I agree. And yet i disagree, a lot. Because as you try to repair, you run into 3 issues: Can you reach the part without removing items, can you find readable documentation for the part(i.e manual) and can you physically poke all the connectors with a voltmeter? The general answer is that you can move your hands half a meter from the battery, and nothing is now accessible by hand. Which means if connectors are not exposed at doors or hinges, you can't diagnose them. Nor is cables mentioned anywhere.
Oil filter and fluids is generally easy to access. Clutch oil? Not so much. Might not be mentioned in manual either. Fuses and tires are easy to change, so long you don't need to calibrate sensors. Lights? Assuming you can reach them, its possible. Bonus point for socket type not being mentioned in manual, so you need to remove them before entering store to buy replacements. Interior lights are harder, because they often have hinges that are hard to spot or pry. Relays are a nightmare to replace if they are not exposed, or if you don't know enough about electronics to poke the right ends with a voltmeter to find it. Springs and suspensions requires special tools and clamp to change safely. Coating frame underside is cheap. Having a way to elevate and have it elevated safely, so you don't need a gas mask while lying on the back: Not so cheap. Engine isn't so bad, but you need a tool to lift it. And you need to know how to connect it with everything, and possibly adjust all valves. Gasoline filter? It might not be exposed at all. Air filter tends to be exposed, and getting a new coal filter is like a dream for the first few hours driving.
This time, a lot of the horrid technical features is fixed. Which still leaves us with a few essential problems: 1. Most VR game stuff is designed for high end desktops. There isn't a lot of those, meaning its a small marked 2. There is a platform/controller/store split 3. The upgrades to controllers or input methods will cause fragmentation, and its possible that we are stuck with the current control set(but with more buttons) Now, if this will be like the 144hz monitor/TV projector marked, or if it will reach mainstream marked penetration remains to be seen.
No, because it just leads to paying to solve the problem, instead of staffing to solve the problem. Its essentially a hierarchy where problems are not solved unless they are mandatory avoided by law, or people do proper cost benefit analyze or similar things to avoid problems. If 50% increase in workload is just a 100% wage increase, nobody will object to that because nobody will do a cost benefit analyze. Or compare workload to workforce. Or the company has many layers, so management of crunch time department can't actually hire more people, leading to becoming a economic and social issue down the road: Which may or may not get solved.
This is a issue that is very similar to what happens when nations and industries industrialize: First off you solve problems by tossing more labor at it, because labor is is the unit of the management. But as machines wages and output becomes quantities from technology, it might no longer be possible to staff 20 people to operate a machine that outputs the work of 30 people. As society adjusts to this problem, the use of the labor force change from everyone farming the land, to industrial use of the labor. This again introduced a change as heavier industrial usage of machines and processes changes raw material industry, leading to more output. At some points, you have things like Oil Rigs, where slight accidents or improper training leads to complete production halts. So unlike a lot of traditional industries, you can't waive away the cost benefit analyze of securing your operations. But there is a catch: If nobody is reviewing and doing the cost benefit analyze, nobody will find out that there is hours or weeks of lost production due reasons. In terms of science, large studies are limited to nations current labor laws, unless its pilot projects to do new groundbreaking research.
Health and safety laws has lead to various companies and employees discovering that mandatory measures reduce rate of accidents, and increase productivity. But most companies will not do proper research, and follow current regulations. In the IT industry, crunch time is something that is happening because its legal. The moment its outlawed, projects will be failed to be delivered and companies will go bankrupt. But at the same time, the more modest software houses that have proper staff and management will be fine and ahead of the curve.
? Things that move on tracks, accelerate and stop with far better behavior. A electric street car basically move like a high end electric car, where it can change speed in really elegant and powerful ways. The same with elegant stops. And a greater loading space versus how much padding the exterior adds.
These are on top of things like priority in right of way. Or being simpler mechanism means cheaper unit cost. Basically: This isn't about cars per intersection anon, but people per intersection instead. Where working public transport means people can use bikes/trams/street cars or trains to go somewhere, and they will because its actually possible. So instead of 200 cars per minute it could be 3 buses, which means there is more space for everything else.
Another issue is that even if you make chips and semiconductors, thats still different from high end production using state of the art technology. I.E Brazil has been trying to get a internal industry for electronics for quite some time now, mostly by tariffs instead of long term economic plans. End result is that things like watches, electronic toll, cameras is being made in Brazil for Brazilian marked. So there is many low end silicon on chip products, being made and not exported. And the situation is similar in other parts of the world. If you go looking, you will find a place that makes SoC stuff for things like Autopass, various automation, and anything that isn't high end and is economically important. It might be located in small areas, alongside reasonable logistic routes.
As this is a insensitive issue, the truth is far simpler. For something to be inside the genepool, and have its own "genetic disease", it needs to be passed along. So once paired with the right combination, it triggers, and you have a surfaced gene disease. So there is MDM, and there is carrier MDM. The person you are replying is failing to bring along this component to the discussion, and is the core reason his argument is flawed.
