Slashdot Mirror


Disney World Collecting Fingerprints

cvd6262 writes "Disney World is now requiring all visitors to have their index and middle fingers scanned to gain entrance to the park. This started for season pass holders, but is now required for everyone." From the article: "'I think it's a step in the wrong direction,' Civil Liberties Union spokesman George Crossley said. 'I think it is a step toward collection of personal information on people regardless of what Disney says.'"

539 comments

  1. Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    Way to RTFA:
    Disney officials said the finger scans do not take an actual fingerprint
    It's a hand geometry scanner, not a finger print scanner, and they have been doing this for YEARS.

    With that aside, WHO CARES. You cannot be uniquely identified by your hand geometry, it simply reduces the chance that you are using someone elses pass.
    1. Re:Wrong. by stoph+ct · · Score: 1

      is this correct or not? if so, where's the +5 informative on this AC?

      his description sounds less bad then them taking something so identifying as a photo, which they probably do!

    2. Re:Wrong. by takeya · · Score: 1

      "Disney officials said the finger scans do not take an actual fingerprint. The scan recognizes certain points and outlines visitor's fingers, officials said."

      So it is not a finger print, but can be used as a unique identifier. It seems odd to do this, but whatever floats Disney's boat.

      As always, nobody is forcing you to go to Disney World. If you don't want to get your finger scanned, then don't enter the park. The only real issue with this tech is when it is forced upon people as a means of identification.

    3. Re:Wrong. by John+Seminal · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      With that aside, WHO CARES.

      I CARE!!!!

      I heard Bush say, to every citizen in the USA the reason we are going to war is because there was an EMINENT threat. EMINENT means NOW, it means that if something is not done right away, we will be attacked. And then a year later he said there were not weapons of mass destruction, and we did not go to war over that issue, but because we wanted to liberate a people.

      Who knows what the fuck Disney is using with these scans. Maybe right now all the software does is hand geometry, but who know what other data is being sent elsewhere.

      When I was a kid, the police came to my 2nd grade classroom, without parents knowing. They had fingerprint kits, and they showed a movie about a kid that was lost. They said, without fingerprints, they could not help the kid. The police then fingerprinted the whole classroom. When I got home and told my mom, she did not worry, thinking since the school did it, it was okay. But the next day at school, there were 2 parents who wanted their kids fingerprints back, and the police refused to give them back.

      PEOPLE, we are being enslaved. What is the #1 question a judges used when determining bail? Does the person have a job? Is that person making someone else a profit? What the fuck does that have to do with if a person is guilty?

      The USA is worse than all of Al Queda and Nazi germany put together. We are enslaving the world to "western values". I hope a nuke goes off in NYC, or should I say NYX.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    4. Re:Wrong. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 3, Informative
      I live in central Florida and have been getting annual passes for my family for a few years now. My wife and I always have to put our fingers in the little scanners, however our small children (3 and 1) obviously do not.

      I personally do not see the device as a finger print scanner. The devices are just a little too crude looking (and don't take very long to do) to actually scan your finger print and compare that to a massive database of other prints in the 2 - 3 seconds it takes. I agree with the GP, they seem to just grab some non-unique hand geometry and compare that to the first record that was created the first time the ticket was used. The device seems only "good enough" to prevent me from giving my annual ticket to my friend so he can get a free day at one of the parks. I am sure that enough people tried my pass, one of them would have similar enough hand geometry to get in.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    5. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So it is not a finger print, but can be used as a unique identifier.
      No, it is not a unique identifier. When they scan your hand they compare it to your previous scan, and if it matches then they know it's you. But it's likely that hundreds of other people have the same biometric data as you if the tested population is sufficiently large. This simply reduces the chance that someone else can use your pass. Now if this is bimodal it would be a different matter, but it seems to be just straight up hand geometry scans.
    6. Re:Wrong. by ag-gvts-inc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I shouldn't reply, but you had me nodding my head in sympathetic agreement, until your last paragraph. Now, I'm thinking: wtf dude?

    7. Re:Wrong. by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, same here.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    8. Re:Wrong. by LordBodak · · Score: 1
      Actually it's an imminent threat. Eminent has an entirely different meaning.

      What's scary is that people who can't even figure out the difference are voting.

      --
      LordBodak's journal.
    9. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude. Just don't go to Disney and chill out.

      Yes, our freedoms are being removed slowly, so nobody notices. Like a chinese finger trap.

      Check out the Free State Project if you want to work towards change.

    10. Re:Wrong. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      +5 to the parent poster. Last I heard, they were less than 80% accurate (meaning one out of every five people couldn't get a good scan), and if you can't get your fingers to verify, the front entrance people will generally auto-rotate the turnstile and let you in anyway.

      I do think it's pretty cheesy that they require it of tickets other than seasonal/annual passes now, but I expect it's because A.) they're attempting to enforce the official non-transferability policy printed on the ticket to prevent people from selling multi-day tickets with unused days to the shady folks on U.S. 192 who then re-sell them back to the general public, and B.) they get the ability to strong-arm more personal information from people that they otherwise wouldn't during single and multi-day ticket purchases. Disney makes more money if they can prevent the outside sales, and part of the reason I don't work for them anymore is because I've seen just how protective they are of their bottom line - safety and the best interests of the customer be damned.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    11. Re:Wrong. by John+Seminal · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Actually it's an imminent threat. Eminent has an entirely different meaning.

      What's scary is that people who can't even figure out the difference are voting.

      And are you the one who will protect the liberties of those who can not spell? Or is spelling a requirement of freedom?

      Seems to me the people in the middle east don't need to know how to spell, just how to wear a bomb. Same thing in london (hey, fuck them, they never did anything for me, why should i support them, when their enimies are people the british attacked. what is my interest, outside of seeing the big bad brits take one in the eye).

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    12. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hope a nuke goes off in NYC, or should I say NYX.
      This is uncalled for, man. Seriously.
    13. Re:Wrong. by kg4gyt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Busch Gardens Williamsburg has been using the hand geometry scanner for years as well, cuts down on the cost to produce season passes.

    14. Re:Wrong. by 44BSD · · Score: 1

      One thing that the scanner vendors often say when confronted by privacy zealots is "Come on! It is impossible to reconstruct a real fingerprint from the stuff we scan, so your police-state fears are mathematically impossible." Turns out this is untrue

    15. Re:Wrong. by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      or C) buy a ticket and pass the stub back to your friends through the fence.

    16. Re:Wrong. by Torville · · Score: 5, Insightful
      As always, nobody is forcing you to go to Disney World. If you don't want to get your finger scanned, then don't enter the park.
      Yeah, and if you don't want to get your fingers scanned, don't fly, or go to the mall, or use a bank... it's not like it's going to be mandatory or anything... Hello! This is the Microsoft approach to civil liberty reduction. Make optional content dependent on onerous restrictions, then desirable content, then... should I use ASCII to draw you a picture here?
    17. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's uncalled for but we actually all sympathize with his anger. And it's a growing anger.

      It seems to me the world is moving in 2 directions:

      those who don't care and are only too happy to be pushed into whatever bullshit their government or businesses tell them

      and

      those who do care and believe in freedom.

      It's the same across the (Western) world, it's not an anger confined to America. The further this war on terror inspired bullshit goes; squashing freedoms, rights, access then the further a lot of people are going to be become more and more furious about it.

      And rightly so.

    18. Re:Wrong. by saitoh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      bingo, the other thing is, you dont associate your name with the individual pass, so they are only pinpointing "pass 106 has this finger structure with it", outside of that, they know that the first person who uses the pass has those fingers, not their name/age/gender/etc. Creditcard holder information could probably be gleaned, but not the actual person's info (at least not by this).

      I've been to Disney a batch, and one thing I noticed was that the park hopper passes arn't restricted like this, only single park passes and season passes (which makes sense on the seasonal ones so you cant loan out your pass and let the entire neighborhood go for free)

      To me the logic is to prevent/deter theft on the individual passes, or at least give that illusion (which seems to be a key element in America many times now). If you had to provide a name, or some other actual record, say an eye scan or an actual finger print, then yeah, I'd be a tad more concerned, but this I'll conceed in the proverbial war on privacy so that I may pick my key battles another day.

      --
      We don't need an "overrated" so much as we need a "you completely missed the parent's point, dumbass..."
    19. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be more accureate, they started this last year for season pass holders only. Its also optional you don't have to have them scan your hand. You can present your photo ID along with your seasons pass and they let you in. If you are a kid they just let you in.

      I want no part of any of this kind of shit. I guess I won't be going to disney world anytime soon.

    20. Re:Wrong. by takeya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's hard for me to be a libertarian and stand by my principles when I hear news like this, but I have to stick to my guns, even when I fervently personally disagree with something.

      Disney is not a part of your government. They are free to exist as a theme park, just as Six Flags and Alton Towers (in the UK) are. They are entitled to set whichever requirements they like for you to enter their park. Just as you are allowed to place retina scanners at the front door of your house if you so please.

      I believe in monopoly regulation, so as long as Disney is not the ONLY theme park available (and Windows isn't the only usable OS), they are free to set their own rules, on their own property.

      I also believe, however, that they must disclose what they will be doing with any information they collect, so that you can be informed in your decision to surrender or not surrender your finger-scans and such.

      Using your Microsoft example, they currently don't quite have a monopoly on the desktop OS market. There are 2 usable alternatives (*nix and MacOS), and plenty of other hobby OSes that work to an extent. If they set DRM requirements for music and videos, etc. and the market starts to play along, producing hardware that supports this and cripples other OSes, then they develop a monopoly. This is not healthy for the market and really takes away from personal choice of OS, so it must be stopped. That is the only time I support public (government) intervention into such corporate affairs.

      You see what I mean? Right now, you can always take the kids to Six Flags if you don't like Disney's rules. You can always petition Disney to change as well.

    21. Re:Wrong. by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      Yeah. And you frequently wind up having to scan five or six times before it works. Oh, and I had this story hours ago. :) Hand geometry scanners are a frigging nightmare.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    22. Re:Wrong. by tmortn · · Score: 0

      Its only a hand geometry scanner? Ummm what exactly do you think fingerprint DB for criminals consists of ?

      It is possible that the geometry used does not use sufficient points to hold up in court but we would need better stats on the machine and legal requirements to know for sure. It is not something as simple as an overlay, it is comparison of matching points and geometry that matches finger prints.

      I am not so sure this thing is a bad idea really ( or good for that matter ). Afterall, if we want to start using biometrics instead of suitably non dictionary passwords then we have to get used to this idea of having this information available for comparison. What strikes me as worrisome about this is if such DB's get created ad hoc then they are just creating collection points for the information that may later be much more important than checking up on who is using a particular disney pass. And unlike passwords your biometrics don't change with time should they become compromised. All in all that is one of the primary reasons I am not to terribly sure biometrics are a good idea for primary/money ID system.... its actually to good in some ways.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    23. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What is the #1 question a judges used when determining bail? Does the person have a job? Is that person making someone else a profit? What the fuck does that have to do with if a person is guilty?

      So violent and yet so ignorant, perfect terrorist material I guess. Bail is not guilt nor innocent, it is to prevent someone from running away before the trial trial. Would you prefer the guy making $1mil a year and the one making $20k to get the same bail, a bail which one doesn't even blink at while the other couldn't pay even the required 10% on?

      Its paranoid and delusional psychos like you that destroy the world, cause revolutions for the sake of revolution and then ignore the massacres that follow. People like you were the inquisitioners of the past, the nazis who burnt jews with a smile on their face, the communists who sent their own mothers to Siberia, and all those others who thought they were doing the right thing because some guy made a speech and told them so. And never do they really think about it, they follow their misguided leader's talk and warped facts and never consider things logically because to do so would shatter their own warped reality.

    24. Re:Wrong. by ralph1 · · Score: 1

      Instead of scanning us just sell tickets not passes problem solved. no reason to care who bought a ticket as long as it was sold to someone.

    25. Re:Wrong. by Seumas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry. I don't conesnt to a biometric scan of anything. Period. If soomeone else so desperately wants to go to Disneyland that they're willing to give up any number of privacies and rights, that's their business. I respect mine just a little too much to give them up for a ride in a fucking tea-cup.

    26. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Using your Microsoft example, they currently don't quite have a monopoly on the desktop OS market. There are 2 usable alternatives
      Why is it the most ignorant are also the most vocal? I suggest an Econ 101 class to get you started.

      Oh, and just so I can cut you off at the pass, don't try rolling out some link to a dictionary definition of 'monopoly.' That will just show your ignorance even more. (I can see you 100 years ago as the Standard Oil lawyer: "I protest, Your Honor, it clearly says right here in the Webster dictionary that ...")

    27. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's an imminent threat. Eminent has an entirely different meaning.

      He was quoting Bush afterall :)

    28. Re:Wrong. by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's okay. The next step they'll want is to tie your social security number to the pass to prevent terrorism. And they'll be allowed to. Anything is okay as long as it's to fight terrorism.

    29. Re:Wrong. by takeya · · Score: 0

      I decided to look up monopoly, just to be sure I wasn't missing something, AC. I'm not.

      If microsoft has a monopoly on the desktop OS market, as you implied, then I would not be running Linux right now. 90% desktop share doesn't constitute a monopoly. Microsoft has brushed with monopoly, been much closer than it is now in the past, and bullied other companies (monopoly tactics). There have been lawsuits against them and they have backed down a little, only to rise back up again. When it comes down to it, though, they are not a monopoly right now, and there are way too many people in high places watching them right now for them to pull a fast one either. Personally, I'm not as worried now as I used to be about their desktop market influence.

      I've already taken Econ, as well. I think my instructor (who was definitely not an idiot) would stand by me. He was a mac user, by the way.

    30. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fine. Then refuse to be scanned, they still give you the option of using the old picture ID verification system that is used everywhere else. Besides this is for a season pass, not for regular tickets.

      I, however, would rather them scan my hand geometry. This way they can verify me, but cannot say "this man is Anonymous Coward," too many people have similar measurements. With a picture ID though, they will know who you are.

      People are making a big deal out of nothing, it's the kneejerk Slashdot way I suppose...

    31. Re:Wrong. by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and if you don't want to get your fingers scanned, don't fly, or go to the mall, or use a bank..

      Your bank issues 'season passes' for which there is a problem with people passing them around and 'sharing' them?

      They already require a hell of a lot of authentication at every bank I've entered. You can always stick to cash, in which case you really have no reason to go into a bank.

    32. Re:Wrong. by Keebler71 · · Score: 1
      PEOPLE, we are being enslaved... The USA is worse than all of Al Queda and Nazi germany put together. We are enslaving the world to "western values". I hope a nuke goes off in NYC, or should I say NYX.

      Enslaved? By Disney? I want some of whatever you are smoking... besides Disney is a private corporation. They can do pretty much anything they want.

      Here is a link to the US Constitution. Find for me the right to spend $50+ to spend two thirds of your day standing in line for one minute attractions. Or maybe you are concerned with your right to buy an $8 burger/fries/coke combo. When the federales line up behind you with cattle prods herding you through the finger scanners, then maybe you will have a point.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    33. Re:Wrong. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      They previously covered that by requiring a handstamp as you left a park. Any previously used ticket media presented for admission that wasn't tied to you biometrically had to be accompanied by a handstamp, or they wouldn't let you in. They were pretty strict about it.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    34. Re:Wrong. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Except we're not talking about fingerprint scanners here.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    35. Re:Wrong. by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Disney officials said the finger scans do not take an actual fingerprint

      On a side note, I'm not really crazy about the argument that they are not exactly taking fingerprints, but they kinna are. Technically so do police...while the entire fingerprint is taking, only certain points are consequential to them.

      In either case, I find the solution excessively complex. I remember hearing that the individuals who used to work for the railroads would ticket punch the tickets with the basic description of the individual ticket holder so that they couldn't switch tickets with someone else (basically the information that used to keep driver's licenses from being switched with someone else, but is still found on the license anyway...height, weight, eye color.) Perhaps Disney could use a similar system, at far less expense (though admittedly, such a system is more human intensive...but likely just as reliable.)

    36. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try explaining to your kids why you refuse them to take them to any amusement parks when they ALL start to do this (at least of the ones your kids beg you to take them to).

    37. Re:Wrong. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "some guy made a speech"

      "Fuck the revolution!" - Bono condeming IRA violence at a Boston(?) concert, (Rattle & Hum video).

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    38. Re:Wrong. by nigelo · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      Can we have a show of hands to see who else agrees?
      No, wait...

      --
      *Still* negative function...
    39. Re:Wrong. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Great! When they come for you, it'll only be you who'll speak up for you.

      I mean, for fuck's sake, how hard is it to stamp a hand? Clubs do it all the time, and it generally lasts for a few days. Rotate the colors and patterns, and it'll be real tough to enter without paying--and will cost a whole hell of lot less.

      THAT'S why I think this is sinister. Not because I'm paranoid (which isn't a bad way to look at the world, as long as it doesn't paralyze you); merely because I'm efficient and there are others who think like me, and if a company choose to be less efficient than they can be then there must be a reason.

      That reason could be that management is incompetent, but then the board should fire their asses in short order. And something that gives a private company the ability to scan fingerprints (will you be able to determine whether the guts underneath the scanning area had been upgraded?), well, that just smells like fish and lemons.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    40. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I heard Bush say, to every citizen in the USA the reason we are going to war is because there was an EMINENT threat. EMINENT means NOW,

      No, half wit. EMINENT does not mean NOW. IMMINENT means NOW. Learn to spell before you rant.

    41. Re:Wrong. by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      We had a punch-in clock like this at my old work.. I totally disagreed with it at first, on the principle of privacy and trust.

      After I thought about it I changed my mind and decided it was a good thing since it actually protected me from fuckups in accounting or whatnot. If any BS was tried to start about me not at work, I had proof I was.

      However... Disney World doing this would really put me off... once again because of trust.
      Companies that have these crazy (IMO) policies are basically calling their clientelle "liars". I don't like to be called a liar or a thief by anyone/thing.

      I try to avoid giving my business to this type of place.
      Disney will get away with it though... most people will just think of it as part of the cost of going there.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    42. Re:Wrong. by eht · · Score: 1

      Stamping your hand would last for a year? That's why the season ticket holders had it in the first place, and it's probably cheaper to use the already in place infrastructure made for that than to roll out a new system, one that would get washed off if you visited any of the number of water slides, luges, or other wet attractions.

    43. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect the right to visit Disney World anonymously.

    44. Re:Wrong. by Spoukie · · Score: 1

      you are correct. this is old news (if news at all) the hand geometry isn't even stored, it is linked to the ticket til the ticket expires so another individual would have dificulty using you pass to enter. I seem to remember this being around quite a long time ago, and behold! no black helicopters with mickey on the side! no Donald Duck Tin Foil Hats! really people, you have more to worry from the video camera in your office!

    45. Re:Wrong. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      I agree with you where Disney World is concerned. It's their property; they can set whatever requirements they like for entry. You, as a citizen of the United States, have the right to choose not to abide by those requirements and to forego entering the park.

      As far as Microsoft goes, however, they *are* a monopoly, by the classical economic definition. You don't have to have 100% of the market to qualify as a monopoly, only enough of it to exert monopolistic influence. Which they clearly do.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    46. Re:Wrong. by RogerWiclo · · Score: 1
      So you are saying that it is ok for them to store and use biometric data because they aren't doing it very well? Who cares? I care. Have you ever read 1984 or The Crucible?

      What is wrong with showing a photo id? It must have been expensive set up enough of these scanners to scan every person who enters Disneyland.

      The only reason I can see for not using a photo id is because they want to track their customers in a way that ID cards or season tickets could not.

      In 1984 they never tell us who Big Brother is. I guess it was Walt Disney all along. But we already knew that, didn't we?

    47. Re:Wrong. by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      90% desktop share doesn't constitute a monopoly.

      What are you smoking?

      III. MICROSOFT'S POWER IN THE RELEVANT MARKET

      33. Microsoft enjoys so much power in the market for Intel-compatible PC operating systems that if it wished to exercise this power solely in terms of price, it could charge a price for Windows substantially above that which could be charged in a competitive market. Moreover, it could do so for a significant period of time without losing an unacceptable amount of business to competitors. In other words, Microsoft enjoys monopoly power in the relevant market.

      34. Viewed together, three main facts indicate that Microsoft enjoys monopoly power. First, Microsoft's share of the market for Intel-compatible PC operating systems is extremely large and stable. Second, Microsoft's dominant market share is protected by a high barrier to entry. Third, and largely as a result of that barrier, Microsoft's customers lack a commercially viable alternative to Windows.

      Thomas Penfield Jackson, U.S. District Judge
      U.S.A. v. Microsoft Corporation

      Microsoft has brushed with monopoly, been much closer than it is now in the past, and bullied other companies (monopoly tactics).

      They haven't just, "brushed with monopoly", they were officially declared a monopoly.

      In accordance with the Conclusions of Law filed herein this date, it is, this ______ day of April, 2000,

      ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECLARED, that Microsoft has violated 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1, 2

      Thomas Penfield Jackson, U.S. District Judge
      U.S.A. v. Microsoft Corporation

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    48. Re:Wrong. by Nobody+really · · Score: 1

      Here's a page with some more information on the system used at Disney World. http://allearsnet.com/pl/fingerscan.htm

      They have been doing this for years on Annual Passes. The apparent reason for the recent expansion of the system to include all tickets was the introduction of the ridiculously complicated "Magic Your Way" pricing structure last Januray, which makes it incredibly cheap to add extra days to a pass after the four-day mark (to encourage longer stays). It would seem Disney wants to keep people from spending the few extra dollars to add days only to sell the pass with days still remaining. So now every ticket gets tied with a biometric ID. The bottlenecks created from everyone having to fool with the scanners means they often disable them at peak entry periods.

    49. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The only real issue with this tech is when it is forced upon people as a means of identification."

      It already is (in California at least). When you go to get your ID card from the DMV, which is mandatory, you are required to provide a fingerprint.

    50. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eminent: I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    51. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you saying you support terrorism?

      If, in your hometown, someone molests a little kid, does that mean everybody, including you, are potential child molesters? No, it doesn't. NOT EVERYBODY in the Middle East are potential suicide bombers or terrorist you pathetic dickhead.

      Also, hey fuck you. You've never done anything for me. You've probably never done anything for the people of Slashdot, or your family. So, what I suggest is, the next time a bomb goes off somewhere on this planet, why don't you make sure that you are standing next to it.

      The world will be better off without you.

    52. Re:Wrong. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      If gunpowder were brains, you would realize how moronic you sound.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    53. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. It is a hand geometry measurement. The initial measurement is what they use as their base of comparison. They measure from the base to the finger pad of two fingers. You can screw it up by slightly bending your fingers to make them register as being shorter.

    54. Re:Wrong. by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      "Disney is not a part of your government. "

      Wrong.

      At least IN AMERICA.

      Our "Declaration of Independence" makes it clear that RIGHTS come from Our Creator.

      Since, OUR CREATOR is "The Lord" ( or something... YMMV ) those rights are INALIENABLE.

      Since THE CREATOR of a Corporation is The State itself, and the power of The State ( Acording to that same document ) is severely limited to promoting the INALIENABLE rights of real people, The State simply *cannot* create an entity with MORE privileges than The State has.

      Now, SLAVES will see this differently, because they believe companies are Just As Good as real people... But they're SLAVES, and we don't need to care what they think, eh?

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    55. Re:Wrong. by Morky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      80% of New Yorkers voted against Bush, by the way. That aside, I live in NYC, so you just said you would like me and my family to die. I'm sure (I hope) you're like 18 and in some "phase", but that's no excuse for what you said. The U.S. is worse than Nazi Germany? It's sad that historical memory is fading that fast. I hope the judge sets your bail VERY high.

    56. Re:Wrong. by Morky · · Score: 1

      Right on, brother.

    57. Re:Wrong. by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      "I agree with you where Disney World is concerned. It's their property; they can set whatever requirements they like for entry. You, as a citizen of the United States, have the right to choose not to abide by those requirements and to forego entering the park."

      Talk about Slave Speak, eh?

      Uh... Yeah, it's property owned by a Corporation, which has agreed to exchange it's RIGHTS in that property for PRIVILEDGES when it begged The People for the act of incorporation.

      And as part and parcel of that exchange, the corporation, which is created by the state, limited itself to the same limits AS a state, so YOUR RIGHTS are protected fully.

      Slaves think differently, but they're slaves so who cares?

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    58. Re:Wrong. by a1choice · · Score: 1

      I agree, who cares and basically this is a method to prevent reuse of passes, especially annual passes. By the way, Sea World in Orlando, FL is doing the same and has been doing it for a while. I personally like it because it helps speed things up at the line because I don't have to wait for every person to whip out their drivers license or picture ID.

    59. Re:Wrong. by rhedin · · Score: 1

      actually, as of about a month or so ago, all WDW adult tickets require biometrics;

      when they replaced the old park hopper style tickets with the new "magic your way", the new ones required it;

      recently they've required anyone using an old park hopper to do the biometric thing too; so now any adult entering on any (at least multi-day) ticket has to have their hand scanned.

      rob.

    60. Re:Wrong. by owlstead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is such a wrong way of looking at things... What will happen is that they can do whatever pleases them - and not the general public. What happens if every theme park would implement biometric access? It's in their interest, so if one has it...

      Should I be banned from themeparks? What about grocery stores? Privately owned markets? This is the same kind of argument most liberals use for employers. They can do whatever they please - if you don't like it, look for another job.

      Society is there for the people that live in it. Putting any company interests in front of those of the people is plain stupid. I've got nothing against a free market place, but in every playground there should be rules.

      One should be against collecting (uniquely) identifing biometrics.

    61. Re:Wrong. by wfberg · · Score: 1


      Disney is not a part of your government.


      Which doesn't make it OK for them to be asshats.

      Right now, you can always take the kids to Six Flags if you don't like Disney's rules. You can always petition Disney to change as well.

      Well, if you're being all libertarian and all that, I propose that to enable Six Flags to compete on a level playing field, we strip Disney of their copyrights as long as they're being asshats.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    62. Re:Wrong. by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      I wonder what happens if your fingers are bandaged due to an injury. Or if your finger geometry is permanently changed due to a broken bone, lost fingernail, or other injury.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    63. Re:Wrong. by jnuzzo · · Score: 1

      It also protects people from buying a second-hand pass with fewer days than they paid-for.

      The ACLU lives in a state of constant fear an paranoia. In this case it's also ignorance since there are no 'fingerprints' taken. They need to find a better use for their energy.

    64. Re:Wrong. by Stanza · · Score: 1

      This may be off topic, but why does the average libertarian hold on to thier views to extreme poiints? I identify as libertarian to some degree, but I also will argue that private corporations taking my biometric data is wrong and bad. The logic that "there are alternatives" doesn't always hold well, particularly in many areas where there aren't a dozen theme parks at the end of the street.

      Libertarianism has a good idea--but when taken to an extreme, the end results are horrid. I'd like to be able to identify with libertarian ideals, but if the foaming-at-the-mouth libertarian insists that it's the god given right for corps to fingerprint me every time I cross the privately-owned street to buy any one of my choosing of genetically-enhanced-milk-products available from the global monopolist, I sigh.

