Slashdot Mirror


Spammed by Bluetooth

An Anonymous Reader writes "BBC News is reporting a new craze - using Bluetooth to send unsolicited messages. Apparently lots of phone owners are leaving Bluetooth switched on, meaning that anyone within range can send a short message. The phenomenon is known as "bluejacking". It's not clear at present that this is being done by anyone other than pranksters, but one can't help wondering, how long before commercial spammers catch on."

311 comments

  1. Yeah, I've done this. by Nugget · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Heh. I had a long layover in Amsterdam last month and had hours of gleeful fun sending "boe" notes over bluetooth to all the other bluetooth phones I could see while drinking Heineken at the KLM Crown Lounge.

    I've used this feature also to send quick notes to cow-orkers at the office when they were on the phone or we were busy in a meeting. It's handy and saves the absurd ten cent charge applied to an outbound SMS.

    It's only a matter of time before it's rendered useless due to spam, I'm sure.

    1. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by GMontag · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've used this feature also to send quick notes to cow-orkers at the office

      Easily identified by their Gateway workstations.

    2. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by grub · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      Too bad I wasn't with you, nugget.. I'd be sending the goatse.cx link to unsuspecting people. Listen for the disgusted reaction and order another Guinness as a reward for my victory.

      Boe indeed..

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's only a matter of time before it's rendered useless due to spam, I'm sure.

      That seems unlikely. Do you get spam over SMS now? Why would it be different with Bluetooth? Don't spammers/telemarketers avoid spamming cell phones?

    4. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've used this feature also to send quick notes to cow-orkers..."

      All the women in your office are fat, too? I feel your pain, brother...

    5. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by mo^ · · Score: 1

      Yup, i get frequent Spam via sms...... trying to sell me services or some shit

      --
      bah!*@%!
    6. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by ePhil_One · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm not sure this sort of thing is likely to be abused. Maybe a local store will pop a message to my phone with some sort of lure to get me in, but unlike most Spam that would be relevant and hopefully interesting. The range thing means I'd be within throwing distance of the "Spammer" to, so unwelcome offensive spam is likely to incur the potential for physical retaliation.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    7. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Listen for the disgusted reaction and order another Guinness as a reward for my victory.

      But, whatever you do, don't look at their glass. There is no beer in existence that is yellowish-reddish with disgusting brown chunks in it!

    8. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by jrumney · · Score: 1
      That seems unlikely. Do you get spam over SMS now?

      All the time, and if I hadn't registered my cell phone number with TPS (UK equivalent of the do not call list) a year ago, I'd be getting even more.

      Don't spammers/telemarketers avoid spamming cell phones?

      In the rest of the world where the recipient is not paying for incoming calls or text messages, there are no special laws that make cell phones less attractive to spam than landlines. Since bluetooth spam is not costing you anything to receive in the US either, expect it to take off like SMS spam has in Europe.

    9. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Maybe I don't understand. I thought bluetooth could only go like 15 feet, in which case spamming bluetooth would be less effective than just yelling "Cheap Viagra for sale! Get it while it's hot!"

    10. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Broodje · · Score: 1

      Here is the spec sheets: clicky, but I think it's in acrobat 6, which means its unreadable in linux (with acroread from adobe). If anyone knows how to read pdf's made with acrobat 6 on linux, please tell.

    11. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Standard range for PC USB Bluetooth adapters seems to be 10m (33ft), but you can buy ones with a 100m range (330ft).

    12. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      Assuming of course, you couldn't hijack a bluetooth device with some security hole and turn it into a broadcaster. Then you have wandering transmitters.

    13. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by aug24 · · Score: 3, Funny
      It's only a matter of time before it's rendered useless due to spam, I'm sure.

      Do you really think spammers are going to install bluetooth devices every ten yards to acheive that...?

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    14. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks like this dumbass and two dumbass moderators have never read Dilbert

    15. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by MouseR · · Score: 1

      Do you really think spammers are going to install bluetooth devices every ten yards to acheive that
      Nope. But you could expect store entrances and subway station entrances to have such devices.

      As soon as you walk in, you phone spams you with specials at this or that store.

    16. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, reading Dilbert is the mark of a true intellectual.

    17. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Sorry about that. Won't happen again.

      Now about tubgirl (www.tubgirl.com)...

    18. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by realdpk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but not your classic spammer. Instead it'll be your Mom and Pop deli or quicky mart announcing the latest special as you walk by.

      As soon as someone makes a device as easy to program as those LED bars, and as cheap, businesses will eat them up like candy.

    19. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easily identified by their Gateway workstations.

      And their preference for Chic-Fil-A over other fast food restaurants.

    20. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are an idiot. What, you think it's fucking funny? It says on your fucking slashdot page that you're like 30 years old. WHAT THE FUCK? Your whole life seems to revolve aroung goatse.cx and tubgirl, honestly, and I'd much rather you fucked off and died. I thoroughly enjoy trolls but you are a complete unoriginal idiot, stuck in some 1990s hellhole.

      Just to let you know, I'll be modding you down as a matter of course, systematically. Hopefully, you'll learn how to behave after posting at -1 for a while.

      Taco.

    21. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Zemran · · Score: 1

      and as soon as this starts to happen people start to remember to turn off Bluetooth or to set an original code... (saying that reminds me that mine is still set to 0000 :))

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    22. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really were "Taco" you'd know that this wasn't the original poster. Nice try, retard.

    23. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by grub · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hey, if a man can't take pride in his father's work...
      Make me a Foe and quit your bitching.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    24. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How 'bout you fucking get a sense of humour instead?

    25. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by DougMelvin · · Score: 1

      Now taking bets as to when the first bluetooth spam worm is discovered

      --
      Reality is in the mind of the beholder - me 1996
    26. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes just as long to type "'bout" as it does "about", AC retard.

    27. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Progman · · Score: 1

      I'd much rather you fucked off and died

      You must be American. Only in the US is not being funny a capital offense.

    28. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only a matter of time before it's rendered useless due to spam, I'm sure.

      Do you really think spammers are going to install bluetooth devices every ten yards to acheive that...?



      Do you really think spammers are going to follow FCC guidelines for signal strength?

      I see 50,000 wat clear channel Bluetooth in our future.

    29. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by grub · · Score: 0


      ..slashdot page that you're like 30 years old.


      Almost 38. You're such an angry little man. Really, you should seek professional help for your anger management problem.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    30. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      -Why would it be different with Bluetooth?

      Bluetooth has a range of about 15 feet (5 meters). If someone Bluetooth spams you then you look around for the dick with a Sony Ericsson T68i in his hand pushing the buttons and you walk over and beat the shit out of him.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    31. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally! Given the short range of bluetooth, it's an awesome chance to pound a spammer into quivering jelly!!!

    32. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by JamesP · · Score: 1

      MAC Address whitelisting, anyone???

      I guess it's possible using current technology...

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    33. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hold on a sec.

      You're telling someone to go seek professional help when most of your posting history consists of goatse posts? FUCKING HELL THAT'S FUNNY!

      Also, I am not angry. You represent all that is wrong with stupid slashbots - I'm just pointing out the fact really...

    34. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by mpe · · Score: 1

      But you could expect store entrances and subway station entrances to have such devices.
      As soon as you walk in, you phone spams you with specials at this or that store.


      Or they could dot "trigger points" at random places around the store. If someone is already in the store they are less likely to walk straight out again.

    35. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the most banal fucking troll ever. Your time is up, fag.

    36. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by mpe · · Score: 1

      In the rest of the world where the recipient is not paying for incoming calls or text messages, there are no special laws that make cell phones less attractive to spam than landlines. Since bluetooth spam is not costing you anything to receive in the US either, expect it to take off like SMS spam has in Europe.

      It dosn't cost anything to send either, SMS spam is likely to end up costing the spammer actual money.

    37. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by mpe · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth has a range of about 15 feet (5 meters). If someone Bluetooth spams you then you look around for the dick with a Sony Ericsson T68i in his hand pushing the buttons and you walk over and beat the shit out of him.

      Nothing requires the spamming device to be manually operated. The actual range of Bluetooth is 10m in any direction. But that's just from a mobile device, which is restricted in what power levels it can use so as to still have a decent battery life.

    38. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      'He' is a case-hardened kiosk.

      Have fun.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    39. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by MouseR · · Score: 1

      Tourniquet traps!

      As soon as it rotates, your already in and it sends off the bluespam.

    40. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      Something similar happened to me. I have one of those cell phones you can use all over the world. As soon as I crossed the border from Austria to the Czech Republic I got a spam SMS from the Czech mobile provider listing places I might want to call for hotels, restaurant, and tourist information.

      I don't know if proximity SMS spamming is common in Europe, but to me, an American, it was quite novel.

    41. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      In which case everyone will turn off the bluetooth on their phones to eliminate all the unwanted spam, effectively killing off bluetooth for good.

    42. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      It's also interesting to note that while Sony Ericsson phones allow you to leave bluetooth active, but not receive messages - apparently there's nothing in the Nokia phones to do the same thing (heh heh heh).

      Unfortunately bluetooth phones are still very rare in north america, which is sort of unfortunate given my P800 and the excellent application "SMAN" :)

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    43. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by B747SP · · Score: 1
      If someone is already in the store they are less likely to walk straight out again.

      Colour me more likely maybe, but I'm a big one for walking right out when the 'mood' changes. I have no issue with turning my back and walking out on a human salesdroid who pushes the wrong buttons *even* when the droid works for the store with the best price and/or the last stock in the land. I have no more issue with doing zactly the same for a bluedroid who pulls the same stunt.

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    44. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by B747SP · · Score: 1
      I don't know if proximity SMS spamming is common in Europe, but to me, an American, it was quite novel.

      I got it the last couple-o times I stepped off an aeroplane in Singapore and Hong Kong. Made a point of replying to them. Words to the effect of "thanks for your unsolicited 'welcome' to your country. As per your implied request, you have been added to my 'absolutely do not buy from you or your advertisers under any circumstances' list. f*ck you very much... [blah][blah] I'll be picking me another GSM provider from the list my telephone has just offered up... bfn..."

      I do the same thing with fax-spammers... email/fax-them-back, even call them with voice if I have to to get the point across. Basic deal with me is make it very clear that I'm not buying your product specifically because you chose to spam me, notwithstanding that I'd be a high-likelihood potential customer for your product otherwise.

      It's a personal policy thing. I don't buy from spammers, ever.

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    45. Re:Yeah, I've done this. by mlush · · Score: 1
      >Do you really think spammers are going to install bluetooth devices every ten yards to acheive that...?
      Do you really think spammers are going to follow FCC guidelines for signal strength?
      I see 50,000 wat clear channel Bluetooth in our future.

      The local Maplin already do a Bluetooth dongle with a 100m range, add a pringles cans etc and you could probably get a respectable range.

      I don't think spammers are going to go for this in a big way, the cost per message is too high, as well as shops I can see loonies with a message wandering up and down the city streets sending "Repent" and "Romans 10:9" bluejacks

  2. commercial spamming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    because of the short range of bluetooth i think it'll be difficult to use this as commercial spamming.
    or maybe we are going to see people wearing jacket or backpack hiding bt equipment in crowded area? :)

    1. Re:commercial spamming? by enjo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Absolutely.. What you will see is kiosks that are setup in crowded areas (Airport terminals, malls, etc..) that continually look for devices to send messages to. Potentially big business.

      At the most basic level, you'll see stores use this as a means to automatically transmit specials and what-not as you walk into the store.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    2. Re:commercial spamming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, now since slashdot pointed out another way people can spam. Like spammers don't reach slashdot, I can see it now...

