. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Article? What article? All I see is some blog post where some guy rambles on about how his console is broken, and a forum thread where a bunch of people whine about their consoles not working. The closest to actual information we get is a Twitter post from Sony, who indicate they're researching the supposed issues.

      But what we don't have is an article with researched facts. Hell, Sony hasn't even been given a chance to respond to the allegations yet! All we've got here are a bunch of random anecdotes from untrustworthy sources.

    37. Re:HA! by dangitman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The DRM for games purchased on PlayStation Network seems to require that it be able to phone home and validate everything before it lets you play the game.

      But that doesn't seem to be the case. I've played downloaded PSN games plenty of times without having any internet connection. This glitch seems like an entirely different beast.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    38. Re:HA! by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, the reason you shouldn't sue is that suing someone because they pissed you off makes you an asshat.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    39. Re:HA! by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 1

      Two words: Cage Match

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    40. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of them kills the other

    41. Re:HA! by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 4, Funny

      Give the guy a break, he could just be stupid.

      Or he could be following the longstanding tradition of not knowing what the hell you're talking about when bitching on the Internet.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    42. Re:HA! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Jesus fuck. Suing over temporarily not being able to play a game?"

      It's more than that - I can't use my Netflix disc - there is NOTHING to do with trophies on that. Every single game I have has some sort of trophy involved, so I'm essentially stuck with $2,000 worth of games I CAN'T PLAY, not what i wanted, especially since I'm on playthrough #22 of Heavy Rain.

      The only thing that works, is internet browsing, and playstation 1 games - EVERYTHING ELSE is busted (except my linux install, that works no problemo, and thanks to hypervisor cracking, much much better!)

      So I'm stuck with essentially an overpowered PSX with a web browser. For those that paid near $700 at launch (and still have it functional, with BC) they're stuck with a PSX/2 and web browser.

      Haven't tried blu-ray movies, don't own any - have yet to find one I like that outputs at 1080p. All the ones I've tried are 720p, from four different rental places.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    43. Re:HA! by KamuZ · · Score: 1

      ... A network connection has no business being a requirement (to the point of failing to play without it) for a single player game.

      Ubisoft begs to differ on that statement.

    44. Re:HA! by hanabal · · Score: 1

      it might be that the date bug is causing some internal mod prevention code to trip. This is why the console can still be used to watch blurays or browse the web or play ps1 and ps2 games. the mod code prevents access to the psn and ps3 games, which is exactly what people can't access at the moment. sony should hopefully be able to reset the mod prevention code remotely, via an online update or posting cds top the affected parties

    45. Re:HA! by dangitman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's more than that ... So I'm stuck with essentially an overpowered PSX with a web browser

      Well, gee, that's soooo much more than not being able to play a game. You can't use your other forms of digital entertainment either. It's like Sony infected you with AIDS or something, your suffering must be so great. I don't think you'll live to see another day, what a horrible situation to be in.

      The only way this could be any worse is if slashdot went... NO CARRIER.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    46. Re:HA! by Khyber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My PSX games, actual PSX discs, work just fine.

      Dunno about Blu-ray movies, but I know my Netflix disc won't work. None of the $2,000 in games I bought work (every single one has trophies/achievements.)

      Also, try to play that game, it wipes your trophies. Hopefully those will come back once the servers fix themselves.

      This is what they get for making varying hardware in the first place. They should have introduced ONE MODEL, with backwards compatibility all the way through. Leave in EVERY ADVERTISED FEATURE EVER, and ship a solid unit. Don't make different hardware revisions just to save money - they cut corners somewhere along the way and it is starting to come back to bite them in the ass.

      There really needs to just be a massive uprising against Sony in court - they've rootkitted our PCs, they've given us crap invasive DRM, they've advertised one feature (BC) and stripped it from 100% hardware to part hardware part software in the next revision, then to full software in the next, and then pulled it totally the next hardware refresh, and now with the PS3 slim advertising campaign they're saying right on the kiosk wall in Best Buy "It does everything" when in fact it does NOTHING close to what the original did. IT IS PURE AND SIMPLE FALSE AND MISLEADING ADVERTISING, and they need the shit sued out of them so they'll NOT DO IT AGAIN. Screw the money - we can sue for a full injunction, and force specifically SCEA to stop operating in the USA until they get the consumers what they originally were advertised on TV, in magazines, - a PS3 with BC and the ability to install another OS. Damn hard drive size, since we can upgrade that ourselves. Give us the hardware and quit trying to dictate everything in our damned lives.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    47. Re:HA! by laederkeps · · Score: 1

      Wait, I'm confused. I thought that was the American way(tm)!

    48. Re:HA! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Fuck that, if they want to sell software as a service then it needs a service level agreement, 99.999999% uptime.

      That needs to be written into law. NO IF ANDS OR BUTS. Write it that plain and simple, applied to all software sold by license.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    49. Re:HA! by Narishma · · Score: 1

      Why are you acting like they will never fix this bug? Unless I missed something, it's just a temporary inconvenience to me. Certainly not something to get up in arms about.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    50. Re:HA! by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We talk to each other. We try to come to an agreement. If that fails a third party might get involved, especially if it's a disagreement between a company and an individual customer.

      And once all those options have been exhausted...then we might bring in an actual lawyer.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    51. Re:HA! by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      other words, this ONLY effects games with online components, like trophies

      All PS3 games released since January 2009 have had mandatory trophy support... I would assume the games most people are currently playing fall in that group.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    52. Re:HA! by Khyber · · Score: 0, Troll

      Let's see, I've been bitten in the ass by their rootkits on audio CDs, DRM on some of their PC games, I just finished busting EA's balls over Spore's DRM, and now this happens.

      Sorry, when you sell software as a SERVICE, you need to be held to a SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT.

      If I would sue, I would only sue to have that pretty much codified into law, damn the money.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    53. Re:HA! by Rytr23 · · Score: 1

      bzzzzt. Sorry, that's incorrect. I turn off the network connection and still could not play either COD or AC2. This is a disgrace. F Sony.

      --
      So many injustices..so little time..
    54. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all new PS3 games (since about 18 months ago) require trophy support. so that's A LOT of games.

    55. Re:HA! by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 1

      What does it have to do with DRM? Calendar bugs have been a very common part of the computing landscape for many years.

      Because even offline games are unplayable, so it's clear some flaw exists relating to their protection mechanism.

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    56. Re:HA! by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      Graceful failure? Whatever happened to a basic test suite. There's no way something like this should have made it out the door.

    57. Re:HA! by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Because even offline games are unplayable, so it's clear some flaw exists relating to their protection mechanism.

      How does that follow? The Y2K bug would have affected offline systems if not fixed, and that had nothing to do with DRM.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    58. Re:HA! by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      Calm down. They didn't do this on purpose, it was a bug, an accident. Accidents happen. No-one is to blame.

      It sounds like you need to get out of the basement, go take a walk, and interact with the regular 3D world for a change and come back to your PS3 in a few days when Sony have fixed it. I'm no corporate apologist, but if you can't survive without your PS3 for a few days then its you who has a problem and not Sony.

    59. Re:HA! by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We talk to each other. We try to come to an agreement. If that fails a third party might get involved, especially if it's a disagreement between a company and an individual customer.

      And once all those options have been exhausted...then we might bring in an actual lawyer.

      Sometimes even "talk[ing] to each other" and "try[ing] to come to an agreement" result in complaints from the Slashdot peanut gallery. A cease-and-desist notice over a fan-made derivative work, for instance, is just "talk[ing] to each other". And a lot of disagreements don't make the news until "all those options have been exhausted", which biases news coverage in favor of lawsuits.

    60. Re:HA! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must be the sort of dissatisfied customer that every company dreams about: Rants angrily on the internet and purchases $2K worth of product...

    61. Re:HA! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "It sounds like you need to get out of the basement,"

      Seriously, you ignorant people need to quit using phrases like that. I'm independent, I travel the globe, and I work towards getting mankind out into space by working on new artificial plant lighting. Get your head out of your ass so you can actually see, eh?

      "go take a walk,"

      Hard to do with a crippled leg.

      "interact with the regular 3D world for a change and come back to your PS3 in a few days when Sony have fixed it."

      Why should I wait for Sony to fix it? I've been bitten by their rootkits, their DRM, and this bullshit. If they want to start selling their shit as a service, they need to start offering a service level agreement.

      The whole thing is in one way or another tied to the DRM scheme, I'm willing to bet mad money on it. As soon as the fix comes out I'm breaking it down (I've done quite a bit of work on the hypervisor hacking,) and I'm going to see what changes. Almost everything is linked into the DRM controls, so the answer lying within the DRM is a very likely answer.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    62. Re:HA! by addsalt · · Score: 1

      No, the reason you shouldn't sue is that suing someone because they pissed you off makes you an asshat.

      Yes, because people should live by social norms and measured responses, but Sony isn't a someone. We've been pushing free market to the point in which lawsuits are the only way to get a company to do what you want. The risk of financial damage when the PS4 is launched due to customers being upset now will not provide a quick enough response to the problem. Re-read you Ayn Rand, the company should only change if they are financially at risk. Lawsuits provide that risk.

    63. Re:HA! by Joe+Random · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Why should I wait for Sony to fix it?

      Because the other alternative is . . . . not waiting for Sony to fix it? Forcing Sony to hire a team of time-traveling coders to travel back in time and fix the bug before it happened? I fail to see what alternative there is besides waiting for a few days. Deciding to sue Sony won't make your PS3 work any sooner than just doing something else for a few days and then coming back and installing the update that they put out to fix this.

      Look, I know you're upset that a bug in the PS3 calendar has managed to trigger some sort of DRM switch. Sony is rightly at fault, and is guaranteed to fix this in a matter of days. But your over-reaction is well outside the realm of what is reasonable.

    64. Re:HA! by fedos · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ayn Rand is not exactly a good source for economic insight.

    65. Re:HA! by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhhhh...wouldn't that pretty much cover every lawsuit ever filed in history? I mean it isn't like someone is gonna go "hey I really like you, BTW I'm suing you ass!"

      As for the bug, it just shows something we have ALL known for quite a long time-QA is currently extremely shitty, especially for anything having to do with gaming. Who here has NOT ever been bitten in the ass by shitty code gaming? Thought so. Why do you think every fricking games needs patches up the wazoo? Because these companies kick out some truly shitty code, why expect the consoles themselves to be any better? The first gen PS1s died quite often, the first gen Xboxes had shitty DVD drives, and of course the RRoD on the x360, and to a lesser extent the YRoD on the PS3. They just don't QA like they used to, it is the "get it out the door and we'll patch later!" attitude across the industry.

      Anybody who has been gaming for awhile really shouldn't be surprised by this. Hopefully Sony will release yet another patch, that with any luck won't brick the machines, and it will be back to business as usual. That just seems to be the way things are done now, like it or not.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    66. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've downloaded something without an internet connection? Sir, please tell me of this magic art!

    67. Re:HA! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But at least she never installed a rootkit.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    68. Re:HA! by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Well look at it this way, if Sony made cars, they'd be in the same boat as Toyota. The difference is, owners can't just take it back to the dealership for upgrades and have to subject it to more FedEx/UPS/DHL abuse and wait and wait and wait and wait.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    69. Re:HA! by vegiVamp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To me, as an individual, a cease-and-desist doen't feel like you're trying to talk to me, it feels like you're trying to bully me. If you're trying to talk to me, give me a call or send me an informal email, from one human being to another.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    70. Re:HA! by LazyBoot · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about remotely? This is a hardware bug...

    71. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could live with that.

