The solutions presented seem overly complex and over engineered to me.
Given shotgun are effective against small fast targets like birds I would expect a rapid fire automatic shotgun to be at least effective against the small & miniature infantry support drones. Also using air burst ammo for existing grenade launchers.
Against larger drones then use rapid fire AA guns with air burst cannon shells.
Until you get charged with "Going equipped for stealing" an offence under the Theft Act. Since blocking RFID will block most shop security devices. Perhaps Blazers will become the new uniform for shop lifters.
The biggest cost and therefore barrier to Space exploration is launch costs. These needs to be side stepped.
Launch a design prize for low cost probes to be sent in their dozens, hundreds or perhaps even thousands to the asteroid belt on low energy transfer trajectories. These need to include cheap & reliable ways to analyse the asteroids for useful materials.
Have a second round to design low cost extraction 'bots' to follow up the analysis probes to 'mine' those materials. These could hoard the supplies or even again use low energy transfer to Earth/Lunar Lagrangian points.
Sell futures to fund the next step based on the value of those materials.
We don't need (and probably don't want) full functional Von Neumann machines.
These two vessles started off their military life as Bomb (Motar) ships which were traditionally named after Volcanoes, in this cases Mounts Terror & Erebus in Antarctica. (Unsurprisingly Wikipedia is wrong to claim Erebus was named directly after the Greek deity)
The nature of Mortar ships means they were built with disproportionately strong hulls for their (Ketch) size making them particularly suitable as Polar exploration vessels as the age of strife subsided.
It is very doubtful these were Netgear or HP, the scammar lie when they call and claim to be from all sorts of Companies, I've had them claim to be Microsoft, BT and Google.
If you type practically any brand name plus the word support or help into search engines you get the adverts for these scammers at the top of the results.
Try it, it works for "HP Printer Support" and "Netgear Router Support" in Google. Moving the adverts from the right to the top of the organic search result list has just played into these scammers hands.
If fact the negligence in this case was the fault of an external IT contractor who stored the captured data on the website CMS, after the requirements has been change to specifically exclude this feature because of security concerns. However the DPA doesn't take this into account. Data loss is an absolute offence, no negligence is necessary. If the organisation loses the data they are guilty.
The size of the fine is not a reflection of the degree of negligence but a result of the damage done . In this case very serious damage because the extremely sensitive nature of the data and who was able to access it.
Slashdot Mirror
Don't you have laws against wasting Police Time and/or perverting the cause of justice ?
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/p_...
The solutions presented seem overly complex and over engineered to me.
Given shotgun are effective against small fast targets like birds I would expect a rapid fire automatic shotgun to be at least effective against the small & miniature infantry support drones. Also using air burst ammo for existing grenade launchers.
Against larger drones then use rapid fire AA guns with air burst cannon shells.
Until you get charged with "Going equipped for stealing" an offence under the Theft Act. Since blocking RFID will block most shop security devices. Perhaps Blazers will become the new uniform for shop lifters.
Not a computer failure as such, according to my source.
Yes, in the UK private hire vehicles must be licensed, as must the driver and the operator.
https://www.gov.uk/government/...
It doesn't matter if you are building a house, a supermarket, a factory or a major civil engineering project you will needs some bricks.
Building Software is the same
It doesn't matter that it is a fake and the world knows it, it panders to the internal political audience to hang their hat on.
Under the European Data Protection Directive (EU LAW) personal data is protected from unauthorised disclosure.
Idiosyncratic builds is not limited to just browsers and is probably the biggest problem faced by Open Source projects today.
I use open source tools daily and yet with 20 years development experience I have yet to fine one open source project that straightforward to build.
.. and are questionable boot strapping projects.
The biggest cost and therefore barrier to Space exploration is launch costs. These needs to be side stepped.
Launch a design prize for low cost probes to be sent in their dozens, hundreds or perhaps even
thousands to the asteroid belt on low energy transfer trajectories. These need to include cheap & reliable ways to analyse the asteroids for useful materials.
Have a second round to design low cost extraction 'bots' to follow up the analysis probes to 'mine' those materials. These could hoard the supplies or even again use low energy transfer to Earth/Lunar Lagrangian points.
Sell futures to fund the next step based on the value of those materials.
We don't need (and probably don't want) full functional Von Neumann machines.
Or will the UK once again prove to be a lapdog of the US government.
I'm not familiar with this meme, would charging him or letting him off make the UK a lapdog?
This is how good science is supposed to work, peer review to find faults and ongoing refinement until certainty is attained.
If this was not a challenge it would not be Science.
Or they could just waiting until their old tax disc expires/ receive their renewal notice before swapping to to the new system.
The majority of people whinging on twitter are just idiots.
Depends on if you've watched Stargate, Replicator
Perhaps you should not have broken the law then you would not be on the National Criminal database.
I've never broken the law and therefore not on the database.
Having signed on for numerous online courses over the years, I've found the majority are very pooly implemented, over engineered and badly paced.
Natural extension of Legal Deposit which has existed in English law since 1662.
It ensure that the UKâ(TM)s published materials are systematically collected and preserved for future generations.
These two vessles started off their military life as Bomb (Motar) ships which were traditionally named after Volcanoes, in this cases Mounts Terror & Erebus in Antarctica. (Unsurprisingly Wikipedia is wrong to claim Erebus was named directly after the Greek deity)
The nature of Mortar ships means they were built with disproportionately strong hulls for their (Ketch) size making them particularly suitable as Polar exploration vessels as the age of strife subsided.
It is very doubtful these were Netgear or HP, the scammar lie when they call and claim to be from all sorts of Companies, I've had them claim to be Microsoft, BT and Google.
If you type practically any brand name plus the word support or help into search engines you get the adverts for these scammers at the top of the results.
Try it, it works for "HP Printer Support" and "Netgear Router Support" in Google. Moving the adverts from the right to the top of the organic search result list has just played into these scammers hands.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ente...
For "BitCoin to account for more of world GDP than the £/$ by 2015" would be a growth rate of many orders of magnitude.
So if any body believed this to be true (I don't), they would invest in Bitcoin not bet on it.
I want the odds that the Bitcoin ponzi will have completely collapsed by 2015.
Massive cultural assumption or what. What about international science presenters like David Attenborough or Brian Cox
If fact the negligence in this case was the fault of an external IT contractor who stored the captured data on the website CMS, after the requirements has been change to specifically exclude this feature because of security concerns. However the DPA doesn't take this into account. Data loss is an absolute offence, no negligence is necessary. If the organisation loses the data they are guilty.
The size of the fine is not a reflection of the degree of negligence but a result of the damage done . In this case very serious damage because the extremely sensitive nature of the data and who was able to access it.
Anonymous because
1) 'James Jeffery' defaced the the site with Anonymous logo and anti-abortion rhetoric.
2) Posted claim on @Anonymous on twitter
3) Was 'Ratted Out' by FBI informant Sabu.
Hacker Makes Anonymous Look Like Assholes By Attacking Abortion Provider In Their Name
It make me wonder who is funding this stuff and more importantly why?