      If you want something else to be a lump in your pocket and not your cell phone....

    3. Re:commercial spamming? by Mengoxon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but how long until you will find those same kiosks vandalized by upright citizens?

    4. Re:commercial spamming? by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      I may be wrong, but does bluetooth not work at ~2.4ghz, as does 802.11b? wrap the fucker in tinfoil. Ground the tinfoil, BAM! Spammer just lost 90% or more of his transmit range.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
  3. Im sure posting it to slashdot by nb+caffeine · · Score: 0, Troll

    will allow this to stay under the radar of spammers. What better way to keep it secret than inform thousands of people

    --

    "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    1. Re:Im sure posting it to slashdot by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful
      will allow this to stay under the radar of spammers. What better way to keep it secret than inform thousands of people

      Because the best security method is security via obscurity. It's been proven time after time.

      (Sorry to post the obvious in response to a flamebait... someone's gotta do it, do I deserve the mod downs that may follow? ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Im sure posting it to slashdot by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well.. phone users should turn discovery off when they don't want to be discoverd.

      at least with bluetooth you have to be in range of the spammer(and the spam might even be relevant).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Im sure posting it to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Secrecy != security.

      Get your terms right next time.

    4. Re:Im sure posting it to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course hardly *anybody* reads the BBC website....

    5. Re:Im sure posting it to slashdot by relyter · · Score: 1

      Because the best security method is security via obscurity. It's been proven time after time...
      Yeah- just look to Microsoft to find a shining example about how well security through obscurity works...

      It's not clear at present that this is being done by anyone other than pranksters, but one can't help wondering, how long before commercial spammers catch on.
      I'd be willing to bet that it won't be too long now that it has been blared across the front page of slashdot...

    6. Re:Im sure posting it to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was sarcasm, doofus.

  4. Mom and Pop Stores by cflorio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see it now, Mom and Pop stores could have messages sent to your device as you walk past or near their entrance

    1. Re:Mom and Pop Stores by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      that is such a great idea, thanks, I shall start work on it, just as soon as I get a shop & a bluetooth phone 8)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Mom and Pop Stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be more concerned about the big multinationals. i.e. EvilMart

    3. Re:Mom and Pop Stores by ObscureCoder · · Score: 1

      Actually this is already going on. At least with other forms of comunication. I know of at least a few malls in the Ft. Worth/Dallas area that use short dist. broadcasting for cell phones. You walk past the store and your cell rings to tell you that there is a certain special going on inside. Even when I went to miami, and went wifi hunting w/ my friend and his laptop, we found a place that would msg us. Everytime we walked by we would a msg for a discount on one of their products. I would not be surprised in the least to see this occuring with bluetooth at all. Actually it would surprise me more to not have it occuring...

    4. Re:Mom and Pop Stores by kjs3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As I recall, this was one of the intended applications of Bluetooth.

    5. Re:Mom and Pop Stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually spent some time developing this technology at the University of Michigan. It was designed for Pocket PCs however (not cell phones), and was refered to as LDIA. Location Driven Intranet Access.

      Gave the user the ability to receive information about the store or location that they were in at the time. Worked pretty well, cell phone development never got off the ground.

    6. Re:Mom and Pop Stores by Threni · · Score: 3, Funny

      >As I recall, this was one of the intended applications of Bluetooth.

      It's amusing just how many people think they've just discovered some renegade underground use of Bluetooth, rather than what it was invented for! What's next?
      Post-jacking? "You can send post to people and it just turns up in their letterbox". Phone-jacking? "Give someone a ring, they'll have to answer to find out who it is!"

    7. Re:Mom and Pop Stores by lildogie · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Mom and Pop stores could have messages sent to your device as you walk past

      As well as the prostitutes standing in front of their stores.

    8. Re:Mom and Pop Stores by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Finally a service I can use from the spammers. At least this way I'd know the girl was real and what she looked like ;)

    9. Re:Mom and Pop Stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, that's no prostitute! That's my daughter!!

    10. Re:Mom and Pop Stores by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Well... what she looks like anyway. You never know if it's a real girl or not... there are some good fakes out there.

    11. Re:Mom and Pop Stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our EvilMart overlords.

  5. How does this work? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Every bluetooth phone I've ever owned has required a PIN to be set when you activate it. Without the PIN you can't make a connection.

    Then, when connection does succeed, a box pops up on the receiving phone asking whether you want to accept the connection.

    It's difficult to see how that could be done without the owner knowing about it.

    1. Re:How does this work? by Nugget · · Score: 5, Informative

      The PIN is used when pairing two devices. There are a variety of other options which require no such authorization to send things from phone to phone.

      With my T616, I can create a note and then send that note to another phone via bluetooth whether I'm paired with that device or not.

    2. Re:How does this work? by mtg101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In normal operation, say between a PC and phone, you do need to 'pair' devices using a PIN. However for certain operations - like sending a vCard phone2phone, phones will allow connections to be made and messages to be sent without authorisation.

      This allows a vCard (which may just be a message in the 'name' field) to be sent without authentication, or the target having to confirm receipt.

      Worse than vCards, you can send pics this way. It may be funny to take a pic of someone with your phone and then 'bluejack' it too them - but I know people who've received some pretty nasty porn over bluejacking too.

    3. Re:How does this work? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In that case the proper word is not 'bluejacking' it's 'using bluetooth precisely in the way it was designed'. Sending short-range messages is one of its main purposes.

      The article implies they're actually using the victims phone to do something nefarious.

    4. Re:How does this work? by mirko · · Score: 1

      My point too : I'd also be surprised if there were not an automatical blocking system after failing to communicate the relevant PIN 3 times...

      Also, Bluetooth only has a 5-10 meters so it's hard not to find out who may have sent something.

      Both of the above points make me wonder whether this story is more than an actual legend...

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    5. Re:How does this work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      automatical

      In Living Colour rocked, didn't it?

    6. Re:How does this work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but I know people who've received some pretty nasty porn over bluejacking too.

      pssht.... goatse.cx .... pssht!

    7. Re:How does this work? by RainFX · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not just the PIN you need.. you can also set the device to be discoverable, or hidden. It needs to be discoverable in order to pair with another device, but once that's done, you can set it to hidden and only the "paired" devices know it's there. Any other BT device won't be able to see it. And you can't pair devices (except for some headset profiles) without exchanging a PIN.

    8. Re:How does this work? by dknight · · Score: 1

      I dont know about you, but I consider Spam, especially on my cell phone, to be nefarious.

    9. Re:How does this work? by Threni · · Score: 1

      >My point too : I'd also be surprised if there were not an automatical blocking
      >system after failing to communicate the relevant PIN 3 times...

      You don't need a PIN number. That's for pairing devices so you can send/receive on two devices without further permission being required.

      The other use - the one Bluejacking refers to - is where a device has bluetooth enabled and able to receive pictures and business cards. A message will pop up with `picture/business card being sent - accept?` and if you choose `yes` you'll get it, otherwise it'll be rejected. It'll time out if you don't make a choice (or the bluejacker goes out of range).

      > Also, Bluetooth only has a 5-10 meters so it's hard not to find out who may have
      > sent something.

      If you have a good poker-face it'll be impossible to see who sent it. I've done this loads of times on buses, tubes, art galleries, pubs, shops etc. And there are two ranges for Bluetooth, depending on which class of device you have. One is 10 metres, the other 100.

      >Both of the above points make me wonder whether this story is more than an
      >actual legend...

      So you either didn't read the BBC article or you don't believe them. Well, that's your business I guess.

    10. Re:How does this work? by mirko · · Score: 1

      I actually did not RTFA, yep.

      Thanks for your fine explanation :)

      I now consider this problem as a minor annoyance : you can't expect this too happen as systematically as spam.
      I use a bluetooth phone but I am not an hardcore phoner : bluetooth is fine in conjunction with my powerbook, in case I need to access my company's network on the go.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    11. Re:How does this work? by bobdotorg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Worse than vCards, you can send pics this way. It may be funny to take a pic of someone with your phone and then 'bluejack' it too them - but I know people who've received some pretty nasty porn over bluejacking too.

      Nooooooooooo. I thought my phone was a goatse.cx free zone.

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    12. Re:How does this work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but "normal" spam uses email in precisely the way it was designed, too. I'm not passing a value-judgment here, obvously most of us think it's wrong to steal bandwidth, pester people, etc. but my point is that the costs/problems stem from the design phase not-anticipating the way something will be used, or not-adapting to abuse as a mere form of use, and pricing it out of the market with either money or hassle to the user/abuser.
      me best stay cloaked for this one...

    13. Re:How does this work? by rhombic · · Score: 1

      As long as the other phone's set to be discoverable.... which is why mine isn't.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    14. Re:How does this work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know people who've received some pretty nasty porn over bluejacking too.

      Nooooooooooo. I thought my phone was a goatse.cx free zone.


      If you're jacking yourself blue while looking at the goatse guy, I would say there's something seriously wron^H^H^H^Hdiverse about you.

    15. Re:How does this work? by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      That's for pairing. The "bluejack" technique involves sending a contact to the phone. Mos phones ship with the ability to accept contacts via Bluetooth by default.

    16. Re:How does this work? by irving47 · · Score: 1

      I thought most devices only let you set discoverable for three minutes?

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    17. Re:How does this work? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Except "normal" spam exploits open relays in a way that was not designed. E-mail wasn't designed to be nearly untraceable. Spam is.

    18. Re:How does this work? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Well I mean... vCards can contain pics. And sounds. And crypto keys.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  6. Grammar anyone? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

    I don't want to sound too mean, but in the story , I read:

    The phonomenon, known as "bluejacking".

    No verb? What is that?

    1. Re:Grammar anyone? by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      This sentence no verb.

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    2. Re:Grammar anyone? by CXI · · Score: 4, Funny

      New reporting style
      Make it sound like a haiku
      People think it's cool

    3. Re:Grammar anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would imagine the submitter had a sentence like:

      "The phonomenon, known as "bluejacking", is blah blah blah."

      The editors decided to shorten the sentence, and simply truncated it, rather than moving the verb to make it a correct sentence.

    4. Re:Grammar anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The river Temarc, in winter.

    5. Re:Grammar anyone? by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      I also wonder whether phonomenon is an intentional pun, or just a normal run-of-the-mill Slashdot typo.

    6. Re:Grammar anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess The phonomenon, known as "bluejacking". has so many verbs as Grammar anyone? or No verb?
      ;-)

    7. Re:Grammar anyone? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Bluejacking.

      Sounds like a show in Vegas, the next generation of the Blue Man Group. Three bald guys painted blue ... well you can imagine the rest.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  7. What's cool by BWJones · · Score: 1

    Bluejacking is on the edge of being cool. Things like this will be used by folks to contact others or be useful for a number of tasks until they become widely available and then the marketers will come in and take advantage of this. At that point, unless it continues to serve a useful function (like email), it will become more of a nuisance and folks will turn off "Bluetooth Discoverable".

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  8. "Bluejacking" possibilities by TWX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, if they're in range, it shouldn't be hard to find someone engaging in commercial "bluejacking", so we can beat the crap out of them in front of everyone.

    Or is it the removal of testicles that we're out for? I can never remember what the punishment for spamming is...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by lincarnate · · Score: 1

      Castration is by far the best action. Maybe then those spammers will start listening to their "MAK3 Y0UR P_E_N_I_S 4 INC_EHS LONGUR" advertisements they send out.

      --
      All generalizations are inaccurate...except that one about gen....fsck it.
    2. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by brusstoc · · Score: 2, Funny

      It can't be the "removal of testicles" as spammers don't have any. Bacteria don't reproduce sexually.