    72. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      poor design != EBIL DRM!!!!1111oneoneone

    73. Re:HA! by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      No-one is to blam

      Au contraire, mon amis

      The people so stupid they buy games that need an always-on network connection are to blame. They are in the same league as people who by fake drugs from spammers.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    74. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're saying there should be a service level agreement, then that's something you should have insisted on up-front, and if the company couldn't provide it you should have voted with your (or your other half's) wallet. I would have loved to play some of the PS3 games, but I refuse to buy Sony products now based on their past failures and the callous disregard they have shown their customers. It sounds like you have been in the same position yourself but you made a different choice. In the short term my decision results in some inconvenience for me but the only way companies will learn is if everyone follows my lead. If they can constantly rubbish your rights and you go back for more what incentive is there for them to change? Even if they get sued it'd be a drop in the ocean compared to the potential gains they make from some of these tactics. The only way to hurt a company is to not buy its products, tell everyone you know why you're not buying them and spread the word.

    75. Re:HA! by Frenchman113 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, if everyone goes to buy a new PS3, SONY will lose money hand over fist. They sell their units at a major loss.

    76. Re:HA! by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 0

      I was actually looking at a game at wal-mart for my new computer. And it said that I had to have an internet connection to register the fucking game, or I could not play it. What the fuck. If I spend 50+ dollars on a game. I should be able to play with it at my fucking leisure. DRM is ridiculous and it is really starting to piss me off.

    77. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe, *gasp*, it's just a bug.

    78. Re:HA! by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      No, a cease and desist is a threat of legal action.

      I's skipping the talk to each other part completely.

    79. Re:HA! by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be correct; her views fall under the purview of politics and philosophy. I do not think that she ever even studied econ; she instead tried to put forth her vision of a free society, utilitarianism be damned. That's how I see it, anyways. Other than that, she wasn't a very good writer; the only book of hers I could stand was Anthem, which just so happens to be very short. She also wanted to claim that she invented libertarianism.

      --
      SSC
    80. Re:HA! by CronoCloud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This bug is something different. I've been able to play downloaded games and games with trophy support even when the net connection has been down before, but not with this bug.

    81. Re:HA! by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      It's a bug. Sure they should have caught that error and continued with the game itself, but not doing so is hardly uncommon in computing.

    82. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Learn to read.

    83. Re:HA! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I found the ps3 drm quite unintrusive. I just pop in a disc and it works. It doesn't even ask for a serial number. What's your problem?

      His problem is what this article is about.

    84. Re:HA! by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      They've been doing that for a long time. What really annoyed me was passing off unfinished features as bugs, then never really doing a good job of implementing it.

      When networked multiplayer was getting started, they'd brag about that feature on the box, even as it was shoved out the door with that part unfinished. 3 months later you downloaded a "patch" to "fix" the "problems" with networking. Then you'd find they'd done a lousy job of it. Master of Orion 2 particularly comes to mind. No simultaneous turns (let alone real time action), and often you couldn't even look things over while others were taking their turns. May as well have kept it hotseat. Lot of poor jobs in the early days of LAN parties, before MMORPGs. Doom was one of the few games that networked well.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    85. Re:HA! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Still afaict this is a defect in original workmanship (not a wear-out and not a random failure) that renders the product largely unusable.

      If sony doesn't sort this out quickly i'd expect lawsuits in the EU at least.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    86. Re:HA! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Did you actually read the article? afaict this is impacting all games with trophy support regardless of whether the user is online or offline (and these games can most certainly be played without an internet connection)

      One of the (many) reasons I tend to buy console versions rather than PC versions of games is that they don't tend to have online activation BS.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    87. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You talk a lot of shit on the internet, kaiber. I see it pretty frequently. Care to provide a reference to where you "smacked their million-dollar lawyers" ?

    88. Re:HA! by trapnest · · Score: 1

      It's not software as a service, and if you want an SLA don't expect it to cost anything close to what the playstation network cost now.

    89. Re:HA! by trapnest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is not DRM. I understand this is sony and anything that odd gets blamed on them being evil!!!!!!!!111 but that isn't what happened here.

    90. Re:HA! by trapnest · · Score: 1

      For fucks sake people. Lets keep making assumptions and then stating them as fact by the end of our posts. The console is unable to validate the achievement data as not bullshit, and instead of the console saying "lol that's weird" and moving on, it flips out and prevents the game from starting, possibly because it recognizes the "current" date as being "impossible" according to its bugged programming.
      No secret evil motives here, just a design flaw. Hopefully one that can be patched without the console date being valid.
      And I don't even like sony...

    91. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But your over-reaction is well outside the realm of what is reasonable.

      Not that we should expect much more from a gay furry. I know I'll be modded troll but it's obviously true.

    92. Re:HA! by hanabal · · Score: 1

      I never said anything about evil motives. The mod prevention would be understandable and reasonable and yes, a design flaw. Your hypothesis is as possible as mine. However it doesn't take into account the inability to play some PSN games that don't have trophies.

      I suggest you should calm down and realise that no one in the thread above stated their hypothesis as fact

    93. Re:HA! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Actually, any excuse to sue a DRM-laden company is good enough. Only a bankrupt DRM company is a good DRM company. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    94. Re:HA! by al3 · · Score: 1

      You're half right. This is DRM working, not DRM broken.

    95. Re:HA! by DesertBlade · · Score: 1

      I have this issue, but my Netflix disk worked last night. I did set the date to the correct date.

      --
      Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    96. Re:HA! by Golddess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, if that's the only reason you can think of, you're not thinking very hard, are you?

      Neither are you apparently, otherwise surely you'd have provided some examples of additional reasons instead of simply insulting GP.

      While personally I side with GP, I will point out that games do use dates for a variety of reasons. Pokemon games starting with Gold and Silver for the GBC, and the Animal Crossing series, all have date-specific events. Of course, none of those refused to play if their internal clocks did not match the clocks of some central server. Heck, you could even set your clock to before the time of the last time you played, and it would still play just fine (though some Animal Crossing residents might be like "it's been hundreds of years since you've visited me!").

      Except maybe the Wii version of Animal Crossing, have yet to touch that.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    97. Re:HA! by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 2, Informative

      This reminds me of the "must be connected" to XBox Live to play the arcade games you purchased after you had the RRoD.

      It took a while, but Microsoft gave in and made an incredibly convoluted solution to "fix" the DRM being tied to a console that died. This error is a bit more than "no trophies at this time".... but like Microsoft, Sony's DRM has showed us all the dark side of this whole "you don't own anything" mantra of this generation's consoles... (Including the Wii...)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    98. Re:HA! by tepples · · Score: 1

      If you're trying to talk to me, give me a call or send me an informal email, from one human being to another.

      If you see hundreds of fan works out there of which you disapprove, your public relations department probably doesn't have the time to send anything more than a form letter.

    99. Re:HA! by KnownIssues · · Score: 1

      Other reasons to require date being in sync:

      • Anti-cheat measures
      • Gameplay (timing of combatant movement and weapons fire)
      • On screen clock (ok that one is lame, but a list of two items would have looked silly)

      The real point is, there are other reasons that would come to mind if one didn't have DRM-blinders on. DRM-hating becomes a conspiracy mentality, influencing one to fit everything into some evil DRM scheme. Not that there aren't real evil DRM schemes!

    100. Re:HA! by eonlabs · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, you lose some non-net based functionality as well. All my downloaded add-on content is fubared at present, free or paid. This is a pretty significant loss.

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    101. Re:HA! by JavaBear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can it be a date bug in the PS3's hypervisor (or other internal 'security' functions)? The units that that maintains among other things the DRM and copyrights.

      If that insists that the date is 29/2-2010, I can hardly imagine the number of things that will get decoded wrong.
      We may be lucky, that tomorrow the clock will claim it's March 1, at least that is a valid date. or the hardware will continue being 1 day behind, screwing up the DRM again tomorrow.

    102. Re:HA! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I demand, I want, me me me money money money for me.

      And this is why Universal Health care will never work in the United States.

    103. Re:HA! by vegiVamp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you see hundreds of fan works and instead of thinking "damn, the customers love us" you think "how dare they make fanart without paying us for it", you probably don't deserve the customers.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    104. Re:HA! by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      Just a few of the reasons that when I was in a local shop looking at buying a laptop, when the assistant suggested i buy an overpriced and underspec Sony I just giggled and walked out...

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    105. Re:HA! by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 1

      My paid-for copy of PixelJunk Monsters is inviting me to buy the full version, and you think this has nothing to do with DRM? Clearly we are using incompatible definitions of the term. There has been some kind of license-key-management screw-up precipitated by this bug. Regardless of the actual mechanism, that makes it a DRM issue.

      --
      proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
    106. Re:HA! by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Two men enter, one man leaves...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    107. Re:HA! by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      You don't need to be connected to XBL to play XBLA games. When downloaded, the game is licensed to both a) the hardware, and b) the XBL account. As long as one matches (i.e. the console is the right one, OR you're logged in to XBL with the correct account) you're golden.

      If you need to move consoles, you can go to xbox.com and relicense all your stuff to your new console. I think they let you do this once per year, without question.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    108. Re:HA! by Gizzmonic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You despise Sony, yet you spent $2,000 on PS3 downloadable games? Nerd rage troll detected!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    109. Re:HA! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      It's software, written by Sony.

      Do you really need any more explanation than that? Did you ever see their software for the Connect music store? Terrible quality. Their software that ships with their camcorders? Thank God you can open those video files in something-- ANYTHING-- else.

      The long and short is that Sony simple can not write good software. I've yet to see a Sony product with even half-decent software, for that matter.

    110. Re:HA! by HoppQ · · Score: 1

      Mods are funny, since the post should be modded +1 Informative or Insightful.

      --
      My sig will be released in 2015 third quarter. Rating pending.
    111. Re:HA! by Orbijx · · Score: 1

      You don't need to be connected to XBL to play XBLA games.

      Sorry, but I have to call you on this one, from personal experience.

      Before doing the MS licensing dance from the website to link my new machine to my account (Old one was stolen, meh), if I were logged in on my Live account, but disconnected, all my downloaded games were stuck in Trial status.

      The moment I connected, though, it would acquire the full license for my games and let me play them.

      This was a pain in the ass when all I had was mobile broadband -- I'd have to leave my laptop turned on, share the connection with the 360, and log on that way. Usually took two tries, but then it'd let me play more than just chapter 1 of Ikaruga.

      --
      One of these days, I am going to flip out. When I flip out, I'll be back in five minutes.
    112. Re:HA! by Rayonic · · Score: 1

      QA in the gaming industry only seems shitty because it's pretty much the cutting edge of hardware and software technology.

      Can you name a piece of mainstream consumer electronics (i.e. not a PC) that's more powerful than the Xbox 360 or the PS3? I can't think of one.

    113. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yiff yiff yiff

      shut up, furry.

    114. Re:HA! by Fulg · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I have to call you on this one, from personal experience.

      GP is correct, read the rest of his post. All the info is there: an explanation of how the licensing system works, and how to fix it if you're stuck having to connect to XBL to acquire your licenses.

      --
      gcc: no input sig
    115. Re:HA! by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      But that was before you tried to hack your system by setting the clock to February 29, 2010. Once that's been done, even once, your offline system is hosed until it can be validated by Sony DRM (tm).

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    116. Re:HA! by sopssa · · Score: 1

      But everyone here seems to be make the suggestion that it's the Ubisoft like DRM and you can't play your games because you can't connect to PSN. That's not the case here as you can play them offline just fine, normally. It's just a bug in the system, not some draconian DRM refusing to let you play because you can't connect to PSN.

    117. Re:HA! by sopssa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Still afaict this is a defect in original workmanship (not a wear-out and not a random failure) that renders the product largely unusable.

      If sony doesn't sort this out quickly i'd expect lawsuits in the EU at least.

      What? This is exactly that.

