Slashdot Mirror


Volvo's "Safety Car" Runs Windows 98

An anonymous submitter writes "MSNBC is carrying a report on Volvo's new "Safety Car." It sounds pretty cool, too, until you get to the part that mentions it runs Windows 98 as its operating system. Yikes! Be sure to reboot your car frequently to avoid crashes."

564 comments

  1. Service Pack? by netphilter · · Score: 1

    So when does the first service pack come out?

    --
    "Herbivores eat well cause their food never, ever runs."
    1. Re:Service Pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


      I can see it now:

      "Take the number of vehicles in the field, (A), multiply it by the probable rate of failure, (B), then multiply the result by the average out-of-court settlement, (C). A times B times C equals x. If X is less than the cost of bringing in real programmers to fix our code, we don't release a service pack."

    2. Re:Service Pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      win98 handles memory management poorly but if you run it correctly (and don't install gator and stuff) it actually does not crash that often and runs with low hardware requirements. For every BSOD I see on a machine I run, I must read 300 stupid jokes about it.

    3. Re:Service Pack? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is the kind of things that would cause the other part of your split personality to develop SOAP-based protocols.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    4. Re:Service Pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't M$ discontinuing Win98? Where would that leave the car -- unsupported OS and all?

    5. Re:Service Pack? by kyras · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of things that would cause the other part of your split personality to develop SOAP-based protocols.

      You know what Tyler Durden says...

      --
      Tastes like burning! - Ralph Wiggum
    6. Re:Service Pack? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      if you run a default install it works for quitew a while as i personally have had machines go for months as only a web browser... but the problem is that this is not going to be a default install... it will be highly tweaked with 3rd party software... so even if it DOES crash its the same run around that you get calling MS with Pc problems...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    7. Re:Service Pack? by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      Probably after 50.000 Km.

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    8. Re:Service Pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really are an ignorant fool aren't you. Microsoft is not stopping support of Windows 98 only the sales of it. Eventually they will stop support of it but since they stopped support of Windows 95 I think it will be a while.

    9. Re:Service Pack? by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      Microsoft is not stopping support of Windows 98 only the sales of it. Eventually they will stop support of it but since they stopped support of Windows 95 I think it will be a while.
      Actually Microsoft usually "stops sales" of any operating system (or any other product) as soon as a new one comes out. When they came out with Office XP they gave retailers financial incentive to send back unsold Office 2000 copies. This irks customers who expect to be able to buy old versions at cheaper prices (like what happens with cars) but since they wouldn't be lowering the price of the old versions, it makes little difference.

      With Windows ME, they either kept Windows 98 SE on the shelves for a while or the retailers declined to send them back, possibly because of all the issues Windows ME had causing people to actually prefer Windows 98 SE.

      But as for support - Windows 95 support ended on November 30, 2001 (oddly enough they supported MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 through December 31, 2001) and the end date for Windows 98 and NT 4.0 is June 30, 2003. It's all available here.

      I'm a self-admitted Microsoft Whore but I do think this is an application (cars) best served by some sort of Linux. Then again, how many times have you had to shell out tons of money to a mechanic because "they don't make that part any more - we'll have to send off for it..."

    10. Re:Service Pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first rule of Project Mayhem is ... ... get everyone to install Windows 98 in their car.

    11. Re:Service Pack? by sugrshack · · Score: 1

      Don't laugh. It wouldn't be the first time an auto company did this kind of cost-benefit analysis. Remember the Ford Pinto?

      --
      I can't believe it's not lard!
    12. Re:Service Pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you think they got it from... moron.

    13. Re:Service Pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutly brillant

    14. Re:Service Pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you have to buy for every person in the car a SEAT, and what if there is a BLUE SCREEN? Does the car asks for CTRL-ALT-DELETE to? And with every new traffic sign you have to upgrade it?

    15. Re:Service Pack? by ramblingsofafool · · Score: 1

      I love Microsoft as much as the next fool, (no offense to anyone) but I know when Microsoft has over stepped its boundaries. You couldn't pay me money to drive in an automobile that has a computer running Windows; Much less Windows 98. And yes, Linux IS THE MOST RELIABLE OS for an application that you don't want to DIE. I LOVE MICROSOFT but that doesn't mean that I trust them 100%. I mean, do you want to be driving down the highway and have to pull over to reboot. I think NOT. And how do you get the updates, because you know Microsoft will have them, and you'll need them. What about security!? Don't you think a hacker would find if funny as hell to hack into you cars central computer and take over. I could go on and on but theramblingofafool will stop. Hope I made sense to everyone and I hope I never see the day when an Operating System comes standard in my car.

  2. how can anyone complain about this..... by Dudi · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...when the space shuttle works on 486-era technology?

    uJust because it's old tech deosn't make it bad. But I admit, the fact that Win98 crashed on me often makes it kind scary...

    1. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by mlk · · Score: 0

      Don't (didn't) the space shuttles use Acorns and the like (8 bits).

      It's not the fact its based on "old tech" thats the problem, its the fact its based on the most unstable OS ever thats the problem.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    2. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      It's not about the era. It's about whether it's reliable. 486s are chosen because they are reliable, and Windows '98 was chosen by a terrorist!

    3. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 4, Funny

      Russian spacecraft run linux on easy bake ovens.

      Ok, I made that up.

      --

      --
      pants ahoy
    4. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That didn't make it any less funny :)

    5. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Win 95 was unstable on a home desktop, but I'm thinking running a car's computer is much easier and less memory swaping/shifting dependent, causing for a drop in crashes/reboots to zero.

      I'm sure Volvo did their homework before commiting to an M$ solution anyways. It's not like the Volvo execs, upon seeing a DEATH KNELL report on an M$ solution - the same kind everyone here is predicting - go ahead anyways. Generally, people like to keep their jobs.

    6. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by mlk · · Score: 1

      I really don't think Win98 is a good solution (for anything), having it crash with NO applications open. But hey, you never know...

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    7. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Technically, in this scenario win98 would be "rebooted" every time the car was turned on. By my calculations this would mean that Win98 would outperform linux by a factor of 3 (assuming that the car is used 3 times in a day). The more frequently you reboot a Win98 box the better performance you get from it because the memory is freed from improper malloc(s), the cache is cleared, and the buffers are as pure as the morning dew.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    8. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by slickwillie · · Score: 2

      Of course it's safe if you have to stop and reboot every few seconds (five computers running Win98 - I guess you can have any color you want as long as it's BLUE). It's probably almost as safe as Jaguars, which never even start.

    9. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by kyras · · Score: 1

      Technically, in this scenario win98 would be "rebooted" every time the car was turned on. By my calculations this would mean that Win98 would outperform linux by a factor of 3 (assuming that the car is used 3 times in a day). The more frequently you reboot a Win98 box the better performance you get from it because the memory is freed from improper malloc(s), the cache is cleared, and the buffers are as pure as the morning dew.

      What, and linux saves all the improperly malloc'ed memory to nonvolatile storage before rebooting? WTF?

      --
      Tastes like burning! - Ralph Wiggum
    10. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by (outer-limits) · · Score: 2

      Oh come on, have you never heard of ME?

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    11. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by kmellis · · Score: 2
      "What, and linux saves all the improperly malloc'ed memory to nonvolatile storage before rebooting? WTF?"
      That was the first legitimately funny thing I've read in this thread. Whe the hell did I read sixty lame messages to get to it?
    12. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by minghe · · Score: 1

      Would this mean that Id have to wait 2 minutes befort I can actually drive the damn thing every time I start?

      Inane, but valid question. :)

      --
      ...um...like...a sig...
    13. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who? Hilary Rosen?

    14. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "It's not the fact its based on "old tech" thats the problem, its the fact its based on the most unstable OS ever thats the problem"

      As a loyal Mac-head, I'd have to point out that there are versions of the MacOS that make Win98 look positively stable. 8.6 for example, more memory leaks than you can shake a stick at.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    15. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, uhm, how did you actually calculate this?

      (lu * 3) = wu

      That would mean that the 3 is a constant, in which I ask where you came up with that conclusion.

      Also, I wasn't aware that Win98 had some algorithm for booting that you can train by booting it more often. Chancese are it is going to do an fsck^H^H^H^Hcheckdsk or whatever.

    16. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

      "Russian spacecraft run linux on easy bake ovens.

      Ok, I made that up."

      That must mean the Mir ran a pirated copy of Windows `95... Or maybe 3.1 (yecch!!!).

      Those were the two most unstable OS's ever...

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    17. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, i don't think the os is shut off with the car. it's supposed to be able to sense if someone is in your car, trying to break in, or leaning on your car etc and report to you through a cell phone like device. i'm sure that you need some kind of system running while the car is parked to be able to do this, that is unless you have to keep the car running for this feature.

    18. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by Glytch · · Score: 2

      I don't know, I always found 3.1 rather stable. Totally non-functional and utterly useless, but stable nonetheless.

    19. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that if Windowz was installed into a nice, simple, controlled environment, it would have no problems.

      Muvico in Ybor City (Tampa) uses Embedded Windows for their automated ticketing kiosks.. Touch a movie, swipe your card, and it prints a ticket..

      Every time we've gone by there, they're crashed with some error. Most recently, 2 had black screens (lit, but not showing anything), one had a screen that said "Try another kiosk", and the 4th was the best. It displayed the hardware and software specs, as well as the IP and netmask.

      I looked behind the kiosk, and there were 2 ethernet cables plugged into wall jacks..

      Hmmmm.. I have an IP on the network, and physical access to it.. What more could they possibly want to give me?

      Of course, if Windows hadn't crashed out and left that screen up, they wouldn't have problems with hackers getting on their private network. :)

      I wonder if Volvo will provide any sort of connectivity for automated updates.. GM gives cell phone service (of sorts) with OnStar.. That'd be hillarious. A Volvo/Windows-Update automatically runs, and the car stops moving.. Tow it back to Volvo for the OS's to be reinstalled on all 5 machines.. heheeheheheheheeee

      Sorry guys.. If I have to trust my *LIFE* on something, it's not going to be a Windows machine.. I'd rather know that a good programmer wrote a propriatory os for my vehicle, rather than wondering when the next time the air bags will mistakenly inflate, and the brakes will automatically lock.. I could have a beautiful one-car accident in the middle of a road without touching anything.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    20. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They *did* run DOS on a few satellites

    21. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it's old tech deosn't make it bad

      No, the fact that it's WINDOWS makes it bad.

    22. Re:how can anyone complain about this..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarcasm my friend. Sarcasm. If you look at this guys website, I'm sure you'll see what he means by this post.

  3. so close... 2nd post :( by zapp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    it was going to be my 1st...

    --
    no comment
  4. Flamebait? by Patik · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Seriously, I think somebody makes this stuff up just to incite Slashdot riots.

    1. Re:Flamebait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad to see this got modded as "offtopic".. let's all be clear: Microsoft bashing is one of the main topics Slashdot exists to serve.

      In my opinion, Slashdot has one of the most egregious track records for of media bias that I know of. But they do allow dissenting views (such as mine), so I have some respect for the forum. Just take the articles with a grain (or maybe a whole box) of salt.

    2. Re:Flamebait? by Patik · · Score: 1
      Microsoft bashing is one of the main topics Slashdot exists to serve.
      I don't entirely believe that, but if it is, I think the users posting swayed it that way. I'm a Windows user (tried Linux three times, now thinking of a Mac), and I come here to read interesting news about science and computing, as well as people's thoughts on it. There is no reason to alienate a significant portion of the readers. It's one thing if other users complain about Windows, but if the moderators -- the people that run the site -- start to mod up anti-Windows jokes and mod-down Windows-supportive comments, well that doesn't speak too highly of Slashdot as a dignified news/discussion source.
    3. Re:Flamebait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot riot!
      Free speech, not free as in beer!
      Slashdot riot! (Riot!)
      Run a comb through your dirty GNU hair!

    4. Re:Flamebait? by Glytch · · Score: 2

      I'd argue that a lot of Slashdot readers hate, unreliable, insecure software. Hating a signifigant fraction of Microsoft's offerings is merely an effect of that.

  5. Please, please, please. by dys- · · Score: 4, Funny

    No references to "buggy drivers".

    dys-

    1. Re:Please, please, please. by tg_schlacht · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh please! Where would they ever find drivers for a car. Even if there were drivers I doubt they'd offer full acceleration.

    2. Re:Please, please, please. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      I think a bigger problem is that you have to close all windows before restarting. Kinda sucks on a hot day.

    3. Re:Please, please, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      phear dys?

    4. Re:Please, please, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      got brain?

    5. Re:Please, please, please. by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      Don't overlook the potential for fault tolerance here... let's say your steering wheel falls off. Just plug your fancy Sidewinder force-feedback steering wheel into the USB port on the dash, and you're good to go :-)

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    6. Re:Please, please, please. by MattCohn.com · · Score: 0

      But at least it asks,

      "Where do YOU want to go today?"

      when you hop on in...

    7. Re:Please, please, please. by ramblingsofafool · · Score: 1

      Yeah, user error would not be good in these situations, and as an X support technician I know that there will be.

  6. ATTN SLASHBOTS! by electricmonk · · Score: 3, Insightful
    BSOD jokes are not funny anymore! Please take your stupid sense of humor elsewhere!

    Just posting early to pre-empt the inevitable flood of said jokes...

    --
    Friends don't let friends use multiple inheritance.
    1. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Malor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I dunno, Blue Screen of Dents seems pretty funny to me. :-)

    2. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by rutledjw · · Score: 0, Troll
      I disagree, BSOD jokes are funny as long as BSOD is still relevant! Of course Win2K Server wasn't giving me a BSOD the yesterday, it would just lock up tight. Brilliant OS, that one...

      If you don't like the anti-MS bias, go back to ZD with the rest of the low IQ beings!

      --

      Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
    3. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, retire that saying. its stupid

    4. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's the bigger fool? Slashbots...not funny anymore? Are you sure you know where you are?

    5. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a car, that would make it a See-Through SOD.

    6. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by walt-sjc · · Score: 0, Troll

      Your right. It's not funny that Win98 BSOD's every 10 minutes. It's also not funny that an auto mfr would choose to use such an unstable OS for use in a car. The consequences of losing all sorts of functionality in your car or causing undesirable operation when (not if) it crashes is very "not funny."

      The most "not funny" part of this would be if we had to pay the MS tax 5 extra times (one for each "system") to buy a volvo.

    7. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For what win2k offers it is actually a very stable operating systems. Win2K Server wasn't giving me a BSOD the yesterday, it would just lock up tight. Brilliant OS, that one...

      What is that you were saying about low IQ beings? Calling the kettle black are we?

    8. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did the BSOD cross the road ?..

    9. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol!

    10. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that 98 doesn't even have a BSoD, you only get the true BSoD with NT, 2k, XP, etc. (never used Me so I can't vouch for that.) In 98 you get a blue error screen when some crazy shit goes down, but it's not the famed BSoD.

      --
      What?
    11. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by caferace · · Score: 1
      Win2K Server wasn't giving me a BSOD the yesterday, it would just lock up tight.

      See then, the thread is preserved. Of course the "safety car" has antilock software.

    12. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by thales · · Score: 3
      " BSOD jokes are not funny anymore!"

      OK, then we'll write virus jokes, license jokes, security jokes, monopoly jokes, and of course this one has to be posted....

      Is The Hood Welded Shut?

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    13. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by caferace · · Score: 1
      Everyone knows that 98 doesn't even have a BSoD, you only get the true BSoD with NT, 2k, XP, etc

      I'll either got modded down for this, up or sideways but You Sir, must be schooled.

      The term BSOD predates NT and its ilk by a longshot. Win 3.1 had its own variant and Win 98 has it as well.

      Score: -1 Offtopic

    14. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by guttentag · · Score: 1
      BSOD jokes are not funny. They serve an important role as obnoxious reminders
      1. to users of the poor reliability Windows offers
      2. to Microsoft that it still has much work to do
      The protesters who show up at every World Bank meeting aren't funny either, but they remind us that the organization is not to everyone's benefit. They may be annoying, obnoxious and even dangerous, but I'd never advocate telling them to keep their opinions to themselves.

      The day the BSOD jokes stop will be the day Microsoft considers the problem a non-issue, and we will have to live with it and other Redmond lapses. The only people who have an interest in seeing the end of BSOD jokes are Microsoft PR goons (having dealt with them personally on several occasions, I find this word appropriate).

    15. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by electricmonk · · Score: 0

      No, BSOD jokes are just another example of the "FUD" that Linux users profess to hate when it comes from Microsoft but love to spew from their own mouths. Windows 2000 and Windows XP even more so are pretty damn stable, so don't you think it's time to stop comparing the latest release of Linux with an OS that was released more than 4 years ago? Spout all the anecdotal evidence that you want, but I can tell you that my Windows 2000-based laptop and desktop have not crashed once since upgrading to Professional.

      --
      Friends don't let friends use multiple inheritance.
    16. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      It was funny. Once. Now in every damn story it's gotten insanely old. Maybe the reason that geeks are socially awkward is because they laugh at the same jokes every day.

    17. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      That's wonderful. We're all very proud of you. Maybe Volvo will take your lead, and upgrade to Windows XP in their "Safety Car." Until then, we'll compare the latest release of Linux with an OS that was released more than 4 years ago. One crash in this car could be the last.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    18. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Eminor · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, BSOD jokes are just another example of the "FUD" that Linux users profess to hate when it comes from Microsoft but love to spew from their own mouths. Windows 2000 and Windows XP even more so are pretty damn stable

      I run Windows XP on a machine and, no joke, one day a few weeks ago I came home to a BSOD. So they say XP is more stable, but when it goes down, it goes down. I had to reinstall (I tried everything, but nothing seemed to work, not even MS's own repare wizard could bring it back).

    19. Re: ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1, Funny

      > No, BSOD jokes are just another example of the "FUD" that Linux users profess to hate when it comes from Microsoft but love to spew from their own mouths. Windows 2000 and Windows XP even more so are pretty damn stable ... Spout all the anecdotal evidence that you want, but I can tell you that my Windows 2000-based laptop and desktop have not crashed once since upgrading to Professional.

      <yawn>So, what exactly do you do at Microsoft?</yawn>

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    20. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Peyna · · Score: 2

      But it's not a BSoD in 98 because the thing isn't necessarily dead. The only time I've ever seen the term BSoD used was in reference to STOP messages in NT based OS's, very similar to a kernel panic in unix based OS's.

      Although, I did just do some searching and found that many people refer to the fatal exception messages in 98 as BSoD's, I don't consider them as such, since you can often recover from them. Good luck doing anything but rebooting after a STOP message.

      --
      What?
    21. Re: ATTN SLASHBOTS! by electricmonk · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm the head development manager for NTFS. What do you do at RedHat? Oh wait, that's right, you're unemployed!

      --
      Friends don't let friends use multiple inheritance.
    22. Re: ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > I run Windows XP on a machine and, no joke, one day a few weeks ago I came home to a BSOD. So they say XP is more stable, but when it goes down, it goes down.

      Yeah, but it goes down in a more stable sort of way than the old ones did.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    23. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      It was funny. Once. Now in every damn story it's gotten insanely old. Maybe the reason that geeks are socially awkward is because they laugh at the same jokes every day.

      When we're old, and sitting in rocking chairs, we'll have had plenty of practice in telling the same old jokes and stories every day, and laughing at them, too. We'll be ready, as long as we drank enough caffeine...

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    24. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, the day you guys stop comparing ultra-tuned,mega-patched, specially patched versions of NT and IIS to a fresh, out-of-the-box Desktop User edition of RedHat when doing enterprise-level webserver benchmarks, THEN, and ONLY THEN, will it stop...

    25. Re: ATTN SLASHBOTS! by TurdFurgeson · · Score: 0

      So, what exactly do you do at Slashdot?

    26. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by oever · · Score: 2

      Okay, here's another one:

      Not only are Windows user dummies, with this volvo car, the debuggers are dummies too.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    27. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by zangdesign · · Score: 2

      Except that you're preaching to the choir on /.

      BSOD jokes here, on this forum, are pointless.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    28. Re: ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > So, what exactly do you do at Slashdot?

      I troll the Microsoft employees.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    29. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by JimR · · Score: 1

      Too right BSODs aren't funny.

      But that didn't stop Microsoft including them in
      every version of Windows I was ever exposed to.

      --
      #exclude <ms/windows.h>
    30. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by thales · · Score: 2
      Will it have "Volvo Update" where a faulty part is sometimes replaced with a worse part?

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    31. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by spongman · · Score: 2

      All versions of windows shipped since win3.1 have BSoDs. A BSoD occurs when there's an unhandled exception in ring-0 code (on x86). The only thing you can do after a BSoD is reboot. That's the point, to run any more code in such a situation is dangerous (read: corrupt disk), in Linux terms it's equivalent to a kernel panic.

    32. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, I doubt that most of the World Bank protesters have enough of a grasp of global socio-political economics to know whether or not it's for their benifit, or anyone else's for that matter.

    33. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Kernal Panick!
      The first time I mentioned this to my wife (she's not too technical). She thought that was the Linux Penguins name Colonel Panic.

      Had to chuckle at that.

    34. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Salsaman · · Score: 1
      If only it were a joke...

    35. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Ricky+Glaze · · Score: 1

      Ok, well I will just use another ancronym... POS. I have used Win98 since I was a beta tester for it from the very first release, and it's horrible OS structure and protection (or lack of) against even the simplest execptions has never failed to amaze me. It is, by far, the absolute worse OS I have ever had to deal with. True, I am a Linux lover, but I like NT just fine, as it doesn't crash on me every half hour. So stop the wining about the BSoD jokes.

    36. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      Is The Hood Welded Shut?

      We're doing Windows jokes here, not Mac jokes

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    37. Re: ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Xawen · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, but it goes down in a more stable sort of way than the old ones did."

      Oh, I see, so it crashes better than previous versions. That makes is all ok...we can all go home now...

    38. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      Slashbots...not funny anymore? Are you sure you know where you are?

