Ah, one of those, who believes that if he did not steal enough from somebody today then he didn't have a good day and that the individual (or company) he didn't steal enough from today got away with something. Mmmm, the thievery is strong with this one.
Government destroys the free market with every step it takes, it's time for governments to die.
While it's cool to shit on GoDaddy here, it is not only that company that can fall to this type of an attack. They have to implement better security features themselves rather than just trying to sell their own version of 'security' to their customers (extra $$$ for preventing your name and email and whatever else, possibly address from being queried by whois).
I think at the very bare minimum they can implement some sort of a secure word / pin / voice password and maybe a call back to a phone number as a secondary measure.
I see nothing "socialistic" about a government imposing rules and regulations on businesses.
- do you understand what it means, when the mob (government collective) comes to tell you (private property owner) what you cannot do and how much ransom you have to pay not to be shut down and thrown into a pri... re-education camp?
It means that some collective is preventing you from running your own business or your own life as you see fit and as the market forces allow. That is socialism or fascism, basically a collectivist system.
Free markets have been regulated by government since the dawn of civilization.
So selfish, not to want the mob to use its overwhelming numbers to attack a minority of people to steal from them because they have something that the mob wants.
I am nowhere near 99.9% or whatever, I oppose all theft out of general principle, that principle being: virtue is non initiation of force.
The socialist mob (jealous thieves) gives the fascist government the power to initiate force against a tiny minority of people who have something that the mob wants. Then the mob is surprised when that tiny minority of people does whatever it can to attempt and fight against this violence and against this theft, which is the most unjust thing that common people except on nearly universal basis and even have the gall to call it 'justice'.
First I will give you the economic argument: consumption does not drive the economy, production does. You cannot consume what doesn't exist, which is why you are not flying a space ship yourself to a Jupiter holiday today. Production (creation of stuff) is the economic driver, consumption is the trivial act of economic destruction (even if that destruction is required to keep somebody alive, it is still destruction).
Second I will give you the moral argument (which, as far as I am concerned is the real argument): it is morally indefensible to do what the governments and the mob are doing, stealing from people in the first place and then stealing disproportionately more from some than from others.
All income and wealth related taxes are theft and are immoral acts of violence propagated by the mob with the use of a violent government system. You cannot have a just system as long as the system is immoral and it is immoral to steal from some to provide others with the incentive to gang up against the minority that is being stolen from in order to increase the theft.
What is 'promote'? Talk about it? Investigate it? Report on it? Discuss it? Express your personal opinions?
What do they mean by 'block' and 'web sites'? If it is a torrent shared file, then what? What does block mean, what if some content cannot be 'blocked' will they (who is *they*) take France off line completely?
How do they define 'France' in this case? Who is this magical 'France' that will do all of these things?
Also why 'block websites', does that mean forums as well?
The old saying goes: the more languages you know the more human you are. Why stop at two languages? I like a set of at least 5 personally, preferably 7. Wonder what that does to perception of the reality.
So I wonder how this UV projector doesn't cause solids to form inside the vat if in fact this projector can cause plastic to solidify as it is being removed from the vat with liquid resin. First I thought maybe that would work by combining UV, resin and basically air, but then how does it work for solidifying the resin within somewhat thicker parts of the model, not every part of a model is spider web thin. Looks like it's both plausible and magic at the same time, because as the UV passes through the vat I somehow expect it to turn all of the resin it passes through into a solid mass. Oh well, maybe that's the secret sauce that makes thing thing. Maybe there are separate wavelengths that get combined together just near the surface of the resin and that's where it gets solid?
I think that any real insider trading only happens in the halls of government offices, where government officials trade on exact knowledge of the laws that they themselves are passing.
I think that any actual fraud needs to be punished, regardless of whether it is committed by an individual or his or her company but I also think government has no business in that, that's what private legal system should be handling.
I think that the real problem with the society is its desire to use violence perpetrated by the government thugs with guns upon individuals.
I hope you don't really believe that. All the evidence says otherwise.
- it is not a matter of belief, it's a matter of fact. It is government laws that discriminate and hurt people with discrimination. Slavery was a government law, so was the law that chemically castrated Alan Turing, so was any law that forbade interracial marriages, so is any law that says anything at all about homosexuals or straight people, races or genders, or any kind of a 'minority' related law, anything at all that divides people into groups and categories is government discrimination.