    118. Re:HA! by PRMan · · Score: 1

      My Netflix disc wouldn't work either until I reset the date/time this morning to March 1.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    119. Re:HA! by dangitman · · Score: 1

      But that was before you tried to hack your system by setting the clock to February 29, 2010. Once that's been done, even once, your offline system is hosed until it can be validated by Sony DRM (tm).

      And your evidence for that is what, exactly?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    120. Re:HA! by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Both are correct. Before the license transfer utility, on a new box you needed to be logged on. Now, you can transfer the hardware license to a new console (as GGP says). GP is also correct that you must be more than logged on with the correct XBL account, you must be connected with the Live servers. In other words: no offline play without the hardware license.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    121. Re:HA! by Late+Adopter · · Score: 1

      .And the only reason I can think of why someone would want the date sync'd or the game made non-working due to changed system date was because of some form of DRM.

      You assume that the bug is related to a mechanism that stops you from playing a game, but it could be a hangup or a crash or weird behavior, which other posters ARE reporting. The leap to assuming DRM is related is premature (though not ruled out).

    122. Re:HA! by prockcore · · Score: 1

      A network connection has no business being a requirement (to the point of failing to play without it) for a single player game.

      and it's not. This bug has nothing to do with the network and everything to do with bad firmware.

      The ps3 slims aren't affected... and single player games aren't the only thing this firmware bug is affecting, it also corrupts peoples themes.

    123. Re:HA! by Entropius · · Score: 1

      No, she's not, nor ethical insight. She's a rotten bastard.

      But reading the writings of a rotten bastard gives some insight into how rotten bastards operate -- in this case, Sony. They're not going to improve unless forced to at lawyer-point. Thus, lawsuits.

    124. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just don't QA like they used to, it is the "get it out the door and we'll patch later!" attitude across the industry.

      Like they used to when? Mainframes? When we sold one [1] and the associated herd of technicians on contract?

      Mass-productions products (ie, products a hell of a lot more sophisticated brought down to casual consumer prices by vast quantity) need a /huge/ co-ordinated production, marketing, and retailing scheme. That's why deadlines get written in the blood of sacrificed interns. Lacking omniscience and omnipotence, Release & Patch is the only way to put these toys in your hands. There's much more to mass production than just throwing chairs.

    125. Re:HA! by prockcore · · Score: 1

      No kidding.. I bet when the power goes out he starts raving about the thousands of dollars worth of equipment in his house that is now USELESS!

    126. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually most games seem affected even in offline mode. Saying it was just a few games would be sony lying.
      Now it has been nearly 24 hours and still no fix. I even tried setting the clock manually under linux for ps3 and even that did not work. The hardware clocks gets just reset back to 1999 no matter what you do.

    127. Re:HA! by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Sadly the US-lawyer-mentality, while damaging as all hell generally, is what's needed here.

      It takes two civilized people to solve a problem, not one civilized person and Sony.

    128. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if your fridge doors locked and prevented you from using it each time you set the date wrong on the fridge, yes I would suggest suing.

      The electric oven in a flat I used to rent would lose its time setting if the power ever went out (which it did every few months). It wouldn't turn the heating elements on until the time had been set.

      It was annoying, and caught me out a couple of times with turning it on to preheat and coming back 15 minutes later to find it still cold, but I wouldn't sue over it

    129. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nexus One. Now what's your definition of powerful?

    130. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think of one that is more powerful than the Xbox 360, and that is the PS3. Apart from that ...

    131. Re:HA! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Well it's true it's not the same law that applies in the two cases.

      However turnabout, saith the proverb, is fair play.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    132. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same applies to Microsoft really. Don't you think so?

    133. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI: Uncharted 2 worked just fine for me last night. I suspect it has to do with how games react to the trophies not being available.

    134. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and he talks about having a boyfriend! Go figure!

    135. Re:HA! by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Pffffff, make it a mudwrestling match with some hot girls.
      When they are done, all of us will have forgotten about the lawsuit and Sony will have issued a patch to fix this little glitch.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    136. Re:HA! by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Don't speak so confidently; you're no more certain of your facts than those claiming it IS DRM.

      I suspect the bug itself has nothing to do with DRM, but that the consequences of the bug are numerous, including tripping some DRM checks (therefore preventing downloaded PSN games from playing). Regardless, I'm kind of glad this happened... shine more light on the issue.

    137. Re:HA! by tbannist · · Score: 1

      It looks to me like there several different issues tied to a single bad-leap-year calculation:

      1) It's using an invalid date to update trophies because when you try to play a game with trophies, the trophies disappear. The game becomes unplayable because the trophy code requires them to be available or the game won't launch (this may only be some games with poor trophy code).

      2) The invalid date is (somehow) being transmitted to the PSN on login attempts, the bad date is rejected on Sony's end and you can't login to the PSN. Any game that relies on being logged into PSN won't work.

      I doubt it was intentional that if the date was wrong games would stop working. I think if you change the system date and play offline you won't bork your trophies and you will still be able to play (In fact, someone reported that they did exactly that and didn't have any problems).

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    138. Re:HA! by tbannist · · Score: 1

      While I'm not absolutely positively sure of this, I think single-player games that don't have trophies work fine. It's the date bug that screws up the trophies that screws up the offline games. The network connection problem is correlated, not causitive.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    139. Re:HA! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      If you haven't paid attention to the recent news - Sony is preparing to charge for the PSN.

      So guess what I'm going to demand?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    140. Re:HA! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Sony is rightly at fault, and is guaranteed to fix this in a matter of days. "

      My PS3 is now officially a BRICK. It will NO LONGER POWER ON.

      Sony now has one week to answer for this. If I don't get an answer, I'm going to crack heads.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    141. Re:HA! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      McQuown vs. Electronic Arts - the entire case is public record.

      You act as if you know me (yet you can't even spell my nickname properly when it's right in front of your face.)

      I doubt you've got half a brain to understand anything written in that court case, you can't even spell my name properly when it's right in front of you.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    142. Re:HA! by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      Who here has NOT ever been bitten in the ass by shitty code gaming?

      *raises hand quickly*

      *brain kicks in*

      *puts hand back down*

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    143. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This wouldn't be a problem is Sony were being civilized in the first place and not DRMing their games.

    144. Re:HA! by yukk · · Score: 1

      "Sony is rightly at fault, and is guaranteed to fix this in a matter of days. "

      My PS3 is now officially a BRICK. It will NO LONGER POWER ON.

      Sony now has one week to answer for this. If I don't get an answer, I'm going to crack heads.

      Umm, I don't know how they're going to apply a patch to your console if it won't power on.

      --
      The trouble with the rat race is that even if you win, you're still a rat." Lily Tomlin
    145. Re:HA! by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 1

      One of the primary issues this bug causes is that it resets the clock to 12/31/1999. Most content (in fact, all content that I'm aware of) has a "licensed starting" date/time, and none of the titles I have will work at all. This tells me that they must have a secondary clock (a "real clock") that they use to tell when licensed content is valid/invalid (so people can't just change the date/time back two days to play a demo that has expired, or a rental that has expired, etc).

      And since the clock is obviously integral to their protection mechanism, it is a flaw in said mechanism.

      Note: No, I have no inside information, but this seems to be a reasonable deduction given the evidence at hand.

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    146. Re:HA! by ZosX · · Score: 1

      Dude. I think you need to seriously consider getting out more. Sunshine is a good thing, you know?

    147. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand your explanation of the bug,

      No you don't.

      I just can't find it easy to accept their explanation for this, that's all.

      The official Sony explanation from their blog site is

      "We believe we have identified that this problem is being caused by a bug in the clock functionality incorporated in the system."

      Any other "explanation" you've heard is purely speculation and rumor.

      I'm just saying a game shouldn't be crippled by the system date.

      The problem isn't the date, the problem is with the system clock. This can be confusing so I'll explain this in layman's terms: The system clock is NOT a calendar, it does not track the Date and Time; it works more like a stopwatch. It starts counting when you turn the system on, & the date & time program uses it to calculate what the time actually is.
      The system clock is really the "heartbeat" of a computer (or gaming console), and since much of the software, from the OS on up to the programs like the games, relies upon the system clock you can have all kinds of problems if the clock has a problem.

      I've only run across a few games that are "crippled" by the system date. One example is Animal Crossing on various Nintendo platforms- if you do something today, and then change the date to the past, it causes a few things to get messed up in the game, since the game "keeps track" of time when you're not playing, and uses the Date & Time in those calculations.

      If this was purely a date/time issue, then the fix would simply be to set the date/time correctly, & all would be well. That won't work. In addition, if it really was the date/time causing the issues then you'd have this problem any time your date & time got messed up for any reason. I know for a fact this isn't the case- if you hook up a PS3 with a date/time that is drastically wrong, it'll give you a warning when you connect to PSN that some stuff might not work normally, but most things will still work fine, and your offline content will work perfectly. If anyone really wants proof of this, go get a slim model PS3 (unaffected by the bug) and set the date/time manually to something crazy, you'll see no crashes like what is happening, and any time there IS an issue you'll get a nice message window that tells you your date & time are fucked & you need to reset them.

    148. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We talk to each other. We try to come to an agreement. If that fails a third party might get involved, especially if it's a disagreement between a company and an individual customer.

      And once all those options have been exhausted...then we might bring in an actual lawyer.

      Bringing in a lawyer is not the same as suing somebody. I keep a lawyer on retainer & it comes in very handy... I've never had to actually sue anybody or go to court. But there have been a few situations where I simply could not get anybody at a company to even listen to me, let alone try to get anything accomplished. In those cases simply having a lawyer send them a letter which politely outlines your position, complaint, concern, etc. along with a statement that you'd prefer not to get into litigation is enough to get things taken care of.
      It sends the message that "Yes, I'm really serious here, not just some asshole who's bitching to try & get something for free, you need to pay attention".

      On that note, I'd also like to mention that there are very few lawyers who are willing to just sue someone for you, without attempting to resolve things outside of legal channels first. And those lawyers who will, are usually not the people you really want representing you.
      In the US, lawyers are generally the best 3rd party to consult with. Many people assume that a lawyer's job is to sue people or defend them in court, but in reality the bulk of a lawyer's work is entirely outside the court system; they offer legal advice, recommend courses of action, and can help facilitate communication with parties who normally won't give you the time of day. Occasionally you might be in a situation where you are required to go through arbitration prior to court action, but even in those cases it's usually a good idea to at least consult with a lawyer first.

    149. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is NOT with the Date/Time, and Sony never said it was. People are assuming that because the D/T is messed up, and since Sony said the clock is bugged, that they are the same. The system clock is NOT the same things as the Time and Date, although the T&D does rely upon the system clock to function properly. But there are many other things which rely on the system clock.

      and the Animal Crossing series, all have date-specific events. Of course, none of those refused to play if their internal clocks did not match the clocks of some central server. Heck, you could even set your clock to before the time of the last time you played, and it would still play just fine

      Actually on the Gamecube version, in some cases, if you time-traveled it would permanently glitch some characters & events, to where you just would never see someone (like Sahara for example) show up, or certain tournaments would never appear. I believe they fixed the perma-glitches in ALL the subsequent versions, but it will still lose any mail that is in transit & make your villagers act funny for a while. Oh, and it'll rot your turnips too, but from what I understand the game was designed to do that to prevent cheating.

    150. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you need to buy better games, VAlkryia Chronicles worked the whole time, I actually bought Heavy Rain and Valkyria Chronicles when the ApocalyPS3 started (I was out the door ~5:40CST(+6 GMT, so right before it started) Came home, WTFed when I couldn't join my roommate in MAG. QQed til i found the NeoGAF thread, laughed at the logical reason behind the problem(the clock making feb. 29th this year. and will fix itself) Waited and watched the forum. LAughed when everything went fine as the clock went from feb 29th to march 1st (actually march 2nd)

    151. Re:HA! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Oh you think you have been bitten? You don't know the pain of being bitten buddy! I downloading the demo for the original Max Payne. Man it was fun, bullet time, cool graphics, so I went out and shelled out the bucks for it at release. Went through the first level, which was the same as the demo, then guess what? BOOM! crash to desktop. And they didn't fix that shit for nearly a year!

