"a slight liberal lean"... during the 2016 election cycle, their parent company, Time Warner, donated over $500,000 to Hillary (and $37,000 to Bernie, lol). https://www.opensecrets.org/or....
Not wanting to fill out an intrusive form like this for no good reason, divulging personal history and other sensitive information to the government, does not make you a "paranoid conservative". It is the prudent thing to do. Setting aside the fear of the government having such information on you; how much do you trust their information security? The census information would be a treasure trove for social engineers. Rather than saying "paranoid conservatives", you should say "people who aren't fucking idiots and weren't born yesterday". Political affiliation has nothing to do with desiring privacy.
Just because that is repeated ad-nauseam doesn't make it true.
Of course NAT has security benefits: It acts basically as a "one-way" firewall, which is exactly what most people that don't run a server at home need.
Of course you could configure a IPv6-firewall the same way, but that would take several days and who has time for that?
NAT IS NOT A FIREWALL IN ANY SENSE OF THE TERM. Also, why is anyone bothering to debate v4 vs v6 with people who think that NAT is a firewall, and that you have to "call AT&T and request IPv6"?
"a slight liberal lean"... during the 2016 election cycle, their parent company, Time Warner, donated over $500,000 to Hillary (and $37,000 to Bernie, lol). https://www.opensecrets.org/or....
... it's not. It's just a bullshit clickbait title. /. Is no better than BuzzFeed. Fucking garbage. For shame.
You raang?
Good choice of weasel words for non-peer-reviewed bullshit. Is this what /. has come to?
What's the matter KGill, forget to sign in?
There's a difference between "sterile" and "sterilizing".
Thanks, Abe Simpson.
It's almost as if they are "baiting" you to "click" both links...
It must be hard for you, I mean, having the same name as him. I celebrate the guy's entire catalogue.
Not wanting to fill out an intrusive form like this for no good reason, divulging personal history and other sensitive information to the government, does not make you a "paranoid conservative". It is the prudent thing to do. Setting aside the fear of the government having such information on you; how much do you trust their information security? The census information would be a treasure trove for social engineers. Rather than saying "paranoid conservatives", you should say "people who aren't fucking idiots and weren't born yesterday". Political affiliation has nothing to do with desiring privacy.
Where do you live, Santa's workshop? Most Canadians live within 100 km of the US border.
I hacked a rock to beat paper. Worked well, until someone hacked their scissors.
average fleshlight app
Good ol' phone sex...
Prove it.
One would think that latency is much less of an issue when you are 9 km closer to the satellite, with nothing obstructing the Fresnel zone.
"Whatever we put on the system, has to be certified. You don't just put anything."
Who reads the articles?
The instructor, Beth Landau-Halpern, is married to Rick Halpern, the dean of the campus where this course is taught.
OneWeb sounds evil. This reads like a script from a Brosnan era Bond film.
Nice name, dick.
NAT has no security benefits.
Just because that is repeated ad-nauseam doesn't make it true.
Of course NAT has security benefits: It acts basically as a "one-way" firewall, which is exactly what most people that don't run a server at home need.
Of course you could configure a IPv6-firewall the same way, but that would take several days and who has time for that?
NAT IS NOT A FIREWALL IN ANY SENSE OF THE TERM. Also, why is anyone bothering to debate v4 vs v6 with people who think that NAT is a firewall, and that you have to "call AT&T and request IPv6"?
He said 210k per year, but he didn't say dollars... perhaps he makes 210,000 pesos, yen, or roubles per year?
The guy had pushed the "maximum overdrive" button. Simple mistake.
But does it run Linux?
You must mean something like securID token dongles because RSA keys do not weight anything and you can put thousands of them on one single USB dongle.
Whoosh doesn't suffice.