Slashdot Mirror


Do You Know Where You Live?

An anonymous submitter writes "Thanks to GPS, it seems quite a few people are discovering they don't live where they thought. Prior to GPS, state, county and city borders were part law, part measurement, and part guesswork. Now, they're able to go back and discover where actual borders should be, and it's making many people unhappy. Some familes in Rhode Island are finding out they may actually live in Connecticut. Each state, county and city wants as much land as possible, because it means more tax income. The people caught in the middle simply want to know where they'll send their kids for school."

442 comments

  1. Borders by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 5, Funny

    NOOOOOOOoooooooo...

    I'm Canadian!

    --
    With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    1. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't worry. With luck, they'll manage to change the border in such a manner so that we get to be Americans.

    2. Re:Borders by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe we could use GPS to get back the portions of Alaska that stretch down our west coast!

      Idiocy at it's best.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    3. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Maybe we could use GPS to get back the portions of Alaska that stretch down our west coast!

      Nah, we'll just thumb wrestle you for it.

      Ready, 1-2-3 ...

    4. Re:Borders by enrayged · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...at least you didnt find out you are mexican...

      Oh great, here comes INS...

    5. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you shut the hell up and we hold off on the invasion for one more day.

    6. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than being a Rhodie.

      People from Rhode Island are idiots.

    7. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm Canadian!

      Sorry, but we can't help.

    8. Re:Borders by wilburdg · · Score: 1


      What's all that aboot? It's alright to be canadian eh...

    9. Re:Borders by Kwikymart · · Score: 2

      I used to live right on the Candian-American border (in Canada). The American part was just a little penisula that was totally cut off from the rest of the US. Anyway, the "official" border extended 15 feet into what should have been Canadian territory. So, the Americans had a bit more land than they should have. Overall if you take into account the whole border, I think Canada wins out and gets more space than it should just because they surveys that were taken were just not accurate enough.

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    10. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just the people from South Providence.

    11. Re:Borders by rlowe69 · · Score: 3, Funny


      NOOOOOOOoooooooo...

      I'm Canadian!


      Welcome to the fold, eh! Want some poutine, ya hoser?

      --
      ----- rL
    12. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      relax, just good-natured joking.

    13. Re:Borders by sdjunky · · Score: 1

      Eh?

    14. Re:Borders by Medevo · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you read history, in about 1900 Canada and the USA were fighting over Alaska (and those coastal regions). Since Canada was still pretty much a British colony the British and Americans formed a group of 5 (2 Americans, 2 British, 1 Canadian) that heard arguments from both sides, and were to vote based on the arguments. In the End the British decided to vote for the Americans to help improve relations (this is one of many times the British sold of Canada to create favors for themselves).

      Medevo

    15. Re:Borders by topham · · Score: 2

      Point Roberts?

    16. Re:Borders by bobpence · · Score: 1

      Does finding out that their from Connecticut and didn't know it somehow make them wiser?

    17. Re:Borders by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I'm Canadian"

      It like an american - but without the gun.

    18. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who burnt down who's capital building buddy!

    19. Re:Borders by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      i'd like to reply, but I suspect a temper... we don't even want Canada. If Canadians became Americans, it would no longer be politically correct to make fun of the accents...

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    20. Re:Borders by Rhombus · · Score: 1
      Sure it would...after all, we make fun of people from Alabama all the time...just look at Jerry Springer.

      No, really...look at him.

    21. Re:Borders by paladin_tom · · Score: 1

      Congratulations!

      Now you can find out what real beer is all about.

      I AM CANADIAN!

      --
      #define sig "Every social system runs on the people's belief in it."
    22. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you betcha!

    23. Re:Borders by Rhombus · · Score: 1
      I want Baja California.

      Make it happen.

    24. Re:Borders by 2Bits · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, it's like an american, but without pretending that you are the center of the universe.

    25. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh.. typical American... No sense of humour, just a love of mindless violence.

    26. Re:Borders by CableModemSniper · · Score: 5, Funny

      Redundant unfunny Simpson's quote:

      "Why should we leave America to visit America Junior?"

      --
      Why not fork?
    27. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, it's like an american, but without pretending that you are the center of the universe.

      No pretense involved. It's fer real.

    28. Re:Borders by f0rtytw0 · · Score: 1

      ahh... kids in the hall. That was the sketch with the phillipeno (sp?) boy. fantastic

      --
      this is the most important sig ever! In your face 446154!
    29. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      history says otherwise. Americans have tried to invade Canada twice. Both times the invading armies were forced to retreat.

      So When you say "you dont even want Canada"... do you not mean, "you dont want to have to retreat again...?"

    30. Re:Borders by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      If Canadians became Americans, it would no longer be politically correct to make fun of the accents...

      As a Canadian, I find this quite funny coming from an American. Ever been to Long Island? If anything, I would venture that Canadians speak English better than the English.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    31. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean "look at Jerry Springer's *guests*"? After all, Jerry himself is not from Alabama. I believe he was born in London and was mayor of...Cleveland was it?

    32. Re:Borders by laserjet · · Score: 2

      I feel sorry for you because you just called Molson a real beer. While I will grant you that perhaps all Molsons are better than BudMillerCoors, none of them are real bears as far as I am concerned. Oh, they do contain alcohol, but light lagers such as these bare very little resemblance to a good beer.

      Surely Canada has many microbrews that make good beer, no? (or should I say eh?)

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    33. Re:Borders by ObitMan · · Score: 0

      fer christs sake, if you can take the time to do "(sp?)" you can certainly make the effort to open up a dictionary or even dictionary.com and get it right.
      Filipino, native of the Philippines.

      Hrmm now looking at it... stupid engrish!

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
    34. Re:Borders by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

      You mean better then the American english?

      I think the English (From England) by definition speak English better then the Canadians.

      --
      ~ kjrose
    35. Re:Borders by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      If it's Filipino , isn't it Filipines?

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    36. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you I was waiting for that! :D

    37. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't consider Molsons or BudMillerCoors real bears either... They just don't pack enough of a wallop for me. I mean, you need to have some real fur, claws and teeth to be considered a real bear by a conniseur like I. :-P

      Personally I think Grizzly and Black are much better bears.

    38. Re:Borders by paladin_tom · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ahem... may I as what you consider a real beer?

      Yes, you've used "eh" correctly. It's most often used to transform a statement ("American beer tastes like cow piss.") into a question ("American beer tastes like cow piss, eh?").

      However, if you replace "no" with "eh", you should remove the "Surely". Otherwise you're mixing "British aristocrat" with "Canadian lumberjack", in a way that nature did not intend.

      --
      #define sig "Every social system runs on the people's belief in it."
    39. Re:Borders by Zone5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Interesting opinion. Have you ever tried *listening* to one of the british trying to speak their own language? It's obvious that at one time they spoke the queen's english, but that is no longer the case. Canadians do in fact on average speak a more 'pure' dialect of the english language than do the english people themselves.

      If one were to accept the premise that the shifting of a language over time in its homeland remained the accepted standard for that language, wouldn't welsh and manx both be considered alive and well, and stunningly similar to common english?

      --
      "So on one hand, honey is an amazingly sophisticated and efficient food source. On the other hand it's bee backwash."
    40. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, only a Canadian would know what cow piss tastes like...

      sorry - couldn't resist.

    41. Re:Borders by Giltron · · Score: 1

      Ah but Homer Simpson is really Canadian...Matt Groening confirmed this that Homer is based off...you guess it his dad from Manitoba

    42. Re:Borders by MarvinMouse · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Since I have never truly heard the 'pure' dialect of the english language. I guess it's hard for me to say that we do or do not speak it more so.

      To us, Canadian's, our english sounds better then any other Nation's english. But that doesn't make it a more 'pure' dialect then the english nor the Americans.

      On the other hand, if we define English as from England, American as from America, Canadian as from Canada, and so on. Then by definition, the English would have to have the more 'pure' dialect of english, whether wer agree or not.

      I do know people who speak Welsh, and they consider the language alive and well. And these people are from Wales in Great Britain.

      --
      ~ kjrose
    43. Re:Borders by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

      You gotta love the fact that the greatest boost to our National identity came from beer commercials done by Molsons.

      I still get a kick out of that. Perhaps, Chretien should begin doing 'I AM' commercials, so Paul Martin doesn't take his job. :-)

      --
      ~ kjrose
    44. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Filipino.

    45. Re:Borders by kiwimate · · Score: 2

      Hear hear -- please, do tell. I'd love to know if your tastes run up to something like, say, Theakston's Old Peculier* or Monteith's, as opposed to the standard fizzy anaesthetized brown stuff.

      * And before you even sniff at my spelling, yes, that's how they spell it. So sod off.

    46. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Thay... think... aym... sloh... coz... aym... frahm... Canehduh, eh?"

    47. Re:Borders by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Yes, you've used "eh" correctly. It's most often used to transform a statement ("American beer tastes like cow piss.") into a question ("American beer tastes like cow piss, eh?").

      I am an American, born and raised, and I had that habit for maaany years in my writing. It was beginning to get rather annoying, since I was seemingly ending every other sentence with it. (once again this is in my writing only.)

      I do not know what I read that caused me to start doing that, I typically pick up the mannerisms of whatever I am reading at the time.

    48. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also couldn't have won the revolutionary war without the help of the French. But guess what, nowadays we could take England easily.

      Things change.

    49. Re:Borders by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Just wait. With Tectonic shift, it'll be yours in 18 million years.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    50. Re:Borders by cmallinson · · Score: 4, Funny
      Actually, it's like an american, but without pretending that you are the center of the universe.

      Why would americans pretend they're from Toronto?

    51. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh... typical Canadian. Condescending and ungrateful.

    52. Re:Borders by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      That was then. To quote Roland, "The world has moved on."

      And anyway, just because you can afford free health care do to having no military doesn't mean you have to rub our noses in it. :)

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    53. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says I am Canadian?

      Sigh... typical American again... judgemental, jumps to assumptions and egotistical (ungrateful, why should Canadians be greatful to you?).

    54. Re:Borders by arnex · · Score: 2

      I used to work at a radio station with this guy, where the rumor went around that he was a cousin of Matt. I couldn't help but think that, if the rumor were true (and, no, I never bothered to just ask him), Homer must have been based at least partly on him. See the photo to judge for yourself.

      Strangely, I recall him having less hair. And saying "d'oh!" a lot.

    55. Re:Borders by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Canada...it's like a whole 'nother country!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    56. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's Dutch, isn't it Dutchland?

    57. Re:Borders by gid-goo · · Score: 1

      (These are U.S. available beers from various local and international breweries - all are excellent) Black Butte Porter (Deschutes), Blue Paddle or Fat Tire, Catamount Ale, Optimator, Czechvar, anything from Bridgeport in Portland, OR, Paulaner Hefeweizen, Celebrator, I'm a sucker for Russian Stouts and just about any Dopplebock as well. Wow, I'm getting thirsty. Notice neither Labatts nor Molson is on that list, nor Bud, Busch, Schlitz, Schaefers, PBR, Hams, Olympia, Rainier nor any of the other bazillion shit ass beers.

    58. Re:Borders by nigelc · · Score: 1

      (Yeah Offtopic)
      There's a bar here in Boston that serves Theakston's Old Peculier chilled in frosted mugs.
      I can't wait to find out what they think of that in Masham...

      --


      Cthulhu Barata Nikto
    59. Re:Borders by uberdave · · Score: 1

      A more hideous fate, I cannot imagine.

    60. Re:Borders by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I resent that!

      I love well-planned and carefully choreographed violence too!

      I'm sick of the stereotypes!

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    61. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh. I guess I will adjust one of my statements:

      Not all americans have no sense of humour.. At least this one has a sense of humour. :-)

    62. Re:Borders by kiwimate · · Score: 2

      Damn, you're joking! Where? We were just in Boston, and are actually seriously considering moving there. Regardless, we're definitely coming back -- and we need to know where this is! It's not tap, I suppose?

    63. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler. Kiss my big American Ass. My granddaddy helped stop that psycho from coming over here and gassing everyone.

      Stalin. Another psycho my granddaddy stopped from nuking you to hell and back.

    64. Re:Borders by wdr1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, it's like an american, but without pretending that you are the center of the universe.

      Or rather, it's like being an american, but without BEING the center of the universe. ;-)

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    65. Re:Borders by topham · · Score: 2

      If Cretien did "I AM CANADIAN" commercials I'd declair myself anything but...

    66. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I am not mistaken Canadians were fighting Hitler long before the Americans.

    67. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the Delux still serve pints o' Guiness for $2.75? Is it still the bike messenger/cross-dresser bar of choice? Is the food still good?

      The ONE Dunkin' Donuts in Boulder just closed...AARRGGHH.

    68. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhere in a book (Pinker, maybe), I recall reading that the people who live in the Appalachian (sp?) Mountains speak closer to Shakespearean English than anyone in England itself. For instance, the current dialect in England which pronounces "castle" as "cah-sell" is apparently rooted in an 1800's fad. This is, of course, nothing compared to the Great Vowel Shift.

    69. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cincinnati

    70. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure of the source but I remember reading somewhere that there were something like 42 extant dialects of English being spoken within the UK. What constitutes a dialect, a colloquialism and an accent, I'm not sure. If we wanted to get picky then maybe I speak L.A. County, my girlfriend speaks unaccented East Texas and my good friend speaks Great Lakes, West Shore variant.

    71. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like that matters. It was the Soviets who kicked his ass.

    72. Re:Borders by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      You mean that little bump on the northern border of Minnesotta? Separated by the Lake of the Woods I believe?

      It's my favorite trivia question.
      Of the 48 contiguous states, which one is further north?
      Most people say Maine.

    73. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely. ;)

    74. Re:Borders by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1
      Yes, there are many great micro brews in Canada, but none as good, IMNSHO, as St-Ambroise brewed and bottled in Montreal, Quebec.

      And yes, Molson, while it originated in Montreal, is piss just like BudMillerCoors except that it has a wee bit more alcohol.

      --
      :wq
    75. Re:Borders by Rolker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why did the quebecois have to steal the "poutine" name from a traditional Acadian dish? Don't they have any creativity? Here's a real poutine!

    76. Re:Borders by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      Yeah, eh. Damn hosers. Why are they making fun of Canadian accents, eh?

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    77. Re:Borders by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      And it was also the Canadians who said that "One jew is too many".

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    78. Re:Borders by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      I guess the Brits figured not pissing America off was worth more than an icy territory a few miles short of Upper Siberia.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    79. Re:Borders by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Actually, Old Peculier is one of my favorite beers, and I regularly get it at the grocery store. When I am not drinking my own brew, I usually like most micro-brew IPAs (I am a hophead junky) - right now I am trying a Steam Pumper IPA made by a brewery in portland (I forget their name).

      I also like most of Deschutes' beers, Idaho Brewing Company's, Moose Drool, Guinness, some of Red Hook's products (not their hefeweizen, though), Tablerock (local brewery) Hopzilla, Dr. Hops, etc. I basically like to try any microbrew I can get my hands on.

      Beers I don't like: bud, miller, coors, ranier, hamms, fosters, labatts, etc.

      Basicaly I don't like most of the filtered down, crystal clear, sorry excuses for beers. After you charcoal filter beer that many times to get it so clear, they lose a lot of flavor, and the hops are pretty much nonexistant in the mass swill beers.

      I always like how sometimes I see things like "imported Hops" on boxes of Michelob, etc. Like they are special. I can go buy imported or domestic hops anywhere... now if only i could taste the imported hops they put in... :)

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    80. Re:Borders by laserjet · · Score: 2

      God, I would kill for Old Peculier to be on tap at any bar. Unfortunately, most bars only have the big beers, so I stick to brewpubs and such where I can get good beer.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    81. Re:Borders by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      Actually, its like an American but from the most useless country in the world, save Australia, which is full of criminal genes.

      Try exporting something for once.... Oh crap wait.
      I get all of my "bud" from BC.
      I retract all of the above statements.

      I LOVE CANADA!!!

      Now if only I could find my pants.

    82. Re:Borders by JabberWokky · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      naq lbh jnfgrq n srj frpbaqf bs lbhef znxvat gung - naq ernqvat guf

      --
      Evan (no reference in this message)

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    83. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chilled?

      The useless fuckers *chill* *beer*? Nooooooooooooo

    84. Re:Borders by pythorlh · · Score: 1

      Jbhyq lbh gjb fgbc jnfgvat zbzragf bs zl zrnavatyrff yvsr?!?

      --
      Do not confuse duty with what other people expect of you; they are utterly different.Duty is a debt you owe to yourself.
    85. Re:Borders by ArcadeNut · · Score: 2
      "eh" is not a word. It's Canadian Puncuation!

      For example to ask a question:

      Lets go to a movie, eh?

      To state a fact:

      We're going to the movie, eh?

      To express emotion:

      That movie sucked, eh!

      I'm almost Canadian, I'm from Alaska!

      --
      Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    86. Re:Borders by caspper69 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Right.

      He was a news anchor of some sort, and then he went into politics. He ran for city council, and in Cincinnati, the city council member with the most votes becomes mayor.