      Or what about Vampire:Bloodlines? I had the original Vampire, and thought "Wow, this is gonna be SOOOO sweet!" so again I bought it at release. Guess what? BOOM! Bitch crashed halfway through the FIRST mission, and my bug wasn't fixed until a fan made patch came out nearly TWO YEARS later!

      That is why I have just about given up on getting new games. Alpha quality BS code, bugs that never get fixed, just a bunch of shit. Now I wait until it hits the bargain bin, so that by then all the patches and the anti-DRM No-DVD is ready to go. Between that and "Good Old Games" (Which if you haven't bought from them I HIGHLY recommend it! No DRM, easy to backup installers, everything "just works" even on x64!) I am just staying out of the BS. On a positive note that means I'll probably get another couple of years out of my 4650 1Gb, since waving my ePeen isn't something I care about.

      I just want my games to work, dammit! Is that too much to ask?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    152. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now your the one looking like an idiot, now everything is back to normal, and it turns out you actually lost nothing but a few hours online gaming time.

    153. Re:HA! by internewt · · Score: 1

      Easy, kettles, toasters, ovens...... oh, you didn't mean that kind of power ;)

      Either way though, those devices don't contain (non-safety) mechanisms that are designed to stop the machine from doing the job the customer bought it for.

      A kettle with only 2 switches was more computationally useful than a PS3 with its x million switches a couple of days ago!

      But seriously, stop apologising for the games industry. WRT consoles, they have very static platforms to publish on, and even though it might be quite new tech, it is their business decisions that lead to these scenarios, not some inherent property of technology.

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    154. Re:HA! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I fixed the issue - it just took unplugging it and trying to turn it on to discharge all remaining power, plug it in and turn it back on, it works, now. Full power cycle.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    155. Re:HA! by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you said, except the YRoD (Yellow Ring of Death) on the PS3.

      There is no "such thing"... You are talking about the yellow light that comes on when a general failure occurs (Memory error/CPU error/MB Error/FAN failure).

      The whole talk of "the yellow light of death" was a poorly researched piece by the BBC's Watchdog, where a "tech pundit" suggested that there was a recurring problem with PS3's caused due to poor soldering, and that "many" PS3s where broken. It was later revealed that the "pundit" was in the employ of Microsoft.

      The thing was, the YellowLightOfDeath, as mentioned above, is a general hardware failure signal. It was not representative of a specific problem. Secondly it affected just 0.5% of the consoles. Thats actually pretty low.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    156. Re:HA! by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Actually depends where the software is written for. Most of their embedded stuff, and firmware is actually of a pretty good quality, especially considering what it does, and the eyecandy they offer...

      There "supporting" software (eg pc stuff.. etc....).. however...........

      --
      Have a nice day!
    157. Re:HA! by eonlabs · · Score: 1

      You want to explain why you lose DLC functionality, even temporarily, when you can't connect to their servers and the date is messed up? You really think that their services will exist forever? Hate to break it to you, but for all the complaints about DRM and players rights on this site, this is an example of where it's significant.

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    158. Re:HA! by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I work in QA for a large Pharmaceutical company.

      We have to do a lot of testing, and conform to many rules set out by various agencies including the FDA. There has to be significant testing done on a new product to ensure that it does what it's supposed to do, and does it without killing people in the process.

      Now that's just the molecule.

      On we go to the manufacturing process.

      We document every single little action performed during the very early stages of making the Active Ingredient, to the Drug Product, to the eventual finished goods (be it a pill, syringe or vial)

      We then review all the documentation, check if anything out of the ordinary happened, take multiple samples and test them to see they are what we set out to make ... more things happen ... ... Some time later, the product ships out to go to the hospitals so you have pain killers and anaesthetic.

      From the inception of a new molecule, to numerous QA testing processes registration etc, it can be years before someone out there gets the new wonder drug. By this time there is already something in the R&D pipeline for the next life saving drug.

      This means that it can take years for new medicinal ideas to reach people. And this is because there are a lot of QA processes there to protect people from dodgy meds.

      Fortunately badly programmed games rarely kill people, so there are much fewer restrictions regarding QA for such. This means that new ideas, new technologies can be taken advantage of much quicker from when they are formed. If it ships 90% perfect, and can be patched later on for that last 10% then it might be seen as an acceptable trade-off to have the latest and greatest thing out there as soon as it can be got.

      Blizzard and Diablocraft 2-3 would appear to be the exception to this (and Duke Nukem Forever) whereby they are holding off on releasing the product until they are certain it's perfect. What will the fallout for it be? Will the games still be cutting edge when they arrive finally? We'll just have to wait and see.

    159. Re:HA! by mweather · · Score: 1

      No, the reason you shouldn't sue is that suing someone because they pissed you off makes you an asshat.

      Correction: A rich asshat.

  3. Not again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It reminds me of that OTA firmware upgrade that bricked things....

  4. Complete and utter Sony DRM failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    On my UK PS3, the date was reset to 31/12/1999 (a value you cannot input yourself manually) and then rolled over into 2000 some hours (5?) later.
    None of my downloaded PS1 games will start - just gives an "invalid copyright protection" error message.
    With the exception of Wipeout HD, none of my downloaded PS3 games will start.
    None of my Blu-ray game disks will start.
    My PlayTV device is not performing scheduled recordings
    VidZone cannot be used, since it requires signing into PSN network to determine what region you're from

    1. Re:Complete and utter Sony DRM failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      wow, parent is actually modded 'flamebait' for describing the exact issues that the problem has caused

    2. Re:Complete and utter Sony DRM failure by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Simple response? A big no.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    3. Re:Complete and utter Sony DRM failure by erroneus · · Score: 0

      What they will learn is that people will complain and then shut up and return to normal after it is fixed. No one will stop using their PS3 nor will anyone stop using PSN.

      One day I chose among Nintento's Wii, XBox 360 and Playstation 3. Wii sucks ass in my opinion. I don't want to stand up and wave my arms to play a game. I like sitting down with a controller that is comfortable in my hands to play games for hours on end not knowing how much time has passed stopping only after my hands get tired, taking a break and playing the rest of the night. So it was a choice between XBox360 and Playstation 3.

      I'm quite anti-Microsoft, but I REALLY hate Sony. Between the two, if one were more anti-consumer than the other, I would rank Sony as #1 in being anti-consumer. So I chose XBox360.

      I vote against Sony with my dollars. I really wished I could vote FOR something instead of against something. In any case, my kids use XBox360 too so...

    4. Re:Complete and utter Sony DRM failure by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      You seem to imply that this was an accident.
      Got any proof for that? ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:Complete and utter Sony DRM failure by rworne · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sony may be more anti-consumer as a whole, but between the two platforms Microsoft is definitely the more anti-consumer of the two gaming platforms.

      Simple HD swaps vs. overpriced upgrades
      Ability to install another OS (crippled as it may be) vs. nothing
      Plethora of 3rd party peripherals vs. only licensed ones
      Availability of 3rd party wireless controllers vs. very few due to refusing to issue licenses - especially guitar controllers
      Using any method of USB storage vs disabling 3rd party memory devices.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    6. Re:Complete and utter Sony DRM failure by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

      No wonder, as this is not a DRM failure but rather a software defect that has a DRM-related side-effect. It's a disgrace to see that post modded to +5 informative.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    7. Re:Complete and utter Sony DRM failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, 15 million PS3s completely unable to get past Sony DRM checks to start downloaded PS3 and PS1 games - with an additional side affect that these PS3s cannot connect to the Sony network (causing most recent disk-based games to fail for another reason), but it's "not a DRM failure, it's a software bug". Hilarious. Do you write Sony Press releases for a living?
      The DRM system implemented within the PS3 makes use of an internal hardware clock - that entire system is broken and not working, but "it's not a DRM failure". Ludicrous to the extreme

    8. Re:Complete and utter Sony DRM failure by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Whatever. I haven't tried mine today, and it worked last night. If it doesn't work, yes I'll be upset, but as long as its fixed pretty quickly, I don't see a reason to stay pissed. A few hours of inconvience compared to many more enjoying it isn't worth cutting off the leg when you just stubbed your toe.

      I don't expect things to never, ever, ever, break (and if you do, don't buy a house). There are a few exceptions... my car being one, because a stuck gas pedal could lead to my death (and I don't own a Toyota anyway).

    9. Re:Complete and utter Sony DRM failure by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I'm betting Ubisoft's EULA will clearly state that they don't guarantee that the game will actually run at all, just like every other EULA.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    10. Re:Complete and utter Sony DRM failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DRM scheme that uses a date as a pillar it stands on to deny lawful use of a product is a failure and this a tangible example of it coming to light. Most of us know that if you have physical access to the machine that the machine can be compromised so why bother with a client side date check in the first place. This will be exploited when the PSN goes down so that people can play the games they bought a few years down the road.

  5. It figures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least my brother can calm down, his hardware didn't toast.
    He started calling Sony tech support 2 hours before they were supposed to close, apparently they were already closed, almost as if they did it intentionally.
    (Please ignore the cheap attempt at inciting a paranoid mob. After all, what possible reason could they have for pissing off their customers on the day they got hit with a hugely visible bug?)

  6. Microsoft has to love this by tsotha · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, man, the party is at Balmer's house tonight.

    1. Re:Microsoft has to love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Only if you conveniently ignore Microsoft's Zune calendar bug. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zune#Zune_30_leap_year_bug)

    2. Re:Microsoft has to love this by V!NCENT · · Score: 2, Funny

      The party headed over to Nintendo for his Xbox360 got a red ring of death...

      Okey, next...

      --
      Here be signatures
    3. Re:Microsoft has to love this by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 3, Funny

      RSVP and BYOC - (Bring Your Own Chair)

    4. Re:Microsoft has to love this by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We didn't ignore it. Everyone just forgot about it because nobody has a zune. ;)

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    5. Re:Microsoft has to love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't MS' fault, so I doubt they care.

    6. Re:Microsoft has to love this by ViViDboarder · · Score: 1

      Yea! We can all have a Windows 7 Party! I missed those when it came out. ;)

    7. Re:Microsoft has to love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't recall this?

      http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/03/y28-zune-quirk-really-a-freescale-bug/

  7. Can someone explain the bug? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Okay, 2010 was flagged as a leap year (which seems odd - I'd have thought you'd just want to check if the year is a multiple of 4, and you're good until 2100). Why didn't it just report to day as the 29th February?

    And why doesn't the workaround of setting the date to 1st Jan 2010 or 1st March 2010 work? What is causing the date to reset? surely this is just a number read from a real time clock.

    1. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by Sowelu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It happened because two different time tracking systems disagreed with each other and were stupid. System 1 said "It's February 29th, 2010", and passed it to System 2. System 2 says "WHOA, that's impossible, nuke it from orbit and start over". Why did they do it like that? Who knows?

    2. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the clock that is displayed on-screen is just some application level date. it's for 'display purposes only. changing this has no effect on DRM licenses restrictions (such as when you download a movie with an authorization to watch it once over the next 7 days).
      the 'real' ps3 clock is a hardware device (I guess they changed model between the 'phat' and 'slim' hardware releases, which is why slim is not affected). this clock has read-only access via the hypervisor only.i don't think it's even possible to reset it - at least that's what was claimed in a Sony document describing the PS3 Linux kernel
      if the hardware RTC has a fault, they've got a real big problem

    3. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Problem is I scrolled through the thing resetting my time and date - the PS3 fat can't roll over to Feb 29th 2010, I've tried it - so the bug might be on the other end.

