That's true. And if there's one thing Trump does, it's remain consistent in his opinions over time./s
I've always hated when people do this. If someone forms the wrong opinion first, we criticize it, and then if they come to the right decision, we mock them for not hanging on the wrong idea, rather than appreciate them for having an open mind. Could they have been informed before opening their mouth? Sure, but we shouldn't discourage admitting mistakes. Ever.
But who am I kidding, all that matters is that partisanship is justified.
It looks like everyone thinks that wealthy men keep their wealth in some kind of vault like Smaug. This is not the case. Most of their wealth is already in the economy, there is basically nothing you can get from the wealthy by taxing them more.
This isn't even in the top 10 reasons why people consider UBI.
This comment is sad, in that it's either intentionally misleading, or just ignorant. Much like the voting rhetoric of mainstream American today.
It'll be fun when Hillary is president, people have forgotten about Trump, and she just gets DESTROYED by everything she's sown. That or she gets away with everything because of apologists like you. I'm hoping many people like you come around after she's president, better late than never.
I wonder how they come across that estimate of tripling women in 'computing workforce', has there been any measurable success in the current efforts that are literally everywhere? What happens if we include only ethical means?
I don't know how many times this needs repeating to Hillary apologists but, just because SHE didn't mark it classified, doesn't mean it didn't CONTAIN classified information. The information was always classified. And Secretary of State knows the nature of classified information so it shouldn't be a surprise.
Actually I do know how many times it needs repeating. Every time. Because they have no room for new information on this topic.
Surely there's some middle ground as well, though? Yes, we all know we use the resources we pay taxes for. But it's also legitimate to be angry that it's only a small portion that benefits us (INCLUDING the notion that helping others also helps us) and a large portion that goes to pork.
I think there is just noise and no signal and people are seeing a rabbit in the clouds because they're looking for it very hard.
Yeah, but based on what? The tests were done in a hard vacuum, and not the first tests to repeat the results, so does everybody have measurement problems? Does the community not know how to measure on that scale? What noise are you talking about? This seems like an opinion formed before the recent tests.
People are attempting to recreate the "thrust-less" momentum at home basically. Lots of skepticism, lots of optimism, but real numbers being thrown around.
We're almost past the point of whether or not it works and moving onto why it works.
Although I would never bother to sue over it, I assume this is the new normal. Does anyone remember the movie "9"? The trailer had puppets fighting robots to the tune of "Welcome Home" by Coheed and Cambria. It looked awesome.
That was perhaps the most disappointed in a movie I ever was. Not only were there very few of the fight scenes that weren't in the trailer, but the song never played during the movie. Just the credits. What's the point?
None of which justifies his murder by police. Yet another example of unjustified shooting by US police.
Nice argument by you, too. 1. using definition of murder wrong. 2. Ad hominem. 3. 'Yet another' as an argument. 4. Not actually having to defend the things that led up to being shot.
Clearly using emotion to win an argument? Check. (that's an opinion by me of course, but I think it's rational?)
Since when is "intentionally circumventing classification handling procedures" considered 'being sloppy'?
Walking out with some papers off the printer might be 'sloppy', and even that could be messy. Walking in with a hidden USB drive could be 'sloppy', unless they can prove intent.
If I went home and wrote a book on my google drive about current classified mission data, and sent it to a few co-workers or friends I hired, I wouldn't be 'slapped on the wrist'. And they wouldn't buy the whole 'I didn't mark it classified so it's not' argument.
Slashdot Mirror
That's true. And if there's one thing Trump does, it's remain consistent in his opinions over time. /s
I've always hated when people do this. If someone forms the wrong opinion first, we criticize it, and then if they come to the right decision, we mock them for not hanging on the wrong idea, rather than appreciate them for having an open mind. Could they have been informed before opening their mouth? Sure, but we shouldn't discourage admitting mistakes. Ever.
But who am I kidding, all that matters is that partisanship is justified.
No. Clinton directed her maid to print unclassified emails that were retroactively classified years later.
Troll, or doesn't understand "retroactive classification". Either way, we should all be ashamed of the 'Insightful' Mods.