      All went well for him too until he went across the river to Kentucky and paid a prostitute with a personal check! It worked out for the best though.

    87. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it was the Brits (with the Canadians and the ANZAC) in the west and the Soviets (with the Russian winter) in the east that kicked Hitler's ass.

    88. Re:Borders by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Who burnt down who's capital building buddy!

      The British burned down the American's. Did they get the Capitol Building or was it just the White House and miscellaneous other buildings? (Not that any Americans would know, since they aren't taught about wars they didn't win.)

    89. Re:Borders by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      history says otherwise. Americans have tried to invade Canada twice. Both times the invading armies were forced to retreat.

      Canada also occupied the Michigan peninsula for a period during the War of 1812.

    90. Re:Borders by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      But guess what, nowadays we could take England easily.

      How many hundreds of nukes does the UK have? Might not be quite so easy.

    91. Re:Borders by bashibazouk · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      192 total warheads.

      48 are ready to be launched at any one time (sub based).

    92. Re:Borders by andyf · · Score: 1

      That's the Northwest Angle, but that's not what that guy's talking about. The Angle is quite large really, though it's mostly forest. It's not like the survey errors they're talking about here -- those are on the order of maybe a couple hundred yards/meters. The Angle is like 10 by 15 miles. (I work for the phone company who provides service up there, even to the little islands in the lake. Oh, and some of those little islands even have DSL).

      Andy

      --

      Photos of bits of the past hiding in the present: afiler.com
    93. Re:Borders by pod · · Score: 1
      I think the English (From England) by definition speak English better then the Canadians.

      But they can't spell as well...

      <duck>

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    94. Re:Borders by TomV · · Score: 1
      Old Peculier chilled

      That is barbaric

      Right. Lads, we've given them 225 years of the benefit of the doubt, but this must stop. And it must stop now!

      It's 01:30GMT. I reckon if we let slip the cavalry now we can have the US back in British hands in time for tea.

      Hey, it's the moral imperative. How else can we react?

      TomV

    95. Re:Borders by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Try exporting something for once he says as Canada continues to have year after year of staggering trade surpluses....

    96. Re:Borders by lommer · · Score: 1

      They got the Capitol Building alright...

      Not only that, the first family evacuated the white house in the middle of a dinner. So once the Brits marched in, a few officers finished it off before they set fire to the White House.

      BTW, I live in B.C. :-)

    97. Re:Borders by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      At least get it right.

      "My parents moved here from Canada, and they think I'm slow, eh?"

    98. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no such thing as an LA County accent and you know. There's a billion accents in this friggin county. Especially since the county is made up of hundreds of other accents. Then there are mixtures.

    99. Re:Borders by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 1

      Actually, people from Wisconsin speak the most pure form of English, because everbody on TV sounds like US! ( As a rural wisconsinite, I have always wondered why that is.)

      --
      Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
    100. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALL your bud? Sure, beesters are nice bud, but go for some variety, man! Just got some really tasty Vermont outdoor myself.

    101. Re:Borders by vinnythenose · · Score: 2

      Actually Canadians speak (on average) the most "neutral" english. It's the most easily deciphered by other english speakers (regardless of dialect).

      As a result we're somewhat in demand for radio and announcing and such in other nations. I don't know how much in demand, but as I understand there is one. Especially for some internation outfits.

      Whether we speak "pure" english, well, that's a debate that could last forever. Consider languages change constantly over time, no one can truly speak a "pure" english.

      --
      --- I used to moderate, then I read the -1 articles and decided having to filter through them was not worth it.
    102. Re:Borders by vinnythenose · · Score: 1

      as I understand the Americans started it and burnt down our parliament first... but my history is rusty.

      --
      --- I used to moderate, then I read the -1 articles and decided having to filter through them was not worth it.
    103. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry, but it's a true known fact, that Alaska was purchased from Russia for two cents an acre.

      It's listed in several history books at least...

    104. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you, dude. "Hideous" doesn't even begin to cover it.

    105. Re:Borders by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Hi, I'm an American.

      In the War of 1812, the USA managed a classic example of sophmoric diplomacy. France and England were having a trade dispute, we refused to take sides, and we wound up going to war with England over it.

      The English army, not fighting the french at the time, was able to put its skilled troops to bear on the USA. The result was a rather humbling war, that included the burning of the White House. The elementary school tales focus on how the First Lady (I don't remember her name) saved as many artifacts from the fire as she could; most of these, IIRC, are now either in the Smithsonian or back in the (rebuilt) White House (which, according to legend, was painted white only after being rebuilt; prior to this, it was simply the "Exectuive Mansion.")

      The War of 1812 finally ended when the Federal Government and England were able to come to terms over their trade dispute. Due to the abyssmal packet transmission time of sailing ships, the greatest American victory of the war took place after the war was actually ended.

      As for other "Wars that we didn't win," Congress has been rather lax in actually declaring war. To the best of my knowledge, the USA has had the following "real wars."

      American Revolution: Won
      War of 1812: Lost
      Civil War: Won
      Spanish-American War: Won
      "The War with Mexico": Won
      World War I: Won
      World War II: Also, won.
      Korean War: Stalemate
      Vietnam War: Lost
      Gulf War: Won
      Conquest of Afghanistan: Won

      Pretty good record, if you ask me.

      AFAIK, the Vietnam war wasn't actually declared by Congress, but Congress gave their tacit approval by granting the President "War-making powers." In a simliar vein, the war in Afghanistan, being part of the Congressional Decree telling the president to "take the necessary steps", counts as a declared war.

      Ambiguous, ongoing crusades (War on Drugs, War on Terror) minor military escapades (Invasion of Panama, "Antiterrorism", Somalia, Yugoslavia, Iraqi No-Fly Zone), and extended periods of conflict (Cold War & Manifest Destiny) are hardly what we would consider "Wars." I guess the best way to judge what is and is not a war would be the involvement of the public, and not simply military action.

      Of course, we're the single strongest country in the world, and the last time American Soil (one of the 50 states) was attacked and *not* followed up by a successful war was the War of 1812, which was largely our own dumb fault.

    106. Re:Borders by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > as I understand the Americans started it

      Not really. The Royal Navy went about boarding American on the high seas ships and dragging off alleged British deserters kicking and screaming. I don't blame the US for considering it an act of war. BTW, I live in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    107. Re:Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      42? Sounds too little to me.

      Sweden has a well documented near 1000 dialects. Most rural Swedes can spot villagers from as little as 20-40 km from their home village. I assume England should have the same geographic resolution. Therewith giving you som 200-400 identifiable dialects, considering England is smaller.

    108. Re:Borders by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

      I don't care who wins this argument so long as we ozies can keep our title of speaking the worst English, where proud of that

      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    109. Re:Borders by Medevo · · Score: 1

      Yes, and i didnt deny this. Canada was more concerned about the coastal areas beside BC, even thought if britin had supported canada we would have got part of alaska.

      Medevo

    110. Re:Borders by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

      Actually, you can't really say you "won" the civil war, because if the confederates "won" then you would also be able to say you "won" the civil war, since the US would be run by the confederates.

      Vietnam was always a "military action" officially by the states, only the rest of the world acknowledged it for what it really was, a war.

      I wouldn't consider the Gulf War really won, more of a delay actually. If it was won, there wouldn't still be problems with Saddam, IMHO.

      WWI and WWII were won by most of the western world, and the states entered both wars incredibly late (especially WWI). In a weird twist, WWII sorta evolved into the Cold War though with Russia and the States, so I could see an argument form that it wasn't won until just recently.

      Also, the American Revolution has the same effect as the Civil war. If the British won, then what is now the states could still say they won because they would be British loyalists. As well, the States would've likely have eventually seperated smoothly like Canada did.

      Personally, I consider the Korean War a loss for the States by just the fact that they didn't accomplish the objective they wanted, while north Korea was able to maintain it's communist regime.

      I have studied Modern World History with a mildly Eurocentric perspective (1800-now, Mainly in Europe) so I may be inaccurate on some of the finer details of the american wars, but from what I can see, the Americans have a less successful record in the end, but then again, the Americans have also fought more wars then the Canadians.

      Canadian Record

      1812 - On the winning side
      Boer War - On the winning side
      WWI - On the winning side
      WWII - On the winning side
      1945 - onwards, all UN actions, not wars. Canada tries to avoid fighting in outright wars. But, hey, we got great peacekeepers. :-)

      I will admit though that the states has a very powerful military establishment right now, and that is both good in the fact that it can protect the country and bad in the fact that in history large armies led to general unrest and instability when times got bad since they still had to be fed and paid. So, it's a good and a bad thing to have a good establishment. :-) I have an interesting journal entry on Defence Budgets if you look at my journal, you may like it.

      --
      ~ kjrose
  2. Whew by Tri0de · · Score: 2, Funny

    Glad to find out I *DON'T* live in San Francisco after all, couldn't take another one of those summers

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
  3. orbit 12,500 miles?? by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 0

    That seems a bit high.. Do the GPS satellites really orbit that high?

    1. Re:orbit 12,500 miles?? by topham · · Score: 2

      From Garmin's website "The 24 satellites that make up the GPS space segment are orbiting the earth about 12,000 miles above us. They are constantly moving, making two complete orbits in less than 24 hours. These satellites are travelling at speeds of roughly 7,000 miles an hour. GPS satellites are powered by solar energy. They have backup batteries onboard to keep them running in the event of a solar eclipse, when there's no solar power. " About GPS

    2. Re:orbit 12,500 miles?? by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 0

      Good enough for me. Thanks!

    3. Re:orbit 12,500 miles?? by hubie · · Score: 2

      Yup.

    4. Re:orbit 12,500 miles?? by Kobal · · Score: 1

      That's not that high when you compare it to the commonly known geostationary orbit. The gps satellite array doesn't serve the same kind of purposes as those, anyway.

    5. Re:orbit 12,500 miles?? by Rhombus · · Score: 1
      Here's a little info.

      Geosynchronous (geostationary orbit):
      35,786 kilometers (or)
      19,323 nautical miles (or)
      22,241 statute miles

  4. Buckaroo Banzai by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wherever you go, there you are!

    --
    >
  5. great! by jeffy124 · · Score: 3, Funny

    maybe that can solve the India-Pakistan problem....

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  6. Little to late by mclaren_1010 · · Score: 0

    I think now, if countries, provinces, states, countys or towns were to start changing borders, it could lead to huge disputes. No one will be happy. Even though the technology is here, we nessecarly dont have to use it. It could ruin many things. We shouldn't just run out and start changing borders. Look at whats happening in the holy land and in isreal(same places?) all they do is dispute over land. do you think if a WESTERN world(mainly USA) were to go over there with satellites and GPS's that it would change everything? Nah...

    1. Re:Little to late by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

      The comparison is of no value. The dispute between the Palestinians and Israelis involves much much more than the location of borders. It involves the creation of a state and the relationship between that state and Israel. Your fears are misplaced.

      More accurate means of surveying are good. That we can be more accurate and do so w/less resources and effort is also good. As the population of the world increases I would imagine that the demand for such services will grow as well.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  7. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by topham · · Score: 2

    Your either trolling, or overly paranoid.

    I have a GPS receiver. Note, I said RECEIVER! It doesn't transmit anything.

    Kinda fun to use on commercial airliners too! (I have an interesting trace of a recent trip, its only partial but shows us flying in anything but a straight line. (We were avoiding some rough weather).

  8. Of course. by Fehson · · Score: 0

    Had they written the Constitution with Licensing 6.0 in mind, this probably wouldn't be an issue right now.

  9. Doesn't Matter... by Free+Heel+Skier · · Score: 2, Funny


    I'm always in the State of Confusion.

    1. Re:Doesn't Matter... by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      oh, you live in D.C.?

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    2. Re:Doesn't Matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't we all.

  10. Related problem by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 5, Informative

    I used to work in the Oil-n-Gas business (petroleum, not Taco Bell) and that industry is grappling with the same question about well spotting -- the exact surface location of a well. Historically, they are identified via footage calls from a known location (e.g. 354' N, 287' E of SW corner of such-n-such)
    While the state agencies would love to have nice, precise lat-lon coords, the property owners often refuse access to the survey crews because an accurate survey may show that the property line is incorrect, and Farmer Smith never really owned the well, it's on Farmer Johnson's land.
    The real financial impact can be huge.

    1. Re:Related problem by gilroy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:
      the property owners often refuse access to the survey crews
      It amazes me people can refuse access. Even if you believe in the virtual sancitity of private property you own, until the survey is done, you don't know you own it. Couldn't the state argue that, to know where your "denial" begins, they need to get on your land anyway?

      For that matter, say Farmer Johnson thinks the well is on his land. Can't he grant access for the survey team to walk the perimeter of his land, and then see where the well ends up?

    2. Re:Related problem by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      Most states have laws that if you are allowed to encroach on someone's land as if it were your own for X amount of years, it becomes yours.

      For example, I was recently buying a house that wasy too close to the back of the lot, but there was a fenced off 50 foot back yard even though the lot only went 15 feet off the back of the house. Since the landowner being encroached upon hasn't demanded they remove the fence, in several years, that land might become part of the other lot, and the original landowner will have no recourse.

      I'm sure these laws will get their test with this new development.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Related problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most states have laws that if you are allowed to encroach on someone's land as if it were your own for X amount of years, it becomes yours.

      For example, I was recently buying a house that wasy too close to the back of the lot, but there was a fenced off 50 foot back yard even though the lot only went 15 feet off the back of the house. Since the landowner being encroached upon hasn't demanded they remove the fence, in several years, that land might become part of the other lot, and the original landowner will have no recourse.

      In many such cases, however, paying taxes wins the argument. If the encroached-upon landowner can prove he's been paying taxes based on the fenced-off property, the other guy can't claim it for his own use.

    4. Re:Related problem by NotoriousDAN · · Score: 1

      I don't know how it is in the States, but in Canada there seems to be a legal bias in favour of whoever currently has possession of real property, in terms of expelling trespassers and the like. The police could probably get a warrant of some sort, however.

      Refer to the Criminal Code, 40-42.

    5. Re:Related problem by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Where I'm at gas wells are on a grid. Most of the time one company owns all of the mineral rights, but still any property that crosses that grid is given a percentage. Sometimes this can be a nightmare. One persons property might be on 5% of the grid another at 25% and so on. If one company doesn't own all of the mineral rights in a given area, it might not be worth going there no matter how much gas is there. That's why gas well companies are mostly lawyers to deal with this. They subcontract almost all of the real work. They are mainly deal makers. It is not unheard of for surveyors to be run off at gun point just because the map data is so bad.

    6. Re:Related problem by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Blockquoth right back atcha:
      It amazes me people can refuse access. Even if you believe in the virtual sancitity of private property you own, until the survey is done, you don't know you own it. Couldn't the state argue that, to know where your "denial" begins, they need to get on your land anyway?
      In some parts of the county (Mississippi, to be precise) the state survey crews have been greeted by shotgun-toting farmers (ranchers? I've not spent a lot of time in MS) when the survey crews come to call. When I say they are refusing access, I don't mean some lawyer in a suit, I mean a very simple, literal (and effective!) refusal. In a very rural setting like this, the survey crew isn't going to get a lot of support from the local sherrif, and the state law enforcement has better things to do.
      For that matter, say Farmer Johnson thinks the well is on his land. Can't he grant access for the survey team to walk the perimeter of his land, and then see where the well ends up?
      In many cases, this is exactly how the state (dept of revenue in some places, dept of environmental quality in others) is getting the job done. Doesn't always work though, there may be several wells along the property line, some on each side. It's an agrarian Prisoner's Dillema!
      What's always been funny to me is that the state agencies that care about well locations don't care at all about property lines. One of the most effective efforts involved establishing fixed points for differential GPS, then sending backpack-sized receivers in with the well maintenance crews. It's a nutty industry all around.
    7. Re:Related problem by queequeg1 · · Score: 1

      Except in 99.9999% of the adverse possession cases, the assessor will be basing the taxes on the legal description that is found on the deed, not on what amount of property the tax payer is actually occupying (including the adversely possessed property).

    8. Re:Related problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, Mississippi needs to get with the times and finally adopt "law".

      In places that aren't lawless, threatening to shoot someone with a shotgun will get you in trouble with the police.

    9. Re:Related problem by goodlogin · · Score: 0


      Im not sure about this because our family farm boundries have fluctuated with fair-use agreements ( the river bend changes and suddenly you are missing/gaining usable property ) over the years.
      How do taxes work with fair-usage ? How do surveys work with fair-usage ? How does GPS account for this ? etc etc

    10. Re:Related problem by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Most states have laws that if you are allowed to encroach on someone's land as if it were your own for X amount of years, it becomes yours.

      I have a small strip of lawn separated from the rest of my front yard by the driveway. My neighbor mows, waters, fertilizes it, and keeps it looking better than the part of the yard I maintain. Should I make him stop?

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    11. Re:Related problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should kill your neighbor.

    12. Re:Related problem by maeka · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let a surveyor (try to) clear this one up.