      If so, maybe the new slim models have the same bug?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by LtGordon · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that, if indeed the bug is date-related, this could be tested by simply removing the network connection and changing the date to some arbitrary knwon-functional date (e.g. February 28, 2009). Unless, of course, the bug is causing some irreparable damage/state change.

      The problem, however, seems to be with games that require an active network connection even to play single-player. My response to this is: what the hell is the world of videogaming coming to? Just the other day I pulled out a copy of Super Mario Bros. 3, and I can't imagine booting it up to an error screen because a verification server was no longer available to determine that mine was a legitimate copy, or because who would even want to play a game without trophies?!

    5. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Cool story bro. The problem is, this bug didn't start today, that's just when you heard about it. I heard about it yesterday when it was still February 28 in much of the world. (However by that time it was indeed February 29 in Japan... hmm...)

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    6. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, putting the clock back in some way seems a common way to handle odd timing errors:

      E.g. the newsreader trn had a somewhat similar bug in 1996 (or 92?): when storing last update as a day-number it added 1 for the leap-year (i.e. adding the leap-day before January 1st as well - not correct).

      When restarting the same day(!) it used correct date-routine and noticed the date it was started last time was in the future, and wound the time for last start back 60 days causing a bit of problems.

    7. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by defaria · · Score: 1

      No the real question is why System 2 needs to say "nuke it from obit and start over" instead of just issuing an error message and continuing onward. IOW there's no reason to stop the user from further processing just because the date is in disagreement!

    8. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The local timezone doesn't matter, the clock itself uses UTC.

    9. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happened because two different time tracking systems disagreed with each other and were stupid. System 1 said "It's February 29th, 2010", and passed it to System 2. System 2 says "WHOA, that's impossible, nuke it from orbit and start over".

      Why did they do it like that? Who knows?

      That's more or less what happened.

      The downside is that System 1 is the internal hardware itty bitty battery clock. That has been on for 4 years now. So it thinks it's a leap year now.

      System 2 handled the leap year fine 2 years ago when it WAS an actual leap year. But now that system 1 believes it's a leap year it's all screwed up.

    10. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by brock+denton · · Score: 1

      I don't think it has to do with games requiring an active network connection. My system hasn't been connected to the internet (no ethernet cord even plugged in) for over a month and I hit this when starting games that have trophy support.

      So, I don't think this has anything to do with an internet connection, just had hardware clock bug that some software modules are barfing on. I think most people first noticed this when trying to connect to PSN, but it's likely the handshaking that's having the issue. However, for me, since I'm not trying to even signing on to PSN it's the trophy registration module is having this issue, which has little to nothing to do with trophy server sync but likely is rather for accessing the local trophy DB. As Sony mentions in their blog, I've lost the latest trophy data from my system (although not all the trophy data since my last server sync). I'm not sure why they seem to have two levels of trophy storage unrelated to server sync though.

    11. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by brock+denton · · Score: 1

      Just realized that the local trophy DBs are likely per-game. Since I didn't access the other game that has trophy data since my last sync that data isn't affected. It's probably only upon accessing the per-game trophy data that it notes it as corrupt and possibly deletes the entries. At least that's my latest guess.

    12. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by brock+denton · · Score: 1

      I agree that local time doesn't matter but for a slightly different reason in addition to the UTC one you gave. You'll notice that many people are saying that they didn't have this issue when others have, only three hours later to say they now have it. I believe that this may be due to the hardware clocks running at different speeds in each system. In *nix systems the software clock normally adjusts for the HW clock differences whenever we reset them. It uses a file with some stats on how much the software clock needed to be adjusted in order to determine how much off of real time the HW clock is running. On system startup it reads the HW clock and this file to determine the time to which to set the software system clock.

      For those of us that hit this on 28 Feb I'm guessing our hardware clocks were running fast. Those that took longer to hit it may have had HW clocks that were running slow.

    13. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Trophies are stored locally, and only synced if you select the Trophies area of the XMB. If you read the PS3 backup docs, it explains it doesn't back up trophies, and the only way to back them up is to sync to PSN.

    14. Re:Can someone explain the bug? by rworne · · Score: 1

      Something's been wrong with the PSN trophy tracking for at least a week now. I've gotten trophies on Star Ocean and Heavy Rain. Neither of the two are showing up on PSN, although the console is tracking them and my trophy count is correct. Old games that had previous trophy data are tracking properly though.

      And yes, my 60GB US PS3 (now 500GB) is borked. And I'm really nervous about it because I have a very sizeable Rockband and Singstar library. I also have 60GB and 40GB JP units whichwere off before and will remain off until all this blows over.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  8. 9's by toastar · · Score: 1

    well sony just blew there 3 nines rating. :(

    1. Re:9's by toastar · · Score: 1

      arg.... drunk and sleep deprived.... I meant Their... I swear!

    2. Re:9's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late, Jonny... Internet doesn't forget this easily!

    3. Re:9's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to worry, drunk and sleep deprived is probably an accurate description of 90% of posters here.

    4. Re:9's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the rest 10% are just otherwise crazy.

    5. Re:9's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one really cares.

  9. Re:Cheaters get banned, whine about it by Dibblah · · Score: 1

    "modded PS3s"?

    Uhm... There are no modded PS3s at this time.

  10. I Told You All! by sysusr · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I said the Millennium Bug would strike again, you all thought I was crazy! Who's laughing now?

    --
    \x72\x6D\x20\x2D\x72\x66
    1. Re:I Told You All! by V!NCENT · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How about the *NIX date bug? In 2038 the intarwebs will come to a screaching halt and we are all going to die and...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem

      --
      Here be signatures
    2. Re:I Told You All! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      How about the *NIX date bug? In 2038 the intarwebs will come to a screaching halt and we are all going to die and...
      On what do you base this claim? I'd expect by 2038 most internet stuff will be running 64-bit software which at least on linux means a 64-bit time_t.

      Individual applications may break if they did stupid things (like using int where they should have used time_t ), if they stored dates in binary files or they never got rebuilt for 64-bit but I don't see any major problem for the internet in general.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:I Told You All! by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Didn't the "we are all going to die and..." part gave away that I was far from serious? ;)

      --
      Here be signatures
  11. Suing as a means to modify behaviour? by CdBee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Potentially could suppliers be forced into higher standards by the fear of consumer litigation?

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  12. They'd better fix this by RogueyWon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this a hardware/firmware issue, then I hope to god for Sony's sake that there's a quick and easy fix that users can apply at home. The problem is that even if they offer everybody a free trade-in to a PS3 slim (which would be cripplingly expensive), then a lot of users, self included, won't accept this. Trading from an original 60 gig PS3 to a PS3 slim is not an upgrade. It's a downgrade.

    Why? Because the original first-gen PS3s had full PS2 back-compatibility, while the more recent versions don't. People like me, who got rid of their PS2 when they picked up a PS3, are not going to be happy in the slightest if it turns out we need to start hitting Ebay for PS2s.

    1. Re:They'd better fix this by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the firmware will actually update, the servers have a fit as the date on the machine does not match that of the server, and again, "invalid copyright protection" error appears.

    2. Re:They'd better fix this by vlm · · Score: 1

      People like me, who got rid of their PS2 when they picked up a PS3, are not going to be happy in the slightest if it turns out we need to start hitting Ebay for PS2s.

      PS2s are still available retail for $99, as far as I know. Compared to the cost of replacing all the worlds old PS3s, throwing in a PS2 as a consolation prize is no big expense, plus it depletes the warehouses, probably a convenient way to discontinue the PS2. That's what a reputable company would do. Oh, wait, this is Sony, home of the root kit. No, I guess you're just out of luck.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:They'd better fix this by Raxxon · · Score: 1

      Except I would want a PS2 from the 4th through 8th revisions of the hardware along with an Ethernet adapter for the unit.

      That's what I gave up when I moved to the PS3 (Specifically a 4th gen with Ethernet adapter). Anything else is not "fair replacement".

    4. Re:They'd better fix this by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      In other words, a Fat PS2 with the HDD bay, progressive scan for DVD's and the built in IR?

    5. Re:They'd better fix this by LazyBoot · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess this is where the offline update methods come in (USB-drive or disk comes to mind)

    6. Re:They'd better fix this by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      And a Free McBoot memory card with HD Loader on it? Feels good, man.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    7. Re:They'd better fix this by JDmetro · · Score: 1

      I got a 320 gig PS3 fat. Upgraded from the 40 gig when I fist bought it. If they are just going to hand out new consoles there better be some sucky sucky with that.

    8. Re:They'd better fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Because the original first-gen PS3s had full PS2 back-compatibility, while the more recent versions don't.

      US/Canadian and Japanese models only. The rest of the world never had backward compatibility

    9. Re:They'd better fix this by frozen_kangaroo · · Score: 1

      PS3 Slims apparently do not support Linux !!! Which makes it a downgrade in my opinion

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Weird coincidence by Cruciform · · Score: 1

    I just hooked my PS3 up after disconnecting it for a couple of weeks, and noticed the date was off and I couldn't connect to the PSN. Oh well, might as well read Slashdot! And I find this. Someone call James Randi, I think we found a psychic!

  15. No PSN on sim yesterday by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

    My PS3 slim wouldn't stay logged in on PSN yesterday evening, didn't have any issues earlier that day. Not sure what the error code was, and I haven't tried it today (because I'm obviously at work).

    Also interesting to see that also games on the PS3 have shitty DRM that requires online activation/presence. Are they really trying to kill gaming on all platforms?

    1. Re:No PSN on sim yesterday by mjwx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are they really trying to kill gaming on all platforms?

      No, DRM is and has always been about killing 2nd hand sales. The piracy non-issue was just an excuse that no one would question whilst they went about removing your consumer rights. For over a year now publishers have been openly equating the 2nd hand market to piracy. The ultimate goal is to destroy all media they don't control, if DRM isn't stopped in the near future all games will require an authorised console, with authorised media, on an authorised display device and an authorised user and if any of these things fail authorisation then the whole system will stop working (for you at least).

      So at least write to your representative (I know in the US this will do nothing but not all /.ers are in the US) about DRM.

      I've said it before and I'll say it again, consoles have DRM built into the hardware. This makes it both more prevalent and more aggressive then DRM on the PC. It also makes it harder to remove.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:No PSN on sim yesterday by Sancho · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are they really trying to kill gaming on all platforms?

      I don't know, but they've pretty well made me decide not to get a PS3. I was waffling, so I know I'm not their target demographic in the first place, but I'm frankly sick of phone-home DRM. Here's a perfect example of it failing and locking out legitimate users.

    3. Re:No PSN on sim yesterday by dangitman · · Score: 2, Informative

      but I'm frankly sick of phone-home DRM. Here's a perfect example of it failing and locking out legitimate users.

      Except that isn't what happened. It's a clock error. It has nothing to do with phoning home.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:No PSN on sim yesterday by Sancho · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter. Do you think they'd be more careful with DRM?

      The fact is, the software phoned home to the server. Doesn't matter why, but if you want to go down that road, it was for something that ostensibly benefits the user. Phone-home DRM provides absolutely no benefit to the user, but has the same potential for screwing up.

    5. Re:No PSN on sim yesterday by dangitman · · Score: 1

      The fact is, the software phoned home to the server.

      No, that's not the fact at all. Otherwise, how would the games work when not connected to the internet? The problem was caused by the internal clock resetting itself, and had nothing to do with connecting to a server.

      Phone-home DRM provides absolutely no benefit to the user, but has the same potential for screwing up.