    3. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by bidule · · Score: 1

      If removal of your gonads is the punishment, I'd hate to be a female spammer.

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    4. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I too would like to de-genitalize spammers, don't think that just because the spammer is in range that said scum would be easy to find. If you are in a crowded area or if their bluetooth device were concealed, that would sure suck.

      Someone else also suggested the possibility of "Bluejacking bombs", which a device programmed to automatically spam, so in this case our scum could have their phone or PDA in a backpack and just be wandering around.

      Sucks, don't it?

    5. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by Empiric · · Score: 1

      Or is it the removal of testicles that we're out for?

      I'm fully in support of this. If they aren't "bluejacking" before this, they will be.

      --
      ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    6. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by FartSmeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow... does the potential for having someone send a message to your phone really invoke such ire? Somebody needs a hug...

      I mean really, let's think about this: If you're walking in front of my coffee shop and I "bluejack" you with a coupon for a half-price latte, are you gonna come in and beat the crap out of me because I made your phone beep? I think we're so programmed to see (and hate!) 'spam' that we automatically get our hackles raised about something that could actually be a cool way to support small businesses and escape the "WalMart" mentality.

      I know I'm guilty too, but I'm trying to learn to relax. Just my two cents worth... decimate at will... (sigh)

      --


      You are in a little twisting maze of passages, all different. You're screwed.
    7. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      let's think about this: If you're walking in front of my coffee shop and I "bluejack" you with a coupon for a half-price latte

      Leave me alone! Leave my phone alone! Put a sign in your window.

      Let's perform a thought experiment. Suppose you hire someone to stand out on the sidewalk and harass people that pass by to come into your store. Some people will call the police. Some people will punch that person in the nose. And perhaps there will be other responses as well. Some might try to get you some bad PR on the news.


      Wow... does the potential for having someone send a message to your phone really invoke such ire?

      Yes. As it should.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    8. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by FartSmeller · · Score: 1

      I'll admit I don't know much about Bluetooth, but why can't I leave my Bluetooth broadcast reception on, and you turn yours off? That way, I can get the coupon, and you can continue past, uninterrupted.

      Suppose you hire someone to stand out on the sidewalk and harass people that pass by to come into your store.

      I don't really have a store, but if I did hire someone to stand out on the sidewalk and hand out coupons (oops... I mean dead trees), I wouldn't expect them to 'harass' people. But then again, I was raised to be polite, and would expect disinterested people just to say "No, thank you" without feeling 'harassed'.

      Silly me.

      Your post is 'Insightful', indeed, but not in a complimentary way, and I mean nothing derogatory specifically toward the author of the above post. The sentiment toward any contact from strangers seems common, and I think it shows how 'on edge' we are as a society if, upon the (one way! we don't even have to respond!) reception of an unsolicited message on a user-misconfigured phone, our blood boils to the point of physical violence. Yikes. I can't help but chuckle at the thought of some cutie Bluetoothing 'ReelOddeeo' at the coffee shop out of romantic interest, and ending up with a black eye.

      --


      You are in a little twisting maze of passages, all different. You're screwed.
    9. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by mpe · · Score: 1

      I mean really, let's think about this: If you're walking in front of my coffee shop and I "bluejack" you with a coupon for a half-price latte, are you gonna come in and beat the crap out of me because I made your phone beep?

      There are plenty of other ways in which you could make that offer, put up a sign, pay for an advertisment, mail out coupons, partner with some other business so that their receipt acts as a coupon, etc, etc.
      By making someone's phone beep you are accosting them. In much the same way as if you physically stopped them walking past whilst you explained your great offers.

    10. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 1

      The sentiment toward any contact from strangers seems common, and I think it shows how 'on edge' we are as a society if, upon the (one way! we don't even have to respond!) reception of an unsolicited message on a user-misconfigured phone

      It is not in response to contact from any random stranger.

      My phone is NOT misconfigured. It is configured specifically so that strangers could text me. This is not an invitation for hundreds, thousands, millions or billions of businesses to harass me.

      Just try reading your response above in response to SPAM. Why is everyone so riled up? It is just an unsolicited message? Their misconfigured e-mail software allows just any spammer to send them a message.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    11. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Well, if they're in range, it shouldn't be hard to find someone engaging in commercial "bluejacking", so we can beat the crap out of them in front of everyone.


      At which time you'll go straight to jail. Have fun.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    12. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by FartSmeller · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just try reading your response above in response to SPAM. Why is everyone so riled up? It is just an unsolicited message? Their misconfigured e-mail software allows just any spammer to send them a message.

      I've often thought people were a little over the top about spam, too. Granted, I don't pay for metered bandwidth, but I get lots of spam everyday - it's NEVER made me want to punch anybody.

      This is not an invitation for hundreds, thousands, millions or billions of businesses to harass me.

      Save the drama... Thousands? Millions? Billions? I know I can type 'till I'm blue (no pun intended) in the fingers, but I must insist, there's some sort of inconsistency regarding someone with a phone strapped to his hip and a "Leave Me Alone!" attitude. It's just funny. And the bottom line is, if you feel 'harassed' by a text message, you're not yet ready for the real world.

      Yes, someone is trying to sell you something. The beep of a Bluetooth takes a second from your battery life. The size of an email costs bandwidth. The height of a billboard blocks a piece of otherwise beautiful sky. The length of a TV commercial spins your electric meter a bit. The full page newspaper ad taxes the recycling plant just one more bit.

      Advertising makes the (Western) world go 'round, and for all of it's ills, I'd like to see capitalism work. From my admittedly uneducated point of view, a few things have to happen to make that a reality:
      • Justice must be served to those who cheat the system, like Ken Lay.
      • Controls must be put in place (and enforced) to keep jobs from being exported.
      • Mom n' Pop shops need some kinda break from the fear of WalMartopoly.
      It might seem offtopic, but it's not: that last point is important. When one company controls the price of everything, then there's no healthy competition. So the MnP shops are important to a healthy economy. And if MomNPop's Shoe Shop can't afford a 4-color 16 page insert in the sunday paper, then I say "more power to them" when they Bluetooth me as I pass them on the way to WalMart for new boots. As a matter of fact, I'll take it one step further and wish that I could make my phone yell "Hey! I'm shopping for shoes!" as I drive TO WalMart.

      And this is where I'll agree to disagree. You and I see things fundamentally differently. I don't mind throwing away things I don't need (but I do like it when technology gives an assist, like the Outlook filter that moves new mail containing the word "Viagra" to the TrashCan). I'm sorry that interruptions cause you to become so angry, and I hope that they don't cause you to get in any trouble.

      Take care.
      --


      You are in a little twisting maze of passages, all different. You're screwed.
    13. Re:"Bluejacking" possibilities by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I've often thought people were a little over the top about spam, too. Granted, I don't pay for metered bandwidth, but I get lots of spam everyday - it's NEVER made me want to punch anybody.

      I don't pay for metered bandwidth. But I do have limited on bandwidth. Maybe you simply don't get enough spam. Please post your e-mail address. Surely you don't mind? It's just an unsolicited message. (Apply all of your arguments here.)


      It's just funny. And the bottom line is, if you feel 'harassed' by a text message, you're not yet ready for the real world.

      Please. Stop the insults and address the issue.

      It's like litter. If just one person does it, there is no real problem. But everyone notices that they can do this behavior at no apparent cost. Now there is a problem.

      If bluetooth spamming is allowed to happen, then every business will want to (ab)use it. Everyone's phone will be constantly beeping them. So everyone will turn off their bluetooth -- thus rendering the feature useless. Sort of like e-mail. Entirely defeating the purpose of the feature. To be easily contacted, even by strangers. (Which is NOT what anyone is upset about. Nor over the top about.) In fact, if I "misconfigure" my phone to accept messages from strangers, then maybe I wanted such contact!


      The beep of a Bluetooth takes a second from your battery life. The size of an email costs bandwidth.

      The battery life or bandwidth are not ethe issues. You obviously do not get enough spam to understand the issue. Or you have too much time on your hands. Or simply place no value on time. (Maybe you have nothing better to do?)

      The issue is about TIME. SPAM is an enormous waste of time. And resources. I don't remember the statistics about how many dollars are wasted because of spam. But it is a large number.

      My legitimate e-mail gets lost in the noise. Are you simply unable to see why people are upset?


      TV commercial.....full page newspaper ad

      Irrelevant. Not like spam. Spammers don't pay for my connection to the internet nor the content I get from it.


      Advertising makes the (Western) world go 'round, and for all of it's ills, I'd like to see capitalism work.

      I'd like to see capitalism work too. Eliminating spam in all its forms, including bluetooth won't prevent this. If you have a shop, you're free to put up a sign. You have no right to bother me as I pass by. If you put up a sign, and it is obnoxious enough (blinking, twitching, jumping, scrolling, seziure inducing), I'll avoid even passing by your shop, and I'll be sure that your neighboring businesses know this too.

      Spam has nothing to do with capitalism. Legitimate marketers are interested in a legitimate target market.

      Spam whether by mail or bluetooth is NOT advertising.


      Mom n' Pop shops need some kinda break from the fear of WalMartopoly.

      I agree with your sentiment here. But spamming is not the way to do it. Isn't the walmart-opoly phenomena just part of that wonderful unrestrained unbridled greed of capitalism run amuck that you want? Big powerful interests can mold things to work their way, despite the interests of many shop owners expressed to the city council and zoning commission?


      I'll take it one step further and wish that I could make my phone yell "Hey! I'm shopping for shoes!" as I drive TO WalMart.

      This is the way it should work. Sort of like an electronic yellow-pages. I should be able to see your ad when I WANT to see it and am looking for it.

      Even if my phone/pda could announce what is on my shopping list, it would be abused to the point of uselessness. Everybody just isn't going to play nice. If my pda says I'm looking for shoes, then shops I pass by will try to sell me tennis rackets, sweaters, cameras, etc.

      The directory concept would work. Suppose I could pu

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  9. Bluetooth directional antennas. by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As bluetooth operates in the same 2.4 GHz band as WiFi, I'd bet some people are hooking up Bluetooth devices to cantennas for greater bluejacking range.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Bluetooth directional antennas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea! I'll be marketing my UNIVERSITY DIPLOMAS to everyone in no time!

    2. Re:Bluetooth directional antennas. by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 1, Informative

      close, but no cigar. Bluetooth requires 2way communication. The devices on the recieving end don't have the power the set up a connection.

    3. Re:Bluetooth directional antennas. by Technician · · Score: 3, Informative

      Last time I checked, a directional antenna works both ways. Has something changed that make the directional antenna provide gain when transmitting and not when receiving?

      Think about it. The Dish antenna on top of houses for TV are to receive a weak signal, not send a signal.

      A can antenna would not only increase your transmit range but also increase the receive range. I see no reason a cantenna would not work on one end to increase the 2 way connection.

      Have I missed anything?

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  10. Well... by GarfBond · · Score: 4, Informative

    While I'm sure this could become a major problem in the future if it reaches critical mass, the beauty of Bluetooth is that it's designed for personal area networks. So, although it's bluetooth spam, it shouldn't reach anyone farther than 30 feet away from you or so. This by itself will make bluetooth spam a little harder to operate than just SMS or email spam.

    Unless, of course, Microsoft makes a smartphone that has Outlook on it and bluetooth as an option... :)

    1. Re:Well... by ItsIllak · · Score: 1

      What? Like: This ?

    2. Re:Well... by swb · · Score: 1

      Until airports and other high-density pedestrian areas get bluetooth spam senders installed that allow them to saturate the area with periodic bluetooth spam. Yay. Another victory for economic "choice."

