Slashdot Mirror


User: aengblom

aengblom's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
477
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 477

  1. Re:Their Name on Trident Back From the Dead · · Score: 2

    I don't think they'll be able to live down the stigma associated with their company name.

    I don't know. I like there gum. I havn't tried any of their other products, but it couldn't have been that bad

  2. Re:Microsoft FUD Parroted on USA Today says "Linux waddles from obscurity" · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The lack of rebuttal, and use the word "warns" (which implies a notification of a real threat) rather than a more correct one such as "claims" or "asserts", gives undeserved credibility to this shibboleth.

    As a journalist, one should never use such words as "claims" or "asserts". Why? Because both words inject the idea that the JOURNALIST doubts this. Microsoft "warns" is clearly attributed to the MICROSOFT. (To be a real stickler, it should be says/said) Further, the use of PAINT should certainly be enough for you. It implies that this is microsoft's "deliberate attempt to take certain materials and make them look like IT wants them to look". Don't require the writer to be biased towards your side. Especially when you're right ;-).

  3. Re:600? on Wanted: Home for Adventurous Robots · · Score: 2

    not really bots. Mellon is into robotic machines. Things that like to big REALLY BIG HOLES for example. Farm equipment, military equipment.. So it wants 600 acres of land it can tear to shreds and nobody says UNCLE!

    actually.. my own personal opinion is they just need a bigger place to party

  4. Re:Hmmm. The conflicted mind on 1985 Usenet About Y2k · · Score: 2

    Those phone numbers are 17 years old. You could prank them if you want, but a white pages would be just as good.

    Sure, but if I'm thinking this, so are 1000 other people. We could slashdot the phone system for a little fun.

    hehe. Yes evil thoughts.

  5. Simpsons Reference on Black Blobs Appearing In Camden, NJ · · Score: 2

    Article: A quick field test wasn't able to confirm that the substance was petroleum-based, said Department of Environmental Protection spokesman Fred Mumford.

    Slashdot: It's roofing tar

    Obligatory simpsons reference:
    Lisa: I don't understand professor, why didn't your tests show that the skeleton was a fake.
    Dr. Gould:
    I'm going to be honest with you Lisa, I never did the tests.
    [Dr. Gould walks away]

    I mean...it's Camden

  6. Hmmm. The conflicted mind on 1985 Usenet About Y2k · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't know whether to to gaze into the beauty of the formated and edited messages or make prank calls to the phone numbers listed beneath them.

    Ahh the conflicted mind ;-)

  7. You mean? on Do You Know Where You Live? · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe these "surveyors" are that bad. I mean it's not as if the states aren't all different colors! I live in central PA so it's all green. New Jersey, as we all know, is orange! Perhaps we should get some non-color blind folks out there to define the borders!

    Hint: Black line=new state!

  8. Re:Not lazy at all... on NYC Subways Testing Flywheels · · Score: 1

    First I must say I respect anyone not willing to enter garbage but I think you're not really considering the situation.

    NY Times says it will not sell your e-mail. The Times takes it's reputation pretty darn seriously, so if you catch them doing it, they will be quite embarresed. Also many of their registered users are SUBSCRIBERS. You don't want to piss them off.

    The site does not even ASK for your real address (just zip) or any specific information that can identify you.

    Also, it promises to tell you if there is a true change in the policy via e-mail. (As, no doubt, slashdot will too)

    NY TIMES PRIVACY POLICY BELOW

    Privacy Policy

    his Overall Privacy Policy verifies that The New York Times on the Web is a member of the TRUSTe program and is in compliance with TRUSTe privacy principles. We also participate in the Council of Better Business Bureaus' BBBOnLine Privacy Program, and comply with all BBBOnLine Privacy standards.

    This policy discloses the privacy practices for The New York Times on the Web and The New York Times Learning Network. (The New York Times Home Delivery website maintains a separate privacy statement.) For further information, please also visit our Member Center, where under the Site Help tab, you can view our Subscriber Agreement and read Frequently Asked Questions about Cookies. In the Member Center you can also review Your Profile as well as manage your E-mail Preferences.

    TRUSTe

    When you visit a Web site displaying the TRUSTe trustmark, you can expect to be notified of what personally identifiable information of yours is collected; what organization is collecting the information; how the information is used; with whom the information may be shared; what choices are available to you regarding collection, use and distribution of the information; what kind of security procedures are in place to protect the loss, misuse or alteration of information under the company's control; and how you can correct any inaccuracies in the information. Questions regarding this statement should be directed to The New York Times on the Web Customer Service; if the Web site has not responded to your inquiry or your inquiry has not been satisfactorily addressed, please contact TRUSTe.