      Well sure - but why do you bring that up when it's not relevant? You may as well talk about pink elephants.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  16. Effects are rather... odd by Raxxon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was refusing to install the Star Ocean Trophy set. I could get it to start Bayonetta, but when it attempted to load the first cutscene it just hung forever. Tried doing a number of things, nothing worked... And it wouldn't let me back up my data as the largest thumbdrive I own is 8gb and after removing ALL game data, installed demos and everything else I could strip, it claimed it still needed another 750mb of space (original claim was over 17gb). And of course it refuses to recognize either of my external USB HDDs as a target for backing up or reading data from...

    So I started thinking "HD Failing" (it is an original PS3 after all). Figured I'd have it format the drive then reinstall and repatch my games. Nearly a 5 hour time estimate. Take a nap, wake up, see this.... "oh god damnit."

    1. Re:Effects are rather... odd by vlm · · Score: 1

      So I started thinking "HD Failing" (it is an original PS3 after all). Figured I'd have it format the drive then reinstall and repatch my games. Nearly a 5 hour time estimate. Take a nap, wake up, see this.... "oh god damnit."

      AKA the "it just works" console gaming experience? Or are you running a PS3 emulator on a windows PC? I haven't had/heard that kind of agony in gaming since trying to get Wing Commander working by editing config.sys lines back in 1991-ish.

      I'm not trolling, I'm genuinely curious, since your experience is supposed to be unpossible on a console.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Effects are rather... odd by Raxxon · · Score: 1

      80gb "mostly hardware" BC PS3 unit. Not an emulation setup or anything.

      It could very well be the HD picked today to start giving out, but it's kinda odd in that a friend of mine was playing Star Ocean under his profile on the system 2 hours before. Didn't have issues saving, didn't crash or anything. When we came back after grabbing a bite to eat is when the "fit hit the shan". Went to start up Star Ocean on my profile (already had a game saved at the first save point so everything had already been installed) and it refused to install Trophy Data. Tried a couple of times, rebooted the system, hard powered the system... same results across the board. Thought it might be an issue with the Disc. No scratches, smudges or anything. Popped in Bayonetta (A game I had already beaten) and it starts, but when it attempted to load the first cutscene (before the actual game starts) it hung with a "Loading..." message on the screen. No action at all. Thinking it might be a laser issue (I remember older PS2's having issues with their drive/laser assembly having to be replaced or retuned) I popped in a copy of Boondock Saints (DVD) and watched it. 0 problems with that. Considered it might be an issue with the frequency for BluRay disks so I popped in Dogma (BluRay edition) and watched it. Sat through most of the Deleted Scenes. Watched the outtakes. 0 problems. This pointed me back to the HD as a possible issue given that both Star Ocean and Bayonetta have installs to HD (Bayonetta does after the patch enabled it). I attempted to perform a backup from the system menu. Told initially it needed 17gb over what I had available on my (empty) 8gb thumbdrive I dumped all install data for games, all demos downloaded from PSN and anything else I didn't "have to keep". After stripping it as far as I could it still claimed to need another 750mb over an 8gb stick. I have an external 1tb RAID0 SATA -> USB enclosure, but it refuses to use/see it as storage. Friend has an external WD HD (1tb), it refused to see that as well. Figured that I could re-beat Bayonetta in a few days and neither one of us were that far into Star Ocean (although I am quite pissed about losing my data for DJ Hero :( ) so format the drive in an attempt to see if it returns a hard error that would indicate I need to replace the drive or if it would remap any bad sectors and allow me to resume my gaming.

      Initial Estimate to format the 80gb drive: 4 hours, 45 minutes. I took a nap for a couple of hours, woke up and decided to check out what was happening online and ran into this... Much h8. So much h8 it might compress into some i9.

    3. Re:Effects are rather... odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try formatting the disks as FAT32. That's what the PS3 wants external media formatted as. I can almost assure you based on what you've written that your drives are formatted as something else.

    4. Re:Effects are rather... odd by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      If those external drives are NTFS, the PS3 can't use them, it only supports FAT.

    5. Re:Effects are rather... odd by LazyBoot · · Score: 1

      And of course it refuses to recognize either of my external USB HDDs as a target for backing up or reading data from...

      chances are that your USB HDDs are ntfs formated... try FAT32 and it should work like a charm

    6. Re:Effects are rather... odd by Raxxon · · Score: 1

      The first time I connected my RAID0 enclosure to the system I'm pretty sure it was FAT32. I know the WD External is NTFS, I'll have to double check mine (currently sitting at the office) and try again.

      Kinda odd, IMO, that they haven't updated the system firmware to read NTFS given that Windows refuses to let you format anything larger than 40gb as FAT32 anymore and most "users" wouldn't be able to figure out what linux is let alone how mkfs.vfat works... ;)

    7. Re:Effects are rather... odd by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Not really given FAT32 is mostly a universal standard for external media and is old enough that patents (as long as you avoid long names) are not really an issue.

    8. Re:Effects are rather... odd by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm surprised too and also that they don't support ext2 or ext3 in GameOS either.

    9. Re:Effects are rather... odd by Raxxon · · Score: 1

      Except that, once again, most people are using Windows as a PC OS. Unless they're buying a small external HD (and in the case of newer PS3's, something too small to do a full backup) they will be unable to format it FAT32.

      Yes FAT32 is old. Yes it's simple. Yes it doesn't have the potential issues of royalty or patent licensing. It's still a stupid choice to rely on that alone in an instance like this.

    10. Re:Effects are rather... odd by Raxxon · · Score: 1

      Not horribly shocking, but given that they did give the option to be able to install "another OS" on the older PS3's you'd think there would be some kind of support for something other than FAT32...

    11. Re:Effects are rather... odd by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      I can check when I get home, but it comes to my mind that every external hard drive I've purchased in the past four years has been FAT32 formatted for me already. Additionally, while XP and such force the GUI format to NTFS if the drive is over 32GB, you can go up to 1TB with the command line format.

      Really, do you think Sony, the company with arrogance the arrogance of Nintendo without the revenue stream of the Wii, is going to license the NTFS rights from it's other 'main' competitor, Microsoft?

      They'd sooner come up with their own formatting scheme.

    12. Re:Effects are rather... odd by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      PS. In case you want it and your google-fu is out sick today it's:

      format /FS:FAT32 X:

      with X being your drive.

    13. Re:Effects are rather... odd by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I have a 160 GB Maxtor USB drive purchased with the PS3 in mind that came formatted NTFS. At first I was wondering why it wasn't showing up in the XMB, so then I plugged it into the windows machine to check it out.

    14. Re:Effects are rather... odd by Raxxon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it seems that using the cmdline format (at least for WinXP, no hits yet for Vista/Win7) will let you "bypass" the artificial limiter that MS put in with SP2 for XP...

    15. Re:Effects are rather... odd by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Actually it dates back to Win2000, the first version of the NT series that support FAT32.

  17. Sony timer by reybrujo · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is not a bug, it is the Sony timer.

    1. Re:Sony timer by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

      I actually found such a timer once in a philips (iirc) video recorder... The thing would only play black and white after a certain date. resetting the clock solved the problem...

      --
      The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
    2. Re:Sony timer by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      Nokia used to have kill timers too.

    3. Re:Sony timer by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A loose S-Video connection can also result in black-and-white video if the chrominance pin isn't connecting.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    4. Re:Sony timer by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

      well, then why did the image go b/w every time I set the clock to the actual date and back to color when I set the clock back (went through 3 iterations of this iirc)

      --
      The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  18. PS3 RTC "chip" firmware is probably bugged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PS3's RTC is part of SYSCON (the microcontroller that handles general system control stuff, power sequencing, etc.), which is believed to be an ARM architecture chip. As far as I know, its firmware can be updated. I bet this bug originates in this firmware (it'd be rare for a hardware, dedicated RTC chip to have such a catastrophic leap year bug), and I bet Sony can update it to fix it (i.e. they wouldn't even have to work around this issue at the OS level).

  19. It's A Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not preventing you from playing games because of DRM. It's a bug, the main bug related to offline games seems to be the trophy-sync operation, rather then failing in it's usual way when you're offline, it is crashing. As for the DRM'ed network games, if you want to buy a game that doesn't need the internet, don't buy playstation network games, buy something with a physical disk. Games you buy over the Playstation Network need you to be properly signed in to use, which is where the problem lies.

    Problems happen. Whether or not this was preventable is a very, very difficult question. Before anyone shouts EVERY PROBLEM IS PREVENTABLE has never spent any time in real life. Hell, I've even had the OS give me an error message for a completely different file then what I was trying to run.
    Not everything is knowable or preventable.
    What matters here is how long it takes to fix it. Until now, I've never had a problem with the Playstation Network, (other then failures with my i-net connection).

  20. D'oh by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

    I can't sign into PSN on my US 60GB, so it's looks like I'm affected by this... :(

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  21. Since when is a year = 2 mod 4 EVER a leap year? by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Guys, it's really not that hard:
    GregYear <- (appropriate year for start of Gregorian era in locale)

    IF (month = 2 AND year MOD 4 = 0 AND (year < GregYear OR year MOD 100 > 0 OR year MOD 400 = 0))
    {MaxDayForMonth <- 29}
    ELSE IF (month = 2)
    {MaxDayForMonth <- 28}
    ELSE IF (month IN (4,6,9,11))
    {MaxDayForMonth <- 30}
    ELSE
    {MaxDayForMonth <- 31}

    (pseudocode style adapted for Slashcode)

  22. How to fix Netflix PS3 by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 3, Informative

    I ran into this problem last night trying to watch Netflix on the PS3. the Netflix disc gave me a cannot connect error.... Being a slashdot reader my first though was I'd done something weird with my router ports.. So Mucked with those for awhile first making sure I hadn't done something weird. Then I noticed the system date was wrong on the PS3. I tried "Set Time via Internet" which failed, then I Set time manually and tried Neflix again and it works as normal. I'm sure the Servers figured that a 10 year old packet was "timed out" and didn't respond (or the PS3 won't respond to communication from 10 years in the future).

    Worked for me, didn't try any games yet though.

    1. Re:How to fix Netflix PS3 by trogdor8667 · · Score: 1

      I've got a slim, which seems to be unaffected. I streamed some Netflix, downloaded a demo from PSN which played, etc.

  23. god damn, how f*cking hard is this!? by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1
    god damn, how f*cking hard is this!?

    bool leap_year(int year) {
    return (year%4==0 && year %100!=0) || year%400==0;
    }

    There, I just pulled the above code out of my ass, and it's so damn simple! I don't claim any copyrights to this! Go ahead, copy 'n paste it into any of your products as you like (also commercial and closed source, I don't even want a mention!), if that is really to hard for you, you lame ass tinkerers!

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
    1. Re:god damn, how f*cking hard is this!? by ViViDboarder · · Score: 1

      Did they use any kind of algorithm? For most intents and purposes of the PS3, even just year%4==0 would have prevented this.

      I don't know how many PS3's will be used in 2100. I have a feeling trophy servers being long gone will be more of an issue then than a day mismatch. :p

      I'm curious what they actually did! Did they try to tag years manually? Like just a list of leap years! Or is it something a bit more complex. Something similar to the issue with the Zune effecting the modulus operator and causing a false positive?

      Anyone else more curious about this?

  24. I take it you don't play Animal Crossing by tepples · · Score: 1

    The only reason I can see a video game not working because of mis-matched dates is because of DRM, there is no - and neither should there be, any reason why a game should be dependent on any date.

    Then why do the Dreamcast, PlayStation 2, GameCube, and Nintendo DS even have a clock? Consoles have clocks for at least four reasons:

    • Keeping track of when each player earns each trophy.
    • Allowing parents to ration their minor children's use of a video game console on a school night.
    • Video games where decorations depend on the calendar: the Smashville stage of Super Smash Bros. Brawl.
    • Video games where events depend on the calendar: Pokemon series, Animal Crossing series, and Nintendogs.
    1. Re:I take it you don't play Animal Crossing by IgnitusBoyone · · Score: 1

      I like how everyone forgets that save data has time stamps. Clocks are good for book keeping and a good source of seeds for Pseudo random number generators.

