Slashdot Mirror


Hacking Hotels 101

romka1 writes "Wired has an interesting interview with Adam Laurie, chief security officer of the London security and networking firm ALD. Laurie was able, using laptop, tv tuner and an infrared port to access premium content, billing information of all the rooms in the hotel, watch how other guests access their emails and access desktop of a backend computer clicking icons on the desktop and launching applications."

224 comments

  1. ya by Heem · · Score: 4, Interesting

    probably because most of the passwords were

    "password"

    "(name of hotel)"

    etc.

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
    1. Re:ya by postgrep · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it was 'god','sex' or 'secret'? ;)

    2. Re:ya by zbyte64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      read the article. he says most systems don't even use passwords

    3. Re:ya by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      When I stayed at Hampton Inn, they provided unused, unique, randomly generated passwords for each guest.

    4. Re:ya by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      Usually, it's just the room number :)

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:ya by LowbrowDeluxe · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, I just read the article on this on FARK and the process the guy is describing is kind of fascinating. Basically, since the TV is controlled by the IR signal from the remote, almost anything the hotel has accessible, is accessible through IR (and the program this guy wrote). Up to and including, appearantly some hotels mini-bars are controllable by IR remote (locking due to local prohibitions, or so the maid can restock them, etc). It's actually this sort of hacking, not PC hacking that I think has the possibility of causing the largest backlash in coming years. As more and more things become complicated pieces of electronic equipment. (Ferinstance: Hotel mini-bars) and computers become more powerful and portable, it's going to become more and more possible to interface with all sorts of equipment. Stealing some guys tax records off his hard drive is bad, but in most cases people just don't viscerally respond to it. Identity theft, no matter how terrifying credit card companies try to make it, just doesn't strike as much of a cord with people. But being able to walk away with free booze, that's something. Or let's say wireless becomes more prevalent in small scale communications. In some buildings, say a grocery store, or school, there's probably going to come a point where it will be cheaper to rig up some form of wireless PA system, rather than running new wires or whatever. With the proper effort, any standardized communication system can be hijacked. Now, admittedly, if it was me, I'd be in the grocery store whispering, "Snausages!" in varying tones of voice over the PA, but I can see all sorts of ways things could go. Suffice to say, hacking computers to most people is still just so much techno-magic. When it has a physical effect that can be directly observed, that will make it something much different. (another possible example, let's say they go to RFID tagging cars, and priority tag police cruisers or other emergency vehicles for getting through traffic lights and whatnot, well, there's another easily imagined opportunity.) Sorry, I'm babbling. In short, when computers are illegal, on criminals will have computers. Okay, I'm done.

    6. Re:ya by xbrownx · · Score: 1

      Can someone please tell me how a bad cliched joke from someone who didn't even bother to read the article because they wanted one of the first posts is modded "Interesting"?

    7. Re:ya by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh yeah, you want a seriously righteous hack, you score one of those Hiltons man. You know, the hotels they use to like, rent rooms and stuff.

      *rubs nipple*

      Wouldn't you just love to get one of those Hiltons baby...

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    8. Re:ya by double-oh+three · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're typing in the HTML formatted comment box, remember that (take away the _) does the same work as an enter key.

      I'll post my comment from Fark below:

      This isn't that new, as I heard a presentation on it at Schmoo Con in DC earlier this year. The blurb about the presentation reproduced below from this page.


      "Old Skewl Hacking: Infra Red - MMIrDA (Major Malfunction's Infra Red Discovery Application)" Major Malfunction

      Major Malfunction spends a lot of time travelling. Consequently he spends a lot of time in Hotels. Hotels have Pay-Per-View. Hotels have infra-red remote controlled TVs. And so, to while away the hours, MMIrDA was born...

      Infra Red is all around us. Most of us will use an Infra Red controller on more or less a daily basis, to change the TV channel, or open a car or garage door, but how often have you thought about how it actually works? This talk will describe not only how to analyse the signals being sent by your remote, but also how to use that information to find hidden commands and reveal functions you didn't even know your systems had. You will learn how to brute force garage doors, car doors, hotel pay-per-view TV systems, take over LED signs, vending machines and even control alarm systems, using cheap or home made devices and free software.

      DEFCON Goon since DC5. White Hat hacker since the late 70s. Co-founder of InterFACE, one of the earliest Internet streaming pirate radio stations (1995).


      /got into Schmoo for free
      //no didn't sneak in
      ///free passes for DC2600 members -- hope they do it again

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    9. Re:ya by postgrep · · Score: 1

      I'm sure many people have already gotten a certain Hilton ;)

    10. Re:ya by David_W · · Score: 1
      (another possible example, let's say they go to RFID tagging cars, and priority tag police cruisers or other emergency vehicles for getting through traffic lights and whatnot, well, there's another easily imagined opportunity.)

      Actually, they are getting there already... in Virginia we have the Dulles Toll Road, which has two sets of lanes, one on the outside for normal traffic (which has to pay the toll) and another set on the inside for airport traffic (which is free). Well, they have a few spots where busses can cross between the sets of lanes, since the inside lanes tend to not back up as badly. There's a gate blocking the lane, and a Smart Tag/EZ-Pass reader over it. All the busses have tags, and when they go through the lane it opens the gate. I'm sure if someone wanted to reprogram their tag to the same as one of the busses it'd open for them too. :)

    11. Re:ya by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but have they gotten in the backdoor?

      That's the difference :-)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    12. Re:ya by pdhenry · · Score: 1

      The Hampton "access code" isn't a password, and it's not randomly generated. I don't even think it's unique to a specific user.

    13. Re:ya by name773 · · Score: 1

      i've already heard of something where people found out how to bypass the current system for authenticating emergency vehicles (re changing lights to green) and started selling the devices. arrest/fine if i recall correctly (and you get caught)

    14. Re:ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure it wasnt god's secret sex?

    15. Re:ya by xsonofagunx · · Score: 1

      years ago, I read that the traffic lights were changed (by the emergency vehicles) by having strobe lights that flashed certain patterns and at certain rates I have no idea if that's still how it's done, but it's ungodly simple to do if that's the case. However, the patterns and rates were different for different cities, so one generic device probably wouldn't do it. Now, a programmable strobe and a little time to brute-force the traffic lights, and you'd only have to figure out the pattern for each region once...

    16. Re:ya by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Simple, possibly, but certainly not inconspicuous. I mean, hey, you could go through red lights if you had emergency lights on your vehicle, but I suspect ultimately that wouldn't go too well either.

    17. Re:ya by Fishead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I stayed at a Rainbow Hotel in Oslo last month, and the internet was a nuissance. The largest time card I could buy was 24hours, and cost the same as a whole month of internet at home. The access cards were scratch off name and password with ~ 8 random characters for each.

      Rome was more reasonably priced (and only a one time purchase for my entire stay) but they had a nasty habit of shutting down my connection when I was Idle. That meant that at the end of every long Gmail I typed, I would have to reset my connection before I could complete the send. My solution to that was to just get the biggest Linux ISO I could find, and start downloading. Them trying to be frugal on bandwidth ticked me off so much that I used 50 times the bandwidth I would have if they had just left me connected.

      A hotel I stayed at in Connecticut advertised internet for the length of my stay, just 3 dollars. It was great, they gave me a password, but I didn't even need it. When checkout time came, I had to tell them that I used the internet or they wouldn't have billed me.

    18. Re:ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      ...they had a nasty habit of shutting down my connection when I was Idle. That meant that at the end of every long Gmail I typed, I would have to reset my connection before I could complete the send. My solution to that was to just get the biggest Linux ISO I could find, and start downloading....

      It's called PING.

      /Happy to help.

    19. Re:ya by Fishead · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the sensor would be sensitive to IR light? Get a xenon strobe, build a filter out of parts from your camera shop and you have an invisible strobe that may or may not work. Hook that up to a 555 timer and a bunch of pots and you can vary the frequency and pulse width to find one that works... hm... gonna go turn on my soldering iron now...

    20. Re:ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That meant that at the end of every long Gmail I typed, [...]

      Oh please! I know Google is good and stuff, but can we call e-mails e-mails still?

    21. Re:ya by karmatic · · Score: 1

      From firsthand experience, the answer (where I live, at least) is yes, although it's difficult to get any range with it.

    22. Re:ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probabbly the same type of idiot that would use the dumbest phrase "Do a google". It called do a search on google, or do a search on Alta vista,etc.

    23. Re:ya by moonbender · · Score: 1

      I already mentioned it somewhere else, but MM also did his presentation in December 04 at the chaos communication congress in Berlin. I guess that wasn't the first time, either, it must be his standard show. :P

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    24. Re:ya by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1

      Man, my brain must be really filled up with crap if I can remember a ten-year-old usenet thread but not my cow-orkers' names, but here's some details:
      http://groups.google.com/group/alt.2600/browse_frm /thread/d407fb354c06bd20

    25. Re:ya by HighBit · · Score: 1

      ...strike as much of a cord with...

      You mean chord ..

    26. Re:ya by Apiakun · · Score: 1

      I don't have as much of a problem with someone saying "google it", as I do with someone saying they sent a "gmail". That to me is like someone saying they saw something on mIRC. It's the protocol vs a specific service.


    27. She's already told Jimmie Fallon that:

      Fallon: "I'm a celebrity, I might have to come in through the back door."

      Paris: "I don't care who you are, it's not happening."

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!

    28. Uhm, Alta Vista is still around? Didn't know that.

      This is why you SAY "Do a Google"...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    29. Re:ya by name773 · · Score: 1

      good reference though, if that's any consolation to you

      thanks

  2. free hotel porn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unfortunately its often not worth

  3. Why? by turtled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is it okay for "agencies" to go and find vulnerabilities in public networks, but as soon as a high school student finds a hole, tells someone, then no onw does anything, he has to exploit it to get noticed, then charged with some stupid "hacker crime"?

    --
    "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
    1. Re:Why? by oberondarksoul · · Score: 0

      A hotel's internal network is not public. It is private, owned by the hotel. The hotel then goes and hires these agencies to probe their networks (or invites, or is offered an inspection by), who then report what they find.

      When you have permission, it's okay.