      Adverse possession is the term for the situation. It's entirely up to the decision of the courts, but a few things they take into account are:

      1. The encroachment must be open and known to both parties.
      2. Intent of the original deed does hold weight
      3. Platted land (i.e. lots) is almost never subject to adverse possession - boundaries were set forth in the original plat, (you'll see your deed most likely referring to lot #x of So-and-so's subdivision in Plat Book y)
      4. Who pays taxes has little if not nothing to do with deciding the argument. The auditor is not the recorder. Auditor's map boundaries ALWAYS close, even if they have to force it, they are not always precise to the recorded legal description of a parcel.
      5. The time period for adverse possession is usually 50 years.

    13. Re:Related problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      yes but old jim boy there is my bud from high school, and he married my cousen. If it comes down to him or you some city slicker that comes in here with all his fancy equipment. Ill help him shoot yee.

      If you dont think the good-ol-boy system doesnt exist your dreaming. IT DOES.

      Then he may just throw you in jail for a few days just because.

      There are places like this. In large cities these people are just different. But they exist there as well. They will follow the law to suit them...

    14. Re:Related problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the heck needs physical access to the land
      to locate things? You find the nearest county
      survey marker, and temporarily put a GPS base
      station on top of it with enough radio
      transmission power to reach the disputed area.
      You take differential GPS on public land (at
      least2 points, probably on the side of the road),
      near the disputed area. Then you use laser range
      finders to locate the disputed point. All you
      need is visual access.

    15. Re:Related problem by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In a very rural setting like this, the survey crew isn't going to get a lot of support from the local sherrif, and the state law enforcement has better things to do.

      The state law enforcement has better things to do than arrest someone for open threatening or assault with a firearm? Damn, but i'm staying the fuck OUT of that state.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    16. Re:Related problem by pod · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't want to know what state YOU live in.

      The described situation is called trespass. If someone can't be on your land without your permission, or can be removed by you if you so wish, you can use necessary force to remove them. Out in the middle of nowhere this usually means waving around a rifle or a shutgun.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    17. Re:Related problem by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Unless it's been fenced off, it's harder to argue that I think.

      Usually encroachments are like someone building part of their driveway on your land, or fencing off part of your land, or having part of a building on your land.... Just having him maintain the strip of lawn probably isn't enough. Consult a lawyer in your state if you are concerned though, I can't give legal advice.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    18. Re:Related problem by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2

      I live in a state where you don't screw with perfectly legitimate state workers for the sheer purpose of being an asshole, nor do you greet someone at the door with a shotgun (so sayeth the parent post) without having gone though more peaceful methods

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    19. Re:Related problem by pod · · Score: 1

      Well, not that I approve of the extreme measures to keep government workers off your land. However, you say they haven't gone through more peaceful methods, but I bet that's not the first time some surveyor tried to get in with their equipment. The farmers can argue and wave their arms all day long, or settle the whole thing in less than a minute and get on with their day.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    20. Re:Related problem by xdroop · · Score: 2
      The state law enforcement has better things to do than arrest someone for open threatening or assault with a firearm?

      Suddenly those Canadian jokes at the top look a lot less funny, don't they.

      Unless you are (like I am) Canadian, in which case they become fucking hilarious!

      --
      you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
    21. Re:Related problem by foobar104 · · Score: 2
      I know this isn't quite as hip as quoting The Simpsons, but I for one would like to hear what the Coen brothers have to say on the subject.
      Bang! A rifle shot kicks up dust in front of the men.

      CHILD'S VOICE
      Hold it rah chair!

      The front of the farm house shows only a harshly shaded front porch and a dark screen door.

      The screen door swings open and a child emerges on to the porch and steps down into the sunlight, holding a gun almost bigger than he is. The grimy-faced boy, about eight years old, wears tattered overalls.

      You men from the bank?

      PETE
      You Wash's boy?

      CHILD
      Yassir! And Daddy tolt me I'm to
      shoot whosoever from the bank!

      He pokes his rifle at the three men, who raise their hands.

      DELMAR
      Well, we ain't from no bank,
      young feller.

      CHILD
      Yassir! I'm also suppose to shoot
      folks servin' papers!

      DELMAR
      Well we ain't got no papers.

      CHILD
      Yassir! I nicked the census man!

      DELMAR
      There's a good boy.
      (Proper screenplay formatted foiled by the cotton-pickin' sos-n-sos who wrote the dang-burned lameness filter.)
  11. 3G phones by Jedi+Paramedic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe that Sprint's (and other manufacturers') new third-generation phones come out soon - many of them are bundled with GPS capability.

    It's touted as a convenience (calling assistance and saying "find me an ATM") and/or safety feature (Calling Cell 911 with "I've just been probed by aliens and have no idea where I am, come save me!"), but I wonder how soon marketing people (and Big Brother) will get a hold of the info... "Hm, this person spends 10 hours a week at supermarket A, let's SMS-page him with sale announcements for our client, supermarket B!"

    *shrug*

    --

    That's my purse! I don't know you! -- Bobby Hill
    1. Re:3G phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I believe that Sprint's (and other manufacturers') new third-generation phones come out soon - many of them are bundled with GPS capability.

      Sweet. So will I be able to call up my daughters mobile and get an accurate answer to "Where did you spend the night?"

    2. Re:3G phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Call forwarding. You'll accurately know where her phone spent the night....

  12. GPS accuracy by Kobal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We're currently having issues at work with that silly GPS, as it's nowhere nearly as reliable as we'd need when it comes to field use. You know where you stand, but you can't quite know where most of the limits are supposed to be, thanks to the napoleonic era cadastre that is still used. So, while getting the data to map again, the surface we get for a given plot can be wildly different from what was previous declared, with no way to know which is right. So what good are precision tools when you still have to rely on your eyes and ancient maps?

    1. Re:GPS accuracy by topham · · Score: 2

      Complicate question, as the whole thing is based on statistical probablities. But, I can get a reading, right now, in the open that within a minute is probably accurate to less than 10 meters. Further samples will generally give back more accurate results.

      It is possible on some low-end units to get accuracy less than a meter, but requires external data and software to process. (I've tried, but the data I have access to won't get me that level of accuracy in my area).

    2. Re:GPS accuracy by RadioheadKid · · Score: 2

      Well for surveying, you can place one receiver at a known point, and then have it tell the other receiver it's error and then relative to the first point I think they can get down to centimeters IIRC.

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    3. Re:GPS accuracy by topham · · Score: 2

      Yes and no, your correct, except consumer grade equipment cannot get that accurate.

      Consumer grade equipment does not generally give out the necessary data to be merged with another unit necessary to correct for the error. Garmin units produce some of the necessary data when some undocumented functions are accessed though the serial port. But even then, my undertsanding is the Garmin units cannot generate the data at the resolution required for less than about half a meter accuracy.

      (Garmin produces units which can do better, but I would not classify them as consumer grade, they are much more expensive).

    4. Re:GPS accuracy by RadioheadKid · · Score: 1

      " Yes and no, your correct, except consumer grade equipment cannot get that accurate."

      Well I thought that was implied when I was talking about surveying, but yeah obviously, the $300 receiver is not going to do this.

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    5. Re:GPS accuracy by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Yes, you are very correct. Anyone that has looked at an old plot of land that is in metes and bounds can see this. They all go off a given landmark, but they are not 100% exact.

      There is now software that can help plot your land on a map from metes and bounds, but it is too bad they still use this ancient system when GPS is available.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    6. Re:GPS accuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article said down to one inch.

      ac

    7. Re:GPS accuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have used a back pack mounted 4 inch antenna setup to measure points to the 1/100th of a foot. For our Canadian friends, that's just a wee bit over a 3mm size. The equipment would have done more, but 1/100th was 'code' in my municipality, and to go further would require spending more than 48 seconds at each point.

    8. Re:GPS accuracy by gleam_mn · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I used to work for a photogrammetery outfit doing orthophotos... I can tell you for sure that the most accurate "local" solution doesn't mean shit if your ground control points (the known world coords that you use to tie your local solution to the real world coords) aren't accurate. If your local solution is accurate to +/- .1' but your control points (usually based off of surveyed points, and the damn surveyors seem to be drunk about half the time if they're measurements are any indication) are off by 5 tens, or the surveyor can't write down the coords correctly off the GPS unit... then your overall solution accuracy is off... basically it's a case of "the chain is only as strong as the weakest link".

      Until the USGS and crew get a better system that leaves less room for human error I'd meet the tax assessor that wants to change your property line at the gate and tell him to take a hike.

      --
      - The auditors said to secure the server... hand me that duct-tape -
    9. Re:GPS accuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government doesn't let us civilian types get our hands on something that accurate - WE MIGHT BE TERRORISTS, REMEMBER!

    10. Re:GPS accuracy by maeka · · Score: 1

      The reason we still use the system is because there is no better way.

      Lets start with an assumption for the sake of making the argument.
      Let's assume you have a machine that gives you perfect ground coordinates (not grid - the earth is not flat).

      It would be very difficult if not impossible to take all the old metes and bounds surveys and find the property corners as described, not to mention the harder part - being able to fit all the neighboring properties together without gaps.

      And when I say if not impossible, I'm not trying to exaggerate. The computing horsepower it would take to run even a simple least squares adjustment of all those property boundaries would be a monumental undertaking.

      Then you need to consider that the old deeds were measured with chain, rod, or tape. Good ways of measuring grid distances, but does not take into account the curve of the earth.

      How do you describe the curvature of the earth (you need to do that to tie all those distances to something real)? All the states have localized plane coordinate systems, but they don't use the same ones - with good reason I might add, a unified projection over the whole of the United States would throw error all sorts of places.

      And this all works off the first assumption - that there is a magic box that can spit out perfect coordinates, grid or ground. There is no such box. Look at the other story up today about the earth changing shape. Any good conversion from ground to grid coordinates needs to take into account the (non spherical) shape of the earth, and the little bugger is moving on us, some places more than others. It's hard enough to measure the shape, much less develop a model to describe those observations, much less create a formula or formulas to convey that model.

      I'm rambled long enough, thanks for listening.

    11. Re:GPS accuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gads, shut up already.

      This has nothing to do with terrorists, there has always been civilian and military GPS differences use some intelligence when spouting off like this.

    12. Re:GPS accuracy by superyooser · · Score: 1
      Au contraire.

      According to Bob Long, the engineer technician for Civil Mining Environmental Engineering Inc. in Somerset, PA who helped to rescue the nine trapped coal miners in Quecreek, PA, "It's accurate within less than a centimeter."

      He used military-grade GPS, but this is apparently available also for civilian use.

    13. Re:GPS accuracy by roybadami · · Score: 1

      How do you describe the curvature of the earth (you need to do that to tie all those distances to something real)? All the states have localized plane coordinate systems, but they don't use the same ones

      And this all works off the first assumption - that there is a magic box that can spit out perfect coordinates, grid or ground. There is no such box.

      You may be surprised just how well developed the mathematical basis of cartography has been for a some considerable time.

      There are such boxes (GPS), there are coordinate systems (geodetic coordinates) referenced to the earch (geodetic datums), and ways of taking account of the curvature of the earch (map projections). It is perfectly possible to precicely convert a position in one projection and map datum to coordinates in another.

      See: Coordinate Systems Overview Geodetic Datum Overview
      Map Projection Overview
      Global Positioning System Overview

      I have no connection with the above, other than that I found them useful and informative sources of information. The author requests that anyone citing or linking to his work credit him, so here goes: The material linked to above is due to Peter H. Dana, The Geographer's Craft Project, Department of Geography, The University of Colorado at Boulder

  13. use common sense... by bje2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i can see where this could matter to states or municipalities in terms of tax revenues, etc...but when it comes to interfering with people's lives, common sense should be used...for intance, if a kid has been going to a school in one district for a while, then they find out that the family actually lives somewhere different (becuase of a redrawn line), let the kid stay in his old school...make it some sort of grandfather clause...the other things, such as taxes, etc, that's fine...they don't directly effect your day-to-day life...and if the two disputing parties want to sort out who collects taxes and what not from you, that's fine me...of course, i can already see the problem arising where a student goes to school in township A, but his family pays taxes that support schools in township B...i didn't say it was is perfect, but every effort should be made to not interfere with people's daily lives becuase of some poorly drawn boundry line many, many years ago...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:use common sense... by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Informative

      such as taxes, etc, that's fine...they don't directly effect your day-to-day life

      You must not have a job yet.

      There is also a lot more than taxes or schools involved that directly impact peoples daily lives. State laws can vary greatly. I'm in the middle of my state. But what if I lived near some other state and suddenly things I own are illegal (I've got a rifle that would fit this easily in some places)

      This is a pretty big deal and I think what will have to utlimately happen is people will need to move if they really don't want to live where they really live.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:use common sense... by Zapman · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem with this is that both RI and Conn. are planning on sending taxes to these residences, and BOTH expect to collect. If they don't they will take these people to court in either RI or Conn, where they will be guilty.

      What do you do in that case? It certainly will impact you, especially if one state is a tourism state (collects lots of revenue from sales tax) and the other is a property tax state.

      --Jason

      --
      Zapman
    3. Re:use common sense... by emoeric · · Score: 1
      if a kid has been going to a school in one district for a while, then they find out that the family actually lives somewhere different (becuase of a redrawn line), let the kid stay in his old school

      dude, mighty ducks?

      --

      |---------------|
      practically an AC
    4. Re:use common sense... by Dynedain · · Score: 5, Informative

      But where does that funding come from to pay for the kid's schooling? Property taxes. No state is going to want to take a decrease in their property taxes without the associated decrease in students. So a change in tax structure will affect everyday lives. The money to pay for that kid's education doesn't just appear out of loopholes, and it would cost more to transfer the money between states than it does to send that kid to school.

      And what happens when the parents have another kid? Does he/she go to the same school or to one in their "new" state? How long does it get grandfathered? One generation? One continuous family line? Does it stick with the property? If so, then give the property to the state where the people are using the tax money.

      And there's more than just taxes to fund schools...you also have roads, sewer, zoning issues, etc. etc. etc....

      Part of why the US isn't a true democracy is because the majority typically overules the minority. So, by correcting state lines, some 50 people out of a combined population of a couple million are affected....an extremely small minority that probably won't notice much of a difference anyways.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    5. Re:use common sense... by hyperizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      the other things, such as taxes, etc, that's fine...they don't directly effect your day-to-day life...

      What about the elderly lady whose amublance service (that she presumably pays for with her taxes) would be switched to a town much farther away? It's a situation that shows how important these borders (and your taxes) can be...

      And what about voting districts? What if you're suddenly unable to vote for the school board for your child's district?

      In the Southwest, water rights are a big issue. I wonder if GPS has been making any changes to who gets to water their crops.

    6. Re:use common sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Present both bills to the judge. Then set up an account to store some bux so when it is straightened out years later you can pay the tax. Collect interest on the money while saving.

      Too easy and logical, huh? Thought so...

      ac

    7. Re:use common sense... by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Nice reference. Let the Mighty Ducks all teach us a very important lesson!

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    8. Re:use common sense... by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Part of why the US isn't a true democracy is because the majority typically overules the minority.

      No, that's democratic--majority rule.

      We're not a TRUE democracy because the minority is protected from the tyranny of the majority. It's better this way.

    9. Re:use common sense... by OutsideBoston · · Score: 1

      "...especially if one state is a tourism state (collects lots of revenue from sales tax) and the other is a property tax state."

      What some of you may not know is that North Stonington also shares a border with Ledyard, CT. Ledyard is where Foxwoods Resort and Casino, the largest resort/casino in this hemisphere, lives. I'd certainly say this makes CT a tourism state...

      ~N

    10. Re:use common sense... by kc0dxw · · Score: 1
      Part of why the US isn't a true democracy is because the majority typically overules the minority.

      That statement is the definition of Democracy -- the majority rules.

      --
      Matt Meola AFOD
      Westminster, CO
      "Gun control means using two hands."
    11. Re:use common sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That statement is the definition of Democracy -- the majority rules.

      In my experience, the majority sucks.

    12. Re:use common sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, CT is a property tax state.

    13. Re:use common sense... by Spamlent+Green · · Score: 1

      I think this is more common than one might suspect -- there are even areas in Europe where property spans national borders -- one example was someone's house being in both Belgium & the Netherlands. At any rate, I believe tax rates are generally pro-rated based on the square footage within the respective borders, so you're not really double-taxed.

      The real issue here is actually where your legal residence is, not just where all of your property is. This affects all the important stuff -- services, schools, voting, etc.. Consider the examples from the article -- one woman lives a mile from her 'old' town center -- the new town and its services (police, ambulance, etc..) are now much further away.

    14. Re:use common sense... by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      And hopefully countries will do the same thing. They will make the laws in such a way that living in a country is like choosing a certain OS over another. This (should) promote laws to be more lawful, or beneficial so people *want* to live there.

    15. Re:use common sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why it's better that we're NOT truly a democracy.

    16. Re:use common sense... by jdunlevy · · Score: 1

      If both states are claiming the right to tax the same property, it would have to be settled in the Supreme Court, which has jurisdiction to decide in cases of Controversies between two or more States.*quot; (Article III, sec 2 of the U.S. Constitution)

    17. Re:use common sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because God only knows how much property tax the Foxwoods Casino pays.

