Slashdot Mirror


Total Commercialization Awareness

jjohnston writes "Salon just posted its technology and business predictions for 2003: Total Commercialization Awareness. Includes: Al-Qaida online, Slashdot sells out, and pets: the new white meat. Cute ..." That's so 1999.

126 comments

  1. Wait a minute by MasterOfMuppets · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot sells out to Al Qauida?? OMG!!

    --
    The Master Of Muppets,
    CAPTAIN: TAKE OFF EVERY "SIG"!!
    1. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, Al Quaida is supposedly the premier terrorist network. It only makes sense that they extend the network to become a WATN thats (Wide Area Terrorist Network)

  2. And thats bad how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commercialization gives welth for a countrys citizens!

    A suggest salon visit a communist country and check out how life is there.

  3. Judging by that headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    JonKatz must be back.

    1. Re:Judging by that headline... by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

      JonKatz must be back.

      No, if it was a Katz article it would have been named "Total Commercialization Awareness And Globalism In a Post 9/11, Post Columbine World"

      GMD

  4. What would have been interesting... by somebaudy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They don't make predictions about Salon's fate in 2003.
    Will they sell out?
    Will they bite the dust and go 404?
    I've read so much about their financial problems that I'm surprised to hera they're still around.

    --
    http://www.somebaudy.com
    1. Re:What would have been interesting... by HamNRye · · Score: 2

      I've read their site and I am suprised they're still around.

      This article was poor. The jokes weren't funny to geeks, incomprehensible to non-geeks. Is this MCSE humor?? The Pets for Food section would have been poor humor on Joe Nobody's Blog, and just plain insulting when the writer was paid by the word for it.

      Linking to "wierd" websites and then making lame jokes about them is what Bloggers do best. Let the Bloggers keep on doing it. Seriously, if this had been posted somewhere other than Salon would it even bear mentioning??

      ~Hammy
      Good? Bad? I'm the guy with the gun.

  5. Wake up call! by saintan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it me or is that picture of Jack Nicholson a bit disturbing for first thing in the morning?

    --
    ****--- A fortune cookie once told me the meaning of life...so I ate it. ---****
    1. Re:Wake up call! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? I clicked the link and looked at Jack for about a minute. OK, I thought that maybe this was some slashdot, in-joke for geeks. Commercial awareness? Eh? What's so funny about the Joker? I don't get it, dammit.

    2. Re:Wake up call! by NSObject · · Score: 1

      It's this picture that was a popup at the top of the page.

    3. Re:Wake up call! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that's disturbing? I once slept with a girl who had an enormous poster of Jack Nicholson's face on the wall over her bed. So every time I looked up while we were having sex, I saw a giant, gaping mouth surrounded by a field of disgusting stubble. Now that was disturbing. I don't think I'll ever get that image out of my head. :(

  6. One Of These Things Is Not Like The Other... by limekiller4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    michael writes:
    jjohnston writes "Salon just posted its technology and business predictions for 2003: Total Commercialization Awareness. Includes: Al-Qaida online, Slashdot sells out, and pets: the new white meat. Cute ..." That's so 1999.

    The "that's so 1999" Slash article you linked to is about Slash going IPO. The Salon blub reads:

    The popular discussion site for fans of open source software will disclose that it's perilously close to bankruptcy and needs to make all Slash code proprietary in order to survive. Slashdot regulars will rebel, and some will attempt to set up alternative discussion sites -- but Slashdot's founder, Rob Malda, will sue under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to prevent any copycat sites. When readers accuse the site of "monopolizing" all the vital discussions of the various ways of cooling your computer with liquid nitrogen, Justice Department officials will threaten prosecution of Sherman antitrust violations. But Slashdot will prevail, after hiring David Boies, litigator to the stars.

    Which, while satire, is quite a bit different, don't you think?

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  7. Pets - the new white meat? by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    So does Fluffy really taste like chicken?

