Memogate, what a great way to get the discussion away from the disturbing little fact that the C-I-C sending American Kids to kill Iraqi's over a pack of lies is a known deserter.
Hell, iffn he was a REAL Christian Father, he'd TELL those girls of his to enlist so HIS family can take the same risks he's putting our families into.
And RIGHT NOW, start preparing for 06, 07, and 08 by listing in 08, a replacement for such things as the disk array which will be obsolete, Antivirus licenses, etc...
I cannot believe that with the threat to freedom from both International Terrorist Networks and Unethical International Corporations, they find time to consider this.
When the next terrorists strike, It'll be because these guys were busy playing games.
Remember SLAVES are the ones, who despite the clear intent of the Declaration of Independence, State Constitutions and State Law believe that Corporations have "Rights".
They don't. And it's an INSULT to us REAL FREE PEOPLE who know better.
For instance, OUR rights come from OUR creator, and since OUR creator is omnipotent, our rights are inalienable.
A SLAVE or CORPORATION is different. They don't HAVE Rights. Just priviledges. The difference is that their Rights have been given up for special status, such as tax breaks, or limits on liability.
But a CORPORATION's creator is The State, and since The State cannot require you to give up your prints, HOW can they confer that priviledge upon their creation?
They can't. You've been lied to, and have internalized the Slave-Speak.
And for some piece of shit COMPANY to believe they have Rights!!! And that their "rights" trump YOUR REAL RIGHTS to say, privacy, and to be secure in your papers!!!
How many SLAVES really believe that crap?
REAL FREE MEN AND WOMEN, know that companies are the creation of The State, which has no rights, and cannot endow them unto their creation.
WE have rights because "Our Creator" gave them to us, and they're omnipotent. Companies have PRIVILEDGES they get from The State when they AGREE to the deal by asking to file the articles of incorporation.
If they wanted to keep thier RIGHTS to the PRIVATE PROPERTY, they shouldn't have incorporated. But they wanted the priviledges of lessened personal risk, and lessened taxes, etc...
Oh, and their demand *may* just be a violation of Federal Civil Rights Law ( as in a FELONY for the conspiracy part... ), go look it up, and have some fun arresting the disney flunky, and then filing charges in the federal district court.
All of a sudden it would get EXPENSIVE to defend themselves on the civil side of the suits which would result...
Just a thought... Do your own homework on the law, and you'll see it MIGHT be a neat angle...
The declaration of independence allows for the creation and maintenance of governments for ONLY the purpose of protecting the rights of men and women. Rights which are INALIENABLE since they're granted by THEIR CREATOR.
Not The Creator of a Corporation is? THE STATE. Which has NO RIGHTS, eh? Just priviledges granted by The People.
Now can The State confer on IT'S creation "rights"?
No.
And does that ARTIFICAL LEGAL ENTITY have "rights"? If you read the HEADNOTE to the Santa Clara case, written by a clerk, maybe. If you read the DECISION, explicitly no.
Stop believing their lie that they have rights, and start treating them like the slaves they are. Otherwise, us FREE MEN AND WOMEN just make a note that YOU are a SLAVE, and stop paying attention to your bullshit.
"I agree with you where Disney World is concerned. It's their property; they can set whatever requirements they like for entry. You, as a citizen of the United States, have the right to choose not to abide by those requirements and to forego entering the park."
Talk about Slave Speak, eh?
Uh... Yeah, it's property owned by a Corporation, which has agreed to exchange it's RIGHTS in that property for PRIVILEDGES when it begged The People for the act of incorporation.
And as part and parcel of that exchange, the corporation, which is created by the state, limited itself to the same limits AS a state, so YOUR RIGHTS are protected fully.
Slaves think differently, but they're slaves so who cares?
Our "Declaration of Independence" makes it clear that RIGHTS come from Our Creator.
Since, OUR CREATOR is "The Lord" ( or something... YMMV ) those rights are INALIENABLE.
Since THE CREATOR of a Corporation is The State itself, and the power of The State ( Acording to that same document ) is severely limited to promoting the INALIENABLE rights of real people, The State simply *cannot* create an entity with MORE privileges than The State has.
Now, SLAVES will see this differently, because they believe companies are Just As Good as real people... But they're SLAVES, and we don't need to care what they think, eh?
