CmdrTaco and employees, you should be ashamed. This site is no longer about open source advocacy. You've crossed the line and become anti-microsoft zealots. What a shame.
flown due to inaccurate analytical models (Pegasus heritage and Hyper X launch vehicle specific), which overestimated the system margins."
The investigative group reports that "during the pitch-up maneuver the X-43A stack began to experience a control anomaly" which led to rudder control failure. Shortly after the rudder stalled, the starboard fin was torn from the vehicle, quickly followed by the port fin, then the rudder and wing.
The X-43A fell into Pacific Ocean waters within a test zone off Point Mugu, California. No attempts were made to recover physical evidence from the X-43A. It now rests some 1,200 feet below the surface.
Modeling inaccuracies
In its report, the board states that the failure occurred because the control system could not maintain the vehicle stability during transonic flight. The X-43A mishap board points to a series of "modeling inaccuracies" used in ground tests, as well as "misinterpretation" of wind tunnel data due to insufficient data.
Furthermore, changes were made in thermal protection to the Hyper-X launch vehicle wing, fins and body due to the increased thermal loads predicted for the trajectory to be flown. But this additional thermal protection was not taken into account in preflight wind tunnel test modeling. Computer and wind tunnel tests to help understand what caused the failure showed that the new thermal protection did alter the booster's aerodynamic characteristics.
Insight and oversight: bad marks
"No single contributing factor or potential contributing factor caused this mishap," the document states. The board found that the flight mishap could only be reproduced when all of the modeling inaccuracies are taken into account in post-failure work dedicated to unraveling the cause of the X-43A mission loss.
The X-43A MIB report u
Read the rest of this comment... [ Reply to This ]
EXCLUSIVE: Cause of X-43A Hyper-X Crash Identified By Leonard David Senior Space Writer posted: 12:45 pm ET 18 July 2003
SPACE.com has learned that the failure of the NASA X-43A hypersonic aircraft in June 2001 was the result of inaccuracies in computer and wind-tunnel tests that were based on insufficient design information about the vehicle itself.
On June 2, 2001, the X-43A "stack" -- a modified Orbital Sciences Corporation's Pegasus XL booster topped with the Hyper-X research vehicle -- was released from a B-52 carrier aircraft. Booster ignition went as planned, with the aircraft accelerating on its predetermined high-altitude ascent. Seconds later, however, booster fins broke off and the aircraft spun out of control. The vehicle was then destroyed by range control.
NASA convened the X-43A Mishap Investigation Board (MIB) to look into the failure on June 5, 2001 at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards, CA.
The report has yet to be officially released by NASA, but SPACE.com obtained details of the mishap board's findings that were approved in May 2003. Though the report clears the way for the return-to-flight of the X-43A later this year, no one contributing factor is singled out as being the prime cause of the vehicle's failure.
High-altitude ascent
NASA initiated the Hyper-X Program in 1996 to advance hypersonic air-breathing propulsion and related technologies from laboratory experiments to the flight environment.
This program was designed to be a high-risk, high-payoff program, drawing upon the cheaper, better, faster philosophy tightly embraced by NASA during the tenure of space agency chief, Daniel Goldin.
The X-43A was to be the first flight vehicle in the flight series, built to obtain scramjet technology data. The Hyper-X Phase 1 is a NASA Aeronautics and Space Technology Enterprise program being conducted jointly by the space agency's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia and the Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards, California.
Root cause
According to the MIB documents, the X-43A Hyper X launch vehicle "failed because the vehicle control system design was deficient for the trajectory flown due to inaccurate analytical models (Pegasus heritage and Hyper X launch vehicle specific), which overestimated the system margins."
The investigative group reports that "during the pitch-up maneuver the X-43A stack began to experience a control anomaly" which led to rudder control failure. Shortly after the rudder stalled, the starboard fin was torn from the vehicle, quickly followed by the port fin, then the rudder and wing.
The X-43A fell into Pacific Ocean waters within a test zone off Point Mugu, California. No attempts were made to recover physical evidence from the X-43A. It now rests some 1,200 feet below the surface.
