Cloud services need to avoid any type of actions that create the illusion that they may be responsible for what users do. As long as they never have any editing of any uses of their product they will probably not be held liable by the courts. In a way it is like the truck driver that opens the trailer door and sees what he is delivering. As long as he does not know what is in the trailer the law will not charge him with transporting illegal or stolen items. Intent and knowledge are locked together. Don't look, don't see and don't know.
A huge waste of money by a fool filing an absurd law suit. Hell, conservative republicans scare the living hell out of me. Can I sue those idiots just for existing?
I had a position that may have involved technology that was a little sensitive for several years. At one point a disgruntled employee burglarized the personnel files and spread information around about various people. As it turned out the investigation of employees went back quite a few years and some of the compiled information had to be garnered from neighbors long since passed away. I know that postal employees are sometimes asked about people on their route but apparently at least in some cases there are very large sums of data that go back for several decades kept and available. I can only imagine our government having the time or interest to do such a search of people's backgrounds. I have never had even a misdemeanor and can not fathom why such files were kept on me. I was not in the military at any time. Apparently some employers must feed the government information about their employees or perhaps even their customers.
As I had nothing in particular to hide I found the incident upsetting but not to the degree that I sought to file suit against the firm involved. But I'm not so sure how free people are when the government can compile information to that degree upon its citizens. I am also assuming it was the government that did the leg work. It is quite possible that other entities do the compilations. In some areas the police kept or keep "yellow sheets". They do it indirectly through a benevolent fund or some other straw man so that they can deny in court that they have such information. Often when a crime takes place they seem to know exactly where to go to snag the culprits. They also really do know about certain machinists that would have special abilities useful in committing certain crimes such as machining a weapon from scratch or the ability to cut through safes due to work in armaments. These days certain areas of electronics might draw a great deal of governmental attention.
The most serious of torture cases involve placing prisoners in the hands of other nations where the most radical tortures and deaths are applied with great frequency. We urgently need laws that forbid our government from transferring prisoners to other nations.
For those that think it doesn't matter we already allow corporations to run prisons in the US and it isn't much of a reach to think that they might export a burgler from Brooklyn to Egypt for fun and games knowing that that convict will surely perish in custody.
Considering the proximity of several very busy airports there has to be an awful lot of trust in allowing drones in the area. Miami International Airport among others is right in the center of Miami. We could get a huge oops type of event and it is so hard getting those bodies out of the Everglades.
One of the great conflicts we may see soon is the closing of traditional school buildings as electronic, at home education becomes the norm. That sets family against family in that those families in which the father and mother or single parent homes have no way to keep their kids doing their school work on computers. Yet homes with a stay at home parent as well as people who do not have children have no reason to support physical school properties. With modern electronics we can be certain that the child attends his online courses and that a truant officer soon arrives if the kid cuts classes. We can also make certain that the right student is answering the test questions.
Those employees who work at home can also be watched as well as offices where the business owner is frequently on the road. Drug sniffing technology can also track down illegal drug users or those that simply live in homes where illegal drugs are used. Employers may well get rid of people who have drug traces in their homes or molecules of drugs on their clothing. All in all it will simply keep people honest.
Now we need a chip that can take any given problem and divide it into one thousand parts so we can feed it into these processors. -Gives me a headache!
Hungary has great experience with censorship. First trained by the Nazis in goose stepping and book burnings they then got similar training from Joe Stalin's friends who moved right in to help them suppress freedom. Is this some sort of divine justice about to strike again?
A man is about to die and the only surgeon available who is dead on his feet does a rescue surgery. We would not have it any other way. Conversely a greedy butcher who takes on way to many patients and works insane hours kills a healthy man on the table during minor surgery. This is an area that leads into that zone of immense hazard concerning judgement of motives. Although it needs doing opening that door to evaluation of motives really will create some really awful judgements and punishments.
I believe a refusal to take a test is equivalent to a plea of guilty in Florida. I don't know if that only relates to drunk driving penalties or whether that extends into convictions for hit and run or traffic homicide while drunk driving. But at the very least it is expensive already for a DUI conviction and insurance companies get a great shot at a drunk driver's wallet for years to follow.
The truth has a force and direction of its own. It is not Wiki Leaks task to be concerned about the path that information takes nor the consequences of exposures. Almost all information will do harm to some and good to others and the effects can be very,very indirect.
Now if I can just get a copyright on prayer. Think of the income from the Lord's Prayer alone. Why should corporations be limited in their right to beat down the public and take every cent from their pockets?