    BBBOnLine

    A wholly owned subsidiary of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, BBBOnLine's mission is to promote trust and confidence on the Internet through the BBBOnLine Reliability and the BBBOnLine Privacy programs. Launched in March 1999, BBBOnLine Privacy awards seals to online businesses that have been verified to be following good information practices. Further information about this program is available at www.bbbonline.org.

    The New York Times on the Web has adopted a set of information management guidelines which serve as the basis for our customer and advertiser relationships. These guidelines have been developed with the recognition that Internet technologies are rapidly evolving, and that underlying business models are still not established. Accordingly, guidelines are subject to change. Any such changes will be posted on this page. If the changes represent a material departure from our current practices with respect to the use of personal information, the changes will be posted on this page thirty days prior to taking effect and registered users will be notified via email.

    The New York Times on the Web is not responsible for the content or the privacy policies of Web sites to which it may link.

    What information does The New York Times on the Web gather/track about you?

    Registration: During a free registration process prior to using the site, The New York Times on the Web requires that you supply a unique member ID, e-mail address, and demographic information (country, zip code, age, sex; household income, industry, job title, job function, and subscription status to The New York Times newspaper). You must agree to the terms of our Subscriber Agreement.

    Premium Products and Services: While the majority of The New York Times on the Web is offered free of charge, we do charge fees for select premium products and services. These products include our Premium Archive, Premium Crosswords, Editors' Picks, Topics of The Times, among others. To enable the purchase of these products, The New York Times on the Web collects and stores billing and credit card information. This information will only be shared with third parties who perform tasks required to complete the purchase transaction. Examples of this include fulfilling orders and processing credit card payments. You may review and update your Premium Account information, view your most recently purchased products and transaction history in the secured Premium Account area of the Member Center.

    Contests, Surveys, Special Offers: On occasion, The New York Times on the Web also collects additional personal information from subscribers in connection with optional contests, surveys, or special offers.

    Cookies: The New York Times on the Web employs cookies to recognize you and your access privileges on The New York Times on the Web, as well as to track site usage. Subscribers who do not accept cookies from the domain "nytimes.com" cannot access most areas of The Times on the Web. For detailed information about our use of cookies see Frequently Asked Questions About Cookies in the Site Help area of our Member Center.

    We use a proprietary advertising server to display ads on our site. In addition, advertisers may elect to use third-party advertising companies to serve ads onto our website. Please click here to see a list of these advertising agencies and their privacy policies. In the course of serving these advertisements, the third-party advertisers may place or recognize a unique "cookie" on your browser. We do not have access to these cookies or any information that they may contain. If you would like more information about this practice and about your option not to accept cookies placed by these companies, please click here. Acceptance of cookies from domains other than nytimes.com is optional.

    IP Addresses: The New York Times on the Web logs IP addresses, or the location of your computer on the Internet, for systems administration and troubleshooting purposes. We do not use IP address logs to track your session or your behavior on our site.

    What does The New York Times on the Web do with the information it gathers/tracks?

    Statistical Analysis and Banner Advertising: The New York Times on the Web may perform statistical analyses of user behavior in order to measure interest in the various areas of our site (for product development purposes) and to inform advertisers as to how many consumers have seen or "clicked" their advertising banners. We also use demographic and preference information to allow advertising banners on our Web site to be targeted, in aggregate, to the users for whom they are most pertinent. This means that users see advertising that is most likely to interest them, and advertisers send their messages to people who are most likely to be receptive, improving both the viewer's experience and the effectiveness of the ads. In this statistical analyses and banner advertisement targeting, we will disclose information to third parties only in aggregate form. Personal information about you as an individual subscriber will not be provided to any third party without your consent, except under the circumstances described in Compliance with Legal Process below.

    E-Mail: If you so elect at registration or in the E-mail Preferences section of our Member Center, The New York Times on the Web will periodically send you promotional email about services offered by The New York Times on the Web and its advertisers. The New York Times on the Web may contact you regarding account status, changes to the Subscriber Agreement, and to confirm registration.

    The E-Mail This Article feature is an easy way for New York Times on the Web users to send articles through email. The e-mail addresses that you supply to use this service will not be used for any other purpose without your consent. The New York Times on the Web does not send unsolicited e-mail.

    We use e-mail links located in the Site Help area our Member Center to allow you to contact us directly with any questions or comments you may have. We will use your email address to respond directly to these questions or comments.

    Data Security: To prevent unauthorized access, maintain data accuracy, and ensure the appropriate use of information, we have put in place appropriate physical, electronic, and managerial procedures to protect the information we collect online.

    With whom does The New York Times on the Web share the information it gathers/tracks?

    The New York Times on the Web shares the information it gathers, in aggregate form only, with advertisers and other partners. We will not release personal information about you as an individual to third parties, except under the circumstances described in Compliance with Legal Process below. You can review and modify all of your personal information provided during the free registration process by visiting the secured Your Profile section of our Member Center. If you do not remember your Member ID and password, please go to www.nytimes.com/forgot for assistance.