Because he fails to address carrier MDM, where the carrier only can pass it on: He can't argue for what this do the genetic pool. And because he can't argue for the impact his talk of sterilization or sustainable treatable damage caused by MDM becoming a common treatable disease in infancy. His argument also indirectly talks about access to medical care, and the technology needed to treat MDM. Or the costs by making treatment common without addressing the hereditary concerns.
Okay, so i don't know a lot about this tech. But since email is email, how exactly is this going to work? You are essentially sending a formatted text file, so how will you actually do this? The mail is no longer on your server once you send it. So that leaves the mandatory questions from people like me who doesn't know: Gmail only? Bully Mozilla/Microsoft into complying? A forgotten standard feature used to create destructive emails? And again, the same with >The feature also prevents recipients from forwarding, copying, printing or downloading its content To view content, you need to download it, otherwise you can't access it. Are we talking about gimping Gmail, or simply posting links to content ala dropbox or a online image hoster service? The same with forwarding, copy, etc. HOW?
You do. However, with no perspective or language, there can be no fundamental understanding of WHY those words you put to use leads to anything. Basically, you have acquired a skill. This skill is supported by a technologically marvel where certain machines are certain uses, and some of them are unique. And your skill is not something that is trained for by default: What is trained for by default in educational institutions is skills that might trough years of experience lead to your skill. And since the claim is that its hard to replace you, it means your nearest colleagues are not doing similar things to you, not learning your skillset. Not having your "unique" background. And the steps towards your workstation might involve lost or dead technology.
So if they want to replace you, they need to look into several years of lost productivity, for all they touch. This do give you a short term bargaining power, where you can't be replaced without a hefty price. However, if you can't replace the worker, the system that fuels the worker can be replaced in half a decade. Or: The company starts a career path where they end up with more similar workstations to yours, so they can partially hire people and train younger people. This is expensive and long term, so its not a short term bargaining option, but it works quite fine.
But this also causes another problem: Since companies are segmented and large, HR of the local department can fire people. But the same department can't make long term goals to replace lonely wolves of high skill workers, because it can't control how the company evolves organically. Meaning HR will quickly lack the tools needed to fix long term strategic problems. And thats true even for smaller companies. So once you go far enough, you can quickly create a flawed analogy: If there is a lose cog: Replace it. If that can't be done, ignore it and hope it goes away. But unlike with machines, you can't weld on another segment to remove the flaw that caused the loose cog. And in many cases its impossible to weld for the simple reason that you hire from external sources: Rivals, immigrants, or educational institutes. Or the parent company is in the situation where they got a contract from another company to do something, so they have no way of acquire or expanding their expert level of knowledge.
But it does make a lot of sense. The entire obstacle of Netflix or Amazon is that people need to invest into a streaming device, a audio/video setup, find out about Netflix/Amazon, and then sign a subscription. From what I remember in Scandinavia, as Netflix penetrated the marked, it was of big importance to have shows that already went on TV, and also have access to popular shows that where hard to find on DVD at the local consumer electrical retailer. So there was some 90s Disney cartoon series, X-Files, Star Gate, and a lot more on Netflix. And they needed those shows to get people to sign up. And once they had signed on, watched a few, gotten comfortable with the platform, they would keep on going and watch more stuff.
What anon AHuxley is saying, is that you need something to sell the entry subscription. For India that would historically have been a gaudy dance drama action series. A "Bollywood Drama". Once Indian audience enter the inside of Netflix, they might watch westerns, some cinema movies, tv series, but they want more of the stuff they think they want. So they don't want to watch poor shows like Iron Fist, when their native TV stuff is better at that genre.
350 vs 220? Its not a big difference, but you also need to consider that all the valves and seals needs to withstand the tank. And the extra seals needed to secure hydrogen properly, because its so low on the atomic scale that it leaks really really badly if you just store it in anything resembling normal containers and high pressure tanks. But this is do able. And its not a issue.
>The US is the only place in the world NOT making a major push this direction... Russia, Norway, China and Japan isn't making a push for hydrogen either. Nor is Japan, or anywhere. The problem with Hydrogen is that: 1. Nobody has invested into the baseline tech properly, so its still not production ready. Hydrogen is at the EV car stage, without a Tesla to get it somewhere 2. You need somewhere to tank it, and that by itself is not a challenge, but it requires infrastructure outside of the worst urban hellholes. 3. Once you start drive longer distances, you need to refuel to keep up the Bars to stop it from leaking. Which is not a limitation, but it means if you leave your city, you need to refuel before you can leave your car inactive for a week or two.
>I don't know about you, but in the area I live, housing expenses have gone through the roof. Activists fight rent increases tooth and nail, so property owners have zero reason to provide charging facilities.... ? Why are you making a issue about what is essentially using a power socket over night? There is no such thing as "a charging facility" unless you plan to do a quick charge.
>There also have the rise of what are called super-commuters... 100 mile one way drives to and from work Only 2 hour drive each way? Really? Tesla can do that just fine. Other under designed city only cars can't really. And thats the simple reality.