    3. Re:Well... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      So the spammer is within 30 feet? *cracks knuckles* That's close enough.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Well... by fitzsimj · · Score: 1

      There are three classes of Bluetooth devices: 1 (100m range), 2 (20m range) and 3 (10m range). If I understand correctly, mobile phones are Class 1 devices.

      In my own experience developing Bluetooth devices, we saw connections out beyond 100 meters, and this was inside an office building (i.e. passing through walls). IIRC we were using TDK dongles and the Zevo BT chipset.

      So, imagine a circle with a radius of 100 meters. Now fill it with a crowd. Now find the spammer.

    5. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my sweet Jebus that was hilarious.

  11. The nice thing about bluetooth... by Soulfader · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is that it is fairly short range, so when you identify the spammer you can go punch them.

    1. Re:The nice thing about bluetooth... by Kingpin · · Score: 1


      OR you can give their community website a good old fashioned slashdotting!

      --
      Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
      Geocrawler error message.
    2. Re:The nice thing about bluetooth... by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
      ...is that it is fairly short range, so when you identify the spammer you can go punch them.

      BlueJacker Gets Jacked, News @ 11

    3. Re:The nice thing about bluetooth... by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      is that it is fairly short range, so when you identify the spammer you can go punch them.

      Most likely this process will be automated, so you end up punching some metal box at the bus stop.

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    4. Re:The nice thing about bluetooth... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Thats why you come back when its dark with a bat or crowbar. :p

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  12. Definately within reach of legislation by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    Existing legislation might be easy to enforce with this...they have to be within Bluetooth range of you to send you a message, and Bluetooth range, for most people, doesn't include foreign countries.

    1. Re:Definately within reach of legislation by Threni · · Score: 1

      >Existing legislation might be easy to enforce with this...they have to be within
      >Bluetooth range of you to send you a message,

      Legislation against what? Wireless networking?

      >and Bluetooth range, for most
      >people, doesn't include foreign countries.

      Clearly you haven't been to Andorra.

    2. Re:Definately within reach of legislation by furiogiante · · Score: 1

      And it's all good until someone writes a cellphone worm and gets it distributed; then we'll have 50,000 teenage Nokia users with $2000 a month SMS bills because they are the hapless drones delivering "EN@rgE yEr UNit" messages to your phone.

      (/me buys Wireless server provider stock and sets out to build a better worm.)

    3. Re:Definately within reach of legislation by Angram · · Score: 1

      I suppose stalking and harassment laws would come into play if the person followed you, as well.

      --

      GL
  13. Short range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the short range of blue tooth.... Identifying who is spamming your phone is a bit easier to do than normal. Most likely its your buddy giggling next to you.

  14. aplliances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sometimes i leave my toaster on, it burns my toast

    1. Re:aplliances by uncle_riley · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      please mod parent up. I dont like burnt toast it makes me sad

    2. Re:aplliances by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Insightful, but thing is, is your toaster on by default?

  15. Reach out and touch someone by schmeis · · Score: 1

    The difference here is that bluetooth only works within a couple of metres. Which means that if you do get spammed there's a good chance you can track down the spammer and show them how much you appreciate them.

    1. Re:Reach out and touch someone by dattaway · · Score: 1

      The difference here is that bluetooth only works within a couple of metres.

      Never underestimate the power of a high gain yagi
      antenna. It is possible to sit on a tower and be a bluesniper. Same concealable 2.4GHz antenna and everything.

  16. Real close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm counting the number of spammers within a 10 metre radius of me right now.

  17. Not long... by AtOMiCNebula · · Score: 1
    It's not clear at present that this is being done by anyone other than pranksters, but one can't help wondering, how long before commercial spammers catch on.


    Thanks for giving them the idea Taco!
  18. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I claim Prior Art on the technique. I had a plan to transmit messages wirelessly to users of gentlemen's toilets as they were standing there unable to do much else. The original intention was to send advertisements, and it would ideally have been done on a pay-to-view basis so I would be making money three ways: from the advertisers, from the recipients of the adverts and from the patent royalties.

    1. Re:Prior Art by 7*6 · · Score: 1

      Do you call ownership to the name Anonymous Coward (TM) as well? Otherwise I'm TOTALLY stealing your idea heehee!

  19. Hardly jacking anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think bluejacking is accurate. You are sending a message to an open communication device. You are not jacking anything. I think such a ballsy move to send unsolicited messages should be called blue balling.

  20. Bluetooth devices must include "off" switch by kneecarrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bluetooth-enabled devices must include an easy hardware switch which allows the convenient shutting off of Bluetooth functionality. An indicator light displaying the current status must also be included on the device. Devices like the Tapwave Zodiac are well designed and include these features.

    --

    I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

    1. Re:Bluetooth devices must include "off" switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most items do include an "off" switch. The ones that don't can be turned off by removing batteries and other power sources.

      Another button is just what I want for my device!

    2. Re:Bluetooth devices must include "off" switch by joshuac · · Score: 1

      ---snip
      Bluetooth-enabled devices must include an easy hardware switch which allows the convenient shutting off of Bluetooth functionality. An indicator light displaying the current status must also be included on the device. Devices like the Tapwave Zodiac are well designed and include these features.

      ---snip

      Email-enabled devices generally can have email disabled, with one catch; you don't get to use the email anymore.

      Don't like spam? I dare you to stop using email :) Same goes for bluetooth; turning it off to avoid spammers isn't much of a solution.

    3. Re:Bluetooth devices must include "off" switch by kneecarrot · · Score: 1

      Let me use your email analogy to better explain. Having an off switch for Bluetooth is like being able to disconnect from the Internet on your home PC between sessions of emailing. Sure, you could keep the PC connected to the Internet at all times. But, you leave yourself open to attacks. Same thing with a Bluetooth switch. If another device is close by and you need to use Bluetooth, just flip the switch to "ON". Otherwise, the switch is left off. Functionality isn't being limited... just opportunities for attack.

      --

      I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

    4. Re:Bluetooth devices must include "off" switch by joshuac · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you will find that on Slashdot many users are constantly connected. I have half a dozen machines here at my house (I am working from home today) that are always connected. I would consider it rediculous if I needed to turn off my computers on a regular basis to protect myself from the big, bad internet.

      But that doesn't match the metaphor I was using for email in any case.

      To get on to this gist of what I was trying to point out, you are recommending limiting your ability to use something. It is silly that we have to wade through spam in our email, I for one remember when this was not the case. Nowadays email is so flooded with runaway marketing that it is not nearly as effective of a tool as it once was.

      I see the same pattern coming up with Bluetooth; it's a great tool especially when it is always there and "just works". It won't be nearly as useful as it could be if people have to conciously turn it off and on just to use it.

  21. Authorization by meta-monkey · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I have a bluetooth phone (Nokia 3650), and I've used it to sync my address book on my PowerBook, and also to get my PowerBook online. Whenever I try to connect the two, I get a pop-up on the phone that asks if it's okay for the PowerBook to connect. First I have to enter an authorization code in the PowerBook, and then I have to type the same code into the phone. So, how are the spammers sending the messages without the user authorizing the connection?

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    1. Re:Authorization by mikecouk · · Score: 3, Informative

      they're sending an address book entry, with the message they wish to send as the "name" of the contact.

    2. Re:Authorization by jazman · · Score: 1

      Haven't got anything with Bluetooth but I imagine there are two possibilities:

      (1) it's a content-free "user wants to connect" message, and you don't know what the message is, so you say yes and get asked if you want a bigger penis.

      (2) the message "get a bigger penis" appears on your phone and the damage is done.

      All we need to do is exclaim "who's that wanker", then anyone looking suspicious in the centre of a 10m circle of people saying "who's that wanker" gets the crap beat out of them. Actual GBH against spammers is should be effective, which is the big advantage bluejacking has over the spammers' normal means of jacking off a load of messages.

    3. Re:Authorization by EddWo · · Score: 1

      You can set it not to require authorisation for a specific paired device. Once you have paired the phone and the powerbook, you should not need to have to enter the code every time.

      If you have bluetooth on and set to discoverable people can send you vCards containing their messages.

      There are more security options on phones usually, but people don't know they are there and it phone is open by default.

      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
  22. Shhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one can't help wondering, how long before commercial spammers catch on.

    Perhaps a little longer if you didn't blurt it out loud...

  23. Nokia users by Jayanef · · Score: 0

    Usually nokia users got bluetooth on and discoverable as default configuration

    --
    -- There is four mistake in this sentences.
    1. Re:Nokia users by jdvuyk · · Score: 1

      Certainly not on my 6210! Off by default.
      I bet people who leave this feature on will equally complain of how little battery life they get. Deserve what they get really.

  24. Capitalism is like life by LNO · · Score: 1

    Penile shrinkage from the electromagnetic field of the phone clipped to your belt.

    Penile enlargement spams coming to the phone.

    It's a symbiotic relationship, really.

  25. Enlarge your... by omarques · · Score: 0

    talk time with our new prepaid plans!

  26. Welcome to capitalism, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If there's money to be made, there's advertising to do. It will continue in whatever medium we create.

  27. Re:I FOR ONE WELCOME OUR NEW ALIEN BLUETOOTH OVERL by tazanator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    lets see they said it on the simpsons and third rock from the sun ... several others but I'm board...

    --
    I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
  28. Bluetooth viruses by sfraggle · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Bluetooth spamming seems only of limited use; you have to get close enough to be able to send the message. Maybe from a car driving around a busy city or in a nightclub or crowded bar it might work.

    What might be more interesting is bluetooth viruses. We're probably fairly safe since we dont have a monoculture in mobile phones like that which exists on the desktop, but you can just imagine bluetooth viruses hopping from phone to phone as their owner travels around :-). Plus the fact that its very difficult to update phones to fix holes could make this a pretty big problem if such security holes were found.

    --
    were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
    1. Re:Bluetooth viruses by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Bluetooth spamming seems only of limited use; you have to get close enough to be able to send the message.... What might be more interesting is bluetooth viruses.
      Sounds nice, but unless somebody invents VBScript attachments for cellphones we're probably safe - it's just text messaging. (Microsoft, if you're listening, please stay out of cellphones).
    2. Re:Bluetooth viruses by bobthemuse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Forget viruses, what if someone discovers a way to send a malformed message which crashes the phone?

      Even worse, some of the new phones offer 'over the air' programming updates. The right bug, and someone could render your phone useless....

    3. Re:Bluetooth viruses by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Microsoft, if you're listening, please stay out of cellphones Where have you been? They're heeeree... (Not doing too well yet, but wait until the 3.0 version.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Bluetooth viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " its very difficult to update phones to fix holes"

      yeah, it's not like they have to connect to a network or anything...

    5. Re:Bluetooth viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say is "OH CRAP!"

    6. Re:Bluetooth viruses by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of Pocket PC PHONE EDITION? T-Mobile had a Pocket PC PE phone, and Orange has a CE powered phone. Also, Audiovox has rolled their own phone software for Pocket PC 2002. Too late.

  29. Suspicious Timing by elefantstn · · Score: 1
    --
    If it ain't broke, you need more software.
  30. Methinks they've been BlueDotted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how the lameness filter encourages one to include lame text in messages!

  31. YAGging by Joel+Rowbottom · · Score: 2, Informative

    We've been doing this for ages in the UK. See here for Andy's way of doing it ;)

    --
    Smegma.
  32. Commercial Spammers by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I doubt there would be spam like we have now on email, the range is simply to short. But I can see supermarkets or similar companys using this to send you messages while in there store.

    Annoying sure, but at least semi-relevant to what your doing. And at least you can turn it off. (You can, can't you?)