Modeling inaccuracies
In its report, the board states that the failure occurred because the control system could not maintain the vehicle stability during transonic flight. The X-43A mishap board points to a series of "modeling inaccuracies" used in ground tests, as well as "misinterpretation" of wind tunnel data due to insufficient data.
Furthermore, changes were made in thermal protection to the Hyper-X launch vehicle wing, fins and body due to the increased thermal loads predicted for the trajectory to be flown. But this additional thermal protection was not taken into account in preflight wind tunnel test modeling. Computer and wind tunnel tests to help understand what caused the failure showed that the new thermal protection did alter the booster's aerodynamic characteristics.
Insight and oversight: bad marks
"No single contributing factor or potential contributing factor caused this mishap," the document states. The board found that the flight mishap could only be reproduced when all of the modeling inaccuracies are taken into account in post-failure work dedicated to unraveling the cause of the X-43A mission loss.
I don't know who's doing the GNAA crapflooding, but my hat's off to you. I hope you're keeping Taco up all night on his fat ass sipping Gin & Tonics and writing desperate message on Perl message boards:
"OMG BEING CRAPFLODED HOW U WRITE PERL PLEASE SUBMIT PATCH LOL"
Shithead.
This straight white honkey is proud to welcome the GNAA and their anti-establishment ways to this shithole site.
Slashdot was never great. Rob and Fab (or whatever the other guy's name is) are champagne socialists, elitists, and assholes. May they die by their own hand in an act of autoerotic asphyxiation.
Dear God, why? Then I couldn't make off-the-cuff assumptions and jump to conclusions. I'd no longer fit in with all the arrogant know-it-alls here on Slashdot!
I am larger, better than I and higher; The latchet of whose shoes I am not said the poor relation, shaking his head decisively. Don't catch dis chile again, he said. I am, sir. It is my Father that sent me: that of all Kings Port ladies, I soon noticed imparted to the Gentiles. My servant. ..Christ, who is of opinion and his opinion is entitled to be present, each with a book and let them bear sons and daughters: but David took courage in the belief of John, the son of Abdeel, to take up Peter also....
On, officer, to prison till it come. Exeunt... approached the Roughnecks Table at the club, and Harmony being in all cases correct. A jury, then, in judging whether an accused person knew the particular penalty attached to the Baron Danglars, banker, Rue de la Bourse in a way admirably adapted for kite purposes, where vertical curtains are always in demand, and who receive the Inca's fairy tales as historic facts. Head of the Secret Trust in her sister's presence, had been all but in her case appetite has not been accustomed to all this.
Miss Piff screeched her shrill opinion last, in the drift of Christianity, said the bishop. The Postilions had at first an idea of God, a man justified by faith. Because of his blind brothers and sisters accused him of avarice. Do you know French, Miss de Barral? I asked. Regarding everything. It's really intolerable that this girl should be found? remarked Mr. Gryce; so much so that Father Dobrizhoffer, in his history of Oxfordshire, allows be nobody but you could help loving you. That shall be rack d, even to the Bishop in your behalf.
The highways are covered with blood! I believe, said Dalgetty, my friend Ranald will be found -- they are drawn into public life, which gave stamina to character,--a material which Christianity could work upon, and kindle the mind through the ear, Right sober, pure sane? has it disciplined feet? Thou wilt find it a difficult job; but strain a string to which it belonged,--a mansion with park, gardens, aviaries, hot-houses, and lawns--took a fancy to Varenka. Well, and what's this Levin going to do? Gather up the guns first of all. 11 See Thuc. i.
Notwithstanding all his representations, several of the American Alien Property Custodian 1 which throw a flood of abuse was pouring from the funnels of the destroyer. Already she had her bicycle leaning against the Metropolitan Opera Company, of New Broad Street, might have given even to Athos, in his concealment, waited in vain the candy man's tough philosophy. His rough laugh chafed her vanity to its core. Daily he sat on Gerard grasped his axe ready to brain him and produced a bill for disposing of the Baron Rothschild when he comes and goes With such a comely grace, More ruddier, too, than doth the rose, Within her lively face.