      This would, of course, require slashbots to have been funny at one point.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    39. Re:ATTN SLASHBOTS! by lazerus · · Score: 1

      Will I have a new sticker telling me to reboot every 48 days? Will I have to wait an extra 15 miniutes to start it anytime I turn the car off before putting it in park? Will the car slow down if I have more than one accessory running? How long until microsoft has to approve any new road construction? If I drive to Mexico or canada will I need a new language pack? Will .// be a universal key? How long till we get to sell Volvo a linux security system? Microsoft still sells 98 lisences? Will I have to hit the start button to turn it off?

    40. Re: ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you do that? Is it somehow comforting to delude yourself into thinking that anyone who isn't a rabid Linux zealot must be employed by Microsoft? Are you really that emotionally fragile?

    41. Re: ATTN SLASHBOTS! by Computer! · · Score: 2

      Flamebait, my ass! That shit was funny! I give it my own personal +1, Funny.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
  7. Oxymoron by s390 · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Windows 98" and "safety" in the same sentence is a patent oxymoron. Perhaps this is obvious, but apparently not to the people at Microsoft, Volvo, or MSNBC.

    1. Re:Oxymoron by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 2

      Let's just hope it's cosmetic. "Windows 98" and "drive-by-wire" in the same sentence... now THAT'S scary.

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    2. Re:Oxymoron by Matthew+Luckie · · Score: 5, Funny

      It has come to my attention that slashdot has posted a story with the keywords "windows 98", "volvo", and "safety".

      Your "joke" was the first with a funny moderation on it that i saw. I would like to take the opportunity to address the rest of the slashbots and say "all the rest of the windows 98 BSOD jokes are going to suck".

      They are not original, and they aren't funny anymore. You are flogging a dead horse. Slashbots are one trick ponies.

      I'd like to see linux circa 1998 try and power a car.

      Thank You

    3. Re:Oxymoron by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Oh great, you're saying MS now has patents on oxymorons. When will it end!

    4. Re:Oxymoron by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd like to see linux circa 1998 try and power a car.

      What makes you think it would have been any less capable at it than Windows 98? Actually, I'm really surprised that they chose Win98. I would have expected a realtime-ready OS for a job like this. In fact, DOS would have probably been a better choice in this case than any of the Windows versions or normal Linux distributions.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    5. Re:Oxymoron by Matthew+Luckie · · Score: 0, Troll

      just to add to what i said above, slashbots are never original. after all, they idolise people whose sole purpose in life is to imitate (as best they can) microsoft and apple usability innovations on a 30 year old dead horse.

    6. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you a low quality troll? or are you really that stupid?

    7. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yhbt, yhl, hand

    8. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i am a low quality troll.

    9. Re:Oxymoron by Ripsnorter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd like to see linux circa 1998 try and power a car.

      Well in 1998 2.0 was the kernel of the day, and from memory 2.0 was faily stable. Also I seem to remember that some embeded stuff is based on this kernel, so this would make it quite capible for running a car.

      I think this article is a little misleading. I don't think all the computer system in the car would be running windows 98, just what the user(driver?) can see. I think the real time stuff would be running a RTOS, like QNX.

      Oh yeah OS'es don't power cars, petrol/desile/electrons do :)

    10. Re:Oxymoron by 1lus10n · · Score: 0

      who imatates micro$ucks usability ? not *nix users , remember WERE the ones who actually preffer command line so we know what the F* our system is doing .... not to mention we actually fix problems when our systems have problems

      and doesnt mac OS X run a BSD kernel ?

      30yr old dead horse ? so i take it your reffering to unix ? right its dead ..... have a bank acount ? i highly doubt its handled ANYWHERE NEAR an MS server. payroll ? yeah probally unix has well ...... come to think of it 67% (at last count) of the internet (servers, firewalls etc.) run a *nix varient.

      AND NO REBOOTING TO FIX IT IS_NOT A SOLUTION !

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    11. Re: Oxymoron by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Informative

      > Your "joke" was the first with a funny moderation on it that i saw. I would like to take the opportunity to address the rest of the slashbots and say "all the rest of the windows 98 BSOD jokes are going to suck". ... I'd like to see linux circa 1998 try and power a car.

      You probably wouldn't have too look too hard to find a Linux system that hasn't been down since 1998.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    12. Re:Oxymoron by dotgod · · Score: 1
      I'd like to see linux circa 1998 try and power a car.

      Me too...how on earth would you get it into the gas tank?

    13. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, os x's userland is freebsd and the kernel isn't. it's mach.

    14. Re:Oxymoron by someonehasmyname · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > I'd like to see linux circa 1998 try and power a car.

      It's 2002 and they've chosen win98 for their new model.

      Linux's usability in 98 doesn't matter. It's more than capable of running a car today...

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
    15. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So says the indignant, little Microsoft cheerleader before she stomps off in a huff to reboot her system so she can restart her game of solitaire.

    16. Re:Oxymoron by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

      What makes you think it would have been any less capable at it than Windows 98?

      From the level of knowledge this guy displays, I'd guess he probably figures that since KDE didn't exist back then*, then Linux wasn't good for anything but running web servers at the time.

      (Realistically, of course, Linux circa 1998 would be just fine, though it might not scale well if one kernel had to control more than 2 CPUs :)

      *Yes, I know that it actually did.

    17. Re:Oxymoron by falzer · · Score: 1

      This cannot be! What next? Telling Slashdot that Beowulf cluster jokes aren't funny anymore?

      (Score:4, Funny)

    18. Re:Oxymoron by nickgrieve · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hmm, is she a cute cheerleader? Because when cute girls get mad, it just makes em more cute.

    19. Re:Oxymoron by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, linux has been very stable for years. In fact, I belive my linux server ran the entire year of 1998 without a reboot (it had an uptime of
      somewhere around 750 days before I had to power down to move it.)

      From what I read of the article, there was nothing "real-time" about any of the tasks that these extra systems were doing. No need for QNX.

      As for Matthew's flamebait comment on a "30 year old dead horse", this "dead horse" is more stable that any MS crap out there. It's well known and understood, easy to program, easy to extend, open, versitile, etc. All things that MS weenies would love but can't have.

    20. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      microsoft stability jokes are used excessively on slashdot for something that hasn't been an issue for at least 2 years now. if they're going to make BSOD / stability jokes, lets compare apples with apples, and talk about the stability of windows XP.

      - mjl

    21. Re:Oxymoron by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "I would like to take the opportunity to address the rest of the slashbots and say "all the rest of the windows 98 BSOD jokes are going to suck". "

      It's cooler to hate MS than it is to know what you're talking about. If the article was about the car running Linux and somebody cracked a joke like "I guess that means they won't make one that has an automatic transmission", you'd get modded down as 'troll' or 'flamebait'. Never mind that Windows users who have dabbled in Linux would find that funny as hell.

    22. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashbots are one trick ponies.

      Hate to break it to you, but you're one of them. You're just as much a part of the herd mentality you're complaining about, if not worse because when you realize there's a problem all you do is change the tone of your baa'ing instead of stopping it. Looking through some of your other posts, you're as indistinguishable in your kneejerk reactions as the people you're complaining about. The only difference is when you resort to playground name calling when your own sacred cows are threatened you use different terms than the M$ abbreviators. If you stood as apart from the other people here as you seem to think, you'd have moved on to another site years ago.

    23. Re:Oxymoron by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

      Funny, I read ahead in the comments. Turns out the car is _not running 98 at all_ (its CE). So every post to this artile that does not take this into account should be modded redundant or offtopic.

    24. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Stick your fist in Steve Jobs's ass.

      Twist it. Twist it good.

      Bitch slap that Jobs. He is a bitch she woman.

      Break his bitty faggot glasses in half.

      Stick them up his rectum.

      Bitch slap that woman named Jobs.

      Make him bark like a dog. Bitch.

    25. Re:Oxymoron by millette · · Score: 1

      actually, your post should be the one noted as redundant: after all, you admit to having read ahead and are now just copying what was said. Logical :)
      ps: I am joking, ok!

    26. Re:Oxymoron by SB5 · · Score: 1

      So they both are five letter words, they both have 2 vowels and the letter L in common, and they both are not considered top of the line by the rest of the country but to a knowledgeable few they are considered top of the line and ready to try revolutionary things.

      You confused Apple with Volvo, its a common mistake, people made the same mistake on Gore and Bush on ballot boxes.

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    27. Re:Oxymoron by Bush+Pig · · Score: 0

      Yeah ... I think I installed Linux on my PC back about then (or maybe a bit earlier) ... it was considerably more reliable than the Win3.1 that coexisted on the same box 'til I foolishly replaced it with Win98 (Win3.1, not Linux).

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    28. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what kind of troll are you??
      talk ab0ut slashbot, did you notice that what you said originally ("hey slashbots, don't talk about how much windows suck its just not funny anymore") was also said by like 5 other people in this discussion?
      Are you some LoserBot5000 or something?

    29. Re:Oxymoron by Da+Schmiz · · Score: 4, Funny
      Oh great, you're saying MS now has patents on oxymorons.
      Of course they do. Ever heard of "Microsoft Works"?
      --

      "Anything is better than IE, and you can quote me on that." -- Wil Wheaton.

    30. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Micro$ucks. Wow, that's real witty. Lessee if I can top that: Linsucks, Linaxe, Linenx, Limex, Lamex, yeah, that's pretty good...

      How about unix: unads, yousucks, youhicks.

      Look at me, I'm funny, mod me up!

    31. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least Windows has games and other applications.

    32. Re:Oxymoron by pauleir · · Score: 2, Informative

      check out the ARGO project.
      They had an autonomous car running linux in June 1998.

    33. Re:Oxymoron by yatest5 · · Score: 1, Troll

      It's 2002 and they've chosen win98 for their new model.

      Linux's usability in 98 doesn't matter. It's more than capable of running a car today...


      ITS A FUCKING PROTOTYPE. In prototypes, they'll constantly be changing the software, in the real thing they'll probably have a custom made chip with the software burnt on.

      FOR FUCKS SAKE, does everything need to be explained to you people?

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    34. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please ignore the above poster. he somehow thought that making fun of other people for not being witty is witty. please ignore the above post. thank you

    35. Re:Oxymoron by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      Yep. A prototype. Everyone please read yatest5's comment again, take ten deep breaths, read the above comment *again* then read the article again.

      It's a prototype.

    36. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, KDE did exist back then. sux0r.

      I can't believe that you didn't notice this:

      since KDE didn't exist back then*, then

      See the asterisk (*)? That means "See Footnote". See the footnote?

      *Yes, I know that it actually did.

      Why is this a troll?

      Its not, you're just an idiot.

    37. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. It's so stable, that when you change some hardware, you have to reinstall it completely; I wonder: if they choose WinXP for their car, would the owner reinstall the OS every time he changes the tires?

    38. Re: Oxymoron by zbuffered · · Score: 2

      That reminds me of an excellent point. If this car ran Windows 98, it would take 5 minutes to start, right? eww.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    39. Re:Oxymoron by MJovodji21 · · Score: 1

      Linux circa 1998 would be far more stable, and far safer, than Windows 98. Everyone loves to joke about how often Win98 crashes, but when it's running your car, it's no joke. It really is only a matter of time (a short matter) before Win98 crashes, and then what happens to your car?

      When you're talking about controlling a critical system, stability is also critical. The old 2.0 Linux kernel was and is quite stable, unlike Win98.

  8. Can't Drive 55 by Mad+Man · · Score: 1

    I don't trust Windows 98 to cruise the "information superhighway," so why would I want to use in on a real highway?

    1. Re:Can't Drive 55 by antirename · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, Volvo uses fairly solid engineering. Why would they do this using Windows 98 unless they had it on hand? Even that's not a good reason... $10 mil, and they run it off an unsupported buggy OS? Somehow, I doubt it. If they really did use that for the prototype, I doubt that they would use it for the production version.

    2. Re:Can't Drive 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it doesn't have anything to do with driving the car.

  9. More bad 98 jokes: by geogeek6_7 · · Score: 1

    ....Yeah and if you hit your head in a crash you don't even get properly protected memory!!...

    ~geogeek

    1. Re:More bad 98 jokes: by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny


      "Clippy On Board"

      "I break for solitare"

      "Bob is my copilot"

      "I don't break for Netscape"

      (Fish sticker with four Windows color segments)

  10. Since When? by huckda · · Score: 1

    Since when does rebooting windows 98 often prevent crashes?

    --Huck

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    1. Re:Since When? by scott1853 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      When you do it every 10 minutes.

    2. Re:Since When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh!

      If all you do is keep rebooting your PC, it wont
      do any real work and therefore will not crash.

  11. The sky sure is blue today.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow, not a cloud in the sky..... wait a minut...

    1. Re:The sky sure is blue today.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahahahahaha!!!!1 I get it BSOD!!!!1111

      lolololololololololololol your to funi!!!!11

      Okay XOXOXOXOXOX bye

  12. I simply can't resist... it's too easy by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

    Three engineers are riding in a car: an electrical engineer, a chemical engineer, and a Microsoft engineer. Suddenly the car stalls and stops by the side of the road. The three engineers look at each other with bewilderment, wondering what could be wrong.
    The electrical engineer, not knowing much about mechanics, suggests, "Let's strip down the electronics of the car and try to trace where a fault might have occurred."

    The chemical engineer, not knowing much about electronics, suggests, "Maybe the fuel has become emulsified and is causing a blockage somewhere in the system."

    The Microsoft engineer suggests, "Why don't we close all the windows, get out, get back in, open the windows again, and maybe it will work."

    On a more serious note... why Linux won't ever be used in a car or other similar product: Most, if not all, automotive (and other) companies have a little problem with the GPL. As much as they'd like to use it, they'd never agree to releasing the source of their kernel tweaks, changes, etc that would fall under the GPL or its derivatives, fearing competitors' stealing the information and making a competiting product. Sorry RMS, that may be a true utopia for you, but it's not the way American business works, nor will it ever work that way... the way of "completely free information exchange."

    --

    Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    1. Re:I simply can't resist... it's too easy by WetCat · · Score: 1

      Ok... why not FreeBSD? You are not under RMS restrictions then...

    2. Re:I simply can't resist... it's too easy by scott1853 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Who says they'd need to tweak the OS? I would think they could run a standard kernel and do their own application on top of it without that application being public. Or am I missing something, like anything that runs ON linux must be open source too. I'm not sure, I haven't actually read the license stuff all the way through.

    3. Re:I simply can't resist... it's too easy by Swaffs · · Score: 2

      It is my understanding that they only have to release the source code if they're planning on distributing their work.

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

    4. Re:I simply can't resist... it's too easy by thelinuxkid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You wouldnt have to release the tweaks as long as you didnt release the code as a product if I remember correctly. Just have the binaries run on the car and don't release them to the public. Right? I could be wrong.

    5. Re:I simply can't resist... it's too easy by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      I would think they could run a standard kernel and do their own application on top of it ,p>
      Actually, I would think a realtime kernel would be better for this kind of task. Do you agree?

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    6. Re:I simply can't resist... it's too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not necessarily:

      A: GPLed software would need to modified. my kernel driver for car monitor xyz does not.

      B: since its an embedded solution for a product, ie the software is not the product it self, there may be less restrictions.

      but either way, they do not need to release their software, unless it is based on (ie modified other's source for their own binary)

    7. Re:I simply can't resist... it's too easy by Analog+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't selling the car count as distributing their work?

    8. Re:I simply can't resist... it's too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I would have suggested but I know that FreeBSD != Karma.

    9. Re:I simply can't resist... it's too easy by scott1853 · · Score: 1

      That's probably the best way to go, but as it is they're already running on Win 98 machines, so it doesn't sound like a tremendous amount of processor utilization is needed. The article said they're doing things like checking to see if you cross the yellow line or not. It's not like it's that hard to put a webcam under the car and look for yellow in the picture and then see if there's black on the left or right side. It's not like they need the responsiveness of guided missle controllers to make minute changes every millisecond.

    10. Re:I simply can't resist... it's too easy by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Uhh, if you sell the car, you are distributing the binaries to whoever buys the car. You would have to provide access to source code for anyone who purchases the car. However, I don't know if kernel modules need to be GPL'd, as long as they are not actually compiled into the kernel. I may be wrong about this, however.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    11. Re:I simply can't resist... it's too easy by joto · · Score: 2

      They probably can run it as an application. On the other hand, if they need real realtime features, it's possible that they will need to run in kernel space, and that might be a problem with the GPL (although there does seem to exist binary drivers for linux, hmmm...)

    12. Re:I simply can't resist... it's too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a more serious note... why Linux won't ever be used in a car or other similar product: Most, if not all, automotive (and other) companies have a little problem with the GPL.

      Actually, if I am not mistaken Dodge made extensive use of Linux on a prototype show car recently.

  13. Well isn't this interesting by Bizaff · · Score: 1

    Bwaaaaaahahaha!

    A friend of mine showed me a similar article earlier today, but this one mentioned about 5 different foreign (to me anyway) automobile manufacturers planning on using Windows CE, for just displays I think.

    I wonder how happy people will be knowing they'll get to pay for a Windows license.

    1. Re:Well isn't this interesting by Bizaff · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is the article I saw earlier.

    2. Re:Well isn't this interesting by rutledjw · · Score: 2
      I can see Windows CE in cars for displays. These guys want the LEAST amount of hassle possible and are very concerned with user-friendliness and appearence. Granted the open *nixes (BSD and Linux) have made some GREAT progress, but for right-out-of-the-package stuff, I'd _consider_ CE as well.

      Where Linux helps is in licensing, if a focus group (of potential buyers of that car) will accept a linux system (appearence and function) then the cost differential is it. $100, $50 or even $25 per CE license times a few million units (cars), suddenly a free OS may look a little better.

      However, while the system is only going to be in high-end vehicles (where markup is high anyway) the cost difference isn't such an issue so the incentive to use a low-cost OS isn't as great. Once these system start to appear in lower-cost vehicles, more cost pressures appear.

      Either way, it's hard to argue against a high-quality, free OS!

      --

      Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
    3. Re:Well isn't this interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This eetimes article includes info on the 5 (non-US) car manufacturers willing to try Wince in some cars.

      quoting:

      "Microsoft's list is notable, however, for its lack of any North American automakers. Neither General Motors, with its industry-leading OnStar Division, nor Ford employ Windows CE for automotive use.

      Microsoft executives said that its successes with European and Asian automakers reflect a higher demand for telematics in those areas of the world. "Telematics started in Japan and Europe," Lansinger said. "In those places there's more demand for navigation systems because the roads are more complicated."

      Analysts believe, however, that Windows CE could eventually face difficulties in the United States and Japan because Microsoft is not a member of the Automotive Multimedia Interface Collaboration (AMI-C), which is attempting to create a standard specification for telematics hardware and software. "Windows has laid a fledgling claim to the dashboard, but it's not by virtue of participation in AMI-C," Hansen said. "AMI-C latched on to Java and has continued to go in that direction."

      end quote..

  14. Ingenious! by aengblom · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ingenious!If it doesn't go... you can't get hurt!

    Gotta give some credit to those volvo engineers

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    1. Re:Ingenious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got to give you some credit too for posting annoying predictable Microsoft bashing. You suck.

    2. Re:Ingenious! by Miska · · Score: 1

      ... or maybe one would just experience _virtual_ crashes
      (not real ones)

      .

      --
      -
    3. Re:Ingenious! by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2

      Actually, the real problem might be that it won't stop. Every Win 98 machine I've ever worked on has managed to develop the "Help me, I can't shut down!" syndrome. The best part is the way that Scandisk insults you on re-boot: "if you shut down your machine properly, this wouldn't happen!" Well excuse me Bill. If you wrote an OS that would actually shut down, I wouldn't see that message either!

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    4. Re:Ingenious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you piled on lots of shit software you downloaded from shareware sites.

      All that 'be clever, replace the standard xxx with yyy' garbage takes it's toll.

    5. Re:Ingenious! by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2
      That's because you piled on lots of shit software you downloaded from shareware sites.

      Bzzzt. I've got a machine at work, no non-MS software on it whatsoever. Default desktop background, no screen saver. Won't shut down. face it, Win98 is pile of steaming dung.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  15. This just in.... by SouperDouper · · Score: 1, Funny
    [Minneapolis]- Local authorities are investigating the scene of a lethal 8 car pileup. Apparently the 19 year old driver of a Volvo Safety Car had loaded Grand Theft Auto 3 onto his onboard computer and forgot where the line between reality and gaming is drawn....
    1. Re:This just in.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha! That is really funny. Or was it gay? I always seem to mix those two...

    2. Re:This just in.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that why you visit so many comedy clubs?

    3. Re:This just in.... by Ionized · · Score: 1

      parent comment was very gay. i laughed out loud.

  16. Unlikely by MisterBlister · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I find it unlikely to believe the journalist got this Win98 tidbit right. All joking about Win98 stability aside, its just not an OS that is designed to be run in any embedded enviornment. Why would they choose Win98 over WinXP embedded, some Pocket PC variant, or something else? It just doesn't add up.

    I'd bet money that the journalist flubbed this one, or its some elaborate trolling with MSNBC realizing that a 'safe' car running Win98 would get an instant Slashdotting.

    1. Re:Unlikely by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Volvo might have used Win 98 just for the prototype. I'm sure they spent more than a year actually putting this thing together so W2K or WinXP wouldn't have been around. Win98 may have been what was around when they started this project and may have been easier to deal with than Windows ME since they removed real mode driver support.

    2. Re:Unlikely by jarrell · · Score: 1
      Actually, seems perfectly reasonable. I've been seeing the occasional car show story about the auto-adjusting seat trick for a couple of years now; I suspect much of the hardware and electronics have been underdevelopment since before 2000. Realize, this article is about a demo vehicle that's now touring the country; it probably hasn't had any active development for upwards of a year.

      I'm willing to bet that when they *started* work on it, 98 was the most stable, and accessible in terms of fiddling, of their choices. The others likely being NT, which often causes non computer people heartburn dealing with privilege issues, and probably ME. Given those choices, I'd probably go with 98 too; they knew how to code for it. Even if they started after w2k was out, they probably didn't want to waste time on the learning curve. Remember, these are a bunch of engineers who likely started fiddling with things themselves, and brought programmers in later.