    --
    When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    1. Re:Pets - the new white meat? by Kircle · · Score: 1

      mod parent up! the PetsOrFood.com website mentioned in the article is hilarious if not scary!

      --

      -- Kircle

    2. Re:Pets - the new white meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      From stand-up comedian Lord Caret:

      I've found out why cats lick themselves. They're delicious!

      And just like a cat not to tell you...

    3. Re:Pets - the new white meat? by TeknoDragon · · Score: 2

      it has to be a hoax

      the testimonials are too much... not to mention the questionable legality of the roast bald eagle

      Check the registrant, the CEO and sysadmin live at the same Redwood City address.

      also: checkout his main site

  8. Come on Slashdot! by gpinzone · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nice try putting this in the "It's Funny, Laugh" section! Salon uncovers your scheme and you guys try to play it off as a farce!

  9. 8. Slashdot sells out by Mwongozi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The popular discussion site for fans of open source software will disclose that it's perilously close to bankruptcy and needs to make all Slash code proprietary in order to survive. Slashdot regulars will rebel, and some will attempt to set up alternative discussion sites -- but Slashdot's founder, Rob Malda, will sue under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to prevent any copycat sites. When readers accuse the site of monopolizing all the vital discussions of the various ways of cooling your computer with liquid nitrogen, Justice Department officials will threaten prosecution of Sherman antitrust violations. But Slashdot will prevail, after hiring David Boies, litigator to the stars.

    Uh, yeah.

  10. Snooze by bildstorm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mildly amusing, but even with over 300 mg of caffeine in my system, it's still not that interesting.

    I much preferred Dave Barry's recap of 2002.

    --
    The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. - G.B. Shaw
    1. Re:Snooze by melvin22 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just thought I'd put a link to Dave Barry's recap.

      Here it is...

  11. Behind the times by dipipanone · · Score: 0, Troll

    Slashdot sells out

    Yet another example of why Salon is failing to make any money after the dot.com bubble has burst.

    If they actually bothered to readSlashdot, they would know that this had already occurred several years ago.

    Just how much more *out* do they suppose there is left to sell?

    1. Re:Behind the times by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/users.pl

      Any info look interesting to you? Dime'll get you twenty.

    2. Re:Behind the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than the big ad promoting some MPAA movie i'm not sure what else i'm supposed to notice there...?

    3. Re:Behind the times by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      Any info look interesting to you?

      Nah. That stuff is tedious as all hell. I should know, I wrote it.

      Dime'll get you twenty.

      Twenty what? Years in jail?

  12. Slashdot Timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    2002. CmdrTaco married.

    2003. Slashdot publishes 1,000,000th rumor passed off as actual story. The story generates 480 comments, 263 of which agree with the article, and 107 of which point out it's a rumor and are modded down as redundant. The remaining comments are all "first posts."

    2003. Slashdot parent corporation VA Research^W Linux^W Software stock worth 35 cents. Rumors that AOL, Microsoft, or even Jimmy the hobo who lives under the Longfellow Bridge may buy it. 2004. VA Software bought by Microsoft for a cup of coffee and a donut. All Microsoft-critical articles mysteriously disappear from Slashdot. Bill Gates as Borg logo replaced with Bill Gates as God.

    2004. CmdrTaco loses virginity.

    2004. The WIPO Troll returns again, showering Slashdot in 45,000 copies of the same post: "Lick my crotch hairs." Slashdot, despite running on 18 redundant IIS/8.0 servers, buckles under the load. The term "Slashdotted" is replaced with "WIPO-Trolled."

    2004. Slashdot officially shut down. Millions of screaming, unwashed geeks invade Redmond campus and lynch Bill Gates.

    2005. Linus Torvalds and Anal Cox found dead along with six penguins, a tub of crisco and several used condoms.

    2005. CmdrTaco rumored to have had sex again.

    2006. CowboiKneel found dead in hotel room with 56 pizza boxes covering his bloated corpse. Three suffocated gay prostitutes are extracted from beneath his body as police remove it with a backhoe.