Some emotional disorders can cause lapses in concentration in which complex questions are solved and easy questions answered incorrectly. I would think that any accusation or action in regard to cheating best have one heck of a strong proof or the lawyers will have a feeding frenzy.
Although we elect people and they in turn appoint people we are the ones who pay. Therefore we must be able to see the work being done. I also do not want liars representing me or my country.
Suppose for example that a conservative, hawk type of candidate runs for president and he barks endlessly about beefing up the military at great expense. Without knowing the actual abilities of our military how do I decide if he represents my interests. It makes a vote a joke. It also creates a condition where the state becomes the master having privileges that a person does not. For example they can study me endlessly and in great depth but I am not allowed to study them in any meaningful way. That really sets up a master and slave relationship between the citizen and the government. What kind of military do I want. I want one strong enough to have no secrets and able to slap the snot out of any combination of nations such that they can do nothing about it even knowing when and where we will strike.
The normal and usual tool of the right wing is lies. If it is conservative it is lying. We now have proof that Bush stole his election. The computer programmer who wrote the code that altered the ballot count has testified that he wrote the code and exactly who paid him to do it.
Then there is the trickle down economy lie created by Reagen. Obviously that magical theory of economics was absurd and hatched by lunatics. Now we have right wing congressmen who are trying to revive that nonsense. We even have right wingers who want tax breaks for the rich under the absurd supposition that the rich will somehow create jobs in America if they have more money. Think about that for just a moment. If you were wealthy and wanted a big return on investment why on Earth would you invest it in the US? Why not buy a factory in China and earn some real money like everyone else or perhaps a factory in Mexico where labor is cheap? After all if you want to build yachts wouldn't it be better to pay $10. per day to a highly skilled worker in Mexico than pay $250. per day to a skilled worker in the US? And they'll let you pollute and make a mess of everything with a few bribes here and there.
If it is right wing it is lying and if you don't stomp them out they will bite you or steal the food off of your table.
Sometimes the poorest of the poor lead the way. Adoption of efficient lighting methods reminds me of the tendency of slum dwellers to recycle every item almost endlessly. One pair of pants may be used by three kids growing up. No beer can is safe in the trash from the poor scavenging for aluminum. Folks who are better off lack motivation.
In my area a car AC has to work hard almost all year. A 30 second shutdown would be enough to turn the driver and passengers into a very wet ball of sweat.
There is more than one freedom bouncing around in the Bill of Rights. Freedom of association is exactly the same idea as freedom not to associate. Think about it. Were the founders so stark raving insane as to compel all people to associate all of the time? In other words freedom not to associate is part of your freedom and mine as well. Then it follows that some will say that we must associate unless certain exceptions are in play such as hiring people or choice of who we marry. That also will trash freedom as it opens you to examination of motives and inquiry by law enforcement and civil courts. For example a black woman with bleached blond hair fails to get a job and files a complaint. Was it her age, her skin color or bleached hair that caused her to be rejected? Maybe it was due to her blue eyes as refusing to hire people because of eye color is legal. Maybe you wanted to hire a man or a transvestite. Should law enforcement or any court have the right to interrogate you and pass judgement upon your motives? I think not.
I had a wretched mother in law who was an alcoholic, a red head, Jewish and the most rude woman I have ever known. I hated everything about her. If a person reminds me of her for any reason I wouldn't hire them as it just creeps me out to be around them. How could I ever offer proof that it is not religion, age, sex or whatever but her rude attitude that causes me to reject anyone that reminds me of her?
No expense or effort must be spared in burying the truth. The truth must be obscured under all conditions. There is nothing worse than truth bursting out. Freedom of suppression, the right to suppress the truth, must reign supreme.
I now live in terror that Google may one day post my underwear for the world to see. i don't see how that poor woman can stay alive after people have seen her under garments. Oh the terror, the horror!
Really the best thing that could ever happen to that prude is running into a real sexual pervert who gives her a very long and complete experience.
In Florida where the real monsters play the huge accounts are posted by South Americans. They are by far the greatest ethnic group that open accounts in the hundreds of millions or billions of dollars. And no, they are not all drug lords. Many are land barons who have held huge estates ever since Spanish colonial days. That may well mean they are even more vile and evil than the drug lords.
Believe it or not young women just out of high school seek jobs in banks so that they can study the holdings of potential fools and get next to and marry them. These young women actually have long running plans on harpooning and harvesting a whale.