CEO is capitvated by the laws of the free marked. If he wants to chase tomorrow and perish by not planning, he is free to do so. The problem arrives when the rest of the marked is not paying attention: CEO's can ride around companies in a pure stasis draft
But you are also describing the problem indirectly, by saying >The CEO is a captive to the consumer's preference. >Consumers generally do not reward those who try to manufacture domestically You are basically saying that >The CEO can not plan ahead to make a manufacture advantage by purchasing and expanding what is already a part of their supply chain What is even more troubling is that you could describe what outsourcing do long term, in a vacuum, but you don't, to make a rather cheap talk point. Outsourcing is a long and tedious process, where in the long term the company loses its ability to maintain its IP. At first, you get fewer places to start the entry level recruitment for the firm Then It turns out nobody knows how to make these things And then it turns out that if you don't control the factory, you are basically on the factories good graces to even support your venture. And as time goes on, you no longer have anybody who can build patents or IP, because the industrial basis to train these people do not exist.
The simple fact that this has already happened, for low end chips. Sure, if you want some fancy x86 thing, a server chip, or a computer chip you are going to need to license a expensive design. But for everything else that is used? If your local manufacture plants also make computer chips, you could get anything for small electronics. Anything for anything that doesn't require a real OS: So your idea is basically true for all embedded systems, which is still quoted at "98% of microprocessors". Currently any medium size enterprise can basically get any known expired design, and do a test run, and then use it. And it happens.
But by this revealing statement, the next puzzle arrive: Will the trends thats true for the embedded systems ever be true for things like workstation CPUs?
Or is it? The current scenario is one where content hosts is colluding with possibly IP owners, instead of forcing everyone to walk the talk and go to court. Then again, legman law is basically crippled by poor understanding of law, and how harmless going to court is(assuming signed papers can be produced, and a rough outline of laws can be gathered)
But the reason we are here in this topic, is because Norway used to have mandatory conscription screening, which did produce a lot of statistics about its population.
In the age group of 18, there is roughly 70.000 each year. Since conscription is unisex these days, even if its a 2/3 male/female split. So 17.000 of those gets called in for all the tests: Physical, aptitude, perception, mental ability. So the sad part is that we don't test the other 53.000. And another thing is that statistics will skew as the total amount of boys tested will go down. But since this is a national endeavor, the statistical skew will affect the more populated areas a lot more than any rural region, and Norway has a lot of rural regions. So past that, Norway wants about 9000 conscripts, conscripting what it can.
And there is a lot surrounding this. Screen has been gradually reduced, alongside smaller number of conscripts. In 2012, Civil Service was removed. This used to apply to people with the aptitude, but with clashing moral reasons to serve the army. In the early 2000s, a change was made to stop doing the interview screening process with the local police, and instead went for a online form. Somewhere in the 1990s, the amount of conscript was reduced, but not the extensive screening process. This is what happens when Soviet Russia collapses into something lesser. 1977, women where allowed to enter all parts of the army, assuming they passed physical screening. This is also a topic where its hard to google for information, since very few newspaper articles will publish the line of historical events.
No, he is talking about the systematic extermination of a language by the passive means of not using it. The same is true of TV, Media and Internet. Schools is just a far more proactive way of doing it, since you encounter kids at a young enough age to properly get them native in their second language. This isn't a problem of a moral dilemma, its more a fact that the communities might be large enough to support their language for internal use, but the proactive means of forced language in school kills it in a few generations. If you ask a educated Frenchman about this, he might give you a lot of history on this topic, since they are now speaking Parisian.
So basically, Amazon is technically liable for every product thats gets sold, that has fake certification. Like anything involving electronics that has CE or FCC label. The keyword here is "technically", because you would still need all things to line up to go to court.
If you where a smeltery, and you where actually doing what you where doing on a large scale? Historically, you find a place to build a hydro plant, build the smelting plant next door, add a convenient travel route from a nearby living area, or even build a village. You then use the competitive price of electricity to leverage reduced cost , and then abuse the logistical advantages of running a electrical powered smelting plant from a hydro plant. Essentially bottled waterfall power. And if you wanted to go further, you need to think about what is happening: You are using a versatile resource to be competitive in enriching a resource, enchanting it, for increased surplus and competitive edge. And increased production cap, which is important. To take your enterprise to the next step, you would also need a enterprise that would transform the en richened material into something useful in the same area, to leverage the surplus of the already existing infrastructure, and further strengthen the possibility of a inland artificial village having enough of a community to make it something more than a place for people to work.
Rationing will deal with current shortages. And its the only way to deal with the long term psychological problems that causes shortages: Because otherwise you could end up with a social class that will ignore the shortages because they can pay for the embargoed mafiapriced water. In some cases it can be the entire of society.
But only policy changes to infrastructure, and what happens around the waterways will impact future shortages. Desalination, what is happening around the rivers that supply the water, groundwater, etc.
You would think, but that is also a very narrow view, especially after actually visiting Tallinn. Train is not as important as light rail(actual rail, and busses with power wires on top), combined with flexible bus routes.
