I know I may have fallen for a troll trap here, but I am not letting this one go:
Hitler atheism is in doubt. The evidence point more toward him being a catholic. Beside wasn't the soldiers who committed these crimes?, are you telling me that Germany's army during ww2 was an atheist army ??None of these soldiers was a catholic one ?
Stalin was dogmatic in his views about social composition, he was so dogmatic about these things, it was as religion. Same goes for Pol Pot.
It was religion that started the Crusades, it was religion who started the inquisition, it was religion who brought down the Towers. What about slavery in US ? who were the south quoting on the right for slaves? Get you fact right!
"Good people will do good things, and bad people will do bad things. But for good people to do bad things -- that takes religion." -- Steven Weinberg
I feel ashamed now. I work in this field(neutrino cosmology, well more like neutrinos coming from Dark matter annihilation) and I didn't know about this.
Sir, I thank you!
I been faithful supporter of Firefox for the last few years. But I do think that Microsoft did some major advancement with IE(after IE6). I do agree that they still have much to do.
But saying in an absolute manner that it's insecure, that's something I don't agree with.
I would like to see how they are going to enforce that.
There is overlaying stuff here, You bought a camera, that camera is yours, you own it. Using to film your new episode of 2 girls 1 cup and sell it online is your right, and yours alone.
That's like buying a car, and the manufacturer tells you, that you are not allowed to use to car to race, because the steering software is not licensed for racing.
If anyone is liable it's the manufacturer of the camera, he has not right to enforce how you are going to use your hardware even if it was in the EULA, and if you do break the EULA as it is, it there ass's who is going to be prosecuted.
"The Usual IANAL statement".
I don't know if what I am saying is 100% correct. But people who might vote for Pirate, Green, ect ect. are mostly geeks or people directly involved in this. The problem is that the general population are not very tech savvy or don't care(yet). What is needed now is not voting for these parties(even though it is important, and we should do it), but it's education the general population of the dangers of these laws and how can it affect them. Point is we need advertisement campaign or whatever that might do the trick.
Or else we will have an internet dark age.
However Kudos for the ISP, good work I say.
Since when our social interaction were rational ? There is no point in rationalising this for the human majority. If putting information about themselves on a site so they'd connect with people is what's required , they would do it.
They see this as a way of being capable of interacting with more people using less time.
Question, how many(of active) profiles have a friend list under 20 friends? I would suppose not a lot, I would even go as far as saying probably very rare. People want to meet more people(in general) and online social interaction can give you something of that in less time.
So people put the information there, so people would see it.
Because we are social. We need social contact. If being social means having a profile on facebook so you'd connect with your friends, most people(whether they know the risks or not) will have one.
I am an anti-theist as the following guy, but what you said is wrong.
You might just have wrong information, trolling me, or explicitly lying. But he only had one wife under 10.
Not only in Germany, but in France as well. Though I am not sure about the prepaid ones, but for the plans it's the same. When I first came to France 2 years ago I went through the same thing, I had to register my number with real data providing real documents. I don't think this is a wrong idea. As long as it's protected as the grand parent post indicated.
They (Viacom) look like a bunch of hypocrites, they want their cake and eat it as well. I am not saying Youtube is innocent. But I hope viacom get slapped, and get slapped hard.
I can shed some light on this, I am doing physics in France. An important percentage of my fellow colleagues(not just French others as well) use Macs on the laptops. However for any scientific calculations done it's always Linux. Mostly Scientific Linux.
Personally I am not willing to pay that money for a Mac.
The question is, how a 3 years old can pick a gun up, and while pointing the gun at himself, be able to pull the trigger ?
If the parents really did leave a loaded gun with the safety pin unlocked near a child, they do deserve to go to jail.
But what do you mean by europe?(I wasn't even specific myself) Do you mean the whole eurozone ?
It may be subjective of me, but is that even helping them ? I could be wrong but isn't there more people under poverty line in US ?
From what I've seen here(in france) that people are more taken care of(in case of sickness, bad events, ect ect).
I never understood this American fear of socialism. What is so wrong with it, that the mere mention of it makes you an agent of the devil ?
I mean what's so specific about American culture that plant fear of socialism ? Europe is doing fine, isn't this a more then a good evidence ?
Nope,not even any kind of problems. I have this system for half a year now. Never experienced any sort of problems except those which I was the cause(doing stupid stuff).
My experience with Vista is good so far. However i still prefer my fedora for it.
Anyway this may be because my system is still new and fully patched. But There is a lot of people out there running Vista on different hardware, a global view is needed to make any kind of conclusions.
Depending whether SuperSymmetry is correct or not. We need SS to allow the increase in mass(in addition to other things). Without SS it has to be between 115 and 150 (taking into consideration the data we have from SM only).
No, SM wouldn't be wrong, however This extension of SM would be. I am not saying SM is perfect, there is a lot of problems with it, Mainly the mass problem. But not finding higgs wouldn't mean anything beyond the mechanism itself. SM is just the collection of theories dealing with the different forces. SM work in assuming we already have the mass.
Now from a person point of view, as a scientist I would rather not finding the higgs(or any mass-generation mechanism), because that would open the way to changing our entire perception of the subatomic world.
I just finished reading this article: http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2579v2 "Strong coupling in Horava gravity"
And in one short sentence, there is a lot of problems with theory, and as a theorist, I don't think it's a viable one!
Slashdot Mirror
Call me tinfoil hat wearer, but me thinks they want a faster way of cracking encryption...
So that makes married men smarter then married women ? Because they are wrong the whole time ?
