Ho Great. So that when I run a batch job on a MULTI USER system, I have to glue a post-it on its screen ssaying; "DONT LOG OR I WILL LOSE OR DATA AND YOU WILL SUFFER THE WRATH OF KANH!"
Welcome to the multi-user ala Windows.
Cool, All this time, UNIX had it wrong. Thats true innovation for you.
"The good thing is that in any event, multi-vendor competition DOES NOT bode well for Linux's chances against single-vendor operating systems such as Windows Mobile and Symbian, since competitors in the Linux space end up contributing to an regressing shared base of pirated software."
I will cancell you check and send SB to your office for chair reorganization.
Yes but then they fall in the copyright turf. If what you said is true, the developper must follow the license of the code they "reuse". If they include code from GPL sofware and dont give back the "changes" they make to the community and then re-distribute, well they infridge. Anything else is pure plagiarisme and fall into copyright juridiction. If they dont distribute or their employer does not distribute, well teh GPL dont come into play, they are in legal territory.
You must follow the license of the code, period. If you can't, just dont use it.
"ReplayTV 5500 requires a broadband Internet connection or a analog phone line. A home network is required for room-to-room video streaming. A PC connected to a home network is required to store and view digital photos with ReplayTV. ReplayTV reserves the right to automatically add, modify, or disable any features in the operating software when your ReplayTV 5500 connects to our server."(emphasis mine)
Dont believe me? check it for yourself.
Seems like a Tivo thing waiting to happen!!
You what I gonna do, I gonna head over there and buy the new DVD release. So Lucas will have his cut.
Then I'm gonna download the 3 Originals, burn 3 DVD with it.
The new Boxed set will be a Gift to whomever I want. And I will not feel bad about it, because I did not "steal" a sale from Lucas. I bought it and burned it the way I like.
Can you name ONE SINGLE THING that RMS has predicted years before it happen, that had gone wrong?
Did he not say before that the Linux generalization term will confuse and will be used by the proprietary companies to muddy their not so just arguments against the GNU/Linux OS?
Did he not say before that patents are an Evil Thing(tm)?
Did he not forsee the abuse the BSD license will get from uncrupulous coporate entities, producing the GPL?
Tell me, mister wise guy, where RMS has said something wrong about what He has dedicated his life for?
I am not a Zealot, I am using Linux at home, at work sometimes. And I am gratefull for RMS CONSISTENCY in what He is doing.
When you read this, you wonder what he was thinking, or was he thinking at all?
5) The SCO debacle has created a crisis within the Linux community. They pretend that it hasn't, but it has. This will come to a head in 2004 with either the development of a new organizational structure for Linux or the start of its demise. Linux has to grow or die, and the direction it takes will be determined in 2004.
This sentence imply that SCO has a case and IP is not taken seriously in the Linux development methods. Get Real. Their is no fearce IP defenders thant the OSS/GNU developpers, and Linux is a prime example of that fact. And by the way which crisis? Can you be more specific? Or can't you? This is a bold statement.
6) As for SCO, they'll continue to make noise until the middle of the year, at which point the legal case will implode and the company will give up. By that time, the company executives, insiders, and major investors will have all sold their positions at a handsome profit. This was never more than a stock scam, pushing the price of SCO shares up by more than 15 times. The clever part is how they used a legal case to make public claims that would have caused serious regulatory problems in any other context. We'll see more of this ploy in the future.
And now, he states that SCO has no CLAIMS. How can you contradict yourself in the same breath and be proud of your wrintings. This one wasn't so hard to predict and nullify the No 5 prediction.
I just receive to email supposely from Microsoft, with the patch52.exe as an attachement. The HTML email was designed like a microsoft support web page, but poorly. I deleted the two suspicious email. I should have kept them for historical reference.
Lukely for me I was running mozilla mail, not outlook. If I were, the attached executable would have been run and voila!! I hope people wont fall for those 2 emails. Who am I kidding..
Slashdot Mirror
Crap. You beat me to it :-)
simple. He use the firefox feature to embed anything nonespecified into:
:-)
"alert("Hello World");"
Its a IE bug reproduced by the firefox team..
Wait a minute. Are you surfing the same pr0n site than I do ?
Ho Great. So that when I run a batch job on a MULTI USER system, I have to glue a post-it on its screen ssaying; "DONT LOG OR I WILL LOSE OR DATA AND YOU WILL SUFFER THE WRATH OF KANH!"