      --
      And tomorrow the stock exchange will be the human race
    2. Re:Why? by Laivincolmo · · Score: 1

      Agencies are professionals who can convey a sense of trust with the owner of the network. Some kid with a laptop might not be a credible source. If they don't believe you, I'm sure there are lots of people out there on the internet who would be willing to give it a try...

    3. Re:Why? by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who said he had permission? When did he get permission to spy on other people's private information from those people?

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    4. Re:Why? by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The man was just looking to get FREE PORN! Didn't you read TFA?

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do ivy leauge schools teach Machiavelli instead of a warmed over highschool civics class?

      It all boils down to getting away with what you can because you inherently have more power. There is no inherent "morality" involved in any given legal system or government. Anyone over the age of 7 should be able to recognise this on a daily basis.

      Besides, it's important to have a fake set of rules for individulas to follow and conform to... otherwise we'd all be living in a perminent state of chaos. Just imagine millions of gun owning people behaving the way nation states do!

    6. Re:Why? by kd5ujz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Because when high school students do this shit, they later rm -rf the entire storage array.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    7. Re:Why? by Randseed · · Score: 1
      That's why they should use a VPN, SSL, or some other kind of security. In the case of, say, SQL requests being blown in the clear over a Ethernet hub to every room in the hotel, the liability needs to lie with the hotel. The hotel can then decide to sue the network installer or whatever the hell they want, but the fact of the matter is that someone uses a service and either:

      1. The data is broadcast over the air in the clear.

      2. The data is broadcast into their computer with the assumption (that neither the user nor the computer has agreed to) that it won't look at traffic that hits it if that traffic isn't targetted at its IP address.

    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High school students? Nah, they're more likely to change them F's to good ol' A's and B's. Well you can't make the marks look too perfect can you? It'd make em suspicious.

    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's largely about authority. Not so much what you have the ability to do, but what you have the "right" to do. Agencies have the authority to test systems' security and make recommendations based on their findings. High school students don't. The outcome may be the same, but it shakes down differently as far as the law is concerned. A cop tries to sell drugs and it's a sting. You try to sell drugs and you go to jail, regardless of your intent. Authority.

    10. Re:Why? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "Anyone over the age of 7 should be able to recognise this on a daily basis."

      Actually, no, because humans are primates and this is how primates work. Well, actually, yes, maybe they do - they're just trained not to admit it.

      Remember, 55 million people elected Bush - and if they hadn't, they would have elected Kerry.

      As we anarchists say, "No matter who you vote for, the government gets into office."

      I don't know if your last sentence was meant as a joke, but it was funny, since millions of gun owners couldn't act the way nation states do.

      Well, they wouldn't after the first million or so died, in any event.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    11. Re:Why? by chawly · · Score: 1

      I read TFA, and that's true. Did the man think he was giving birth to the original thought ? If so, he is/was wrong. To my idea, free drinks and free porn are the right of any reasonable individual who is forced to carry a laptop about with him. I hope this guy got paid plenty for his "chat-show" - but I don't think it'll change anything; unless he repeats it 97 times. 97 times being the time-tested number of repetitions required to get a "security" message across. He should shut his mouth before getting to this number, though - he could spoil it for the rest of us.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  4. Oh, I see how it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I do that, and I go to jail for 5 years. He does it and he's on Slashdot!

    1. Re:Oh, I see how it is by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      And now you know why the CIA has many agents working in hotels.

      Its to their advantage that its INSECURE so they can spy on any one.

      I wouldnt be supprised if every tv had a tiny camera built in too, at least in modern hotels that is.

      Obviously any techy in the know will not talk about this because he is being paid nice 6digits.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:Oh, I see how it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go away, Kevin.

    3. Re:Oh, I see how it is by nerdonamotorcycle · · Score: 1

      You are Randal Schwartz and I claim my five pounds.

  5. OFF TOPIC: /. Poll Locked by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Well where else can you put a comment about comments being blocked?

    Anyone explain why the # DVD's ripped poll has been locked?

    Anyway, /. discussion normally stems from the first four or five posts, so this question will sink down to the bottom with time anyway.

    -H.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    1. Re:OFF TOPIC: /. Poll Locked by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      I was still able to vote in it, but there are no comments showing at all. Interesting.

      --
      Be relentless!
    2. Re:OFF TOPIC: /. Poll Locked by tommeke100 · · Score: 0

      I agree with your comment, but for your tag-line, isn't it: "aide-toi, Dieu t'aidera" ?

    3. Re:OFF TOPIC: /. Poll Locked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably to keep the MPAA away from Slashdot.

    4. Re:OFF TOPIC: /. Poll Locked by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1, Troll

      Anyone explain why the # DVD's ripped poll has been locked?

      Because you touch yourself at night.

      ;)

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    5. Re:OFF TOPIC: /. Poll Locked by Saeger · · Score: 1
      I, for one, welcome our brave new censors. A poll of that kind would have surely invited ILLEGAL SPEECH, as well as ILLEGAL *ACTS* OF LINKING to terrorist software tools.

      (In all seriousness, I bet the poll being comment locked was an accident, and it will soon be unlocked. I mean slashdot can't possibly be THAT overly-lawyered to mute a poll for free speech they're not responsible for; AFAIK, they've only nuked a couple scientology posts thusfar, and that wasn't pre-emptive.)

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    6. Re:OFF TOPIC: /. Poll Locked by thegoogler · · Score: 1
      hmm, this is strange. im hoping this is just a bug.

      since i thought /. was anti censorship,and yet every 10 seconds or so if i refresh the page, its back to 0 or 1 comments even with people posting more.

    7. Re:OFF TOPIC: /. Poll Locked by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      Won't someone please think of the kittens!

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    8. Re:OFF TOPIC: /. Poll Locked by darkonc · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not permanently disabled. You just need the proper infrared code to unlock it. I've got it right here, on my laptop....

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    9. Re:OFF TOPIC: /. Poll Locked by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Happened on the last one ("How many computers fixed...") as well.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    10. Re:OFF TOPIC: /. Poll Locked by Suhas · · Score: 1

      This is a test

  6. Inspiration... by utopicillusion · · Score: 5, Funny

    He did it for free porn!!

    1. Re:Inspiration... by Andrewkov · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I don't know if you read the article or not, but he said this all started when he was trying to get free porn on the hotel TV.

    2. Re:Inspiration... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 State the fscking obvious

    3. Re:Inspiration... by ChazeFroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is old news and was discussed at ShmooCon in February 2005:

      http://www.shmoocon.org/2005/program.html#major

    4. Re:Inspiration... by darkonc · · Score: 1

      That explains it. I'm looking at my billing screen and I've got 2 views of 'Debbie Does Dallas'. For a second there I thought my girlfriend and her long lost sister had gone lesbian.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    5. Re:Inspiration... by moonbender · · Score: 1

      This was also discussed in 2004's chaos communication congress in Germany. And I assume a couple of times before that. Major Malfunction's (he never gave us a real name at that venue) talk was hilarious, though, probably the most amusing official event I was at. Way too short, though, I'd have loved to hear more.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  7. Replying ot this from a hotel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I got on their "pay-for-use" wireless network by simple MAC spoofing...

    Glad I didn't use the TV email function!

  8. tell me about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I go out and shoot criminals and everybody gets all pissed off about it, but when the cops do it they're like "good job, dude, here's a medal or something."

    Fuck that.

    1. Re:tell me about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go join Scotland Yard. Then you can shoot suspected criminals in the face.

    2. Re:tell me about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While pinning them down with 4 or 5 of your fellow officers.

    3. Re:tell me about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then lie about what the guy was wearing (a 'bulky winter coat'), only to admit the truth (a 'jean jacket') later to the guys cousin.

    4. Re:tell me about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go join Scotland Yard. Then you can shoot suspected criminals in the face.

      Shoot an innocent and they'll pay for your vacation, but probably not to Brazil...

  9. Bye. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the grand tradition of shooting the messenger, I guess he'll be in Guantanamo/Belmarsh before we can blink. Maybe they'll bother charging him and giving him a trial in 10 years or so...

  10. Because, by Sr.+Pato · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To be brutally honest, High School kids have no credibility and are easier to push-around and use as scape-goats. When an agency tells you your network is insecure, it's the companies fault for not being secure enough. When a kid does it, the network was secure, but this 'genius hacker' happen to break it. It works wonders with the media. Good damage control.

    --
    Nobody's gay for Mole-Man. :-(
  11. premium content? by Psionicist · · Score: 1

    What the hell is premium content? I hear marketroids use it all the time now. According to dictionar.com premium means, among other things " Something offered free or at a reduced price as an inducement to buy something else.". What's the problem if someone gets "premium" content for free then?

    1. Re:premium content? by justMichael · · Score: 2, Informative
      What the hell is premium content? I hear marketroids use it all the time now. According to dictionar.com premium means, among other things " Something offered free or at a reduced price as an inducement to buy something else.". What's the problem if someone gets "premium" content for free then?
      Read a little further down...
      6. The amount at which something is valued above its par or nominal value, as money or securities.
      Premium channels are generally movie/porn/sports channels.

      When you are at dinner or in a bar/pub and order something other than a well cocktail you are getting a premium (granted this actually has a graduated scale). BTW, never drink well, that crap will kill you.

      When you fill your car up with "Premium" it doesn't me you get it free ;), it's a higer grade that the norm, thus you pay a premium for it.
    2. Re:premium content? by waltznumber3 · · Score: 0

      premium content (in hotel context)
      read: "porn"

      --
      If you just took anything I said seriously, read it again.
    3. Re:premium content? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      What the hell is premium content?

      As in premium channels... things you pay extra (a premium) for. That stupid soft core porn is a premium, as well as pay per view movies and such. Once thing nice about cell phones is you don't have to worry about the premium phone service in those premium hotels that costs an arm and a leg just to make a local call, chances are the mobile is cheaper.

      The problem with getting the premium service for free is the fact that people feel that they are being robbed blind by freeloaders even though they set up the service as being an option which you can pay for. I use to travel with a VCR/camcorder rather than pay for VCR rental for example. This was some hotel outside vancouver. I got a big speech about how my bring my own vcr was theft of service because this was a service provided by the hotel that I wasn't paying for. The cops were amused when they found out they were called about some yank who heaven forbid went on vacation with a camcorder and was watching home video of Stanely Park. Needless to say the TV was listed as an amenity, vcr and tapes were listed as a seperate premium.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:premium content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That definition is for a noun. In this case premium is an adjective, which has the definition "of exceptional quality or amount; also : higher-priced"

    5. Re:premium content? by UltimateRobotLover · · Score: 1

      In my experience, the Premium petrol is the cheapest, and you need something called ActiGrade(TM) or some other tosh to get the expensive stuff...

