Slashdot Mirror


NASA Mars Press Briefing & "Significant Findings"

An anonymous reader writes "NASA will have a press briefing today at 2 p.m. EST to announce "significant findings". Salty liquid water maybe? Bacteria? This meeting will also be broadcast on NASA TV."

485 comments

  1. Steve Squyres is a Martian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    But I, for one, don't find that particularly significant.

  2. They've found life! by log0n · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bow down before your Martian overlords!

    1. Re:They've found life! by IckySplat · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I for one welcome our new Martian overlords

      --
      Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
    2. Re:They've found life! by LukePieStalker · · Score: 1

      Mars is on its way down. We're the upwardly mobile life form in this corner of the galaxy.

    3. Re:They've found life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I think they found all the missing socks.

  3. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Salty liquid water... bacteria... they didn't need to go to Mars for that, I have it right under each arm.

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Walkiry · · Score: 3, Funny

      If they're running you can bet your ass those are not bacteria.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have that in my pants.

    3. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for finally making /. users look worse than I do.

      Sincerely,
      A NASA Scientist

    4. Re:Hmmm... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed. All this talk about water on Mars. Now if they found a trapdoor, THAT'd be something!

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  4. Now if cable TV companies were only smart enough by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    to carry NASA TV. I swear, the closer you get to Kennedy Space Center, the less chance they will offer it.

  5. Martian life found by poptix_work · · Score: 4, Funny

    For Immediate Release: NASA in conjunction has forged a treaty with the Martian people, part of this agreement stipulates that they will no longer steal our probes for fun, in exchange, the USA has agreed to prevent the Brits from sending any more beagles.

    --
    Just because you disagree doesn't make it offtopic or flamebait.
    1. Re:Martian life found by poptix_work · · Score: 1

      .. In conjunction with the US Government.. rather. Feh.

      --
      Just because you disagree doesn't make it offtopic or flamebait.
    2. Re:Martian life found by anti-trojan · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, they found oil instead. In unrelated news, there are rumours that Martian terrorists are planning an attack against Saturn, and Bush extends the war against terror to outer space.

    3. Re:Martian life found by garyok · · Score: 1

      the USA has agreed to prevent the Brits from sending any more beagles.

      Eh?! The USians are going to tell us to stop deploying invasive surveillance devices? But we've only just got warmed up bugging the NWO^H^H^HUN and now we're supposed to just stop?

      Jeez, you use us and then you break our hearts...

      --
      One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
    4. Re:Martian life found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do too.

    5. Re:Martian life found by cozziewozzie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, the recent spirit photos seem to indicate that the Martians are not really interested in a treaty!

    6. Re:Martian life found by GLowder · · Score: 1

      part of this agreement stipulates that they will no longer steal our probes for fun,...

      The Martians are also to stop probing Earthlings for fun.

      --
      I used to have a good sig...
    7. Re:Martian life found by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      No, they found oil instead. In unrelated news, there are rumours that Martian terrorists are planning an attack against Saturn, and Bush extends the war against terror to outer space.

      It's okay. Bush is a war president.

    8. Re:Martian life found by mikerich · · Score: 1
      in exchange, the USA has agreed to prevent the Brits from sending any more beagles.

      Well you'll doubtless be thrilled to know that the British government is sounding very encouraging about contributing to ESA's Aurora programme which aims to put a lander on Mars later this decade.

      For those of us on the right-hand side of the Pond, there is a Beagle 2 retrospective at the Royal Society next week.

      Beagle2 - the next generation: In conversation with Colin Pillinger

      Monday 8 March 2004 at 7pm at The Royal Society, London or via the RS webcast.

      Beagle 2 was the plucky little spaceship that people in Britain and across the world took to their hearts.

      The dream of a successful Mars landing on Christmas Day 2003 may be over but project leader, Colin Pillinger remains undaunted.

      Join him at the Royal Society as he discusses the scientific and emotional legacy of Beagle 2 and Mars Express and his plans for a new voyage to the Red Planet. Admission is FREE and on a first come, first served basis - no ticket or advance booking required.

      You can also watch this special event live on the internet from www.royalsoc.ac.uk/live.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    9. Re:Martian life found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic, I know, but does anyone else get a warm fuzzy feeling that the brits don;t quite trust the UN and are going all 007 on their asses?... then sharing the goodies with us!

    10. Re:Martian life found by cfuse · · Score: 1
      For Immediate Release: NASA in conjunction has forged a treaty with the Martian people, part of this agreement stipulates that they will no longer steal our probes for fun, in exchange, the USA has agreed to prevent the Brits from sending any more beagles.

      I don't suppose you could ask them to stop probing my anus as well?

  6. Significant findings: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Help, we run out of money !

  7. Waldo? by Guy+Innagorillasuit · · Score: 5, Funny

    They found Waldo? Or did they find Carmen Sandiego?

    1. Re:Waldo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nope; They found Marvin. Consequently, Spirit is no longer operational.

    2. Re:Waldo? by orthogonal · · Score: 0, Funny

      They found Waldo? Or did they find Carmen Sandiego?

      They found the WMDs, Osama bin Laden, and Jimmy Hoffa, thereby justifying Bush's Mars mission plans even to the neo-cons.

      The 4th Amendment, however, is still missing, and presumed Ashcrofted.

    3. Re:Waldo? by krzysztof · · Score: 3, Funny

      Spirit...it could survive being flung across the cold vacuum of interplanetary space, but it couldn't survive even one hit from the Illudium Q36 Space Modulator. Sigh.

    4. Re:Waldo? by elwell642 · · Score: 0

      OMG! THEY FOUND ELVIS!!!

      --

      <insert witty linux comment here>

    5. Re:Waldo? by keester · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or did they find Carmen Sandiego? Come to think of it, she did say she was going to the 4th planet from the Sun. Now, is that Rio de Janeiro, Rome, or Mars? Picking Mars is obviously risky as it will take a few weeks to return and by that time Carmen will likely be long gone.

      --
      Take it easy? I'll take it anyway I can get it . . .
    6. Re:Waldo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps they found one of those 5,000 secret detainees, or one of those Constitutional rights that have disappeared, or Bush's secret plans for stealing Iraq's oil. You know. Those things the left has been preaching about but never delivered.

      Retard.

    7. Re:Waldo? by d2t7m · · Score: 1

      "Picking Mars is obviously risky as it will take a few weeks to return and by that time Carmen will likely be long gone"
      Dont worry, they will capture a henchman as a consolation prize, which in turn will:

      1. Have henchman spill beans
      2. Go after Carmen Sandiago with said spilled beans
      3. ?????
      4. Profit!!!

      --
      -Keys pressed randomly, any words that actually make sense are entirely a coincidence-
    8. Re:Waldo? by Exatron · · Score: 1

      Nope, they finally found Dick Cheney's undisclosed location.

      --
      "I think so, Brain, but 'instant karma' always gets so lumpy." - Pinky
      "Decepticons FOREVER!!!" - Ravage
    9. Re:Waldo? by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1

      Has he got the diodes replaced yet, or are they still bothering him?

    10. Re:Waldo? by justanyone · · Score: 1

      > Nope; They found Marvin. Consequently, Spirit is no longer operational.

      Gud ting dey deedunt fiynd Ehlmer Fudd, tuh huh.
      Of course, he can be a vewee vewee quiet wabbit hunter!
      (grin)

      -- Kevin J. Rice

    11. Re:Waldo? by dlelash · · Score: 1

      They found Dick Cheney.

    12. Re:Waldo? by xaaronx · · Score: 1

      Sing it with me:
      Where in the solar system is:
      CARMEN SANDIEGO?

      --
      It's amazing how much "mature wisdom" resembles being too tired. - Robert Anson Heinlein
  8. NASA TV by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Funny
    Salty liquid water maybe? Bacteria? This meeting will also be broadcast on NASA TV."

    Darn. If it's broadcast on NASA TV, then there's no way on Earth (or Mars, for that matter) that it could possibly be anything of interest.... Forget C-Span, if you want boring TV just be sure to tune in to this.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:NASA TV by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      You've never watched ESA TV then? :)

    2. Re:NASA TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never watched ESA TV then? :)

      Well it's not his fault - due to funding issues ESA TV is broadcasted from a hut near Kourou, French Guyana, with an old can of Cassoulet as emettor.

      The signal can be received with acceptable quality within a radius of approximately 200 meters, unfortunately none of the local tribes have access to electricity. The French government and the 150 civil servants in charge of the programme says that they can hardly do better with a funding of only 2 million euros / day.

  9. Clearly... by Quantum-Sci · · Score: 5, Funny

    They've photographed the Martian who destroyed Beagle II, and other prior landers.

    --
    Campaign finance reform is national security.
    1. Re:Clearly... by Threni · · Score: 5, Funny

      "We got 'em."

    2. Re:Clearly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      News of life on Mars will be rebroadcasted to the world at large by Fox News once they figure out a way to make it agree with the Bible and make very sure there are no WMD's there either.

    3. Re:Clearly... by Attaturk · · Score: 1


      Nope but thanks to new photographic evidence, Colin Powell is pretty sure that the evil-doing Martians have concealed tonnes of weaponised anthrax in underground bunkers. =)

    4. Re:Clearly... by buckeyeguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      and the Martian looks suspiciously like Carrot Top. Hmm... at least he has an endorsement deal waiting for him.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    5. Re:Clearly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations! You've won the first "Mindless Fox News Bashing" award of the day!

    6. Re:Clearly... by whovian · · Score: 1

      NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity's last few seconds of life....

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    7. Re:Clearly... by Helpless+Will · · Score: 1

      Hey, if it gives the space program a much needed shot in the arm, why not?

      WMD's on Mars! Get 'em!

      -H

      --
      "If there's anything more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot now." -- Z. Beeblebrox
    8. Re:Clearly... by first.last · · Score: 0

      I don't think its nice of you to insult Martians like that.

      --
      Wishing I was a millionaire since 1969.
    9. Re:Clearly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who, the Beagle saboteur or the Beagle? I mean, They're either with Us or against Us, and Old Europe is against Us, so perhaps the Beagle was against Us, and its saboteur is with Us? Or is Us?

    10. Re:Clearly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "But the LORD God created not birds of the air, nor fishes of the sea, nor beasts of the field in the worlds amidst the heavens."

      Oh wait. The Bible does not say that.

  10. NASA discovers mission by swschrad · · Score: 2, Funny

    uh, thank you for coming, folks. we have, ahhh, found a place to send things today.....

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  11. OFFTOPIC?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    How on Earth--er, Mars--is this offtopic? Steve Squyres is part of the panel giving the presentation! A significant presentation no less, one that is about Mars!

    Stupid moderators.

  12. I know what it is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of the chief scientists saved a bundle on his car insurance.

    1. Re:I know what it is! by gekkotron · · Score: 0

      Funny, I thought he had lowered his cholesterol.

    2. Re:I know what it is! by netglen · · Score: 1

      Dang, I thought he can now throw a football through a tire hanging from a tree. Go figure.

    3. Re:I know what it is! by scumbucket · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, the chief scientist 'went to see the doctor'; i.e. started taking Viagra.........

      --
      CMDRTACO CHECK YOUR EMAIL!
    4. Re:I know what it is! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      oh shit that was hilarious. you rule

    5. Re:I know what it is! by SkiddyRowe · · Score: 0

      Actually, he just had SubWay for lunch...

      Yeah, yeah, "Offtopic / Redundant" moderate how you will, my self-esteem will recover.

    6. Re:I know what it is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He also lowered his cholesterol

  13. Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A lot of people are saying "salty water", but damn...microbes....it's just too much to hope for.

    1. Re:Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It isn't life. Look at the list of scientists - not a biologist among them. Also, rotini-pasta-shaped rocks nonwithstanding, the rovers simply aren't equipped to detect life. This announcement is just about modern-day (i.e. not just historical) water. Don't get your hopes up.

      That being said, it means there is a possibility there was past life, and perhaps some future probe (or manned landings) will discover microscopic fossils.

    2. Re:Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by Marnhinn · · Score: 3, Informative

      It definently has to do with water - not microbes, and almost certianly saltly water at that. This article on MSNBC talks a fair amount about it.

      More or less, the appearence of the martian bedrock appears to be sedimentary in origin, with a clumpy, sticky soil that hints at a bit of brine. While it's not life, water is one of the building blocks of life.

      --
      There is always a frontier where there is an open and willing mind
    3. Re:Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there enough for one free shrimp from Long John Silver? Time is running out.

    4. Re:Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      This seems like a lot of hype for just that kind of announcement. NASA looking for a PR boost I guess.

    5. Re:Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by dellis78741 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think they will announce both that the bedrock originated in a watery environment and that there is water in liquid form right now in the soil under the Rovers' wheels (in the form of brine). That white 'frost' we have often been seeing in the tracks the Rovers make will turn out to be water that got squeezed out of the soil (and immediately froze).

      --
      ======= ~\_/~\_O Burmese
    6. Re:Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by CXI · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This seems like a lot of hype for just that kind of announcement. NASA looking for a PR boost I guess.

      A lot of hype?! Are you kidding? Liquid water has never been seen naturally anywhere but on Earth. This IS a big deal! It's like the difference between deciding the Earth wasn't flat and actually sailing all the way around it. Yeah, "everyone knows" Mars probably had water, but no one has ever proven it, which is the important part.

    7. Re:Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What if they took a picture of a disturbed looking martian rodent? Hmm? Betcha didn't think of that! Haha!

    8. Re:Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by luna69 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > This seems like a lot of hype..

      Mod me as flamebait, but...

      Do you know ANYTHING about planetary science? The discovery of liquid water (briny or otherwise) is a huge discovery, and changes a great deal of what we've assumed about conditions on Mars (and thus its evolution, potential for life, available resources, etc.).

      --
      No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
    9. Re:Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      What do you mean "not a biologist among them"? John Grotzinger of MIT, who's going to be on the panel, does "biogeology". Check out his research at:

      http://www-eaps.mit.edu/sedlab/projects.html

    10. Re:Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by first.last · · Score: 0

      the rovers simply aren't equipped to detect life

      They have microscopes. Hell, I could detect life with the Sears-Roebuck POS microscope I had when I was 12. Just because its for geological studies doesn't mean it can't be used to detect microbes.

      --
      Wishing I was a millionaire since 1969.
    11. Re:Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by njchick · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually, it would be more exciting if they found evidence of lakes in the past than traces of water now. Presence of liquid water is almost a certainty. Pathfinder and Viking 2 showed frost on the surface. We know the temperature of the soil, we know that it has salts, we know the atmospheric pressure. It can be modelled on Earth.

      Now, if Mars had lakes, it would indicate that it was warmer, that its atmosphere was more dense, that it could have harbored life and that the water is trapped somewhere in large quantities.

    12. Re:Seriously, any NASA geeks got the scoop? by njchick · · Score: 1

      They were specific that they will talk about a discovery made by Opportunity. If present water was discovered, I think they would have mentioned Spirit.

  14. Red Planet by GuyinVA · · Score: 0

    They've disovered that the red palnet isn't really red. We've just been looking at it with rose colored glasses.

    "Don't forget what happened to the man who suddenly got everything he ever wanted".."He lived happily ever after"-Willy Wonka

  15. Maybe? by ambisinistral · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Maybe they finally found a giant butt to go along with the giant face.

    Hey, don't blame me for the bad joke... what are you supposed to say regarding a news conference about an unknown topic?

    --

    deserve's got nothing to do with it...

    1. Re:Maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely.

      The butt would be facing inward towards the planet.

      Perhaps some other type of genitalia?

    2. Re:Maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Maybe they finally found a giant butt to go along with the giant face.

      Don't be silly. Everyone knows that the butt is on mercury.
    3. Re:Maybe? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Now all we need is Dib to go on a rampage with Zim, monster truck style (SUNDAY SUNDAY SUNDAY!).

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  16. Significant finding? by Zone-MR · · Score: 5, Funny

    They've found the Beagle :=)

    1. Re:Significant finding? by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Or a number of other probes

      (damn you for beating me to my joke :)

    2. Re:Significant finding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they found Jimmy Hoffa.

  17. Re:Now if cable TV companies were only smart enoug by notque · · Score: 5, Funny

    I swear, the closer you get to Kennedy Space Center, the less chance they will offer it.

    Of course. If Kennedy Space Center isn't sold out by the Thursday before the week, Nasa TV is blacked out for all the surrounding areas.

    Go Support your local space exploration!

    --
    http://use.perl.org
  18. Or maybe.. by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Bugblatter Beast of Traal destroyed both of our Mars Rovers because we did not equip them with towels to wrap around their video cameras.

    --
    Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
  19. I hope it's not life by crymeph0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's right. Because you know what will happen then don't you? The more aggressive environmentalists will say we can't send people there, and no way in hell can you colonize Mars, because we'll screw up the Martian bugs' habitat. And then even our robotic missions will have to go through some sort of expensive sterilization to make sure they don't squish anything. It would, in short, take all the fun out of the final frontier.

    --
    It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
    1. Re:I hope it's not life by 23skiddoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah. Check out the Red/Green/Blue Mars trilogy by Kim Stanley Robinson. One of the interesting things was the bacteria and molds that the scientists hid within some of the probes to "seed" Mars. And in defiance of some of their collegues that wanted a pristine Mars.

      --

      [ insert your own witty .sig here ]

    2. Re:I hope it's not life by tmasssey · · Score: 5, Informative
      Mars probes already go through some sort of expensive sterilization process. They want to avoid contamination.

    3. Re:I hope it's not life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree! Space is supposed to be all about chicks in go-go boots and sex with green women.

