Slashdot Mirror


TiVo OS Update Adds Content Protection

generic-man writes "According to PVRBlog, TiVo's new operating system update enables content protection flags on a per-show basis. On some programs, notably syndicated shows, a red flag appears to indicate that the copyright holder has requested that TiVo devices not save a program past a certain date and that the program may not be copied to a PC using TiVo to Go. TiVo users were told to expect this style of flag only on pay-per-view and video on demand programming, and as such are upset that TiVo has restricted the capabilities of the receivers they bought and subscribed to use. The TiVo Community boards have some screen shots and firsthand accounts."

615 comments

  1. MythTV by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Just one more good reason to bite the bullet, sit down, and build yourself a MythTV box.

    There's a good walkthrough on building a MythTV box over on O'Reilly Digital Media, and another on the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:MythTV by rovingeyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well yes that is an option. But the idea defies the very purpose any one would be interested in buying Tivo. Lets say if I try to tape a game on sunday and I am out of town for an extended vacation. So when I come back a week later Tivo is gonna say "sorry you're schedule clashed with mine". Wasn't Tivo supposed to solve that problem? I was indeed considering buying it pretty soon but now I will instead look at building myself MythTv box.

    2. Re:MythTV by brandonY · · Score: 1

      Do you know if there's a guide anywhere on taking the Tivo Series2 hardware and using it for other things now that I've cancelled my account? I'd love to use the whole box as a myth tv box, or failing that, I'd love to rip out the video capture card.

    3. Re:MythTV by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

      According to the discussions I've seen on the topic, you can't put MythTV on a TiVo box for one or both of the following reasons:
      • The MythTV interface runs under X windows, and the TiVo can't run X11.
        -and/or-
      • TiVo has non-standard hardware for which no drivers are available.
      I don't know if any of that has changed with Series2, but I'd love to know...odds are good you can pick up a used box for a song, since most ex-TiVo users will not have any further use for it.
      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    4. Re:MythTV by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      If you'll RTFA, you'll see it is about how the copyright owner on what you record can disable "keep until I delete" on their program.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    5. Re:MythTV by Leiterfluid · · Score: 1

      Next time, Try RTFA. It specifically addresses that some TV shows are being broadcast with not only a "do not copy to other Media" option, but a "this program will most certainly be deleted by mm/dd/yyyy" option.

    6. Re:MythTV by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Or if you dont want to spend lots of your time dinking and want a turnkey solution.

      replayTV and Dvarchive. extract your replaytv shows, add a replaytv server and none of the drawbacks of Tivo.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:MythTV by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      mini-itx case mod DVR =P

      Or doorstep...

      Or you can find a way to upload your own listings from your own mothership instead of tivo's...

      *shrug*

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    8. Re:MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TRIP!!! Master-bater Monkey!
      Glad to see you are able to sit at your computer after that fisting session we had last night!

    9. Re:MythTV by lowrydr310 · · Score: 2, Informative
      To quote the quoted article:

      On some programs, notably syndicated shows, a red flag appears to indicate that the copyright holder has requested that TiVo devices not save a program past a certain date

      So if that NFL game is flagged, "keep until I delete" won't work.

    10. Re:MythTV by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      1) it doesn't need to run an X11 display itself. As long as X11 compiles and installs OK you can export DISPLAY to somewhere else and crank it up.
      2) what about MythWeb?? I haven't looked at it in a year or so, but that's supposed to be able to drive MythTV via a browser.

    11. Re:MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MythDora makes a MythTV install very easy.

    12. Re:MythTV by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      EyeTV, EyeHome, and a G4 -Good combo and no BS
      see www.elgato.com

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    13. Re:MythTV by Tanlis · · Score: 1

      From the MythTV documentation:

      No.

      While it is true that the TiVo runs the Linux kernel, and TiVo has released their changes to the kernel under the GPL, the TiVo is not a general-purpose computer, and there is no programming information available for the custom hardware contained within a TiVo. TiVo is under no obligation to release the source code to their application.

    14. Re:MythTV by bjheu · · Score: 1

      Until some other form of broadcast DRM hits and your precious pre-broadcat flag tuner becomes useless. This is just the beginning. The MPAA/RIAA don't want any media to be outside of their control. Thank the supreme court for killing FCCs broadcast flag, all that means is that it will take vendors longer to agree on a far reaching DRM scheme. Once that happens heaven help us all.
      In the meantime visit independent artists and show your support cuz they're all that we few free consumers will be able get without restrictions.

    15. Re:MythTV by hawkbug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't go with MythTV unfortunately, or else I would in a heartbeat. I have DirecTV and I currently enjoy my dual tuner tivo which is able to record a show while I watch another. I would have to have 2 seperate dtv receivers to do this with myth, and that's just dumb to pay for 2 different boxes for one TV. Trust me, if there was a better way to make it work with DirecTV, I would do it in a second. I have the money, time, and knowledge to build one of these boxes - I just don't want to get rid of DTV.

    16. Re:MythTV by Darby · · Score: 1

      what about MythWeb?? I haven't looked at it in a year or so, but that's supposed to be able to drive MythTV via a browser.

      MythWeb is great for scheduling your shows, checking on the status of the machine, and some other things, but it isn't really a replacement for the real frontend.

      Whoever did the design though did a very nice job IMHO.

      You can download the programs that you've recorded, but in my case, I don't run any transcode jobs so the files are about 1 Gig per half hour so downloading them over the internet from my cable connection is really slow.

      In the house, I have a gigabit network, so watching shows on any computer in the house works great.

    17. Re:MythTV by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should RTFA. This was a bug, no one is actually using said content protection yet.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    18. Re:MythTV by Truekaiser · · Score: 1

      heh, exactly. i have been pointing people to mythtv when ever they consider geting a tivo telling them with this you have control of the device and not the company that owns tivo.

    19. Re:MythTV by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Try reading more closely. This is a bug in the Tivo software, caused by a noisy signal, not actual content protection being used.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    20. Re:MythTV by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      If you'll read the whole fucking article, you'll see this is a bug in the Tivo software, not content protection being used.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    21. Re:MythTV by zorkmid · · Score: 1

      Is anyone aware of a MythTV distribution that you can just dd onto a tivo drive, boot and go?

    22. Re:MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Sure it's a bug but the point is that the feature is still there. It *could* be used on purpose in the future. The fact that a bug triggered this feature is not the issue, it's the fact that the feature is there and could be utilised to prevent people from doing something that IMHO falls under fair use.

      Oh, and please stop posting the same comment over and over again. Anybody reading this thread will have managed to get your point the first time around.

    23. Re:MythTV by qray · · Score: 1

      And tell me how I get a Myth TV box to control my satellite box and record two programs at once?

      --
      oober tuestmay gostock ombre

    24. Re:MythTV by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Oh, and please stop posting the same comment over and over again. Anybody reading this thread will have managed to get your point the first time around.

      3 people took the time to tell me to RTFA I already read, so I returned the favor.

      I fucking hate that "RTFA" bullshit.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    25. Re:MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I fucking hate that "RTFA" bullshit."
      So why help propogate it? You'd come across as having more of a point if you didn't run around posting the same thing over and over (not just in this thread) *and* being hypocritical while you do it.

      Chill out, people can see what you're saying, you don't need to get all het up. A better way to get listened to is to make a well thought out argument than an aggressive, repetitive one :-)

    26. Re:MythTV by randyest · · Score: 1

      For those who don't want to deal with wondering what TiVo will take from them next, but also don't want the hassle of building your own MythTV box, there is an alternative .

      We are still very happy with our ReplayTV 54xx series (which is still available in some places, incuding eBAY, but have ben replaced by the 55xx series after Denon/Marantz Holdings bought ReplatTV from the failed SonicBlue.) A lot of people avoided these and went for TiVo a few years back because SonicBlue's future was uncertain. It's been a pleasure to find that Denon/Marantz has kept all of the existing features on old models, only removed auto-commercial skip from the new models, reduced the monthly guide fee, and actually improved on SonicBlue's already pretty good customer service.

      A ReplayTV has all of the Tivo features except advertisements, control flags, and predicting what you want to record. Instead you can fully control what it records and when, using simple "themes" or search words that also will avoid re-runs for you. Plus, a Replay includes automatic commercial skip (no need to press any button, it detects and omits commercials -- or not if you disable that feature,) 30-second skip without a hack, and most importantly open source apps for getting recordings off the replay (no way for them to stop or limit this!,) sharing them over the net or LAN, full remote control, scheduling, or even making your own guide service. Plus the monthly subscription is cheaper ($0 if you make your own guide.)

      MythTV is cool, but it's not a good solution for my parents or grandparents. ReplayTV is.

      --
      everything in moderation
    27. Re:MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once that happens heaven help us all.

      Heaven help us because we might have to go back to reading, or interacting with other people, or doing something that helps us learn or grow. What a tragedy it would be to lose this sedentary, brain-killing pasttime that we all love.

    28. Re:MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA, Jackass.

    29. Re:MythTV by ill_conditioned · · Score: 1

      Plug Myth TV box into low speed data port on satellite box if present, otherwise get an external IR signal generator. As for recording two at once, get multiple tuners... Granted this is all very tweaky to setup compared to a TiVo box, but it can work.

    30. Re:MythTV by eyeye · · Score: 1

        1) it doesn't need to run an X11 display itself.

      apart from to WATCH TV on maybe?
      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    31. Re:MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can one install MythTV on a Tivo box?

    32. Re:MythTV by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      I can't be that hard to compile apps for the tivo hardware though. If you were fine with using their kernel, you could conceivably make your own tivo style program to run on the box.

    33. Re:MythTV by Wavicle · · Score: 1

      If I read the gp post correctly, he said if his NFL game had the flag, he would not be able to save it until delete, and this is indeed true. The original article is correct, TiVo is adding functionality so that it no longer "gives you the freedom to watch your favorite shows any time, anywhere." Promises that this feature would only be used for pay per view and video on demand were, in fact, broken.

      I'm not too worried about it myself, my TiVo is hacked in just about every way except stealing service. I can just yank the data off the TiVo drive without their blessing.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    34. Re:MythTV by Trixter · · Score: 1

      Nope. Just one more good reason to bite the bullet, sit down, and buy a ReplayTV box. NONE and I mean NONE of this has ever been a problem with ReplayTV units. They cost less, have embedded ethernet ports you can use free Java software to suck shows off of the unit with, have semi-automatic (newer) or automatic (older) commercial skip... the list goes on and on. You'll pay less for a ReplayTV unit than a MythTV box.

    35. Re:MythTV by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with the internals of a Tivo, but it must have video out, right? That's how you'd normally use the Tivo to watch TV or replay recorded shows. So, is there a Linux (or other OS) driver for that video output device?? If not, Myth has a frontend that'll run on any PC, which I'll grant you is not necessarily as good as pushing it out directly to a TV.

    36. Re:MythTV by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Slight typo in your post there, Gigs. I think you meant to say:

      "If you'll smoke a great big bag of crack like I just did, then read the whole fucking article, you'll see bugs in the Tivo software, bugs crawling all over your face, all sorts of things."

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    37. Re:MythTV by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sorry, I thought you were a troll when I was rude to you earlier. You're just confused. My bad!

      So, let's lay it out. Tivo's new software has content protection in it. Owing to a bug, we've noticed.

      It's like my large friend Mungo, who I've just sent round to your house with an axe. I can categorically assure you that Mungo is just going to stand in your front room. I am absolutely not going to phone him up and tell him to chop you into little bits.
      That nice Jewish family he chopped up last week? Oh, that was just a bug. I mis-dialed, it was a bad line, I said "Is that the Golden Bug Take Out?" and he thought I said "Take out the Goldbergs".We had a good laugh about it back at the office later.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    38. Re:MythTV by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Owing to a bug, we've noticed.

      You are just now noticing?

      You missed all the constant Slashdot "OMG DEY ARE TAKING R RIGTS AWAY!!!" stories about it?

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/ 28/1423202&tid=129&tid=137
      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/17/15 38219&tid=129&tid=98&tid=17

      October 2004, man!

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    39. Re:MythTV by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Look, are you a troll or not? Make up your mind, for goodness sake.

      Some of use are reading slashdot at work, our time is precious.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    40. Re:MythTV by qray · · Score: 1

      I thought about the IR signal generator. The multiple tuners adds some cost. Sounds like the best bet is to switch to cable.
      --
      haj bo retrad

  2. welcome! by namekuseijin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Welcome to the (our DRM) future!"

    - MPAA, RIAA, Disney, M$ and associates

    --
    I don't feel like it...
    1. Re:welcome! by KillShill · · Score: 1

      and don't forget the to list the associates, otherwise how will thoughtful customers avoid such intentionally crippled products.

      education is key.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  3. Evil bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is it using the evil bit?

    1. Re:Evil bit by rovingeyes · · Score: 0

      Damn! Tivo told me it was the "sensitive bit" - sensitive to copyrights. Those lying assholes!

    2. Re:Evil bit by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, the evil bit is set and the "what a waste of money on a TiVO" switch is broken in the "on" position.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    3. Re:Evil bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who don't know evil bit:
      http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3514.html

  4. Go Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is where Open Source really shines. No dependence on service providers, no taking away what you already have.

  5. Driving Sales! by AcheronHades · · Score: 4, Informative

    For some reason I remember reading that Tivo struggles to stay out of the red and that they are really not even that profitable. So why then would they add in a feature to restrict the functionality of their product and piss people off?

    There has to be something else here, this just doesnt make buisness sense.

    1. Re:Driving Sales! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am ripping off something I read in the past...

      That is one good reason to ReplayTV as they have no new development...

    2. Re:Driving Sales! by Aspasia13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does since their strategy is not off-the-shelf sales, but rather combining with content providers such as cable and sattelite TV companies. That way they can manage to use their position of market leader with brand-name recognizability to get exclusive contracts with the provider companies.

      And those companies will only allow it if there is "content protection".

      It makes perfect sense if you think about their business model and who their real intended customer is.

    3. Re:Driving Sales! by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1

      Simple. They're being paid to add that feature, or it's part of an agreement to get schedules and schedule coordination from that content provider.

      Or they're doing this to get something new from them and this is what they're doing in exchange.

      --
      "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
    4. Re:Driving Sales! by AcheronHades · · Score: 1
      Or they're doing this to get something new from them and this is what they're doing in exchange.
      That's what I was getting at.
    5. Re:Driving Sales! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Because Tivo is liable under the DMCA and fcc laws to implement copyright protection.

    6. Re:Driving Sales! by kfg · · Score: 1

      There has to be something else here, this just doesnt make buisness sense.

      Subscribers are not the customer. They are the product.

      Follow the money.

      KFG

    7. Re:Driving Sales! by dreamt · · Score: 1

      Because, if you actually followed some of the links here (I know, asking too much already), you will see that it is because Tivo (the company) would like to keep Tivo (the hardware) being able to operate. If Tivo want's to keep its Macrovision license (in other words, if Tivo wants the unit to be functional), they had to add this 'feature'.

      The fact that the flag was picked up is a bug in how Tivo is handling a noisy over-the-air analog signal. The signal source here was coming from a noisy antenna that trigged the signal. It is only supposed to be for 'premium' content.

    8. Re:Driving Sales! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has to be something else here, this just doesnt make buisness sense.

      I doubt that many slashdot members have an idea of what "good business sense" even means.

    9. Re:Driving Sales! by dreamt · · Score: 1

      Your or statemnet is probably closer. They want to do things such as T2G, or DVD burning.

      For DVD stuff, Tivo need a CSS license (no, Tivo can't use DeCSS). For a CSS license, they needed Macrovision. For Macrovision, they needed this.

      Guess what Tivo needed to do to get T2G functionality?

    10. Re:Driving Sales! by sysadmn · · Score: 1
      Because they're trying even harder not to piss off the content producers. See their FAQ:
      Who were the initial investors of TiVo Inc.?
      Our investors include: America Online. Inc. Institutional Venture Partners, NBC Multimedia, Inc., New Enterprise Associates, DIRECTV, Inc., Sony Corporation, Vulcan Ventures, Inc. and TiVo employees.
      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    11. Re:Driving Sales! by Phillup · · Score: 1

      Stopping copying is not the same as not enabling it.

      Tivo doesn't need to implement a system that keeps people from copying files. They do need to take reasonable precautions against enabling copyright infringement (maybe), as determined after the fact by a jury.

      I'm sure most juries would find it reasonable to believe that the *average* person would not take their Tivo apart... and take their computer apart... and put the hard drive from the Tivo into the computer... and run a different OS than the one that came with the computer... to get the data off the Tivo drive.

      Standard disclaimer applies... IANAL. (Tho you probably aren't either)

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    12. Re:Driving Sales! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      That is one good reason to ReplayTV as they have no new development...

      At one point, ReplayTV did worse than TiVo in this regard. The Panasonic ReplayTV ShowStopper model refused to record or display any Macrovisioned content. But sanity prevailed and version 3.02 allowed such content to be recorded and reinstated it on playback.

      If ReplayTV was still developing new versions, I'd expect their licensing of MPEG-2 which makes Macrovision support compulsary would require them to make the same restrictions as TiVo does now.

      I'm hoping TiVo lives long enough to make a Series3 unit that will use a codec that doesn't make them contractually beholden to the industry.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    13. Re:Driving Sales! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      There's no need to go through DVD and CSS to be locked into Macrovision-honoring license terms. You can get there just by licensing MPEG-2.