    6. Re:premium content? by mick_S3 · · Score: 1

      BTW, never drink well, that crap will kill you.
      The BEST piece of advice I have seen here in a long time.

      --
      A gin in the hand is worth two in the bottle.
    7. Re:premium content? by fingerfucker · · Score: 1


      premium:

      adj.
      Of superior quality or value: premium gasoline.

  12. It was for beer.

  13. Security through obscurity by DragonHawk · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a classic case of "security through obscurity". The hotels (or rather, their vendors) are relying on the fact that nobody knows how their system works to keep it secure. They just broadcast everything and figure, "Hey, you need one of our special remotes to do anything, so we're safe".

    I think it is important to blame the vendors as well as the hotels. Two days ago I got a sales presentation of a document management system called "DocStar". The sales weasel kept going on and on about security, repeating himself with how it has security "at the level of individual pixels". But whenever I tried to pin him down about how that system is actually secure, he had nothing. As near as I can tell, their whole pitch is "It's secure because we say it is". Right. I'm supposed to take his word for it, when vendors demonstrate over and over, with cases like this, that their security usually amounts to "We hope nobody will ever try to break in".

    Gag.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:Security through obscurity by Dj-Zer0 · · Score: 1

      I agree, There are many companies in the coorperate world today talks about security but dont do security, they get paniced and buy the most expensive firewall when they hear someone try to break in but there is no maintaining, i think alot of companies out there need to take Application & Network security little more seriously.

      --
      http://iesucks.org
    2. Re:Security through obscurity by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was secure.

      However, a sales guy knowing the technical details of a product is as unlikely as being allowed to *talk* to a developer at their company to explain their security mechanisms in the first place.

      Sad state of affairs, really. Programming is all about abtraction; I wish people understood that when a programmer uses abstraction to centralize logic such as security, we'd all be better off if we could abtract across companies.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    3. Re:Security through obscurity by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      I once worked for a company that had paid X amount of dollars for a turnkey, login based web application that you could hack by editing the cookie and changing the username. I demontrated how I could log in, edit the cookie, and suddently access the entire personal info database.

      It is absolutely bone chilling to think that such programmers can actually find work, and twice as scary that even if you demonstrate this, it's often seen as something to fix in the future, not such a freaking easy and scary hack that the system should be taken down until the security mechanism was suitably re-written.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    4. Re:Security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I once worked for a company that had paid X amount of dollars for a turnkey, login based web application that you could hack by editing the cookie and changing the username. I demontrated how I could log in, edit the cookie, and suddently access the entire personal info database."

      Could I interest your boss in a pair of invisible monkeys? Only $10000.

    5. Re:Security through obscurity by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Former boss, and I was just contracting. I got the hell out of there as soon as it became obvious that they were set on asking for things that would eventually put them out of business.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    6. Re:Security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I once worked for a company that had paid X amount of dollars


      Please, please can we stop with this usage? X in this context is meant to stand in for an unknown or specified number. Unless you would say "I had a lunch that cost 10 amount of dollars", use "I once worked for a company that had paid X dollars" (or even just "that paid X dollars").
    7. Re:Security through obscurity by JadeNB · · Score: 1
      The sales weasel kept going on and on about security, repeating himself with how it has security "at the level of individual pixels".


      Not that the general ignorance needs any more specific fun poked at it, but it seems that the concept of something being secure `at the level of individual pixels' (a document has pixels?) is about the same as that of a substance which is cool `at the level of individual atoms'.
    8. Re:Security through obscurity by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Whatever helps you sleep at night man. It was a grammatical error that even looks stupid to me. Who do you think you're helping?

      Now, as for a more legitimate concern, can we stop posting AC?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    9. Re:Security through obscurity by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Look at Windows XP SP2. It adds a few genuine security enhancements, but most of what it does is make security settings more visible, like the security center on the control panel. Why is that there? To make PBHs feel warm and fuzzy inside. Because Microsoft knows nobody will really probe them for details. An illusion of security tends to be good enough to convince business-types that the product is secure, so this is all that companies think they need to do.

    10. Re:Security through obscurity by djcapelis · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, this is so very true. When you tell someone they should check for viruses, spyware or adware you usually get some response: "Oh, but I have anti-virus software"

      They expect some lame blocker to be a silver bullet solution. Unfortunately they almost always make the mistake of either never updating or using some little lame piece of software that doesn't actually do much. Not all security solutions are equal, yet no one can really understand that unless they're technically inclined.

      --
      I touch computers in naughty places
    11. Re:Security through obscurity by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      No. Doc*Star is that bad.

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    12. Re:Security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...document management system called "DocStar"..."

      "DocStar", eh? He didn't, by chance, describe it as the most powerful document management system in the galaxy, and then claim that their corporation would keep people trying to copy documents in line through fear?

      Obviously, to convince people of the security of their system, they need to perform a demonstration. Perhaps a military document. Preferably one that is not too obscure.

    13. Re:Security through obscurity by flimflam · · Score: 1

      Not to defend the guy, but I just took a look at the docstar website and I suspect what he was talking about is a digital signature stored for every document. It's not security in the sense that "no one can read this document." but rather security in the sense that "no one can modify this document (even a 'single pixel') without it being detected."

      --
      -- It only takes 20 minutes for a liberal to become a conservative thanks to our new outpatient surgical procedure!
    14. Re:Security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happen to work remote server support for one of the providers in question here and there are a few points that are being overlooked.

      im not sure about the "other" companies, but at least in our setup we use a dedicated linux box complete with snort and a massive iptable ruleset to prevent most stuff.

      not to mention that every switch is fully vlanned. as for the internet part, it is very secure.

      as for the information available over our system.

      that is very limited. our "database" consists of a room number, terminal address, and checkin state. we are interfaced with the property management system which does hold a lot of customer info, but our company does nothing with the billing. The only time a customer name would come across is if the guest was checking out from the tv and whatever the property management system sends to us is displayed on the screen. In all cases, this consists of no more than their room number, name, and list of charges.

      of course if you break the security key off the tv or wall tap you can view anything on the system. it is a coaxial analog distribution system so if you have a tuner you're in. the terminals in or outside of the tvs communicate with the server and are responsible for letting the tv tune to certain frequencies. bypassing this is what will allow people to view the "premium" channels. our terminals do quite a bit more communication than one would imagine so it is very easy to tell when a terminal has been bypassed.

      i think it is funny that he acts like they he has found some new and innovative way to hack a hotel system when all they are really doing is breaking the security sleeve and plugging in.

  14. Its a TRAP!!!!!!!!!! by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1

    Quick get an AXE!

  15. You need a better dictionary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Extracted from a REAL dictionary.

    Main Entry: 1 premium
      Pronunciation: 'prE-mE-&m
      Function: noun
      Etymology: Latin praemium booty, profit, reward, from prae- + emere to take, buy -- more at REDEEM
      1 a : a reward or recompense for a particular act b : a sum over and above a regular price paid chiefly as an inducement or incentive c : a sum in advance of or in addition to the nominal value of something [bonds callable at a premium of six percent] d : something given free or at a reduced price with the purchase of a product or service
    2 : the consideration paid for a contract of insurance
    3 : a high value or a value in excess of that normally or usually expected [put a premium on accuracy]

  16. My own experience by hixie · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was in a hotel a few months ago, plugged into the free ethernet (for which I was very thankful), checking my e-mail, editing my documents on a remote server, chatting on IRC and browsing work sites (all over SSH, TLS, and SSL). My work consists amongst other things of testing Web browsers, and at one point I had to determine why one browser was not handling some HTTP headers correctly, so I fired up tcpdump to check exactly what headers were going over the wire.

    What I saw scared the heck out of me. SQL queries from the hotel reservation system, including things like the results of "SELECT * FROM RESERVATIONS" and "INSERT INTO ROOMS ..." and so on, with full credit card numbers, addresses, names, room numbers, lengths of stays, the works.

    Not only was it all unencrypted, but they were broadcasting all that information to every ethernet port in every room. You can just imagine the potential for identity theft and burgalary networks ("he'll be gone til tuesday!"). And I wouldn't be surprised if you could actually just send out your own SQL queries if you wanted to ("I'll be staying for another week, honest!").

    1. Re:My own experience by Dj-Zer0 · · Score: 1

      Thats weird, so your saying their Ethernet is not switched right, and probably is using a HUB ? otherwise how can it be possible the stupid thing is broadcasting all over,, or is the DB server located at the broadcast IP. hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

      --
      http://iesucks.org
    2. Re:My own experience by hixie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm guessing they just had everyone on a hub. (Even if they used a switch, though, you could still get to see this stuff using ARP floods to redirect the traffic through your machine.)

    3. Re:My own experience by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some of these hotels/motels run pretty amateur operations for their "high speed access", so having a hub wouldn't surprise me at all.

      Even if the network is switched, one could just use a simple ARP poisoning tool such as ettercap to poison the MAC address table and make the switch go into "hub mode".

      Recently, I was at a Super 8 Motel in Addison, TX for business. I had alot of free time at the motel, so I got in my laptop and used the wireless. The connection was painfully slow, 3000-8000ms pings to everywhere. I fired up ettercap (ARP poisoning isn't nessecary on wireless, but ettercap is still a cool sniffing tool regardless) and saw that some bonehead was saturating the T1 with Gnutella downloads of pornographic pictures.

      I could care less that he is looking at porn, but he was hogging all the bandwidth. I solved the problem by "stealing" his IP address and generating some traffic to keep the the ARP table of the motel's router associating the "stolen" IP address with my MAC so that he could not use the internet.

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    4. Re:My own experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ARP poisoning is not too hard. Don't be skeptical of what you don't understand.

    5. Re:My own experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, if you wanted some hot pr0n, all you had to do was ask. Geez.

    6. Re:My own experience by wallingford · · Score: 1
      I saw a similar experience at a seminar for work a few weeks ago. Part of the theme was datacenter security.