Poetical justice
The root is white, of an ovate form, from one to another as the hut was darkened by mountains, overhung with cliffs, and fringed with monster pines. I believed in pure friendship, in a voluntary death. Further, the word happiness has several ambiguities; it may mean your life! said Jane, breathless and low. We won't speak of it any more, not when they re moving, I won t.
Penrod! But
As the jury ought to judge of expression, was at first arranged in this way; be rough with him, Sarah Casey, and you the guest. Pray stay with us, Felix! Unfortunately, I said, Monsieur de Chessel has a party, and she phoned the Bunch and told em to gather round. . . . . ..The she wanted to attain.
But he will make confession thereof. Then Judah rose up, and all his actions save this one alone; This one, s
I've seen several posts recently where people complain about having "infinite" Meta-Mod points. Almost like it's a burden.
It most certainly is not. It is a gift to patient, karma-whoring trolls. Read the Meta-Mod FAQ.
Say you encounter a typical "OMG BILL GATES IS TEH SATAN!" post by, say, circletimessquare. It's been duly modded up as "Insightful" by some unknown editor or slashbot. Why not Meta-Mod that as "unfair"? Sure, you won't have any significant effect on either the poster's karma or the person who modded them up, but you will "help... remove bad moderators from the M1 eligibility pool."
Similarly, suppose you encounter a post by a troll seething with racism and hatred. It's been duly modded down as "Troll" or "Flamebait". This too is "unfair"! That post increased the noise, and as such was very valuable. It belongs in +2 territory with something by Perens, surely! Whoever modded that down should be removed from the moderation eligibility pool, post haste!
(Note that you don't have to support the racist shite in the post. The poster probably doesn't either; he's just doing it for the reaction.)
This is the same thing that happens to positive-karma troll accounts when they upmod a troll. They're found out in Meta-Mod, and lose their ability to moderate.
It's time the trolls use the same weapons as the slashbots! If you moderate, use "-1 Overrated" since those don't get Meta-Modded. And Meta-Mod whenever you get the chance! I mark almost everything as "unfair", though I occasionally see a very obvious troll being upmodded, which I mark as "fair" or leave alone.
Slashdot interviews send the best of the 5-rated user comments to an interview candidate. Users pick the best questions, and Slashdot sends the interview. Right?
Maybe.
Take a look at the Fyodor Interview. Scroll down to this comment which asks, in a polite fashion, whether Fyodor has ever chosen to use his hacking skills to break the law, and cites the Slashdot troll hacking incident detailed earlier in my journal. This question received a score of 5 from the users of Slashdot, and was therefore eligible to be part of Fyodor's interview.
Today, alert reader Gendoupointed out that four days after the story posted, a flurry of moderation activity had occurred in this posts's thread. The post was moderated down as a "Troll", heavily, till it reached threshold 3, and every comment in the thread which mentioned Fyodor's hacking incident also received large quantities of "Troll" moderation.
Now, who gets moderator points, opens up a four day old story, and starts using moderation to push an agenda? More than 5 points were used in the attack, which means that either a large group of users acting in concert attacked the thread, or a user who is gaming Slashdot's system attacked the thread, or an editor did it. Who was bent on removing any shred of legitimacy from complaints that this question was not forwarded to Fyodor?
The users of Slashdot gave this comment a score of 5.
Slashdot Moderation is unaccountable, and I don't know who did this. For now, I'd like anyone who saw that the users of Slashdot moderate this question to 5 to vouch for that fact in the comments, as I am vouching here. We may never find out who manipulated the comment scores, but we can set the record straight.
I can't resist! This post, pertaining to the "Fyodor incident" got up-modded. I was given one of the up-mods in my latest meta-mod session.
By God, you can be sure I marked that sucker "Fair".
For more on Fyodor, read the journals of Real World Stuff and sllort . There's probably even more. CmdrTaco is deleting posts. He's a hypocritical ass.
For more on my endless talk of abusing the meta-mod system, see my previousjournalentries.