    18. Re:use common sense... by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      You think a state is going to let THEIR money (which is how they see tax dollars. It's THEIR money, they just haven't been able to pry your sticky fingers off it yet.) in YOUR bank account? You honestly don't think you would end up being forced to pay both and then fight for your money back (with no interest of course, because why should they give YOU interest on THEIR money?)

      We are talking about state governments with dollar signs in their eyes here.

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    19. Re:use common sense... by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      Actually, in a true democracy everyone must agree in order for an action to be taken, not just the majority.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    20. Re:use common sense... by Sharkyfour · · Score: 1

      Foxwoods is also on an Indian Reservation. They pay no taxes. They "donate" a little bit of money to the state, but it's nothing compared to what they would pay in taxes if they had to. And believe me, the casinos don't bring in that much tourisim. It might be different if there were actually airports or even interstate highways that got near them, but there isn't, so...

    21. Re:use common sense... by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      If both states are claiming the right to tax the same property, it would have to be settled in the Supreme Court

      Fortunately for the homeowner, finding a lawyer to fight all the way up to the Supreme Court will be very cheap. If he's lucky, he'll only have to give his house to a lawyer to pay for it all.

    22. Re:use common sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention... What would you put on your passport? And who's driver's license do you get?

    23. Re:use common sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The homeowner shouldn't have to pay to bring their case to the supreme court, if they're being charged criminally they have the right to an attorney assigned to them. I think the case would be pretty damned easy to make: I was already taxed for RI, so you can't tax me. The court can't ignore the fact that two states are claiming tax rights on one person, so it seems impossible that they would actually be convicted. It's got to be one or the other.

    24. Re:use common sense... by smithmc · · Score: 1
      What do you do in that case? It certainly will impact you, especially if one state is a tourism state (collects lots of revenue from sales tax) and the other is a property tax state.

      Or you could live in both a property tax and a sales tax state (New York grumble mumble...) and not have to worry about it.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    25. Re:use common sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Part of why the US isn't a true democracy is because the majority typically overules the minority.

      Think about what you just said. The US isn't a true democracy precisely because we have a constitution which prevents tyranny by the majority (though not as effectively as it should, perhaps). A true democracy is ruled by the mob (in at least one sense of that word).

      Let's assume that you were very tired, and didn't proofread...

    26. Re:use common sense... by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

      If I remember right years ago California had this problem. You see some of the markers were placed on top of mountians, that are moving!! Actually of California is moivng either mainly north or south compared to some other mark...

      Well alot of property lines in central valley are MILES for were the belong. IE our house is on your nieghbor's nieghbor's nieghbor's land.

      These guys are not worring what state they live in, but do we move the house on to the property?

    27. Re:use common sense... by roybadami · · Score: 1

      Consider the examples from the article -- one woman lives a mile from her 'old' town center -- the new town and its services (police, ambulance, etc..) are now much further away.


      I didn't understand this part of the article. Why is she saying she'd have to move as the local town would now be fifteen miles away?

      Surely she could just do day-to-day stuff (like shopping, etc) in the same town she's always visited.

      Administrative stuff that requires dealing with county/state authorities could surely be done by post and/or phone.

      I don't see quite why this will effect her anywhere near as much as she says it will...

    28. Re:use common sense... by jdunlevy · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but I'd think that -- before very long -- one of the two states would take the other to Court. I'm not sure the individual homeowner would be more than a witness...

    29. Re:use common sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      WTF are you babbling about?

      Since when do ducks have GPS receivers?

  14. What if they figure out the Canada-US border by shadowofdarkness · · Score: 1

    That may piss people off if they have to change countries.

    At least I am far enough away from any border that it will not affect me.

    1. Re:What if they figure out the Canada-US border by bje2 · · Score: 2

      there was an episode of West Wing where that happened...Donna (Josh's secretary) found out that where she had grown up in Minnesota was now considered Canada because of a border change....it ended up she was grandfathered in as an American citizen, and had to take some stupid american history or something test to make it offiicial...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    2. Re:What if they figure out the Canada-US border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, West Wing is just a show. You know, make believe and all that?

    3. Re:What if they figure out the Canada-US border by Kwikymart · · Score: 2

      It is not news that the Can-US border is inaccurate. That has been known for decades upon decades. Though the border was most likely stated where it was in a treaty or something similar (I dont feel like doing research), it not matching up to the actual physical location means nothing. When they establish the border it is set in stone and it doesn't matter where it actually ends up.

      I understand that this is a joke, but people changing countries is just not going to happen :)

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    4. Re:What if they figure out the Canada-US border by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 1

      Considering the current exchange rate I'd appreciate if our borders are kept the way they are for the next little while please. CDN$1.60 per US dollar, good thing most of my business is done in US funds.

      Once the dollar comes back up though I don't mind, just promise me we'll get an honest, intelligent man in power.

      -Matt

      --
      --- Need web hosting?
    5. Re:What if they figure out the Canada-US border by PD · · Score: 1

      You're on crack. West Wing is real. It's as real as Star Trek.

    6. Re:What if they figure out the Canada-US border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, NBC Nightly News is just a show. You know, make believe and all that.
      Grantedly, both West Wing and NBC Nightly News are both based partly on reality. But who believes anything they see on TV ^H^H /. , anyhow?!!

    7. Re:What if they figure out the Canada-US border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where she was born would be irrelevant if either of her parents were Americans at her birth.

    8. Re:What if they figure out the Canada-US border by foo12 · · Score: 1

      Stupid, stupid plot. It doesn't matter where the current border is; it matters where it was at the time of birth. For example, if you were born in the Canal Zone, you didn't become a Panamanian and non-American when the land was returned to Panama.

  15. No surprise by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Funny

    In writing the manual for some civil engineering software back in the 80s, I found that there are some very oddly laid-out survey markers out there, especially in the plains states. The client explained that most of these were laid in the mid-19th century, which was the peak period of American alcohol consumption.

    rj

  16. I live... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in a sea of shitty BAL and COBOL programs due next Wednesday.

    GPS will not help me deal with the crappy MVS system on the IBM 390 mainframe.

    Ahhhhh, dreaded COBOL fingers!

    So I read Slashdot, which I don't need no GPS to find.

  17. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he speaks the truth.

  18. Canada vs USA by mclaren_1010 · · Score: 0

    I live 45 minutes away from the US border and i'd hate to find out i was born in america. But hey, at least I got free health care for 18 years! w00t!

  19. well... by Auckerman · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I suspect in the cases sited, which used rivers to determine boundries, you will see the old common law agreements sticks. When you are measuring within a few feet to find a spot that moves (a few yards) with the seasons, on both sides of the border no less), you're new "accurate" measurement has little value and one is still stuck with simple common agreement.

    Would be an easy case to present, and keeping common agreed boundries is a no brainer. If one starts using fixed points on boundries, who's to say a narrow river that is used as a boundry will not just move entirely into another state or county...imagine the implications for water management...

    No rational person wants that.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
    1. Re:well... by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 5, Funny
      No rational person wants that.
      True; but we're talking about lawyers and politicians....
      --
      Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
    2. Re:well... by The_Guv'na · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it were my choice, I'd change all current records to the real coordinates of the previously accepted borders, therefore records are now accurate, nobody has to be bothered by changing schools, tax arrangements, addresses etc... If anyone complained I'd say "Well, if it really matters that much, you should have done your own damn survey, just in case!". Seems pretty sensible to me, but...

      No rational person wants that.

      ...it's not about what rational people want. It's about what lawyers and state governors want!

      Ali

    3. Re:well... by Frobnicator · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This is GOVERNMENT. It won't happen.

      Almost every time political boundaries need to be altered (for representatives), these people don't move the border around a few houses, they rewrite the entire map to best suit their own agenda. Legislative Redistricting causes this problem (known as Gerrymandering) in elections again and again and again ALL OVER THE USA.

      You are right about no rational people wanting it. There are many rational people who have offered ways to restructure boundaries that offer the biggest human benefit and lowest government cost. These ideal solutions segment the groups by physical boundaries and population density. But government is not a rational entity.

      There are countless smart was to divide it up. Clusters of people should rationally be served by the same set of government. People between clusters should be separated by distance to the clusters and other boundaries (hills, rivers, roads). In dense population areas, map the location of a current road, or a side of the road, as the boundary -- not the line between where two rivers meet and where another river enters a lake bed.

      And of course after two counties or states go to court fighting it out -- costing millions of taxpayer dollers -- They will put out big press releases saying either "We saved tax money by moving these buildings outside of our county!" or "We increased tax revenue without increasing taxes!", overlooking the fact that they wasted millions in the process.

      frob.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    4. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that is the case where I used to live in Omaha, NE. The Missouri changed course quickly one day and now there is a chunk of Iowa that sits on the East-Central part of town.

    5. Re:well... by gCGBD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Using rivers isn't always clear either.
      Take the case of New Hampshire vs. Maine
      Which, after centuries of dispute was only recently resolved by the Supreme Court.

      --

      O=='=++
    6. Re:well... by ckedge · · Score: 4, Insightful


      GPS Coordinates, I'd imagine that they don't account for continental drift, eh?

      One inch a year adds up over a century or two. So by default you can't use precise GPS coordinates, unless you account year by year for all the plate movement.

    7. Re:well... by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are some gotchas there. In the Southern California earthquake of 1971 (think that's the right year) much of the San Fernando Valley moved three feet. The legal costs of keeping property lines fixed to coordinates would have been atrocious (I'll swim in my end of the pool if I damn well please, pal...); as it was, they just let the property lines move with the land.

      rj

    8. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think an 80s comedian sneaked in with Marty.

    9. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't use common law because Louisiana is the only state based on French Civil Law rather than English Common Law.

      Don't know what Civil Law tradition has to say about this. Maybe the shortest guy with the funniest hat wins?

    10. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, yeah, over two centuries it adds up to a wopping 16.6 feet. Of course, a lot of these borders were based on landmarks and such, and many of those have drifted as well.

    11. Re:well... by lommer · · Score: 1

      Yes, 1"/year would add up over a few centuries.

      Fortunatly however, Continental drift is rarely more than a few millimeters/year. A geologist friend of mine was recently ecstatic because a colleague of his had shown that Australia was drifting at a rate of 4 whole mm/year towards North America! at that rate, it'll only be a few hundred millenia before those damn Aussi's are knocking on our front door!

    12. Re:well... by delphi125 · · Score: 2
      GPS doesn't: it is based on WGS84 (World Geodetic System 1984).

      Having said that, Europe for example has a different system, ETRS89, which is almost the same as WGS84, but takes in to account continental plate movement.

      More details at http://www.gps.gov.uk/additionalInfo/coordinateSys tems.asp

    13. Re:well... by lightcycler · · Score: 1

      GPS Coordinates, I'd imagine that they don't account for continental drift, eh?

      Apparently the Greenwich observatory is already a hundred metres west of the GPS' meridian, so here in the UK, GPS is incorrect by definition.

      Absolute coordinates are of little use when the ground is moving under them...

    14. Re:well... by roybadami · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that this is due to a change in datum. As other posters have pointed out, the ground moves by milimetres per year. There's no way that the Greenwich observatory has moved by hundreds of metres.

    15. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.satirewire.com/news/jan02/australia.sht ml

  20. Very Easy Solution by unsinged+int · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just make a 51st state that includes Everyone Living on the Thick Black Lines of the US Map. Think of all the interstate commerce with all the states they'd border! Oh, but wait, what about the people living on the border between the new Border State and the other states? Let's create another...ouch. **Brain implosion**

    1. Re:Very Easy Solution by Cutriss · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, but wait, what about the people living on the border between the new Border State and the other states? Let's create another...ouch. **Brain implosion**

      Wow...Infinitely recursive bureaucracy! Maybe this is how we can fix those nitwits in Congress!

      I mean, most of them have hairpieces, so they wouldn't fall prey to the old robot trap of "Lather-Rinse-Repeat"...

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    2. Re:Very Easy Solution by unsinged+int · · Score: 2

      Don't we already have that?

    3. Re:Very Easy Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the idea! Just imagine ... it would make the four-colour map problem a breeze - you could do it with two!

  21. I think... by LordYUK · · Score: 0, Troll

    A better question is do you know where Natalie Portman lives. :)

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
    1. Re:I think... by bobpence · · Score: 0

      Cambridge, Mass. She attends Harvard. And because Drudge made a big deal out of a (well-written and well-reasoned) letter she wrote to the Crimson, and the Crimson is online, I know her real name too.

    2. Re:I think... by ckd · · Score: 0
      because Drudge made a big deal out of a (well-written and well-reasoned) letter she wrote to the Crimson, and the Crimson is online, I know her real name too.

      The Crimson's changed their online copy of the letter. Of course, that doesn't exactly mean it's not easily findable.

  22. GPS accuracy by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

    How accurate is GPS for civilian use?
    20 meters? 10 meters? 1 meter?

  23. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just a question, from what input does the satalite generate the data to send to the GPS reciever? Or how does the satalite no where to send the data? Odds are, your Receiver is also transmitting something.

  24. Old Land by N8F8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought a piece of peopery in Surry County Virginia a few years ago. I had a hell of a time because the recorded deed goes back more than a hundred years and refers to chops in trees for markers and distances measured in chains.

    Most mortgage companies wouln't touch it without a recent survey. I finally found a farm credit company that would give me the mortgage. I've had the road frontage surveyed but I still have to survey the other 60+acres. Researching the sale was quite an education.

    I could go down to the city office and pull up three different aerial surveys of the area, but no land surveys. Reaally sad because the county taxes me on 40 acres and acording to the surveyer I used for the frontage, I probably have 80+ acres.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Old Land by nolife · · Score: 2

      My county has all their property records, real estate transactions, tax information, buyers, sellers, satellite photos, coordinates etc all available online.... On one hand it is very convenient to look at your property and values, on the other its scary to think that anyone in the world that is online can too.

      The Prince William County mapper is here. For an example you can search by "address" for 8091 COUNSELOR. I live off of Bristow Road, haha. The tax information is available via link after finding an address. You can do all kinds of strange searches like adjoining properties, school boundaries, road paths, recently sold houses etc...

      The site is normally slow so I doubt it can handle /. It is a cool thing to play with and browse around with though. I don't know how updated it is, my pool has been in for almost 2 years and it doesn't show up in the photos.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  25. Re:Children are starving in Africa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I see troll

  26. Reminds me of Four Corners.... by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last year, I went through Four Corners - for those of you not up on your US geography, Four Corners is the point at which Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah all meet, being the only place in the US where 4 states meet.

    I was struck by the arbitrariness of this location - it was nothing but a meeting of fictional lines on a map. There was no magical property of this location - c was still 3E8 m/sec (to 1 significant digit), 9.8 m/sec^2 acceleration, no majestic peaks, poles, or pyramids rising from the ground. Save for a decision made by a bunch of beaurcrats there was nothing special about this location.

    This article strikes me the same way. Due to a complete non-event (the changing of a line on a map), people's lives are going through upheaval.

    So we are able to more accurately define these imaginary lines. Why do we need to change the location of the border - why not just more accurately define existing practice. Look at a map of Kansas - the state USED to be a simple rectangle, until somebody decided to use the river to define the northeast corner. Now we have the silliness of "Kansas City, Mo!"

    It just seems so wasteful!

    1. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by gilroy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:
      there was nothing special about this location.
      What is special about Four Corners is exactly that there is nothing special. The mid-US states are amazing in the political undertone. Look, those borders were drawn by some guys with a pencil and straightedge. No natural fortification. No concern for defensible borders. No historical or trade mandates. What a wonderful thing to break free of that mindset! Those lines were drawn for administrative convenience only.
    2. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by whovian · · Score: 0

      You haven't needed to signal YOUR mothership at local midnight to beam you up, now have you?

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    3. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by Rhombus · · Score: 1
      no majestic peaks, poles, or pyramids rising from the ground

      They've got that stage thing right where all the lines intersect...when I was ten, I stood on it and was in four states at once.

    4. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If the name has an apostrophe, it is probably from Star Trek.

      Or The Wheel of Time

      Yes, I know... Offtopic.

    5. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't notice the giagantic underground alien hive base while you were there?!

      That's one of the area's 51 biggest attractions! I've still got my "I got anal probed and all I got was this louse teeshirt" coffee mug.

    6. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by n-baxley · · Score: 2

      To confuse matters, there is also Kansas City, KS right accross the river!

    7. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it might be Elven....

    8. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by budalite · · Score: 1

      Ah, well, hold on there, laddie. Ye had me on your side until ye went and mentioned the land of me birth in a poorly worded slur, likely with alcohol on yur breth.

      Actually, Kansas City, Mo, strictly speakin', was there first and was originally named "City of Kansas" (1853), for the local Kanza (kansa?) indians. See History of Kansas City . Well, actually, Independence and Westport, both now part of the KCMo metro area, were there even earlier. So, there.
      MadDad32

    9. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      What is special about Four Corners is exactly that there is nothing special. The mid-US states are amazing in the political undertone. Look, those borders were drawn by some guys with a pencil and straightedge. No natural fortification. No concern for defensible borders. No historical or trade mandates. What a wonderful thing to break free of that mindset! Those lines were drawn for administrative convenience only.

