What are you? Some kind of moron? Of course it gives you the moral justification to break that agreement- the iTunes terms of service are so unreasonable that you have to break that agreement to truly exercise your rights to any songs you purchase. Attempting to deny fair use rights to users trumps any claims that breaking the iTunes TOS agreement is unethical.
Re:Ask the girl out on a date!
on
D&D Is 30
·
· Score: 1
That's why you need at least a level 6 lawyer before going through a divorce.
Then you saw wrong. Return of the King was only nominated for sound mixing, and no clips from it were shown when the sound editing nominees were listed. It only won one of the sound awards because it wasn't nominated for both.
I still don't get how Daryl can claim that he can't say what code may be infringing SCO's copyrights because it will be removed while also claiming that the allegedly infringing code is so substantial that it can't be removed without crippling Linux. Shouldn't he have to pick one?
While you're at it, find something that will make people care.
Virii, viruses, does it really matter which one people use as the plural of virus? The plural of alveolus is alveoli, bronchius is bronchi, villus is villi, so why can't the plural of virus be virii? Whining whenever people use the spelling you don't like certainly won't solve anything, especially when either one is no more or less proper than the other.
It's not fair at all. I have every right to record a football game to view at my leisure at a later date, regardless of whether someone has 'exclusive' rights.
It's a bad thing because it takes away people's right to fair use for the sake of ensuring that the networks feel safe. Freedoms are being lost under the assumption that everyone must be a criminal.
There is one thing he got wrong. He assumes that Republicans would be the primary benifactors. From what I've seen, the Republicans and Democrats are simply the same beast with two faces.
This isn't about "freedom to be a criminal." The Patriot Act does nothing to solve the underlying problems that caused those poorly named terrorist attacks. (What idiot thought "9/11" was a good name?) Instead it eliminates much of the oversight and checks on law enforcement officials' powers. The abilities granted by the USA PATRIOT Act do not belong in the hands of a presedential administration known for being secretive and abusing its powers, let alone trustworthy parties.
Franklin was quite correct, and society hasn't changed enough to sacrifice our privacy for the terrorism bogeyman. Freedom does come at the price of a perfectly safe world, but it's not worth giving up for the sake of a problem that can be solved without eliminating people's rights.
Holy zombie Jesus! That's the silliest thing I've read today. Nobody was disrespecting your beleifs, and it certainly isn't a matter of decency. It's a name, nothing more. It's ludicrous to expect people to adhere to your rigid, backwards religous notions- especially when there's an opportunity for humor.
That might work. If the ballot box also recorded votes as the ballots were submitted, the results could be compared to the sum of the results on individual machines after the polls close as a form of error detection. If the numbers don't fall within a very small margin of error, it would force a manual count of each ballot.
Slashdot Mirror
What are you? Some kind of moron? Of course it gives you the moral justification to break that agreement- the iTunes terms of service are so unreasonable that you have to break that agreement to truly exercise your rights to any songs you purchase. Attempting to deny fair use rights to users trumps any claims that breaking the iTunes TOS agreement is unethical.
That's why you need at least a level 6 lawyer before going through a divorce.
Futurama's animation budget was significantly higer than Family Guy's, but both series cost about the same amount per episode.
Suspicious of what? Martians with weird fetishes using the rover in a depraved alien porno?
Nope, they finally found Dick Cheney's undisclosed location.
The Chewbacca defense is perfectly logical compared to SCO's legal strategy.
Then you saw wrong. Return of the King was only nominated for sound mixing, and no clips from it were shown when the sound editing nominees were listed. It only won one of the sound awards because it wasn't nominated for both.
I'm wondering if it wouldn't be easier to build the thing out of upsidaisium.
No, he got his definitions right. Millions of kids starving is sad, but it isn't a tragedy. Technically, it's a statistic.
Walter Koenig: "How can you do a spoken word version of a rap song?"
Melllvar: "He found a way."
Of course he looks unhealthy. That's what zombies are supposed to look like.
That shouldn't matter. It's not the size of your pipe, it's how you use it.
I still don't get how Daryl can claim that he can't say what code may be infringing SCO's copyrights because it will be removed while also claiming that the allegedly infringing code is so substantial that it can't be removed without crippling Linux. Shouldn't he have to pick one?
The Jim Henson company was owned by EMTV, a german conglomerate. Henson's heirs bought the company back earlier this year.
Two words: cryogenic stasis. Every year they thaw him out for the new years bash and stick him back in the freezer when they're done.
Virii, viruses, does it really matter which one people use as the plural of virus? The plural of alveolus is alveoli, bronchius is bronchi, villus is villi, so why can't the plural of virus be virii? Whining whenever people use the spelling you don't like certainly won't solve anything, especially when either one is no more or less proper than the other.
It's not fair at all. I have every right to record a football game to view at my leisure at a later date, regardless of whether someone has 'exclusive' rights.
It's a bad thing because it takes away people's right to fair use for the sake of ensuring that the networks feel safe. Freedoms are being lost under the assumption that everyone must be a criminal.
There is one thing he got wrong. He assumes that Republicans would be the primary benifactors. From what I've seen, the Republicans and Democrats are simply the same beast with two faces.
Franklin was quite correct, and society hasn't changed enough to sacrifice our privacy for the terrorism bogeyman. Freedom does come at the price of a perfectly safe world, but it's not worth giving up for the sake of a problem that can be solved without eliminating people's rights.
Holy zombie Jesus! That's the silliest thing I've read today. Nobody was disrespecting your beleifs, and it certainly isn't a matter of decency. It's a name, nothing more. It's ludicrous to expect people to adhere to your rigid, backwards religous notions- especially when there's an opportunity for humor.
Tragedy? My first thought was comedy.
I'm a 10th level vice president.
That might work. If the ballot box also recorded votes as the ballots were submitted, the results could be compared to the sum of the results on individual machines after the polls close as a form of error detection. If the numbers don't fall within a very small margin of error, it would force a manual count of each ballot.
Perhaps we should give the world a preview of life under such treaties and "accidentally" turn off the internet for a few days.