Slashdot Mirror


First Wind-up Phone Charger Review

Jonathan Bennett writes "Here's the first actual review (as opposed to speculation) of Motorola's FreeCharge hand-operated mobile phone charger. Only works with Motorola phones for now, but other devices on the way. "

221 comments

  1. Not too bad... by DJayC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Motorola claims that 45 seconds' winding will produce 4-6 minutes of talk time and 'several hours' of standby time."

    That's actually not bad at all. The only problem is that if you wind it to get standby back, if someone calls you are likely to only have a minute or so of talking. This seems like an excellent idea for emergencies though.

    1. Re:Not too bad... by sharkey · · Score: 2

      The only problem is that if you wind it to get standby back, if someone calls you are likely to only have a minute or so of talking.

      Simple. Turn off the phone while charging it. Turn it back on when you're done.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Not too bad... by DJayC · · Score: 1

      Turning off the phone while charging it may or may not help. Imagine this scenario:

      You are waiting for an important call at the beach (don't ask =] ). Your cell phone dies. You wind it up to keep the phone on standby so you can still get the call. Depending on when the call actually occurs, you may only have a couple minutes of talk time. Of course that would be enough to let the caller know the deal, and then call from a pay phone, but hey *shrugs* :)

    3. Re:Not too bad... by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

      The only problem is that if you wind it to get standby back, if someone calls you are likely to only have a minute or so of talking.

      Who told you to stop winding after 45 seconds? D-oh!

      --
      "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    4. Re:Not too bad... by micromoog · · Score: 2

      So charge it up again every hour.

    5. Re:Not too bad... by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Of course, if the call was THAT important, you could try to charge it BEFORE it dies completely.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re:Not too bad... by sporty · · Score: 2

      Unless you are in a real emergency. 45 seconds could mean the difference between life and death. Something quicker, like a pump or maybe the use of gears to make the charging quicker would be great.

      It is understood the more work you want out of a system, the more work you have to put in. (Energy can't be created etc...)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    7. Re:Not too bad... by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You are waiting for an important call at the beach (don't ask =] ).

      You've got it all backwards--buy your weed before you go to the beach. It's much more fun that way!

      --
      "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    8. Re:Not too bad... by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only problem is that if you wind it to get standby back, if someone calls you are likely to only have a minute or so of talking.

      Could be a potential problem when I call up those automated voice mail hell^Hp trees that force me to navigate <wind>through the <wind>duration of every inappropriate <wind>branch and <wind>twig until I get to a nice operator <wind>leaf that puts me into a queue to talk to a real person.

      "Thank you for calling $CORP. <wind>Your call is important to us. All of our operators are busy assisting other customers. Please <wind> continue to stay on the line...<music> ... <wind> <product_advertisement> ....<wind> ..."

      (I can see carpal tunnel setting in from winding...)

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    9. Re:Not too bad... by tHiNk411 · · Score: 1

      automated voice mail hell^Hp trees

      I love the typo! voice mail hell and help trees! amazing how linux knows this stuff and leaves the typos in.

    10. Re:Not too bad... by ghjm · · Score: 2

      So wind while you're talking.

    11. Re:Not too bad... by Ra-Rue · · Score: 1

      No Linux about it.

      Not original. Take off from BOFH and the
      "Hell Desk".

    12. Re:Not too bad... by spiny · · Score: 1

      or you could always keep winding it while on the call perhaps ?

      --

      Fry: heh, Yakov Smirnoff said it
      Leela: No he didn't.
  2. Big Deal, by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

    This is nothing more than a dynamo flashlight or disaster radio without the bulb or radio.

    I'm not impressed!

    AWG

    --
    You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    1. Re:Big Deal, by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "This is nothing more than a dynamo flashlight or disaster radio without the bulb or radio."

      What kind of long distance rates are you getting with your dynamo flashlight?

    2. Re:Big Deal, by freeweed · · Score: 3, Funny

      What kind of long distance rates are you getting with your dynamo flashlight?

      Free, if you know Morse Code.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    3. Re:Big Deal, by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      What good is the charger without a phone?
      It's not new technology, it's merely applying technology in new and functionally useless ways!

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    4. Re:Big Deal, by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      It's not new technology...

      So?

      "...it's merely applying technology in new..."

      Yes, that is called an invention. ...and functionally useless ways!"

      So ... powering your mobile phone long enough to call for help without the need of a power outlet is functionally useless, but dynamo flashlights and radios are okay?

      OoooooooKay! Never mind that lotsa people go camping, or break down on the highway, or forget to take their charger when they travel. Heh. It's funny how the less somebody knows, the stronger their opinions are.

    5. Re:Big Deal, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have one hell of a small local calling area.

  3. All that excercize finally pays off... by colmore · · Score: 5, Funny

    For years, I've been excercizing for this product, once, twice, or sometimes even three times a day. At last all that hard work and repetitive motion will pay off.

    And if I can get one of those phones that can view color photos, I might be able to continue excercizing after I've charged it.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    1. Re:All that excercize finally pays off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll probably need a "hands-free" version if you'll be calling those 900 numbers.

  4. Another box to lug around by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Unfortunately, it's not integrated into the phone. There are uses for an "emergency phone" with a built-in crank generator. But this is an external unit you carry around.

    A "squeeze the handle a few times and you can make a call" unit might be more useful.

    1. Re:Another box to lug around by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
      But this is an external unit you carry around.

      Yep, and at 350 grams it's about 4 times as heavy as my Nokia 6510, which gives me roughly 5 days of standby.

      Conclusion: if you're too damn stupid, or lazy to hook up your phone for a couple hours every four to five days, then you probably deserve the additional weight.

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

  5. Inerita Chargers by SanLouBlues · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why don't they just do it like watches do?
    Or: http://howthingswork.virginia.edu/clocks.html

    1. Re:Inerita Chargers by colmore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Watches are at a pretty high torque point, on your wrist, and will get a lot more energy than something clipped to your belt.

      Also watches require much less power to operate.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    2. Re:Inerita Chargers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Because watches need fractions of a milliwatt to operate, while a phone typically needs a watt. That's over 1000 times more, in case you're SI-challenged.

    3. Re:Inerita Chargers by nomel · · Score: 1

      Because a watch is not only on your hand where it is flailing around all the time, but they require _very_ little power.

    4. Re:Inerita Chargers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which would prevent it from charging a battery through a transformer why?

    5. Re:Inerita Chargers by zrodney · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just do it like watches do?

      physics mostly. it takes a lot more energy to run
      a radio transmitter in a phone than it does to
      keep the crystal in a watch ticking.

    6. Re:Inerita Chargers by Klatma · · Score: 1

      I just have to bite on this one. A transformer does not give you any more power, it will only change the voltage and amps. If voltage goes up amps go down. Because the watch chargers do not produce enough Watts, a transformer is going to do absolutely nothing for you.