    4. Re:I hope it's not life by Mean_Nishka · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I agree.. Beyond political concerns finding life (especially microbial) adds an entirely new level of danger to astronauts visiting the planet..

      If we all came from the same 'stuff,' it's likely these microbes could be compatible enough with humans to cause some nasty infections.

    5. Re:I hope it's not life by lambent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right. Because the government has a great track record of respecting the environment and listening to scientists.

      If it is the sort of "mars can support life" thing, you can expect SimMars style terraforming to begin any minute now.

      If it has ANYTHING to do with money (the manufacture of), you can bet the gov't will be all over that like stink on shit.

      /and yes, i'm mostly joking. mostly.

    6. Re:I hope it's not life by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      they already get sterilised.

      moreover, it's very unlikely that stuff from here would contaminate whole mars anyways.

      and even moreover, so what if it would contaminate most of it? isn't that the whole point of dreaming about terraforming?? if there's signs of life there it means other, much more significant things! answer to things like "is earth the only place in the universe with life?" and other 'little' things.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:I hope it's not life by hikerhat · · Score: 1

      The article you link to seems to indicate that in the future they hope to go through an effective sterilization processes, but haven't developed one yet. It is a hard problem, and they only have theories on how to do it at this point.

    8. Re:I hope it's not life by gobbo · · Score: 1
      One of the interesting things was the bacteria and molds that the scientists hid within some of the probes to "seed" Mars. And in defiance of some of their collegues that wanted a pristine Mars.

      Even more interesting is KSR's exploration of the tension between culture, faith, science, and politics, leading to a series of really complex contradictions expressed as a movement. The Reds (mars' version of our Greens) resort to sabotage and an underground in order to reverse terraforming, according to a kind of scientific-spiritual code of respect for the new wilderness. If you can stand the occasional boredom of 300 year-olds with memory loss, the trilogy's a good mix of hard SF and political conjecture.

    9. Re:I hope it's not life by ethanms · · Score: 1

      we could easily be the result of a "dirty" probe sent here 3 billion years ago...

      Although I will admit that it would suck to announce results of finding life on another planet only to figure out that someone sneezed on the probe before take off.

    10. Re:I hope it's not life by jafac · · Score: 1

      I wonder about this, because I recall also hearing about how a component blew out in the assembled vehicle, and the probe had to be taken apart on the pad so the component could be replaced - did they re-sterilize it AFTER that procedure? and How?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  20. News Flash! by NSash · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pressing news: later today, pressing news will be announced.

    1. Re:News Flash! by Samrobb · · Score: 2, Funny
      Pressing news: later today, pressing news will be announced.

      You're confusing the NASA announcement with the SCO announcement.

      Then again, maybe that's what's going on... SCO will announce a partnership with NASA, by which means they intend to:

      (a) Discover life on Mars,
      (b) Introduce said life to Linux, and then
      (c) Sue them into submission to their new Earth Overlords.

      Actually, that sounds a whole lot more plausible than what SCO's done so far...

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    2. Re:News Flash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, why couldn't this wait until 2:00?

    3. Re:News Flash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The discovered the Europeans were right..there is water on Mars!

    4. Re:News Flash! by geeber · · Score: 1

      Because it would have deprived hundreds of posters an extra opportunity for "All your probes are belong to us" jokes.

  21. Let me guess, they found who SCO is suing on mars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    And maybe even the mysterious missing millions and millions of lines of sco code as well...

  22. News about Mars. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, they found remnants of bacterial life and water but...

    ... not on Mars. The probes navigational systems malfunctioned and they spend the last few weeks driving around Nevada instead.

    1. Re:News about Mars. by chamilto0516 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, I've seen the images sent back from the rover. Nevada is cool.

      --
      Magic Eight Ball: Outlook not so good., Hmmm, how about Excel and Word?
    2. Re:News about Mars. by argStyopa · · Score: 5, Funny

      Malfunction?

      Heck, I thought that was the mission plan. The "Mars" set is in the building right next to the "Apollo" set.

      --
      -Styopa
    3. Re:News about Mars. by Wakkow · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're looking at it wrong.. The rover malfunctioned and drove across the lot to the "Apollo" set. The big news is that it's now "exploring the moon"...

  23. NASA TV via Internet - RTFA by michael+path · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:NASA TV via Internet - RTFA by mycr0ft · · Score: 3, Informative

      at the risk of being a Karma-whore, I should point out that xine plays the ASX stream just fine. No need for any non-free stuff to watch NASA TV wih bated breath.

      --

      Me physicist. Me make rockets.
    2. Re:NASA TV via Internet - RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mplayer worked great. Thanks.

      mplayer -vo sdl 'mms://wmbcast.nasa-global.speedera.net/wmbcast.na sa-global/wmbcast_nasa-global_jan042004_1732_53706 '

    3. Re:NASA TV via Internet - RTFA by Docrates · · Score: 1

      So does media player classic, and it also plays the "real" feed if you have Real Alternative.

      --

      There are two kinds of people in the world: Those with good memory.
  24. Microbes? I doubt it. by tgd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't think either rover had any instruments designed for detecting any form of life. Unless it was significantly bigger than a microbe and could be seen with the relatively low-power microscope on the rover, I suppose.

    1. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yesterday, space.com had a photo with a clipping that zoomed in on an interesting part. When I tried to find it this morning, it was pulled from the site. (It was in the update to their rather `dramatic` NASA briefing announcement.)

    2. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by Pond823 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I hate it when people are right.

    3. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by BRSQUIRRL · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are correct...I don't believe the microscopic imager has the magnification muscle to view something as small as bacteria, and the Mossbauer spectrometer is very specific in what it can analyze (iron-bearing minerals). These rovers are, as designed, primarily geological instruments.

      For details about what the rovers are carrying, instrument-wise, see this page.

    4. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by JDevers · · Score: 1

      Trust me light magnification isn't the best or most reliable way to recognise signs of life...even on Earth with humans at the scope. More than likely they could infer living organisms through spectrographic identification of by-products of theoretical living creatures...

      I agree though, I don't think the rovers really have the capabilities to positively identify life.

    5. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by Transcendent · · Score: 1

      Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't think either rover had any instruments designed for detecting any form of life.

      Along with it's drilling tools and such, it carried a spectrometer (or something of the sort) to detect mineral and chemical composition.

      That's all you need for a "life detector."

    6. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by ENOENT · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, it would have to be bigger than a microbe. Like maybe shai hulud.

      --
      That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
    7. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Unless it was significantly bigger than a microbe and could be seen with the relatively low-power microscope on the rover, I suppose.

      I'm guessing that the rover used its robotic arm to lift up a rock, and underneath it found a bunch of those little brown bugs that curl up into a ball when startled. Those things seem to be everywhere.

    8. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by orim · · Score: 1

      Maybe they packed an UV lamp on the rover. They turned it on and...

      "Oh my god! The planet is covered with spooge!"

      --
      "If you could only see what I've seen with your eyes..." - Roy Batty
    9. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe the microscopic imager has the magnification muscle to view something as small as bacteria

      Maybe they found a Martian gorilla.

    10. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by asa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Along with it's drilling tools and such, it carried a spectrometer (or something of the sort) to detect mineral and chemical composition.

      Actually, several spectrometers. There's the Mossbauer spectrometer, designed to identify iron-bearing minerals. There's the APXS (alpha particle x-ray spectrometer.) which performs elemental chemistry analysis. And there's the Mini-TES (thermal emission spectrometer) which studies infra-red spectra to help determine type and abundance of minerals.

      Then there's the arsenal of 9 cameras on each rover, including the stereo panoramic cameras which have filters from far IR to near UV (980 nm, 930 nm, 900 nm, 860 nm, 800 nm, 750 nm, 670 nm, 600 nm, 530 nm, 480 nm, 440 nm, and 430 nm).

      Yes, we've got spectrometers :-)

      Are they likely to be the required tools for confirming the existence of life? No. These are geologic and rock chemistry tools.

      Is it possible that we've got MI pictures that suggest life? Yeah, it's possible. Is it possible that our wider-angle cameras spotted some Martian beast moving across nearby terrain? Yeah, possible, I suppose. Is it likely that they've got anything close to definitive proof of life on Mars? I don't think so.

      I'm going to take a guess and say that they're likely to tell us that they've got a pretty good handle on the local geology at Opportunity's crater in Meridiani Planum and that the rocks they've analyzed most likely formed in large bodies of standing liquid water.

      As a bonus, it would be nice if they also announced that they've found more than trace amounts of liquid water just under the surface or large amounts of water, frozen above the surface (could those spherules be ice cubes? Ray did say that they were the "grayest" think they'd ever seen on Mars, though that could be a signal that they were the coarse gray hematite they're looking for.)

    11. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by BenBenBen · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately you are 100% wrong.

      They have cameras. Life can demonstrably be seen on cameras, if sufficiently large (and opaque).

      Ergo, you are wrong. Sorry.

      I'm not saying we'll see a picture of ALF, but it is a possibility, and it would be wrong to completely discard the concept.

      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    12. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by JDevers · · Score: 1

      Wait a second, you also need the cameras to have plenty of resolution and magnification. Neither of which the onboard camera has.

      Anyway, LIVING THINGS can be seen with a microscope sure, I didn't say that it COULDN'T see living things. At this point though, we are looking for SIGNS of life, such as ONCE living things. It is notoriously difficult to see the difference between many dead microscopic life forms and many other naturally occuring particles.

      I never said we should discard the concept, simply that we shouldn't expect to see microscopic life forms with a camera that has a one megapixel resolution and no zoom lens to speak of. The mission of the rovers was NOT to see life forms, but to ascertain the existance of water... All I said was that with the same equipment there are BETTER ways of identifying signs of life than a damned camera.

    13. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by BenBenBen · · Score: 1

      You said [paraphrasing] there's not really any way to detect life...

      I said you were wrong, there is really a way to detect life. I agree with the rest of your statements. You were just wrong in a "Is there a way: Yes/No" kind of binary fashion.

      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    14. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by hoof · · Score: 1

      The microscope appears to have a resolution of about 800 dpi (the grinder is supposed to have a 45mm diameter, I'm basing my guess at the resolution off the photos of the grinding holes). An Intel Play QX3 microscope can take an 8000 dpi picture. Is NASA so poor that they can't afford a $40 microscope for their rover?

    15. Re:Microbes? I doubt it. by JDevers · · Score: 1

      Actually I said: "I don't think the rovers really have the capabilities to positively identify life"

      I still stand by that, there is very little information that they could provide that we could use and then say "yep, thats alive." Now they COULD provide information we could use to argue that life exist(s/ed) on Mars...

  25. What they found. by neodymium · · Score: 5, Informative

    German newsmag "Der Spiegel" has the story: They found a certain kind of iron sulfate compound, which forms only in bodys of standing water. Discoveries were made using the MIMOS-II Moessbauer spectrometer and the APXS x-ray spectrometer. Images are available in the article.

    1. Re:What they found. by addaon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The parent is correct, but should be revised to say "is thought to form only in bodies of standing water." I promise we'll hear lots of arguments about that very issue in the next couple of weeks.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    2. Re:What they found. by neodymium · · Score: 1

      In one paragraph they cite NASA scientists saying that these sulfates were "definitely" formed in standing water. In another paragraph, the newsmag says they might have been formed there. Whatever, it sounds pretty definite.

    3. Re:What they found. by Darken_Everseek · · Score: 2, Informative

      This makes sense. One of the panelists for the press release is Professor John Grotzinger, MER science team geologist from MIT. I'm looking forward to hearing the discussion.

    4. Re:What they found. by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Better yet... they found standing water because despite all the space hardening that the rovers went through, they weren't water proof... ;-)

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    5. Re:What they found. by Smitty825 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Also, how long does water need to be "standing" for this to occur? It seems to me that there is the potential for a comet filled with ice to hit, have the water melt (assuming proper atmospheric conditions) and then have the minerals form over a few years before the water disappears (...I'd assume by having H20 bonds broken by radiation from the sun?)

      --

      Doh!
    6. Re:What they found. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for giving away the surprise, Hans. No, really, thanks.

    7. Re:What they found. by jafuser · · Score: 1

      This is nice, but it'll be about the sixth time they've announced they've found proof of water on Mars...

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    8. Re:What they found. by whovian · · Score: 1

      Or the water evaporated, thereby concentrating the sulfate solution, causing precipitation / crystalization.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    9. Re:What they found. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or ice sublimated from the icy brine.

      This is a cheeseball way to filter salty water. It works much better in the polar latitudes or past 45deg lat...

      Take a big pool (lake size...), line bottom with plastic. When it's freezing, spray water into tank. Most of the water will freeze in the air, with the remaining being a much saltier solution that settles at the bottom of the pit and the ice floats to the top. Pump out the brine. Then, when the warm weather comes back, you have a nice supply of pretty salt-free water when the slushie melts.

  26. The BIG News by ralf1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They found Dick Cheney's undisclosed location.

    --
    "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
  27. hi. I'm Troy McClure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi. I'm Troy McClure. You might remember me from such Mars discovery videos as "So That is where My Car Keys Went" and "The Proper Classification of BEM Scat"

  28. OIL!!! by jimmyCarter · · Score: 5, Funny

    They found oil underneath the surface of Mars!! Haliburtan probe to be launched at 4pm Friday.

    --

    -- jimmycarter
    1. Re:OIL!!! by pubjames · · Score: 3, Funny

      Haliburtan probe to be launched at 4pm Friday.

      To be paid for by the US tax payer at a cost of (pinkie to corner of mouth) one hundred billion dollars!!

    2. Re:OIL!!! by amabbi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you're obviously being facetious... but if oil were discovered... that would be a monumental discovery scientifically, since oil is formed by decayed organic matter under high pressure...

    3. Re:OIL!!! by Anixamander · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you think you're joking, but the fact is, we don't need oil to make Haliburton rich off of this. Read this

      --
      Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball(TM)
    4. Re:OIL!!! by kevlar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a school of thought that believes that oil exists on Jupiter, where no organic life has ever existed. This came about when comet shoemaker-levy 9 crashed into Jupiter and created that "big black eye".

      http://www.the-planet-jupiter.com/Shoemaker-Levy -9 /g-impact-Shoemaker-Levy-9.jpg

    5. Re:OIL!!! by babbage · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Please have Cheney be the pilot...

      Please have Cheney be the pilot...

      Please have Cheney be the pilot...

  29. Finally! They found copied SCO code... by ferratus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yep, here's the scoop. Illegal SCO code was found today, but it wasn't easy. They had to search Mars to find something.

    No wait, that would be rather far fetched. I mean, it probably doesn't exist anyway. It's probably something mundane and obvious like water or proof of life.

    DAMN. so close.

    --
    IP Therefore I am.
    1. Re:Finally! They found copied SCO code... by stuffduff · · Score: 1
      Do patents really apply to Space? I thought it was just the Earth!

      "Will all Linux users please board the Mars rocket on launchpad 13."

      --
      "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  30. Religion by DrugCheese · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I hope this puts a curb on religios fanatics who believe God created the world in 7 days. What day did he create the living organisms on this planet, on that other planet? I know I'm way off topic here. But something like this could dramatically change the world. Proof that we are no longer alone.

    We have a flu on Mars to chum up with.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
    1. Re:Religion by Ricin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure. Earth was a 7 day contract. He did Mars to get some practice, and Venus out of curiosity ("Hmm, let's have more greenhouse effect"). Mercury, well, we all get drunk now and then. And as for the giant planets, He's still looking for whoever it was that misappropriated His IP.

      (In my defense: Well, what do you expect with a story that says there's going to be a story...)

    2. Re:Religion by JPelorat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      World != planet Earth.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    3. Re:Religion by mrsolo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It was 6 days and the Bible doesn't say that life only exists on Earth. I'd have to say that the majority of creation scientist believe that life on other planets is very probable. Bacteria can withstand a lot of extreme environments, including space travel. In fact, there are a lot of theories that bacteria thrown up into the atmosphere through collisions with meteorites on Earth could indeed disperse bacteria into space.

    4. Re:Religion by Rostin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I doubt it. One relatively famous "day-age" creationist I know of (who, incidentally, all the "real" creationists hate) speculated years ago that we would probably eventually find evidence of life on mars. Here's a link to a more recent statement his organization has made. Quote: "Will NASA ever find evidence of life on Mars? I expect so, if NASA searches with sufficient diligence. Just as meteors travel from Mars to Earth so also do they travel from Earth to Mars. Over the past four billion years at least several billion tons of Earth material, much of it life-carrying material, has landed on Mars."

    5. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody, including Mel Gibson and his dog, know that God sent down an asteroid to earth, to clear the way for the creation of Man.

    6. Re:Religion by mirio · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll bite.

      As a Christian and believer in God, I find your comments to be ignorant and intolerant.

      You should know that I of course believe that God created the world in 7 days. Why not? If there is an omnipotent God, why could he *not* do it in 7 days? Put it this way, if you were God, and you created a mountain, then you allowed a geologist to immediately examine the strata in in the side of the mountain, would the geologist be able to determine that it was only minutes old? Anyway, that's neither here nor there.

      The fact is that I am also a believer in science. Anyone who is a Christian will quickly realize that our beliefs tell us only about goings-on in Heaven and Earth, and contains no references to other planets or other extra-terrestrial life forms. I believe that there are probably many other intelligent and unintelligent life-forms in the universe.

      I would bet that most Christian-bashers on Slashdot would consider themselves great, tolerant progressives, yet they seem to only be tolerant of the cause du jour. How sad.

    7. Re:Religion by TrevizeNet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unfortunately just the opposite would probably happen, look at the Book of Mormon. When life is found somewhere else, Jesus is going to have to save them too you know.

