Because you would have to string together a series of circumstances by which the president knew of said spear-phishing tactic and either paid said person or group to conduct such an action either directly or through various parties. Then and only then could you remotely put the pieces together that Trump rigged or attempted to rig an election outcome in his favor. But it has been provably stated that even if this spear-phishing tactic had worked, it would never have changed the outcome of the election, much less a vote tally. Since no such vote fraud or vote tally has occurred, it can be assumed with provable facts and has been stated by many election officials in their respective states that no such vote manipulation has taken place.
You are mad if you think that won't be the case as it was before us and will be after us. The sheer stupidity of your statement is unfathomable in its displaced lunacy in breadth and scope. The idea that this planet will be rendered uninhabitable past our lifetimes is such sheer hyperbole and fear mongering on a scale that leaves me to think that you really never have given this premise much thought and are simply peddling the gobbly-gook of what you've heard somewhere and nodded in acquiescence in the affirmative.
Tell me, are you willing to spend untold trillions of dollars to lower the global mean surface temperature of the earth by less than a half of a degree centigrade, while the immediate issues that can be worked on go unfunded and ignored? How much value are you willing to drain from the world economy, if not the US economy to see your goal of sustained habitability past your lifetime are you willing to sacrifice on the alter of AGW/Climate Change? Until you can tell me what you want the mean global surface temperature of the earth to be, then everything you are gnashing your teeth on is meaningless garbage. There are so many more things we can tackle with that kind of money, but no, you want to ausage your hand-wringing scaredy cat feebleness to ensuring the planet will be habitable past your lifetime.
If I ever heard someone say that to my face i'd laugh right back in theirs for the utter humorous stupidity that they presented.
Biology is simple. XX XY sometimes a mutation of a partial combination of the two into three or parts of the two. Male/Female at the basis of it all. Even hermaphrodites are both male and female. There are no other genders. The notion is stupid, silly, and a whimsical fantasy for those that want to be different, but can't escape the prisons of their own minds.
Trump gets vilified for sharing terrorist information with the Russians. Something Obama and Bush also did in the past, but Manning is lauded as a brave hero for releasing classified information because transgenderism and a phony understanding of what being a traitor means. In short, the left is filled with moronic lunatics that don't have an iota of understanding of how the real world works and apply false pretenses of righteousness to wholly horrible people for all the wrong reasons.
None of these programs have been effective. There is more homeless than ever before and there is more poor than ever before. I think it's high time in this country that we need to decide as a society whether the homeless and the impoverished would be better of fending for their own best interests rather than sucking at the public tit for generations if not lifetimes. It is abundantly clear that many of the homeless wish to remain so and yet government will break its back to spend tax payer dollars to come up with any number of useless programs to dump money into so that they can think they are solving a problem even they know will never be solved. That money would be better spent on infrastructure project like road repavement, sidewalk repair, water/gas mainline repair and replacement. That would have a direct impact on people and dollars better spent.
A lot of these people want to be left alone and I say we give it to them. The only difference is, is that if you choose to be homeless, do not be shocked if you are moved elsewhere to be homeless.
Stop saying a national healthcare system is a free healthcare system. It isn't. Healthcare is not a right that governments can simply dole out and it should never have been. If you need medical care, then you should pay for it out of your own pocket or through an employer-based insurance system, not because government mandates it. Not to mention we've seen what a single payer government mandate system in the US looks like, look no further than the VA system. A sheer and total failure. Socialized healthcare is a joke and should be abandoned at all costs. Even Canadians are fed up with it, but put up with it because Canada has basically made the private health insurance system illegal. Links as an example.
So disabuse yourself that healthcare should be another job and entitlement for the government to give you. For crying out loud, do you not see what you are advocating is tantamount to perpetual servitude if not outright slavery? And for what?
https://www.city-journal.org/h...https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...
Why do you want to hurt astronauts by giving them free healthcare for life. I mean, if you want to see what free healthcare for life looks like, then look no further than how the Veterans Administration is run. That is a clear example of single payer healthcare and this is what a few fools want for the rest of the country too? Madness.
And people are repeating the same mistakes over and over again. What did people expect was going happen? Workers demand more money and more demands on businesses and business pretty much tell them to take a flying leaping fuck out of a 100 story window. They are going to automate wherever they can, cut back on payrolls, and simplify their business in a much more efficient way. Workers lose, owners win because both sides are being greedy. Workers are trying to squeeze owners for more cash and owners do an end run to replace them and make more cash. People don't fucking get it.