    1. Re:Commercial Spammers by jrumney · · Score: 1
      I doubt there would be spam like we have now on email, the range is simply to short. But I can see supermarkets or similar companys using this to send you messages while in there store.

      Precisely, but how is this not spam? Shops in the UK are already doing this with SMS. I now avoid walking past the Carphone Warehouse in Liverpool Street Station because of the SMS spam they've sent out as I walk past on a number of occasions.

    2. Re:Commercial Spammers by Threni · · Score: 1

      >I now avoid walking past the Carphone Warehouse in Liverpool Street Station
      >because of the SMS spam they've sent out as I walk past on a number of occasions.

      How do they get your phone number?

    3. Re:Commercial Spammers by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Precisely, but how is this not spam? Shops in the UK are already doing this with SMS. I now avoid walking past the Carphone Warehouse in Liverpool Street Station because of the SMS spam they've sent out as I walk past on a number of occasions.

      Really? I didn't know they where already doing this. Wonder how that works.

      I didn't mean it wasn't spam, just not like what we get via email. I normally get 40 or 50 email spams a day (tho it's been 800-ish per day this past week), none of which are even slightly relivent.

      But yea, it is still spam and still annoying. Just not quite as annoying :)

    4. Re:Commercial Spammers by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I was their customer, and at the time these messages started, I had just become eligible for a phone upgrade so I guess they might scan for former customers whose contracts have just reached that point.

    5. Re:Commercial Spammers by jrumney · · Score: 1

      My phone accepts 15 SMS messages before the buffer fills up. If more shops start doing this (whether by bluetooth or SMS), deleting the messages to make sure there's enough room for my friends' messages to get through is going to be more annoying than email spam.

    6. Re:Commercial Spammers by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      deleting the messages to make sure there's enough room for my friends' messages to get through is going to be more annoying than email spam

      Fair point!

      Most mobiles don't have anything in the way of filters either. Urg...

    7. Re:Commercial Spammers by Threni · · Score: 1

      >I was their customer, and at the time these messages started, I had just become
      >eligible for a phone upgrade so I guess they might scan for former customers
      >whose contracts have just reached that point.

      Sure. But avoiding their branches won't keep them from spamming you, I'm afraid. I get spam from T-Mobile but i've yet to get around to switching them off. I think the problem is that I have about 5 passwords for their various services (My Account, My Servies, general t-mobile password, one for their mobile email etc).

    8. Re:Commercial Spammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure. But avoiding their branches won't keep them from spamming you

      The weird thing is, I only ever got the spam within seconds of walking past that branch of Carphone Warehouse. I think they might have been part of some trial of geographically targeted SMS spam.

      My number is listed with TPS, so most reputable companies don't send me spam normally (the above trial must have bypassed the check against the TPS database, but unfortunately SMS is still a grey area so there are no fines for SMSing TPS listed numbers). Mostly I just get the "You have won a 1000 prize" timeshare scams.

    9. Re:Commercial Spammers by Threni · · Score: 1

      >think they might have been part of some trial of geographically targeted SMS spam.

      Never heard of that...

      > Mostly I just get the "You have won a 1000 prize" timeshare scams. ...but I get that sort of thing once or twice a month, and very few non-friends (companies and the like) have my number.

    10. Re:Commercial Spammers by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Never heard of that... Location based services definitely exist, and have done for some time. That particular example say that they require prior permission, but that doesn't mean all do (especially if it was a trial, the rules from the phone companies may have since changed).

  33. Spam spam spam by zyridium · · Score: 1

    Spam is more effective when it is difficult to distinguish it from genuine messages.

    Based on how well short messages I have had sent to me are written, it is sure to be a lot more difficult to filter spam than it is with email -- see those bayesian filter zealots solve this one :P

    I can just imagine how much fun you could have with this though. Hey you, see me over here with the brown hair and the blue eyes, come over and... !!

    1. Re:Spam spam spam by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      A Bayesian filter will just take longer to miss the legit messages, hit the spam, and may have a slightly higher false positive rate and lower false negative rate, but over time will improve to the same as traditional e-mail bayesian filtering.

  34. this has been around for quite a while....example by mike300zx · · Score: 4, Informative

    When the Sony Ericcson's came out with bluetooth they made them come with the bluetooth turned off by default. When Nokia came out with their bluetooth phones they had them ship with it on by default. Soon on the Sony Ericson message boards people found they could discover the nokia's in a crowded place (movie theaters, etc.) and you could create a contact in you contact list and then send them that contact. This has the benifit that you message is actually the contact name which the person on the recieving end will actually see first so they don't have to click OK and then get the message...it's already there. Anyhow, it's much better in Europe for this type of thing as they've had GSM phone and associated cool features such as bluetooth for quite some time while America is just starting to catch on. I've done discoveries with mine and never had any success connecting or seeing any other bluetooth activated phone that wasn't purposly turned on for the connection. I wonder if Nokia has caught on and is leaving bluetooth off on their America bound phones.

  35. range vs power? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everybody is talking about how the damage will be limited because bluetooth has such a short range, but what happens if the spammers boost the power of their transmittors? Is this possible with Bluetooth (I admit I don't know)? If so, we may be in for more problems then the first few posts let on.

    Sure, it may be illegal/immoral, but can we trust spammers to be legal and moral?

    On another note how long until this is used to SPAM products designed to defeat this type of SPAM (ala Windows Messenger Service)?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:range vs power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Both ends would need to have their power boosted, as the master/slave radio frequency hopping nature of bluetooth requires that each end can reach the other. i.e you need to hand shake to get a message across, you can't just wave like with FM radio.

    2. Re:range vs power? by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      Both ends would need to have their power boosted, as the master/slave radio frequency hopping nature of bluetooth requires that each end can reach the other. i.e you need to hand shake to get a message across, you can't just wave like with FM radio.

      Not necessarily. Wouldn't you get the same effect by having an antenna on the spammers side with a higher receive gain? How else do cell phone networks work? The base stations put out tons of power while the headsets transmit a watt or two tops (maybe even less with the new digital cell phones?). But the base stations also have much bigger antennas with higher receive gains that can process weaker signals.

      Of course I doubt too many spammers will be this sophisticated but it only takes one.... Wonder how long they'd get away with it before the FCC tracked them down and spanked them?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:range vs power? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter how powerful the transmitter is because it still has to receive a response back from the receiver in order to "discover" that the receiver is there before sending the message. In other words, sending a vCard is still a two way operation. Sender "discovers" the potential receiver by an intermittent "ping" and is then able to send them the message.

      Perhaps innovative spammers could figure out a way to ignore one half of the conversation or spoof the handshake in some way, but I doubt it.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  36. Fragment by filmsmith · · Score: 1

    The phonomenon, known as "bluejacking".

    Care to finish that thought?

    1. Re:Fragment by horsie · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Clippy. :D

  37. If I was a spammer.... by Corbets · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd read Slashdot. I'll bet they get all kinds of great ideas from us! :)

    1. Re:If I was a spammer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We already do.

      See?

      The great thing about geeks is that, while they are quite clever, they have an overwhelming desire to tell everyone how clever they are. Makes my job easier!

      KTHXBYE!

  38. Could you imagine bluejacking bombs? by Refried+Beans · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You could easily create a small battery powered embedded device running Linux that would just send out bluetooth messages. Drop that on a city bus or subway car and you could spam a ton of people really easily.

    Perhaps I should be patenting an idea like that. ;)

    1. Re:Could you imagine bluejacking bombs? by raider_red · · Score: 1

      File it as a "defensive patent". That way, if spammers do it, you can sue them for patent infringement.

      Or you can just license it and make a ton of money.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    2. Re:Could you imagine bluejacking bombs? by libra-dragon · · Score: 1
      If it requires a two-way handshake... how about bluetooth tarpits?

      Of course you could probably get around that with multithreading.

    3. Re:Could you imagine bluejacking bombs? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      How about both? Sell it to some spammers and sue the ones who buy the competitors' products.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    4. Re:Could you imagine bluejacking bombs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be awesome because, I'd find your device and then steal it for parts.

  39. Commercial spammers? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    From the article, "Bluetooth works over a range of about 10 metres..."

    I hardly think spam is going to be a problem. It's not economically feasible for generic spam (no economy of scale) and I think localized messages (for example, a restaurant sending you a message saying "eat here") would annoy rather than entice, thus costing the offender business. The blujackq.com faq says

    On most models the phone will bleep the same tone as when a text message is received, and it will show a message similar to "name of contact has just been received by Bluetooth". If the user then accepts it, the contact will appear in their phonebook. From here the user can see what is written in the other fields too.

    The potential to drive away customers by angering them is enormous. Of course, this could be used to good advantage by a competitor...

    1. Re:Commercial spammers? by nullard · · Score: 1

      As far as the restaurants go, this could be beneficial to them. If there are two neighboring restaurants, and one of them sends you a coupon over bluetooth, you might go to that one to get the better deal. I see this becoming prevalent in the fast food business where you often see several competitors in close proximity. A Burger King next to a McDonalds could send send out 10% off coupons to pull drivers into their drive-thru.

      --


      t'nera semordnilap
  40. John Anderton by jfedor · · Score: 1

    You look like you could use a Guinness!

    -jfedor

    1. Re:John Anderton by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      Talking about the "Minority Report", I think there is a more appropriate scene about Tom Cruise shopping in Gap. You know, "Welcome Mr. Whoever, are you satisfied with the turtleneck you bought last year". Each BT device has its unique number just like the MAC address of a network card. By storing and tracking these unique ID's they can identify you as the guy who often buys pink translucent dildos and should be alerted about the latest models.

  41. Unless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the spammer is not there at all. This could be done by installing a small transmitter in a shop, for example, which broadcasts messages to all and sundry who pass by.

    1. Re:Unless... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      This could be done by installing a small transmitter in a shop

      It's not just a transmitter, it's a receiver too. A short, directional, high-output pulse ought to do for it.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  42. Re:Wow. Thrilling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sounds like Taco got taken in by a brand new urban legend

    Sounds like you have a very, very, boring life.

  43. Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course someone did it. People leave those things on by default. It's one of the first bt projects I did just to learn and it was easy and pretty cool. Blue tooth sucks though, to slow to do much more then messages, and at least in my area, there are not enough people around to make it worth it. I don't even have carrier signal at my house.

  44. Object Push by andrewdcs · · Score: 1

    Bluejacking relys on a couple of things to be in place to work. 1. Other end (jack-ee) has to have Bluetooth, and switch it on. Some phones come with it on by default 2. You have to agree to accept what your being sent, This can be worked around as you can set your Bluetooth devices name to be "Hi! you've been BlueJacked" 3. For the "total" jack experience OBEX Push profile has to be on either end, for the business card (vCard, same format as with IR on Palms etc.) exchange (when accepted(?) by the confused jack-ee) then they have a semi-permanent record on their phone. The ideas been around for a while, in singles bars (where techies lurk), and school playgrounds (where kids always have right ideas for mischief).

  45. A friend of mine does this by Sarin · · Score: 1

    When he's going out somewhere and bored, he starts sending messages like: "this phone has been reported stolen. your number has been registered, deliver it at the local police station"
    Some people look like they're thinking: "oh shit, I'm fucked"

  46. ad-hoc network? by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

    Apparently lots of phone owners are leaving Bluetooth switched on, meaning that anyone within range can send a short message.


    Hmm... could this be used to set up an ad-hoc local network, e.g. in a cinema? Can you get a remote bluetooth phone to forward a message to another?

