Slashdot Mirror


User: MondoMor

MondoMor's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
192
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 192

  1. Hi michael, you worthless cunt! on Using GPS to Hail Cabs · · Score: -1, Troll

    Abused your editorial powers lately?

    Made much of an ass of yourself with your ignorant, opinionated pumpkinhead?

    Please die in your next autoerotic asphyxiation experience.

    Ta,
    Me

  2. Real "wrath of God" type stuff on AOL, MS & Yahoo Unite On Anti-Spam Initiative · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dogs and cats, living together...

    [b]mass hysteria![/b]

    WTF. MS et al joining together to resist fundamental changes to the internet, and AOL moving to stop SPAM.

    What's next? The fall of communism?

  3. Sorry, on Micro-Helicopter Fun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Even with a gyro keeping the tail steady, it still takes two hands to fly. Even to hover.

    A better way to kick the porn habit is to glue sandpaper to your hands, pillow and realdoll.

  4. fp on Old-school Nerdy Comics · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    omG YOU SUCK LOLOLOL
    '
    AND STUFF

    no more caps ok

    i have infinite metamod ability! woohoo!

  5. Shouldn't this have been posted by CmdrTaco? on Spam Research Six Month Report · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Spam" ought to be CmdrTaco's category to update all by himself. It appears to be some weird obsession with him, since most people in his position just use one of the many freely-available tools and live with it.

    Spam, the religion of CmdrTaco, who will soon declare SpamJihad on the troll community here, unleashing his SpamFedaykin-Slashbots! SPAM!

  6. A day when CmdrTaco doesn't bitch about spam... on Did You Really Want To Read That Spam? · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is like a day without sunshine.

  7. Columbia FAQ on Shuttle Data Recorder May be Key to Accident · · Score: 5, Informative

    This being Slashdot, there's a lot of people talking about things they know nothing about, and acting like experts.

    There's an excellent FAQ, that will clear up a lot of misconceptions, and hopefully shut up some of the ignorant pedants.

    If you're afraid it's a hidden goatse link, here it is naked:

    http://www.io.com/~o_m/home.html

  8. Your reward, loyal mindless slashbot, on TRON + Linux = "T-Linux" · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    is a picture of a twat. Good job picking up the obligatory predictable anti-MS joke, shithead.

  9. Mobile device question on TRON + Linux = "T-Linux" · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Will T-Linux run on my T-Mobile PDA, allowing me to get T-Boned in my car while I draw a T-Rex in GIMP?

    Because, fuck ME, that sounds like a smashing way to spend an evening!

    AHHAHAHAHA SMASHING

    I AM A HUGE NERD. KILL ME BEFORE I HARM MYSELF OR OTHERS.

  10. Meta-mod == gift to trolls on 2gbps Wireless Network Rollout this Summer · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I've seen several posts recently where people complain about having "infinite" Meta-Mod points. Almost like it's a burden.

    It most certainly is not. It is a gift to patient, karma-whoring trolls. Read the Meta-Mod FAQ.

    Say you encounter a typical "OMG BILL GATES IS TEH SATAN!" post by, say, circletimessquare. It's been duly modded up as "Insightful" by some unknown editor or slashbot. Why not Meta-Mod that as "unfair"? Sure, you won't have any significant effect on either the poster's karma or the person who modded them up, but you will "help ... remove bad moderators from the M1 eligibility pool."

    Similarly, suppose you encounter a post by a troll seething with racism and hatred. It's been duly modded down as "Troll" or "Flamebait". This too is "unfair"! That post increased the noise, and as such was very valuable. It belongs in +2 territory with something by Perens, surely! Whoever modded that down should be removed from the moderation eligibility pool, post haste!

    (Note that you don't have to support the racist shite in the post. The poster probably doesn't either; he's just doing it for the reaction.)

    This is the same thing that happens to positive-karma troll accounts when they upmod a troll. They're found out in Meta-Mod, and lose their ability to moderate.

    It's time the trolls use the same weapons as the slashbots! If you moderate, use "-1 Overrated" since those don't get Meta-Modded. And Meta-Mod whenever you get the chance! I mark almost everything as "unfair", though I occasionally see a very obvious troll being upmodded, which I mark as "fair" or leave alone.

