How they can expect a customer to adopt their product when they show no commitment to it?
How many times do we have to waste time learning, using new thing that goes into obsolete mode?
Throw it at the wall and see if it sticks no longer works with their approach.
Internet is not much different than scribes writing books in Middle Ages. We always preferred to store information outside of our brain - books, encyclopedias, and now to internet/wikipedia. Internet just enabled quick and free access to information.
You have to play your users - it is a mind game. Deprication warnings are great but them jump 5 to 7 is a problem. People will upgrade to next minor version but will hesitate a move to major version (not to mention 2 major versions). You need to move users thru small set of changes in each minor release 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, then 6.0. It takes more time and planning but it ensures everone moves along. The only way to fix it is to release 5.7 branch and start including 7.0 changes.
Frameworks, languages should always provide a clear migration path and never jump major versions. Python, Zope, PHP, and many more learned that lesson in a hard way.
Twitter will not solve the "mistery" - a proper investigation will do. I know it will take time but at least it will cut sensationalism. Just give it a time.
First of all AIs are biased towards provided dataset.
Since most people cannot tell why they had a hunch to hire/not hire the person - how they are going to provide good data set for AI?
$20k rollex shows time the same way $20 timex does. To some people it is disposable income to some it is a choice what to do with it (invest, travel, etc.).
It is hard to DevOps with security when in most organizations DevOps means 1 person is doing a job of 4+ people (BA, Dev, QA, SysAdm).
Security is usually first one to get compromized (cost, time, and scope would be considered before security).
In not so old days to replace battery you needed no tools or in a worst case a screw driver. Now you need special tool, other crap and 30 minutes - what a waste.
They should offer you free CT scans when you pass the security checkpoint. Connect it with AI to catch random things and offer medical results after you land at your destination.
...to drop it by google?
C should remove pointers. It is offensive!
How they can expect a customer to adopt their product when they show no commitment to it? How many times do we have to waste time learning, using new thing that goes into obsolete mode? Throw it at the wall and see if it sticks no longer works with their approach.
are you going to enforce it on products and make sure car/phone/etc is produced out side of the state with zero carbon emission (... in China)?
SSL/certificates solves website legitimacy issue.
Are they trying to get obsolete by creating a default home page from where you can access information they control? good luck, who is next?
it took them long time..to doctor those recordings.
Internet is not much different than scribes writing books in Middle Ages. We always preferred to store information outside of our brain - books, encyclopedias, and now to internet/wikipedia. Internet just enabled quick and free access to information.
Making America Great Again? There is nothing like a combination of a free market idea and conservatism. Cheers!
You have to play your users - it is a mind game. Deprication warnings are great but them jump 5 to 7 is a problem. People will upgrade to next minor version but will hesitate a move to major version (not to mention 2 major versions). You need to move users thru small set of changes in each minor release 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, then 6.0. It takes more time and planning but it ensures everone moves along. The only way to fix it is to release 5.7 branch and start including 7.0 changes.
Frameworks, languages should always provide a clear migration path and never jump major versions. Python, Zope, PHP, and many more learned that lesson in a hard way.
Twitter will not solve the "mistery" - a proper investigation will do. I know it will take time but at least it will cut sensationalism. Just give it a time.
Ig Nobel Prize is in order for reasearch on breaking cooked/wet spaggetti in two pieces.
First of all AIs are biased towards provided dataset. Since most people cannot tell why they had a hunch to hire/not hire the person - how they are going to provide good data set for AI?
$20k rollex shows time the same way $20 timex does. To some people it is disposable income to some it is a choice what to do with it (invest, travel, etc.).
or you can buy Kindle Filre 8.9" for $60 that does 90% of things Note does.
Oracle warns about vendor lock in - good one. (only if you choose someone else).
soon we will have Alexa HD; 2 years later Alexa 3D; then we will forget about it; then someone will come back with amazing Alexa 2.0.
It is hard to DevOps with security when in most organizations DevOps means 1 person is doing a job of 4+ people (BA, Dev, QA, SysAdm). Security is usually first one to get compromized (cost, time, and scope would be considered before security).
US outsources not only production but also polution.
It is not outselling they are fulfilling long standing orders. Not the same.
people disable voice mails, if you want to reach me send me text or email.
test data provide test results.
In not so old days to replace battery you needed no tools or in a worst case a screw driver. Now you need special tool, other crap and 30 minutes - what a waste.
They should offer you free CT scans when you pass the security checkpoint. Connect it with AI to catch random things and offer medical results after you land at your destination.