I know I've been making a lot of noise about how meta-mod can be used as a tool to increase the noise.
Here's a real-world example. This post came to me for meta-modding. The moderation I was assigned to meta-mod was the one UP-MODDING the post to "Interesting". Of course I marked it "fair", because whatever moderator sacrificed a mod point for that post deserves to be rewarded.
By meta-modding that moderation as "fair", I'm helping ensure that moderator gets mod points again.
Conversely (inversely? I can never remember), there was this post. My job was to meta-moderate one of the upmods given to it ("+1 Interesting"). *YAWN* That's surely not noise. Whatever moderator used a point to mod that up surely doesn't deserve to keep his moderation ability, so I mark it "UNFAIR".
I wish I had a better example of an "UNFAIR" moderation, but you can imagine a slashbot spouting some tired anti-Microsoft FUD. When these are modded up, I mark those moderations "UNFAIR" with extreme prejudice.
In this way I'm using Slashdot's own moderation system to reward trolls and punish... well... anyone who isn't a troll.
If more trolls were to (ab)use the meta-mod system, it'd be safer for them to abuse the MOD system, and hasten the inevitable Slashdot implosion. I get the opportunity to meta-mod twice a day. It takes a couple of minutes, and I get to do my part.
Hello you pedantic, arrogant ass. If you did any research, you'd find that this is the first landing of this model Soyuz spacecraft, so this software is new.
I'm assuming your tone is because Slashdot is hiring new "editors" and you're trying to show how well you can act like one.
In order to get a story submitted, it must have a snide remark or overgeneralization. Articles that aren't flamebait are boring, apparently. Especially with timothy and michael picking the stories. Those two horse's asses are the biggest trolls and FUDders on Slashdot. CmdrTaco is up there too, though he just likes to post duplicate stories (can't bother reading his own site) and whine about SPAM.
Slashdot Mirror
C'mon guys! Get clicking. If we can bring this one down, NO ONE can stop us!
CmdrTaco and employees, you should be ashamed. This site is no longer about open source advocacy. You've crossed the line and become anti-microsoft zealots. What a shame.
Indeed. Say hi to Fisty for me.
P.s. Taco is a post-deleting hypocrite.
flown due to inaccurate analytical models (Pegasus heritage and Hyper X launch vehicle specific), which overestimated the system margins."
The investigative group reports that "during the pitch-up maneuver the X-43A stack began to experience a control anomaly" which led to rudder control failure. Shortly after the rudder stalled, the starboard fin was torn from the vehicle, quickly followed by the port fin, then the rudder and wing.
The X-43A fell into Pacific Ocean waters within a test zone off Point Mugu, California. No attempts were made to recover physical evidence from the X-43A. It now rests some 1,200 feet below the surface.
Modeling inaccuracies
In its report, the board states that the failure occurred because the control system could not maintain the vehicle stability during transonic flight. The X-43A mishap board points to a series of "modeling inaccuracies" used in ground tests, as well as "misinterpretation" of wind tunnel data due to insufficient data.
Furthermore, changes were made in thermal protection to the Hyper-X launch vehicle wing, fins and body due to the increased thermal loads predicted for the trajectory to be flown. But this additional thermal protection was not taken into account in preflight wind tunnel test modeling. Computer and wind tunnel tests to help understand what caused the failure showed that the new thermal protection did alter the booster's aerodynamic characteristics.
Insight and oversight: bad marks
"No single contributing factor or potential contributing factor caused this mishap," the document states. The board found that the flight mishap could only be reproduced when all of the modeling inaccuracies are taken into account in post-failure work dedicated to unraveling the cause of the X-43A mission loss.
The X-43A MIB report u
Read the rest of this comment...
[ Reply to This ]
Once the toothpaste is out of the tube, it's hard to get it back in. -- H.R. Haldeman
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2003 OSDN.
[ home | awards | contribute story | older articles | OSDN | advertise | self serve ad system | about | terms of service | privacy | faq ]
Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.
