Nope, I've had users get infected with this that solely use Firefox for web browsing. This is not a virus that exploits Windows, it's really targeted at exploiting Adobe vulnerabilities plus a few others.
As I write this message, I am running a scan to make sure I just finished cleaning this virus off one of my user's machines. This user has TeaTimer installed, yet still got infected. It's rather odd, seeing as the infect piggybacks on some registry values. So either the user is mindless hitting Allow on TeaTimer, or the virus is circumventing it.
I can kinda understand why one would equate hard-line capitalism with freedom when half the world was ruled by the Soviet Union, but it's long gone now, so we really need to drop the rethoric and admit that social good needs to be considered too.
People really underestimate the greens when it comes to obstructing progress.
I mean come on, how can you trust a group that bitches about how unclean coal is and then holds up the building of Solar power with litigation waiting for environmental impact studies of plopping solar arrays in the middle of a desert.
I have one user who is still on a Windows 2000 platform. Last I knew Win2000 didn't support IE7 (and I assume IE8 by extension). He's been bitching about "certain" websites not working properly, which I am about 99% certain is because a lot of websites just aren't bothering to support IE6. I told him to use Firefox, he bitched about that, I threw my hands up in disgust and left him to rot. Then he installed Firefox and bitched about Firefox not doing what IE does.
I'm going with a literal interpretation. The article says information on the space shuttle, not the boosters.
Further, going to Boeing's page on the space shuttle, all I can tell is their involvement is strictly limited to the orbiter, not the rocket boosters.
This leads me to the conclusion of why China would want the shuttle? Maybe there's a few secrets in the orbiter worth having, but the value of the boosters is not necessarily within Boeing's possession.
The House of Lords functions in a manner that the US Senate should have functioned. Since the appointment is life time, the Lords are not subject to listening to the populism. Thus they are free to make intelligent and informed decisions rather than relying on listening to the whims of the populace, potentially serving as a mechanism by which to prevent utterly stupid laws from passing.
The US had that with the Senate, by making Senators a 6 year term and not making their appointment subjected directly to the whim of the people. Since the 17th Amendment in 1913 things have gotten progressively worse as Senators suddenly pay heed to populism.
What I find disturbing is that its two categories which my browse is showing up unique in. Browser Plugins and System Fonts. It's the System Fonts uniqueness that has me perplexed.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, but then everyone around you knows that you didn't. Why didn't you opt in? Didn't want to show how much you don't care about the environment?
Fuck the greens.
Bah, they'll use your children and your neighbors to pressure you in to behaving in their pre-approved way, and damn your freedom.
I still be the greens will oppose this tech under the grounds that it doesn't reduce waste ENOUGH.
It will encourage growth, the very last thing the greens want. Expect to see opposition to it.
"Oh, we won't repeal that tax, we can find new things to spend that freed up money on."
Nope, I've had users get infected with this that solely use Firefox for web browsing. This is not a virus that exploits Windows, it's really targeted at exploiting Adobe vulnerabilities plus a few others.
As I write this message, I am running a scan to make sure I just finished cleaning this virus off one of my user's machines. This user has TeaTimer installed, yet still got infected. It's rather odd, seeing as the infect piggybacks on some registry values. So either the user is mindless hitting Allow on TeaTimer, or the virus is circumventing it.
So does the tax get repealed once the conversion has taken place?
I can kinda understand why one would equate hard-line capitalism with freedom when half the world was ruled by the Soviet Union, but it's long gone now, so we really need to drop the rethoric and admit that social good needs to be considered too.
Yes! Less capitalism, more free market!
Rich Asian Chicks aren't hot anymore?
People really underestimate the greens when it comes to obstructing progress.
I mean come on, how can you trust a group that bitches about how unclean coal is and then holds up the building of Solar power with litigation waiting for environmental impact studies of plopping solar arrays in the middle of a desert.
Then you just find one person hanging on a rope somewhere in a basement instead of two guys in suits duking it out in the server room.
Let's get ready to rummmmmmbbbbbbbbllleeeeeeeee!
Bonus points if you fire the person out of a condom.
If by treated well you mean got his winky whacked. Sure.
Bang the table?
Well of course. Anything with Danny Devito is by default better.
Yes.
Man, I was completely expecting you to show that a Wii platform could run all those options.
I guess I'm back to designing all my user machines around PS3s instead of Wiis.
I have one user who is still on a Windows 2000 platform. Last I knew Win2000 didn't support IE7 (and I assume IE8 by extension). He's been bitching about "certain" websites not working properly, which I am about 99% certain is because a lot of websites just aren't bothering to support IE6. I told him to use Firefox, he bitched about that, I threw my hands up in disgust and left him to rot. Then he installed Firefox and bitched about Firefox not doing what IE does.
Some people are beyond redemption.
Are you suggesting that the US would use the shuttle as a launch platform or delivery mechanism for nuclear weaponry?
I'm going with a literal interpretation. The article says information on the space shuttle, not the boosters.
Further, going to Boeing's page on the space shuttle, all I can tell is their involvement is strictly limited to the orbiter, not the rocket boosters.
This leads me to the conclusion of why China would want the shuttle? Maybe there's a few secrets in the orbiter worth having, but the value of the boosters is not necessarily within Boeing's possession.
Essentially.
And the pun wasn't intentional.
The House of Lords functions in a manner that the US Senate should have functioned. Since the appointment is life time, the Lords are not subject to listening to the populism. Thus they are free to make intelligent and informed decisions rather than relying on listening to the whims of the populace, potentially serving as a mechanism by which to prevent utterly stupid laws from passing.
The US had that with the Senate, by making Senators a 6 year term and not making their appointment subjected directly to the whim of the people. Since the 17th Amendment in 1913 things have gotten progressively worse as Senators suddenly pay heed to populism.
Just as a matter of interest, why do you hate market solutions so much? Are you some kind of socialist?
The introduction of artificial scarcity by a non-market entity (government) does not make something a market solution.
What I find disturbing is that its two categories which my browse is showing up unique in. Browser Plugins and System Fonts. It's the System Fonts uniqueness that has me perplexed.
Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 3,396 tested so far.
Fuck.