      Keep in mind that the earliest versions of TiVo was so good at locking onto the video signal that they defeated most analog channel channel scrambling methods. This did not get out in any consumer versions.

      It should be possible to eliminate its ability to detect Macrovision to defeat this. (The TiVo effectively strips out Macrovision and only notes that it was present when the recording started.)

      And enough is known about the video database TiVo uses that red-flagged content could be altered to be unflagged by a separate utility. Then it depends upon whether TiVo wants to get involved in an arms race of detecting unauthorized changes to such data with those determined to retain their recordings.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    14. Re:Driving Sales! by dreamt · · Score: 1

      Ok, makes my arguement even easier, in that case. Without honoring this, no Tivo. For that matter, how is it possible that a Windows Media Center recorder wouldn't support this (or does it already, I've never looked at one).

      If this is the case, then, theoretically, someone could also declare that somethign like MythTV is illegal if it uses MPEG-2.

    15. Re:Driving Sales! by randyest · · Score: 1

      If ReplayTV was still developing new versions, I'd expect their licensing of MPEG-2 which makes Macrovision support compulsary would require them to make the same restrictions as TiVo does now.

      If?!?

      ReplayTV was bought from the failed SonicBlue by Denon/Marantz Holdings. ReplayTV then released the new 5500 series which does not include the same restrictions as TiVo. ReplayTV is doing pretty well these days.

      In fact, even the new replayTV's are much better than TiVo in most ways (unless you dig DRM.) But the best systems are the original 54xx series ReplayTV, which you can still buy if you look hard.

      Sorry for the reality check to the face there, but that's the truth.

      --
      everything in moderation
    16. Re:Driving Sales! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A PBS talk show received over a good cable connection is what got flagged for me. Do you think this was a mistake too or was this a test?

  6. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's something wrong about selling a device to do something, and later limiting the ability of the device to do what it was designed to do.

    1. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure it's the part about limiting the device's ability after the sale.

    2. Re:Wrong by c0n0 · · Score: 1

      For example, something fully functional costs $100, and the manufacturer decides to limit the functionality and charge $80. I don't see anything wrong with it...it could be a good or a bad business decision, or whatever.

      What I do see wrong is that people agree to those terms and buy it, and then complain because there are limits to what they can do with their newly bought stuff.

      If you KNEW a corporation had the potential of manipulating/controlling what you could do with the box, and you agreed to it, then you are not a victim.

      I just wouldn't feed the beast. Don't like the terms? don't buy.

    3. Re:Wrong by Quasar1999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's something wrong about selling a device to do something, and later limiting the ability of the device to do what it was designed to do.

      My car can 'theoretically' go up to 240km/h. The damned thing has a governor/limiter installed in it that won't let the car go faster than 180km/h. Solution, get rid of the governor.

      Why can't we do the same with the TIVO? It might be a gray area, but it's your device since you purchased it (not renting it), so you can modify it... or am I missing something?

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    4. Re:Wrong by Surt · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that from their point of view what they sell is a device which provides the most up to date TiVo service, and that their device continues to do that as well as it ever has.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:Wrong by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you KNEW a corporation had the potential of manipulating/controlling what you could do with the box, and you agreed to it, then you are not a victim.

      They said that they may keep the software up to date and add new features. They never said they would delete existing features. It is a manipulation that I would say is against the terms of service. I buy it to timeshift everything, including PPV. Then, I agree to a ToS that specifies that they can continue to improve my box. Is it somehow my fault when they violate their ToS and remove functionality? I'm sure they have things in there protecting them if they add and remove features from their subscription service. But I don't think there is anything in their EULA specifying that future firmware releases will reduce functionality over the device as purchased.

    6. Re:Wrong by blakestah · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. This move allows them to increase the box capabilities. TiVO is working on trickle download with netflix. You rent a movie, download it with high speed internet. Watch it, remove it from your box. You are not allowed to copy it. If you screw it up you can download it again from netflix.

      Downloads will take about 6-8 hours.

      Similar features are planned for renting movies from other sources.

      None of this is possible without content protection. And it will not be possible on other PVRs that lack content protection.

      Do you think being able to rent movies via trickle download is worth the content protection? I use netflix now and love it, it would be worth 3-4 times more to me with trickle download.

    7. Re:Wrong by c0n0 · · Score: 1

      well, it wouldn't surprise me if they used words such as 'improve functionality' or others subjective terms.

      But you do have a point if they said 'add new features' (or something very specific) and then they went ahead and deleted features.

      You know, what it is sad is that they use this kind of subtleties and that we always have to assume the default position of defending our rights as consumers.

      I can't stand the fact that corporations can be built on the basis of screwing customers.

    8. Re:Wrong by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      But did you buy your car without a limiter fitted? Did the dealer later fit one as a compulsory "upgrade" when you took it in for a service?

      If they did, did they later tell you about it by couching it in weasel-words, such as "an exciting new enhancement", "improved functionality", or "for your safety & convenience"?

      I thought not...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  7. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    Tivo's sales dropped dramatically on their latest attempts to restrict what people do with their own bought-and-paid-for hardware.

    also in other news, sales of MythTV increased for the 99th straight quarter at the new increased price of $0.00

    1. Re:In other news by mshiltonj · · Score: 2, Funny

      sales of MythTV increased for the 99th straight quarter at the new increased price of $0.00

      What!? That's more than 10 times what I paid for it six months ago!

    2. Re:In other news by Binestar · · Score: 1

      Yes, but did you take inflation into account?

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
  8. MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MythTV .. no fuss no muss, free, HDTV/CableTV PVR. End of discussion :-)

  9. BUG!!!! by doormat · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a bug on behalf of the Tivo software...

    See

    http://blogs.chron.com/techblog/archives/2005/09/c opy_protection.html


    Update: Jim Denney, director of product marketing for TiVo, said the instances of standard TV shows being affected by new copy protection restrictions likely are "false positives."

    Denney said the copy protection is trigged by a flag in the video signal. The reports appearing on the Web appear to be cases where TiVo misinterprets noise in the signal as a copy protection flag, and imposes the restrictions.

    "During the test process, we came across people who had false positives because of noisy analog signals," he said. "We actually delayed development (of the new TiVo software) to address those false positives."


    Apparently they still didnt fix the issues.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    1. Re:BUG!!!! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Isn't this expected when you start broadcasting macrovision codes which are themselves manufactured errors in the data stream?

      I haven't ever been able to comprehend buckling the excellent error correction work that has gone on in many fields just for the disney brigade.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:BUG!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Evidence of his noisy analog signal:

      SOURCE:
      Discussion Thread from the tivo community blog
      http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.ph p?t=259169

      Pissedmonkey quote:

      "And the real joke is that I'm using attenna reception, no cable, no satellite. (Yes yes, I know it doesn't make sense. I moved to the woods, and I'm 0.3 of a mile out of Time Warner's service area. Also, trees are too dense for satellite.)"

    3. Re:BUG!!!! by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ``Isn't this expected when you start broadcasting macrovision codes which are themselves manufactured errors in the data stream?''

      Actually, no. I think you can get about any desired reliability by just making the signal sufficiently strong and sufficiently spread out. The fact that this didn't work out in this case shows that the implementation is either bad or BAD. In the first case, it can be fixed by TiVo. In the second case, it's likely that the users are screwed, because the big corps probably don't care that you can't copy even the shows that don't have the flag set.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    4. Re:BUG!!!! by JWW · · Score: 1

      Mr. Denney has his work cut out for him then. Because the "false positives" are still true bullshit. Its not like Tivo owners are going just go "ok well delete my show then I know its only a mistake".

      This is a big PR screw up for Tivo. Once the darling of the Linux world, they now are snivelling minon of the "Content Providers" (damn that term pisses me off).

      As it is I am already a MythTV user and as such I will use whatever means I can to maintain ALL my fair use rights against this onslaght of bullshit DRM policies.

    5. Re:BUG!!!! by SpecBear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, if this flagging is so robustly implemented that it can be triggered by noise, how long will it take for someone to create a filter to eliminate that "noise"?

      Egad, I can see it now: "With our innovative new filter, not only will your shows look clearer, they'll last longer!" Except I won't be laughing at that ad.

    6. Re:BUG!!!! by All+Names+Have+Been · · Score: 1

      A bug, yes. These shows weren't supposed to have the flag set. However, the fact that this so-called "feature" was added AT ALL speaks volumes about Tivo's respect for it's users. And it doesn't even work right, as evidenced.

      Just because it isn't turned on now doesn't mean it won't be tomorrow. This junk won't be unused for long, that's for damn sure. If I *EVER* start losing shows because I don't watch them within the parameters defined by some batshit insane network exec, my Tivo's are going out the window.

      I've read from some Tivo defenders that this was required by Macrovision as part of their new agreements with TV and Hollywood. Well to hell with them! Who the hell says this monopoly of DRM has to be integrated into every device that attaches to a TV? No one.

      I hardly watched TV before I got Tivo (way to inconvenient) and I suppose I'll live without it again. Maybe I'll get something done.

    7. Re:BUG!!!! by smashr · · Score: 1


      This is a bug on behalf of the Tivo software...

      See

      http://blogs.chron.com/techblog/archives/2005/09/c opy_protection.html


      Okay, so it's a bug. This does not mean that it is acceptible for TIVO to release software to its users, especially software which is forcibly updated which would cause this sort of bug. If TIVO cannot be reasonably sure that it's system will not misintepret noise as a broadcast flag, then it should not release the software

    8. Re:BUG!!!! by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Not much software would ever be released if you want some sort of provable guarantee of being bug free.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    9. Re:BUG!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why I will never, ever, ever, knowingly buy a DRM-enabled system (I've bought a couple, but only because I did not realize it). Not because I'm a pirate. But because I don't want to be in the situation of a "false positive". EVER.

      In a consumer setting, there is nothing more annoying than paying for something and then having that product deny access because it mistakenly thinks you are trying to do something illegal or otherwise out of the license terms. Not being able to copy something legitimately is only the start of the annoyance. What happens when your HD-DVD/Blue-ray system erroneously decides to apply some denial process thanks to a scratched-up disk, and you end up with an expensive, out-of-warranty paper weight that you can only rectify by convincing the vendor you weren't doing anything naughty?

      Physics and Murphy's Law are challenging enough without engineering intentional ways for a system to fail. I'll buy the vanilla, non-DRM system, thank you. And if that's not available, I'll seriously consider skipping it entirely, because I don't really know what I am buying. The vendor could even change the terms after I buy it.

  10. iTV? by mysqlrocks · · Score: 0

    I'm just waiting for Apple to release iTV. People could just download TV shows and watch them whenever they want. TiVo has shown that there would be a demand for such a service.

    1. Re:iTV? by Flying+Purple+Wombat · · Score: 1

      I would pay for that, maybe $2 for a half-hour show. Subtitled foriegn shows (yeah, I'm talkin' about Anime) would probably make some good money for the studios.

      --
      If God had meant for man to see the sunrise, He would have scheduled it later in the day.
    2. Re:iTV? by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      You can bet that if Apple were to do that, they'd want to avoid the stigma of the name iTV.

    3. Re:iTV? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Except that you could only copy the shows to your iPod TV, and you could only write them to tape 10 times. I mean 7 times. I mean, whatever it's been reduced to this month.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
  11. Oh, good... by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...it's another example to use when explaining to people exactly why they should be opposed to DRM and the Broadcast Flag. It's good that it will spread awareness of the issue, so that we have a better chance of stopping it before it becomes mandatory by law.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:Oh, good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so that we have a better chance of stopping it before it becomes mandatory by law.
       
      Stop trying to make it sound like you're part of an underground revolution. What happens to DRM will have absolutely nothing to do with you.

  12. 7 days? by jshaped · · Score: 2, Interesting


    They limited the particular program stored to only 7 days?!?! That's ridiculous.
    So much for saving your favorite concerts, as I have done.
    (I just hope my ReplayTV doesn't head toward this...)

    1. Re:7 days? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I've kept some movies on my TiVo for years just to prevent a Wishlist created to find and record the series of the same name from recording the movies every 28 days and possibly conflicting out something else (because the series is higher priority but the movies is low priority).

      Last I checked there was not a Not-Movie category, nor a Not-Actor to exclude Tom Cruise in a Title Wishlist for "Mission: Impossible".

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  13. That's fine for us ... by b0r1s · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But the age-old argument holds: this won't work for (just an example) my parents.

    In the past, Tivo employees have been very helpful in helping users work around these types of issues - they don't really care if you record the show, install larger hard drives, pull video off to your computer, as long as they get their subscription fee.

    Hopefully a workaround comes out and makes it to the forums.

    --
    Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    1. Re:That's fine for us ... by Gulthek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why won't it work for your parents? You can't build the MythTV box for them?

    2. Re:That's fine for us ... by b0r1s · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because eventually something will 'go wrong' with it - for example, the first time they unplug it from the wall without powering down, and the kernel forces a check (e2fsck or whichever), and (because it's actively reading and writing all the time) some inconsistency is found: I'm not willing (due to past experiences attempting to support their electronics) to answer phone calls and walk them through an explanation of how to get the system live again.

      It's a decision I made ages ago, and I highly recommend doing the same for anyone who does computer'ish work for a living.

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    3. Re:That's fine for us ... by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'll take journaling filesystems for $200, Alex.

    4. Re:That's fine for us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Work in a hosting environment sometime, and you'll see how foolproof ext3 really isn't...

    5. Re:That's fine for us ... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Kinda strange how I do that with my Linux based Tivo all the time with no problems.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    6. Re:That's fine for us ... by Threni · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a bit harsh. I'm happy having my parents/friends call my premium rate support line. At 50p per minute, they can take as long as they like to have me explain what double clicking is...

    7. Re:That's fine for us ... by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tivo deliberately built a crippled product: Unless you paid them for a monthly subscription you got no guide data, and that made it unuseable. The monthly subscription is exhorbitant, and the flaw in their business model is that they wanted to sell you the box.

      If they had kept the boxes and let you have one as a rental that business model might be valid and the idea that you received some "service" for your monthly fee might have some validity.

      But they sold them, and through the crippled nature of their product and the monthly fee they are trying to maintain ownership and control over you and your box, which unfortunately for them they SOLD you.

      You can't maintain control over things you sold. If you want to maintain control, don't sell it.

      That is now over since they have tipped their hand, first by sending you ads and taking up part of the guide data that YOU ARE PAYING FOR. Now by limiting what you can do with items you have stored in your box, which you own.

      I think it's about over for the current Tivo business model.

      They should just start being honest, give the boxes out as a rental and then they can control them.

      Once sold they lose the ability to control them and I can see the handwriting on the wall, internet accessable guide servers will soon abound and Tivo has no more revenue from people who own those boxes- their current customers.

      That is completely fair.

      --
      .
    8. Re:That's fine for us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well I recently tried to build a MythTV box and unless you know everything about compiling and installing Linux video drivers and IVTV for the hardware you've got it's extremely difficult.

      Couple that with the fact that any instructions out there are for older distros of Linux that won't work properly with anything recent and you've got a recipe for head banging. Couple that with really poor remote control software support and it's hard to see MythTV as anything but the Emperor's New Clothes.

      It took me days to get no-where with MythTV, and only a few hours to get SageTV and Windows going... and yes I'm posting as AC because round here if you do anything with Windows when you could have use Linux you're a pariah.

    9. Re:That's fine for us ... by SQLz · · Score: 1

      ewww, you use EXT3? Why punish yourself? Try Reiser, XFS, or JFS.

    10. Re:That's fine for us ... by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 1

      Aye agreed - my wife is continually unplugging my MythTV box without powering it down first. Yet to have a issue using Reiser. Ext3 however...NEVER again!

    11. Re:That's fine for us ... by jdgreen7 · · Score: 1

      I've given up on Resier for a while... I was using it as a home file server (for non-crucial files) on a Gentoo box last year and the drive failed. Now, hardware failures happen all of the time, but I was still able to access the drive with utilities and read raw data from it. But, none of the Reiser recovery tools worked worth a flip. I spent weeks trying to recover data from that drive on multiple machines with no luck. Sorry, but until the recovery/diagnostics tools work as well as the ones for ext-based file systems, I'm staying with the old school stuff.

    12. Re:That's fine for us ... by Gulthek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, nice. Thanks for everything Mom and Dad, but you aren't worth my free time.

      If you don't care enough to do tech support, what do you care about this latest TiVO development? I.e. why mention the trouble your parents would have with MythTV at all?

    13. Re:That's fine for us ... by DavesWorld334 · · Score: 1

      No kidding, dead on.

      I'd have had a TIVO years ago, but they insist on charging me for the box AND charging me a monthly fee. Sorry, no. Pick one.

      Let me pay you for the box, and even double the cost out of spite that I won't weld myself to your ongoing revenue stream. The box should be programable like a plain old VCR (i.e., recordable on channel X at time Y for Z length of content), or it should pull data from the "Channel Channel", or both.

      Sadly, no one seems interested in building a DVR that isn't subscription based. Up yours corporations!

    14. Re:That's fine for us ... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what backups are for. Damn people these days with their 500GB hard drives and no backups. You get what you deserve.

    15. Re:That's fine for us ... by null+etc. · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I can certainly understand your perspective - that's my exact experience a few years ago.

      Recently, however, I've taken another fstab at it using Gentoo. I've come to learn much more about Linux that I've ever understood, thanks to the crisp documentation and hands-on aspect of Gentoo.

