Considering the amount of fruit that is produced in a given year, even though the stickers are really cheap. This system will probably pay for itself fairly quickly just by removing the cost of putting the stickers on. I suspect that once the FDA approves it we will be seeing it all over the market more for this reason then for the consumers. I'm excited because all the people that litter and paste them on things won't be able to anymore.
Or you can delete it and no one can read it. A place I worked at had that requirement to reduce liabilities during lawsuits. If you own the mail server they can still see it when they give you the warrant. If you use a third party copy or print it off once you get then they have to talk to you to get it again. There are tonnes of ways to circumvent this issue if you feel the need to.
I suspect the TOS could be argued that it is infringing on your rights afforded by law making it null and void. That is why warranties always mention that the law trumps them when it does so it doesn't nullify the agreement. Plus there is some case law like the My Space case that got thrown out. Of course I am just guessing so I might be wrong.
It doesn't make sense because economics is based on scarcity of resources. Copying music has such minuscule costs that it doesn't make sense. You can't make a good argument. Unless money is involved, money attaches a value to the infringement and makes it arguable.
Its more political then fair. If you have a tough sentence then you get headlines and people think your laws are making a difference. The tough sentence is argued as a deterrence for others which most people will accept. It "reduces the number of court cases"(not really in practice) so it is beneficial to the already over taxed court system. Removes that argument when passing such a broad and aggressive law, like this one. That is how it happens. What the parents should have done is sit them down and talk it out. The courts is not the way to go. If that failed they could have easily gotten a peace treaty(Canadian Law, not sure if there is an analog in the States). It is like a reduced restraining order which makes sense. Making this law really superfluous.
Tactile response is sometimes a god send. I would hate having to look at my mouse to figure out where my hand was. A touch pad makes sense because you aren't moving it so everything stays relatively put. The mouse on the other hand would at least need something to orientate yourself to where things are, but that would kind of destroy the whole point in my mind of using a multi-touch surface.
Too much information for one class. It would be important to cover the era the author lived in. That usually gives huge insight to their writing and I don't see how to do that without eating up a lot of time Maybe focus on a sub genre or a specific time period for the stories. Short Stories would be more realistic, but you lose the benefit of some of those really interesting works that everyone else likes to mention. Also assume that they will take this course because they have an interest in the subject so they might have already read them. Pick obscure and international pieces. The writing styles would be worth the exposure. A course like this will be no easy task to design if you don't want it to be a bird course. Good Luck.
I suspect the battery pack strapped to her side and the scars on her chest might give them a clue this is not a normal emergency call. Its not like a pace maker where its contained within the body completely. Now that I think of it pace makers would cause more issues and they have been around for a while.
No, but for a new car the paint is a separate cost. Yet I can't get an unpainted car. You don't get pay per view shows (wrestling) without throwing out something extra. Server companies will charge you for a piece of paper to run more processors on their servers. When the socket is there either way. ISP and phone companies are legendary for charging extra without even asking you. I would say this is the systemic. Do I like it? No. Should something be done about it? Maybe. The only thing that I see fixing it is people voting with where their money goes.
I like the rfid card cars that detect when the user is near by and unlocks. The car starts with a button when the rfid is near by to make things even easier. Of course it has to be a secure challenge, answer style system like SIM cards or it is just as bad as those enhanced id things.
I completely agree with you. This is just like the guy toting opendns as being bad. Most companies have IT departments and if the guys running it are worth their salt they will research the best solution for the problem. Sometimes OSS wins sometimes Proprietary wins it completely depends on the niche they are trying to fill and the budget they have. These guys that are trying to sell you their software are just marketing. You should not take their comments at face value and at least the summary tries to tell you that.
Wasn't there a Microsoft add on for Firefox that forcefully installed itself. Wouldn't that increase the "surface of attack". Why doesn't Microsoft get with the interests of their customers, developers and let us make informed decisions. Or at least follow their own advice.