    2007. CmdrTaco actually has sex again. With a woman.

    2007. BSD is still officially "dying." No word on when its demise will take place.

    2007. CmdrTaco starts new weblog to replace Slashdot, creatively named Dotslash. Remainder of Linux users flock to the site and immediate WIPO-Troll it out of existence.

    2008. CmdrTaco has sex with his wife for the first time.

    1. Re:Slashdot Timeline by halftrack · · Score: 3, Funny

      Present time: First time the parent troll is slightly on topic and has been modded up as funny.

      (We've all seen it before, haven't we?)

      --
      Look a monkey!
    2. Re:Slashdot Timeline by damiam · · Score: 4, Informative

      Come on, if you're gonna troll, at least give credit where credit is due.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:Slashdot Timeline by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      Um.... Hasn't this been posted before?

      I can't find a link, but I'm pretty sure that it's recycled.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    4. Re:Slashdot Timeline by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 1

      The WIPO Troll returns again, showering Slashdot in 45,000 copies [....]

      WIPO? Is that some new brand of bathroom tissue?

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  13. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's so 1999.

    Ya that's abut the time that slashdot soldout...

  14. Selling out? by von+Prufer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Slashdot selling out in 2003? You mean Microsoft banners weren't selling out enough? What does it take to sell out- sending spam, advertising for Microsoft, selling moderator points while simultaneously raping our loved ones?

  15. What a joke. by TheViffer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only reason slashdot was mentioned in the article was so it WOULD get posted here knowing full well that it would get dismissed as drivel.

    Katharine Mieszkowski: "No one is going to read this crap."

    Farhad Manjoo: "You know your right. But how can we get more publicity from it?"

    Katharine Mieszkowski: "I know, lets metion slashdot!"

    Farhad Manjoo: "Hey, and I know. Go grabs Salon's 2003 plan and replace all mentions of Salon with Slashdot."

    Katharine Mieszkowski: "We are going to be famous!"

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    1. Re:What a joke. by SunPin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Exactly my sentiments. Slashdot should have rejected this submission solely on the grounds that Salon--a magazine that people allegedly read more than,say, New Scientist--was trolling for traffic.

      I consider this piece of garbage to be irrefutable evidence that Salon is already dead.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    2. Re:What a joke. by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      yeah, and damn that new york times, putting headlines out there that troll for buyers.

    3. Re:What a joke. by SunPin · · Score: 1
      Your analogy doesn't work.

      Trolling for traffic--as opposed to writing a great article that appeals to /. readers--and trolling for buyers are entirely different things.

      First of all, editors are not the cause of "trolling for buyers", advertisers are. Publications offer advertisers the ability to troll at a certain price.

      This is a case of an allegedly big magazine purposely putting /. in their predictions and essentially substituting their own name with /. to describe things that they will do (have done.)

      But perhaps I'm giving Salon too much credit.

      They needed 5 ideas. They needed traffic. They had only four thoughts that barely qualify as ideas. They have no traffic.

      Add a dash of /. to give your site a momentary rise in traffic... Yay!

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    4. Re:What a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect assessment. If this is Salon's best attempt at humor, it's no wonder they're in the tank. Christ! This is the writing of some wonk who just pulled his head out of The Economist (er... more likely Time) long enough to cobble together a pathetic piece of name dropping. And, exactly which name -- once dropped and subsequently linked -- guarantees to light up the proverbial switchboard? Slashdot, of course...

      Weak.

    5. Re:What a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your just jelious that Salon didn't say your name.

  16. It should have read this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The popular discussion site for fans of open source software will disclose that it's perilously close to bankruptcy and needs to make money in order to survive. While the bulk of Slashdot's readership and staff claims to be anti-closed source, Slashdot quickly realizes that open source software makes no money and, therefore, cannot pay for ads on Slashdot. Microsft, however, pays to get .NET advertisements on Slashdot. Slashdot then tells its readership to pay a subscription fee, or they will be subjected to countless MS adverts

    Its funny, because it will never happen. Oh, wait.