  47. Yeah well by cangeceiro · · Score: 1

    I'll be honest with ya, the first time something like that happens to me i know the guy will be with in looking distance, and I'll beat his ass

  48. Bluetooth spam by Zocalo · · Score: 1
    how long before commercial spammers catch on

    Oh, puhleeeze let it be soon! With the range of Bluetooth, they'll have to send so many spams to get their 0.00001% hit rates that their fingers will fall off through exteme RSI and the bastards won't be able to send us email spam either. ;)

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:Bluetooth spam by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      But, they could drop a PDA with bluetooth, and have it constantly scanning and sending spam to all victims in the area.

  49. what about Internet connection over BT phone? by BigGerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I understand that some bluetooth phones are used to connect your PDA or laptop to the Internet.
    Is it possible to place a laptop next to a phone, somehow hijack the connection, get the IP address, send 1000 spam messages and disconnect?
    Should not take more than 30-50 seconds.

    1. Re:what about Internet connection over BT phone? by davidstrauss · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not easily. I use exactly the technology you're describing. The phone must be paired with the PC to use the phone's modem (a.k.a. dial-up networking) profile. Also, it's not IP data going over the bluetooth connection. It's what would go over a serial cable to an external modem.

  50. Re:Commercial spammers or advertisers? by I-R-Baboon · · Score: 1

    I am sure this was the mentality when Spam first started clogging our inboxes, wasting our bandwidth and dDoSing our mailservers. Yet, to this day people still do it and I hardly think it is for the fun or the incredible popularity Spammers bask in. Some pinheads somewhere actually enjoy and like this kind of pestering (same with telemarketing). Which means it cannot be repulsing all that much business (grounds for immediate lifetime boycott in my book) and somebody is cashing in on it.

    Should the victim have to pay for this solicitation I can see a very bitter court battle as we all still get commercials(advertisments) on most channels we pay for on cable or for dish owners when they have reception.


    --
    -1 Overrated (Too many big words for me to comprehend)
  51. Hey Ive just got this bluetooth message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "all your phone are belong to us"

    What can it mean?

  52. ARGH! by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    *all* bluejacking is: turning on your bluetooth and scanning for nearby devices who's idiot owners haven't turned "discoverable" off. that's what "discoverable" means: your phone can be discovered and messaged. Nokia ships with this on by default.
    it's not some cool hack, or anything, it's just a setting within bluetooth for exchanging information without pairing.

    1. Re:ARGH! by TiggsPanther · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, there'll be the inevitable "bored geek" game of sending "You really should turn 'discoverable' off" messages to unguarded phones takes off.

      Tiggs

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  53. Is this going to be known ... by dunstan · · Score: 1

    ... as drive by spamming??

    Dunstan

    --
    The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
  54. no, they musn't by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    it's not part of the BT spec, and i don't remember ever seeing a device that had this. you turn it off in "software" which phone designers like as you don't have to clutter the already cluttered keypad with a button just to babysit idiots...

    My phone has a blue LED that indicates, yes, you guessed it, that I'm using bluetooth. It *doesn't* mean I've been dumb enough not to realise that if you don't put a tick in the "discoverable" box that you can get short range messages from strangers.

    1. Re:no, they musn't by mpe · · Score: 1

      it's not part of the BT spec, and i don't remember ever seeing a device that had this. you turn it off in "software" which phone designers like as you don't have to clutter the already cluttered keypad with a button just to babysit idiots...

      With the the result that an already overloaded interface becomes even more overloaded. Together with the possibility that there may be other ways to change the configuration of the phone.

  55. ermm.. NOT SPAM as such.. by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 5, Informative

    Blue tooth is a remarkably secure system requiring PIN numbers and autentication to do any form of connection.

    WHat is actually happening here is the OBEX transfer part is beign utilised. Any Bluetooth phone that is set to discoverable will accept certain OBEX information (usually just vCards, and vCal files, and maybe notes). The phone ideally will accept the information and ask the user if he/she woudl liek the add the recieved infomation into their phonebook/calendar/notes. it is EXACTLY like the beam facility of Palm units, and others, just using Bluetooth for non-line of sight transfers.

    What people do in "BlueJacking" is create a dummy addressbook entry, and send it to the unsuspecting user (usually Nokia users.. more on that later). I did it beofre once, when i was at a resteraunt and this idiot with a Nokia camera phoen was showing off and making a nuisence in front of some girls he was entertaining. So i sent a address "vCard" with the name "Stop Playing with yr BRICK" from my phone to his (his phone was discovered as "poser"?!!?!??!?!) SHoudl haev seen the look on his face.. especially in front of the girls..

    However (unless you are a Nokia 7650/6310i/6xxx user) You have nothign to worry. Most phoens ship with bluetooth off or in none discoverable mode. The SOny Ericssons only stay "discoverable" for a maximum of three minuites. The blueJackign craze started in the (Sony)Ericsson community when it was discovered some (if not most) Nokia Bluetooth phones were shipped default with Bluetooth on and discoverable, so it was a prank to those users!

    As was pointed out, it is extremely easy to make a phoen none discoverable, and most ppl have cottoned on.

    So as for "spam" via blue tooh, it isnt going to happen, unless you are EXTREMELY stupid... then again..... there is a hell of a lot of stupid people :O

    --
    Have a nice day!
    1. Re:ermm.. NOT SPAM as such.. by i_really_dont_care · · Score: 1

      However (unless you are a Nokia 7650/6310i/6xxx user) You have nothign to worry.

      Think Windows Messenger. It's a matter of like five mouse clicks to disable it, yet about every Windows user out there is constantly getting spam and virii over it and has no clue how to disable it.

  56. An Example... by Hoplite3 · · Score: 1

    Phone: *beep* You have a new message!

    Me: What! Lousy bluejackers! Wait, herbal viagra for only $19.95? How could I lose?


    Yeah right. I didn't buy the stuff from spam, I filtered it out. I didn't buy the stuff from junk mail, I threw it away unopened. I'm on a no-call list. I configured my computer to stop showing ads from the internet. I use a pvr to avoid commecials. Why oh why will I buy stuff from a phone message?

    I'm so sick of advertising like this. I like ads that keep me informed as to what is availible or make me laugh. I dislike repition, ads designed to make me feel bad, and local car dealership commercials. Given that balance, I'll choose to avoid any ads but the ones on google and in my phonebook.

    We were all suposed to sell mindshare in exchange for radio, tv, and websites. But I'm sick of it. It's my mind. Give it back. I need all of it. Find another business model and leave me alone.

    --
    Use the Firehose to mod down Second Life stories!
  57. Looking for dope? by DJStealth · · Score: 1

    Hi-tech drug dealers could use this technology to quietly advertise dope on the streats without being to conspicuous.

    1. Re:Looking for dope? by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

      Right up until the point he Bluejacks a copper.

      Can you imagine the "Oh shit" expresison on a Dealer's face when he notices a ticked off policeman holding a mobile?

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  58. Software distribution by Bluetooth by TonkaTown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A friend of mine uses Bluetooth in this way to distribute his freeware Symbian games such as Vexed to other Symbian phones.

    Watch out for a manic Scotsman on the London tube system waving a Nokia 7650...

  59. antisocial intros? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Too bad the first people to use this Bt feature are socially maladjusted geeks, who will probably alienate any "normals" from using it. It would really enhance "in the flesh" socializing if your phone could whisper to another in the room, without having exchanged info before.

    "Waiter, we need silverware"
    "Is there a doctor in the house?"
    "Are those 2 seats next to you taken?"
    "Hi, my name's Steve - over by the Christmas tree, in the black shirt. Touch your shoulder if you want me to rescue you from that jock."
    "Who wants my drink ticket? Starting bid $0.25"
    "8th level CN human male fighter ISO C* elvish illusionist"

    Phones could allow people to meet, without the overhead of checking them out too much, and in a form that's easier to deflect than traditional approaches. If rude Bt ambushes disabuse everyone from allowing access, and spammers rush into the breech, what's a usable protocol to allow strangers to make an introduction, while weeding out unwanted advances. This is the middle ground between address book whitelists and spammer blacklists - how can we navigate it?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:antisocial intros? by TonkaTown · · Score: 1

      The only minor problem with this is that you may not be talking to the person you think you are.

      Instead of sending a chat up line to the beautiful blonde waving her Nokia 3650 (which just happens to have Bluetooth turned off), you might well be sending it the lawyer behind you who has a phone in his jacket pocket.

      It can be a very indiscriminate way to broadcast a message.

    2. Re:antisocial intros? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Ah - that's where a new social/tech protocol comes in: it's not like actually whispering in a room. No protocol might be practical until I can send a pic of myself with the message. Maybe our phones broadcast a pic and a number, received by all within our personal space. Maybe the phones broadcast a relationship description for every phone whose broadcast they're receiving. Maybe the broadcasts are encrypted, viewable by only members of groups (or members of types of groups) who already have the key. Lightweight, transient webs of trust, creating a protocol for electronic whispers.

      What would the most open (unstructured), yet manageable protocol infrastructure be like? Release it into the wild, and let people use it until it's usable.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:antisocial intros? by TonkaTown · · Score: 1

      Picture sending is definitely possible (I've received/sent pics to/from others plenty of times), most Bluetooth phones tend to be higher end devices with cameras anyway, so a picture of the current environment is trivial to send.

      As for social networking, that's already being looked at, the Friend-of-a-Friend project people (social networking based on open format XML/RDF files) are already looking at FoafMobile with Bluetooth being a major component.

  60. doesnt make sense by irabinovitch · · Score: 1

    Seems like it would be hard to mass msging like spammers because of the short range. I guess you could had a "transmitter" in crowded public places, but its no where near as cheap as good old SMTP spam.

  61. new term "bluerage" by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    Bluerage: noun
    Meaning: The act of finding and beating of a person who uses a bluetooth enabled device to send people with bluetooth enabled devices unsolicated messages.
    Other Notes: Due to local regulations, you may only beat the person with your phone. However, if your phone is integrated into a pair of brass knuckles, all the better.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  62. Finally by jptechnical · · Score: 1

    A commercially viable use for bluetooth. Perhaps this is the first truly successful use of bluetooth. However, like all of the other hype surrounding bluetooth it will no doubt be driven totally from a marketing machine.

    The only difference I see between this and all of the other uses for bluetooth is that it didnt start with marketing hype and no usability... just the oposite. Usability that will soon directly benefit the marketing and ads companies.

    Bluetooth may have been more successful if it were developed this way in the first place. Usable concept first, release the hounds second.

    --

    Boredom's not a burden anyone should bear.
  63. Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps they indeed have read Dilbert, but they have also seen a Gateway computer box.

    You don't seem quite as deep as you think you are.

  64. Let me guess... by kneecarrot · · Score: 1
    You are one of these people who gets angry at 45 year old housewives who don't know how to configure Linux.

    Look, as Bluetooth becomes more and more integrated into devices two things will happen:

    1. Non-geeks will use increasingly more Bluetooth enable devices. Do you think they will have any idea what "discoverable" is? Do you think they will want to wade through software menus to turn Bluetooth on and off?

    2. More sophisticated methods will be discovered to take advantage of people who unwittingly leave the Bluetooth window open. This includes spam or viruses and other as-yet undiscovered threats. This means it will become increasingly important to be able to *quickly* and *efficiently* turn off Bluetooth when required (ie. not through some crappy menu).

    --

    I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

    1. Re:Let me guess... by mpe · · Score: 1

      Non-geeks will use increasingly more Bluetooth enable devices. Do you think they will have any idea what "discoverable" is? Do you think they will want to wade through software menus to turn Bluetooth on and off?

      Or have a clue about what half the options do in the first place.