Businesses mostly keep away from discrimination if government law does not make it prohibitively expensive not to discriminate. I know I would not hire any type of a government protected group specifically because laws make it extremely expensive to hire and fire them, not because of any personal feelings on any of those subjects. I care about making money more than I care what somebody does on their free time with their penises, vaginas, what skin colour they are, whatever. The point is that any government law that makes it expensive to fire somebody makes it nearly infinitely expensive to hire any such people.
As to 'bonded' whatever, yeah, I don't care what government program there is, it's all a trap anyway. There shouldn't be any government oppression where it concerns our private property and private deals.
It is our right (right = protection against government oppression) to discriminate against any individual in our everyday lives for any reason whatsoever. Governments destroy our rights by punishing individuals or businesses for any type of discrimination while governments are most likely to discriminate themselves, not private businesses and government discrimination is what is most damaging, not individual or business discrimination. Businesses and individuals discriminate very little due to free market not approving of it. But we must maintain our rights and be free people and keep our right to privately own and operate property without governments oppressing us.
As to criminal background checks themselves, as long as a business can be sued in court for money by anybody claiming that business caused them damage by hiring an ex con and the client somehow lost something and now wants retribution and government allows him to sue because business maybe hired an ex fellon, as long as that is the case (and it is happening all the time), you bet businesses will not hire ex cons. It is all about minimizing costs, and these types oflawsuites do not falll into a category of minimizing the cost of runni g a business.
Well, if we are going to measure how 'successful' this 'law' is, I would say it has total success. Consider that the way that Putin was able to radicalise some segments of the Russian population and have his covert war in Ukraine by pushing propaganda that Ukrainian is ran by 'fascists' and 'nazis', and they have achieved this by equating the Ukrainian nationalists, who use Bandera symbolism to fascism. Of-course Bandera was a nationalist who was trying to build a movement to get both, the Soviet and the Nazis out of Ukraine and he did not mind using connections with the Nazis to achieve his goals, however he was far from being a fascist, he personally spent time in a Nazi concentration camp after once it became known he was building an attempt of overthrowing the Nazis in Ukraine.
So Godwin law is here to stay, it proved to be extremely useful for the powers of the world.
Patriotism is stupid. It is stupid to assign yourself to a group and then cheer for the group or go down with it. It is a sign of a weak intellect and stupid ideology to cheer for a team or for anything that is set up to consume and chew up and spit out an individual in the first place. Patriotism is for idiots and it is a useful way to control idiots.
There is only private property, in a war that is aimed at your private property and/or life you don't have a choice, but to be a patriot simply because of a set of circumstances that caused you to be born in a particular location within a particular set of people is stupid.
Stupid idea of patriotism is used for most horrendous crimes committed by the elites, who create walls made of people around themselves to protect their own power. These walls of people are then used as cannon fodder to destroy individual liberties, be it in civil or external wars.
Patriotism is a stupid idea that starts with the stupid idea of team sports and progresses all the way into wars.
No, it is not a good idea. USA citizenship is an albatross around your neck at this point, given where the USA economy is going and what the USA tax system is like. It makes much more sense to start learning Mandarin at this point and figuring out how to get citizenship of Singapore instead.
A corporation is not a person, however that is not what is meant by 'corporations are people', the people in question are the people who start/run/own the corporations. Corporations are 1 or more people that own the corporation and the speech of the person that owns a corporation is limited by government, when government denies that person the right to use his corporation to express his view.
I was born in the USSR, not an American, lived all over the world and maintain a 5 flag strategy. I have a better understanding of the global situation than many people on this planet who have never even left their own city in their lives.
As to the rest of your comment, clearly you cannot read. I am not talking the general population, I am talking about welfare recipients, so try and stay on topic, would you please?
Your assertion that people who aren't working won't do anything but breed is also not supported by evidence. People who are educated with large amounts of personal freedom have a much lower reproductive rate than people who need to spend most of their time working in order to survive.