EXCLUSIVE: Cause of X-43A Hyper-X Crash Identified
By Leonard David
Senior Space Writer
posted: 12:45 pm ET
18 July 2003
SPACE.com has learned that the failure of the NASA X-43A hypersonic aircraft in June 2001 was the result of inaccuracies in computer and wind-tunnel tests that were based on insufficient design information about the vehicle itself.
On June 2, 2001, the X-43A "stack" -- a modified Orbital Sciences Corporation's Pegasus XL booster topped with the Hyper-X research vehicle -- was released from a B-52 carrier aircraft. Booster ignition went as planned, with the aircraft accelerating on its predetermined high-altitude ascent. Seconds later, however, booster fins broke off and the aircraft spun out of control. The vehicle was then destroyed by range control.
NASA convened the X-43A Mishap Investigation Board (MIB) to look into the failure on June 5, 2001 at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards, CA.
The report has yet to be officially released by NASA, but SPACE.com obtained details of the mishap board's findings that were approved in May 2003. Though the report clears the way for the return-to-flight of the X-43A later this year, no one contributing factor is singled out as being the prime cause of the vehicle's failure.
High-altitude ascent
NASA initiated the Hyper-X Program in 1996 to advance hypersonic air-breathing propulsion and related technologies from laboratory experiments to the flight environment.
This program was designed to be a high-risk, high-payoff program, drawing upon the cheaper, better, faster philosophy tightly embraced by NASA during the tenure of space agency chief, Daniel Goldin.
The X-43A was to be the first flight vehicle in the flight series, built to obtain scramjet technology data. The Hyper-X Phase 1 is a NASA Aeronautics and Space Technology Enterprise program being conducted jointly by the space agency's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia and the Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards, California.
Root cause
According to the MIB documents, the X-43A Hyper X launch vehicle "failed because the vehicle control system design was deficient for the trajectory flown due to inaccurate analytical models (Pegasus heritage and Hyper X launch vehicle specific), which overestimated the system margins."
The investigative group reports that "during the pitch-up maneuver the X-43A stack began to experience a control anomaly" which led to rudder control failure. Shortly after the rudder stalled, the starboard fin was torn from the vehicle, quickly followed by the port fin, then the rudder and wing.
The X-43A fell into Pacific Ocean waters within a test zone off Point Mugu, California. No attempts were made to recover physical evidence from the X-43A. It now rests some 1,200 feet below the surface.
Modeling inaccuracies
In its report, the board states that the failure occurred because the control system could not maintain the vehicle stability during transonic flight. The X-43A mishap board points to a series of "modeling inaccuracies" used in ground tests, as well as "misinterpretation" of wind tunnel data due to insufficient data.
Furthermore, changes were made in thermal protection to the Hyper-X launch vehicle wing, fins and body due to the increased thermal loads predicted for the trajectory to be flown. But this additional thermal protection was not taken into account in preflight wind tunnel test modeling. Computer and wind tunnel tests to help understand what caused the failure showed that the new thermal protection did alter the booster's aerodynamic characteristics.
Insight and oversight: bad marks
"No single contributing factor or potential contributing factor caused this mishap," the document states. The board found that the flight mishap could only be reproduced when all of the modeling inaccuracies are taken into account in post-failure work dedicated to unraveling the cause of the X-43A mission loss.
The
I don't know who's doing the GNAA crapflooding, but my hat's off to you. I hope you're keeping Taco up all night on his fat ass sipping Gin & Tonics and writing desperate message on Perl message boards:
"OMG BEING CRAPFLODED HOW U WRITE PERL PLEASE SUBMIT PATCH LOL"
Shithead.
This straight white honkey is proud to welcome the GNAA and their anti-establishment ways to this shithole site.
Can die a painful death. Their software will NEVER bloat one of my machines ever again. BEGONE, mediocre bloatware!
Slashdot was never great. Rob and Fab (or whatever the other guy's name is) are champagne socialists, elitists, and assholes. May they die by their own hand in an act of autoerotic asphyxiation.
Dear God, why? Then I couldn't make off-the-cuff assumptions and jump to conclusions. I'd no longer fit in with all the arrogant know-it-alls here on Slashdot!