      Thus far, my experiences with building MythTV on Gentoo, with all sorts of crazy features (gaming, VFD text displays, universal remote support, PS2 gamepads, HDTV capture and TV output, etc) has been extremely positive.

      My problem now? Spending absurd amounts of money modding the hell out of my MythTV box. I bought one of those dedicated Media PC cases, and am going crazy installing lighted pushbutton switches, rewiring my PSU to be like an XConnect, running neon lights all over the place, soundproofing the heck out of the machine. I've spent almost $2k on this box! But, it has Dual layer DVD-R, half terabyte of hard drive space, can record two HD channels, and looks more A/V than my A/V receiver! Buying a similar box from Sony costs about $1,200, which doesn't let you play games, run Windows apps via Wine, or have file sharing and version control services.

      I'll take that over Tivo any day of the week for $2000, Alex! And now I don't have to worry about some product manufacturer farking around with my rights after I've bought a lifetime subscription to their service.

    16. Re:That's fine for us ... by LordNimon · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Two years ago, you could have purchased a lifetime subscription for $250. That's the same thing as doubling the cost and not charging a monthly fee.

      As for building DVRs without a fee, there are companies that sell pre-built MythTV boxes. They cost more than TiVo plus lifetime, though.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    17. Re:That's fine for us ... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I run MythTV with a journaling filesystem. What you find out is that Murphy's law has no exceptions.

      For example, this summer I found out that my BIOS had an optional setting to automatically cut power if it thought the MB temperature was too high. The machine had been crunching on shows for months, but once the warm season arrived, it would mysteriously power down with no warning during long transcoding jobs. It took me a little while to figure out what was going on and turn off that option (the MB really wasn't getting all that hot; the threshold was just set way too low).

      I've had video card driver I/O errors lock up the machine more than once.

      Once an error at the Zap2it server caused the entire program guide database to empty out, so recording stopped until I reloaded it.

      The latest screwup was somebody left the CD tray slightly open and then closed the front access door so the tray was stuck between open and closed. The kernel started logging millions of messages about not being able to access the CD drive. After a couple of days, it filled up the OS partition and MythTV stopped working.

      MythTV has a lot of compelling features that make it worth it for me to maintain it, but I would never consider taking on the hassle of doing it for someone else. People tend to think that the shows they record are a high priority, so of course any problems have to be fixed NOW. It's bad enough answering to members of my own household when the thing starts messing up, much less handling the crisis for someone else on a phone help line.

    18. Re:That's fine for us ... by null+etc. · · Score: 4, Insightful
      That's what backups are for. Damn people these days with their 500GB hard drives and no backups. You get what you deserve.

      What do you back up 500GB hard drives onto? 125 DVD-Rs for $150?

    19. Re:That's fine for us ... by ad0gg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not only did they force you to purchase monthly service, they also spy on you aswell. When your tivo makes its daily call, its sends your remote control click log back to tivo. So they actually know you rewind on every racy scene. They say its anonymous, but on the same call it sends your credentials back so it can get the guide the data.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    20. Re:That's fine for us ... by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      I'd have had a TIVO years ago, but they insist on charging me for the box AND charging me a monthly fee. Sorry, no. Pick one.

      Why didn't you buy a Tivo with the lifetime subscription then? I'm not sure you can buy that anymore, but it was offered for quite some time.

    21. Re:That's fine for us ... by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      While I don't doubt that what you say is true, why in the world would your wife unplug your MythTV box so consistently, powering it down or not?

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    22. Re:That's fine for us ... by ebh · · Score: 1

      Definitely. We can cobble these beasts together, put them into service, and make them stand up and dance for us. But hell hath no wrath compared to Dad when his recorded CSI won't play for him at 2:00am.

      I long ago gave up on talking my family into anything other than off-the-shelf hardware and software, because I give quite enough tech support at work, thank you, and I at least get paid for that.

    23. Re:That's fine for us ... by jdgreen7 · · Score: 1

      The parent has a point. Your best bet is to buy a few 500GB drives (or twice as many 250 GB drives) and set them up in a RAID array. Not quite as simple, but much more fault-tolerant.

    24. Re:That's fine for us ... by jdgreen7 · · Score: 1
      You get what you deserve.

      Note: I said non-crucial files. Hence, no major reason to back them up. However, it's sometimes faster to recover files from a damaged hard drive than it is to go out and re-download all of them. ext-based filesystems have been around long enough that the recovery tools are pretty efficient at getting data back from damaged drives. But, I have found that Reiser isn't quite so friendly in this regard.

    25. Re:That's fine for us ... by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      When do we get to see a nice MythTV standalone distro for people who just want one box set up with MythTV? Not a network, not multiple frontends, just something that can record and manage TV recordings, and show the files in a Samba share.

      And no, I won't do it myself. If I have to do it myself, I'll just buy the windows software that's easier.

    26. Re:That's fine for us ... by secolactico · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ewww, you use EXT3? Why punish yourself? Try Reiser, XFS, or JFS.

      I'm not trying to start a flamefest, but it seems that for everyone that says "ewww, you use EXT3" there is one that says "ewww, Reiser is teh suck!".

      How does tivo records it's data, anyway? Some custom filesystem?

      --
      No sig
    27. Re:That's fine for us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      reiser4 has the most thorough and complete fsck tool I have ever had the pleasure to use. True it was an early alpha version, but nonetheless, it worked brilliantly to recover every last bit of data from my otherwise dead drive (Windows would not even let me mount the NTFS partition on it).
      The fsck took almost an hour, but I had all my 300GB of data from that drive at the end of it, even though my dmesg was full of drive error reports.

      Namesys has earned my confidence with their software.

    28. Re:That's fine for us ... by north.coaster · · Score: 1

      The lifetime subscription is still available. The only problem is that the subscription is tied to the box, not the owner. that's why I stick with monthly subscriptions.

    29. Re:That's fine for us ... by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't have a Tivo. I have Ultimate TV, and I pay Directv every month for it. It's well worth it too!

      --
      .
    30. Re:That's fine for us ... by pegr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I've thought about how to get out from under restrictive TiVo terms with the least pain for a couple of years now. Seems to me that there is no reason (well, a minor technical reason, easily overcome) why you couldn't run a totally custom version of software on the TiVo hardware. TiVo hackers have been expanding the capability of their TiVos for quite some time. The general feel for TiVo hacking at the moment is to go ahead and hack it however you want, but don't step on TiVo (or, more correctly, their monthly fee) and TiVo will turn a blind eye to it. So far, that's how it has worked.
       
      But I guarantee that the moment TiVo becomes the "screw the customer, we represent the illogical corporate interests of content providers" company this article implies, all TiVo hacking gloves will come off and their will be a highly successful port of MythTV or FreeVo for the actual TiVo hardware. TiVo knows this. If something like this hits the streets, TiVo is screwed. They don't want this (obviously), so they are highly motivated to balance the interests of their customers and content providers.
       
      BTW- The examples cited in the article are mistakes. Nobody really intended to restrict access to a syndicated rerun, for crying out loud. The restrictions were only supposed to apply to OnDemand and Pay-Per-View content. Somewhere, sombody/something screwed up. The actual circumstances were unintended, but boy did it fire up a lot of TiVo owners! I hope TiVo responds to this in some fashion...

    31. Re:That's fine for us ... by Phillup · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... Not a network... and show the files in a Samba share.

      Make up your mind, do you want a network or not?

      In the meantime, check out knoppmyth.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    32. Re:That's fine for us ... by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Knoppmyth, kick ass.

      Now, by "not a network" - I meant none of this frontend stuff with streaming the media through the network - it's still nice to be able to rip the files from the PVR at my lesiure.

      Damn, I wish I hadn't bought an AIW 9600 for my desktop. ATI ripped me off - the included PVR software is the worst POS I've ever seen, and it doesn't support Linux so I can't run MythTV.

    33. Re:That's fine for us ... by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only did they force you to purchase monthly service, they also spy on you aswell.

      There is no force involved. They're doing exactly what they said they do (tracking use so that their service can learn what to recommend to you, etc). You're certainly not forced to use a commercial product and its companion subscription service. Where does the force come in? Did some armed TiVo goons drag you to Best Buy and make you procure one of their devices? Here's an idea: stop using it if you are only now deciding to think through the nature of the service they've been providing (and how they do it). Sheesh.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    34. Re:That's fine for us ... by Phillup · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only problem is that the subscription is tied to the box, not the owner. that's why I stick with monthly subscriptions.

      It is also why my five year old box, that I paid $199 for, is still worth at least $199.

      I've replaced the two moving parts (fan and hard drive) and just bought a new remote... good investment as far as I'm concerned.

      And a hell of a lot cheaper than the monthly fee over the five years! (I paid $199 for lifetime sub)

      And... I also have a Myth network to catch the stuff I want to record while the Tivo is busy or perhaps save a bit longer. As far as I'm concerned... it (Tivo vs. Myth) isn't an either / or situation.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    35. Re:That's fine for us ... by eyegone · · Score: 1


      As for building DVRs without a fee, there are companies that sell pre-built MythTV boxes.

      Who? It's about time I started on my Christmas list.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    36. Re:That's fine for us ... by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but when I bought mine, the lifetime was something like 13 months of service at the monthly rate. Okay, now it's $13 and $300, which is 23 months. Unless you replace your TiVo more than once every two years, the monthly subscritpion is foolish.

      Even if you do replace your TiVo every couple of years, though, the monthly subscription is still foolish because you get most of that money back in terms of a higher selling price when you sell the thing on eBay.

      About the only way the monthly subscription makes sense is if you think the thing is only going to last a year. Even then, when it dies, send it to TiVo and tell them to repair it. If they can't, they will replace it. Either way, the lifetime subscription continues. It isn't ever lost unless you sell the box outright and buy a new one.

      The monthly subscription NEVER makes sense.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    37. Re:That's fine for us ... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      in addition to the excellent knoppmyth mentioned previously... MythDora FC3 MythTV tailored distro.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    38. Re:That's fine for us ... by ad0gg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I love the tivo apologists. I also love paying $10 a month to use my vcr that spies on me. Oh wait I stopped service and now my tivo collects dust. I can live with paying for service, I can't live with my own device spying on me. I have 0 tolerance for spyware and companies that spy on their customers.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    39. Re:That's fine for us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been happy with JFS on my MythTV box. Unplanned power outages and a spate of lockups before I tracked down and replaced some bad RAM have yet to cause the loss of any files.

      Both XFS and JFS are reported to work well for MythTV, or any other similar uses: frequent turnover of large files.

    40. Re:That's fine for us ... by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      One of the other comments in this thread included a link.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    41. Re:That's fine for us ... by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Unless you're on DirecTivo, where the monthly fee is only $5, you're paying that bil, anyway, and there's no lifetime subscription, anyway.

    42. Re:That's fine for us ... by milkman_matt · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unless you paid them for a monthly subscription you got no guide data, and that made it unuseable. The monthly subscription is exhorbitant, and the flaw in their business model is that they wanted to sell you the box.

      Isn't that the point? I don't mind paying their monthly subscription (although my TiVo and my parents TiVos all have lifetime subscriptions.) The TiVo is -extremely- useful, and worth the $10/$12/mo... I think TiVo is the best thing to happen to TV since HBO. I've seen so many more of my favorite shows that I was never around to watch and so many shows that I never would have thought to watch, or shows that I'd love to watch but didn't realize they were even on.

      If they had kept the boxes and let you have one as a rental that business model might be valid and the idea that you received some "service" for your monthly fee might have some validity.

      It's not like you're buying a $400 gaming console.. The base TiVo is only $99 everywhere I've looked.. Now that's not 'cheap' by a lot of people's standards, but for what you're getting? I think it's reasonable..

      But they sold them, and through the crippled nature of their product and the monthly fee they are trying to maintain ownership and control over you and your box, which unfortunately for them they SOLD you.

      I really don't see this as really -crippling-.. So far it looks like TiVo is flagging things to limit the time you can save them, and cut the ability to transfer them to a PC.. well.. first off, how long do you need to save stuff on there? (granted this varies greatly from person to person, I had a couple things on my TiVo for months at one point, but I didn't NEED them.) And you can't transfer them to a PC? ...well... I don't see anything stopping you from transferring the content to VHS or DVD? I don't think they'll ever be able to stop that...

      You can't maintain control over things you sold. If you want to maintain control, don't sell it.

      They're not maintaining control over what they sold (the TiVo), they're maintaining control over their SERVICE (the Guide, software, software updates, etc.) In fact, I don't recall the last time I've seen a company so supportive of their users hacking their product and doing whatever they want with it... Even when it means some loss of revenue (buy a cheap TiVo, buy a cheap large HDD, get more recording time than a high end TiVo.) I think TiVo as a company has been VERY cool about the use of their product, and VERY supportive. Don't see xbox hacking forums on microsoft.com right?

      I think it's about over for the current Tivo business model.

      That's your opinion, but I, and many, many, MANY other TiVo owners aren't going anywhere anytime soon...

      They should just start being honest, give the boxes out as a rental and then they can control them.

      Already covered this, and if they did that, no more TiVo modding community or anything like that.. some people do a -lot- more with their TiVos than plug 'em in and use 'em out of the box.

      Once sold they lose the ability to control them and I can see the handwriting on the wall, internet accessable guide servers will soon abound and Tivo has no more revenue from people who own those boxes- their current customers.

      They never tried to keep control of the hardware. As for internet accessable guide servers, I'm sure there will be a way to point to them, and I don't think we'll hear about TiVo bitching about the people who do modify their boxes to do this.. However, TiVo will still have 'revenue from people who own those boxes' via monthly subscription fee, granted some people may stop subscribing, but they've already paid, and I'm sure the money TiVo makes off of their monthly fees more than makes up for the traffic that 1 customer uses to access the guide and content downloads.. I don't think they're nearly as doomed as you would like to make them out to be.

    43. Re:That's fine for us ... by thuh+Freak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      obviously you backup a 500GB drive directly onto millions and millions of 5.25" disks. duh?

      a second fucking hard drive, retard.

      --
      I wish that I was a catfish.
    44. Re:That's fine for us ... by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Oh, thats a good reason. Your drive fails and you blame the filesystem. Smart you are. NOT.

      Get a RAID. Mirror it or RAID5 it. I run a studio, and we have a server I build using 4 250 gig drives, RAID 5ed, running on a P4, using an Adaptec 2400. Old school RAID. Works great. Already had a drive fail, and it took about 20 hours to rebuild the array, but everything worked.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    45. Re:That's fine for us ... by molarmass192 · · Score: 3, Informative

      TIvo uses a custom filesystem for video, it's been "figured out", by Tridge if I remember correctly, but it's certainly their own creation. The actual Tivo linux OS piece is on ext2 or hpfs, can't remember which exactly.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    46. Re:That's fine for us ... by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      If you had bought that lifetime subscription you would have had the tivo "service" all that time.
      A nice guide to what's on.
      The ability to save things you liked on your equipment as long as you want.
      The ability to save something to VCR if you want.
      All of which you bought and paid for.

      Now however you would also have the following:
      1. Ads on your guide taking up part of what you paid for when there were none when you paid.
      2. Spyware on the box reporting back everything you watch. It is debateable whether they did that two years ago.
      3. Items you recorded being erased under someone else's control, on your own equipment which you own.
      4. The ability to copy something off the Tivo to a VCR or DVD taken away under someone else's control.

      It looks to me that if you HAD paid for that subscription you would now be getting less than you paid for. And less than what you used to have.

      Since you own it your only option is to pull the plug on it, sue them for their "takings" and demand they stop, or suck it up.
      Doesn't sound all that fair to me.

      --
      .
    47. Re:That's fine for us ... by mikey1134 · · Score: 1

      Tivo actually uses a filesystem similar to one of Apple's older filesystems. There was a story a while back describing the innards of the Tivo, but I'm too lazy to find the link right now...

      --
      <gir voice> I love this sig... </gir voice>
    48. Re:That's fine for us ... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I love the tivo apologists

      Who's apologizing? My wife is glad when it pops up with a episode of something from BBC she's been trying to catch at odd hours, and I find their guide info to be much more comprehensive (and accurate) than anything I can get from the local cable provider or newspaper web site. It's a service. It costs the same as two pints of Guiness.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    49. Re:That's fine for us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spending absurd amounts of money modding the hell out of my MythTV box.
      Do you plan on posting some pictures/mod notes?

    50. Re:That's fine for us ... by milkman_matt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they also spy on you aswell. When your tivo makes its daily call, its sends your remote control click log back to tivo. So they actually know you rewind on every racy scene. They say its anonymous, but on the same call it sends your credentials back so it can get the guide the data.

      Do you have a source for this remote control click log? Also just because it's doing these two things at once, doesn't mean they don't store the data anonymously..

    51. Re:That's fine for us ... by John+Newman · · Score: 1
      I'll take that over Tivo any day of the week for $2000, Alex! And now I don't have to worry about some product manufacturer farking around with my rights after I've bought a lifetime subscription to their service.
      That's great. I'm a big Gentoo fan, too, and I thought long and hard about modding my PC to be a MythTV box.

      Before I bought my TiVo. Because I realized that the immediate hardware cost would be more than the lifetime cost of TiVo. The basic boxes are $50 now, and the rest of your $2000 investment would buy 6 lifetime subscriptions. Or, if you're a pay-as-you-go kind of guy, 12.5 years of monthly bills. Not even counting the value of my time saved during the product lifespan (TiVo really is idiot-proof, but in an efficient, Apple-like way).