    8. Re:Religion by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

      Please don't take offense to what I wrote. I don't mean to provoke anyone. Just as I'm sure the Mormons don't mean to provoke anyone driving their bikes house to house handing out literature. The one true freedom God gave us all is to make up our own minds.

      I myself am a recovering Christian. I was refering to the people who still believe that humans are the center of the universe. No, that Christians are the center of the Universe.

      I just hope for drastic change on our rock. And maybe in some geeky star trek way hoping another rocks inhabitants no matter how insignificant can lend us some insight into all the whats whys when and wheres.

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
    9. Re:Religion by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny
      I would bet that most Christian-bashers on Slashdot would consider themselves great, tolerant progressives, yet they seem to only be tolerant of the cause du jour. How sad.
      There's no intolerance here. We just find creationists hysterically funny, that's all.
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re:Religion by kundor · · Score: 1

      several billion tons? So that's a ton a year, managing to land on one planet. Presumably we must be losing a couple hundred times that that don't end up on mars. Funny, I hadn't noticed everything around me constantly flying up into space (exactly the way a brick doesn't.)

    11. Re:Religion by gratefully+dead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, I guess I have to poison my karma to post this. Sorry, but I have to point out that you are using circuitous logic.

      Ex...
      I beleive in an omnipotent God because he must have created the universe. Therefore God created the earth in 7 days because he is omnipotent.

      Creationism is a farce, and is easily debunked by someone with sufficient knowledge of biology. Only quack scientists are advocates of it as a theory. However, this is a free country and you can believe whatever you want. Just realize you are deluding yourself.

      This is just one facet of the greater problem of religious fundamentalism.

    12. Re:Religion by oniqPL · · Score: 0

      Why 7 days and not 6? Or 1? Or instantly? Sounds to me like a man made fairytale.

    13. Re:Religion by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Parent is not flamebait. Mod is a poopy-head.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    14. Re:Religion by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To say that creationism is a huge bunch of baloney is NOT intolerant, it's the way it is. Creationism is NOT science, and if you are a creationist who still "believe" in science, then that means you have chosen to disregard certain parts of biology, geology, cosmology and paleontology, because it doesn't fit well with your beliefs. And if an ignorant moderator wish to mod me down, please go ahead; I'm not the one making an ass out of myself by cowardly modding people down becuase you feel insulted.

    15. Re:Religion by zephc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      to bite for the troll who bit for another troll...

      By your own admission, your own supposition that God put this false evidence in place serves to do nothing to further your ideas of divine intervention. It becomes a matter of merely "believing" that God put all this false, divinely created evidence in place, which is a matter of taking to heart a book which has changed dozens of times since a bunch of desert nomads wrote it.

      The reason that there are no references to other worlds or ETs is that these desert nomads didn't have the vaguest concept that such things might exist.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    16. Re:Religion by Supero100 · · Score: 1

      What gets me about Christianity is that when you take communion, you have to literally believe that that host is literally the body of Christ. Not a symbol, not a reference, not simile nor metaphor, but the literal body of Christ.

      I always laughed when I was in 'religous education' as a youngster once I parsed that line and it's... um... belief requirements.

      They didn't like my blasphemy as a 4th grader.

    17. Re:Religion by 0x0d0a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You should know that I of course believe that God created the world in 7 days. Why not?

      Why?

      It does not seem that there is any more evidence for the existence of an omnipotent, omnicient Christian God than there is for Shiva.

      I have heard some Christians claim that evidence is unnecessary, that pure faith, faith pure of grounding in evidence is necessary. I the fail to see how any Christian can criticize someone for entering, say, David Koresh's cult. There is as much evidence for Koresh being Christ as there is the content of the Bible being true (and, heck, the Bible is self-inconsistent in many places). The same argument a Christian uses to argue in favor of his beliefs being reasonable seems to also justify, say, Satanism.

    18. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why 7 days and not 6? Or 1? Or instantly? Sounds to me like a man made fairytale.
      Especially considering that before Earth existed, there was no definition of "days"... Unless we're talking 24 hours x 7 "units".
    19. Re:Religion by gingerTabs · · Score: 1

      Anyone who is a Christian will quickly realize that our beliefs tell us only about goings-on in Heaven and Earth, and contains no references to other planets or other extra-terrestrial life forms

      Soooo. If those other planets do have life, and that life has a religion with a god, is that the same god or a different one?

      And more to the point, whose God is better? Yours or theirs These are the questions that need answering by Christians

    20. Re:Religion by flacco · · Score: 1
      As a Christian and believer in God, I find your comments to be ignorant and intolerant.

      as an atheist, i find your particular brand of crazy just as perplexing as any other :-)

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    21. Re:Religion by Lane.exe · · Score: 0, Troll
      If by hysterically funny, you mean so utterly nuts as to think the second law of thermodynamics could somehow apply to the biological generation of complex life (namely, by making such generation impossible because of the conservation of energy and mass), then yes... that is pretty funny.

      --
      IAALS.
    22. Re:Religion by luna69 · · Score: 1

      > You should know that I of course believe that
      > God created the world in 7 days.

      Which is why most of us would classify you as mentally ill.

      > The fact is that I am also a believer in
      > science. Anyone who is a Christian will quickly
      >realize that our beliefs tell us only about
      > goings-on in Heaven and Earth

      So, it's ok to believe silly, unfounded things on our own planet, but on other planets we have to be bound by evidence? Heh.

      > I would bet that most Christian-bashers on
      > Slashdot would consider themselves great,
      > tolerant progressives, yet they seem to only be
      > tolerant of the cause du jour. How sad.

      No, it's just that we're tolerant of things that MAKE SENSE.

      --
      No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
    23. Re:Religion by div_2n · · Score: 1

      Off topic? Maybe, but I feel compelled to respond.

      Ok, while you don't directly quote the Christian Bible, I can only deduce that you are drawing your 7 day belief from it. Therefore, I feel it necessary to put into light that which you use to form your religious-scientific belief on the creation of Earth.

      If you draw your creationism from the Old Testament, you should know that first and foremost where numbers such as seven appear, it has more to do with the symbolic nature of the number itself than with their actual belief that God created the world in seven days. You can do a little research to find out more about that if you like.

      Secondly, you should also know that there is a quote in the Bible (2 Peter 3:8) that says one day to God is as a thousand years to man. I don't think that should be taken too literally except to say that time as we know it is not what time is to God.

      Thirdly, I think if you dig into the message, you will find that the Bible is meant more as a spiritual guide and a guide to how to live your life more than it is to base your beliefs on how the universe was formed. Try not to get too wrapped around the axle of creationism.

      Lastly, why would an omnipotent being take the time make the Earth look old? Sounds like an aim of deception to me. And while I am thining about it, why would an omnipotent being need to rest? Does He get tired? Does He take naps during the time He answers prayers? I am not trying to troll on that, I am just curious as I don't recall that ever being discussed.

      Disclaimer: I am a Christian that is very alienated by my lack of agreement with virtually every preacher I have ever heard on their seemingly uneducated and misguided interpretation of the Bible.

    24. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If extra-terrestrial life was discovered, does it mean that Jesus died for their sins too?

    25. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have heard some Christians claim that evidence is unnecessary, that pure faith, faith pure of grounding in evidence is necessary.
      Ah, but the Babelfish is a dead giveaway, isn't it? It proves God exists, therefore he doesn't. QED.
    26. Re:Religion by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      And more to the point, whose God is better? Yours or theirs These are the questions that need answering by Christians

      SUNDAY SUNDAY SUNDAY!

      THE deathmatch of the MILLENIA!

      Mars God vs. Earth God!

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    27. Re:Religion by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      On the off-chance this isn't a troll, biological life is not a closed system. The Sun is pouring energy into our life system every second of every day (and our planet, of which we are a part, radiates energy too.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    28. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      These are the questions that need answering by Christians

      Why just Christians? Most religions believe that their God or Gods are the true God or Gods. Why would the question you pose only apply to Christians? Probably because your enjoy bashing Christians. It wouldn't be envouge around here to bash Muslims or Jews afterall now would it?

      I'm no Christan, but I find it increadibly hyprocritical how people constantly bash that religion but wouldn't dare publicly bash any other.

      I don't think anyone has the right to bash anyone else for their religious beliefs as long as said individual isn't using those beliefs as justification for wrong doing.

    29. Re:Religion by gobbo · · Score: 1
      The reason that there are no references to other worlds or ETs is that these desert nomads didn't have the vaguest concept that such things might exist.

      Well, they had an existing mythology full of angels, demons, and other beings to populate, and visions or experiences or whatever got shoehorned into it. Then there's some wild 'n crazy stuff like Ezekiel (maybe after eating some slightly off rye ;-)

      I looked, and I saw a windstorm coming out of the north-- an immense cloud with flashing lighting and surrounded by brilliant light. The center of the fire looked like glowing metal, and in the fire was what looked like four living creatures. In appearance their form was that of a man, but each of them had four faces and four wings.
      Their legs were straight; their feet were like those of a calf and gleamed like burnished bronze. Under their wings on their four sides they had the hands of a man. All four of them had faces and wings, and their wings touched one another. Each one went straight ahead; they did not turn as they moved. (1:4-9)

      Their faces looked like this: Each of the four had the face of a man, and on the right side each had the face of a lion, and on the left the face of an ox; each also had the face of an eagle. Such were their faces. Their wings were spread out upward; each had two wings, one touching the wing of another creature on either side, and two wings covering its body. Each one went straight ahead. Wherever the spirit would go, they would go, without turning as they went. The appearance of the living creatures was like burning coals of fire or like torches; it was bright, and lightning flashed out of it. The creatures sped back and forth like flashes of lightning. (1:10-14)

      As I looked at the living creatures, I saw a wheel on the ground beside each creature with its four faces. This was the appearance and structure of the wheels: They sparkled like chrysolite, and all four looked alike. Each appeared to be made like a wheel intersecting a wheel. As they moved, they would go in any one of the four directions the creatures faced; the wheels did not turn about as the creatures went. their rims were high and awesome, and all four rims were full of eyes all around. (1:15-18)

      When the living creatures moved, the wheels beside them moved; and when the living creatures rose from the ground, the wheels also rose. Wherever the spirit would go, they would go, and the wheels would rise along with them, because the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels... When the creatures moved, I heard the sound of their wings, like the roar of the Almighty, like the tumult of an army. (1:19-20, 24,)

      So how do you like them martians?

    30. Re:Religion by Geno+Z+Heinlein · · Score: 1
      As a Christian and believer in God, I find your comments to be ignorant and intolerant.

      Maybe it's your karma catching up with you.
      • The Crusades. (Killed Muslims.)
      • The Inquisition. (Killed Jews.)
      • The Burning Times. (Killed witches.)
      • Trying to "cure" gay people with drugs or electric shock.
      • Shooting doctors who perform abortions.
      • Demonization of other religions.
      Christians have done everthing possible not just to advocate their religion, but to eliminate all other religions. I'll tolerate Christians when you forswear the use of violence against us.
    31. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Christian can't be a true believer in science unless he selectively chooses which parts of science he wants to believe.

      If you only believe in certain parts of science then whats the point of believing it at all. If you only believe in certain parts of the bible, then whats the point in believing in any of it...

      The two just don't go hand in hand, no matter how hard fundamentalists try to claim otherwise.

    32. Re:Religion by rstultz · · Score: 1

      A bunch of baloney?

      Interesting. I don't believe in evolution (Macro, that is). There is no real evidence of macro-evolution, that's why it's called the Thoery of Evolution. Micro-evolution is pretty much a given, but Macro is still a large unknown. The fossil record is too incomplete to give us an answer, and until you can prove it, then I don't see why Creationism is any more ridiculous than some other unproven theory.

      Look into Stephen Jay Gould's writings about the eye if you think macro-evolution is a given.

      Ryan Stultz

    33. Re:Religion by xao+gypsie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's no intolerance here. We just find creationists hysterically funny, that's all.
      as a student of religion and mathematics, and a confessing Christian, I'd have to agree with you...

      --


      xao
      http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
    34. Re:Religion by xao+gypsie · · Score: 1

      you have to literally believe that that host is literally the body of Christ
      that is the catholic view, called transubstantiation. Lutherans (and similar) see is as becoming like the body and blood of Christ: consubstantiation. modern evangelical Christianity and Baptist denominations see it as a symbol or metaphor. when it all boils down, it really doesn't matter which you choose, i think, but it is an important ceremony or ritual.

      --


      xao
      http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
    35. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Kind of you to mention that. Last time I checked, there was no fossil record of God either.

    36. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Demonization of other religions."

      That is exactly what you are doing. I guess your religion is the only one to be allowed.

      "Christians have done everthing possible not just to advocate their religion, but to eliminate all other religions"

      They've done a piss-poor job of it: those with other religions outnumber Christians 4 to 1. In fact, Christianity is one of the more tolerant religions when it comes to letting others practice their faith (not as much as Buddhism, but much more so than Atheism and the Mohammadans).

    37. Re:Religion by hal9000 · · Score: 1

      mirio, Occam's Razor. Razor, meet mirio.

      --
      Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
    38. Re:Religion by tiger99 · · Score: 1

      The thing that is hysterically funny is that evolution on the scale commonly imagined is statistically impossible, no evedence for it has ever been found, Darwin changed his mind in the end because even he saw it was stupid, and it seriously contradicts certain aspects of genetics that can easily be demonstrated in the lab. Yet these sad people who want to believe that there is no God mock and revile creation, while their theory is totally untenable.

    39. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble there is that he'd have to find intelligent life, or specifically 'conscience lifeforms'.

      Wouldn't you agree?

    40. Re:Religion by Zilfondel2 · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised no creationists or christians have made the argument that since Mars was never mentioned in the bible, it must not exist and therefore all of this NASA stuff is really a ploy by God to lead the nonbelievers astray and to hell.

      Then again, thankfully they do not typically troll these waters.

    41. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Atheists are trying to eradicate people of other religions? Atheists torture and pour massive resources into propaganda against those who have other beliefs?

      Puh-leeze.

    42. Re:Religion by BenBenBen · · Score: 1
      the wheels did not turn about as the creatures went. their rims were high and awesome
      23" chromes, baby. They were driving Escalades...
      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    43. Re:Religion by rstultz · · Score: 1

      I never said I believed in God. Merely that I don't believe in macro-evolution. I'm agnostic about the origin of life.

      Ryan

    44. Re:Religion by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "pour massive resources into propaganda against those who have other beliefs?"

      see: public school system
      see: universities
      see: mass media
      see: Slashdot

    45. Re:Religion by mirio · · Score: 1

      It's good to see that my little experiment in human psychology has succeeded. Just as I thought...there is no tolerance for people with different ideas. My original post was not indicitive of my true beliefs but was an attempt to see what type of responses I would receive. I guess I was right.

    46. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look into Stephen Jay Gould's writings about the eye if you think macro-evolution is a given.

      Are you trying to talk about irreducible complexity? You're not going to get very far with that.

      Which of Gould's writings, in particular, are you referring to?

    47. Re:Religion by mirio · · Score: 1

      Christians have done everthing possible not just to advocate their religion, but to eliminate all other religions. I'll tolerate Christians when you forswear the use of violence against us.

      Geno, my friend, this is like saying that all Muslims are terrorists (which obviously is *not* true). I gather from your name and your web site that you're German. By your logic I would have to conclude that you're a Nazi? :-)

    48. Re:Religion by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      Which is why most of us would classify you as mentally ill.

      Not mentally ill, just indoctrinated. Religion is a process of psychological training that exploits various human needs, from hope for an afterlife to emotional fulfillment. It satisfies these needs in return for idealogical fealty, which religous leaders can use to exercise power over a populace in various ways. In my observation, most people get religion b/c they are either afraid of ceasing to exist when they die or because certain aspects of religion stimulate them emotionally (revivals especially), but usually not because they rationally believe everything in the Bible is true. That acceptance of the verity of religious doctrine tends to come after or in return for the emotional benefits provided by religion.

      Some people have the innate intelligence/skepticism/whatever to see through it immediately, while others (like myself, born raised and indoctrinated in the Bible Belt) eventually come to understand this through experience and continual, open-minded re-evaluation of their beliefs. Many others never do.

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    49. Re:Religion by oliphaunt · · Score: 1
      There's no intolerance here. We just find creationists hysterically funny, that's all.

      now if there was only some way to prevent them from voting or holding elected office. I envision a check-box on the front of the ballot:
      Do you have any religious beliefs whatsoever in any organized religion? yes() no ()

      and any ballots where "yes" is checked are immediately discarded. I'm tired of being punished for other peoples' ignorance.
      --




      Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
    50. Re:Religion by gingerTabs · · Score: 1

      Mostly it was a reference to the crusades, which was started by christians. Other religions are, as you suggest, quite capable of staggering intolerance and I didn't mention them because the parent explicitly stated his faith.

      And I have the right to bash anyone I like thank you very much. It's freedom of speech. It may be misguided or wrong, but it is my right.

    51. Re:Religion by tk_11 · · Score: 1

      Tolerance has been redefined, culturally in the West, in the last hundred years or so. The Christian variety of tolerance means everyone is free to believe what they want, however not everyone is right. As Christians, we believe God calls to each and every individual, but few end up responding. It's too bad, but human nature is to reject God and the calls He makes to their conscience. The secularization of "tolerance" however, means that only what the secularists say is to be tolerated, all serious believers in Christ are to be ridiculed. Other religions are much more tolerated, Christianity being much more ardently persecuted. Just look at Hollywood today, there's no one screaming about the "intolerance" of movies putting Buddhism in a positive light. The thought-police of Hollywood are goose-stepping to their own definition of "tolerance". The watering-down of a belief in God is somewhat acceptable to that flavor of "tolerance", but absolutely no one who really believes in salvation through Jesus Christ by faith. Often the loudest voices against Christians are the ones whom God has called to repeatedly, and they take it out on Christians who prick that conscience the same way God does.