      Having started with a platform, they were unlikely to be interested in upgrading just for the sake of upgrading; they're not putting this into production, this is a demo unit, and if the software works, they wouldn't care if it was running win 3.1 at the time, it works.

      If they go production with this stuff, they'll likely revist their options, probably opting for a more rommable embedable windows, or wince or some such.

      As for why not linux, at the time while they'd probably heard of linux, the likely wouldn't have actually *had* a box, or had really much clue of what to do with one; again, a lot of the options that could make linux attractive for that type of application likely happened *after* they started the project.

    3. Re:Unlikely by stuuf · · Score: 0

      they wanted 98's integrated internet explorer, but not integrated media player like XP.? wait a minute, they would want you to use a microsoft sound system... so it still makes not sense!

      --

      Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

    4. Re:Unlikely by phanki · · Score: 1

      Yes indeed, I agree to the same comment. If there are OSes built specifically for the embedded environmen, why would anyone want to use an OS built for the desktop. Somehow it does not fit in. And what I also wonder about is how come Volvo engineers missed out on the number of other OSes that exist for embedded systems. It would be very interesting to know how the volvo engineers decided on Win 98.

    5. Re:Unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SO what you're basically saying is, "I don't have a fucking clue about any of this, but I'm going to make lots of half-assed guesses anyway", right?

    6. Re:Unlikely by marcop · · Score: 2

      Check out this O-scope:

      http://www.tek.com/Measurement/Products/catalog/td s7000/eng/index.html

      It runs Windows 98! I evaluated it for purchase by the company I work for. It seemed to work well but we chose a Lecroy scope instead because in general I haven't been happy with support for any PC based control system. PC components seem to go into obsolescence far to quickly. O-Scopes should last many years and I am skeptical about getting parts for a PC-based scope at a time when it is 10 years old.

      I didn't look into it, but they may be using some 3rd party software to replace the Window's kernal with a RTOS. I ran some control software that did this for WinNT 4.0. I think that it was called Intime.

      This control software:
      http://www.entivity.com/vlc.htm
      replaces the HAL of WinNT with a RTOS. You can crash NT and rip out the HD and the control software still runs, no HMI though. It had a crappy programming environment (flowcharting) but I was sort of impressed with its stability.

    7. Re:Unlikely by yahwey · · Score: 1

      It doesn't sound like they are running an embeded system. A "trunk full of equipment" could very well be regular PC's. If they were ever to make this for consumers though, I'm sure they would use a more stable embedded OS. Even Microsoft wouldn't promote running win98 in such an envirnment.

    8. Re:Unlikely by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 1

      Why windows at all, though? Wouldn't you want some realtime OS like QNX?

      --
      Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
    9. Re:Unlikely by shd99004 · · Score: 2

      True, I can not believe that they use Win98 for this purpose. Noone would consider that, not even an ordinary computer user would... let alone engineers.

      --
      Will work for bandwidth
    10. Re:Unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's possible, there are numerous pictures on the Internet of Win9x being used in kiosks, billboards, ATM machines, and the cash register in your grocery store.

    11. Re:Unlikely by operagost · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Assuming they just had to use Windows, Windows NT has been around since 1993. Even NT 3.1 would be more reliable than Windows 98.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    12. Re:Unlikely by Phronesis · · Score: 2
      All joking about Win98 stability aside, its just not an OS that is designed to be run in any embedded enviornment.

      Well, Hewlett Packard, who has plenty of resources for making the best choice, somehow chose a customized version of Win95 as the embedded OS for their Infiniium line of oscilloscopes (that division has now spun off as Agilent). The newer ones use Win98.

      True to form, one of my Win95 scopes now spontaneously reboots every four or five hours, often right in the middle of a measurement. It's not a car, so nobody dies, but if I catch an Agilent developer alone after dark, that may change.

    13. Re:Unlikely by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Ummm Okay - why the h3ll use Windows at all?

      Linux has already shown to be more stable, and when interfacing with custom hardware - then given the nature of linux, writing interface drivers would be a lot easier - at least you iknow what is going on in the low level - under windows anything - unless you work for MS, you can only take a wild stab at wtf they are doing under the hood. I certainly wouldnt trust ANY closed source OS for this kind of app. Fine- the code Volvo develop for this will be theirs, proprietory - their business and trade secrrets - but the only close source they should consider is their own IN HOUSE closed source. And no I dont trust OS/2 or Mac Os's for these kind of apps for the very same reason. Ever read the disclaimers at the back of Windows manuals?(I was bored okay) The one Ms wrote themselves about not using their OS with Nuclear power stations, air traffic control etc... Running a cars safety systems would fall into that category - and MS Windows - ANY MS Windows based OS is unsuitable for it.

      I hope the guys saying it may be trolling or hoax are right... Or this would be a safety nightmare..

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    14. Re:Unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From memory, the Tek 'scope has a PowerPC that does the RT 'scope stuff, and an x86 that runs Windows and does the display, the touchscreen and the rest of the UI.

  17. Windows98? Feh..Check out the iDrive System by Qnal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    BMWs iDrive System on the BMW745i is the real deal.

    iDrive consists of a computer that controls 270 functions (including basic climate and stereo settings), a center-mounted LCD screen and a console-mounted rotary pushbutton knob that works as the system's "mouse." It's an amazingly powerful system that BMW sees taking over almost all vehicle functions.

    More info here.

    1. Re:Windows98? Feh..Check out the iDrive System by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      I wonder if you'll have to pay Apple $100/yr to use iDrive now, like you do with iTunes, etc...

    2. Re:Windows98? Feh..Check out the iDrive System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great... when i pull into the burger king drive through to get a whopper, i'll have to put my hand on the iDrive and do push-left-left-push-right to roll down the window, then push-push-right-right-right-push-left-push-push to turn down the stereo, then i can tell my order to the speaker. but while i wait in line, since it's raining, i need to do a quick push-push-right-right-push-left-left-push to roll the window back up and then stare at the screen for a while trying to figure out how to turn my music back up. finally the guy behind me will honk because i haven't pulled forward yet, and i'll have to push-left-push-push to honk back at him.

      "real deal" my hairy white arse.

    3. Re:Windows98? Feh..Check out the iDrive System by JimBobJoe · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...and it is an amazing bitch to use. The edmunds article you link talks about the horrific complexity of iDrive. Indeed, BMW North America has a call center with 20 employees (not all day, but during the day 20 employees, though it's a 24/7 call center) to support just iDrive, and not the other features of the 745i--or any other BMW vehicle.

      But that's not to say that iDrive doesn't have potential--with a major redesign it does. However in the long run, until cars drive themselves, having so many features in so many menus (especially features that are either critical or often adjusted) will not work out very well.

    4. Re:Windows98? Feh..Check out the iDrive System by qbed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a while since iDrive was first demo'd, but reviews (at least here in Oz) were of the opinion that as cool as it seemed, it was very distracting. If you ask me its bad enough having to navigate people driving and talking on their mobie phones. Imagine if they are also surfing the internet looking for local maps!

      --
      imagination is more important than knowledge --Albert Einstein-
    5. Re:Windows98? Feh..Check out the iDrive System by olethrosdc · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have a friend that had working on this one. Aparantly the system is an engineering nightmare :) Of course, that is what one expects from an amazingly powerful system. Major problems with module (both hardware and software) dependencies should be expected. I wonder if they are going to release it on time....

      As far as the original posting goes, it is strange that someone would install windows in such a thing.. As far as I know there are much better solutions, such as VxWorks which incidentally maybe what your car might be running right now. Especially since the article specifically mentions "5 different computers (running windows 98..)". How do they communicate? Via Microsoft's network code? NetBIOS even? Give me a break.

      --

      I miss my rubber keyboard.(Homepage)

    6. Re:Windows98? Feh..Check out the iDrive System by kiwimate · · Score: 2
    7. Re:Windows98? Feh..Check out the iDrive System by Hollinger · · Score: 2

      Ummm.... if I recall correctly, it takes seven steps to program one of the radio's presets. I don't need to pull over every time I find a new station.

    8. Re:Windows98? Feh..Check out the iDrive System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Siemens+BMW=iDrive] is using the Microsoft® Windows CE operating system in the Control Display. So wince isn't doing anything important but just driving the lcd display.

  18. Coming Soon... by daeley · · Score: 1, Funny

    The Blue Screech of Death. :)

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    1. Re: Coming Soon... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > The Blue Screech of Death. :)

      Yeah, but think of what a great excuse you'll have whenever a cop pulls you over for speeding:

      But officer, the dashboard is a Windows application!

      OTOH, when you take it in to have the sluggish performance checked you'll get a big bill for taking the engine out and re-installing it.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Coming Soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... No! It's not blue! It is BLACK! Don't you ever seen skid marks?

      Fritos

  19. Driver distraction... by billbaggins · · Score: 1
    ...according to knowledgeable sources, driving with just a cell phone in play (even a hands-free one) is enough of a distraction to make you drive like you're drunk. What is all this gadgetry going to do to a driver??

    Seriously, though, all those warnings are good (as long as false positives don't cause boy-who-cried-wolf syndrome in the driver) but being able to watch the back seat? I think this is going too far...

    --
    "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
    --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Driver distraction... by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      but being able to watch the back seat? I think this is going too far...


      Ooh ooh ooh!!! .com idea!!! (bit late but....)

      Give these cars out to high schoolers, setup a remote transmitter for the video feed from the back seat.

      (if you can't figure out what to do with /that/ video feed. . . .)

    2. Re:Driver distraction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what do these Car Talk people know about driving intoxicated? Hmm?

  20. I would imagine it's not used in... by qubit64 · · Score: 1

    I would imagine that windows 98 is not used in anything critical for the car to run, like say, fuel regulation, traction control, airbag deployment, etc. If it is, it's probably a stripped down version of it with almost nothing left of the original windows 98. Otherwise this 10 million dollar car wouldn't be much good on the road... What if the traction control decided to send all power to your right wheels, and brake your left wheels while cruisin at 90mph? that'd be fun... Or better yet, if steering suddenly went all the way to one side. (Like sometimes happens in some f1 video games I've played in windows 98)

    --
    "Save me jebus!" - Homer Simpson (btw, I'm probably talkin out of me arse)
    1. Re:I would imagine it's not used in... by spongman · · Score: 2

      yeah, let's hope they tweaked that f1 video game code before they installed it in the car.

    2. Re:I would imagine it's not used in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is a stripped down version then Microsofts claim that removing pieces of it (IE for example) would cripple the OS is false.

      Like we didn't know that already.

    3. Re:I would imagine it's not used in... by qubit64 · · Score: 1

      It's a good point but I think it has more to do with the code in windows 98 that deals with the wheel itself (it doesn't only happen in that game) now, I'm sure this is something that wouldn't come up in reality since they probably aren't using directx for input from the wheel (in fact I doubt that that is even windows 98 controlled)

      --
      "Save me jebus!" - Homer Simpson (btw, I'm probably talkin out of me arse)
  21. I can imagine buying one of these by gatesh8r · · Score: 4, Funny
    First, I have to take off the shrink wrap, implying that I agree to the EULA. Next I would have to check the Certificate of Authenticity on the VIN number. After that, I go ahead and fill gas up... not just any standard gas, but one developed by M$ for Volvos -- this costs twice to ten times as much or more, depending on make and model. While the tank isn't that big, the thing's a gas guzzler. After about 50 miles I have to fill up at around $10/gallon for a 2 gallon tank. Again, it's proprietary gas; most likely a diesel. Now it's a regular diseal engine, and modding it to get regular diseal is possible, but there's a TPM in the way, and breaking it is a violation of the DMCA...

    Shall I keep going? :-)

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
    1. Re:I can imagine buying one of these by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about the gas, there's an instant $300 rebate on the car if you agree to buy the gas at a "reasonable" rate from a bundled provider for one year. Of course, this gas is slightly inferior to other providers and it often brings up extra ads on your radio display.

      --
      Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
    2. Re:I can imagine buying one of these by tringstad · · Score: 2

      You forgot to mention that your gas costs count only for yourself, and at that gas pricing rate, you may not have any passengers. To carry passengers, you'd have to multiply your gas prices by the appropriate number of people in the car, even though you will still be using the same amount of gas.

      -Tommy

      --
      "I got a half gallon of Jack, and 2 dozen Ant Traps. I'm about to get wild." -me
    3. Re:I can imagine buying one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and of course, you can not drive anywhere near Larry Ellison's of Scott McNealy's residence in those cars.

    4. Re:I can imagine buying one of these by rudiger · · Score: 1

      actually you wouldn't be using the same amount of gas if you had more passengers, because the added weight would require more energy to move that weight to the particular destination.

    5. Re:I can imagine buying one of these by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

      And don't forget, if you want to carry passengers in your car, you have to buy more licenses ;)

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    6. Re:I can imagine buying one of these by spongman · · Score: 2
      sure, what about the reams of paprework you have to go throught in order to sell a real car, let alone the taxes you have to file. not only do you have to pay tax on the price of the car, but you probably have to pay each year just to drive it, and that's on top of the tax on gas. don't even think about selling it out of state - what a nightmare!

      speaking of monopolies...

    7. Re:I can imagine buying one of these by cybercuzco · · Score: 2
      After about 50 miles I have to fill up at around $10/gallon for a 2 gallon tank.

      Thats better than most SUV's, they get 10-13 MPG, while youre getting 25MPG

      --

    8. Re:I can imagine buying one of these by chialea · · Score: 1

      volvo weight >>>>> passenger weight. even if they're heavy. my volvo's likke 4500 pounds, according to the manual.

      Lea

    9. Re:I can imagine buying one of these by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      Plus you have to keep gas purchase receipts in case of a random audit by the Petroleum Business Alliance (PBA) highway patrol - "This is a receipt for single occupant MSgas and you have 3 people in the car. I'll have to ask you to step back to the squad car sir..."

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    10. Re:I can imagine buying one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeeesss..... still uses more petrol.

    11. Re:I can imagine buying one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > First, I have to take off the shrink wrap, implying that I agree to the EULA.

      And if you can't show the EULA and proof of purchase for the Windows licence and all updates on demand from MS or any agents then the car can be confiscated.

  22. Awww fuck by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    and I just made a joke about this on /. a few weeks ago. . .

    *sighs*

    When oh when will people stop listening to me?

    1. Re:Awww fuck by linzeal · · Score: 1
      mr deeds !!! Can I borrow 10,000 to pay off my student loans when you become rich?

      To your question, "When oh when will people stop listening to me? "; I would say it involves wearing a see-through dress, beating someone with your own detached leg, and chunky naturual peanut butter.

  23. Grow up, kids. by coupland · · Score: 5, Informative

    Would this have even made it onto /. if the car didn't run Windows 98?? If you want to actually learn something then here is the official Volvo site for the car and here are a bunch of other references you can look at. None make mention of Windows 98.

    Wouldn't be quite so funny if it was a kit car that comes in 5,000 pieces that runs linux, now would it? :P

    1. Re:Grow up, kids. by ffatTony · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't be quite so funny if it was a kit car that comes in 5,000 pieces that runs linux, now would it? :P

      Although you are joking, I probably would buy one. I'd love a new project and a linux-car would be great for the sheer geek factor. I could get a stupid vanity plate and have it key'd everywhere I go. Woopee!

    2. Re:Grow up, kids. by coupland · · Score: 2

      Your logic is flawed, open-source cars would be impervious to keying and would never crash. :)

    3. Re:Grow up, kids. by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2
      Would this have even made it onto /. if the car didn't run Windows 98??

      More importantly, would this have even made it onto MSNBC if the car didn't run on Windows? But seriously, thanks for the links -- a little more detailed info on the car is appreciated.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    4. Re:Grow up, kids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would this have even made it onto/. if the car didn't run Windows 98??
      Of course not. Slashdot is not a car enthusiast site. An article that just talks about a new car design (unless it had some radically forward-thinking engineering like maybe flying or powered by flatulence) wouldn't belong on Slashdot.

      Wouldn't be quite so funny if it was a kit car that comes in 5,000 pieces that runs linux, now would it?
      Um no. Why on earth would that be funny? Cars come in kits or they come as preassembled packages. So does Linux. What's your point?

    5. Re:Grow up, kids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the cars would get keyed regularly. Just like open-source developers get beat up by the cool kids regularly.

    6. Re:Grow up, kids. by jsse · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't be quite so funny if it was a kit car that comes in 5,000 pieces that runs linux, now would it? :P

      It was funny in the first glance, then fear overcomes me: all the buses here use Volvo engines. Our life is depending on the engineers who have technical merits of running a life-depending system on...Windows 98?

      I didn't say it'd be better off running Linux, but running a system which its maker planned to abandon is a bit out of hand.

    7. Re:Grow up, kids. by shepd · · Score: 2

      >Wouldn't be quite so funny if it was a kit car that comes in 5,000 pieces that runs linux, now would it?

      Not so funny, but it would make it onto slashdot in a heartbeat.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    8. Re:Grow up, kids. by thales · · Score: 2
      A Car that ran on Any desktop OS rather than run of the mill embeded chips would make it into a "news for nerds" site.

      There are a bunch of stale old jokes about how unreliable a car running Windows anything would be, so yes it's funny as hell to see old jokes turn into an actual product. If it'll make you feel better, an equal time joke. They tried a Linux car but changing the sparkplugs created dependancy problems that forced you upgrade to a new Fuel Injection system. (rimshot)

      The funniest part of the whole thing however isn't the predictable jokes, it's the predictable behaviour of the Microsofties who whine about the jokes about their favorite OS instead of bitching to MS about not fixing the problems that led to the jokes.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    9. Re:Grow up, kids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and if you start now, it may be running within fifteen years.

    10. Re:Grow up, kids. by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Yea, a company which made its name for SAFETY choosing a DOS hybrid Windows 98 as its OS for a car isn't worth a story.

      FYI, Windows 98 can't run complete protected memory and in theory, a single MODE command when booting from DOS would crash entire system.

      Cars use VxWorks etc OS'es, NOT a customer operating system.

      I shouldn't waste my infra keyboard's batteries. Just one question, mr "Grown Up"... What was the purpose of MSNBC a venture of MS making that story than?

      Xp Embedded maybe, Win2k embedded maybe but for GODS SAKE, not a DOS hybrid!

    11. Re:Grow up, kids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So who support the OS when M$ drops Win98 ?

    12. Re:Grow up, kids. by spongman · · Score: 2
      open-source

      does that mean there's a leak in the gas tank?

    13. Re:Grow up, kids. by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

      You obviously don't have to manage two offices of Win98 pcs like the 42 YO writer of this comment. At least I have all my users trained to just reboot and get back to work, there's nothing I can do about it. "Yeah, Win98 does that! Just reboot and carry on. If you don't like it, join the line to sue Msft".

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    14. Re:Grow up, kids. by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      "Yeah, Win98 does that! Just reboot and carry on...."

      Wow. I've used those exact same words numerous times. I never added the part about "If you don't like it..." though.

    15. Re:Grow up, kids. by ffatTony · · Score: 2

      No, the cars would get keyed regularly. Just like open-source developers get beat up by the cool kids regularly.

      That settles it, I'll need to start working on plans for the anti-cool kid cow-catcher and skull crushing tires.

  24. More Info by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

    Is available at the Volvo concept car site.

    --

    Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

  25. Crashes? by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

    If Windows crashes while you're on the road, will the car burst into flames? Or just veer off the road in an uncontrollable trajectory?

    I can only imagine the rescue workers... "Looks like a nasty crash!"

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  26. And the #1 most stolen car is.. by prisen · · Score: 0

    The new Volvo "Safety Car," thanks to an OS that has more security holes than an unpatched IIS server running without a firewall.

  27. It depends what subsystem uses it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cars are very complex devices--for that reason, the electronics are divided into subsystems. Fuel ignition, sensors, signals, suspension, and various other parts of the car are controlled by separate embedded microcontrollers communicating on a data bus of some kind, such as CAN (Controller Area Network).

    I suspect that what Volvo has done is simply added a Win98 based subsystem--in other words, if Windows crashes (quite likely), some subsystems won't work, but others will. If Volvo has been smart, the car won't lose power and will continue driving. It's quite possible that Volvo has even implemented some kind of watchdog timer that will automatically reboot.

    I don't think this is as bad as many people think--after all, if this car runs Windows, it can run Linux too. Think of the modification possibilities; this car is like a great big Tivo just waiting to be hacked!

  28. It IS very safe... by countach · · Score: 3, Funny

    No matter how bad a crash you have in this car, all you have to do is press "RESET" and a couple of minutes later you're back on the road.

    When you hop in, does the car say "Where do you want to go today?"

    1. Re:It IS very safe... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      I test drove BMW's 740 iDrive, which is powered by Windows CE, and it kept insisting on putting my latte in the "My Cupholders" folder. Very annoying.

    2. Re:It IS very safe... by spektr · · Score: 1

      No matter how bad a crash you have in this car, all you have to do is press "RESET" and a couple of minutes later you're back on the road.

      It's not MS's fault. Most likely this was an issue with a non-MS-certified car-driver.

  29. Time out, sportsfans by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1

    If any auto manufacturer were going to pick a version of Windows to deploy in a product, Win98 is the one I'd be most comfortable with. That's where I got off the Windows upgrade treadmill myself. Win98SE is what sits on my second partition, it works just fine for all the reasons I've got it out there, and if I buy software that runs under Win98 I can be pretty confident it will run under WINE as well. Otherwise, it goes back to the store as broken.

    So where Volvo's at right now, they could theoretically jump over to Linux for less than pocket change. Hey, they're European, givem a chance, they'll figure it out....

    1. Re:Time out, sportsfans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To pick a nit, Volvo is a U.S. owned company. It's part of Ford, actually. It's been running in the red pretty badly since the purchase so Ford is considering selling it.

