The Iraq War was a message to those in the middle east who support or push terrorism.
It told them that you won't be able to attack the United States with impunity and that we WILL show up on your door step and people you care about WILL die because of your actions.
See it's strategic vision like this that gets you into that coveted Senior Terminator Solutions Architect position within malevolent sentient lifeforms like Skynet LLC.
Oooh "router level redirect" that sounds serious. I bet it never occured to the creators of SSL/TLS that *routers* could be involved with transferring the traffic.
That's true. However, the browser is going to be the technology that ultimately allows the user to act. So as long as Google, Mozilla, etc make the security risks clear, everything should be okay.
The current set of browser security warnings are pretty effective (giant red screen with lots of scary text). If the end user still approves, it's their fault.
It's only trusted by you if you assert that it is. This proposal formalizes the act of notifying of an available proxy and allowing the user to trust (or not trust) said proxy.
Slashdot Mirror
Or even enough to retire on!
It said "expect" not "can expect."
AlthoughYouShouldHaveAlreadyRealizedThat
Hahaha, this is hilarious that the GP is +5 insightful.
Little planes can also be scary as fuck.
The Iraq War was a message to those in the middle east who support or push terrorism.
It told them that you won't be able to attack the United States with impunity and that we WILL show up on your door step and people you care about WILL die because of your actions.
These days its the other way around. Samsung is the leader and Apple is following.
No way. We need something like Gentoo here, ideally running some kind of CPU robbing bit coin mining software in the background.
Why? Because fuck end users, that's why.
I wonder if Ben Stein was involved in this? Sounds like a Ben Stein Joint.
Riiight, because Steam isn't a closed garden (???).
123AHSD712UQWJASDJQWU1238129000XZC0ZX0CZX0C0ZXC0AD0ASDASD
Riiight, because Steam isn't a closed garden (???).
Hey I knew that guy in college! Little Tommy Bin Laden we called him...
Huawei so serious?
Exactly, do you really need to hoard all that content?
See it's strategic vision like this that gets you into that coveted Senior Terminator Solutions Architect position within malevolent sentient lifeforms like Skynet LLC.
Upper management potential here folks.
Remember, kill all humans!
Lucas shot first.
Cue maya/3dsmax fan boy or random internal troll encounter.
What is it like being the Paris Hilton of the Open Source Movement?
And that man's name was Eli Whitney.
METAPROTIP: When you meta correct someone's grammar, usage, or mechanics, it's more polite to add a topical comment as well.
BURMA SHAVE
"I'm sorry Dave, I can't let you do that. Great job in that last round of bowling though."
http://www.gadgetguy.com.au/cm...
Oooh "router level redirect" that sounds serious. I bet it never occured to the creators of SSL/TLS that *routers* could be involved with transferring the traffic.
Heavens no.
Sounds like a certain someone doesn't know how SSL/TLS works.
That's true. However, the browser is going to be the technology that ultimately allows the user to act. So as long as Google, Mozilla, etc make the security risks clear, everything should be okay.
The current set of browser security warnings are pretty effective (giant red screen with lots of scary text). If the end user still approves, it's their fault.
No, the summary is fucking retarded and sensationalist.
It's only trusted by you if you assert that it is. This proposal formalizes the act of notifying of an available proxy and allowing the user to trust (or not trust) said proxy.