      Some readers of slashdot might have once lived in places like Russia, Romania, China, etc and other communist countries over the last century who took great pains to stamp out Christianity. The communists were in favor of ecumenicalization (ie ultra-watering-down, still keeping the "form" of religion without the substance) and recruiting the "pastors" of the ecumenicalized churches to spy on their own parishoners. People who became too serious about Christ were reported, and went to "re-education facilities" for "sensitivity training". Many never came out. Those who did come out have the marks to prove what went on there. By and large, those who did survive got sent back again, because the truth of Christ became even more evident during their imprisonment.

      The same tactics used by some other slashdotters to disparage Christians is really no different than those used in many of these "re-education facilities". Communists proclaimed that religion of all forms would be stamped out in a few generations. Russia had 70 years, but never succeeded. Today, people in Russia are hearing about Christ for the first time "legally" and believing in Him. China has an underground church that is estimated to be about the size of the US population (~ 200-300M). All these slashdot-like efforts to discourage and ridicule Christians in countries where owning a Bible brings a prison and torture sentence, and what has resulted? So much effort to stamp it out, and what has happened? Christ is being preached and people are coming to know Christ like never before.

      Your soul is hungry, it was designed to be hungry to know God. Do you honestly think all the efforts to buck God will be fruitful? Does it really bring wholeness to your soul to deny and ridicule Christians and God?

    52. Re:Religion by funkydom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So evolution is statistically impossible, but Noah managed to get two animals of every species on his wooden ark and survive the greatest flood the earth has ever seen. And no evidence of this flood has ever been found.

      And that makes more sense to you than evolution?

      Crazy, the lot of you.

    53. Re:Religion by Geno+Z+Heinlein · · Score: 1

      Geno, my friend, this is like saying that all Muslims are terrorists (which obviously is *not* true). I gather from your name and your web site that you're German. By your logic I would have to conclude that you're a Nazi? :-)

      Wrong on both counts -- Heinlein and Nietzsche were both strong individualists :-) -- but I'm not using logic. I prefer the facts.

      I didn't say "all Christians". I will say "most". Christianity at-large has continually applied violent action against non-Christians.

      I know many people who identify as Christian, but who are against all of the examples I listed. Few of them cease to call themselves Christian or oppose the churches' use of the term, few of them boycott or oppose the churches or other Christian institutions, few of them withdraw financial support from the church, few of them speak out against the use of force.

      Few.

      The rest -- and I stress that these are the vast bulk, the overwhelming majority of the population self-identified as Christian -- watch silently and continue tacit support, like attending, contributing, identifying as Christian on the census, and so on. Since those people are actively supporting the users of violence (often with cash), I can't see any ethical way not to hold them accountable for the violence.

      Until those people forswear the use of violence -- and disassociate themselves from those who use violence -- I can't consider them as anything other than dangerous criminals.

    54. Re:Religion by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      Why do you think that it was 7 days?

      After all, the writing in the book of Genesis was in the style which describes a design to come later....
      not the actual 'implementation'. So it's the design which was prepared in '7 days' not the implementation! And it was never the purpose of the text to give you scientific or historic data like how many days the world / universe was created in.

    55. Re:Religion by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      There's lots of evidence.. every time somebody is healed by God, that is a sign for others, so you can call that evidence. I've never heard of Shiva healing anyone.

    56. Re:Religion by Farce+Pest · · Score: 1

      I object to your use of the word "farce", you insensitive clod!

      --
      This message has been scanned for memes and dangerous content by MindScanner, and is believed to be unclean.
    57. Re:Religion by jafac · · Score: 1

      How is that any different from:
      My God created the Earth 5 seconds ago. . complete with ME, and my memories of a past life?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    58. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      see: public school system
      Nope. The Public School System doesn't push any particular view point (and is constitutionally bound not to.) Should you see it push atheism, complain to the nearest Supreme Court.
      see: universities
      Nope. Publically funded universities are, again, bound by the constitution and cannot promote atheism or any other form of religion. Again, should you see one doing so, I suggest you complain to the nearest Supreme Court.
      see: mass media
      That's the same mass media that's always pushing Christianity down my throat? You're kidding right? We're talking about the one that'll turn any bible story into an epic, and invent controversies about judges shoving statues of the Ten Commandments into courtrooms where they shouldn't? In case you missed it, the media was heavily pushing both for the "right" of the latter to do so, and for the "right" of schoolchildren to be lead into acknowledging God every time they pledge allegience.

      If you think the mass-media promotes atheism, you haven't seen it.

      see: Slashdot
      It does? Where? Individual Slashdotters, perhaps. I've never seen CmdrTaco enter a story of "God doesn't exist: fact". Perhaps you'd like to point me at one?
    59. Re:Religion by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

      Christianity at-large has continually applied violent action against non-Christians
      Wrong
      Historically speaking, the Christian church has endured far more persecution than it has handed out, all the way from the beheading of John the Baptist to the imprisonment of modern-day Chinese church leaders. How many people are sitting in jail right now simply because they are atheist or agnostic? Care to guess how many are just because they are Christian?

      Historically speaking, Christians have been responsible for founding the majority of hospitals and schools in existence, many disaster and food relief agencies and many sustainable development programs. Head to the worst part any city, and odds are you'll find the Salvation Army there. For that matter - how many atheist or agnostic organizations have soup kitchens in the core of your city? Now compare that to the number of Christian ones. And let's not forget the Catholic church keeping reading, writing and science alive during that unfortunate period called the dark ages.

      Love for everyone - including your enemies - is a central tenant of the Christian faith. Of course, there has been times where this has been either forgotten or skewed, and every one of these incidents are tragic and lamentable. At other times, certain individuals have attempted to use words like "God", "Christianity" or parts of the bible to justify their own horrific actions, but to smear the whole church because of those individuals is disingenuous and malicious. If you want to play those kind of character-assassination games, there isn't a single organization on earth that can stand up to that kind of scrutiny.

      these are the vast bulk, the overwhelming majority of the population self-identified as Christian
      How would you know? I'm guessing that you don't run much in Christian circles. The ones I know do not support violence or oppression of any sort, and would consider it a personal insult to insinuate that they did. All of the examples that you listed are either ancient history or are the actions of particular individuals. Can you give one concrete example of how a mainstream Christian organization or denomination is perpetuating violence today? And how does identifying oneself as a Christian foster oppression today?

    60. Re:Religion by gcalvin · · Score: 1

      The whole point of transubstantiation is that it's supposed to be hard to believe. It's one of the Great Mysteries of the faith. The dogma says that the bread and wine of the Eucharist, when consecrated, become "wholly and substantially" the body and blood of Christ -- but in every detail of outward appearance, they would seem to be bread and wine. If you put them under a microscope, or tested them with a spectrometer, they would appear to be just bread and wine. It's splitting hairs, and it seems goofy, but bottom line it's a simple act of faith. Is it really any harder to believe than the idea that Jesus rose from death and forty days later ascended into Heaven (wherever that is)?

    61. Re:Religion by Perdition · · Score: 1

      I remember once watching my four-year-old nephew wrestle with an oddly-latched sliding door. He struggled with it mightily for a few minutes, and lost his patience several times. Because none of the adults in the room particularly wanted him using that door (he wasn't dressed for the weather, etc.), he was left to "figure it out on his own". At one point, he stopped and asked, "Is this really a door?" He had expectations, former experience with more cooperative doors, and when one door in particular stumped him, he doubted it was a door. That's how I view scientists who adamantly deny God and incessantly raise that bar for proof of His existence. I understand their frustrations, and what they struggle with is self. God isn't going to push them about. He'll have to appear on their terms, as solid and obvious as a rock on a driveway, and then they'll have Him. Because only His empirical existence will truly destroy Him, since it reduces Him to another notable phenomenon, another catagorical event. Bait, switch, ridicule, doubt, and when all else fails, define it as the 10th dimension, because whatever's holding the universe together sure ain't God. In the end, we have the impasse. I cannot offer any empirical proof for God that would satisfy a secular reasoner, because they're still tugging at the door, or doubting it is a door. I figure they look at me the same way.

      --
      Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
    62. Re:Religion by bani · · Score: 1

      Put it this way, if you were God, and you created a mountain, then you allowed a geologist to immediately examine the strata in in the side of the mountain, would the geologist be able to determine that it was only minutes old?

      By logical extension, one could equally assert the universe was created 3 minutes ago, with all its "evident history" premade.

      But what you are really implying is that god is a liar, who deceitfully plants false evidence in order to fuck around with you.

    63. Re:Religion by Geno+Z+Heinlein · · Score: 1

      Historically speaking, the Christian church has endured far more persecution than it has handed out...

      Nonsense. Christians were persecuted early on, but as early as the Fourth Century, the church was a substantial and powerful institution. Since at least then, Christians have handed out persecution in big economy size packages.

      For that matter - how many atheist or agnostic organizations have soup kitchens in the core of your city? Now compare that to the number of Christian ones.

      So what? Those are recruiting centers. Christians use the hospitals, the schools and the soup kitchens to get their hands on the sick and dying, who are especially vulnerable to religion; kids, who are especially vulnerable to brainwashing; and the hungry, who will generally side with whoever is feeding them.

      And let's not forget the Catholic church keeping reading, writing and science alive during that unfortunate period called the dark ages.

      No one earns points for preserving their own culture. If they had preserved Celtic or other pagan cultures as diligently, then they might deserve credit. Since they instead wiped out those cultures, this is not a good Christian deed.

      ... but to smear the whole church because of those individuals is disingenuous and malicious.

      No, it's not. "Those individuals" get support from other individuals, the church-goers who tithe. That makes them culpable.

      How would you know? I'm guessing that you don't run much in Christian circles.

      Are you kidding? Christians are everywhere! They come out of the ventwork like aliens in a Sigourney Weaver movie.

      The ones I know do not support violence or oppression of any sort, and would consider it a personal insult to insinuate that they did.

      So the ones you know don't give money when the plate comes around? They don't attend church on Sunday? They don't call themselves Christians when the census taker comes around? If they do those things, they are supporting an institution that uses violence.

      Can you give one concrete example of how a mainstream Christian organization or denomination is perpetuating violence today?

      Child molestation by priests. Covering up those molestations by Bishops and Cardinals. Lobbying efforts to censor movies, television and radio. Gay bashing. Telling Wiccans they can't wear their religious icons to school while Christians can. Blue Springs, Missouri spending government money to slander the Goth community.

      Sorry, should I have stopped at one?

      And how does identifying oneself as a Christian foster oppression today?

      Because if lots of people identify as Christian, politicians lean toward supporting Christian legislation.

    64. Re:Religion by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      There's lots of evidence.. every time somebody is healed by God, that is a sign for others, so you can call that evidence. I've never heard of Shiva healing anyone.

      Who are some people who were healed by the Christian god, and what proof do they have that these healings were done by that god and no other?

    65. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are ignorant & naive as a child. We cannot change who you are, so don't get angry at us. And nobody was christian bashing. Maybe bashing ALL religions, but then we have the intelligence to see when we are being lied to.

    66. Re:Religion by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

      1. The constant martyrdom of Christians has been documented, consistently, throughout the ages. Factual, historical, record. You could check the facts yourself, if you were interested.
      (We could go back and forth like this all day. I think the point to be learned is that the church is not one monolithic entity, but comprised of many parts, and many different people. While in some areas of the world, at times, a church was powerful, other churches were being extinguished at the same time.)

      2. So caring for the hungry, sick and dying counts for nothing? The renaissance was a malicious act? And you say the church is the one who is doing the brainwashing? That is, well, ... absolutely amazing.

      3. You don't seem able to separate the actions of individuals from the intent of an organization. You are very correct in saying that some people in the church have done some very evil things, but you are very mistaken in claiming that the church itself is responsible for those things.

      "Child molestation by priests. Covering up those molestations by Bishops and Cardinals"
      Actions of certain individuals. Those actions were never condoned by the church at large. Not that I'm trying to minimize or dismiss what happened. Those acts were horrific, and the perpetrators were terribly mishandled by their superiors, but to condemn the church worldwide because of the acts of some Cathlolics is to paint with a brush that is, oh, about 5 miles wide.

      "Lobbying efforts to censor movies, television and radio."
      How is this violent?

      "Gay bashing."
      Once again, actions of individuals, and usually neo-nazi skinheads.

      "Telling Wiccans they can't wear their religious icons to school while Christians can. Blue Springs, Missouri spending government money to slander the Goth community."
      Haven't heard of that one. Care to provide some details?

      "Because if lots of people identify as Christian, politicians lean toward supporting Christian legislation."
      Sorry, that's usually called the democratic process. They're entitled to their own opinions, even if they conflict with yours.

      You are basing your opinions on stereotypes, not facts. Using your line of reasoning, one could conclude that "All animals have fur and eat fish" after watching a documentary on bears. In any group large enough, you will find a few nutbars, some flakes and possibly even a real lunatic or two, even in the church. It's a side effect of being human and that whole free will thing. To write off an entire organization, and all related organizations, because of it's bad seeds is intellectual laziness (see baby, bathwater)

    67. Re:Religion by Geno+Z+Heinlein · · Score: 1

      1. The constant martyrdom of Christians has been documented, consistently, throughout the ages. Factual, historical, record. You could check the facts yourself, if you were interested.

      Those facts aren't in dispute. But Christians have persecuted others far more than they have ever been persecuted.

      We could go back and forth like this all day. I think the point to be learned is that the church is not one monolithic entity, but comprised of many parts, and many different people.

      Those people give money, funding the church.

      2. So caring for the hungry, sick and dying counts for nothing?

      They're only caring for the hungry, sick and dying to recruit.

      The renaissance was a malicious act? And you say the church is the one who is doing the brainwashing? That is, well, ... absolutely amazing.

      You're trying to take credit for the renaissance?!? The renaissance was despite Christianity, not because of it.

      3. You don't seem able to separate the actions of individuals from the intent of an organization.

      If you support an fascist institution, you are a fascist.

      ... to condemn the church worldwide because of the acts of some Cathlolics is to paint with a brush that is, oh, about 5 miles wide.

      Wrong again. Christian culture is based on violence. These acts you're trying to characterize as exceptional are an inevitable result of the culture.

      "Lobbying efforts to censor movies, television and radio."... How is this violent?

      You think people follow laws without the threat of confiscation of property or threat of incarceration? Until there's a man with a gun, there is no law.

      "Gay bashing."... Once again, actions of individuals, and usually neo-nazi skinheads.

      Who were taught that being gay is a sin and evil by the church. Do you deny that the church teaches this?

      "Telling Wiccans they can't wear their religious icons to school while Christians can. Blue Springs, Missouri spending government money to slander the Goth community."... Haven't heard of that one. Care to provide some details?

      Here's a brief summary.

      "Because if lots of people identify as Christian, politicians lean toward supporting Christian legislation."... Sorry, that's usually called the democratic process. They're entitled to their own opinions, even if they conflict with yours.

      Not when they force that opinion on me with guns. If it's a law, there's a gun somewhere.

    68. Re:Religion by mirio · · Score: 1

      but I'm not using logic. I prefer the facts.

      Facts? You care about facts? How about 6,000,000. That's the number of Jews your countrymen killed. Yet, you're not a Nazi because your German but I'm a murderer and persecutor of non-believers because I am a Christian? Makes no sense to me.

      Please, if you can, name ONE instance of modern-day Christian violence towards non-christians. Clearly you have pre-conceived notions about Christians that inhibits you from thinking clearly with an open mind.

    69. Re:Religion by Geno+Z+Heinlein · · Score: 1

      Facts? You care about facts? How about 6,000,000. That's the number of Jews your countrymen killed. Yet, you're not a Nazi because your German but I'm a murderer and persecutor of non-believers because I am a Christian? Makes no sense to me.

      The Irish killed 6,000,000 Jews? You probably need to look into this more. (Rereading the other post where I told you I'm not German probably wouldn't hurt, either.) And bear in mind that Ireland's ancestral culture, the Celts, have been so exterminated we're not even sure what our cultural rituals are. Who did that? Oh, yes, you Christians.

      Please, if you can, name ONE instance of modern-day Christian violence towards non-christians. Clearly you have pre-conceived notions about Christians that inhibits you from thinking clearly with an open mind.

      Here's three. Gay bashing, because church leaders tell their followers that gay people are sinners. Wiccans are attacked as well, because they worship differently. Doctors who perform abortions are killed by Christians.

      You clearly want to believe you're the good guys, but you're not. Christianity has been the most repressive, hostile, murderous part of Western "civilization" for most of 2000 years. The violence and hatred of outsiders is built into Christianity.

      You want to be a Christian, fine. But keep it to yourselves, don't force it on others. No one has the right to tell anyone else what to do. They certainly don't have the right to take away their equal access to government service, their health or their lives.

  31. Just out of interest by pubjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just out of interest, does the media in the USA cover space news from other countries? For instance, was the launching of the European "Rosetta" probe today covered?

    It is a fascinating project. Take a look at the "Animated guide to the Rosetta mission" about half way down the page on this BBC news item).

    1. Re:Just out of interest by Serk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For what it's worth, yes, the Rosetta launch was covered... At least, it was covered by the local AM news station here in Dallas, Texas that I listen to every morning...

      Fascinating project, but 10 years to wait for results... Man, it takes patience to do this kind of science!