  30. Missing the point by hdparm · · Score: 1
    Aparently, VOLVO is well known as a maker of one of the safest vehicles around. Win98, while may be causing some operational problems to VOLVO drivers, won't be able to hurt them much - VOLVO are tough babys.

    I would be much more concerned about the health of the rest of us, not driving VOLVOs.

  31. Where to get the updates? by rute_1 · · Score: 1

    1. I didn't know MS included Volvo drivers in Windows 98. I thought they weren't included until XP.

    2. So does this mean that all service stations will have to sign a non-disclosure agreement with MS in order to work on this car?

    3. Will patches be available at the pump or do you get them from behind the register?

  32. This reminds me... by ryman · · Score: 1

    of a similar article about BMW's use of Microsoft's Windows CE to run critical (or at least near critical) car systems. Does the fact that BMW's running a more compact M$ OS mean they'll crash less? ;)

    --
    "We are far too easily pleased." --C.S. Lewis
  33. Done already with Linux by simetra · · Score: 2

    A few years back, Linux Journal ran a story about a car, I believe in Italy, that was using Linux. I believe Linux did the steering as well.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  34. Nadar will say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unsafe at any speed. Thanx god, we have somebody trying to do the right things.

  35. Okay, I think I know why... by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

    This car uses stuff like occupant cameras, etc --- stuff that would be easy to run off of 98 in a concept car --- why make custom hardware/software for custom ICs when you can throw a Win98 box in the trunk, plug it in, and do a simple demo?

    I mean, if they write portable code, it's not like it's terribly difficult to migrate.

    Plus, I bet Windows had the available drivers ;)

    --

    Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    1. Re:Okay, I think I know why... by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Plus, I bet Windows had the available drivers ;)

      Well yah, but likely so did 2K or even (depending) NT4.

      98 /can/ be made to be rather stable, but it requires a ton of tweaking and messing around with things.

      I am sure that if everything was customized to hell though (read only HD partition for instance. . . . ^_^ No registry bloat then, heh) that it /could/ be made stable enough for this application, but, err, why?

      With NT4, NT5, and NT5.1 out there, why bother with the old 9x tree?

    2. Re:Okay, I think I know why... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      With NT4, NT5, and NT5.1 out there, why bother with the old 9x tree?

      I'm only guessing, but it may be because Win98 is a little more friendly towards direct manipulation of the hardware. NT-based Windows versions really try hard to isolate the programmer from direct communication with hardware. By having more direct access to hardware, you get a step closer to realtime capabilities. However, as I said earlier in another thread, I would have thought DOS would have been a better candidate here.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    3. Re:Okay, I think I know why... by spongman · · Score: 2

      i doubt it. windows 98/ME is the most IHV-supported OS. It's easy to find '98 drivers for everything, but try finding 2k/XP drivers... especially for the kind of hardware these guys were using when they started the project a few years ago. (for example, the 2k drivers for my wireless card were released just before XP, they crashed all over the place (BSoD) and were generally useless, the XP drivers have only justbeen released, although they're much better, mostly because XP does all the UI and you don't have to use the crappy 3rd-party piece-of-shit).

  36. Because no one will actually read the article.... by base2op · · Score: 1

    NOTE: The OS doesn't drive the car, it exists to handle the warning sensors and the like; so stability isn't that big of an issue.

    Though, I have no idea why anyone would employ Win98 over 2000 or a stripped down Linux?

  37. Simply FUD by VP · · Score: 1

    On a more serious note... why Linux won't ever be used in a car or other similar product: Most, if not all, automotive (and other) companies have a little problem with the GPL. As much as they'd like to use it, they'd never agree to releasing the source of their kernel tweaks, changes, etc that would fall under the GPL or its derivatives, fearing competitors' stealing the information and making a competiting product.

    Bullsh*t - kernel drivers can be non-GPL (look at NVidia), besides, as long as the automotive companies are not distributing their tweaks, they don't have to provide the source for any changes.

    1. Re:Simply FUD by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your extremely insightful comment. You practically repeated what I said verbatim. I hope we've cleared this up now, hmm?

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    2. Re:Simply FUD by VP · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, I pointed out that you are either a victim, or, more likely, a perpetrator of FUD regarding the GPL and the Linux kernel.

      The Linux kernel is GPL-ed, but it has an exception, which allows the creation, use and distribution of proprietary drivers. NVidia uses this to provide their closed-source Linux drivers. It is very likely that any changes automobile manufacturers need could be limitted to specific drivers for the kernel.

      Can you hear me now?

    3. Re:Simply FUD by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking drivers.... I'm talking about kernel-level tweaks, which is/are GPLed software.

      Trust me, I was talking to a few folks from a certain networking-products manufacturer and asked them about the embedded Linux in their products, and the GPL implications. One of the engineers said that while they have made kernel-level tweaks, and yea, they would be selling their products eventually for profit, they have also hired a crack-squad team of lawyers to analyze the GPL and try and find any and all loopholes so that they could weasel their way out of releasing their software.

      So I'm not full of hot air after all...

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    4. Re:Simply FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing about Windows98. Even though it's pretty fucked up, it is not gay like Apple Mac OS. Apple Mac OS is very much for queers. Did you ever notice that? Apple mostly sells to homosexuals.

  38. Volvos are the most dangerous cars on the road... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    Volvos (Volvoes?) are the most dangerous cars on the road.

    Not to those inside it, but to those outside. The morons who buy Volvoes buy it for the "safety" that's a trade-mark of the car, so they drive like assholes, thinking that if they're in accidents, they'll be okay.

    Perhaps if seats belts were outlawed (for the driver), you'd see people driving carefully, because in case of accident, they'd know they'd get turned into marmalade.

  39. Maybe it's gonna come true... by dotgod · · Score: 1

    Remember what GM said will happen.

  40. IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't read the article (as usual) but is the Win98 installed on it a stripped down modular version or does it have all the IE, WMP, etc integrated into it? Unless they're using 98lite/litepc?

  41. Umm. . . WinCE? by Bastian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would be much better suited to embedded development.

    OTOH, since it's a concept car and meant for the market, they may have just kludged something together with commodity PC parts for one or more of those 5 computers on that car, and it may have just been easier to have it running Win98, since it is only a concept car, so they don't need to worry as much about using a /real/ embedded OS.

    1. Re:Umm. . . WinCE? by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      I dunno...I've got WinCE running on an iPaq. I don't know if it's CE or pocketPC on top of it, but if that was in car, they'd need to make sure the little hole to stick the stylus in for reset would have to be VERY accessiable.

    2. Re:Umm. . . WinCE? by caferace · · Score: 1
      they'd need to make sure the little hole to stick the stylus in for reset would have to be VERY accessible.

      Simple. The ignition. :)

    3. Re:Umm. . . WinCE? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      You're running a mixed assortment of third party software on that iPaq, aren't you? In this sort of embedded environment (and yes, Hewlett-Packard, now Agilent, put Windows 98 in a $15,000 logic analyzer as the embedded OS) the application software is tightly coupled to the OS. No third party crap at all is installed. The drivers are specifically designed for the application. The whole bundle as a piece is tested thoroughly.

      It's not like your crap-box machine that you install random hardware and junkware off Geocities sites onto.

      It's clear that this whole thread is really just a 'have fun slagging Microsoft' free-for-all because there's been little or no common sense discussion about any of the above.

    4. Re:Umm. . . WinCE? by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Actually, no, it has issues with just the default MS stuff that is on there.

  42. Safety Car Causes 11 Car Pile-up After Bluescreen by hillct · · Score: 2

    I can see it now. "Officer, It's not my fault. Microsoft sold me an unsafe product. If it were safe, my car wouldn't have stalled in the middle of the inteterstate."

    In all seriousness though, as the promotion of WIndows for Embedded Devices continues, these sorts of safety issues will need to be evaluated vary carefully. The software industry - the only industry in which selling defective products has almost no consequences - will have to take greater responsibility for bugs and instabilities in their products. As the stakes go up to the point where their products are directly responsible for human lives, a new approach to security and reliability will be needed. Among other things, Microsoft will need to alter it's position oposing full disclosure of security vulterabilities.

    Cars running Windows are one thing but regardless of what steps are taken, it'll be many years before I'll be comfortable being attached to a heart bypass machine running MS Windows for Embedded Devices.

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
  43. YES. safest car! by Jonavin · · Score: 2

    No matter how badly you "crash" , you won't get physically hurt!

    Seriously though, this article suggests a fair number of manufacturers including BMW use Microsoft based systems in their cars. It's Windows.CE.

  44. MSNBC blew it: CE, not 98 by Ristretto · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unsurprisingly, Volvo is not using Windows 98 in their safety concept car. As Motor Trend reported in May, they're using Microsoft's embedded operating system, Windows CE. It's kind of old news that Microsoft has been leading an initiative on embedding CE into cars. Check out the information from MS at Microsoft Windows CE for Automotive.

    1. Re:MSNBC blew it: CE, not 98 by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2
      As Motor Trend [motortrend.com] reported in May, they're using Microsoft's embedded operating system, Windows CE.

      And if this is the case, it answers most of the questions as to why they chose a Windows product. The automotive version of Windows CE has a realtime kernel -- an absolute must for this kind of application.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    2. Re:MSNBC blew it: CE, not 98 by barc0001 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh, OK. So, like that's any better.

      Ever used a Pocket PC? I had one at the office once. Damn thing crashed more often than my Win98 desktop! I went out and bought with my own money a Handspring instead to replace the Pocket PC.

    3. Re:MSNBC blew it: CE, not 98 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it strike anyone else oddly that there really is a URL www.microsoft.com/automotive , and that Microsoft really is taking over the world?

  45. huh? by Bastian · · Score: 2

    Why would any software running on linux need to be open source? I'm assuming you're implying that the GPL might require all other applications put in the same computer must be GPL'ed too. That, of course, would mean running XFree86, Apache, OpenOffice, and Mozilla couldn't be run on Linux legally, since none of them are under the GPL.

    1. Re:huh? by Compenguin · · Score: 1

      erm actually most of mozilla is dual liscesed under the gpl there are a few bits where they havent found the authors still floating arounder under the MPL only.

  46. Windows keeping people safe by VirexEye · · Score: 1

    It gives the phrase "blue screen of death" a whole new meaning.

    1. Re:Windows keeping people safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good one. Did you come up with that one all by yourself?

  47. Insurance by slakdrgn · · Score: 1

    I know that win98 is only running some sensors and such, nothing too critical.. but you gotta laugh at the notion.. imagine how much insurance would cost if cars ran win98 for critical functions ;)

  48. Sure, it will crash once a day... by crywolf · · Score: 1

    but will it only cost $5?

    --
    CAUTION: Product may be hot after heating
  49. I apologize for my abysmal grammar. by Bastian · · Score: 2

    really, I do.

  50. Liability by ThroughYourEyes · · Score: 1

    Since the automotive industry is an entirely different beast, can Microsoft be held liable if people die because of shoddy software design?

  51. Actually my fscking Windows2000 had a kernel panic by BoomerSooner · · Score: 0

    because I switched (of course with the computer off) between a USB MS Natural Keyboard Pro and a PS/2 Natural Keyboard Pro.

    Unbelieveable. I cannot wait for my Mac to arrive. FreeBSD with a decent GUI. Sad to hear i'm not going to get a @mac.com address though.

  52. in other news... by lingqi · · Score: 1

    Volvo's company image survey indicated it is now the world's *least* saft car.

    also, after many volvo curiously ran into the ditches, Microsoft spoksperson stepped up to defend Volvo, saying that it was a not a bug, but a feature.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:in other news... by shaldannon · · Score: 2

      Maybe you missed the fact that Volvo sold its light car division to Ford something like 4-5 years ago. I love my 740 wagon, and you could probably pursuade me to set foot in a C70 convertible, but I really worry about the safety of a Volvo made by Ford....

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    2. Re:in other news... by rnturn · · Score: 2

      I recall reading or hearing that either the S60 or the S80 was the last true Volvo and that everything else has a lot of design input and direction from Ford. Perhaps that's where the decision to use Windows 98 came from. (``Hey it's four years old! All of the bugs must be worked out by now, eh?'') Heck I barely trust Win98 to run the system (for now, needed to get into network at work) that's sitting on my desk. I can't even imagine trusting it in a mobile application unless it was some silly trip computer.

      ``I love my 740 wagon...''

      We have a 240 wagon that's still going strong. We're close to rolling over the odometer for the second time and I expect we'll see the third before we finally replace it. I'm doubting that too many of the newer Volvos will last as long. Still see a lot of 240s on the road, though.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    3. Re:in other news... by shaldannon · · Score: 2

      240 was the best series they ever built. I had a 91 240 sedan as a graduation gift...would still have it were it not for a bit of carelessness one Sunday morning that took me through a red light.

      The parents still have a 760 wagon and a 240 sedan, and they recently bought another Volvo (don't know the model) for a younger brother. Good, solid, pre-Ford cars.

      I did talk to one of the sales agents at Weaver Brothers Volvo in Raleigh who told me Ford was leaving Volvo autonomous when it came to design and that if anything Ford was using Volvo's designs. I'm not sure I'm convinced, but that's the word from the company.

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    4. Re:in other news... by jafac · · Score: 2

      I have a 91 240 sedan. Just passed emissions today - w00t!
      Ugly fucking thing though.

      (and, of course your Volvo sales guy is going to tell you that. Why else would you pay $50k for a car instead of going down to the Ford dealer and paying $30k for essentially the same thing?)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    5. Re:in other news... by shaldannon · · Score: 2

      I find a certain appeal to the old boxy Volvos. The new ones that look like a Volvo-Ford hybrid I don't care for (especially the ones that look like a cross between a wagon and a mini SUV).

      RIP Volvo. You made good cars until the '90s, then sold out to Fix or repair daily.

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    6. Re:in other news... by jafac · · Score: 2

      Well, I'd *really* swoon over a p1800. That's a sweet-lookin Volvo.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  53. Maybe they could have cut down on cost by ditching by nate.sammons · · Score: 1

    Maybe they could have cut down on the $10M cost by not needing to pay all those license fees.

    -nate

  54. Warning! Blue Screen of Death approaching! by allrong · · Score: 1

    I think we understand where all those "false-positive" error messages are coming from.

    --
    What is the inverse of the Matrix?
  55. MS by loconet · · Score: 1

    Not joking here...
    I just watched a special report on this car on CNN en Español, and the lady reporting, who was also testing out the car, kept sayin ..."Oh, theres that Microsoft Sound again ..." at one point she goes.. "oh, that Microsoft sound is making me nervous". These parts were not translated by the spanish narrators, but the english version could be heard in the background. I was praying it didnt mean that the car was running windows, but I was wrong :(

    --
    [alk]
  56. You are all idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes M$ sucks, Lunix r0x0rs, but in the end, none of the car's computers will crash, and there will be no blue screens of death.

    This is just another example of the Lunix loving myopia that plauges the hobbiest's club like mold. This one-sided blidness can only serve to HURT the Lunix experiment rather than help it.

    Run win2k, it doesn't crash ever.

    1. Re:You are all idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't crash ever... what a joke
      my girlfriends company uses win2k for a database server and a video/audio recorder for telemarketing...
      guess what!
      each win2k machine freeeeakkks out about once a week(about the same as NT4)
      the linux experiment.. haha.. some experiemnt that is widely used by wall street and powers 30% of the worlds web sites

    2. Re:You are all idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LUNIX should invest in a spellchecker.

  57. even more unlikely... by rebelcool · · Score: 3, Interesting
    is the idea that the engine controls (or any other drivetrain subsystem) would be running on anything but a dedicated device chock full of proven code.

    Maybe the gimmicky interface parts run windows CE (this volvo car isnt all that new, i remember reading about it a long time ago), but either way the crucial components would never be left to something that centralized.

    --

    -

  58. Drove the test version... by GeoNerd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I drove the Volvo that the MIT Media Lab used to collect 'predictive' data for the lane-change detection etc. It was an interesting experience - driving in Boston wearing a small fiber optic video camera taped (!) to some cheap safety glasses, several video cameras pointing every which way, and sensors on the steering wheel, brake pedal, and gas pedal to collect the data.

    The theory was that they would use the data to predict when you were *about* to change lanes - and set off an alarm if there were a car in your way. I'd be interested to know if they actually succeeded in doing this.

    This wasn't a fully automated process - there was a co-driver who you had to tell when you were going to change lanes, turn, etc., then he would punch the appropriate action into a laptop.

    Then again, I got paid $20 for the hour or so it took, so I'm not complaining :) Well worth all of the funny looks I got on I-95.

    1. Re:Drove the test version... by _xeno_ · · Score: 2
      I just can't imagine detecting if there's a car in your way in Boston.

      Whenever I'm about to change lanes in Boston, the car three blocks behind me in the lane I want to move into makes sure he's in the way...

      Or when I have to do the grand "merge into the other car" move where you just sort of make a space so that you can get in the appropriate "x-Turn Only" lane for your destination. (Or to get out of the "we're UPS and therefore can park in the right lane" idiots. It seems to be just UPS - I've never found myself cursing out the postal service or FedEx. What does Brown do for me? Causes a mile-long backup.)

      I'd imagine that in Boston, you'd just have to detect the car turning and sound the alarm... because if there isn't somebody in your way yet, someone will ensure that they get in your way.

      Then there's the "dodge-the-pedestrian" game - seeing as people in Boston never seem to either try and cross at a crosswalk or, if they do, wait for the walk light. Not that it stops them from pushing the walk light button, crossing anyway, and then laughing at all the cars stopped in all directions when the light turns red to activate the walk light. (There's nothing like being stopped because some idiot reading a book while slowly meandering across Mass Ave without actually paying attention to the road...)

      Of course, it's not so much that I hate driving in Boston, it's that I hate parking in Boston...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  59. Safe car runs Win98? Bwuhahahaha by dh003i · · Score: 2

    A safe car runs Windows 98? Bwuhahahahaha. That's funny.

    Expect this car to be listed as the one that crashes the most. Some bug in the software will probably tell the user to turn left on red.

  60. Needs to be said.. by loconet · · Score: 1

    Yall know that those airbags are not going to be your traditional ~WHITE~ colored airbags ..hehe

    --
    [alk]
  61. Upgrade? by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

    Isn't MS going to stop supporting Win98 soon? Does this mean I'll have to buy a whole new car, or can I upgrade to XP-Automobile? (Maybe XP-Freight, if I'm always carrying stuff in the trunk.)

  62. Linux = trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is a fucking joke. I hope it dies.

  63. What's a safe car without Safe Mode? by nakaduct · · Score: 5, Funny
    The last time you started this car, the fuel tank exploded and killed everyone inside. How would you like to start this time?
    • Safe Mode
    • Safe Mode with Fuel
    • Horn Only

    1. Re:What's a safe car without Safe Mode? by kikensei · · Score: 1

      That was goddam funny. Busted a gut.

    2. Re:What's a safe car without Safe Mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bold type is for emphasis, not to make your karma whoring more effective.

      Your comment was funny. It probably would have made +5 on its own merits. But bolding the whole fucking thing is just unnecessary and annoying.

    3. Re:What's a safe car without Safe Mode? by martinflack · · Score: 2
      • CmdrTaco
    4. Re:What's a safe car without Safe Mode? by nakaduct · · Score: 2

      I was conveying the relative hugeness of 80x25 on a 17" monitor, or in fact any type on a small display.

      And yes, it was funny. Thanks!.

    5. Re:What's a safe car without Safe Mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, my apologies.

      Seriously, my mistake. My comment was uncalled for.

    6. Re:What's a safe car without Safe Mode? by xenyz · · Score: 1

      ahahahaha

  64. Five different systems by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

    So what it it's running Win98 (or WinCE, as another poster corrected).

    It's got five different systems.

    With that kind of redundancy, you can AFFORD to run Win98.

    (Just kidding; I suppose they are five different systems for five different functions because WinCE isn't multitasking...)

    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
  65. Question... by CommieLib · · Score: 1

    Does it run in safe mode?

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  66. In a related story... by chuckcolby · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has announced plans to buy Volvo and dub the car "XCar". It won't drive to as many destinations, and will probably lose the company a ton of money. The company plans to counter by suing owners of the car that allow unlicensed drivers to operate XCar.

    Apple will release a similar auto, the MacDriver. It will be fully functional, but will only have one button for the driver to push. Additionally, diagnosis will be limited to a "Sad Mac" or "Bomb" icons.

    Linux's automotive offering ("GNU-Car") will come in an Erector set complete with tools, detailed instructions on how to design and harden a car, and software that will allow you to run XCar's fuel... sort of. This auto promises to be a favorite of automotive enthusiasts, but the car-driving masses just won't get it.

    --
    We all get along together like tornadoes and trailer parks.
  67. three finger salute? by stuuf · · Score: 0

    If you press Ctrl-Alt-Delete, or maybe Clutch-Downshift-ParkingBrake will the car instantly freeze and display a 'close program' dialog? press it again and you will reset, losing unsaved trip odometer, radio presets, and fuel comsumption?

    --

    Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

    1. Re:three finger salute? by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      If you press

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You so funny! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You so original! You make me laugh! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You funny man! I like you jokes! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Wow...my sides are hurting with that funny, funny quip you just threw down on us like some clever maniacal funny man! You so funny! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Someone will probably mod you up as funny to show how funny you really are to the rest of us! Quip, quip says you! Everyone! Over here! Look at the funny man! He made a funny about Ctrl+Alt+Del! Get it? ...Ctrl...Alt...Delete! HAHAHAHAHA! It's a reference to Windows...yes when you have to give it the three-fingered salute!...HAHAHAHAHA! Yes, I am not sure where this guy is from but boy is he funny! Who invited him to the party? We gotta have this guy over more often! Honey? Come down here a second and listen to this guy 'tell it like it is' in a really funny way. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! Clutch-Downshift-ParkingBrake, that's priceless. "...close program dialog..." Gold. Just pure gold. How do you do it? I mean, so many people post here at Slashdot, but then you see a funny gem like this. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Pure hilarity. When's the last time you actually used Ctrl+Alt+Del and so wittily remarked about it? Had you been using WinCE, NT4, W2K or XP this wouldn't apply at all and hence your joke would 'have no teeth' as it were. But the brilliance of you associating in Ctrl+Alt+Delete with the car functions had me splitting my sides. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You funny man. So clever, so very very clever. I'll bet you were the funny man in high school too. Wow. You still got it!