- are you kidding? People who aren't working are breeding, that's all they are doing. This is proven conclusively by countries with welfare systems in place, such as the USA, Israel and others, where there are large swaths of population whose only fame to claim is the benefits that they are extracting from the system and producing more mouths to feed. There is a culture of welfare produced in the USA, white trash is among the top welfare recipients of-course. In Israel the Haredim (ultra orthodox) Jews see it necessary to have scores of children (while also using their procreating habits to encroach further and further into the Gaza strip increasing the tensions and violence and at the same time Haredim do not join the military forces in the country).
spend their time creating, gardening, helping their neighbors, decorating things,
- yeah, that's what I call idle population. Creating new forms of porn and that's about it.
and eventually building businesses or small trading operations
- oh yeah, sure, subsidized by the 'basic income' for no reason whatsoever just because they graced us with their presence on this planet.
A person's worth is in what the person does, a person that lives off of others is not worth anything, he or she is a net drain on the system, not a net benefit. Thinking that a significant number of people with that mentality will amount to anything at all if they are not prodded by the cold reality of having to survive on this planet but believing they are owed something by others, who have something, that doesn't make creative and entrepreneurial people at all, but it will create a class of people for who it will never be enough. They will believe that if they procreate and create more mouths to feed for the system now, that the system has to expand its own production for their sake and feed them all and probably do even more than just feed them, because 'dignity'.
Dignity does NOT come from forced coercive threat of violence and income redistribution based on that violence. We have conclusively proven that in the former USSR (and North Korea and more).
Individuals need to stop cooperating with the oppressive collectivist (socialist/fascist) governments. The oppressive collectivist governments derive their power from our cooperation and we must stop this and we have the power to do it. We must violate every oppressive collectivist rule and law, they send their goons to kidnap us and 'judge' us, we must not cooperate. We must not give up without a fight and when they overpower us (they are the collective socialist fascist mob with all the guns and muscle after all), we must not cooperate with their goon 'judges' and goon muscle. They should have to use force for everything, we must not even walk when they tell us to. Of course this is not a recipe for self preservation but for rejection of their authority over us. The only thing they have is guns and muscle, they have to be put into position to show what they really are every step of the way. The so called society has to be shown what it is, to create and maintain this system of oppression of the individual by the group. It has to be made clear to the mob that it is the mob with all its pitchforks and bonfires with individuals used for fuel.Without freedom individual has nothing and nothing else matters. All mob laws are pure expression of violence and they should be forced to display it and live with it or change every step of the way.
Individuals need to stop cooperating with the oppressive collectivist (socialist/fascist) governments. The oppressive collectivist governments derive their power from our cooperation and we must stop this and we have the power to do it. We must violate every oppressive collectivist rule and law, they send their goons to kidnap us and 'judge' us, we must not cooperate. We must not give up without a fight and when they overpower us (they are the collective socialist fascist mob with all the guns and muscle after all), we must not cooperate with their goons 'judges' and goons muscle. They should have to use force for everything, we must not even walk when they tell us to. Of course this is not a recipe for self preservation but for rejection of their authority over us. The only thing they have is guns and muscle, they have to be put into position to show what they really are every step of the way. The so called society has to be shown what it is, to create and maintain this system of oppression of the individual by the group. It has to be made clear to the mob that it is the mob with all its pitchforks and bonfires with individuals used for fuel.
Without freedom individual has nothing and nothing else matters. All mob laws are pure expression of violence and they should be forced to display it and live with it or change every step of the way.
People not only had affordable and cheap health care in USA, they had affordable and cheap health insurance. 50 years ago the most commonly sold health insurance plan would only cost $25 per year per family of 4 with a 500USD deductible, covering up to 50,000/year, which was more than enough for 2.5 years of stay in a hospital in a year. So it was catastrophic insurance, which and people paid for most of their expenses out of pocket and it was not a problem whatsoever.
Even before that, around 1920s, 1930s, a family with 2000-3000USD income would spend around 108USD in health care a year, closer to 261USD with hospital stay in a year.
Yes, insurance and health care used to be very cheap in the USA before the fucking piece of shit collectivist, and yes, socialist/fascist government destroyed the free market capitalism.
Do you even realise that it is not supply of money that is limiting people's wealth, it is supply of production, or do you not realise that? Money is a measure stick, the wealth is not cash, it's what you can produce and savings that are based on real excess production that is exchanged for other goods/services/investments/savings.
You can't use 'technology of money creation' to do anything except to create inflation (expansion of the money supply) thus reducing the relative value of money and destroying its worth.