      --
      Never ask a geek why, just nod your head and slowly back away. -Rob Malda
    2. Re:Just out of interest by adpowers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, as a citizen of the USA, I heard about it from my number one news source: Google News

      I don't know if it was covered in local media like the evening News. However, I'm sure it was mentioned, at least in passing.

    3. Re:Just out of interest by GuyinVA · · Score: 1, Funny

      [sarcasm]No. We here in America believe that what other contries do is benieth us. And therefore irrelivant to what we do[/sarcasm]
      Now that's cool. I would really like to see if they could find something on comets. Hope I'll remember to check back on it in 2014...

      "Don't forget what happened to the man who suddenly got everything he ever wanted".."He lived happily ever after"-Willy Wonka

    4. Re:Just out of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is covered at the bottom of CNN, and of course the science pages.

    5. Re:Just out of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Well, as a citizen of the USA, I heard about it from my number one news source:
      > Google News

      That site seems to only show stories about muslims killing other muslims. Oh, and the odd Israeli killing of muslims to even it out a little.

      Then again, that sort of news probably goes down well in the States!

    6. Re:Just out of interest by CXI · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know you tell me

    7. Re:Just out of interest by chamilto0516 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Our media only covers rocket news where:
      • We shot it up 30% chance
      • We shot it up and it blew up 100% chance
      • Someone shot it at us 90% chance
      • We shot it down +5%
      • Someone shot it at us, we failed to shoot it down and it hit something noteworthy:
        • Goverment building 100%
        • Republican Goverment Building -5%
        • Some place that, now out of commision, will put us at risk of not getting our soda, beer or pizza 100%
        • Just some field 50%
        • Just some field where the owner is as backwoods country ast they come 90%
        • Just some field where the owner is as backwoods country ast they come and he thought it was a UFO100%
      --
      Magic Eight Ball: Outlook not so good., Hmmm, how about Excel and Word?
    8. Re:Just out of interest by oni · · Score: 1

      launches are not usually covered. I don't remember hearing anything when Cassini was launched or when Opportunity and Spirit were launched.

      But you can be sure that when a mission produces some results, it will be covered.

    9. Re:Just out of interest by Docrates · · Score: 1

      Too true. American media will probably cover it "properly" when the results pour in or if it fails.

      The launch of the MERs wasn't covered at any more length than Rosetta was today. Same for Beagle.

      --

      There are two kinds of people in the world: Those with good memory.
    10. Re:Just out of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Don't forget what happened to the man who suddenly got everything he ever wanted".."He lived happily ever after"-Willy Wonka

      Gee, this looks like a sig, but it can't be, because I turned signatures off in Slashdot. Guess that's not good enough for some people, eh Wonka-boy?

    11. Re:Just out of interest by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      Amazing how they've managed to get the Earth and Mars to stay still while Rosetta does it's loops... ;)

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    12. Re:Just out of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting article, but I stopped reading when I read this: "The rendezvous with Comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko is set for early 2014." Maybe that's why it's not being covered in the US media. Remind us about this in ten years.

    13. Re:Just out of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to admit it, but it was only recently made clear to me that anyone else even *had* a functioning space program.

      "Wow, a European space administration? When's the first mission?"
      "Uhh, about 10 years ago or more... "
      "Oh, well... how'd that go?"

    14. Re:Just out of interest by cherokee158 · · Score: 1

      And, for any of the above, there is a 100% chance that the event will result in the FAA creating new airspace regulations designed to make pilots even more miserable.

    15. Re:Just out of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?? You mean to tell me that there are other countries interested in space besides the USA? Are you suggesting that the USA is *NOT* the first and greatest at everything? Heathen! ;-)

    16. Re:Just out of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google News covers everything!

    17. Re:Just out of interest by adpowers · · Score: 1

      That site seems to only show stories about muslims killing other muslims.

      Well, maybe if it didn't happen so often ;).

  32. WMDs by Petronius · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Finally some good news for Bush: NASA found WMDs on Mars.

    --
    there's no place like ~
    1. Re:WMDs by will_die · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Old News.
      This week the martians are claiming that Bush armed the Phobosians who started a war; then he went and kipnapped the former martian leader who is now living in forced exile on Deimos.

  33. I'm going with technical difficulties... by Ayandia · · Score: 1, Funny

    They've either found water, found life, or Spirit is flipped on it's back like a turtle right now.

    Is there still time to place my bet on this one? $50 on Spirit being in a ditch and NASA needing millions to send a second one with a large magnet to pull it back out.

  34. Val Kilmer's robot dog by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm placing my bets on Val Kilmer's robot space-dog.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  35. Leaked image! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny


    To ruin US surprise, France has released image of the announcement:

    http://www.humour.com/Image/AffichageImage.asp?VID Image=5682&VIDThemeImage=2

  36. Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Probes already undergo severe sterilization procedures prior to launch. For the very simple reason that you don't want earth microbes in outer space places when you're looking for bugs there in the first place.

  37. Satellite option by Attaturk · · Score: 4, Informative


    NASA Television can be found on the satellite AMC 9 Transponder 9C, 85 degrees west longitude, vertical polarization downlink frequency - 3880 MHz, Audio is at 6.8 MHz.

    1. Re:Satellite option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can get NASA TV the way I do, via DirecTV (channel 376). Have to have a multi-LNB dish, though - it's only on one of the 3 birds - the one that also carries the DirecTV "Para Todos" Spanish programming, I believe.

    2. Re:Satellite option by Unoti · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is the kind of stuff that makes slashdot so magical for me.

    3. Re:Satellite option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the kind of stuff that makes slashdot so magical for me.

      What? Nerds talking about satellites and calling them "birds" to be cool by using the industry term?

      It made me get wood... and I'm a girl...

    4. Re:Satellite option by Romeozulu · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'll let my mom know, thanks.

  38. SCO PR Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is obviously the SCO model of PR - announce the announcement first. I'm just surprised there was no announcement that they were going to announce the announcement.

  39. "Onion"-style Version by RyanFenton · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Guys. Really. Mars is REALLY boring." Says Scientist studying Mars.

    "It's not funny anymore guys! I was into the whole robot thing for a while. That was cool. But it's been like, weeks now, and the that time delay thing is REALLY getting to me." Says Mark McGraffy, associate technician on the Spirit & Opportunity Mars data-gathering projects.

    "Look... see! There it is ... more ...ROUND THINGS! I mean geesh - you want us to just sit here and guess and dream about them more? Ask me last week, and I would have been able to give you 5 theories, but... I just don't want to play the game anymore. They're round things... really boring... round things. Just because they're red and uniform doesn't make them magic people! Hey - maybe they're altoids, great! Let's dream about that for a while!"

    Mr. McGraff then ran off screaming. More news as it happens.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:"Onion"-style Version by Peyna · · Score: 1

      "Onion"-style = satirical. It's not like they invented satirical reporting.

      --
      What?
  40. Re:NASA TV streaming by sam1am · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can view NASA TV online, as well, it seems... (The page also has satellite coordinates, and alternate sources for NASA TV)

  41. Okay, WTF. by tgd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What the heck has happened to the caliber of readers on /. if "A lot of people are saying "salty water", but damn...microbes....it's just too much to hope for." is considered Insightful?

    Its a reasonable comment to make, and I agree with it, but come ON. How is that insightful? That should imply it saying something interesting that perhaps the moderator didn't think of. Who here didn't think that same thing? Lets see a show of hands.

    Pickles are green.

    Now moderate me insightful. :)

    Oh yeah, Martians are green too, so no moderating me off-topic.

    1. Re:Okay, WTF. by MooCows · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bitching about the parent's moderation, how is that insightful?

      Its a reasonable comment to make, and I agree with it, but come ON. How is that insightful? That should imply it saying something interesting that perhaps the moderator didn't think of. Who here didn't think that same thing? Lets see a show of hands.

      Wait .. paradox detected..

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
    2. Re:Okay, WTF. by FroMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      And here we have proof, that 80% of your moderators find green pickles and martians insightful.

      Perhaps NASA TV needs to cover slashdot more often.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    3. Re:Okay, WTF. by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      I think I see a pattern here.

      Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Off-Topic Off-topic Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Off-topic Off-topic Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful Insightful A Troll! Oh, it's a Troll!

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    4. Re:Okay, WTF. by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Right. Because the caliber of /. moderators used to be soooo much higher.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    5. Re:Okay, WTF. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Technically, they could be moderating the analysis of the moderation as Insightful. I found it rather Interesting at least, as I hadn't really noticed what was being pointed out.

    6. Re:Okay, WTF. by purdue_thor · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... is that supposed to be to this tune?

    7. Re:Okay, WTF. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >What the heck has happened to the caliber of readers on /. if "A lot of people are saying "salty water", but damn...microbes....it's just too much to hope for." is considered Insightful?

      Let me guess, you have been vacationing the last 5 years?

    8. Re:Okay, WTF. by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I've noticed over time that posts which mention words that coincide with moderation options often get moderated that way. I.e. a post which mentions the word Insightful a couple of times often gets modded up as Insightful. Hence the grandparent post, it contains Insightful a lot, mixed with some other mod options. Let's see what the mods think of it ;-)

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    9. Re:Okay, WTF. by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Who cares about microbes? Water would be worth it's weight in Gold Pressed Latinum on Mars. Or, for the non treekies, more than Platinum and Gold.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    10. Re:Okay, WTF. by Mangal · · Score: 1

      Who cares about microbes?

      The point of looking for evidence of a more watery past on Mars in the first place was because we can't imagine life without water, remember? My question is, if we can't imagine life without water, will we ever recognize life that is not dependent on water?

      --
      I'm not just being paranoid- I've seen the data.
  42. No, no, no..... by caino59 · · Score: 0

    They didn't find the martians, didn't find beagle 2...but rather, the martians have now destroyed spirit and opportunity

    notice there hasn't been any picture updates since 2.27?

    uh huh...me thinks that's it....the martians finally got 'em!

    1. Re:No, no, no..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh come on...100% overrated? wtf...

    2. Re:No, no, no..... by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/

      No updates? Maybe no 'press' images over the weekend, but they're still releasing the images as the come in.

    3. Re:No, no, no..... by caino59 · · Score: 1

      ok, so they updated it today...

      http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-images/ima ge s.html

      that's what i was refering to

      and damn, you people can't sense sarcasm for shit.

  43. No bacteria by Eloquence · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The present Mars Rovers, like all successful NASA Mars missions since Viking, does not have instruments to detect life. Its payload is designed for one purpose and one purpose only: to detect whether there has been "ancient water" on Mars, i.e. whether oceans flowed billions of years ago.

    It would be regrettable if this annoucement only amounted to "We have evidence from the rock layers / erosion patterns / spherule concretions that water must have been involved in the creation of these features", as we already know that water can today exist in liquid form on 30% of the planet's surface, and that water has been active on the Martian surface in the recent geological past (source). But given NASA's reluctance regarding all things water-related, I wouldn't be surprised if that's what it's going to be.

    The really interesting stuff is the things they have avoided talking about, like the "mud-like texture". But most interesting in terms of water evidence is the trench dug by Opportunity. If you look at the fairly solid wall of soil at the right you will see a slightly dark streak on it. That streak leads directly to a puddle on the floor. Given this visual evidence, and the structure of the soil, it is pretty obvious that this stuff is wet.

    The simple reality is that Mars is a wet planet. The oceans didn't just vanish, they went underground into the porous subsurface world of Mars. That's where the real action is, not on the UV-sterilized surface. All we see of Mars' underground water world on the surface is the occasional puddle or pond, the black streaks and Malin's famous gullies. If you want to see Martian life, find wet underground regions with geothermal activity.

    1. Re:No bacteria by mongbot · · Score: 3, Informative

      Geothermal activity on Mars? All the volcanoes are long dead. Mars cooled down long before Earth, because it's hot core is ten times smaller. I'm pretty sure most scientist think Mars is geologically "dead".

    2. Re:No bacteria by CXI · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be regrettable if this annoucement only amounted to "We have evidence from the rock layers / erosion patterns / spherule concretions that water must have been involved in the creation of these features"

      Actual real proof of liquid water is a big deal! It has never been scientifically proven to exist other than on Earth. If you read your source link you will discover that your 30% figure is just speculation: "There are 5 five distinct regions where we might sometimes find surface water... Together they comprise about 30% of the planet's surface. That's not to say that liquid water really does exist in those places, just that it could." Regardless of your opinion, this is a major discovery.

      If you look at the fairly solid wall of soil at the right you will see a slightly dark streak on it. That streak leads directly to a puddle on the floor.

      No, it looks more like some of the obviously darker surface material slid down the side of the trench to form your "puddle", otherwise known as a pile of dirt.

    3. Re:No bacteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The simple reality is that Mars is a wet planet. The oceans didn't just vanish, they went underground into the porous subsurface world of Mars. That's where the real action is, not on the UV-sterilized surface. All we see of Mars' underground water world on the surface is the occasional puddle or pond, the black streaks and Malin's famous gullies. If you want to see Martian life, find wet underground regions with geothermal activity.

      Someone explain to me why a high UV environment would be enough to hinder/stop the development of life. I just keep thinking that while we use heat to sterlize things, we have no problem accepting that life can exist at extreme temperatures. So, if salty water does exist at or near the surface of Mars, how much would the UV radiation change the odds of where life might be found?

    4. Re:No bacteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >Someone explain to me why a high UV environment would be enough to hinder/stop the development of life
      It would hinder development of life on the surface since UV light is ionizing, that means large molecules needed for complex life would be shredded into radicals. And radicals themselves are damaging to other molecules.

      That does not rule out the possibility of underground life that might later move to the surface protected by some kind of shell.

      Sunlight is after all a useful source of renewable enrgy for life forms so some form of surface presense would be handy. LIfe in eternal darkness would need a chemical energy source that could eventually run out, just like oil here on Earth.

    5. Re:No bacteria by mforbes · · Score: 1

      if ('puddle'=='shadow') {
      do rant_and_rave();
      }

      --

      Allegedly real newspaper headline from 1998:
      Man Struck by Lightning Faces Battery Charge

    6. Re:No bacteria by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      You forgot Europa where water was found some years ago on this day itself...

    7. Re:No bacteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That ain't no puddle; you're seeing things. Do you actually think NASA scientists are so stupid that they would miss something like that? They are rocket scientists, you know.

    8. Re:No bacteria by CXI · · Score: 1

      You forgot Europa where water was found some years ago on this day itself...

      Is there actual scientific proof? Do you have a link? All I've read about is "strong evidence", just like the strong evidence we've had about Mars, but no actual scientific proof.

  44. Europeans: by Sarin · · Score: 2, Informative

    EST = GMT - 5 hours. (unless it's summertime then it's 4 hours)

    so 2 p.m. EST should be 19.00h (GMT) in the UK and 20.00h in Amsterdam/Paris/Berlin (GMT+1).

    1. Re:Europeans: by Saberwind · · Score: 1

      The difference between EST and GMT is always the same.

      Just as the difference between EDT and GMT is always the same.

      I always found it annoying that there isn't an acronym that means "the current eastern time" regardless of whether we're in daylight time or not.

      Of course, the only place such an acronym couldn't be used is in parts of Indiana. Central Indiana doesn't observe daylight savings, and is always on EST. Must make life awfully confusing.

    2. Re:Europeans: by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      There and Arizona. And at least AZ has a sign on the border (on the CA side anyway) helpfully telling you that they switch between pacific and mountain time. No such luck in Indiana. I was driving thru and had no idea till I hit Indianapolis and all the clocks by the road were wrong ("I *know* you don't hit Eastern Time till Ohio! WTF?")

      But I defintiely agree. I can *never* remember the terminology (ie are we currently daylight savings or standard? I'd have no idea without looking it up.)

      We should just officially rename them to "Eastern Spring-Forward Time" and "Eastern Fall-Back Time".

      In which case I know that right now I'd be in PFT.

  45. Life on Mars by pubjames · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Before we all get too excited, remember all the fuss in about 1996(?) when it was claimed that fossil bacteria traces had been found in a martian meteoite. And then turned out not to be true.

    1. Re:Life on Mars by Mr+Bubble · · Score: 1

      I don't have time to look it up, but I don't think it turned out NOT to be true. I think the consensus at NASA and elsewhere is that what they found is only produced by bacteria (at least on earth). However, there is no way to prove it without further evidence and some people dispute the findings.

      --
      "The world is a construct of forceful imagination. Those who don't know walk around in the reailties of those who do"
    2. Re:Life on Mars by SB9876 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although most of the evidence for martian life in the meteorite was later disproven, the magnetite crystals still stand as a fairly persuasive argument for martian life. There was a rebuttal to the magnetite particles but I'm not at all convinced by it - researchers have been trying to make magnetic particles like the ones in the meteorite/Earthly magnetotactic bacteria for decades without success. I'm very dubious, therefore about the report that a simple geology simulation can form those particles. Given that a significant fraction of the Martian particles are identical to Earthly ones to the atomic level, we can't throw out the meteorite evidence just yet.

  46. I think they will announce they have found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Weapons of Mass Destruction

  47. Hail Ants by Apostata · · Score: 1

    [obligatory Simpson's quote]

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
  48. The martian goverment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    decided to buy a SCO license. Way to go SCO!

  49. The BBC carried this yesterday by Albanach · · Score: 4, Informative
    in this article they said NASA will announce "Significant findings" about water on Mars at a Press Conference today [Tuesday] in Washington DC.

    So exciting stuff, but probably not any microbes.

  50. NASA discovered the Star Wars DVD Cover! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's exactly what they have found... in order to prepare the public for the shock, they have leaked the cover.. see previous Slashdot item...

  51. Talk it up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think we should talk it up so much that whatever they announce it will be a big let-down.

