I though Reloaded was a huge drop off from the orignal and this one may be a huge disappointment. Too bad, because the orignal was one of the best SciFi movies in Years.
Actually it wasn't - it was a fairly mediocre film filled with mumbo jumbo and mostly recycling of old scifi ideas, but what it had was FANTASTIC visual - totally new and unseen. People were blown away by new and fantastic sights and generally chose to ignore a mostly lame story (robtos using humans for energy, please!) - but then everybody else used the effects. In movies in commercials, we've seen it ripped off over and over and over.
Then the sequels came along and is mostly the same, a mishmash of the longest words from the thesaurus, a bit of hocus pocus from different religions, and wild special effects - except THIS time we've seen the effects, perhaps not these specific ones, but we have seen enough effects, basically nothing new there - they could have shocked us to the core by having written someone clever instead, but that's not the way it mostly goes in Hollywood.
Well, if they're in range, it shouldn't be hard to find someone engaging in commercial "bluejacking", so we can beat the crap out of them in front of everyone.
At which time you'll go straight to jail. Have fun.
If you've ever eaten a steak or a hamburger or a sausage or a ham sandwich or a chicken, you either consider hunting moral or you're a raging hypocrite.
Remember production activation is basicaly immoral, boycot products who use it, and let them know that you are not going to be slave to their schemes for ever. Buy a product you will always be able to use.
So, can you define 'a while'...what period of time is this?
Think before you post, would you: It varies.
Are you saying basically,
I'm saying you can't say "Even though we are not over there, we are still at war" forever, yes. Saddam surrendered Gulf War 1. He agreed to terms. He got a chance to abide by them....and basically did everything he could not to.
That's hardly surprising is it, anything signed under duress is not legally valid.
After awhile,
After awhile even the US broke down and admitted he didn't have WMD (left of the ones the US sold him perviously)
Sometimes, all that is understood is swift, blinding violence and force.
Yup, its understood to be inhuman and unfair.
This is not a utopian world, will never be one as long as there are humans. There are by default, some bad seeds out there, and on occasion, you have to show one what the consequences are for bad behavior, otherwise they will run rampant.
Which is exactly what Bin Laden says. Now, if you people could just leave the planet and fight somewhere else, but that would be nice.
No, its not relevant. After a while it becomes a defacto peace - a country can't just use it for ever after as an excuse to invade another country. If it does it will receive the condemnation of the world society for being a rouge nation.
The way many people make it out to be is that the US decided to attack some peace-loving nation of people that 'Love' their leadership.
I find it hard to believe anyone would say that. Of course i don't know what kind of company you keep
If you want to ignore facts,...
No thanks, we'll leave that to you people.
We should ignore how the facts that countries that have invoked gun ban laws experiencing a marked increase in the violent crime, burglaries and other such villanious acts.
I'm glad you started by saying you were going to ignore the facts.
I though Reloaded was a huge drop off from the orignal and this one may be a huge disappointment. Too bad, because the orignal was one of the best SciFi movies in Years.
Actually it wasn't - it was a fairly mediocre film filled with mumbo jumbo and mostly recycling of old scifi ideas, but what it had was FANTASTIC visual - totally new and unseen. People were blown away by new and fantastic sights and generally chose to ignore a mostly lame story (robtos using humans for energy, please!) - but then everybody else used the effects. In movies in commercials, we've seen it ripped off over and over and over.
Then the sequels came along and is mostly the same, a mishmash of the longest words from the thesaurus, a bit of hocus pocus from different religions, and wild special effects - except THIS time we've seen the effects, perhaps not these specific ones, but we have seen enough effects, basically nothing new there - they could have shocked us to the core by having written someone clever instead, but that's not the way it mostly goes in Hollywood.
Well, if they're in range, it shouldn't be hard to find someone engaging in commercial "bluejacking", so we can beat the crap out of them in front of everyone.
At which time you'll go straight to jail. Have fun.
I was stating a fact. And now i have better things to do that waste time on a troll.
If you consider "law is not the same as moral" and "eating steak" as being a hypocrite, then you are beyond help.
If you've ever eaten a steak or a hamburger or a sausage or a ham sandwich or a chicken, you either consider hunting moral or you're a raging hypocrite.
*BEEP*: Wrong - but thanks for playing.
Unless you're a vegan, I don't think you can really talk about the morality of hunting.
Nonsense, that's not in the least bit relevant.
Considering that vegans are a -very- small minority in this country, you have no point.
You mean people with morals are a minority - I doubt that.
While you may morally object to hunting (as is your right) it is a legal activity virtually everywhere.
;)
Legal is not the same as moral.
Target shooting is an internationally recognized sport,
Use a computer
Its probably a double joe job - Robby doesn't wanna annoy random website users, he just wants to get out of this time frame!
Remember production activation is basicaly immoral, boycot products who use it, and let them know that you are not going to be slave to their schemes for ever. Buy a product you will always be able to use.
IPO IPO IPO - huh? This is what it means.
If you want to find something on the Microsoft website, its already better to use Google than their own search engine!
Isn't democratic freedom wonderfull? Oops, only in Europe it seems.
You mean in the vicinity of earth?
So, can you define 'a while'...what period of time is this?
Think before you post, would you: It varies.
Are you saying basically,
I'm saying you can't say "Even though we are not over there, we are still at war" forever, yes.
Saddam surrendered Gulf War 1. He agreed to terms. He got a chance to abide by them....and basically did everything he could not to.
That's hardly surprising is it, anything signed under duress is not legally valid.
After awhile,
After awhile even the US broke down and admitted he didn't have WMD (left of the ones the US sold him perviously)
Sometimes, all that is understood is swift, blinding violence and force.
Yup, its understood to be inhuman and unfair.
This is not a utopian world, will never be one as long as there are humans. There are by default, some bad seeds out there, and on occasion, you have to show one what the consequences are for bad behavior, otherwise they will run rampant.
Which is exactly what Bin Laden says. Now, if you people could just leave the planet and fight somewhere else, but that would be nice.
It's incredibly relevent
...
No, its not relevant. After a while it becomes a defacto peace - a country can't just use it for ever after as an excuse to invade another country. If it does it will receive the condemnation of the world society for being a rouge nation.
The way many people make it out to be is that the US decided to attack some peace-loving nation of people that 'Love' their leadership.
I find it hard to believe anyone would say that. Of course i don't know what kind of company you keep
If you want to ignore facts,
No thanks, we'll leave that to you people.
We should ignore how the facts that countries that have invoked gun ban laws experiencing a marked increase in the violent crime, burglaries and other such villanious acts.
I'm glad you started by saying you were going to ignore the facts.
Tell me, what else should we ignore?
You?
I can't blame you for not knowing.
Oh we know, we just don't care. Its not relevant.
I swear, the UN General Assembly seems to have less balls than a eunuch convention.
Any idiot can fight - it takes guts not to be dared into a fight.
Because its a stupid childish question. Are people supposed to say "Ooh, we hadn't thought about that! You are right, lets give everybody guns!"
You either:
1.Die - in which case you do nothing more.
2.You don't die in which case you tell the police afterwards.
You decided the level of debate with your retort.
You've created the problem, you'll have to live with it (die with it) until we get rid of them all.
Now do I agree with the parent? No. Guns shouldn't have serial numbers either/
Damn right, they should be abolized all together. Only cowards need guns.
I doesn't - those who complain are intelligent people, not AOL customers.
Underpaid volunteer teachers to help the most greedy industry in the world - news at eleven!
What they are going to say when movies are leaked now?
Told ya!
Easy and available wouldn't quality a girl for my top ten list :)