He doesn't even have Jobs's ego. Ego usually describes a person's inflated idea of their own genius. Jobs really was about as good as he thought he was.
Never mind that you can't tell the difference between Foxconn and Apple, you also don't seem to have any idea what a tax break is. Why don't you find a dormitory to suicide off.
You are an idiot. This was done by the original author of the software. You could write whatever you want in your little license and he could take that and inject ads into it. I mean, he could remove that bit and release his software.
You seem to have a serious problem with changes that don't affect you. Use your power cable as a noose and hang yourself. You'll never be bothered by systemd again, you whiny shit-bag.
Has the default behavior of journalctl changed? No? Then take your computer and use it to bludgeon yourself to death, you ultra-conservative whiny shit-face.
You're right. Instead of taking two minutes to solve your problem, you could take the same two minutes to put a bullet in your brain. Then you've solved everyone else's problem, too.
If you don't want apps to track you, set the permission once and never bother again. For navigation apps, I agree that force-quitting is the only sane option. I do that, too.
Sorry, but you're an idiot of the first order. So extremely stupid that someone must have helped you with the big words.
The entire point of not force-quitting is that launching an app is more resource-intensive than unfreezing it. So launching a 100 or so apps at device start would waste a lot of resources that will probably never be used. Very few people use all the apps they have installed all the time. Your "suggestion" would waste tons of resources, instead of saving them. Anyone who isn't an extreme moron understands this.
iOS has no swap. It memory maps static resources, such as the code and the DATA sections of an executable, but it doesn't swap read/write memory to storage. This is done both for performance (even with SSD, swap is expensive) and because there's a limited amount of storage available.
He doesn't even have Jobs's ego. Ego usually describes a person's inflated idea of their own genius. Jobs really was about as good as he thought he was.
No. It's just him.
I guess you're too stupid to be a troll.
Never mind that you can't tell the difference between Foxconn and Apple, you also don't seem to have any idea what a tax break is. Why don't you find a dormitory to suicide off.
I can do it with just 2 tanks of gas...
You have a vehicle that gets 500 MPG? Somehow, your claim is less than believable.
Where did you get that idea from, you ignorant sack of shit?
Do you know what the J in AJAX stands for?
Soon, you'll die. But, alas, not soon enough.
Your sig and your post both point to your genuine and long-lasting idiocy.
It also doesn't make sense, because the wind is turning the blades. It's a turbine, not a fan.
Making money is the what, not the how. A business model is the how.
You are an idiot. This was done by the original author of the software. You could write whatever you want in your little license and he could take that and inject ads into it. I mean, he could remove that bit and release his software.
Seriously, man. Turn your brain (back) on.
And "never trust the client" can be shortened to "never trust". When it comes to security, anyway.
Apple has enough liquid assets to buy State Farm. If they want to be stubborn, no piddly insurance company is going to stop them.
You seem to have a serious problem with changes that don't affect you. Use your power cable as a noose and hang yourself. You'll never be bothered by systemd again, you whiny shit-bag.
Has the default behavior of journalctl changed? No? Then take your computer and use it to bludgeon yourself to death, you ultra-conservative whiny shit-face.
You're right. Instead of taking two minutes to solve your problem, you could take the same two minutes to put a bullet in your brain. Then you've solved everyone else's problem, too.
What does any of that have to do with hate?
If you don't want apps to track you, set the permission once and never bother again. For navigation apps, I agree that force-quitting is the only sane option. I do that, too.
iOS does not swap RW memory to storage. If there is memory pressure, frozen apps are killed to reclaim their memory.
Because, unlike you and the AC, the Apple engineers aren't drooling idiots who wear slip-on shoes because they can't learn to tie laces.
Huh?
Sorry, but you're an idiot of the first order. So extremely stupid that someone must have helped you with the big words.
The entire point of not force-quitting is that launching an app is more resource-intensive than unfreezing it. So launching a 100 or so apps at device start would waste a lot of resources that will probably never be used. Very few people use all the apps they have installed all the time. Your "suggestion" would waste tons of resources, instead of saving them. Anyone who isn't an extreme moron understands this.
iOS has no swap. It memory maps static resources, such as the code and the DATA sections of an executable, but it doesn't swap read/write memory to storage. This is done both for performance (even with SSD, swap is expensive) and because there's a limited amount of storage available.
Who decides what they fair share is? Some anonymous shit-wads from slashdot?