      That makes it seem even more depressing, some suit got to decide how things work. . . oh great. . .

      No logical reason for it to be like that, 'broke free' from the sensicle mind set,

      must be middle management.

    10. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by forkboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've never been to Four Corners, but I've been in 4 states at once....denial, disarray, confusion, and panic.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    11. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by TWR · · Score: 2
      Why is it more depressing for a "suit" to decide a border than it is for people to die over it? Go pencil pushers on this one...

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    12. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by Com2Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is it more depressing for a "suit" to decide a border than it is for people to die over it? Go pencil pushers on this one...
      -jon



      Not easily defendable for one thing, always nice to have logical reasons for placing a boarder someplace. That is actually the line that kind of ticked me off, boarders should be placed in logical locations, not just willy nilly.

    13. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      No, I use a more visible landmark, like Meteor Crator.

    14. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by smallstepforman · · Score: 2

      Well, if you live in Europe (specifically the Balkans), that imaginary administrative line is a cause of civil war. No way I'm going to allow that to govern me. These borders are stupid.

      --
      Revolution = Evolution
    15. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by alienmole · · Score: 1
      That is actually the line that kind of ticked me off, boarders should be placed in logical locations, not just willy nilly.

      Why? And what makes a border location "logical"?

      The willy-nilly borders are probably the more honest and clever ones - it's the ones that were fought over that are really silly. Take a look at Israel/Palestine for an example of the logic of borders...

    16. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Not easily defendable for one thing, always nice to have logical reasons for placing a boarder someplace.

      Defensible? You have news of an impending civil war or something? What would one of the central/western states defend against that they would need "defensible" borders?..

    17. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by cheebie · · Score: 1

      >Defensible? You have news of an impending civil war or something? What would one of the central/western
      >states defend against that they would need "defensible" borders?..

      If it's Colorado you're talking about, they'd defend themselves from the invasion of the Californians.

    18. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by foobar104 · · Score: 2
      That is actually the line that kind of ticked me off, boarders should be placed in logical locations, not just willy nilly.

      I agree! Just last month, we had three guests staying in our house. One day, two of them were in the guest bedroom and one slept on the couch in the den. The next day, two slept on the floor of the office and one stayed out all night. The next day, everything changed again!

      I agree that boarders should always be placed in logical locations!

      ;-)

    19. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by lightcycler · · Score: 1

      I was struck by the arbitrariness of this location ( the only place in the US where 4 states meet)

      As opposed to English/celt boundaries? All lay-lines, iron-age ditches, and river boundaries?

      Incidentally, was Tintagel castle built (Arthur of Briton's castle) on some really important spot where everything converged?

    20. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Last year, I went through Four Corners - for those of you not up on your US geography, Four Corners is the point at which Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah all meet, being the only place in the US where 4 states meet.

      Beaten by the place called Five Corners, which DOES have some sort of monument.

      It must be true, 'cos I saw it on the Simpsons ...

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  27. Re:Children are starving in Africa! by JayAndSilentBob · · Score: 1

    But are the children really in africa? Couldn't they be on the disputed border between africa and... uhhh..... never mind

    --


    Love,
    Jay and Silent Bob
  28. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    just a question, from what input does the satalite generate the data to send to the GPS reciever? Or how does the satalite no where to send the data? Odds are, your Receiver is also transmitting something.

    Nope. The satellites determine their positions from triangulating ground signals and one another's signals. Each satellite transmits its own position. The receiver determines its own position by triangulating the signals of as many satellites as possible. The GPS receiver is merely a receiver with enough brainpower to do some simple geometry.

  29. This Just In... by Rhombus · · Score: 1
    According to the new, GPS-assisted measurements of the states in the Union, it appears that the actual area of Rhode Island is zero.

    Apparently, the whole Rhode Island thing was just a hoax played on us by the Founding Fathers. Rhode Island doesn't exist, and never did, and any Rhode Islanders you think you may have met must have been just hallucinations.

    1. Re:This Just In... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Oh. I always thought Rhode Island was a city in Massachussetts.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    2. Re:This Just In... by wizzy403 · · Score: 2

      I always knew there was something odd about that side of my family...

  30. Tomorrow Never Dies, but sometimes it gets moved by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

    Anyone else see a possible parallel (on a much smaller scale) to the GPS hacking done in the Tomorrow Never Dies? Lets say you want someone else's property REALLY bad... go mess with a GPS satellite and change the boundary lines by a few meters in your favor! Suddenly, the greener grass on the other side of the fence is all yours!

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
  31. It would be an excellent PR thing by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    It would be an excellent PR thing for the people who draw these lines to simply redraw the line for extreme cases like this where they are cutting someone's house in half.

    It would also be nice to have some sort of prescedent to settle total B.S. border disputes where parts of people's domiciles get divided in land quarels. I'm sure this has happened before, and in my opinion, unless the people that built thier house KNEW they were building on someone else's land, they should simply have to redraw the lines, or in the first case, pay a monetary supplement.

    1. Re:It would be an excellent PR thing by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      wouldn't happen.....there are buildings built arround the country that straddle state lines. Meaning the owners must split their taxes proportionately between two states. A certain resort with the pool on the border of California and Nevada comes to mind

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  32. What, no grandfather clause? by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And if not, WHY not?

    how would this be any different than cities/counties/whatever annexing land like they do now?

    Borders change all the time - maybe not usually in a state border situation - but certainly often at lower government levels.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  33. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by EvanED · · Score: 1

    If you want to get technical, your watch transmits information. But practically speaking, it doesn't. Same with GPS.

    A GPS receiver has a clock in it. Every GPS satellite has a clock in it. (All of these are synchronized.) The satellites transmit the time they have continuously. The receiver gets that time, calculates the difference between it and its time, and calculates a distance based on that time. Do that for four satellites, and you have your position. (Note: you need more if your GPS receiver doesn't have an atomic clock)

  34. I liked how my old town used to do it. by MarvinMouse · · Score: 1

    They never used Latitude and longitude to judge where the limits were.

    It was always

    This road, that road and this road are the city limits. Simple and easy enough to judge.

    --
    ~ kjrose
  35. Out of State Tuition.....? by Ruthless_Advisorette · · Score: 1

    There has to be something to this......
    OSU instate - 3K Out of state - 18K IIRC

  36. Border crash by stevewz · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of that joke: "If a plan crashes directly on the border between the US and Canada, where do they bury the survivors?"

    1. Re:Border crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think you screwed that up. Why bury those that survived the crash? You would want to bury those that died in it.

    2. Re:Border crash by Rhombus · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      i think you screwed that up. Why bury those that survived the crash? You would want to bury those that died in it.

      I think you screwed that up. It's a classic trick question, like "Why can't a man living in Michigan be buried west of the Mississippi River?".

      Clever up, frood.

    3. Re:Border crash by Disco+Stu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Last time I saw that happen, I buried the survivors in my basement. They stopped screaming eventually.

    4. Re:Border crash by beebware · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, if they are Canadian* - anywhere you like as they won't be missed.
      (*=Substitute American here if you want)

    5. Re:Border crash by Rhombus · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      It's a trick question because you usually try not to bury survivors.

      Honestly, I think you're putting a little too much effort into this...either that, or too little...

  37. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    ummmmm hello. It's a GPS RECEIVER, not a TRANSMITTER.

  38. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by queequeg1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Than obviously you haven't had to work with a lot of surveyers. Without any intention of maligning that industry, I can say that surveyers are as prone to error as any other profession. In the course of checking legal descriptions for clients, I have run the descriptions through computer programs that plot them and have found some of the craziest plots imaginable. In one case I found a closure error of over 5 miles - the legal description described a big open-ended U. And while a mere meter or two might not be all that bad out in the middle of nowhere, much smaller distances (even a few inches) can become very important in downtown metropolitan areas.

  39. Established borders should stay in place. by n-baxley · · Score: 2

    If a border has been agreed upon for 160 years it should be left alone. The markers their basing the new lines on seem to be doubtful and sometimes movable! Wouldn't it be better to use the established borders? It sure would save a lot of headaches and "wasted" tax payer money that would be spent straightening this thing out.

  40. Border Issues in RI by Jugomugo · · Score: 1

    This is actually a really common thing around there. I used to live about 10 minutes from North Stonington in Voluntown CT. I remember hearing stories of kids going to two different schools depending on where the kids bedrooms were. Interesting to see a story so close to where I used to live.

    --
    "In a cat's eye, all things belong to cats."
  41. geography by Jonavin · · Score: 2

    What about plate shifts etc.. the relative distance between two points on Earth does change, even if it's only a little bit.

  42. Doesn't sound right... by [l0l]Bobo · · Score: 1
    Then, on a computer, the survey team plotted the markers on a detailed map and connected them with a straight line

    Am I the only one thinking that this doesn't sound right? On most maps, a straight line on the (spherical) ground does not equate to a straight line on a map. I'm not going to work through the numbers, but I wouldn't be surprised if it makes a few feet of difference on a line that's a few miles long..

    1. Re:Doesn't sound right... by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2

      Or, given that the source is MSNBC and they, like most journalists - print, web, and broadcast - must target audience with the collective average of a sixth grade education, it is possible that such details were ommited.

  43. Re:Children are starving in Africa! by Monkey+Angst · · Score: 1
    Jesus people, is this REALLY that big of an issue?

    Is it a big issue what state you live in? Uh, yeah, kinda. Who gets your tax money? How much tax money? If the border of Texas and New Mexico were redrawn, and I ended up on the New Mexico side (not likely, since I live in Austin :) ) I would suddenly have to start paying income tax. Will the world end? No. In fact, I would prefer it. But my neighbors (the ones with the tattoos of eagles and the gunracks on their trucks) probably wouldn't.

    --
    stripShow - Where WordPress meets webcomics
  44. For all you non-Rhode Islanders by RadioheadKid · · Score: 4, Funny

    First off, c'mon RI is so small anyways, just let them have a little more land. You know that little chunk that Massachusetts has along the top of CT, I think CT is still pissed off about that and taking it out on RI.

    The other amusing thing is this quote: "It bothers me giving up my low-number license plate with my initials on it." It's kind of a hobby, maybe even an obsession, of some people in RI to try and get a low number (or as they say in RI "low numba") license plate, for example if you had w-12, you would be all the envy in the state. License plates are typically two letters and three numbers in RI.

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    1. Re:For all you non-Rhode Islanders by jc42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      > You know that little chunk that Massachusetts has along the top of CT, I think CT is still pissed off about that ...

      Well, I always thought that was a tab so that Massachusetts wouldn't just slide out to sea.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    2. Re:For all you non-Rhode Islanders by Siva · · Score: 2

      don't we have that whole one letter and 3 number thing too, but without the '-' in between? seen a lot of those lately...

      i remember seeing the license plate '7' once when i was in HS. i believe that was the one that then-governer Sundlun "obtained" for his wife. i love this state...

      --

      Keyboard not found.
      Press F1 to continue.
    3. Re:For all you non-Rhode Islanders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I miss the daily Buddy news updates...

    4. Re:For all you non-Rhode Islanders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You know that little chunk that Massachusetts has along the top of CT, I think CT is still pissed off about that and taking it out on RI.

      I grew up in CT, and they really are still pissed about that. A while back I was visiting family and brought my bike so I could have something to do while they were at work, and that little tab of MA allowed me to have a leisurely bike ride through two states in one afternoon. The problem was, since I was using back roads, there's no "Welcome to" signs, so I only knew I had crossed the border when the license plates on the cars in driveways changed.

    5. Re:For all you non-Rhode Islanders by TheLer · · Score: 1

      It's so very true.

      "4409" is practically a family heirloom.

    6. Re:For all you non-Rhode Islanders by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

      First off, c'mon RI is so small anyways, just let them have a little more land.

      "It's not the size, it's how you use it."
      -- The new state motto of Rhode Island.

    7. Re:For all you non-Rhode Islanders by RadioheadKid · · Score: 2

      Along those same lines, the real state motto is Hope

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
  45. CT beating up on RI? by behrman · · Score: 1

    Rhode Island is already tiny! They can't afford to lose any ground. Maybe MA and CT are ganging up on RI to re-border them out of existance! :)

  46. Using GPS to locate what?! by mattster999 · · Score: 1

    What information are they using to figure the lines? Do the old documents showing lines have lat/lon to 6 decimal places or something? Maybe we're talking about even number boundaries, but it seems like locating the corner of a barn with GPS and measuring 30 feet (or so) off of it is still inaccurate.

  47. I live in Rhode Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I live one town over from Hopkinton (Richmond). Hopkinton is not a bad place to live if you like living in the sticks. Connecticut and Rhode are different in terms of taxation and public policies so I can see why they might be upset.
    Personnaly I wouldn't mind living in Connecticut since I work there and Connecticuts state goverment is far less corrupt than Rhode Islands.

    1. Re:I live in Rhode Island by Siva · · Score: 1

      hard to call it sticks though, when you compare it to some places in the midwest...

      --

      Keyboard not found.
      Press F1 to continue.
  48. Re:Children are starving in Africa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not entirely sure why're asking us Jesus People specifically, but yes, starving children are more of a problem. That doesn't mean the border shifting isn't pain in the tuchus for many, though.

    Love in Christ,
    David
    www.oldwestchurch.org

  49. internet... by skydude_20 · · Score: 1

    like i'd tell you where I live on slashdot...
    you'll just have to track me down by user #

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
  50. of GPS receivers and portability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the receiver, which typically is portable, calculates its distance from the various satellites and triangulates to determine its own location within an inch.

    Typically portable? What use could a non-portable GPS receiver be? ;)

    1. Re:of GPS receivers and portability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What use could a non-portable GPS receiver be?

      Um, we could use it as a stationary atomic clock with redundant feeds.

    2. Re:of GPS receivers and portability by Falcor · · Score: 1

      Fixed GPS receivers are used to set up differential GPS transmitters (they broadcast the variation due to local atmospheric / electromagnetic activity, making GPS more accurate... and were a way around the deviation caused by the military years ago...) Fixed GPS receivers are also used for very accurate time receivers, for measuring things like network latency accurately.

  51. Re:Children are starving in Africa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Children starving in africa?
    Is that REALLY such a big issue?
    I mean, black holes are eating entire solar systems!

  52. Re:Children are starving in Africa! by levl289 · · Score: 1

    Then the real issue here is whether or not the government will pay attention to these new findings - I'm betting no.

    --

    Q: What do you think about American Culture?
    A: I think it's a good idea.
    (adapted from Gandhi)

  53. Potential Benefit by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2

    This may be a stretch, but some people affected by this discovery may benefit from the confusion. If you are in this situation and were arrested/convicted by the state that you weren't really in at the time, it is possible--though IANAL & YMMV--to have your conviction overturned due to lack of jurisdiction.

    I'm just throwing that out there because a lot of people with DUI, indecent exposure, drug possession, etc... run-ins from their teen & college years will have an unfair disadvantage for the rest of their life because of the fanciful association potential employeers make between a police record and future job performance.

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    1. Re:Potential Benefit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it an unfair disadvantage if they were correctly convicted of a crime they committed?

    2. Re:Potential Benefit by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • I'm just throwing that out there because a lot of people with DUI, indecent exposure, drug possession, etc... run-ins from their teen & college years will have an unfair disadvantage for the rest of their life because of the fanciful association potential employeers make between a police record and future job performance.
      I don't know, seems rather relevant to me. . . . If you where getting wasted all throughout college fair odds are you were not learning (or at least retaining. :D ) as much as the next applicant who managed to stay at least a bit more sober. . . .

      Also, AFAIK, crimes (unless reaaaaly serious) from before a person is 18 get locked up once the person turns 18, slate wiped clean and all.
    3. Re:Potential Benefit by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2
      If you where [sic] getting wasted all throughout college fair odds are you were not learning (or at least retaining. :D ) as much as the next applicant who managed to stay at least a bit more sober. . . .

      Doesn't seem to keep anybody from becoming President, right? Ergo, it shouldn't matter in a job interview.

      --
      "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    4. Re:Potential Benefit by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Doesn't seem to keep anybody from becoming President, right? Ergo, it shouldn't matter in a job interview.


      Your daddy ever head of the CIA, you got relatives in high government positions? If not. . . .

  54. The earth is moving too by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Not only are borders inaccurate, but the earth moves too. For exampe the San Andreas shifts two inches a year- sometimes in violent jumps all at once. This adds up to 16 feet in a century.
    Boundaries based on waterways are prone to sfting also.

    GPS is used a research tool to observe earth shifts on a minute scale.

  55. Big deal by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2

    When my home state was still a territory, the river that separates it from one of its neighbour states changed course. That boundary dispute is still in the courts more than a century later.

    So those of you who think you've recently moved, don't rush out and buy new stationery just yet....