      As a demonstration of how some people just didn't know about the risk, the presenter plugged his Windows laptop into a wall outlet and fired up Nessus.

      It was a mess. Every staff computer was running Windows XP unsecured. You could see them in Network Neighborhood. He tried the main server with password "password" over virtual desktop and got in. This from some businessman with no CS training, just curiosity. I would imagine that someone with deeper experience and malicious intent could have raised hell, or worse, stolen information and never let anybody know about it.

      He later told the hotel owners what had happened (pretty brave of him, I suppose, considering what's happened to whistle blowers in the past). I have no idea if they were impressed or intend to do anything. Or if they have even the slightest idea of how to fix the problem; I seriously doubt that your average hotel has an IT staff.

      After all this, staying at any hotel is sounding a lot scarier. He's been able to pull this trick almost everywhere he lectures at.

    7. Re:My own experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a company that installs and supports HSIA in hotels. If you were at one of ours (and it's my day off so I'm not going to look it up) all you had to do was pick up the phone and tell the help desk. Guy would have been banned from the network in less the 10 minutes (damn "have to get permission to kick assholes off the network" rule)

    8. Re:My own experience by darkonc · · Score: 1
      This was probably put in back around 2000, when going from a hub to a switch would have been an extra few hundred dollars per 24 ports. When multiplied by a few hundred rooms, it starts to add up -- and all for a 'free' service (piggybacked on the internal hotel network). "Why not just go with a hub. I mean it's not like we needed the extra performance right?" Things like privacy and security just don't sneak into some of these conversations, or go over the heads of the people who have signing authority. Sometimes the people who know better just don't raise the issue because the extra cost will ditch the whole idea.

      These sorts of problems would now be almost trivial to fix -- either with a $50 switch, or more properly with a proper firewall (or just a BSD box with 3 ethernet ports). Although this would be easy enough for most of us here on /. to fix, most hotel owners are probably feeling pretty lost. To most of them the network and computer system are just a black box. If you explain the problem to them, they'll probably just nod their head like they understand what you're saying and then go hide in their office until the wierd words stop rattling around in their heads.
      If you want a change, you'll have to get into contact with someone who (A) understands IT, and (B) has authority to spend the money on a fix. (good luck).

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    9. Re:My own experience by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 1

      I looked up this "HSIA" thing and I'm pretty sure the motel didn't have it. There were two access points in range (that were the motel's), they were both Linksys 54g routers. I didn't expect the motel staff to have the technical competency to understand the problem, much less be able to deal with it. The APs were also completly open too, no authentication whatsoever.

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    10. Re:My own experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not hard but the poster said he was inocently trying to look at his own traffic, not going out of his way to see other people's. Also, I didn't see any skepticism in there, just surprise that any reasonably large network was running that way.

    11. Re:My own experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's *you* I have to blame for the late night calls from my dad saying "the internet in my room is down! Here talk to the hotel manager before I kill him!"

    12. Re:My own experience by GMontag451 · · Score: 1
      Even if the network is switched, one could just use a simple ARP poisoning tool such as ettercap to poison the MAC address table and make the switch go into "hub mode".

      Any high quality switch wouldn't do that. It would just shut off th two offending ports and be done with it.

    13. Re:My own experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. Most of the switches the average user encounters are not that sophisticated or configured to do anything special like that.

    14. Re:My own experience by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would he shop at Best Buy for the routers? For the WRT54GS it's like $40 at NewEgg and $80 at Best Buy.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  17. Most Hotel TV are locked though right? by bogie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've not looked at the TVs in every hotel I've ever stayed at, but when I have the cable going to the TV was locked and you couldn't unscrew it if you wanted to.

    Still, this makes me want to pick up a USB tv tuner for next time I travel. ;)

    "Additionally, he could use hidden codes that transmitted from the remote-control device to the TV through infrared to control functions in the system...Laurie automated the process by using a program he wrote that analyzed and mapped all the possible codes in 35 minutes to see which ones were relevant for the system he was trying to crack. Laurie doesn't plan to release the program."

    Booooo, release the code!

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Most Hotel TV are locked though right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Booooo, release the code!

      Well, the way I see it is that the more people who exploit these design flaws, the sooner hotels take to fix them becuase every little script kiddie will go out to break into the minibar and swipe guests' personal information/CC numbers.

      I dont know about you, but this seems like something that I could spend a few hours hacking around with next time that I'm at a hotel just for the sheer fun of it.

    2. Re:Most Hotel TV are locked though right? by Randseed · · Score: 1
      "Additionally, he could use hidden codes that transmitted from the remote-control device to the TV through infrared to control functions in the system...Laurie automated the process by using a program he wrote that analyzed and mapped all the possible codes in 35 minutes to see which ones were relevant for the system he was trying to crack. Laurie doesn't plan to release the program."

      What a wimp. Information wants to be FREEEEEE! :)

    3. Re:Most Hotel TV are locked though right? by Dahan · · Score: 1
      I've not looked at the TVs in every hotel I've ever stayed at, but when I have the cable going to the TV was locked and you couldn't unscrew it if you wanted to.

      The ones I've seen aren't locked, but have a plastic cylinder around the F connector that keeps you from unscrewing it. However, all you need is a security wrench. They're also handy if the hotel TV doesn't have AV inputs, and you want to hook up your VCR or DVD player to it via a RF modulator.

    4. Re:Most Hotel TV are locked though right? by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      THe hotels I've been to have a handy peice of plastic guarding the back which is easily defeated by a "harsh prying" with a "security screwdriver". Soul Calibur tournament here I come.

    5. Re:Most Hotel TV are locked though right? by dknj · · Score: 1

      And we have just identified the script kiddies. If you want it to be free, write it yourself

  18. Chinese Hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are talking about hacking, then you must be talking about a Chinese hotel. Most hackers originate from China, which includes Taiwan province and Hong Kong.

  19. Don't worry by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I could get you're going to jail on Slashdot.........twice! (rimshot)

    1. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "rimshot" you meant "I have terribal grammer," you'd be right.

      nourish

  20. My theory... by antdude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe /. staff doesn't want us to be talking about DVD ripping with softwares?

    It would had been nice if /. staff posted a comment why no comments are allowed.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:My theory... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      They don't want to talk about it? Why post the poll in the first place?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:My theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean "software." Not "softwares."

    3. Re:My theory... by antdude · · Score: 1

      [shrugs] Hellifiknow. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:My theory... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Heaven forbid we should come to a discussion site in order to have a discussion.

  21. Which hotels? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Are these the more expensive and higher class hotels or the cheaper ones? I did not see any hotel names mentioned in the article.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  22. Could that be right? by FrenchSilk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Plugging the TV into the tuner, which is the size of a laptop power pack, and the tuner into his laptop, Laurie is able to use his laptop to pick up content through hotel TVs that the backend system is broadcasting but not currently displaying on the TV. Wouldn't he plug the cable, not the TV, into the tuner? Or maybe he split the cable. It would surprise me to find out that hotel TVs have some form of signal out. For what reason?

    1. Re:Could that be right? by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      The two-way signal is used for the room information screens among other things.

      For example, most hotels will allow you to use the TV remote to review your charges, extend your checkout time, checkout, order food, etc. The TV is communicating with a hotel computer somewhere to facilitate that. The computer generates a video channel specifically for that room.

      There is also sometimes an alarm signal on the wire to detect if someone disconnects the TV to hook up a DVD player or game (they want your to rent THEIR DVD player or SNES from the front desk) or just unhooks the TV perhaps with the intent of stealing it.

      I know, with TVs as cheap as they are and as advanced as they are, it makes no sense to steal a worn out old hotel TV.

      OMG! It's a twenty SEVEN inch Zenith with fuzzy mono audio! W0W! Must STEAL!

      --
      Sig for hire.
    2. Re:Could that be right? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      To order pay per view- and other two-way communications...

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    3. Re:Could that be right? by FrenchSilk · · Score: 1

      I am aware that there is 2-way communication, but I think that both directions go on the same single cable. Which is why I said he had to connect the cable, not the TV (as TFA said) to his tuner. However, since he also sends IR to the TV to be decoded and sent to the back end, I assume that the TV must also be connected to the cable. Which, if true, means he is splitting the cable, connecting one side to the tuner and the other to the TV.

    4. Re:Could that be right? by ring-eldest · · Score: 1
      OMG! It's a twenty SEVEN inch Zenith with fuzzy mono audio! W0W! Must STEAL!
      Cocaine's a hell of a drug!
  23. Holiday Inn for one...Re:Which hotels? by redwoodtree · · Score: 1

    Well then, you didn't read it closely enough because he metions Holiday In..

    1. Re:Holiday Inn for one...Re:Which hotels? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I only glanced through the article. Thanks.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  24. Some other (more useful) comments. by Randseed · · Score: 5, Interesting
    For what it's worth, I do the same thing sometimes when I'm stuck in traffic at this particular intersection in front of a hotel that provides free 802.11b to their guests. I haven't sniffed the traffic because I'm never there long enough and I don't care either, but I have no doubt that were I to do so I'd get all sorts of juicy cleartext passwords, usernames, network information, and God only knows what else. Oh, and by the way, it also works at my university, which is a major academic institution.

    This is because in the interests of usability, these systems do not use WEP. In the case of the university, their security consists of not honoring DHCP requests if the system doesn't know your MAC, and hiding the ESSID. Again, no WEP. I have sat in conferences and watched people checking their email. (That's also good for, how shall we say, 'social intelligence.')

    The bottom line is, and always will be, that people need to pay attention to how the technology they use works. If they don't know, then it is to a certain extent their own problem.

    To combat this, all my wireless systems, including the ones I use at home, use a VPN to connect to my home router, and then the traffic goes out from there. The VPN uses a cryptographic key for authentication, not a password, and all traffic except for DHCP requests go over it. The best someone can really accomplish at the network level is to bump me off the network, at which point the VPN falls over too, and no data is compromised. The system at home also uses WEP, and requires that all machines connecting over wireless use a VPN to get routed from the router to, well, anywhere, even the LAN.

