FYI, you screwed up and responded with your wrong account, this conversation was started with your macs4all account, not TheFakeTimCook. I know, it is hard to keep all these shill accounts you run straight, after all, Apple must be defended against all criticism of their awful choices. Keep up the good fight, I'm sure Apple will be #1 any day now.
NSA is a bunch of lamers, having built such an espionage infrastructure and having a near zero exhaust from it is beyond simply something shameful and embarassing.
Funny, last time I checked, the NSA doesn't do press releases over everything they get from their Top Secret programs...
Why do our mighty Russian hackers rely on pathetic phishing scams instead of putting in hardware backdoors by intercepting new hardware in the mail?
Because people in the US rarely buy hardware made in Russia? How would they gain access to the hardware to put in the backdoors?
Why can't they park a TEMPEST van a few miles away and read the passwords from the keyboard?
You simply asking that question indicates your complete lack of knowledge of what TEMPEST is and how it works. No, those signals are far too weak to travel miles, they might travel 20 feet or so, but not miles. TEMPEST is reading the signals that unintentionally leak from computers in the keyboard/mouse cables, and the video signaling (van Eck phreaking), and in vibrations being generated by things such as the keyboard as you type.
This report is related to the DNC leaks which alleged the presence of RATs, etc. being found after an investigation caused by the emails being leaked to Wikileaks. Podesta was phished in a completely separate incident.
Actually, the report details both hacks. Take a look at the diagrams, they show APT28 using a spear phishing email to get into "Recipient"'s email.
In fairness, Obama and the CIA were smack in the middle of the Ukraine situation and is what initiated the Russian response. The same is also true for Syria.
In fairness, only Russian propoganda tries to claim what you stated as fact. The whole rest of the world sees the claim that the CIA was behind anything in Ukraine as the paranoid ravings of crazy people.
If you look at Dog-Cow's comment, there is a Parent link at the bottom of it. This button will highlight the post to which he was replying, and let you know that this is the comment he believes caused the AC to diserve such wonderful treatment.
Because you have a brain the size of a pea.
Do you live in some backwater redneck county that doesn't provide basic science education?
1. It is very unlikely that NK has the gunpowder to fire those artillery, as gunpowder becomes useless due to humidity after a time, and it has been a long time since the war. 2. They know if they use those artillery, they will be instantly crushed by the US and China.
The link above is from captures from the new Star Wars movie where Leia was CGIed into the part. My guess is AC was being sarcastic about the use of CGI to put a living actor into a younger-self role.
Seriously? Is it really that simple to knock a city's entire cellular phone system? Don't tell ISIS... Of course, it is not. Reminds one of the "phones on the planes" scare-mongering — for decades we were supposed to believe, a cell-phone could "interfere" with the plane's electronics...
Yeah, maybe we should fear ISIS learning about ECM...
Yes, if you broadcast in the right frequencies, it is entirely possible to interfere with a wireless signal. Do you not know how wireless stuff works? This is the entire reason that the FCC exists, to regulate wireless frequencies.
Actually, you have it wrong, as I said upthread to another of your statements like this. Marriage as a religeous ceremony comes from the Roman Catholic ceremony that was named martre in Latin (likely butchered by/., but it is in the above link). You are very confused about the origins of marriage, and provide no citations. Considering that your claim about it dating back to 5k BCE, can be demonstrated false just from the etymology of the word.
Personally, I still don't know why polygamy is outlawed. In polygamys relationships, all people conscent to the relationship. Both women have to agree to the marriage (or both men...), so what reason does the state have to outlaw it?
I ask this as a Catholic, I am not Morman, and wouldn't want multiple wives myself, but it is something that always has bothered me. Also, how are anti polygamy laws not unconstitutional via the first amendment's freedom of religion?
Except for the fact that Marriage predates the civil ceremony. Marriage is a religeous ceremony that the government felt it needed to have some control over and so cooped it. It is still a religeous ceremony, and a civil contract/license. I am not sure what it would mean to marry a robot. Would you be giving the robot the authority to make medical decisions on your behalf? Would you be entitling the robot to inhereting your properties? Why would a robot need property? Why would there be a tax benefit for marriage to a robot? Can a robot earn its own income? Can a robot even conscent to the marriage?
Big important detail missing from this story, robots are inherently non sentient. An android is a sentient robot.
I learned while going through a divorce, all the papers you sign between the two of you mean 0 to a judge. We had a divorce decree (drawn up by a lawyer and signed by both of us) which set out specific things, but when it came to the divorce, it was treated just as a peice of paper. Luckily, the changes weren't too drastic, and I still ended up with the kids, but our agreement meant nothing once the courts were involved.
Make sure you talk to that lawyer about how binding that prenup, or other paperwork really is.
Slashdot Mirror
The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
Amarr is missspelled, dropping the extra i might allow you to fit the d dropped from the end. Otherwise, a very funny sig.
https://slashdot.org/~butzwonk...
It is a bug, not sure why his name shows as blank, but he has a name.
Homosexual connectors? Wouldn't a more appropriate comparison be to doggy style and missionary?
Except when it is a video game you are running a dedicated server for and the programmers never considered that in their server search algorithm?
-1 troll, I don't agree with your assessment!
That's why you twats have the biggest cunt of an incoming president since fuck-knows-who.
No...Hillary lost... /joke
My guess is "rest of the world".
