I disagree with what you see as a "problem." I'm perfectly capable of securing my access points, but I choose not to, because I'm quite happy to share my signal with everyone who wants it.
Too much can be lost in a dub. Especially for your usual voice actor fare (For example, Kitsune's english voice of Love Hina fame. Southern drawl is *not* the same as osaka-ben). It was well worth the investment in a, albeit cursory, japanese language education to understand the intonation and emotion in the original voices...with the subtitles as a guideline for meaning.
There are good voices and bad voices. But generally, american dubs see bad voices.
It's seeped its way into common use in the americas, as a general-purpose word, meaning anything so outlandish it can't be believable.
The south american lunar christ cultists have recently been dissolved (forcibly) by the argentine government, (see news relating to that), I'm sure they're satisfied that their diety will live on for awhile in popular language.
The primary lunacris cultist belief was that upon death, a man will rise to the heavens and join the lord in the Sea of tranquility.
From what I know of the cult, they were most popular in their founding country of Argentina, but they are still quite popular and active in Chile and Ecuador, with inactive members in some of the other South American countries.
I use Linkification for firefox. I think that the author of this "linkification" software should be put in jail because it just automatically hyperlinked the clear text you wrote, providing a means by which I can subvert intellectual property that I may not have previously had.
You misunderstood (or I may have misstated my intended meaning), I intended to mean that, the copyright holder, is free to relicense their software.
i.e.: If I am sole copyright holder over X software, I can release it under License G for versions, 1 and 3, but version 2 is licensed under license F and version 4 is licensed under license Q.
If you copy verbatim the "include in your source" portion of the GPLv2, you'll find that it reads:
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
Many authors do copy verbatim this portion, and place their trust in the FSF that future licenses will not be bad things. Of course, it is the copyright holders' discretion to relicense subsequent versions.
News News (n=uz), n From New; cf. F. nounelles. News is plural in form, but is commonly used with a singular verb.
1. A report of recent occurrences; information of something that has lately taken place, or of something before unknown; fresh tidings; recent intelligence.
I hate to tell you, but not getting laid doesn't qualify as "news" for 90% of us here. But thanks for reminding us, jerk.
Slashdot Mirror
Without seeing a draft of the new GPL, how can they speculate?
And once drafted, the FSF will most certainly be accepting feedback from the community.
I disagree with what you see as a "problem." I'm perfectly capable of securing my access points, but I choose not to, because I'm quite happy to share my signal with everyone who wants it.
Antennas used for transmission in that range by unlicensed users are required to be FCC approved and meet a specific criteria.
Licensed users are a different story.
In any case, possessing a device that you're not allowed to use isn't a crime. Although using it may be.
Shoot 'im (or 'er).
not to pick nits or anything, but how does a dumb tech ever say reinstall?
Two heads are better than one.
"please distribute it to your friends without any modification."
# Freeware
Sounds non-free to me, since its missing 50% of the essential freedoms of free software.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html
If you're referring to http://www.crimsoneditor.com/, GNU is not an appropriate word to describe it.
Maybe "non-free" would be better. The non-free Crimson Editor.
If you're not referring to that, please give us a link.
What's more dangerous about google's projects hosted at sf.net and *every other* project hosted there?
Pay attention, They're hosted on sf.net for now.
http://code.google.com/projects.html
Too much can be lost in a dub. Especially for your usual voice actor fare (For example, Kitsune's english voice of Love Hina fame. Southern drawl is *not* the same as osaka-ben). It was well worth the investment in a, albeit cursory, japanese language education to understand the intonation and emotion in the original voices...with the subtitles as a guideline for meaning.
There are good voices and bad voices. But generally, american dubs see bad voices.
page 1 of the article.
... not very nice.
The link in the post goes to page two for me
I'm happy to let IBM put its shit in our community wheelbarrow. More shit for everyone can only be good.
That's the spanish word for the lunar christ...
It's seeped its way into common use in the americas, as a general-purpose word, meaning anything so outlandish it can't be believable.
The south american lunar christ cultists have recently been dissolved (forcibly) by the argentine government, (see news relating to that), I'm sure they're satisfied that their diety will live on for awhile in popular language.
The primary lunacris cultist belief was that upon death, a man will rise to the heavens and join the lord in the Sea of tranquility.
From what I know of the cult, they were most popular in their founding country of Argentina, but they are still quite popular and active in Chile and Ecuador, with inactive members in some of the other South American countries.
I don't know how many times I've told those boys...never call chicks broads.
Victor Frankenstein. Who else?
FWIW, the OP said "Don't shoot me"
I use Linkification for firefox. I think that the author of this "linkification" software should be put in jail because it just automatically hyperlinked the clear text you wrote, providing a means by which I can subvert intellectual property that I may not have previously had.
I think you've misunderstood; Darwin is alive and well...it's BSD that's dead.
or M-x unmorse-region in emacs
If anything, Linux prevents AIDS by causing all you nerds to abstain from having sexual relations.
Safe sex is in the palm of your hand.
You misunderstood (or I may have misstated my intended meaning), I intended to mean that, the copyright holder, is free to relicense their software.
i.e.: If I am sole copyright holder over X software, I can release it under License G for versions, 1 and 3, but version 2 is licensed under license F and version 4 is licensed under license Q.
Many authors do copy verbatim this portion, and place their trust in the FSF that future licenses will not be bad things. Of course, it is the copyright holders' discretion to relicense subsequent versions.
That's why Origin invented MMORPGs...
I hate to tell you, but not getting laid doesn't qualify as "news" for 90% of us here. But thanks for reminding us, jerk.