  17. We'll always fnd a way around it!!! by mustangdavis · · Score: 4, Interesting
    For every 20 minutes on the Web, "viewers" will be required to download three minutes of ads


    Who ever wrote this was smoking crack!

    People will find a way around this! They will either find some tech way around it, or they will simply stop visiting sites that make you do that.

    I run a web site that rely's on ad revenue, but if these annoying forms of advertising don't come to an end, it could be the end of the Internet for everyone except big business. I know that there are VERY few sites that I would tolorate if they had annoying ads that "made" me do something.

    Honestly, I think that the person that wrote this was just looking to get a rise out of people. (He got one out of me) Hopefully he will wake people up about this BEFORE this kind of thing becomes reality. What happened to simple, NON-POP-UP banners? Yes, they didn't work well, but they got sites exposure! I make it a point NOT to visit sites with annoying ads .... and the people that play the games I run seem to do the same thing. Of all the clicks we get, 10% go to the traditional, non-pop-up ads, 89.99% to the skyscraper banners, and 0.01% go to pop-up ads. NO ONE clicks on our pop-up ads because they are annoyng ... and the people want them to go away! Now if only everyone else would be smart enough to follow suite of a few thousand MPOG players ...

    1. Re:We'll always fnd a way around it!!! by grub · · Score: 5, Informative


      Who ever wrote this was smoking crack! [...] Honestly, I think that the person that wrote this was just looking to get a rise out of people.

      With all due respect, you have an amazing grasp of the obvious.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:We'll always fnd a way around it!!! by lvdrproject · · Score: 0
      . . . .

      Are you retarded, or just trolling?

    3. Re:We'll always fnd a way around it!!! by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      With all due respect, you have an amazing grasp of the obvious.

      I supposed this is an improvement on those who have no grasp of the obvious whatsoever.

      ;-)

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    4. Re:We'll always fnd a way around it!!! by SunPin · · Score: 1

      Don't feed the gigantic troll named "Salon."

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    5. Re:We'll always fnd a way around it!!! by Greedo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now if only everyone else would be smart enough to follow suite of a few thousand MPOG players ...

      MPOG players? How many little milk carton caps can you fit in one of those?

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  18. Slashdot sells out by tmark · · Score: 2, Funny

    Salon just posted its technology and business predictions for 2003...Slashdot sells out

    Are you sure these were predictions for 2003, and not some sort of recap ?

    *ducks*

  19. We are sellin out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone is trying to make a buck.

    Hey when you are done slashdotting, come visit our website Pajonet.com!

    Quickly becoming the number 1 website in the world!

    1. Re:We are sellin out! by mustangdavis · · Score: 2
      Everyone is trying to make a buck.


      You must be making a buck ... or atleast I hope you are .... since you aren't (or shouldn't be) paying that much for bandwidth! Are you on cogent or a dial-up?

  20. Slashdot may sell out but ... by beanerspace · · Score: 4, Funny

    The author of the article got it wrong. It should read The popular discussion site for fans of open source software will disclose that it's perilously close to bankruptcy and will rewrite and abstract SlashCode into .NET components using Visual Basic which it will license and monitor through Microsoft Passort ...

  21. Bah. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Where's my goddamn Flying Car that I was promised in 2000?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Bah. by phloon · · Score: 1

      Fsck the flying cars. Where are the robot slaves?

    2. Re:Bah. by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


      Where are the robot slaves?

      You can get an alpha version here. These early models don't do much though.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:Bah. by phloon · · Score: 1

      Dude... there's no way that thing is gonna be able to clean my house.

