Ingested carbs need to go somewhere. Brain consumes a bit, and the remaining part is the problem. If one has enough physical activity, carbs get burned in muscles. Otherwise, they are converted into fat, or remain in bloodstream (this is diabetes) until cleared by kidneys. Of course it is also possible to get both fat and diabetes.
A smart AI could ask itself what human are good for, and whether their presence is really useful. Next step would be to "optimize" humanity so that it consumes less resources. A few specimen could remain to preserve biodiversity.
I just had a look at Rich Communication Services at Wikipedia. Given the large feature coverage, it is just impossible that this will be implemented without security holes. The attack surface is too large.
Why would they bother deploying a DDoS component if they did not intend to use it?
Perhaps they look after small DDoS against individuals, to gain advantage in network games, for instance. Or perhaps they are ready to split the botnet and resell parts to other actors that are interested in massive DDoS.
That's for concatenated hashes. As in, you hash the two hashes to form one number, usually by XOR'ing the numbers together. Which can be shown to increase the solution space considerably.
But that reduced the difficulty of breaking SHA1, since you now just need a collision for the length of a shorter MD5 hash.
Perhaps it is just that reporters are ageing? Remember that tech available when you were born is boring, new tech while you are under 30 is exciting, and new tech when you are older than 30 is scaring.
It is pleasantly surprising that Honda lets third parties connect to the vehicle control electronics. I would have expected fiercely guarded proprietary systems...
Even the veto power is restricted to directives that go through the co-decision process [between EU council and EU parliament]. There are other subjets where it is just asked its opinion, or others where it is not involved at all.
There is a flavor of autism called "regressive autism" with symptoms that disapear with gluten and casein eviction. Apart than that I am not aware of any treatment.
If you can read memory arbitrarily via this exploit
I understand the exploit lets the attacker discover the randomized addresses, and hence have the knowledge of where vulnerable stuff is loaded in memory. I suspect the notion of read protection bypass was added by the journalist.
Profits! Nowadays, low worker's income makes goods and service demand too weak. As a result, investments in real economy have low returns, and investors prefer to invest profits in speculative financial products. But without enough demand from real economy, these investments will bubble and burst, causing yet another financial crisis.
Wealth production is always somehow shared between labor and capital, and if one side takes to much to the other, things go bad. For 30 years, we went too far toward increasing capital's share. See for instance OECD report
I, for one, would believe in the EU as a valid social economic construction when it imposes a 24 hours work week, decreasing by 1 hour every year until full employment is achieved.
I fear you missed the whole point of the EU project: the designers wanted an optimum currency area, and think that the fastest way to achieve it was to destroy any regulation and welfare system.
The rest of the world bears no resemblance to the US - particularly not Europe
I am sorry to call you wrong: in most European countries (at least in France, since you cite it), social welfare is funded from employee gross salary. The contribution is mandatory and directly paid by the employer.
You miss an important point: UBI enable people to work on projects that make no or little money, at least not enough to live without UBI's help. And such project can benefit the whole society. For instance, someone could work full time on writing free software.
UBI is very different when the sum is enough to live or not.
If it is too low (and at 560 euro/month it is certainly too low to pay housing and food), then people still have to accept any job to live, and employer can pay less because decent living costs are already partially covered by UBI. In such a situation, UBI acts as a social support to employer without taking any power from them.
OTOH, with a UBI high enough to cover basic needs, things change a lot. Employers need to convince people to enroll them instead of the other way around, while people can also choose to start businesses that have social benefit without being profitable.
Of course that consideration do not cover the huge question: how to find the money for high UBI? Some specialists consider a high UBI possible if all national labor costs are socialized: Instead of paying employees, employers contribute to a labor fund which in turn pays UBI to people. I have no idea if this is workable or not
Slashdot Mirror
Ingested carbs need to go somewhere. Brain consumes a bit, and the remaining part is the problem. If one has enough physical activity, carbs get burned in muscles. Otherwise, they are converted into fat, or remain in bloodstream (this is diabetes) until cleared by kidneys. Of course it is also possible to get both fat and diabetes.
A smart AI could ask itself what human are good for, and whether their presence is really useful. Next step would be to "optimize" humanity so that it consumes less resources. A few specimen could remain to preserve biodiversity.