      (yes I know I'm taking the philosophy to the extreme in the example, but that's what I'm ranting about--I think libertarianism has good ideas that should be applied in smaller and more thought-out methods rather than just "PRIVATIZE EVERYTHING AND MAKE EVERYTHING LEGAL!!")

    65. Re:Wrong. by jleq · · Score: 1

      Walt Disney is dead. He was a cartoon animator who really had nothing to do the current state of the Disney corporation. Don't blame him for how it is today.

      I visited Disney world recently, and didn't really have a problem with the scanning machines. They're not fingerprint scanners (if anybody can tell me how to scan a fingerprint through brushed aluminum, you get a hug). They make the whole park entering process fairly automated. Each person takes around 8 seconds to enter, depending on how fast they are walking.

      Disney has a right to protect their sources of revenue by deploying automated means to check if people entering the park are valid ticketholders. If you don't agree with it, then don't go to Disney world.

    66. Re:Wrong. by pla · · Score: 1



      No longer true.



      To me the logic is to prevent/deter theft on the individual passes

      Theft? This doesn't prevent theft, it prevents two similar-sized families on vacation together, who plan to visit at least two different theme parks, from swapping multi-day passes between two sites to save a few bucks. The pass itself gets fully and properly paid for. This just helps Disney give a great big "FU" to people capable of planning ahead so as to minimize their costs. "Non transferable?" WTF does that really mean?


      You dont associate your name with the individual pass, so they are only pinpointing "pass 106 has this finger structure with it"

      Yeah, sure - LOTS of people will pay over a grand in cash for a week's pass for four people, plus one or two of the ticket "options" (I hope you like Disney's most famous ride, "search for a parking spot two miles away from the gate", if you don't add the "parkhopper" extra).

      And we all know that no one has ever managed to use credit card data to identify the user, right?

      Add to this the fact that, despite the manufacturer's claim, you can regenerate an image of the fingerprint from biometric scanners like this... It may not actually "store" the image, but it stores enough information to come up with a damn close fake (good enough to fool a human, and a computer would use the exact same features as stored to do a comparison in the first place!).



      I ditched my last bank when they started requiring a thumbprint to cash checks ("Oh, I do? Well, do you need a thumbprint to withdraw cash? Great, I'd like to withdraw my entire account balance, please. Feel free to close out my account!" - Yeah, figure that out... To put money in, they wanted biometric ID against which they didn't even have any basis of comparison on file... But to take it out, a license and a smile will do). Where the hell does Disney get off requiring two fingers?

    67. Re:Wrong. by pfleming · · Score: 1
      When they scan your hand they compare it to your previous scan, and if it matches then they know it's you.
      So it's a fingerprint of your fingerprint. How long before it's a real fingerprint and they're comparing it to RIAA and MPAA records to catch "downloaders" and sending files to the Feds?
    68. Re:Wrong. by mistermund · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with showing a photo id?

      Nothing - it's just faster to use the scanners than for everyone to dig out their ID's. (Keeping the lines short is worth a lot of money to Disney) If you prefer to use an ID instead, you're welcome to do so.

    69. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always petition Disney to change as well.

      Exactly. I simply won't go to Disney anymore.

    70. Re:Wrong. by IamLarryboy · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is a monopoly. Microsoft has many copyrights and patents which are government granted monopolies.

    71. Re:Wrong. by Cromac · · Score: 1
      The USA is worse than all of Al Queda and Nazi germany put together. We are enslaving the world to "western values". I hope a nuke goes off in NYC, or should I say NYX.

      What an idiot. It's a shame people with such a poor grasp of history and reality are allowed out in public.

    72. Re:Wrong. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Yet another socialist fighting to be able to tell the rest of us what to do and how to live our lives. And if we don't agree with the little twit, or think that perhaps the Constitution is more important than his own pet views on How The World Should Be(TM), we're stupid little slaves who don't understand the evils done to us by our corporate masters.

      It's good to know that vastly superior intellects such as your own are looking out for our welfare. Snort.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    73. Re:Wrong. by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      "It's hard for me to be a libertarian and stand by my principles when I hear news like this, but I have to stick to my guns, even when I fervently personally disagree with something."

      And stuff like this is why I'm no longer a Libertarian.

      Libertarians excel at being suspicious of government, and rightly so.

      Libertarians see government as a massive power that can and, routinely does, swamp the power of individuals.

      But Libertarians have a blind spot: they see corportions as nothing more than a Mom & Pop store scaled up, and so desire to extend to the "Big Mom & Pop" store the same rights as Mom and Pop.

      But -- as so often in software -- there's a scaling problem. A big corporation accumulates far more power than Mom & Pop's Conveneience Store: it can hire legions of lawyers, armies of lobbyists and PR men and advertisers. To the point that it can harness the State to its bidding in a way that a Mom & Pop never could.

      And unlike Mom & Pop's -- where you can complain directly to Mom or Pop -- the mega-corporation has few of the vulnerabilities of a small enterprise.

      But the Libertain mind-set continues to see a mega-corporations as "nothing more than" a successful small business.

      To a Libertarian, military conscription is slavery, but a town with only one major employer -- such as a WalMart -- literally locking employees in the store after their shifts end is just good capitalism.

      Liberatarians, I think, in their hearts believe in some idealistic Jeffersonian ecomony made up of small businesses and gentlemen farmers, with a wide Western frontier for the disgruntled to relocate to.

      Maybe this was true two hundred years ago, but today Libertarians have to extend their suspicions of government to also encompass any super-large centralized power-weilders -- notably, Big Business.

      Or Libertarianism becomes increasingly irrelvant, "protecting" us from government intrusion but shrugging when Mega-Corp does exactly the same. In the end, the injury to me from the intrusion is the same, because as an individual I'm just as unable to fight Corporate Tower as City Hall.

    74. Re:Wrong. by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....So it is not a finger print, but can be used as a unique identifier..

      In order to get into the Disney parks, do you also have to give then your SS number, Name, Address etc? if not, how can this be an identifier of YOU or any other individual. They just want to enforce the terms of the ticket which says it is not transferable. The finger scan ties you and the ticket together, that's all.

      --
      All theory is gray
    75. Re:Wrong. by takeya · · Score: 1

      You are very right. I stated earlier that I do believe in some government regulation over corporations.

      In general, Libertarians don't believe the government has any role acting similarly to corporations, that it shouldn't be the one handling mail or educating children, those should be privatized.

      We say that consumers are those who regulate corporations, but you're right, when there is a local monopoly, like your wal-mart scenario, it does need to be regulated. Not by the federal government, but maybe by local or state government.

      Thanks for that comment, it really made me think.

    76. Re:Wrong. by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      Genius, I applaud you, parent post.

      The constitution says we are free to conduct business. We just can't FORCE people...

      I honestly can't believe this entire comment section. There is no abetting of rights here. There is no right to force a company to conduct its business in a way that makes YOU happy.

      Don't mistake a corporation's means and methods with a government's laws and courts.

      And I already know the rebuttal. 'But they ARE forcing me, because they're the biggest park! I have no choice!'... its the same arguement about microsoft, or any other company who becomes an important market force and others, who are not important market forces, wanting to compete on an unlevel playing field.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    77. Re:Wrong. by zotz · · Score: 1

      "That is the only time I support public (government) intervention into such corporate affairs."

      Since Disney is a big player in the copyright area, the government is already mixed up in the middle of their affairs.

      all the best,

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    78. Re:Wrong. by instarx · · Score: 1

      Should I be banned from themeparks? What about grocery stores? Privately owned markets? This is the same kind of argument most liberals use for employers. They can do whatever they please - if you don't like it, look for another job.

      And this is just the kind of reply that non-thinking people make. Think about it for cryin' out loud - do you think liberals LIKE corporations intruding into their privacy and lives? Of course they don't. The original poster was making a valid point that the Constitution protects us from abuse of our privacy BY THE GOVERNMENT, not by private citizens or corporations.

      In your blind, non-thinking way you just assume that what liberals believe is bad and since this particular liberal was saying that corporations have the right to intrude on your privacy (and face it, they do) that was the liberal credo. Nothing could be further from reality. It is primarily CONSERVATIVES that have little problem with oppressive corporations and their abuse of both their employees and their customers. The so-called "free-market" that you incorrectly ascribe as a liberal position is in fact a conservative spinword that loosly translates into "no controls on corporations".

      This is just another example of the conservative take-over of the language in order to make bad ideas sound good. "Free market" translates into "non-regulatory", "no child left behind" into "Federally mandated educational testing", "clear skies" into the cancellation of New Source Review, "Healthy Forests" into more clear cutting on Federal lands, and the list goes on.

      Use your brain! It makes no sense to attribute liberals with the support of corporations intruding on our privacy!

    79. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then don't go. Nobody is forcing you to go to Disney.

    80. Re:Wrong. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      And that was the entire point of my brief post.
      If you had read it.
      Duh.

    81. Re:Wrong. by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      I don't know - out of N. Korea, Iran, Libya and the rest of the "Axis of Evil" Saddam was the only one (so far) who woke up to an impromptu visit from the full might[1] of the US military.

      I'd say that makes him the most "distinguished", "outstanding" and "famous" threat to the US. Just not the most "scary", "factually-accurate" or "credible" one.

      [1] Yeah, ok, this might be sarcasm... but "full might of all twelve remaining members of the US military they can still afford to recruit and fund" just doesn't roll off the tongue so well... ;-p

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    82. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a misunderstanding. The original definition of liberal (still used in Europe) is quite opposite than the one used in the U.S. Look it up!

    83. Re:Wrong. by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Aye, i have been reading hoping someone will explain how HAND geometry = 2 fingers?

      Doesn't seem that you get much info from 2 fingers without reading the prints........

      Sounds like a system using fingerprints that stores one less data point than the police with a pretty name attached.

    84. Re:Wrong. by MasTRE · · Score: 1

      > Disney is not a part of your government. They are free to exist as a theme park, just as Six Flags and Alton Towers (in the UK) are. They are entitled to set whichever requirements they like for you to enter their park. Just as you are allowed to place retina scanners at the front door of your house if you so please.

      Unfortunately, you, like many others, fail to see the real picture here. The masses will NOT take a stand on anything, they will just play along. That is why this is bad (if it actually took/stored your fingerprint, which supposedly it does not -- but how long will it be before it does?). And the same people that see no problem with giving their biometrics away to [government|corporation] are the same people that would NOT enter your house if you installed a retina scanner, as you suggest. It's okay for the big guys to do it, but God forbid a small guy do the same thing.

      > You see what I mean? Right now, you can always take the kids to Six Flags if you don't like Disney's rules. You can always petition Disney to change as well.

      Right now, yes. What about when everything on the shelf will have partially-hydrogenated corn syrup in it?

      The future, if we continue on this crazed path, will have corporations cooperating with the government in a police state. Much like, say, communism.

      --
      Must-not-watch TV!
  2. It's a free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't like Disney's policies? Take your business elsewhere.

    1. Re:It's a free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      its not a freemarket when disney monopolizes my entertainment. furthermore freemarkets suck. they arent free. even further, ALL markets suck. so fuck you.

    2. Re:It's a free market by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Too bad I don't have mod points or you'd be at least +1 Funny.

      --
      No sig
    3. Re:It's a free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not a free market. The money supply is managed by central banks. Plus, The Walt Disney Company is a Delaware corporation which means the government has forced or threatened others to respect its granted limited liabilities.

    4. Re:It's a free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron. Just simply do not visit Disneyland. Is that so difficult for you? Is someone holding a gun to your head and making you go kiss Mickey's ass?

    5. Re:It's a free market by eric76 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Those without arms will have to go to other amusement parks.

    6. Re:It's a free market by jgerman · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck modded this insightful. They don't explain any of that up front, once you've bought your tickets it's too late.

      Hell I went through the gate without even thinking about what they were doing before I realized.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    7. Re:It's a free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Don't like Disney's policies? Take your business elsewhere."

      Your unspoken implication is that we shouldn't be complaining about it. A lot of people think they can support a "free market" without supporting public criticism of market practices -- but it just doesn't work that way. Criticism is a fundamental component of a free market.

    8. Re:It's a free market by slittle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Disney only admits armed patrons? I didn't know they moved to Texas....

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    9. Re:It's a free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, my implication isn't that you shouldn't cry like a little baby about it. Publicize it, great. Whine about? Give me a break. It's not the government. It's not mandatory. You won't go to jail if you don't do it. You simply won't be going to Disneyland/world.

    10. Re:It's a free market by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Criticism is a fundamental component of a free market.

      In a free market, the best sort of criticism of all is to *not give your money to the company in the first place*.

      What's interesting is how many people here have bitched about the policy...and then chosen to suffer through it to go the park anyway. I guess the concept of 'hypocrisy' is a bit too complex for them to comprehend.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    11. Re:It's a free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is someone holding a gun to your head and making you go kiss Mickey's ass?"

      You obviously don't have children.

    12. Re:It's a free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not difficult for me. No, they are not.

      I'm not a moron, you are. It's not a free market no matter what you say. You're just misinformed and now angry because you don't like being told you're wrong.

  3. Indeed, First Hand Account by LiNKz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I recently went there for the 4th of July (well, arrived around the second). After buying the tickets we decided to go to Disney Quest (Arcade).. We waited in line for quite awhile waiting for a number of people in front of us to do the whole two finger scan deal. Usually, it wouldn't work the first time, and they would need to do it over, and over.. One group in front of us couldn't get in because the girl's fingers didn't match her card. Nothing about how it wasn't a valid card, just the fingers didn't match.

    What I was told was the first time you use the system they take a shot of your fingers, this is used across the parks afterwards. My group of friends laughed when I raised an eyebrow at the fact that they were collecting fingerprints (though apparently not, generally it would be taken as that).. I was a bit annoyed at the fact that my prints were then on record with Disney. What exactly is the point? Keeping people from reusing the pass? Ok, that is fair, but it would have seemed better to use something like "It was used twice in minutes? That makes no sense!" Or perhaps "They haven't left the building yet, how has it been used elsewhere?"

    It just seems like they've put way too much work into making it harder.

    --
    Proceed with Format (Y/N)? Y
    1. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      I believe the point is that - if something happens - they have a better record of who came in, etc. I'm not saying it's worth what some people would call an "invasion of privacy" (since it's voluntary, I refuse to call it that), but I believe that's the point.

      What will be really interesting is how they use this to make more money. Undoubtedly, the installation of this system cost money, without any obvious profit as a result. Will they sell this database of prints? Will they track the size-shift in your prints and correlate it to age data? Will they track how often you come to the parks and extrapolate what attractions you're interested in?

      Of course, the MOST interesting thing will be this: when you get assaulted/robbed/etc. on the property (and assuming the perp somehow dodged all the cameras) will they dust you/the area for relevant prints? Will police be able to subpoeana them?

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    2. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      but it would have seemed better to use something like "It was used twice in minutes? That makes no sense!" Or perhaps "They haven't left the building yet, how has it been used elsewhere?"

      I think what they are more worried about is people buying a pass and loaning it out to friends and/or family.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    3. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were them, I'd encourage that activity. When you get rediculous about everyone paying $2000 to see your park you start looking a bit like a dick.

      Oh wait, it's Disney. They're only one of the most evil, soulless, greedy (not to mention ironic) companies in the world!

    4. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by billsoxs · · Score: 1
      I believe the point is that - if something happens - they have a better record of who came in, etc.

      So you are 'claiming' that Disney is doing this for the next 9/11? I know that is an over simplification of your comment but that is the logical conclusion...

      I'm not saying it's worth what some people would call an "invasion of privacy" (since it's voluntary, I refuse to call it that), but I believe that's the point

      It is only entirely voluntary IF you are warned well before hand that this is the policy.... After you have paid for the trip ~$500/person and the one day pass ~$50/person you are sort of stuck.

      I do want to thank the person that sent in the original post. Now I know to never go to Disney

      --
      This message was brought to you by "Lack of Sleep."
    5. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Ok, that is fair, but it would have seemed better to use something like "It was used twice in minutes? That makes no sense!" Or perhaps "They haven't left the building yet, how has it been used elsewhere?"

      Those aren't the circumstances they're trying to put a stop to. What they're trying to do is prevent me from loaning you my season passport so you can get in for free.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by lheal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to hand it to you, you put your finger right on it. Disney has put way too much effort into making it harder to use their theme park.

      It's just like copy protection and other license-enforcement schemes: they maximize the profit/user ratio by decreasing the denominator instead of by increasing the numerator.

      Probably they will show a higher profit/user ratio, and the bean counters will declare a success. But they won't see the deadly effect on their image of treating their customers as criminals, nor will they ever see the profit they could have made by turning their energies to something park visitors would actually enjoy.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    7. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Keeping people from reusing the pass? Ok, that is fair, but it would have seemed better to use something like "It was used twice in minutes? That makes no sense!" Or perhaps "They haven't left the building yet, how has it been used elsewhere?"
      But that wouldn't stop me from giving my family annual passes to another family to use on a day my family and I don't plan on going to the park. The other family would get a free day at the Disny parks.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    8. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      "So you are 'claiming' that Disney is doing this for the next 9/11? I know that is an over simplification of your comment but that is the logical conclusion..."

      No, I'm not saying that, and I don't appreciate that you knowingly "oversimplified" my comment in that way. I was suggesting that if something happened, e.g. a mundane crime, a lost kid, a kidnapped kid, etc. they'd be able to have a better idea who was in which park. If they had the scanners (or at least card scanners) at each ride, you'd be able to say where IN the park a given user such as a lost child was. True, if there were an outright terrorist attack this could be helpful, but only insofar as attaching the name used on entry with a possible attacker.

      It's voluntary, btw, period. If you don't research your trip, it's your own damn fault. If I want to go to Disneyworld but I don't bother to look up when it's open, it's my own damn fault if I get there and it's closed. Same thing here: if you don't bother to look up the basic admission requirements to a private theme park before buying your tickets, then you've just paid for a valuable life lesson.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    9. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      What will be really interesting is how they use this to make more money. Undoubtedly, the installation of this system cost money, without any obvious profit as a result.
      Without any obvious profit? How do you figure? The system is designed to stop people from using tickets that they didn't pay for. That results in either those people not going to the parks or those people _paying_ for tickets. Should I be allowed to give my families annual passes to another family so that Disney is cheated out of those sales?
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    10. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by ag-gvts-inc · · Score: 1

      I don't see the problem with loaning it to a friend or family. I mean, the money was paid and it's not like two people are getting in simultaneously...

    11. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by irtza · · Score: 1

      First hand??? I thought you only needed two fingers. You sure you were at Disney dude?

      Since you've seen what happens, can you tell me what people were doin with their fingers before they touched the scanner? I mean... I can think of a few reasons why the scanner wouldn't pick up the prints. But I'd like to keep this post G. Just think of all the wonderful things you pick up while the scanner picks up your prints. Tasty!

      --
      When all else fails, try.
    12. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      "The system is designed to stop people from using tickets that they didn't pay for." Let's reword that, it's designed to stop people from using tickets that people (albeit different people) DID PAY FOR. A ticket is a ticket, why should Disney care who bought it.

    13. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      What will be really interesting is how they use this to make more money. Undoubtedly, the installation of this system cost money, without any obvious profit as a result. Will they sell this database of prints? Will they track the size-shift in your prints and correlate it to age data? Will they track how often you come to the parks and extrapolate what attractions you're interested in?

      No, it's not that complex. They've already been using the system for years to prevent multiple people from using a single seasonal or annual pass. They're now attempting to do the same for multi-day tickets now - there's a booming business in the Kissimmee area for multi-day tickets with unused days on them, and Disney has wanted to shut that down for years as it represents a substantial cost in lost ticket sales. The readers themselves are not that expensive, and you'd gag if you saw the infrastructure that Disney already has in place, so any additional hardware costs would be a drop in the bucket for them.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    14. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by 1Oman · · Score: 1

      It wouldnt be free, you paid for it.

    15. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      If you don't research your trip, it's your own damn fault. If I want to go to Disneyworld but I don't bother to look up when it's open, it's my own damn fault if I get there and it's closed.

      God damn, I wish every guest had been like you when I worked there. Never mind that park schedules are generally available no less than a month in advance, people will still whine about early park hours or something else that a little research would have told them. My favorites were all of the people that got upset the first weekend of June each year...

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    16. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could have worked "digital" in there somewhere. Too subtle?

    17. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by billsoxs · · Score: 1
      I don't appreciate that you knowingly "oversimplified" my comment in that way.

      Sorry but that was more or less the logical conclusion of your comment.... Now that you have changed your wording

      I was suggesting that if something happened, e.g. a mundane crime, a lost kid, a kidnapped kid, etc. they'd be able to have a better idea who was in which park.

      This means that you need to know who is leaving as well as who is coming in. You also have to look at the number of people in the park at any given time - my guess 5,000 to 20,000. How do you know who is who? Couldn't I pay cash and give a fake name and kidnap a kid? (- Not that I would do that... I already have 4 and I would like to lower the number not increase it.) Frankly I don't see a way to have that data in a useful format if something bad does happen. Besides there are many simpler ways to find lost kids. An "Amber" Alert type of thing is a good example - It works well for the whole state of Texas and there is no hand scan to get in. This all harkens back to 10 to 12 years ago when the cops where fingerprinting all of the little kids - 'for safety'. Then it became - they make fingerprints for the parents. For all of the kids fingerprinted (including my now teenage sons) I don't think there was ever anyone found that way.

      It's voluntary, btw, period. If you don't research your trip, it's your own damn fault.

      except this is NOT normal behavior by a company and so most people would not know to look for this issue

      --
      This message was brought to you by "Lack of Sleep."
    18. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Because it DOES cost them money when people aren't tied to a specific ticket, but you have to understand how they sell tickets to see why. Disney sells single-day and multiple-day tickets, as well as seasonal and annual passes. If Disney sells you a five-day ticket and has the technical means to prevent someone else from using it, then that means that you can't use only two days (let's say you got bored and decided to go somewhere else), then sell the remaining three days on the ticket to someone else. It means that if another person wants a three-day ticket, they have to buy it from Disney instead of buying your remaining days. So in this case, even though only five days' admission might actually have been used between you and the other guy, Disney actually sold eight days for practically no extra expense. That's a substantial chunk of cash they're trying to avoid losing.

      I didn't say it was right, just that they have an understandable reason for enforcing the non-transferability clause in the ticket agreement.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    19. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Ok, that is fair, but it would have seemed better to use something like "It was used twice in minutes? That makes no sense!" Or perhaps "They haven't left the building yet, how has it been used elsewhere?"

      They've already been doing that for years - if you attempt to use a single pass more than once in an hour, the system flags it and won't let you in without the attendant overriding the system.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    20. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      But it's much better for them if every family member is forced to buy their own pass, regardless of whether any two people will be attempting to use it simultaneously.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    21. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      Same thing here: if you don't bother to look up the basic admission requirements to a private theme park before buying your tickets, then you've just paid for a valuable life lesson.

      So this requirement is clearly stated when you buy the tickets?

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    22. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by nunchux · · Score: 1

      The first thing I think about when I hear this story is Big Brother is finally here, 666 and the Rapture and all that tinfoil stuff.

      But the second is, how many times a day are those fingerprint scanners cleaned? Do I really want to stick my fingers in some machine that 5,000 snotty brats have just touched? Can you imagine what a disgusting petri dish of festering bio-germs from all over the world are growing on those things?

    23. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      hell, maybe they should just sell one ticket per year and the whole country can share it!

    24. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by gklyber · · Score: 1

      I read in a tour book recently that disney sees more like 20,000-80,000 visitors in one day. 80,000 is during the peak Christmas time, 60,000 is common for peak summer time, and 20,000 is in the off season.

    25. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      wrong, you paid for yourself to go not your neighbor, and i'm sure that's explained very well in the terms you read and sign when buying your ticket.

    26. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      It depends on the park. The last Christmas I worked there, the Magic Kingdom was refusing admission for everyone (resort guests included) when they hit 61K. Average summer evening would be about 25-30K. Epcot can handle significantly more since it's a much larger park, and likewise, MGM can't handle nearly that many.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    27. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it would have seemed better to use something like "It was used twice in minutes? That makes no sense!"
      The utilization of biometrics on admission media does not preclude software checks like this. In fact, this sort of check already exists in Disney's turnstiles. And it's significantly longer than 2 minutes.
    28. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      Disney's making it harder to get into their parks? About time. Maybe now you won't have to wait over an hour to get on a damn ride. I am just waiting for the time when Disney offers home equity loans at the gate to pay for your time at the park.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    29. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please Druid, by all means, provide us with a link online showing where these requirements are stated? I just spent the last 20 minutes looking around the website and didn't see anything at all about finger scanners.

      If the information is not obvious and the company is not upfront about it, how is it my own damn fault? Heaven forbid the information should be easily obtainable to everyone thinking of visiting Disney World; why, people could get the wrong idea, and ticket sales would plummet. So we'll just hit em at the gate with it.

      I'd appreciate it if you would actually research and provide links before browbeating and ridculing other people.
      However, you know what they say about arguing with idiots.....

    30. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah why not?

      Actually, Disney shouldn't give a god damn about what you do with your ticket after it was purchased; however, they of course should and obviously do give a damn about making money.

      So let's see, I can force someone into a five day ticket (after all, it's part of the package) to the resort when they are only going to be able to enjoy it for three days due to their schedule. Since they can't hand of their ticket to their cousin/brother/uncle/etc, so that they might use the remainder of the days the ticket is valid:
      we can double our ticket sales by forcing the other to buy a new ticket, and at the same time lower our admission count. GENIUS.

      Disney needs to die, or become seriously wounded.

    31. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Probably they will show a higher profit/user ratio, and the bean counters will declare a success. But they won't see the deadly effect on their image of treating their customers as criminals, nor will they ever see the profit they could have made by turning their energies to something park visitors would actually enjoy.

      See, in capitalism you have a choice. If you have an "issue" with it, don't go. Voila, you've voted against this sort of thing with your wallet.

      But the fact is, most people won't find this terribly onerous, so it will continue. So? You're not affected by it if you don't go.

      --
      -Styopa
    32. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always, ya know, not go there?

    33. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      A ticket is a ticket, why should Disney care who bought it.
      Why should someone who didn't pay for a ticket be allowed to use up Disney resources (only so many people can get on a ride per-hour).

      Say I go in to a 7-11 and buy one of those huge cups that come with free refills for a certain amount of time. Should I be allowed to give you the cup so you can get free drinks even though you didn't pay for them? IMO that is wrong, other may disagree.

      To me it comes down to whether the resource being used is finite or infinite. For example, I don't have a problem with letting someone borrow a CD I bought to listen to it (without copying it). The CD can be duplicated an infinite number of times. However, for my 7-11 example, once you drink the soda, it is gone, I cannot go and drink the soda that you just drank (well not without some disgusting regurgitation on your part).

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    34. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I think there's a subculture of people who actually consider a visit to a Disney park as some kind of moral obligation. The more it costs, the more difficult it is to accomplish this pilgrimage, the more cognitive dissonance works to demand it.

      Until recently, I assumed a trip to Disneyland would involve $30 bucks or so per person, a drive to Anaheim, and whatever you wanted to spend on food and souveniers. It had not occurred to me that the price would be orders of magnitude higher. Certainly, cognitive dissonance is going to be a strong force for someone defending the decision to attend.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    35. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      The Florida Legislature could fix this.
      Pass a law that compels an entertainment venue to allow multi-day passes to be transferrable. Simple as that.