    1. Re:Big deal by handorf · · Score: 2

      Which state boundry are you talking about? I know Kentucky and Indiana have a bit of this going on, but I wasn't aware of any others.

      --
      -- IANAEG - I am not an elder god.
  56. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by /dev/trash · · Score: 1
    just a question, from what input does the satalite generate the data to send to the GPS reciever? Or how does the satalite no where to send the data? Odds are, your Receiver is also transmitting something.

    Well with that reasoning, my FM radio should be transmitting too.

  57. Boy, does this hit home by HonkinUnit · · Score: 1

    My next door neighbor just moved after 25 years. I'ved lived in the same house for almost 15 years, no problem. When the neighbor went to have a survey done, he was told that all of the property lines in the area are off by 90 freakin' feet. There is now some question as to whether I actually own the land under my house or not. Technology is not always a good thing.

    1. Re:Boy, does this hit home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll learn to check those things out next time before you buy a house won't you.

      i.e.

      I there a toxic waste dump undernieth my house that I'll be liable for after I buy?

      Do these people actually own this house that I'm buying it from?

      etc.

      etc.

      etc.

      What the hell I am going to be liable for after I sign?

      You've learned haven't you rookie.

  58. Transport Tycoon Town Name Generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a shame. I'm a mile from the Hopkinton town hall, the post office, the police, two miles from the ambulance," says Mrs. Crider. "If they put this house in Connecticut, I'll have to sell. I can't go 15 miles [to town]. I'm in a wheelchair.

    If you can't use a post office, police station or ambulance because you live in a different state, then you should really be worrying about who created a silly rule like that in the first place.

  59. RI Surveyors by electric_yak · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to work for a surveyor in RI, and this situation doesn't surprise me in the slightest. Surveying is really more than just right-angle trig, it also involves a careful assesment of existing markers, the path of previous surveyors, and "known-good" boundaries to measure from (ones whose choice will be accepted by a court). In a rural town like Hopkinton, there are no good comprehensive plans to reference-you have to search back in the title records (in some cases, back to the 1640s) when "legal deed" could be as vague as "my property is five rods by the Old North Road on the west, five rods by Farmer Joe's land to the North, seventeen-hundred cubits by the land of Cooper Ptarmigan III in the east, and finally five rods bordered on the south by the property of the Widow Fenimore, now deceased, to the Old North Road and the point and place of beginning."

    The rest of the properties in town are similarly well-described, which means you have to start your measurements further away from the actual property you are concerned with, in some cases, starting in New York would be a good idea:) The local governments tax property on the assessor's best guess of how much land you own, so there is no incentive for accurate public land data. Hell, the City of Providence can't even prove where it's own north border is-most of the markers are gone and the records are non-existant.

    Oh, and one final thing: until GPS receivers have 1/100" precision _and_ accuracy, don't expect measurements taken using one to stand up in court-adjudicated property dispute.

    1. Re:RI Surveyors by Alioth · · Score: 2

      "Oh, and one final thing: until GPS receivers have 1/100" precision _and_ accuracy, don't expect measurements taken using one to stand up in court-adjudicated property dispute."

      Or that the systems used to determine the location are the same. I'm wondering if this whole mess is started because the old records are not using the same lat/long system as the new ones. GPS generally uses the World Geodetic System 1984 as a datum for lat/lon coordinates - anything using any other datum could be as little as feet to as many as miles off what the WGS 84 says a location is.

  60. same in Oz over postcodes by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    Here in Sydney. People get into A big hooha when suburb boundaries are updated/corrected/change & they end up with a less exlusive postcode. Take the leafy Northshore suburb of Wahroonga, some claimed their properties were devalued $40,000 because of the change from the Wahroonga postcode to the Turramurra postcode.

    1. Re:same in Oz over postcodes by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      of the change from the Wahroonga postcode to the Turramurra

      Come on... You're making that up.

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
  61. what about map datums? by Phil+Karn · · Score: 1
    I wonder how much of the problem has to do with differing map datums? For those who don't know, there are actually dozens of reference grids for latitude and longitude, all slightly different. The "WGS-84" datum native to GPS is only one of them. Which datum the receiver displays is a setup option. Until the 1980s, most US maps used "NAD-27" (North American Datum 1927), and it differs by as much as a few hundred feet from WGS-84 (and the very similiar NAD-83) over much of the continental US. The differences are primarily in the east-west direction, which may be relevant to the border dispute between Connecticut and Rhode Island.

    Last summer, my wife and I visited the Old Greenwich Observatory near London, site of the 0 degree longitude line. Naturally, I took my GPS. I found that the true (WGS-84) line lies in the park several hundred feet east of the ceremonial line marked at the observatory. The true line is not marked in any way, nor do you need to pay admission to stand on it. Switching to older British map datums brought the discrepancy down, but still didn't eliminate it completely. In fact I got better matches between the older datums and their older reference lines at the observatory than I did for the "modern" datum and reference line.

    I really should post my photos to my website...

    1. Re:what about map datums? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about yo mamma? Yo mamma is what we be talkin' bout bitch!

  62. Kids in the hall... by FirstNoel · · Score: 1

    I always liked that quote.

    --
    "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
  63. Dumb problem... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Whatever happens, im sure that the tax each state gains or looses from this will soon be dwarfed by the ammound of money spend on meetings and dumb ideas(tm) that are cooked up to fix it.

    Wars have been fought over less...

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  64. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the hoi-poloi only have access to GPS RECIEVERS.
    I'm got a GPS TRANSMITTER right here on my bench!

    Know if I only knew where the hell I am.


    some rocket scientist, in a lab -- somewhere

  65. Re:Borders (Moderator's on crack!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the hell is this Offtopic?

  66. reminds me of my cambodian/laotian/thai friend by 2Bits · · Score: 2

    Yeah, human-drawn artificial border line is a big mess, and can have a very negative impact on people's life.

    I had a friend at college who could really tell his country of birth. It all depends on the season and the result of the guerilla war. He was born in a village in the Golden Triangle (the border of Cambodia, Laos and Thailand). He would be cambodian or laotian and thai citizen, depending on who controlled the area. And when the drug warlord controlled the area, he would be stateless (in a no-man's land, and had to pledge allegiance to whoever controlled the area).

    1. Re:reminds me of my cambodian/laotian/thai friend by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

      You don't need borders for that zanyness. German law defines citizenship by the mother, whereas the belgian one defines it by the father. So, a belgian woman I know had a first son from a german, then had a second from a french. Since France defines citizenship by the place of birth, both sons cannot have any citizenship at all! (They currently have UN passports).

    2. Re:reminds me of my cambodian/laotian/thai friend by qubit64 · · Score: 1

      Can I revoke my own citizenship and get a passport from the UN?

      --
      "Save me jebus!" - Homer Simpson (btw, I'm probably talkin out of me arse)
  67. Re:Tomorrow Never Dies, but sometimes it gets move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Working for a GPS technology company I would say that if you can hack a GPS satellite then you DESERVE your neighbors property as well as the respect and admiration of hackers everywhere.

  68. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
    "And while a mere meter or two might not be all that bad out in the middle of nowhere, much smaller distances (even a few inches) can become very important in downtown metropolitan areas."

    For certain ... supposedly land in downtown Tokyo costs more than US$250 per SQUARE METRE (!!)

  69. No need for GPS, just ask the IRS by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2

    They'd be able to track you down in the middle of Antarctica.

    RMN
    ~~~

  70. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2

    You had it right on up until the end. Four satellites are enough for any receiver regardless of clock type. You need three if you have a disciplined atomic clock available to the reciever.

    Also, if you have an atomic clock and can make an assupmtion about your altitude you only need 2. Early GPSs on Navy submarines used that trick, since subs always carry (multiple) atomic clocks and since they could only get a GPS track on the surface their altitude was always 0 MSL. They could surface or get to periscope depth and get a super-accurate position fix in just 3 or 4 seconds then dive again.

  71. Grandfather Clause... by Uttles · · Score: 2

    Is there a way you can just be exempt from the new borders and cite the original declaration of land ownership from when you bought the property?

    --

    ~ now you know
  72. Land ownership -- a ridiculous capitalistic myth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one can really own land. They only have the right (temporary) rights to occupy and exploit it.

    This whole situation just proves that people are deluded by magic spells written on pieces of paper. (The white paper and the green paper, too!)

  73. This happened in Maine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One day the state survey team came through to check the border between Maine and New Hampshire. As it happened, one of the houses they passed in Maine turned out to really be in New Hampshire. When they informed the owner, an old Mainer, he gave a sigh of relief and said "Thank goodness! I don't think I coulda took another Maine Winter!"

  74. More significant for country borders by kiwimate · · Score: 2

    I remember reading a newspaper article a few months ago about a town that straddles the US/CDN border. The article discussed specific people, such as a lady who lives on the US side but works on the CDN side (or the other way around), or neighbours who live across the street from each other and are in different countries.

    The article then discussed some of the ramifications of this, especially in light of September 11. Before that, people were fairly relaxed about "crossing the border". Now, however, they can't afford to take such things lightly.

    Moving more on topic, the article pointed to in the story mentioned a certain Iva Crider.

    Iva Crider, 78, has more serious concerns. She and her husband built a house near the border 60 years ago. She'd always considered her house -- and five chicken coops -- in Rhode Island. The North Stonington survey would bump her into Connecticut.

    "It's a shame. I'm a mile from the Hopkinton town hall, the post office, the police, two miles from the ambulance," says Mrs. Crider. "If they put this house in Connecticut, I'll have to sell. I can't go 15 miles [to town]. I'm in a wheelchair. After 160 years, I think they should just leave it alone."


    This is someone who is facing her whole life being turned upside down for the sake of what must seem to her like purely arbitrary definitions.

    Unfortunately, there's no simple question. Jurisdiction demands that these questions be defined precisely (especially in such a litigious society as America; what police officer is going to want to risk getting caught in a jurisdiction battle over disputed boundary lines when he is responding to a violent crime which may require him to draw his sidearm?). And simple politics demands that politicians protect their territory, valid or invalid, sensible or insensible.

    1. Re:More significant for country borders by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      I remember reading a newspaper article a few months ago about a town that straddles the US/CDN border. The article discussed specific people, such as a lady who lives on the US side but works on the CDN side (or the other way around), or neighbours who live across the street from each other and are in different countries.
      That's Rock-Island & Derby line, located on the US/Canada/Québec/Vermont border.

      The opera house (bottom of the page) is built accross the international boundary; an actor during a play will cross the border several times... And a nearby bar has the pool table smack on the border...

      A street runs astride the international boundary, and no one seems to object to the surveillance cameras that have been there for more than 20 years.

      To end such zanyness, both the US and canadian governments passed a law prohibiting building less than 6 feet from the border (but there are a few common customs houses, though).

  75. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2

    correction... that's more than US$250,000 per square metre. Yes, I was off by a factor of 10^3 before.

  76. Re:Tomorrow Never Dies, but sometimes it gets move by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying that it is feasible, only that it is (remotely) possible. You may not even need to do something that complicated to get your way, just bribe a surveyor or hack the individual GPS handheld.

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
  77. Can you imagine... by Xeriar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If this was not the U.S., but just a hodgepodge of 50 or so countries?

    And they go to war, not for land, not for mineral or 'natural' resources, but for fucking (pun intended) -people- and the taxes they represent.

    Why can I see this happening?
    Somewhere, on some planet or continent even more boneheaded than ours, this has, or will happen...

    1. Re:Can you imagine... by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 2
      If this was not the U.S., but just a hodgepodge of 50 or so countries?

      You know ... you're surprisingly close, the US is a Republic of 50 hodgepodge states, each with it's own government that looks out for its own best interest.

      Why can I see this happening? Somewhere, on some planet or continent even more boneheaded than ours, this has, or will happen...

      Or even worse ... what about those people that go to bed Americans, and wake up one day Canadian, eh? AARRRRRRGGGGHHHHH

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
    2. Re:Can you imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HEHEHE, even worse ... waking up French ...

  78. Big Brother Rant by throatmonster · · Score: 1

    ID technology is invading our lives very quickly. Hell, I already sold my children's anonymity to the government for a f'ing tax deduction. They've tied the birth certificate to SSN application. You can't claim child tax deductions without their SSN.

    There's been ankle bracelets for home arrest prisoners for a long time now. With GPS, expect a *lot* more of this: once you've been caught on the wrong side of the law, government claims the right to shackle you with a device that allows them to know where you are, all the time. It will revolutionize the prison industry.

    There's even people who VOLUNTARILY have their children fingerprinted for government files, "just in case" something happens. WTF? As if the government's knowledge of your wherabouts and identity isn't one of the most hazardous propositions there are!

    How long will it be before we (well, Americans anyway) replace (or worse add) chip implantment for/to circumcision?

    Trading your anonymity for 'security' is just plain stupid. Security is just an illusion - it does not exist. Any time you trade your freedom for security, you are selling your soul for vaporware.

    I'm actually surprized that the government hasn't already required car manufacturers to install GPS tracking chips in all new cars. Wouldn't that stop car thieves? And do all kinds of other wonderful 'stop the bad guys' things?

    Yeah sure, it would, BUT...

    Get a clue, people, it's all relative! There's a distinct possibility you will wake up and find yourself on the wrong side of some law. Enemies are interchangeable; the only thing that stays the same is that people get hurt, lives get ruined, wars get fought. Our freedom, our anonymity, *is* our security, idiots!

    And now we're already to the point that we've elevated technology to GOD status - trusting what some GPS receiver says more than our own common sense. For crying out loud, if you've spent 20 years living in a house in Rhode Island, paying taxes there, etc., can't anyone come to the conclusion that it's like common law marriage? This is a huge can of worms, and will throw the real estate industry into turmoil. And what will be the answer? Lawyers and more title insurance companies (that aren't liable for a damn thing, when you read the fine print)? Stupid, stupid, stupid.

    Ranting provides some stress relief, at least. Doubt it will do much more than that.

    --
    All pass beyond reach of medicine. None pass beyond the reach of love.
    1. Re:Big Brother Rant by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2
      There's even people who VOLUNTARILY have their children fingerprinted for government files, "just in case" something happens. WTF? As if the government's knowledge of your wherabouts and identity isn't one of the most hazardous propositions there are!

      I agree with most of what you said, but I think you have the details of the fingerprinting thing wrong. They fingerprint your kid, and then hand you the print cards in case your kid turns up missing. They don't keep a copy, you (as the parent) do, in case the unthinkable happens.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    2. Re:Big Brother Rant by throatmonster · · Score: 1

      and then hand you the print cards in case your kid turns up missing

      If you don't realize that they have more information about you and your kid after the procedure than before, you've got your head in the sand. At the very least, they know you have them. It's not hard for the police to get a search warrant. These days, they don't even need that. Just 'probabe cause'. It's just a matter of someone else (not you) deciding whether you or your kid is a 'good guy' or a 'bad guy'.

      Also, inferring that every single one of these types of programs works exactly that way (and none keep a copy) isn't completely accurate.

      Furthermore, you might want to extrapolate the scenario a little bit; instead of fingerprints on a piece of paper, it's a locator chip anklet or implant. That's what this thread is about. I don't care what anyone tells you, you are not going to be the only one with the information on how to locate that device.

      I'll stick to educating my kids, and skip the fingerprinting.

      --
      All pass beyond reach of medicine. None pass beyond the reach of love.
    3. Re:Big Brother Rant by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2
      I have no problem with you choosing not to have your kids fingerprinted - if I had kids, I wouldn't, either. All I wanted to point out was that all of the fingerprint programs I've heard about do not keep copies of the prints. It'd be just as easy to 'print your kids yourself, and squirrel them away.

      PS - I want some of that 'probabe cause' you mentioned! 8-)

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  79. Erm.... by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    "It's a shame. I'm a mile from the Hopkinton town hall, the post office, the police, two miles from the ambulance," says Mrs. Crider. "If they put this house in Connecticut, I'll have to sell. I can't go 15 miles [to town]. I'm in a wheelchair. After 160 years, I think they should just leave it alone."

    Why do you have to go to a different town just because they change your border? I'm pretty sure the post office will still accept your mail.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
    1. Re:Erm.... by Siva · · Score: 1

      Why do you have to go to a different town just because they change your border? I'm pretty sure the post office will still accept your mail.

      outgoing, yes; incoming (as in something you have to sign for but can't be available to receive and do not want left on your doorstep), no.

      --

      Keyboard not found.
      Press F1 to continue.
  80. 54-40 or fight? by Interrobang · · Score: 2

    Well, at one time you folks wanted it all, and at one time, you folks didn't want parts of MI or WI... Make up your minds!

    (Actually, I'm not so sure where this fabled "inaccuracy" would come in, since the Canada/US border follows the 49th parallel through most of the countries, and bisects the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway for most of the rest of it.)

    1. Re:54-40 or fight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy. Missmeasurement of the parallel in earlier times placing a town in a new country on modern re-examination.
      More precise measuring of the middle of the St. Lawrence placing one of the many properties, say, in the 1000 Islands area, might make someone's vacation home Canadian.

    2. Re:54-40 or fight? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
      Well, at one time you folks wanted it all, and at one time, you folks didn't want parts of MI or WI... Make up your minds!