      So more power to you for building a kick-ass MythTV box that can do anything but cook and clean - when I can eventually afford to, I'll probably do the same - but TiVo is going to remain insansely popular for doing what it does easily, well, and cheaply.
    52. Re:That's fine for us ... by milkman_matt · · Score: 2, Informative

      The lifetime subscription is still available. The only problem is that the subscription is tied to the box, not the owner. that's why I stick with monthly subscriptions.

      PROBLEM is that the subscription is tied to the box? I see that as a MAJOR benefit. Say you don't want your TiVo anymore, ups the resell that's for damned sure. I'd sooner buy a TiVo off of eBay with a lifetime subscription for $300 than a new one for $99 with a monthly subscription. Of course it takes a couple years to make up the difference, but I see it as completely worth it..

      I think in writing this I see your point.. You can't transfer your lifetime subscription to a new TiVo if you decide to upgrade.. but then, you can still pawn off your old TiVo (which you'd need a subscription for 2 TiVos if you kept it anyway) for enough to cover the lifetime subscription for your new box.. I don't see it as a downside, major upside for purchasing a used TiVo, or selling one, but not really a good or bad thing for if you want to upgrade..

    53. Re:That's fine for us ... by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      Heh. You are a Tivo apologist!
      Guy, Tivo crossed the line when they put ads on the guide. I don't have Tivo so I have never seen their ads. But if they want to send me ads and want me to pay as well, forget it.
      If I watch commercial supported TV I expect ads.
      If I am paying, like a PPV movie or for HBO, I don't expect ads. At least not ads for maxi-pads.
      As far as Tivo making money off their monthly fees, they never have. Not yet.
      And Tivo boxes are not usually $99. They are $99 with a commitment to subscribe, or they will bill you for it. Check it out.

      --
      .
    54. Re:That's fine for us ... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I really don't see this as really -crippling-.. So far it looks like TiVo is flagging things to limit the time you can save them, and cut the ability to transfer them to a PC.. well.. first off, how long do you need to save stuff on there? (granted this varies greatly from person to person, I had a couple things on my TiVo for months at one point, but I didn't NEED them.) And you can't transfer them to a PC? ...well... I don't see anything stopping you from transferring the content to VHS or DVD? I don't think they'll ever be able to stop that...

      What's with the NEED crap? Seriously, it's an entertainment medium that I'm paying for. It's not research. For one, nobody NEEDED to watch the show in the first place, but that isn't the point. The hardware is mine. If I choose to record a show to MY Tivo, then the hell with how long I NEED it: I should be able to keep it there for as long as I WANT it. I'm sorry but it doesn't make sense for a corporation to be not only sitting around figuring out what I need and don't need, but also forcing those "needs" into reality.

      And I can tell you right now that I usually don't WANT to transfer anything to a VHS or DVD. Hell if it was on VHS that I wanted it I would have programmed the damn VCR to record it and not worried about the Tivo in the first place. In today's modern age if I want to archive a show I'm storing it on my home theather PC. With 500GB of storage space it can keep track of most of the movies and shows I want to watch and I never need to swap (or keep track of) media.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    55. Re:That's fine for us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiousity... what card did you end up using for HDTV capture?

      Thanks,
      AC

    56. Re:That's fine for us ... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Everyone once in a while, Tivo offers new products and the option to upgrade your old subscription service. I've only seen them do it once, but I've heard of others.

      That, and I understand there's software out there to tweak what serial number your box thinks it is.

    57. Re:That's fine for us ... by maxpublic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I noticed you conveniently failed to address his point about the device you bought and paid for spying on you. But I suppose that isn't a problem for you because only criminals have something to hide, eh?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    58. Re:That's fine for us ... by MrRogers2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, nice. Thanks for everything Mom and Dad, but you aren't worth my free time.

      If my parents were local I would certainly help, but having spent *hours* on the phone with my tech-challenged dad I encouraged him to get a built PC with a service plan when it was time to upgrade. I love my dad to death, but those tech calls were torture.

      --
      MrRogers(2)
    59. Re:That's fine for us ... by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Y'know, all very valid points. I guess I was thinking of it more from my own experience as a very casual TV watcher. The only thing I ever stored lonoger than a week was some HBO Originals, and most other shows were highly syndicated and overwritten on a daily basis because I told it not to store more than 5 of a show (and they were on like 10 times a day, simpsons, cheers, stuff like that)... So yeah, for the casual user This isn't THAT much of a big deal, but yes, for your purposes such as moving things to a home theaterPC and such, I can see it as becoming a hassle.

    60. Re:That's fine for us ... by scsscs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What spying? One of the main selling points of Tivo is its recommendations. To generate those recommendations Tivo must know what you watch. This is not done in secret, it's a feature of the service. If this is not something you want, then don't buy a Tivo.

    61. Re:That's fine for us ... by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Funny
      It costs the same as two pints of Guiness.

      Hey, that's a good reason not to get TiVo... ;)

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    62. Re:That's fine for us ... by Clod9 · · Score: 1
      There's no reason it has to send the click log back to HQ in order to rate shows according to your preferences. I'm not sure how they actually do it, but they COULD process the program guide data on the box itself, fitting it to a model that's kept on the local box. The simple fact is, though, that the usage data is useful to them, so they collect it. Even if they do use it on the backend for analysing preferences, it's a sure bet they use it for many other things besides.

      If I don't want my usage data collected, I should have the option to turn it off. And the precise data they collect, and how it's used, should be spelled out in the service contract. (I don't have a TiVo, maybe it is.)

    63. Re:That's fine for us ... by null+etc. · · Score: 1
      a second fucking hard drive, retard.

      Heheh, thanks for calling me retard. It reminds me of when your mom was into those spanking games.

      No, but think about this, retard:

      If you have nearly 500GB in data, how many backups can you make?

      Why would you spend upwards of $200 just to be able to make one backup?

      If you RAID the 500GB drives, how do you perform incremental backups?

      How can you make offsite backups easily by using a second hard drive? What, use USB or Firewire and wait 5 hours for all the files to transfer?

      What happens if both drives are fried during the same incident, like if a UPS goes faulty and cooks your system?

    64. Re:That's fine for us ... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      And the precise data they collect, and how it's used, should be spelled out in the service contract. (I don't have a TiVo, maybe it is.)

      Actually, TiVo is extremely specific about the anonymous user info they collect, and go to a lot of trouble to soothe privacy worries. You can even have them stop collecting your anonymous user data if you want. They tell you how.

      But since I find that what they do collect is benign (enough), I'm happy to let them slurp it up... because what I get in exchange is a very "smart" display of what's on, and what I might like. That being said, TiVo does pull some strange stuff out of thin air sometimes (for a week there, I was getting a lot of Spanish language stuff pre-recorded - but signaling my dislike for that on a couple of listings before deleting them, it stopped recommending that and went on to more Scifi re-runs it thinks I missed during the regular season - and it's usually right).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    65. Re:That's fine for us ... by scsscs · · Score: 2, Informative

      What TiVo collects, and what they do with it, are all spelled out in their TiVo Privacy Policy. TiVo does allow you to opt out of these collections if you want, by calling them and requesting it.

    66. Re:That's fine for us ... by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I noticed you conveniently failed to address his point about the device you bought and paid for spying on you. But I suppose that isn't a problem for you because only criminals have something to hide, eh?

      I didn't address it because it didn't seem necessary (as in, that part seems like a flagrant troll). TiVo is very clear about what they collect, how they collect it, and how to turn that behavior off it you want them to.

      I don't consider it spying because I'm telling them to do it! In fact, I'm paying them to do it. I like what they do with the information they collect, and if I didn't I could still use their scheduling and guide service without them collecting any data at all. They have no problem with that - though they point out that some of what they can do for you becomes less useful if your unit doesn't get to leverage their database as well.

      Of course, no, I don't have anything to hide anyway. But if I didn't want them to know that our household seems to watch an insufferable and odd mix of geeky tech stuff, geeky scifi stuff, and geeky outdoorsy stuff (yes, there is such a thing), I could prevent them from knowing that. Yes, if they decided to actually lie about what they're doing, they might still find out what I'm watching. But... so what? It's not like I can use TiVo to stalk Jodi Foster or post death threats on Jihaddi web sites. Yes, it might be embarassing to some to be caught only getting all of their news from Oprah, or from O'Reilly, or from Howard Stern - but, what - that's going to be shocking to someone? If you're using TiVo to control your cable box and record racier stuff off of HBO, well - happily the Taliban won't come and cut out your eyes (though someone from PBS may send you a scolding letter, or something).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    67. Re:That's fine for us ... by scsscs · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. =)

    68. Re:That's fine for us ... by scsscs · · Score: 1

      Tivo must send your credentials when getting guide data so they can check if your account is in good standing. They say the data they collect is stored anonymously. If, for some reason, you do not trust them, then you can choose not to use their service.

    69. Re:That's fine for us ... by tekboy25 · · Score: 1
      I bought a TV tuner card from ATI about 5 years ago. It came with a free listings service which I use to this day. Basically a DVR service that's not subscription based.

      I had to schedule my own delete script to find the oldest non-read-only mpg file on the drive whenever the free space falls below a threshold.

      All's well except it runs on Windoze, so the TV server has to be rebooted from time to time.

    70. Re:That's fine for us ... by Quixotic137 · · Score: 1

      Or, call their 800 number and opt out of the data collection.

    71. Re:That's fine for us ... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The basic boxes are $50 now, and the rest of your $2000 investment would buy 6 lifetime subscriptions. Or, if you're a pay-as-you-go kind of guy, 12.5 years of monthly bills.

      Wrong. The previous poster specifically stated he could record two HD channels simultaneously. The HD version of TiVo, last time I checked, was $800. And can it even record two channels at once? Of course the basic version is much cheaper, but it's not HD. The previous poster could have saved a lot of money on his box by not going HD: much cheaper capture cards, much smaller hard drives, etc. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison.

    72. Re:That's fine for us ... by willabr · · Score: 1

      I got ride of my television about eight years ago, don't miss it at all. I found it all to be a big bunch of s**t any way.

      I still now what's going on, I have a lot more things to do then watch TV, (on my schedule or their's, it don't matter)

      I think if every one just stopped watching, things would change quickly. The "model" is already a pain in the arse.

      Bah.. humbug, who needs it. Free your self and the rest will follow.

    73. Re:That's fine for us ... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      BTW- The examples cited in the article are mistakes. Nobody really intended to restrict access to a syndicated rerun, for crying out loud. The restrictions were only supposed to apply to OnDemand and Pay-Per-View content. Somewhere, sombody/something screwed up. The actual circumstances were unintended, but boy did it fire up a lot of TiVo owners!

      As well it should have. That it was unintended is no excuse at all. If GM cars have a feature to turn off your engine remotely, for use by law enforcement only, of course, and GM accidentally turns off peoples' engines in rush-hour traffic and they can't restart them until the next day, you think people would forgive them because it was an accident? Of course not. That "feature" should never have been installed in the first place. And it's the same with TiVo. There should be no mechanism to restrict recordings or delete recordings without the user's input and permission. Law enforcement concerns, content owner concerns, etc., are no excuse.

    74. Re:That's fine for us ... by KillShill · · Score: 1

      just like the console business. i have no problem with this kind of business model provided they rent and not sell the devices. once something is sold, the vendor loses all rights to the product in question unless a signed contract (a real one, not the hope-the-public-buys-our-nonsense-and-thinks
      -it-is-binding-and-legal-EULA).

      thank you.

      seeing comments like yours brings me a NEW HOPE that human kind has the ability to STRIKE BACK at such nonsense.

      and yes, we are RETURNing.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    75. Re:That's fine for us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you do when you accidentally delete a file you needed?

    76. Re:That's fine for us ... by smc13 · · Score: 1

      "That's what backups are for"

      You're kidding right. You need backups because reiser doesn't supply good recovery/diagnostics tools. Why would you use a file system that doesn't have good recovery tools? do you really want to waste the time to restore a backup when you could just run fsck?

    77. Re:That's fine for us ... by mayamaniacslash · · Score: 1

      here's a solution for folks who likes to unplug computers: get a small UPS/APC power backup unit and plug the PC into it, if power is loss, the computer just safely shutdown, and then safely bootup when power is restored.

    78. Re:That's fine for us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, This is an attempt by big media (RIAA, MPAA, cable systems, etc) to kill Tivo. They've sued ReplayTV to death, and I would not be suprised if MS product was killed thru the backdoor. So Tivo is the last of it's kind. They have little direct control over it. All that is left it MythTV and the like, which they will try to make go away via DMCA and the like.

    79. Re:That's fine for us ... by calzones · · Score: 1

      So... TiVo's true intent is now revealed. Now that we see that they are tracking remote clicks.

      They likely wanted to do this in order to serve custom-tailored advertising and be the company propelling the custom-tv movement we've heard predicted so much in the past.

      They want to be able to be the service that could offer this easily to advertisers and bypass part of what goes through the networks and the cable companies, like doubleclick for TV.

      And the coup-de-grace is that TiVo will be able to update the TiVo boxes so that you CAN'T skip TiVo commercials. This would mean advertisers would flock to TiVo at the expense of cable companies and networks. This move, unforeseen, would very quickly put TiVo into a dominant position in the TV industry before anyone else could really do anything about it, putting TiVo in control of TV in much the way Microsoft controlled the computer industry.

      Well, at least I imagine how they planned/pictured it would go.

      --
      Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    80. Re:That's fine for us ... by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      You need backups because reiser doesn't supply good recovery/diagnostics tools. Why would you use a file system that doesn't have good recovery tools?

      And how the fuck do you know that from his single anecdote? How do you know that the drive would have been recoverable if it was Ext2?

      Just because he thought he could read data off of it doesn't mean that data was anything that still even vaguely resembled his files. For all you know it was just the controller chip spewing random bits ad infinitum.

      Also, out of interest, how many times have you had HDDs die and then actually been able to recover stuff using ext2.fsck?

      How many times have you accidently deleted files and then recovered them with the ext2 undelete tool? Has that tool even been updated in the last 5 years? I bet it wouldn't even compile.

    81. Re:That's fine for us ... by MooUK · · Score: 1

      Nope, another 500GB drive, clearly... If you can afford one, and have enough data to fill it, you can probably afford a second too.

    82. Re:That's fine for us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a very narrow definition of force.

    83. Re:That's fine for us ... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Bottom line, your data is worth saving and backing up... or it's not. If it's not worth an extra $200 drive or two for A/B offsite backups, then stop bitching when a single 500GB fails and you lose everything. It wasn't worth saving, remember?

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    84. Re:That's fine for us ... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      What do you back up 500GB hard drives onto? 125 DVD-Rs for $150?

      Why bother backing up the MythTV box? Since everything on it other than the OS and MythTV software came off of television, I can say with 100% certainity that there is nothing important in those 500GB.

    85. Re:That's fine for us ... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Do you have a source for this remote control click log? Also just because it's doing these two things at once, doesn't mean they don't store the data anonymously.

      I thought it was common knowledge that TiVo tracks what is watched (and rewatched). But in case you didn't, here is atleast one piece of proof.

    86. Re:That's fine for us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure are better than us TV watchers. You have so much free time you post on /. Good for you kid.

    87. Re:That's fine for us ... by John+Newman · · Score: 1
      Wrong. The previous poster specifically stated he could record two HD channels simultaneously. The HD version of TiVo, last time I checked, was $800. And can it even record two channels at once? Of course the basic version is much cheaper, but it's not HD. The previous poster could have saved a lot of money on his box by not going HD: much cheaper capture cards, much smaller hard drives, etc. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison.
      Sure. Nor can the $50 TiVo burn DVDs, nor can it easily transfer DRM-free files to your computer, nor can it store more than 11 hours of best-quality non-HD video, nor can it play games and run Office in its spare cycles...

      But it does the fundamental job at low cost with no hassle. In fact, you can't build a MythTV box with even the most basic functionality for the same price. And TiVo is still indescribably easier to set up and use. So it depends on what you need, but clearly the market for TiVo is much, much, much larger than the market for kick-ass $2000 MythTV systems.
    88. Re:That's fine for us ... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      The latest screwup was somebody left the CD tray slightly open and then closed the front access door so the tray was stuck between open and closed. The kernel started logging millions of messages about not being able to access the CD drive. After a couple of days, it filled up the OS partition and MythTV stopped working.

      That's why you make individual partitions for things like /var and /usr so that logs don't fill the device up. A few months ago, I had that same problem on a web server; in summary, the database locked up due to the unavailability of space, and I ended up finding that the logs had become exponentially huge do to some error that's escaping me at the moment. Setting a limit to the logs as well as setting up a cron to purge old unneeded logs fixed that problem.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    89. Re:That's fine for us ... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're comparing apples to oranges. I can get the same functionality as TiVo by getting some 13" TVs at a yard sale, tuning them to different channels, and just watching them when the shows I want come on. Of course, this isn't anywhere near the same experience and usefulness as having a DVR, but then again, a $50 TiVo doesn't have anywhere near the usefulness and features of the $2000 MythTV system.

      Who cares if it has the "basic functionality"? People could buy dirt-cheap economy cars, or better yet 20-year-old used economy cars, and still get from point A to point B, but they usually don't. Expensive vehicles of all types sell quite well. No one wastes their time comparing $100 beaters to $50k Lexuses, so why are you comparing two things with vastly different featuresets and functionality?