Nuclear mass destruction is about as looming as a the second coming of Christ. Nuclear weapons are a political tool, not a militaristic one. A lot of people can't see the difference, but it's there.
It's a meaningless metric to normal and reasonable thinking people. For the emotionally unhinged and mentally deranged it's an indicator of doom because after all they have no way to gauge how doomy things will get until they see the big hand moving towards the 12 to justify their lunacy.
No, you aren't going to really change anyone's mind because the subject is simply to large for people to generally grasp in total anyway. People will simply adapt to 'climate change' and move on. The left has harped on it for so long and cried wolf about it for so long, that they've lost their power behind it. Whether you are a believer in it or not, is irrelevant because there are more important issues to deal with than how we affect the weather or not.
So continue to demonize people who don't agree with you, make the claim they don't believe in science when in fact they simply don't agree with the science and then place the blame for an apocalypse on them because the only thing your ideological ilk do is blame shift.
Telling someone "no, i will not perform a service for you" is the real issue in this regard. Where does it end. Would I be fined and or compelled to mow the lawn of black people, homosexuals, transgendered by force of law if I tell them no? I haven't misbehaved. I've simply said no to them and that is now a punishable offense.
it was one thing to discriminate based on skin color because that was a matter of real differentiation in terms of behavior towards another human being along racial lines, but to extend that same gratuity along gender fluidity? It's nonsense.
There is a difference between political speech vs. commercial speech. There is also an avenue for using political speech in a commercial space and how it is handled.
You can't spend decades insulting hard working people who don't think like you and call them racists, bigots, homophobes, xenophobes, sexists, and misogynists and think you are going to win elections and not have them give you a giant FU. Then afterwards watch as they throw a collective temper tantrum because they didn't like the outcome of calling you racists, bigots, homophobes, xenophobes, sexists, and misogynists. It simply proves that the left is an emotionally unhinged, mentally deranged ideology who's adherents are even more so.
The easiest way to level the playing field is for the modification of the electoral college to give out proportional electoral votes on a per county basis. So for example two main counties/regions in California drive the entire 55 electoral votes for it; L.A. and the Bay Area. The rest of the state is majority red, yet those voices are squelched. If you made each state give out proportional electoral votes on a per county basis, you would see a much more competitive race and the candidates wouldn't be catering to five or six swing states and neglect the rest of the country. It would be a much fairer system and a few states already do it.
Well, I suppose if you won't believe the media's account what is on a server or laptop and what isn't then I guess you probably won't believe anything the media shows or prints. I have no issue with healthy skepticism and that should be the norm, but your total dismissal and using sexually charged slurs is a little much to take you seriously with.
Also, did you mean illiterate rather than being alliterate? See what I did there?
Interesting blame shifting. Instead of placing the blame on aberrant homosexual behaviors and eventually aberrant sexual behaviors in general, you instead implicate Nancy Reagan who was not the president, nor was in NYC political life in the 70's as being the real asshole in what could only be deemed as the lifting of the veil on the true nature of the decadent deviant homosexual lifestyles of the 70's and 80's. Then once HIV/AIDS took on what appeared to be epidemic proportions it became highly politicized and a cause célèbre for leftists, Hollywood, and the homosexual community as a whole. It effectively reinvigorated the entire notion of the acceptability of the homosexual lifestyle, which led to homosexual marriage, and an entire rewrite on what is now accepted as the LGBT movement we see now because it drew on sympathy rather than facts.
"Patient Zero" was told in no uncertain terms that his lifestyle is dangerous and he needs to stop to which he said, FUCK YOU and went out of his way to infect as many people as he could without a care in the world and yet, you choose to blame Nancy Reagan instead. I think you have a serious disconnect with reality in this regard.
Oh, how I long for the days when I had an office instead of being thrust into the company of a dozen other people that I can see or could see me, and hear me, and smell me, and interact with me involuntarily. An office has a place, but the problem for many of these companies is that they still see an office space as a luxury to dangle over workers heads and because they are too cheap to go to spaces with offices.
Slashdot Mirror
Triple eyewitness testimony? By whom and when?