  6. Why bother by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    OK you better be away from a power source for a LONG time before you need one of these. Granted if you were realy desperate and bothered to cary this small brick around with you. The battery side that takes 36 minutes of winding to charge is 1000ma assuming you would spend an hour a day winding this thing up (or just plug it into a socket and recharge it) and that it weighs in at two thirds of a pound you would be better off getting a few extra cell phone batteries (yes some people do actualy remove there battery and replace it every now and again)

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
    1. Re:Why bother by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The point isn't to charge it to capacity, the point is to get your phone running long enough to place a call if your battery goes low.

      I don't get many calls on my cell phone, so I get lazy about charging it. If I could wind it up a few times and get 10-15 minutes of talk time (which sounds reasonable based on the article), then it saves my booty if I get stranded or something.

      You're operating on impractical assumptions there. Heh.

    2. Re:Why bother by paulbort · · Score: 1

      I go camping for two weeks straight every year. Primitive camping, no cabins, no RVs, no electricity. This is a lot better than lugging a car battery or trying to find spares for my three year old phone.

      --
      -- Spring: Forces, coiled again!
  7. Shamless advertisment plug? by iamwoodyjones · · Score: 1

    Uh, not to repeat myself but... Almost usless news connected to products yet again

    1. Re:Shamless advertisment plug? by colmore · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      oh, get over yourself. Slashdot is "news for nerds"

      nerds like gadgets.

      when a new gadget comes out, it's news.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    2. Re:Shamless advertisment plug? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Uh, not to repeat myself but... Almost usless news connected to products yet again"

      Is it wrong of me to take pleasure in seeing posts like these? All of these "I dont get it therefore it is stupid" posts make me feel 733t. Heh.

    3. Re:Shamless advertisment plug? by iamwoodyjones · · Score: 1

      How was this about myself? Get over your "almost usless" bashing of others and grow up. Hate never ends hate. Only love does --Buddha

  8. This is just great... by telekon · · Score: 1

    Now your wrist can get tired on all of your phone calls, not just the ones you hope your significant other doesn't see on the bill.

    --

    To understand recursion, you must first understand recursion.

  9. Cool! by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

    As well as the mobile charger modules, you're given a torch module for the FreeCharge. Unfortunately it's a bit disappointing, considering that FreePlay has produced wind-up torches before.

    This sounds like some cool James Bond device. Battery charger for emergency phone calls AND bad guy incinerator!

    (Yes, it's a joke.)

    --
    Forget the whales - save the babies.
    1. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. that whole article I felt like I was decrypting some secret code language or something.. English people sure did put the fuck in English.

      Why didn't we just let the Nazis take over that piece of shit Island and turn it into a mercedes plant or something.. it would have been a more productive use of the land imo.

  10. The product page is moderately more interesting. by Sweetums · · Score: 2, Informative
    There is more info on the product page at Freecharge. But I think it would be cool if there were a little more information. The "45 seconds of winding" for what sounds like full charge seems pretty cool. This would be excellent for camping trips and such.

    The nerd in me wants to know if you are winding a sping or direct charging....

    --
    ------------------------
    Jack not name, jack job!
  11. excellent by tps12 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hadn't heard of this product before, but I'm excited. Imagine what it'll be like when these devices become commonplace...you'll get up in the morning and grind and brew coffee by hand. Wind up your radio to hear the news as you crank up the microwave for some oatmeal. Then crank your car and drive to work, where you spend all day in front of a computer, pedalling a stationary bike.

    We will all be quite muscular!

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will all be quite muscular!

      Dam forainers.. why must you always act so sexily?

    2. Re:excellent by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

      It solves the geek/exercise problem quite nicely... I don't exercise because it takes too long, and I can't do much else simultaneously.

      But if pedalling a bike is the only thing that keeps my computer running...

      --
      This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
    3. Re:excellent by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... Imagine the bill savings... Have my computer screen over a cycle...

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  12. A possible problem... by MWoody · · Score: 5, Funny

    Her: Hello?

    Me: *pant* *pant* *pant*

    Her: Ew! Pervert! *click*

    Me: *pant* Wait! *pant* Damnit!

    Maybe this isn't a good thing...

    1. Re:A possible problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it should be she and I.

    2. Re:A possible problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      According to google over a third of the people on the web spell "dammit" d-a-m-n-i-t. Neither spelling of the word appears in m-w.com's online dictionary, and since the word is considered slang, how right can you really be on the spelling? Me and Her in the sense that he used them was fine also.. I and She would have seemed about as gay as you.. which is pretty fucking gay.

      damnit

      dammit

    3. Re:A possible problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the weirdest troll I've ever seen.

      There is no 'M' at the end of the root word, 'Damn'. If you want to get picky, there's no such word anyway, because it should be "Damn it".

    4. Re:A possible problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it shouldn't. Have you ever read a play? In the form he used, this is how it goes: Mark: Hi! Bob: Well, hello Steve: First post... oh, fuck The word at the front tells you who is speaking. It's not meant to be english sentences, as in "she said bla, I said bla"... So, "Me" and "Her" are correct - they replace nouns.

    5. Re:A possible problem... by MWoody · · Score: 2

      I'm two quarters shy of a degree in English Lit. It's correct as is, or it's at least as correct as a casually composed Internet message need be.

      And, oh yes, please be so kind as to go fuck yourself. Thank you so much. ^_^

      In all seriousness, I can see the argument for it being spelled "Dammit," given that it's only a phonetic representation of a commonly used spoken contraction, and not an "official" combination of the words "damn" and "it." But I'll need to see some pretty convincing arguments before I'll agree it should be "I" and "She" instead of the far more common "Me" and "Her."

      There. I've taken the low ground _and_ the high ground in this argument. Yee-hah.

    6. Re:A possible problem... by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Um, actually no. I don't get caught up in grammatical flames, because I feel as long as you get the point across it's fine. Kind of like how I don't mind "Billy and me went to the store".

      But if you're going to start getting technical, technically, you're wrong. "I" and "She" replace subject nouns. They are subject pronouns. "Me" and "Her" replace object pronouns.

      "She gave it to me"
      "I gave it to her"

      See how "She" becomes "Her" and "I" becomes "me"? "She" and "me" are object pronouns, in other words they can be either direct objects or indirect objects (objects of the proposition).

      So yes, "Me" and "Her" do, in fact, replace nouns, but they only replace objects, not subjects.

    7. Re:A possible problem... by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Yes, but google asks you: "Did you mean "dammit""?

    8. Re:A possible problem... by mangu · · Score: 2
      I'll need to see some pretty convincing arguments before I'll agree it should be "I" and "She" instead of the far more common "Me" and "Her."

      Miranda: O, woe the day!

      Prospero: No harm.

      Suppose Her is Miranda and Me am Prospero. One can say "Miranda went to the city" and "Prospero went to the city". These sentences can be substituted by "She went to the city" and "I went to the city", but not by "Her went to the city" or "Me went to the city". Conclusion: if "Me" and "Her" is common in plays, maybe playwrights don't know much about English.