    90. Re:That's fine for us ... by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      come on, this is a tech/geek board, we all want specs, devices and pics! This is the 3rd post asking for data, you either share with us or we'll assume you just popped a torrent'd windows media ed in your daddy's 5yo dell pee cee... ;-) Come on boy, speak up...

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    91. Re:That's fine for us ... by _pi-away · · Score: 1

      Oh, thats a good reason. Your drive fails and you blame the filesystem. Smart you are. NOT.

      Good at reading you are. NOT.

      He said the drive failed, but he could still read raw data off of it, and the Reiserfs recovery tools to extract the files didn't work properly.

      Get a RAID. Mirror it or RAID5 it.

      He told you right off the bat it was non-crucial data for home use. Maybe you're made of money, but why would most people want to spend the money on two (or more) drives to protect non-crucial data. Considering that you're comparing it to your business it seems like you just weren't even paying attention.

      Next time, read before you post.

      --

      "The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw."
    92. Re:That's fine for us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> But I guarantee that the moment TiVo becomes the "screw the customer, we represent the illogical corporate interests of content providers" company this article implies, all TiVo hacking gloves will come off and their will be a highly successful port of MythTV or FreeVo for the actual TiVo hardware. TiVo knows this.

      This is eactly what I want. I want TV my way, not some someone else's way, mine. Tivo will become anti-customer just to survive. They're in it for the money, not for the love. draw your own conclusions.

      I own a Tivo, I'd love to see some replacement software. It's getting tougher to justify the subscription fee considering what's actually delivered.

    93. Re:That's fine for us ... by MacJedi · · Score: 1
      My problem now? Spending absurd amounts of money modding the hell out of my MythTV box. I bought one of those dedicated Media PC cases, and am going crazy installing lighted pushbutton switches, rewiring my PSU to be like an XConnect, running neon lights all over the place, soundproofing the heck out of the machine. I've spent almost $2k on this box!...
      OMFG, it's true! Gentoo is for ricers!
      --
      2^5
    94. Re:That's fine for us ... by north.coaster · · Score: 1

      Good point. I had no considered the difference in resale values between TiVo boxes with and without lifetime subscriptions.

      I have a second TiVo box on order (hard to beat the $150 rebate) and when it arrives will consider buying lifetime subscriptions for both my boxes. Too bad they don't offer a multibox discount for lifetime subscriptions, like they do for monthly subscriptions.

    95. Re:That's fine for us ... by BoldAndBusted · · Score: 1

      Unless you work in the Television industry... or other major media... which might be several thousand potential MythTV users.

    96. Re:That's fine for us ... by Flower · · Score: 1
      Good for you. I'm glad that your sacrifice has enhanced your self-esteem and contributed to your journey towards self-actualization. Your contribution and opinion on the current state of successful network programming, while slightly off-topic due to the story being centered on an appliance to facilitate television viewing, is noted.

      However I will politely refrain from foregoing my current television habit having trained myself to avoid the s**t and viewing fare I find worthwhile (which most people would consider to be boring s**t but I digress.) I'm definitely not considering giving up television while on the treadmill during winter. But that's just me.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    97. Re:That's fine for us ... by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      Can you make the box accessible via SSH? It is much easier to log in and solve things than to fight with a clueless user over the phone. A boot CD with code that automatically opens a connection to your machine and hands you over the control can help even with filesystem-level stuff.


      Murphy's laws have no exceptions. So factor them into the design.

    98. Re:That's fine for us ... by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      Would you be able to tell us the name/model of the card, and the name of the listing service that you are using, a web address perhaps?
      I would be interested in looking into that.
      I looked at the ATI site and they have about 8 different TV tuner cards. I looked at the manual for an old ISA one and it didn't seem to mention any listing service. But it might be with the bundled software.

      --
      .
    99. Re:That's fine for us ... by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I found it. Gemstar's Guide+.
      The same as the TVGuide broadcast guide that is available on some dvd recorders. Still free, though you do have to log in.

      --
      .
    100. Re:That's fine for us ... by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      You know that you can call or write TiVo, and they will opt you out of this, right? They have notified me of this capability like three times, twice through my regular updates, on the TiVo itself, and once through a letter in the mail.

      They also electronically notify you when their ToS changes.. which is more than I can say about most other companies.

      Also, have you ever really looked at the log?

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    101. Re:That's fine for us ... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Can you make the box accessible via SSH?

      My MythTV box is accessible via SSH. Usually that's the best way to work on it, since it's pretty clumsy to do sysadmin tasks using a TV and a wireless keyboard on my lap. Sometimes though, like the drive tray problem and the BIOS settings issue, you just need to physically poke around the box.

      The main thing is that I just wouldn't have enough spare time to fix a bunch of similar problems on other peoples' machines, local or remote.

    102. Re:That's fine for us ... by ericdano · · Score: 1
      A failed drive is not worth the effort to try to get stuff off of. I had a drive fail on a computer that was nonimportant. I had a recovery program run a WEEK trying to get stuff of it. It did, mostly.

      Hard drives are cheap. What is more expensive, the time you spent fucking around trying to get something off a failed drive, or buying a backup drive. For me, the answer is simple.

      Go back to with your P133 server or whatever you do....

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    103. Re:That's fine for us ... by _pi-away · · Score: 1

      A failed drive is not worth the effort to try to get stuff off of. I had a drive fail on a computer that was nonimportant. I had a recovery program run a WEEK trying to get stuff of it. It did, mostly.

      Hard drives are cheap. What is more expensive, the time you spent fucking around trying to get something off a failed drive, or buying a backup drive. For me, the answer is simple.

      Go back to with your P133 server or whatever you do....


      "Go back to with" ?

      And you're responding to me because? I didn't have a hd fail, I didn't try to recover any data, I don't have a P133 server. I never said I had any of those things nor did I ever give an opinion on any of them. Is this an argument you're having with yourself? Seriously jackass, wtf are you talking about?

      Did everyone on slashdot fail reading comprehension?

      --

      "The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw."
    104. Re:That's fine for us ... by brazenmisfit · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you are but here 100 dvd-r's go for $30 and thats Canadian money too.

    105. Re:That's fine for us ... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      What do you back up 500GB hard drives onto?
       
      Another one, in an old P-233 at the other end of the house.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    106. Re:That's fine for us ... by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Of course, if it breaks out of warranty... /wave lifetime subscription?

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    107. Re:That's fine for us ... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      So what about people who don't have nerd relatives to come round and build computers for them? The fact that the MythTV needs building from scratch shows that it's not exactly a user-friendly solution. People don't put TVs or video recorders together themselves, so why a computer recorder? And not even many nerds will want people ringing up all the time complaining about things going wrong.

      Even nerds might have trouble setting up a MythTV box. Last I looked it ran on Linux, and decent TV cards that work with Linux are like gold dust. Who wants to spend hours trawling through amateur forums finding out whether anyone's found a card that works on Linux? Even if you do find one, you have to make sure it's the exact same version. I bet a lot of Linux users know the pleasure of spending £50 on model RXGEWEGV60.7 when they really needed RXGEUEGV60.7, the former only working on Windows XP, but the latter has some reverse-engineered, third-party driver available from a dodgy pirate website in Taiwan, but it only works at 2/3 speed and the picture's upside down.

      The thing about a Tivo is, you buy it, plug it in, and use it. And that's the end of it. MythTV is an adventure in itself.

    108. Re:That's fine for us ... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Raid arrays?
      Drive partitioning?
      SSH?
      Motherboard settings?
      Cron jobs?
      Drivers?

      And people say MythTV is a suitable alternative to Tivo? That's like saying kit-cars are a drop-in replacement for getting a taxi.

    109. Re:That's fine for us ... by instarx · · Score: 1

      Let me pay you for the box, and even double the cost out of spite that I won't weld myself to your ongoing revenue stream. The box should be programable like a plain old VCR (i.e., recordable on channel X at time Y for Z length of content), or it should pull data from the "Channel Channel", or both.

      The Tivo box is far from useless without Tivo's purchased programming data. You *can* set Tivo to record at x time for y length on z days (every day, avery weekday, every Tuesday, etc). Your statement just shows how little you actually know about this topic.

      Frankly I don't see what's wrong with a monthly fee. It is optional, it is light years better than the cable menu screen (2/3 advertizing and 1/3 actual programming data), it automatically finds and tracks shows, schedule changes, directors, actors, subjects and keywords (try that with your *free* cable guide channel).

      And as for your *pure and free* cable guide channel - you DO pay for it. In fact you pay twice for it: first in your cable fees and then again in the advertizing on it. You didn't really think the cable company gave you that guide for free just because they don't break the charge out in the bill? Hawwwwhawwww!

      If you are so consumer oriented why do you keep that system where you pay twice as a hidden cost? I much prefer an up-front service that I pay for, with its additional services and functionality rather than that absurd cable menu channel which is in reality just another cable company revenue stream.

    110. Re:That's fine for us ... by tekboy25 · · Score: 1
      Yes, it is bundled - a Windows front end for Gemstar's Guide+. It's somewhat integrated with the rest of the ATI sw, called Multimedia Center.

      It has a preview pane, can click-to-schedule for watching or recording, slices and dices program info like a data mart, etc. The app logs itself in to Gemstar, so the user doesn't have to do anything beyond opening it.

      I don't see the actual card on the ATI site anymore, but there seems to be plenty of similar (but newer) ones. Mine's an All-In-Wonder Radeon from about 4 or 5 years ago.

      The Multimedia Center includes DVD/CD/File players. The TV app schedules recording, file playing, watching.

      So cool: It can scan all available channels and show them all on-screen in a mosaic of postage-stamp sized captured frames updating continuously. (patented by ATI, I think). Click on one once and it comes to life in place, playing that channel live with sound. Double-click and it switches to full-screen.

      It seems to honour copy-protection, like macrovision or something. I tried to capture a VHS tape to MPG with it and it didn't work. So I actually got 2 and daisy-chained them. The first one can watch the tape and regenerate a clean composite video signal. The second one can record it.

    111. Re:That's fine for us ... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      That's like saying kit-cars are a drop-in replacement for getting a taxi.

      That's true. And I put up with the hassle of using MythTV for the exact same reason that I don't use taxis for daily transportation.

    112. Re:That's fine for us ... by DavesWorld334 · · Score: 1

      Because I don't need or want the "additional services". Clearly, that you assume I need them shows how little you know about this subject.

    113. Re:That's fine for us ... by null+etc. · · Score: 1
      come on, this is a tech/geek board, we all want specs, devices and pics!

      Uh, yeah... just because I can mod a media PC doesn't mean I have a server capable of withstanding the /. effect ;)

      Seriously, I'll post some pics when I get my web host configured.

    114. Re:That's fine for us ... by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      blogger.com is your friend... :-)

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
  14. Relevant question by ifwm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there someplace I can buy a MythTv box, so I don't have to muddle through it myself? I don't mind learning, but I'd rather have a working box while I do so.

    1. Re:Relevant question by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard of one, and without a lot of work put into refinement, I wouldn't want to be in that business.

      These instructions are pretty decent though:
      http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/fcmyth.php

      It would still take several hours. The problem I'm currently having is the system suddenly can't operate my tuner, particularly, channel control.

      The problem I had before was that a program to test the tuner before going to the final Myth setup, xawtv, was hard to find, I did find packages for it though. Make sure you install Synaptic, that made finding the packages I wanted a lot easier.

    2. Re:Relevant question by jvbunte · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.magicitx.com/ has a prebuilt MythTV setup with a small form factor for about $700, with options for more memory, larger hard drive, and remote. It uses the universally accepted Hauppage PVR250 hardware encoder (I own a 350 and a 150 and they work with all freeware pvr software I've found). You will need an external infrared sender to work with digital cable or satellite receivers.

      (I am not affiliated with magicitx in any way, just found a link to them on ebay.)

      --
      I think we'd all enjoy a nice cold beverage. -David Letterman
    3. Re:Relevant question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try this out

      http://mythic.tv/product_info.php?products_id=44

      You can buy the box from them, or build it yourself (as I am doing).

    4. Re:Relevant question by javaxman · · Score: 1
      http://www.magicitx.com/ has a prebuilt MythTV setup with a small form factor for about $700, with options for more memory, larger hard drive, and remote. It uses the universally accepted Hauppage PVR250 hardware encoder (I own a 350 and a 150 and they work with all freeware pvr software I've found). You will need an external infrared sender to work with digital cable or satellite receivers.

      Holy crap, that seems expensive, especially when you consider the cost of a Tivo2 right now, even considering monthly fees... does it really have to be so expensive? Do Tivo and the companies that sell it's boxes lose money on every hardware sale?

    5. Re:Relevant question by jvbunte · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've spent alot of time researching different PVR solutions and I've implemented most of them. $700 for a prebuilt working MythTV setup seems pretty reasonable to me. I built my own PVR with a nice case, multiple tuners (the aforementioned 350/150), and a dvd-+rw for a little less than $700. While MythTV is the obvious choice for most linux users, it is not the easiest software to install if you are new to things like Framebuffer devices, MySQL, LiRC, etc. I think having this prebuilt specifically for the hardware ready to go out of the box has some inherent value.

      Remember, even with a prebuilt MythTV box, it is still a fully functional linux os. If you wanted to load up samba and share off the storage, you can. If you want to configure some MythTV front-end systems in different rooms, you can. If you want your MythTV box to run your DSL/CableModem, have a nice firewall, run a webserver, keep more SQL databases, YOU CAN. I doubt Tivo can offer you that kind of expandability or flexability.

      --
      I think we'd all enjoy a nice cold beverage. -David Letterman
    6. Re:Relevant question by Darby · · Score: 1

      Is there someplace I can buy a MythTv box, so I don't have to muddle through it myself?

      Put the parts together, forward ssh through your firewall to it, throw in a Gentoo live CD, give me the IP and pass, and I'll do it for $50.00

      I just sent my mom one for her birthday. She loves it :-)

    7. Re:Relevant question by toddlg · · Score: 1

      I JUST built my own Windows-based HTPC using the free (as in beer) software GBPVR (http://www.gbpvr.com/

      I am running it with XP Pro on an old P3/866, gig of ram, 1 10 gig HD for OS, 1 40 gig HD for recordings, a WinTV-PVR-150 (http://www.hauppauge.com/pages/products/data_pvr1 50.html), and a Geforce MX4000 for TV out.

      And when I say JUST built it, I started it last Tuesday. All I had to buy was the WinTV card as I had the other stuff lying around.

      I tried mythtv, knoppmyth, and Meedio (windows HTPC software), but got the most bang for my time with GBPVR. In two hours I was up and running and within three days or so had it tweaked how I wanted.

      I'm no noob to linux either (I run a few servers at work doing spam filtering/firewalling and have a web server at home for my wife's business, and run it on my laptop) but I did not want to put my wife/kids through TV "downtime" while I troubleshot linux stuff I'm not that familiar with.

      Todd

    8. Re:Relevant question by toddlg · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, it's working well too. I recorded OSU-Texas last Saturday (and then watched the whole game in like 45 min), and have a "season ticket" set up for Zoboomafoo and General Hospital... LOL

      My Geforce was overscanning on live TV, so I got the 53.03 drivers of their site which fixed that. (read about that on some htpc forum somewhere)

      I'm also using the Flat Blue High Vis. skin since my TV is only 25".

      The WinTV card I got at CompUSA for $80 (they had a rebate last week, but I think it's over now). It also came with a remote which GBPVR works great with.

      For performance sake, I dont' have timeshifting turned on by default (the box is a little underpowered in that sense), but if I hit the "Pause" button on the remote, GBPVR switches to timeshift mode and starts recording.

    9. Re:Relevant question by Darby · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, that seems expensive, especially when you consider the cost of a Tivo2 right now, even considering monthly fees... does it really have to be so expensive?

      I've built a few, and it really isn't cheaper to build one yourself. Given how Tivo has dropped in price, it's really more expensive.

      The major thing is just the fact that Tivo makes a lot of them. They have custom hardware which they get a substantial bulk discount on (or they need to fire whoever negotiates these deals).

      My typical specs are about 1.8GHz, with half a gig of RAM.
      Figure out what you could build a box like that for, then add about $170 for a PVR-350 card.
      Depending on your needs, price the amount of storage you want in it as well as (if desired) a DVD burner.

      You could do it cheaper, but I'm a fan of the PVR-350 since it has a hardware encoder and decoder.
      When I'm recording one show and watching another, the CPU is largely idle, so you could get away with a much slower machine if you have that card.
      Once you add in background jobs like commercial flagging and possible transcode jobs, then the extra horsepower is nice.

      So, I don't know if they lose money, but they have a much easier time making them for less money than it would take you to build one, or even for some of these companies selling Myth boxes to make many, but still far fewer than Tivo does.

    10. Re:Relevant question by sparkie · · Score: 1

      Does GBPVR support Automatic Recording of shows i.e. like TiVo's Season Pass (couldn't find anything on the website)

    11. Re:Relevant question by toddlg · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does. I just connected to the web interface of my home box (another nifty feature) and when you click a show (either at the TV or via web) you get the option to record that episode or all episodes/the season.

      I doubt, though, it will be able to adjust the time of recording for, say, Sunday night programs coming on after late-running football games. It seems to just remember a time slot. Tivo, I think, adjusts its schedule.

