Google representatives have instituted a policy of not talking with CNET News.com reporters until July 2006 in response to privacy issues raised by a previous story.
Sorry, Eric, but 'privacy' isn't the issue here. All the information Cnet obtained about you was freely available on the Web, and you have no reasonable expectation of privacy there."
Just because it's available on the internet doesn't mean that's a reason to publish it.
I support Google's ability to not report to whoever they like. If cnet wants to continue to act like a supermarket tabloid, it would be in Google's best interest not to speak w/ them.
It's very hard to make out what your software actually does from your website. Is it a nagios frontend? webmin?
If you're in your 6th generation, provide an online demo or at least some screenshits w/o having to squint to see them embedded in a PDF. I'm not talking about a 'demo' where a salesperson shows me some screenshots that have been selected for their marketing value. I want to see how the software actually works.
I doubt the software RLX came up w/ is any closer to being "the first". rsync? cron? expect?
c'mon man, stop trying to pretend your comment is anything but an ad for your software.
OBTW, I _really_ love the part about how your ticketing software is watched 24 hours a day. right.......
The FCC places limits on the allowable gain that an antenna used on "public" frequencies can have.
It's not that the FCC doesn't like reformed potato paste, it has to do w/ keeping the freq you use from interfering from others trying to use the shared medium.
Get your license. It's a piece of cake. It allows for using less congested freqs and to pump out more power.
>>I would like to see your proof of this. Because, combining a finite series of neurons apparently produces conciousness in humans. Have you or anyone else proved that neurons are more powerful than "light switches"?
When was the last time a light switch turned itself off?
You're going to block ports to stop a developer from extracting code from your location?
Any developer worth his salt would have no problem overcoming any such restriction.
It the strictest sense, you may be correct. It will be harder to get a copy of the code. Harder in the sense that it may be harder to make a left turn by taking 3 rights, but in no way is it difficult.
I once tried hillybilly wine made from Welch's. It was starwberry flavor. I thought it'd be cute to do a peanut butter so as to be able to make a PBJ wine. Trust me PB doesn't work too well.
I've noticed a slowdown in computer response when using gig cards and moving lotsa' data. I thought the bottleneck may have moved to the file systems. Didn't seem to be the case as pumping dummy data throught the nic also caused issues.
I didn't pursue it far enough to see where where the actual problem was. These cards may help, but my money is on a faster cpu.
Being that none of my users would have that type of access to files that they wouldn't already have in our 'normal' current configuration, I don't see this as being a problem with this setup.
This is a permissions problem, not a multi-seat issue.
It doesn't need to be a harmonic (radio term loosely related to multiple) of the freq the transceivers are transmitting/listening on. The wavelength of the radiation emitted from the offending device just needs to match (or be a harmonic of) any length of electrical conductor used in an important system to cause noise.
Slashdot Mirror
"Fom TFA:
Google representatives have instituted a policy of not talking with CNET News.com reporters until July 2006 in response to privacy issues raised by a previous story.
Sorry, Eric, but 'privacy' isn't the issue here. All the information Cnet obtained about you was freely available on the Web, and you have no reasonable expectation of privacy there."
Just because it's available on the internet doesn't mean that's a reason to publish it.
I support Google's ability to not report to whoever they like. If cnet wants to continue to act like a supermarket tabloid, it would be in Google's best interest not to speak w/ them.
Aren't Sprint cars an entirely different class than those in the Nascar Nextel Cup?
"The code was hard to write. The code should be hard to read."
Was that some form of early DMCA or IP lockdown?
Hams get the neat ability to modify their equipment to pump out more power and use better/stringer/faster toys. (Legally)
This is also true when using cantennas.
Read up here for the commercial aspects:
http://www.michwave.com/bbnetwork/faq/fcc.htm
Here for the amateur side:
http://www.qrpis.org/~k3ng/ham_wisp.html
Not to burst your bubble...
It's very hard to make out what your software actually does from your website. Is it a nagios frontend? webmin?