      You'd have to get the *people* on board, because those responsible for the entertainment industry have already applied some political influence.

      The people weild all the power, but they have to work together and be organized. I think you'd discover if you tried it, that there are more people in Florida who'd support the Disney position.

      If the people aren't upset, that's the end of the story.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    36. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "My favorites were all of the people that got upset the first weekend of June each year..."

      What happened the first weekend of June?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    37. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by solive1 · · Score: 1

      Your prints were never on record. The system uses finger geometry to make sure you are the person using your pass. It compares numbers in the database to the numbers scanned. When it matches, it lets you through.

    38. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by whimmel · · Score: 1
      --
      Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    39. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by whimmel · · Score: 1

      There are also face-scanning devices all over the parks and at traffic intersections on property.

      So.. when we force you to come to WDW, we know what you look like. We know the shape of your index and middle fingers (and by extension, perhaps, your penis size).

      We also know your whereabouts because we force you to carry a Pal Mickey or various infrared-controlled light-up pins and buttons.

      Oh, and what you eat and how much you sleep based on your resort room key or regular credit card use.

      --
      Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    40. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if someone buys a 5 day ticket, why shouldn't they be allowed to use it 2 days and let a friend have it the other 3? As far as Disney is concerned, the same number of man-days has been spent in the park as was paid for. If you go to 7-11 and buy a drink that includes 1 "free" refill, then the cost is built into the original drink and it shouldn't matter if you pass the cup onto your friend for the second glass. 7-11 is still selling 2 drinks, and there are still 2 drinks being enjoyed by someone.

    41. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I'm a member of our local zoo, and they have a low-tech solution which is just as effective: Key the ticket to your name, and present photo id along with your card when you enter. Theoretically you could fake an id, but theoretically you could fake a fingerprint, too.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    42. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      I personally agree with you 100%. Cost-wise there is no difference to a company. However, Disney would rather limit their tickets per-person. This way Disney will get two tickets purchases from two people instead of just one. Do I think this if fair or the right way to do business? No. However, this is very similar to how a lot of software is also licensed. If my company buys some developer tool for me, it is licensed to me, and technically, no other programmer can use it.

      I do agree with you that from a cost perspective, it doesn't cost a company any more money. It only loses (in their opinion) them "potential" sales. For example, me, you and 3 other guys split a 5 day pass to Disney. We each use the pass for 1 day. Disney was paid by us for 1 person to go to the park(s) each day for 5 days. So there is no lose on the part of Disney from our perspective. However from a Disney-bean-counter perspective, Disneyy lost the sale of 4 additional 5 day passes.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    43. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      Plus, what if the person can't use the last two days of the pass, noone will use it. Do you realize how much they will lose in concessions and souveneirs by not letting someone else take that ticket?

    44. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      If Disney sells you a five-day ticket and has the technical means to prevent someone else from using it, then that means that you can't use only two days (let's say you got bored and decided to go somewhere else), then sell the remaining three days on the ticket to someone else.

      Yeah, but fingerprints? I know you were just describing why they'd want to make sure people don't resell partial tickets, but...

      Wouldn't a valid ID that matches the one you showed when you bought the ticket be just as effective?

      Buy a ticket, they scan your driver's license. When you try to re-enter, you have to show the exact same license (and it has to look like you too) or they won't let you in. For kids without an ID, they could take their photo and print it right on the ticket itself, never storing the photo in any system.

      Is there a privacy policy? Do they delete the biometric data as soon as your ticket expires?

    45. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      They're not taking fingerprints.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    46. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      > They're not taking fingerprints.

      Huh?

      If you're referring to how it takes a sample set of points on your fingerprint, and not your whole fingerprint, then know that that's how every fingerprint-authentication system works, not just Disney's.

    47. Re:Indeed, First Hand Account by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      No, I'm referring to the fact that the system doesn't look at the print at all. It looks at the shape and size of the entire first and second fingers.

      Once again, they're not taking fingerprints.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  4. Two fingers is cheap by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last time I went, they wanted an arm and a leg.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  5. I don't know by Xenkar · · Score: 2, Funny

    I sort of got mixed feelings about this. On one hand, we have to give up our biometrics. On the other, at least we don't have to get rectal exams on entry to the park.

    1. Re:I don't know by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the other, at least we don't have to get rectal exams on entry to the park.

      You haven't looked at ticket prices lately have you?

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    2. Re:I don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On one hand, we have to give up our biometrics.

      Don't you "give up your biometrics" every time you walk somewhere or touch something?

    3. Re:I don't know by +InvaderSkoodge · · Score: 1

      On one hand, we have to give up our biometrics.

      Why?

      Last time I was at Disneyworld they didn't scan my fingerprints. Why do they need to do so now?

    4. Re:I don't know by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >You haven't looked at ticket prices lately have
      >you?

      Actually, I tried to look at ticket prices and found it difficult to do so. Certainly didn't find a definitive "Adult admission $35.00" or whatever.

      Disneyland wouldn't be my thing anyway, even if I had kids. But I go back to the days of travelling carnies and unsafe rides, wooden rollercoasters, and when midway rides served a purpose for distracting kids while the grownups did their livestock and agriculture shows.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  6. Abuse by Andrew+Tanenbaum · · Score: 1

    I think this has some potential for abuse - I hope they secure their data well.

    1. Re:Abuse by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      A large company that gets thousands of people in their park per day...securing their data?

      Surely you jest!

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    2. Re:Abuse by John+Seminal · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I think this has some potential for abuse - I hope they secure their data well.

      Secure it?? They will sell it. Or government will force them to release ie.

      Do you remember the airlines after 9/11. They were forced to send all their passengers data to the government. The airlines denied it. Then it came out as true. Then the airlines admitied it.

      Can anyone imagine seeing a mom, pushing her 6 year old daughter and saying "honey, scan your hand so we can see Mickey".

      Did anyone see the slashdot story a month ago about the Naperville library that requires fingerprints to use their library?

      Or what about Boston and the thousands of cameras they put up? Then Chicago and the 3,000 cameras they put up?

      When will everyone admit this is a police state? When you are not allowed to quit your job? When you are told you must work and have no overtime. When you have no health insurance. When the courts take away your rights, that your grandparents had? WHEN? WHEN!!!

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    3. Re:Abuse by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      "They were forced to send all their passengers data to the government. The airlines denied it. Then it came out as true. Then the airlines admitied it."

      What??

    4. Re:Abuse by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      The installation of video cameras in public spaces is quite different from the collection and cataloguing of biometric data. Among other things, it's trivial (if it matters to you) to simply wear something like a burkha if you want to obscure your identity in public spaces where the cameras are present. You don't want to cover yourself head to toe in public spaces? Bummer for you.

      This private company can do whatever it wants. That's the libertarian ideal. It would be very bad if the government could demand this info, and possibly illegal (depending on the Supreme Court's contents, frankly), but it's different from the cameras for at least the simple reason that one is a private company, one is the government.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    5. Re:Abuse by ag-gvts-inc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's needed is for the people to get together and (in a nice way) let congress know how they feel about these things. While I admit that that's not likely to happen, your histrionics make it seem like only those on the lunatic (sorry) fringe care about these things.

    6. Re:Abuse by billsoxs · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Or what about Boston and the thousands of cameras they put up? Then Chicago and the 3,000 cameras they put up? When will everyone admit this is a police state?

      Has it occurred to you how much computer processing time is needed to do what you are implying? Think about the disk space to store it..... yippie I am buying IBM/HP/Sun stock - they'll never finish building all those mainframe computers

      --
      This message was brought to you by "Lack of Sleep."
    7. Re:Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When will everyone admit this is a police state? When you are not allowed to quit your job? When you are told you must work and have no overtime. When you have no health insurance. When the courts take away your rights, that your grandparents had? WHEN? WHEN!!!

      Please be patient. We are working as fast as we can to get your "police state".
      -Department of Homeland Security

    8. Re:Abuse by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When will everyone admit this is a police state?

      Hmm. For living in a police state, you sure are able to talk all you want about the evilness of the police state.

      As for the article in question: if a private company wants to use a hand-geometry scanner to help eliminate abuse of their passes, well, that's their business. Just take the kids to one of those Linux-powered Open Source Anarchyworld Amusement Parks I've been hearing so much about.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    9. Re:Abuse by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Secure it?? They will sell it. Or government will force them to release ie.

      Sell what? Your prints? Or the reams of data they already have, like so and so has visited there 5 times in the last 3 years, and spent an average of $275 each visit.
      They already do that. No prints needed.

      Or what about Boston and the thousands of cameras they put up? Then Chicago and the 3,000 cameras they put up?

      You want cameras? Go to England.

    10. Re:Abuse by kerrle · · Score: 1

      You're probably one of those people who thinks the technical requirements for something like Echelon mean it doesn't exist, either.

    11. Re:Abuse by D'Sphitz · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I believe there's an empty one-room cabin in the Rockies of Montana with your name on it...

    12. Re:Abuse by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They were forced to send all their passengers data to the government.
      From what I heard, that is not quite true. Apparently, the feds told the airlines that they did not have to turn over the info. But if they did not, the US gov. would forbid ALL employees from flying the airline. In addition, they would not be eligible for the loan (did not help United, but I am not sure that United gave up the data). Finally, they might have a hard time making changes at airports, flights, etc.

      Basically, GWB's admin guaranteed that if they did not cooperate, that the feds would sink them slowly.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    13. Re:Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's trivial (if it matters to you) to simply wear something like a burkha if you want to obscure your identity in public spaces where the cameras are present.

      Even if you wear a burkha, you can still be identified by facial geometry (e.g. distance between eyes), non-visible light images (e.g. infrared or radar), or gait.

    14. Re:Abuse by pauldl63 · · Score: 1

      why is there a reluctance for some readers to acknowledge that the U.S is almost a fascist state?

      --
      I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees.
    15. Re:Abuse by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      "When will everyone admit this is a police state? When you are not allowed to quit your job? When you are told you must work and have no overtime. When you have no health insurance. When the courts take away your rights, that your grandparents had? WHEN? WHEN!!!"

      Teachers are often stuck working unpaid overtime. In Michigan it is illegal for them to strike over it.

    16. Re:Abuse by Stelminator · · Score: 1

      "non-visible light images (e.g. infrared or radar)"

      Time to break out the tin foil suits!

    17. Re:Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, yes; America IS a fascist state!

      Just last night, my neighbors, who are Democrats, were dragged screaming from their home, to be sent to the Gulags in Montana. All we could do was watch through the window.

      But that's not the worst of it. Last month, they purged the neighborhood of non-Christians. I hear there's a mass graveyard located just . . .

      SLAM! BANG! "Nothing to see here, folks, just move along."

      ---

      Yeah, right. Fascist state. Perhaps you should read some history (somewhere other than moveon.org or democratunderground) before you spew such drivel. Read about Nazi Germany. Soviet Russia. Cuba. China. Pol Pot's Cambodia. Even Iraq under Hussein. THOSE are fascist states, or worse.

      Idiot.

    18. Re:Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe. Might make you a tad obvious when you walk through the body imaging sensor at the airport, bus, train station, school, shopping mall, sports event, amusement park, etc.

      Face it, you will be scanned, identified, and monitored: http://www.millivision.com/products.html

      Make sure you wrap your house too.

    19. Re:Abuse by dbIII · · Score: 1
      When will everyone admit this is a police state?
      It's the opposite - it's idiots playing cops and robbers and just implementing superficial stuff that they have seen or heard of law enforcement doing.

      Scanning in this case is just another way of saying to the clients that thay are not trusted - and having rigid systems shows that they don't trust the employees either. If you refuse go through some of the tinpot security attempts lately you will usually not be able to be able to talk to anyone that has the authority to use their initiative in a situation that isn't in the manual. Conversely people who play amataur law enforcement can really stuff things up for a lot of people by creatively misapplying poorly defined and overbearing rules, like the clown who decided to teach Cat Stevens a lesson for being a Muslim and ruined the day of a few hundred people by holding and diverting the plane.

      While the legal framework is there for a police state (suspected enemies of the state could just dissappear, be held without being charged for years, and be shipped overseas for a spot of torture outside of US jusristiction) the real thing is much scarier and is a long way off. The funny thing is the French, who get accused of being soft on terrorists, were so hard line it was counterproductive - killing suspected terrorists after capture drove the mainsteam against them, effectively recruiting more terrorists and lost them Algeria.

    20. Re:Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it's worse than the rest of the world.

    21. Re:Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't really get the difference between 'dictatorial' and 'fascist', do you?

    22. Re:Abuse by flubbergust · · Score: 1

      Because its not really true?
      You still can criticize Bush without fear of disappearing. Just because they put cameras everywhere (which would make UK a more fascist state) is not reason enough to proclaim USA as a fascist state.
      You don't get it do you? People are scared. They want to live a good life and some believe that in order to have a safe and secure life others must be put in jail or other measures must be done to guarantee that.

    23. Re:Abuse by aaronl · · Score: 1

      I agree that as a private company, Disney isn't doing anything illegal, though I'd say it is not the most ethical of things. I won't patronize their parks because of it, and I wouldn't spend my money anywhere else that requires such things. To me, the problem is that I'm in enough of a minority that these companies can pull such things off.

      As far as the police state goes, just because you don't always get prosecuted doesn't mean that you can't be. There are many laws that are in force that amount to the government being *able* to run a police state. They aren't applying them across the board, but that doesn't really make it much better. I'd like to think that if the government enforced all the laws to the fullest extent that the populace would force change, but given recent events... I'm not so sure.

    24. Re:Abuse by aaronl · · Score: 1

      I get the impression that you were trying to be funny... but what did these people actually ever do that was so bad? It's a joke to you, but quite a few people have been killed and arrested for being those people in Montana and similar.

      Go read up some primary source material and you probably won't think it's funny.

      Just as an example: owning a gun used to be a common and normal thing. Now many people get scared of you just because you have one. It's something that many gun owners won't mention because it makes people uneasy just knowing that you have one.

    25. Re:Abuse by aaronl · · Score: 1

      This is a very common thing for the Federal to do. They pull this on the states, and the states pass it along to local governments. You don't want to follow some expensive Federal mandate? Fine, you lose all grants and other funding.

      When the Federal forced the speed limit to 55mph, they didn't do it by passing a law. The basically said that the state in question would lose all highway funding should they not lower the speed limit. The same was true for drinking ages and many other things.

      If the airlines didn't follow what the Federal asked for, they would not only lose the business from Federal employees, but they would funding, certain access, and a lot of fringe things. It becomes harder to operate at various airports, and many other things.

      Worse yet, the Fed could just force you to turn over that data anyway. It was a better business decision for them to turn it over when asked than bearing all the consequences of making the Feds get a court order.

    26. Re:Abuse by aaronl · · Score: 1

      The Feds can also step in and force striking labor to go back to work if they deem it a threat to national infrastructure. I bet Michigan has similar laws in place.

      If you work for a public school, you work for the government. You really shouldn't be surprised that such rules are in place in that circumstance.

      I have little love for teachers unions, but a strike should always be an option in the worst case scenario.

    27. Re:Abuse by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Sounds like "forcing" to me, even if it is done in a very, very, bad way.

    28. Re:Abuse by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      From Random House's Webster's Unabridged Dictionary:

      1. a person who believes in or sympathizes with fascism.

      2. (often cap.) a member of a fascist movement or party.

      3. a person who is dictatorial or has extreme right-wing views.

      What did you think it meant?

    29. Re:Abuse by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah. Before you go off on the definition of "fascism". From the same source:

      1. (sometimes cap.) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.

    30. Re:Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From what I heard, that is not quite true. Apparently, the feds told the airlines that they did not have to turn over the info. But if they did not, the US gov. would forbid ALL employees from flying the airline. In addition, they would not be eligible for the loan (did not help United, but I am not sure that United gave up the data). Finally, they might have a hard time making changes at airports, flights, etc.

      You left one thing out. They ask nicely by saying give us the data we need or else we will come back with a court order (translation: we will come back and take all your computers). A judge must give them a subpoena which is guaranteed by the Patriot Act. Thus putting you out of business. What choice do you have. None. Place nice with the FBI or you are fsck'd.

    31. Re:Abuse by BeBoxer · · Score: 1

      forced. verb. To compel through pressure or necessity.

      The airlines were forced. Plain and simple. If telling a company "do this or we will drive you out of business" doesn't meet the definition of the word, what does? It's like saying the government doesn't force me to pay taxes because nobody actually shows up and puts a gun to my head every April.

    32. Re:Abuse by solive1 · · Score: 1

      Sell what? Numbers that correspond to your finger geometry?

      There are no prints on file. Unless they're going to sell data about trends in finger size, there's nothing worth selling here.

    33. Re:Abuse by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Linux-powered Open Source Anarchyworld Amusement Parks I've been hearing so much about

      The GooglePark? It's in beta.

  7. They will see.... by WillRobinson · · Score: 5, Funny

    My middle finger for sure.... before they see me.

    1. Re:They will see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modded as redundant. Unbelievable. Humorless pricks with mod points strike yet again.

    2. Re:They will see.... by Tablizer · · Score: 1
    3. Re:They will see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support the British and give them both fingers.

  8. I For One... by iignotus · · Score: 1, Funny

    Welcome our new oversized-eared mouse overlords!

    1. Re:I For One... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay... how is this at troll? Jesus the mods can't get their head straight sometimes. How do you guys get to be mods anyways? Fuck CmdrTaco in the butthole while nibbling on Zonk's scrotum? Yum yum... quite the tasty treat for you fuckers just to give out mod points. Get a life.

    2. Re:I For One... by iignotus · · Score: 1

      Thank you? :P

  9. Ya gotta give up something... by greg_barton · · Score: 1

    ...either your civil liberties or your soul, take your pick. (All on the taxpayer's dime, of course...)

  10. Terrorism! by kypper · · Score: 1, Funny

    Osama wants to bomb Mickey Mouse! Someone please think of the children!

    1. Re:Terrorism! by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      Someone please think of the children!

      Yes! Please think of the children and have Osama bomb a more annoying character, such as Barney or the Teletubbies. Although bombing Disney wouldn't be too bad, they are quite the evil empire.

  11. And this has to do with rights online ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... how exactly?

    1. Re:And this has to do with rights online ... by deft · · Score: 0

      "And this has to do with rights online ...... how exactly?"

      Online is where I'm going to download your fingerprints, thats how.

      probably @ alt.shashdot.troll.fingerprints

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    2. Re:And this has to do with rights online ... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      "... how exactly?"

      Easy: it's using a technological means to collect personally identifiable information about you.

      I've often thought that engineers have a moral responsibility to not work on certain technologies that can be easily used to subvert a persons constitutional rights. Luckily for the bad guys, there are immoral engineers.

      -- Terry

  12. This isn't news by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

    It's not news. They've been doing this for nearly 10 years.

    --
    503 Sig Unavailable

    The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    1. Re:This isn't news by Keamos · · Score: 1

      So /. is a day early on posting this, then?

    2. Re:This isn't news by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      They've been doing the seasonal/annual passes for that long, but the single/multi-day passes only since January. Still, it's not really news, and I can't argue that point.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  13. Index and middle fingers scanned? by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not sure about the index finger, but I'll certainly be giving Disney a chance to "scan" my middle finger after reading about this one.

    --
    Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
  14. Mixed Reaction by Staplerh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While agreeing with the ACLU that this is a step in the wrong direction, it is not as troubling as one thinks. We must keep it in mind that Disney is a private corporation and is able to set barriers to access to its parks. As long as they're not discriminating based on protected categories, their requirement for fingerprints must be protested with lack of patronage but little else. Ultimately, I think in overly security-concious America, we'll see that the public views this as a 'lesser evil' in the broader war on 'terror'. Indeed, they'll gladly surrender their fingerprints in order for the mirage of safety within Disney - perhaps they prefer it to a seemingly non-secure environment like ... oh Six Flags?

    The only problem I could see is if this applies to season-ticket or regular-ticket owners who bought their tickets under circumstances that did notinvolve fingerprinting and are now faced with fingerprinting or being refused access to the park.

    --
    "There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all."
    - Bob Dylan
    1. Re:Mixed Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like OMG, they're totally invading my privacy! Micky Mouse is going to find out where I live and come to my house to sodomize me. Help! LOLzors, where's Garcia with the crazy conspiracy theories when you need him?

    2. Re:Mixed Reaction by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They need to let folks they are knowing this. If I had just shown up there and they had asked for my fingerprints I would refuse. But I would have already blown money for hotels and airfare to get there. I had no idea they were requiring this of season ticket holders or anyone before.

      I certainly won't be giving any of them my cash in the future.

    3. Re:Mixed Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, the Disney scanner isn't so bad because it's not actually scanning finger-prints, but think about "what if it was?" Biometric identification is based on Something I Am, those fingerprints are me. There are exactly two entities that I know have my fingerprints in their possession (there are probably more, since the government loves to collect this stuff): The Department of Motor Vehicles and the colocation facility where my company stores its servers. If someone were to get their hands on my fingerprint from the DMV (or any other source), they could get into the colocation facility and possibly have access to the servers.

      This is a serious problem, and goes far beyond just ACLU handwaving or tinfoil hats. As biometric authentication becomes more and more popular because of the insecurity of people's passwords, we'll hit the same problem once everyone is using their fingerprint or retina scan or any other biometric identification method... one fingerprint per person, and lots of people will have access to lots of other peoples' fingerprints.

    4. Re:Mixed Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disneyworld was never very interesting. Now it's not only boring, but Orwellian to boot. I don't think I'll be going there any time soon. By the way, your point about how Disney is a private corporation and can thus do whatever it likes may be true from a strictly legal standpoint. However, from an ethical and social perspective, it's obviously abhorrent to have theme parks treat people like criminals and collect biometric data. To defend Disney's practice by invoking the technicality of the law is thus pure sophistry. Thus, the public must re-think its social contract with corporations, who have become abusive.

    5. Re:Mixed Reaction by v1 · · Score: 1

      There is one minor issue with that though - lets say burger king has pissed you off. "Don't eat at Burger King" - ok, that's reasonable, there's McDonalds, Wendy's, etc., you have the option to take your business elsewhere. There are other near-equivelent businesses to pick from.

      Problem is when someone is offering a unique service or product. (and with the disgraceful state of our IP management laws nowadays this is happening a lot) Now say Disney pisses you off. Where else do you plan on taking the kids for spring break? Sure you can take them to see a different show, but if they want to see the mouse, you don't really have a choice now do you?

      IP laws create "limited monopolies". Unfortunately, during this limiting time, they do indeed have a government-granted monopoly, and the consumer is at their mercy. (this is particularly bad with Walt Disney, that has a *congress*-granted *extended* "limited" monopoly - i.e. they probably have a "limited monopoly for life" on the mouse)

      So you really don't have a good choice. Saying someone has a choice when they can either have what they want or have something that's not even close is not really a choice, it's more of a "like it or lump it" situation. Disneyland is a unique place, and as such there should be restrictions on what rights they can force you to give away to attend their unique attraction. But that's not likely to happen.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    6. Re:Mixed Reaction by raehl · · Score: 1

      They were doing this when we were there in April. We had tickets that were a year or two old. We didn't have to scan our fingers.

    7. Re:Mixed Reaction by MrPerfekt · · Score: 2, Informative

      This doesn't have anything to do with security. They're not taking your fingerprint at all, and even if they were I don't think they'd be comparing it against fingerprints of known terrorists.

      This is just a fuzzy form of authentication. Other people are bound to have the same hand measurements as you but it's unlikely they your friend or family member will have something close.

      They've been using this for a while now. The point of it is to prevent other people from using your ticket, even if you're not even using it that particular day. The multi-day tickets have had "Non-transferable" written on them since practically the beginning of time. This is finally a way to enforce it.

      I think it's really a shame that it's come to this. Does Disney _really_ need the extra revenue that comes from not allowing people to use other people's ticket? Most people think when they buy the ticket that they're buying X days in the park. You're not, you're buying X days in the park for you. Now, they're really driving the point home.

      To put it another way, it costs Disney the same for a 3-day ticket whether or not you personally use all 3 days or if you lend/give it to another person. The difference now is that they're forcing the other person to buy another ticket instead of using unused days of another ticket.

      Anyway, I was there in February this year. I had a ticket left over from the end of 2001. I still had a few days left on it. I only had one ticket though so my friend had to buy a new ticket. His ticket forced him to do the finger thing. Mine did not. So to answer your last statement, pre-authentication tickets do not force you to authenticate and in practice (not legitimately) are transferable.

      It's nice though that these false statements in the summary really do show who RTFAs. :)

      --
      I just wasted your mod points! HA!
    8. Re:Mixed Reaction by SydShamino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >> We must keep it in mind that Disney is a private corporation and is able to set barriers to access to its parks. As long as they're not discriminating based on protected categories, their requirement for fingerprints must be protested with lack of patronage but little else.

      Errr.. but the government can and should set limitations on what data companies can or cannot collect about us.

      What if Disney required your home address and social security number to enter their park? You know that some people would provide that, stupid as it may be. Instead, the government has laws that limit who can require your social security number.

      Or, what if Disney asked for a list of all medications you take before you enter the park. They could, but there are laws that limit the extent to which they can force you to comply, and the limit to which they could share information provided.

      In other words, the government can and should limit the abilites of private corporations to store and share personal information. That's one of the things I want it to do. They just don't do enough of it these days. And biometric data like fingerprints is one of the main things that should be protected.

      ---------

      All that said, supposedly this is just a hand shape scanner anyway, so this is moot.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    9. Re:Mixed Reaction by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Disneyland is a unique place, and as such there should be restrictions on what rights they can force you to give away to attend their unique attraction.

      It's also private property. If they want to require a scan for you to enter their property you do indeed have to "like it or lump it". The decision *isn't up to you* and in a free society it'll *never be up to you*. Your role in this little melodrama is either to put up with it for entry into the park, or refuse your patronage and take the kids someplace else.

      Just because there isn't another place quite like Disney World or Disney Land doesn't grant you any special rights, or impose any special restrictions upon the park. *There is no element of coercion here, regardless of what you may think*.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    10. Re:Mixed Reaction by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      What if Disney required your home address and social security number to enter their park?

      If you object then don't go to the park. It's that simple. You don't have a 'right' to visit the park, nor to set the terms by which you can enter their property. And if enough people think the same way you do the park will be forced to change their practices or go out of business.

      But if you're in the minority you'll simply have to suck it up and deal with it. That's part and parcel of the whole concept of 'private property'.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    11. Re:Mixed Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I think in overly security-concious America..."

      1. It's spelled "conscious."

      2. I don't think you're very well informed about our southern border and our porous visa program.

      3. Fuck the Koran. It's just a collection of the mindless rantings of a lunatic serial pedophile and anti-Semite. Who cares if a guard at Gitmo doesn't give it "proper" respect when the diaper-headed throat slitters don't even respect basic human life.

    12. Re:Mixed Reaction by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      How can a corporation, an artificial creation of The State, have any powers it's creator doesn't?

      In other words $CORP is a subclass of $STATE? Where did the additional "Priviledges" get added it?

      Or are you one of them what believes that some piece of shit COMPANY is as important and free as a REAL FLESH AND BLOOD person?

      consider,

      In the Declaration of Independence, we are endowed by OUR CREATOR with rights. If the CREATOR of a company is The State ( By Law ), how can the company have anything the state doesn't?

