Your suggestion is for something that would make the text easier to read. Not all/. readers are native speakers and we have a hard time trying to make sense of badly constructed sentences. Thank you.
I wonder what does "twisting RNA strands into a triple helix" looks like without use of contraptions that grab it from both ends and then twist it like a peace of cloth.
Can anyone explain me what is the point of Japan agreeing to a international regulation, then not respecting it? I mean, they can leave the International Whaling Commission any time, who would impede?
No one owns the oceans. It's ridiculous to say the oceans belong a country. This whole proposition is pointless.
Owning seas (not oceans) is not more ridiculous than owning land in any way, yet land ownership has been one of the pillars of most civilizations. In fact, you own land inasmuch as you can guard it. Sea "ownership" used to suffer this deterrent as seas are not settle-able, so no one would be there to guard the frontiers of it. Now, as countries can guard a sea, they can own it. Maritime territories are regulated by international treaties and may be subject to disputes, somewhat as land territories do.
However, if you were talking about owning the very oceans, that is really ridiculous, but no one has proposed it, and I didn't understand why you would bring such a subject.
No. You can't bring that up without bringing up the superiority and sleek design of a proper Linux desktop. This is the year of the Linux desktop, and all Macs and PCs will be thrown to the dogs to chew on.
In software nothing is simply impossible. It's only impossible under the given constraints: time, money, hardware, knowledge, intelligence...
One may even doubt if his experts said just "impossible", instead of "impossible on given deadline, or budget or whatever".
That's because the "lay people" some commenter mentioned earlier (#51001373) don't understand that a SmartTV is just a fancy name for an all-in-one computer with a specific purpose.
Sorry for the confusion: spelling is not one of my strengths. I should have written outcaste, i.e., one not belonging to a caste, usually by birth, instead of outcast, one expelled from a society. "Dalit" would have served me better.
Slashdot Mirror
Now, there is a reason not to download pirated media. If only most of malware on internet were on illegal torrent sites!
Your suggestion is for something that would make the text easier to read. Not all /. readers are native speakers and we have a hard time trying to make sense of badly constructed sentences. Thank you.
I wonder what does "twisting RNA strands into a triple helix" looks like without use of contraptions that grab it from both ends and then twist it like a peace of cloth.
That's a good answer, thank you!
Must be either because Bill Gates is a CEO or because he's a billionaire. Looks like those are the only people Trump wants to talk to.
I hope they are not doing it the Conquistador's way.
Also, gold melts, but never burns.
Diamonds, however, are flammable.
Can anyone explain me what is the point of Japan agreeing to a international regulation, then not respecting it? I mean, they can leave the International Whaling Commission any time, who would impede?
No one owns the oceans. It's ridiculous to say the oceans belong a country. This whole proposition is pointless.
Owning seas (not oceans) is not more ridiculous than owning land in any way, yet land ownership has been one of the pillars of most civilizations. In fact, you own land inasmuch as you can guard it. Sea "ownership" used to suffer this deterrent as seas are not settle-able, so no one would be there to guard the frontiers of it. Now, as countries can guard a sea, they can own it. Maritime territories are regulated by international treaties and may be subject to disputes, somewhat as land territories do.
However, if you were talking about owning the very oceans, that is really ridiculous, but no one has proposed it, and I didn't understand why you would bring such a subject.
Can you run Emacs on top of Windows(r)?
The problem lie in inbreeding.
No. You can't bring that up without bringing up the superiority and sleek design of a proper Linux desktop. This is the year of the Linux desktop, and all Macs and PCs will be thrown to the dogs to chew on.
Toot late! I will be already old in five years.
What about that big source of EMF radiation in the sky?
I guess there is more scientific basis to support a causation in that!
What did you use in the three years before Google?
There are other colors of gold already, see Colored gold. However, any color of gold has been inevitably goldish.
Not all commenters are subscribers. I've visited their site and the only restriction to create an account is catcha (unreadable by most robots).
In software nothing is simply impossible. It's only impossible under the given constraints: time, money, hardware, knowledge, intelligence...
One may even doubt if his experts said just "impossible", instead of "impossible on given deadline, or budget or whatever".
So, those noodles are from the same matter as cardboard?
SmartTVs are so vulnerable right now that crackers can infect them in bulk and profit from small payments.
That's because the "lay people" some commenter mentioned earlier (#51001373) don't understand that a SmartTV is just a fancy name for an all-in-one computer with a specific purpose.
You must be new here. This site never had real editors...
Some of the old folks tell a legend of CmdrTaco and a time when there where real editors.
Sorry for the confusion: spelling is not one of my strengths. I should have written outcaste, i.e., one not belonging to a caste, usually by birth, instead of outcast, one expelled from a society. "Dalit" would have served me better.
Stupidity knows no limits.