    12. Re:Relevant question by martin_b1sh0p · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not a pre-built MythTv, but a pretty similar pre-built device can also be found here http://www.interact-tv.com/

    13. Re:Relevant question by javaxman · · Score: 1
      If you wanted to load up samba and share off the storage, you can. If you want to configure some MythTV front-end systems in different rooms, you can. If you want your MythTV box to run your DSL/CableModem, have a nice firewall, run a webserver, keep more SQL databases, YOU CAN. I doubt Tivo can offer you that kind of expandability or flexability.

      All very, very, true ( although probably using your Tivo for some SQL databases isn't *too* tough ), and I'm not saying the cost is high for a Linux server with a nice video capture card. Depending on the specs of that $700 machine, I might say spend a little more for disk space, memory, etc, even.

      However, I *am* saying it's expensive compared to a TiVo, even when factoring in recurring costs... and most folks aren't going to use or think of using their DVR device for *any* of the things you've mentioned. It's quite likely that people who *are* interested in that stuff would enjoy putting together their own machine anyway... some day when I have a thousand bucks or so and TiVo's DRM implementations bug me, I probably will put together a media server and a couple of clients for each TV.

      More to the point, that $700 price point leaves MythTV wildly uncompetitive with Tivo for the vast majority of TV viewers, and probably even the vast majority of /. readers, sad as that may be.

    14. Re:Relevant question by randyest · · Score: 1

      Try this See this post for more info.

      --
      everything in moderation
    15. Re:Relevant question by glamslam · · Score: 1

      If you don't mind spending a few hours figuring a few small things out, KnoppMyth makes installing Myth a snap! Seriously... it detected all of my hardware and set everything up perfectly in a matter of minutes. I had to spend some time tweaking things to my liking, but if you are into computers at all, it really isn't that hard. Try it!

      For the record, I don't even know how to recompile the kernel (never needed to).... A bit of Linux knowledge would help, but there are friendly people in the forums to help you...

    16. Re:Relevant question by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and if you don't know how to build a car, just put the parts together, paint it, put some petrol in, turn it on, and I'll do it for $50...

      Some people on this site are unbelievable.

    17. Re:Relevant question by NetGuy411 · · Score: 1

      jv...I this is slightly off topic. I built a Windows media PC with a PVR350 card. I found the TV recording to be soft and fuzzy compared to the clarity of my TIVO. My source is Satellite so it is pretty clean. Any suggestions about how to make the recodings clearer?

  15. Re:short term measure by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    Or you could send Tivo (and their new puppeters) a message and go open source. Everytime you use cracked corporate software, you're hurting open source developers.

  16. Different Account of it over on PVRBlog by beeudoublez · · Score: 5, Informative

    Read: http://www.pvrblog.com/pvr/2005/09/tivo_72_os_adds .html
    Quoted from one of the posters: This is a BUG!
    http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.ph p?p=3233152&&#post3233152
    http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.ph p?p=3236586&&#post3236586
    TiVo recognizes the Macrovision flag but there have been NO cases of a network or studio actually utilizing it.
    Even HBO whose websites says OnDemand stuff can't be DVR'ed... well, I could TiVo my OnDemand stuff just fine. I did all the time. That was before 7.2 and I don't have HBO any longer but it did work.
    Again - this is a BUG. Neither the local station or FOX intended for this syndicated rerun to be flagged like this.
    Are bug bad? Sure. But it's not worth getting all up in arms at TiVo about.

    1. Re:Different Account of it over on PVRBlog by diamondsw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nice taking that one post on a blog out of the context of the rest of the posts. The problem is not that something triggered it, the problem is that it exists to be triggered in the first place. Most people don't like purchasing a box/service to allow them to "take back control" of their TV viewing, only to had said control taken away again.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    2. Re:Different Account of it over on PVRBlog by beeudoublez · · Score: 1

      People already knew of this feature, the problem in this instance is that a lot of people are mis-reporting an actual case of it being employed. Yeah, 90% of the posts were the same 'sky is falling' posts as here on Slashdot, so I felt it necessary to post something applicable. It was used to bolster the evidence that it was a bug, not an intentional use by the broadcasting companies

    3. Re:Different Account of it over on PVRBlog by Surt · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but it is worth getting up in arms with TiVo about, because what's to stop a broadcaster from slapping that flag deliberately on anything they want to, even if they aren't doing it yet? This bug proves the possibility.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  17. And still nobody will care by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People will continue to plunk down cash for these products and services, because most people don't care about DRM. Even this won't really affect them, why do you think you can buy the Superbowl on DVD, or the World Series on DVD? People shell out $$ for seasons and seasons of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, etc. So they DRM the shows on your Tivo after a month.. by then people have either wiped it, or bought the damn thing on DVD.

    Then there is the minority, who are not media consumers, who remain unaffected by this.

    Before the tinfoil hatters come out, and blame the ??AA or the Government, think: when was the last time you watched one of those old Star Trek episodes you taped 15 years ago "in case you ever wanted to watch them again"?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:And still nobody will care by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you where they are.. theyre divxed on my computer, and i watch them daily (well, not star trek, mst3k actually), and not everything makes it to the magical medium of dvd, and some shows that do make it are improperly mastered.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:And still nobody will care by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Before the tinfoil hatters come out, and blame the ??AA or the Government, think: when was the last time you watched one of those old Star Trek episodes you taped 15 years ago "in case you ever wanted to watch them again"?

      You've obviously never met my aunt.

      --
      Why not fork?
    3. Re:And still nobody will care by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      Before the tinfoil hatters come out, and blame the ??AA or the Government, think: when was the last time you watched one of those old Star Trek episodes you taped 15 years ago "in case you ever wanted to watch them again"?


      A couple weeks ago, as a matter of fact. And I would have been pissed if that had been DRMd!
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:And still nobody will care by blueZhift · · Score: 1

      Before the tinfoil hatters come out, and blame the ??AA or the Government, think: when was the last time you watched one of those old Star Trek episodes you taped 15 years ago "in case you ever wanted to watch them again"?

      Absolutely. I finally decided to reclaim all of the space those old tapes were taking up and started buying DVD boxed sets. As long as TiVo remains easy to use for most people and doesn't become too expensive, most people won't care about DRM. The question is, will the content owners get so greedy that they impose more and more restrictive DRM? That's the deal breaker, and right now I'm not convinced that the media giants are smart enough to realize this. They still seem intent on forcing people to pay everytime you watch a show or play a song. That's the kind of thinking that will make pirates of us all.

    5. Re:And still nobody will care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't assume everyone who uses Tivo is uneducated. I care a great deal about DRM. I don't use any online music service unless I can defeat its DRM. That's a hard enough fight in itself. I never would have used Tivo's To-Go feature on my PC had Tivo's protection not been defeated, either. I know the second the flag shows up on my (embarassingly enough) YuGiOh or my GF's Law & Order or Days of Our Lives episodes, it's curtains for Tivo.

    6. Re:And still nobody will care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before the tinfoil hatters come out, and blame the ??AA or the Government, think: when was the last time you watched one of those old Star Trek episodes you taped 15 years ago "in case you ever wanted to watch them again"?


      Wrong question. The right question is: how mad would you be when that one special show was gone because of DRM?

      People won't notice or much care if all kinds of crap disappears. They'll care when one of the few things they really love is gone.

    7. Re:And still nobody will care by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yesterday evening I watched the first "Q" episode, and on Monday I watched "Bread and Circuses".

      Last week I watched my tape of Quantum Leap (the first episode where Sam leaps into the Jet Fighter tester).

      Haven't watched broadcast television for about three years ever since I got tired of Fox overrunning it with sports.

      I watch the 8 discovery channels mostly and record the stargates/BSG on fridays. You know - so I can watch them during the week without commercial intruding?

      And to be fair - I have bought all the stargate series on DVD -

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    8. Re:And still nobody will care by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      My wife uses it all the time. (ReplayTV) She watches SG-1, but will do it in 4 or 5 our batches when she has the time. By son has been watching the same episodes of Blues Clues for 6 months.

      Quite frankly I'm supprised at the number of people that sound like battered housewifes. "Yes, he hits me, but it's only because he loves me. And he promised he wouldn't do it again."

    9. Re:And still nobody will care by KillShill · · Score: 1

      people continue to plunk down cash because most of them are not informed of the situation.

      they don't have a clue as to what this whole "digital restriction" (and analog with macrovision etc) thing is really about. they just see it as some kind of lock but they lack the context in which to make sense of it.

      they don't understand why that top of the line dvd player won't send a digital signal over to their new fangled HDTV but the video is downsampled (crippled) to 480p. they don't understand why they can't record their favorite shows anymore due to the broadcast flag. they don't understand that there is an entire industry whose sole purpose is to prevent people using their bought and paid for products after the sale has been made.

      they lack the insight to view the issue in a big picture sort of way. they don't understand why the RIAA and MPAA exist to shield the studios and reroute customer anger. they also have never seen any program on TV that raises the question the DRM is not for the benefit of the customers. they have never read an article in a magazine or newspaper as to why manufacturers have the right to control their products after the sale.

      so the goal becomes clear: education.

      you and i, as informed geeks have the duty and obligation to make the uninformed public aware of the issues.

      democracy only works with a well informed and clueful citizenry.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    10. Re:And still nobody will care by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      "you and i, as informed geeks have the duty and obligation..."
      Who are you, Plato? I don't have a duty or obligation to do anything to the uninformed public.

      "they lack the context in which to make sense of it"
      Again, this is MY problem?

      If you can create a cogent argument that makes these failures MY problem, remembering that I'm not a media consumer, other than renting movies via NetFlix, which is essentially baked-in DRM, please do so.
      But don't appeal to my "duty" or someone else's failure as something which compels ME to act. You lack of grammar, command of English, and high Slashdot number indicate that you are an American student, and so, can partially be forgiven for naivete.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    11. Re:And still nobody will care by Dot_Killer · · Score: 1

      If I had an easy way to watch that 15 yr old Star Trek episode I would watch it. The digital VCR has given people a new ability they didn't have 5 years ago. People are now changing there viewing habits because of it. It they just remove all the features everyone bought it for what does it become.

      --
      Euphemism, what is that a euphemism for something.
  18. I, for one, welcome our new DRM masters by spif · · Score: 1

    This will either not get used much and be easily ignored, or it will cause a wave of dissent and defection among Tivo viewers which will lead to it getting yanked. It either forces the issue or it's irrelevant. Either one is fine with me. Let's rumble.

    --
    fnord.
  19. Re:Driving Stockprices into the floor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    5 day stock price

    oops a >3% drop in 5 days, nice move Tivo, time to short their stock methinks

  20. Goodbye TIVO by mc900ftjesus · · Score: 0

    Why do companies think that imposing their will upon people will keep customers around? If I had a TIVO I would cancel my subscription, run over it with my car and then mail it back.

    Can anyone explain what this is helping? Who on this earth makes more money with this feature?

  21. And if you don't kneejerk... by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... you'll see that this was a bug found by someone using their TiVo over antennae, not cable, which could have distorted the signal.

    The whole macrovision flag is for PPV shows, not regular shows.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      It's not just a bug - it's an exploit. TV stations and other content distributors can start exploiting this bug to force deletions on people's Tivo boxes (unless Tivo patches their product to prevent false positives).

    2. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would stations want to delete shows? The amount of money they make doesn't have anything to do with how long King of the Hill lives on somebody's PVR.

    3. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      It does if they get a kickback from Fox.

    4. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by tji · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just because it's triggered in error doesn't mean it's not a cause for concern.. This is just exposing capabilities they built into the product before they were ready to force it on their customers.

      I don't want to invest $1,000 in a HD-Tivo, only to later find out that programs I record are forced to expire beyond my control. Not to mention the commercials it records automatically, popups on the screen offering more advertising, etc..

      What's next? Disable 30 second skip (yes, they are getting pressure to do this)?

      No thanks, my MythTV box works great, and will never be forced to obey a company's decision before mine.

    5. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      Someone needs their foil hat adjusted...

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    6. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by sysadmn · · Score: 1

      This incident was apparently a bug. However, the capability is definitely in the software. Once you've taken the update, you have only TiVo's word that is won't be used on anything but PPV and the like.

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    7. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by eaolson · · Score: 1
      Why would stations want to delete shows? The amount of money they make doesn't have anything to do with how long King of the Hill lives on somebody's PVR.

      Stations probably don't care, but the network probably does. If, say, I had the entire series run of Firefly on my Tivo, I would have been less likely to buy the DVD set. (I don't have a Tivo, but it's just an example.)

      I'm surprised more networks aren't doing this. If they can limit you to only being able to keep stuff for a limited time, say a few weeks, they can drive you into renting or buying the DVD to catch up on that critical episode of Lost (or whatever) that you missed.

    8. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by Surt · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the bug proves that it's possible for the flag to be interpreted on regular TV shows, which means that it is now possible for the TV show producers to go ahead and add that flag to any content they want. How long do you really think it will be before this is used by some broadcaster to prevent time shifting by more than a year, a month, a week, a day, an hour ...

      The flag may be for PPV shows, but this proves that it can be applied to regular shows as well.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    9. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The amount of money they make doesn't have anything to do with how long King of the Hill lives on somebody's PVR.

      Let's say you want to see a re-run.

      If it's recorded, net revenue to the station (ie: Eyeballs glued to TV * money from advertisers) = 1 viewing (the first and only time).

      If you wait for it to be shown again, they can double their numbers.

      Which do you think is better for the station?

    10. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Bad example, because they never aired the entire season of Firefly, and you would have been forced to purchase the DVD set anyway (up until this rebroadcasting in anticipation of the release of Serenity).

    11. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by Bleck · · Score: 1

      Certainly a reasonable point. However, in the 4.5 years I've had Tivo/Tivo service, there have been a number of these things that seem to start a "slippery slope," and get people all worked up. So far, none of them have come to pass.

      At one point, for example, there was an uproar over the "yellow star" advertisements that would show up on the main Tivo page. Once they were shown to exist, people started saying that soon they'd be everywhere -- you'd have to view an ad before watching a show, or an ad would come up every time you switched, etc. None of that ever happened, and I've happily ignored the ads on the main menu ever since.

      So ... yes, if Tivo *does* start using these to restict viewing more and more, I'll start shouting. For now, though, I'm happy to take it as a bug, and I'll wait until it erases my two-year-old Southpark episode before I really curse :)

    12. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by Surt · · Score: 1

      I think the key point here is that this was out of TiVos control, and in the hands of the broadcasters. I'm willing to give TiVo a little bit of trust, but do you trust the broadcasters?

      Oh, it's you tom. No wonder this seemed like such a reasonable response.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    13. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by eaolson · · Score: 1

      Come on, it was just an example. I just picked Firefly because it's the last (and only) DVD set I've bought. Replace it with Lost or Desperate Housewives or whatever show you want and it's still a valid example.

      If they can stop you from recording something, or stop you from keeping what you've recorded, then they can push you into spending money on the DVDs that you wouldn't otherwise have spent.

    14. Re:And if you don't kneejerk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure why you bring up that he was using an antenna. I've had the same happen to me with a PBS show and I have a clean cable connection. Maybe mine wasn't a mistake.

  22. er.. RTFA? by GoNINzo · · Score: 1, Redundant
    If the poster read the fuming article, they would have noticed that this was a bug, not on purpose. One of the local fox stations accidently got flagged as 'Content protection', maybe because the guy is using an antennae...

    How can we expect readers of slashdot to RTFA if we can't get anyone writing the summary to do so. heh

    Anyway, the old software, 3.x, does not support the broadcast flag, I'll continue to use it until I'm forced to switch to MythTV or GBPVR cause of all the advertising. (Which Tivo is letting run rampant, IMHO.)

    --
    Gonzo Granzeau
    "Nothing the god of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for.." -Roy Batty
    1. Re:er.. RTFA? by infochuck · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant. Something like this will happen someday. Just a matter of times. Closed systems + DRM = access yanked out from under you at any time.

    2. Re:er.. RTFA? by hkb · · Score: 1

      If YOU had rtfa, you'd know that people aren't pissed about King of the Hill accidently being DRM'd, they're pissed that the ability to DRM was added in the 7.2 software release.

      And yet, you still get moderated up.

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    3. Re:er.. RTFA? by north.coaster · · Score: 1

      I have a Tivo running 7.2 software, and I have not seen any advertising. Where is it showing up?

    4. Re:er.. RTFA? by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      If the poster read the fuming article, they would have noticed that this was a bug, not on purpose

      I would consider the fact that this can happen completely on accident via signal noise to be even WORSE than some bastard executive deciding they want to DRM a show.

      At least when when it's a conscious decision to flag the content, I can keep up with the community and know when it's about to happen...and prepare for it. When it happens at complete random, all I can do is pray that it doesn't accidentally happen when I'm on vacation for a week.

    5. Re:er.. RTFA? by Surt · · Score: 1

      However, the bug unfortunately proves that the content protection flag can be added to non-ppv content, which means that broadcasters can start adding it to anything they'd like. Maybe from now on you'll find more and more of your shows can't be time shifted by more than a day.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  23. Incase of slashdotting break glass by coolnicks · · Score: 1

    http://data.coolnicks.co.uk/IMG_2674.jpg
    Here's the now playing list. (yes yes, I know, Oprah and Dharma, what can I say, it's a shared TiVo.)

    http://data.coolnicks.co.uk/IMG_2675.jpg
    Here's the program info.

    http://data.coolnicks.co.uk/IMG_2676.jpg
    Here's the keep until screen.

    http://data.coolnicks.co.uk/IMG_2677.jpg
    Here's the show details screen.