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    13. Re:Mixed Reaction by syberanarchy · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you've heard of something called "minority rights?" No? Look into it sometime.

      I do have a right to expect private corporations not to be able to set such invasive terms on my doing business. This "you don't have a right... private property...you can't set the terms" bullshit is just a cop-out by apologists for corporate america.

      Fact: it's not that people decide to do business with these soulless corps despite the drawbacks as your kind wish us to believe, it's that the public is too stupid to realize what half of these companies are doing, and these capitalists well... capitalize on that.

      By your view, all consumer protection laws are null and void because hey, the free market guys, am I rite?

    14. Re:Mixed Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the rights of corporations and governments are a subset of the rights of individuals. Although the government created the legal concept of a corporation, groups of people have been running companies together for a long time. People and corporations have the right to do anything that the government has not explicitly forbidden. A business run by one person has all the rights that the individual does. A business owned by two people or N+1 people still has the same rights as the individuals that own it.

    15. Re:Mixed Reaction by hacker · · Score: 1
      Errr.. but the government can and should set limitations on what data companies can or cannot collect about us.

      That's precisely the problem... the government IS setting limits on what corporations can and cannot collect, and those limits are astronomically high. That is what we're afraid of... especially with our current administration's overuse of the word "terror" in every sentence.

      Are we afraid that terrorists would have too much fun at our theme parks? Are we afraid that they'd somehow enjoy themselves more than they should, being "terrorists" and all.

      Who cares if they hand their day pass to someone else. They can walk into a mall with a backpack and kill 700 people, or a theme park with a stroller full of C4 and kill the same number of people. Having their fingerprints on file doesn't stop that behavior at all.

      As with all of these "anti-terror" fantasies concocted by our current adminstration, they serve no purpose other than to persecute the innocent and continue to erode our basic freedoms as guaranteed to us by the Constitution.

    16. Re:Mixed Reaction by v1 · · Score: 1

      Not sure where you live, but assuming it's the USA...

      you must not be a big believer in the Bill of Rights? I suppose we should just abolish that nonsense and say "if you don't like it here, get out."

      Same effect. There are some rights that no one should be able to force you to surrender, for any reason.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    17. Re:Mixed Reaction by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Who cares if they hand their day pass to someone else"

      It's not about safety, it's about the calculus of overbooking.

      There might even be some classism at work here. Those with credit cards and the luxury of being able to plan vacations months ahead have an advantage over someone who just wants to buy someone else's ticket today, to go to the park today. Disney is effectively limiting access to the former category, shutting out the others.

      This plan has a side effect of cutting off scalpers, ebay sellers, and gifts.

      Seems like it might correct itself, though. It might affect food, clothing, and novelty sales. That stuff is probably more significant than admission prices, and this stuff can play out dramatically as turf wars between business units.
      If the frozen pop and t-shirt bean counters notice a downward trend that correlates to the loss-prevention department's overbooking plan, policies will change faster than you can say bibbity-bobbity-boo.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    18. Re:Mixed Reaction by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "I think it's really a shame that it's come to this. Does Disney _really_ need the extra revenue that comes from not allowing people to use other people's ticket?"

      If they can enforce nontransferability, they can overbook. Especially if they can analyze usage with metrics down to the individual pass holder!

      I suspect that lots of people buy 3-day tickets and go for 2. Disney knows this, and also knows that the 3rd day ticket gets transferred. I'm sure they watch it happen right outside the gate.
      Isn't there a healthy scalper economy there?

      As long as the passes can be transferred, they have a limited ability to overbook. You say you had leftover tickets. I suspect that is a very, very common scenario. I also suspect that it's more common for people to give their unused tickets to other people, than it is for them to eat the tickets.

      Technically, the only legal option is to eat the ticket, since the thing says it's not transferrable. But that's widely ignored, of course. Disney knows this. It stops them from overbooking based on the numbers of people who buy a week, get bored after three days and go to the beach or something. (The real story here might be more along the lines of "Disney parks are boring and overpriced.")

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    19. Re:Mixed Reaction by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      you must not be a big believer in the Bill of Rights?

      Yet another example of why people say the educational system in the U.S. has gone to shit.

      The Bill of Rights defines citizen interaction with government, not citizen-citizen interaction. Your rights apply to government entities, not private ones - which is why, for example, you have no implied or actual right to privacy at your place of work, nor do you have the right to free speech on company time.

      Place of business =! government body.

      Just how bloody hard is this for you to grasp?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    20. Re:Mixed Reaction by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      I do have a right to expect private corporations not to be able to set such invasive terms on my doing business.

      Sure you do. You can also expect the rest of us to bow down before you and worship you as a superior human being. But it ain't ever going to happen.

      There is no limit on expectations. Humans have all sorts of unrealistic and downright loony expectations.

      This "you don't have a right... private property...you can't set the terms" bullshit is just a cop-out by apologists for corporate america.

      And the argument against private property is a copout for little socialists to throw a tantrum over the fact that they don't get to tell those big, bad property owners what to do and how to conduct their business.

      Fact: it's not that people decide to do business with these soulless corps despite the drawbacks as your kind wish us to believe, it's that the public is too stupid to realize what half of these companies are doing

      Not only are you a socialist prick, you're an elitist, egomaniacal socialist prick who thinks he's smarter than just about everyone else in America.

      Get over yourself, junior. You aren't that bright. And you certainly aren't unique.

      am I rite

      Nor, it seems, can you spell.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    21. Re:Mixed Reaction by HorsePunchKid · · Score: 1
      Errr.. but the government can and should set limitations on what data companies can or cannot collect about us.
      Huh? Doesn't the government have better things to be doing? Whatever happened to being a conscientious consumer and exercising your right not to support a company whose policies you disagree with? Fuck 'em!

      There's always an alternative; it's just a question of how hard you want to work for it. Kids have their heart set on going to Disney this summer? Be a better parent and use your imagination. (You haven't outgrown it yet, have you?) You can find something else that they'll be excited about.

      --
      Steven N. Severinghaus
    22. Re:Mixed Reaction by hacker · · Score: 1
      Seems like it might correct itself, though. It might affect food, clothing, and novelty sales. That stuff is probably more significant than admission prices, and this stuff can play out dramatically as turf wars between business units.

      Then it makes sense to ALLOW Day Pass Borrowing, not restrict it.

      Case in point: I go to the park with my family, and I buy them all flags, t-shirts, pins, whatever... park schwag. I'm all done outfitting my family with Disney Dreck, therefore I'm no longer providing value to the park.

      But if I loan my pass to a friend who lives nearby for the next day, he can take HIS family to the park, buy THEM all kinds of t-shirts and schwag, and make the park more money.

      It just doesn't make financial sense that they'd prohibit this.. I"m buying admission to the park; 1 body (or family) per-pass. Handing that pass to someone else doesn't break that rule. If I lend my pass to someone else, I can no longer enter the park until I get the pass back. Either way, Disney is assured that a human body is taking up space in their cash register somewhere.

    23. Re:Mixed Reaction by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Then it makes sense to ALLOW Day Pass Borrowing, not restrict it."

      That's the point I was trying to make.
      The bean-counters in the department that wants to overbook admission tickets, may eventually clash with the bean-counters in the department that sells novelties and t-shirts and ear-hats, and they may even reach a functional compromise.

      These people observe metrics. If they've created a problem that costs money somewhere, it will drive a policy change. On the other hand, if it ends up boosting revenue (or merely decreases the cost of giving service per customer), well, I suppose they will note that the policy was beneficial to the fiscal health of the enterprise.

      Actually, I'm down with that. I adhere to the oversimplified philosophy of "the bigger they are the harder they fall." And Disney still isn't quite big enough for their fall to be completely satisfying.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    24. Re:Mixed Reaction by Aidtopia · · Score: 1
      What if Disney required your home address and social security number to enter their park? You know that some people would provide that, stupid as it may be. Instead, the government has laws that limit who can require your social security number.

      Can you provide an example of such a law? I just found this explanation on the Social Security website:

      If a business or other enterprise asks you for your SSN, you can refuse to give it. However, that may mean doing without the purchase or service for which your number was requested.
  15. Get rid of the first... by redmo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Get rid of the index finger and you have yourself a deal!

    --
    If you're tired, sleep! Wenn Sie muede sind, schlafen!
  16. Disgusting... by sanermind · · Score: 1

    Thankfully, I just went to disney about 2 months ago, so I've had my fill for the next decade or so. I would never consent to such an invasion of my privacy. What next, DNA testing? Blood samples? How can the american public put up with this? ...Sigh...

    --

    ---
    the pen is mightier than the sword, the sword is mightier than the court, the court is mightier than the pen.
    1. Re:Disgusting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No you haven't. Because if you had been to disney two months ago, you would have had to do this.

      I was actually there three months ago and it really isn't that big a deal, so settle down. They are NOT taking finger prints. They're basically measuring the distances between your knuckles.

      Plus, it doesn't work all that well. They had to reset my wife's every other time she tried to enter a park because it failed to identify her. And they did reset it, everytime, without any questions.

  17. Clarification by M$+Mole · · Score: 1

    This isn't happening at Disneyland...it's happening at various part of Disney WORLD. Yes, it's splitting hairs, but they are two different places.

    --
    Karma: Non-existant. Due mostly to the fact that you smell funny and nobody likes you.
  18. How is collecting fingerprints like Minnie Mouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's fucking goofy!

  19. dna by rupert0 · · Score: 1

    2 years from now they are going for DNA .. creepy

    --
    RUPERT! I TOLD YOU TO WATCH THE BAGS! You were looking at the boys again, WEREN'T YOU.
    1. Re:dna by KentoNET · · Score: 1

      Hey, as long as the girls are hot...

      --
      "You tried your best and failed miserably. The lesson is...never try. Heh!" -Homer
  20. "Pirate's Life" by infonography · · Score: 0, Troll

    THE VANDALS LYRICS

    "Pirate's Life"

    Seven hits of L
    and nobody could tell
    So I spent every dime
    just to get to Aniehem

    I was in the Magic Kingdom
    Now I'm in the Carribean
    You get something really wicked
    when you spend an E-ticket

    High adventure on the sea,
    but it's not the life for me
    Now those harry tatooed pirates are all chasing after me
    I was threatened with a knife by a pirate playing fife
    Now I'm sailing for my life thanks to LSD 25

    Where can I hide?
    I don't want to buy a bride
    I'm alone as I float
    Hey, there were others in my boat

    Up ahead, one of the men
    he said he would be my friend
    He'd guide me to the hole
    If I deeded him my soul

    To the hole I didn't make it
    That doesn't mean he didn't take it
    He laughed at my plight
    He said you'll be one of us tonight

    High adventure on the sea,
    but it's not the life for me
    Now those harry tatooed pirates are all chasing after me
    I was threatened with a knife by a pirate playing fife
    Now I'm sailing for my life thanks to LSD 25

    He was right, I'm still here
    as I have been, for over a year
    With my last bit of hope,
    a tin can and rope
    I just want to break free

    But I can't get away
    No I can't get away
    cause that damn dog's got the key
    No one listens as I tell
    of my ordeal in this cell

    They stand right by
    but they don't fell
    Is this for real?
    Is this for real!

    Based on the lyrics, I think I know why they are doing this.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  21. Identity? by Skevin · · Score: 1

    Is there any identity associated with your prints, in this case? What if you want to pay for your admission in cash, and you left your wallet back in the hotel room?

    After all, the whole point of cash is to allow you to conduct anonymous financial transacations, is it not?

    Solomon Kevin Chang

    --
    "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    1. Re:Identity? by chazwatson · · Score: 1

      Even by paying with cash, you are still buying a paper ticket that must be used to gain (re)entry into the park.

  22. Re:Fuck you, Disney by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

    You want to force people to get down on all fours to get their anal probe.

    You'd think that instead of all this finger scanning, they'd just scan the inside of your ass when they do the anal probe and get it over with in one easy step.

  23. Hey! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 4, Funny

    WTF is this Mickey Mouse bullshit?

    1. Re:Hey! by Lingur · · Score: 0

      Leon -- The greatest movie made

      Apparently it goes by the name "The Professional" in the states... you yanks, with your special needs ;)

    2. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh? isn't that from full metal jacket?

    3. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, our "getting movie quotes right" special needs.

    4. Re:Hey! by duffahtolla · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The Professional is the cut version of Leon. It's not just a name change.

    5. Re:Hey! by Kirth · · Score: 1

      Like "Mickey Mouse Windows XP"?

      --
      "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
  24. Re:Fuck you, Disney by Skater · · Score: 1

    "Disney officials said the finger scans do not take an actual fingerprint. The scan recognizes certain points and outlines visitor's fingers, officials said."

    We had something similar at the University of Georgia years ago - you'd scan your card then put your hand on a scanner that would verify you were who your card said. It didn't actually take a finger or palm print, just the geometry of your hand. It's hard to imagine how that could be used against you - not even CSI has figured out a way to work them into a criminal case.

  25. The problem with biometrics... by Sancho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reason I don't like biometrics for identification is that it's virtually impossible to get a new identification should the old one be compromised. Worse, with fingerprints at least, you're leaving copies of your ID everywhere you go on everything you touch.

    Imagine someone gets ahold of your identity right now. Yes, it's going to be a pain, but you can get a new SSN, driver's license number, credit cards, etc. But what if a thief gets your fingerprint and creates a fake ? How do you cancel that? Sure, in theory, a database of compromised biometrics could be created to prevent future unauthorized use, but now what about your legitimate use? If my fingerprints were compromised, would I no longer be allowed in to Disneyland? And in a more serious application, would I be denied credit? Be unable to use an ATM?

    1. Re:The problem with biometrics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are finger scanners like this sanitary? I'm not sure I want to put my hand where a kid may have just put the fingers she was keeping in her mouth or coughed on.

    2. Re:The problem with biometrics... by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      Go back to your biodome and watch your Full Season DVD's of Monk. The scanners will need to be kept optically clean to function. Can you say that about the restrooms doorknobs? In any public venue?

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    3. Re:The problem with biometrics... by crack_vial · · Score: 1

      It is re-usable, but to a degree. Retina scans only take a sampling of all the available data. If one set is comprimised, a new key can be generated from the pool of remaining data. Granted, that pool is finite.

  26. Re:Fuck you, Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I congratulate you for successfully Godwinning this story.

  27. Just wait by mfloy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Although it is clearly not fingerprints now, it makes me think like this is just a lead-up to actual fingerprinting. They get everyone use to the idea of biometrics at the park, well at the same time trying to keep privacy advocates slightly less angry.

    1. Re:Just wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just have to offer the convenience of having your prints linked to your credit card!

    2. Re:Just wait by hacker · · Score: 1
      Although it is clearly not fingerprints now, it makes me think like this is just a lead-up to actual fingerprinting. They get everyone use to the idea of biometrics at the park, well at the same time trying to keep privacy advocates slightly less angry.

      More to the point.. they could just replace the scanners they're using today which are "broken", with ones that are much more accurate AND store the fingerprints as well as geometry. To the park visitors, they'd just think that Disney "fixed" their scanners.

      "Oh, just put your hand on the thing there, its just checking your finger's length and stuff for a match, most of the time they don't even work."

      "Oh neat, I guess they fixed it."

      Meanwhile your fingerprints were taken without you knowing about it, because for all you knew, it was just checking finger geometry with the "broken" scanners.

      Its like banner ads. Eventually your brain tunes them out as noise and ignores them. Eventually people will just get used to using their hand to scan into everything, and they'll forget that some scanners are actually being used for information storage and gathering purposes, and not just for "comparison".

    3. Re:Just wait by imadork · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If all they wanted was a biometric way to authenticate that the proper people were using the passes, it seems a picture would be much less invasive. I mean, they already hire people to take your picture and sell it back to you as you enter the park whether or not you want your picture taken, taking your picture when you enter the park is not that much of a stretch. And facial recognition technology must be just as accurate as hand geometry, and there's the added benefit that if there's a questionable match, a ticket taker can compare the person's face with a prior picture easier than they can compare hand geometries. As to why Disney would want to take everyone's fingerprints at some point in the future, I have no idea. What practical use would a fingerprint collection of everyone who went to Disney have? It seems like an awfully large endeavor to just reduce the number of people sharing season passes....

  28. Parent is not troll, makes good point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a resident near Orlando, FL, I remember when Disney World first started using these biometric systems for Florida resident passholders. Prior to the finger scans, the passes had an ID photo which made the lines go much slower while a ticket attendant checked to make sure the picture matched you. The long and short of it is, the privacy concerns are no worse than having your picture taken was.

    Yeah, you probably can't buy a park hopper ticket and give it to a terrorist now, but you shouldn't be doing that anyway. :-P

    1. Re:Parent is not troll, makes good point by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

      I was going to post something about this being an outrage, and that if they want to verify someone's ID they should, well, ask them for ID. But I understand really that they already do that, and the fingerprint scans (Yes, I believe it probably scans and stores the actual fingerprint even if it only uses certain generic points for verification.) are just a way to do what they've always been doing, only faster. Cheaper. So cash-strapped Disney won't have to employ more human eyes to look at cards and move people through lines.

      But, this is to protect the passes, and make certain that only the original purchasers use them? They want to make sure a person can't hand off the pass to someone else. But, why is it worth all this? If you have my Disney pass, then I certainly don't have it. It's not like I gave you a copy. I'm not using it if you are. Why do they even give a shit which one of us is in the park, kneeling at the altar of the Golden Mouse and throwing cash at it?

      Fuck Disney.

    2. Re:Parent is not troll, makes good point by InvalidError · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If there is zero checking on season passes, many people will setup pass pools and rent-a-pass style things... for pools, people put down a pass' worth in cash and get a pro-rata refund minus processing fees after an amount of time equivalent to a pass' validity period. For rent-a-pass, people would put down a safety deposit and the refund would be the pass's cost divided by the typical number of rentals per pass.

      In large pools and rent-a-pass networks, there could be something like one pass per hundred users since not everybody goes to WDL every day of the week for the full day.

    3. Re:Parent is not troll, makes good point by facelessnumber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      not everybody goes to WDL every day of the week for the full day.

      Yes, but they could if they wanted to. They shouldn't sell shit like that if they're counting on it not being used. This is like a web hosting company overselling its resources, and counting on the fact that the customers won't all decide to use what they bought.

      This is their fault. Don't sell me a 6mbps cable modem on an "unlimited usage" plan and bitch at me or shut me off when I max it out. And so what if I share it with my neighbor? The bandwidth has been paid for. If my subscription is a net loss to you, then you should have sold me less or charged me more.

      If they want to reward and encourage people who go to Disney parks regularly, maybe they should do it differently. I don't buy some kind of personalized, reduced-rate sandwich card at Subway. They give me these little stamps, that I can redeem later when I have several of them. Maybe they could do some kind of "frequent flyer" style program. Hell, I don't know. There are a hundred other ways to do this that don't involve personal surveillance.

      And I'm not even saying that the passes should go unchecked. Maybe their current model is fine. There are other ways to check ID. Maybe instead of machines to scan your hand and get people through lines quicker, they should have more people looking at IDs. (And I mean looking. That's it. That's all that's neccessary. Not writing down what's on it or keying it into a database. That's right, more wage-earnging human beings. Disney can afford it.

    4. Re:Parent is not troll, makes good point by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "Yes, but they could if they wanted to. They shouldn't sell shit like that if they're counting on it not being used. This is like a web hosting company overselling its resources, and counting on the fact that the customers won't all decide to use what they bought."

      Every webhosting company and ISP does this. The power company does this. Roads are designed this way. Airlines do it. Even the memory subsystem in most modern operating systems does this.

      Overcommitting is a fact of life. Get used to it.

    5. Re:Parent is not troll, makes good point by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they could if they wanted to. They shouldn't sell shit like that if they're counting on it not being used. This is like a web hosting company overselling its resources, and counting on the fact that the customers won't all decide to use what they bought.

      There is no need for everyone on your street to own a car. You should let anyone in your town borrow your car while you're not using it. Cars spend ~80% of their time parked so by "oversubscribing" them, only one car for every three or four drivers should be sufficient.

      As for ISPs and Web servers, it is a generally well accepted fact that >90% of all bandwidth is used by 10% of the customer base so oversubscribing 10:1 would be very conservative since even that 10% is not going to be using it all at the same time. Last time I heard, my ISP's bandwidth oversubscription was estimated to be around 100:1 but I have never had any problem getting a steady 425-475KB/s off my 5Mbps cable service.

      If you look at webhosting centers, when people lease a 100Mbps link, they are often guaranteed this 100Mbps. What happens in reality is that the service is oversubscribed and whenever a border link saturation alarms goes off, the datacenter investigates the surge's nature then adds new links if they determine that the surge was caused by legitimate traffic. Under a DDoS attack scenario, even not having any oversubscription can still bring networks down.

      As the sibling says, oversubscription is a fact of life. Overselling rights to use facilities on the basis that not everyonw will access them at the same time has been around for ages. I have a municipal pass for libraries and parks but I cannot be everywhere at once and not everybody in town will decide to do the same thing at the same time.

    6. Re:Parent is not troll, makes good point by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm totally use to it. Sure, it's a fact of life, and a viable business practice. It's also a gamble. When businesses make that gamble, the odds are usually in their favor, but it's still a risk and they must be prepared to lose a time or two.

    7. Re:Parent is not troll, makes good point by Aidtopia · · Score: 1
      I don't buy some kind of personalized, reduced-rate sandwich card at Subway. They give me these little stamps ... that I can redeem later when I have several of them.

      Not anymore. Subway recently discontinued the Sub Club program because there were too many stolen and counterfeit stamps. Near the end of last year, my local Subway was robbed. All they took was the spool of stamps.

    8. Re:Parent is not troll, makes good point by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      They shouldn't sell shit like that if they're counting on it not being used.

      Why the hell not? If YOU don't like the terms, YOU shouldn't accept the deal, whether it's from Disney or your cable company or whoever.

      The stupidity of your proposed "solution" to the problem of people getting capped on usage is obvious when you consider that if your usage approaches the cable company's cap, you're using FAR more bandwidth than the bulk of their customers.

      You're saying that the cable company should be forced to ONLY offer "unlimited", uncapped service... So you use 100 GB/mo. of transfer on porn and BT, while your neighbors use maybe 10 MB/mo. on email and WWW browsing, but you all pay the same rate??!! That's stupid--your neighbors are just paying for your incredibly high bandwidth usage.

      If you want unlimited service, there are ISPs that will charge you based on monthly transfer instead of a flat-rate with a cap. And there are ISPs (like mine) that don't have caps, but that cost somewhat more to cover the additional bandwidth that it's assumed you'll use.

      Remember: your ISP pays for traffic by the bit--their offering a flat-rate service is just a billing convenience to customers, not a fucking license for you to free-ride on everybody else's dime.

    9. Re:Parent is not troll, makes good point by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

      Oh, damn dude... You completely missed the point on that.

      I'm not saying that they shouldn't cap my bandwidth. I'm saying that they shouldn't claim not to. If they say "unlimited" then it should be so. It's straight-up false advertising. If a 600 pound dude with a steel oil drum for a stomach waddles up to a buffet table and cleans it out, eating way more than $5.99 worth of food, then that's a risk that the restaurant has just got to accept when they hang up a sign that says "All you can eat for $5.99!"

      That never even happened to me in the first place, it was just a fuckin' analogy. Chill out, man. I have a VPS on a fat pipe for my pr0n and BT, where I abuse the bandwidth to my heart's content knowing there's a cap and having agreed to terms that clearly said where it is.

  29. Missleading title. by stm2 · · Score: 1

    They are not collecting fingerprinting. They are scanning just fingerPOINTS o finger geometric information. It can't be used to match a fingerprint in any database.
    Anyway, you can opt-out of being finger scanned, just showing any photo-ID where your name match the one printed in the ticket.
    I prefer this than being stamped with a UV sensitive ink.

    (English is not my first language!)

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    1. Re:Missleading title. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (English is not my first language!)
      We could tell, you used it too good for it to be your first.

  30. Disney WORLD, not Disneyland by tabacco · · Score: 1

    This story is about Walt Disney World in Florida. Disneyland, the park in California, still uses good old fashioned paper tickets.

    1. Re:Disney WORLD, not Disneyland by LiNKz · · Score: 1

      You still use paper tickets here too. Pity they just don't use ID, or for these people who have seasonal passes, a photo id right on it. Seems cheaper then half-working finger scanners.

      --
      Proceed with Format (Y/N)? Y
  31. Mickey not subject to scan by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

    ...being that he only has four fingers and all and hence no real middle finger.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  32. I showed 'em by ag-gvts-inc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well I did my part: I clicked the "No, I don't like it" button on their survey. Twice!

    1. Re:I showed 'em by billsoxs · · Score: 1
      Well I did my part: I clicked the "No, I don't like it" button on their survey. Twice!

      what survey? (a Link perhaps?)

      --
      This message was brought to you by "Lack of Sleep."
    2. Re:I showed 'em by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "(a Link perhaps?)"

      Slashdot posters get dumber by the hour.

    3. Re:I showed 'em by klang · · Score: 1

      RTFA .. NEVER!! :-)

  33. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL NUBS FOR LIFE

  34. I'll give them my middle finger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is right in my front pocket I'll take it out when they requiere it.

    Really I don't know what disney is thinking, last time i was there a bitch thretened me with security like if I was doing something wrong, I won't give a dime either a fuck to disney anymore.

  35. What if... by mendaliv · · Score: 2

    What if you managed to get your index finger lopped off (or at least "slightly damaged") during your stay at the park?

    Or what if you happened to break your hand at work, got a huge settlement, and are now taking time off... will this thing recognize bits of your cast?

    Swelling due to a beesting or some allergy perhaps?

    In any case, I wonder what Disney's policy is for these sorts of unusual cases.

    1. Re:What if... by Blutarsky · · Score: 1

      Well, just an assumption, but They would probably just wave you through. It's kind of like the security system in retail stores, most employees don't really care if it goes off, theres not much they can really do if it does. It's just a detterent system to prevent people from swapping passes.

    2. Re:What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, considering the prevalence of finger-munching machinery in a modern amusement park, these are clearly vital concerns that need to be addressed. An item as precious as a day pass to Disney World is not something to be discarded simply because one loses an appendage or two.

      While we are at it, if Disney World is to revert to a traditional paper-based system, they should consider having the ticket fastened to the visitor's shirt at all times, so that legitimate ticket-carrying visitors can easily identify themselves even if they were unable to reach into their pockets by virtue of having had their arms lopped off(or at least "slightly damaged").

      In all seriousness, it seems from other comments posted that photo identification could be used instead of this scheme on a per-visitor basis. Surely that is what you would use if you were unable - or unwilling - to have your hand geometry data scanned.

    3. Re:What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you managed to get your index finger lopped off (or at least "slightly damaged") during your stay at the park?

      if your index finger has just been lopped off on a ride maybe you should be trying to get into a HOSPITAL, not the epcot center

  36. Growth by kushboy · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be a problem for long-term ticket holders who grow up and their fingers change?

    1. Re:Growth by chazwatson · · Score: 1

      Assuming that they go to Disney World often enough, the system could update their geometric information with each visit. I'm curious what their dispute policy would be should the person be unable to match the information on file.