    "But what about after the data leaves your cable modem at home?" That's a valid concern. So any data that I'm really concerned about is encrypted going out of there too. The catch is that, of course, I can't do that all the time, and it could still give someone a lot of intelligence by monitoring the traffic. At that point, though, I have a legitimate beef with the cable company, just as users who plug their computer into a hotel ethernet port (not wireless) have a beef with the hotel if someone in the adjacent room sniffs their traffic.

    The sad reality is that most people have absolutely no data security at all. Often times, they give themselves the illusion of security by doing something like using some snake-oil crypto product on their Windows machine, which is still clearly open to a number of software-based attacks. And, of course, if you compromise the hardware, nothing is going to save your ass.

    Sitting at home, I see six wireless networks. One of them is mine. Four of them don't have any indication of whose they are, so they get a bit of security through obscurity in terms of someone trying to attack them directly. Nevertheless, three of the four are insecure, and the fourth uses only WEP. Of those three unsecured networks, they're broadcasting all sorts of crap in the clear, and two of the three are ridden with spyware and viruses to the point that I can tell remotely using only passive means.

    The last guy got interesting. He removed the confusion about whose network was whose, at least with regard to his, by putting his last name in the SSID. The network is wide open.

    1. Re:Some other (more useful) comments. by hixie · · Score: 1

      WEP isn't secure. There are several WEP-cracking tools available that will get you a key, either through an active attack or even through a passive attack.

      Personally my home wireless network is non-encrypted and is serving DHCP to anyone who asks (although the router's configuration page is password-protected), mostly because I think sharing connectivity is fine, and I'm thankful for people who do that same when I'm stuck in a town I don't know.

      But all my traffic is highly encrypted at the application layer (e.g. SSH for mail and editing my documents, SSL for IRC, TLS for any important Web sites I have to log into), so it doesn't matter. There's nothing to sniff except my /. password.

    2. Re:Some other (more useful) comments. by eosp · · Score: 1

      You want wide open? One of my friends has a son who got into his school network. The student password for every class: "student". Yes, this means messing up other students' assignments. And the teacher password: "techies".

    3. Re:Some other (more useful) comments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you didn't specify exactly how insecure WEP is; getting a key should take ~5 min these days.

      WPA otoh is reasonably safe.

  25. Big whoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When he figures out how to tap into the video feed from the hidden room cams, wake me up.

    1. Re:Big whoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we checked your camera, you weren't sleeping. Ewwwwww!

  26. Not really news if they don't name the hotels by riversky · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is very easy to do. Cracking 802.11 broadcasting networks is really easy. There are websites that explain step by step how to do it. There is a coffee shop in Seattle on 15th Ave where I live that is always hoping. Mostly laptops, it looks like a friggin office. BUT friends found a flaw in the security and sniff out everything. We actually had a party in which they read emails (very private) they had transfered right off people's hard drives. Some even scoured webmail accounts after getting usernames. Some people have the most obvious password! More security is needed!!

    1. Re:Not really news if they don't name the hotels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Victrola?

  27. Wild guess here... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    According to dictionar.com premium means, among other things " Something offered free or at a reduced price as an inducement to buy something else.". What's the problem if someone gets "premium" content for free then?

    Perhaps the problem is the premium content was not being offered for free in this case? But was available at a "reduced price", which the individual did not pay?

  28. Mobile phone vs. Hotel phone by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Once thing nice about cell phones is you don't have to worry about the premium phone service in those premium hotels that costs an arm and a leg just to make a local call, chances are the mobile is cheaper

    Every hotel I've been at (including "premium" ones) have free local calls.

    However, the fact I am staying at this hotel means I am far from home, making all my cell phone calls roaming calls, and calls to anywhere local (relative to the hotel) long-distance (as far as the cell phone company is concerned) on top of that.

    1. Re:Mobile phone vs. Hotel phone by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      There are still cell plans where roaming and long distance calls are extra cost?

      I get 600 daytime minutes, as well as free nights and weekends. Within that time, I can call anywhere in the US or Canada from anywhere that I can get a signal with no extra charges. Every plan I've had for the past few years has been like this. Roaming is something I haven't dealt with since the analog phone days.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    2. Re:Mobile phone vs. Hotel phone by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Every hotel I've been at (including "premium" ones) have free local calls.

      The last hotel I stayed in that one might consider premium was a two room suite holiday inn... utah when they had the hurricane, or rather the night before. I think it was a holiday in... apparently there was a convention in town and it was the only room. Anyhow the phonecall to the airport, local call I might add was $1.25, which is annoying the fact that the room was pretty upscale on the price yet everything in there including the 8bit nintendo was pay access only.

      Most Motels... and sub $80/night i've noted had free local calls... where many a hilton or Hyette it was cheaper to use the payphone than the room phone... except incomming calls were free.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    3. Re:Mobile phone vs. Hotel phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the misfortune of staying at the "Triton Hotel" in San Francisco.

      Apart from poor service and noisy rooms (the rooms are right next to a busy street) this hotel *DOES* charge for local phone calls!

  29. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holiday Inn

  30. Free pr0n! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe the article summary didn't mention the free pr0n!

  31. This is old news within the hospitality industry by JoeShmoe · · Score: 5, Informative

    My first day of work in a hotel, I see a guest come in with a VCR tucked in under his arm. I ask him if he's planning on watching some movies. He says no, he's planning on recording some. He tells me all he has to do is plug in his VCR, tune around until he finds someone watching a movie, then hit record.

    Over the years, I've learned a lot more. Basically, the world of hotel entertainment is run by two companies, LodgeNet and OnCommand. Both use almost identical technology. The way it basically works if hotels buy commercial television sets that have a port on the back to control the tuner. An RF interface plugs into this port and allows signals to be sent over the coaxial cable to a server and receive signals from the server.

    Let me explain how it works. The hotel puts all the regular television (called free-to-guest in the lingo) on a certain range of channels. The commercial set is then programmed to only allow tuning from the remote in that range. If the guest tried to go higher than say 30, it wraps back to say 2. Entering number from the remote higher than the range won't work either.

    Now the remote has some special buttons. Let's say a guest hits the main menu button. The IR receiver on the commercial TV passes the signal to the RF unit, which sends it over the coax to the server. The server starts up up a video stream and outputs it through a video card to a modulator. The server tells the commercial TV "tune to channel 43". Since the guest can't normally tune to this channel, they only way he sees it is when the server tells his TV to tune there. The guest can now interact with the server and only he sees what he is doing because he's the only one the server lets turn to channel 43.

    For hotel info, movies, this is how the guest gets the content. If it's a web browser session, it's the same thing only using essentially a terminal server session.

    Now, the problem is there's only about a handful of commercial TV sets made. It's not terribly difficult to obtain or borrow a master remote from someone. You can copy the button commands into your PDA or universal remote, then next time you are at a hotel with that brand of television, just tune around until you find something interesting to watch. Or, bring your own tuner like the guy with the VCR or the article talks about.

    Some ways hotels are dealing with this is locking off the connection so you can't just plug in a tuner. You can cut the cable, but I wouldn't recommend it if you don't want to be charged for the repair. But the master remotes are still out there and still universally known.

    Smaller or older hotels that have regular televisions use a little IR dongle to control the television instead of card that plugs in the back, but it's the same principle.

    I've always wondered why warez groups don't pick up on this as a way to get first-run movies. The hospitality window is about two months after a movie hits theaters (just after home pay-per-view but before DVD). The source is either DVD or digitial files downloaded directly to the server, so the quality should be excellent. Just bring an firewire capture card with your laptop and you can release "screener" quality with virtually no risk.

    Not that I would ever do something like that of course...just saying...

    - JoeShmoe

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  32. Security through Obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe, just maybe, they thought of using this method of security. Honestly, I consider most of us fairly bright and all, but who would "stumble upon this accidentially?"

  33. "screenshots" of internet access being *BROADCAST* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ?!!? This is scary to say the least. Not only is the signal of what you are doing is being sent to every TV in the hotel, but a porrly sheilded/broken cable anywhere in the system could potentialy leak the signal into the air. I'm willing to bet that all of these channels are using standard cable frequencies (most which fall in
    the broadcast TV UHF range, albiet with different frequencies), which can be picked up with a cheap $15 B&W portable TV with a slide tuner.

      Are they really too cheap to just use a regular network and WEB-TV-like units in the rooms?

  34. NOTE TO THE MODS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You insensitive clods, the parent post is a family guy reference, NOT A TROLL.

    Giggity.

  35. He's not the only one by Minwee · · Score: 1
    This isn't anything new. About three years ago I was staying at a hotel on business and started playing around with the TV. It had been poorly locked down so I was able to view the movies, web browsers and other on-screen information for everybody on the floor.

    I really had no interest in watching people read their email or check out, but it was entertaining to see which pay-per-view porn movies were the most popular among my fellow travellers.

  36. I've setup a 120 room hotel by maxrate · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've setup a 120 room hotel, we wired the joint and installed switches on every floor.

    At the moment, we have a pretty crumby system - a d-link router - yes I know why this is bad, but we're changing that (we knew about this to begin with)

    My question to the slashdot crowd is, what can you think of that we can do to stop a guest from running their own DHCP server? (screwing the network)

    1. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      there is a way to do it, back at school if you ran a DHCP server your port shut itself off automatically for two hours, same if oyu tried to bridge anything

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by linuxpyro · · Score: 1

      What is the layout like for the network? How many floors do you have? The first solution that would come to my mind would be to set up multiple routers and have different subnets, thus making it harder for someone with their own DHCP server to screw with the entire network.

      Another option would be to setup a Linux (or other UNIX) and then have a shell script run every 5 minutes or whatever and scan a range of hosts to find out which are listening on port 68, which I believe is what DHCP servers listen on. You could have the script make note of the IP, and then maybe block traffic too/from it, tell the guest to remove the DHCP server, etc. based on your situation.

      --
      Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
    3. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by smeenz · · Score: 1

      Cisco switches let you set ports to only be able to communicate with what you designate to be the uplink port.. it's okay if everything fits neatly into one switch, but if you have two or more switches then you need to have them blocked from seeing each other's traffic at a layer 3 level (ie, put them all on different subnets).

    5. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by grink · · Score: 1

      Cisco 3750s have the ability to force dhcp on ports, error disable ports that do STP and BPDU, and block roque dhcp servers.