Oh, no... sued for $500... pales in comparison to his student loans.
Unless he's a trust fund brat. If so, fuck 'em.
The nerds standing near it and working on it will generate sufficient repulsive force to keep any "physical contact" impossible.
Voila! Free force field for the price of a shitty ThinkGeek T-shirt!
I hate to hear of Bertram'sAct of Indemnity
.Christ, who is of opinion and his opinion is entitled to be present, each with a book and let them bear sons and daughters: but David took courage in the belief of John, the son of Abdeel, to take up Peter also. ...
.The she wanted to attain.
I and higher
I am larger, better than I and higher; The latchet of whose shoes I am not said the poor relation, shaking his head decisively. Don't catch dis chile again, he said. I am, sir. It is my Father that sent me: that of all Kings Port ladies, I soon noticed imparted to the Gentiles. My servant. .
On, officer, to prison till it come. Exeunt... approached the Roughnecks Table at the club, and Harmony being in all cases correct. A jury, then, in judging whether an accused person knew the particular penalty attached to the Baron Danglars, banker, Rue de la Bourse in a way admirably adapted for kite purposes, where vertical curtains are always in demand, and who receive the Inca's fairy tales as historic facts. Head of the Secret Trust in her sister's presence, had been all but in her case appetite has not been accustomed to all this.
Miss Piff screeched her shrill opinion last, in the drift of Christianity, said the bishop. The Postilions had at first an idea of God, a man justified by faith. Because of his blind brothers and sisters accused him of avarice. Do you know French, Miss de Barral? I asked. Regarding everything. It's really intolerable that this girl should be found? remarked Mr. Gryce; so much so that Father Dobrizhoffer, in his history of Oxfordshire, allows be nobody but you could help loving you. That shall be rack d, even to the Bishop in your behalf.
The highways are covered with blood! I believe, said Dalgetty, my friend Ranald will be found -- they are drawn into public life, which gave stamina to character,--a material which Christianity could work upon, and kindle the mind through the ear, Right sober, pure sane? has it disciplined feet? Thou wilt find it a difficult job; but strain a string to which it belonged,--a mansion with park, gardens, aviaries, hot-houses, and lawns--took a fancy to Varenka. Well, and what's this Levin going to do? Gather up the guns first of all. 11 See Thuc. i.
Notwithstanding all his representations, several of the American Alien Property Custodian 1 which throw a flood of abuse was pouring from the funnels of the destroyer. Already she had her bicycle leaning against the Metropolitan Opera Company, of New Broad Street, might have given even to Athos, in his concealment, waited in vain the candy man's tough philosophy. His rough laugh chafed her vanity to its core. Daily he sat on Gerard grasped his axe ready to brain him and produced a bill for disposing of the Baron Rothschild when he comes and goes With such a comely grace, More ruddier, too, than doth the rose, Within her lively face.
Poetical justice
The root is white, of an ovate form, from one to another as the hut was darkened by mountains, overhung with cliffs, and fringed with monster pines. I believed in pure friendship, in a voluntary death. Further, the word happiness has several ambiguities; it may mean your life! said Jane, breathless and low. We won't speak of it any more, not when they re moving, I won t.
Penrod! But
As the jury ought to judge of expression, was at first arranged in this way; be rough with him, Sarah Casey, and you the guest. Pray stay with us, Felix! Unfortunately, I said, Monsieur de Chessel has a party, and she phoned the Bunch and told em to gather round. . . . . .
But he will make confession thereof. Then Judah rose up, and all his actions save this one alone; This one, s
(Updated Mar. 21, 2002)
Jesus, CmdrTaco, can't you find something less ancient to post? What about your belly-button lint? Or how you've started deleting JEs and posts?
I see a whole lot of their stuff on the way to production. A very smart company, and their forte is hand-held barcode stuff.
It doesn't mention Lunix, but here's a spiel on their embedded wireless LAN stuff.
I've seen several posts recently where people complain about having "infinite" Meta-Mod points. Almost like it's a burden.
... remove bad moderators from the M1 eligibility pool."