    Programs From Our Partners: During the registration process, new users who select to register for certain featured offers from our partners will begin receiving e-mail from these companies. You will only receive e-mail messages from these companies if you elect this opt-in service. The New York Times on the Web may use this information as set forth in this privacy policy. Should you decide to discontinue your e-mail subscription or would like more information on these companies, please see our list of partners that have participated in this program.

    YesMail: Users who selected to register for YesMail during the NYTimes.com registration process became YesMail members. If you selected this option, YesMail uses the information collected on the NYTimes.com registration form to provide targeted e-mails to you on behalf of its advertisers. The New York Times on the Web may use this information as set forth in this privacy policy. You will only receive e-mail messages from YesMail if you elected this opt-in service. Please contact membercare@yesmail directly if you no longer wish to receive e-mail messages from them.

    Forums: The New York Times on the Web offers Forums, or message boards. Any information you disclose when posting a message in these Forums becomes public. Moreover, Members who post a message in our Forums make their e-mail address available to others through a feature of our Forums software, which could result in unsolicited e-mail from other subscribers or parties. For more information about Forums see the Posting Policy, or write to the Forums moderators at threadmaster@nytimes.com.

    How do I change or update my personal information?

    The Member Center: The Member Center is a centralized area where you can manage your relationship with The New York Times on the Web. There are a number of things you can do in the Member Center to ensure your personal information is accurate and up to date. Under the Your Profile tab, you can gain secure access to update the information you provided during the free registration process. The E-mail Preferences tab is the place to go to sign up for our E-mail newsletters and manage your delivery options. If ever you purchase a premium product on nytimes.com, you can visit the secure Premium Account tab in the Member Center to update your billing and credit card information and review your transaction history. In order to gain access to the areas of the Member Center containing personal information, you will be asked to re-enter your password. If you do not remember your password, please go to www.nytimes.com/forgot for assistance. If you need further assistance, please contact Customer Service.

    Compliance with Legal Process

    We may disclose personal information if we are required to do so by law or we in good faith believe that such action is necessary to (1) comply with the law or with legal process; (2) protect and defend our rights and property; (3) protect against misuse or unauthorized use of The New York Times on the Web; or (4) protect the personal safety or property of our users or the public (among other things, this means that if you provide false information or attempt to pose as someone else, information about you may be disclosed as part of any investigation into your actions).

  9. Some facts on iVillage Renounces Pop-up Advertising · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fact: I work at a MAJOR news web site

    Fact: My company held off from pop-ups/flash until only recently

    Fact: My company has spent and continues to lose millions

    Fact: Numbers still continue to grow.

    Fact: Pop ups don't drive readers away. Or the very least, drive away fewer than the pop ups are worth.

    We hate them as much as the average user. NO we hate them more. (I WORK on a website which displays pop ups. Think about it.) Preview: Popup. Copy edit: Popup. Check out other departments work: Pop up. Pop up. Pop up.

    It's not the web sites that need to change. It's the advertisers. Popups=revenues as long as advertisers think they do.

    meanwhile. Just the other day on cbs.marketwatch I ran across a REAL VIDEO Ad. Wow.

  10. What is this? on May I Have Your EULA Please? · · Score: 1, Troll

    What is this? A competition to build the most boring database in the world?

    hehe

  11. Re:Cost effective on Ask About 10 Years of Free Web Publishing · · Score: 2

    Don't totally waste a question ;-)



    ibiblio is a nonprofit internet collaborative supported through the generous
    and enthusiastic contributions of the following partners...

    http://ibiblio.org/partners/



  12. Are they happy about it though: on Make Money Fast Online · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Note that they're not making money from banner ads, but from classified ads.

    The question though. Are they happy about it?

    What do I mean? Classifieds are THE most profitable part of dead-tree newspapers. A major reason newspapers WENT online is because they feared their classified business would be stolen by web sites. Hopefully--and I say this because I READ newspapers and Web sites--the demand for classifieds can support both.

    [Disclaimer: Newspaper Association of America Slashdotted so I didn't read the article]

  13. Re:Um. on U.S. Developing 100-Kilowatt Laser for Strike Fighters · · Score: 2

    I have a question: how practical is this, really? The article tells us that you get two four-second shots, spaced four seconds apart, and the laser then needs 30 seconds to cool down. This is hardly what I'd call a practical battlefield weapon, especially given the modern war methodology of one well-coordinated, completely overwhelming attack. Why use a laser with such poor fire times?

    These are rechargable missiles. Not the dogfighting lasers you're thinking of from Star Wars. And two two-second bursts is plenty...you only need one hit. Also... laser go faster than missiles and gun fire. Hence, less chance for a reaction from the competition--meaning more accuracy than anything else available.