Because you would have to string together a series of circumstances by which the president knew of said spear-phishing tactic and either paid said person or group to conduct such an action either directly or through various parties. Then and only then could you remotely put the pieces together that Trump rigged or attempted to rig an election outcome in his favor. But it has been provably stated that even if this spear-phishing tactic had worked, it would never have changed the outcome of the election, much less a vote tally. Since no such vote fraud or vote tally has occurred, it can be assumed with provable facts and has been stated by many election officials in their respective states that no such vote manipulation has taken place.
You are mad if you think that won't be the case as it was before us and will be after us. The sheer stupidity of your statement is unfathomable in its displaced lunacy in breadth and scope. The idea that this planet will be rendered uninhabitable past our lifetimes is such sheer hyperbole and fear mongering on a scale that leaves me to think that you really never have given this premise much thought and are simply peddling the gobbly-gook of what you've heard somewhere and nodded in acquiescence in the affirmative. Tell me, are you willing to spend untold trillions of dollars to lower the global mean surface temperature of the earth by less than a half of a degree centigrade, while the immediate issues that can be worked on go unfunded and ignored? How much value are you willing to drain from the world economy, if not the US economy to see your goal of sustained habitability past your lifetime are you willing to sacrifice on the alter of AGW/Climate Change? Until you can tell me what you want the mean global surface temperature of the earth to be, then everything you are gnashing your teeth on is meaningless garbage. There are so many more things we can tackle with that kind of money, but no, you want to ausage your hand-wringing scaredy cat feebleness to ensuring the planet will be habitable past your lifetime. If I ever heard someone say that to my face i'd laugh right back in theirs for the utter humorous stupidity that they presented.
Don't confuse treason with rebellion.
Biology is simple. XX XY sometimes a mutation of a partial combination of the two into three or parts of the two. Male/Female at the basis of it all. Even hermaphrodites are both male and female. There are no other genders. The notion is stupid, silly, and a whimsical fantasy for those that want to be different, but can't escape the prisons of their own minds.
Trump gets vilified for sharing terrorist information with the Russians. Something Obama and Bush also did in the past, but Manning is lauded as a brave hero for releasing classified information because transgenderism and a phony understanding of what being a traitor means. In short, the left is filled with moronic lunatics that don't have an iota of understanding of how the real world works and apply false pretenses of righteousness to wholly horrible people for all the wrong reasons.
None of these programs have been effective. There is more homeless than ever before and there is more poor than ever before. I think it's high time in this country that we need to decide as a society whether the homeless and the impoverished would be better of fending for their own best interests rather than sucking at the public tit for generations if not lifetimes. It is abundantly clear that many of the homeless wish to remain so and yet government will break its back to spend tax payer dollars to come up with any number of useless programs to dump money into so that they can think they are solving a problem even they know will never be solved. That money would be better spent on infrastructure project like road repavement, sidewalk repair, water/gas mainline repair and replacement. That would have a direct impact on people and dollars better spent. A lot of these people want to be left alone and I say we give it to them. The only difference is, is that if you choose to be homeless, do not be shocked if you are moved elsewhere to be homeless.
Stop saying a national healthcare system is a free healthcare system. It isn't. Healthcare is not a right that governments can simply dole out and it should never have been. If you need medical care, then you should pay for it out of your own pocket or through an employer-based insurance system, not because government mandates it. Not to mention we've seen what a single payer government mandate system in the US looks like, look no further than the VA system. A sheer and total failure. Socialized healthcare is a joke and should be abandoned at all costs. Even Canadians are fed up with it, but put up with it because Canada has basically made the private health insurance system illegal. Links as an example. So disabuse yourself that healthcare should be another job and entitlement for the government to give you. For crying out loud, do you not see what you are advocating is tantamount to perpetual servitude if not outright slavery? And for what? https://www.city-journal.org/h... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...
Why do you want to hurt astronauts by giving them free healthcare for life. I mean, if you want to see what free healthcare for life looks like, then look no further than how the Veterans Administration is run. That is a clear example of single payer healthcare and this is what a few fools want for the rest of the country too? Madness.
And people are repeating the same mistakes over and over again. What did people expect was going happen? Workers demand more money and more demands on businesses and business pretty much tell them to take a flying leaping fuck out of a 100 story window. They are going to automate wherever they can, cut back on payrolls, and simplify their business in a much more efficient way. Workers lose, owners win because both sides are being greedy. Workers are trying to squeeze owners for more cash and owners do an end run to replace them and make more cash. People don't fucking get it.