    Either that, or just have fun. Whichever.

    Edit I've recently realized that my alter ego and I make up a fifth of $$$$$exyGal's foes. I am beaming with pride. Almost as much pride as nabbing 5,000,001st post, or having my sordid past with michael crapflooded by SexualAssPussy.

  11. my name is michael and I'm a horse's ass on 2gbps Wireless Network Rollout this Summer · · Score: -1

    It's true!

    MMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmichael!

    Anyone ever see the MST3k version of "Mitchell"? I like to imagine michael as the '90s version of Joe Don Baker - a completely unlikeable twat with no redeeming qualities.

    BUZZ OFF KID!

  12. You give him too much credit on Return Of Bloom County. Sorta · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Let's run some articles about compelling web content for sale. After people are used to buying the good stuff, maybe they'll subscribe to /."


    CmdrTaco once said,
    "Golly, it sure is a lot of effort picking out the stories to submit. Now that the subscribers pay me for the priveledge of spell-, dupe- and fact-checking the stories we "editors" put up, I'm free to engage in a surly wank-a-thon with michael and timothy!"

    Michael replied, "but rob dear, will I still get to act like a complete ass and suggest conspiracy theories where none exist?"

    "yes! and we must be able to inject every possible drop of our irrational biases into the submitted stories," interjected timothy.

    Hemos, tied up and bleeding on the couch, grunted and suggested that nothing would change. In fact, Slashdot would become even MORE partial, biased and ignorant. Plus, a new "plum" was coming out so that the Slashbots could eat and regurgitate even MORE anti-MS FUD!

    They all laughed an evil laugh and opened another bucket of KFC. Except michael, who for some reason just sulked.
  13. Re:Oh yeah, dune on Children Of Dune Tonight · · Score: 1

    Herbert really was hitting the crack pipe when Leto did the sandtrout thing.

    Leto's sacrifice: to live thousands of years, seeing everyone he loved die, and to become the "greatest predator mankind has ever known". Because of Leto's oppression (and his ability to carry out the oppression over many lifetimes -- long term planning), there would be no more Emperors, and mankind would scatter farther than it would have normally.

    Whatever the Bene Gesserit-cum-Honored Matres were running from, it was scary as hell. Leto saw it coming thousands of years beforehand.

    I just wish Duncan Idaho hadn't been used all the way up to the end.

    I was hoping Brian Herbert would carry on his Dad's legacy and publish what he could find about Dune after Chapterhouse, but after reading two of his three "prequel" books, I just want him to stop. A Dune concordance would be nice, though.

  14. Paul, what do you think of: on Ask Security/Cryptography Expert Paul Kocher · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This mind-numbingly overrated site? Would you like to purchase a subscription so that you can spell- fact- and dupe-check articles for the editors? See, they're too busy, uh... hmmm... well they're too busy to do this themselves. Probably because they're wankers.

    Also, Paul, if you happen to find an error for the editors, please make sure to email them immediately because the only reason they actually read the comments is to mod down anyone who isn't toeing the Slashdot party line. They tend to skip over comments like, "BROKEN LINK", "DUPLICATE ARTICLE", "NO TEXT IN ARTICLE" and "SHUT UP WITH THE COMMENTARY, YOU FUCKING TWATS". (Yes, it's censorship, but good luck getting it through Rob Malda's SPAM-encrusted skull).

    But by all means, make your email asskissingly polite otherwise you'll be heaped upon by "friends of Slashdot" (i.e. Rob's little brother).

    Sincerely,
    MondoMor

  15. Meta-mod == gift to trolls on Professional Apache Security · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I've seen several posts recently where people complain about having "infinite" Meta-Mod points. Almost like it's a burden.

    It most certainly is not. It is a gift to patient, karma-whoring trolls. Read the Meta-Mod FAQ.

    Say you encounter a typical "OMG BILL GATES IS TEH SATAN!" post by, say, circletimessquare. It's been duly modded up as "Insightful" by some unknown editor or slashbot. Why not Meta-Mod that as "unfair"? Sure, you won't have any significant effect on either the poster's karma or the person who modded them up, but you will "help ... remove bad moderators from the M1 eligibility pool."

