It is a nice story, but the assertions in the article are not supported with original work or referenced. Plus, lack of evidence does not debase a claim it only means it needs to be researched further.
They don't care as long as it does not cut into their profits. That is all they are concerned about. The way you ask it makes it sound like they are selling guns knowing full outright that they will be used to commit crimes of terror. They are going out of the way to kill people. Whats interesting is that we don't know as much as we want to think we know about GMOs. It is all a lot of hand waving.
You mock but this is all in the realm of possibility. There is just a need for the same number of people that demand that exact device and are willing to pay for its development. Which is what the OP is missing. This product is there because people want it not because the company wanted to make it. He is basically complaining that society enjoys technical advances.
There are advances in technology that make your demands feasible if not completely possible given the money. A gas detector could be used to test freshness of the coffee, like the one used on pears. The maker could easily be connected to the taps, like the ice maker. Easy to clean is relative considering designs. A tassimo like design would fit the bill. You could then give the thing an ip and have it track where you are using the gps in your phone so it ensures that it finishes as you open the door.
Obviously everyone doesn't need this, but it does not mean that some people with the means and money won't and it will get built. At least technology is there to afford the choice.
Then there shouldn't be a cigarette tax then and everyone should be taxed for the health costs of those people. Notice how cigarettes are not illegal as well in this case. Same thing happened when they started taxing pot. The courts had to strike down the tax because it legitimized those peoples position. I for one would like an independent study on how pirating is effecting the industry and costing it money before the tax is legitimized or the tax is just legitimizing illegal activity. Even then it should not be burdened on to a single product.
With something this big why does it have to be such a concrete deadline. Couldn't they work it out into phases and release the phases. Its not like the town plan will benefit if their trunk has to be reworked.
Okay so I have 64bit Vista and tried it out because I like to gamble and it broke explorer. So Microsoft is lying it is dead simple to create and I suspect it is more then just some. I also figured out how to fix it if you did it too. You need to delete the folder that the folder is in. With another user or something depending on where you put it(desktop). No idea how to make it work correctly though.
What will really mess you up is the fact that those dormant parts are traded with active parts and vice versa. Makes you really think about how scientific genetic modifications are and how much of it is a guessing game.
They might not plan to extinguish per say. Thinking of printer drivers they will probably beat the standard with a bat enough that you will need a PhD to figure out whats going on. If they can't get proprietary at least they can make it so they are the only ones with enough cash to develop the standard. You know if your not the best make it harder for other people to be the best.
In TFA it mentions that it starts to become spaghetti. As ISP get smart and start blocking that address block the criminal moves on to other things. The lease expires on the block and it is issued to a legit company and then problems happen because the blacklists are not updated by the ISPs. IPv4 also is a very limited size so you can't just rotate around the blocks you issue every 100 or so years (conservatively) and avoid this issue.
The guard will probably be able to tell I suspect since it is being done in his or her presence. TFA says its used on suspected carriers and that hash and pot are the biggest issue. I didn't understand the whole currency thing because it just adds an extra step in a process that doesn't need it. I mean smuggling the drugs would be just as hard as smuggling money.
I realize a large number of people won't trust it because its not opensource. I can see the authors view point though of not wanting Microsoft to turn around and make a patch against it. If you don't want it don't run it, but if it is a trojan a firewall can easily defeat that. If it is a virus word will spread and people will avoid it. It is like the Antivirus 2009 programs, other then being blatantly obvious viruses, don't work anymore because people know they are bad.
One of the major issues with that is the amortization of bandwidth. When multiphase signal came out it really screwed a lot of projects up because they budgeted the project expecting to get a premium on the bandwidth. ISPs struggle with the fact that unpredictable advances in technology really screws them over because they can't just throw out what they have before it has paid for itself, yet there is new technology that reduces the price of bandwidth. Yes it doesn't significantly consume more resources, but the installation costs are huge.
Security through obscurity does not work. If you can write a program there is at least one much less ethical person out there willing to do it as well. The fact we don't see it suggests that people are not motivated or see a benefit in doing it. I suspect much won't happen if you release it. I realize it might also be the case that it is going unreported. Either way it will get developers motivated to fix the issues. See Microsoft for example. So that when Linux becomes a major OS and people will want to freak the systems they will have a much harder time.