This is a super computer not some thing you would use for normal every day computer activities. I think it would cater more to people that are doing protein bending or other extremely processor intense activities. Most of people wanting to use one probably have access to a University or Government Super Computer so that only leaves the self-employed or small business research market. I would not be surprised if even more of these appear from other companies because that market is one of the few that is growing.
The information they are crawling is public information. Maybe this is not as bad as it sounds. If it was a project on hacking into a computer then pulling the information off it then I would get worried. The internet was not designed for privacy and confidentiality. Anything you transmit can be intercepted and dissected so you should have provisions to handle that, like encryption. I wonder the benefit of this though as people hiding anything would attempt to avoid detection. I also wonder how enforcement would be applied especially in societies where laws vary. Globalization has really lead to that funny gray area where people get charged for crimes not committed in that specific country. It just seems easier to keep your head down and not become a blip on anyone whose is important's radar.
Maybe after enough people complaining a firmware update that lets you setup what the reaction to triggers will be. I mean if it is written well, it should be object oriented enough to allow for this with little effort. It is silly how much software is written that could be improved by letting the user have more access to preferences to configure the software to their specific situation. Of course there can always be a default for those that are to busy to fiddle.
I remember reading somewhere on BBC that a recent study found that there is no nutritional difference between organic and normal grown plants. I have no idea then how they would prove or disprove that the cell tower is a danger to or has effected the crop.
...long this will be humored by the courts. Basically, the politicians are passing the most restrictive rules possible for consumers they can think of then tune them back until the courts let it pass. Why don't they just think up what would be considered fair in a free society then see what happens from there. I am not France, but would be interest to find out if this is how French society allows all its laws to be created.
I don't think the author of TFA knows much Copyright law;
And, yes, these tweets were reproduced with permission.
The tweets are facts directly cited from the source. It could be argued the guy has no copyright claim to them in this context. No wonder the US's Copyright system is broke. The people that talk about it don't even understand it fully.
"The 6.7m figure was then calculated based on the estimated number of people with internet access in the UK. However, Jupiter research was working on the assumption that there were 40m people online in the UK in 2008, whereas the Government's own Office of National Statistics claimed there were only 33.9m people online during that year."
I think this demonstrates the point better then the rest of the article. They made significant numbers up in their head to inflate their claim. This is not questionable research. It is a bunch of opinions made by the researchers and stated as fact.
I remember hearing a while ago that there are huge penalties for fudging bids on government contracts(US). Maybe they should do the same for reports that are presented to the government.
The United Kingdom military has had to stop the development of some wind farms because it would leave a blind spot to their early warning systems. Their government has doled out a fair bit of cash to find a solution to the issue.
I suspect your trolling, but your comment floored me. Also your analogies are silly.
1. The Postal Service is a Government agent and is held to a standard of holding public interest so they are expected to watch for the stuff. Your ISP is not a Government agent.
2. Most bus-lines check for those sorts of things to protect their own buses from attack. Even then they are not caring out the act.
3. The phone-sex line should be checking to stop children from calling. It would be impossible for the phone company to know it was happening.
4. Who gave made the gun available to the kid in the first place. Seriously your basically suggesting that the electrical company be at fault for people how toaster themselves in their bathtub.
You hope that scare tactic and horrific examples will impress upon people your point. The person your quoting is suggesting a commonly discussed and rather valid business model for an industry. Why should ISP be expected to act as police, judge, and jury. Citizens simple do not have the resources to defend against corporations. The Government should be watching out for its people more anything else.
I hate it when scientists do this. They declare something as widely accepted then refuse to reconsider. Many great innovations came from the choice of not following the accepted norm at the time and we praise them for their courage. So let them scrutinize the research and comment on it, maybe something interesting will happen. That said though it should not be a court decision. Judges are trained in the law not scientific concepts. A panel of worldly people solely interested in seeking the truth, would be ideal (if possible).