    9. Re:A possible problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez, I really do hate the English language...

    10. Re:A possible problem... by Klatma · · Score: 1

      If you are going to correct someone do it properly you fucking retard. It is DAMN IT. Not DAMMIT or DAMNIT.

    11. Re:A possible problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er, "Joe gave the flowers to Miranda"

      Joe gave the flowers to I?

      no

      Joe gave the flowers to me.

  13. crank'able web server by spotter · · Score: 1

    This hand powered webserver was featured on slashdot awhile ago. Personally I find this cooler, even if it is less usefull.

  14. Telemarketing needs more motivation... by taernim · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. I just imagine the rage when people get telemarketing calls with that phone...

    "You made me crank my phone for this crap?! You better tell me something interesting and fast, or I'm going to let you wind down!"

    --
    "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    1. Re:Telemarketing needs more motivation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.. I just imagine the rage when people get telemarketing calls with that phone...

      I don't think this add on effects the phones caller id functionality. You will still be able to screen calls, and/or hang up on people.

  15. Bye Bye horror movies by gelfling · · Score: 2

    Damnit the phone's dead. Oh wait...wind wind wind wind wind wind wind

    Yeah 911? There's an axewielding maniac freak after me, send help. Thanks.

  16. Yeah! by Hacker'sEdict · · Score: 1
    Motorola sales guy: For sixty dollars you can now own a simple hand held motor that charges your cell phone!

    Everyone else: For sixty bucks yeah..

    Us: $60?! Are you F*CKING CRAZY?!

  17. not very efficient by drwho · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The amount of rigorous cranking it takes to get a charge makes this generator seem inefficient. Maybe efficiency was sacrificed for portability.

    Human legs are much more powerful than arms. some sort of foot-operated device would be more tolerable in terms of effort, but probably not as portable. Piezoelectrics that sit in the soles of shoes are not very intrusive, and could provide power over a long time. I believe this is what the MIT wearables group is using.

    Hand power, foot power, wind power, and water power require different gearing ratios in order to operate efficiently. An impressive design would allow this type of switch through some type of transmission (CVT? Pneumatic?), and have linkage adapters to hands, feet, windmill blades, waterwheels, etc. The problem is accomplishing this while maintaining a light weight.

    1. Re:not very efficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just be glad it takes a circular motion and not a vertical up and down motion which would probably cause some stareing by onlookers.

    2. Re:not very efficient by bob_jenkins · · Score: 1

      Well then you'd need some sort of cord attaching your shoe to the phone. Or, they could embed the phone in the sole of your shoe. Or -- here we go -- your phone could snap onto the sole of your shoe.

    3. Re:not very efficient by catch23 · · Score: 1

      With piezo electrics, you can put them in gloves so that you have to beat someone up to be able to use your phone. Soon we'll have extremely hostile mobile phone users....

    4. Re:not very efficient by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      With piezo electrics, you can put them in gloves so that you have to beat someone up to be able to use your phone. Soon we'll have extremely hostile mobile phone users....

      Given the dirty look (at a minimum) that you get when you ask some jerkoff to quit yakking on his phone so you can watch the movie, how is this any different than the way things are now?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  18. Self winding? by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1

    What about strapping the thing you your belt and harness the kinetic energy from your movements. There are some things like watches that do this. Of course cell phones use more power than that but, if I get off my fat ass and run the 4 miles home from work, I might build up enough to be able to call and order a pizza. :-)

    --
    Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
    Kull: She told me she was 19!
  19. Makes a nice addition to a survival kit by netringer · · Score: 2

    I'll bet they would have liked to have one of these on "Survivor," "Six Days, Seven Nights," or "Gilligan's Island."

    Now if they just would come up with a portable cell tower...

    Seriously, on the chance that in an emergency I would be near enough to civiliazation to use a cell phone, I'd put one of these in the survival kit in my plane. I have a long-shelf-life disposable battery for my Nokia in there now.

    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    1. Re:Makes a nice addition to a survival kit by cmeans · · Score: 2, Informative
      Now if they just would come up with a portable cell tower...

      They have, it's called a COW (Cell On Wheels). Wireless companies mostly wheel them out for special golf tournaments etc. so that the area has additional coverage.

  20. Please! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
    Make sure you take it out of your pants pocket before charging!

    "Son, we need to have a little talk. Has your mother told you anything about the Birds and the Bees?..."

  21. Crank Call by Static242 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This little devices gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "Crank Call"

    --
    The wages of sin are unreported and back taxes are hell to pay.
    1. Re:Crank Call by unicron · · Score: 2

      Damn that was bad.....I was thinking you could strap this to your hand while you "flog the bishop" and call it the world's cheapest phone sex.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  22. Why not clockwork? by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to the article, there is no clockwork involved in the charger. The handle turns the generator directly. The box is already larger than a cellphone, so why not include clockwork? Instead of using hand power to turn a generator, why not use handpower to compress a spring (at a significant mechanical advantage, of course) that turns a flywheel that turns the generator.

    Of course it would be much harder to turn the crank, but you wouldn't have to keep up an exhausting pace of over 100rpm. At least in my mind, I'd rather turn a very hard-to-turn crank 10 times than an easy to turn crank 1000 times.

    Does this model work? I've seen it work in some of the various other 'squeeze and go' utilities out there. I had a flashlight/FM radio combo a little while back that used something similar (handle, spring, and flywheel arrangement). It was relatively hard to crank, but one or two cranks got you 30 seconds of flashlight or 5 minutes of radio at top volume.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Why not clockwork? by spencerogden · · Score: 1

      You could do the same thing woth out clockwork by making the gear ratio between the handle and the generator greater than it is now..

    2. Re:Why not clockwork? by Bonker · · Score: 2

      I understood that the point of the clockwork was to keep a flywheel turning. My understanding is that a flywheel is very hard to start, but also very hard to stop. Its high intertia makes for very good, very efficient storage of mechanical energy, and therefore less wasted energy in the charging process.

      IANAP and IANAEE! Physics majors or EE's please correct me!

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    3. Re:Why not clockwork? by spencerogden · · Score: 1

      I think either way you are going to have to put the same amount of energy into it. Remember that the generator puts a good amount of load on whatever is turning it.

    4. Re:Why not clockwork? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      The problem is that dynamos take alot of power. Your flywheel would have to be very large and heavy, on a scale anywhere from the size of a CD to the size of a bicycle tire, and I already said heavy didn't I? It's just not applicable to this device. It's already moderately awkwardly large, so the clockwork idea just wont cut it.

    5. Re:Why not clockwork? by Bubblehead · · Score: 1

      There was an article - I believe in MIT's Technology Review - explaining this (I looked for it, but couldn't find it online).