It's like you have 1 ton of steel that you mined. You can use 1 dollar to measure its worth or you can use 1 Trillion dollars to measure its worth, that number is irrelevant to how much steel you have.
Providing the entitlement of the so called 'basic income' creates a situation where the currently idle population simply procreates to consume all of the resources allocated to them for free. So as an example the idle population of 1,000,000 becomes population of 1,000,000,000 and where the 'basic income' was enough to sustain 1,000,000 comfortably the new 1,000,000,000 are so poor on it, they are now demanding the entitlement to be increased proportionately to their numbers.
Well, so where does that extra excess productive capacity come from to feed the new 99,000,000? Well, the 1,000,000 would have had to WORK to create enough WEALTH to sustain the new 99,000,000 (who also would have to work).
Providing the so called 'basic income' is a recipe for greater and greater, bigger and bigger more and more massive levels of poverty among larger and larger idle population.
There are plenty of jobs that need to be done that cannot be done today because people are doing all kinds of other nonsense (including nothing, for those sitting on welfare), we need to build more shit, we need underwater cities, greenhouses, underground cities, space cities and space farms, space mining, robot training, biogenetic programming, who knows what else.
This is pure crapola, it doesn't matter, but if we could eliminate 99.9% of jobs tomorrow so that those jobs could be done by machines cheaply, quickly and ubiquitously and we would have new jobs created but of-course with that kind of disruption we have to disrupt the political system. Out of the 99.9% of jobs, 99.9% of politicians and other government officials also need to lose their jobs so that the free individuals not encumbered by rules and laws and taxes can start thinking of satisfying all of the untapped desires that people have that are not even close to being satisfied.
Until nobody else wants to own a yacht, a green house for their own vegetables and fruits and whatever artificial meat you want and your own private space station there will not be unemployment unless it is created by government. Unemployment is created by government rules, laws, taxes, nothing else. Absent rules, laws and taxes designed to stand in your way, when you are trying to build a new business, all you are limited by is your imagination.
Slashdot Mirror
Ah, one of those, who believes that if he did not steal enough from somebody today then he didn't have a good day and that the individual (or company) he didn't steal enough from today got away with something. Mmmm, the thievery is strong with this one.
Government destroys the free market with every step it takes, it's time for governments to die.
While it's cool to shit on GoDaddy here, it is not only that company that can fall to this type of an attack. They have to implement better security features themselves rather than just trying to sell their own version of 'security' to their customers (extra $$$ for preventing your name and email and whatever else, possibly address from being queried by whois).
I think at the very bare minimum they can implement some sort of a secure word / pin / voice password and maybe a call back to a phone number as a secondary measure.
I see nothing "socialistic" about a government imposing rules and regulations on businesses.
- do you understand what it means, when the mob (government collective) comes to tell you (private property owner) what you cannot do and how much ransom you have to pay not to be shut down and thrown into a pri... re-education camp?
It means that some collective is preventing you from running your own business or your own life as you see fit and as the market forces allow. That is socialism or fascism, basically a collectivist system.
Free markets have been regulated by government since the dawn of civilization.
- that is the problem.
So selfish, not to want the mob to use its overwhelming numbers to attack a minority of people to steal from them because they have something that the mob wants.
I am nowhere near 99.9% or whatever, I oppose all theft out of general principle, that principle being: virtue is non initiation of force.
The socialist mob (jealous thieves) gives the fascist government the power to initiate force against a tiny minority of people who have something that the mob wants. Then the mob is surprised when that tiny minority of people does whatever it can to attempt and fight against this violence and against this theft, which is the most unjust thing that common people except on nearly universal basis and even have the gall to call it 'justice'.
First I will give you the economic argument: consumption does not drive the economy, production does. You cannot consume what doesn't exist, which is why you are not flying a space ship yourself to a Jupiter holiday today. Production (creation of stuff) is the economic driver, consumption is the trivial act of economic destruction (even if that destruction is required to keep somebody alive, it is still destruction).
Second I will give you the moral argument (which, as far as I am concerned is the real argument): it is morally indefensible to do what the governments and the mob are doing, stealing from people in the first place and then stealing disproportionately more from some than from others.
All income and wealth related taxes are theft and are immoral acts of violence propagated by the mob with the use of a violent government system. You cannot have a just system as long as the system is immoral and it is immoral to steal from some to provide others with the incentive to gang up against the minority that is being stolen from in order to increase the theft.