A quick summary would read something like: As a former communist nation, Estonia has a spread out infrastructure, with a lot of smaller towns surrounding Tallinn, and a lot of space between the populated areas and the industrial areas. A Soviet war insurance one could call it, but not centralizing the population centers, but rather rely in infrastructure for the expansions. This results in that even in a expanding city as Tallinn, there is a lot of space left to expand upon, and a lot of existing infrastructure that already is capable of some massive expansions. The entire point of the free public infrastructure is for "borgers", or "Citizens" or "Headhunted foreign IT workers". Which means the company can acquire a space that do not need a lot of parking, and settle the workers around the cities tram lines. Which means that even with massive expansion, there is not a insane housing inflation, and Tallinn can freely expand, and even have entire enclaves of Scandinavs, Balts, Finns and Icelanders who want to experience a new world of IT, working abroad, for a few years. And they would move there, because quality of living combined with wages and housing cost is competitive with hellholes like Oslo or Stockholm, even more so with free city wide transportation.
And it has another great benefit: You now have a massive infrastructure that can also be used for tourism. You go to Estonian, and basically pay a symbolic sum free usage of all transportation inside of Tallinn. It was amazing, even if you needed a phone app to avoid dealing with the horrible maps at each station. And this has been tested since 2013, so either they want to puff up other areas of Estonian for off shoring, or they realized the costs are worth it for the convenience & commerce it brings its citizens.
The entire point of GDPR is that if somebody visits your site And you sell that information You just sold a visitors information, against their rights. So if you want to be safe, do not allow external sites to mine your users. And thats pretty simple. Except that you might want a marked tool, like Google analytics, to get a performance idea of your site, essentially violating the GDPR by feeding google data, and google will live off that data in some way shape or form.
Which mean the question then turns into: How will the actual implementation of the GDPR affect a site owner? Because its currently a draft law, that will be 100% rewritten for actual states to have their version. So the question remains: Will GDPR make google analytics illegal, or not?
I would guess that permanent nuclear flight leave you with issues related to internal part heat. And a large enough airplane to have a large enough crew to support a 24 hours of operation, in at the least 3-6 shifts a day. On top of maintenance in the air, for what is possible.
On top of either building megaplane to make the reactor crash proven, or risking a spill each time you land. I assume canceled for pragmatic reasons: Simply no need for megairplane, yet
But it do have a answer. If you know Chinese Law, you might know, to drive such a boat, with such a carge(more than X tons), you might require a special license, and that license requires some age to even certify for it. I think the answer is "Older than 26" or something. But there is further value in there: If used properly, you can study and see how kids react in panic, since very few will know or guess anywhere correctly. Its also a question of reading: Do you understand that only some facts are irrelevant, or do you flabbergast into math?
The defunding is also not a easy issue. Defunding is never done in a linear manner. It usually starts off with the upper class realizing that they can pay to skip the queue, and then slowly try to influence their local positions about this. The problem only appears as you have the media, a political party, and a few voters, straggling alongside party politics. Slowly, the private offering will increase in quality, slowly it will penetrate the part of society willing to pay. In most Nordic countries, everyone who can bother, can pay for private insurance to cover this, meaning its not a issue of money, but more a issue of social class(and their way of managing money). The interesting part, is that since the class of people paying for the part is loop sided, the feedback is loop sided.
So, running this experiement live, in Norway, since the The Grand Adventure of Oil started: The Politicians kids are now adults, from those times. As a weird upperclass crust, they most likely grew up with the extra protection the upper class is willing to invest into. From higher sport participation, more activities as kids, to more networking, to better public morale, and simply to having better health insurance. So what is happening, is that those kids are now becoming politicians, and since the parties are basically aristocratic dynasties in many ways, the pile of class have a impact. And thats before you consider that the upper class has rather normal ways of networking: Newspapers and social circles. What is interesting, is how this ends up being portrayed. Currently, local doctors are the more stressed parts of the public sector, is basically crying wolf. Because of the state media, their cry get heard. But because of rather harsh populism and tabloid culture, there is no digging into WHY they are crying wolf, and how it has been adapted into their workforce since at the least the war. So basically: The local doctors(needed to get access to the rest of the public health sector) Are in this situation where they are understaffed, because they need to do somebody elses job. This much is obvious, but beyond that, why they needed somebody else to do their job is not researched, or why we live in a era of extra paperwork. Still, this feeds into the feed back loop causing the issue: So if the public sector is getting worse(a little), regardless of the issue, it will result in it getting further slashes down the road, because the aristocrats influencing the political cabal do not care about its ability in the long term.
The political situation in other nations with universal health care is similar: Not the same, but in broad strokes, the pattern is there. And it really doesn't have anything to do with the base quality.
Remember, if its something smart, the implementation must be stupid. So all it has to do, is to poke at it. So if it broadcasts to you, you already got a signal to sample. So if you can tell the connection limit of that, by the wireless signal standard, you can basically guess the max speed, since its far lower than what the cabled broadband in the back of the shop actually is.
Slashdot Mirror
I agree.
And yet i disagree, a lot.
Because as you try to repair, you run into 3 issues:
Can you reach the part without removing items, can you find readable documentation for the part(i.e manual) and can you physically poke all the connectors with a voltmeter?