    Similarly, suppose you encounter a post by a troll seething with racism and hatred. It's been duly modded down as "Troll" or "Flamebait". This too is "unfair"! That post increased the noise, and as such was very valuable. It belongs in +2 territory with something by Perens, surely! Whoever modded that down should be removed from the moderation eligibility pool, post haste!

    (Note that you don't have to support the racist shite in the post. The poster probably doesn't either; he's just doing it for the reaction.)

    This is the same thing that happens to positive-karma troll accounts when they upmod a troll. They're found out in Meta-Mod, and lose their ability to moderate.

    It's time the trolls use the same weapons as the slashbots! If you moderate, use "-1 Overrated" since those don't get Meta-Modded. And Meta-Mod whenever you get the chance! I mark almost everything as "unfair", though I occasionally see a very obvious troll being upmodded, which I mark as "fair" or leave alone.

    Either that, or just have fun. Whichever.

    Edit I've recently realized that my alter ego and I make up a fifth of $$$$$exyGal's foes. I am beaming with pride. Almost as much pride as nabbing 5,000,001st post, or having my sordid past with michael crapflooded by SexualAssPussy.

    D'oh!

  16. Meta-Mod == gift to trolls on Peter Molyneux Asks For Gov't Help For Small Shops · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I've seen several posts recently where people complain about having "infinite" Meta-Mod points. Almost like it's a burden.

    It most certainly is not. It is a gift to patient, karma-whoring trolls. Read the Meta-Mod FAQ.

    Say you encounter a typical "OMG BILL GATES IS TEH SATAN!" post by, say, circletimessquare. It's been duly modded up as "Insightful" by some unknown editor or slashbot. Why not Meta-Mod that as "unfair"? Sure, you won't have any significant effect on either the poster's karma or the person who modded them up, but you will "help ... remove bad moderators from the M1 eligibility pool."

    Similarly, suppose you encounter a post by a troll seething with racism and hatred. It's been duly modded down as "Troll" or "Flamebait". This too is "unfair"! That post increased the noise, and as such was very valuable. It belongs in +2 territory with something by Perens, surely! Whoever modded that down should be removed from the moderation eligibility pool, post haste!

    (Note that you don't have to support the racist shite in the post. The poster probably doesn't either; he's just doing it for the reaction.)

    This is the same thing that happens to positive-karma troll accounts when they upmod a troll. They're found out in Meta-Mod, and lose their ability to moderate.

    It's time the trolls use the same weapons as the slashbots! If you moderate, use "-1 Overrated" since those don't get Meta-Modded. And Meta-Mod whenever you get the chance! I mark almost everything as "unfair", though I occasionally see a very obvious troll being upmodded, which I mark as "fair" or leave alone.

    Either that, or just have fun. Whichever.

  17. Re:Simple solution... on New Windows Worm Inching Around Internet · · Score: 2, Informative

    And let's not forget the default hidden shares under win2k....if your admin password is blank, then blamo - full access to your machine.


    Unless you disable the "server" service (this is NOT ISS). Then those shares are disabled. Home users and many business users don't need the Server service running.

    Google for Win2k Services Tweak guide and follow the many happy descriptions.

  18. $$$exyGal on The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Not only has $$$$exyGal caused much consternation and offtopic discussion, she has illustrated the value of socially engineered trolling.

    $$$exyGal works fantastically because she recalls the highschool class structure. She's a popular girl with sex appeal, untouchable by nerds. Since most slashbots are still emotionally of high-school age, they remember being outcasts, rejected by the popular, attractive women. Some take the opportunity to befriend her, hoping to increase their social stature.

    Others, cynical after countless previous rejections, immediately hate her and anyone who befriends her. Now the tables are turned! The nerds get pleasure out of doing the rejecting because here they're the dominant social class, not the "popular" or "attractive".

    So it's still "KILL THE DIFFERENT ONE", only now it's the nerds doing it instead of the jocks. There's so much talk of social justice here, but when it comes down to it, slashbots are hypocrites.