    2. Re:three finger salute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, i thought that was sort of funny.. the downshift clutch brak part, anyway. as for the post i'm reposnding to, its just an example of some dickless wretch getting off on insulting people... probably to make up for how pathetic his life is. well, geez, we're all patheitc, this is slashdot, but probably 'bungi' has to be among the lamest shit i';ve seen on here (except the ascii asshole drawings)

    3. Re:three finger salute? by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      I was going to reply... and then I realized you must be some sort of blobbery infectious construct, slithering your way across the fat pipes of the Internet to end up here.

      And still I replied. Damn.

      Please check yourself into the nearest CDC office. I'll catch up with you later.

  68. Ask fortune: embedded systems by billbaggins · · Score: 1
    >/usr/games/fortune -m "imbedded system"

    If you ever want to have a lot of fun, I recommend that you go off and program an imbedded system. The salient characteristic of an imbedded system is that it cannot be allowed to get into a state from which only direct intervention will suffice to remove it. An imbedded system can't permanently trust anything it hears from the outside world. It must sniff around, adapt, consider, sniff around, and adapt again. I'm not talking about ordinary modular programming carefulness here. No. Programming an imbedded system calls for undiluted raging maniacal paranoia. For example, our ethernet front ends eed to know what network number they are on so hat they can address and route PUPs properly. How do you find out what your network number is? asy, you ask a gateway. Gateways are required by efinition to know their correct network numbers. Once you've got your network number, you start sing it and before you can blink you've got it wired into fifteen different sockets spread all over creation. Now what happens when the panic-stricken operator realizes he was running the wrong version of the gateway which was giving out the wrong network number? Never supposed to happen. Tough. Supposing that your software discovers that the gateway is now giving out a different network number than before, what's it supposed to do about it? This is not discussed in the protocol document. Never supposed to happen. Tough. I think you get my drift.

    --
    "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
    --Winston Churchill
  69. Oh My God!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  70. Re:Actually my fscking Windows2000 had a kernel pa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MacOS X (darwin) is not freeBSD

    its based on BSD, and has shared developers at times with freeBSD, but it not based on freeBSD.

  71. wasn't very specific. by GiMP · · Score: 2

    It is very possible that this was an error or genernalization by the reporter. He says that the car has 5 computer systems and they run windows98.. it is very possible that these systems are not for the control of the car, but rather for end-user use in each of the 5 seats available.

    It may also be possible that he meant to say that only one of them uses Windows98, etc.

    Looking at other reviews, I couldn't find any information regarding their computer systems.

  72. weee by mstyne · · Score: 1

    (23:36:09) Erin: that is retarded
    (23:39:20) Erin: wow
    (23:39:29) Me: yeah, i want one
    (23:39:29) Erin: but the clear glass a frame pillar sounds cool
    (23:39:36) Me: i'll put linux on it
    (23:39:41) Me: and then it will drive itself

    --
    mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
  73. win95 at work by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 2

    I work in a factory, I roll mats on a machine which uses a scanner connected on a computer which tells me on which route to place the mat. I've been there 2.5 months, for 8 hours a day, and never seen it crash.

    1. Re:win95 at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you've got to do is account for the other two-thirds of that time, and you'll be on to something!

    2. Re:win95 at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow.... thats amazing
      a computer os that can do one thing and not crash...
      maybe we should put that company in charge of every computer or digital device in the entire country, thaey must make really good stuff.

  74. Oh yeah and since it's Volvo by nakaduct · · Score: 4, Funny
    • Bork Bork Bork
  75. Actually... by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

    As this is a concept car, I wouldn't be too surprised that it's running '98.

    A couple years ago I decided to put together an in-car MP3 player. After buying the needed stuff, I got it set up in a few hours one day using '98. As it's running one program alone, and isn't dealing with all the interaction and varied programs that a user desktop is, it actually runs rather stable, crashing perhaps once every 6 months or so, when I have to take it in the house and do some standard clean-up. I switched to ME early on, but it's pretty much the same. These are dirty OSs for the desktop, but when they're under the passenger seat running one single program and nothing else, they perform remarkably! :-)

    Quick to set up, best hardware support around, stable enough when there's little variation in function or installed software base; I understand why they chose '98 for a concept design / prototype. No one in their right mind would try to use it in a production, for-sale system though.

  76. What do they call car sales? by Eravau · · Score: 1

    "Installing a new driver"

  77. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2

    I realize that further discussion on this topic is useless because we already know that the version of windows embedded into these cars is CE, not 98. However, for all of you wondering what it takes to embed win98, here's someone who did it:

    clicka

    --
    [o]_O
  78. I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I hop in my Volvo, start 'er up, and then have to wait an extra minute while my dashboard displays a dlg box that says 'Windows has detected new hardware. Installing driver for FUZZY DICE.'

  79. Could be worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if it ran WinME?

  80. This things been around a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it was on last year's Auto Show Circuit, according to Edmund's. Considering how long it takes to develop a prototype, that may explain the choice of Windows 98 - when this was being developed, 2000 was still brand new, and Volvo probably wanted something that had been tested longer. I guess they could have used NT 4, but maybe they needed plug and play and USB.

  81. Noooooo! by zulux · · Score: 2

    "It appears that your driving to work..."

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  82. Pretty Pictures and some clarification by Precipitous · · Score: 1

    I was looking for a convincing answer to whether or not the car actually runs Win 98, and instead found these pretty pictures of the car in a more informative article.

    A previous post suggested this article (no bookmark anchors, scroll down 2/3 of page) from motortrends, which states that Windows CE is the OS in production systems - but doesn't speak to the issue of their concept cars. The MSNBC author could easily be right in this case - but should have known that it was could have known that this was not the production choice.

    Other info from miscellaneous articles: the fancy communicator uses Bluetooth networking.

    --
    My motto: "A cat is no trade for integrity."
    1. Re:Pretty Pictures and some clarification by Kerosene · · Score: 1

      The communicator has many other tricks up its sleeve too I guess. It's too bad my brother in law isn't awake right now, (sweden is +6hrs from eastern time) he could tell you all about the communicator and the car itself, and clear up all of this FUD. (He did a lot of work on it for volvo)

      --
      -- There's only one replacement for displacement.....
  83. Template for future posts on this topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ***Some piss-weak joke about Windows 98 being unsafe for car use***

    Seriously though...

    ***Some excruciatingly obvious comment about Windows 98 being unsafe for car use***

  84. The car is red? by retro128 · · Score: 1

    Why did they paint the car red? I would have picked blue with white text.

    --
    -R
  85. Re:Volvos are the most dangerous cars on the road. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
    Perhaps if seats belts were outlawed (for the driver), you'd see people driving carefully, because in case of accident, they'd know they'd get turned into marmalade.

    Oh, that explains why I've never ever seen a motorcycle rider speed or make any kind of dangerous maneuver.

  86. So it runs Windows CE by Sangui5 · · Score: 1

    But does anybody else find it amusing that MS choose a name where the most natural shortening of it is wince?

  87. Ford (1/2 owner of Volvo) is a 100% MS shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a company that does Volvo's US website and we've been given strict orders from Ford to use all MS, all the time when working on the Volvo site. This is not to say that I don't use Unix when it would make everyone's lives easier, just that I'm supposed to use MS all the time.

    Apparently, Ford internally and externally is a big MS center so it doesn't surprise me that they are using Windows CE. (not 98.... why would slashbots believe MSNBC under any other circumstances than when it results in a chuckle?)

    As a funny aside, we had to drop everything we were doing in moving to a CMS decided upon by Volvo Sweden when Ford's CEO had lunch with Bill Gates who convinced the Ford CEO that all of Ford's sites should use MS's at-the-time-unannounced CMS. Of course, we were 8 months away from a launch when we were told to hold wheat we were doing and wait for a MS product that not only was pure vapor, wasn't even publically announced yet! Oh, the laughs I have at my job.

  88. No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, that would be pretty cool. You just gave me a good idea.

  89. Re:Actually my fscking Windows2000 had a kernel pa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never hot plug a PS/2 item, mouse or keyboard. That's the root of your problem, hardware. Basically it has to do with the voltages in the PS/2 standard, and that if you don't plug it exactly straight so that all the pins make contact at the same time, it'll do anything from locking the OS to frying the motherboard.

  90. dashpc by Wolfier · · Score: 2

    Does anyone remember www.dashpc.com?

    It is about embedding a linux-powered PC inside a car. The project is improving everyday - if you're interested, please take a good look. Very interesting stuffs.

  91. if people bought cars like computers... by tanveer1979 · · Score: 5, Funny
    I got an interesting piece from plig. This was written as a humorous story but it may come true ;-)

    General Motors doesn't have a "help line" for people who don't know how to drive, because people don't buy cars like they buy computers - - but imagine if they did... HELPLINE: "General Motors Helpline, how can I help you?" CUSTOMER: "I got in my car and closed the door, and nothing happened!" HELPLINE: "Did you put the key in the ignition slot and turn it?" CUSTOMER: "What's an ignition?" HELPLINE: "It's a starter motor that draws current from your battery and turns over the engine." CUSTOMER: "Ignition? Motor? Battery? Engine? How come I have to know all of these technical terms just to use my car?" HELPLINE: "General Motors Helpline, how can I help you?" CUSTOMER: "My car ran fine for a week, and now it won't go anywhere!" HELPLINE: "Is the gas tank empty?" CUSTOMER: "Huh? How do I know!?" HELPLINE: "There's a little gauge on the front panel, with a needle, and markings from 'E' to 'F.' Where is the needle pointing?" CUSTOMER: "It's pointing to 'E.' What does that mean?" HELPLINE: "It means that you have to visit a gasoline vendor, and purchase some more gasoline. You can install it yourself, or pay the vendor to install it for you." CUSTOMER: "What!? I paid $12,000.00 for this car! Now you tell me that I have to keep buying more components? I want a car that comes with everything built in!" HELPLINE: "General Motors Helpline, how can I help you?" CUSTOMER: "Your cars suck!" HELPLINE: "What's wrong?" CUSTOMER: "It crashed, that's what went wrong!" HELPLINE: "What were you doing?" CUSTOMER: "I wanted to run faster, so I pushed the accelerator pedal all the way to the floor. It worked for a while, and then it crashed -- and now it won't start!" HELPLINE: "It's your responsibility if you misuse the product. What do you expect us to do about it?" CUSTOMER: "I want you to send me one of the latest versions that doesn't crash anymore!" HELPLINE: "General Motors Helpline, how can I help you?" CUSTOMER: "Hi! I just bought my first car, and I chose your car because it has automatic transmission, cruise control, power steering, power brakes, and power door locks." HELPLINE: "Thanks for buying our car. How can I help you?" CUSTOMER: "How do I work it?" HELPLINE: "Do you know how to drive?" CUSTOMER: "Do I know how to what?" HELPLINE: "Do you know how to DRIVE?" CUSTOMER: "I'm not a technical person! I just want to go places in my car!"

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:if people bought cars like computers... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Man, that stuff isn't funny until after you've quit a tech support job. If I read this 6 years ago I'd be reaching for the apsirin bottle.

    2. Re:if people bought cars like computers... by altgrr · · Score: 1

      Aspirin bottle? Me, I just reach for the sledgehammer and drive my car, which doesn't have any computers in it to go wrong, right over to the user, and wield the sledgehammer telling them they WILL accept it's their fault it's gone wrong.

      --


      Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.
  92. This is a bunch of hyped balleyhoo. by Kerosene · · Score: 5, Informative

    My brother in law worked on some of the components of this car. It doesn't "run" anything. Nor does it even use 98. It uses windows CE to run a few of the non critical subsystems of the car. It's actually a great concept. Everyone needs to chill on the "jump down whoever's throat is mentioned using any microsoft product" bandwagon. This site is actually starting to sound a lot like middle school. Boo to MSNBC for misreporting and setting off the microsoft alarms.

    --
    -- There's only one replacement for displacement.....
    1. Re:This is a bunch of hyped balleyhoo. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Everyone needs to chill on the "jump down whoever's throat is mentioned using any microsoft product" bandwagon. This site is actually starting to sound a lot like middle school."

      When I was in middle school, you called somebody 'homes!' or 'homie!' if you were insulting them. That's the image I get in my head when people make redundant jokes around BSOD's etc.

      Why don't we all just make fun of Mac users? Both the Windows and Linux guys severly outnumber them! They could be modded into oblivion! :P

    2. Re:This is a bunch of hyped balleyhoo. by zbuffered · · Score: 2

      I think people are freaking out because they all used Windows 98, and they hate it. Just thinking about that operating system gives me a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach. More recent MS operating systems don't do that to me. So hearing that this car runs CE, I'm happy.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
  93. Re:Actually my fscking Windows2000 had a kernel pa by BJH · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ahem... MacOS X aka Darwin is basically a FreeBSD release reworked to run on Mach.

  94. Re:Volvos are the most dangerous cars on the road. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I definitely agree with you. Are these new safety gimimcks supposed to be a replacement for proper driving ability? If you need to be reminded by the car to signal when changing lanes, or to stop staring at the dashboard and look at the road, or to turn on your headlights at night, then you shouldn't be behind the wheel in the first place.

    There are plenty of ways, in which clueless drivers can screw up, where their "safe" Volvo won't help them (ie. running through stop signs & red lights, illegal left/right turns, etc). And those idiots with Volvos think that they are indestructable.

    In conclusion, Volvos are for the weak, who do not know how to drive, regardless what operating system they use.

  95. Saftey is not a concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this IS volvo we are talking about. Despite win98, the car is still a steel tank

  96. Re:Actually my fscking Windows2000 had a kernel pa by BJH · · Score: 1

    What part of "of course with the computer off" did you not understand?

  97. Its a volvo... by H3XA · · Score: 1

    It is still a Volvo... I would be more worried about the wetware drivers crashing than the software OS (Win98) crashing. The "safety" in "Safety Car" is for the occupants, not the people outside tha car.

    Now - how long will it take before someone replaces Win98 with Linux in the "Safety Car"....

    - HeXa

    1. Re:Its a volvo... by bergeron76 · · Score: 2

      I would like to offer to make this mod to anyone who can provide me (and the dashpc team) with this volvo. Our references can be found here and here.

      PLEASE NOTE: This is a shameless plug.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  98. CE is only about $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... and runs on way cheaper hardware than W98 too.

    The CE kernel is actually quite robust.

  99. Re:Because no one will actually read the article.. by hagar� · · Score: 1

    Owner: WTF do you mean engine detonation?? Mechanic: It ran out of oil and coolant! Owner: Why didnt the warning lights say something?? MS Lawyer: This conversation is over, please collect your assorted volvo parts and leave the premises. I'm calling security.

    --
    Insert something insightful here, or I'll insert something painful there.
  100. Regarding the actual point of the article ... by Precipitous · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like to challenge y'all step beyond the specific OS choice and consider the technological implications of this article. For example:

    This points towards the impending implementation of ubiquitous computing that's been talked about for years. It seems that embedded computers have reached adequate power that we can start using similar platforms in them that we use in PC's/servers. That OQO can deliver a PC that fits in a pocket gives a picture of how the size a gadget you can put computers in. This will explode the availablity of programming knowhow available to producers of all manner of gadgets. Your PC program and interface development C / VB/ Java / KDE etc skills for PC's and servers may soon be directly applicable to VCR's, refridgerators, traffic lights, and is already applicable to some mobile phones. There are a number of avenues to explore in this direction which would be more interesting then squabling over the platform choice for this vehicle.

    It might not happen in this decade- but you are starting to see the change in the face of the computer. Already, I know hospitals where the complex tasks of registering patients and services rendered are accomplished by staff walking around with card scanners and portable computers. The office worker is leaving the office. Think about your JOBS and possibilities. There is enormous potential for innovation in applications here and interfaces here.

    Sigh, I guess we should get back to the BSOD / M$ squabble.

    --
    My motto: "A cat is no trade for integrity."
  101. Re:Linux in 1998 by fence · · Score: 3, Troll

    I've been a user and promoter of Linux since late '94. Pushed it for the first time (quite successfully, BTW) at NASA Dryden in 95 for use in their mission control rooms.

    And I've been pushing Linux ever since--in 1998 I'm sure that I had several boxes with uptimes (I know--who cares) over 200 days.

    While linux was harder to install back then (no fancy wizards or GUI installers) it was still a fully functional and full featured O/S.

    just my .02--have a nice day/life :)

    --
    Interested in the Colorado Lottery or Powerball games?
    check out http://colotto.com
  102. GM helpline redux.... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Having worked in tech support, I always imagined that a call to a GM support line would run like this:

    Helpline: "General Motors Helpline, how can I help you?"

    Customer: "I have a 1998 Camaro, and when I'm doing 60mph on the Garden State Parkway, shifting into 4th gear with the air conditioning on, my radio station mysteriously switches from my favorite radio station to that crappy country station. Is there a way I can solve this problem?"

    1. Re:GM helpline redux.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. Could you explain this please?

    2. Re:GM helpline redux.... by zbuffered · · Score: 2

      Exactly.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
  103. Re:Volvos are the most dangerous cars on the road. by owlmeat · · Score: 1

    If you did, he was probably trying to get out of the way of a cager Volvo driver.

    --
    They stab it with their steely knives,

    But they just can't kill the beast.

  104. Let the jokes fly! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay, since nobody can come up with anything better than "heh heh, the car will blue screen. heh heh. Err I can't think of any other reasons I don't like Windows", I'll flip the topic around:

    What if the car ran Linux?

    - The version with the automatic transmission would have 4 drive gears that all work differently, that way you can pick one from an individual that you like.

    - Instead of intuitive buttons on the steering column to turn on windshield wipers and so on, you have a patch board complete with a very nice array of differing lengths of cable.

    - The driver of the car has to understand how the internal combustion engine works before he can go anywhere in it.

    - More than one steering wheel can be added to the car, afterall it is a multi-user OS.

    - The gas door would be located underneath the car so that gas doesn't have to go as far to reach the tank. A bottleneck is removed that way.

    - The key to get into the door can only fit one right side up, afterall it is case sensitive.

    - The 'ding ding' noise when you start the car without the seatbelt fastened won't go off because the sound drivers don't work.

    - The car wouldn't come with headlights because only newbs need to be able to see where they're going.

    There, that's much better than "ha ha snort snort, that means they'll have to restart the car every ten minutes." :P

    *Hopes the mods have a sense of humor today.*

    1. Re:Let the jokes fly! by josh+crawley · · Score: 1, Troll

      Someone oughtta mod this fucker down. He doesn't get "it". The interface doesn't matter when compared to the OS. You can write as many interfaces to abstract as much as you want. The reason why Win98's bad as a "carOS" is that it has no real preventive measures against mal-soft. Who knows if that car has memory leaks, and it probably matter now. I'd feel better if they used a real kernel (such as NT, Linux, or bsd). AT least those can recover from errors

    2. Re:Let the jokes fly! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure where you read in my post that I was defending Windows 98. I wasn't. You're right, NT's kernel kicks 9x's ass. I don't think anybody in the world would argue with you on that. That's why Windows 2000 is so much better than 9x.

      "The interface doesn't matter when compared to the OS..."

      That's not true really. The interface is exactly why Windows 95 and 98 were successful in light of more stable OS's like Linux or BSD. There's been lots of chatter on Slashdot over the last week or two about that, you should go check it out.

      If somebody could make an interface for Linux like Apple did with BSD, it'd be a bad assed OS that just about anybody could use. It may, at that point, even be a Windows killer. Right now, it is still so hard to use that most people'd rather put up with instability. This is not an MS biased poke at Linux, it's an honest informed opinion from somebody who designs interfaces for a living.

    3. Re:Let the jokes fly! by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

      Dont forget that if you are a true geek you can also change the compresion ratio with a new kernel compile!
      You could also take the extra bloat out so you can increase you HP by about %15!

      --
      This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    4. Re:Let the jokes fly! by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      - The car wouldn't come with headlights because only newbs need to be able to see where they're going.

      No, the car wouldn't come with headlights because the implementors thought the law about car headlights was, while well-intentional, also completely unconstitutional. =)

    5. Re:Let the jokes fly! by nathanh · · Score: 2

      The jokes are good, but did you have to ruin it with a little soapbox speech about how everybody (except you) is anti-Microsoft?

    6. Re:Let the jokes fly! by horza · · Score: 3, Funny

      * There would be Linux-car drag races, where people could test their custom tuned kernels against each other

      * Going over 6k rev/min would kill the sound server and the horn would stop working

      * The cars would come in kit-car form, each driver able to slot in their own personalised dashboard

      * You would be able to use any type of fuel, emulation will get some kind of perormance out of it

      * It has a standard looking speedo, but the font for the numbers looks awful

      * Forget child locks, you are able to individually set the priviledges of each component for each user (eg useful for stopping passengers from changing the radio station)

      Next? :-)

      Phillip.

    7. Re:Let the jokes fly! by altgrr · · Score: 1

      - The key to get into the door can only fit one right side up, afterall it is case sensitive.

      Did you ever own a VW Beetle? They built that feature in many decades ago.

      and another parallel - some cars these days do have four different settings for Drive.

      ...all of which makes me lament the fact that so many drivers seem like newbies, not knowing how to use the things they don't need (like indicators...)

      --


      Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.
    8. Re:Let the jokes fly! by Sherloch+Hemloch · · Score: 1

      If it ran Linux:

      -You could connect a number of economy cars together to get sports-car performance

      -Would people be trying to get K-cars running on Linux as hobbies?

      Could you imagine a cluster of Volvos...

      --
      Never trust a bald barber; he has no respect for your hair
    9. Re:Let the jokes fly! by sys49152 · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a -very- old joke:

      If Bill Joy designed a car it would have no dashboard, just a screen that displayed a question mark whenever something went wrong. "The user would no what it means," said Joy.