The general answer is that you can move your hands half a meter from the battery, and nothing is now accessible by hand. Which means if connectors are not exposed at doors or hinges, you can't diagnose them. Nor is cables mentioned anywhere.
Oil filter and fluids is generally easy to access. Clutch oil? Not so much. Might not be mentioned in manual either.
Fuses and tires are easy to change, so long you don't need to calibrate sensors.
Lights? Assuming you can reach them, its possible. Bonus point for socket type not being mentioned in manual, so you need to remove them before entering store to buy replacements. Interior lights are harder, because they often have hinges that are hard to spot or pry.
Relays are a nightmare to replace if they are not exposed, or if you don't know enough about electronics to poke the right ends with a voltmeter to find it.
Springs and suspensions requires special tools and clamp to change safely.
Coating frame underside is cheap. Having a way to elevate and have it elevated safely, so you don't need a gas mask while lying on the back: Not so cheap.
Engine isn't so bad, but you need a tool to lift it. And you need to know how to connect it with everything, and possibly adjust all valves.
Gasoline filter? It might not be exposed at all.
Air filter tends to be exposed, and getting a new coal filter is like a dream for the first few hours driving.
Seeing as VR has caught on this time? Its good.
This time, a lot of the horrid technical features is fixed. Which still leaves us with a few essential problems:
1. Most VR game stuff is designed for high end desktops. There isn't a lot of those, meaning its a small marked
2. There is a platform/controller/store split
3. The upgrades to controllers or input methods will cause fragmentation, and its possible that we are stuck with the current control set(but with more buttons)
Now, if this will be like the 144hz monitor/TV projector marked, or if it will reach mainstream marked penetration remains to be seen.
No, because it just leads to paying to solve the problem, instead of staffing to solve the problem.
Its essentially a hierarchy where problems are not solved unless they are mandatory avoided by law, or people do proper cost benefit analyze or similar things to avoid problems.
If 50% increase in workload is just a 100% wage increase, nobody will object to that because nobody will do a cost benefit analyze. Or compare workload to workforce. Or the company has many layers, so management of crunch time department can't actually hire more people, leading to becoming a economic and social issue down the road: Which may or may not get solved.
This is a issue that is very similar to what happens when nations and industries industrialize: First off you solve problems by tossing more labor at it, because labor is is the unit of the management. But as machines wages and output becomes quantities from technology, it might no longer be possible to staff 20 people to operate a machine that outputs the work of 30 people.
As society adjusts to this problem, the use of the labor force change from everyone farming the land, to industrial use of the labor. This again introduced a change as heavier industrial usage of machines and processes changes raw material industry, leading to more output.
At some points, you have things like Oil Rigs, where slight accidents or improper training leads to complete production halts. So unlike a lot of traditional industries, you can't waive away the cost benefit analyze of securing your operations. But there is a catch: If nobody is reviewing and doing the cost benefit analyze, nobody will find out that there is hours or weeks of lost production due reasons.
In terms of science, large studies are limited to nations current labor laws, unless its pilot projects to do new groundbreaking research.
Health and safety laws has lead to various companies and employees discovering that mandatory measures reduce rate of accidents, and increase productivity. But most companies will not do proper research, and follow current regulations.
In the IT industry, crunch time is something that is happening because its legal. The moment its outlawed, projects will be failed to be delivered and companies will go bankrupt. But at the same time, the more modest software houses that have proper staff and management will be fine and ahead of the curve.
?
Things that move on tracks, accelerate and stop with far better behavior. A electric street car basically move like a high end electric car, where it can change speed in really elegant and powerful ways. The same with elegant stops. And a greater loading space versus how much padding the exterior adds.
These are on top of things like priority in right of way. Or being simpler mechanism means cheaper unit cost.
Basically: This isn't about cars per intersection anon, but people per intersection instead. Where working public transport means people can use bikes/trams/street cars or trains to go somewhere, and they will because its actually possible. So instead of 200 cars per minute it could be 3 buses, which means there is more space for everything else.
Another issue is that even if you make chips and semiconductors, thats still different from high end production using state of the art technology.
I.E Brazil has been trying to get a internal industry for electronics for quite some time now, mostly by tariffs instead of long term economic plans. End result is that things like watches, electronic toll, cameras is being made in Brazil for Brazilian marked. So there is many low end silicon on chip products, being made and not exported. And the situation is similar in other parts of the world.
If you go looking, you will find a place that makes SoC stuff for things like Autopass, various automation, and anything that isn't high end and is economically important. It might be located in small areas, alongside reasonable logistic routes.
As this is a insensitive issue, the truth is far simpler.
For something to be inside the genepool, and have its own "genetic disease", it needs to be passed along. So once paired with the right combination, it triggers, and you have a surfaced gene disease. So there is MDM, and there is carrier MDM.
The person you are replying is failing to bring along this component to the discussion, and is the core reason his argument is flawed.
Because he fails to address carrier MDM, where the carrier only can pass it on: He can't argue for what this do the genetic pool.
And because he can't argue for the impact his talk of sterilization or sustainable treatable damage caused by MDM becoming a common treatable disease in infancy.