The issue is that the technology is specific to the company. The guy that made the system is 100x more valuable at solving the issue then the new guy, that would need the week to get up to speed on how everything is integrated. The cost of the premium for staying available is tiny to the "getting up to speed" cost with hiring out for each issue. The guy who owns the site is going to cut his legs out from under him for not recognizing this and driving away his webmaster.
I read your links and the first thing that jumped to my mind was vapour pressure. Water could easily condense on the sensors if the device is in a hot humid environment that then moves to a cold one. Its called dew and people experience it all the time. I agree. I call shenanigans.
I suspect your talking about Obama so I thought I would give you a neat read (make sure to check the date). I don't know about you but I think that anyone that works that hard for dismantling nuclear weapons is doing something deserving a peace prize. I don't blame you though I had to read it in a university news paper to know about it. Mainstream journalism really dropped the ball reporting the truth. Although about Linus how has he helped promote humanitarian efforts and world peace? I'm not sure. I simply don't know enough about the guy.
Reminds me of the sapphire fire suppression just applied all the time. Or the sealed mineral oil boxes people seem to put computers in. The system could be huge if they apply it right and it actually realizes a 93% reduction in energy cost(I have my doubts). The largest issue I have heard is that it is tricky, but not impossible, to move the heat away from the components once they heat up the liquid.
I agree, but they aren't really like the record industry where they are struggling to use an outdated business model using outdated methods of shipping that are no longer needed. They see it as a monopoly situation so demand for their product is rather inflexible. By controlling the release of their product they can tier the charging and make more money as people become more willing to buy in. Movies aren't really inflexible though. I don't really need movies so I will just spend my money on something else until the price comes into my price range, like $2 at the rental store. I don't really see where their argument is going. They aren't really selling more product they are just trying to add another pricing tier to capture more profit when it won't.
Slashdot Mirror
It is a nice story, but the assertions in the article are not supported with original work or referenced. Plus, lack of evidence does not debase a claim it only means it needs to be researched further.
I would say water related illness or something in their house. It would be funny if there was a TV, Radio station or something near by.
They don't care as long as it does not cut into their profits. That is all they are concerned about. The way you ask it makes it sound like they are selling guns knowing full outright that they will be used to commit crimes of terror. They are going out of the way to kill people. Whats interesting is that we don't know as much as we want to think we know about GMOs. It is all a lot of hand waving.
You mock but this is all in the realm of possibility. There is just a need for the same number of people that demand that exact device and are willing to pay for its development. Which is what the OP is missing. This product is there because people want it not because the company wanted to make it. He is basically complaining that society enjoys technical advances.
There are advances in technology that make your demands feasible if not completely possible given the money. A gas detector could be used to test freshness of the coffee, like the one used on pears. The maker could easily be connected to the taps, like the ice maker. Easy to clean is relative considering designs. A tassimo like design would fit the bill. You could then give the thing an ip and have it track where you are using the gps in your phone so it ensures that it finishes as you open the door.
Obviously everyone doesn't need this, but it does not mean that some people with the means and money won't and it will get built. At least technology is there to afford the choice.
Then there shouldn't be a cigarette tax then and everyone should be taxed for the health costs of those people. Notice how cigarettes are not illegal as well in this case. Same thing happened when they started taxing pot. The courts had to strike down the tax because it legitimized those peoples position. I for one would like an independent study on how pirating is effecting the industry and costing it money before the tax is legitimized or the tax is just legitimizing illegal activity. Even then it should not be burdened on to a single product.
With something this big why does it have to be such a concrete deadline. Couldn't they work it out into phases and release the phases. Its not like the town plan will benefit if their trunk has to be reworked.
Okay so I have 64bit Vista and tried it out because I like to gamble and it broke explorer. So Microsoft is lying it is dead simple to create and I suspect it is more then just some. I also figured out how to fix it if you did it too. You need to delete the folder that the folder is in. With another user or something depending on where you put it(desktop). No idea how to make it work correctly though.
What will really mess you up is the fact that those dormant parts are traded with active parts and vice versa. Makes you really think about how scientific genetic modifications are and how much of it is a guessing game.