Does Mozilla has too much money in its hands? There is a lot of room for improvement of Firefox itself, that should be the priority.
The only working economical model I see for lifetime car insurance is when the car maker is certain the car will quickly kill you!
I just had a look at Rich Communication Services at Wikipedia. Given the large feature coverage, it is just impossible that this will be implemented without security holes. The attack surface is too large.
30% increase of air traffic will not help curbing down CO2 emissions.
Why would they bother deploying a DDoS component if they did not intend to use it?
Perhaps they look after small DDoS against individuals, to gain advantage in network games, for instance. Or perhaps they are ready to split the botnet and resell parts to other actors that are interested in massive DDoS.
TV make you dumb, regardless of its curvature.
Since SHA-2 ciphers where introduced in TLS 1.2, that suggest we should remove TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1. suppoort soon.
That's for concatenated hashes. As in, you hash the two hashes to form one number, usually by XOR'ing the numbers together. Which can be shown to increase the solution space considerably.
But that reduced the difficulty of breaking SHA1, since you now just need a collision for the length of a shorter MD5 hash.
Perhaps it is just that reporters are ageing? Remember that tech available when you were born is boring, new tech while you are under 30 is exciting, and new tech when you are older than 30 is scaring.
Does that mean they found a way around the secure enclave?
Once we lived in cities. Now the place are called markets.
It is pleasantly surprising that Honda lets third parties connect to the vehicle control electronics. I would have expected fiercely guarded proprietary systems...
gamma radiation
I also believed that cosmic rays trouble were about gamma radiation, but TFA says it is all about neutron radiation.
Even the veto power is restricted to directives that go through the co-decision process [between EU council and EU parliament]. There are other subjets where it is just asked its opinion, or others where it is not involved at all.
This is yet another non binding resolution, by this fake parliament that has too much time to spend considering its small powers. As TFA says:
The Commission is not legally obliged to institute the Parliament's recommendations but it must state fair reasons for anything that's rejected.
Is there any treatment at all?
There is a flavor of autism called "regressive autism" with symptoms that disapear with gluten and casein eviction. Apart than that I am not aware of any treatment.
If you can read memory arbitrarily via this exploit
I understand the exploit lets the attacker discover the randomized addresses, and hence have the knowledge of where vulnerable stuff is loaded in memory. I suspect the notion of read protection bypass was added by the journalist.
It is nice to diagnose, but without treatment, what will the outcome be?
where does that money come from?
Profits! Nowadays, low worker's income makes goods and service demand too weak. As a result, investments in real economy have low returns, and investors prefer to invest profits in speculative financial products. But without enough demand from real economy, these investments will bubble and burst, causing yet another financial crisis.
Wealth production is always somehow shared between labor and capital, and if one side takes to much to the other, things go bad. For 30 years, we went too far toward increasing capital's share. See for instance OECD report
I, for one, would believe in the EU as a valid social economic construction when it imposes a 24 hours work week, decreasing by 1 hour every year until full employment is achieved.
I fear you missed the whole point of the EU project: the designers wanted an optimum currency area, and think that the fastest way to achieve it was to destroy any regulation and welfare system.
The rest of the world bears no resemblance to the US - particularly not Europe
I am sorry to call you wrong: in most European countries (at least in France, since you cite it), social welfare is funded from employee gross salary. The contribution is mandatory and directly paid by the employer.
In UBI, some or all of these costs go away.
You miss an important point: UBI enable people to work on projects that make no or little money, at least not enough to live without UBI's help. And such project can benefit the whole society. For instance, someone could work full time on writing free software.
UBI is very different when the sum is enough to live or not.
If it is too low (and at 560 euro/month it is certainly too low to pay housing and food), then people still have to accept any job to live, and employer can pay less because decent living costs are already partially covered by UBI. In such a situation, UBI acts as a social support to employer without taking any power from them.
OTOH, with a UBI high enough to cover basic needs, things change a lot. Employers need to convince people to enroll them instead of the other way around, while people can also choose to start businesses that have social benefit without being profitable.
Of course that consideration do not cover the huge question: how to find the money for high UBI? Some specialists consider a high UBI possible if all national labor costs are socialized: Instead of paying employees, employers contribute to a labor fund which in turn pays UBI to people. I have no idea if this is workable or not