    6. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by dknj · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? This is precisely why this article exists. Admins that don't know what they are doing setup a blatently insecure network (why would you even consider d-link for the magnitude of your project). Then you have the admin asking on slashdot for solutions (hint: usenet has been around since 1987 and provides many more technically adept contributers than slashdot). What hotel do you work for? I would like to know so I make sure I never stay there in the future

    7. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by maxrate · · Score: 1
      Hey fuck face, you don't know the whole sitation. We were the cable guys at the time, not the network engineers. It needed setup fast, so thanks for the advice.

      I have some for you, go fuck yourself. Nice spirit of helping.

      Also, it's a FREE service from the hotel. It's no different from how majority of the hotels are setup, and almost no different from plugging in your notebook directly to the internet.

      For the most part, it seems you won't be staying at many hotels as you've just narrowed your selection probably by 99 percent!

      And switches cost big bucks - I only can do what the customer wants to spend.

      Thanks again, fuck face.

    8. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repeat after me: "I will not feed the trolls"

      I think This sums it up ...

    9. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by AndreyF · · Score: 1

      Another option would be to setup a Linux (or other UNIX) and then have a shell script run every 5 minutes or whatever and scan a range of hosts...

      Or you could do that exact same thing in Windows, or pretty much any other modern operating system.

    10. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by linuxpyro · · Score: 1

      Geez, I'm sorry I wasn't being OS politically correct. Yeah, I'm sure you could use another OS, Windows included. Why don't you go do that then.

      --
      Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
    11. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by AndreyF · · Score: 1

      Another option would be to setup a Linux (or other UNIX) and then have a shell script run every 5 minutes or whatever and scan a range of hosts...

      Geez, I'm sorry I wasn't being OS politically correct.

      Actually, you made it sound like someone had to install Linux... and politically correct would be not calling Linux "a UNIX".

    12. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by linuxpyro · · Score: 1

      OK, fine. I really don't care; Linux happened to pop into my head, as that is what I would probably use in that situation. To me, it is the easy solution. Perhaps you should have suggested yourself that he do it on a Windows/VMX/whatever box if you really wanted to put that as an option, but instead you had complain about my choice of words.

      And if you really want to separate Linux that much, be my guest. It's close enough for me, and it works.

      --
      Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
    13. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by AndreyF · · Score: 1

      I was just pointing out that installing an OS is not part of the instructions to writing a script that will scan ports.

    14. Re:I've setup a 120 room hotel by linuxpyro · · Score: 1

      what would you have used?

      --
      Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
  37. Hotels with free internet rule by Klowner · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was happy to find an ethernet port in my room at a hotel I was staying at some time ago, I plugged in my laptop and got all setup via DHCP. I checked my mail, checked slashdot, etc.. got bored, decided to play with nmap...

    I found some laptop (I assume) with IIS running on it, and some ugly website for a home siding and windowing company on it, I read it, wasn't interested.. But still, it seems that some people don't realize they're entering a fairly high speed and insecure network when plugging into most hotel setups.

    1. Re:Hotels with free internet rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it seems that some people don't realize they're entering a fairly high speed and insecure network when plugging into most hotel setups

      Of course they don't. They also probably dont' realize I coudl crawl under their car with a pair of pliers and break the car. What is your point?

    2. Re:Hotels with free internet rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happen to work remote server support for one of the providers in question here and there are a few points that are being overlooked.

      im not sure about the "other" companies, but at least in our setup we use a dedicated linux box complete with snort and a massive iptable ruleset to prevent most stuff.

      not to mention that every switch is fully vlanned. as for the internet part, it is very secure.

      as for the information available over our system.

      that is very limited. our "database" consists of a room number, terminal address, and checkin state. we are interfaced with the property management system which does hold a lot of customer info, but our company does nothing with the billing. The only time a customer name would come across is if the guest was checking out from the tv and whatever the property management system sends to us is displayed on the screen. In all cases, this consists of no more than their room number, name, and list of charges.

      of course if you break the security key off the tv or wall tap you can view anything on the system. it is a coaxial analog distribution system so if you have a tuner you're in. the terminals in or outside of the tvs communicate with the server and are responsible for letting the tv tune to certain frequencies. bypassing this is what will allow people to view the "premium" channels. our terminals do quite a bit more communication than one would imagine so it is very easy to tell when a terminal has been bypassed.

  38. Re:This is old news within the hospitality industr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always bring a pair of long nose pliers, the real long ones with the flat ends.
    Those can easily get the nut off of the so called "protected" cable ends.
    Watch out! If they have something that detects the loss of the 75 ohm connection, meaning it figures out you have disconnected the TV, you are going to get a visit.
    In most cases if you do it fast enough they may just think it's a glitch, but the idea is to prevent the theft of the TV, I don't think they care about the programming so you could say the picture sucked or something, as long as they see the TV is still there.
    On the wireless net access stuff, the hotel I stayed at just gave out verbally a code when you asked for access then you entered that into a web page, I asked the guy and he told me everyone gets the same code which is changed weekly. The page asks for your name and makes you agree, the front clerk said no one checks the names later on so it wouldn't be a problem to enter a fake name and keep your privacy from "those damn spammers".

  39. Re:This is old news within the hospitality industr by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    In most cases if you do it fast enough they may just think it's a glitch, but the idea is to prevent the theft of the TV, I don't think they care about the programming so you could say the picture sucked or something, as long as they see the TV is still there.

    If asked just say "i'm hooking in a camcorder, i'm on vacation and i'm making a home movie". Works perfectly well for me when i'm on vacation and making a home movie.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  40. Snausages! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nearly spit my drink all over my monitor at that one...

  41. More Info on Master Remotes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the master remotes are still out there and still universally known.Are there sources which collect info on which hotels use which master remote models? If not, there really should be!
    I've always wondered why warez groups don't pick up on this as a way to get first-run movies. The hospitality window is about two months after a movie hits theaters (just after home pay-per-view but before DVD).
    SO why not grab it off of home pay-per-view? But most warez groups try to get DVD screeners, which often PRECEED (or, at least, shortly follow) theatrical releases anyway.
  42. Dont you mean "Security through apathy" by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    This is a classic case of "security through obscurity". The hotels (or rather, their vendors) are relying on the fact that nobody knows how their system works to keep it secure. They just broadcast everything and figure, "Hey, you need one of our special remotes to do anything, so we're safe".

    I think, generally speaking... no one gives enough of a shit to even bother hacking a hotel broadcast network. And the minority that do... the very small minority are for the most part paying upwards of $50/night just to be there, generally not worth it to hang out and commit an act of theft of service. Investing something resembling a secure system would be a hell of alot more costly than just a slew of comercial TVs that can be remote controled from a central location and tuned to some high VHF frequency if you click the little buy a movie button. The system is good enough for it's application.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  43. Re:This is old news within the hospitality industr by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

    Does lodgenet still do games? I know there have been SNES and N64 units, don't know about anything newer. And didn't they have multiplayer between rooms or something? How did that all work? Of course, the games were insanely expensive, like $4 a hour or something.

  44. I've heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was talking to a hotel electritican about this. He says that some remote controls have buttons built into them so you can get admin access. All you have to do is take off the plastic cover and the buttons are there. Just hidden from view from normal people.

  45. Re:This is old news within the hospitality industr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    A few other helpful tips: You can use any old generic cable tv converter box to watch. I would recommend the Scientific Atlanta 8511 or similar. Its the size of a small clock radio and works with almost all universal remotes.

    Also seach ebay for 'coax removal tool' if you need to get around those pesky security sleeves.

    One interesting tidbit about my 8511 converter box. At first it did not work with any remote control. I took it apart and found a small jumper wire running from the input pin of the IR decoder to ground. Effectively disabling the IR remote control of the box. Upon removing the jumper, the remote worked fine. And it looked like a factory job too, so apparently some bastard cable co's ordered their boxes intentionally crippled.

  46. been there, done that by ewe2 · · Score: 1

    dude, i hacked several hotels in neuromancer already!

    --
    insecurity asks the wrong question irritation gives the wrong answer
  47. Wish some would keep there big mouths shut! by threaded · · Score: 1

    Sometimes, just sometimes, I wish some would keep there big mouths shut!

    IT contractor types have been getting free drink and pr0n this way for years and years.

    I've lost count of the number of hotels whose Amiga OS cable TV system has crashed requiring a reboot...

  48. Re:This is old news within the hospitality industr by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Always bring a pair of long nose pliers, the real long ones with the flat ends.

    Actually, it's easier if you just use a small allen key or two and spin the protective cable guard. Also easier to travel (fly) with.

  49. Re:"screenshots" of internet access being *BROADCA by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm willing to bet that all of these channels are using standard cable frequencies (most which fall in
    the broadcast TV UHF range, albiet with different frequencies), which can be picked up with a cheap $15 B&W portable TV with a slide tuner.
        Are they really too cheap to just use a regular network and WEB-TV-like units in the rooms?


    Hmmm... those cable channels fall into the high VHF range. There are some channels used between 6 and 7 , but I can't remember off the top of my head. I.e. cable channel 14 is the same distance from TV 13 is from TV 12, but UHF 14 IIRC VHF 13 is 210-216Mhz CATV is 14(sic) 216-222Mhz (also used in marine radio) and UHF 14 is 470-476Mhz... I stand corrected... channel 13 + 6mhz = catv 23 there and about. My memory is fuzzy as those first generation digital dial but manual analog tuners allowed you to access a slew stuff before cable ready TVs were popular. You do have CATV channels 95-99 91.25-119.775mhz smack dab between channels 6 and 7.. which just so happen to be used by FM radio, which would explain why sometimes you could get the playboy channel on your radio.

    But that's not the point, or rather the whole frequency spectrium being totally screwy isn't the point. Why I bothered with that whole paragraph when you were talking about those cheep slide tuner TVs that can access all sorts of weird stuff is beyond me.

    The point is this... Yes, they really are too cheap. Wouldn't you be? Why go with any sort of encryption on a system which for the most part is protected by physical security... lock and key. Got a key, your spending money. If you spend more money to watch a movie, hotel makes a buck, the provide makes bucks, everyone is happy. Cable feed, monitors broadcast via radio waves from a centralized location in a room without windows deep in employee only zone. If some jack ass steals a TV... well they lost a $800 TV. If some jackass steals a 22 inch network termianl... well they just lost something worth a few grand. Not to speak of support issues, damage, power surges.