    10. Re:Let the jokes fly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, lets cover these arguments.

      1. Most importantly the car will be using WinCE, not Win98.
      2. Malicious software is irrelevant since no one will be installing anything to the controller computer.
      3. Memory leaks are a function of the application, not the OS. Presumably the application will be tested to minimize or eliminate these.
      4. Once again, the ability of the OS to recover from errors doesn't matter. If the application controlling the sensors, etc. crashes the whole thing is useless. No one is telnetted in doing anything else.
      5. Congratulations, your troll caught me.

    11. Re:Let the jokes fly! by pekka_v · · Score: 1

      Great lines! As the MS jokes do have some truth in them, also the above Linux jokes do.

      Really, IMHO Linux and MS platforms are for different purposes - at least in practice. If I were to choose Linux over MS for some project the purpose would not be to save money on OS cost. In short: For MANY (of course, not all by far) sw projects the cost of OS and also the cost of sw tools or components does not matter (it is neglible). What would matter is how long time and how many people you will need to finish the job. I had linux first installed in 1994 (Windows really was crap then), but I still have done a lot of work on MS platform. I have the feeling that lately the MS platform is quicker to develop on (!!!when you don't have hordes of experienced coders available, which is often the situation) as compared to Linux or even Java world. You might not be able to get the same stability with MS but w2k is good enough for many real world solutions. Wouldn't use it for a space shuttle or similar purpose...

    12. Re:Let the jokes fly! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      I didn't say I was pro MS, nor was it a soapbox speech, I was being critical of the lack of originality with the jokes this article presented. So I flipped the topic around to what people here know about: Linux. With as much as MS gives you, I find the lack of originality about Windows jokes to be insulting. It's kinda like the obligatory 'Monica Lewinski' jokes.

    13. Re:Let the jokes fly! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Heh all the functions in the car begin with 'K'....

    14. Re:Let the jokes fly! by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 2
      I realize that people just want to make jokes, but if a car was using Linux, the car manufacturer would take some release as a starting point, and then customize the code for their application. It would fit the job that it was asked to do perfectly, because it would be custom modified for the job.

      The fact that the code base would split off from the mainstream Linux distributions would not matter because this is not a computer, it is a car, and future Linux enhancements would likely be largely irrelevant to the car manufacturer.

      OK, back to the jokes.

    15. Re:Let the jokes fly! by sharkey · · Score: 1, Troll

      - The version with the automatic transmission would have 4 drive gears that all work differently, that way you can pick one from an individual that you like.

      Be minimally dexterous, get a standard shift.

      - Instead of intuitive buttons on the steering column to turn on windshield wipers and so on, you have a patch board complete with a very nice array of differing lengths of cable.

      Better than buttons. You'll be able to tell if the cable is plugged in. The cables are also labelled with WORDS, not "guess-what-I-do" inkblots.

      - The driver of the car has to understand how the internal combustion engine works before he can go anywhere in it.

      Easier than understanding how you click START to shut down.

      - More than one steering wheel can be added to the car, afterall it is a multi-user OS.

      Sounds like a Drivers Ed car. They have multiple brake pedals, too.

      - The gas door would be located underneath the car so that gas doesn't have to go as far to reach the tank. A bottleneck is removed that way.

      Been there, done that. Under the plate, bottom of the bumper.

      - The key to get into the door can only fit one right side up, afterall it is case sensitive.

      As it should be. If you put it in upside down and try to turn it, it'll break.

      - The 'ding ding' noise when you start the car without the seatbelt fastened won't go off because the sound drivers don't work.

      Thank God!! Much easier than dicking with fuses and rewiring to shut that fucking beeper off.

      - The car wouldn't come with headlights because only newbs need to be able to see where they're going.

      Only people who can install the lights properly should be allowed to drive. If you can't plug a lightbulb in, you're too stupid to drive.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    16. Re:Let the jokes fly! by jafac · · Score: 2

      More: "if the car ran Linux"

      You could remotely view and operate the instruments and controls of another car - but only if it's not running Windows.

      You could add-on extra motors anywhere they'll fit, and the car will go faster.

      The driver is expected to manually advance ignition timing as engine speed changes - but savvy drivers will automate this with a cron-fired script.

      The driver is expected to manually set the fuel-air mixture ratio, but again, savvy drivers will automate this with a script which can respond to different driving conditions, allowing them to dynamically select things like: "emissions testing", "racetrack", "stop-n-go".

      Same with valve timing, gear ratios, cooling-system overhead, etc.

      The license plate and VIN# can be altered with a simple text editor.

      Skinnable dashboard; W00T!

      Can be configured to drive on Microsoft (TM) roads, but the roadsigns and surface are periodically changed, so the car must be continually upgraded to keep up with this change.

      The engine does not need to be shut down, in fact, Linux-Car drivers will proudly share the number of days, weeks, months, years, etc. they've run their engine continuously.

      You'll be able to change your battery, or alternator, brakes, clutch, and exterior sheetmetal, not only while the engine is running, but while you're driving down the road.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  105. Possible lawsuit defense? by obsidian+head · · Score: 1

    Tanenbaum explains that Microsoft OSes are actually pretty stable, it's just the buggy drivers lead them to crash. I hope MSFT remembers that defense.

  106. Re:hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go kill yourself fuckhead - you won't be missed.

  107. Safety by v8interceptor · · Score: 1

    This is a very safe car compared to the other new Volvo which runs Windows Millennium... (har! another priceless Microsoft joke).

    --
    --- Why are you wearing that stupid bunny suit? | Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?
  108. Re:Volvos are the most dangerous cars on the road. by shaldannon · · Score: 2

    I have to stick up for us Volvo drivers. I've seen worse driving by folks in Japanese sportscars and clunker American boats than I have Volvo drivers. The folks in the sportscars fall into two classes: those who try to use raw speed on the interstate, and those who bought a sporty looking car that they're afraid to use. The folks in the beaters all seem to be driving 10 under in the fast lane.

    Most of the Volvos I've seen are driving smoothly in traffic. They're usually soccer moms in V, 7, and 9 series wagons and sedans.

    Of course, I concede you could have been driving behind me....I can milk my 740 wagon for all it's worth. But that's not because I feel safe and secure in a Volvo so that I can run people over. That's because I'm an aggressive driver who happens to like Volvos.

    Then again, some people don't appreciate fine cars...I like my Volvo because I can get a little performance out of it, it is rock solid, and if there happens to be a problem, I do have a nice safety net. If I was into more performance, I'd be eyeing a BMW.....

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  109. speaking of patches... by shaldannon · · Score: 2

    The maintenance guy at my apartment shared me this story:

    It seems his buddy and his buddy's girlfriend were driving down the road. The buddy was drinking and driving, but this being the south, that sort of thing is common. In his mirror he sees blue lights flashing, so he hands his bottle to his girlfriend and says "peel off the label." She says "you can't fool a cop by just peeling the label off!" He replies "just peel it off."

    So he pulls over. As the cop walks up his girlfriend gives him the label. The cop leans in and sniffs in the car, then says "are you drinking?" Slapping the label on his shoulder, he says "No, I'm on the patch."

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  110. New highs in car security by thogard · · Score: 1

    I send you this file in order to to jack your car.

  111. Just think... by dsr9996 · · Score: 1

    If a Mac were running the car, at least the Volvo wouldn't be so boxy!

  112. Re:Volvos are the most dangerous cars on the road. by FFFish · · Score: 2

    I'm afraid that with the motorcycle crowd, which is an abnormally attentive bunch of drivers, what with their lives being on the live, SUV drivers rank as serious threat #2, with Volvo drivers ranking #2. Can't much argue with their experience.

    (Of course, anyone with a cell phone is a greater threat than even the clueless SUV-driving soccer mom.)

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  113. Hold on by bios+burn · · Score: 1

    I doubt this has much to do with quality and more with logistics, The development cycle for cars is alot longer than it is for computers, they have to know that the vendor will still be around in four years. even though linux won't dissappear the vendors do, and sadly, do to forced expansion by investors, even the once quite profitable companies are in the black.

  114. "slashbot' is a cliche term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calling people who have opinions that are common on slashdot 'slashbots' is no longer clever. you are just repeating what some other moron said. stop it, get a new schitck you tired old loser.

    1. Re:"slashbot' is a cliche term by wheany · · Score: 1

      Actually I'd like to claim making slashbot a cliche. After all, didn't "All your base are belong to us" become a cliche only after people did something like this.

  115. os jokes aside by ndevice · · Score: 1

    this reminds me more of the "if cars were like computers" thing from bill gates.

    http://www.cobalt-blue.com/humor/gates.htm

  116. speaking of scary uses for windows 98 by Indy1 · · Score: 1

    My brother works for the Greeley, Co police department. The machines in their cars (you know, the ones they use for doing license plates lookups and what not) run 95 and 98. Apparently the pd IT department has to ghost the car machines every few weeks or so as 95 and 98 tend to eat itself or blue screen, or otherwise do goofy crap.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  117. Destroy the car? by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    we'll write virus jokes, license jokes, security jokes, monopoly jokes[...]
    Do I have to destroy the car if I don't agree to the EULA, or just hand in the plates?
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Destroy the car? by thales · · Score: 2
      Does the EULA say it's an OEM License that can't be transferd? Do Used safety car buyers have to purchase new Win car licenses?

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
  118. YOU ARE NOT INSIGHTFUL by electricmonk · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Why is it that everyone automatically assumes that when Windows is used, any of the OS will lead to plane crashes or car crashes, but when Linux is used, it is always on "non-critical" systems that wouldn't do such a thing. Do I sense an inferiority complex?

    Oh, and for those of you wondering, the last time I checked, cars were still steered by the steering wheel, and handbrakes still stopped your wheels.

    --
    Friends don't let friends use multiple inheritance.
    1. Re:YOU ARE NOT INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't say that Linux will never crash in that application, but why would you use Win98 for the nonessential systems in a car like that? Wouldn't having all those sensors just give out on you with no warning provide a HUGE distraction to the driver?

      And how long does the damn thing take to boot up when you start the frickin' car? That could be a problem with any OS...

    2. Re:YOU ARE NOT INSIGHTFUL by electricmonk · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't having all those sensors just give out on you with no warning provide a HUGE distraction to the driver?

      Yeah, if you're a dumbass. Seriously, if you can't drive because you get too distracted by the computer in your car you either

      • Shouldn't be driving that car.
      • Shouldn't be driving, period.
      Actually, forget I said "either"...
      --
      Friends don't let friends use multiple inheritance.
    3. Re:YOU ARE NOT INSIGHTFUL by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1
      Well, I dunno, I can imagine several distracting things in non-essential car systems. . .

      For example, I would be slightly distracted, if any combination of the following occured: Car alarm going off, Radio blasting, Radio randomly switching stations, Cellphone dialing random numbers on speaker phone, Random noise eminating from car speakers, Continous light fluctuations, etc. . .

      So called non-essential systems can be very distracting.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    4. Re:YOU ARE NOT INSIGHTFUL by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      Because it's Windows 98!!!!!!
      If it is NT, 2000 or XP, then I might believe it is stable. But this is 98!

    5. Re:YOU ARE NOT INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you can't be THAT computer-ignorant and you're just running a trolling experiment; fair enough. But on the car part of your remark, I'd like to remind you that in this day and age of electronics, there is nearly as much (more?) circuitry in the average car as there is in a modern PC. For instance, brakes are partially controlled by microchips on many cars, as is obviously ignition on most of them, as well as fuel injection, and so on. A total and sudden electrical breakdown happenned on my dad's car once, and he was lucky enough to survive : without electrical power, no more engine power, hence steering power reduced by 90%, same for brakes. And no, you don't stop a running car by pulling the handbrake nowadays ! Imagine that situation while driving on a fast curve, or while overtaking a truck at 80Mph on a motorway. Considering the volvo case, I don't know if the OS controls such vital car functions as these; what i DO know is that there are many security features on a modern car that are controlled by electronics, and that i wouldn't like these controlled by such an unreliable OS as windows, but rather by dedicated, mission-critical, realtime-whatever systems designed for this only purpose.

      David

    6. Re:YOU ARE NOT INSIGHTFUL by WowTIP · · Score: 2

      What do you think controls the servos that indirectly give you control of your brakes and steering in most modern cars? The handbrake is still a physical control in most models, I guess. I would still not feel comfotable driving a car where the only means of manuervering is a handbrake, though.

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
    7. Re:YOU ARE NOT INSIGHTFUL by JesseL · · Score: 2

      I actually haven't heard of any car put into production that had servos operating the steering or brakes. AFAIK they all still have mechanical linkages from the steering wheel the the front wheels (albeit with hydraulic or electric power assist) and the brake pedal still directly operates the brake master cylinder (again with power assist provided by a vacuum or electric solenoid, and servo controlled hydraulics for ABS and traction/stability control). There are several cars out now that have a drive-by-wire throttle, and most automatic transmissions are electronicaly controlled, but virtually all cars on the road can still be brought to a safe stop in the event of a massive electronic failure.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    8. Re:YOU ARE NOT INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      depends on what you consider safe... if you're alone on a straight road, ok, but that's not always the case.

    9. Re:YOU ARE NOT INSIGHTFUL by WowTIP · · Score: 2

      Yes, you are right in parts, but in the event of the massive electronic failure you spoke of, you would still probably have a hard time controlling the vehicle. It will require a certain amount of muscles. Aunt betty might not have those. I have tried driving servo controlled cars with the servos off (legally) and I can tell you, it was no picnic.

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
  119. My idea of "Safety Car" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cars they use in Carmageddon should be pretty safe

  120. They would have preferred to use XP, but... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    ...thought that perhaps the caravan which this entailed spoiled the look and handling of the vehicle.

    Behold, a joke in none of the above categories... and here comes another one!

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:They would have preferred to use XP, but... by thales · · Score: 2
      If you steal it will you be charged with grand theft, auto or software piracy?

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    2. Re:They would have preferred to use XP, but... by Ricky+Glaze · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and if you change the battery you will have to call MS and convince them that it is still the same car and get a reactivation code.

  121. Windows 98 in a high-speed vehicle by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    ...is a whole new approach - a whole new, er, depth of meaning - to the phrase `embedded systems' ...and of course...

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Windows 98 in a high-speed vehicle by thales · · Score: 3, Funny
      Can you press "Esc" and bypass needing a key to start it?

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    2. Re:Windows 98 in a high-speed vehicle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "nuke the gay whales"

      Shoudn't that be "nuke the gay whales for jesus"?

  122. Expensive by roalt · · Score: 1

    Pretty expensive volve car to drive... How long will one Windows 98 license take you? Hmmm, I think I still prefer my car to run on gas instead of Win98...

  123. The boot* is the most appropriate place! by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    Where else would you put systems that needed frequent booting? `How often do you boot your systems?' `Oh, permanently.'

    * Note to yanks: this is what the rest of the English-speaking world calls that bit under the lid on the back of a sedan where luggage goes (-: A `trunk' is the hose thingy dangling from the front of an elephant. :-)

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re: The boot* is the most appropriate place! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > * Note to yanks: this is what the rest of the English-speaking world calls that bit under the lid on the back of a sedan where luggage goes

      Really? Over here we call it our "stash".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:The boot* is the most appropriate place! by gaudior · · Score: 2

      A 'Boot' is also the clamp that Parking Meter officers put on your tire to keep the car from moving.

    3. Re:The boot* is the most appropriate place! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. In canada it's just called the back or the trunk... and we are part of the commonwealth, ol' boy. :-)

    4. Re:The boot* is the most appropriate place! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A 'Boot' is also the clamp that Parking Meter officers put on your tire to keep the car from moving.

      Which are fun to pick and put back on the Parking Meter officers' tires.

    5. Re:The boot* is the most appropriate place! by fonetik · · Score: 1

      Note to brits: Brush your teeth, stop listening to the cure, and drink a nice tall glass of shut the hell up. What the hell is the use of being british if you are so obviously bereft of humor?
      Bonnets and boots are things that little girls wear, not things on cars. "Now go away or I shall taunt you a secoond time-a!" =)

    6. Re:The boot* is the most appropriate place! by jafac · · Score: 2

      No, a boot is the rubber thingie that goes on your CV joint to keep dirt from getting in, and to keep you from determining on a casual inspection, whether the CV joint is worn and in need of replacement.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  124. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  125. Re:Volvos are the most dangerous cars on the road. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're the one who doesn't understand the difference between safety features and driving assistance features. An airbag is a safety feature, so is a seatbelt. They can save your life if you get into a crash.

    But something which beeps when you forget to signal, or when you're drifting out of your lane, is a DRIVING ASSISTANCE feature; it tells you that you're not driving properly, and tries to help you. If someone needs such a beeper, that means they DON'T KNOW HOW TO DRIVE, and thus should NOT be in front of the wheel.

    And when I said "Volvos are for the weak", I was talking about all Volvos and everyone who drives them. They all need to trash their worthless "safe" Volvos, go to a real driving school, and then buy a real car. Then the streets would be a much better and safer place.

    I don't care if it's just a prototype, it's a waste of time and resources. Why don't the engineers design a more efficient engine, or drive train, rather than wasting time trying to help idiot drivers?

  126. Actually.... by unformed · · Score: 2

    Yes it is, I've been sitting here laughing my ass off.

    That said, I gotta go; I think it's my turn to hit the bong ...

  127. Oh, and since this class of joke is inevitable... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    Will they be bringing out an AI version with it's own set of driver disks? (-: Will it support plug and play within the vehicle? :-)

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  128. Jaguar Safety by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

    It's probably almost as safe as Jaguars, which never even start.

    No... Jags are probably on parr with Volvos, even running Windows 98. (Volvo owns Ford, guess what webserver www.ford.com runs on... urk.)

    Jags have Lucas Electrics. Unlike Ozzy, Joe Lucas is the original Prince of Darkness.

    Q: Why is it the British like warm beer?

    A: Because Lucas makes refrigerators!

    Q: How many Lucas engineers does it take to change a light bulb?

    A: None! They just redefine darkness as the prevailing standard!

    No, that last joke started with Lucas, not Microsoft. :)

    Honestly, I thought the stories of honking your horn and having the headlights go out were an urban myth and an exaggeration by those who don't know anything about automotive electrical systems. Then I rewired a 1950s MG for a friend. On the pre-work test drive, that happened to me.

    How? I had the system all apart, and all I can guess is that the headlights and the horn relay shared a *slightly* corroded ground connection. I couldn't believe that would do it.

    How about a car where the headlights draw 20 amps, the parking light circuit another 10 amps, the windshield wipers another 15 amps, and the generator only puts out 40 amps?

    (Electrical Engineering Homework: if the battery is rated for 50Amp-hours, the ignition system stops working when the system voltage gets below 7 volts, and the vehicle speed is 35 MPH, how far can you get on a rainy night before the engine stops running and the battery is too dead to run the starter?)

    Lucas Electric jokes here.

    Urk.

    Jaguar not starting? That's okay. The starter motor cranking overheats the wire's insulation. The wire's insulation catches fire and ignites the fuel spilled when the fuel pump's relay stuck on when the car was last run. Ka-boom.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Jaguar Safety by swaic · · Score: 1


      Q: Why is it the British like warm beer?

      Uhhh... Because they're as useful as a jar of warm pee? :)

    2. Re:Jaguar Safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what?

  129. Ummmmm.. be careful with this thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some do not realize it but some of the major gas station pumps ARE running WinCE and are going to go wireless very soon. Might be that your car and the pump "talk" a bit and you just might have to put in a certain gas in set quantities. Since I worked on one of the projects for a large nice multinational gas corp, I know part of the game plan and have seen some of the code beginning to roll out. They have REAL ideas on how to get you and your car in a nice controlled system along with the data they want to collect and how they wish to influence your habits or if necessary, none to hidden steer you to certain choices. The corps are sharing more data than most realize too though not directly. Sad part is I helped with this junk and even gave ideas on how to help the whole process. Dumb and I apologize for it but cannot undo it.

  130. Also coming soon... by flacco · · Score: 2

    Fire-retardant children's footsie pajamas made of woven det-cord soaked in lighter fluid!

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  131. `Soccer Mums' - hah! by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    About 7 or 8 years ago, driving along the westbound lane of Canning Highway here in sunny Perth, Western Australia, I chanced to look up as I paused at the lights in Melville outside the KFC. A block away down the road, a Volvo station wagon began reversing out onto the Highway. Slowly. As the light went green, it halted astride the dotted line which separates the two westbound lanes. When I say `astride', I mean the line bisected the car's diff. It sat there. And sat there. The reversing lights went off. It sat there some more. The brake lights went off. Slooooowly, slowly it began to roll down the Highway towards Bicton. It would have been doing about 20-30km/h (in a 60km/h speed zone) by the time the traffic caught up with it, still perfectly aligned over the dividing line. As it nochalantly sidled towards the 40km/h mark on the way around the corner, it weaved a little left, then drifted across to the right until it finally sat in the right-hand lane (keep left in Oz, unless overtaking) at about 50km/h on the way up the hill, and the other traffic could finally begin to set about overtaking. The driver was an old Asian bloke wearing a tweed hat.

    Despite some of my very good Asian friends being excellent drivers, and an Asian friend of Dad's being a good driving instructor, Asian drivers (at least in Oz) are generally hopeless. I've seen one tourist* accidentally put his rent-a-car sideways twenty feet onto a dry dirt road at about 30km/h, and a FoaF who repairs brick walls for an insurance company claims that around 2/3 to 3/4 of the damage he repairs is done by drivers with Asian names. You might be pleased to know that they tend to prefer Mercedes to Volvos. It must also be said that many more BMW drivers than Volvo drivers seem to have forgotten what the little orange lights are for.

    * Yes, tourists really do expect to see kangaroos hopping down the main street of Perth, so the Council's put in some nice bronze ones for them; and yes, they really do hop into taxis and ask to be taken to Sydney (roughly 3000km).