      --
      Momento Mori
  25. See "warranty" by tepples · · Score: 1

    Copyright infringement is prohibited by law. Computers/consoles/software are not guaranteed by law to work all the time.

    I beg to differ.

    1. Re:See "warranty" by dangitman · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ [wikipedia.org].

      Well, you'd be wrong. Where does a product being covered by a warranty mean that you can sue the manufacturer for it not working? It just means that they need to replace or repair it if it is faulty. Not that any of the "fat" PS3s are under warranty anymore.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:See "warranty" by tepples · · Score: 1

      Where does a product being covered by a warranty mean that you can sue the manufacturer for it not working? It just means that they need to replace or repair it if it is faulty.

      And if the manufacturer refuses to take reasonable steps to replace or repair it, this could lead to a class-action lawsuit to make the manufacturer honor its warranty contract. But I agree that suing is premature at this point.

    3. Re:See "warranty" by sopssa · · Score: 1

      You really think they won't fix this issue and just leave millions of PS3's hanging around useless?

    4. Re:See "warranty" by tepples · · Score: 1

      I think they'll at least try to fix the issue to maintain the value of the PLAYSTATION brand, which is why I said "I agree that suing is premature at this point."

    5. Re:See "warranty" by Entropius · · Score: 1

      The defect is in the game, being programmed in such a way that it requires a network connection. This is a "defect in materials or workmanship", no?

    6. Re:See "warranty" by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      All of these talks about suing Sony are fucking pathetic. They will fix this, they didn't mean to do this, it was a mistake, it will be resolved. They want you to keep buying games, they want the Sony brand to survive. This is not even as bad as the Zune dec 31 bug. There is nothing that points you out as a douchebag quite like screaming lawsuit every time there's a bug.

    7. Re:See "warranty" by dangitman · · Score: 1

      But the problem is not that it requires a network connection. The games normally play without a connection, and are failing whether or not the machine is online.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    8. Re:See "warranty" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ?

      The slim was only released here about 6-7 months ago.

  26. Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They aren't going to fix dick. Mark my words. Anyone who tries to roll their own fix will get sniped with a DMCA, and Sony will just tell everyone to buy a new console. Gamers will begrudgingly buy one, but if as long as they buy new stuff then Sony is happy.

    1. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. They've already announced that they aren't going to fix this: the official fix is to wait for the clock issues to "resolve themselves."

      If it doesn't? Buy a new one, the new ones "work fine."

    2. Re:Oh please by Khyber · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't fly in the state of California. there would be a class-action against SCEA so fast it'd make their lawyer's heads spin.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  27. Flower? Really? by wandazulu · · Score: 1

    Talk about timing: I downloaded Flower for my 5 year old, who loves just flying around in the pretty fields, and the game won't start because of this error. A single-player game, that has no multiplayer aspect, that doesn't even keep score, and it can't be played because it can't connect to the network.

    I guess it's because Flower has trophy support, but really...you can't store the trophy information locally and then transmit later? I couldn't sit there, looking at the error screen, then trying to explain to my daughter why she can't fly around the field, and not feel like there was an awesome lesson to be learned here.

    So we pulled out a pack of Go Fish cards instead.

    1. Re:Flower? Really? by Captain+Chaos · · Score: 1

      I'm checking titles right now, Flower doesn't work for me either. Bomberman Ultra reverted to the demo, but the copy of Flow I just got free just launched fine and that has trophies, so does Bomberman Ultra. Trophies wouldn't be the cause of Flower not working for you, because you can sync those manually or it can automatically sync when logged in. I recently got a platinum for Uncharted 2 and it doesn't show in my online profile because I haven't let it sync yet. The last few times I played I wasn't logged into PSN at all.

      It looks like games I downloaded from PSN that have a demo mode will launch, but will revert to the demo. Games like Flower with no demo will give this error: "An error occured during the start operation. (8001050F)" I stopped automatically logging into my PSN account and I thought I had played some of these games offline, but it looks like I will have to test once they fix the current problem. Which better me fast, this is a huge black eye for them. I'm hating DRM even more than I did before, thanks for helping the anti-DRM crusade yet again Sony. They are going to love bringing this one up.

    2. Re:Flower? Really? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I guess it's because Flower has trophy support, but really...you can't store the trophy information locally and then transmit later?

      At the risk of sounding smug, that's exactly what Xbox Live does when it can't connect for whatever reason. Next time it successfully logs in, it just syncs your Achievements with the server. (Which is kind of cool-- you can also see your PC game Achievements from the Xbox and vice-versa.)

      Of course the entire concept of Achievements is completely useless, since the points don't get you anything, but at least it's implemented well.

    3. Re:Flower? Really? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I was playing inFAMOUS Sunday afternoon. When PSN died at midnight UTC, I got a logout error, but the game carried on working. A while later I got an error from the trophy system, but again the game carried on working. I got no more trophies, of course, in spite of finishing the game.

      So I'd say it's down to bad programming on the part of the game developers too. They are assuming that if networking is switched on, the PSN trophy server must be available, rather than timing out.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  28. Re:Since when is a year = 2 mod 4 EVER a leap year by JamesP · · Score: 1

    My thoughts exactly, I mean...

    It fails the FIRST TEST, that is, ((year % 4) == 0) for leap years. Guys, 2010 % 4 == 2, I mean

    the mind boggles

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  29. Maybe?? by robotmankiller · · Score: 0

    Maybe this is a sneaky way for Sony to block the hypervisior exploit in fat PS3's.

  30. Intern coding by AlpineR · · Score: 1

    A leap year miscalculation is no worse than the skewed random shuffle bug reported in Microsoft's browser selection screen yesterday. If that's the problem with these PS3's (which I doubt), it could be something similarly brain dead:

    int year = getYear();
    int shortYear = year % 10;
    bool leapYear = ( shortYear % 4 == 0 );

    Somebody tested that on 2001 through 2009 and declared it good enough.

  31. So thats what they ment by a 10 year plan by grapeape · · Score: 1

    My 60gig now says its 1/1/2000 guess thats what Sony ment by a 10 year plan.

  32. Geez. by hkdm · · Score: 1

    I sure hope this bug is fixed soon. I own a fat 80GB model which meets the description but I haven't played it in the past 3 days or so. Other people I've read say that some 80GB models are unaffected and seem to work fine for now, but it still worries me. If it is indeed a calendar issue and we cannot connect to PSN or even the internet, how are we to receive an update?

    1. Re:Geez. by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      the PS3 can take firmware updates from a disc. PSN could also be tweaked to relax the network/console date comparison.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  33. Headline needs to be changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Headline should be changed. Not all old 'phat' PS3's are effected. Mine is a launch 60GB model and it's had no issue whatsoever.

  34. what will happen in 15 years? by PmaxII · · Score: 3, Interesting

    2 months ago my PS3 died (i've replaced it since)... so I decided to show to my kids what kind of games we played when I was a kid. So I dug out of the basement my old ps1, my sega genesis and my 30 years old mattel Intellivision... All of them worked. I didn't expect anything else! (now I remember why we were playing real hockey outside ...) But it make me wonder, will my ps3 still be working in 15 years (or maybe 30)... A simple drm check and everything is down... I have COD warfare 2, and it has to connect to the net ?? I didn't know that.. And I sure would'nt have buy that game if I knew that... What if the current ps3 network is not compatible with the network in 30 years.. what if sony's servers are down next year? I have a serious question here, are we really all going toward this kind of drm in everything (tv, blueray, fridge, beds (whatever..)) or is it dying (like for the mp3s) ?

    1. Re:what will happen in 15 years? by Tukz · · Score: 1

      Even a lot of PC games is doing quite the same now.
      You need an active internet connection to play the game.

      DRM'ed music have been like this for years, fetching license statuses.

      You better get used to it, unfortunately.

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    2. Re:what will happen in 15 years? by Spatial · · Score: 1

      Well, you'd have to buy all your games again wouldn't you?

      That would be just awful. For you .

  35. Re:Since when is a year = 2 mod 4 EVER a leap year by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    No, the biggest failure is, to reinvent the wheel yet another time, when there are libraries out there that are literally tested for decades, and knows to work properly.

    When you don’t know exactly that you can and will do it better, always use the standard library! :)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  36. How many other systems have this y2k bug? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    How many other systems have this y2k bug?

    1. Re:How many other systems have this y2k bug? by kirkb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've got a fleet of GPS vehicle trackers that crapped out last nite when they hit "00:00 March 1st" UTC. Working with the vendor to resolve :(

      --
      Slashdot: come for the pedantry, stay for the condescension.
  37. Can't play CoD:MW2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Players cannot play games that require a connection, even in single-player, offline mode, e.g. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2.

    Good.. that's what they get for buying that PoS anyway.

  38. Re:Cheaters get banned, whine about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. I haven't modded my console, and I'm seeing this bug.

  39. Computer games by suso · · Score: 1

    Its funny, I don't have this problem with computer games. Doh! Slam!!!!

  40. It's another cyber attack from china by TheFakeMcCoy · · Score: 1

    They are taking down the US military's ps3 supercomputer rig! http://www.gamepro.com/article/news/213076/u-s-military-building-ps3-supercomputer/

  41. My Fat PS3 Is Not Affected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a "fat" PS3 and it is not affected. It is the most recent model they produced before switching over to the slim body style.

    1. Re:My Fat PS3 Is Not Affected by kaen · · Score: 1

      Our 120 GB and 80 GB fat PS3s are working, but the 40 GB model isn't.

  42. sopssa = M$ Troll? by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

    Everyone remember this post, where sopssa is clearly defending SONY, next time he makes sense but is accused of being an "M$ troll."

    1. Re:sopssa = M$ Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sopssa is a douchebag who spams every Slashdot post with irrelevant drivel to drive up his/her/its karma score. He never even bothers to read the title of the post.

  43. Actually, our linux systems have the bug, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of our linux PS3s are set to reboot a 3AM everyday. cron log shows normal shutdown and startup:
    Feb 28 03:11:31 mouth crond[1544]: (CRON) STARTUP (1.0)
    Feb 28 04:01:01 mouth CROND[1635]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Feb 28 04:02:01 mouth CROND[1639]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.daily)
    Feb 28 04:02:01 mouth run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[1642]: starting 000-delay.cron
    Feb 28 04:22:01 mouth CROND[1653]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.weekly)
    Feb 28 04:22:01 mouth run-parts(/etc/cron.weekly)[1656]: starting 000-delay.cron
    Feb 28 05:01:01 mouth CROND[1669]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Feb 28 05:02:35 mouth run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[1671]: finished 000-delay.cron
    Feb 28 05:02:35 mouth run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[1674]: starting 0anacron
    Feb 28 05:02:36 mouth run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[1682]: finished 0anacron
    Feb 28 05:02:36 mouth run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[1684]: starting 0logwatch
    Feb 28 05:02:36 mouth anacron[1680]: Updated timestamp for job `cron.daily' to 2010-02-28
    Feb 28 05:02:48 mouth run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[2076]: finished 0logwatch
    Feb 28 05:02:48 mouth run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[2078]: starting cups
    Feb 28 05:02:48 mouth run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[2083]: finished cups
    Feb 28 05:02:48 mouth run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[2085]: starting logrotate

    And then things went awry:

    Feb 28 22:01:01 mouth CROND[5146]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Feb 28 23:01:01 mouth CROND[5154]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Mar 1 00:01:01 mouth CROND[5161]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Mar 1 01:01:01 mouth CROND[5169]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Mar 1 02:01:01 mouth CROND[5176]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Mar 1 03:00:01 mouth CROND[5184]: (root) CMD (/sbin/shutdown -r +10 "CRON: the system will restart in 10 minutes, save your work and exit!!")
    Mar 1 03:01:01 mouth CROND[5189]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Dec 31 18:48:29 mouth crond[1544]: (CRON) STARTUP (1.0)
    Dec 31 19:01:01 mouth CROND[1632]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Dec 31 20:01:01 mouth CROND[1640]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Dec 31 21:01:01 mouth CROND[1648]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Dec 31 22:01:01 mouth CROND[1655]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Dec 31 23:01:01 mouth CROND[1662]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Jan 1 00:01:01 mouth CROND[1669]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Jan 1 01:01:01 mouth CROND[1676]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)

  44. Big software companies: remedial programming 101 by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and you'd think Microsoft would know how to shuffle too, right? ;-)

  45. Upgrade Incentive by hduff · · Score: 1

    Sony must have gotten schooled by Microsoft about "encouraging" their users to upgrade.