I know I may have fallen for a troll trap here, but I am not letting this one go: Hitler atheism is in doubt. The evidence point more toward him being a catholic. Beside wasn't the soldiers who committed these crimes?, are you telling me that Germany's army during ww2 was an atheist army ??None of these soldiers was a catholic one ? Stalin was dogmatic in his views about social composition, he was so dogmatic about these things, it was as religion. Same goes for Pol Pot. It was religion that started the Crusades, it was religion who started the inquisition, it was religion who brought down the Towers. What about slavery in US ? who were the south quoting on the right for slaves? Get you fact right! "Good people will do good things, and bad people will do bad things. But for good people to do bad things -- that takes religion." -- Steven Weinberg
I feel ashamed now. I work in this field(neutrino cosmology, well more like neutrinos coming from Dark matter annihilation) and I didn't know about this. Sir, I thank you!
By which detector ? can you give me some references to this ?
I don't think any neutrino detector can detect them. Not even IceCube.
I been faithful supporter of Firefox for the last few years. But I do think that Microsoft did some major advancement with IE(after IE6). I do agree that they still have much to do. But saying in an absolute manner that it's insecure, that's something I don't agree with.
I would like to see how they are going to enforce that. There is overlaying stuff here, You bought a camera, that camera is yours, you own it. Using to film your new episode of 2 girls 1 cup and sell it online is your right, and yours alone. That's like buying a car, and the manufacturer tells you, that you are not allowed to use to car to race, because the steering software is not licensed for racing. If anyone is liable it's the manufacturer of the camera, he has not right to enforce how you are going to use your hardware even if it was in the EULA, and if you do break the EULA as it is, it there ass's who is going to be prosecuted. "The Usual IANAL statement".
I suppose this might an opportunity to test those "We reserve the right to change the EULA" and the EULAs themselves in court.
I think this is the second coming of SCO.
I don't know if what I am saying is 100% correct. But people who might vote for Pirate, Green, ect ect. are mostly geeks or people directly involved in this. The problem is that the general population are not very tech savvy or don't care(yet). What is needed now is not voting for these parties(even though it is important, and we should do it), but it's education the general population of the dangers of these laws and how can it affect them. Point is we need advertisement campaign or whatever that might do the trick. Or else we will have an internet dark age. However Kudos for the ISP, good work I say.
Since when our social interaction were rational ? There is no point in rationalising this for the human majority. If putting information about themselves on a site so they'd connect with people is what's required , they would do it. They see this as a way of being capable of interacting with more people using less time. Question, how many(of active) profiles have a friend list under 20 friends? I would suppose not a lot, I would even go as far as saying probably very rare. People want to meet more people(in general) and online social interaction can give you something of that in less time. So people put the information there, so people would see it.
Because we are social. We need social contact. If being social means having a profile on facebook so you'd connect with your friends, most people(whether they know the risks or not) will have one.
I am an anti-theist as the following guy, but what you said is wrong. You might just have wrong information, trolling me, or explicitly lying. But he only had one wife under 10.
Not only in Germany, but in France as well. Though I am not sure about the prepaid ones, but for the plans it's the same. When I first came to France 2 years ago I went through the same thing, I had to register my number with real data providing real documents. I don't think this is a wrong idea. As long as it's protected as the grand parent post indicated.
They (Viacom) look like a bunch of hypocrites, they want their cake and eat it as well. I am not saying Youtube is innocent. But I hope viacom get slapped, and get slapped hard.
I can shed some light on this, I am doing physics in France. An important percentage of my fellow colleagues(not just French others as well) use Macs on the laptops. However for any scientific calculations done it's always Linux. Mostly Scientific Linux. Personally I am not willing to pay that money for a Mac.
The question is, how a 3 years old can pick a gun up, and while pointing the gun at himself, be able to pull the trigger ? If the parents really did leave a loaded gun with the safety pin unlocked near a child, they do deserve to go to jail.
But what do you mean by europe?(I wasn't even specific myself) Do you mean the whole eurozone ? It may be subjective of me, but is that even helping them ? I could be wrong but isn't there more people under poverty line in US ? From what I've seen here(in france) that people are more taken care of(in case of sickness, bad events, ect ect).
I never understood this American fear of socialism. What is so wrong with it, that the mere mention of it makes you an agent of the devil ? I mean what's so specific about American culture that plant fear of socialism ? Europe is doing fine, isn't this a more then a good evidence ?
Nope,not even any kind of problems. I have this system for half a year now. Never experienced any sort of problems except those which I was the cause(doing stupid stuff). My experience with Vista is good so far. However i still prefer my fedora for it. Anyway this may be because my system is still new and fully patched. But There is a lot of people out there running Vista on different hardware, a global view is needed to make any kind of conclusions.
Depending whether SuperSymmetry is correct or not. We need SS to allow the increase in mass(in addition to other things). Without SS it has to be between 115 and 150 (taking into consideration the data we have from SM only).
No, SM wouldn't be wrong, however This extension of SM would be. I am not saying SM is perfect, there is a lot of problems with it, Mainly the mass problem. But not finding higgs wouldn't mean anything beyond the mechanism itself. SM is just the collection of theories dealing with the different forces. SM work in assuming we already have the mass. Now from a person point of view, as a scientist I would rather not finding the higgs(or any mass-generation mechanism), because that would open the way to changing our entire perception of the subatomic world.
I just finished reading this article: http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2579v2 "Strong coupling in Horava gravity" And in one short sentence, there is a lot of problems with theory, and as a theorist, I don't think it's a viable one!
Where is the whatcouldpossiblygoeswrong tag ?