The state of research today is to write garbage to acquire federal grants.
Nuclear mass destruction is about as looming as a the second coming of Christ. Nuclear weapons are a political tool, not a militaristic one. A lot of people can't see the difference, but it's there.
It's a meaningless metric to normal and reasonable thinking people. For the emotionally unhinged and mentally deranged it's an indicator of doom because after all they have no way to gauge how doomy things will get until they see the big hand moving towards the 12 to justify their lunacy.
This is actually more overpriced than their one month AT&T Passport service which cost only $40/month. $10/day is robbery plain and simple.
I'm still trying to see where the con occurred.
No, you aren't going to really change anyone's mind because the subject is simply to large for people to generally grasp in total anyway. People will simply adapt to 'climate change' and move on. The left has harped on it for so long and cried wolf about it for so long, that they've lost their power behind it. Whether you are a believer in it or not, is irrelevant because there are more important issues to deal with than how we affect the weather or not. So continue to demonize people who don't agree with you, make the claim they don't believe in science when in fact they simply don't agree with the science and then place the blame for an apocalypse on them because the only thing your ideological ilk do is blame shift.
Have the English people been so cowed that they are letting this happen while they have unrepentant Sharia Jihadi Muslims living among them?
Telling someone "no, i will not perform a service for you" is the real issue in this regard. Where does it end. Would I be fined and or compelled to mow the lawn of black people, homosexuals, transgendered by force of law if I tell them no? I haven't misbehaved. I've simply said no to them and that is now a punishable offense. it was one thing to discriminate based on skin color because that was a matter of real differentiation in terms of behavior towards another human being along racial lines, but to extend that same gratuity along gender fluidity? It's nonsense.
There is a difference between political speech vs. commercial speech. There is also an avenue for using political speech in a commercial space and how it is handled.
You can't spend decades insulting hard working people who don't think like you and call them racists, bigots, homophobes, xenophobes, sexists, and misogynists and think you are going to win elections and not have them give you a giant FU. Then afterwards watch as they throw a collective temper tantrum because they didn't like the outcome of calling you racists, bigots, homophobes, xenophobes, sexists, and misogynists. It simply proves that the left is an emotionally unhinged, mentally deranged ideology who's adherents are even more so.
The easiest way to level the playing field is for the modification of the electoral college to give out proportional electoral votes on a per county basis. So for example two main counties/regions in California drive the entire 55 electoral votes for it; L.A. and the Bay Area. The rest of the state is majority red, yet those voices are squelched. If you made each state give out proportional electoral votes on a per county basis, you would see a much more competitive race and the candidates wouldn't be catering to five or six swing states and neglect the rest of the country. It would be a much fairer system and a few states already do it.
Well, I suppose if you won't believe the media's account what is on a server or laptop and what isn't then I guess you probably won't believe anything the media shows or prints. I have no issue with healthy skepticism and that should be the norm, but your total dismissal and using sexually charged slurs is a little much to take you seriously with. Also, did you mean illiterate rather than being alliterate? See what I did there?
I wonder if this law precludes voiding the warranties if you do alter your devices.
Interesting blame shifting. Instead of placing the blame on aberrant homosexual behaviors and eventually aberrant sexual behaviors in general, you instead implicate Nancy Reagan who was not the president, nor was in NYC political life in the 70's as being the real asshole in what could only be deemed as the lifting of the veil on the true nature of the decadent deviant homosexual lifestyles of the 70's and 80's. Then once HIV/AIDS took on what appeared to be epidemic proportions it became highly politicized and a cause célèbre for leftists, Hollywood, and the homosexual community as a whole. It effectively reinvigorated the entire notion of the acceptability of the homosexual lifestyle, which led to homosexual marriage, and an entire rewrite on what is now accepted as the LGBT movement we see now because it drew on sympathy rather than facts. "Patient Zero" was told in no uncertain terms that his lifestyle is dangerous and he needs to stop to which he said, FUCK YOU and went out of his way to infect as many people as he could without a care in the world and yet, you choose to blame Nancy Reagan instead. I think you have a serious disconnect with reality in this regard.
Oh, how I long for the days when I had an office instead of being thrust into the company of a dozen other people that I can see or could see me, and hear me, and smell me, and interact with me involuntarily. An office has a place, but the problem for many of these companies is that they still see an office space as a luxury to dangle over workers heads and because they are too cheap to go to spaces with offices.