    Still, I'm sure a simple root-kit would fix the problem.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  46. Moving the clock didn't help by acomj · · Score: 1

    I moved the date forward on my PS3. Didn't help. Downloaded games don't work (flower, flow, nobi). Except pixeljunk eden works for some reason.

    I didn't try any ps3 games but ps2 games played fine.

    I personally hate the need for an internet connection to play games. I think its more of a time thing than a pure internet connectivity thing. (my machine isn't always on the internet and I've had no problems till now)

    Clearly a stupid bug.

  47. You Haven't Thought of a Reason by Petersko · · Score: 1

    "And the only reason I can think of why someone would want the date sync'd or the game made non-working due to changed system date was because of some form of DRM."

    You haven't thought of a reason, or an explanation. You've got a boogey-man you'd like to blame something new on, even though you have no basis for it, and you've concluded that it must be true because you can't think of anything else. You could equally conclude that it's a failure in the flux capacitor, since nothing else makes sense.

    +5 Insightful just ain't what it used to be. You can get it by using the reasoning of a five year old.

  48. I can see this coming by Suzuran · · Score: 1

    "Quick! Find an excuse to issue a patch that disables OtherOS!"

  49. All older 'phat' sytems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have one of the older 'phat' 60GB that runs PS2s with the hardware instead of software emulation and have not run into the problem (logged it/out) last night/this morning (US date Feb 28th as well as March 1st) and have not had any problems. Do we know exactly what systems this affects? Should I be worried (how can I avoid?), or because I'm still going as of this morning it might not affect my particular model?

  50. Not a chance. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1

    "Quick! Find an excuse to issue a patch that disables OtherOS!"

    No way. Apply Hanlon's Razor to the situation: "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."

    If they wanted to disable OtherOS, they could do it easily enough by making the latest hot game need a firmware update that did it. That's what many companies have done, including Sony on the PSP. Annoying millions of their customers by making the games they've already paid for not work? Companies - even Sony - have done some stupid things out of greed, but that's a whole new level of moronic.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    1. Re:Not a chance. by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      But see, that would be too transparent. It's entirely plausible to the average gamer for Sony to say "The RTC fix is incompatible with OtherOS, so we had to disable it, our hands are tied!"

    2. Re:Not a chance. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      It's entirely plausible to the average gamer for Sony to say "The RTC fix is incompatible with OtherOS, so we had to disable it, our hands are tied!"

      1)No it's not "entirely plausible".

      2)This didn't happen, the "fix" was to wait for the clock to roll over to a valid date. It had nothing to do with OtherOS. But don't let that stop you from littering the board with your half-baked conspiracy theories!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    3. Re:Not a chance. by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      Hey, someone has to do it. Would you rather have more FP crap posts/ad spam/etc?

    4. Re:Not a chance. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Touche, my suzerain!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  51. Steve Ballmer? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure somebody at MS is smiling at this. Not at Nintendo, they are still out cold from laughing to hard all the way to the bank.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  52. Re:They'd better fix this blu ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had PS3 for a couple of years and the blu-ray is bust (errors when loading disk). It worked great untill I started playing Unchartered 2. Now the blu ray's worn out? I knew Drakes fortune was using the reader a lot as you can hear it spinning more than other games, and I understand after investigation that Drakes Unchartered 2 runs ALL of the disk, so by logic, this WILL wear down your blu ray reader faster than say GTA IV, that installs a lot to HD.

    So thanks to shoddy hardware or Unchartered, I can only play games saved on HD (downloaded from the PS3 store).

    I may be wrong but it seems that think Sony's business model included re-couperating costs, by making a game that wears out the blu ray. Then trying to make sure this happens AFTER the warranty, then they can charge £128 to get a new diode, or to clean a lense (something simple and inexpensive).

    I say this becasue you can't download many (popular) games at all, even though this should be possible, especially for titles that Sony produce (like Drakes 2). The annonying thing is that everything works (CD, DVD, downloads, PS2 games, internet etc). So I can't bring myself to get it repaired and feel really dissapointed with Sony and blu ray. In fact I would go as far as to say I am worried about how Sony are operating.

  53. Optimize! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This pseudo-code is not optimized. You should instead first test for the most common cases.


    IF (month IN (1,3,5,7,8,10,12))
    {MaxDayForMonth <- 31}
    ELSE IF (month IN (4,6,9,11))
    {MaxDayForMonth <- 30}
    ELSE IF (month = 2 AND year MOD 4 = 0 AND (year < GregYear OR year MOD 100 > 0 OR year MOD 400 = 0))
    {MaxDayForMonth <- 29}
    ELSE
    {MaxDayForMonth <- 28}

  54. I'll be playing my Dreamcast by Plastic+Pencil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had one Dreamcast since 9/9/99 that's run flawlessly to date. In that span I've had: -2 N64's (#1 from '96 croaked in '02) -2 PS2's (#1 died after 1 year) -1 Lonely Gamecube -2 Xboxes (okay they both work, but #1 is sounds like it's on its deathbed...) -4 or 5 360's (#1 broke in a week, RROD gave me 3 or 4 different 360's in Spring/Summer '07) -2 Wii's (1st was broken out of the box) -1 PS3 (although it was sidelined last fall after a Sony 'update' broke it, and demanded $150 to fix. A user fix resolved the problem and it's been ok til now). But that system from going on 11 years ago (and a launch day system at that) is still going strong. Long Live the Dreamcast indeed.

    1. Re:I'll be playing my Dreamcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a GameBoy in a pear tree...

  55. AVOID THE ISSUE by loafula · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lucky for me I read up on this before using my PS3 at all today. I seem to have circumvented the issue to a degree. I unplugged the power my wireless router and then fired up my PS3. From there, I noticed my date/time was set to 12/31/2000. In the system settings, I disabled internet connection and reset the time manually to 3/1/2010. Now that internet was disabled, I plugged my router back in. I tested a few games, and all worked. Granted, this does not solve the issue of trophies and getting into PSN, but at least I can play single player games until they come up with a fix.

    --
    FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
  56. Re:Since when is a year = 2 mod 4 EVER a leap year by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    No, the biggest failure is, to reinvent the wheel yet another time, when there are libraries out there that are literally tested for decades, and knows to work properly.

    You've heard of GPL Allergy. There's something older than that called NIH Syndrome (Not Invented Here). A symptom is over-dependence on clean-room practices.

    And I've used software written in the 1980s that never expected to still be in use in the 1990s so only a single digit, stored as ASCII, was used for the year. 1989 was followed by 198: (nineteen eighty-colon). But at least it was just cosmetic and still worked.

    The update that fixed it also sent a copyright notice with every disconnect of the modem to the caller for the software the interpreter was sold with, even if completely different software was being run.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  57. Appropriate by FallinWithStyle · · Score: 1

    Grr... I reformatted my PS3 last night... I think the onion called it

    --
    Does this smell like Chloroform to you?
  58. Calendar bug? by Scarumanga · · Score: 1

    Why is it we cannot get a calendar right? The mayans were able to make a calendar that went to 2012 without skipping anything...and they only had rock and chisel. I think intelligence is on a downward spiral if people cant geit their shit in order.

    1. Re:Calendar bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didnt even have the concept of zero!

  59. Re:They'd better fix this blu ray by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Well, look on the bright side. If they have to replace your console, at least it will have the side-effect of fixing your disc reading problem too.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  60. From The Horses "mouth" by badass+fish · · Score: 1

    Here is a monday afternoon post from playstation detailing issue and serving warnings to not even turn on affected units http://blog.us.playstation.com/2010/02/playstation-network-status-update/ updates to problem will be on their Twitter page http://twitter.com/sonyplaystation

    1. Re:From The Horses "mouth" by badass+fish · · Score: 1
    2. Re:From The Horses "mouth" by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Sony was being over-cautious, affected PS3 units work fine for anything not using PSN functionality. Played Oblivion and Lego Star Wars myself, as well as used the web browser. PS1 and PS2 games also worked fine.

      But it's fixed now.

    3. Re:From The Horses "mouth" by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      Not quite true. Both of the PS3 games you tried are old games which pre-date the trophy system, so they work fine. Newer games that use the trophy system would not run, even though they can, under normal circumstances, be run just fine offline on a system that has never been anywhere near a net connection.

      The advice to leave your machine off also had a good basis. The more messing around you did while things were broken, the less likely it was that you'd be able to just get going again with no problems the next day. I'm certainly hearing accounts of people who spent a while trying to fix things yesterday morning before they knew this was a worldwide glitch, who have lost savegames and had to redownload/reinstall data as a result of their own actions interacting with the glitch.

      This is weird, it feels like I'm defending Sony, because I'm confirming the value of their advice, but in reality, I'm pointing out that yes, their screw-up really *was* that serious.

  61. 8001050f Workaround Fix by shammyclause · · Score: 1

    Got to Date and Time Settings Set Manually (you will notice it will be off a day) Back out and go somewhere else on the PS3 Go back in to Date and Time Settings and Set by Internet Back out again and do something else Go back in manually and make sure date and time are right You should be fixed!

  62. Everything's back to normal now. by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    Just logged into PSN with my CECHE that was affected by the bug, my PSN downloads have the owner name back, my theme is working, yadda yadda yadda.

  63. It works now ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It works now (Slovakia GMT+1 2:51). But the trophies from Demon's souls game which disappeared yesterday are still gone. Trophy sync didn't help because i did not sync them before the date glitch.

    1. Re:It works now ! by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      Yes, it looks like it's over. It probably fixed itself with the change to March, 2. Now, I hope they will be able to prevent this from happening again.

  64. Marcianelbert by Marcianelbert · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I really enjoy reading your article. Keep it up the good work. http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/acai-optimum-review-get-free-trial-now-1704552.html

  65. Re:Since when is a year = 2 mod 4 EVER a leap year by JamesP · · Score: 1

    You really don't need A LIBRARY to know if a certain year is a leap year...

    Time libraries are really useful and should be used thoroughly (especially for thing like - what's the week day of 400 days from now)

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  66. Re: THAT IS IT FOR ME WITH SONY by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    I was so proud that I bought two original PS3 units. I wanted to write programs for the advanced hardware within. Of course that might mean unauthorized software that Sony would not have control over. I don't like where this is going. I am simply not going to buy any more Sony products. The Sony rootkit episode should have put me on notice. I am not going to buy any more closed hardware. There is no need. Alternatives exist. If GPUs are your thing, there is CUDA. I am sure I would be more pissed off about this if I had an investment in time and money with games, and I was concerned about my on-line status. I was thrilled about the impending release of the HOME product, but after a couple of years of waiting, I gave up. My two original PS3 units are collecting dust, and I remember them being pricey at the time I bought them.