His argument also indirectly talks about access to medical care, and the technology needed to treat MDM. Or the costs by making treatment common without addressing the hereditary concerns.
Okay, so i don't know a lot about this tech. But since email is email, how exactly is this going to work?
You are essentially sending a formatted text file, so how will you actually do this? The mail is no longer on your server once you send it.
So that leaves the mandatory questions from people like me who doesn't know: Gmail only? Bully Mozilla/Microsoft into complying? A forgotten standard feature used to create destructive emails?
And again, the same with
>The feature also prevents recipients from forwarding, copying, printing or downloading its content
To view content, you need to download it, otherwise you can't access it. Are we talking about gimping Gmail, or simply posting links to content ala dropbox or a online image hoster service?
The same with forwarding, copy, etc.
HOW?
You do.
However, with no perspective or language, there can be no fundamental understanding of WHY those words you put to use leads to anything.
Basically, you have acquired a skill. This skill is supported by a technologically marvel where certain machines are certain uses, and some of them are unique. And your skill is not something that is trained for by default: What is trained for by default in educational institutions is skills that might trough years of experience lead to your skill.
And since the claim is that its hard to replace you, it means your nearest colleagues are not doing similar things to you, not learning your skillset. Not having your "unique" background. And the steps towards your workstation might involve lost or dead technology.
So if they want to replace you, they need to look into several years of lost productivity, for all they touch. This do give you a short term bargaining power, where you can't be replaced without a hefty price.
However, if you can't replace the worker, the system that fuels the worker can be replaced in half a decade.
Or: The company starts a career path where they end up with more similar workstations to yours, so they can partially hire people and train younger people. This is expensive and long term, so its not a short term bargaining option, but it works quite fine.
But this also causes another problem: Since companies are segmented and large, HR of the local department can fire people. But the same department can't make long term goals to replace lonely wolves of high skill workers, because it can't control how the company evolves organically.
Meaning HR will quickly lack the tools needed to fix long term strategic problems. And thats true even for smaller companies.
So once you go far enough, you can quickly create a flawed analogy:
If there is a lose cog: Replace it. If that can't be done, ignore it and hope it goes away. But unlike with machines, you can't weld on another segment to remove the flaw that caused the loose cog. And in many cases its impossible to weld for the simple reason that you hire from external sources: Rivals, immigrants, or educational institutes. Or the parent company is in the situation where they got a contract from another company to do something, so they have no way of acquire or expanding their expert level of knowledge.
But it does make a lot of sense.
The entire obstacle of Netflix or Amazon is that people need to invest into a streaming device, a audio/video setup, find out about Netflix/Amazon, and then sign a subscription.
From what I remember in Scandinavia, as Netflix penetrated the marked, it was of big importance to have shows that already went on TV, and also have access to popular shows that where hard to find on DVD at the local consumer electrical retailer. So there was some 90s Disney cartoon series, X-Files, Star Gate, and a lot more on Netflix. And they needed those shows to get people to sign up. And once they had signed on, watched a few, gotten comfortable with the platform, they would keep on going and watch more stuff.
What anon AHuxley is saying, is that you need something to sell the entry subscription. For India that would historically have been a gaudy dance drama action series. A "Bollywood Drama".
Once Indian audience enter the inside of Netflix, they might watch westerns, some cinema movies, tv series, but they want more of the stuff they think they want. So they don't want to watch poor shows like Iron Fist, when their native TV stuff is better at that genre.
You can't reach Armageddon unless you actually prepared to deal with the local hurricane seasons
Or deal with the logistical flaws of your local area
350 vs 220? Its not a big difference, but you also need to consider that all the valves and seals needs to withstand the tank.
And the extra seals needed to secure hydrogen properly, because its so low on the atomic scale that it leaks really really badly if you just store it in anything resembling normal containers and high pressure tanks.
But this is do able. And its not a issue.
>The US is the only place in the world NOT making a major push this direction...
Russia, Norway, China and Japan isn't making a push for hydrogen either. Nor is Japan, or anywhere.
The problem with Hydrogen is that:
1. Nobody has invested into the baseline tech properly, so its still not production ready. Hydrogen is at the EV car stage, without a Tesla to get it somewhere
2. You need somewhere to tank it, and that by itself is not a challenge, but it requires infrastructure outside of the worst urban hellholes.
3. Once you start drive longer distances, you need to refuel to keep up the Bars to stop it from leaking. Which is not a limitation, but it means if you leave your city, you need to refuel before you can leave your car inactive for a week or two.
>I don't know about you, but in the area I live, housing expenses have gone through the roof. Activists fight rent increases tooth and nail, so property owners have zero reason to provide charging facilities....
?
Why are you making a issue about what is essentially using a power socket over night? There is no such thing as "a charging facility" unless you plan to do a quick charge.
>There also have the rise of what are called super-commuters... 100 mile one way drives to and from work
Only 2 hour drive each way?
Really?
Tesla can do that just fine. Other under designed city only cars can't really. And thats the simple reality.