    While *i'd* prefer the webTv experence, point and click movies without issues of analog signal degrading by the rats in the walls... I respect the fact that traditional TV from a centeralized broadcast location is really the way to go. Hell even for a net terminal i'd still go with a dumb monitor with keyboard relay.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  50. Re:This is old news within the hospitality industr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    you can pull the card out of the back of the tv on lodgenet systems...move the jump 1 pin over and auto program the tv and watch whatever anyone else is watching...including internet

  51. The driving force of Internet development! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    Laurie first discovered the vulnerability when he was "mucking about with hotel TVs to get the porn channel without paying for it."

    Yep, ever since the days of printing ASCII porn on teletypes!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  52. Re:This is old news within the hospitality industr by scsscs · · Score: 1

    I can verify this. I was at a hotel a couple years ago with the LodgeNet system and like JoeShmoe explained, all the TVs were programmed to show only a certain range of channels and the remote would not let you go any higher. However, one of the TVs in my room could be reprogrammed from the TV itself by using an auto discover feature which would cycle through channels 0-99 and add all the active ones. It added a bunch of new channels where you could see movies other people had ordered, people playing SNES games, and people using the tv based store.

  53. I think this is his presentation at various CONs by g-san · · Score: 1

    You can find it here.

  54. You people suck... by Linegod · · Score: 1

    ....most 'hospitality networks' can be crack in 6 seconds. Anything less, and you suck. Seriously.

    --
    -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
  55. Article leaves out some details by aolsheepdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a *friend* who travels a lot who has been doing this with the TVs for years.

    Although most hotels lock the F-connector on the outside of the wall jack, remove the two screws for the wall jack and you can access the F-connector on the inside. I don't know if the systems are checking for missing TVs yet, but as a precaution a decent splitter should be used so the TV doesn't go missing when you connect your laptop. Someday they will wise-up and check. Then an engineer will not on your door to see if there is a problem with your TV.

    Everything comes back from the headend via a TV channel. The system just allocates the channels as they are needed. The problem with this is you can only have about 80 people using the premium content at one time (because some channels are used for the regular content). Of course I here there are rarely more than 10-15 using the system simultaneously. If you scan the TV channels at 4am, you probably won't find much activity.

    This leads me to the other point which is overlooked in the article. Yes, you can see porn and PPV movies but only if somebody ordered it. If it hasn't been ordered, then it won't be shown. Now for porn, stumbling across the active channel in the middle of the movie isn't too bad. But if it's a PPV movie that you haven't seen, you just have to get lucky. Obviously the larger the hotel and the more guests, the better your chances of finding what you want.

    1. Re:Article leaves out some details by sirsky · · Score: 0

      Actually, it doesn't matter what they're watching, you still won't be able to tune to the channel they're watching it on - they warn you not to change the channel when you order the flick. Instead, you simply tune to the 'menu' channel, and order whatever you want to watch, whether they're watching it or not.

      This method basicaly amounts to changing the network address to another room that's enabled with all the PPV services. Just remember to change it back in the morning before you check out...

      The thing is, whoever's room you 'attach' to - gets *BILLED* for the stuff you do. I can only imagine being in Hawaii, at one of these hotels, ordering the most expensive porn, then coming down to check out the next day and see some 70 year old couple on an anniversary vacation fighting and bitching at each other because she thought he ordered a porn while she was sleeping at 3:00am!!!!

      I'll not say how I know this, but I will say it's nothing new to me.

  56. Re:My theory... DVD ripping (for backup purposes!) by hazem · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course, I only use my equipment and software to make legitimate backups of the DVDs I have purchased. That said, I use the following:

    Hardware: NEC 3520A dual-layer burner. It has all kinds of great firmware hacks available that make it region free, enable bit-setting (allows your DVD+R media to self-identify as DVD-ROM so it plays on more DVD players), and disables Rip-Lock so you can copy the data off more quickly (rip-lock limits it to about 2 x speed when copying a DVD-ROM)

    Software:
    DVDShrink - it allows you to shrink a dual-layer disk (about 9GB) to a single-layer (4.5GB) with compression. It also allows you to replace video pieces with still-images. This can reduce the amount of compression - for example, my Usual Suspsects has a Widescreen and Fullscreen version. I replaced the fullscreen version with a still-image and I didn't have to compress the widescreen at all to fit a single-layer disk. It also removes PUO (prohibted user options - you know, the "you can't do that with this disk"), and removes region coding. That way, you can watch the DVDs you bought on your trip to Europe (though you still have to reconvert PAL to NTSC).

    DVD Decrypter - this program is more robust than DVD Shrink, and provides many more options for manipulating your drive and the output. When DVD Shrink can't handle something, I use DVD Decryptor to copy the disk to my harddrive, then use DVDShrink to make it fit on a single layer disk.

    Note that even if your drive is region free, windows will keep track of your changes on its own. If it's region free, it will assing a default region and let you change it once. This is in the registry and is independent of the drive's settings itself. I accidentally let my drive get set to region-2. Even after flashing the original firmware back on it, I could not get it off region-2. Only after deleting all references in the registry to the drive (while the drive was removed), was I able to get windows to return to region-1.

  57. Re:My theory... DVD ripping (for backup purposes!) by hazem · · Score: 1

    Oh! And make sure windows is set to use DMA if your drive and motherboard can handle it.

    I was very sad that it took more than 30 minutes to burn a DVD. Once I finally found out that I should be using DMA and that I wasn't, I fixed it. Now it burns in less than 6 minutes. I also found my CD burner burns much faster with DMA enabled.

  58. Corporate espionage? by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    It can also let someone read the e-mail of guests who use web mail through the TV, putting business travelers at risk of corporate espionage.
    Oh please. Your company's employees are reading unencrypted web mail and using strange computers to do it, and you say the hotel is putting travelers at risk of espionage?!?! Wrongo, dorkwad. Your employees and email policy are what is putting you at risk of espionage, not the hotel.

    "R2D2, you should know better than to trust a strange computer." Really. You should know better.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  59. Re:This is old news within the hospitality industr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me explain how it works.

    No!

  60. This guy is full of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only older/poorer/dumber hotels should be using these systems nowadays.

    I contract for a company that delivers content on demand via CATV and COAX (ip over coax). We still have an old school system like he mentions, but, even that can detect when he has been playing with the tv and then send someone from the hotel up to bust his balls.

    I would like to see him get free pr0n from my companies installations. The content is sent encrypted to the tv and it is decrypted via a RISC chip on the actual TV (unique keys for every movie). Note: This is IP traffic, not an analogue signal.

    I guess this guy can't afford to go to the decent hotels. The more he opens his mouth, the more people will go for my companies solutions.

    1. Re:This guy is full of BS by jeremycec · · Score: 1

      I saw the talk at DefCon. He was at the Paris Hilton (heh). Not a bad hotel. Guess what--I was staying at the Excalibur in Vegas, and its TV system had the *exact* same splash screen as he showed in his demo, so I suspect his methods would have worked there and a great many other places as well.

  61. Re:This is old news within the hospitality industr by Keruo · · Score: 1

    > I've always wondered why warez groups don't pick up on this as a way to get first-run movies. The hospitality window is about two months after a movie hits theaters

    I think you answered yourself there, good warez groups tend to release stuff before it even gets to theatres, not two months after.

    Your firewire-capture method would create telesync rip, there's risk of going out of sync and possible glitches in video or sound caused by disturbances in other rooms nearby(old electric razors, hairdryers etc).
    For early releases, scene groups use high-quality telecine machines to capture the source from cinema reels, creating better quality telecine rips.
    They also use the original 5.1 soundtrack, so the sound is what you'd hear in theatres.

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
  62. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  63. Passwords? by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

    "Password? What's that, man? ... You mean, like, a secret word you can use to confuse the snoopers? Like, way cool, dude. I'll have to check that out!"

    Yes, Virginia, there really are some dum'ns in the world.

    --
    "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
  64. For the same reasons... by swb · · Score: 1

    ...you rugrats can't buy liquor, guns, gamble, rent a car or get into a titty bar.

    You've got the life experience and wisdom of a child, because you are one. I know it sucks when people tell you that, but it's true, and you won't realize it's true until you're in your 30s.

    1. Re:For the same reasons... by coopex · · Score: 1

      Wow, I never knew there was some magic age when kids stop being stupid and are able to make decisions with the same competency as adults.

      You're just some bitter old dipshit that's wasted his life and trying to justify it by pretending that you've got more wisedom and life experience. I've known morons that are 15, and morons that are 55, the difference being, there's actually a chance that the 15 year old might not be a moron.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    2. Re:For the same reasons... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You've got the life experience and wisdom of a child, because you are one. I know it sucks when people tell you that, but it's true, and you won't realize it's true until you're in your 30s.

      Wow, concise, interesting, but stupid. I'm in my 30s now, but I was better equipped to be out on my own (other than the age descrimination of other people, especially someone like you) at age 12 than most people will be their entire lives. I'd give some details, but I'm sure you wouldn't change your mind anyway. But with the differing development and abilities of people, there are people that will be more capable at 12 than most adults at any age. Discounting someone solely because of their age just shows that you don't have the capability to learn from your experience, so it won't matter how many years you have on the 12 year old, some of them will still beat you out.

    3. Re:For the same reasons... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Actualy there isn't any specific age were a kid starts making decisions like an adault.

      There is however certain ages were a child become as responcible as an adault. This means that wether or not they are capable of making the proper decisions that society thinks they should be able to make, they are goign to be held acountable in the same way an adault is.

      Why are these ages artificialy set you might ask? because society has observed the majority of past juvenilles and decided that most of them are capable at this age. Generaly there will be kids above and below this average as well as those with no hope of ever meeting it.

      A high school kid doesn't get as much respect as some agency or someoen who is older much because of the same reasons there are age limits. There is an amount of assuem or presumed responcibility and or creditability associated with it. The same person age thirty could actualy have less credit if they acted like a modern teenager and a twelve year old could gain more credit if they acted like thirty year old. It is an ilusion of perception and its a fact of our enviroment.

    4. Re:For the same reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...there's actually a chance that the 15 year old might not be a moron.