How can a corporation, an artificial creation of The State, have any powers it's creator doesn't?
In other words $CORP is a subclass of $STATE? Where did the additional "Priviledges" get added it?
Or are you one of them what believes that some piece of shit COMPANY is as important and free as a REAL FLESH AND BLOOD person?
consider,
In the Declaration of Independence, we are endowed by OUR CREATOR with rights. If the CREATOR of a company is The State ( By Law ), how can the company have anything the state doesn't?
Riiiight... And if it just happens to limit their exposure for bad checks because, really, they don't BOTHER training their people to REALLY check id's.
They've wanted this, and check21 for so damn long. Why?
And everyone is trained that they, themselves cannot JUST FILE YOUR OWN DAMN CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS.
Sometime the court clerks don't KNOW that they're supposed to accept your filing. But a quick letter to the supervising judge's office usually gets a letter back saying "Your filing will be accepted".
Y'all can trace code out. Think of Criminal Procedure Law as just another set of shitty documentation, and you'll soon get the idea.
Slashdot Mirror
Full Backups, and tested Bare Metal Restores?
Nutjob.
What, don't you crave "Excitement"?
That's a joke, but when Google releases their beta of their filesystem in some distant future...
a) Application Deployment as we know it will end....
b) Storage Management as we know it will end...
c) You won't need to be Linus to benefit.
Please, Dear Lord, Let me live to see the day!
Memogate, what a great way to get the discussion away from the disturbing little fact that the C-I-C sending American Kids to kill Iraqi's over a pack of lies is a known deserter.
Hell, iffn he was a REAL Christian Father, he'd TELL those girls of his to enlist so HIS family can take the same risks he's putting our families into.
And RIGHT NOW, start preparing for 06, 07, and 08 by listing in 08, a replacement for such things as the disk array which will be obsolete, Antivirus licenses, etc...
As if Voting is fair and valid.
Grow up. It's as fake as wrasslin.
I cannot believe that with the threat to freedom from both International Terrorist Networks and Unethical International Corporations, they find time to consider this.
When the next terrorists strike, It'll be because these guys were busy playing games.
Hanging's too good for 'em!
Let us not forget the 99 of every 100 people arrested and held who were uncharged or had the cases dismissed.
ONE of 100 took the plea bargin.
But the point was to get 'em in lockup, and keep them there for the duration.
Nice Job, NYPD.
No wonder no-one but the tame press would pretend to shed a tear if a REAL NEW YORKER tossed 'ya on the tracks for wanting to search their shit...
"Anything that can be used to save the lives of our brave young men and women is worth discussing and implementing."
I agree with you, we need to get out of Iraq yesterday.
No. Doc*Star is that bad.
I *don't* download a heck of a lot of trailers to being with, but...
Kudos to the guys who set that site up. For the first time I can remember getting the file downloaded wasn't a royal pain.
Click through, and the save as box pops up... No embedded crap, etc... Bravo!
Remember SLAVES are the ones, who despite the clear intent of the Declaration of Independence, State Constitutions and State Law believe that Corporations have "Rights".
They don't. And it's an INSULT to us REAL FREE PEOPLE who know better.
For instance, OUR rights come from OUR creator, and since OUR creator is omnipotent, our rights are inalienable.
A SLAVE or CORPORATION is different. They don't HAVE Rights. Just priviledges. The difference is that their Rights have been given up for special status, such as tax breaks, or limits on liability.
But a CORPORATION's creator is The State, and since The State cannot require you to give up your prints, HOW can they confer that priviledge upon their creation?
They can't. You've been lied to, and have internalized the Slave-Speak.
At least OUR children are and will remain free.
And for some piece of shit COMPANY to believe they have Rights!!! And that their "rights" trump YOUR REAL RIGHTS to say, privacy, and to be secure in your papers!!!
How many SLAVES really believe that crap?
REAL FREE MEN AND WOMEN, know that companies are the creation of The State, which has no rights, and cannot endow them unto their creation.
WE have rights because "Our Creator" gave them to us, and they're omnipotent. Companies have PRIVILEDGES they get from The State when they AGREE to the deal by asking to file the articles of incorporation.