  52. Re:Hi by sjwt · · Score: 0, Funny

    isnt it obvious..

    who do you think is the first linux user
    SCO is suing..

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  53. This is what they found: by dzym · · Score: 1
  54. Big Black Monolith by mrycar · · Score: 5, Funny

    A Big Black Monolith, 1x4x9.

    --
    Gator/Claria is Spyware.
    1. Re:Big Black Monolith by jerryasher · · Score: 1

      1x4x9x16

  55. It's better than life ... by hackster · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... it's a monolith.

  56. A typo by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 5, Funny

    What we meant to say was that Nasa needs significant funding. Funding, not finding. Sorry for any confusion, but since you all are here we are going to pass around these offering plates and feel free to give what ever you can spare.

    Who said science can't learn from religion?

    --
    500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
  57. Psst. Hey Troll: by numbski · · Score: 0, Troll

    Get back under your bridge and stay there. :P

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  58. And last night he slept at a... by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 5, Funny


    ...Holiday Inn Express!

    1. Re:And last night he slept at a... by jnik · · Score: 1

      You think it's funny, but the Holiday Inn Express is probably the best place to stay in Los Alamos. Scientists don't exactly travel on a huge budget....

  59. Keeping the French off mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "in a small note it also saying something about preventing french to step foot on mars..."

    Just tell the french that there is an opposing military presense on mars. You'll have an instant retreat to Venus.

    1. Re:Keeping the French off mars by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're keeping busy with comets comets (with Europe) and the most distant galaxy in universe (with Swiss).

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  60. Water would not be a significant finding. by imbaczek · · Score: 1

    It would be a groundbreaking one, I guess. Bacteria would be even better.

  61. They found Daryl McBrides missing code! by drizst+'n+drat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    and a supoena under a rock!

  62. "Significant findings" by BobGregg · · Score: 4, Funny

    >>NASA will have a press briefing today at 2 p.m. EST to announce "significant findings".

    (from the press conference:)

    "The bad news is, no, we haven't found water."

    "But the good news is, we just saved up to 15% on our car insurance by switching to GEICO."

    "Hey, come back..."

    1. Re:"Significant findings" by Peyna · · Score: 2, Funny

      With the number of accidents NASA has had, I doubt GEICO would save them any money. They're probably labelled high risk.

      --
      What?
  63. Monuments of Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hoagland knows: they're finally admitting to the moments of Mars.

  64. If you don't speak german. by Darken_Everseek · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:If you don't speak german. by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 3, Funny

      First suspicion confirms

      The "tuxedo Gun", the irrefutable proof for the existence of past tides on Mars, is one in the stones discovered sulfate connection, which can be formed only in the environment by water.

      ??? The "tuxedo Gun" ???

    2. Re:If you don't speak german. by Darken_Everseek · · Score: 1

      I said it was a translation; I didn't say it was readable ;)

    3. Re:If you don't speak german. by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Babelfish kinda sucks, so try PROMT's translation instead.

    4. Re:If you don't speak german. by xTina · · Score: 1

      German "smoking" == "tuxedo" :-)

    5. Re:If you don't speak german. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      ??? The "tuxedo Gun" ???

      The one that James Bond carries.

    6. Re:If you don't speak german. by first.last · · Score: 0

      Get Smart did it first. Beat that, Simpsons!

      --
      Wishing I was a millionaire since 1969.
    7. Re:If you don't speak german. by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      "Tuxedo Gun"

      Wasn't he one of the bad guys in a James Bond movie?

  65. Daylight Savings Time by sprag · · Score: 1

    EST is always GMT - 5 hours. In the summer, when daylight savings time kicks in, its EDT. EDT is GMT - 4 hours.

    1. Re:Daylight Savings Time by trolman · · Score: 1
      The Problem is that NASA is going to hold a press conference at EST but announced it using PST and now we have to convert GMT for the rest of the world. Nothing is simple when dealing with rocket scientists.

      Whatmore is the NASA home page is featuring the Super Bowl Superzoom One Loooong Pass - NASA Drops in on the Big Game What is up with that? Has NASA been tasked by the FCC? Is this some new mission to earth program? Hell I hope that they found intelligent life on Mars because there ain't none in Houston.

  66. Yes, we're quite aware by tjic · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Just out of interest, does the media in the USA cover space news from other countries? For instance, was the launching of the European "Rosetta" probe today covered?

    Instead of putting in us the burden of disproving that we ignorant provincials, look at news.google. It's the top Sci/Tech story.

    Every American space enthusiast I know is quite interested in Russian, ESA, Chinese, Indian, etc. space programs.

  67. It's water - says SPIEGEL magazine's exclusive by xTina · · Score: 4, Informative
    ... it claims to have a source inside NASA.
    1. Re:It's water - says SPIEGEL magazine's exclusive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIRROR ON-LINE ONE EXCLUSIVE
      "Opportunity" finds proof for Mars floods
      Of Thorsten Dambeck
      The proof succeeded to the Mars Rover "Opportunity" that on Mars once water flowed. How MIRROR ON-LINE ONE from NASA circles experienced, will the US space agency the discovery this evening admits to give.

      NASA JPL Water-purely: Bright rock in the proximity of "Opportunitys" landing strip "I am baff, I am surprised", said Steve Squyres, scientific director/conductor of the Rover mission, in view of the photos of the second Mars vehicle "Opportunity". No other landing place resembled the far level Meridiani subgrade level, in which the sister probe of "Spirit" had come down. Particularly done showed up the researcher of the bright gesteinsformation, which out-peeped directly before the camera eyes of the Rovers from the dark Mars and. After detailed mineralogical and chemical analysis of the rock in the last weeks it seems now clear that Squyres spontaneous enthusiasm was justified. As MIRROR ON-LINE ONE from circles of the US space agency experienced, it concerns with the rock formation sediments, which were formed definitely in a standing waters.

      First suspicion confirms

      The "tuxedo Gun", the irrefutable proof for the existence of past tides on Mars, is one in the stones discovered sulfate connection, which can be formed only in the environment by water. NASA wants to present the results in the today's Tuesday evening at 20 o'clock German time on a press conference in Washington.

      The first close-ups of the formation had already fed the suspicion of the Planetologen that the rocks could have resulted from sedimentation, thus by deposit. The individual layers were to be constituted on the highly dissolving snapshots of the panorama camera of "Opportunity" clearly. The Moessbauer spectrometer "Mimos II" of the Mainzer of physicist Goestar Klingelhoefer might have played an important contribution with the discovery, which is responsible for the mineralogical analysis of eisenhaltiger Mars rocks.

      Break-through with German instruments

      Already on 9 February German members of the Rover Forschertruppe had announced surprising results of its APXS instrument ("alpha Particle x-Ray Spectrometer"). Afterwards analyses with the spectrometer in a bright rock with the name "Robert E" had resulted in by far higher contents of zinc and sulfur than with all Mars breaking into examined so far. "this points on it that the stone a solidified, salzhaltige deposit and not volcanic origin is", explained a coworker of the max Plack institute for chemistry, where the APXS spectrometer was built.

  68. SETI@Home by moartea · · Score: 1

    I will be staring at the SETI@Home graphs for the next few days waiting for our martian overlords to pop out of the screen. I will keep you posted :)

  69. He won't be happy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  70. Re:Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for making me regret browsing at +1.

  71. NASA TV is viewable with mplayer! by david.given · · Score: 5, Informative
    Do this:

    mplayer mms://wmbcast.nasa-global.speedera.net/\
    wmbcast.nasa-global/wmbcast_nasa-global_jan\
    212004_1021_53608

    (Watch out for the \ that mark line continuations!)

    Frame rate is low, but the audio's nicely in sync and is certainly decent enough for watching press releases.

    Beware, though, that as I post, NASA TV is broadcasting some ghastly children's programme. You have been warned...

    1. Re:NASA TV is viewable with mplayer! by Wumpus · · Score: 1

      Beware, though, that as I post, NASA TV is broadcasting some ghastly children's programme. You have been warned...

      But I like NASA's children's programs! They're cool, in a dorky sort of way.

    2. Re:NASA TV is viewable with mplayer! by JackRabbitSlims · · Score: 1

      Great suggestion. Windows Media Player was not responding very well, and mplayer just did the job. For those of you that wonder, the bandwith needed for a fluent audio and video is a steady 12 Kbytes per second. With that, you get pretty good video with ocassional blocky video noise when full scene change. When the bandwith goes below that you get frequent cuts, but still you can follow it.

    3. Re:NASA TV is viewable with mplayer! by JackRabbitSlims · · Score: 1

      Talking about mplayer... is there a good way to dump this to disk? I've tryed mplayer -autosync 0 -dumpstream -dumfile nasa.avi but audio is never in sync with video, which goes way fast. I'm thinking about scheduling this broadcasts and save them on disk for later review.

  72. Significant Findings? by brain_not_ticking · · Score: 0

    Could they have found a long lost SCO lawsuit?

    Maybe even a lawsuit against NASA...they have deep pockets...who cares if they use vxworks?

    As far as SCO is concerned, if it isn't Unixware, it isn't legal.

    Or did they find darl's mind? he's obviously lost it...

  73. Re:Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you recite such tired cliches, you insensitive clod!

  74. I Heard NASA was the SCO Lawsuit Target!! by syntap · · Score: 1

    Life on Mars, or Linux on Mars?

  75. not new news though by klocwerk · · Score: 1

    that might be it, but it's not really new news. They've known about that for a few days now, and hadn't been keeping it under wraps.

    I'm all for 'wait and see.'

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
  76. Real or Mediaplayer ? by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 1

    I either have to install Real or update Mediaplayer on a PC to watch this? No thanks, I think I will just wait for the copy to be posted.

    --
    Stay tuned for new sig...
  77. Excerpt from Bush's speech tonight by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    This week the martians are claiming that Bush armed the Phobosians who started a war

    Here's an excerpt from Bush's expected press briefing tonight: "The Only Thing We Have to Fear... is Phobos Itself!"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Excerpt from Bush's speech tonight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After a quick trip to dictionary.com, I get it.

  78. An anti-US protest? by jhines · · Score: 1, Funny

    The rovers found signs saying "go home yankee imperialists" and "free mars forever".

  79. EASY by the_DaRKaNGLe · · Score: 1

    Amino acids. That's a good find, and implies enough to be "a big deal"

    --




    A problem cannot be solved at the same level of awareness that created it.
  80. Consequences by stuffduff · · Score: 1
    1. Life: We get the hell off of Mars and 'watch.' The New Reality Television. Maybe we still go to the moon.
    2. Water: We go to Mars; we look harder for #1, but we hope we don't discover #1.
    3. Boom! We watch a lone fighter swoop out of the (now blue) sky and destroy the rover. Bush Declares War. Bush demands to become dictator for life and starts longevity and cloning research because unkile his father he's going to see this through no matter what.
    4. Fizzle: Not much news, NASA just needs to grandstand & get stroked during an election year. We are greatful that #1 and #2 didn't lead to #3.
    5. Drizzle: John Carter is located on Mars!
    6. Sizzle: Mars is discovered to be the home of a race of cannibal supermodels that have been secretly invading our planet! Men line up to be 'Eaten Alive!'
    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
    1. Re:Consequences by falsification · · Score: 1

      7. Profit!!!

  81. I know I am ready by segment · · Score: 1
  82. Water means manned missions by scottennis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everybody is all excited about finding water on Mars because that increases the odds of finding life on Mars.
    But the big excitement of finding water on Mars means that manned missions are possible. Not the one-way missions that were discussed previously here on slashdot, but the kind where we go in light and process our own fuel for the return trip.

    1. Re:Water means manned missions by JustLikeToSay · · Score: 0

      Coca-cola landed a water-extraction plant on Mars while no-one was watching and will shortly be selling filtered, purified, expensive water back to the Martian bacteria.

      --
      I know the truth and I know what you're thinking
    2. Re:Water means manned missions by isaac · · Score: 2, Informative
      But the big excitement of finding water on Mars means that manned missions are possible.

      We've known there's plenty of water on Mars for years, in the polar ice caps. (No, they're not all frozen CO2.)

      The excitement is over finding liquid water (or evidence of same). -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    3. Re:Water means manned missions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the big excitement of finding water on Mars means that manned missions are possible

      Also, now they don't need to bring food to Mars. They can go out fishing. It'll be a cheaper trip to Mars.

    4. Re:Water means manned missions by thales · · Score: 1

      If Life is found on Mars then there should be a total ban on Manned Missions to the red planet. There is no way that we can send a manned mission without contaminating Mars with Earth's bacteria. The Value of finding Independantly evolved life excedes anything that could be gained from Manned Exploration, and it would need to be studied without contamination before we should even consider sending the first humans.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    5. Re:Water means manned missions by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      So build a research station / ship in Earth orbit, and then fly it over to Mars orbit. Do the research remotely, but closer to allow real time interaction and to make sample collection manageable. Maybe we don't have to land people just yet, but we need to get more info and do more research. Doing it from Earth just takes too damn long.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  83. NASA's Announcement : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "As of 2PM today a seven figure sum has been wired to SCO Corporation for IP Licensing compliance purposes on the Linux systems we run.

    SCO has graciously extended the license to specifically cover NASA systems located outside the United States of America and even on other planets and satellites. As soon as we have legally valid documentation from SCO we will be able to switch on our Linux based probes and start collecting results from the surface of mars.

    Press release ends."

  84. Life can be bacteria from Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you have brine you also have many other minerals dissolved in water which is nutrients for bacterial life. Combine this with the knowledge that the Soviet landers were insufficiently sterilised and that bacteria are known for a fact to survive years in space then it is not unlikely that the life they might find is, well, Soviet bacteria.

    BTW the Soviet probes used thermionic valves and cold therefore not be sterilised at high temperature so it is likely that some survived to join the probe on its journey to the red planet.

    1. Re:Life can be bacteria from Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the Soviets sent Lenin's DNA to initiate the red revolution on the Red Planet. Too bad they collapsed before the final outcome. Thank G-d, the American found them - there is balance and hope in the Universe.

  85. We Found 'em!! by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

    NASA is to annouce that, after a long search, the WMDs have finally been found.

  86. Ooh, ooh, Mr. Kotter, Mr. Kotter!! I know... by Wun+Hung+Lo · · Score: 2, Funny

    MARS NEEDS WOMEN!!!

  87. They found him! by valjean78 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They finally found Osama bin Laden. He's been on Mars the whole time!

    1. Re:They found him! by flacco · · Score: 1
      They finally found Osama bin Laden. He's been on Mars the whole time!

      so THAT'S why bush wants to send a man to mars! to bitch-slap the shit out of osama!

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  88. NASA TV also available via Internet2 Multicast by Danathar · · Score: 5, Informative

    NASA does not put it on their page (I emailed them asking them to), but if you are on an Internet2 enabled + multicast enabled network (college/university) it is available via MPEG1 multicast feed.

    You can view it with Quicktime, Real 9 (real 10 crashes with SDP), VideoLan and CISCO IP/TV.

    To view it on Videolan start the player with

    --extraint SAP

    and look at the playlist....it can take up to 10 min before you'll see the NASA listing.

    If anybody wants the sdp file I'll try and find a way of posting it. I tried to...but the slashdot forum filters killed my post!

  89. FYI for non-American readers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the parent is a reference to a (somewhat | very) humorous car insurance company advertisement campaign on tv here in the States.

  90. If Life... by gmiley01 · · Score: 1

    If they have found evidence of microbial (or more advanced) present or past life on Mars give a thought to the chances that there is intelligent life outside of our planetary system. Two planets in the SAME PLANETARY SYSTEM. We have millions upon millions of stars in our galaxy alone. And there are over 100 billion galaxies known to exist out there. The odds just got alot better that we are not alone. Tho, at the same time, we also now run the risk of being non-unique and therefore life is just a standard thing that occurrs everywhere. Religions will go haywire, what will people believe in? People will have to change their ideas of 'my religion is better than your religion'. I can't wait.

    --
    "All it takes to fly is to hurl yourself at the ground... and miss." -D. Adams
    1. Re:If Life... by josh_freeman · · Score: 1

      This really shouldn't have an effect on religion, at least not Christianity. Certain interpretations of Genesis aside, the Bible is largely silent on the mechanics of creation of the universe, and is concerned only with our particular part of it. Most of the confusion between fundamentalists and scientists result from trying to read a very ancient Hebrew text through the eyes of post-enlightenment readers, and not getting the symbolic importance of what is being written.

    2. Re:If Life... by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that to find the true value of the bible, you need to toss out the parts that are inconsistent with reality?

      Because I suggest this indicates there wasn't nay to begin with, beyond the rebranding and profitization all of the popular myths from ancient history.

    3. Re:If Life... by josh_freeman · · Score: 1

      No, I'm suggesting that if you approach any text outside of the context in which it was written, you are going to get utterly lost. If I didn't know anything about *NIX, and you told me to finger you, I would most likely back away slowly and think you were a pervert. Hebrew and Greek has a different structure than English. If you try to translate the words as accurately as you can, you can lose the context. If you try to keep the context, you can lose shades of meaning.

  91. Give him a coathanger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Osama's beard is full of martian chiggers, and it itches like a sonofabitch.

  92. Imagine for a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine for a second there is a world outside of the Internet, where strange people who spend less than half their lives sitting in front of the computer go freely around.

    The question is, did those people hear about Rosetta at some point during the last few hours?

  93. "Significant Findings" by rindeee · · Score: 2, Funny

    They found AOL CDs no doubt. God knows that Earth couldn't contain them all.

  94. Software by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

    They found Open Source on Mars

  95. Naa the truth is more shocking... by tazanator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Al-Quaida has attacked the mars rover.