      In a nutshell, you can't run a cell phone directly from an unwinding spring (for various technical reasons) - you will have to go through the battery which acts as a buffer. While the spring gives you a (more or less) constant torque, this is an advantage if you need a constant current (e.g. to power a radio), but not to charge a battery (cell phone). In addition, springs (and especially clockworks) are not that efficient - at least if you want them cheap. Plus, they take up space.

      In fact, I believe the article said that the key for this device was to get rid of spring and clockwork in the forst place, for space reasons. It was key to find a mechanism that would allow the charging of the battery, no matter at what pace the user would wind.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    6. Re:Why not clockwork? by gotih · · Score: 1

      flywheels storing enough energy to power a cellphone would have to be spinning very very fast (way faster than the fastest hard drives). getting this up to speed by hand, even with an efficient transmission, is not going to be as efficient as if you just made the power then stored it in a battery.

      --

      fear is the mind killer
    7. Re:Why not clockwork? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      "flywheels storing enough energy to power a cellphone would have to be spinning very very fast (way faster than the fastest hard drives)."

      Huh? How do you figure that the flywheel would have to spin any faster than a hand currently has to wind it? Even entertaining the possibility of gear ratios, which it sounds like you, for some reason, think are required, the reviewer said it felt like 100rpm to get the light glowing. Simple math shows that even a 10:1 gear ratio would only be spinning at 1000rpm if the handle was still turned at 100, be it 10 times harder to get up to speed. This is significantly *slower* than a slow 5400rpm hard drive.

    8. Re:Why not clockwork? by silentbozo · · Score: 2

      The gyroscopic effects of a spinning flywheel in your phone would be interesting to observe.

      Man trying to control phone while driving: <SMACK> Ow!

    9. Re:Why not clockwork? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      "The gyroscopic effects of a spinning flywheel in your phone would be interesting to observe."

      true enough, but it would be so much easier just to balance your phone on-end on your dashboard when it's charging :-P

      or maybe have it walk a piece of string :-P

    10. Re:Why not clockwork? by gotih · · Score: 2

      i think you need to do some reading on flywheels.

      the issue is that the flywheel must keep spinning, though it is constantly loosing energy to power the phone -- as soon as you get that wheel spinning at 1000rpm it starts slowing down due to resistance from generating power. IANAP but to keep your phone operating that 1000rpm is going to be 0rpm within a minute. i estimate, by conjecture, that 1000rpm, on a small light disk, would only last about 2 seconds.

      as an example, consider an upside-down bicycle with a perfect, frictionless mount. now you add energy by cranking the pedals to get the rear wheel spinning, like a flywheel. next you want to get some energy out of the system. no matter how you do it (heat through friction or electricty through a reversed motor/generator) your wheel will loose energy and momentum.

      but if you get that wheel spinning wayyyyyyy fast, as in the-rubber-tire-flew-off-from-centriptal-force and the rim is barely holding on, you'll have more energy to extract which translates to longer 'battery' life.

      also, another silentbozo mentioned that the gyroscopic forces which would be too severe to be able to use the device. that's probably true. there are ways to balance the spins by using multiple flywheels at right angles but at that point it looses portability....

      --

      fear is the mind killer
    11. Re:Why not clockwork? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      point 1) The word is centrifugal, which means away from an axis. Centripetal is towards the axis, which doesnt happen on anything spinning. Think of a centrifuge. Or see dictionary.com.

      point 2) I realize it's going to need to be continuously spun but with a flywheel it's insanely easier once it's started. It appeared to me that this was the intent, as nobody gave the required information for any other situation, such as for what duration it would need to keep spinning once winding stopped, etc. But now I see what you were saying. You were saying that if you wanted to get it started and leave it, it would need to be spinning very fast. True enough.

      (not to you alone) People, stop trying to look smart by saying centripetal! :-P

      the end

    12. Re:Why not clockwork? by gotih · · Score: 1

      (not to you alone) People, stop trying to look smart by saying centripetal! :-P

      point taken, though at the time i wrote that i thought centripetal was the right word -- these things happen when you attend public school, i mean, work 20 hours straight (minus slashdot breaks). ;)

      --

      fear is the mind killer
    13. Re:Why not clockwork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehehe okay, you're excused.

  23. Next step by delphin42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now all they have to do is offer an electronic device that does the winding for you...

    --
    -- Adam
    1. Re:Next step by Neil+Watson · · Score: 1
      Now all they have to do is offer an electronic device that does the winding for you...

      Or a hampster and a its wheel.

    2. Re:Next step by guttentag · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Now all they have to do is offer an electronic device that does the winding for you...
      Forget it, I think Forgent already owns the patent for this.
  24. Cellphone Hack ver 1.0 by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny

    This cranking is tiring! Now if I hooked up a motor to the crank, powered by a small battery, I could save a lot of work!

  25. Repetitive Stress Injuries by DCram · · Score: 1

    Wow..
    Yet another way for us to get RSI. I cant wait.. Think about it. Sitting around the campfire with your friends tipping back some brew.. And then you friend passes you..no not a joint.. but the hand cranker. The hours just fly by.

    --
    If I were only smart enough to accomplish the things I dream about.. Or maybe too dumb to care.
  26. Great..... Now we have another clue... by axis-techno-geek · · Score: 2, Funny
    First they get the ear plug/mic connection for their cell phone and they walk around the airport/mall/street having these conversations and everybody tries to figure out if this is some wacko or somebody talking on a cell phone, sometimes it is hard too tell.

    Now we'll all know that the in-duh-vidual having the wild converstaion is on a hands free cell phone call because they are crancking for their life.... and looking like they are having a conversation with their "inner" self.

    NOTE: Your not that important, and nobody want to hear it.

    --
    This is not the sig line you are looking for... -- Old Jedi Sig Line Trick
    1. Re:Great..... Now we have another clue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.. I was visiting this site, and noticed you have a computer consulting business. I am just wondering how much it might cost for to consult with me on how to make a web page with some missing images and animated gifs of my countrys flag with a kick ass white outline around it?

      Also.. I was wondering if your company could help me to design some sort of 3D logo with a cool checked effect and some colors that have a very poor contrast so that people feel proud when they finally read what it says.

      robert (dot) gosh ... sh) dev (dot) com And what the hell is all of that shit?

      NOTE: Your(s/r/'re/) not that important, and nobody likes Canadians. Go watch hockey or something you fucking maple flavored cum guzzler.

  27. Why not... by andrersbrazil · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... MS releases a Windows wind-up as well? Sometimes you just wish it had one of these when it freezes!

    --
    Andre "Don't take life too seriously. You're not getting out of it alive, anyway."
  28. Ad free link by cow_licker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or we could post directly to the ad free version, right here

    --
    $_='while(read+STDIN,$_,2048){$a=29;$b=73;$c=142;$ t=255;@t=map{$_%16or$t^=$c^=($m=(11,10,116,100,
    1. Re:Ad free link by rainwalker · · Score: 2

      ads? whats an ad?

      ahh, the wonders of the Proximotron...