      Well, I guess I'll take it, if nobody else wants it (except for the icy bits, unless they hold oil or gas). I'll pay you a US dollar and Canadian dollar so the contract will be nice and legal, even in that pesky internantional court thingy the UN wants to be settin' up. Please send me an address so my boy Col... -- uh, Secretary Powell -- can mail the contract to y'all.

      Sincerely,
      G.W. Bush

      P.S. Y'all have 30 days to vacate the premises.

      --
      That is all.
  81. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by karnal · · Score: 2

    I don't think my magellan for my palm v has an atomic clock.

    What I do think is that every satellite probably just transmits their time in a signal, and judging on when you get that signal, you can re-assemble where you are - I don't believe the unit even has to worry about time, other than "time between signals".

    --
    Karnal
  82. State Line by boowax · · Score: 1

    Hmm...there is still a law on the books in Texas that says oral sex is illegal....perhaps my girlfriend and I can claim that we're technically in Oklahoma!

    --

    You report, Slashdot decides
    Prevueing you're poast ownly hellps iff ewe no how two spel inn teh furst plase
  83. Fuzzy boundaries! by TekkonKinkreet · · Score: 2

    Never happen, but it's fun to think about. Throw a blur on those black lines on the map. "Well, you appear to live 70% in Israel and 30% in Palestine, please split your taxes, votes, political leanings, religious doctrines, prejudices, and so on accordingly."

    My take: people live where they think they live. For tens of thousands of years, people have defined places using prepositional phrases. Now we can use coordinates, great. But if the numbers conflict with those definitions, it's the numbers that need adjusting.

    Oddly enough, this is germain to my germaine to my half-baked, nowhere-near-ready-for-public-consumption personal project, which involves trying to represent places both with GPS coordinates and phrases like "down by the riverside".

  84. anyone got surveyor jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His surveyor puts his bed, and more specifically his pillow, in Connecticut. Since courts base residency on where one sleeps at night, Mr. Kemp, who sells golf-course equipment, figures he might have to switch allegiances.

    Its obvious that a lot of these surveyors got out of the wrong side of their beds this morning.

  85. Re:Borders (Moderator's on crack!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Because it insults Americans in a thread started to insult Canadians....nevermind...

  86. It's happened, people by Greedo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Between 1820 and 1842, the boundary between Maine and Canada was disputed.

    In 1903, the border between Canada and the US along the Alaskan "pan-handle" was finally decided.

    In 1925, a treaty with the UK clarified the boundary through the Lake of the Woods (Minnisota), resulting in the transfer of a few acres between countries. US residents in this area actually wanted to secede from the US at one point due to fishing regulations.

    Several towns straddle the New York/Quebec border, where the border can run through a library. That page also mentions that many people in the region have dual citizenship because they were born in the States.

    So, it ain't that much of a joke.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    1. Re:It's happened, people by foo12 · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, there's a few tiny islands in the lake of the woods that are for all intents unclaimed---they were simply too small to bother surveying at the time (northern Minnesota is largely wilderness, even now) and constant border haggling never quite resolved if they were Canadian or US. iirc, the legal border actually slashes some of the islands in two, and a border innacuracy could easily shift an island into either country.

  87. RI and CT by borgasm · · Score: 1

    I live in Rhode Island.

    I go to school in Connecticut.

    It sucks to live either place.

    Recommendation: Move to the middle of a large western state. At least you will know for sure which shitty state you are a resident of.

  88. The Continuing Search for a New Authority by guttentag · · Score: 2
    The survey used military satellites to locate two 19th-century boundary markers, six miles apart. Then, on a computer, the survey team plotted the markers on a detailed map and connected them with a straight line -- correcting the slightly distorted border established by an 1840 survey.
    If the survey team was hired by the town in Connecticut, the team has an incentive to skew the findings. It's not difficult to do by "correcting" the time your receiver thinks it is, and if ever contested in court it could be excused as a simple mistake. "My watch must have been a few minutes fast, your honor." A survey team hired by the Rhode Island town could set their watch back a few minutes to get favorable results.

    Of course, articles about GPS always highlight the fact that they are "military satellites" up front to suggest to the reader that some official military operation was involved. The WSJ article even calls GPS "new technology" -- which is really stretching the idea that "new" is a relative term. I used the same network of military satellites, "new technology" and a $100 device that runs on two AA batteries to drive from San Francisco to the Grand Canyon last year. Doesn't sound quite so official now, does it?

    Neither team's findings would change the fact that the border established between the states 160 years ago was based on observations on the ground, not GPS. It would take an agreement between the two states or a drawn-out legal battle before the U.S. Supreme Court similar to the case that resulted in New York and New Jersey splitting Ellis Island right through the middle of an existing, historic building. Ellis Island was arguably more important financially to the states than a handful of houses, and I suspect the Supreme Court would rule that the indigenous residents of those houses have a greater right to choose their state than a bunch of abandoned buildings.

    On the other hand, Connecticut and Rhode Island could always go to war over this. Yeah, let's do that. There's nothing good on TV tonight anyway.

  89. Green Acres by boristdog · · Score: 1

    Turns out we don't live in Hooterville after all, we live in Pixley.

  90. You mean? by aengblom · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe these "surveyors" are that bad. I mean it's not as if the states aren't all different colors! I live in central PA so it's all green. New Jersey, as we all know, is orange! Perhaps we should get some non-color blind folks out there to define the borders!

    Hint: Black line=new state!

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    1. Re:You mean? by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

      Hint: Black line=new state!

      I think part of the problem is that the black lines have faded too much. I can hardly even see them anymore. They must have been painted a while ago. Maybe we need to hire somebody to repaint them?

    2. Re:You mean? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 2

      whrere in central PA?

      I mean, I live in Jersey Shore, PA. Lycoming County. Those surveyors were off by A FEW HUNDRED MILES.

  91. Portable GPS by arnex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the article: The receiver, which typically is portable, calculates its distance from the various satellites and triangulates to determine its own location within an inch.

    Uh, is there really such a thing as a non-portable GPS receiver?

    1. Re:Portable GPS by IMarvinTPA · · Score: 1

      The kind you bolt down on other mobile things like ships and cars.
      Portable means hand held.

      IMarv

  92. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by bobKali · · Score: 1
    I have a GPS receiver. Note, I said RECEIVER! It doesn't transmit anything.

    That's just what THEY want you to think.
  93. Border changes? Great! by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Just think, now I can move my family to Cape Cod without packing my family and belongings out of our apartment in Garden Grove, CA! What a way to get closer to my inlaws! Um, waitasec....

    --
    This sig no verb.
  94. Super-GPS? by EdMcMan · · Score: 1
    The receiver, which typically is portable, calculates its distance from the various satellites and triangulates to determine its own location within an inch.

    I thought GPS was only accurate to a few meters. Was there an upgrade? I would think even with a lot of satellites to do triangulation off of, measuring a distance that exact wouldn't be easy.

    1. Re:Super-GPS? by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2

      It's not easy to get that accurate. Or cheap either. It requires a very expensive GPS theodolite rig. When these things first showed up, they didn't work in real time either. You had to dump a bunch of observation data a computer and combine it with obersvation data from a special base station receiver (that had to be placed on a surveyed spot) and let it finish the number crunching before you would get usuable location fixes. Those first units were claiming sub-centimeter accuracy, don't know how well they delivered though.

  95. Two things by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

    1) I like how both cities are planning on taxing the property owners - no free rides, even if you have to pay twice!

    2) Oh my GOD I can't believe how small RI is - and they still get 2 senators. The whole thing should be squashed into another state. They do have the highest population/area ratio of any state, however, so I have to give them that. At 948 people per square mile, there's a lotta livin' going on in RI.

    1. Re:Two things by Siva · · Score: 1

      At 948 people per square mile, there's a lotta livin' going on in RI.

      yeah...kinda sucks. all these stupid "family-oriented subdevelopment housing communities" going up, sucking up all the land. damn population growth. i hope when we go to buy a house in 5 or so years, we can still find one from which we won't be able to see our neighbors' houses...

      --

      Keyboard not found.
      Press F1 to continue.
  96. This all sounds VERY familiar... by schon · · Score: 2

    Hmm.. border disputes, Rhode Island... where have I heard this before?

    Oh, yeah - Family Guy!

    Man, talk about life imitating art..

  97. Re:Borders (Simpsons, eh?) by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

    Not only that. There are a lot of Canadian Connections in the Simpsons.

    check this:
    http://ccr.ptbcanadian.com/simpsons/

    This site goes through all of the episodes and lists all of the Canadian connections in the Simpsons.

    --
    ~ kjrose
  98. Re:Whew - Lucky for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just found out I don't live in Central Florida, and that I am infact a TOURIST! Oh well I guess it is time to start driving like one.

    -Josh

  99. Different technology for high-accuracy measurement by Fencepost · · Score: 2
    Most receivers use what's called "code phase" processing, which can be accurate down to about a meter.

    For surveying and high-precision positioning they switch to "carrier phase" processing, which is both more expensive and can be accurate to less than a centimeter.

    More information on Magellan's site

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  100. I live right across the street from Osage County.. by nenolod · · Score: 1

    Didn't even know it.... (Osage county is in Oklahoma), oh and that street also happens to be like the 96 degrees west meridian.

  101. East Chicago by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Illinois can frickin' have it! Bad enough to have to admit that Gary is in the same State that I live in. Come on!! Let's clean up Indiana!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  102. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2
    Well, here it is on slashdot 8-)

    All superheterodyne receivers have some miniscule level of IF leakage. For a typical FM radio, it's at 10.7 MHz. TVs are at 45 MHz. AM radios are at 455 KHz. For commercial gear, it could be 30, 45, 70 or any other freq (or freqs) the designers choose. Many receivers have several IFs, therefore several possible 'transmit' frequencies.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  103. Not a big deal by eples · · Score: 2


    The people caught in the middle simply want to know where they'll send their kids for school.

    Send 'em where you always sent 'em before.

    It's like when the electricity goes out and the traffic lights stop working - don't panic, it's not the end of the world.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  104. Re:Tomorrow Never Dies, but sometimes it gets move by retro128 · · Score: 1

    Then it would be wise to take a picture of it, in order to enjoy it as you rot away in jail for the rest of your natural life :)
    Hell, charges are being pressed against people for pointing out network vulnerabilities, imagine what the feds would do to you if you h4x0r3d their GPS sats and offset the coordinates. If you can do something like that, you should go for bigger things than your neighbor's petunias.

    --
    -R
  105. Hey..... by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    I just found out that China is part of the U.S.!!! Holy geography Batman!

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  106. Thank you pentex and technocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally the clue less people are even more so. The people that live on the border of a city are fucked. The people that want you slashdot lamers to rot in hell will rule the day thanks to uber precise GPS trilocation systems that make it a lot harder for you to stash your weed and get what you deserve: A nice hard ass reaming from tiny, buba, and sin.
    See you in hell with me mother fucker

  107. Re:Land ownership -- a ridiculous capitalistic myt by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

    when I eat paper, I can do magic things.

    --
    Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
  108. Do You Know Where You Live? by NorthDude · · Score: 2

    No... And what's my name? Who are you!?! Where am I??? Arrrgggggg!!!!

    --


    I'd rather be sailing...
    1. Re:Do You Know Where You Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And what's my name?

      Well ... I can find out if you send me your Social Security Number ...

  109. How can I breath? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If my GPS tells me I'm in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean?

  110. OT: TV broadcasts by Sanga · · Score: 1

    I always wondered how those 10/9 central programmes were broadcast ... what happens to those that live on the border of two time zones?

  111. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a very cool link.

  112. In Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In reality it's a problem with shoddy surveying during the 1800's. I've personally heard stories from people whose great-grandparents who were surveyers.

    They would be out surveying, doing a good job, see a bunch of upland game, decide they're hungry, and voila! It turns out they would pack their gear and hurry off to bag a few birds. Unfortuneatly, back then not much was surveyed yet or only partial surveys. So finding the exact spot was not that easy in a sea of prairie or trees.

    You'll see evidence of this as well the further north you go. Sections have weird shapes and aren't the trapizoid they should be. Southern states don't notice the inch missing from mile to mile.

    As they came back to finish surveying they had to fill in the gaps, as it were. Unfortuneatly, It's nearly impossible to move a main survey marker once surveyers have been measuring offsets from it for YEARS.

  113. Hey retard, this story is about state borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't the government out to get you. It's about using GPS to determine state lines. Jesus christ!

  114. Land Title by johnalex · · Score: 1

    This story reminded me of a joke:

    A New Orleans lawyer sought a FHA loan for a client. He was told the loan would be granted if he could prove satisfactory title to a parcel of property being offered as collateral. The title to the property dated back to 1803, which took the lawyer three months to track down.

    After sending the information to the FHA, he received the following reply:

    Upon review of your letter adjoining your client's loan application, we note that the request is supported by an Abstract of Title. While we compliment the able manner in which you have prepared and presented the application, we must point out that you have only cleared title to the proposed collateral back to 1803. Before final approval can be accorded, it will be necessary to clear the title back to its origin.

    Annoyed, the lawyer responded as follows:

    Your letter regarding title in Case No. 189156 has been received. I note that you wish to have title extended further than the 194 years covered by the present application. I was unaware that any educated person in this country, particularly those working in the property area, would not know that Louisiana was purchased by the U.S. from France in 1803, the year of origin identified in our application. For the edification of uninformed FHA bureaucrats, the title to the land prior to U.S. ownership was obtained from France, which had acquired it by Right of Conquest from Spain. The land came into possession of Spain by Right of Discovery made in the year 1492 by a sea captain named Christopher Columbus, who had been granted the privilege of seeking a new route to India by the then reigning monarch, Isabelle. The good queen, being a pious woman and careful about titles, almost as much as the FHA, took the precaution of securing the blessing of the Pope before she sold her jewels to fund Columbus' expedition. Now the Pope, as I'm sure you know, is the emissary of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. And God, it is commonly accepted, created this world. Therefore, I believe it is safe to presume that He also made that part of the world called Louisiana. He, therefore, would be the owner of origin. I hope you find His original claim to be satisfactory. Now, may we have our loan?

    They got it.

    --
    JA
    http://www.johnalex.org/
  115. State of Confusion == California by qnonsense · · Score: 1

    Hollywood born.
    Santa Monica raised.
    Santa Cruz resident.

    --
    There comes a time in every man's life when he must say, "No mother! I do not want any more Jell-O!"
  116. Re:Hey retard, this is Slashdot! by throatmonster · · Score: 1

    What on earth prompted you to pick this one post out of the rest of the 90% of off-topic posts to flame?!? Good gracious, you'd think that it was *that easy* for someone else to decide you're a bad guy! Oh wait... it is.

    And I did mention that it was going to cause turmoil in the real estate industry, just in case you didn't read my whole rant.

    Mod me down, mod me down, I'm outta control, I'm wearing a frown.

    --
    All pass beyond reach of medicine. None pass beyond the reach of love.
  117. Sure, I do. by yzquxnet · · Score: 2

    They came out and surveyed the land and pounded stakes in the ground at the corners of the property. That's my land. I don't care if it moves over time. Or shifts from the earths plates moving. Everything inside those markers is mine.

  118. You're victim of a ruse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Canada is not a country. Never has been a country. Canada is a territory of the US. The name "canada" is really an Acronym.

    Continental American National Arctic Disposal Area.

    Sorry to let the cat out of the bag, so to speak.

  119. Who blames corporate greed in that case ? by liberteus · · Score: 1
    It's just incredible to see how State officials can behave! Can't they just leave people alone ? One guy didn't buy a new home: he loses months looking for another one. The seller sees his asset value plummet.

    The old lady can't have an ambulance when she would need it.

    Kids don't go to the same school as their neighbour's.

    But what's the motive ?? MONEY. It is not CORPORATE GREED, it is STATE GREED.
    Why can't we hear nothing about State greed ? br>Enron and else sank, but I guess in 10 or 20 years some cities or States will still spend $1.000.000 a year to extort a few square meters to the neighbouring State or city, therefore earning $10K in taxes ?

    --
    http://www.pageliberale.org
  120. I do not slur KC by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    I bemoan the fact that fools have caused a good city to be divided for no reason.

    I bemoan the fact that the bulk of Kansas City is not in Kansas.

    But the actual CITY I like.

  121. In Surry by N8F8 · · Score: 2

    You go down to the courthouse and dig through a room of really old books. Last time I was there I talked with the librarian(?) and he mentioned that he was trying to figure out how to scan in all the documents so they wouln't have to be handled so much. That, he said, would have to be done out of his own pocket since the county didn't have the budget to do it.

    If you ever get a half-day off from work you should take the ferry from Willimsburg to Surry. You can eat lunch at the Virginia Diner(be sure to eat some hush puppies) then walk across the street and look around the courthouse. Its kind of neat to read all the old legal papers.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:In Surry by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      You go down to the courthouse and dig through a room of really old books.
      In a disused lavatory, with a "beware of the leopard" sign on the door...
    2. Re:In Surry by willybur · · Score: 2

      Whoa, your comment and signature both talk about the same thing! And I just read that book about 2 weeks ago.