  37. What Public Relations won't say by Green+Salad · · Score: 1

    I'm sure not sure this has to due with annual pass fraud detection. In the aftermatch of the London bombers, Disney doesn't want to point out that their park involves "very tightly packed crowds" and "international symbol of American decadence/innocence" -very bad for ticket sales.

    1. Re:What Public Relations won't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what are you saying -- that terrorists don't have fingerprints ?

      A fingerprint scan would not have stopped the 9/11 terrorists -- the only one who was in the country illegally had already been arrested (that's why there were 19 instead of 20). It would not have stopped the London bombers. It would not have stopped the Madrid bombers, or the Bali bombers.

      The fact is, that until a suicide bomber goes off, you can't tell him from a normal guy. Nazi Germany had some of the best security in the world, and one of their best Generals, Rommel, still helped put a suitcase bomb next to Hitler -- he escaped by luck. Remember that example and think about it in light of the currect security issues: would holographic driver's licenses, retinal scans, and invading Iraq stopped Rommel ?

      The guys that put in these finger scanners can figure that out. If they really wanted to protect the investment of the Disney Corp., they would employ real checks. If they wanted to re-assure the sheeple and make them come back and open their wallets, they might put in the finger scanners but they would have ABC (which they own) screaming about the new super-secure Disney land in every "news" broadcast.

      This stuff is not there to prevent terrorism. They might be interested in denying known child rapers entrance. More likely they are just selling the info.

    2. Re:What Public Relations won't say by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      Theme parks aren't my thing. (If I ever visit America I'd want to see natural wonders like the Grand Canyon, Rocky Mountains, Yellowstone Park and the Niagra Falls.) The idea that dense crowds at theme parks make an attractive target for terrorists puts me off even more. I don't think a suicide bomber is going to care if his finger measurements stay on file after he's blown himself up.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    3. Re:What Public Relations won't say by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "The fact is, that until a suicide bomber goes off, you can't tell him from a normal guy."

      If he's packing anything that can really do damage, you should be able to tell him apart by the cloud of volatile nitrates that's emanating from him or his backpack.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  38. Last time I was there by jcnnghm · · Score: 2, Informative

    They would do the finger scan, and if it didn't work the first time the attendant would usually just manually override the scanner and let you in without much hassle. Also, the person I was with and I have similiar hand sizes, and flip-flopped passes all week. It almost certainly isn't a fingerprint scanner, just a very rough check.

    Additionally, it seemed that the biggest issue with the scanner was not getting your fingers all the way into the device. If they weren't pushed all the way in, with the webbing between your index and middle fingers hitting the stopper peg, it didn't register. We kept trying to put our finger tips on the scanner assuming it was a finger print scanner, but it seems its main function is to check finger length. Of course, this is just an observation I made, I have no idea how the thing actually works.

    --
    You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Last time I was there by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about this and thinking that if you really objected to it, you could just screw around with the scanner and continaully move your fingers, not put your hand in far enough, plead that your fingers have a genetic defect that prevents them from going in far enough, and generally moan, wail, and bitch while tying up the line until they just let you in because there are 100 families with screaming kids behind you getting angry.

      I can see why they'd use it for season pass holders, however using it on EVERYONE, it's overkill. I mean, if you're already going INTO the park anyway... (unless they offer all-day in/out priveledges, which I doubt)... Maybe if they only required it if you want to leave/re-enter it wouldn't be as much of an issue.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    2. Re:Last time I was there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually many people with arthritis DO have a problem having their hand scanned, which is why they also give people the choice of using picture identification. Same goes for people with missing fingers and even people with really long fingernails. If you cut your fingernails the system can't identify you anymore.

    3. Re:Last time I was there by oncebitten · · Score: 1

      We kept trying to put our finger tips on the scanner assuming it was a finger print scanner, but it seems its main function is to check finger length.

      Ah, so that's the *real* reason.

      It's so Disney employees know who to hit on. Every one knows about the reputation of those Florida girls. And they have many gay employees (ask the Baptists who boycotted them).

      And big hands/fingers means big ...

  39. What does this accomplish? by e9th · · Score: 1
    Didney does this merely to prevent the abuse of passes.

    The terrorist who wants to blow people up will just get a job at one of the parks and wear 20 lbs. of explosives under his Goofy costume.

    1. Re:What does this accomplish? by klang · · Score: 1

      Like the recent attack in London, an attack in Disney World would be an "inside job" .. whith the rest of the character-community condemming the actions of one fanatic member! .. am I being too morbid?

    2. Re:What does this accomplish? by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "Didney does this merely to prevent the abuse of passes."

      They haven't convinced me that transferring the pass constitutes an abuse. Trying to claim it wasn't paid for? I'm sure they are quite expensive.

      "The terrorist who wants to blow people up will just get a job at one of the parks and wear 20 lbs. of explosives under his Goofy costume."

      Either that, or they'd just hit one of the hotels.
      The whole amusement park thing really amounts to a market draw for the hotel business. People are all spread out when they're at the theme park. The only thing that makes it a risky target for a terrorist attack is the cultural prominence of the Micky Mouse icon. I don't believe the terrorists weigh that sort of importance as heavily as Disney's marketing people would like to think they do.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  40. I couldn't agree more by soft_guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Disney is one of the most hipocritical and anti-freedom companies in existance. I for one would not visit their parks for any reason, but this is simply ridiculous.

    I fucking hate Disney for what they have done to our laws. I hate them for using this hand scanner. They are bastards.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    1. Re:I couldn't agree more by awksedfred · · Score: 1

      Does one have to use one's own finger? Or can it be someone elses finger? I'm being silly but trying to make a point. It's kinda scary where things could go from here.

    2. Re:I couldn't agree more by Cheval · · Score: 1, Funny

      >>Does one have to use one's own finger? Or can it be someone elses finger?

      If there's a Wendy's nearby you can get some chili and use the finger in it when you go to Disneyworld.

    3. Re:I couldn't agree more by RollTissue · · Score: 0

      This is yet another instance of 1984 exposing itself. It is all around us, we only need to be observant to see Big Brother developing.

    4. Re:I couldn't agree more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fucking hate Disney for what they have done to our laws.

      If an amusement park gets you foaming at the mouth, I wonder what your opinion is on some actual world problems.

      Oh don't bother, I for one welcome the idea that someone with your attitude isn't going to Disneyland.

    5. Re:I couldn't agree more by Tassach · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I concur completely. Disney represents the epitomy of corporate greed and hipocricy, as well as the mediocrity of pop culture. If it were up to me, they would get none of my money; unfortunately my wife and kids have different ideas.

      That said, I won't be visiting any of their parks in the forseeable future. The only finger of mine they'll be seeing is the middle one.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    6. Re:I couldn't agree more by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      Don't forget all of their gleefully racist WW2 propaganda cartoons (i.e., "Wack a Jap.") For that, I'll gladly boycott them until the end of time. Not to mention their permanent Micky Mouse copyright.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    7. Re:I couldn't agree more by Rinzai · · Score: 1
      Given that you can't spell "hypocritical" or "existence," I'm forced to disregard your opinion. If you can't spell correctly, what else can't you do correctly?

      Think?

    8. Re:I couldn't agree more by whimmel · · Score: 1

      Sure, slashdotters rationalize stealing music, movies, software and even bandwidth. Disney has come up with a reasonable way to keep you from stealing admission and it makes you angry.

      --
      Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    9. Re:I couldn't agree more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure, slashdotters rationalize stealing music, movies, software and even bandwidth. Disney has come up with a reasonable way to keep you from stealing admission and it makes you angry.

      You generalize, and push the balse argument that copyright infringement is theft without even backing it up, as well as make claims that you most likely assume true.


      Oh, and if by rationalizing the crime of copyright infringement you mean being corrected when you apply "theft" to "Copyright violations" you are right that happens alot, but only people who are really deluded would see any disagreeing corrections as rationalization.

    10. Re:I couldn't agree more by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Don't forget all of their gleefully racist WW2 propaganda cartoons

      Oh, I dunno - I'll forgive them for their war effort cartoons. Sure they were racist, but they were targetting enemy troops pretty much exclusively, unless they made some 'japanese spy' toons I'm not aware of. I'd actually like to get my hands on some of the european theatre proaganda toons- seeing Goerring salute and a skunk walk by is priceless.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    11. Re:I couldn't agree more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm wondering how long it will be before someone tries to go through these with gloves on and refuses to take them off. It doesn't get very cold (in my opinion) down in Florida, but some people may feel cold enough in December and January for gloves. In addition, I doubt they sanitize the hand scanners between each person. Will Disney refuse to allow the person wearing gloves to enter?

    12. Re:I couldn't agree more by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Your mother is a whore.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  41. Exactly by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    That is a major reason they do this - for only $500 (annual pass) a whole lot of people could get in.

    They do make a significant amount of money on ticket sales, and once you're in you don't have to give them a cent if you dont want to.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  42. Here's mine, take it by paiute · · Score: 4, Funny

    They can take my prints off of Sleeping Beauty's voluptuous ass. Seriously, that bitch got back.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  43. They did this last year, still news? by Oz0ne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They do it to allow a day pass to go in and out, without being used by multiple people.

    Seems like a nicely elegant solution to me!

    1. Re:They did this last year, still news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you hear about how well it actually works. They have something similiar at Busch Gardens. I opted out of using it and just use a photo ID and I get through much faster than the morons who have their hands scanned. It seems that at least 1/3 of the people don't do it right and they have to keep repositioning their hand. Sometimes the people working the gate just give up and let them through.

      I have no idea how this is supposed to be better than using your drivers license for authentication but somebody was duped into spending big bucks on this big brother crap.

  44. Respond to the poll by Tetravus · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a poll in the original story, a simple yes no maybe box with a submit button.
    If every /.'er responded it would be easy to push the poll in the direction of individual liberties and defense of privacy.

    Yes, I am aware it's not an official Disney poll but there's still a chance they'd pay attention to the results if they were overwhelmingly negative because the tv channel hosting the poll is neutral.

  45. Fsck you, Disney! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to read TFA again, but from where I sit this means it's time to shitcan Disney and everything to do with it.

    Goodbye, Disney! May your Mouse get sat on by a fat woman and suffocated.

  46. 6 fingered terrorist activity increases by 400% by llZENll · · Score: 1

    Quitely Osama distributes memos with instructions for all followers to cut off their index and middle fingers in the name of Jihad!

  47. Re:Anti-Capitalist Tin-Foil Wearing Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "The collecting of this fingertip information and how it is to be used and what the source of that information is as it relates to what it will show -- I don't like it and we will look into it," Crossley said.

    Shut up. And stop drooling.

    Don't like it, don't go to Disneyland.

    Yeah, sure. Okay, it's creepy, but hey, it's just Disneyland. I don't have to go there. And tomorrow Blockbuster Video starts requiring a scan to rent a video, but hey, it's just video-rental. Soon the Mobil gas-station starts using biometrics for their speedpass. Then maybe the bank wants your prints if you want to open account. And if the government starts requiring it first for their services and later legislates it as a requirement for other businesses, well, it's not as if it wasn't being used everywhere already, right?

    I prefer to stop these things BEFORE they become the accepted norm.

  48. The trouble with your argument is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it hardly bothers me that I won't be going to this particular private property. However, if they start doing this somewhere I do need to go, like the only food store in town (for instance), I will be sorely aggrevated. Private property owners can demand things that the police can't even ask for. We have laws to protect people from discrimination. For instance, I can't be refused entry because I'm black. I think we need laws to protect us if we want to keep our civil rights. I shouldn't be refused entry just because I refuse to give those up. Is this, or is this not, the land of the free?

  49. I'm all ears... by mikael · · Score: 1

    ... if someone has a better way of solving this identity card problem...

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:I'm all ears... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Check out the document I wrote in my signature (a newer version is here

      As well as my blog.

  50. Re:Fuck you, Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I agree with most of your points, but...
    And I hope a terrorists gets in and blows up tons of people. You will deserve it.

    Wow. Just... wow.
  51. Re:Anti-Capitalist Tin-Foil Wearing Nuts by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "They came for the Anonymous Cowards, but I was not an Anonymous Coward, so I did not speak up...?"

    Shut up. Stop drooling.

  52. Obligitory... by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our Mickey Mouse overlords.

  53. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The terrorists totally won.

  54. ACLU can shove it. by GottaGettaLife · · Score: 1, Funny
    If Disney wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.

    Don't like it? Don't go to Disney. Too bad for you - it's their park, their property, their rules.

    Life sucks. Get a helmet.

    1. Re:ACLU can shove it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the Cinema wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.
      Don't like it? Don't go to the movies. Too bad for you - it's their cinema, their property, their rules.

      If Walmart wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.
      Don't like it? Don't go to Walmart. Too bad for you - it's their store, their property, their rules.

      Life sucks. Get a helmet.

      If the pharmacy wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.
      Don't like it? Don't go to the pharmacy. Too bad for you - it's their drugs, their property, their rules.

      Life sucks. Get a helmet.

      If your ISP wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.
      Don't like it? Don't use them. Too bad for you - it's their service, their property, their rules.

      Life sucks. Get a helmet.

      If ebay wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.
      Don't like it? Don't go to ebay. Too bad for you - it's their site, their property, their rules.

      Life sucks. Get a helmet.

      If amazon wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.
      Don't like it? Don't go to amazon. Too bad for you - it's their site, their property, their rules.

      Life sucks. Get a helmet.

      If that porn site wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.
      Don't like it? Don't go to that porn site. Too bad for you - it's their porn site, their property, their rules.

      Life sucks. Get a helmet.

      If Google wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.
      Don't like it? Don't go to Google. Too bad for you - it's their site, their property, their rules.

      Life sucks. Get a helmet.

      If Microsoft wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.
      Don't like it? Don't use Windows. Too bad for you - it's their software, their property, their rules.

      If Apple wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.
      Don't like it? Don't use OS X. Too bad for you - it's their software, their property, their rules.

      If Ubuntu wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.
      Don't like it? Don't use Ubuntu. Too bad for you - it's their software, their property, their rules.

      Life sucks. Get a helmet.

      If spreadfirefox,com wants to collect fingerprints, good for them.
      Don't like it? Don't go to spreadfirefox,com. Too bad for you - it's their browser, their property, their rules.

      Life sucks. Get a helmet.

    2. Re:ACLU can shove it. by trewornan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's idiotically simplistic - ownership doesn't give you the right to make up any rules you like. Or do you think Disney should be allowed to refuse entry to Black, Jews, etc? Maybe just Muslims would be alright?

    3. Re:ACLU can shove it. by Legion303 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "That's idiotically simplistic - ownership doesn't give you the right to make up any rules you like. Or do you think Disney should be allowed to refuse entry to Black, Jews, etc?"

      I don't know about the person you're responding to, but that sounds reasonable to me.

      Business owners free to be as idiotically bigoted as they want to be, and consumers free to give their money to companies that don't suck. It's better than the sort of concealed racism we have now.

      At any rate, it's not as though this is the last straw for me where Disney's concerned. They sucked long before this situation ever saw light. I'm proud of the fact that my toddler does not recognize Mickey Mouse or any other Disney character.

    4. Re:ACLU can shove it. by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ownership doesn't give you the right to make up any rules you like.

      Funny, that's how it works on my property. I tell my guests they can either follow my rules or leave - and they can leave any time they like. But there is no third option available to them.

      In the land of the free I'm free to make the rules that govern my property, and you're free to leave (or not enter the property in the first place) if you don't like the rules. Freedom all around, for everyone concerned.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    5. Re:ACLU can shove it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad for you that it isnt so. You are not allowed to disciminate people on either private or public property.

    6. Re:ACLU can shove it. by stomv · · Score: 1

      No, that's not how it works on your property.

      Try paying a hooker on your property.
      Try selling booze to a minor (with a consenting adult).
      Try building something requiring a permit.
      Try requesting that a law enforcement personel follow your rules or leave.
      Try kicking your dog.
      Try lighting your own house on fire.
      Try firing an employee because of gender, age, race, religion, etc. on your property.
      Try paying your employee below minimum wage, violating any other labor law, or OSHA law for that matter.

      There are many laws that govern what you can do on your property. You may not like all of them, but they exist, in part because democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch, and in part because your actions have an impact on the greater community, and the negative results (or risk thereof) may outweigh your personal gain.

      Ownership doesn't give you the right to make up any rules you like, even on your property.

    7. Re:ACLU can shove it. by Butt · · Score: 1

      Business owners free to be as idiotically bigoted as they want to be, and consumers free to give their money to companies that don't suck. It's better than the sort of concealed racism we have now.

      Isn't it funny how I've only ever heard white people use this argument.

    8. Re:ACLU can shove it. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Ownership doesn't give you the right to make up any rules you like, even on your property.

      Perhaps, but I do have the right to tell you to get the fuck off my property if you won't obey my rules. And guess what? If I say "get the fuck off my property", *you have to get the fuck off my property whether you want to leave or not*. You don't get any other choice.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    9. Re:ACLU can shove it. by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      The really sad part of all this is that you're not only wrong, you're really proud of being wrong.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    10. Re:ACLU can shove it. by stomv · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but I do have the right to tell you to get the fuck off my property if you won't obey my rules.

      You can say what you like, but you still don't have that right in all circumstances. Consider:
      * warrant
      * emergency services
      * police chase
      etc.

      So yeah, you're wrong. You don't get to make the rules on your property with impunity, and you can't keep everyone off of your property with impunity.

      Thanks for playing.

    11. Re:ACLU can shove it. by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "Isn't it funny how I've only ever heard white people use this argument."

      I don't know, is it?

      Regardless of who makes the argument (and you're making very large assumptions about people you can't see online, although statistically it's a good guess), the argument stands or falls on its own merits. Were you going to debate it on its own terms or are you just trying your hand at trolling?

    12. Re:ACLU can shove it. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      you can't keep everyone off of your property with impunity.

      And I didn't say that. I said I could tell YOU to fuck off - and you wouldn't have a choice in the matter one way or another. Refuse to leave and the cops come and drag your sorry ass away for trespassing.

      I also said that I could set the rules for YOU, and that if you don't like them you could leave. But you don't get the choice to ignore my rules and remain on my property. You have only two choices here: obey them or leave, either under your own power or assisted by the boys in blue.

      This isn't a terribly difficult concept to grasp, unless of course you're some sort of socialist who doesn't believe in private property, or one of those pseudo-liberal fucks who thinks that HIS rules apply wherever he happens to stand.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    13. Re:ACLU can shove it. by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      > I said I could tell YOU to fuck off - and you wouldn't have a choice in the matter one way or another.

      So your point is that you can kick people off your private property under limited circumstances? Whoa! Call CNN.

      We do enjoy reading your posts, however. They're quite amusing for containing so much vitrol, and yet such moot points.

      Incidentally, if you're interested, I can rent you some 'pseudo-liberal fucks' to stand on your lawn so you can yell at them to get off or get hauled away by the boys in blue. I'd be willing to bet that the power rush is at least worth 10$ a head to you? Lets work something out ...

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
  55. Obligatory clodding by seramar · · Score: 1

    I'm an amputee, you insensitive clods!

    --
    australian project gutenberg is better than the original.
    1. Re:Obligatory clodding by thanku4playing · · Score: 1

      That would give you a fairly unique handscan.

  56. They have been doing this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, a really long time. at least at disneyland. they must have my print on file many times over.

    1. Re:They have been doing this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you've opened it?! Good luck - you have just been D****Wished! Tonight at midnight, your true love will realize they love you. Something good will happen to you at 1:00-4:00pm tommorow, it could be anywhere. Get ready for the biggest shock of your life. If you break this chain, you will be cursed with relationship problems for the next 10 years.

      Re-post this somewhere else within the next 15 minutes.... I'm sorry, I'm too superstitious not to have done it..

  57. Fix it by blowing it up. by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, you had a reasonable (if somewhat rambling) argument in your post right up until the last sentance...

    "I hope a nuke goes off in NYC, or should I say NYX."

    ...why, because the Iraq war is unjustified, or because the cops stole your fingerprints? I have no idea where you live but it is irrelevant. I know people born and bred in my country who would also recommend nuking cities as a political tool.

    Your kind are of no particular colour, you cover the spectrum of politcs and privlage. You need not worry about Disney or the cops, you are easy to recognise from your advocacy of a "final solution" that makes the rest of us want to puke!

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Fix it by blowing it up. by flubbergust · · Score: 1

      I might not always agree on everything with everybody but that doesn't give me any kind of rights to kill them or harm them in anyway. The right to not agree is part of the freedoms that I have chosen to protect. I cant have it both ways. If everyone else is not allowed to think what they want then I would not be allowed to do that too and then we have a dictatorship instead of a democracy. Its too bad that a part of the people in USA have started to take that road and started to, in my opinion, act like everyone is not free to think and feel whatever they want because it doesn't agree with them.

    2. Re:Fix it by blowing it up. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Yes he has a right to his free speech (even though I consdier it incitement rather than speech). I never said he should be killed, harmed, arrested or even to shut the fuck up. What I did was use my free speech to highlight my opinion that nuking ANY city is a manifestly evil thought that should be rejected by all of us.

      PS: I do not live in the US and you are not Ben. Franklin.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:Fix it by blowing it up. by IamLarryboy · · Score: 1

      I do believe that Goodwin's Law has just been invoked.

    4. Re:Fix it by blowing it up. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Yes it has and it was deliberate. Does that make my post irrelevant?

      Could it be that droping a nuke on a large city is so extreme that it is hard to find another evil with a catchy slogan that adequately compares to that kind of genocidial thinking?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  58. No no no you've got it all wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Idiots chirping 'don't like it don't use it' in a gay voice just don't understand.

    When someone like Disney do something like this, it sets a very bad precident. Other smaller companies then think they need to do be doing it for some reason. It wasn't that long ago I was reading on /. about a small town gym was requiring fingerprints. That's just plain silly.

    It's a current psycological fad that has come as a result of the War against Terror(TM) and people just lap it up unquestionably and think it's 'necessary'. It's also because the equiptment involved has become a lot cheaper and easier to deploy.

    The real problem is people dont' question it. Even the staff don't really know why they are doing it.

    That is bad enough before you even get to the repurcussions of enormous databases of physical individuals access to certain facilities, which in the case of Disney are probably being heavily tracked and probably include the tracking of children too.

    I think in time, this kind of bs may actually go away as a silly fad. But it may be a while before it does.

    1. Re:No no no you've got it all wrong. by takeya · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ultimately, if you don't like it, you haven't got any options other than to not use it.

      You can't forcefully change a company's policy, all you can do is inform others about how wrong it is. I would not let Disney scan my finger/hand to enter the park, and I would urge family and friends to do the same in a show of protest. That is, really, all that you can do.

    2. Re:No no no you've got it all wrong. by RabidOverYou · · Score: 4, Funny

      > it sets a very bad precident

      I believe that misspelling precedent sets a very bad precedent. Soon enough you're misspelling you're, and they're messing up they're. It's a short skid to it's, and before long no one can spell no one.

    3. Re:No no no you've got it all wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, it must be a delightfully delicious treat to sit in your leather arm chair with your exquisite crushed velvet smoking jacket, pipe and ermine slippers correcting trivial spelling and grammatical errors of peasants observed with your hawk-like eye on your Interweb machine.

      I only wish more people in this uncouth world had your depth of character and extraordinary wit, so that we may mould civilization for the better, saving ourselves from our own uneducated insensibility.

    4. Re:No no no you've got it all wrong. by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, if you don't like it, you haven't got any options other than to not use it.

      Sure you do. Get a fake fingerprint (thin silicon tip on your fingers). Give the same one to all your friends and family. Pretty soon they see 20 or 30 people with the same finger-ID coming through their system. This causes much bug-hunting and cost increase and general head-scratching, and eventually the system goes away. If you don't like the system, confuse the hell out of it.

    5. Re:No no no you've got it all wrong. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Disney has had this system since before the "war on terror" so the idea that people only accept it because of the war on terror "fad" (I hope it is a fad too but I don't think anyone is sure at this point) is completely wrong.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    6. Re:No no no you've got it all wrong. by corngrower · · Score: 1

      Are you shure they weren't thinking president? sets a very bad president? Maybe they meant elected a very bad president?

    7. Re:No no no you've got it all wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot "a lot."

  59. Choice for grown ups by RompeRatones · · Score: 0

    To be assisted manually by Snowhite to fill a container of a sprm sample

  60. That's fine. by derEikopf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Disney certainly has the right to do that. And we certainly have the right not to go to Disney. I'm sure Universal Studios will accept us with open arms.

    1. Re:That's fine. by Boilermaker84 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Universal Studios and Sea World plan to do the same according to the local news. It's monkey see, monkey do with the three of them.

    2. Re:That's fine. by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      "Disney certainly has the right to do that."

      Slave! Have you no memory of what being FREE is?

      Let me remind you.

      The declaration of independence allows for the creation and maintenance of governments for ONLY the purpose of protecting the rights of men and women. Rights which are INALIENABLE since they're granted by THEIR CREATOR.

      Not The Creator of a Corporation is? THE STATE. Which has NO RIGHTS, eh? Just priviledges granted by The People.

      Now can The State confer on IT'S creation "rights"?

      No.

      And does that ARTIFICAL LEGAL ENTITY have "rights"? If you read the HEADNOTE to the Santa Clara case, written by a clerk, maybe. If you read the DECISION, explicitly no.

      Stop believing their lie that they have rights, and start treating them like the slaves they are. Otherwise, us FREE MEN AND WOMEN just make a note that YOU are a SLAVE, and stop paying attention to your bullshit.

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    3. Re:That's fine. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Universal Studios will accept us with open arms.

      and closed hands.

    4. Re:That's fine. by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. The problem lies in that this is something that benefits them, not the public. You will not have a choice. And personally, I do not believe in the mayority to uphold my privacy.
      And it limits choice. Sure, there are others that provide the same kind of entertainment. But they may not provide what I am looking for in other fields, such as cartoons but also geographic location etc. etc.

    5. Re:That's fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Universal Orlando right now uses photograph right on a plastic card for annual passes, it's actually pretty nice.

      Seaworld/disney/Busch use paper tickets and are easy to get messed up. It looks and feels cheap, and costs more than the uo one.

    6. Re:That's fine. by hacker · · Score: 1
      Mod parent up. The problem lies in that this is something that benefits them, not the public. You will not have a choice. And personally, I do not believe in the mayority to uphold my privacy.

      I just had a thought after reading your reply... What are the two largest venues to capture as many people as possible for the purposes of "monitoring" or gathering personal information about them?

      1. Airline travel
      2. Theme parks

      Without a doubt, these are the two quickest ways to get as much information (fingerprints, credit history, verifyable location, etc.) from as many people as possible in the least obtrusive way.

      Now all they have to do is figure out how to get the rest of us to willfully hand over our freedoms and personal information to put into their big national DNA/tracking/"anti-terrorism" database, and they're done.

  61. Euro Disney? by qzulla · · Score: 1

    What about Euro Disney or Disney California? Is this only in Florida?

    q

  62. Re:Anti-Capitalist Tin-Foil Wearing Nuts by djhack · · Score: 0, Troll

    so first you serve us the
    "don't like it take your business elsewhere" crap

    ok, that's fine

    but uh oh , that only works in a free market, under the 20 more years every 20 year copyright system only disney can sell you disney copyrighted material.

    where the frack are you supposed to take your business to when you have a governement protected never expiring monopoly ?

    put that in you free market pipe and smoke it !