If they wanted to keep thier RIGHTS to the PRIVATE PROPERTY, they shouldn't have incorporated. But they wanted the priviledges of lessened personal risk, and lessened taxes, etc...
Oh, and their demand *may* just be a violation of Federal Civil Rights Law ( as in a FELONY for the conspiracy part... ), go look it up, and have some fun arresting the disney flunky, and then filing charges in the federal district court.
All of a sudden it would get EXPENSIVE to defend themselves on the civil side of the suits which would result...
Just a thought... Do your own homework on the law, and you'll see it MIGHT be a neat angle...
"Disney certainly has the right to do that."
Slave! Have you no memory of what being FREE is?
Let me remind you.
The declaration of independence allows for the creation and maintenance of governments for ONLY the purpose of protecting the rights of men and women. Rights which are INALIENABLE since they're granted by THEIR CREATOR.
Not The Creator of a Corporation is? THE STATE. Which has NO RIGHTS, eh? Just priviledges granted by The People.
Now can The State confer on IT'S creation "rights"?
No.
And does that ARTIFICAL LEGAL ENTITY have "rights"? If you read the HEADNOTE to the Santa Clara case, written by a clerk, maybe. If you read the DECISION, explicitly no.
Stop believing their lie that they have rights, and start treating them like the slaves they are. Otherwise, us FREE MEN AND WOMEN just make a note that YOU are a SLAVE, and stop paying attention to your bullshit.
"I agree with you where Disney World is concerned. It's their property; they can set whatever requirements they like for entry. You, as a citizen of the United States, have the right to choose not to abide by those requirements and to forego entering the park."
Talk about Slave Speak, eh?
Uh... Yeah, it's property owned by a Corporation, which has agreed to exchange it's RIGHTS in that property for PRIVILEDGES when it begged The People for the act of incorporation.
And as part and parcel of that exchange, the corporation, which is created by the state, limited itself to the same limits AS a state, so YOUR RIGHTS are protected fully.
Slaves think differently, but they're slaves so who cares?
"Disney is not a part of your government. "
Wrong.
At least IN AMERICA.
Our "Declaration of Independence" makes it clear that RIGHTS come from Our Creator.
Since, OUR CREATOR is "The Lord" ( or something... YMMV ) those rights are INALIENABLE.
Since THE CREATOR of a Corporation is The State itself, and the power of The State ( Acording to that same document ) is severely limited to promoting the INALIENABLE rights of real people, The State simply *cannot* create an entity with MORE privileges than The State has.
Now, SLAVES will see this differently, because they believe companies are Just As Good as real people... But they're SLAVES, and we don't need to care what they think, eh?
How can a corporation, an artificial creation of The State, have any powers it's creator doesn't?
In other words $CORP is a subclass of $STATE? Where did the additional "Priviledges" get added it?
Or are you one of them what believes that some piece of shit COMPANY is as important and free as a REAL FLESH AND BLOOD person?
consider,
In the Declaration of Independence, we are endowed by OUR CREATOR with rights. If the CREATOR of a company is The State ( By Law ), how can the company have anything the state doesn't?
Recipe for Freedom:
1) Check for Rifle and Ammunition.
2) Defend YOU and YOURS.
3) Freedom.
I would offer Ratpoison as an example, but Desqview Did It.
Riiiight... And if it just happens to limit their exposure for bad checks because, really, they don't BOTHER training their people to REALLY check id's.
They've wanted this, and check21 for so damn long. Why?
Because it's CHEAPER for them this way.
Funny how that P.A.T.R.I.O.T. act had all that stuff which enabled banks to treat The People like shit.
There is no fine print.
It's called fraud.
Us ratpoision users don't experience 1/2 the constraints.
Straight Wire + Gain.
Everything else is bullshit.
I don't think if he wasn't an officer of, or representing a company which didn't exist that this would be relevent.
And everyone is trained that they, themselves cannot JUST FILE YOUR OWN DAMN CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS.
Sometime the court clerks don't KNOW that they're supposed to accept your filing. But a quick letter to the supervising judge's office usually gets a letter back saying "Your filing will be accepted".
Y'all can trace code out. Think of Criminal Procedure Law as just another set of shitty documentation, and you'll soon get the idea.
Remember, how hard can it be if LAWYERS do it???