They might not plan to extinguish per say. Thinking of printer drivers they will probably beat the standard with a bat enough that you will need a PhD to figure out whats going on. If they can't get proprietary at least they can make it so they are the only ones with enough cash to develop the standard. You know if your not the best make it harder for other people to be the best.
In TFA it mentions that it starts to become spaghetti. As ISP get smart and start blocking that address block the criminal moves on to other things. The lease expires on the block and it is issued to a legit company and then problems happen because the blacklists are not updated by the ISPs. IPv4 also is a very limited size so you can't just rotate around the blocks you issue every 100 or so years (conservatively) and avoid this issue.
At least some companies realize that IP addresses != people. I might have hope for corporations after all.
Sounds like he doesn't realize how serious the issue is unless his manager is present or his ass is on the line.
The guard will probably be able to tell I suspect since it is being done in his or her presence. TFA says its used on suspected carriers and that hash and pot are the biggest issue. I didn't understand the whole currency thing because it just adds an extra step in a process that doesn't need it. I mean smuggling the drugs would be just as hard as smuggling money.
More of a shit did I say that out loud?
Contracts of adhesion cover this.
I realize a large number of people won't trust it because its not opensource. I can see the authors view point though of not wanting Microsoft to turn around and make a patch against it. If you don't want it don't run it, but if it is a trojan a firewall can easily defeat that. If it is a virus word will spread and people will avoid it. It is like the Antivirus 2009 programs, other then being blatantly obvious viruses, don't work anymore because people know they are bad.
Exactly the same sentiment here. You and what jurisdiction.
One of the major issues with that is the amortization of bandwidth. When multiphase signal came out it really screwed a lot of projects up because they budgeted the project expecting to get a premium on the bandwidth. ISPs struggle with the fact that unpredictable advances in technology really screws them over because they can't just throw out what they have before it has paid for itself, yet there is new technology that reduces the price of bandwidth. Yes it doesn't significantly consume more resources, but the installation costs are huge.
Security through obscurity does not work. If you can write a program there is at least one much less ethical person out there willing to do it as well. The fact we don't see it suggests that people are not motivated or see a benefit in doing it. I suspect much won't happen if you release it. I realize it might also be the case that it is going unreported. Either way it will get developers motivated to fix the issues. See Microsoft for example. So that when Linux becomes a major OS and people will want to freak the systems they will have a much harder time.
If they are hoping for a recall, it makes me wonder how terrible the machine must be in the first place.
The issue is that the technology is specific to the company. The guy that made the system is 100x more valuable at solving the issue then the new guy, that would need the week to get up to speed on how everything is integrated. The cost of the premium for staying available is tiny to the "getting up to speed" cost with hiring out for each issue. The guy who owns the site is going to cut his legs out from under him for not recognizing this and driving away his webmaster.
I read your links and the first thing that jumped to my mind was vapour pressure. Water could easily condense on the sensors if the device is in a hot humid environment that then moves to a cold one. Its called dew and people experience it all the time. I agree. I call shenanigans.
I suspect your talking about Obama so I thought I would give you a neat read (make sure to check the date). I don't know about you but I think that anyone that works that hard for dismantling nuclear weapons is doing something deserving a peace prize. I don't blame you though I had to read it in a university news paper to know about it. Mainstream journalism really dropped the ball reporting the truth. Although about Linus how has he helped promote humanitarian efforts and world peace? I'm not sure. I simply don't know enough about the guy.
Reminds me of the sapphire fire suppression just applied all the time. Or the sealed mineral oil boxes people seem to put computers in. The system could be huge if they apply it right and it actually realizes a 93% reduction in energy cost(I have my doubts). The largest issue I have heard is that it is tricky, but not impossible, to move the heat away from the components once they heat up the liquid.
I agree, but they aren't really like the record industry where they are struggling to use an outdated business model using outdated methods of shipping that are no longer needed. They see it as a monopoly situation so demand for their product is rather inflexible. By controlling the release of their product they can tier the charging and make more money as people become more willing to buy in. Movies aren't really inflexible though. I don't really need movies so I will just spend my money on something else until the price comes into my price range, like $2 at the rental store. I don't really see where their argument is going. They aren't really selling more product they are just trying to add another pricing tier to capture more profit when it won't.