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:`Soccer Mums' - hah! by dragonsister · · Score: 1
      It must also be said that many more BMW drivers than Volvo drivers seem to have forgotten what the little orange lights are for.

      I understand american cars don't have orange indicators. ('Blinkers' - the lights you use to indicate when you're going to turn or change lanes, or something like that.) Apparently car lights are restricted to white and red, and they don't see the point in changing that law ...

      So for any americans confused by the above, the poster is referring to the idiots who don't use indicators. I don't know how often this happens in american cities - Perth and Canberra are both sufficiently low traffic that you don't have to tell people what you're going to do next so that they make room for you to do it. In the larger cities of Sydney and Melbourne it is more likely that you'll need to rely on other drivers' cooperation.

      Rachel

    2. Re:`Soccer Mums' - hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, tourists really do expect to see kangaroos hopping down the main street of Perth, so the Council's put in some nice bronze ones for them; and yes, they really do hop into taxis and ask to be taken to Sydney (roughly 3000km).

      What, the bronze kangaroos hop into taxis? That's a neat trick! :-)

  132. Get you aluminum helmets here! by TurdFurgeson · · Score: 0

    Well it appears that the people who engineered the safety car didn't go with your prefered OS.

    oooh!! the world is coming to an end!!! aaaa!!! they're coming for me! aaaaa!!!!

  133. it's possible by Interfacer · · Score: 1

    I know for a fact that agilent build 400K$ optical measurement devices that run a stripped win98 kernel. Interfacer.

  134. Reminiscent of this... by kubrick · · Score: 1
    When Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973, the distinguished musical satirist Tom Lehrer decided that he could no longer perform. "It was at that moment that satire died," says Lehrer, "There was nothing more to say after that."
    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  135. I can breathe, I can breathe !!! by TurdFurgeson · · Score: 0

    Finally the voice of reason!

    For a moment there I thought that 'slash dot' was a base 16 translation for the words 'blind loser'

    I love watching you all fight like wolves over the stability argument. The battle is over and Microsoft is off to new fronts. New fronts that you are not even aware of yet because you are stuck in the PAST.

    hehehe

    "you won't even see it coming"

  136. New Drivers by talnkyo · · Score: 1

    As a new driver, I have been acquanted with difficulties inherent in attempting to concentrate (ADD style, i.e. fully) on many details at once. This has proven especially difficult when trying to keep over the yellow and white lines (U.S.).

    Bottom line? This could be the end-all solution for driving schools, especially public ones, which get funding from various places. Of course, at 10 mil this is a bit high, but presumably it will drop.

  137. why am i not laughing by Cardhore · · Score: 1, Troll

    It'd be funny if a car ran Windows 98 as it's operating system. Man, wouldn't that be hilarious?

  138. I know what your problem is by TurdFurgeson · · Score: 0

    STOP INSTALLING RAM DOUBLER

  139. Dealing.... by ulbador · · Score: 1

    I drive a '99 grand am, and I still have to deal with my car's OS costing 85(USD) to get reflashed, and 2500(USD) to get the actual computer replaced. The last thing I need is Micro$oft's licensing fee's to deal with an upgrade consisting of WinME to XP just because they couldn't do it right the first time. Yeah, I understand upgrades are necessary, but for christ's sake, my car runs fine with WinME, I don't need Win XP just to get the "upgraded" features.. I guarentee that they didn't plan on my car having 802.11b, so why should they care if my car runs a copy of IIS that is vunerable to Nimda or not. Sure, that my car is exposed to the "Internet" a grand total of 7 minutes a day, but I guerantee that in that time my firewall isn't going to fail or to be compromised

  140. GPFs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do we need to agree to some stupid EULA before using the car? Some terms like, i. if the software crashes and the driver dies, MS is not liable in any other way, ii. MS is neither responsible for the instability of the OS.

  141. After you're all nice and tore up by TurdFurgeson · · Score: 0

    ... then maybe you could go bang out code for 'da_community'

    1. Re:After you're all nice and tore up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he could start moderating.

  142. Continuing off-topic.... by caferace · · Score: 1
    I did just do some searching and found that many people refer to the fatal exception messages in 98 as BSoD's, I don't consider them as such, since you can often recover from them.

    Welllll. I've never seen a less than NT box that got a "fatal exception message" that worked properly for any significant period of time afterwards. You'd need to define the word "recover". I'll define "significant" as more than an hour without the machine dying completely or experiencing increasingly unpredictable behaviour under typical user usage.

    Jeez, but I'm unpleased I have so much experience with this particular subject.

    signed, a SQA guy that is required to test on Win32 boxen

    1. Re:Continuing off-topic.... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1
      Well, I have never seen a 98 box that worked properly for any significant period of time, whenever. An hour included.

      So it kind of looses by default.

      In the name of innovation, I propose we redefine significant as no more than 30 seconds.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    2. Re:Continuing off-topic.... by murdocj · · Score: 1
      Well, I have never seen a 98 box that worked properly for any significant period of time, whenever. An hour included.

      In other words, you've never run Windows 9x. Well, at least we know how much to value your opinion.

      Seriously, this is the kind of blind MS bashing that tends to hide the truly serious problems with Microsoft. It's so obviously wrong that people start thinking "oh yeah those anti-MS people they're just all full of it". Sort of like the statement in the Volvo article about how false collision alerts from the car cause drivers to ignore the real alerts (just to make this post very slightly on topic).

    3. Re:Continuing off-topic.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only a proof how little you've seen.

    4. Re:Continuing off-topic.... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1
      No offense, but you've obviously never had to deal with flaky hardware drivers on Windows 9x. Really. Its bad.

      Savage 2000? Umax scanners? SB Live!?(That one is really bad). Older ATI cards? Older Via chipsets? Bizarre networking problems? I've got a hundred other things that all cause problems together. And it is the hardware driver/os combination, since I have tested most of this stuff on 2000 and XP, and have a lot fewer problems.(ANd this is on just one system, this is on several, sometimes up to five different systems.

      The number of times that I have had to reboot, reformat, and reinstall 9x, are absolutely appalling, especially compared to my debian box. In fact, at one point, I got sick of 9x, and refused to ever run it again. Luckly for my gaming, 2000 was out, and I was able to upgrade.

      This is not blind MS bashing, this is living through an utterly frustrating cycle of weird, unexplaining problems, when things should just work. And you know what, they started to just sorta work on 2000, and they state has improved somewhat a little on XP (though right now I have a problem with an errant DWL-120a from d-link).

      So don't lecture me on 'blind MS bashing'. I have none of these problems with Linux.(I may not have all the functionality all the time, but I have far fewer problems). Yes, this kind of sentiment 'may not help the cause', but these things did happen to me, and I am sure they happened to many others, as I watched it happen to nerds around me as well.

      And if you're going to post something about how we are just not bright enough to get this stuff working properly, don't bother. Primary linux complaint is it is too hard to use. If 9x required just the 'right touch', then it is too hard to use. I feel that we are pretty well experienced+educated.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    5. Re:Continuing off-topic.... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Yipes, my grammar and spelling was bad. This is too early in the morning on my day off.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  143. [Anonymous Cowfart] Well it could be worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, then, if you pressed the brake pedal you would get Oops Oops Kernel Panic.

    That would be funny!

  144. It's not safe. by blair1q · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No certified safety-critical version of any Microsoft operating system exists. The $40 Billion in Microsoft's bank account is not enough money to get the documentation, testing, and reviews done for Windows 98. The WinCE core, with no GUI or Apps, might be certifiable in our lifetimes, but they can expect to be required to change about half of the lines of code, goven that no safety or testability measures were considered in its original production.

    A false sense of safety is counter to safety.

    I wouldn't ride in this thing. I wouldn't even stand on the side of any road I knew it to be driving on.

    --Blair

  145. Re:Volvos are the most dangerous cars on the road. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    (* Volvos (Volvoes?) are the most dangerous cars on the road. Not to those inside it, but to those outside. The morons who buy Volvoes buy it for the "safety" that's a trade-mark of the car, so they drive like assholes, thinking that if they're in accidents, they'll be okay. *)

    Unlike say SUV owners who drive like assholes because they feel like they are in a big war tank and enjoy threatening other cars using their size. However, the SUV's roll over, killing the driver and 5-lanes worth of other cars.

    SUV's are full of Nepoleans.

  146. Pathological Dependence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweden has an almost pathological dependence on things Microsoft. When I sarcastically asked a major IT trainer if their extensive course catalogue with only two Unix/Linux courses still had one such course too many, they didn't get it, but replied that yes, they were going to remove one of those two courses. Sweden just gave an honorary PhD to Bill Gates. So Windows 98 on Volvos? Terrible - but predictably so.

  147. The REAL competition begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now this is an interesting competition. Volvo and Windows competing together to see which actually DOES crash more

  148. Well, it can't run Mac OS X by inputsprocket · · Score: 1
    from EULA from all Apple software:
    The Apple software is not intended for use in the operation of nuclear facilities, aircraft navigation or communication systems, air traffic control systems, life support machines or other equipment in which failure of the Apple software could lead to death, personal injury, or severe or environmental damage.

    So that rules Mac OS X out as the operating system.

    Shame M$ don't put such limits of liability into their EULA.
  149. The obvious choice by balloonhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I don't see why this is so hard for so many to get. I heard that no-one ever got fired for choosing Microsoft.

    --
    This idea was invented by Shampoo.
    1. Re:The obvious choice by balloonhead · · Score: 1
      offtopic? How the hell is that offtopic? Volvo chooses MS for their car, expected Slashdot scuffle ensues, I make witty comment which relates to a prior discussion about Linux vs. Windows and "no-one ever being fired for choosing MS", someone mods it down for being offtopic. the fact that it is ontopic means therefore that the moderator is offtopic.

      So, sir, you are offtopic. I mod you -5 (idiot)

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  150. Re:It's not safe.- TCPA! by pieterh · · Score: 2

    Ah, but Microsoft are working on the solution - the Trusted Car Platform Architecture. The TCPA will eliminate the use of 'unauthorized' parts in cars, thus easing maintenance, improving security, and ensuring business throughflow for the CAs (car authorities). Look: everyone knows that fitting cheap tires and filling up with unauthorized gazoline poses severe security risks. TCPA will eliminate all that! Windows Is Good For You!

  151. Not to be a drone but.... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of all the MS operating systems, I'd prefer 98 over anything else MS puts on the market.

    1. The code is the oldest, hence the most thoroughly checked / seen code on the market from MS. Undocumented bugs for 98 itself are likely few and far between by now. By choosing XP or 2k, you're asking, no, begging to run into a "damn, Nobody saw that coming" bug.

    2. The biggest problem MS faces, security, is pretty much non existant for this implimentation. Who is going to hack a volvo? Not only from the sense of there being no means, motive, or opportunity, who the hell would want to 'hack' a volvo? how anti-l33t can you get?

    3. Pre-existing support. Granted, a sizable portion of this car was done as a hack together job, there are more than a few components that are likely off the shelf product. Since the products re unusual or out of the way items, I doubt the companies providing them put much, if any, though into linux/bsd/mac support

    4. It's a demo car. the idea is to show that the technology exists today. It's easier to make the comparison "it runs on the same operating system your home computer does" than it is to say "we wrote specialized drivers and compiled s specific kernal for a SuSE installation based around the 2.4 kernal. The first reponse makes joe carbuyer go "ooooh" the second makes him say "huh?"

    I'm all for the bashing of microsoft at every given opportunity, but for once there's no point in reinventing the wheel when you can chisel down the octogon you've got lying around. Besides, a production run would DEFINATLY run an true embedded system.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:Not to be a drone but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you can hack the volvo, the car's yours. i'm sure this would make things easier for car thieves if this is mass produced.

    2. Re:Not to be a drone but.... by Ioldanach · · Score: 2
      2. The biggest problem MS faces, security, is pretty much non existant for this implimentation. Who is going to hack a volvo? Not only from the sense of there being no means, motive, or opportunity, who the hell would want to 'hack' a volvo? how anti-l33t can you get?

      You apparently don't know enough Volvo enthusiasts. Some will even go so far as to put a V-8 engine in their "brick", just for fun.

  152. "Luxury" car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BMW Series 7: WindowsCE

  153. Re:Done already with Linux (no crashes since 1998) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes the Linux car is still alive! Visit us at
    http://www.argo.ce.unipr.it

    We are currently switching to a newer car (and a new kernel too! ARGO is still running 2.0.38).

    M.

  154. Please tell me if I'm wrong here!! by TeddyOfUtterLunacy · · Score: 1

    Now there's an uncomfortable reality-turned thought. I'll try not to imagine having windows run absolutely anything in my car. Can any of you honestly picture yourselves saying something in the lines of: "Oh, damn, hang on, I need to reboot my car", followed by the keystroke: "ctrl+alt+delete"... Just picture how much more money Microsoft will make! I mean, they're already making millions off extra elements in computers that people need, basically because there's no other way to make the damned thing work. Soon, cars will develop similar "necessities"... With all the rebooting and overheating that occurs on highways, people will go bankrupt just because they have to call a TechSupport number every ten minutes. How about the use of the internet? We'll gain an all new form of "single-handed surfing" which may even turn out to be the leading cause of death.. desperate and lonely middle-aged male drivers will not be able to keep their eyes off the nude women featured in their car's computer screen. By the time some psycho takes on the challenge to create another nice virus, permitting an even more elaborate death than aids, there'll be nothing left to kill but tree huggers. All of this thanks to the car "crashes" and middle-aged men attempting to drive without using their hands... If we survive the forthcoming human genocide masked as "technological advancement", we'll most probably evolve a second set of arms just to masturbate... now, wouldn't THAT be something!

  155. OMFG!! by rat7307 · · Score: 1

    I'd make some snide comment here re Win98 but my irony alarm is going off at full blast and I can't shut it up......

    --
    Burma?
  156. The article CANNOT tell the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This must be a giant hoax, part of some agreement between Volvo and Microsoft, intended only for marketing and good PR (on the MS side) purposes.
    Methinks that you and me will never see this car around.

    Windows 98, as well as Linux and many other popular operating systems, is not certified for use in critical environments such a running car where human life could depend on their work. For critical tasks usually automotive industries use realtime and very small footprint OSes (though the realtime Linux base has grown significantly during last year), while Windows boxes are used primarily for emulation purposes.
    I'm sure they're using a realtime and stable system hidden somewhere, while Win98 acts primarily as human interfaces (drive the display, beep and play sounds, etc).

  157. Does it include Internet Explorer? by cyba · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After all, it's a part of the OS and cannot be removed, right?

  158. you are right by g4dget · · Score: 2

    You are right: the fact that a car company would put something as unreliable and user-unfriendly as Windows 98 into a car isn't funny, it's sad.

  159. If OS manufacturers made cars by MrLinuxHead · · Score: 5, Funny

    Amiga: Cars that were years ahead of their time, and you don't see many on the road as the manufacturer has gone out of business and parts are hard to come by.

    Apple OS X: Looks great, but You could only get accessories for it if they were made by Apple.

    BSD: Their cars ran really well, but the only mechanic that knows how to work on them is 500 miles away.

    IBM AS/400: Your couldn't buy a car but only lease one, it would come with your own mechanic, and would cost around a million per year.

    IBM OS/2: You could buy one if you are lucky enough to find one, but It never went anywhere.

    IRIX: Their cars would blow the doors off all the others, if you could ever find a gas station.

    QNX: You couldn't buy a car, only find the demo car, and that just had a projection of scenery moving across the windshield.

    RedHat Linux: You had a choice of sports car, station wagon, mini-van, or 18-wheel tractor trailer. You could design your own if you wish to, but most people gave up when it came to picking from the 2000 different accessories.

    Sun Solaris: Their cars would have a least two engines, with up to 32 engines, and they would weigh 400 tons, but once they got moving, they were hard as hell to stop.

    Last but not least: Microsoft: Just Where did You think You were going today?

    --
    I may be bad with names, but I'll never forget your IP address
  160. Huh ? by faqer · · Score: 1

    I hope I won't see messages like "Old lady detected in the road. Would you like to save her as a wallpaper." often.

  161. But... but.. but... by citizenkeller · · Score: 1

    I thought they *promised* not to do that! THem bastards... You really can't trust anyone nowadays...

    --
    -- Serge K. Keller
  162. Being serious for a moment... by Observer · · Score: 2
    ... I really do wonder about the wisdom of some of the convenience mechanisms that have become commonplace in cars over the last decade or so. Centralised electrical locking: fine provided it supplements a mechanical mechanism, not so good if it becomes a single point of failure that can deny you access to your vehicle if it goes wrong. Remote locking and unlocking: nice, but what about side-effects?

    And that's before you even start thinking about failure modes of the more recent 'intelligent' engine-management systems. There was a news report a couple of months ago in Switzerland - sorry, cannot find a URL for it now - of a number of incidents near Zurich where engines in several examples of a newly-introduced model had temporarily cut out for no apparent reason, fortunately without causing damage or injury despite being on busy motorways (and in one case in a tunnel). Suspicion was on interference with vehicle electronics, possibly related to radar emmissions from the nearby air traffic control.

    <luddite>Makes me glad I'm still running an '88 VW with very little electronics. Perhaps I'll do best to replace it with a comparably simple second-hand car when the time comes to retire it.</luddite>

  163. Let's try and clear up a few things... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    ... since it seems the slashbots are out in force today.

    First off, the car *is* a prototype. It's highly unlikely it will actually be sold to the public with Windows-based software. For one thing, Windows CE (not 98, RTFA) is nearing the end of its product lifespan, so it would be pointless basing it on something that's just about to be dropped. Furthermore, Windows isn't necessarily unstable - it is when you've got the four-year-old install of 98 that came when you bought your Packard-Bell, and run all those warezed programs on it, and Kazaa sticks Gator on, and Comet Cursor (and so on). When you run "known" software and drivers, it's actually fairly stable.

    Secondly, it probably won't run Linux either. Nothing wrong with Linux, in fact I use it on all my machines at work and at home. I wouldn't use it in the car, for the simple reason that it's the wrong thing for the job. What they're most likely to use is a real-time OS like QNX, or more likely still, something custom written.

    At the moment, nearly all computers used in cars run entirely custom-written software, on very specialised hardware. It's quite unusual to find any processor more powerful than, say, an 8MHz Z80, although certain combined EMS/ABS units that do traction control and handle automatic gearboxes use 68000's - still at 8MHz though. They don't need to be that fast. Not much happens in a car more often than once every few milliseconds. You also don't need to do *much* calculation, because most things (ignition timing, fuelling etc) are precalculated and worked out from maps stored in ROM. When you "chip" your car for more power, the fuel and timing maps are what gets changed.

    1. Re:Let's try and clear up a few things... by FrankNputer · · Score: 1

      Err...Uhh...

      RTFA-ing, you'll see that the writer DOES say that it's running Windows 98, not CE. And as for being at the end of it's product lifespan, then 98 would be a bad choice as well - it's gone, history, outta here.

      I must say also that I find your statements about the computing needs a bit curious - if you're saying that the cars need little computational power, because not much happens very fast/often, then why would an RTOS be needed?

    2. Re:Let's try and clear up a few things... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2
      Latency, dear boy, latency...

      An RTOS doesn't necessarily do things *quickly*, just within a predictable timeframe.

  164. I know why they're running Windows98 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Windows 98 is the only version of windows left with a real DOS prompt.

    Microsoft will no longer sell you a copy of DOS. It's no longer possible to buy anything lower/cheaper than windows 98.

    Volvo are not using any of the Windows98 functionality. They just wanted to write their code on an x86 box.

    Really... there's nothing to worry about... Volvo are using DOS... Microsoft just won't sell it to them.

  165. Reboot. by mitchelln · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You you have to press and hold down the and pedals to reboot ?

    1. Re:Reboot. by mitchelln · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Should have read clutch + brake + gas pedals, but they got stripped off 'cos they where enclosed in angle brackets.

  166. Re:What I really wonder is... by jmo_jon · · Score: 1

    Will I have to reinstall the driver if I lend my car to a mate?

  167. Not a BSOD Joke! Honest! by LittleGuy · · Score: 2

    One of the annoying kinks of the car is the "Please Wait For Your Car to Shut Down" display.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  168. Windows probably only for the interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knowing how reporters can filter out bits of information when writing their stories, making things sound different than they are. Chances are that Windows is only being used to provide the interface to the user, and most of the other work is handled by an RTOS. The benefits of using Windows for an interface: existing development tools and software. There is no denying that Windows is the best supported platform from a user software point of view.

  169. Give Volvo A Break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To all of you who whine about Windows 98 in this case:

    Give me a damn break. Volvo is - like all other really large car companies - a very clever crowd and I am absolutely sure that if Windows 98 ever crashed on this car, they'd switch to another OS. If they use Windows 98, they must have a good reason. I doubt they'd pay a few bucks less just to get a cheaper OS when it comes to this kind of money, and reputation..

    Windows 98 is OK if you don't install 500 programs on it. Maybe they don't do that on the Volvo car. Maybe you can't even modify Windows 98 on it. Maybe the OS does not even handle any tasks that the car requires.

  170. Volvo and electronics by Knacklappen · · Score: 1

    is the idea that the engine controls (or any other drivetrain subsystem) would be running on anything but a dedicated device chock full of proven code.

    Of course, the whole car is a network of dedicated devices. Thats how everybody does it.

    Switching from Ford-owned Volvo Cars to self-owned AB Volvo, I would recommend reading some of these articles. Heck, they even have serveral connected ECU's in construction equipment (like a wheel loader or articulated hauler)... Don't know about the OS, though, but I wouldn't think that somebody would rely on Win9x for critical applications...

    --


    Excellence: Moderate (mostly affected by comments on your karma)
  171. Bicycle on Debian (unstable) by Sylvanus · · Score: 1

    These car manufacturers are as ever, behind we chaps on 2 wheels. We've been running a Dawes Galaxy with embedded Debian (unstable) for years and it integrates brilliantly with Sheldon Brown's Geomagnetic Booster! ® to provide hours of stable open-source transport which is especially useful on a day like today when the London tube is on strike.