      More sophisticated methods will be discovered to take advantage of people who unwittingly leave the Bluetooth window open. This includes spam or viruses and other as-yet undiscovered threats. This means it will become increasingly important to be able to *quickly* and *efficiently* turn off Bluetooth when required (ie. not through some crappy menu).

      If someone can work out a way to rewrite the firmware they can render a menu option non functional anyway. Problem is even if the user interface actually has an explicit switch you can't be sure that the switch dosn't simply signal a processor of your intentions, as opposed to electrically disconnecting part of the device. Which would also have the handy side effect of increasing battery life.

    2. Re:Let me guess... by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      no, i just know what a switch does. it's explicitly in the manual. this is NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.

  65. So this means... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

    That I can send short text messages from my PC (which has a bluetooth dongle thingy) to my mobile while I'm in meetings close by? For free...

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  66. Bluetooth spam haiku by gosand · · Score: 1
    I doubt there would be spam like we have now on email, the range is simply to short. But I can see supermarkets or similar companys using this to send you messages while in there store. Annoying sure, but at least semi-relevant to what your doing.

    Spam from a bookstore
    "Read a book, gain some knowledge"
    But you walk on by

    Dog doo spelling skills
    Are commonplace on Slashdot
    Generation Duh

    Karma is burning
    It is mine but I don't care
    It has to be said

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Bluetooth spam haiku by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Dog doo spelling skills

      I'm at work but my brain isn't. It's still at home sleeping.

  67. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  68. On slashdot? by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

    Posting this on slashdot doesn't help.. The people who read this already know about (and do) turn bluetooth off on their devices. Any I'm sure that spammers read this as well...

    Posting this here is silly for the same reason that posting detailed instructions of an how to exploit the latest buffer overrun is silly...

    So long, bluetooth!

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  69. range by ragnar · · Score: 1

    Given the range of bluetooth is something like 10 meters, and given the wrath many of use feel about spam, I tend to think this won't catch on. Most spammers like to keep more distance for good reason.

    --
    -- Solaris Central - http://w
    1. Re:range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You walk into a clothing store, suddenly your phone goes off. It says, "Hey Ragnar, how's your day? Check out what I found the other day. Look to your right, see that big red sign? Just below it. You can't beat the price for those loafers! I checked everywhere! AAA++++++++ deals, man."

    2. Re:range by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1
      So you're in the clothing store and you get an advert for clothing being sold in the store. Either the manufacturer is sending you the spam or the store is. Either way, it's pretty easy to track down who's responsible fairly quickly and tell them exactly what you think. Accountability is key.

      With accountability, comes trouble for the spammer. Although there are other examples where accountability would not occur. A store spamming its patrons is not one of those examples.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
  70. Viruses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've also seen reports of phones susceptible to viruses. Now if you have a virus that propagates over Bluetooth, phones would be literally contagious. If someone has a sick phone you'd have to tell them not to get too close to you.

  71. Cha ching Cha ching by onthefenceman · · Score: 1

    I love slashdot stories that point to a site with a page counter - it's like watching the dials go around at the gas pump.

    --
    Have you seen my stapler?
  72. Why keep bluetooth switched on? by jpkunst · · Score: 1

    I turn bluetooth on when I sync my phone with my Mac, and turn it off again when I'm finished. Why would anyone keep bluetooth on all the time?

    JP

    1. Re:Why keep bluetooth switched on? by radja · · Score: 1

      bluetooth headphones.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    2. Re:Why keep bluetooth switched on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never figured this out - you buy headphones to avoid proximity with your Chernobyl-class mobile phone - and then you choose *bluetooth* headphones. Duh. :-)

  73. Re:Bluetooth directional antennas: 2-way gain by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are right and the grand-parent post is wrong. A directional antenna is bidirectional -- it both directs power to toward the distant reciever and amplifies power from a distant transmitter. If this was not true, then cantennas would not work for Wifi because Wifi, like bluetooth, requires bidirectional communications.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  74. brutus the Honeypot by JVert · · Score: 2, Funny

    Meet brutus, he's the bluetooth honeypot. When someone sends a message he doesn't like he pummels everyone within 15 feet.

  75. From Prankster to Spammer ...? by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    It's not clear at present that this is being done by anyone other than pranksters, but one can't help wondering, how long before commercial spammers catch on.

    I wonder how many commercial spammers began their careers as pranksters ...?

    --
    -kgj
  76. Probbly the only time I'll mention this... by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    ...on Slashdot without trolling, but I've definetly seen my friends on a college campus be able to pick up all the Bluetooth phones in a 10-meter sphere around their dorm rooms, and the little bastards have definately send a picture message with the goatse man to anyone and everyone...

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  77. useful by akb · · Score: 1

    I can imagine some useful stuff being exchanged in this way. Let's say you walked into a bar or someother social setting, glance down at your phone and saw the Friendster profiles of everyone there. Instead of wasting time doting after some flashy eye candy who thinks Brittany Spears is deep you could spend your time getting to know someone who's more compatible with you. In more formal situations one might share parts of their professional portfolio.

    The key will probably be metadata about whatever is advertising itself that you can trust. That way you can filter out most things and choose which one's interest you.

  78. It's great fun, this by Bertie · · Score: 1

    Been at it for a while. Some suggestions for good places to attack:

    1) Nightclubs. It's dark, there's hundreds of potential victims on the dancefloor, and there's always somebody faffing with their phone so the likelihood of you getting caught is fairly slim. Plus, if your receiver turns out to be a tasty member of the opposite sex, well, it's an inroad, isn't it?

    2) Gym locker rooms. All those lockers around you with phones safely locked away while their owners are off exercising. Send something appropriately spooky and put the shits up them when they come back. It's unlikely that you'll see their reaction to the message, of course, but the mere prospect of it's amusing enough for me.

    Of course, one drawback is the potential for shops etc. to set up a bluetooth-enabled PC in the window and spam everybody walking past...

  79. Blackjack app for SEMC P800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at sman:
    http://renegade.w3xs.com/droll.htm

    automates sending a "blackjack" vCard to all devices it can find in the area.
    Devices in Bluetooth Security mode 3 will fail, and those in sec mode 2 may require user confirmation before receiving the object.

  80. That would be SO counterproductive... by alispguru · · Score: 1

    Mom and Pop stores by and large live and die on their regular customers. You treat them like gold, and never annoy them.

    Spam annoys 99.999% of the people that receive it, but it "works" because that majority can't retaliate effectively, and they make money off the .001% that respond.

    Advertising that annoys 99.999% of people that receive it would kill a Mom and Pop store, because the annoyed customers would retaliate by taking their business elsewhere.

    Bluejack ads would only work for businesses with no repeat customers, and there are damn few of those.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:That would be SO counterproductive... by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      Why would it annoy? SPAM is annoying because it's for products that you don't want, that you have no interest in. I'd have though popping up a coupon for me for a product that's in the aisle I'm already in would be a GOOD thing.

    2. Re:That would be SO counterproductive... by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      I would go into the store and talk to a manager. I would explain why I was no longer shopping at their store. I would get contact info for the owner, and let them know the same thing.

      I'd most likely call them from a competing store, and let them know the total of my purchase - and how they just missed it.

      I think the worst offenders, and the ones that will be hardest to stop, will be in crowded public places - sporting events, concerts, shopping malls, subway stations...

      Get spam?
      Contact every business possible and let them know why you aren't shopping there, and tell them how much you were going to spend.

      Tackett

    3. Re:That would be SO counterproductive... by mpe · · Score: 1

      SPAM is annoying because it's for products that you don't want, that you have no interest in. I'd have though popping up a coupon for me for a product that's in the aisle I'm already in would be a GOOD thing.

      Just because it's in the same aisle dosn't mean you want it. Phones going off has the potential to annoy other customers, both from the noise and pricing which is dependent on if someone is carrying XYZ type of phone or not.

    4. Re:That would be SO counterproductive... by plover · · Score: 1
      Bluejack ads would only work for businesses with no repeat customers, and there are damn few of those.

      Except at airports. At airports, a new sucker walks by every three seconds or so.

      It has potential ...

      --
      John
  81. removal of testicles? by seibed · · Score: 1

    only if they have blueballs. of course anyone knowing how to do this is likely a geek, and therefore suffering a serious case, so this physical form of 'bluejacking' might be appropriate...

  82. Bluejacking : a growing problem in taxis ... by kobotronic · · Score: 4, Informative

    At least in Copenhagen this phenomenon is quite common. It seems, every other time I get in a taxi I get a bluetooth transmitted business card from the company or sometimes specifically the driver of the taxi. The first time this happened it was a slightly novel new thing I didn't mind much - but now I find myself cursing the people who implemented this standard for not doing it like on Palm where you have to 'accept' the infrared beamed cards. On the Nokia cellphones it's just stored without question so if this practice gets more widespread, soon your address book will be seriously burdened with unwanted business cards. Just finding them will be a big hassle. That's when you switch off bluetooth I guess.

    1. Re:Bluejacking : a growing problem in taxis ... by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Switch to Sony.... my T610 has Bluetooth turned off by default and has the option to hide when turned on. I do not have another phone to play with atm so I cannot swear to it but it has always asked if I want to recieve anything that one of my friends sends to me.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    2. Re:Bluejacking : a growing problem in taxis ... by yelvington · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure what you mean by "On the Nokia cellphones it's just stored without question."

      On my Nokia 3650, Bluetooth is turned off by default, and even when it is on, vcards are NOT inserted into the address book automatically. Incoming objects are saved to a folder, but I have to open the card and explicitly save the data in order to place it in my address book.

    3. Re:Bluejacking : a growing problem in taxis ... by mpe · · Score: 1

      At least in Copenhagen this phenomenon is quite common. It seems, every other time I get in a taxi I get a bluetooth transmitted business card from the company or sometimes specifically the driver of the taxi.

      By the sound of things the device doing this is built into the taxi.

      The first time this happened it was a slightly novel new thing I didn't mind much - but now I find myself cursing the people who implemented this standard for not doing it like on Palm where you have to 'accept' the infrared beamed cards. On the Nokia cellphones it's just stored without question so if this practice gets more widespread, soon your address book will be seriously burdened with unwanted business cards.

      Is the problem with BT or Nokia's interpretation of the BT specs.
      One possible downside of such automatic acceptance is that someone could set up some kind of denial of service "bomb". Which would send out random junk in the appropriate format with the intention of filling up the memory of the phone.

    4. Re:Bluejacking : a growing problem in taxis ... by kobotronic · · Score: 1

      Okay. Mine's a 6310i I use a bluetooth headset and a bluetooth laptop data connection with it. You CAN switch off bluetooth, but when it's on you can't set it to hide or reject incoming transmissions.

  83. range by igotmybfg · · Score: 1

    Range of bluetooth is about 10m. So unless spammer is within that range, can't do anything to/with you via bluetooth.

  84. Could easily be abused... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's to stop an advertising company from installing a little box in Times Square or any other heavy traffic and then selling message time on it? What are you going to do, punch the box?

    1. Re:Could easily be abused... by MKalus · · Score: 4, Funny
      What are you going to do, punch the box?


      I would prefer damaging it so that they have to send someone to repair it, we all then wait for him or her and corner them, after they loose five or six people they'll think twice of sending out a repair crew.

      Yeah! Anarchy! ;)
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    2. Re:Could easily be abused... by akb · · Score: 1

      Nothing. That's why messages from sources you don't know need to be accompanied by verifiable metadata so that you can filter it according to your preferences. Maybe you do want to know if there's a sale at a particular store or if that person across the bar from you is within two Friendster friends of you, but there needs to be a digital signature infrastructure and a friendly user interface for this to happen.