What is 'promote'? Talk about it? Investigate it? Report on it? Discuss it? Express your personal opinions?
What do they mean by 'block' and 'web sites'? If it is a torrent shared file, then what? What does block mean, what if some content cannot be 'blocked' will they (who is *they*) take France off line completely?
How do they define 'France' in this case? Who is this magical 'France' that will do all of these things?
Also why 'block websites', does that mean forums as well?
---
In Russia Putin is making it illegal for people to drive cars in a group together and to set up tent sites... these are being equated to anti-government protests and we can't have anti-government protests obviously and apparently this is not only happening in Russia, I don't see any difference between Russia and France in this case.
The old saying goes: the more languages you know the more human you are. Why stop at two languages? I like a set of at least 5 personally, preferably 7. Wonder what that does to perception of the reality.
So I wonder how this UV projector doesn't cause solids to form inside the vat if in fact this projector can cause plastic to solidify as it is being removed from the vat with liquid resin. First I thought maybe that would work by combining UV, resin and basically air, but then how does it work for solidifying the resin within somewhat thicker parts of the model, not every part of a model is spider web thin. Looks like it's both plausible and magic at the same time, because as the UV passes through the vat I somehow expect it to turn all of the resin it passes through into a solid mass. Oh well, maybe that's the secret sauce that makes thing thing. Maybe there are separate wavelengths that get combined together just near the surface of the resin and that's where it gets solid?
I think that any real insider trading only happens in the halls of government offices, where government officials trade on exact knowledge of the laws that they themselves are passing.
I think that any actual fraud needs to be punished, regardless of whether it is committed by an individual or his or her company but I also think government has no business in that, that's what private legal system should be handling.
I think that the real problem with the society is its desire to use violence perpetrated by the government thugs with guns upon individuals.
I hope you don't really believe that. All the evidence says otherwise.
- it is not a matter of belief, it's a matter of fact. It is government laws that discriminate and hurt people with discrimination. Slavery was a government law, so was the law that chemically castrated Alan Turing, so was any law that forbade interracial marriages, so is any law that says anything at all about homosexuals or straight people, races or genders, or any kind of a 'minority' related law, anything at all that divides people into groups and categories is government discrimination.
Businesses mostly keep away from discrimination if government law does not make it prohibitively expensive not to discriminate. I know I would not hire any type of a government protected group specifically because laws make it extremely expensive to hire and fire them, not because of any personal feelings on any of those subjects. I care about making money more than I care what somebody does on their free time with their penises, vaginas, what skin colour they are, whatever. The point is that any government law that makes it expensive to fire somebody makes it nearly infinitely expensive to hire any such people.
As to 'bonded' whatever, yeah, I don't care what government program there is, it's all a trap anyway. There shouldn't be any government oppression where it concerns our private property and private deals.
It is our right (right = protection against government oppression) to discriminate against any individual in our everyday lives for any reason whatsoever. Governments destroy our rights by punishing individuals or businesses for any type of discrimination while governments are most likely to discriminate themselves, not private businesses and government discrimination is what is most damaging, not individual or business discrimination. Businesses and individuals discriminate very little due to free market not approving of it. But we must maintain our rights and be free people and keep our right to privately own and operate property without governments oppressing us.
As to criminal background checks themselves, as long as a business can be sued in court for money by anybody claiming that business caused them damage by hiring an ex con and the client somehow lost something and now wants retribution and government allows him to sue because business maybe hired an ex fellon, as long as that is the case (and it is happening all the time), you bet businesses will not hire ex cons. It is all about minimizing costs, and these types oflawsuites do not falll into a category of minimizing the cost of runni g a business.
Well, if we are going to measure how 'successful' this 'law' is, I would say it has total success. Consider that the way that Putin was able to radicalise some segments of the Russian population and have his covert war in Ukraine by pushing propaganda that Ukrainian is ran by 'fascists' and 'nazis', and they have achieved this by equating the Ukrainian nationalists, who use Bandera symbolism to fascism. Of-course Bandera was a nationalist who was trying to build a movement to get both, the Soviet and the Nazis out of Ukraine and he did not mind using connections with the Nazis to achieve his goals, however he was far from being a fascist, he personally spent time in a Nazi concentration camp after once it became known he was building an attempt of overthrowing the Nazis in Ukraine.