  14. Until then on First Wind-up Phone Charger Review · · Score: 2
    Until this feature is intergrated into your phone. Try this elequent hack.

    1. Locate a quarter
    2. Purchase scotch tape
    3. Tape quarter to phone
    When you need to make a phone call, but it's dead. Just remove quarter.
  15. Re:"CNN is reporting" on Open Source, Real Media Mega-player? · · Score: 1

    netscape.com.com. Netscape "makes" browsers. It's doesn't report it. CNN is owned by AOL Time Warner which ownes CNN. CNN's content (probably just a wire story anyway) is probably on netscape.com.com. Sheesh how could you get confused. I mean it's just a $multi-billion media company!

  16. Ingenious! on Volvo's "Safety Car" Runs Windows 98 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ingenious!If it doesn't go... you can't get hurt!

    Gotta give some credit to those volvo engineers

  17. Re:Will they... on Extra Scenes in FotR Special Edition DVD · · Score: 2

    Damn. Yo, it's a joke, yall. ;-)

    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=1, Funny=4, Overrated=4, Underrated=1, Total=10.

    I (who never read to books. Bad Geek!) felt they could take out 20 minutes of walking and put in 20 more minutes of other things. Every walking shot had to have a close up, medium range, and a long distance "ooo look at the pretty mountains" shot.

    Overall, I did enjoy the movie though.

  18. In related news. on One Terabyte On a 12-inch^H^H^H^Hcm Disk · · Score: 5, Funny

    In related news. Sony announces it will immediatley begin selling these disks to consumers.

    Optware Spokesman:
    "We were thinking it would take 10 years the technology to be needed, but bad jokes about our hardware's "12 inch vs. 12 cm" capabilities, beowulf of them, and how much prOn one could store on it completly overwhelmed previous storage technologies" ;-)

  19. Will they... on Extra Scenes in FotR Special Edition DVD · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will they have more minute-long shots of them walking? I really don't think their was enough in the original version.

  20. Who knew! on Mac Users May Be Smarter · · Score: 2

    Damn before college I was pretty stinkin' smart! PII 400 Mhz 100 Front Bus 64 Megs of ram. Boy did that put a hole in the ole' wallet. Now, despite 4-years of work and the $100,000 towards tuition I must have a brain the size of a peanut!

    Well at least I'm not smart enough to realize what I'm missing!

  21. CNET on Macworld: No new Towers, But 17-inch iMac · · Score: 4, Informative

    CNET has a story on the 17inchers too.

  22. Great. Just Great! on Chicken-Feather Chips · · Score: 2

    I just put all this work into growing my featherless chickens and damnit now it turns out that features are worth something!

  23. Moz feature on Web Designers Ignoring Standards and Support IE Only · · Score: 2

    Possible Moz Feature:

    Create a button that will send an "error rendered on http://web.address.here" to mozilla. Also put a space to provide the webmaster's e-mail. (Time spent 5-20 seconds. Someone at Moz will check out the most popular links and find out if it's moz's problems or html problems. Moz will then politely send an e-mail. (X,000 of our users have e-mailed us concerning using our browser on your web page. We have verified that our browser was functioning correctly.) You can verify that your page is not compliant HERE.

    Especially in recent nightlies I have seen some render errors. This is expectable, but makes me wary to send in invalid HTML complaints. (And downloading moz 1.0 to check if it works there and then the most recent nightly to see if it works there is a lot of work on my 28.8!) I imagine webmasters also get pissed when they get complaints about build 2002893405209345802853.b, but it seems to be working on 2002893405209345802853.ba. ;-)

  24. Re:Converting to all-digital is a bad idea.. on To Digitize or Not Digitize the Family Photo Album? · · Score: 2

    Digital is really taking off in the world of fine art photography. (At least at my school--which I consider somewhat technologically backwards). With a quality printer (We use epson 2000P) we can print real nice, large color prints. They're also archival.

    Having just completed a course in (excruitiatingly difficult) Color Printmaking (the real/not digital stuff) and seeing full 11x14 prints coming off our G4 lab left me quite interested.

    I'll probably never be able to get into a color printmaking lab, but spening $1500 for a good scanner and printer could allow me to keep myself in color photography.

  25. Re:Why government certified? on U.S. Government Certified Wireless Security Products? · · Score: 2

    Why do we jump to have the government certify our electronic devices, standards, and protocols? Why can't we merely rely on the private sector to develop sound products?

    Just because you don't trust the government doesn't mean we should trust the private sector.
    That's all I'm saying.

    Arthur Andersen
    Enron
    IM Clone
    Worldcom
    Xerox

    And just because this is Slashdot:
    MS Windows