    4. Re:Bah. by grub · · Score: 1


      oops, sorry you didn't say what kind of slave. I just assumed a sex slave was what you wanted.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re:Bah. by istartedi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I already told ya. Move to Texas or Oklahoma, wait for Spring.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    6. Re:Bah. by sulli · · Score: 1

      You can Pre-Order it on Amazon along with your Segway! (They'll hang onto your $475 for .. well .. a long time.)

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    7. Re:Bah. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points. bwahahhahaha

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  22. Humourless Geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah, go and get your morning coffee, and laugh. Its not like 02 January is any excuse anyway.

  23. Hahahaha! by Nanite · · Score: 0

    This is funnier than the Salon article!

    --
    God is real unless declared integer.
  24. Prediction #1 by NitsujTPU · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Total Information Awareness, the Defense Department's system to record and monitor everything Americans do, will fail to detect coming attacks on the United States -- but TIA will find new life as an invaluable opposition-research tool for political campaigns. For example, Democrats will aim the system at Trent Lott in an effort to discover "patterns" of Republicans with questionable histories on race relations -- and TIA will attempt to predict the next time one of them will make a racist gaffe. This will cause Republicans to call for TIA to be immediately dismantled, but Democrats will accuse them of being soft on terrorism.

    Ok, so, I can buy the democrats using the Republicans' own tool against them, but HONESTLY, you think that they'll really use REPUBLICAN party cries that we should have more big brother monitoring, more warfare, more so forth? For them to make that statement would require a change in platform that is distinctly toward the right. They'll use the tool, they'll maybe make predictions, they won't dare tell their constituents that we need more wiretaps... if they did that they might as well change their party mascot to the elephant ;-)

    1. Re:Prediction #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the Dems would just set it up and start using it instead of giving everyone a chance to debate it.

    2. Re:Prediction #1 by gilroy · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Blockquoth the poster:

      if they did that they might as well change their party mascot to the elephant ;-)

      There are those that would say that the Democrats ought to do just that. And there are those -- like myself, a lifelong Dem -- who would say they already have.
  25. That's nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    300 mg of caffeine in my system

    What? That's like three strong cups of coffee. When you look at a paper clip and think "I have more caffeine in my system that *that*", come back and see me. :)

    1. Re:That's nothing! by bildstorm · · Score: 2

      Actually, given the metabolism rate for caffeine, plus the effects on shortening the half-life of caffeine by drinking coffee, it's more like having taking a 200 mg pill to start the day, and then drinking four cups of coffee at a reasonable pace.

      --
      The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. - G.B. Shaw
  26. Parody or reality? by sphealey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The Salon article is clearly meant to be a parody of year end predictions, but the scary thing is I see no reason why Prediction #1 won't actually occur. Should the TIA database be created as advertised, the temptation to use it for politial ends will be tremendous. And we all know how stong politicians are at resisting temptation.

    sPh

  27. Oh by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Funny

    Duh, it's humor

    1. Re:Oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So not only are you a fanboy of the democrat party, but you're also an idiot?

      Or is that redundant?

  28. So they can find duplicates from 1999... by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 4, Funny

    But they can't search for duplicate articles from a week ago? :-D

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  29. Ummm by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Informative

    I do believe Michael was making the joke that Slashdot already "sold out."

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  30. The /.-virus is spreading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    From the article:

    When overeager participants try to use their M-16s and AK-47s to take out the Norwalk virus -- which has no political affiliation -- the Princess Cruise ship will go the way off the Titanic.


    It's called English, it's not hard.
    1. Re:The /.-virus is spreading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about

      It's called English. It's not hard.

      or

      It's called English - it's not hard.

      sheesh.

  31. What do you mean SELL out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to Al-Qaeda?

    Most slashbots are terrorist wannabes, only they don't have the guts to actually carry out their wishes.

    No sale is required.

    1. Re:What do you mean SELL out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whaddya mean, wannabes?...Just ask the spammer from Fla.

  32. 8. Slashdot sells out (TRANSLATION) by ignatzMouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Attacking /. gives Salon much needed banner hits.