So Godwin law is here to stay, it proved to be extremely useful for the powers of the world.
Patriotism is stupid. It is stupid to assign yourself to a group and then cheer for the group or go down with it. It is a sign of a weak intellect and stupid ideology to cheer for a team or for anything that is set up to consume and chew up and spit out an individual in the first place. Patriotism is for idiots and it is a useful way to control idiots.
There is only private property, in a war that is aimed at your private property and/or life you don't have a choice, but to be a patriot simply because of a set of circumstances that caused you to be born in a particular location within a particular set of people is stupid.
Stupid idea of patriotism is used for most horrendous crimes committed by the elites, who create walls made of people around themselves to protect their own power. These walls of people are then used as cannon fodder to destroy individual liberties, be it in civil or external wars.
Patriotism is a stupid idea that starts with the stupid idea of team sports and progresses all the way into wars.
No, it is not a good idea. USA citizenship is an albatross around your neck at this point, given where the USA economy is going and what the USA tax system is like. It makes much more sense to start learning Mandarin at this point and figuring out how to get citizenship of Singapore instead.
So this Wilfried Laurier character,
, he looks like he was from Vulcan . Live long and here is 5 bucks for you!
A corporation is not a person, however that is not what is meant by 'corporations are people', the people in question are the people who start/run/own the corporations. Corporations are 1 or more people that own the corporation and the speech of the person that owns a corporation is limited by government, when government denies that person the right to use his corporation to express his view.
I was born in the USSR, not an American, lived all over the world and maintain a 5 flag strategy. I have a better understanding of the global situation than many people on this planet who have never even left their own city in their lives.
As to the rest of your comment, clearly you cannot read. I am not talking the general population, I am talking about welfare recipients, so try and stay on topic, would you please?
It is 2015 today, isn't it? Did you have to use your hands? It's like a baby's toy!
Your assertion that people who aren't working won't do anything but breed is also not supported by evidence. People who are educated with large amounts of personal freedom have a much lower reproductive rate than people who need to spend most of their time working in order to survive.
- are you kidding? People who aren't working are breeding, that's all they are doing. This is proven conclusively by countries with welfare systems in place, such as the USA, Israel and others, where there are large swaths of population whose only fame to claim is the benefits that they are extracting from the system and producing more mouths to feed. There is a culture of welfare produced in the USA, white trash is among the top welfare recipients of-course. In Israel the Haredim (ultra orthodox) Jews see it necessary to have scores of children (while also using their procreating habits to encroach further and further into the Gaza strip increasing the tensions and violence and at the same time Haredim do not join the military forces in the country).
spend their time creating, gardening, helping their neighbors, decorating things,
- yeah, that's what I call idle population. Creating new forms of porn and that's about it.
and eventually building businesses or small trading operations
- oh yeah, sure, subsidized by the 'basic income' for no reason whatsoever just because they graced us with their presence on this planet.
A person's worth is in what the person does, a person that lives off of others is not worth anything, he or she is a net drain on the system, not a net benefit. Thinking that a significant number of people with that mentality will amount to anything at all if they are not prodded by the cold reality of having to survive on this planet but believing they are owed something by others, who have something, that doesn't make creative and entrepreneurial people at all, but it will create a class of people for who it will never be enough. They will believe that if they procreate and create more mouths to feed for the system now, that the system has to expand its own production for their sake and feed them all and probably do even more than just feed them, because 'dignity'.
Dignity does NOT come from forced coercive threat of violence and income redistribution based on that violence. We have conclusively proven that in the former USSR (and North Korea and more).
Individuals need to stop cooperating with the oppressive collectivist (socialist/fascist) governments. The oppressive collectivist governments derive their power from our cooperation and we must stop this and we have the power to do it. We must violate every oppressive collectivist rule and law, they send their goons to kidnap us and 'judge' us, we must not cooperate. We must not give up without a fight and when they overpower us (they are the collective socialist fascist mob with all the guns and muscle after all), we must not cooperate with their goon 'judges' and goon muscle. They should have to use force for everything, we must not even walk when they tell us to. Of course this is not a recipe for self preservation but for rejection of their authority over us. The only thing they have is guns and muscle, they have to be put into position to show what they really are every step of the way. The so called society has to be shown what it is, to create and maintain this system of oppression of the individual by the group. It has to be made clear to the mob that it is the mob with all its pitchforks and bonfires with individuals used for fuel.Without freedom individual has nothing and nothing else matters. All mob laws are pure expression of violence and they should be forced to display it and live with it or change every step of the way.