Slashdot Mirror
Considering the amount of fruit that is produced in a given year, even though the stickers are really cheap. This system will probably pay for itself fairly quickly just by removing the cost of putting the stickers on. I suspect that once the FDA approves it we will be seeing it all over the market more for this reason then for the consumers. I'm excited because all the people that litter and paste them on things won't be able to anymore.
Or you can delete it and no one can read it. A place I worked at had that requirement to reduce liabilities during lawsuits. If you own the mail server they can still see it when they give you the warrant. If you use a third party copy or print it off once you get then they have to talk to you to get it again. There are tonnes of ways to circumvent this issue if you feel the need to.
I suspect the TOS could be argued that it is infringing on your rights afforded by law making it null and void. That is why warranties always mention that the law trumps them when it does so it doesn't nullify the agreement. Plus there is some case law like the My Space case that got thrown out. Of course I am just guessing so I might be wrong.
It doesn't make sense because economics is based on scarcity of resources. Copying music has such minuscule costs that it doesn't make sense. You can't make a good argument. Unless money is involved, money attaches a value to the infringement and makes it arguable.
Its more political then fair. If you have a tough sentence then you get headlines and people think your laws are making a difference. The tough sentence is argued as a deterrence for others which most people will accept. It "reduces the number of court cases"(not really in practice) so it is beneficial to the already over taxed court system. Removes that argument when passing such a broad and aggressive law, like this one. That is how it happens. What the parents should have done is sit them down and talk it out. The courts is not the way to go. If that failed they could have easily gotten a peace treaty(Canadian Law, not sure if there is an analog in the States). It is like a reduced restraining order which makes sense. Making this law really superfluous.
"You have to be pretty confident to think you know more than the guys who designed the equipment."
I think it speaks volumes. I don't think they would RTFM even if you threatened them it would be a conflict of their personality.
Tactile response is sometimes a god send. I would hate having to look at my mouse to figure out where my hand was. A touch pad makes sense because you aren't moving it so everything stays relatively put. The mouse on the other hand would at least need something to orientate yourself to where things are, but that would kind of destroy the whole point in my mind of using a multi-touch surface.
Too much information for one class. It would be important to cover the era the author lived in. That usually gives huge insight to their writing and I don't see how to do that without eating up a lot of time Maybe focus on a sub genre or a specific time period for the stories. Short Stories would be more realistic, but you lose the benefit of some of those really interesting works that everyone else likes to mention. Also assume that they will take this course because they have an interest in the subject so they might have already read them. Pick obscure and international pieces. The writing styles would be worth the exposure. A course like this will be no easy task to design if you don't want it to be a bird course. Good Luck.
I suspect the battery pack strapped to her side and the scars on her chest might give them a clue this is not a normal emergency call. Its not like a pace maker where its contained within the body completely. Now that I think of it pace makers would cause more issues and they have been around for a while.
No, but for a new car the paint is a separate cost. Yet I can't get an unpainted car. You don't get pay per view shows (wrestling) without throwing out something extra. Server companies will charge you for a piece of paper to run more processors on their servers. When the socket is there either way. ISP and phone companies are legendary for charging extra without even asking you. I would say this is the systemic. Do I like it? No. Should something be done about it? Maybe. The only thing that I see fixing it is people voting with where their money goes.
I like the rfid card cars that detect when the user is near by and unlocks. The car starts with a button when the rfid is near by to make things even easier. Of course it has to be a secure challenge, answer style system like SIM cards or it is just as bad as those enhanced id things.
I completely agree with you. This is just like the guy toting opendns as being bad. Most companies have IT departments and if the guys running it are worth their salt they will research the best solution for the problem. Sometimes OSS wins sometimes Proprietary wins it completely depends on the niche they are trying to fill and the budget they have. These guys that are trying to sell you their software are just marketing. You should not take their comments at face value and at least the summary tries to tell you that.
Wasn't there a Microsoft add on for Firefox that forcefully installed itself. Wouldn't that increase the "surface of attack". Why doesn't Microsoft get with the interests of their customers, developers and let us make informed decisions. Or at least follow their own advice.
