It has about the same range as a $20 harbor freight propane torch used to kill weeds, which is a couple feet. If yours only does a few inches you got ripped off.
They thought the whites just sat back and collected the profits while doing no actual work on the farms and that anyone could step in and fill that role. Turns out they were wrong. Management is an actual skill and does require effort.
They're probably just using it to ramp up for another round of take whitey's land. Just put it in a major city and it gets you a list of names of the people you need to seize property from.
You obviously have a very narrow view of the world and are trying to apply your own reality to others even when its not applicable. In my city for instance you could not lead any sort of productive life without a car. The city is sprawling and public transport is spotty at best. If you moved to the ideal location it might be possible, but how are you supposed to get the money to afford that move?
The deal with Tesla is it COULD make money. They don't have any trouble selling cars, theyre just investing heavily in growth. To investors that looks like prime time to get in.
Remember too that the brain is just part of a system. Without responses from the rest of the system it fails to feel a lot of different emotions. Stress and fear in particular require a bit of feedback from the rest of you to continue on.
I work in a credit union. 90% of our jobs are customer facing for people who want to talk with a human instead of using the website or an ATM. There is very little back office. You have loan underwriters, title clerk's, IT, mail, and accounting. All small departments. Big stuff are call centers, tellers, FSRs, etc...
If it's better for their worldwide margins to build more efficient cars, they will continue to do so. They pay people a lot of money to help them come up with their market strategies. Also, you may actually see an increase in fuel economy. Emissions hardware tends to sap power or require a motor to run in an inefficient manner to achieve the parameters needed to reduce emissions. You usually push your foot down harder to compensate and hence burn more fuel. I'm not saying this whole thing is a good idea, just that its not cut and dry "goodbye fuel economy, hello fumes!".
It's easier to make a car more fuel efficient if emission standards are more lax. Restrictive exhaust systems sap power which you in turn make up for by pushing the pedal down further.
Dunno. I use it for certain things just because of it's popularity, but honestly it's all a giant circle jerk with any difference of opinion being down voted into Oblivion. Makes it a pretty boring place IMO.
No, but the statistic does warrant further investigation. Either the investigation department is acting shady or there are some dirty rotten liars at MS who slander their co-workers.
Don't the batteries naturally lose maximum output as they discharge? If a phone can't handle maximum performance anymore when it can't hold as much charge, how did it do it before as the charge went down ?
If you could copy the process and apply it to different stock, yes. Nature doesn't do this for a reason. If every member of a species has all the same flaws and weaknesses as well as no capacity to change, some disease that CAN change will find a way to exploit it then boom. All of them gone.
It's likely just a PITA to replace one and they probably destroy a phone on accident every now and then. The things weren't made to be changed. They were made to be disposable.
Why not use water or some other method that won't need constant filter replacement and create junk. The water could be reused until it evaporates away and leaves solid waste material. You could even use the water to cool something as it does it's job.
Maybe they shouldn't have fostered a highly toxic work environment full of sexist / racist "SJW"s. Then speaking out against it wouldn't make all of of your coworkers hostile
The solution is for the cops to calm the heck down. Violent crime is at an all time low but the cops keep becoming more and more violent. We aren't In a warzone. Police shot and killed per year is at it's lowest since the early 1900s despite the obvious population increase. Far more die of heart attacks on duty. Maybe lay off the donuts AND the assault rifles.
Sorry I have to fear soy. I'm allergic to it. As well as most nuts and a lot of fruits and vegetables. Rice too. Me and veganism were not meant to be. Not allergic to any animal products.
Slashdot Mirror
Nope! definitely climate change. Always climate change.
Think he's referring to how the article calls is the first 5ghz chip. AMD also made a 5.0ghz vishera, the FX 9590.
It has about the same range as a $20 harbor freight propane torch used to kill weeds, which is a couple feet. If yours only does a few inches you got ripped off.