  29. Cool! by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    I think it is pretty cool for emergency use. They should have done this a long time ago.

  30. In case of emergency... by Quantum+Singularity · · Score: 1

    You could carry this as backup. Emphasis on could. I won't. Emergencies are the only situations that I could ever picture using this for. In any other situations, this unit is good for nothing. Outlets are everywhere! Plug-in chargers are tiny and convenient! This is no better than hamsters running on wheels to power it.

  31. good stuff by Jacer · · Score: 1

    now if i ever get stranded on the side of a mountian i won't have to fling my batteries into the snow so that they can be magically recharged, i do emphasis magical, because frozen batteries don't work

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  32. Far Side by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    I am reminded of a far side cartoon by Gary Larsen where a bunch of geeks with one big strong arm are standing around making fun of a guy who doesnt have one big strong arm.

    cant remember exact context though.

    1. Re:Far Side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hey there, 'little arm'."

      They were bowlers.

  33. Environmental benefits? by schnitzi · · Score: 1
    Laudable as the environmental benefits of using person-power to charge a mobile phone are...
    Are there really environmental benefits to this? I mean, the human energy required to turn the crank doesn't come from nowhere.
    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  34. Re:All that excercise finally pays off... by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2

    So it's a reciprocal motion dynamo? I swore the article said it was rotary.

    You know, you can make both your forearms the same size by winding this phone charger with the hand you don't "exercise" with.

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
  35. too bad... by gyratedotorg · · Score: 0, Redundant

    too bad the wind-up phone charger isn't battery powered.

    --
    Gyrate Dot Org - "Where high-tech meets low-life"
  36. I could use an extra hand here... by 0x69 · · Score: 1

    So I'm using 2 hands to crank this thing, holding my cell phone against my ear with my shoulder as I talk, steering through rush hour with my left knee SCRrreeeeee!!CRASH!!

    --
    It's easy to make up & spread cool- and credible-sounding stuff. Finding & checking hard facts is hard work.
  37. Doh. by glh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's bad enough when Susie in her corvette is driving in front of me with her ear glued to the cell phone. Just imagine when her phone starts going out and she's in the middle of a lane change getting ready to wind... (shudder)

  38. hmmm by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    It would be cool to have a phone that has *only* a crank and you would throw it in the trunk - or camper or whatever. When you were hiking, or camping or stranded somewhere - you crank it up for a bit - enought to make a 10 minute phone call - and when you connect you just get charged for that one call....

    prolly a long way from that type of service, but I am sure we will have these some day.

  39. Rewind? by HoBuster · · Score: 1

    Wow, if you had a really bad conversation, you can just rewind it!

  40. Cool Idea by Matty_ · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great idea.

    I wouldn't want to use it to reguarily charge my phone, but it could come in handy in an emergency situation.

  41. Oh, no. by Dthoma · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I know exactly how this is going to be used.

    Picture a crowded intercity train. With an inconsiderate commuter phoning home.

    Then:
    "HELLO? HELLO? I SAID I'M GOING TO BE LATE! HELLO? @#$% battery!"

    Now:
    "HELLO? HELLO? I SAID I'M GOING TO BE LATE, DARLING! Damn."
    (insert loud cranking sound)
    "AAH, THAT'S BETTER! NOW, ANYWAY, I SAID I'M GOING TO BE LATE BACK! HOW LONG? UH, ABOUT HALF AN HOUR TO AN HOUR LATE! YES? CAN YOU PUT MY DINNER IN THE OVEN? WHAT? HANG ON!"
    (insert loud cranking sound)
    "YES, DINNER! IN OVEN! OH, CAN YOU GET THE WASHING MACHINE READY FOR WHEN I COME IN? OK? WAIT, GOING THROUGH A TUNNEL! HANG ON! PUT THE WASHING MACHINE ON! WHAT DO YOU MEAN? MY SUIT! HELLO? HANG ON!"
    (insert loud cranking sound)

    To be repeated ad fucking nauseam.

    --

    Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

  42. foot pedal by bob_jenkins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What they need is a foot pedal. That way you could talk while charging it.

  43. I glad.. by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

    ... that I have been strengthening the muscles in my right arm. Now I can recharge my battery efficiently. Wonder what talk time I would get now :D

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  44. How about.... by joshuarat · · Score: 1

    Everybody wears these things on their hips, why not a charger that that works like a pedometer? I heard the "average person" walks 10 miles just in a normal day. So lets see...3 feet per step=1760 steps per mile=17600 up and down jolts per day. (not counting the horizontal hip shuffles that I personally take my phone off for)

    --
    That tech support that does not kill me...drives me crazier
  45. More-rewarding self-winding idea by guacamolefoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why not combine the crank with an attachment that would make the activity necessary to generate the power to transfer to the cell phone battery a little less annoying and perhaps a little, er, more rewarding? I mean, if you've got to sit there and turn your own crank anyway...

  46. why wind when you can flash... by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are already solar powered battery chargers on the market.

    http://www.teleadaptusa.com/nme/order_solar_powe r. htm

    google cache on
    http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:72Iu9P5i5Xk C: www.teleadaptusa.com/nme/order_solar_power.htm+sol ar+power+mobile+phone+charger&hl=en&ie=UTF -8

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    1. Re:why wind when you can flash... by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

      for those that say "what if it is dark"...

      Well you can always use your wind up torch (yes, one exists) to power the solar powered charger, DUH :D

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  47. Good thing by Matey-O · · Score: 2

    It's a ZDnet site...'or else they'd need a windup chager for their webserver!

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  48. That's STILL NOT A REVIEW! by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 2, Troll

    The article simply quotes drivel from Motorolla. "Motorolla" says this and "Motorolla" says that.

    Is this the state of pathetetic journalism?

    I wanted to see what someone said after they had one in their hands.

    My god! How much time does it really get?

    Heck, Sony claimed I could get three hours battery time off my VAIO laptop. Not once did I see it get two hours from regualar use.

    --
    "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    1. Re:That's STILL NOT A REVIEW! by Jynxeh · · Score: 1

      Did you not read the whole thing? Sure, they used some quotes from the company, but they also pointed out some bad points about it (the light lacking in power, how long it takes to wind up, etc.), and put in their own opinions on how useful it might actually be. To me, that constitutes a review. It gave some information from personal experience that I think I'd take into account...

    2. Re:That's STILL NOT A REVIEW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not motorolla, as in Motor Holla!

      It's MotorOLA you dumb fuck.

    3. Re:That's STILL NOT A REVIEW! by ChanxOT5 · · Score: 1

      Motorolla said nothing.

      Motorola said it all.

      Zen.