    --
    No artist tolerates reality. -- Nietzsche
    1. Re:8. Slashdot sells out (TRANSLATION) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Salon shut down yet?

      Get to it. And let's stop linking to them, all it does is encourage them and give them revenue.

  33. News for Nerds, not for fans of Open Source by HomerG · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Slashdot is supported by Microsoft ad dollars and the user base is mostly Windows users. It is certainly not the place I go for trustworthy open source news.

    1. Re:News for Nerds, not for fans of Open Source by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

      I got news for you. Thats the way it is for MOST open source websites. It would be interesting to check out the web server logs for www.gnu.org and www.fsf.org

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    2. Re:News for Nerds, not for fans of Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe that's because most of us are goofing off at work, where MS-use is mandatory....
      I've got better things to do at home on my Linux box that read Slashdot, like....euh.... well, I'm sure there's something!

  34. I found this article to be informative by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Informative

    at least about the AAA. Once again, I learn something every day. Though the BWC needs a better server.

    1. Re:I found this article to be informative by frankie · · Score: 2

      Damn straight about Salon's prediction #4. I wish I'd known the AAA was a pro-sprawl lobbyist before I renewed last fall. Bastards, spending my money to promote SUVs.

      If I kept a blog I'd definitely publish this. I'm going to investigate getting a pro-rated refund, and I'll definitely hit them for a couple dozen maps the day before my membership expires.

    2. Re:I found this article to be informative by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Well, some of the biggest promoters of SUVs are the advocates of more choking Federal regulation of the auto industry. People would be buying Station Wagons and other vehicles with lower emissions than overgrown passenger trucks to haul their families around. But the Auto industry was forced to adopt average emissions standards for their fleet of automobiles. SUVs are the result, trucks that people use as passenger vehicles but which aren't calculated into the emissions average as passenger vehicles.

      Yes, the SUV explosion is another example of paternalistic government regulations gone bad.

    3. Re:I found this article to be informative by frankie · · Score: 1
      SUV explosion is another example of paternalistic government regulations gone bad.

      No, SUVs are the result of lobbyists convincing the government to keep a crippling loophole in what could have been a very good patriotic regulation. There have been many attempts to remove the light truck exemption, but all were shot down by big oil (claiming to protect the soccer moms)

    4. Re:I found this article to be informative by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Station Wagons essentially dropped off the scale in sales during the 1980s when the minivan hit the market.

      This drivel about it being regulations has been repeated time and time again. You can get a decent Mercury Grand Marquis which out-performs in every sense anything in the same market created 20 years ago. People just don't want them - SUV's are "cooler" and "safer" (despite all evidence to the contrary.) I don't know a single person who buys an SUV who does it for anything other than the image.

      Disclaimer: I actually work in the auto industry, so I know what I'm talking about. Additionally, I'm not a pseudo-libertarian moron.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  35. too bad you can't mod Salon by josephgrossberg · · Score: 3, Funny

    They'd get a Score: -1, Troll

    1. Re:too bad you can't mod Salon by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Think of all those /. news that could be moderated "-1, Redundant"...

  36. I am glad I have a Salon subscription by MarkWatson · · Score: 2

    .. after reading this extremely funny article.

    Good job Katharine Mieszkowski and Farhad Manjoo!

    -Mark

  37. Many people are forced to use windows at work. by BFaucet · · Score: 1

    Many people are forced to use windows at work. Also many people need to use software that runs under windows.

    I very rarely visit /. while using Linux.

    --
    -Derick
    1. Re:Many people are forced to use windows at work. by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      hummm.. perhaps if employers would pick up on this, we'd all be running linux at work. cut down their bandwidth and improve productivity at the same time ;)

  38. Re:Micheal is a fucking moron by stevenbee · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    "Spelled" is not spelled "spelt". It is spelled "spelled".
    Unless, of course, you were referring to the ancient grain...