If you're in your 6th generation, provide an online demo or at least some screenshits w/o having to squint to see them embedded in a PDF. I'm not talking about a 'demo' where a salesperson shows me some screenshots that have been selected for their marketing value. I want to see how the software actually works.
I doubt the software RLX came up w/ is any closer to being "the first". rsync? cron? expect?
c'mon man, stop trying to pretend your comment is anything but an ad for your software.
OBTW, I _really_ love the part about how your ticketing software is watched 24 hours a day. right.......
The FCC places limits on the allowable gain that an antenna used on "public" frequencies can have.
It's not that the FCC doesn't like reformed potato paste, it has to do w/ keeping the freq you use from interfering from others trying to use the shared medium.
Get your license. It's a piece of cake. It allows for using less congested freqs and to pump out more power.
Mike Coles
'bluelip'
kc2ciw
I enjoyed the new sounds of the handshake sounds that I got everytime I upgraded my modem.
Getting modems to rspond to my whsitling was cool also.
don't know 'bout that. I'm a fan of sloppy mouse focus.
You really don't need for the window to have focus for you to use it. (At least in a CLI mode)
I could see the benefit for a full GUI though.
In CLI, I can type commands in a partially hidden window and the results will show within the window that has focus.
It is very useful for admins.
Any others out there that use this approach? Image editors? Video folks? Financial field?
>>I would like to see your proof of this. Because, combining a finite series of neurons apparently produces conciousness in humans. Have you or anyone else proved that neurons are more powerful than "light switches"?
When was the last time a light switch turned itself off?
You're going to block ports to stop a developer from extracting code from your location?
Any developer worth his salt would have no problem overcoming any such restriction.
It the strictest sense, you may be correct. It will be harder to get a copy of the code. Harder in the sense that it may be harder to make a left turn by taking 3 rights, but in no way is it difficult.
I was told that MCSE really means:
Mine-sweeper Consultant, Solitaire Expert
-or-
Must Consult Someone Experienced
Anyone who uses the phrase "real deal" to describe themself, probably isn't.
ohh.... how could I have forgotten that classic?
I once tried hillybilly wine made from Welch's. It was starwberry flavor. I thought it'd be cute to do a peanut butter so as to be able to make a PBJ wine. Trust me PB doesn't work too well.
http://winemaking.jackkeller.net/
This guy is great. Everything from mild to wild.
hunt, homebrew beer/wine, tan animal hides.... you know.... the red-blooded american things.
I've noticed a slowdown in computer response when using gig cards and moving lotsa' data. I thought the bottleneck may have moved to the file systems. Didn't seem to be the case as pumping dummy data throught the nic also caused issues.
I didn't pursue it far enough to see where where the actual problem was. These cards may help, but my money is on a faster cpu.
Not related to the topic, but needed if you want to get to the site.
The admin has blocked people coming from slashdot. If you want to get there, you must reload the page or type it into the browser's address field.
Again, the link is not broken, the admin just doesn't like people sucking up his bandwidth.
When someone is sending me information, I care about the content. If I have to look 'through' the html to find it, forget it.
I will not read an email that comes that arrives w/ HTML. Give me the information I want, don't try to impress me w/ color and glitz.
HTML in email is annoying and distracting.
The happy noises heard are the coins falling into their pockets.
AMd has been good to us lately. i think they'll continue to 'do the right thing'. Maybe they're the Google of hardware.
Mike
They can insert ads into the pages. increases their revenue. Appears reasonable enough for me.
Do they have a federal CA or must each organization pat verisign or the like? (Or are self-signed sufficient?)
Being that none of my users would have that type of access to files that they wouldn't already have in our 'normal' current configuration, I don't see this as being a problem with this setup.
This is a permissions problem, not a multi-seat issue.
Is any organization openly accepting digitally signed electronic documents as binding contracts?
It doesn't need to be a harmonic (radio term loosely related to multiple) of the freq the transceivers are transmitting/listening on. The wavelength of the radiation emitted from the offending device just needs to match (or be a harmonic of) any length of electrical conductor used in an important system to cause noise.