    1. Re:Incase of slashdotting break glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would hope in the future you would have a little bit more respect for those of us in the Gay community who do not appreciate the slurs and insults made upon us when you wish to denegrate something completely unrelated.

  24. And in other other news by Fastball · · Score: 5, Funny

    Viewership of cable and over-the-air television dropped dramatically when people realized there wasn't anything worth recording on to begin with.

    1. Re:And in other other news by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I live in a shared house with two other people. Last month we cancelled our cable TV service after we realised that none of us actually watched much TV anymore. The last thing I watched on television was Doctor Who - broadcast on free-to-air, and the new season will also be streamed over the web live.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:And in other other news by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I only have cable for one purpose. Battlestar Galactica and Discovery Channel/TLC/NGC/History Channel.

      However the massive slaughterfest of programming on DSC/TLC that is Orange County Chopper, Monster Garage and Trading Spaces has just left me watching History and Sci-Fi.

      I get my Family Guy fix on Fox, and maybe some TBS for Law and Order reruns.

  25. This must be shooting self at the foot by nomad63 · · Score: 1

    Tivo, until now, was a nice and consumer friendly service despite the small tricks they pulled out of their sleeves like "must watch commercials" or product placements on recordings etc. but I took it as survival tactics in the marketplace. And they were livable with.

    But when they started sucking up to hollywood, whiich ithe main reason why people bought tivo or PVRs, they crossed a boundary and started to become annoying.

    I think it is time to tell customer to tell tivo, screw you and send it to the list of failed companies with great ideas, who just could not execute the idea well.

    --

    __________
    The more I know people, the more I love animals
    1. Re:This must be shooting self at the foot by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      Tivo, until now, was a nice and consumer friendly service despite the small tricks they pulled out of their sleeves like "must watch commercials"

      You call that consumer friendly? That was the first hole in the dike of very unfriendly -- to the consuer, that is.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    2. Re:This must be shooting self at the foot by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      And they were livable with.

      Anything is livable with if you put up with it long enough. Apple's high prices for hardware. Tivo's forced commercials and removal of 30 second skip.

      Even this will become livable with if you accept it instead of fighting it now. Don't think this is the last change TiVo plans to make to your personally owned box.

      I think it is time to tell customer to tell tivo, screw you and send it to the list of failed companies with great ideas, who just could not execute the idea well.

      That time has long since arrived. You haven't acted before -- so why now? Has everyone's ox been gored together this time?

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    3. Re:This must be shooting self at the foot by dreamt · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'd love to see one of this 'must watch commercials' that supposedly exist. Ever see one (own a Tivo, even?) or are you just reposting the trash that ends up in other users comments. There has never been a commercial that you are 'forced' to watch. There are overlays that can appear over a commercial where you can -!!-!!BY REQUEST!!-!!- get more info on, but nothing ever to force you to watch a commercial.

  26. It's a bug. It's also a feature! Reconsiderations? by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 4, Insightful

    TIVO has attempted to suggest the flags are a bug. While TIVO admits to making the technology available and active, not a single content provider is using it. That said: I do think it's a bad idea.

    As a TIVO owner, I have to insist that TIVO needs to remove this technology because content flags that require a time frame within which to watch the show defeats the purpose of my purchasing a TIVO in the first place. I'm their customer because I could timeshift on my terms. NOT theirs. Not Fox's. Not NBC's.

    I also want the ability to transfer it to another medium. If I lose that, TIVO loses me as a customer and no amount of lifetime memberships and HDTV versions of TIVO at a discounted rate will prevent me from leaving.

    If TIVO does not remove this feature, I will reconsider remaining a TIVO Customer, and both TIVO and all the content providers lose a "captive" audience member.

    --
    "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
  27. ReplayTV Tivo by digitalvengeance · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use ReplayTV and have never had any problems with content protection. There is even a great open source tool called DVArchive (at sourceforge) that lets one copy shows to/from the ReplayTV units and even stream content directly from the ReplayTV to any machine that supports HTTP streaming.

    I highly recommend both of these products for the geek who wants a great DVR and the freedom to DivX content at will.

    --
    How many roads must a man walk down? 42.
  28. Big Deal! by RUFFyamahaRYDER · · Score: 1

    I agree with the fact that it will get hacked around, but I disagree with this being a "no biggie" for two reasons:
    1)It's a pain to have to get/create a hack for this.
    2)This shows the beginning (or maybe the further progression) of how restrictive things are and are going to be in our future.

    1. Re:Big Deal! by name773 · · Score: 1

      definitely further progression

  29. Ha-Ha by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What happens when people don't read the fine print on service agreements and that all important clause which says TiVo can change the terms of usage at any time without prior notice.

    And this is supposed to be so much better than taping? The time shifting abilities of PRV's are great when watching live shows, but really the only people for whom the PVR experience is "revolutionary" are folks too stupid to program their VCR's to begin with.

    This and digital cable continue to be examples of consumers choosing wiz-bang technology simply because it's new and not because it's better. Few users have the TV's or proper audio equipment to enjoy "the digital difference" but they all lap it up because of all the stations they can't get otherwise, few of them seem to think about how much more difficult exercising fair use rights becomes because of the converter boxes needed for digital cable.

    1. Re:Ha-Ha by rihjol · · Score: 1

      digital cable continue to be examples of consumers choosing wiz-bang technology simply because it's new and not because it's better

      they all lap it up because of all the stations they can't get otherwise

      Ignoring the contradiction from the first part, from what I've seen your second diagnosis is the most common motivator for getting digital cable: channel volume and selection. And sure, maybe it's not seeing the whole picture of what is available, but it's a perfectly valid reason to get it. And in a lot of places it's not much more expensive than standard cable with far fewer channels.

      Granted, regular cable services have been priced up to ridiculous levels, probably to get people to make that jump.

      --
      I like bread.
    2. Re:Ha-Ha by Ride+Jib · · Score: 1

      And this is supposed to be so much better than taping? The time shifting abilities of PRV's are great when watching live shows, but really the only people for whom the PVR experience is "revolutionary" are folks too stupid to program their VCR's to begin with.

      I can program a VCR with no problem whatsoever, yet I would choose TiVo over it any day. I don't need to worry about having a blank tape in, or being home at the right time to swap out the tape. Nor do I need to plan out all my recording sequences. I click a few buttons and don't think about it again. Then at a later time I come to my TiVo to find all my favorite programs, categorized and organized for me, waiting for me to just hit the play button.

      Maybe you have the spare time to label all of your vhs tapes, and organize them by name, date recorded, if you've watched it already or not, etc., but I do not.

      Aside from this, I paid $50 for my Tivo. If I were to count up how many programs I have saved on there right now, the cost of VHS tapes would easily exceed that cost.

    3. Re:Ha-Ha by jonogibbs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right. If you can make me a VCR which can be programmed like my TiVo can, and contains several tapes so more than one show can be recorded at the same time, while another is playing back, and can store, say, 40 hours of material, then I'm more than happy to switch. I dont' care if it's digital, analog, or if some tee-tiny gnomes are doing photorealistic oil painting at a rapid rate. (As long as the gnomes enjoy it.)

      If you think something like TiVo is anything like programming a VCR, then either you haven't tried one (too bad), or you watch very little TV (good for you!)

      --jono

    4. Re:Ha-Ha by danb35 · · Score: 1
      The time shifting abilities of PRV's are great when watching live shows, but really the only people for whom the PVR experience is "revolutionary" are folks too stupid to program their VCR's to begin with.
      So tell me, how do you watch one recorded show while your VCR is recording another one? There's also the nice feature where the TiVo recognizes when the time slot of a show changes for a particular showing, and automatically changes the recording time. Sure, you could do the same thing by checking TV Guide periodically, but it's a definite convenience...
    5. Re:Ha-Ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, I guess you're right. VCR's are the way to go. Nevermind any of the great features a Tivo/PVR provides. I'm a mindless bafoon for using Tivo when I should be using a VCR. Mod parent troll.

    6. Re:Ha-Ha by dogregor · · Score: 1

      I have more than one VCR, that's how. It's not as if they're particularly expensive ...

    7. Re:Ha-Ha by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      The problem is the encryption and the single tuner boxes. You can't watch one digital station and record another, unless you're using a cable company DVR. If you have a TiVo and a box with and S-Video output, the TiVo can change the station as needed for unattended recording. But there's no rule the cable co has to provide an S-Video output and they can disable the port via software patch if they choose. Which means if you want to record at all you have to leave the digital box running on the station you want to record while you're gone (hope all your shows are on one channel).

      There's some progress being made with Cable Cards, but they remain an item you have to buy from your provider and can only be used in flat panels right now. With analog cable none of these issues exist because VCR's can tune whatever they need independantly of the TV's/boxes. If the stations weren't encryted VCR/DVD recorder manufactures could put digital tuners in their equipment.

      As it stands right now to get digital cable a consumer has to give away some of their rights to fair use they gained in the Betamax case, something they shouldn't have to do.

    8. Re:Ha-Ha by hexix · · Score: 4, Insightful
      And this is supposed to be so much better than taping? The time shifting abilities of PRV's are great when watching live shows, but really the only people for whom the PVR experience is "revolutionary" are folks too stupid to program their VCR's to begin with.

      You can't be serious. So here's your solution:

      1. Find a show you're interested in
      2. Look up the time the show should air in your TV guide
      3. Set your VCR to record that given timeslot
      4. Make sure there is a blank tape inserted in to VCR
      5. Turn the VCR off, it will not record if it's on
      6. Rush home from work to swap the tape that just got show A taped to before show B starts taping
      7. Return to step 4

      And here's the Tivo/PVR/DVR/whatever solution:

      1. Find the tv show you wish to record using the search by name feature, or hitting record button while it's on.
      2. Tell the PVR to sign up for a "Season Pass"

      Yeah, definitely for people too stupid to program their VCRs. I own a Tivo and I can say, it's got it's share of problems. I think it's idiotic that I need to pay 13 bucks a month just so it can know when a TV show is on. I already bought the damn box. But to say the idea/technology behind Tivo is useless - well I'd have to disagree with that.

      Now, if you wanted to make the point that TV isn't that great to spend the money on a device that records it, well you might be on to something there. But man, I love sitting down when I get home from work and having new episodes of shows I actually want to watch there waiting for me.

    9. Re:Ha-Ha by digitallife · · Score: 1

      I can tell you've never used a PVR. Before I setup my MythTV, I just thought it would be neat and would enjoy a weekend project. After using it for a few weeks, I began to feel a fundamental shift in the way I view the television. It's impossible to understand unless you actually do it, but MythTV freed me from shackles I didn't even realize I was wearing. The TV became a system that brought me entertainment I wanted, when I wanted it.

      Honestly a VCR isn't even a comparable technology. This isn't about recording shows, per se, but about taking control of your TV.

    10. Re:Ha-Ha by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      So tell me, how do you watch one recorded show while your VCR is recording another one?

      Uh, why would I do that. If I have time to sit down and watch TV I would watch the show that's playing at that time and watch the recorded one later.

    11. Re:Ha-Ha by zhez · · Score: 1
      And this is supposed to be so much better than taping? The time shifting abilities of PRV's are great when watching live shows, but really the only people for whom the PVR experience is "revolutionary" are folks too stupid to program their VCR's to begin with.
      *I* Use my home-built PVR like a giant VHS tape for the most part. I don't have to remember to switch tapes or fast forward to the end if I watch something in the middle. It can store dozens of hours of content instead of 4-8 hours.

      *My Wife* likes the fact that she can search for a show she likes, set it as a favourite, and have it find (across all stations and times) all of the reruns and old episodes for her without ever recording the same episode twice. Plus it tracks which ones have been viewed and indexes what was recorded and when.

      If your VHS tapes do all that then sure.. I must be a VCR idiot. Otherwise you're missing the revolution.
      --
      --- Zhez
    12. Re:Ha-Ha by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      "And this is supposed to be so much better than taping? The time shifting abilities of PRV's are great when watching live shows, but really the only people for whom the PVR experience is "revolutionary" are folks too stupid to program their VCR's to begin with."

      *sigh* I hope this is a troll. You don't understand the power of a fully armed and operational PVR station!

      How much fun was it to label tapes and mark down counter settings and forget the pain of shuttling back and forth to find a show in the middle of a tape! Sorting through and storing stacks of tapes sounds like fun too!

      A PVR doesn't need to be programmed for time/channel/duration... you just tell it find all the seinfeld episodes... or tape any movies with bruce campbell in it... or only the NEW episodes of CSI LV. It's so much more powerful than a vcr.

      the "revolution" is in building up a small queue of programming that was intelligently chosen and watching what you want when you want.

      A VCR is to PVR for recording what old school search engines is to google for finding stuff on the web.

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    13. Re:Ha-Ha by artifex2004 · · Score: 1
      I think it's idiotic that I need to pay 13 bucks a month just so it can know when a TV show is on.


      Couldn't you have bought out the subscription? Of course, then you have to admit that your bargain priced hardware actually cost you $300-400+, but that's still cheaper than the monthly subscription, if you think it will last long enough.

    14. Re:Ha-Ha by e40 · · Score: 1

      The grandparent was a troll or stupid.

      The "your solution" needs amending, though: add playback. When I tried to manage a large number of shows being recorded, I always f***ked up and missed shows, or had to spend a lot of time finding a show. The markers that some VCRs lay down at the beginning of shows helped some, but not a huge amount.

    15. Re:Ha-Ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is supposed to be so much better than taping?

      You tell me. Did you boot off a tape drive this morning? If not, why not?

    16. Re:Ha-Ha by SeaFox · · Score: 0, Troll

      You can't be serious. So here's your solution:
            1. Find a show you're interested in
            2. Look up the time the show should air in your TV guide


      Chances are I'm learning about the show I'm interested in because I already watch it (therefore I know when it comes on) or I saw a promo for it on TV (and networks tend to tell you when they are going to air shows).

            3. Set your VCR to record that given timeslot

      Easy.

            4. Make sure there is a blank tape inserted in to VCR

      Also not difficult.

            5. Turn the VCR off, it will not record if it's on

      What a non-issue! Who leaves their VCR on all the time? Actually, my current one will flash a message on screen two minutes before the recording is supposed ot start telling me to turn off the VCR for timer recording.

            6. Rush home from work to swap the tape that just got show A taped to before show B starts taping

      You're assuming I'm running out of tape. You don't know how many shows I'm taping, at what speed, ect.

            7. Return to step 4

      This step should appear at the end of your list for TiVo programming too. Unless your Tivo knows every show you want to record from just adding one. You're just inflating the VCR programing steps otherwise. So the list is really:

      1. Find a show you're interested in
      2. Set your VCR to record that given timeslot
      3. Make sure there is a blank tape inserted in to VCR.
      4. Turn the VCR off, it will not record if it's on. (which it wouldn't be under most circumstances)

      Now take the fact I can buy a VCR for $40 or so and I'm not paying monthly fees.

      Also, I don't wake up every day wondering if I can still record all the same shows as yesterday, if the programs I have on my TiVo are still there, if other stuff has been added I didn't ask for, or what's going to happen to my TiVo service if the company stops existing. As others have said on this article, having control over my TV is a great thing.

    17. Re:Ha-Ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, definitely for people too stupid to program their VCRs. I own a Tivo and I can say, it's got it's share of problems. I think it's idiotic that I need to pay 13 bucks a month just so it can know when a TV show is on. I already bought the damn box."

      That was my conclusion, so I studied what the Canadian and Australian folks do and now I get my TV data from zap2it, build my own slices and have 3 Tivos that call into my own computer (Debian/XMLTV/Apache) to pick up the guide data on a daily basis. It's been running smoothly for 2.5 years now. I know it's highly frowned upon by the TiVo crowd, but it's my box and I'll feed it the data I want, not what TiVo wants to sell me. I don't want TiVo or anyone else putting ads on my machine or limiting my recording/saving options. For me it's the best of both worlds, the control of MythTV and the usability of the TiVo interface.

    18. Re:Ha-Ha by KillShill · · Score: 1

      and how many real contracts do you know of which have a clause that allows the terms to be changed after the agreement and still coerces the signer to be bound by the new terms automatically?

      if i were a judge, i would throw them all into jail and throw away the key.

      what kind of moronic lawyer would put in an illegal clause into the agreement?

      as far as i'm concerned, it voids the whole contract.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    19. Re:Ha-Ha by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      and how many real contracts do you know of which have a clause that allows the terms to be changed after the agreement and still coerces the signer to be bound by the new terms automatically?

      Actually, quite a few ISP's have it. You're bound to the terms by your decision to continue to use the service after the change is made. It's a service agreemnet, so when you took the service you agreed to the terms and one of them was that the other party could change it whenever they wanted. There's nothing illegal about it when you sign on the dotted line to agree to it.

    20. Re:Ha-Ha by srleffler · · Score: 1
      I don't know about him, but my preferred solution would be:
      1. Find a show I'm interested in.
      2. Look up the time the show would air in my TV guide.
      3. Set my manual DVR (with NO monthly fee) to record that channel at that time every week.
      4. Go spend the 13 bucks I just saved on something else.
    21. Re:Ha-Ha by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Hey, look what I just stumbled across!

      Read sections one and six carefully.