This is a super computer not some thing you would use for normal every day computer activities. I think it would cater more to people that are doing protein bending or other extremely processor intense activities. Most of people wanting to use one probably have access to a University or Government Super Computer so that only leaves the self-employed or small business research market. I would not be surprised if even more of these appear from other companies because that market is one of the few that is growing.
The information they are crawling is public information. Maybe this is not as bad as it sounds. If it was a project on hacking into a computer then pulling the information off it then I would get worried. The internet was not designed for privacy and confidentiality. Anything you transmit can be intercepted and dissected so you should have provisions to handle that, like encryption. I wonder the benefit of this though as people hiding anything would attempt to avoid detection. I also wonder how enforcement would be applied especially in societies where laws vary. Globalization has really lead to that funny gray area where people get charged for crimes not committed in that specific country. It just seems easier to keep your head down and not become a blip on anyone whose is important's radar.
Maybe after enough people complaining a firmware update that lets you setup what the reaction to triggers will be. I mean if it is written well, it should be object oriented enough to allow for this with little effort. It is silly how much software is written that could be improved by letting the user have more access to preferences to configure the software to their specific situation. Of course there can always be a default for those that are to busy to fiddle.
Found it. Thought some people might be interested
Organic Food
I remember reading somewhere on BBC that a recent study found that there is no nutritional difference between organic and normal grown plants. I have no idea then how they would prove or disprove that the cell tower is a danger to or has effected the crop.
*from france. Sorry for the grammar error.
...long this will be humored by the courts. Basically, the politicians are passing the most restrictive rules possible for consumers they can think of then tune them back until the courts let it pass. Why don't they just think up what would be considered fair in a free society then see what happens from there. I am not France, but would be interest to find out if this is how French society allows all its laws to be created.
And, yes, these tweets were reproduced with permission.
The tweets are facts directly cited from the source. It could be argued the guy has no copyright claim to them in this context. No wonder the US's Copyright system is broke. The people that talk about it don't even understand it fully.
From TFA;
"The 6.7m figure was then calculated based on the estimated number of people with internet access in the UK. However, Jupiter research was working on the assumption that there were 40m people online in the UK in 2008, whereas the Government's own Office of National Statistics claimed there were only 33.9m people online during that year."
I think this demonstrates the point better then the rest of the article. They made significant numbers up in their head to inflate their claim. This is not questionable research. It is a bunch of opinions made by the researchers and stated as fact.
I remember hearing a while ago that there are huge penalties for fudging bids on government contracts(US). Maybe they should do the same for reports that are presented to the government.
The United Kingdom military has had to stop the development of some wind farms because it would leave a blind spot to their early warning systems. Their government has doled out a fair bit of cash to find a solution to the issue.
I suspect your trolling, but your comment floored me. Also your analogies are silly. 1. The Postal Service is a Government agent and is held to a standard of holding public interest so they are expected to watch for the stuff. Your ISP is not a Government agent. 2. Most bus-lines check for those sorts of things to protect their own buses from attack. Even then they are not caring out the act. 3. The phone-sex line should be checking to stop children from calling. It would be impossible for the phone company to know it was happening. 4. Who gave made the gun available to the kid in the first place. Seriously your basically suggesting that the electrical company be at fault for people how toaster themselves in their bathtub. You hope that scare tactic and horrific examples will impress upon people your point. The person your quoting is suggesting a commonly discussed and rather valid business model for an industry. Why should ISP be expected to act as police, judge, and jury. Citizens simple do not have the resources to defend against corporations. The Government should be watching out for its people more anything else.
I hate it when scientists do this. They declare something as widely accepted then refuse to reconsider. Many great innovations came from the choice of not following the accepted norm at the time and we praise them for their courage. So let them scrutinize the research and comment on it, maybe something interesting will happen. That said though it should not be a court decision. Judges are trained in the law not scientific concepts. A panel of worldly people solely interested in seeking the truth, would be ideal (if possible).