  49. Re:fucking 2-post limit sucks bird shit off cars by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sexual Asspussy, you are my favorite troll on srashdot. Your name has an extra special meaning for me since my gf gave me some o' dat. In honor of that occasion I am donating 3 karma points by posting this so-called "offtopic" reply to your truly insightful post.

    Great song. Where did the lyrics come from?

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
  50. Until then by aengblom · · Score: 2
    Until this feature is intergrated into your phone. Try this elequent hack.

    1. Locate a quarter
    2. Purchase scotch tape
    3. Tape quarter to phone
    When you need to make a phone call, but it's dead. Just remove quarter.
    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    1. Re:Until then by NanoGator · · Score: 3

      When you need to make a phone call, but it's dead. Just remove quarter.

      You forgot a step...

      4. Bum another quarter off somebody because phone calls cost $.50

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Until then by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2
      Until this feature is intergrated into your phone. Try this elequent hack.

      Locate a quarter
      Purchase scotch tape
      Tape quarter to phone

      When you need to make a phone call, but it's dead. Just remove quarter.
      Unfortunately, this solution won't work for everybody. If your mother were to keep this phone in her back pocket, she might accidentaly squeeze a booger out of George Washington's nose.
    3. Re:Until then by elmegil · · Score: 1

      That is, until you realize that public phones are getting more and more scarce because everyone these days has a cellphone...

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    4. Re:Until then by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Ummm What about the fact that you are so used to your mobile phone storing all the numbers and being able to look them up by name - so you cannot remember the number.. Next...

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  51. Re:The product page is moderately more interesting by mberman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you read the article, it tells you that for a full charge, you need 35 minutes of charging. 45 seconds will get you the minumum "useful" amount of charge (enough for a short call). However, the best use of this seems to be to start with it fully charged (you can plug it in to charge it up), and then whenever you make a call, or if it's been idle for a day or two, you wind it to top off the battery. That way, when you need to make your 30 minute call, you can do it immediately and pay for it later, rather than having to wind it for 20 minutes before being able to perform that emergency heart surgery...

    --

    This is a self-referential sig

  52. I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I know you're a troll, don't think you fooled me, I'll bite anyway though. Basicly you're asking where our priorities are because we're talking about something that happens today instead of something that happened 57+ years ago. Hmm, get a life, stop trolling and live in the present.

  53. Off the Grid Power + Mesh Networks = ... by namespan · · Score: 2

    Totally grid-free telecom. Say goodbye to dependency on large central organizations for communications.

    No, I don't honestly think that the hand crank is good enough. But combine solar, human (on an exercise device, perhaps), and efficiency gains, and something like this might be possible.

    Of course, no gain will probably power Central Air Conditioning, which seems an awful lot like an essential of life at the moment.... : |

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
  54. Re:foot pedal - Better Yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could put the foot pedal under your brake and/or gas pedal...that way when you were driving, it would slowly charge up! Finally, a way to charge my phone in my car!

  55. Like a solar powered flashlight..... by Tall+Rob+Mc · · Score: 1

    Is this really that useful? Anywhere I go where I would need to charge my cell phone, I can bring my much-smaller-and-easier version that plugs into a wall. If I ever go anywhere that doesn't have a wall plug or car cigarette lighter, chances are I don't get a signal anyway.

  56. Back to the future by lildogie · · Score: 2

    Dating myself here; I flashed on June Lockhart picking up the earpiece of the phone at the farmhouse, cranking feverishly on the wooden box, and shouting into that carbon microphone. (It was all a fake set piece by 1963 when they filmed the series, but still...)

    Lassie come home!

  57. Re:The product page is moderately more interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The nerd in me wants to know if you are winding a sping or direct charging....


    RTFA.

    The term 'wind-up' isn't strictly accurate. The mechanism used isn't clockwork -- rather, the handle winds a generator, which charges an internal Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH) battery. This can then be used to charge your mobile's own battery, or to provide power for a call directly.
  58. That thing could save me... by Jynxeh · · Score: 1

    I'm forgetful and apt to wandering around with friends outside, with a dead cellphone in my bag, since I always forge to recharge it. I think that'd save me from many clashes with my irate parents after they get sick of not knowing where I am for the tenth day in a row... plus I might stop missing dinner and living solely on ramen noodles then.

    I loev wind-up stuff like that anyway, my family has a clock and a flashlight for camping, and they're great.

  59. Hasn't Motorola BTDT? by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    Call me crazy, but didn't they already have this 'technology' about 60 years ago? Every episode of M*A*S*H has either Radar or Klinger cranking up a radio before calling Sparky.

    And by 'they', I do specifically mean Motorola. Wasn't their start in making walkie-talkie's and other military communications equipment like this wind-up radio?

    Where's the news?

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:Hasn't Motorola BTDT? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Call me crazy, but didn't they already have this 'technology' about 60 years ago? Every episode of M*A*S*H has either Radar or Klinger cranking up a radio before calling Sparky.

      That was probably a field phone, not a radio. The crank would've rung the phone at the other end of the line.

      And by 'they', I do specifically mean Motorola. Wasn't their start in making walkie-talkie's and other military communications equipment like this wind-up radio?

      http://www.motorola.com/content/1,1037,115-110,00. html

      Their first product was a battery eliminator to enable a radio to run on AC instead of the three batteries (filament, plate, and bias) they previously needed. After that, they got into car radios, which is where they got their name.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  60. Emergency use by chiph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The FreeCharge should be in everyone's hurricane/earthquake/riot prepardness kit.

    There's a much better chance of the cell-phone tower working (they have generators) than the 3 miles of cable between you and the CO still being in one piece. You'll still have trouble getting dial-tone, but that's just a matter of retrying until you do.

    Chip H.

    1. Re:Emergency use by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      That's horrible advice. Unless you are a crew worker in an emergency you should stay off your phone entirely. I mean that is as if you don't want the crew to rescue people!

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Emergency use by Helen+O'Boyle · · Score: 1
      Chip wrote:
      The FreeCharge should be in everyone's hurricane/earthquake/riot prepardness kit.

      There's a much better chance of the cell-phone tower working (they have generators) than the 3 miles of cable between you and the CO still being in one piece.
      After the Nisqually quake in the Seattle area last year, power was off in the well-shaken Green River Valley area until late that night. Our office phone system did not work, because the PBX didn't have power. Cell phones did (when you could get a connection, since everyone was on them).

      I have a FreePlay radio in each of my emergency kits (one in the bedroom and one in the garage), and will add this gadget. A few minutes of winding in order to be able to call someone and tell them where I am and that I'm OK sounds reasonable to me.
  61. "Review, not speculation..." by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has reviews of this strange new technology known as a Dynamo?! Wow! Now we no longer have to wonder if these results of witchcraft actually work.

    I wondered myself, since it's brand new technology :P

    What is so amazing about this again?

  62. Third World Use by Smurphy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One use they don't bring up that they should is being able to use cell phones where there isn't any electricity to charge them. In a lot of the poorer countries they are going straight to cell phones and skipping laying copper. The lack of electricity to charge the phones has been one of the stumbling blocks for getting phone service to some really remote areas.

