Since wireless is not all that difficult to break into, I'm not surprised to see the Microsoft name in this article. What price do you put on security? Is it worth giving your corporate information to anybody nearby just to save a few dollars?
On one hand, there is claims that Iran could not have taken remote control of the drone a few month ago because they do not have sofisticated technology. On the other hand, they are advanced enough to mount a serios wave of cyber attacks. Is someone trying to build a case for an invasion like in the case of the (Still not found) Iranian weapons of mass destruction that Saddam Hussein was hiding in his palaces?
If it is for the navy, will it follow the three laws of robotics?
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
Enemies are humans too....
As I said, " I do not care too much as my machine is secured (I run linux and the machine has been hardened to stop script kiddies)", so you won't get into the important stuff. If someone uses my network to download porn , so be it
Even WPA2 can be broken into. there is little security with WiFi. I do not care too much as my machine is secured (I run linux and the machine has been hardened to stop script kiddies), so I do run wifi with WPA2 and also require MAC address authentication, but I know thta if my machine were a commercial machine with trade secrets, I would have to remove the wireless card.
The way I see it, there are several opportunities here. For starters, there are several jobs that should be advertised soon, also, there should be some contracts to come for security systems design, installation and maintenance. Failing that, I guess some enterprsing people could get into the business of uranium trading.....
They claim that mankind is only about 5000 years old and they are creationists. Do you really want to start defending that kind of stance? Anyone that comes up to me with something like that, I would send to a psychiatrist. If Linus said that, he has my full support (And I also run the OS he is responsible for)
So, an organization that has as main purpose to kill people, that has been known to conduct illegal operations in numerous countries (And therefore does not have a moral leg to stand on) is telling us that something can be consumed with "no major health risks"? Have they defined what a "major health risk" is? Do respectable doctors agree with that definition? Does any respectable government agrees with that definition?
Slashdot Mirror
If they use GNU/linux, there will be plenty of logs by default in /var/log. Adding logs for procedures is kiddies play
I hope that there will be plenty of logs, just in case that when your car avoids a dog and kills a kid you can go to cort and blame Nissan for it
They should sell the iphone as a kit. Have fun building it yourself!
Since wireless is not all that difficult to break into, I'm not surprised to see the Microsoft name in this article. What price do you put on security? Is it worth giving your corporate information to anybody nearby just to save a few dollars?
On one hand, there is claims that Iran could not have taken remote control of the drone a few month ago because they do not have sofisticated technology. On the other hand, they are advanced enough to mount a serios wave of cyber attacks. Is someone trying to build a case for an invasion like in the case of the (Still not found) Iranian weapons of mass destruction that Saddam Hussein was hiding in his palaces?
So, it is a few minutes of pleasure, alifetime of suffering. Almost like marriage.
Subset? - That sounds dangerously close to a fourth Reich
The navy, by definition sails. Leave interplanetary dreams to others.
If it is for the navy, will it follow the three laws of robotics? A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws. Enemies are humans too....
Well, if the hardware is made in Chine, what makes anybody think they are not using Chinese developers as well. Perhaps was not so accidental.
As I said, " I do not care too much as my machine is secured (I run linux and the machine has been hardened to stop script kiddies)", so you won't get into the important stuff. If someone uses my network to download porn , so be it
Even WPA2 can be broken into. there is little security with WiFi. I do not care too much as my machine is secured (I run linux and the machine has been hardened to stop script kiddies), so I do run wifi with WPA2 and also require MAC address authentication, but I know thta if my machine were a commercial machine with trade secrets, I would have to remove the wireless card.
Any evidence of this anywhere?
The way I see it, there are several opportunities here. For starters, there are several jobs that should be advertised soon, also, there should be some contracts to come for security systems design, installation and maintenance. Failing that, I guess some enterprsing people could get into the business of uranium trading.....
There are lots of fans of Salvador Dali working in apple?
They claim that mankind is only about 5000 years old and they are creationists. Do you really want to start defending that kind of stance? Anyone that comes up to me with something like that, I would send to a psychiatrist. If Linus said that, he has my full support (And I also run the OS he is responsible for)
I'm considering immigration.... OUT OF AUSTRALIA
Nope, it is 40 MB per square inch. Increasethe square inches of quartz, have more storage....
It is interesting, however I do not see the reason for this to be on slashdot.....
Install Linux
At least they work....
Thanks, my imagination is highly graphical. You have just made my day!
There are not enough people using bing to raise alarm bells. M$ is hopping that safari users will move accross so they can start.
So, an organization that has as main purpose to kill people, that has been known to conduct illegal operations in numerous countries (And therefore does not have a moral leg to stand on) is telling us that something can be consumed with "no major health risks"? Have they defined what a "major health risk" is? Do respectable doctors agree with that definition? Does any respectable government agrees with that definition?
One more reason to stay with Libre Office...