    3. Re:Could easily be abused... by IM6100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doesn't scale well.

      There are 100,000,000 people who will disapprove of what you do. You'll have 10,000 people worldwide, if you're lucky, who even care what your 'message' was.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    4. Re:Could easily be abused... by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      The correct response would be to go to the business in question and confront the owner or secretary with your complaint. Then present them a bill for advertising fees on your device.

      You own it, they should pay for the privilege of using it.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    5. Re:Could easily be abused... by Fudge · · Score: 1

      Umm, let me see now, if there was a box in front of me that was the cause of my spam, would I feel like doing it some damage? Oooh tough one, that.

      This could be a great source of stress relief in fact (thinking of a scene from office space that involves a baseball bat)

  85. Reality check by Xenna · · Score: 1

    I own one of the most popular BT phones (the Sony Ericsson T68i) and I have to explicitly make it discoverable and if I do it's for no more than 3 minutes.

    Theres *no* way to make it permanently discoverable, to my chagrin.

    This BT spam sounds like a very theoretical problem to me.

    X.

    1. Re:Reality check by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      set your bluetooth setting from 'automatic' to 'on' and it will remain discoverable.

    2. Re:Reality check by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Nope, it's already set to on.

      Maybe I have a different software version.

      X.

  86. Where is this gonna end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the world is heading? One day some desperate salesperson could send millions of emails...

  87. Why leave bluetooth switched on? by JohnPM · · Score: 1

    Bluetooth kills the battery life on my mobile phone so I never leave it switched on. It only takes a second to flip it on and off anyway...

    --
    Karma police, I've given all I can, it's not enough, I've given all I can, but we're still on the payroll.
  88. This is the way bluetooth is designed! by danon · · Score: 1

    DUH! Did anyone ever look at the bluetooth "server-client" protocol? This was designed by sales people to operate exactly the opposite than normal server-client schema - just for the use you're describing in the article.

    In normal server-client, the client contacts the server for the requested service (HTTP,SMTP,whatever)- With bluetooth, the server knows there are clients around it, and is allowed to contact them to initialize a service (in this case - sending you a message). This is a protocol-level feature, and today is only stopped (or filtered) at application level.

    Imagine you're surfing the net, and instead of you contacting a web server, web servers are contacting you asking you: "do you want to surf here?" That is how bluetooth was designed to work. It is the ultimative sales tool by design.

  89. Re:Wow. Thrilling by moehoward · · Score: 1

    Hey, dude! Look! They posted the solar flare story!! Now, my life is even LESS boring! Cool!

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
  90. Bluetooth relay by Jainith · · Score: 1

    Just a thought I had while reading this article...

    Why not have a bluetooth relay, sort of like a chain letter except that it doesnt replicate. In other words the person that starts the relay hands it off to the next person, they hand it to the next person, and so forth...

    Just think of all the interesting data you could come up with this way...

    Of course that brings up all the horrible Ideas you could use it for too...

    Well Im off to think about using this for an orineteering meet.

    Jainith

  91. Bluetooth security in general? by po8 · · Score: 1

    So how hard is it to go the next step and actually hijack a Bluetooth phone conversation? This could be huge fun...

  92. Not a problem by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    I've got a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse and this has never`.'=kk7%34

    FROM: MR ABU LAWRENCE
    DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO.
    REPLY TO THIS: (abu_lawrence@rediffmail.com)

    Dear Sir,

    SEEKING YOUR IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE. Please permit me to make your acquaintance in so informal a manner. This is necessitated by my urgent need to reach a dependable and trust wordy foreign partner. This request may seem strange and unsolicited but I will crave your indulgence and pray that you view it seriously. My name is. ABU LAWRENCE of the Democratic Republic of Congo and One of the close aides to the former President of the Democratic Republic of Congo LAURENT KABILA of blessed memory, may his soul rest in peace. Due to the military campaign of LAURENT KABILA to force out the rebels in my country, I and

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  93. A better world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crashing cellphones? Making them useless? I would see that as a public service against yappers on trains, shows, etc.

  94. Look up the word sarcasm, dork. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (NT)

  95. Patent it!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone would just get a process/method patent on this idea, and protect their IP, they could either be millionaires or keep this from happening much in the US. Use our horrible IP patenting system to an advantage.

  96. Orks? by GQuon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've used this feature also to send quick notes to cow-orkers at the office

    Easily identified by their Gateway workstations.


    And their sunlight intolerance. (You know, being orks.)

    "Orker". That spelling is about as strange as "Virii" or "Microsoft".

    On second thought, apparent sunlight intolerance wouldn't make anybody stand out among other nerds.

    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    1. Re:Orks? by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Nah, most of them will have gotten used to a little UV radiation by now.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  97. and Movies by billwie · · Score: 1

    Just spam those idiots with their cellphones to death before the movie starts. They will be so anoyed they will turn them off!

  98. Here's the plan. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    Everyone store a goatse, tubgirl, weightlifter, whatever pic on their phone. You get bluejacked reply with the pic. When someone barfs or throws their phone/whatever you know whos ass to kick.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  99. My Bluetooth hotspot by pmf · · Score: 1

    I have public Bluetooth hotspot on my university. It's a PC with iTec USB Dongle (100 m range) running Debian GNU/Linux, BlueZ stack and my Java utility, which scans for Bluetooth devices and sends them "welcome on our university" note. Additionally it serves LAN/Internet access using PPP over Bluetooth.

  100. ABigHairyDick by The+Mutant · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I'm bored I'll change my iPaq 5450 BlueTooth device identification to ABigHairyDick and then look for phones.

    Great fun when someone's phone beeps, and on the screen they see "Accept connection from ABigHairyDick?"

    Puzzeled frowns usually result although after this article I'm sure to get my smirking ass beat good.

  101. Re:Commercial spammers or advertisers? by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

    If I walked by a business and got spammed, I would make it a point to go into the business, ask to see the manager, and chew him out as loudly as possible.

    Spam works so well because those of us that don't want it can't retaliate publicly, even though we outnumber the morons that respond to it by one hundred to one. Same with telemarketing or fax spamming, for that matter.

    --
    Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  102. Eat some of this, lame troll by scumbucket · · Score: 0, Funny

    Recipe for Taco Mountain Oysters

    With a sharp knife, cut and pull away the skin surrounding each of the testes and remove. Cover in salted water for one hour and drain. Add to pan of salt water, with just enough water to float the teste. Parboil, drain and rinse. Allow testes to cool and cut into chip sized oval slices. Season well.

    Mix one cup of flour, 1/4 cup of corn meal and finely chopped or dried garlic in a bowl. Roll each of the "oysters" into this breaded mixture. Dip each in a cup of red wine or beer and fry immediately in hot oil. (pure hog lard is authentic, peanut oil will do). Add Lousiana hot sauce to brown the oysters and then remove from the pan. Drain of oil on paper towels.

    Serve immediately with chips and beer.

    --
    CMDRTACO CHECK YOUR EMAIL!
  103. Affects new PowerBooks and iBooks also by illumin8 · · Score: 1

    I just got a brand new 15" G4 PowerBook (I love it, but that's another story), and the default setting for any installation of Mac OS X 10.2.7 (Jaguar) or 10.3 (Panther) is Bluetooth turned on and discoverable. Now the new iBooks ship with Bluetooth as well.

    Knowing that most users don't bother to turn off services that are on by default, how long do you think it will be before people start spamming wi-fi hotspots where people are using a lot of computers.

    Knowing that Microsoft tends to follow Apple's lead and most Wintel notebook manufacturers will start bundling Bluetooth with their systems I expect this will soon be a more serious issue.

    Now, combine all of this information and predict that some innovative hacker will discover a buffer overrun exploit in the MS Bluetooth stack (of course there are probably several, it's MS after all) and now you have a new and innovative method of infection for the next Windows worm of the day...

    Either that, or some really annoying Popups similar to the Windows messenger popup style ads you see today.

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  104. A Self-Fullfilling Question by stankulp · · Score: 1

    It's not clear at present that this is being done by anyone other than pranksters, but one can't help wondering, how long before commercial spammers catch on."

    I think they just did.

    --
    We must be alert to the danger that public policy could become captive to a scientific-technological elite. - Eisenhower
  105. Tctually, it is a feature by xploraiswakco · · Score: 1

    This is similar to one of Bluetooths intended features. I recall something about being able to work down a street or through a Mall, and get a bluetooth message about what special are happening in each store as you pass. Although the idea of having someone drive a car all day sending bluetooth messages, sounds interesting, thats where I would start calling the feature spam.

  106. Simple solution... by rune.w · · Score: 1

    Just switch Bluetooth off! Right now it doesn't have too many uses apart from getting data to and from personal devices. So whenever you're in the street/tube/bus/etc turn it off. Just don't forget to turn it on whenever you need it :)

    R.
  107. First the receiver must accept by codename_par · · Score: 1

    I sometimes search for bluetooth devices and chat for fun, but the first time i want to comunicate with someone the other person must allow me to add it's device to my device list. After that i can freely send all the messages, sounds, or images i want. (Tested with NOKIA a SONY ERICSSON)

  108. Re:Bluetooth directional antennas: 2-way gain by crapulent · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I believe this is called the "reciprocity principle" or something. If you design something that has a particular RF radiation pattern (i.e. Tx) then it will have a corresponding absorbtion pattern (Rx).

  109. invisible by AchmedHabib · · Score: 1

    My Nokia has a function where to select visibility where you can choose "visible" or "hidden". mine is always on hidden, and my paired devices still can connect.

  110. If you know how to do this... by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    When I look at my phone and grin after you've sent a message, come over and say hello -- you're probably more interesting than anyone else in the area :)

    (As for unwanted use, I've mapped the Bluetooth control panel to my right function key -- I can enable and disable in two clicks, if you spam me, it's easy fixed. Anyway, I can always detect your device and retaliate.)

  111. At least you know that the spammer is near by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you can smack'em!

  112. Fashon by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Wifi/Bluetooth etc are going to be the next trends, with phones being more like PDAs there will be all sorts of things like file sharing on the street and people sitting on the tube in silence chatting to the stranger 3 seats down by text. All those dating/friendship things that beep when someone with similar interests walks past will actually take off because it will only be a software download away, and gangs of geeks will go around DoSing shops that spam passers by, gaming has just started to take off with the nokia thing and that will get much bigger and, then there'll be the standard media hype and Microsoft will do something stupid that allows some worm to spread or for anyone to accesses private data on certain phones or pedophiles will use it and then suddenly more media hype and people turning bluetooth off and so stupid trends continue.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  113. Compulsory gripe at spammers by tcas · · Score: 1


    "It's not clear at present that this is being done by anyone other than pranksters, but one can't help wondering, how long before commercial spammers catch on."

    Okay, so spam annoys us all, but is it really relevant to scaremonger about commercial spamming in this context, given

    1. the limited range of Bluetooth, and
    2. the fact that Bluetooth can be easily disabled?

    I presume the writer imagined some situation where a commercial spammer goes into some crowded place, searches for Bluetooth phones and uses some automated Bluetooth send device. I think the simple requirement for a person (or device) to be in the vicinity of the 'spammed' makes that very unlikely.

  114. Spammers Catching On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..."but one can't help wondering, how long before commercial spammers catch on."

    Thanks alot buddy!

  115. From the BluejackQ site by GreenKiwi · · Score: 1

    Massive increase in visitors to bluejackQ
    What a day! By the second week, bluejackQ was averaging around 500 page views a day. I thought I was doing well in the third week when we saw 8,000 page views, but today the traffic increased to well over 115,000 page views!


    I wonder why the hits went up? A post to slashdot?