    1. Re:Third World Use by Jynxeh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's an excellent point- I heard that some of the other wind-up/solar stuff that's come out in the past few years (radios, flashlights, etc.) was actually developed with the Third World in mind. I wonder if that was the case with this, or it was simply developed for forgetful Western consumers like myself, who can't remember to charge their phones up. :-p

    2. Re:Third World Use by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

      If it's designed for third world consumption, then...

      It'll be cheap!

      --
      This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
    3. Re:Third World Use by Sarin · · Score: 2

      Sounds great. But you forget if there's no electricity, then there won't be any antennes from the phonecompany because those need electricity too. And they have only a small radius.

    4. Re:Third World Use by Smurphy · · Score: 1

      True. However they can usually at least get power for the towers, even if it is just a gas generator, especially if there is money to be made. However most of the residents can't afford to have electricity run to their homes.

    5. Re:Third World Use by radish · · Score: 2

      A good point, but the nice thing about many lightly populated areas of the world (I'm thinking much of africa, central australia) is that they're (a) flat and (b) have very few buildings. This increases the tower's range hugely. As an example, there is a cell tower on top of the cliffs near Dover (south east UK). If you get the ferry over the channel to france, you can still pick up a signal from it almost all the way over (about 25 miles), because there are no hills or buildings.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  63. Human energy not free by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 4, Funny

    let's say the extra energy lost requires you to eat an extra hamburger.

    Now this hamburger needs to be heated up. In a place where they need to have light. And toilets. And wireless headsets. And lighted billboards that can be electronically updated. But first of all a cow had to be created. And fed. In a place with electric fences. And a sewer system. And grass that had to be mowed by a tractor that had to be created somewhere in Pennsylvania. And then the cow had to be hollered over to the slaughterhouse in a big truck made in Detroit. And the truck would do about a mile to the gallon. And require new tires every 6 months. And the slaughterhouse would have to buy new Magnum 45s every year to shoot the lead bullets in the cow's brain. And all those people that where so busy making your hamburger now also lost energy and could use a hamburger themselves.

    And you call THIS good for the environment?!

    1. Re:Human energy not free by Tralfamadorian · · Score: 1

      MMMMMM Hamburger.

    2. Re:Human energy not free by Slur · · Score: 2

      No matter how loud I holler the cow won't go into the slaughterhouse. What am I doing wrong?

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    3. Re:Human energy not free by GrandCow · · Score: 1

      Quick! Someone tell the stock brokers! I'll be expecting an announcement in a day or two that says this product is heralding in an upsurge in the economy. Think of all the jobs this product will create!

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
    4. Re:Human energy not free by blazin · · Score: 1

      Dammit, you beat me to it :)

    5. Re:Human energy not free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slaughter houses do not use guns to kill animals. They use an electric device that propells a metal rod for a few inches with a lot of force that punctures the skull and kills the animal. Think of it as a mini electric powered jack hammer.

      Also, the semi trucks probably get 5 mpg or better. But it's a stupid point. People are giong to eat that hamburger anyway. This is a trivial amount of exercise and shouldn't require any extra food.

    6. Re:Human energy not free by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      If god didn't want us to eat animals, why'd he make them out of meat?

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    7. Re:Human energy not free by gavinjolly · · Score: 1

      Yes and we all know the majority of people dont get enough exercise. It is free maybe we will just burn a few more calories.

      Now, what about gyms providing cradles for mobile phones so the can be cranked by exercycles. Your workout would fully charge the phone.

      I read about a system for lighting using white leds charging batteries for third world houses to have some light at night. The system was charged by pedal power.

      Get fit, less fat and have a constantly charged cellphone.

      --

      The weathers here - Wish you were beautiful

    8. Re:Human energy not free by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 2

      Let's see:
      let's say the extra energy lost requires you to eat an extra hamburger.

      Macdonalds Quarter Pounder with Cheese - 530 calories

      Big Mac - 560 calories

      30 minutes of pedalling exercise bike at gym this lunchtime - 250 calories.

      I don't know how much effort it would require to use this phone charger, but it's got to be a lot less than 30 minutes on an exercise bike. Most north americans are probably carrying around tens of thousands of calories worth of stored fat. You might as well use it for something.

      HH
      --

  64. Ahhh... the old phone in the shoe trick, eh? by armyofone · · Score: 1

    Agent 99...? Agent 99...? Is that you?

    --
    "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
  65. bike adapter? by duncanIdaho.clone() · · Score: 1

    wouldn't the environmentally conscious also be riding a bike to work? Think of the potential charge when you are at the top of a hill ...

    --

    feints within feints, wheels within wheels

  66. emergency by doggo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I bought one of those Sony emergency radios, it's bright orange,AM/FM, has little light for the dial, water resistant,an audio beacon (sounds like a smoke detector), and it's crank/battery/ac adapter powered. It's pretty basic, but it sounds okay.

    I bought it to be my work radio, just to listen to talk radio while I'm working in my office. But I started using it in the kitchen while I'm cooking because it's small and durable.

    Anyway, I figured I'd never have to buy batteries for it. If you crank the thing for one minute, you get about 30 minutes of power. But the thing is, it's a pretty stiff crank (heh), and you have to crank it pretty fast. After about 3 minutes, you're pretty much sick of doing it. But that does give you a good hour or so of listening. It'd be good if you were stranded in the woods and you wanted to hear the ball game, or use the smoke detector noise scare away predators. Otherwise, it's just easier to use batteries, which seem to last forever.

    These crank-up electronic devices are really only useful in emergency situations, or by really committed environmentalists.

  67. Ob Simpsons Quote by mssymrvn · · Score: 1

    "In this house we obey the laws of Thermodynamics!"
    - Homer J. Simpson

  68. another review is bizarre by elmegil · · Score: 2
    I did a google search and came up with a different review from ABCnews.com, that appeared to be a prerelease review. In one inexplicable quote, they say It's an ideal tool to have in the car....

    Now, I don't know about you, but when I'm in a car, I have a battery and if the car is running an alternator that can be used to charge the phone just fine.....

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  69. Here's another idea by JustKidding · · Score: 0
    How about using radio waves to charge the battery? Like, using a antenna (possibly the one that's already in the phone) and some very simple circuitry (L/C ring) get energy from strong radio waves. This ought to be enough to charge the battery since it will be generating energy all the time.

    I'm just not sure if you could get this approved, since it may be interfering with the radio transmission you're tapping into.

    This is pretty much how those "incoming call" lights (on the back of a pen) work.

  70. Finally humans are really used as batteries. Yay! by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Seriously though, this gadget could be useful in remote areas of the world. Maybe some village without electricity can get one to listen to weather forecasts, report emergencies and so on. Most people can do better with an AA cell phone adapter though.