It looks like everyone thinks that wealthy men keep their wealth in some kind of vault like Smaug. This is not the case. Most of their wealth is already in the economy, there is basically nothing you can get from the wealthy by taxing them more.
This isn't even in the top 10 reasons why people consider UBI.
True, but the only workaround they really want is to just use an iPhone...
This comment is sad, in that it's either intentionally misleading, or just ignorant. Much like the voting rhetoric of mainstream American today.
It'll be fun when Hillary is president, people have forgotten about Trump, and she just gets DESTROYED by everything she's sown. That or she gets away with everything because of apologists like you. I'm hoping many people like you come around after she's president, better late than never.
I'm imagining the setup to use only Apple Pay at strip clubs. Yes, that's all I'm imagining...
I wonder how they come across that estimate of tripling women in 'computing workforce', has there been any measurable success in the current efforts that are literally everywhere? What happens if we include only ethical means?
We could all be Pokemon to a category 3 civilization out there
Permission to mark a submission "flamebait"?
I don't know how many times this needs repeating to Hillary apologists but, just because SHE didn't mark it classified, doesn't mean it didn't CONTAIN classified information. The information was always classified. And Secretary of State knows the nature of classified information so it shouldn't be a surprise.
Actually I do know how many times it needs repeating. Every time. Because they have no room for new information on this topic.
Surely there's some middle ground as well, though? Yes, we all know we use the resources we pay taxes for. But it's also legitimate to be angry that it's only a small portion that benefits us (INCLUDING the notion that helping others also helps us) and a large portion that goes to pork.
And just like Hillary they are too big to fail/go to jail
Another expensive thing that will break. Which means my wife spending even more money
Is there independent confirmation of this, because I'm not hearing that?
I think there is just noise and no signal and people are seeing a rabbit in the clouds because they're looking for it very hard.
Yeah, but based on what? The tests were done in a hard vacuum, and not the first tests to repeat the results, so does everybody have measurement problems? Does the community not know how to measure on that scale? What noise are you talking about? This seems like an opinion formed before the recent tests.
If you want to do some armchair physics, these forums are really interesting. https://forum.nasaspaceflight....
People are attempting to recreate the "thrust-less" momentum at home basically. Lots of skepticism, lots of optimism, but real numbers being thrown around.
We're almost past the point of whether or not it works and moving onto why it works.
Although I would never bother to sue over it, I assume this is the new normal. Does anyone remember the movie "9"? The trailer had puppets fighting robots to the tune of "Welcome Home" by Coheed and Cambria. It looked awesome.
That was perhaps the most disappointed in a movie I ever was. Not only were there very few of the fight scenes that weren't in the trailer, but the song never played during the movie. Just the credits. What's the point?
Sorry, not much else to say about this, except awesome.
Good call. But doesn't matter, it's a story, damnit!
What an incredibly grounded scale you're basing such an important decision on. I'd love to see the criteria for the scoring
Yes! Because it's what we've come to expect, let's go out and buy t-shirts and bumper stickers supporting it!
None of which justifies his murder by police. Yet another example of unjustified shooting by US police.
Nice argument by you, too. 1. using definition of murder wrong. 2. Ad hominem. 3. 'Yet another' as an argument. 4. Not actually having to defend the things that led up to being shot.
Clearly using emotion to win an argument? Check. (that's an opinion by me of course, but I think it's rational?)
Since when is "intentionally circumventing classification handling procedures" considered 'being sloppy'?
Walking out with some papers off the printer might be 'sloppy', and even that could be messy. Walking in with a hidden USB drive could be 'sloppy', unless they can prove intent.
If I went home and wrote a book on my google drive about current classified mission data, and sent it to a few co-workers or friends I hired, I wouldn't be 'slapped on the wrist'. And they wouldn't buy the whole 'I didn't mark it classified so it's not' argument.
...said competing content provider.
In my opinion, Youtube shows that people would create content without all of this artificial scarcity bullshit.
And according to most of the people posting here, that is an insightful position and Trump is smart for considering her.