Have you even read the summary? How would the iPhone do that if they make binary image of the storage? Can it magically format other storage devices as well?
Every person who ever torrented an album would have to listen to it at least 150 times and every single one would have to buy it if they couldn't download it for RIAA reasoning to make sense.
But yeah, that doesn't add up.
My mistake. Nevertheless, it seems the plan is to make the super heavy lifter reusable, which is one of the key features that makes the plan at least theoretically feasible.
He may not be able to afford a Saturn V, but that's not what he plans to use, he plans to use multi-launch mission using reusable Falcon 9 Heavy. Everything he has done this far suggests he is able to build it. I am not saying he can't fail, but at this point it takes too many unsupported and ill-informed assumptions to just say he isn't going to do it.
This is getting a little bit old to be honest. First it was the main engine. Musk isn't going to develop and/or build one. Look at how much NASA spent developing F1! There is no bussiness case for that! Then it was Falcon and reaching orbit. Musk isn't going to develop and build one! At best it's going to end with huge fireball! Look at how NASA spent on putting things into orbit! Musk isn't going to deliver cargo to ISS! Look at how much NASA spent developing rendezvous and docking technology! He can't afford that or build that!. Give me a break.
It was never guaranteed that was going to succeed and it still isn't. And I understand that you people may not be his fans. But it would be great if you could, for once, learn the difference between you not wishing that he succeeds and him actually not having chance.
SpaceX lost one launch, for which NASA will NOT pay as per the contract. What is wrong with your perception of reality? He is very far from not delivering what he promised.
So a "GAME DESIGNER" is questioning the profesionality of software engineers. Is there no one who sees the absurdity of that?
And to answer the question: no. Not all people who write software are software engineers. You should only call software engineers software engineers. The fact that Google docs go down now and then doesn't make software engineers not engineers. But using it as an argument proves you don't know what you're talking about, because apparently you know nothing about the complexity of the infrastructure that is necessary to keep something like Google Docs up and running. None of its software parts need to fail in order for the service the stop working. But hey, you're just a "GAME " DESIGNER"".
But how could this cause any damage to anyone? Surely, they have nothing to fear if they have nothing to hide, right?
It offends me when the CIA, some media or anyone else behaves as if a) this is a serious problem and b) we should give anything more than 0 shits.
Right, its neither gulag nor concentration camp. Lots of people made it out of them alive. Note that every major power in WW II had concentration camps (US used them for people of Japanese heritage) and many of them, including some in Third Reich, had better conditions than Gitmo.
Look, you made the comparison.
Slashdot Mirror
So a lobbyist "think tank" found out that our liberties cost them money (which they never had). That is truly unexpected and shocking.
Have you even read the summary? How would the iPhone do that if they make binary image of the storage? Can it magically format other storage devices as well?
He's still ahead of FBI.
Every person who ever torrented an album would have to listen to it at least 150 times and every single one would have to buy it if they couldn't download it for RIAA reasoning to make sense. But yeah, that doesn't add up.
No, you can't, you're incapable of recognizing disingenuity.
That's lots of ifs and assumptions for you to call anyone disingenuous without looking very disingenuous, anonymous coward.
How does this add up with 1 illegal download = 1 missed sale?
A big screen that tells me what I should think and listens to everything I say... I'm sure I've read about this somewhere....
You assume that people breaking the speed limit increases the average throughput of the traffic, which is not always the case.
You get someone famous enough to declare it.
Does that actually make sense in your head?
My mistake. Nevertheless, it seems the plan is to make the super heavy lifter reusable, which is one of the key features that makes the plan at least theoretically feasible.
He may not be able to afford a Saturn V, but that's not what he plans to use, he plans to use multi-launch mission using reusable Falcon 9 Heavy. Everything he has done this far suggests he is able to build it. I am not saying he can't fail, but at this point it takes too many unsupported and ill-informed assumptions to just say he isn't going to do it. This is getting a little bit old to be honest. First it was the main engine. Musk isn't going to develop and/or build one. Look at how much NASA spent developing F1! There is no bussiness case for that! Then it was Falcon and reaching orbit. Musk isn't going to develop and build one! At best it's going to end with huge fireball! Look at how NASA spent on putting things into orbit! Musk isn't going to deliver cargo to ISS! Look at how much NASA spent developing rendezvous and docking technology! He can't afford that or build that!. Give me a break. It was never guaranteed that was going to succeed and it still isn't. And I understand that you people may not be his fans. But it would be great if you could, for once, learn the difference between you not wishing that he succeeds and him actually not having chance.
Well constructed and coherent argument, sir.
SpaceX lost one launch, for which NASA will NOT pay as per the contract. What is wrong with your perception of reality? He is very far from not delivering what he promised.
Doesn't make it any less (or more) true.
You forgot to open with "I'm not a racist, but...".
"Rules of war"? You mean Geneva convention and other applicable international law, right?
So a "GAME DESIGNER" is questioning the profesionality of software engineers. Is there no one who sees the absurdity of that? And to answer the question: no. Not all people who write software are software engineers. You should only call software engineers software engineers. The fact that Google docs go down now and then doesn't make software engineers not engineers. But using it as an argument proves you don't know what you're talking about, because apparently you know nothing about the complexity of the infrastructure that is necessary to keep something like Google Docs up and running. None of its software parts need to fail in order for the service the stop working. But hey, you're just a "GAME " DESIGNER"".
Said a member of a nation that doesn't even have its own language.
You type through what?
I am board with your puns.
But how could this cause any damage to anyone? Surely, they have nothing to fear if they have nothing to hide, right? It offends me when the CIA, some media or anyone else behaves as if a) this is a serious problem and b) we should give anything more than 0 shits.
Right, its neither gulag nor concentration camp. Lots of people made it out of them alive. Note that every major power in WW II had concentration camps (US used them for people of Japanese heritage) and many of them, including some in Third Reich, had better conditions than Gitmo. Look, you made the comparison.
They are already taking it more seriously than physical theft. What was the last time you've been robbed? What did the police do about it?
Only if Trump was a race.