    --
    I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
  96. WMD by Serious+Simon · · Score: 1

    The iraqis put them were they never thought anyone would find them...

  97. Bin Laden in a cave meeting with,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, indeed, NASA has found bin Laden in a cave, meeting with Sr George Bush.
    This is a significant event, becouse last time the bin Laden and Bush family had a meeting was in the early morning of 9/11.
    There is a speculation, that the 2 oligarchies have teamed up with still un-announced alien forces, supposedly to plan and execute a spectacular event to help re-elect Jr. George Bush.
    NASA goes public, because the Bushes have made it clear that no more space expeditions - after all, prominent, dominant families need privacy in order to plan earth-shaking events for the voters.

  98. Problem with NASA by Roofles+the+Clown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's rather sad that NASA's discoveries and such rarely make even the back page of the newspapers. There was a big hype right after the two rovers successfully landed, but note how about two weeks afterwards, people forgot that they even landed. The American public grows bored with things very fast unless it is something that has to do with a sex scandle involving a politician or someone famous. When NASA announces something like "We found more of these smooth shiny spheres in the soil!" people often shrug and have no interest at all. All the people want are quick thrills and "big" discoveries. They overlook the fact that most science and groundbreaking discoveries only happen due to small realizations and lots of little facts pieced together slowly. I bet when the discovery of this mineral that only forms in water is announced at the press conference, most Americans won't even know that there was a press conference. The small discovery of this water-forming mineral will lead to more accurate theories that will lead to bigger discoveries. Such things shouldn't be downplayed, as this small discovery raises the chances of past/present life on Mars by an enormous amount!

  99. They've discovered Helium? by sleazyrider · · Score: 1

    THe Barsoomians are demanding we leave NOW! http://home.comcast.net/~cjh5801a/Carter.htm

  100. We can't compete by bkc98 · · Score: 0

    This just in: "Today NASA discovered a new type of 'super-coder' on Mars. These hyper-intelligent beings exist in vast numbers and are willing to do contract development for 1/3 the price of today's Indian resource pool currently gutting the American I/T industry."

    Tom Smykowski from Office Space: "I have people skills; I am good at dealing with people. Can't you understand that? What the hell is wrong with you people?"

  101. Anniversary by pete-classic · · Score: 4, Interesting
    According to Wikipedia, today is the anniversary of the discovery of liquid water on Europa.

    March 2 - Data sent from the Galileo probe indicates that Jupiter's moon Europa has a liquid ocean under a think crust of ice.


    Might make for interesting synchronicity.

    -Peter
  102. Re:NASA TV streaming by Danathar · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's also available via Internet2/Mutlticast advertised via SAP. If you have an I2+Multicast feed you can view it with the VideoLan client or Quicktime if you have the SDP information.

  103. And they found them with him! by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    And he had Iraq's weapons of mass destruction with him.

  104. Amazing discovery by Spacejock · · Score: 1

    They're not quite sure if it's genuine, but it looks like pretty strong evidence of an earlier civilisation

    Further tests are under way to discover whether these artifacts are genuine, or whether they are merely crude attempts to revise history.

  105. Bzz Sorry wrong by Hell+O'World · · Score: 1

    You are forgetting that the surface temperature on Mars is extremely cold. That ain't no water puddle.

    1. Re:Bzz Sorry wrong by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      not neccessarily, the temp can reach cosy +20 degrees C on a nice day.
      I'm more suprised the water doesn't boil away in the very low atmosperic pressure though now if it's liquid water.

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    2. Re:Bzz Sorry wrong by Shadwhawk · · Score: 1

      Er, you got your units confused there. Mars Global Surveyor has seen temperatures of about 30 degrees fahrenheit (~0 degrees C). 20 degrees celcius is 68F, which is significantly warmer than we have ever seen Mars.

    3. Re:Bzz Sorry wrong by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      temperatures of up to 27 degrees Celcius have been seen on Mars, source here

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  106. Puddle? Oh reeeaaallly. by orangepeel · · Score: 1

    If you look at the fairly solid wall of soil at the right you will see a slightly dark streak on it. That streak leads directly to a puddle on the floor. Given this visual evidence, and the structure of the soil, it is pretty obvious that this stuff is wet.

    This is like saying you will see (god damn it, you will see it, because I say it's there) the face of Elvis on the mound to the left. It's not even clear what you mean by, "wall of soil at the right."

    If I'm even looking at the same spot on that photo as you (and given your vague comment, it's impossible to know that I am), it looks to me like the dark, finely powdered soil from the surface layer has poured down the side of the trench wall, leaving a faint stripe down the wall, and forming a small pile at the base of the trench. There's the explanation for your "puddle". No water needed here. Try going outside sometime and examining some finely powdered, totally dry clay or silt. Clearly you're going to be surprised at how fluidly it can behave.

    --
    Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
  107. look at the playlist ! by dario_moreno · · Score: 1

    there was a slashdot story about the songs played at the beginning of each martian day. Did they play "Life on Mars" today ? or just "Mossbauer spectroscopy rocks" (by some artist whose name I have forgotten )

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
  108. Finally by cygnus · · Score: 1

    they weren't in Iraq, but I'm glad the Weapons of Mass Destruction were finally located. Crafty of Saddam to put them on Mars... Hans Blix would have never guessed there.

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
  109. Re:Water means manned missions( not really ) by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most plans for manned mission to mars call for sending a nuclear powered fuel factory to transform indigenous martian resources into rocket fuel. Any people going to mars would probably be anxious that the robotic factory that was supposed to be manufacturing their air supply and fuel for the return trip had been working correctly for the past year it took them to reach marz. You could just as easily send the fuel factory, and unmanned probes that would refuel on marz as send manned vehicles that would refuel on mars. And if the factory wasn't working after all, then you could send another one and the probe could wait happily for it's arrival.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  110. I thoat I saw some water by tilleyrw · · Score: 1

    When will they break the government conspiracy and admit the truth?

    John Carter and Dejah Thoris will be starring in a new reality show, "My Favorite Martian".
    That insane scientist will be a pop-in for the laugh track.

    --
    This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.
  111. Re:HOW CAN A FIRST POST BE REDUNDANT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you mean a (-1, Troll)
    or maybe (-1, Offtopic) .. by definition thought, the first post can't really be redundant, unless it's a restatement of the submission or something.

  112. Re:no life by TheOldFart · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually no. What they found was traces of SCO code on Martian soil. They are now wondering about the license fees.

  113. NEWSFLASH by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Mars is really really red. That and after spending billions to send probes to Mars scientologiest have learned that they can basically say anything to the media cuz there is really no way for anyone else to refute it.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:NEWSFLASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ, either you weren't joking about giving out your account password, or you've gotten even lamer. I honestly don't know which.

  114. The Flood kills that, though by Qinopio · · Score: 3, Informative

    Because we would see evidence for it.

    Instead, we see miles and miles of sediments stacked up on top of each other, many full of animal burrows, others requiring deposition in still water, others are deserts, others have dessication cracks.

    There is a difference between what you say and the evidence. God sure did a good job of making the earth look old.

    --
    __________
    [Big Brick Wall]
  115. flamebait HOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is *absolutely true*.

  116. Press Already Leaked by Der Spiegel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Der Spiegel has already leaked the story.

  117. They found martians! by Unnngh! · · Score: 1
    ...And they are claiming IP rights on Unix. Each martian IP license costs $699 Ooglebrok.

    In related news, Darl finally pulled off his human-like face mask to reveal his pasty green skin and large eyes.

  118. Big surprise by MasTRE · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They found Osama. He was hanging out with Bert, the muppet.

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  119. Flamebait??? Fundementalist Moderators... by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Go bugger off and see "The Passion of The Crap" again... I LOVE reasonably religious folks, but American Fundamentalist Christians are worse than Islamic radicals, if for no other reason than they are INSIDE our country, taking advantage of our freedoms only to use them against ourselves by rolling back our fair and even-handed laws... in pursuit of their narrow-minded 'Moral-hypocrisy' agenda...

    Newsflash for all Fundamentalist Right-Wingers..."America was founded by Deists not Christians... That christian Bible-crap all happened in the forties and fifties. I'm all for believing in god, but don't shake your poo-stick-religous-dogma at me..."

    BIG SHOUT OUT TO ALL FREE THINKING RELIGIOUS BELIEVERS -- KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK -- HELP THE NEEDY -- STOP WORRYING ABOUT ABORTION, HOMOSEXUALS, DRUGS, VIDEOGAMES, ROCK AND ROLL, SEX AND AMERICA's 'FICTITIOUS MORAL-DECLINE'...

    LONG LIVE SECULAR HUMANISM!!!

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  120. Having watched some of the stream... by Andy_R · · Score: 0, Informative

    NASA are announcing their plans and timeline for the future:

    Commitment to manned exploration of the solar system and beyond

    Space shuttle back on line asap

    ISS to be repurposed for manned exploration (Hmm, did they dicuss this with the other countries that built it?

    New manned vehicle do be developed called CEV (anyone have more info on this? I tuned in just as this part ended)

    Manned mission to the moon sometime between 2014 to 2020 (ie slower than the 'in this decade' with 1960s technology)

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:Having watched some of the stream... by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      More from the stream (am I the only one on topic in this story?) - jeez these guys are giving up powerpoint hell here. I won at managementspeak bingo in under a minute, and there has barely an unabbreviated noun for the last 10 minutes. Basically it's about how they will get to the Moon again and then onto Mars. Here's the important bits:

      CEV = Crew Exploration Vehicle

      Initially robotic CEV missions then manned ones, repeated use of the phrases "mars and beyond" and "our next destination"

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  121. Other possibilities... by Punchinello · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are many ways the instruments on the rovers could be used to detect life, but mostly they are for finding geological evidence that the planet could have or could now support life.

    One possibility not yet mentioned (and what to me would be the most exciting news) is if they peeled apart some of the sedimentary layers and found fossilized microbes or evidence of former sea life. That would blow me away.

    --

    Remember... ZG9uJ3QgZm9yZ2V0IHRvIGRyaW5rIHlvdXIgb3ZhbHRpbmU=

  122. Re:Puddle? Oh reeeaaallly. by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

    Looking at it closely, it does look like a puddle, with fine dirt floating on it; as would be expected for a concentrated brine. There appear to be faint reflections of the opposite trench wall on the surface of the puddle.

    Well, reflections, or some less-than perfect application of the airbrush tool. I could lean pretty strongly towards the latter, in this case.

    --
    ...
  123. WMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know what they found.....Bushie's WMDs....

  124. What is it, Dave ? by silma · · Score: 1

    Something wonderful...

    --
    English is not my native language !
  125. Who cares if water has been found? by BigBadBus · · Score: 2, Funny

    What they need to do is uncover some BEER and the place'll be half way decent! ;)

  126. Re:Now if cable TV companies were only smart enoug by bsharitt · · Score: 1

    Well, the cable companies in Hustville, AL seem toa carry it and we're not that close the Kennedy Space Center. Although, the Marshall Space Center and the Space and Rocket Center might have something to to with that.

  127. HAL sez "mod parent down" (not really) by LouisvilleDebugger · · Score: 1

    This mission is too important to allow you to jeapordize it.

  128. WMD? by Poro · · Score: 1

    Could the significant findings be weapons of mass destruction? You never know what those Martians have been planning.

  129. Brine/life/Martian OverLords by Cosmonut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This announcement will probably mention that evidence has been found that hematite deposits were created in a wet environment and that the Martian surface was once warmer and wetter than it is now. I doubt that any mention will be made of brine, although it's possible that a carefully phrased statement such as "the surface characteristics *suggest* the *potential* of brine" may be made. Why hedge? Simple. If definitive findings are announced solving various Martian mysteries there's little or no incentive to send the next rover... There will be NO mention of bacteria/fossils/our Martian Overlords. Look at the list of announcers, there's no biologist (and no real biology experiments on the rovers anyway).

  130. linky linky, eggs and binky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  131. C-SPAN by ThomasFlip · · Score: 2, Informative

    www.c-span.org usually carries all of the NASA rover briefings live as well.

    --
    If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
  132. NASA BUYS SCO LISENCES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheap shot, I know; but I had to take it! ;^)

  133. German spiegel tells: by triptolemeus · · Score: 1

    They found proof of rivers.

    From the article (quick translation): They did some chemical analyses and now the expectation of Mr. Squyres turned out to be true.

    Even if you don't understand the article, the pictures are nice.

    --
    The site where: "I'm right, as long as you ignore the things that prove me wrong", became a valid method of debate.
  134. Puddle or Shadow ? by ntsucks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you referring to this image ? That dark streak and "puddle" are a shadow from a contact prob on the arm.

    --
    Those who can do. Those who can't sue.
  135. I am progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:I am progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Natalie Portman eats hot grits!

    2. Re:I am progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a funny, funny word "progressive" is. I love it when people refer to themselves as "progressives". They are so afraid to say liberal. Just come out with it. You are a liberal! When someone refuses to admit what they are and choose to use code words, that should give you a pretty good idea of their agenda. I'm a conservative and proud of it. You are a liberal and are clearly not proud of it otherwise you would dispense with words such as progressive and simply admit what you are. Alas, you cannot because you know that if you do, people will disregard what you have to say. Why else can you explain John Kerry refusing time after time to admit he's a liberal? He won't even admit it to the New York Times. He says this election isn't about labels. Well if that is the case then why not admit what any educated person already knows that you are? The answer is simply. A liberal can't win the election and he knows it so he'lll try to deny that he's liberal without really denying it. If Bush loses we'll be exchanging one liar for another liar. I think Kerry might just be worst. At least Bush makes no bones about being a war mongering conservative. Kerry won't even admit what he is. IMHO that's worse.

  136. I know the scoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mark my words. They found fish bones.

    1. Re:I know the scoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw... They found an empty beer can.

  137. The BIBLE was written by people! by argoff · · Score: 1

    You should know that I of course believe that God created the world in 7 days. Why not? If there is an omnipotent God, why could he *not* do it in 7 days?

    Because I believe that God's nature is to be rational, but that human nature is to be finite and to overlook things. And the fact is that the Bible was written by humans even if it was inspired by God, and humans with a very limited understanding of scientific method at that.

    In addition, early Jewish culture relied heavially on numerology - for example "7" would often translate to "enough", "12" would often translate to complete, "40" would often translate to "a lot, or a long time". That fact is lost in modern day translations. So how do you know it isn't saying "God did more than enough when he made the universe".

    Thank God someone didn't tell the story of goldylocks and the three bears in the Bible - or they might have actually thought bears talked back then too!

    1. Re:The BIBLE was written by people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thank God someone didn't tell the story of goldylocks and the three bears in the Bible - or they might have actually thought bears talked back then too!
      ...though it does have talking snakes...
  138. Fossils? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if they can't detect microbes what are the chances that they might have stumbled across fossils in the rocks.

    1. Re:Fossils? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep...that's right. Fish fossils. Or at least they look like fish.

  139. My apologies in advance... by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 0

    I don't mean to be overly-incendiary. Like I said, I believe in 'belief'... I just don't believe in forcing beliefs on others. I think religion and 'spirituality' are the providence of one's own domain. One person's morality isn't everyone's, and the drive to re-frame the church-state divide is, in my opinion, antithetical to the designs of this great country.

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  140. Re:NASA TV streaming by leeward · · Score: 1

    Yes, but now that it has been posted on /. I expect to get 2kbs instead of the 150kbs that I normally get from the streaming NasaTV.

  141. Giodorno Bruno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So some apologies will be forthcoming?

  142. Re:Now if cable TV... [MOD PARENT UNFUNNY] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great! You just explained WHY the parent post is funny! Thanks!!1!!1

  143. And they will announce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that they have found the second SCO licensee alive and well and living on Mars

  144. Re:about time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get back under your bridge

  145. Water found on Mars!! by germinatoras · · Score: 1

    Forget having to wait until 2:00pm for the annoucement, I've got it right here!

    NASA Discovers Liquid Water on Surface of Mars!
    The Evidence from the Spirit Rover

    (...with apologies to the JPL crew. :-P )

  146. manual translation by Apogee · · Score: 3, Informative

    Disclaimer first: I am not an astronomist, but at least, I am a german native speaker...

    SPIEGEL ONLINE EXKLUSIVE

    "Opportunity" finds proof for martian floods
    by Thorsten Dambeck

    The mars rover "Opportunity" managed to find proof that once upon a time, there was flowing water on mars. As SPIEGEL ONLINE heard from sources within NASA, the US space agency will make this discovery public tonight.

    [caption]Water trace: Light stones close to Oppotunity's landing spot (NASA/JPL)[/caption]

    "I am flabbergasted, I am astonished", said Steve Squyres, scientific head of the rover mission, in face of the pictures from the second mars vehicle "Opportunity". No other landing zone is similar to the broad plain Meridiani Planum, where Spirit's sister probe landed. The scientist was especially taken in by the light rock formation that appeared in front of the rover's camera eyes, peering out of the dark martian sand.

    After thorough mineralogical and chemical analysis of the rocks in the past few weeks, it seems clear now that Squyres spontaneous excitement was justified. As SPIEGEL ONLINE found out from sources within the US space administration, the rock formation is sedimental stone which was definitely built up in a stagnant body of water.

    First suspicion hardened

    The "smoking gun", the irrefutable proof for the existence of past floods on mars, is said to be a sulphate compound that was found in the rocks, and which can only come into existence in the presence of water. NASA will present these results tonight, Tuesday, at 8 PM german time on a press conference in Washington.