    The only flaw I've seen is that $$$exyGal got too popular, raising the ire of many insecure slashbots ("OMG OMG She writes the same closed-minded drivel I do, but gets better moderation because of the Naked Links! Nasssssty $$$exyGal! Evil $$$exyGal!"). She's now a victim of her own success.

    In short, $$$$exyGal contributes to the continued decline of Slashdot, for which I am glad.

    I'm also proud to be one of the few on her foes list.

    To $$$exyGal!

  19. The future of Google with this algorithm on Google Patents Search Algorithm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thanks to blogging, the web is filling up with more and more, shall we say, "crap"?

    If "what's popular" is "what's important" according to Google, then how long will it take for the mountains of interlinked banality to make that method useless (or at least make more informative search results harder to find in all the noise).

    Don't get me wrong -- I like Google's system, and it's an oustanding site. I just worry about the world's ever-shallowing and more self-referential culture, and its effects on the future.

  20. Columbia FAQ on More on Columbia · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is here: http://www.io.com/~o_m/home.html

    Excellent work by this guy. No irrational conspiracy theories, no useless speculation, no NASA asskissing.

    Sorry if it's a dupe.

  21. Advice to self (age 12): on Advice You Would Give to Your 12 Year-Old Self? · · Score: 1

    You won't go blind. Let 'er rip.

    Also, you'll come upon a question on a test that will knock you on your head. You'll know it when you see it. The answer is "Steve Ballmer's sweat".

  22. Excellent! on The Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect · · Score: 1, Funny
    death, consensual torture and murder, sex, cancer, and incest


    Well, this would be the perfect companion to my Tentacle Rape Hentai divx collection. It's nice to have text to read along with while you look at the pictures.
  23. Space shuttle code is closed on Open Code Has Fewer Bugs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The code for the shuttle's GPCs is closed, and it's regarded by many as probably the most bug-free code around with any degree of complexity. It's been upgraded several times since the '70s, and rarely have errors been found.

    It probably had one of the longest development times for its size, too. Which helps a lot.

    Quality has nothing to do with whether code is open or closed source. It's got everything to do with the environment in which it was written. Code written under extreme management pressure from a profit-hungry megacorp is just as bad as code written by an ignorant or uneducated dork in his basement.

  24. Terrorism. Minnesota. 1977 on The Demise of Model Rocketry? · · Score: 1, Funny

    My dad, fed up with the noise of approaching planes to Minneapolis-St.Paul International Airport, told my brothers and I that if we hit a plane with a model rocket, he'd buy us a new one.

    And believe me, we tried.

    The damn things flew right over our house. These were the days of the low-bypass-engined 727s which are very loud.

    We never hit one, though. The best effort we had was the "KILLER", a rocket with a single D engine, with fins and a nosecone glued to it. Talk about power to weight ratio. It wasn't designed to be recovered. It was like a Mosquito on steroids.

    Yeah, it was irresponsible. If we knew what we were doing, we COULD have hit a plane (they're hard to lead).

    We had much better success with flying kites really high in the flight path and tying the strings to tall trees. Suited airport security dudes would then come around and have to climb messy, sappy pine trees to get them down. We got at least a two hour reprieve from noise while the flights were diverted.

    So, it's probably my family's fault that rockets are getting outlawed. Don't all mod me down at once!

  25. CmdrTaco, the whiny little bitch. on Agile Software Development with Scrum · · Score: 0, Informative
    So today, CmdrTaco posts a duplicate article. Not out of the ordinary, since he can't be bothered to read his own site.

    The twist this time, is that he posted the dupe an HOUR AND A HALF after the first one. Not a week. Not a day. 1.5 hours. There was only ONE story between them.

    Amost every single post in the discussion attached to CmdrTaco's article says "OMG DUPE".

    Of course, he didn't bother reading this (nor the other stories on the front page). Once he woke up and discovered that his idiocy was laid bare, he had the nerve to suggest that the readers should have emailed him:

    CT: Yeah yeah. It's a dupe. Funny that not a single reader emailed me in almost 2 hours to tell me.


    Listen up, shithead. YOU should be proofreading and checking up on your posted stories, NOT THE READERS. Some readers ACTUALLY PAY YOU, so the least you could do is not insult them by posting dupes and implying they should do your checking for you.

    What a fucking worthless prick.