    As ever with embedded systems, shoehorning all the code into the space available has been tough so we've fitted a specially adapted hub to the rear wheel and a windmill like fan on the rear sprocket to cool the Itanium 2 inner core. One advantage has been the thermic glow from this at nightime has reduced the need for rear-lights.

    2 problems we're looking for volunteers to help with:
    1) Seek-time latency on the hard-drive (also fitted to the rear sprocket and rotated by the chain) has been horrible and its been necessary to pedal really fast when playing mp3's
    2) The kernel source is stored in the inner tubes / tyres and patching the source has been extremely haphazard with patches falling off, hissing air and rubber solution all over the place....

    Next step is write kernel modules to drive Sheldon Brown's Bar-End Bayonetz to allow some much more aggressive Open Source advocacy, just as Cmdr Taco was requesting yesterday.

    RMS is a big supporter of the Linucycle as we call it or the GNUcle as he prefers and is helping us in our efforts to integrate the Hurd kernel. An MS spokesman we contacted commented "This is just the sort of hippy s**t I'd expect from those Open Source guys...."

  172. Finally by Workshop+Alex · · Score: 1

    The ultimate laptop is out. It runs on Windows 98 and it runs all over the place. Finally the laptop is on the move again. Geez, this is probably the biggest laptop ever...

  173. Reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it be necessary to stop and reboot while driving?

  174. Turn signals by ThunderBucket · · Score: 1

    American cars do have turn signals: they're optimally yellow, but its allowable to modulate the (red) tail light.

    --

    "All I do is eat and poop!" -- Bean
    1. Re:Turn signals by shaldannon · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but as you and I both know, Americans still seem not to know what that little stick on the left side of the steering wheel is for.

      I hate it when I signal and start to merge into a lane and some idiot decides to merge without signalling. I particularly hate it when they're going slower and they're in front, or they're going faster and they're behind.

      Then again....I grew up driving in Alabama where someone once jested that the double yellow lines are 'racing stripes.'

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
  175. Re:Safety car and Win98? by JimR · · Score: 1

    > This car is not safe...

    Oh, I don't know - if my experience with win98
    is anything to go by you won't even be able to
    get the car to start - so you certainly won't
    be involved in any traffic accidents.

    --
    #exclude <ms/windows.h>
  176. Re:What I really wonder is... by thales · · Score: 2
    Does it come with just a driver's seat and require extra per seat license fees if you add passenger seats?

    --
    Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
  177. hahahaha! you'd be right if... by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    LOL, you'd be right if I didn't just see one on TV the other day! Some programming was cut short by the BSOD! ;)

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  178. License Sticker by cpuenvy · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they put the license sticker on the side, just like any good OEM should...

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  179. Re:What I really wonder is... by thales · · Score: 2
    If you change the radio station, do you have to reboot Windows to have the change take effect?

    --
    Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
  180. I used to like Volvo... by avarame · · Score: 1

    ...now I think they should just roll over and die. I mean, for god's sake, WINDOWS? A CONSUMER version more so? This isn't the user interface, dammit! Use something DESIGNED for critical operations, at the very least NT... Volvo just lost a very loyal customer. I'm sure I'm not unique by a long shot.

    --
    Save time now so you can waste it later
    1. Re:I used to like Volvo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're an idiot. You are ruling out this car already -- and you haven't even seen it in action. Have you actually seen the interface? Have you actually tried the car? Have you seen it fail?

      Probably not, so bugger off with your stupid comments.

    2. Re:I used to like Volvo... by avarame · · Score: 1

      Win98 is regarded as one of the crappiest OSes in existence with the possible exception of WinME. Why it's running CRITICAL REAL-TIME SYSTEMS in a motor vehicle is utterly beyond me. A CONSUMER-LEVEL OS should NEVER be used for critical functions. I haven't seen M$'s EULA, but most of them have a clause about how this operating system is not to be used for critical applications where failures could result in death or destruction - I'd say if Win98 crashed while trying to keep your car on the road, and you died because of it, that counts as death caused by Win98. Volvo is at fault for choosing a consumer-level OS for critical systems, and either Microsoft is hubristic for thinking their OS can run critical systems, or Volvo is breaking the EULA for using it. (And yes I know EULA means *end-user* license agreement, but I'm certain there are similar terms for companies in Volvo's situation)

      --
      Save time now so you can waste it later
  181. Unsupported software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Microsoft has discontinued support for Windows 98, does this mean The Safety Car is unsupported software?

  182. "BSOD jokes are not funny anymore" by Anarchofascist · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...not to you at least, obviously.

    Myself, I'll stop laughing when Microsoft stop making jokes. My favourite joke this year was the marketing hype around XP: Apparently it "makes your computer faster" when you "upgrade your hardware"! Wow! Gotta get me some of that.

    --
    Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
    1. Re:"BSOD jokes are not funny anymore" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Retard... Its mat_T_hew. If you're going to creat trouble at least quote it right

    2. Re:"BSOD jokes are not funny anymore" by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 0
      "...I came not to send peace, but a sword." -- Matthew 10:34

      "Ha-ha! We come in peace, shoot to kill,
      shoot to kill,
      shoot to kill.
      We come in peace, shoot to kill,
      shoot to kill, men."
      --Captain James T. Kirk, clay
      Star Trekking song on Dr. Demento radio show.

  183. Wish it had a better cruise control by ehud42 · · Score: 1
    I don't know about the rest of you, but I find the UI for modern cruise controls to be worse then that of the telephone. Set and Accelerate are the same button?? No status indicator to display if the cruise is on, paused, accelerating, etc...

    I digress. Actually, what I would _really_ like to see is a type of tractor beam. The main problem with cruise controls is the subtle difference between yours and mine. I'm either gaining on you by 0.5kph or someone is gaining on me by 0.5 kph. I hate constantly adjusting the cruise.

    A 'tractor beam cruise' would use some kind of range sensing beam to keep you a 'safe' distance (ie: the 2 - 3 second rule taught in driver's ed, could be adjustable for driving conditions) from the car in front. If the distance started to close fast an alarm would sound to encourage you to press the brakes if needed.

    If a car jumps into the space between you and the car in front, the 'cruise' slows down for a second or two to re-establish the buffer zone.

    This would keep cars safely spaced on the highways and reduce the amount of fiddling with the cruise controls while driving.

    --
    I'm in my right mind and I have the answer to everything!
    1. Re:Wish it had a better cruise control by certsoft · · Score: 1
      I don't know about the rest of you, but I find the UI for modern cruise controls to be worse then that of the telephone. Set and Accelerate are the same button?? No status indicator to display if the cruise is on, paused, accelerating, etc...

      I built my own cruise control for my truck after the crappy aftermarket one the dealer installed died. On mine there is a potentiometer, button, light, and two digit LED readout on the dash. You use the pot to set the desired speed, which reads out on the LED display. Once you accelerate to the set speed it automatically engages, no need to push buttons. The button on the dash is used to turn the unit on (default) and off (like for city traffic).

      I did manage to make use of the throttle cable that came with the original, but I used a stepping motor instead of a vacuum actuator. When you reach the set speed it measures the voltage from the throttle position sensor (already on the truck) and then moves the stepper motor to correspond to where you have the gas peddle.

  184. 745i Dead in driveway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After starting the car a friend found that pressing the gas pedal in drive did nothing, or even worse caused the car to surge forward unpredictably. However the gas pedal worked fine with the car in reverse. I never thought to tell them to reboot the car!

  185. 98 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    98 rawks....
    i still use it.. and dont come and say its because i dont have a good enough comp. because it is good enough (2GHz, 1024Ram etc.)

  186. Car design cycle by stankyho · · Score: 1

    I will admit Windows is a poor choice to put in a car. But you need to think of the design and build phase of a car. I read something about this awhile back. It takes 4-5 years to concept, design, and build a prototype. They cannot say "Let's design the car to use an operating system from the future." They need to pick one and work with it from the start. I think a Linux or Unix based product would have been better as the future upgrades on some distros is not so drastic as say Win98 to W2k or XP. But to design a car around WIn98 then upgrade the whole OS for each upgrade would be silly.

    --

    ---
    eeww, I'll have a crab juice.
  187. Carmageddon Reborn? by Workshop+Alex · · Score: 1

    So now we will have to be careful on the road because some madmen can now play this game with their own car... And once you crash and die, you'll see your score in heaven... Game over, do you want to play again? [Yes]/[No]

  188. pop-window by sputti · · Score: 1

    there was a pop-up window? yikes. i had to close all windows before readin on...

  189. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  190. Re:Volvos are the most dangerous cars on the road. by Odinson · · Score: 2
    I ride and I can't wait until most cars (starting with elderly sales targets I hope) have HUD object enhancement systems. There have been a fair number of studies on Motorcycle accidents after the fact. The number one risk is oncoming trafic making left turns in front of Motorcylces. In case you are curious, number two is tussles with exit ramps.

    This primarily has to to do with poor vision on the car drivers part. With an HUD people could see the oncomming red dot and hear a chime rather than losing the one oncomming headlight in the heat distortion and running bikers down.

    Divided,ramped highways are your friend.

    Volvo's tend keep the hell away from bikes (are their drivers afraid?) but a SUV just tried to run me down two days ago.

    Here are some typical conclusions from motorcycle studies.

    I would never buy a car running Windows anything for any component. If a car manufacturer doesn't see fit to write there own damn toolkit, they don't understand mission critical code by induction and the like, they are lazy and risking my life, or they are buzzword fixated.

  191. Windows is only used for the displays and MP3's by chopper749 · · Score: 1

    I worked on this car. The PC are used to manage the displays and sound system. They were only used so that the system can be modified easily. In a real car, all of the PC's would be replaced with embedded circuits.

  192. not just one, but five! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article:
    "But for all that, the car has five separate computer systems (running Windows 98, by the way)..."
    This is just asking for trouble. Just the other day I walked by a BSOD at the airport. How often will this car get BSODs are need reboots, if it has five separate computer systems running Win98?

  193. Air Flight... by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

    Do you know its not unusual for an aeroplane computer system to be rebooted mid-flight. I seem to remember a fairly exhaustive article on the fact that this statistic is pretty bad - but they have enough backup and contingency systems for this to be a perfectly safe operation...At least so they claim...

    Of course- when you are 30,000 feet+ in the air, with 10s of kilometers of open space(unless it crashes during takeoff or landing and then your scr3wed) its not a big deal to reboot. But when you are at 70+Mph on a busy motorway/autobahn/freeway in a car that could be instantly fatal.

    --
    OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  194. Mine was rejected.... by nichomoff · · Score: 1

    I posted about this a few weeks ago, but alas it was rejected. Guess it's more interesting now!

  195. Volvo is a big dollar MSN advertiser by illumin8 · · Score: 1

    This article is pretty much an advertisement masquerading as journalism. I know this because we have these Motorola Timeport pagers at my work and every day I get these MSNBC market updates sponsored by Volvo... At the bottom of each message it says:

    "Shouldn't the car of your dreams be the car in your driveway? Visit www.volvocars.com today."

    Just goes to show that money can buy journalism.

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  196. Win CE doesn't work by zummit · · Score: 1

    Here's a real-world example of WinCE not working.

    I'm at the movie theatre the other day and in order to skip the lines at the ticket window I thought I'd use the "ticket ATM" instead. But when I walked up to use it, there was a debugging message on the ATM with a bunch of error codes and some text indicating that it was powered by WinCE.

    Therefore to buy tix to the movie, I had to go to the ticket window instead of using the automated solution.

    Thanks to WinCE (and M$), the theatre loses as they spent $$$ on a device that doesn't work.

  197. How to fix *that* Volvo problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a motorcyclist, I can affirm that your allegation about Volvo drivers is quite true. Everytime I see a Volvo waiting at a cross-street in front of me, I can assume that its driver is probably going to pull out *immediately* in front of me as I approach the intersection. Every time I find a Volvo in the lane next to me, I can also assume that its driver is probably about to make an abrupt, unsignalled lane change right into the side of me. Ever time I find a Volvo behind me, I can assume it's probably going to try to run over me.

    To remedy these kinds of problems, I propose that Volvo redesign its cars and keep the passengers enclosed inside the vehicle as is now, for their protection, however the driver's position needs to be relocated to outside the vehicle, to inside a flimsy plastic bubble suspended out in front of the front bumper of the car. On either side of the car, there need to be equipped with impact sensing switches that cause the driver's bubble to become de-attached from the vehicle such that the massive automobile can then run over the bubble and crush it before coming to a stop.

    Once this design is in place, then Volvo drivers will come to drive so carefully that they will be just as safe drivers as the cars themselves are protective of the passengers.

  198. Our concept car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey people, me and a few engineer friends designed a car that alters its speed based on the tempo of music playing in the onboard mp3 player. Not exactly safe, but hella fun when the herdcore techno comes on. Right now it's installed in a 1987 jetta, which is a manual, so you still hafta change gears when appropriate. Get's tricky.
    I'm thinking of making the window a giant clear screen, like they have in some of those sunglasses-type things, but we'll have something similar to a winamp visualization plugin going.
    And no, I'm not joking.

  199. I can fix it... by ctimes2 · · Score: 1

    My dad was a TV repair man...
    - The version with the automatic transmission would have 4 drive gears that all work differently, that way you can pick one from an individual that you like.
    Just use RPM (Regear program manager)

    - Instead of intuitive buttons on the steering column to turn on windshield wipers and so on, you have a patch board complete with a very nice array of differing lengths of cable.
    What's wrong with patch panels?! You have to learn how to do things in Hyundai's too you'know!

    - The driver of the car has to understand how the internal combustion engine works before he can go anywhere in it.
    Read the how-to (holy crap this is turning out good!) http://www.howstuffworks.com/engine.htm ;)

    - More than one steering wheel can be added to the car, afterall it is a multi-user OS.
    My audi has seats with presets for up to 4 users, why shouldn't my stearing wheel? Try to do that with your Pinto!

    - The gas door would be located underneath the car so that gas doesn't have to go as far to reach the tank. A bottleneck is removed that way.
    Sheesh - just rebuild your engine with the loadable-gastank filler module... duh!

    - The key to get into the door can only fit one right side up, afterall it is case sensitive.
    It's harder to crack that way. And if you wrap it in ssh (secure sticky handle) it's even harder for someone to get a hold of your key. That's security baby. Unless of course they break your window because you didn't apply the latest tire patch...

    - The 'ding ding' noise when you start the car without the seatbelt fastened won't go off because the sound drivers don't work. ...I'm a geek. Not a god.

    - The car wouldn't come with headlights because only newbs need to be able to see where they're going.
    You can driveload thermal sights, range finders, radio locators, infrared and night-vision sensors at auto-forge. Who needs headlights? Hell, who needs WINDOWS! (sorry, couldn't resist...)

    *Hopes the mods have a sense of humor today.*
    Amen brother... amen.

    --
    My cube. My friend. My solace. My prison.
    1. Re:I can fix it... by patbob · · Score: 1
      "- The gas door would be located underneath the car so that gas doesn't have to go as far to reach the tank. A bottleneck is removed that way."

      Sheesh - just rebuild your engine with the loadable-gastank filler module... duh!

      Well, of course you just need the gNUpipe module, everybody knows what that module does.

      - And when you get a flat, you simply need to ask on the Internet, where some nice helpful mechanic will talk you though how to rebuild.. er.. reconfigure your transmission so that the car will work with the spare tire. Sheesh! You're a car user, you should know how to change to the spare tire yourself.

      --
      Welcome to the net of 1000 lies. Upgrades are scheduled soon that should bring us to the 10,000 lies mark.
  200. What about airbags ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it ask "Are you sure ?" before opening airbags ?

  201. It's true by manon · · Score: 1

    The picture that can be found on the MSNBC site (here) is manipulated if you ask me.
    I found a more realistic one here.

    --
    42 + 1 = 42
  202. Volvo Safety Car by BadTuna · · Score: 1

    Honest officer , the last thing I remember is popping a cd into the player. It immediately spits it out, flying all around the inside of the car. The speakers started yelling "Err-or " "Err-or" like something from 'Lost in Space '. The steering wheel locked up. I tried restarting the car but the ignition just sat there. I'm looking around the car , the wind shield froze over because the A/C tried to restart the car. Then I look in the basckseat, because that's where Volvo said I should look if I have any problems. There's a CD back there that says 'Rescue...something or other .' I go to put that in and can't because now the A/C has frozen the CD player. Some guy,from somewhere starts yelling 'reboot ' 'reboot' , which is of no help since I'm wearing tennis shoes. Then a light comes on, on the dash, telling me to 'defrag in safe mode'. What the hell is that all about ? Next thing I know I'm sitting here on the ground talking to you!

    --
    Your sig here!
  203. At least it isn't ME! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2

    Then we'd really be up shit's creek. I can see it now: you're driving along on the freeway at 75 MPH and your dashboard suddenly says: "New updates are automatically being installed". Next thing you know the airbags all go off, the brakes stop working, the steering pulls hard to the right, and some voice begins saying: "Please move away from the car".

  204. As heard on the highways... by ocie · · Score: 2

    Cop: Sir, I've been following you for the last 3 miles and you stopped no less than 15 times and threw the car into reverse. I'm writing you a ticket.

    Driver: But officer, the owner's manual recommends frequent backups.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  205. [no subject] by Peale · · Score: 2

    gives a whole new meaning to the phrase 'car crash,' doesn't it?

  206. Re:Actually my fscking Windows2000 had a kernel pa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I experienced a kernel panic under Linux yesterday when I upgraded the kernel!

    Of course, it was because I accidentally compiled the kernel with Pentium optimizations, and the machine was a 486 :o)

  207. Doesn't work on 'open roads' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only for use on Micro$oft(tm) certified highways.

    Just think what you can put on the insurance claims when you 'crash'

    Certainly lots of 'milage' for these jokes.
    It will be a Hard Drive to get there.

  208. New? It was unveiled in January 8, 2001. by aduthie · · Score: 1

    Specifically, at the Detroit Auto Show. Around 2pm eastern time. It's not even a concept; it's just a test bed for various, interesting ideas in safety technology, like the see-through A-pillar that eliminates a big blind spot. That some of it is controlled by WinCE is just proof that wanted to throw the ideas together cheaply in a small space. WinCE does that just fine, but it sure as hell doesn't mean that if any of those ideas make it to production, they'll use WinCE. Lordy.

  209. 50miles per 2 gallons != gas guzzler by donutz · · Score: 2

    Twenty five miles per gallon is pretty decent. Not spectacular, nothing to write home about, but it's no gas guzzler. if you're going to make up numbers, at least make them support your claims

  210. Spoke Too Soon by White+Roses · · Score: 2
    Looks like I'm going to have to retract this little statement I made yesterday . . .

    However, you're still prettly likely to survive the crash. You'll just crash more often.

    --
    Do not touch -Willie
  211. That makes sense by gruntvald · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... presumably it's running in "safe mode" ? (sorry, someone had to say it, or at least, repeat it ...).

  212. Preston Tucker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    WhoTF is Preston Tucker?

    Why would he "be proud"?

    Is this some sort of corporatized media "hero" or something? What does he have to do with cars or this article?

  213. Yeah, but... by slackr · · Score: 1

    ... can you network it?

    --

    * Please do not read my signature.
  214. Finaly. A car I can fix myself by frnko · · Score: 1

    Finaly. A car I can fix myself. If this car stops running, all I need to do i to close all the windows, turn off the engine and restart my car!!! Is this good news or what?

  215. Come on... by daveman_1 · · Score: 1

    How much "up-time" did you really need in your car anyway? Unless you keep your car powered on 24 hours a day for more than a month, you will likely have no problems. ;o)

    --
    Russian Russian Russian RussianDollSig DollSig DollSig DollSig
  216. -- Volvo Hacker by rlangis · · Score: 1

    Who is going to hack a volvo? Not only from the sense of there being no means, motive, or opportunity, who the hell would want to 'hack' a volvo? how anti-l33t can you get?

    Well, being a volvogeek, I'd have to say that *I* would hack a Volvo. So would these guys. In fact, they have. They make the best performance products for Volvos of all ages.

    Whoa, wait a minute... Did I say 'performance' AND 'volvo' in the same sentence? WTF was I thinking? Oh yeah...that's right, Volvo wasn't the company who won the 94 (or was it 95 or 96?) BTCC series running an 850 WAGON?!? Silly me, yes they were.

    Take a look at turbobricks, these guys are into serious performance with their swedish iron. Bork bork bork, my ass.

    --
    GIR: I'm going to sing the Doom song now. Doom doom doom doom doom doom de-doom doom doom doom doom doom doom...
  217. Yes. by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    Both, with Microsoft involved, and probably with endangering national security as well.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  218. Take me to Hall's Creek by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    What, the bronze kangaroos hop into taxis?

    Don't you speak semicolon?

    IRL, I understand that one taxi has hopped into a bronze kangaroo (wet night, changing lanes in a hurry, overdid it) but I can't see any marks from it.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  219. Welcome to Black Tyre Linux by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    Please click on OK to rape, pillage, murder and destroy*. Oh, and get 14% better mileage and automatic crash avoidance. Er, but be prepared to copy your ROMs for anyone who asks.

    [ OK ] [ Sorry, I'm a moron ]

    * The existing control software.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  220. Re:Blue Screen of Death? by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    I think its the actual death you need to be worried about.

  221. and finially by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When are they going to have a hacked version running Linux

  222. Well i guess that means... by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    That none of the patches have ever been installed, so while this box may be up, it is probably rooted.

  223. Re:It's not safe.- TCPA! by blair1q · · Score: 2

    It'll have a tough acceptance curve when it's discovered that you have to call M$ to get a new access code every fifth time you change drinks in your cupholder.

  224. What about the Digital Rights Management? by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 0
    Does that mean that Microsoft can

    remotely take control of your vehicle whenever they feel like it,

    install insecure updates at will,

    snoop on your back-seat video feed,

    install spyware to upload logs of played-music, or

    GPS logs of where you drive or what gas stations you've been to?