  71. Re:foot pedal - Better Yet! by armyofone · · Score: 1

    Your car must have been built in the 1920's to not have one of these...

    --
    "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
  72. Wanted to get onw, but I have a StarTac... by levik · · Score: 2
    I loved the idea of this, since I sometimes go camping, and my battery ends up dying after a day or two... When I went to the motorola website, they only had the freecharge listed for their current crop of phones.

    Mine's a StarTAC, which they have lamentably stopped producing, and I wasn't sure if the charger would work with it, given that it wasn't one of the listed supported models... Anyone know if they're compatible?

    --
    Ñ'
  73. A new freeway hazard by Nykkel · · Score: 1

    I thought it was bad enough that people drive with one hand on the wheel and one hand holding their phone while they babble into it. Now we'll have people who have already been doing this for the past 30 minutes and suddenly need to recharge their phone. One hand to hold the phone, one hand to turn the crank, and one hand to drive?

    Someone's going to have to lend them a hand.

  74. Footpower by magicianuk · · Score: 1

    Trevor Bayliss, the inventor of the FreePlay radio and thence of this invention, has been showing the shoe charging piezo stuff for several years now, but no one has actually marketed it yet ... he has something that fits on the back of a shoe, you walk, it charges a battery that can be used for cellphones and laptops ... he sees it as very useful for developing countries ... like the original radio

  75. Who'da thunkit? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

    60 or 70 years after we quit using hand-cranked generators in phones, we get them back again.

  76. and a Nelson-Mandela approved radio, too by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    http://www.greenmarketing.com/articles/IB_March02. html describes a batteryless radio, which has been praised by none other than Nelson Mandela as a major step for third-world countries.

    Assuming a village can gang together to pay for a phone + contract, it may allow them to cut the middleman out and get a better deal for whatever wares they produce. Maybe one day the rich world will even accept to import third-world foodstuffs and manufactured goods ;-)

    So this is a Good Thing.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:and a Nelson-Mandela approved radio, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe one day the rich world will even accept to import third-world foodstuffs and manufactured goods ;-)

      Damn, you're dumb. Where the hell do you think a lot of the cheap manufactured goods come from? Tropical fruits? Sure some of it's substandard and wouldn't be allowed on the market by the FDA/USDA/(insert EU equivalent here) if it were produced locally, but it's cheap.

  77. Re:Off the Grid Power + Mesh Networks = ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Say goodbye to dependency on large central organizations for communications.

    Who the fuck are you getting your phone service from?

  78. Wind power next.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next we will see a little propeller that will spin as you talk into the mike and generate a current. Great for those idiots like lawyers who never hang up.

    Im also waiting for the step up from the ciggerette loads of the 70's, Slip it in and they explode when lit. Now if we can just get a battery pack to do that on the phones, press talk and boom.

  79. For teens? by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    To fully charge the battery from flat would take 35 minutes of winding -- something you're unlikely to do in one go.

    Man, I haven't done 35 minutes of cranking since I was a teenager.

  80. _old_ news. by smblion · · Score: 1

    This was reviewed MONTHS ago by TechTV.

  81. Some alternatives... by Aaton · · Score: 1
    Here are just afew links to other devices people looking to charge there phone while in the woods or just way from an outlet.

    http://www.hand-e-charger.com/
    http://www.aladdinpower.com/
    http://www.snpower.com/products.htm
  82. Check out .. by phnx90 · · Score: 0

    This solar powered cell phone charger. You can daisy chain up to 5 of them for more power.

  83. Or Second World by mangu · · Score: 2

    I remember a picture I saw once in a book, published in the 1960's, showing a Soviet radio, powered by a solid-state thermoelectric generator set over a kerosene lamp. Of course, the amout of power needed by a six-transistor short-wave radio is much less than that needed to power a cell-phone transmitter, even considering 1960's technology.

  84. Re:foot pedal - Better Yet! by superpeach · · Score: 1

    Maybe they have a non-smoking car? and why not, non smoking pubs exist - which I find very strange.

  85. better idea by Stonent1 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you are into biking or mountain biking, just rig it to run off your wheel. That way it will charge much more quickly. For that matter, I could rig it to an office chair to make good use of those occasional office chair races. :)

  86. Me am Prospero by algernon7 · · Score: 1
    'maybe playwrights don't know much about English' I'd hazard a guess that only the English speaking ones do.

    Since we so firmly moved from the realm of grammar to the 'world of theater' with the uber-literate reference to The Tempest and the un-abashed bashing of all playwrights everywhere (and what has a playwright ever done to you - besides perhaps passion plays and anything by Beckett?), I think it's fair to mention that the convention being attacked has nothing to do with which little pronoun can go the city, or the market, or wherever.
    In the sweet little drama we were presented with earlier - and it must be a play, as you brought up theater - there are two characters:

    Me Her
    The symbol before the colon isn't bound by any of the rules you were applying. It could just as easily been a dialogue between A and B or Joanie and Chachi.
    I would save your impromptu grammar lessons for the green room.

    I can't honestly say that I'm sure I spelled Chachi right. Feel free to correct me.

  87. Re:Finally humans are really used as batteries. Ya by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 2

    ... only when combined with "a form of fusion" :-)

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  88. Re:foot pedal - Better Yet! by armyofone · · Score: 1

    Well... I'm not a smoker but I wouldn't want a 'non-smoking' car. I'm pretty glad my vehicle has a cigarette lighter. It sure comes in handy for plugging in mobile phone adapters, portable air pumps, etc...

    Given a choice between using a cigarette adapter and having to crank this gizmo by hand a few hundred times; I'd rather put my arm to use tipping a pint of Guinness, thank you very much ;-]

    --
    "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
  89. Re:foot pedal - Better Yet! by Nakago4 · · Score: 0

    I thought non-smoking cars just got rid of the ashtray and lighter itself.. the cigarette lighter port is still there, but capped off with something else. So you would still be able to use that port for power.

  90. Much cheaper alternative wind-up charger by eddiec · · Score: 1

    There has been a cheaper wind-up cell phone charger available in the UK for a while, I've seen ads for months. I can't find a web site, but there is a product page for it on the Carphone Warehouse site. At £9.99 I suspect it lacks the extras of the Freeplay FreeCharge such as the built battery and added torch, but it does the job, and it is available for more than just Motorola phones, it will charge Nokia, Siemens and Ericsson phones as well.

  91. Which one is progress? by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    First they were telling us that moving from hand-cranked coffee grinders to electric coffee grinders was progress. Now they're telling us that moving from electric cell phone chargers to hand-cranked cell phones chargers is progress.

    So are hand-cranks "old-fashioned" or are they "innovative"? Technology is so confusing these days.

  92. very old news... by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

    There's been chargers around like this on those fancy pants airplane magazines and sharper image for a loooong time...

    This is nothing new...also this particular charger has been around for awhile as well... so (from the venerable words of Chuck B.) Good grief...