Welcome to the multi-user ala Windows.
Cool, All this time, UNIX had it wrong. Thats true innovation for you.
No No No. You are supposed to say:
"The good thing is that in any event, multi-vendor competition DOES NOT bode well for Linux's chances against single-vendor operating systems such as Windows Mobile and Symbian, since competitors in the Linux space end up contributing to an regressing shared base of pirated software."
I will cancell you check and send SB to your office for chair reorganization.
Sincerely,
Billy G,
CEO, CFO, Chairman and what not.
Yes but then they fall in the copyright turf. If what you said is true, the developper must follow the license of the code they "reuse". If they include code from GPL sofware and dont give back the "changes" they make to the community and then re-distribute, well they infridge. Anything else is pure plagiarisme and fall into copyright juridiction. If they dont distribute or their employer does not distribute, well teh GPL dont come into play, they are in legal territory.
You must follow the license of the code, period. If you can't, just dont use it.
Man I geting tired of linking to this:
See my earlier post here!!
Can you do a fact checking before spooting marketing speak to us??
See my ealier post. Ho Ho Ho!! The cracks are opening wide for the content owners!!
Dont believe me? check it for yourself.
Seems like a Tivo thing waiting to happen!!
nope. His Pinto! And into a Wall!!
You are making some valid points. But when was google started? And did Sun "open sourced" their Solaris?
Is there any time between the both actions?
I tough so.
Pascal
Darn! You beat me to it.
Yes relief!
:-)
At close up, I was sure I would see an old man waving his hand and saying:
"That is not the Moon you are looking for, err At!"
I prefer the Cheese version..
Happy mooning!!
Does the PS2 plays Mario? I tough Nintendo has a Monopoly on that game?
:)
He would be right then..
I've found that: Enjoy!!
Better yet. Let President Bush makes a few phone calls and see what happen. :)
And what make your post diferent than the parent?
Has yes... Yours is not an opinion. Its the truth, isn't it? Your needs are the needs of all of us.
I think not.
You too?
And I though I was a special google customer to have it.
So true. So true. Someone mod this +1.
I was thinking something along this line for my 6 years old kid.
You what I gonna do, I gonna head over there and buy the new DVD release. So Lucas will have his cut.
Then I'm gonna download the 3 Originals, burn 3 DVD with it.
The new Boxed set will be a Gift to whomever I want. And I will not feel bad about it, because I did not "steal" a sale from Lucas. I bought it and burned it the way I like.
And I have one purchase receipt to prove it.
Thanks for the info.
Can you name ONE SINGLE THING that RMS has predicted years before it happen, that had gone wrong?
Did he not say before that the Linux generalization term will confuse and will be used by the proprietary companies to muddy their not so just arguments against the GNU/Linux OS?
Did he not say before that patents are an Evil Thing(tm)?
Did he not forsee the abuse the BSD license will get from uncrupulous coporate entities, producing the GPL?
Tell me, mister wise guy, where RMS has said something wrong about what He has dedicated his life for?
I am not a Zealot, I am using Linux at home, at work sometimes. And I am gratefull for RMS CONSISTENCY in what He is doing.
And because yours doesnt have, does not mean that other are like you.
Learning is never a waist of time.
Ignorance is a bliss!!
How can I break my own uptime record of 253 days beetween reboot when you patch all the useless local exploits!?!?! Stop it!!
14:37:24 up 42 days, 14:38, 1 user, load average: 1.50, 0.48, 0.16
And comming down because of you!!
Geeee, those FOSS guys are terrible.
This sentence imply that SCO has a case and IP is not taken seriously in the Linux development methods. Get Real. Their is no fearce IP defenders thant the OSS/GNU developpers, and Linux is a prime example of that fact. And by the way which crisis ? Can you be more specific? Or can't you? This is a bold statement.
And now, he states that SCO has no CLAIMS. How can you contradict yourself in the same breath and be proud of your wrintings. This one wasn't so hard to predict and nullify the No 5 prediction.
To take with a grain of salt.
-----
I just receive to email supposely from Microsoft, with the patch52.exe as an attachement. The HTML email was designed like a microsoft support web page, but poorly. I deleted the two suspicious email. I should have kept them for historical reference.
Lukely for me I was running mozilla mail, not outlook. If I were, the attached executable would have been run and voila!! I hope people wont fall for those 2 emails. Who am I kidding..
Well back to code.