      Yes, the 15 year old might grow out of it, which is EXACTLY the point!
      Duh!

    5. Re:For the same reasons... by coopex · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree that there are ages that society deems children to be able to handle certain responsibilities, I was replying to the GP that seemed to say that someone younger than 20 is inherently less capable solely because of age. I'n not complaining about the fairness of some policy of age-based rights, since things like alcohol and drugs has much more damaging results on those still growing, I was flaimbaiting people who seem to think that intelligence is directly proportional to age, since they seem to be exactly the people who *still* aren't responsible/wise enough to have those age-based rights. Butchering an Einstein quote "Life experience and the wisdom acquired from it is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen."

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
  65. I'm always skeptical... by bshroyer · · Score: 1

    when I start reading TFA and run across something like this:

    Laurie is known as Major Malfunction in the hacker community. He also revealed how infrared used for garage door openers and car-door locks could be hacked, using simple brute force programming techniques to decipher the code that opens the doors.
    [emphasis mine]

    Now, I'm not a remote entry expert, by any stretch, but I've never even heard of infrared keyless entry or garage door transmitters. Always RF.

    When the article commits such a glaring error in the opening paragraphs, I'm sorry, I just can't trust anything I read further on.

    --
    The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
    1. Re:I'm always skeptical... by cornface · · Score: 1

      Well, just because you have never even heard of something does not make it false.

      A while back there was a stink about Palm Pilots being able to sniff out and emulate car door unlocking codes via IR. Here's a link to a wired article that mentions it. A quick Google will turn up more. You should really hit Google before you hit the bold tag.

      Linkee-dinkee-doo.

    2. Re:I'm always skeptical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adam is British. This is indeed the case in Great Britian that garage door openers work on IR not RF. This is not a mistake in the Wired article.

    3. Re:I'm always skeptical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I attended his presentation and can verify that the article did not make a glaring error about the infrared garage door openers. Sure I've never seen an IR garage door system, but he has and that's what he hacked.

    4. Re:I'm always skeptical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also pictures in his presentation of him doing this. His LayerOne (April 2005) presentation of this same talk also had them.

  66. Re:This is old news within the hospitality industr by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

    LodgeNet made a real stupid deal with both Philips and Nintendo (at the time I don't remember somehow the two companies were connected) to offer games using their technology. Philips made the hardware, Nintendo licensed their N64 technology. That deal has locked LodgeNet into N64 for the last decade or so. OnCommand made a similar "me too!" mistake locking them into PS1.

    I think the N64 deal finally expires this year, and I fully expect LodgeNet to make the same mistake and sign up for GameCube for the next ten years. Then again, Microsoft might figure out that the hospitality market would be a great place to push it's "media center" technology and maybe one of the two companies will get XBox360 (not XBox, since Microsoft seems historically opposed to letting customers get by with old technology... no doubt the contract will require hotels to upgrade to XBox3 in a few years).

    It basically works the same way the terminal sessions do. There's an N64 device on a rack in the back connected to a modulator. The controller signals go through the RF box on the back of the set to the server that sends them to the N64 and the video output comes back on a particular channel the server tells your TV to receive. I've never heard of multiplayer between rooms but in theory the server would just have to send the signal to the controller port 1 for room A and port 2 for room B. But I've never seen that.

    - JoeShmoe

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  67. Re:This is old news within the hospitality industr by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

    If you mean TS telesync, that's defined as "camera pointed at a movie screen but with an audio feed". TS typically look distorted unless the guy with the camera is dead center and can have heads and other things visible (or stupidly just hidden behind huge "letterbox" bars...who are they kidding).

    IF you mean TC telecine, that's defines as a recording from the film, either using a telecine (some kind of rear-projection thing that you can put a camcorder in front of to get a consistant image) or using the video output on a projector if it has one. Usually excellent quality, I've seen some rivaling DVD quality. But overall one of the rarest forms of release.

    A screener is defined as a VHS copy of the film, usually with warnings, that is captured with an analog capture card. This is the closest match to what I'm describing. The advantage to capturing from hotels is no warning messages. A DVDScreener is of course a DVD and therefore ripped for maximum quality, usually with non-removable warnings.

    I don't know what year you are from, but given the industry crackdown on screeners, I think it's virtually unheard of for groups to be getting movies BEFORE it gets to theaters. It's like extremely big news to hear someone get a movie even a day before it comes out.

    In fact, the supply of screeners (combined with people actually getting busted for supplying them) is so sparse, that people basically limp along with TS release for four or five months until a DVDRip finally (and consistantly) comes out a month before the commercial DVD is released.

    Not to mention, screeners are tracked and coded and probably have all sorts of hidden marks that for responsible groups means they need to get access to a second copy so they can make sure their source doesn't get burned because it was missing a key two seconds from someone else's copy. For VOD, every hotel has their own copy, so it would be extremely unlikely that someone could pin down which guest copied it (especially since with someone else actually ordering the movie, you are just grabbing the signal).

    - JoeShmoe

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  68. Vacation Priorites by David+Mazzotta · · Score: 1

    It sure beats sipping maragaritas and hanging around the pool with all the girls in bikinis.

  69. DocStar security by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    "I suspect [it is] security in the sense that 'no one can modify this document (even a "single pixel") without it being detected.'"

    I assumed right from the get-go that they calculate a hash of the scanned document image to validate integrity and authenticity. The thing that concerns me is, what protects those hashes? Are they just stored on the same disk (or RAID) that the scanned document images themselves are? If so, what keeps the hashes from being modified along with the original cleartext? Is there anything keeping the "bad guys" from modifing the image, generating an updated hash, and storing that to disk? The salesweasel didn't understand my questions, which didn't surprise me. He was at least honest enough to admit that, which was nice. A lot of salesweasels will just keep shoveling bullshit without regards to how far in over their heads they are. But he didn't know of any way he could actually justify the security claims, other then to point me at the DocStar website. I had already been there, and it is extremely shallow in terms of actual product information. So, again, we end up back at, "It's secure because we say so."

    There are countermeasures one can put in place against such modification of signatures, but I have seen no evidence (at this point in time) that DocStar actually uses any of them. It could just be more of the same vendor bull, where the only defense is the assumption that nobody will look too closely.

    It's rare that one finds actual, technical security details in product information. We just have to take their word for it, when time and time again, vendors demonstrate that their word isn't so good.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  70. Secure today, hacked tomorrow by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    "generally not worth it to hang out and commit an act of theft of service."

    If that's all it is, I'd tend to agree with you. But I've seen descriptions of seeing what other people's terminals (TVs) are doing, including billing information and supposedly "private" Internet sessions. The idea of skimming credit card info or private business dealings off of this isn't inconceivable. As a potential guest at a hotel, I'm a lot more worried then I would be about the hotel ownership's potential loss of profit.

    "The system is good enough for it's application."

    There is nothing wrong with that attitude in and of itself. The problem is that things almost always get extended beyond their initial application. Cleartext TELNET is good enough for it's original application -- carrying terminal sessions between a handful of computers operated by a group of people who all know each other. TELNET becomes insecure when used on the modern Internet, where your packets might go anywhere, to anyone.

    The same worry applies here. If the original application was handling payment processing for dirty movies, sure, this is prolly good enough. But when you add on Internet access, room service control, billing and payment, and $DEITY knows what else, suddenly the picture (pardon the pun) isn't so rosy.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:Secure today, hacked tomorrow by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      There is nothing wrong with that attitude in and of itself. The problem is that things almost always get extended beyond their initial application. Cleartext TELNET is good enough for it's original application -- carrying terminal sessions between a handful of computers operated by a group of people who all know each other. TELNET becomes insecure when used on the modern Internet, where your packets might go anywhere, to anyone.

      Yes, I get blasted at times for using telnet on a house network to linux box and then from there ssh. I get big lectures about how insecure telnet is and how any old joe could packet sniff my passwords and data. And I stop and wonder as I look at my hub located 1.5 meters away if I have an issue with little gnomes with little laptops that hide under my chair and jack in when i'm looking at the screen and promptly disapear when I look at the hub.

      But I wasn't grasping they were using the name network to feed unencrypted unscrambled signals to the rooms as they were using for billing and TV access. I'm suprised they don't scramble the signal so it's at least somewhat unuseable.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  71. Hacking Hotels 101. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I happen to work remote server support for one of the providers in question here and there are a few points that are being overlooked.

    im not sure about the "other" companies, but at least in our setup we use a dedicated linux box complete with snort and a massive iptable ruleset to prevent most stuff.

    not to mention that every switch is fully vlanned. as for the internet part, it is very secure.

    as for the information available over our system.

    that is very limited. our "database" consists of a room number, terminal address, and checkin state. we are interfaced with the property management system which does hold a lot of customer info, but our company does nothing with the billing. The only time a customer name would come across is if the guest was checking out from the tv and whatever the property management system sends to us is displayed on the screen. In all cases, this consists of no more than their room number, name, and list of charges.

    of course if you break the security key off the tv or wall tap you can view anything on the system. it is a coaxial analog distribution system so if you have a tuner you're in. the terminals in or outside of the tvs communicate with the server and are responsible for letting the tv tune to certain frequencies. bypassing this is what will allow people to view the "premium" channels. our terminals do quite a bit more communication than one would imagine so it is very easy to tell when a terminal has been bypassed.

    i think it is funny that he acts like they he has found some new and innovative way to hack a hotel system when all they are really doing is breaking the security sleeve and plugging in.

    1. Re:Hacking Hotels 101. by jeremycec · · Score: 1

      Funny how all these judgments come from a second-hand article instead of the source. His DefCon talk was entitled "Old Skewl Hacking: IR" or something like that--he knows it's not new technology and mentioned how a lot of it is being replaced by RF. His point was: don't forget about IR just because it's old. It could still be a security threat and point of entry into a system. He did a very convincing demo complete with lots of screen shots and pictures. I believe he was legit. On another note, I have read that most exploits have a characteristic curve which shows them spiking early, then gradually reducing as people deploy countermeasures. However, after a few years, the curve starts rising again as people FORGET about the vulnerability! In this case, I think he's just making this point again.

  72. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not about cracking 802.11. It's about using a TV tuner and IR in hotels. It has nothing to do with 802.11!

    RTFA (or even the goddamn write up...).