Yes. IOW if your complaint about Python is how indentation works it broadcasts to the world that you have no legitimate complaints but your co-workers definitely have some valid ones about you.
You must have reading comprehension in issues. That definition states that cash is coins and bills like a dime and 100 dollar bill, and NOT checks, IOUs, or contractual agreements to pay etc. So IOW all cash transactions involve cash. Who'd a thunk it!?
They can ban them any time they want, they just can't outlaw the dissemination of the information telling how to do it (legally) and if they pass such a law that law would be invalid / illegal.
Did you really just say building diagrams don't express anything? They literally express how to build shit. That is foolish on its face to say. Have you ever been to an abstract art exhibit? Trust me, if you think building diagrams don't express anything don't go. You'll lose your friggin mind trying to understand how that *is* protected speech but this isn't. Of course that is because it clearly and unquestionably is protected.
Actually it isn't a second amendment issue at all. It is only a first amendment issue. They can't have access to lawyers and not know this, but they are hoping for the all too popular "The Constitution says this, but really means something completely different" style of "interpretive ruling." In other words they know what they are doing should have zero chance of succeeding, but also has a decent chance anyway.
No, we have an entrenched swollen beaten disease ridden orange clown cock sucking problem, you swollen beaten disease ridden orange clown cock sucking fucking fascist fucking loser. Get the fuck out of our country; you aren't welcome here.
Show how not building a wall is the same as unrestricted free-for-all access to all and you are a genius... but you can't, because you and your "arguments" are dog shit stupid.
Excellent job showing that you mastered the language of statistics while simultaneously understanding neither the subject matter nor how statistics might or might not be able to shed some light on the subject.
You clearly have no experience with or understanding of the law. Victim statements are considered prior to sentencing so they already have a say, and the law is applied radically differently and sometimes not at all.... Or haven't you noticed fuckface von clownstick breaking laws left and right with impunity as he rapes and pillages the USA?
That is a complete strawman. Nobody is "locking up http" or anything of the sort. They are merely accurately indicating that http connections are not secure connections.
What an absurd comment. Whomever created the browser has 100% access to everything, including your account logins and passwords, both http and https. Google gains no additional advantage.
I can totally see why this issue needs a constitutional amendment. I, like all US citizens, far prefer ads that do not pertain to me. Nothing upsets me more than seeing an advertisement for something I might actually want.
It isn't FUD regardless of the facts. This is basically a thread full of people who have no idea what FUD means. Why don't you dotards stick to "fake" news and "alternative facts" and stop trying to hijack terms you don't understand.
You also wouldn't see them anyway. What do you think Instagram does? Do you think they slip images in to your slashdot session when you aren't looking?
Slashdot Mirror
Yes. IOW if your complaint about Python is how indentation works it broadcasts to the world that you have no legitimate complaints but your co-workers definitely have some valid ones about you.
The fact that you think the government would only know if Google told them would be quaint if we were somewhere you belong rather than on Slashdot.
You must have reading comprehension in issues. That definition states that cash is coins and bills like a dime and 100 dollar bill, and NOT checks, IOUs, or contractual agreements to pay etc. So IOW all cash transactions involve cash. Who'd a thunk it!?
They can ban them any time they want, they just can't outlaw the dissemination of the information telling how to do it (legally) and if they pass such a law that law would be invalid / illegal.
Did you really just say building diagrams don't express anything? They literally express how to build shit. That is foolish on its face to say. Have you ever been to an abstract art exhibit? Trust me, if you think building diagrams don't express anything don't go. You'll lose your friggin mind trying to understand how that *is* protected speech but this isn't. Of course that is because it clearly and unquestionably is protected.
Yep, and just as DeCSS had T-Shirts that proved the point, PGP did too.
Actually it isn't a second amendment issue at all. It is only a first amendment issue. They can't have access to lawyers and not know this, but they are hoping for the all too popular "The Constitution says this, but really means something completely different" style of "interpretive ruling." In other words they know what they are doing should have zero chance of succeeding, but also has a decent chance anyway.
No, we have an entrenched swollen beaten disease ridden orange clown cock sucking problem, you swollen beaten disease ridden orange clown cock sucking fucking fascist fucking loser. Get the fuck out of our country; you aren't welcome here.
Yeah ... Because I desperately need dog shit stupid dumbfucks as friends you trying fucking retard.
Show how not building a wall is the same as unrestricted free-for-all access to all and you are a genius ... but you can't, because you and your "arguments" are dog shit stupid.
You are comparing Apples and Teslas. There is much greater danger with DIY activities involving potential Automated Death Machines.
Excellent job showing that you mastered the language of statistics while simultaneously understanding neither the subject matter nor how statistics might or might not be able to shed some light on the subject.
That is not correct. You aren't educated enough to comment obviously.
You clearly have no experience with or understanding of the law. Victim statements are considered prior to sentencing so they already have a say, and the law is applied radically differently and sometimes not at all. ... Or haven't you noticed fuckface von clownstick breaking laws left and right with impunity as he rapes and pillages the USA?
You were thrust upon yourself? You poor bastard!
That is a complete strawman. Nobody is "locking up http" or anything of the sort. They are merely accurately indicating that http connections are not secure connections.
I hate when my age is hijacked!
Google has been doing what you are so afraid of for well over a decade and the sky hasn't come crashing down. Your fear is irrational.
What an absurd comment. Whomever created the browser has 100% access to everything, including your account logins and passwords, both http and https. Google gains no additional advantage.
I can totally see why this issue needs a constitutional amendment. I, like all US citizens, far prefer ads that do not pertain to me. Nothing upsets me more than seeing an advertisement for something I might actually want.
You are a fucking idiot, as usual.
It isn't FUD regardless of the facts. This is basically a thread full of people who have no idea what FUD means. Why don't you dotards stick to "fake" news and "alternative facts" and stop trying to hijack terms you don't understand.
Why not? You seemed to think it was fine when you were talking about your dingleberry fetish.
No shit Sherlock
You also wouldn't see them anyway. What do you think Instagram does? Do you think they slip images in to your slashdot session when you aren't looking?