  63. Simple Solution... by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...don't go to DisneyWorld. End of problem. It's a private park, not government or public property. Don't like their policies? Don't do business with them.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Simple Solution... by miu · · Score: 1
      That is all well and good, but I think it would also be completely fair to require that Disney and any agent of Disney (travel agency most likely) make the consumer aware that they will be subjected to this to enter the park.

      I really think a fair number of purchasers (not a majority by any stretch, but at least a couple percent) would think twice before planing a Disney vacation if they knew they would be subject to this procedure.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  64. Exactly by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    I hear that. My girlfriend and I just moved from los angeles to south florida. Its a shame cuz we were planning on visiting disneyworld but to hell with that now.

  65. Who would have thunk it... by Sathias · · Score: 1

    ...that a company started by an American supporter of the Nazi party could have had such a detrimental effect on the slippery slope that is civil liberties. Colour me surprised.

    Next thing you know they will cynically have copyright laws changed to suit their company assets... oh wait a minute...

    --
    Blessed are the 1337, for they shall pwn the earth.
  66. Re:Fuck you, Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, Disney. You will never see my family in your park again. And I hope a terrorists gets in and blows up tons of people. You will deserve it. You want to destroy freedom, more than the terrorists

    Dear Moderators: how is this Insightful??? The simple statement that this policy is on the slippery slope towards Nazism hardly offers insight (it's a rehash of every privacy-related statement on Slashdot), and wishing for the deaths of many as a consequence is lunatic, moronic, and counterproductive.

  67. Let's fix the problem by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 2

    All of you American citizens out there, listen up. Whether or not Disney is on the up and up about this, there's only one way to fix the problem once and for all. It's time for every good citizen to petition their political representitives for privacy laws that mean something. In my job, I deal with privacy laws from countries around the world. We plan what we have to do to comply with the local laws of each country. When we come to the US, more often than not it's "don't worry about it, the law doesn't mean a thing". Isn't it about time we make it mean something? Get politically active. It's the only way to make a difference. You can bet the RIAA, MPAA, Disney, Microsoft, even fair haired IBM are politically active.

    The US used to have a government that was for its citizens. It's about time we had one again.

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    1. Re:Let's fix the problem by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      The US used to have a government that was for its citizens.

      Privacy in the Constitution applies to the relationship between citizen and government, not to the relationship between citizen and citizen. You can ensure privacy (or the punishment of it's violation) via contract, if you're concerned about the issue. Getting the government in on the act, other than to settle a contract dispute in the courts, is a very bad idea.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    2. Re:Let's fix the problem by klang · · Score: 1

      We plan what we have to do to comply with the local laws of each country.

      Disney World, that is, Disney Land ... Land, that's another word for "country", so we should comply with the local laws of this "Disney Land", they are all talking about, right? :-)

      The fact that a private company can be allowed to collect fingerprints is both disturbing and sickening.

    3. Re:Let's fix the problem by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

      First of all, there's not a lot of privacy in the constitution in the sense we are talking about here (some would argue none at all). Second, I'm not talking about the government getting involved -- it already is -- I'm talking about the citizens getting involved to promote better laws.

      One of the fastest growing issues in our digital age is identity theft. The single biggest enabler to this problem is unnecessary personal data stored in insecure business systems. Once biometric based identification is commonplace, unnecessary storage of that data becomes even more of an issue, because once the electronic signature of your thumb print is stolen, it's going to be tough to replace your thumb.

      Or maybe you are one of these people who feels like it hasn't happened to you personally so there is no real problem? But then when your personal data is stolen, and you get to shoulder the expense and hassle of cleaning up the mess, then maybe you will have a different attitude about the issue.

      Here's hoping you'll get the chance to experience it firsthand.

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
  68. MOD, don't you mean +1 INCITEfull by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    The parent post could only be considered insightfull if read like this...

    "I hope a terrorists gets in and blows up tons of people...This is evil. It is so unfuckingbelievable"

    I don't want Disney to have my prints either but wishing for people to be blown up for your own parinoid ideology is certainly evil. Doesn't matter who the fuck you are, eh George?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  69. Pay $60 to stand in cattle chutes all day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...been there, done that, I just don't see the thrill of standing in line for 10 hours to spend 20 minutes on the rides...

    go to the beach instead...it's free

  70. Re:Fuck you, Disney by proteonic · · Score: 1
    And I hope a terrorists gets in and blows up tons of people. You will deserve it.

    Man, you need to stop and think hard about exactly what you're saying. This is just slashdot, but that kind of reactionary attitude doesn't solve anyone's problems, it just causes them. Grow up and learn to reason rationally.
  71. Big expense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems like alot of dollars to spend just to try to curb a little ticket fraud. I wonder if there is another motive for this?

    Just how big is the problem of ticket fraud anyway?

    1. Re:Big expense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just a little ticket fraud. If you've ever been to Central Florida ticket resells are rampant. At every gas station there is a hustler in a little wooden shack trying to sell you Disney tickets cheap. Typically at $10 a day instead of $50. These guys prey on the uninformed tourists who think these tickets are just fine. Well, once the tourist gets to the theme parks these tickets never work even without the biometric scan. Disney is trying to prevent this fraud and I think its their right and that everyone will benefit (except the hustlers)

  72. Re:But they are listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are capturing all your key strokes and will come and get you.

  73. Completely agree by itistoday · · Score: 1

    Sorry to say this, but I just don't understand what's so appealing about standing in line on a hot day for hours to go on some stupid ride; and actually having to pay to do it too!

    1. Re:Completely agree by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Standing in line isn't particularly pleasant, but the overly warm weather does often encourage the lasses to wear less than they might ordinarily. ;-)

      Not worth $60 a day, though.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  74. "[this is good]" by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 0, Troll

    Because Disney taking fingerprints will totally stop any terrorist action from happening at their parks. "OMG! They have our *fingerprints*. There is no way we can carry out a suicide attack now!!!"

  75. Re:Fuck you, Disney by VectorSC · · Score: 1

    Nah. Don't forget the corporate mindset of avoiding liability at all costs. A rectal internal vein scan for positive identification would add all sorts of nasty possibilities for liability.

    A) You rectal scan someone, and find they have rectal cancer. What do you do here? Send them a letter? "Thank you for visiting the DisneyWorldTimeWarnerAolParamountDreamworksCNNVeri zonChinaTelecom theme park. Unfortunately, or RectalScan2000 machine has determined that you have rectal cancer. To help you in dealing with your grief, we are offering you tickets to our park at 50% off. Because the spread of rectal cancer is still a medium that we largely don't understand, please do not use our restrooms should you decide to visit again."

    Or even better, do you have a giant Rectal Cancer light right there in the probing stall? You know, the little unhappy smiley face that looks constipated? It's not even an option!

    b)The spread of AIDS would become a real problem. The regular anal probe is only the size and shape of a baseball bat. One with a camera in it would have to be made out of a telephone pole, which is much harder to sanitize correctly.

    c)Don't forget all of the "You found the Virgin Mary in one of your rectal scans, and kept it secret from the public!" lawsuits.

    This list goes on and on. Instead, the corporate lawyers have just recommended that they stick to a simple "Wham Bam, thank you Mickey!" rectal probe to give people a listing impression of their stay at the Big D.

    I know I should have posted this anonymously, but...heh. What's another lawsuit? Get in line!

  76. Re:Anti-Capitalist Tin-Foil Wearing Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't like it, don't go to Disneyland.

    I don't like it and I am not going to Disneyland. However, if you think that's the end of the story, then you just don't get it.

  77. lost ticket sales? by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... as it represents a substantial cost in lost ticket sales.

    Dude, this is called arbitration. A buys something, but doesn't use it up, so A sells it to B. Disney hasn't lost anything - they were already paid for the days A couldn't use.

    If they prevent B from buying A's unused tickets and force B to buy a new ticket that means they're double dipping.

    Not a moral thing to do. But of course, in the good old USA, this is not only legal, it's the thing to do. Profits uber alles.

    1. Re:lost ticket sales? by sigma · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, reselling most multiday amusement park tickets is not legal in Florida.

      See for yourself:
      http://199.44.254.194/statutes/index.cfm?mode=View %20Statutes&SubMenu=1&App_mode=Display_Statute&Sea rch_String=817.361&URL=CH0817/Sec361.HTM

    2. Re:lost ticket sales? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Except, as another poster pointed out, it's against the law to resell multi-day tickets in Florida, plus it's a civil issue as well since the tickets are clearly marked as nontransferable.

      Having said that, I seriously doubt any individual would ever be prosecuted or sued for it, so Disney is attempting to recoup the perceived loss in a manner fairly unlikely to get them skinned alive in the court of public opinion. If it helps any, I still think they're greedy bastards that have done a lot more to damage our society than just keep people from selling their unused tickets.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    3. Re:lost ticket sales? by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      who got that law passed then??? absolutely stupid... refusing to let people resell their unused tickets is madness... cos those people who got in cheap now won't bother and Disney have lost out on the merchandising that they could have sold to that person...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    4. Re:lost ticket sales? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      who got that law passed then???

      Disney had a lot to do with it, but it was backed by consumer advocates as well - the tickets only have a mag stripe on them, so at any non-Disney location there isn't an easy way to verify that the tickets actually were good for the number of days that were being sold, and more than a few people got ripped off by the scam artists.

      Of course, Disney could spin this as "we're protecting the consumer", but anyone that's actually dealt with the company knows what it's really about.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    5. Re:lost ticket sales? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "cos those people who got in cheap now won't bother and Disney have lost out on the merchandising that they could have sold to that person..."

      Personal opinion. Do you have a link to verification of your claim?

    6. Re:lost ticket sales? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The terms of the tickets include a non-transferrable clause. If A bought tickets he couldn't use, it's his problem.

      There is also the problem if A is a fraud. B gets to the park expecting 4 days on the tickets, but they only have 1 day remaining. B paid A for 4 days. Once at the park he can't get his money from A, and can only argue with Disney staff that their usage records must be wrong.

      I'm told that in the past Disney made-good on many such tickets, at considerable expense. The scanner is a fraud-detection technique, period.

      Get over it.

    7. Re:lost ticket sales? by patio11 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Dude, the ticket is priced on the assumption that A will only be in the park consuming resources a limited number of days in the year. If you assume A has the write to sublet his season ticket ("arbitration", by the way, is a dispute-settlement via reference to a neutral mediation. "Arbitrage" is buying a commodity in one place and selling it in another at a higher price. Neither has anything to do with what you're talking about.), then they'll price the pass at expected use of 365 days a year instead of ~12. THEN you can complain about them "double dipping".

      You'll note there are subscription schemes that do allow subletting, and you pay a premium for the right (the obvious example would be apartments -- check your local listing, $600 a month gets you a more desirable apartment if the contract doesn't allow you to sublet than if it does).

  78. Helloooooo terrorism? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 0

    Last week a suicide bomber killed several children in Iraq because they were getting chocolates from an american truck. Don't you think terrorists would LOVE to slaughter some "infidel kids" if they had the chance? SPECIALLY if they see Disney as some "company of the devil"?

    As much as I hate bush and his totalitarian government, or the lack of quality in Disney movies storilines, I don't want to think of the things that could happen in Disney World if some terrorist went there.

    I have very fond memories of my trip to DW with my parents, and I wouldn't like those memories be replaced with another 9/11.

    Besides, Disney's not invading any country, is it? In fact, a terrorist attack in Disney World would give Bush the PERFECT excuse to invade another "terrorist" country. And we don't want that, do we?

  79. Re:Fuck you, Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beh fuck it, I think his sentiment is right. if we carry on at this rate we are all in a lot of trouble.

    I could care less what happens to Disney.

    If someone took out Disney or murdered Bush or Tony Blair I would not be crying about it. I would be doing a jig round the streets in fact and drinking finest champagne.

  80. fingerprint scan not required by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    My mother could not bend her fingers to fit the device. The "cast member" simply swiped a card and let her in. I don't know if you can refuse to put your fingers in, but if you're having trouble it will be bypassed.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  81. I heard the scanners use RTLINUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an inside source told me

  82. Hmmm, that's odd? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    "..I just went to disney about 2 months ago...I would never consent to such an invasion of my privacy"

    Numerous posts have pointed out the system has been in use for up to 10yrs, are you saying Disney time travel really works?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  83. Same ol', same ol' by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure that this is not new. Even the ancient greeks, who thought it honorable to be involved in politics, eventually became apathetic. Not everyone here in the British-owned colonies was for the American Revolution. Some were for, some were against, and some didn't care. Some were against because they were loyal to Britain, others were against simply to maintain the status quo. And even after the Brits left America alone it still took many years for only a few people to agree on a constitution. Something must have turned out right during that (USA is one of the youngest countries, but I believe the oldest government) but the same will eventually be true. America will someday go the way of Rome and Greece and any other nation. This happens and we should try to keep it from happening, but it's not new.

    --
    Stop Global Warming!
    Just say no to irreversible processes!
    1. Re:Same ol', same ol' by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Rome and Greece were both empires, the concept of a "Nation state" has only been around for a few hundred years. /pedantic

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  84. the great satan rolls on by unscripted.ai · · Score: 1

    To think I made a stink at the airport when the United States wanted to collect my fingerprint data so I could get into the country. Then without even browsing my passport the guy questioned the pupose of my 5 day visit to the Middle East. He clearly wasn't psychic either which means his computer red flagged my name when he punched it in. I went to a water park and got accosted by Dubai's finest working girls. The visit to the states was identical in that respect. National ID cards and the following civil rights rebellion of 2019 here we come.

  85. Off To Six Flags Great America by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    This is really sad. My family and I have had a number of good Disney World trips. Their service has always been second to none IMHO. But given a choice, we'll be taking our business elsewhere rather than be treated like criminals just to get into the park. So I guess we'll be heading to Six Flags the next time out. The article states that Universal Theme Parks may institute similar policies, so I guess I won't be going there either. Disney World and the others need to get a clue that their services are not essentials. Treat the customer as less than king, and the customer will go elsewhere or do without. I think on this one word of mouth and a decline in attendance will tell the tale. I just don't think that people are going to put up with finger scanning just to get into an amusement park.

  86. Neutral poll? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    The TV channel and Disney are both in the entertainment bussines, how could the article or the poll be Neutral?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  87. Re:Fuck you, Disney by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

    And I hope a terrorists gets in and blows up tons of people. You will deserve it.

    Even if Disney deserves it - do those people deserve it?

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  88. The obvious solution: by raehl · · Score: 2

    Cockprints.

    1. Re:The obvious solution: by pHatidic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then your mom would have a copy of my identity.

    2. Re:The obvious solution: by Lehk228 · · Score: 2

      she copied it out of your dad's ass?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:The obvious solution: by Morky · · Score: 1

      Penis envy would move out of the subconscious.

  89. Mind In Gutter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or does the picture in the article look like you finger-bang the machine?

  90. why exact is bad by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

    I can explain what is being said, I am not sure I agree with it.

    If my SSN or password is stollen I can change it in theory.

    Biometrics if forged have a couple of problems that are unique to it just based on the stability.

    Like DNA evidence, if it is 100% trusted, nothing can argue with it.

    Also if a method is standardized and accepted everywhere, then someone figures out how to fake your ID you have absolutely no way to change it.

  91. guess there's a reason disney toons have gloves ;) by swschrad · · Score: 1

    and they never wanted animators to leave a print on their cels. hmmmmm, do I smell a plot here?

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  92. Re:What Public Relations won't say Handy... by HungWeiWeiHai · · Score: 0

    This is probably an extension of their previous work, except this new stuff will "come in handy" in identifying any new victims. Afterall, that man in the oval office did tell 'merkuns to (paraphrasing here...) "Take the family out. Go to Disney(land/world). Enjoy a movie/dinner..." after 9/11.

    Now, if the T's "take that to heart", they just conceivably COULD do what another poster said about sneaking 20lbs of stuff under their Goofy costume.

    At least with the hand-scan plan, there might be some closure when/if anyone is "literally dismembered" from the disney membership, whether by T's or if a sky ride suddenly drops to the ground due to poor maintenance or operator error. Really, don't people sometimes dismember after falling some 200 feet? In most movies, the fallen is shown INtact, maybe OUT of tact for the ratings boards...

    I loath the idea of certain businesses collecting SSNs, fingerprints, retina scans, saliva samples, and now, I guess when we go to the movies, we'll have to stick our eye in the Eye-dentifier before getting past the ticket booth.

    Well, no, that's what I'll watch DVDs for. But, T's or not, it seems movie theaters are on the downslide...

  93. In Other News by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny
    Los Angeles, California - Mickey Mouse and Goofy have announced they will appear in a series of US government-sponsored short films entitled "Liberty Is For Chumps" and "Do You Know What Your Parents Are Saying When The Door Is Locked".

    Snidley Frux-Disney, adopted great-grand nephew of Walt Disney's mentally handicapped half-brother Edgar "See What I Do On A Steamboat" Disney said "This is a positive move, we believe it's time for Mickey and Goofy to learn the goose step".

    "Liberty Is For Chumps" will feature Mickey and Goofy in a moral dilemna as they discover that Minnie votes Democrat and donates to the ACLU. "We thought this was the perfect time to retire the character of Minnie, with some real snazzy shots of the Disney Prison, Disney Riot Squad and the Disney Execution Chamber."

    "In Do You Know What Your Parents Are Saying When The Door Is Locked", Goofy discovers that his mother and father are actually distressed that the Patriot Act may be giving away far too freedoms. Mickey sings a brand new Disney hit "Those Little Birds Will Shut Up If They Know What's Good For Them". Naturally, there's some rousing fun as Goofy arrests his parents for thought treason.

    A third film, entitled "Your DNA Belongs To Us" is scheduled for release next year.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:In Other News by JohhnyTHM · · Score: 1
      +5 informative?

      I give up...

  94. So sad... by Cunk · · Score: 1

    Mommy: So, Jimmy. Now that you're finally recovered after months of painful rehabilitation after losing your arms and legs in that awful car accident, what would you like to do to celebrate?

    Jimmy: Yay! I want to go to Disney World and see Micky!!

    Mommy: Oh, ah...hrmmm. I hate to tell you this, Jimmy...

    --

    I am the inventor of the hilarious refrigerator alarm.
    1. Re:So sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mommy: ...Jimmy...well, you will need to be chipped at the Disney gate.

      Jimmy: I don't want to get chipped cuz it's gonna hurt.

      Mommy: It's ok Jimmy, don't cry, your already on the pain killers and it won't hurt...that much.

      Mommy: Besides the great part about it is now Disney can track everywhere you go but only in the park and you don't even need to pay for anything because your information is on file and they will just charge you. You want a corn dog, just grab it...

      Jimmy: But mommy I gots no arms. =(

      Mommy: um I meant, I'll grab it for you and you'll get billed. Isn't technology great Jimmy! A respected Disney spokesman said that the technology is safe and will not be used to invade your privacy and the Disney Database will never be given to the Government unless it will make us all safer from those evil do'er TERRORISTS.

      Jimmy: The american media has made me soooo scared of them TERRORISTS and I'll do anything to make me feel safer from them.

      Mommy: They say if you get chipped then this will help keep them TERRORISTS out of the "It's a small world ride"...

  95. Huh? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    If the ACLU is so concerned about my fingerprint(*) being on a Disneyland pass, where the fsck where they when my freaking PICTURE was being taken? Why are the so concerned about fingerprints at Disneyland but completely and utterly silent about my fingerprints at the Department of Motor Vehicles? Where the hell where they when I was fingerprinted as part of my earlier employment as a teacher?

    Do they really think the government is so noble and enlightened that they can give it a free ride? Disney can't ruin my life with a fingerprint, the government can.

    (*) actually a hand geometry instead

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  96. Casinos are already do this... by SB5 · · Score: 1

    But they do it with facial recognition technology. I don't see how this is any different or a problem. I would like to see laws that this type of information has be placed on the record and people have to be made aware of it.

    --
    If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
    it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
  97. Needed to be said ... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

    Mickey Mouse can have my fingerprints when he pries them off my cold dead fingers.

  98. Once they have your finger measurements.... by pentalive · · Score: 1

    While Disney (or other companies) may have more rights to collect information, what compels them to keep that information to themselves?

    1. Re:Once they have your finger measurements.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who says they are?

      Even if they state it will be kept private or deleted after a period of time, I'd bet there will be a representative of the gov negotiating transfer of records before deletion.

      They already get records of use from libraries, so you can bet the farm that biometric data would be a prime target.

    2. Re:Once they have your finger measurements.... by pentalive · · Score: 1

      exactly my point.

      Nothing compels them to keep the data they collect on you to themselves. The Government is just one group that would pay for any scrap of data that is available.

      And who knows what can be cooked up about you when the put 2 and 2 together and get 22!

  99. Mickey by mike_quinlivan · · Score: 1

    so wait, does that mean mickey is going to have to take off his gloves?!

  100. illegal violation of privacy rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What Disney World is trying to do is clearly illegal and a violation of current privacy rights in the US. They better stop this before people slap them with class action lawsuits.

  101. Roger Nash Baldwin. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the link to Roger Nash Baldwin. I'm from Australia and don't know much about the history of the ACLU, so I followed the link. I fail to see why you would consider him a "galaxy-class Nut" or why you would cherry-pick a quote that portrays him as a communist radical.

    The article states he broke off all radical communist ties in disgust over the Soviet-Nazi pact of 1939, he was a commited pacifist and conciencious objector to WW1. He also rubbed shoulders with the number one communist hunter, General MacAurtur. After WW2 MacAurtur invited him to establish civil liberties organisations in Japan, Germany and Austria. He was awarded both the Medal of Freedom by J.Carter and the Order of the Rising Sun by the Japaneese Government. All of the above does not even scratch the surface of his other accomplishments such as the original Scopes trial.

    "But I sure as hell don't need the ACL-freakin'-U to 'protect' me."

    I think you need them more than most, your anology with "singing and dancing" is not about commerce. It is a lame excuse for your willingness to kiss the arse of the man who wields the whiskey bottle.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  102. Disney, scan my middle finger now by kencurry · · Score: 2, Funny

    here, let me hold it up for you.

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
  103. People are way too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One day, just one day of no one going in.

    Even one or two hours of people standing around outside the gates saying they would like to pay and go in but they are waiting for them to *NOT* scan their fingerprints.

    You people don't deserve to be free. Continue to cooperate and go along the trails with the other cows, thankyou. Now move along.

  104. the plan is working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First you get the kids used to giving out their fingerprints or being restricted from public areas. Then later when their adults a police state won't be such a hard thing to implement.

  105. Outrageous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The scanner doesn't have those little Mickey Mouse ears!

  106. Re:Anti-Capitalist Tin-Foil Wearing Nuts by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
    where the frack are you supposed to take your business to when you have a governement protected never expiring monopoly ?

    Take your kids to yellowstone instead of disney. Inspire them to get excited about the place, and run around for a while. They'll grow up healthier, and smarter. If you cant figure out someplace to go other than disney, I pity the poor kids you'll raise (or have raised).

  107. Mod Parent Up! by Russellkhan · · Score: 1

    Really. I think many here are not realizing the implications that this post demonstrates.

    --
    Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
  108. Notes from someone who knows the system VERY well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A few notes/corrections

    -Even though this has been said before... IT IS NOT FINGERPRINTS! The system takes a few measurements at points around your finger - basically to take a rough measurement on how big your fingers are and the span between them.
    -This is NOT a new system - This has been in place for annual passes for almost 10 years now and has been in place for all tickets since January.
    -The information is not tied to your personal information at ALL. It is simply tied to the ticket information - the system is NOT THAT SMART. It is not pulling your demographic information from some other source to see if you personally have fat fingers. There is no conspiracy here - Don't give the system that much credit...
    -The system uses a VERY ROUGH ESTIMATE... why? Because otherwise in the florida weather where you swell up due to heat or if you gained/lost weight it would be a nightmare with tickets being rejected every 2 seconds.. If you are close - it lets you in!
    -Why use this instead of photos? Human error - after you look at photos all day everyone starts to look the same and you stop caring enough to pay attention and stop people unless it is very obvious.. plus the time factor.
    -What is this used to prevent? - People reselling tickets... Not to stop use of a ticket 2 minutes later.. the turnstiles are already smart enough to stop that.

  109. captian hook by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    how is he going to get in?

    1. Re:captian hook by EEBaum · · Score: 2, Funny

      He will be declined, ejected from the resort area, and heavily sued. I think we're all familiar with Disney's views on piracy.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  110. Re:Fuck you, Disney by soliptic · · Score: 1
    Too bad you earnt yourself a flamebait mod with this unnecessary and inexcusable remark:

    And I hope a terrorists gets in and blows up tons of people.

    Because this part:

    You want to destroy freedom, more than the terrorists.

    Strikes me as pretty insightful, frankly.

  111. Sea World does hand geometry as well by serverroomguy · · Score: 1

    And have been for a while - I'm not sure of the exact date they started, but it caught me off guard when we went earlier this year. I wasn't happy, but I was asked by my significant other not to cause a scene about it.

  112. I agree with the position that it isn't any deal by suitepotato · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, it IS THEIR park, THEY OWN it, THEY DECIDE who gets in and HOW.

    Secondly, they are not collecting fingerprints, they are checking something personally identifiable, that is the geometery of the hand, of the owner of the passes and tickets. No different than using a hand scanner at a business to control access to a sensitive area as far as I'm concerned. Don't like it, don't go there.

    Why is it so hard to understand that this has NOTHING to do with your freedoms? Unless Disney suddenly was handed power without someone telling me, they can do with and control their property and services as they see fit. My choice to spend my money on business with them as I see fit. Why is this such a hard thing to grasp?

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  113. Disney Abductions! by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't let them sample and gene scan you! They're just selecting their next victims for Disney Abductions! Have you or anyone you love:
    Disappeared for off-the-map hours at a Disney site.
    Been completely unable to remember where the time went.
    Had a wonderful time, no need to do hypnotic regression recall, keep back you mothers of sons! If so, you might be Cory Doctorow. Please contact your Magic Kingom Hall.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  114. Re:Anti-Capitalist Tin-Foil Wearing Nuts by dbIII · · Score: 1
    Don't like it, don't go to Disneyland.
    Outsiders like me read this sort of behavior as if you don't like it, don't go to the USA. I hope the paranoia exploited by opportunists (which is what Disney is, using previously unacceptable and certainly unwarranted security measures) settles down a bit before my next visit.

    All these half hearted attempts at security using stuff that is supposedly perfect but doesn't come close will actually make it easier for confidence tricksters in the future.

  115. wait by etzel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Weren't you the same people that elected Bush president?

    --
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."
  116. oh no! my personal info!! by akhomerun · · Score: 1, Interesting

    OMG now they know my finger geometry! would the government even WANT to buy that? who cares! from what some people have been saying, it doesn't even work half the time! it can't even be that accurate.

    many people probably have the same finger geometry, this is just a tool to prevent someone from using someone elses pass and there's probably about a 1 in 100,000 chance of you having similar finger geometry to another person, not a 1 in 6 billion chance like you would for a finger print scan.