Iraq had WMDs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
How is the truth fake news? There were WMD found in Iraq, just not nuclear WMD.
FYI, you screwed up and responded with your wrong account, this conversation was started with your macs4all account, not TheFakeTimCook. I know, it is hard to keep all these shill accounts you run straight, after all, Apple must be defended against all criticism of their awful choices. Keep up the good fight, I'm sure Apple will be #1 any day now.
NSA is a bunch of lamers, having built such an espionage infrastructure and having a near zero exhaust from it is beyond simply something shameful and embarassing.
Funny, last time I checked, the NSA doesn't do press releases over everything they get from their Top Secret programs...
Why do our mighty Russian hackers rely on pathetic phishing scams instead of putting in hardware backdoors by intercepting new hardware in the mail?
Because people in the US rarely buy hardware made in Russia? How would they gain access to the hardware to put in the backdoors?
Why can't they park a TEMPEST van a few miles away and read the passwords from the keyboard?
You simply asking that question indicates your complete lack of knowledge of what TEMPEST is and how it works. No, those signals are far too weak to travel miles, they might travel 20 feet or so, but not miles. TEMPEST is reading the signals that unintentionally leak from computers in the keyboard/mouse cables, and the video signaling (van Eck phreaking), and in vibrations being generated by things such as the keyboard as you type.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
This report is related to the DNC leaks which alleged the presence of RATs, etc. being found after an investigation caused by the emails being leaked to Wikileaks. Podesta was phished in a completely separate incident.
Actually, the report details both hacks. Take a look at the diagrams, they show APT28 using a spear phishing email to get into "Recipient"'s email.
https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/...
The second diagram in the report is what is talking about the spear phishing email.
As far as I recall, there was a passing reference in the movie to the 1:4:9 ratio.
However, that gravitational anaomaly was in tycho crater on the moon.
Are you calling Putin a liar?
https://www.google.com/search?...
He has come out and admitted that they invaded Crimea to force a favorable vote so they could seize the territory of anouther country.
In fairness, Obama and the CIA were smack in the middle of the Ukraine situation and is what initiated the Russian response. The same is also true for Syria.
In fairness, only Russian propoganda tries to claim what you stated as fact. The whole rest of the world sees the claim that the CIA was behind anything in Ukraine as the paranoid ravings of crazy people.
If you look at Dog-Cow's comment, there is a Parent link at the bottom of it. This button will highlight the post to which he was replying, and let you know that this is the comment he believes caused the AC to diserve such wonderful treatment.
Because you have a brain the size of a pea.
Do you live in some backwater redneck county that doesn't provide basic science education?
Go put on your Tinfoil hat.
Can we mount it onto the front of a train to get it to 88 MPH?
1. It is very unlikely that NK has the gunpowder to fire those artillery, as gunpowder becomes useless due to humidity after a time, and it has been a long time since the war.
2. They know if they use those artillery, they will be instantly crushed by the US and China.
The link above is from captures from the new Star Wars movie where Leia was CGIed into the part. My guess is AC was being sarcastic about the use of CGI to put a living actor into a younger-self role.
Seriously? Is it really that simple to knock a city's entire cellular phone system? Don't tell ISIS... Of course, it is not. Reminds one of the "phones on the planes" scare-mongering — for decades we were supposed to believe, a cell-phone could "interfere" with the plane's electronics...
Yeah, maybe we should fear ISIS learning about ECM...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Yes, if you broadcast in the right frequencies, it is entirely possible to interfere with a wireless signal. Do you not know how wireless stuff works? This is the entire reason that the FCC exists, to regulate wireless frequencies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Actually, you have it wrong, as I said upthread to another of your statements like this. Marriage as a religeous ceremony comes from the Roman Catholic ceremony that was named martre in Latin (likely butchered by /., but it is in the above link). You are very confused about the origins of marriage, and provide no citations. Considering that your claim about it dating back to 5k BCE, can be demonstrated false just from the etymology of the word.
Personally, I still don't know why polygamy is outlawed. In polygamys relationships, all people conscent to the relationship. Both women have to agree to the marriage (or both men...), so what reason does the state have to outlaw it?
I ask this as a Catholic, I am not Morman, and wouldn't want multiple wives myself, but it is something that always has bothered me. Also, how are anti polygamy laws not unconstitutional via the first amendment's freedom of religion?
Except for the fact that Marriage predates the civil ceremony. Marriage is a religeous ceremony that the government felt it needed to have some control over and so cooped it. It is still a religeous ceremony, and a civil contract/license. I am not sure what it would mean to marry a robot. Would you be giving the robot the authority to make medical decisions on your behalf? Would you be entitling the robot to inhereting your properties? Why would a robot need property? Why would there be a tax benefit for marriage to a robot? Can a robot earn its own income? Can a robot even conscent to the marriage?
Big important detail missing from this story, robots are inherently non sentient. An android is a sentient robot.
Be careful, you might break AmiMoJo.
I learned while going through a divorce, all the papers you sign between the two of you mean 0 to a judge. We had a divorce decree (drawn up by a lawyer and signed by both of us) which set out specific things, but when it came to the divorce, it was treated just as a peice of paper. Luckily, the changes weren't too drastic, and I still ended up with the kids, but our agreement meant nothing once the courts were involved.
Make sure you talk to that lawyer about how binding that prenup, or other paperwork really is.