Individuals need to stop cooperating with the oppressive collectivist (socialist/fascist) governments. The oppressive collectivist governments derive their power from our cooperation and we must stop this and we have the power to do it. We must violate every oppressive collectivist rule and law, they send their goons to kidnap us and 'judge' us, we must not cooperate. We must not give up without a fight and when they overpower us (they are the collective socialist fascist mob with all the guns and muscle after all), we must not cooperate with their goons 'judges' and goons muscle. They should have to use force for everything, we must not even walk when they tell us to. Of course this is not a recipe for self preservation but for rejection of their authority over us. The only thing they have is guns and muscle, they have to be put into position to show what they really are every step of the way. The so called society has to be shown what it is, to create and maintain this system of oppression of the individual by the group. It has to be made clear to the mob that it is the mob with all its pitchforks and bonfires with individuals used for fuel.
Without freedom individual has nothing and nothing else matters. All mob laws are pure expression of violence and they should be forced to display it and live with it or change every step of the way.
People not only had affordable and cheap health care in USA, they had affordable and cheap health insurance. 50 years ago the most commonly sold health insurance plan would only cost $25 per year per family of 4 with a 500USD deductible, covering up to 50,000/year, which was more than enough for 2.5 years of stay in a hospital in a year. So it was catastrophic insurance, which and people paid for most of their expenses out of pocket and it was not a problem whatsoever.
Even before that, around 1920s, 1930s, a family with 2000-3000USD income would spend around 108USD in health care a year, closer to 261USD with hospital stay in a year.
Yes, insurance and health care used to be very cheap in the USA before the fucking piece of shit collectivist, and yes, socialist/fascist government destroyed the free market capitalism.
Do you even realise that it is not supply of money that is limiting people's wealth, it is supply of production, or do you not realise that? Money is a measure stick, the wealth is not cash, it's what you can produce and savings that are based on real excess production that is exchanged for other goods/services/investments/savings.
You can't use 'technology of money creation' to do anything except to create inflation (expansion of the money supply) thus reducing the relative value of money and destroying its worth.
It's like you have 1 ton of steel that you mined. You can use 1 dollar to measure its worth or you can use 1 Trillion dollars to measure its worth, that number is irrelevant to how much steel you have.
Providing the entitlement of the so called 'basic income' creates a situation where the currently idle population simply procreates to consume all of the resources allocated to them for free. So as an example the idle population of 1,000,000 becomes population of 1,000,000,000 and where the 'basic income' was enough to sustain 1,000,000 comfortably the new 1,000,000,000 are so poor on it, they are now demanding the entitlement to be increased proportionately to their numbers.
Well, so where does that extra excess productive capacity come from to feed the new 99,000,000? Well, the 1,000,000 would have had to WORK to create enough WEALTH to sustain the new 99,000,000 (who also would have to work).
Providing the so called 'basic income' is a recipe for greater and greater, bigger and bigger more and more massive levels of poverty among larger and larger idle population.
There are plenty of jobs that need to be done that cannot be done today because people are doing all kinds of other nonsense (including nothing, for those sitting on welfare), we need to build more shit, we need underwater cities, greenhouses, underground cities, space cities and space farms, space mining, robot training, biogenetic programming, who knows what else.
This is pure crapola, it doesn't matter, but if we could eliminate 99.9% of jobs tomorrow so that those jobs could be done by machines cheaply, quickly and ubiquitously and we would have new jobs created but of-course with that kind of disruption we have to disrupt the political system. Out of the 99.9% of jobs, 99.9% of politicians and other government officials also need to lose their jobs so that the free individuals not encumbered by rules and laws and taxes can start thinking of satisfying all of the untapped desires that people have that are not even close to being satisfied.
Until nobody else wants to own a yacht, a green house for their own vegetables and fruits and whatever artificial meat you want and your own private space station there will not be unemployment unless it is created by government. Unemployment is created by government rules, laws, taxes, nothing else. Absent rules, laws and taxes designed to stand in your way, when you are trying to build a new business, all you are limited by is your imagination.