      --

      --
      "Everybody wants a rock to wind a piece of string around." - They Might Be Giants, "We Want a Rock"
  122. Calvin Quote by pandemonia · · Score: 2, Funny

    Calvin: [Daydreaming]

    Mrs. Wormwood: Calvin! What state do you live in?

    Calvin: Denial!

    Mrs. Wormwood: I guess I can't argue about that...

    --
    -mz
  123. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by david94133 · · Score: 1

    by my calcs this works out to over a billion $ per acre. it sure seems high to me. do you have a source? it's facinating if true.

  124. GPS is informative by Lewis+Mettler,+Esq. · · Score: 2

    GPS is informative.

    A few years back (when I lived in San Jose) I got ahold of a GPS unit and a marine navigation software package (Cpt something).

    The nice part of the package was that you could fire up the GPs unit (and since it was for marine navigation) it would plat your course over time on a map.

    Well. This was too tempting.

    So, (in my house) I set up the antenna and unit and began to plot my course.

    Well. Hey, this was around the time of the recent earthquake in Oakland around 1992 or so, but still, my place is not going to move, right?

    Wrong.

    My place moved. Over a day or so, plotting my movement, my place moved as much as a quarter mile or so in several directions. No, I did not notice any more earthquakes during that time.

    And, no, I do not think the military had their satelites set to the 10 meter or better resolution. But, a "quarter a mile".

    Nice cruise is all I could conclude.

    --
    NexuSys - Linux support by the best
    1. Re:GPS is informative by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2

      A quarter mile is kind of harsh, but I could see that happening on that vintage of a GPS if it was having problems getting a lock on 4 satellites. Low signal strength, especially indoors, or interferrence can cause the receiver to go into a degarded accuracy mode. Usually the receiver will indictate this by displaying a estimated error or figure of merit number.

    2. Re:GPS is informative by Lewis+Mettler,+Esq. · · Score: 2

      Oh I agree.

      But, we are talking about a 1992 vintage or so.

      Of course, the interesting thing was the particular software would plot the sequencial readings on a map. You see, this was a marine software package so the course of your "boat" was important, right?

      Well. It was important. And, if you were trying to figure out how close you were to the California coast line it would be just fine. But, when you know your "boat" is not going anywhere, what you plot over time is simply the inaccuracy of the GPS, etc.

      The quarter mile error was about the worst. But, one eigth to a sixteenth occured in just about all directions. It was one hell of a ride if you "believe the instruments". And, of course, I had military training that taught you to believe the instruments over your own assessments. Well. Usually that is fine.

      I would love to try the same experiment today. Marine software would try to plot your course over time for navigation purposes. The other stuff out there just tells you where you are now (supposedly) and does not give you any capability to doubt its accuracy.

      And, of course, since satellite are flying around all the time they can alter the accuracy of their information as well. As far as I know, the GPS satellites are not geosyncronous. They actually move around the place (our planet).

      So, if you are in one place (such as a fixed building) you can easily test the accuracy of their system. And, the marine software nicely plots it. Of course it is disburbing if you falsely conclude your place is moving around.

      --
      NexuSys - Linux support by the best
  125. So... by FFNieko · · Score: 1

    "Do You Know Where You Live?"

    Is this some kind of lame joke?

  126. A brewery in Portland by phriedom · · Score: 1

    Hehe, "a brewery in Portland" doesn't narrow it down very much. Just counting the companys that actually bottle beer in Portland and not Hood River, Newport, or Bend, and none of the many brewpubs, we get"
    Portland Brewing Company
    Widmer Bros.
    Saxer
    Nor'Wester (now owned by Saxer)
    and last and best Bridgeport.
    Bridgeport makes a firkin IPA that is quite good, but I don't know of a Steam Pumper. I had a steamer (ale made with lager yeast) from a San Francisco brewery once.
    Portland really ought to call itself the Beer City instead of the Rose City.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    1. Re:A brewery in Portland by laserjet · · Score: 2

      I just got home and looked. It is "Fire Station 5 Brewing Company". A damn good beer, not a issy IPA like a lot of them are.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  127. Re:Children are starving in Africa! by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

    I would suddenly have to start paying income tax. Will the world end? No. In fact, I would prefer it.

    Well go ahead then. What's stopping you? Send the government a check. I'm sure they'll cash it.

    --


    This space intentionally left blank
  128. Canadian border problems worse, as are counties. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lived on the corner of a county in a corner house lot. Snow trucks KNEW this and each county tried to mac MASSIVE hills of snow on my property on the "other counties" lot. We always tried our puny best to move it into traffic.

    It sucks living on a border you have no benefits.

    This gps issue messes up the rare curvier borber parts of canada-us the most but as waterways are USUALLY used, the specific lines thankfully ar moot.

    Mexico is a different problem... Ever try to use a GPS phone along Mexicali city border? YOu can't. YOu need to call sprint.. The GPS in the phones seem to claim you are in Maxicon when you are actually 500 yards on US soil.

    Canadian border cell phones switch over as soon as you cross bridges.

    I know there is no "real" border with mexico... merely a continuum of illegal aliens for 300 miles north... but there is supposed to be a legal border, and sprints gps lines claim its firther north than we have built our fences.

    No wonder mexican army has taken potshots from Hummers this year while on allegedly "us" soil.

  129. land title searcher by rapidweather · · Score: 1

    I used to search land title for a company in San Bernardino County, USA, and I found a few errors in old surveys, maps, etc. that resulted in a slice of land that didn't pass along with the deed as intended. Usually there would be a triangular slice of land only a few inches at the widest point, sometimes a foot or so. There were other combinations, too. I'm suprised that the gps system has uncovered big parcels of land that were not surveyed correctly. I do know that if you do not have your transit level, then it shoots an arc. You have to mark several points along the line to detect this, and that was probably done in nearly all cases. I'm sure most of the old surveys were done by very competent folks, and they were, for the most part, error free. Bringing new technology in, can change things, however.
    btw, here is a site that has some photos of antique surveying instruments:
    http://www.antiquesurveying.com/
    Equipment such as shown there was what they worked with.
    Off topic: My website, linked below, is down, I have been told by aplus.net customer site that they are working on the problem. I inadvertently brought it down when accessing my directory with the ftp client. (It's not their fault, I did it.) Can't say any more than that, you know the new rules ;-)
    Isn't technology wonderful?

  130. A problem as old as the first satelites by Jack+Greenbaum · · Score: 1

    My father worked on the first geosynchronous satelites (Syncom I and II). When examining the telemetry from the first bird to make orbit, they realized that an earth station on a certain island in the south pacific was NOT where they thought it was. It took some convincing for their conclusions to be accepted, but in the end they were proven correct. Now with GPS there are many more geeks who notice that things are where we thought they were, but satelites have been "changing" the world in this way for decades!

    1. Re:A problem as old as the first satelites by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      Here's a site where awards were given by NAE for those satellites:
      http://www.nae.edu/nae/naehome.nsf/weblinks/NAEW-4 NHMBM
      apparently, we would not have satellite dishes if it were not for Syncom I and II. I also notice that the same award was given in 2001 for the invention of the internet itself. Quite a milestone, Syncom I and II.
      tip: to get the link to work, when you paste it in your browser, remove the space between the "4" and the "N". IMHO this is a ./ Post Comment bug that I have seen before. One puts the correct URL in the "Comment" box, and ./ adds a space somewhere in the URL, making it unuseable.
      Off topic: My rapidweather.com site is down, tech support has been working to get it up, or so I'm told ;-)

  131. Lines aren't quite straight by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    The borders in this part of the country are almost precisely aligned with major lines of latitude and longitude. Which can be fun if you have a GPS and are on a road heading directly towards (or away) from a border.

    But if you get a very large-scale map, you'll see that the lines aren't quite straight. There are small jogs, just enough to include a mining claim or spring or other natural resource. It makes you wonder what sort of backroom deals occured to make sure that property was in Utah instead of Colorado, etc.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:Lines aren't quite straight by Brendor · · Score: 1

      In my father's home town of south royalton, i-89 (the only major interstate in VT) was built to not interfere with a particular landowner's property. He was told this by a childhood aquaintance, now working for as a Historian for the state, whose land got divided by the interstate.

  132. I went through... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went through the state of misery on vacation.

    ...

    Huh? mis-ERY?

  133. Some day... by inertia187 · · Score: 1

    ...you'll be able to put on your Personal Heads Up Display (PHUD) that's tied into your city's building, planning, and zoning offices and see a representation of what should be superimposed on what actually is. Won't that be interesting.

    Hey, that fire hydrent shoud be three feet north!

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  134. I see penguins... by vectra14 · · Score: 1

    ...i must be on one of the poles... i'm POLISH!!! (no offence to Poles, especially ones that dont live on the pole, but i dont mean Poland, which is to say... AAARGGH)

  135. Much ado about nothing by raoulortega · · Score: 1

    It's been the Common Law (for those nations based upon the English traditions) for several centuries that a boundary voluntarily agreed to supercedes the written definition. That's why its considered so important to well mark the boundaries. In the case of governments, usually there is a commision established by both parties which supervise the surveying and placing of markers, and then maintaining them. It's also not unsual for the commissions to play fast and loose- the various jogs in the Tennessee-Kentucky border, for example, are there because locally influential landowners managed to get themselves on the "proper" side of the border. Some of the various jogs in New England boundaries probably have the same source.

    You don't need a GPS to find boundaries that don't go where you think they should, any sufficiently detailed map will do. Such maps will also show that any border defined as a line of latitude or longitude won't follow that line exactly. (The curvature of the earth doesn't help, either.) Many of the surveys were in remote areas with too much to survey and too little time to do it right, so like most other government work, "good enough" was substituted. They also relied on a sound engineering principal-- without a systematic problem (like misaligned transits) all the mistakes tend to cancel each other out.

    One reason the US went to the uniform Meridians and Base Lines of the General Land Surveys of the West was to avoid the problems such as in the article. By not basing it on local geography, there would be few problems when the geography (read rivers) changed.

    For historic information about the borders of the US and its states, see "Boundaries of the United States and the Several States" USGS Professional Paper #909 by F.K.van Zandt.

  136. What about the USPS? by Hyped01 · · Score: 1
    I had thought that the districts, sub-divisions and such, as used in addressing agreed as accurate by the USPS was the final say. Wouldnt that make this a moot point? Anything else would make all the governmental census data wrong...

    And the data, btw, is to the umpteenth decimal place by longitude and latitude... for instance:

    Here's the central longitude and latitude for Richmond VA
    +037.531050
    -077.474584

    The long and lats that define the borders are as accurate, and they were done in conjunction with surveying which should thus make the postal service databases accurate as well.

    Now on the other hand, I've had GPS's accurate to within 3 feet tell me I am a couple miles from a city I am already in, or that I have passed a town by without going through it, while I have just driven down Main Street of whatever town.

    Joe Smith's house being innaccurately accounted for on a map is one thing, as inplausible as it would seem... but a whole city, or a decent sized (area wise) town? Unlikely... seems more like the GPS's are wrong.

    For school, (at Carnegie Mellon U) a friend did some tests using 14 different satellites to take readings for a(n exactly) known location... you'd be surprised at the varied info. Yes, more than reliable enough to drive by, but not nearly the 3 feet some high end, super GPS devices claim, (and in some cases off by hundreds of feet).

    FWIW, I doubt the gov't will even care especially considering the havok one decent sized "correction" would create (assuming this GPS data is correct).

    - Robert

    www.Hyperforce.com

    --

    WebMaster:
    BinFeeds
    XXX Thumbnailed Image Newsgroups but

  137. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1

    I read it in a newspaper some years ago ... the Toronto Star I think. I did a bit of googling and it seems that this number is way too high. Perhaps the figure was in Yen. So basically, take the previous figure with a grain of salt. It's quite possible I got it wrong.

  138. La Legge e legge by DEBEDb · · Score: 1

    "His surveyor puts his bed, and more specifically his pillow, in Connecticut."

    There's a 1958 French (or is it Italian)
    movie about this very thing...

    --

    Considered harmful.
  139. In New Hampshire,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the Board of Selectmen in each town is required, by state law, to walk the boundaries of their town at least once every five years to check on it. There are, usually, stone obelisks in place at each corner, assuming the corner is on dry land.

    The northern border of NY and VT, by the way is NOT 45.0000 degrees north. It's actually 45 degrees 0 minutes 29.5 seconds North, as the result of a surveying error about 200 years ago.

    In 1934, the US Supreme Court's Boundary Commission stepped in and settled a dispute between NH and VT, and erected an obelisk near town line between Pittsburg, NH and Canaan, VT to mark the exact line. And, yeah, this is along the only part of the border between NH and VT that IS surveyed (about 2-3 miles' worth) - most of it is the Connecticut River.

    Bet no one here knows how the northern border of NH (and the US) is defined, either.

    PS - don't go swimming in Hall's Stream - it's bugged !

  140. What is the difference? by teetam · · Score: 2
    I come from a country where people in each state speak a different language and are sometimes very different from each other.

    I can never understand why the border between states in US would be so controversial. After all, what is the difference between one state and its neighbors? Same people, same issues and the same two political parties fighting it out.

    Makes me curious, are there any neighboring states which don't get along very well? Any states that fight over water or any other natural resources?

    --
    All your favorite sites in one place!
    1. Re:What is the difference? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Same people, same issues and the same two political parties fighting it out.

      You've obviously never been to New York, or California, Nevada, Texas, or Florida.

      Some of the states are *very* different than their neighbors. Different tax levels, different levels of government, different *laws*... in some ways, moving from one state to another can be as different as moving from one country to the next.

      Makes me curious, are there any neighboring states which don't get along very well? Any states that fight over water or any other natural resources?

      I imagine that there are. But since we've got the Feds, they fight with lawyers and not their respective "National Guards" or State Police.

  141. Everything old is new again by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

    This gem is probably from sometime in the century before last:

    Surveyor: Do you own this farm?

    Farmer: Ayuh.

    Surveyor: Well, we have some news for you. We took a survey of your property and it turns out your farm isn't in New Hampshire after all.

    Farmer: 'Taint?

    Surveyor: No, we resurveyed the border and found out that your property is actually on the Vermont side.

    Farmer: So you're sayin' mah fahm is in Vermahnt?

    Surveyor: Yes, that's what we're saying.

    Farmer: Good. Nevah could stand them New Hampshah wintahs.

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
  142. That was worth noting by Auckerman · · Score: 2
    "They can't use common law because Louisiana is the only state based on French Civil Law rather than English Common Law."

    I actually thought of this, strangely enough. But I think it's not relevent. Within Louisiana, they are well within their rights to use Napolianic code to setting common disputes, but a case about state borders, is for the federal courts, which is based off English Common.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
  143. this ia all well and good but .... by schlam · · Score: 1

    After working in the cellular industry I know the there is an intrinsicly built error in to gps ( supposedly to prevent nuclear attacks) of about 20 to 30 meters ( how that would stop a nuke I am not quite sure but hey ...) so even with gps people woud still not know where they are :)

    --
    Don't worry! Everything is getting nicely out of control....
  144. Settling Your Borders the Right Way by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1


    I live in Switzerland; every spring, each village here has what's called a 'Banntag' (no clue what it means.)

    Essentially, all the villagers pack up large amounts of firecrackers and toy cannon and things and march the entire length of their community border, getting properly liquored up in the process.

    A bunch of the local yokels always dress up in period costumes and spend the day shooting black powder muskets, inevitably blowing off a few fingers and bits--what else could you expect from a bunch of soused farmers with explosives?

    The tradition stems from an age-old custom of every village making sure the bunch of foreigners (the next village) up the road didn't try anything funny with the border markers (big heavy engraved stones.) Best way to do that is to grab your flintlock and a few pints of the local jet fuel schnaps and to make sure your borders are respected...

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  145. Treaty Freaks and Surveying Anomalies by FrankDrebin · · Score: 2

    Check out Point Roberts, WA to see an example of an outcome of treaty-making without good surveying. The outcome of the war of 1812 caused the Americans and British to firm up borders. Finally, in 1846 the border between the US and what is now British Columbia was established at 49 degrees North. Apparently they didn't realize Point Roberts would be an isolated outpost of the US!

    Apparently the border markers along this part of the world were done with 1800's technology, and the generally accepted border in the area is about 300m too far north. So there is some strip of "Canadian" territory being "occupied" by Americans just south of Vancouver. This is an academic joke because both countries have since agreed that the border stands where the markers are. However, the State of Washington, until fairly recently, had officially defined the border as 49 degrees North, and a number of court cases for crimes committed in this 300m strip, notably illegal fishing just off-shore, were thrown out due to lack of jurisdiction!

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  146. Accuracy of GPS receivers by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

    My GPS receiver is accurate to about 15 feet. So, I can't tell if my property line has moved for at least 150 years. But since my zoning mandates a minimum of 400 feet of road frontage, it doesn't bother me that much. Folks crammed into cities or suburbs like sardines (why is it never anchovies?) would probably be more concerned.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)