CEO is capitvated by the laws of the free marked. If he wants to chase tomorrow and perish by not planning, he is free to do so.
The problem arrives when the rest of the marked is not paying attention: CEO's can ride around companies in a pure stasis draft
But you are also describing the problem indirectly, by saying
>The CEO is a captive to the consumer's preference.
>Consumers generally do not reward those who try to manufacture domestically
You are basically saying that
>The CEO can not plan ahead to make a manufacture advantage by purchasing and expanding what is already a part of their supply chain
What is even more troubling is that you could describe what outsourcing do long term, in a vacuum, but you don't, to make a rather cheap talk point.
Outsourcing is a long and tedious process, where in the long term the company loses its ability to maintain its IP.
At first, you get fewer places to start the entry level recruitment for the firm
Then It turns out nobody knows how to make these things
And then it turns out that if you don't control the factory, you are basically on the factories good graces to even support your venture.
And as time goes on, you no longer have anybody who can build patents or IP, because the industrial basis to train these people do not exist.
The simple fact that this has already happened, for low end chips. Sure, if you want some fancy x86 thing, a server chip, or a computer chip you are going to need to license a expensive design.
But for everything else that is used? If your local manufacture plants also make computer chips, you could get anything for small electronics. Anything for anything that doesn't require a real OS: So your idea is basically true for all embedded systems, which is still quoted at "98% of microprocessors".
Currently any medium size enterprise can basically get any known expired design, and do a test run, and then use it. And it happens.
But by this revealing statement, the next puzzle arrive: Will the trends thats true for the embedded systems ever be true for things like workstation CPUs?
Or is it?
The current scenario is one where content hosts is colluding with possibly IP owners, instead of forcing everyone to walk the talk and go to court.
Then again, legman law is basically crippled by poor understanding of law, and how harmless going to court is(assuming signed papers can be produced, and a rough outline of laws can be gathered)
But the reason we are here in this topic, is because Norway used to have mandatory conscription screening, which did produce a lot of statistics about its population.
In the age group of 18, there is roughly 70.000 each year. Since conscription is unisex these days, even if its a 2/3 male/female split. So 17.000 of those gets called in for all the tests: Physical, aptitude, perception, mental ability. So the sad part is that we don't test the other 53.000. And another thing is that statistics will skew as the total amount of boys tested will go down. But since this is a national endeavor, the statistical skew will affect the more populated areas a lot more than any rural region, and Norway has a lot of rural regions.
So past that, Norway wants about 9000 conscripts, conscripting what it can.
And there is a lot surrounding this. Screen has been gradually reduced, alongside smaller number of conscripts.
In 2012, Civil Service was removed. This used to apply to people with the aptitude, but with clashing moral reasons to serve the army.
In the early 2000s, a change was made to stop doing the interview screening process with the local police, and instead went for a online form.
Somewhere in the 1990s, the amount of conscript was reduced, but not the extensive screening process. This is what happens when Soviet Russia collapses into something lesser.
1977, women where allowed to enter all parts of the army, assuming they passed physical screening.
This is also a topic where its hard to google for information, since very few newspaper articles will publish the line of historical events.
No, he is talking about the systematic extermination of a language by the passive means of not using it.
The same is true of TV, Media and Internet. Schools is just a far more proactive way of doing it, since you encounter kids at a young enough age to properly get them native in their second language.
This isn't a problem of a moral dilemma, its more a fact that the communities might be large enough to support their language for internal use, but the proactive means of forced language in school kills it in a few generations. If you ask a educated Frenchman about this, he might give you a lot of history on this topic, since they are now speaking Parisian.
So basically, Amazon is technically liable for every product thats gets sold, that has fake certification.
Like anything involving electronics that has CE or FCC label.
The keyword here is "technically", because you would still need all things to line up to go to court.
If you where a smeltery, and you where actually doing what you where doing on a large scale?
Historically, you find a place to build a hydro plant, build the smelting plant next door, add a convenient travel route from a nearby living area, or even build a village.
You then use the competitive price of electricity to leverage reduced cost , and then abuse the logistical advantages of running a electrical powered smelting plant from a hydro plant. Essentially bottled waterfall power.
And if you wanted to go further, you need to think about what is happening: You are using a versatile resource to be competitive in enriching a resource, enchanting it, for increased surplus and competitive edge. And increased production cap, which is important. To take your enterprise to the next step, you would also need a enterprise that would transform the en richened material into something useful in the same area, to leverage the surplus of the already existing infrastructure, and further strengthen the possibility of a inland artificial village having enough of a community to make it something more than a place for people to work.
Rationing will deal with current shortages.
And its the only way to deal with the long term psychological problems that causes shortages: Because otherwise you could end up with a social class that will ignore the shortages because they can pay for the embargoed mafiapriced water. In some cases it can be the entire of society.
But only policy changes to infrastructure, and what happens around the waterways will impact future shortages.
Desalination, what is happening around the rivers that supply the water, groundwater, etc.
You would think, but that is also a very narrow view, especially after actually visiting Tallinn.
Train is not as important as light rail(actual rail, and busses with power wires on top), combined with flexible bus routes.