    --
    Don't read this!
  39. In a related news by kedi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The TCA story was a calculated research article supposedly aimed at accurately finding out the percentage of geeks understanding humour, while in actuality it was a veiled (burqa clad) method to bring some geeks nearer to the aims and objects of TIA, while sorting out the rest in several groups: terrorists, provocateurs, anti-something lunatics, etc.

    The method is said to be based on monitoring who laughs, for how long and on which sentences.

    The feedback technology used to compile the results is said to be working on SELinux.

    burqa=http://labs.google.com/glossary?q=burqa&bt nG =Google+Glossary+Search

  40. 35 cents a share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is ESR's humility any less facescious and more genuine since he is no longer a multi-trillionare?

    did he get his stock sold off in time, or is he holding 250,000 shares at 96 cents (at writing).

    Granted $240,000 for writing a configuration editor for fetchmail and flapping his fat jowls isn't a bad deal, I suppose.

    1. Re:35 cents a share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he was on VA's board right?

      If a board member sells stock it'd show up in Yahoo's insider selling, and I sure don't see it there, so he's probably still got it.

  41. wrong, Scoop by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 4, Informative
    Scoop is written in Perl.

    Scoop on Freshmeat

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:wrong, Scoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy SHIT! are you SERIOUS!?? and all this time, I thought it was FUCKING OBVIOUS to anyone who doesn't have their head up their ass.

  42. Re:Micheal is a fucking moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spelt is an acceptable UK version of the past-tense of 'spell', ya soft-headed git. There's more to the English language than the American dialect.

  43. Not only that by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 2

    But AlterSlash was threated by no other than legal genius Jeff "Hemos" Bates for violating Slashdot's copyright by accessing the site with scripts. It's more real than you think...

    --

    --sdem
  44. Re:Some of these are kind of funny by aWalrus · · Score: 5, Informative
    I wonder how many of those moves are due to arm-twisting by VA lawyers trying to get blood from a stone?

    How about none? Slash is open source. People are encouraged to use it. If they find a better alternative they can switch whenever they want to. No one forces them one way or the other. CmdrTaco or VA can't charge them for use of slash, Scoop is not written in C, it's perl, just as slash, and you're a well known troll who, incredibly, gets moderated up rather frequently.
    --

    --
    Overcaffeinated. Angry geeks.
  45. Actions aren't right or left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The motivations for those actions are right or left.

    Everyone wants war. War is good for the politicians, the economy (which helps the politicians), and patriotism (which helps the politicians).

    What will happen is that the liberal politicians will wait until the war is turning out to be a win or over, and then start their speal about how they fixed it.

    Right and left have nothing to do with actions, and everything to do with motivations (or justifications). Both communism and facism both control production. The fact that business owners exist in facism is merely a power brokering facade of the facist government. Instead of being a party member in good standing, and getting your toilet paper first, you are a business owner, and can pay to get your toilet paper first. The toilet paper is still in short supply, because the government dictates all resources directed toward vodka production in either place.

  46. Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, just cause Lott bought a dozen white pillow cases, two large logs, Birth of a Nation, and a few gallons of tar doesn't mean he's a racist. His wife was surely redecorating all the bedrooms and wanted them to match her antique porclin geese. Now that he's going to have more free time than the senator from Die Hard 2, he figured he'd chop his own fire wood to save money and get an inexpensive cardio workout. He likes old movies. And he has a few driveway cracks to repair, but the home depot near him only had the 10 gallon buckets or 30 gallon drums.

    Just because someone has a first edition of Uncle Tom's Cabin signed by Strom Thurmond people automatically go jumping to all kinds of crazy unfounded conclusions. What about the stuff you don't see about him? Like he owns two copies of Michael Jackson's Invincible CD [BMG], and nearly everything Simon and Garfunkle did. He collects basketball memorabilia, a sport dominated by african americans. He has signed Larry Bird, and John Stockton jearsys as well as an old Washington Senators uniform.