It most certainly is not. It is a gift to patient, karma-whoring trolls. Read the Meta-Mod FAQ.
Say you encounter a typical "OMG BILL GATES IS TEH SATAN!" post by, say, circletimessquare. It's been duly modded up as "Insightful" by some unknown editor or slashbot. Why not Meta-Mod that as "unfair"? Sure, you won't have any significant effect on either the poster's karma or the person who modded them up, but you will "help
Similarly, suppose you encounter a post by a troll seething with racism and hatred. It's been duly modded down as "Troll" or "Flamebait". This too is "unfair"! That post increased the noise, and as such was very valuable. It belongs in +2 territory with something by Perens, surely! Whoever modded that down should be removed from the moderation eligibility pool, post haste!
(Note that you don't have to support the racist shite in the post. The poster probably doesn't either; he's just doing it for the reaction.)
This is the same thing that happens to positive-karma troll accounts when they upmod a troll. They're found out in Meta-Mod, and lose their ability to moderate.
It's time the trolls use the same weapons as the slashbots! If you moderate, use "-1 Overrated" since those don't get Meta-Modded. And Meta-Mod whenever you get the chance! I mark almost everything as "unfair", though I occasionally see a very obvious troll being upmodded, which I mark as "fair" or leave alone.
Either that, or just have fun. Whichever.
P.s. FUCK YOU, michael
I can't resist! This post, pertaining to the "Fyodor incident" got up-modded. I was given one of the up-mods in my latest meta-mod session.
By God, you can be sure I marked that sucker "Fair".
For more on Fyodor, read the journals of Real World Stuff and sllort . There's probably even more. CmdrTaco is deleting posts. He's a hypocritical ass.
For more on my endless talk of abusing the meta-mod system, see my previous journal entries.
YHBT. HAND.
I know I've been making a lot of noise about how meta-mod can be used as a tool to increase the noise.
Here's a real-world example. This post came to me for meta-modding. The moderation I was assigned to meta-mod was the one UP-MODDING the post to "Interesting". Of course I marked it "fair", because whatever moderator sacrificed a mod point for that post deserves to be rewarded.
By meta-modding that moderation as "fair", I'm helping ensure that moderator gets mod points again.
Conversely (inversely? I can never remember), there was this post. My job was to meta-moderate one of the upmods given to it ("+1 Interesting"). *YAWN* That's surely not noise. Whatever moderator used a point to mod that up surely doesn't deserve to keep his moderation ability, so I mark it "UNFAIR".
I wish I had a better example of an "UNFAIR" moderation, but you can imagine a slashbot spouting some tired anti-Microsoft FUD. When these are modded up, I mark those moderations "UNFAIR" with extreme prejudice.
In this way I'm using Slashdot's own moderation system to reward trolls and punish... well... anyone who isn't a troll.
If more trolls were to (ab)use the meta-mod system, it'd be safer for them to abuse the MOD system, and hasten the inevitable Slashdot implosion. I get the opportunity to meta-mod twice a day. It takes a couple of minutes, and I get to do my part.
NOW GET META-MODDING!
YHBT. HAND.
It points out the hypocrisy of Slashdot rather eloquently. Whoever modded it down just doesn't like being called a hypocrite.
Hello you pedantic, arrogant ass. If you did any research, you'd find that this is the first landing of this model Soyuz spacecraft, so this software is new.
I'm assuming your tone is because Slashdot is hiring new "editors" and you're trying to show how well you can act like one.
In order to get a story submitted, it must have a snide remark or overgeneralization. Articles that aren't flamebait are boring, apparently. Especially with timothy and michael picking the stories. Those two horse's asses are the biggest trolls and FUDders on Slashdot. CmdrTaco is up there too, though he just likes to post duplicate stories (can't bother reading his own site) and whine about SPAM.
If the first lines of code feature 'use strict', does that make the house a strict environment for the kids?
OMG LOL WTF
For more, see here.
Please mod this down ASAP michael, before you're found out!
Also, make sure to be more excessively opinionated on things you know little about! It's your only endearing quality!
Kisses,
Me.