With Musks twitter account being an official, registered, Tesla communication channel? Will you soon pop up claiming that press conferences from Tesla should automatically be assumed to be lies?
In my experience it means that the person saying/writing it is a fucktard (most cases) or some sort of contrarian like nerds focusing on "technical correctness" instead of real world use of the term.
The main problem would be eliminated if we could agree for a term for batshit insane people pushing some strange "social" agenda and leave the SJW term for the people trying to right what they perceive as real world social problems - because $DEITY knows there still are a lot of those. Example of the batshit insane people are those that claim to do good for (they claim) underprivileged group while actually making things worse for all people, or those that try to remove gender from technical discussions not related to human anatomy while actually pushing some gender based agenda. Insane. Or those idiots that doesn't like meritocracy in fields that are all about merits and not anatomical features or political views of the people involved... Insane.
But that's just like my opinion man and everyone knows I'm a rabid SJW - after all everyone not throwing stones on women and transsexuals are obviously rabid reactionaries. And yes people have that opinion. Fucking scary.
Corporatism is part of fascism however was not invented by fascists. The description is however the main problem, Mussolini and the others wanted to eliminate unions by forcing workers and employers to work together in a state-enforced system. Also unlike the German regime at the time Italian fascism wasn't a pure dictatorship - there were a council with considerable power. They voted to dispose of Mussolini for example, something unthinkable in the Reich where military and others swore an oath to Adolf Hitler.
The proper way to do it would be a distributed search engine, let users work together to do searches and compensate by removing ads or something. Of course that way lies communism/s.
No, by requiring C++ there is no new software. Not reading linked articles is standard here, not reading the blurb is normal too, however not even reading the title?
So you are an idiot. Doing work in the EU, targeting EU citizens while not following EU law that includes the protection* of individual rights to a degree the US will never reach** means one will get punished according to EU law. If the main company then is based in the EU or not isn't relevant.
(* sometimes to IMHO extremes as seen with the right-to-be-forgotten thing) (** in some cases perhaps that's good, in most I think not)
Well. Their French model "Guilty until you prove innocence" justice.quote>
I assume you have examples?
The fact that all the people with actual power are unelected and unaccountable.
One could say the same about the US (supreme court) however that would be equally false.
The fact that if the people with the power don't want something passed, it either isn't addressed, or they play parlimentary games to assure that the vote goes their way.
Examples?
And there's no way, beyond violence, to actually redress anything.
Obviously false.
The fact that what they're pushing for is the EU, which was merely supposed to be a trade alliance, as a totalitarian super-state and stealing the right of ACTUAL self-government from the member nations.
That isn't an example of respecting feelings. "Your code wiped out three of our production servers. For the second time. This week. You're fired!" *cries* *Employer not raising a fuss about the crying* -fin-
The right kind of glass is generally good, but why do you think plastics are used in some cases where the container have to be really inert (strong acids for instance)? Because some plastics aren't affected by things that make glass dissolve.
Plastic is a description of material property, plastics a description of a material class that are (generally) plastic and made of some sort of polymer often (but not always) man made. Plastics aren't inherently toxic and anyone thinking they are should be forced back to school.
Slashdot Mirror
With Musks twitter account being an official, registered, Tesla communication channel?
Will you soon pop up claiming that press conferences from Tesla should automatically be assumed to be lies?
I think you are confused. Severely so.
In my experience it means that the person saying/writing it is a fucktard (most cases) or some sort of contrarian like nerds focusing on "technical correctness" instead of real world use of the term.
The main problem would be eliminated if we could agree for a term for batshit insane people pushing some strange "social" agenda and leave the SJW term for the people trying to right what they perceive as real world social problems - because $DEITY knows there still are a lot of those. Example of the batshit insane people are those that claim to do good for (they claim) underprivileged group while actually making things worse for all people, or those that try to remove gender from technical discussions not related to human anatomy while actually pushing some gender based agenda. Insane. Or those idiots that doesn't like meritocracy in fields that are all about merits and not anatomical features or political views of the people involved... Insane.
But that's just like my opinion man and everyone knows I'm a rabid SJW - after all everyone not throwing stones on women and transsexuals are obviously rabid reactionaries. And yes people have that opinion. Fucking scary.
Corporatism is part of fascism however was not invented by fascists. The description is however the main problem, Mussolini and the others wanted to eliminate unions by forcing workers and employers to work together in a state-enforced system.
Also unlike the German regime at the time Italian fascism wasn't a pure dictatorship - there were a council with considerable power. They voted to dispose of Mussolini for example, something unthinkable in the Reich where military and others swore an oath to Adolf Hitler.
The idiocracy is coming closer every day...
Freeâ(TM) software not open source. Don't confuse the two or that guy that informally represents Freeâ(TM) software will get agitated.
No!
VIA isn't Intel. The design of VIA C3 isn't the design of Intel processors nor AMD processors.
Why do you think every word is trademarked?
Isn't DDG using Bing as the real engine anyway?
The proper way to do it would be a distributed search engine, let users work together to do searches and compensate by removing ads or something. Of course that way lies communism /s.
8) A glitch in the simulation.
That is not a correct description of corporatism nor fascism.
Proof? Lots of claims but no one ever produces shit for proof.
Proof? Talk is cheap.
Yes, like rain on a wedding day.
Da!
No, by requiring C++ there is no new software. Not reading linked articles is standard here, not reading the blurb is normal too, however not even reading the title?
So where exactly is the iOS source? Or do you think for instance MS open sourcing something (they have) makes them open source?
On the other hand many people think behaving as an asshole is showing confidence. As KixWooder wrote: don't conflate the two.
So you are an idiot. Doing work in the EU, targeting EU citizens while not following EU law that includes the protection* of individual rights to a degree the US will never reach** means one will get punished according to EU law. If the main company then is based in the EU or not isn't relevant.
(* sometimes to IMHO extremes as seen with the right-to-be-forgotten thing)
(** in some cases perhaps that's good, in most I think not)
Well. Their French model "Guilty until you prove innocence" justice.quote>
I assume you have examples?
The fact that all the people with actual power are unelected and unaccountable.
One could say the same about the US (supreme court) however that would be equally false.
The fact that if the people with the power don't want something passed, it either isn't addressed, or they play parlimentary games to assure that the vote goes their way.
Examples?
And there's no way, beyond violence, to actually redress anything.
Obviously false.
The fact that what they're pushing for is the EU, which was merely supposed to be a trade alliance, as a totalitarian super-state and stealing the right of ACTUAL self-government from the member nations.
They? The ideas what the EU should be are many.
The correctness of that is in the eye of the beholder.
STFU, or disprove it
Those that don't even understand the basics in voting look like fools by default.
That isn't an example of respecting feelings.
"Your code wiped out three of our production servers. For the second time. This week. You're fired!"
*cries*
*Employer not raising a fuss about the crying*
-fin-
Musk... Invented... Paypal...
It's hard to enumerate in how many ways that's inaccurate.
The right kind of glass is generally good, but why do you think plastics are used in some cases where the container have to be really inert (strong acids for instance)? Because some plastics aren't affected by things that make glass dissolve.
Plastic is a description of material property, plastics a description of a material class that are (generally) plastic and made of some sort of polymer often (but not always) man made. Plastics aren't inherently toxic and anyone thinking they are should be forced back to school.