Slashdot Mirror
Cloud services need to avoid any type of actions that create the illusion that they may be responsible for what users do. As long as they never have any editing of any uses of their product they will probably not be held liable by the courts. In a way it is like the truck driver that opens the trailer door and sees what he is delivering. As long as he does not know what is in the trailer the law will not charge him with transporting illegal or stolen items. Intent and knowledge are locked together. Don't look, don't see and don't know.
A huge waste of money by a fool filing an absurd law suit. Hell, conservative republicans scare the living hell out of me. Can I sue those idiots just for existing?
I had a position that may have involved technology that was a little sensitive for several years. At one point a disgruntled employee burglarized the personnel files and spread information around about various people. As it turned out the investigation of employees went back quite a few years and some of the compiled information had to be garnered from neighbors long since passed away. I know that postal employees are sometimes asked about people on their route but apparently at least in some cases there are very large sums of data that go back for several decades kept and available. I can only imagine our government having the time or interest to do such a search of people's backgrounds. I have never had even a misdemeanor and can not fathom why such files were kept on me. I was not in the military at any time. Apparently some employers must feed the government information about their employees or perhaps even their customers.
As I had nothing in particular to hide I found the incident upsetting but not to the degree that I sought to file suit against the firm involved. But I'm not so sure how free people are when the government can compile information to that degree upon its citizens. I am also assuming it was the government that did the leg work. It is quite possible that other entities do the compilations. In some areas the police kept or keep "yellow sheets". They do it indirectly through a benevolent fund or some other straw man so that they can deny in court that they have such information. Often when a crime takes place they seem to know exactly where to go to snag the culprits. They also really do know about certain machinists that would have special abilities useful in committing certain crimes such as machining a weapon from scratch or the ability to cut through safes due to work in armaments. These days certain areas of electronics might draw a great deal of governmental attention.
The most serious of torture cases involve placing prisoners in the hands of other nations where the most radical tortures and deaths are applied with great frequency. We urgently need laws that forbid our government from transferring prisoners to other nations.
For those that think it doesn't matter we already allow corporations to run prisons in the US and it isn't much of a reach to think that they might export a burgler from Brooklyn to Egypt for fun and games knowing that that convict will surely perish in custody.
Sometimes freedom is little more than an illusion deliberately foisted off on those who can't measure the cage in which they operate.
Any wagers as to whether fish are in that lake and what they might look like?
Dolphins do deserve a more vigorous protection even though they will never be any good at playing the piano.
Considering the proximity of several very busy airports there has to be an awful lot of trust in allowing drones in the area. Miami International Airport among others is right in the center of Miami. We could get a huge oops type of event and it is so hard getting those bodies out of the Everglades.
One of the great conflicts we may see soon is the closing of traditional school buildings as electronic, at home education becomes the norm. That sets family against family in that those families in which the father and mother or single parent homes have no way to keep their kids doing their school work on computers. Yet homes with a stay at home parent as well as people who do not have children have no reason to support physical school properties. With modern electronics we can be certain that the child attends his online courses and that a truant officer soon arrives if the kid cuts classes. We can also make certain that the right student is answering the test questions.
Those employees who work at home can also be watched as well as offices where the business owner is frequently on the road. Drug sniffing technology can also track down illegal drug users or those that simply live in homes where illegal drugs are used. Employers may well get rid of people who have drug traces in their homes or molecules of drugs on their clothing. All in all it will simply keep people honest.
Now we need a chip that can take any given problem and divide it into one thousand parts so we can feed it into these processors. -Gives me a headache!
Hungary has great experience with censorship. First trained by the Nazis in goose stepping and book burnings they then got similar training from Joe Stalin's friends who moved right in to help them suppress freedom. Is this some sort of divine justice about to strike again?
A man is about to die and the only surgeon available who is dead on his feet does a rescue surgery. We would not have it any other way. Conversely a greedy butcher who takes on way to many patients and works insane hours kills a healthy man on the table during minor surgery. This is an area that leads into that zone of immense hazard concerning judgement of motives. Although it needs doing opening that door to evaluation of motives really will create some really awful judgements and punishments.
I believe a refusal to take a test is equivalent to a plea of guilty in Florida. I don't know if that only relates to drunk driving penalties or whether that extends into convictions for hit and run or traffic homicide while drunk driving. But at the very least it is expensive already for a DUI conviction and insurance companies get a great shot at a drunk driver's wallet for years to follow.
I wish I could express my opinion of Chinese law and government but it would be pornographic. Besides I don't want that stuff on my shoe.
The truth has a force and direction of its own. It is not Wiki Leaks task to be concerned about the path that information takes nor the consequences of exposures. Almost all information will do harm to some and good to others and the effects can be very,very indirect.