  117. I call bullshit by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    The device seems only "good enough" to prevent me from giving my annual ticket to my friend so he can get a free day at one of the parks.

    Now Disney's parks have a lot of visitors each year, but how much can they be losing per pass that is 'loaned' out like this? Or, rather, is the ammount that they make by preventing pass sharing greater than or at least equal to the cost to deploy such a system?

    We have a lot of IT folk here, someone correct me if I'm wrong on my guesses, but I'm going to put the price tag on a system like this to be well over six figures annually. Several IT folk to run the servers, software & hardware, training for the booth monkeys, some sort of service contract with someone to maintain and replace scanners, etc. Are there that many passholders with friends?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:I call bullshit by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Are there that many passholders with friends?

      You are confusing common-sense business with the activities of mega-corporations. Once corporations become as large as some small countries, they too develop an unquenchable thirst for power and control over others, the sheep known as "consumers" in particular.

      So they deploy police-state mesures, even if they are actually losing money on the specifics. The general idea however is that enslaving "consumers" will in the long-term result in an uninterruptible (regardles of economics) income. Disney (like many other corporate nation-states) has been engaged in these activities for a very long time.

      You did not think DMCA was about piracy, now, did you?

    2. Re:I call bullshit by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Informative
      Or, rather, is the amount that they make by preventing pass sharing greater than or at least equal to the cost to deploy such a system?
      Have you ever worked for a fortune 500 and deployed multi-million dollar systems? I have (three different fortune 500's). When an expensive system is deployed you don't look to make your money back in one year. It might take 5 years or 10 years to see the full potential. If the system lowers the amount of people "stealing" their way into the park without paying by 80%/year, and the system can stay in place for 20 years, that represents a huge return over the life of the system for Disney.
      I'm going to put the price tag on a system like this to be well over six figures annually.
      Six figures annually is a drop in the bucket for a large enterprise. You can be certain that Disney _had_ to justify this system some way to their share holders. If you are really curious, start googling for the answer. I would guess that it returns many different values to Disney. 1) it helps to dramatically reduce people getting into their park without paying (there are a lot of people in Florida you know, and like me, many purchase season or annual passes which save a family a _ton_ of cash). 2) Better tracking of their customers such as peak park times, how many people go to more than one park in a day, etc. Stats like that can help Disney offer better options to their customers such as the "Park Hopper" passes. 3) Many other benefits that only Disney employees could probably tell you since I am not employed by Disney.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  118. Who makes the goofy finger scanning device anyhow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read that Disney will chip all bi-amputee's at the gate as they do not have a hand to insert into the machine. It only takes a few seconds and ensures that Disney does not lose share holder value. I hear they are borderline bankrupt and if they don't stop the admission fraud then they will be forced to move operations to India.

    Seriously, does anyone know who makes the finger scanner and exactly what data is acquired? It's great hear Disney officials say that it only takes finger geometry but what is it capable of? It would be interesting to know the manufacturer specs of the reader to better understand how it works and what data could be acquired.

    In the bigger picture, it could be yet another baby step towards moving the minds of the masses to accept something that should not be accepted. Homeland Security could sure use a device like this! Just imagine how much safer you would be from them evil doer's entering the it's a small world ride.

    On a side note, I read that you can opt out of the finger scan and still get in but you have to wait in a really really really really really long line with a bunch of cranky kids that just want to get in and see Curry Mouse.

  119. Re:Fuck you, Disney by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

    That's not a probe they're sticking up there

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  120. One good point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't RTFA so I'm not sure if this point was made or not, but I see a clear benefit in this system since it can provide a safer environment for the children. For instance, this system might be able to notify Disney employees if a known sexual offender has entered the park. They can then monitor his movements to ensure he isn't attempting to abduct or abuse a child.

    This system can also be used to monitor the movement of a lost/separated child through the park, though I'm sure an RFID tag would be a better method.

  121. Maybe it's time by concreationist · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's time to give them... the finger? Hmm? Ah-thank-you

    --
    ...what if there were no rhetorical questions?
  122. And one more time by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seems like I go through this every time a biometric security thing comes up on /.

    There are three fundimental ways to identify yourself for access:

    Something you have.
    Something you know.
    Something you are.

    Something you have would be a physical token that can't be copied, at least not easily. A smartcard would be a good example. Someone has to physically steal it from you to use it, and you are likely to notice it's absence and alert the proper people. However the problem is that it can be stolen, or lost and thus used.

    Something you know would be a password or PIN code. It's an ID stored in your head. The advantage is you don't have to carry it around and can't lose it. The problem is if someone finds it out, they can use it without you ever knowing it's been compramised.

    Something you are is of course a physical trait. The good thing is that can't be stolen or anything. Problem is what you are changes, and can't be measured precisely anyhow and thus can be spoofed.

    Now, real security comes from using 2 or three of these. Since their problems are different, moving to more than one makes it much harder to compramise security. If all that is required to get on a system is a password, all an intruder needs to do is find out the password and they are in. If, however, it takes a password, smart card, and fingerprint they have to find out the password, steal the card, and obtain and make a fake finger, all before any of this is noticed and access can be revoked.

    So, in the case of Disneyland, they are maoving from 1-factor (somthing you have) to 2 (something you have and something you are). Even if someone steals your card, they have to build a fake hand (it's checking hand geometry, not fingerprints) and use it unnoticed. However the real aim is to prevent peopel from shaing their cards. It's easy to give away a token, much harder to make a convincing fake hand and not get caught.

    So biometrics are NOT worthless unless they are the only security. When used as an augmentation to one or both of the other methods of security they make it that much harder for someone unauthorized to gain access.

    1. Re:And one more time by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, in the case of Disneyland, they are maoving from 1-factor (somthing you have) to 2 (something you have and something you are). Even if someone steals your card, they have to build a fake hand (it's checking hand geometry, not fingerprints) and use it unnoticed. However the real aim is to prevent peopel from shaing their cards. It's easy to give away a token, much harder to make a convincing fake hand and not get caught.

      That doesn't answer the question - if your biometric identifier is compromised and revoked, how do you authenticate yourself in such a two-factor scheme? You still have the card, but you no longer have the biometric aspect.

      How do you prove that you've not just borrowed someone else's card?

      Likewise for an ATM, if it uses a fingerprint and PIN. Without the fingerprint, how do you gain access? (Just like today - no card, no access)

      Sure, n-factor authentication makes it harder for someone to impersonate you. However, if for whatever reason one of htose factors is rendered unusable to you, you must replace it. That, as the OP points out, is impossible in the case of a biometric identifier.

    2. Re:And one more time by danila · · Score: 1

      A great replacement for No3 is the system that was discussed a short time ago - a technology for writing digital information on nails. This makes it possible to use for identification parts of yourself that are naturally replaced.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  123. Don't like it, don't go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like the policy, don't go.

    Especially at the prices they charge, no one is FORCING you to go to any Disney or any other theme park.

  124. Giant hands? by whassaname · · Score: 1

    Do you think they need giant hand scanners, for when Mickey, Goofy etc arrive at work?

  125. Disease transmission by technogogo · · Score: 1
    Is anyone else worried about touching a surface that thousands of other folks would have touched? I understand that hand-to-surface-to-hand is by far the most common vector for the common cold and flu virus to be transmitted. Also some much nastier germs.

    Looks like Disney should know about this too... http://www.cbc.ca/stories/print/2002/12/03/norwalk _virus021203

    1. Re:Disease transmission by thanku4playing · · Score: 1

      Yes, you and Howard Hughes got it right. Don't touch those door knobs.

  126. Middle Finger... by Palal · · Score: 1

    I guess I'll have to give them my middle finger if they want it so bad!

    --
    -Palal
  127. Re:Fuck you, Disney by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

    I didn't know that Disney was liberal.

    --
    Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
  128. fingering Disney , stay home by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    Our family's last two experiences with Disneyland: ~1996 our family group of 10, including elderly grandmother, was delayed 50 minutes entrance because gate wanted a 2nd set of sale documents (besides the "tickets") back at the hotel room. Never had that kind of bs elsewhere. I think Disney wasted $$$ of our time and patience for a mediocre experience tainted by vicious gate policies. Kid went to California, Disneyland with hs band 2 yrs ago came home sick and unimpressed. Save your money, and don't support greed-head facists, a real waste of money. I won't subscribe to ANY Disney product. Thaw Walt, chill out the rest the you. Gummy fingers for grimey grinches.

  129. I'm not paranoid, but... by frostilicus2 · · Score: 1

    Confirmation that Disney is the propaganda wing of the new world order. :)

    --
    Nothing sucks like a Vax, nothing blows like a PowerMac G4
  130. Re:Fuck you, Disney by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    And I hope a terrorists gets in and blows up tons of people. You will deserve it.

    Even if Disney deserves it - do those people deserve it?

    No, the people don't deserve getting hurt. The employees don't deserve getting hurt. Nobody does, not anywhere, not in the USA or anywhere. It is just so frustrating watching the America I love turn into a country where human rights and civil liberties no longer mean very much. It was frustrating being called unpatriotic for not supporting the war, like I am less of an American because I don't blindly follow, and question statements government makes, for example "we were fighting for WMD" then "No, it was never about WMD, it was about removing a dictator". Does anyone remember the presentation Powell gave at the UN showing drawings of mobile WMD factories on wheels driving around Iraq. Did my mind make that up? Do people remember any of it, or do they not care??

    The government is supposed to protect all the people, to value democoracy, to gaurentee individual liberty so people can read whatever they want, work anywhere, and be free. Instead, there are libraries that require fingerprints, Disney World scanning fingerprints. It follows logic, as the price of these fingerprint machines goes down, more stores will be buying them. What will it be like, when in order to pump gas you first have to scan your fingerprints, to make sure you don't drive off. Then Hotels decide they like the idea of fingerprints scans, no more keys to rooms. Then the airplains and trains decide that in order to ride, they want a fingerprint. Then the stores in poorer neighborhoods want them, for fear of being robbed. Soon, it will be hard to find places that don't want your fingerprint.

    And you know what is waiting in the shadows. Some large corporation that will buy this data and put it in some uber-large database. Your whole life will be in a computer somewhere. Your habits, where you shop, what you buy, how much you make, what you read, if you preffer coke to pepsi.

    What if one day there is a government that wants a coup, to overthrow the democracy we have. Would it be easier if these people had large databases, to know exactly who to go after, the troublemakers who would make noise?

    Now, take that information with what employeers are doing. Large companies convinced the USA to pass NAFTA, the companies promised it would be good for American workers. Instead, these same companies are building factories in Mexico, and firing people in the USA. Jobs that people need, that familes relied on. Watch Roger and Me, it is a good example of what can happen when a large factory closes its doors, how a community can turn from upscale into a poverty stricken ghost town. And don't get me wrong, if these companies paid the same wage to mexicans as they did to americans, I would not be complaining, but they are paying the mexicans an unlivable wage. It is slave labor, when people have to work their hearts out to make just enough to eat.

    And employers are getting worse. A local computer store now requires applicants to take a drug test, then come back and take a personality test which they never tell you the results to, then the last step is agreeing for a credit check. This is for a $9.50 an hour job working the floor stocking hard drives, video cards, and anwsering customer questions. And after they hire the person, they still never tell them the results to those tests, or what they did with them. If they don't hire, you have no way of knowing if those tests were the reason they did not hire you.

    What scares me is what I see comming down the pike. An America with limited jobs, most low paying, and all requiring going through databases to see everything about your life. Unlike in the 60's when anyone could get a job anywhere making good money, today it is hard to find a good job. Companies like Motorola lay off 11,000 people over three years, and then give their CEO a million dollar bonus. Sun Microsystems asked the government for permission

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  131. How about by Pete+LaGrange · · Score: 1


    just the middle finger?

    --
    loyalty above all, save honor
  132. If it makes it safer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 5yr old son and I went to Disneyland in California at the end of May. Before you can get into the park, they searched all our bags. Do I have a problem with that? Not at all. If it prevents somebody hurting my family, I'm all for it.

    If Disneyworld wants to use fingerprint scanners, build up a database, and use it for countering fraud and possibly to keep known "bad people" out of the park, I'm all for that too.

    If I were single, I might think otherwise. But having a child in your life changes perspective. If the end-goal is to protect the guests of the park, they are doing a very good job, and I would even pay more for my ticket passes in order to have them accomplish this.

    They have a fantastic park, and the visit to Disneyland was incredible. It was very safe, clean and enjoyable.

    I'm a geek, and responsible for application security in a large company. I care about privacy. But given a choice between having "no privacy" (ie: fingerprint scanners, data sold to other parties as well) versus the real possibility of being physically harmed (ie: bad guy let into park), I'd take the former.

  133. Future scenareo by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Place your index finger on that pad please sir.. BEEP! Im sorry sir it says here you stole a bag of Doritos when you were 13 im afraid I cant let you in, next please. Oh hello Mr Atta, welcome to Disney Land.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  134. From out at the turnstiles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    Have to post anonymously, here... I've got a lot of first-hand knowledge of the Disney admission control (turnstile) system, including the biometric readers that are the subject of this article. I'm basically going to make one longer post instead of trying to respond to misinformation throughout the comments.
    • You have a choice: use the biometrics or don't go to Walt Disney World. This is actually incorrect - you have a third option. Put your name on the pass and show valid identification. You never need to put your fingers in the reader.
    • The actual device has a simple reflective bottom surface and there is no way the bottom of the device scans/reads your fingerprints at all. There is a "camera" in the top of the box which images your hand geometry. From above. (it takes several readings and averages them out, from what I'm told)
    • The result of the scan is a basically one-way hash and can not be used to reconstruct your hand geometry. It is constructed such that similar hand geometries will result in a similar hash, but it's one-way. Compared to Disney taking a picture of you and storing that, I'd rather have this system.
    • Accuracy - in my experience, you have about a 10% chance of false positive recognition, and about a 3% chance of false negative with the tolerances built-in. Particularly with more experienced users (like the Annual/Seasonal passholders were) With the older model of biometric readers, there was an LED array at the side of the device to help align the fingers. That has been removed, to make the system simpler for Guests, but probably to the detriment of consistent placement of fingers.
    • How common is abuse?Back when the system was only used for annual/seasonal passholders, it was at least daily that I'd see someone present an annual pass, fail the biometric scan, and then be unable to produce any sort of identification - not a credit card, not a drivers' license, not a hotel key, piece of mail, anything. (Usually, this is despite clearly having a wallet in their pocket, or a carrying a purse). The passes clearly stated that ID is required for entry. Usually these people also had no clue how the biometric readers were to be used, even though they already had used the pass many times. These passes were confiscated (and usually mailed to the owner, with a warning letter, assuming it was the first misuse of the pass). The people who attempted to use them would then go purchase the admission media they should have. This is direct revenue, and clearly Disney's analysis indicates that it is worth it.
    • Sales of used tickets - as cited elsewhere, it is illegal to resell partially used tickets in Florida. But perhaps more importantly are the number of people I've seen burned by less than reputable ticket brokers. As the admission media have not actually indicated usage for some time, it is quite impossible to purchase a ticket and be absolutely sure it has value. (Without first presenting it, in person, at a WDW Guest Relations window, or trying it in the turnstile). It could have all the days used up. It could be voided or have been reported as lost or stolen. It could have limitations on validity (certain parks/days) which are not obvious from the descriptive text. Or people just aren't told that their ticket doesn't allow Park-Hopping. I've seen many a police report filed by people who bought what they thought were valid tickets, only to find out they were not. What a way to start a vacation.
    • Stolen park tickets are now much less valuable - with a significantly reduced chance of being able to use them to get into the park, the value of a stolen pass drops.
    • As to the cost - I think the real cost is simply in increased staffing levels at the turnstiles. As you increase the transaction time (by adding biometric scans), you need a wider gate, or more turnstiles open at a given time. But it is probably dramatically fewer front-line cast memb
    1. Re:From out at the turnstiles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your 0 score is unjustified. Very informative and to-the-point.

      Are there any accessible sites where your statements can be verified?

    2. Re:From out at the turnstiles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can ask out at the turnstiles at the parks, they'll be glad to answer questions [to the extent that they can, most of the front-line Cast Members don't have a thorough technical understanding of the things. That's what you get for putting a computer science student out there...] (note: it's best to ask when they're not swamped with people coming in - like towards the end of the day).

      The long-standing article at AllEarsNet is perhaps the closest I can find to publicly available information on this that will verify what I'm saying.

      I forgot one more detail - people often get confused when they realize they switched passes in their group and it still worked. Tickets bought in the same transaction are linked in the system, and if your biometrics match for another ticket in the group, it'll let you through (noting on the Cast-Member's display it's a [Different Person]. I believe the tolerances are a bit tighter for granting access in this manner, but it is what I consider a pretty nice feature.

      And the score of 0 is what you get for being at work when the article is posted, so that you're late to the party combined with having to post anonymously because while nothing here is *secret* the Mouse isn't a fan of the internet...

  135. I want go Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never been to Disney World, and now I am getting more sure that I never will either...

  136. But the real question is... by Sangbin · · Score: 1

    How do you tell apart the finger prints of Mickey's and Minnie's?

  137. take a mugshot instead, hello? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like most theme parks do for season passes, why don't they just snap a quick photo ID of you and print it on your pass? Seems like the tech would be cheaper to implement even if they use it for single-day passes.

    Is it that big of a deal for the gate employees to have to be like bar bouncers and make sure the face matches the pic?

  138. Ethics for biometrics/survelience by pfafrich · · Score: 1

    To me there are several questions which should be asked of any biometric system.

    • Do you know what information is being recorded?
    • Do you know who can use that information?
    • Do you have the ability to decline?
    If neither 1) or 2) is satisfied then there are significant problems for liberty.

    Consider the case of entering a private space, in entering that space you are making a contract with the owner. Part of that contract involves their use of biometric information about you. I believe you should have the right to know how that information is used. In particular: is their covert survelance - hidden cameras? Which third parties have access (could images of you be sold to private investigators etc)? At the very least there MUST be a sign informing you and a contact number for more information.

    Whether you can decline is a simple matter for a private space: you simple do not go in. It is a tougher problem in public space or when not entering deprives you of a fundamental liberty (say preventing you from getting medical treatment). Just as there should be prevision for wheelchair there should also be provision for those who decline.

    For public spaces there is also essentially a contract with you and the government. This is where the moral arguments come in.

    --
    There are four sorts of people in the world: fools, lunatics, idiots and morons. - Umberto Eco, Foucaut's pendulum.
    1. Re:Ethics for biometrics/survelience by thanku4playing · · Score: 1

      Do you know what information is being recorded? An outline of your fingers. Do you know who can use that information? Everyone who can see your hand already has this information.

  139. Also in Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Does anyone know if this is also being done in Eurodisney near Paris?

  140. But is it Enforcable by SoloFlyer2 · · Score: 0

    the question is based on your decision to refuse to to use the hand scanner can they deny you entry?

    or

    if you fail to be verified correcty can they legally deny you entry???

    --
    "I reject your reality, and substitute my own" - Adam Savage
  141. You trust Disney officials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Disney officials said the finger scans do not take an actual fingerprint."

    You trust Disney officials much more than I do.

  142. Security via Intimidation by geoff+lane · · Score: 1

    That's what it is really. It's intended to scare off kids and parents who have a cunning plan to misuse the tickets.

    1. Re:Security via Intimidation by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      And for some piece of shit COMPANY to believe they have Rights!!! And that their "rights" trump YOUR REAL RIGHTS to say, privacy, and to be secure in your papers!!!

      How many SLAVES really believe that crap?

      REAL FREE MEN AND WOMEN, know that companies are the creation of The State, which has no rights, and cannot endow them unto their creation.

      WE have rights because "Our Creator" gave them to us, and they're omnipotent. Companies have PRIVILEDGES they get from The State when they AGREE to the deal by asking to file the articles of incorporation.

      If they wanted to keep thier RIGHTS to the PRIVATE PROPERTY, they shouldn't have incorporated. But they wanted the priviledges of lessened personal risk, and lessened taxes, etc...

      Oh, and their demand *may* just be a violation of Federal Civil Rights Law ( as in a FELONY for the conspiracy part... ), go look it up, and have some fun arresting the disney flunky, and then filing charges in the federal district court.

      All of a sudden it would get EXPENSIVE to defend themselves on the civil side of the suits which would result...

      Just a thought... Do your own homework on the law, and you'll see it MIGHT be a neat angle...

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
  143. Haven't been to Disney in decades so I have to ask by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    I can understand Disney having your name and address for annual or season ticket holders, since they probably send them to you in the mail. But, if you show up at the park one day and want to buy tickets and pay in cash, do they specifically ask you for personal information?

    If not, who cares if they take finger prints, retina scans or probe every orafice of your body...they have no personal information to tie it to, so they have no clue who the scans belong to.

    Now, if they do require personal information for a cash purchase of one day or one week tickets....that's a different story.

  144. Ok so we have our hacking assignments by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Let's go and fuck it up.

  145. Me too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me too!

    --
    "Me too!" guy

  146. Just say NO! by barfomar · · Score: 1

    Just say NO!
    You don't have to buy their f*cking tickets. Do the same with the RIAA and the MPAA too.
    Buy a harmonica for $5 and make your own music or go to the public library instead.
    It's just all trash designed to sell you more trash.
    Don't let them own you.

  147. People would object if it were a photo by Comrade+Pikachu · · Score: 1
    If, instead of finger scans, people had to have their "mug shot" taken they would raise hell about it. We need to get people to understand that there are more subtle and invasive forms of privacy violation.

    BTW, as a former Disney "Cast Member", I had to do the finger scan thing as well whenever I used my "main gate pass" to visit Disney World outside of my work duties.

  148. Bones, more likely by Coppit · · Score: 1
    Here in Williamsburg, Busch Gardens has been using the bone structure of your hand for the last couple of years. You give them the card, they swipe it, then you stick your hand in a box that has pegs to align your fingers. Occasionally it complains, so you take out your hand and try again.

    I'm guessing Disney is using a similar system. Matching fingerprints seems more difficult to me.

  149. Free enterprise and corporate actions by QuestorTapes · · Score: 1

    You make some good points. A few things I wanted to comment on:

    > Disney is not a part of your government. They are free to exist as a theme park, just as Six Flags and
    > Alton Towers (in the UK) are.

    Very true.

    > They are entitled to set whichever requirements they like for you to enter their park.

    Almost. Any legal entity, human or corporate, under most British Common-Law type legal systems, have a great deal of autonomy in their business practices, as long as those practices are not illegal -or- determined to be contrary to the overall public interest.

    For instance, actions which are perfectly legal for a corporate entity may be held to be anti-competitive or monopolistic if that company controls a large enough part of a limited market.

    And some things are contrary to the public interest by their nature, such as indentured servitude. In the US, certain types of non-compete employment contracts are illegal for this reason.

    In the case of the season passes, Disney has (arguably) a legitimate interest in verifying the identity of the user. For day passes, this doesn't seem to be the case.

    As some have noted, since they are not retaining fingerprint information, but rather the hand geometry, there is no apparent collection of persistent personal information. That said, this is a gray area of public policy. I'd like to see some folks fight this in order to get some precedents on record regarding what is and is not legitimate.

    While Disney aren't keeping personal data in this case, the general trend in the corporate world (in the US, anyway, and probably some, if not all European nations) is to gather data they have no business asking for in the first place.

    > I believe in monopoly regulation, so as long as Disney is not the ONLY theme park available (and
    > Windows isn't the only usable OS), they are free to set their own rules, on their own property.

    Ehh, not entirely agreed. Disney may not be an actual monopoly, but they are at least a -local- de facto monopoly. And as I mentioned earlier, there is the public policy issue.

    > I also believe, however, that they must disclose what they will be doing with any information they
    > collect, so that you can be informed in your decision to surrender or not surrender your finger-scans and such.

    Very true. I'd really like to see a blanket ruling that private corporations are prohibited from collecting any kind of personal information or identifying data without prior informed disclosure.

    The reality is that for non-season-ticket pass holders, this is excessive; like a thirty page license agreement for a $20 piece of software. For a new car, sure; for a basic commonplace transaction, hell no.

    > You see what I mean? Right now, you can always take the kids to Six Flags if you don't like
    > Disney's rules. You can always petition Disney to change as well.

    Agreed that this is probably the best way to change it. I'd still like to see a legal precedent set, though. Just enough to shift the burden of justifying these little indignities. Currently, the corporation just does it; consumers need to justify withholding the data. I'd like to see it reversed. If consumers were legally entitled to withhold the data unless the company demonstrated a compelling need, it would slow down the flood of these idiotic ideas.

    1. Re:Free enterprise and corporate actions by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....a legitimate interest in verifying the identity of the user. .....

      Disney, in this case is only interested in enforcing the non-transferability of the ticket. They could'nt care less about any of your other personal information. If they start asking for the same kind of information that you have to give to an airline and then still do the fingerprint stuff as well, they may be stepping over the line.

      --
      All theory is gray
    2. Re:Free enterprise and corporate actions by QuestorTapes · · Score: 1

      > Disney, in this case is only interested in enforcing the non-transferability of the ticket.

      Disney's interest is largely irrelevant to the legitimacy of their actions. Good intent can't make a wrong action right; it may affect culpability and punishment, but it can't make a wrong action right.

      They have a legitimate interest in the non-transferability of season passes, and this is one way to address that. It may or may not be the best way, and it may or may not be a legitimate way. Disney is not the ultimate arbiter of this; it will be decided by the public based on their patronage of Disney, or by the courts, or possibly both.

      > They couldn't care less about any of your other personal information.

      Today. Unfortunately, a lot of companies today see the personal information they gather about their customers as something that belongs to the company, not the customer. Disney could change their mind later. I'm not saying "Disney is evil", but rather "Who are these people that I should give them the privilege of collecting this data?"

      As I said earlier, I don't think this is a real invasion in terms of the data collected. I'm more concerned about the next company, which may use this as a precedent to do something more intrusive.

      > If they start asking for the same kind of information that you have to give to an airline
      > and then still do the fingerprint stuff as well, they may be stepping over the line.

      I would agree with that statement; I just don't necessarily accept that they haven't crossed the line here. The line isn't codified in law or in common practice; currently it's just a big gray area. I'd like to see the line placed so that corporations need to demonstrate a need for data they want to collect, instead of merely stating the desire for it.

      Thanks for your thoughtful comments.

  150. An afterthought by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

    What if a double upper-limb amputee buys a season ticket? What about a paralytic? Do Goofy and Mickey lift the guy's hands and stick them into the scanner?

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    1. Re:An afterthought by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....What if a double upper-limb amputee buys a season ticket? What about a paralytic?....

      They'll let those kinds of people in for free or at least let them passs their ticket onto another amputee/paralytic.

      --
      All theory is gray
  151. Wha?? by xENoLocO · · Score: 1

    "The collecting of this fingertip information and how it is to be used and what the source of that information is as it relates to what it will show."

    Wha?? *head pops*

    --
    "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
  152. Blurring the line by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

    The line between business and government gets more blurry every day. Consider the recent SCOTUS ruling that cities can exercise emminent domain and seize private property from one private citizen/entity and give it to another private citizen/entity in the name of commerce.

    Big government IS big business, and vice-versa.

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  153. Cases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I only wish more people in this uncouth world had your depth of character and extraordinary wit, so that we may mould civilization for the better, saving ourselves from our own uneducated insensibility."