    Already the first close-up pictures of the formation fed the suspicion of planetologists, that the rock formation may have been built by sedimentation, by the process of deposition. The single strata were clearly visible on the high-resolution snapshots from Opportunity's panoramic camera. An important contribution to the discovery can be assumed to have been made by the Mossbauer-Spectrometer "Mimos II" , built by the physicist Gostar Klingelhofer from Mainz, which is responsible for the mineralogical analysis of ferrous martian rocks.

    Breakthrough with german instruments

    Already on the 9th of February, German members of the rover research team reported surprising results from their APXS ("Alpha Particle X-Ray Spectrometer") instrument. According to these reports, analyses of a light rock named "Robert E." using the spectrometer found substantially higher levels of zinc and sulphur than in all previously investigated mars rocks. "This indicates that the rock is a hardened, salt-containing sediment, and not of volcanic origin", said a member of the Max-Planck Institute for Chemistry, where the APXS spectrometer was built.

    But even if non-volcanic processes are being favored more and more: Until last week, NASA scientists emphasized that various formation mechanisms -- including variants without the influence of liquid water -- are possible. Now, it seems, liquid water made the race.

    With this, the US-rover would have confirmed from the ground what the european probe "Mars Express" already discovered from orbit: End of January, ESA scientists interpreted the breath-taking pictures of the red planet as clear evidence that once upon a time, rivers and seas existed on mars.

    1. Re:manual translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Apogee - nice translation! Thorsten Dambeck

  147. Sigh, so old, so olllldd. by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    I can remember Horseshack saying things like that.

    Or is some nostalgia channel running Welcome Back Kotter again?

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  148. Iraq's WMD by 511pf · · Score: 1

    They found Iraq's WMD. They were flown to Mars using Saddam's top-secret balsa wood drone program. We will now invade Mars.

    1. Re:Iraq's WMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I KNOW WHAT THEY FOUND! THEY FOUND SADAM'S WMDS!!!

      I swear I'm kicking the fsck out of the next asshat that comes up with that joke all the way up to mars to see for himself if he's right.
      STOP IT ALREADY!!!11 IT'S NOT FUNNY ANYMORE!!!!

      Thank you and have a good day.

  149. A subpoena from SCO! by aborchers · · Score: 1

    Seems the first suit is going to be against the MLUG!

    --
    Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
  150. Significant find!! by bpiltz · · Score: 1

    They found Hoffa!!!

    --
    Goals for 2011: 1. Stop plate tectonics. 2. Prevent animal predation. 3. End supernovae now. 4. Rid the world of evil.
  151. mod parent up ! good handmade translation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  152. Missed the point by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You are missing the point.

    Imagine, for a second, God has just crated Adam.Boy, is he ever hungry! Because his digestive tract is completely empty. In fact, he has a blood sugar level of zero. He goes unconscious and his brain dies in a few minutes. Obviously (taking one possible creationism standpoint for a second), God created Adam as if he had eaten meals in the recent past, had been innoculated with the appropriate intestinal flora, had grown through the normal proceseses of metabolism, had had the amount of exercise that would be normal for an adult human being. In other words, with all the hallmarks of a history that never actually happened. A lemma, if you will, of this viewpoint is that Adam had a belly button.

    Same goes (in this theory) for the world at large. It was created as an ongoing affair, complete with geological features (including fossils) that are indicative of a history that never happened. This history can be studied in any level of detail you wish, because it is perfect and indistinguishable from the results of an actual history. In fact it is an actual history in every respect other than it did not happen.

    "But, but," you will object, " this kind of theory is not scientific."

    Exactly.

    All long term successful relgions go through periods where they "go back to basics". Ad fontes -- "to the wellsprings" was the cry of the Reformation theologians. The Cluniacs of five hundred years earlier in their own drive to recreate primitive Christianity inaugurated many of the institutions that the Reformation theologians rejected as corrupting innovations.

    The problem is that you can never truly go back.

    Fundamentalism is just a more recent variation on the same theme. They are following ad fontes impulse to try to recreate what they believe to be a primitive literal belief in the scientific truth Bible. Another, perhaps more hostile view of the Bible is that it is a pre scientific view of the world, and therefore it is obsolete. Personally, I think both viewpoints are misguided. Premodern religious people were not concerned with scientific truth, with its standards of evidence and negatability. To make the Bible "scientific" is both to add something to it that was outside the kenn of its creators, and to obscure its real value. By in large early religious people were concerned about the inner quality of human life. You can see this in the rather free way they treated their myths.

    The Lurianic Kabbalists, for example, completely overlayed the Torah's account with their own highly detailed and symbolic creation myth. On the Christian side, much of what we receive as standard myths about Angels, particular Lucifer, is extra-Biblical. Almost every Chrisitan takes it for granted that the serpent in the Garden was Satan. In the Genesis account, the status of the serpent is much more ambiguous; while he is cursed in the end, he is certainly no Prince of Darkness -- he is a bringer of knowledge with all its attendant pain. Furthermore, read critically and in the cultural context in which Genesis was likely written, it would appear to be a gloss of earlier creation myths and shares many familiar symbols.

    Why do people need a creation myth? In part, to address their curiosity about origins, a need that is now better satisfied through palentology, geology and cosmology. But curiosity about natural history is only a secondary reason; after all most people can make it through the day, the year, perhaps even their entire lifetime without giving any through to the creation the universe. The reason people need creation myths is that they need some kind of working hypothesis to questions that have no final answer: Why am I here? Why is life the way it is, full of pain and suffering?

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Missed the point by AlphaSys · · Score: 1

      Where are my mod points when I need them? You clarify points for both sides and stand on neither, as each harbor their own fallacy. Magnificent.

      --
      Can I bum a sig? I left mine at the office.
  153. INSIDER info - Water, extinct life, evidence, TTP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. The surface of Mars is saturated with very concentrated water solution at near-phase-state conditions. It has been in this state for many millions of years and represents the tail-off of much more vigerous dessicatory processes. More importantly the components of the solution strongly pro-indicate prior biological processes. These findings will be presented and also plans for VROTSM (Very Rapid Off The Shelf Mission) to test samples. We also hope to get emergency funding for a mission to bring home some of this urea solution to the lab.

  154. Discovery: by Unregistered · · Score: 1

    Martian in a chevy nova stole a wheel off the rover casue he had a flat tire.

  155. A twelver of crumpled cans of Bud... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...and Ford F-150 tire tracks perhaps?

    The Redneck planet!

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  156. They've found life! by kogalurshear · · Score: 4, Informative
    Back in 1976, the LRE experiments on Viking were consistent with evidence for microbial life on Mars. These were dismissed as false positives by some in the community, despite the protests of Gilbert Levin, one of the original researchers on the project. Fortunately, he saved printouts of all the data, and these were later used in 2001 by Miller, a biologist at USC. The new study showed evidence of a periodic gas release according to circadian rhythms consistent with microbial life. In retrospect, Miller said there was a 75% chance of life, given the data in 1975. After his study in 2001, he said there was a 90% chance of life.

    The summary of the study can be found at USC here.

  157. NASA TV Programming - The Information Age, not yet by CKW · · Score: 3, Interesting


    I think I know what they did with the apes that came back from the early spaceflights.

    They put them in charge of NASA TV programming.

    I mean, J.H.C, when the "big spacewalk" was happening a week or two ago I tuned into NASA TV, and what did I get to watch?

    **NOTHING**

    Well, not quite nothing, a grainy image of the command center with an even grainer occasional camera view of a bigscreen projection of their track, which was 100 times worse than simply going to J-Track. Do you seriously mean to tell me that NASA controllers did not have a video feed of or from their own astronauts outside the station, and that all they had was nearly unintelligable acryonym laced audio? Or is it that they simply can't afford a $5 video splitter?

    ( During the hubble repairs a few years ago at one point they showed nothing but a video feed of an inanimate obscure connector between the shuttle and the telescope. Apparently the shuttle didn't have enough downlink bandwidth, and they needed them all for the job at hand. )

    In any case if NASA and the administrationis so concerned about public image and if they really want people to get enthused about spaceflight, how about simply spending an extra $5000 for a single extra camera on the station to provide a view of the interesting things going on?

    Throw in another camera to give us a LIVE view of the earth on another channel - 24/7. How many of you wouldn't LOVE to see a 400 mile wide live video feed from space of the earth, and follow it along with J-Track, a recent GOES image, and your atlas / globe, dynamic topographic and/or terraserver reference feed?

    Isn't this supposed to be the information age?

    Can you imagine how utterly amazing it would be for science teachers to be able to plan a science/geography class around an hour of that each couple weeks with a few groups of kids around 5 PCs all watching the different feeds and trying to match them to the live feed? Add in a few kids using google groups and google news to provide live socio/political/weather commentary, etc etc.

  158. Christianity 101 by mpowers · · Score: 1

    While some are busy handing out labels of ignorance, let me try to clear something up.

    Fundamentalists are a subset of Protestants who are a subset of all Christians. Protestants believe that the Bible is the sole source of understanding the divine. Fundamentalists believe that the Bible should be literally interpreted as fact. The rest of us don't. Thank you.

    When you don't have to literally interpret every word, hour, or day, there's not a lot of conflict with current scientific theory.

    For instance, the order of events is basically correct: darkness, then light, then stars, then planets, then oceans, then land, plants, animals, and finally people. Not bad for people writing ~5000 years ago.

    And the apple-from-the-tree-of-knowledge thing -- how is that not the story of humanity in general and geekdom in particular: germ warfare, nerve gas, nuclear proliferation, grey goo, cloning, cyborgification, etc. etc.

  159. Elvis has just arrived.... by tore · · Score: 1

    for this years Elvis lookalike competition on Mars.

  160. Cancelled!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The event has been cancelled, due to some unforeseen, unfortunate events.

    Dr. Ed Weiler, Associate Administrator, Office of Space Science at NASA Headquarters and the fellow panelists have been killed in an accedident on their way to Washington DC.

    NASA released a prompt statement, that due to the huge impact of the originally planned announcement, only the killed NASA employees knew what they were about to reveal.

    There will be an investigation launched into the accident, which is currently described by the FBI as CIA, as "normal looking, absolutely non-suspicios" unfortunate turn of events, which happens every day all over the world. So far no sign of any notes about the originally planned NASA announcement have been recovered.

  161. Spherules... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those spherules have HATCHED!

  162. With no biologist? by zCyl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Following is the panel they will have available for interviews in an hour. Note that there is a geologist, but no biologist or anything similar. Thus I would guess that they found strong evidence for water, rather than stumbling across bacteria.

    # Professor Steve Squyres, Mars Exploration Rover (MER) Principal Investigator, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
    # Professor John Grotzinger, MER science team geologist, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
    # Dr. Benton C. Clark III, MER science team member and Chief Scientist of Space Exploration, Lockheed Martin Space Systems Astronautics Operations, Denver
    # Dr. Joy Crisp, MER Project Scientist, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
    # Dr. Jim Garvin, Lead Scientist for Mars and the Moon, NASA Headquarters

  163. Surpring find... justified trip by theendlessnow · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. 200 cartons of biological chemical agents.
    2. 400 delivery canisters
    3. 50 lead lined radioactive transport carriers
    4. 5 rocket propelled grenades
    5. 10 fake pilot id's
    6. 25 bacteria growth containers
    7. 100 gallons of unidentified chemical
    8. 6 packages of unidentified white powder
    9. 25 expelled radioactive cores
    10. 1 picutre of Uday and Qusay
    11. 1 picture of Beagle II
    12. 1 magnetic dart board with George Bush Sr's picture.
    13. 1 picture of Sadaam Hussein and apparently an Elvis impersonator.
    14. Many pictures of an Elvis impersonator together with someone who looks similar to JFK.
    15. 2 pictures of Jimmy Hoffa playing Nintendo.
  164. The beagle DID land by HermanZA · · Score: 1

    and promptly sank into the muck? Next time they should make sure Mars probes can float...

  165. Re:Now if cable TV companies were only smart enoug by Zerbey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I swear, the closer you get to Kennedy Space Center, the less chance they will offer it.

    Have you asked? We used to have it on Time Warner and it was removed in favour of WB (I kid not). So, I went down to the local store and put in a request for it to be re-added. 2 months later, they added the channel again.

  166. In other news... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    Versign sues ICANN over the right to reserve .mars TLD names.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  167. Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It won't be another Segway... where everyone's built up this huge buzz only to find out there may have been water on Mars.

  168. Re:NASA TV streaming by macmurph · · Score: 1

    I think its disgusting that they arent using Quicktime. NASA, please fix that snafu.

  169. OPPORTUNITY Latest Findings on Mars Water by bendelo · · Score: 1

    "Landed in an area of mars where water once drenched the environment."

  170. Breaking News - Water! by eric777 · · Score: 1

    They found water!

  171. Opportunity in Once Drenched Area by stuffduff · · Score: 1

    That is the big news!

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  172. "Drenched" by flanker · · Score: 2, Informative

    They just announced the surface where Opportunity is was "drenched" with water for an extended period of time.

    --
    Left shift 1 for e-mail...
  173. Re:NASA TV streaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    be quiet, petulant one.

  174. BRIEFING: Opportunity Site was once *Drenched* by mycr0ft · · Score: 1

    BRIEFING: Opportunity Site was once *Drenched*
    Yeah the little blueberries are evidence of water flowing in the past.

    --

    Me physicist. Me make rockets.
  175. Re:NASA TV Programming - The Information Age, not by log0n · · Score: 1

    OT Rant, but this is something I deal with everyday.

    I work for a public school system (webmaster) and I have a lot of in-school dealings with teachers and students. In my specific county, there are countless good, dedicated teachers that come up with excellent ideas (like yours) that would entertain students brains, teach them new things, wow them with the power of science and education - all of those good things that makes a kid want to learn on their own - but these ideas are shot down by the board of education and administration.

    Why?

    There are so many problems. I went through 4 iterations of this paragraph before giving up. Modern parents (25-35) don't have adequate coping mechanisms for real life stress largely due to PCorrect thinking/training of the past decades. I have to better explain myself, but most of the day to day problems I see come from that root cause.

  176. Mars rocks soked in water by aa_trna_syn · · Score: 1

    Press briefing highlight: Jarasite rocks found at Meridiani Plannum, rocks here were definitely modified by liquid water.

  177. Damn you slashdotters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Here I am, stuck at work on the late shift at 7:15pm (UK), trying to read what the big announcement is from NASA, and every other comment is banging on about religion ?!?! Guys, you are all so off-topic it's untrue! GET A ROOM! I want to read about Water on Mars and stuff like that!

  178. Re:NASA TV Programming - The Information Age, not by CKW · · Score: 1

    Very interesting...

    Please elaborate, I don't care how "imperfect" you think your description is... Perhaps just give us an actual example or three, I'm sure the rest of us will spot the trend, especially considering your own suggestion of the "root cause".

    OT to your point - I do realize that what I threw out could be *quite* ambitious, especially for an "average" class of kids. I've only done a few years of TA'ing 1st year university labs while in grad school, no High School experience. But I also know that human beings don't really shine unless they are given a SOLID daunting challenge that forces them to overcome it. But you're right, I could see a lot of unexpected negative spin-offs that might be a bit to handle....

    Ahhh, I don't know. It's really hard to tell what might happen until someone actually tries something!!! (And you can take that statement as liberally and as generically as you like).

  179. Over and over we have asked for it by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    They just aren't smart enough to carry it.

  180. Wet Solar System by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

    Water, water, everywhere! But not a drop to drink!

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  181. Re:NASA TV Programming - The Information Age, not by log0n · · Score: 1

    Heh, I went through this whole paragraph also and realized I wasn't really saying anything useful.

    A lot of parents like to complain because they have an elevated sense of entitlement, that their child is somehow more deserving of the school system than other children, etc. Quite literally, the parent wants to accomplish X, and doesn't care if Y, Z, or A^2 + B^2 / C^2 gets in the way, or is inconvenienced. The school system has faced threats of law suits with severe monetary damages so often that innovation and creativity is (figuratively) no longer permitted. The position of the staff attorney is to always err on the side of the parent over the teacher/staff to avoid a potential $-draining suit. Good teachers lose their initiative to innovate for fear of a professional reprimand (because if they get in trouble, they are automatically martyr'd). Parents continue with a cycle of being unaware of the consequences of their actions and feel victorious in their 'call for change'.

    It's hard to give specific examples (also, don't want to get in trouble - JIC), but in my system (like many others in my state), the problems are from patronizing the parents ad nauseam and allowing the true point of education to get lost in this overly litigious age.

    More or less, there's very little tolerance anymore. Those who attempt to cope and find a middle ground get overrun by those who are on a mission.

  182. Re:NASA TV Programming - The Information Age, not by log0n · · Score: 1

    Oh, and to give you a literal example of why your seriously great(!!) idea of tracking along with the space station wouldn't work, I can envision (based on past incidents) parents complaining that either there aren't 1) enough computers for the studetns to use individually - so it shouldn't be done), or 2) the child doesn't have a home computer - so it shouldn't be done, or 3) the technology is a waste of money when there are other problems (like not enough books) or something.. or 4) teaching rocketry/astronomy/space science isn't agreeable to 1 parents religion - so it can't be taught on religious reasoning to all, etc.

    The state of the modern american's ability to tolerate and to cope is truly disappointing.

  183. Re:NASA TV Programming - The Information Age, not by CKW · · Score: 1

    Wow - I see what you mean.

    Consider me truly disappointed. : |

  184. Also found... by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    ....the rover has apparently also found an empty Coke can and a potato chip packet. NASA officials are keeping tight-lipped about these findings, only saying that these don't necessarily prove signs of 'intelligent' life on Mars.

    -psy

  185. So anyone actually watched it? by denger · · Score: 1

    Is there a summary we can find somewhere? Or even, god forbid, a recodrd copy of the briefing?
    Any links?
    Thanks!