Now if I can just get a copyright on prayer. Think of the income from the Lord's Prayer alone. Why should corporations be limited in their right to beat down the public and take every cent from their pockets?
Some emotional disorders can cause lapses in concentration in which complex questions are solved and easy questions answered incorrectly. I would think that any accusation or action in regard to cheating best have one heck of a strong proof or the lawyers will have a feeding frenzy.
Although we elect people and they in turn appoint people we are the ones who pay. Therefore we must be able to see the work being done. I also do not want liars representing me or my country.
Suppose for example that a conservative, hawk type of candidate runs for president and he barks endlessly about beefing up the military at great expense. Without knowing the actual abilities of our military how do I decide if he represents my interests. It makes a vote a joke. It also creates a condition where the state becomes the master having privileges that a person does not. For example they can study me endlessly and in great depth but I am not allowed to study them in any meaningful way. That really sets up a master and slave relationship between the citizen and the government. What kind of military do I want. I want one strong enough to have no secrets and able to slap the snot out of any combination of nations such that they can do nothing about it even knowing when and where we will strike.
The normal and usual tool of the right wing is lies. If it is conservative it is lying. We now have proof that Bush stole his election. The computer programmer who wrote the code that altered the ballot count has testified that he wrote the code and exactly who paid him to do it.
Then there is the trickle down economy lie created by Reagen. Obviously that magical theory of economics was absurd and hatched by lunatics. Now we have right wing congressmen who are trying to revive that nonsense. We even have right wingers who want tax breaks for the rich under the absurd supposition that the rich will somehow create jobs in America if they have more money. Think about that for just a moment. If you were wealthy and wanted a big return on investment why on Earth would you invest it in the US? Why not buy a factory in China and earn some real money like everyone else or perhaps a factory in Mexico where labor is cheap? After all if you want to build yachts wouldn't it be better to pay $10. per day to a highly skilled worker in Mexico than pay $250. per day to a skilled worker in the US? And they'll let you pollute and make a mess of everything with a few bribes here and there.
If it is right wing it is lying and if you don't stomp them out they will bite you or steal the food off of your table.
Sometimes the poorest of the poor lead the way. Adoption of efficient lighting methods reminds me of the tendency of slum dwellers to recycle every item almost endlessly. One pair of pants may be used by three kids growing up. No beer can is safe in the trash from the poor scavenging for aluminum. Folks who are better off lack motivation.
In my area a car AC has to work hard almost all year. A 30 second shutdown would be enough to turn the driver and passengers into a very wet ball of sweat.
There is more than one freedom bouncing around in the Bill of Rights. Freedom of association is exactly the same idea as freedom not to associate. Think about it. Were the founders so stark raving insane as to compel all people to associate all of the time? In other words freedom not to associate is part of your freedom and mine as well. Then it follows that some will say that we must associate unless certain exceptions are in play such as hiring people or choice of who we marry. That also will trash freedom as it opens you to examination of motives and inquiry by law enforcement and civil courts. For example a black woman with bleached blond hair fails to get a job and files a complaint. Was it her age, her skin color or bleached hair that caused her to be rejected? Maybe it was due to her blue eyes as refusing to hire people because of eye color is legal. Maybe you wanted to hire a man or a transvestite. Should law enforcement or any court have the right to interrogate you and pass judgement upon your motives? I think not.
I had a wretched mother in law who was an alcoholic, a red head, Jewish and the most rude woman I have ever known. I hated everything about her. If a person reminds me of her for any reason I wouldn't hire them as it just creeps me out to be around them. How could I ever offer proof that it is not religion, age, sex or whatever but her rude attitude that causes me to reject anyone that reminds me of her?
No expense or effort must be spared in burying the truth. The truth must be obscured under all conditions. There is nothing worse than truth bursting out. Freedom of suppression, the right to suppress the truth, must reign supreme.
I now live in terror that Google may one day post my underwear for the world to see. i don't see how that poor woman can stay alive after people have seen her under garments. Oh the terror, the horror!
Really the best thing that could ever happen to that prude is running into a real sexual pervert who gives her a very long and complete experience.
In Florida where the real monsters play the huge accounts are posted by South Americans. They are by far the greatest ethnic group that open accounts in the hundreds of millions or billions of dollars. And no, they are not all drug lords. Many are land barons who have held huge estates ever since Spanish colonial days. That may well mean they are even more vile and evil than the drug lords.
Believe it or not young women just out of high school seek jobs in banks so that they can study the holdings of potential fools and get next to and marry them. These young women actually have long running plans on harpooning and harvesting a whale.