    This should be "so that we might". You're using the incorrect subjunctive. You're also missing quite a few words from both your sentences. The first should be "as observed with..." and the second should have "thus saving ourselves..."

    There are several other serious issues, but they're more subtle. The ones I listed cause parsing errors.

    Proper grammar is not easily satirized. Most who try to write involuted persiflage just end up looking foolish because it's so clear that the mockery comes from position of ignorance. You'd probably have done better with "Hey douchebag, shut the fuck up."

  154. Re:I agree with the position that it isn't any dea by hacker · · Score: 1
    First, it IS THEIR park, THEY OWN it, THEY DECIDE who gets in and HOW.

    What if they required that you stand naked in front of a camera for full frontal photographs, in order to enter? Anyone between the ages of 16 and 65 have to be photographed nude to enter... after all, its their park adn their rules, right?

    Wrong. What if they required your social security number, home address and credit card number before allowing entry?

    Secondly, they are not collecting fingerprints, they are checking something personally identifiable, that is the geometery of the hand, of the owner of the passes and tickets. No different than using a hand scanner at a business to control access to a sensitive area as far as I'm concerned. Don't like it, don't go there.

    Ok, so it would be ok for me to fill in my fingerprints with some gel and putty on that day then, right? Since they're checking "geometry" and not the actual fingerprints, they shouldn't have a problem with this, right?

    Wrong. They're using two fingers and not to check the geometry of the hand.

    What if it was a blood sample? What if it was more than that? How intrusive does it have to get to be admitted in there. We're PAYING them for their service, and when we leave, the services are terminated.

    Can I guarantee that when I leave, all of my personal information collected is permanently destroyed? No, I very much doubt it.

  155. House of terror by owlstead · · Score: 1

    They should place a voluntary fingerprint reader at the ghost house. I heard that biometric data can be used to reduce terror.

  156. Missing the point by Brass+Cannon · · Score: 1

    You are missing the point. The question here is not if they are allowed to collect your fingerprints. A ticket to Disney world is not like opening a bank account or traveling across state lines. it's a luxury. Disney is a private company and you do not have to buy a ticket. You should be more worried that the US government is about to require fingerprints for the other things I mentioned above. See the Real ID Act.

    The question here is what did I buy when I purchased a ticket? Did I purchase the right for a single person to be in the park at any given time? That is accomplished by requiring a ticket for admission. Or, as they are implying, did I purchase the right for only myself to be in the park? If I purchase a multi day pass and cannot use it all of the days. Disney would have me trhow it away? I purchased an admission. I should be able to give it to my friend and have him use it if I can't.

    Also it's not

    "Your DNA Belongs To Us"

    It's

    "All your DNA Are Belong To Us"

    1. Re:Missing the point by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      If I purchase a multi day pass and cannot use it all of the days. Disney would have me trhow it away?
      No, you can use your multi-day park passes for a long time. I live in central Florida a few minutes from Disney World. My family and I have annual passes while my parents, who live in PA, come down twice a year. They buy multi-day park hopper passes and can use them for the entire year.
      I purchased an admission. I should be able to give it to my friend and have him use it if I can't.
      You purchased an admission ticket to the park for _your_self_, read the agreement. If you don't like it contact Disney or don't go to Disney. Disney is not a basic life requirement, it is a luxury and they have the option to make the rules. Don't like them, don't go. It is really that simple.

      Say I own a buffet. You and your friend come in to my restaurant. You buy the all-you-can-eat buffet and your friend says he is not hungry. Should you be allowed to steal food back from the buffet for your friend who didn't pay? IMO, no. It is the same for Disney. The parks have limited resources, only so many people can get on a ride per-hour. Why should someone who did not pay to go into the park be allowed to use those resources?

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    2. Re:Missing the point by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It's a luxury. That not everyone can afford. So Disney is offering a plan for parents to sell some children into slavery, so the others can have a lifetime pass to Disney World. It's a private corporation, private property, not a "State", so the 14th Amendment doesn't apply.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Missing the point by Brass+Cannon · · Score: 1

      Disney is not a basic life requirement, it is a luxury and they have the option to make the rules. Don't like them, don't go. It is really that simple.

      I think that is exactly what I said...

      The parks have limited resources, only so many people can get on a ride per-hour. Why should someone who did not pay to go into the park be allowed to use those resources?

      If only a person with a ticket can be in the park at a time your whole "limited resource" argument makes no sense. Also, if i used the ticket in the morning and eat the food and buy toys and stuff - which costs extra, and then I leave and my friend uses the pass for the rest of the day, don't they make more $?

      I have never done this but it seems like a lot to go thru just to keep me from sharing something I purchased.

      I know the agreement says the ticket is for me alone. It just seems extreem.

    4. Re:Missing the point by KernelHappy · · Score: 1

      Your analogy is more like somoene entering a movie theater with two friends, running outside and bringing in two more friends with the first two friends ticket stubs. More people are using the resources expended than were purchased.

      If Disney sells a ticket for a whole day, and the price reflects using the park services for a whole day, I'd hope they have enough resources that everyone can be served. As long as the number of people inside the park never exceeds the number of paying customers then Disney is not losing. I don't think it is morally wrong for someone to leave the park midday and let someone else use the pass for the remainder of the day, but granted if the terms of the ticket explicitly state that it's one person by identity, not quantity, then that's the terms of the ticket.

      I personally don't have a problem with Disney limiting a ticket to one person (by identity) per day, but on something like a 5 day pass where it's generally accepted that a person will use all 5 days, is it really wrong to give the remainder of a ticket away if someone can't finish using it? Unless of course Disney is banking on a certain number of patrons getting sick and keeping their money. If lets say the original bearer of that 5day pass ended up with a bad sunburn and didn't not feel well enough to enter, I dont' see how Disney would lose by letting them give the 5 day pass to someone else, they've been paid to provide 5 days of service. If Disney offers a refund for people who cannot complete the use of a multi-day pass then it wouldn't bother me.

      This is different than a season pass, where a season pass is priced based on the average number of uses it'll get in a season.

      It's been years since I went to either Disney park, is a travel agent that books a Disney trip required to explain to a person the terms of the Disney tickets? I can imagine scenario where people would plan on sharing a multi-day pass only to find upon arrival that they have not only been stuck with a multiday pass they can't use as intended but now have to shell out additional money for. (imagine 3 couples going away wit htheir kids with the understanding that each day one couple will take thekids into the park while the other parents go off on their own for the day)

      IANAL but for Disney to hold a customer to such terms I would think they would need to disclose the details at the time of sale especially since its different than I think the average person would expect the terms to be. I think it's pretty commonly understood that a 5 day pass would mean one person can enter each day and I doubt few people would intrinsically understand that to mean it's a contract for a particular individual.

      --
      -- Button up, your ignorance is showing
    5. Re:Missing the point by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Informative
      IANAL but for Disney to hold a customer to such terms I would think they would need to disclose the details at the time of sale especially since its different than I think the average person would expect the terms to be.
      They do. I am looking at my annual pass right now and it states:

      Nontransferable; must be used by the same person on any and all days

      Disney is not responsible for misplaced, lost or stolen tickets

      Parks or attractions may change operating hours; close temporarily due to refurbishing, capacity, inclement weather or special events; and may otherwise change or be discountinued without notice and without liability to the owners of the WALT DISNEY WORLD(R) Resort

      Ticket and ID required for entry; Ticket, ID and handstamp required for re-entry

      Not valid for special events requiring a separate admission charge or for any park commencing operations after May 1, 1998

      It is agreed between owners of the WALT DISNEY WORLD(R) Resort and ticket users that all claims for injury or loss arising incident to presence on owners' property shall be litigated in Florida

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    6. Re:Missing the point by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Here is what is says on my annual Disney pass:

      Nontransferable; must be used by the same person on any and all days

      Disney is not responsible for misplaced, lost or stolen tickets

      Parks or attractions may change operating hours; close temporarily due to refurbishing, capacity, inclement weather or special events; and may otherwise change or be discountinued without notice and without liability to the owners of the WALT DISNEY WORLD(R) Resort

      Ticket and ID required for entry; Ticket, ID and handstamp required for re-entry

      Not valid for special events requiring a separate admission charge or for any park commencing operations after May 1, 1998

      It is agreed between owners of the WALT DISNEY WORLD(R) Resort and ticket users that all claims for injury or loss arising incident to presence on owners' property shall be litigated in Florida

      If you do not agree to those terms then either complain to Disney or don't buy a ticket.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    7. Re:Missing the point by Brass+Cannon · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I get it. I agree. it is their park. Come and go on their terms. You keep trying to explain to me that they make it clear that those are the terms.

      I think it is a bit extreem when they resort to taking my personal biological information as the price of admission.

      For as infrequently as I go, it's not enough to get upset about. It's just, well strange.

      Feel free though, in your response, to tell me the terms again. perhaps their website has a more detailed set of T's & c's.

    8. Re:Missing the point by OldeClegg · · Score: 1

      Purchasing 'luxury' services should not require exchanging your basic rights to obtain them. Do the boundaries of private property provide an exclusion zone in which common law does not apply?

      And, at what point of magnitude and to what degree does large scale private business remain private? Does this huge theme park exist in isolation? Does it not use huge amounts of public infrastructure in order to do business? Private, public, whatever - it may not be a state, but it exists in one.

      To some degree, unless you live all alone on a little island, your 'private business' both contributes and takes from the public domain, the commons. The smaller they are, the less perhaps their activities impinge on the commons. When they are huge, their effect is also. To some degree, Main Street in Disneyland is a public street, and you do not lose your rights of privacy, nor your other basic rights when you pay to stroll there.

    9. Re:Missing the point by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Did you really think that I was seriously suggesting that parents sell some of their children into slavery to finance their others' lifetime passes?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:Missing the point by OldeClegg · · Score: 1

      Hah! No, not at all.

      I was talking about, really, the assumption of some that private business somehow can trump the Constitution and Bill of Rights by printing something on the back of a ticket, and the fallacy that private property boundaries mark some sort of exclusion zone inside of which the owners wishes have more legal weight than than those. That's all. Nothing about selling kids.

  157. Over the line by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    While they are a private business and can *ask* for anything they wish for entry, this goes too far.

    This is a damned THEME PARK.. not some government installation.

    The are nuts. I know where i WONT be going to take my kids during the summer.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  158. Handstamps blow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't care much about handstamps for clubs and ballparks until the time I came home with a nasty rash/allergic reaction on my backhand from where I was stamped. Either I was allergic to the dye they were using, or (more likely) they stamped some nasty fuck never bothered to clean the stamp.

    With the amount of visitors Disney gets, I wouldn't be surprised if handstamping would be problematic. Not that this couldn't be solved with a technical solution (touchless sprays, etc), but whatever.

  159. Micky Mouse the AntiChrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disney's next policy: tatoo 'Property of Disney' on forehead of each visitor.

  160. Paranoia by kt0157 · · Score: 1

    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't watching you.

    K.

    1. Re:Paranoia by jnuzzo · · Score: 1

      It's thoroughly irrational to think that an entire population could be watched. No public or private agency on the planet has the resources for that kind of surveillance.

      What kind of life is it, spending all of one's time and energy looking over his shoulder in fear of being watched?

      The ACLU is a your best friend if your goals include crime, terrorism, or just going out to make people miserable. They keep criminals on the streets and terrorists in our midst.

      They simply do not know when to back-off for the good of the population at-large. IMO we'd be better off without them.

  161. Super Glue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smear super glue on your fingers. Works great been doing it for years at the DMV. Looks like scar tissue to the scanners. Ps DONT HOLD YOUR FINGERS TOGETHER TOO LONG lol. Easily removes with nail polish remover.

  162. Perfect for you SLAVES... by mikelieman · · Score: 1

    Remember SLAVES are the ones, who despite the clear intent of the Declaration of Independence, State Constitutions and State Law believe that Corporations have "Rights".

    They don't. And it's an INSULT to us REAL FREE PEOPLE who know better.

    For instance, OUR rights come from OUR creator, and since OUR creator is omnipotent, our rights are inalienable.

    A SLAVE or CORPORATION is different. They don't HAVE Rights. Just priviledges. The difference is that their Rights have been given up for special status, such as tax breaks, or limits on liability.

    But a CORPORATION's creator is The State, and since The State cannot require you to give up your prints, HOW can they confer that priviledge upon their creation?

    They can't. You've been lied to, and have internalized the Slave-Speak.

    At least OUR children are and will remain free.

    --
    Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
  163. It's FUD - Here's How it Really Works by mistermund · · Score: 1

    I work for Disney World IT - here's the non "We're local news so let's see how sensationalist we can make this" story.

    The scanners have been used for years (at least for the past six that I remember) for Annual Pass holders, for maybe two years for people who work there, and just recently was expanded to have everyone use it with the introduction of the "Magic Your Way" tickets. It's old technology, and simply looks at the top of fingers for hand geometry, then stores a hash with that unique ticket ID (which comes from the magnetic stripe on the card). The data is stored only until the ticket expires. Anyone who's actually seen the scanners in real life can confirm that there's simply a flat retro-reflective surface that you place your fingers on so the imager above can get a good view of the hand shape.

    The system is used to prevent swapping of tickets between people, simply as a replacement for showing some sort of photo-id with your name on it. You don't have to use it - just ask to show a photo ID that matches the name on your ticket instead. The acceptable margin of error is turned very wide in order to keep the system running quickly - maybe 10 out of 100 people could pass as you.

    The reason that this hit the news is because the system has been expanded (starting around January, I think) so that now everyone uses it. The reasoning behind this (pushed by finance) is that there's a real problem with people buying and selling multi-day tickets that have unused days on them on eBay and those discount ticket stalls you see in Kissimmee and on I-Drive. The only way to check how many days are left on a pass is to scan it on a reader attached to the Disney ticket system - which only exist on Disney property. People were getting ripped off, buying tickets that the seller swore had days on them, only to find that they've got a useless piece of paper.

    Oh, and to those who worry that Disney would use this data to somehow track or follow or gather more data about folks - Disney's like any other big company. Different departments don't talk to each other enough and like to keep their dealings to themselves. I'm not sure ticketing, operations, IE, and finance could actually get their heads together enough to do something evil like everyone's ranting about. I've been in meetings with these folks, they know that if they were actually doing the "evil" things that everyone was ranting about, it wouldn't fly.

  164. Just wrap your hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like it, just wrap your rhand in gauze and walk through the gate. Sure it will cost you a little in gauze but are they seariously going to make you unwrap your "injured" hand to stick it on their device?

    1. Re:Just wrap your hand by chawly · · Score: 1

      I fear so, my friend, I fear so. If not today then it'll be here tomorrow.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  165. You people deserve it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all you've done, you people really deserve this. Next up: fingerprints for trains and planes!! It is pure fantasy that these things will really save anybody, but they will be a great tool for oppression. GATTACA and 1984 were way too tame depictions of the reality we will experience.

  166. Re:Anti-Capitalist Tin-Foil Wearing Nuts by fishbowl · · Score: 1



    "where the frack are you supposed to take your business to when you have a governement protected never expiring monopoly ?"

    I think the spirit of the foundation of this government is that when things get this bad, you are supposed to take your business, your life, and everything else you can muster, and do your damndest to end the tyranny. Once it's tyranny, it's a life-and-death problem, and transcends any value of the profitability of your business or even your life.

    Don't have the influence needed to persuade tens of millions of others to join in your revolution? Maybe that's a sign that the problems are not yet to the "intolerable tyranny, life-and-death matter", level.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  167. Hey, It's Their Park by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Hey, it's their park. They paid for it. They build it. They ought to be able to set the rules for how it's used.

    Isn't it amazing how many other people think they own the results of your own efforts?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  168. There is a difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You pay because it is illegal NOT to. The airlines did this, because GWB's whitehouse had a veiled threat. So one is legal, and the other is totall illegal (but happening these days due to the fasicist nation that we have become; basically, the gov. allows corp. to rule as long as they understand that there is one ring to rule them).

  169. PLEASE MOD UP by duffahtolla · · Score: 1

    This is probably the best breakdown of the situation that has been posted.

  170. Wrong - Now on two counts! by Zaxor · · Score: 1
    I think others have covered well enough the idiocy of your closing, but I thought I'd note your gross factual inaccuracy. You wrote:
    I heard Bush say, to every citizen in the USA the reason we are going to war is because there was an EMINENT threat. EMINENT means NOW, it means that if something is not done right away, we will be attacked.
    First of all, the word is IMMINENT. Secondly, if you actually read or watched the State of the Union in 2003, a few months prior to the war, you'd have known that very clearly what the President said was,
    Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option.
    Emphasis added.
  171. Wrong Again by Elranzer · · Score: 1

    Actually, those scanners scan the fingerprint-like pattern *BETWEEN* your index and middle finger. Take a look, those patterns there are unique to everyone just like the fingertip finger prints.

    And these actually do scan and compare to a database. They've been doing this since the late 80's, because this was how you got the Lifetime Pass. You didn't bring any ticket or anything if you had the Lifetime Pass, just got your finger between-area scanned. They stopped selling the Lifetime Pass in the mid-90's and so these machines started to get little to no use (since the Lifetime Pass was applied to your body, basically, you couldn't sell it to someone else).

    So these new methods are just to give these dormant machines a new use. While they do scan your between-area on your hand, I do not think it actually matters. It's just there to make people feel secure I think. I just went to the park earlier this year and sometimes they scanned my finger area, sometimes they didn't and the computerized gates let me in anyway.

    The idea that they scan the length of your fingers/hand is ridiculous because Disney World gets plenty of people who are growing (kids, teens). Since you can use a pass within a year of buying it, you can visit one day and then visit again two weeks later and it's possible your fingers have grown, if you're a child or teen.

    The "everyone's collecting personal data against our will" conspiracy nazis can safely back off this one.

  172. a little FUD with your flume ride by Lexor · · Score: 1

    > there's a real problem with people buying and
    > selling multi-day tickets that have unused days
    > on them


    Take a look at this article on Slashdot today. Maybe you should adjust your licensing model instead of calling your customers thieves.

    Ever think this "real problem" is really just a large corporation trying to force people to waste their unused days ?

    When a horrible reason is behind a horrible idea, it's time to run. Run far away.

    --
    Regards, Lex
  173. Futureworld by msbsod · · Score: 1

    What is so wrong about fingerprinting? It has been done to criminals, then potential terrorists/tourists and now to visitors of Disney. Your bank may also ask you for your fingerprints. So why complain, everybody is doing it. It always has been a normal procedure. This is just how Westworld works. And why not make the next step to Futureworld? Criminals' DNA is already taken and stored. Nothing wrong with that. Who knows what all those invading aliens may hide. What's next?

  174. ELITISM PRICK SOCIALISM PRICK JUNIOR PRICK by syberanarchy · · Score: 1
    That's rich. You're the flaming troll that has to resort to unoriginal, redundant insults on a regular basis because your own arguments are lacking, but yet, I'm the one who's "not that bright." Neocon logic, ladies and gentlemen! Your e-Penis must be HUGE!

    Nor, it seems, can you spell.

    Nor, it seems, would you know sarcasm if it came up behind you and bit you in the ass.

  175. Efficiency by kt0157 · · Score: 1

    No state has the the resources to do it efficiently. But plenty of states have enough resources to make life miserable for a whole bunch of people who irritate the authorities in one way or another. Or haven't you heard about material witness arrests?

    You should go read your history of (for example) East Germany. The Stasi there had a pretty good system for keeping tabs on people. You had to watch your mouth pretty closely from 1933 to 1989. Or maybe you don't care what's happening in America, and are happy that a bunch of "stinkingliberalcommiefagatheists" get locked up at random.

    One day the Replicans won't be in power. Do you think the Democrats are going to dismantle all those nice mechanisms for suppressing dissent? You think they won't be using material witness arrests when coming after anti-abortionists? When the boot is on the other foot it's still going to be people with unorthodox opinions that get a kicking. The orthodoxy will change, but the kicking will continue.

    K.

    1. Re:Efficiency by jnuzzo · · Score: 1

      That's absurd.

      You've just compared Disney to Nazi Germany. I suppose your next point will be that Mickey is a likeness of Hitler?

      Exactly what I expect from the ACLU.

      You behave like we're in (or approaching) Nazi Germany, or Stalinist Russia.

      Absurd.

    2. Re:Efficiency by kt0157 · · Score: 1

      No, not Disney. There's not much of an issue there, as was pointed out - it's anonymous.

      No, I'm worried about an elected Government that installs an apparatus for tyranny. Step by step. It's what happened in Nazi Germany. A Government elected on a minority vote that promised to keep people safe. From communists, the "Asiatic Hordes", Jews, whatever.

      Step by step. If you stand by and watch people held without trial or charge, denied access to lawyers, on the say so of the Government then where do you think you're going?

      I'm not a member of the ACLU, by the way.

      K.

    3. Re:Efficiency by jnuzzo · · Score: 1

      If I saw signs of the type of gov't that you describe, I'd be concerned.

      I don't see those signs... not now.

      I have no problem with a gov't watching real troublemakers.

      People like MLK, who try to effect change through peaceful protest/demonstration are not being oppressed.

      OTOH, those who incite violence should be watched very carefully. Same for those who associate with known terrorists or terrorist groups. The people held at Gitmo are there for good reason.

      I am far more concerned about ultra-conservative groups -- including fundamentalists of all denominations -- than I am of our govt.

      Worldwide, the worst trouble surrounds the fundamentalist religious groups. The lack of tolerance in the mideast (both sides) and the decades of war it's fostered. The terrorism backed by fundamentalist Muslims.

      In the US, the targets are less obvious but still present: anti-immigrant militias; those in the anti-abortion camp who murder practicing physicians... The list goes on and on, and underlying it all is intolerance born of fundamentalist religious belief. The concept that one's God is the correct God and everybody else is wrong.

  176. Why not use another high tech method? by DaCool42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like, say, putting your picture on the pass.

    --

    ----
    All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
    1. Re:Why not use another high tech method? by thanku4playing · · Score: 1

      Because all you humans look the same.

    2. Re:Why not use another high tech method? by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new giant mouse overlords...

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  177. No, you don't have to replace it by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    It's not as though building and using fake body parts is easy, easpically for good scanners. It's still one more step someone has to take. It's also not like all theives have a mental connection via TheifNet(tm) to each other or something. If a person finds out and duplicates the biometrics being used to authenticate you, and they get caught, they get thrown in jail and the fakes destroyed. Also then hopefully you look in to modifying the scanners to reject such fakes in the future.

    Just because a lock can be picked (and they can all be picked) doesn't mean it's worthless, nor just because biometrics can in theory be duplicated doesn't make them worthless.

    Also, you can take proactive measures if you find someone's biometrics have been compramised. Say there's unauthorized lab access, and it requires a fingerprint and code. However you know for a fact the owner of said fingerprint didn't do it. Ok, so change the code, then setup the old code to allow entry, but set off alarms with security. Theif comes in, gets busted.

  178. Re:Fuck you, Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if Disney deserves it - do those people deserve it?

    Yes, yes they do to die hardcore. ALL stupid people deserve to die. It's no my law. It's nature's and Darwin's law.

  179. Misleading Title by orange+haired+boy · · Score: 1

    Since I used to work there...I should know. They don't take fingerprints. They take measurements of the bones in your fingers and how they're spaced etc.

    This is such old news I really don't know why it's on /. The technology has been in place and has been used for years.

    And, my 0.02 on the privacy issue is: Are people really SO uptight that they're scared of someone knowing what one of the finger's bones looks like? Maybe you'd prefer something less pervasive...like the new face scanners? Or...is your face private too? Put the bag over your head.

    Here's the thing with biometrics. They're the best that computer's can do. Humans can look at each other and instantly identify someone we know. But, since you can't expect every Cast Member to know every guest, there has to be a system. It's really that simple. Why is it that as soon as a computer attempts to mimic what human's do so well people are in a uproar.

    So, to all of you that don't like getting your finger bones measured, wear gloves. You never know...you might be walking down the street and someone might see or even look at your hand!

    *insert fake spooky music here*

    </rant>

    1. Re:Misleading Title by thanku4playing · · Score: 1

      Most biometric hand readers take an outline of a part of your hand and convert it to a few numbers. Every time your hand is read the number changes. They are just looking for the number to be close. It is impossible to convert this number back to the original

  180. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, what is the purpose of this? If you have the pass you're good, if not you're not. While it is possible that some season ticket holders share their passes with others does that really occur often enough to justify the cost of rolling out this system?

    IMHO this is an utter waste that represents disney getting taken for a ride by some dime-store tech salesman.

  181. english cameras by doorbender · · Score: 1

    I'd like to google those.

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
  182. You are now entering Tomorrowland! by jcuervo · · Score: 1

    Please note that smoking is not allowed in Tomorrowland.

    Disneyland closes tonight at 9pm. For your convenience, the Main Street shops will remain open for another hour. Guests with our sign-of-the-beauty-and-the-beast implants receive a five percent discount!

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  183. Some clarification, and opinions... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    I feel compelled to clear a few things up, having read the relevant articles and making some assumptions based on my knowledge of security technology.

    The scanners at D-world are NOT, at this time, full fingerprint scanners. If they were, they would not need two fingers, only one, and the process would only take a second or two for each person (I know this -- I've been digitally fingerprinted due to the fact that I work for a law-enforcement agency).

    They are, I believe, GEOMETRY scanners which map the approximate shape of two specific fingers, turn them into data points, and associate them with the record of the passholder or patron entering the park. The San Francisco Airport (and other airports) have been using full-hand geometry scanners for decades to do access control; This application appears to be a simplified version of the same thing.

    Now, with that said, I do have some thoughts on the issue. On the one wing, Disney parks are, in fact, private property. They belong to a specific corporation. Said corporation does indeed have the right to install any means of access control for their parks that they want to.

    On the other wing, and as others have pointed out, this sets a rotten precedent. It would not take much, in the way of hardware and software modification, for this system to be able to record full fingerprints. The scary part is that it could be done transparently, without the visitor even realizing that a lot more data points are being recorded and stored.

    This raises the question of how Disney is storing the data, what OTHER data they're associating with the scan, how LONG they're storing it, WHO has access to it, and WHAT they ultimately plan to do with it. If it's strictly an admission-control thing, fine. However, lacking further details, it seems to me that the door is wide open for abuse.

    This also raises the question of 'Does it make the park less susceptible to terrorist attack?' The answer is 'of course not!' Anyone who is truly determined to cause harm and mayhem at a theme park will find a way to do so that does not involve getting their hand scanned, or leaving much of any other identity traces.

    If I invoke my ultra-paranoid side, and put on my tinfoil hat, I can see another possible scenario. Homeland Security or whoever wants as much data as can be gained on the general population. What better way to gather a whole stack of fingerprints than to let someone else pay for the hardware and software, and then simply pay that someone else (Disney, in this case) under-the-table for copies of the records?

    Granted, that's probably a pretty silly idea, but see what happens when I let my imagination off the leash for a bit?

    FWIW: I've heard that Universal Studios and Sea World Orlando are going to be deploying similar (if not identical) technology for their gates. As if I needed another reason not to visit either park ever again, especially after that horrible travesty of a whale show...

    Keep the peace(es).

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  184. I've said this for years! by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Mickey Mouse is a fucking COMMI. Now I have proof.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!