Anyone working for a company that makes sudden drastic changes to your livelihood on a regular basis is going to be stressed.
They thought the whites just sat back and collected the profits while doing no actual work on the farms and that anyone could step in and fill that role. Turns out they were wrong. Management is an actual skill and does require effort.
They're probably just using it to ramp up for another round of take whitey's land. Just put it in a major city and it gets you a list of names of the people you need to seize property from.
You obviously have a very narrow view of the world and are trying to apply your own reality to others even when its not applicable. In my city for instance you could not lead any sort of productive life without a car. The city is sprawling and public transport is spotty at best. If you moved to the ideal location it might be possible, but how are you supposed to get the money to afford that move?
The deal with Tesla is it COULD make money. They don't have any trouble selling cars, theyre just investing heavily in growth. To investors that looks like prime time to get in.
Remember too that the brain is just part of a system. Without responses from the rest of the system it fails to feel a lot of different emotions. Stress and fear in particular require a bit of feedback from the rest of you to continue on.
I work in a credit union. 90% of our jobs are customer facing for people who want to talk with a human instead of using the website or an ATM. There is very little back office. You have loan underwriters, title clerk's, IT, mail, and accounting. All small departments. Big stuff are call centers, tellers, FSRs, etc...
If it's better for their worldwide margins to build more efficient cars, they will continue to do so. They pay people a lot of money to help them come up with their market strategies. Also, you may actually see an increase in fuel economy. Emissions hardware tends to sap power or require a motor to run in an inefficient manner to achieve the parameters needed to reduce emissions. You usually push your foot down harder to compensate and hence burn more fuel. I'm not saying this whole thing is a good idea, just that its not cut and dry "goodbye fuel economy, hello fumes!".
It's easier to make a car more fuel efficient if emission standards are more lax. Restrictive exhaust systems sap power which you in turn make up for by pushing the pedal down further.
Dunno. I use it for certain things just because of it's popularity, but honestly it's all a giant circle jerk with any difference of opinion being down voted into Oblivion. Makes it a pretty boring place IMO.
No, but the statistic does warrant further investigation. Either the investigation department is acting shady or there are some dirty rotten liars at MS who slander their co-workers.
Don't the batteries naturally lose maximum output as they discharge? If a phone can't handle maximum performance anymore when it can't hold as much charge, how did it do it before as the charge went down ?
If you could copy the process and apply it to different stock, yes. Nature doesn't do this for a reason. If every member of a species has all the same flaws and weaknesses as well as no capacity to change, some disease that CAN change will find a way to exploit it then boom. All of them gone.
It's likely just a PITA to replace one and they probably destroy a phone on accident every now and then. The things weren't made to be changed. They were made to be disposable.
Thats not how businesses work. They dont care about your bugs. They care about one thing: "how much proffit did it make?"
Why not use water or some other method that won't need constant filter replacement and create junk. The water could be reused until it evaporates away and leaves solid waste material. You could even use the water to cool something as it does it's job.
Since when has ATT or Comcast cared about outages? The ATT DSL service here gets spotty every time it rains and it rains a LOT.
Maybe they shouldn't have fostered a highly toxic work environment full of sexist / racist "SJW"s. Then speaking out against it wouldn't make all of of your coworkers hostile
The solution is for the cops to calm the heck down. Violent crime is at an all time low but the cops keep becoming more and more violent. We aren't In a warzone. Police shot and killed per year is at it's lowest since the early 1900s despite the obvious population increase. Far more die of heart attacks on duty. Maybe lay off the donuts AND the assault rifles.
Sorry I have to fear soy. I'm allergic to it. As well as most nuts and a lot of fruits and vegetables. Rice too. Me and veganism were not meant to be. Not allergic to any animal products.
Yep. FSA limit for me was 2100. That's very easy to blow through.
You're missing the point. What pisses everyone off is how this is being rammed through despite massive backlash. I still say treason.