A quick summary would read something like:
As a former communist nation, Estonia has a spread out infrastructure, with a lot of smaller towns surrounding Tallinn, and a lot of space between the populated areas and the industrial areas. A Soviet war insurance one could call it, but not centralizing the population centers, but rather rely in infrastructure for the expansions. This results in that even in a expanding city as Tallinn, there is a lot of space left to expand upon, and a lot of existing infrastructure that already is capable of some massive expansions.
The entire point of the free public infrastructure is for "borgers", or "Citizens" or "Headhunted foreign IT workers". Which means the company can acquire a space that do not need a lot of parking, and settle the workers around the cities tram lines. Which means that even with massive expansion, there is not a insane housing inflation, and Tallinn can freely expand, and even have entire enclaves of Scandinavs, Balts, Finns and Icelanders who want to experience a new world of IT, working abroad, for a few years. And they would move there, because quality of living combined with wages and housing cost is competitive with hellholes like Oslo or Stockholm, even more so with free city wide transportation.
And it has another great benefit: You now have a massive infrastructure that can also be used for tourism.
You go to Estonian, and basically pay a symbolic sum free usage of all transportation inside of Tallinn. It was amazing, even if you needed a phone app to avoid dealing with the horrible maps at each station.
And this has been tested since 2013, so either they want to puff up other areas of Estonian for off shoring, or they realized the costs are worth it for the convenience & commerce it brings its citizens.
The entire point of GDPR is that if somebody visits your site
And you sell that information
You just sold a visitors information, against their rights.
So if you want to be safe, do not allow external sites to mine your users. And thats pretty simple.
Except that you might want a marked tool, like Google analytics, to get a performance idea of your site, essentially violating the GDPR by feeding google data, and google will live off that data in some way shape or form.
Which mean the question then turns into: How will the actual implementation of the GDPR affect a site owner? Because its currently a draft law, that will be 100% rewritten for actual states to have their version.
So the question remains: Will GDPR make google analytics illegal, or not?
I would guess that permanent nuclear flight leave you with issues related to internal part heat. And a large enough airplane to have a large enough crew to support a 24 hours of operation, in at the least 3-6 shifts a day. On top of maintenance in the air, for what is possible.
On top of either building megaplane to make the reactor crash proven, or risking a spill each time you land.
I assume canceled for pragmatic reasons: Simply no need for megairplane, yet
But it do have a answer.
If you know Chinese Law, you might know, to drive such a boat, with such a carge(more than X tons), you might require a special license, and that license requires some age to even certify for it. I think the answer is "Older than 26" or something.
But there is further value in there: If used properly, you can study and see how kids react in panic, since very few will know or guess anywhere correctly. Its also a question of reading: Do you understand that only some facts are irrelevant, or do you flabbergast into math?
The defunding is also not a easy issue.
Defunding is never done in a linear manner. It usually starts off with the upper class realizing that they can pay to skip the queue, and then slowly try to influence their local positions about this. The problem only appears as you have the media, a political party, and a few voters, straggling alongside party politics. Slowly, the private offering will increase in quality, slowly it will penetrate the part of society willing to pay.
In most Nordic countries, everyone who can bother, can pay for private insurance to cover this, meaning its not a issue of money, but more a issue of social class(and their way of managing money). The interesting part, is that since the class of people paying for the part is loop sided, the feedback is loop sided.
So, running this experiement live, in Norway, since the The Grand Adventure of Oil started: The Politicians kids are now adults, from those times. As a weird upperclass crust, they most likely grew up with the extra protection the upper class is willing to invest into. From higher sport participation, more activities as kids, to more networking, to better public morale, and simply to having better health insurance.
So what is happening, is that those kids are now becoming politicians, and since the parties are basically aristocratic dynasties in many ways, the pile of class have a impact. And thats before you consider that the upper class has rather normal ways of networking: Newspapers and social circles.
What is interesting, is how this ends up being portrayed. Currently, local doctors are the more stressed parts of the public sector, is basically crying wolf. Because of the state media, their cry get heard. But because of rather harsh populism and tabloid culture, there is no digging into WHY they are crying wolf, and how it has been adapted into their workforce since at the least the war.
So basically: The local doctors(needed to get access to the rest of the public health sector)
Are in this situation where they are understaffed, because they need to do somebody elses job. This much is obvious, but beyond that, why they needed somebody else to do their job is not researched, or why we live in a era of extra paperwork.
Still, this feeds into the feed back loop causing the issue: So if the public sector is getting worse(a little), regardless of the issue, it will result in it getting further slashes down the road, because the aristocrats influencing the political cabal do not care about its ability in the long term.
The political situation in other nations with universal health care is similar: Not the same, but in broad strokes, the pattern is there. And it really doesn't have anything to do with the base quality.
Remember, if its something smart, the implementation must be stupid.
So all it has to do, is to poke at it. So if it broadcasts to you, you already got a signal to sample.
So if you can tell the connection limit of that, by the wireless signal standard, you can basically guess the max speed, since its far lower than what the cabled broadband in the back of the shop actually is.