    Who's Mr. Lott's favorite actor? Mr. Cuba Gooding Jr. That's right. He has Chill Factor, the Superbit version of Snow Dogs, AND As Good As It Gets. How can you possibly say such a person isn't a friend to african americans?

    So what if he thinks America would be a better place with segregation. I've seen Far From Heaven, and who's to say. If it was set in the 90's that little girl would have been shot for wearing the wrong color shoes, so you can't say the 50's were worse.

  47. I think they gave it to the guy. . . by kfg · · Score: 2

    they promised it to in 1947. They're handing them out in order of invoice number.Better go get a lawn chair and a Porta-Potty(tm), you've got a loooooooooong wait ahead of you.

    KFG

  48. haha. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Unlike what VA thinks of the SourceForge software (that it has value as a comercial product, yeah right) They should be aware that the /. sourcode isn't really worth anything. I mean, there's lots of blog+comment sofware out there, and a lot of it's better too.

    The only thing closing the slash sorce would do would be to antagonize the userbase. Not they seem to mind doing that, but I doubt they would do it for no value.

    Anyway, the value in /. is the userbase, and nothing more.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:haha. by wunderhorn1 · · Score: 1
      I thought you were going to say the only thing slash has over other blog software is the user-antagonizing features...

      (lameness filter, etc.)

      --
      Karma: Bored. (Thinking about resurrecting the "Anyone else is an imposter" joke.)
  49. Total Commercialization Awareness by banzai51 · · Score: 2

    So James Watt is making a comeback?

  50. Al Qaeda's website by Moderator · · Score: 1, Funny

    Al Qaeda already has a website. Since I'm an American I'm not allowed to link to it.

    --
    The World is Yours.
  51. And #11 by aufecht · · Score: 2, Funny

    People actually start forking over money to read the drivel we puke up here at Salon!

  52. Pretty sad by Sanity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The slashdot mention seems like a pretty transparent attempt by Salon to get slashdotted. This article isn't particularly amuzing or funny, so I guess they needed some kind of gimmick to boost their hit-rate.

  53. Re:Micheal is a fucking moron by stevenbee · · Score: 1

    Sod off! :-)

    --
    Don't read this!
  54. Salon accuses Slashdot of selling out. by Valar · · Score: 2

    Slashdot counter attacks by hosing them down with thousands of connections using ad blocker features. Good move, slashdot.

  55. Slashdot racism by yeti+(dn) · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why essentially the same post from registered user gets +3 Funny while from Anonymous Coward -1 Troll?

    Answer yourself (and don't forget to give this -1 too, of course).

    --
    Life is the slowest way to death.
  56. Offtopic? by HomerG · · Score: 1

    Maybe before moderating a post the moderator should read the story first. The article states about Slashdot, and I quote "The popular discussion site for fans of open source software".

  57. RAPA APA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sha1:WYP47F2ARSZBIIPSF2QAGTQ3VFCH7XBN
    sha1:TEI3UE M2XZ7USW3UEEA25E3WGHECPSQY

  58. I'm going to Disneyland! by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Actually, it was Disney World, and last month, so I got my prognostications about the future taken care of early instead of my usual procrastination.
    Must...obey....Big.....Mouse......

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  59. Manjoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me or does that name sound awfully close to MAN JUICE?

  60. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof. There are many examples
    of outsiders who eventually overthrew entrenched scientific orthodoxies,
    but they prevailed with irrefutable data. More often, egregious findings
    that contradict well-established research turn out to be artifacts. I have
    argued that accepting psychic powers, reincarnation, "cosmic conciousness,"
    and the like, would entail fundamental revisions of the foundations of
    neuroscience. Before abandoning materialist theories of mind that have paid
    handsome dividends, we should insist on better evidence for psi phenomena
    than presently exists, especially when neurology and psychology themselves
    offer more plausible alternatives.
    -- Barry L. Beyerstein, "The Brain and Conciousness:
    Implications for Psi Phenomena".

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...