    22. Re:Ha-Ha by KillShill · · Score: 1

      it's not even remotely logical.

      and that's what i'm talking about.

      how they can get away with this... it boggles my mind that more people don't stand up to stuff like this. even if it's just saying "i think this sucks".

      certainly not financially supporting them is the best bet but all companies try to pull this garbage.

      changing a contract without notice only means you cannot enforce the changes on the ones who've already signed. you need to have them sign again. that's the logical solution but then they would have to have a good reason to sign a more restrictive agreement.

      who is rooting for the rights of customers?

      certainly not enough people, that's for sure.

      and i wonder how business got it's crooked and dishonest reputation from...

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    23. Re:Ha-Ha by catacow · · Score: 1
      Uh, why would I do that. If I have time to sit down and watch TV I would watch the show that's playing at that time and watch the recorded one later.
      And what if the recorded show is the previous episode which you're yet to watch?
  30. Industries that wreck themselves by HBI · · Score: 1

    The commercial PVR was a great way to improve the lives of nongeeks. It was something that did a useful function that people would have difficulty figuring out themselves.

    With this DRM crap, it removes most of the value added. If you can't store the video to your liking, the PVR becomes pretty much useless. I'm not talking about people who can make their own PVR out of the parts. I'm talking about my mother here.

    I sense the rapid penetration of these devices will end right about...now.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:Industries that wreck themselves by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      I'm not talking about people who can make their own PVR out of the parts. I'm talking about my mother here.
      This may be an opportunity for a geeky person who wants your mother as a customer.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  31. Directivo too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Does this affect Directivo too? Not all the Tivo software updates get passed through.

    1. Re:Directivo too? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Nope. Those of use with DirecTV TiVos are already so functionality limited that there was no point.

    2. Re:Directivo too? by rebullandvodka · · Score: 1

      really? what features am I missing out on besides the forced ad content?

    3. Re:Directivo too? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Well, in particular, the features that caused them to add this copy protection crap in the first place: The "Home Media Option" and "Tivo To Go."

      When you ask them about those features (say, because you want to watch your Tivo shows in the bedroom sometimes, but you don't want to have both Tivos record the same thing and then have to be careful to delete manually on the one you didn't use in any particular viewing session), they tell you that they're going to be replacing Tivo with something way worse DRM wise in the near future, and that will (sort of) have the features you're looking for if you shell out the cash for the new box.

  32. Ebay by brakk · · Score: 1

    I don't think there's much you can do with it except scavenge the HD. But, you can always sell it on ebay to recoup some cost.

  33. Advantages to living in the cracks by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are advantages to living in the cracks sometimes. Harry Harrison once wrote that every society has rats, and even an incredibly advanced one would have the equivalent, even if it's a 'stainless steel' rat. By owning a ReplayTV instead of a Tivo, I feel like I'm living in that crawlspace, away from all the media attention that a company like Tivo gets.

    Replay got sued for the automatic commercial skip, but once that PVR had been thoroughly surpassed in numbers by Tivo, attention shifted elsewhere and now the only people who know about Replay are the owners.

    1. I can pull my shows off my Replay over the network, no broadcast flag.
    2. My 5060 (w/ the requisite hard drive upgrade, of course) still automatically skips commercials. They aren't taking away features I bought, and I appreciate it.
    3. There's no pop-up advertisements like Tivo has. There just isn't the money in doing stuff like that because the user base is so small (but the development effort doesn't get cheaper as a result).

    You can see some of the same stuff happening with Apple. The Macintosh has, lately, demonstrated less enthusiasm about adopting the various DRM flavor of the month technologies that the Windows PC has. This is in part because there isn't the same level of scrutiny, and also because the development effort of adding that stuff doesn't amortize across the user base as well. I'm sure there are other 'do no evil' type considerations and whatnot, but money is the real motive power to be reckoned with.

    I sometimes wonder what the implications are for the rest of society. Do I, the middle class anonymous guy have more freedom than the popular, rich people? Probably. There's no media scrutiny of my every move, if I had a T-mobile Sidekick, nobody would bother trying to break into it, I can post diatribes to slashdot without apologizing via a press release, and so on.

    Just a thought on the trade offs between being comfortable and caged in the living room above versus being a bit cramped, but living the freedom that only the unknown can claim...

    1. Re:Advantages to living in the cracks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news: people who show some effort and don't trade in wads of cash for convenience are better off in the long run.

    2. Re:Advantages to living in the cracks by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      I LOVE my replay tv. And personally, I think it's interface is nicer than tivos. I've used my in laws tivo and I hate it.

      That said, I'd like to build a mythTV box.

    3. Re:Advantages to living in the cracks by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "By owning a ReplayTV instead of a Tivo, I feel like I'm living in that crawlspace, away from all the media attention that a company like Tivo gets."

      And thus you have a product whose parent company has an even more dire future than TiVo does.

      "My 5060 (w/ the requisite hard drive upgrade, of course) still automatically skips commercials. They aren't taking away features I bought, and I appreciate it."

      You can enable the "commercial skip/30 second advance" on TiVo units. ReplayTV just stuck an actual button on their remote and triggered a giant lawsuit from the Broadcasters Association that brought down the Company. Despite having spent millions on legal bills, the attorneys Replay (SonicBlue) had on the payroll apparently weren't smart enough to make the case that several VCR manufacturers were putting 30 second "commercial skip" buttons on their remote controls and those were name brand machines being sold at CostCo at the time. TiVo survived and Replay's second owner did not. Judge who was the foolish party.

      It should also be stated that TiVo is entertaining the thought of adding a commercial skip button to its standard remote control. Its an option of new feature requests on their webpage found here:

      http://research.tivo.com/suggestions/2web519.htm

      "There's no pop-up advertisements like Tivo has. There just isn't the money in doing stuff like that because the user base is so small (but the development effort doesn't get cheaper as a result)."

      The pop-up ads aren't intrusive. If it eventually makes TiVo profitable enough to cancel subscriptions, I'm all for it. Plus, I like having the option of receiving materials from Range Rover and other advertisers if I request it. That's a feature that is changing television advertising for the better. The omission of such a feature and revenue generator on the Replay platform just illustrates the ineptitute that has plagued the product since 1999...a failure to understand the industry.

      "The Macintosh has, lately, demonstrated less enthusiasm about adopting the various DRM flavor of the month technologies that the Windows PC has. This is in part because there isn't the same level of scrutiny, and also because the development effort of adding that stuff doesn't amortize across the user base as well."

      No, its because Steve Jobs has vision when compared to Steve "the Chair Master" Ballmer. Apple also has a dedicated user base (and a sustainable one at that) willing to devote $$$ to Apple products. TiVo has a similar fanatical user base passionate about the product and is mainly disgusted with the Company for not going far enough. Replay does not have any of that, except for "me too" users who always feel compelled to post on websites about ReplayTV whenever a story breaks about TiVo.

      I should also mention that TiVo has from the start had the intention of eventually killing off the Nielsen ratings thanks to its aggregate data collection. ReplayTV never had such an intention. That was one of the major reasons why I went with TiVo originally over Replay. I don't care if my TiVo reports what I watch because I want the Nielsens taken down for the sham that I believe they are. I'm not worried about the government coming to arrest me if the TiVo records *Skinamax* or anything else on television because anything too controversial and/or critical of the government will never hit the airwaves to begin with, and any tin-foil hat wearer worthy of their aluminum foil knows that.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    4. Re:Advantages to living in the cracks by Kahnspiracy · · Score: 1

      You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of Commercial Advance. It is not 30 second skip; the replay has that too. It marks the start and end of a whole segment of commercials and skip them all...instantly. It's gets it right about 90% of the time for me; YMMV depending on video signal quality.

    5. Re:Advantages to living in the cracks by Akoma+The+Immortal · · Score: 1

      See my ealier post. Ho Ho Ho!! The cracks are opening wide for the content owners!!

      --
      assert(expired(knowldege)); core dump
  34. Great, lower prices! by Andrew+Lenahan · · Score: 1

    Since adding DRM means that the Tivo device won't be able to do things that older versions could (and thus has less functionality), surely this means that they'll compensate customers by lowering prices. Right? Right? Right???

    --
    Andrew Lenahan http://www.starblind.com/
  35. Well then by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
    MythTV just got a lot more important.

    I've felt that a lot of the complaints against TiVo to this point has been mainly petty Slashdot whining, but now there's something to really complain about.

    How is MythTV when it comes to HD? Because I've got my hacked TiVo box for now, but when I get an HD set and all that, it'll be time to move to different hardware.

    1. Re:Well then by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      How is MythTV when it comes to HD?

      Bandwidth consumptive. You pretty much need to transcode shows (unless 15-25GB/hour sounds good to you). You will also need a pretty serious CPU to handle record, playback, transcode simultaneously. Disk bandwidth is probably ok with most recent drives. My PATA drives keep up with it fine, but the CPU can't decode it fast enough to stream it without the occasional glitch. Plan on an Athlon 64 3200+ or better. Make sure your bus and video card can handle the bandwidth, too.

      Right now you can really only get clear cable channels and over the air content. I'm not sure what cable card compatible PC cards are on the horizon.

    2. Re:Well then by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      It's still Slashdot whining, nothing has changed. It's just a bug someone found.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Well then by dreamt · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly believe that any software will be able to access the output from these cablecard compatible cards without supporting content protection?

      Then again, if you believe that, you probably also believe that Tivo added content protection because they wanted to (rather than being forced to because they want to keep their Macrovision license).

    4. Re:Well then by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly believe that any software will be able to access the output from these cablecard compatible cards without supporting content protection?

      I never gave it much thought. I have only expected to make use of OTA signal. Given the industry's current panic over locking down their content, I wouldn't place high odds on it. However, if you see the ability in Windows software on x86 processors, my guess is someone will figure out how to use the dll's under Linux at some point.

      Then again, if you believe that, you probably also believe that Tivo added content protection because they wanted to (rather than being forced to because they want to keep their Macrovision license).

      TiVo's reasoning for content protection is irrelevant to me. I have always too highly valued the ability to watch my legally captured content wherever, whenver, and on whatever device I choose to have given a TiVo more than passing consideration. I suppose at times I have wished to pay the $15/month to save the hassle of MythTV, but mostly it is no longer a hassle for me.

  36. Yeah send a message to the little guy ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who's doing his best Samsonite impression with a cartel of gorillas.

    Wrong place to fight the battle. Instead, when your local affiliate stations FCC licences come up for renewal, write letters to the FCC asking that they not be renewed because the network they carry isn't serving your community well. And list everything you object to, and include as a parting shot that they don't respect the American traditions that keep our nation free and strong and are unwilling to live up to the agreements they made with the public when we ceed OUR airwaves for their broadcasts. If a station manager sees a spike of say 100 of those letters in a community, from sane and secular people, that will be a little scary.

  37. Hackers Unite! by GecKo213 · · Score: 1

    Hahah, It's only a matter of time before someone gets into the firmware and has a hack to ignore this problem. Just like the mods available for the Playstation, PS2, PSP, XBOX etc regarding copied CDs. There's got to be a flaw in there somewhere to be exploited.

    --
    Generation Trance: What generation are you?
    1. Re:Hackers Unite! by jandrese · · Score: 1

      While I'm sure it wouldn't be too difficult to "fix" this once you have the HDD pulled and attached to your comptuer, it's already a pretty big step to do that. Also, TiVo has been making it harder and harder to modify the OS in their boxes over time. It's an ordeal to get a simple SSH daemon installed, and you have to do it over every time the OS is updated. Plus, the majority of the TiVo community has a gentelmens agreement to not talk about extracting shows and defeating protections in public. However, as TiVo becomes more and more friendly with Macrovision and less friendly with the hacker community, I can see this gentlemans agreement start to disappear over time and leave us with a dynamic like the outright hostility between DirectTV and their hackers.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Hackers Unite! by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      I would strongly suggest you stop reading the TIVO Community Forums where such "gentleman's agreements" are held and instead head over to http://www.dealdatabase.com/forum/ instead. There you willfind all th einfo you need to hack a TIVO, including the latest software versions, how to prevent it from being "upgraded", and how to extract and insert video using about 3 different methods. ;-)

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  38. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by brakk · · Score: 1

    I also have a ReplayTV and can't live without it now. They are also very easy to increase storage size. (much easier than Tivo from what I understand)

  39. Oh well by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    I'm sure Tivo arnt stupid, they will have realised that this is needed to shut the networks up and that this will also split their customer base into three:

    - people who think its totally fair
    - people who don't like it but will live with it
    - people who will move to build-your-own PVR's and will probably end up creating something much better than Tivo anyway

    Just as long as they know what they're doing from a business perspective.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  40. DVD restrictions by twl1973 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder in the future if they will start to restrict any episode of a show that was released on DVD. It will be a move to make more money off of these shows by forcing a person to actually spend the money on the DVD instead of saving it on your Tivo or moving it onto your computer.

    1. Re:DVD restrictions by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      The logical thing to do would be to put added value in the DVD release, such as commentary tracks, deleted scenes, and other fun stuff, instead of pissing off one's potential customers.

      Then again, I guess we're talking about the entertainment industry here, so never mind.

    2. Re:DVD restrictions by TheRealStyro · · Score: 1

      The power-that-be would probably still hate it, but an idea would be to keep your recordings of shows. You could then buy the DVD sets of the shows and destroy your recordings. Everybody would get what they wanted, everybody should be satisfied.

      --
  41. SageTV anyone? by JustASlashDotGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love my SageTV. If you have the savey'ness, then build your own 'tivo'. I love my SageTV (Dual Tuners, Remote, etc.. 'love'en it).

    MythTv is awesome too, from what I hear.

    1. Re:SageTV anyone? by zhez · · Score: 1

      I COMPLETELY AGREE!

      SageTV is awesome. I just threw two Hauppage PVR 150's ($60 at Best Buy on sale) into an existing computer running Win2k and bought SageTV 2.x.

      It kicks ass. It "just works". It plays Divx/Xvid and anything else that Media Player can play. The 150's each come with a remote that also "just works".

      Sage can even be customized and extended by the user community.. best of all worlds IMHO.

      Wife loves it too. No crashes, no quirks. the WAF is up to a solid 9/10 after 3 months!

      --
      --- Zhez
    2. Re:SageTV anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon my dumb, but what's "WAF is up to a solid 9/10" mean?

      Also, I have an old 1.3GHz windows box with 384MB of memory I was thinking of turning into a PVR. I've read the min specs for SageTV, but want to know from actual users, how much performance is really enough. Anyone have any thoughts?

    3. Re:SageTV anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WAF = Wife Appreciation Factor

    4. Re:SageTV anyone? by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      1.3 GHz is plenty for standard definition TV.

    5. Re:SageTV anyone? by up2ng · · Score: 0

      I have Sage 2.2.8 running on a 1.0 Ghz Duron with 256 SDR Memory and ATI 7500 with no hiccups whatsoever. For HD I use Sage 3.0.7 (beta) and a 2.4 Celeron D with 512mb DDR with Nvidia 6200 w/HDTV out.

      --
      Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
  42. This is no suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A lot of us could see this coming way back. It's only a suprise to those early adopters who bought into this naively believing that the industry would preserve their investment.

    This is stupid and short sighted behavior from the industry. Those early adopters finance new technologies until the manufacturing costs drop down to where mainstream consumers start buying the stuff. They keep burning the early adopters like this and they're going to have a hard time getting any new technology off the ground.

  43. That's it, I'm buying a movie camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    16mm aimed at the TV.

    Look Ma, no DRM.

  44. ObSimpsons... by infochuck · · Score: 1

    HA-HA!

    Suckers. Seriously, who couldn't see this - and worse - coming, eventually?

    Methinks my MythTV box will be unaffected.

    Yeah, yeah, TiVos are cheap, and Myth requires some effort, but you get what you pay for. Okay, maybe not if you buy a TiVo...

  45. Become a producer if you don't like it by wheelbarrow · · Score: 1

    If you don't like the idea that some entertainment producers practice DRM, then why don't you become a producer who releases entertainment that is free of DRM. It should be easy. Create a show that everyone wants to see and then you can freely and voluntarily choose to release it without DRM.

    Once your show becomes popular enough, the producers who use DRM may voluntarily decide to change their past DRM decisions and release without DRM.

    I'd like to see this fought out in the arena of voluntary decisions.

    1. Re:Become a producer if you don't like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about I voluntarily decide not to use TiVo's products and use a DVR system that has no restrictions such as MythTV?

      Seems fair to me. You beam the content into my living room, I will decide then how I want to manipulate those electrons.

    2. Re:Become a producer if you don't like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if we wish to have a voice in the process through which fair use is being technically eliminated, all we have to do is spend the several million dollars it costs to produce a television show and then obtain one of the extremely limited number of FCC licenses.

      Libertarianism wins again! Capitalism ensures that the final outcome is whatever is best for you, as long as you have several million dollars!

    3. Re:Become a producer if you don't like it by KillShill · · Score: 1

      because DRM is against the laws of commerce.

      if the media cartels want to have rights after a sale has been made, they can stop selling in first, second and third world countries which still have reasonable property laws.

      they're SELLING and not RENTING. that's the difference.

      if they want to sell, then sell. DRM goes completely against SELLING. DRM is only compatible with RENTING.

      that's why.

      let them find a country which has corrupt laws, i mean more corrupt laws and don't recognize property laws.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  46. Now what does Tivo actually DO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This just makes me even happier to have MythTV.

    I mean, I understand why you can't play emulators or rip DVDs (that I bought) with Tivo, but now you can't even record TV shows permanently? I mean, isn't that the whole point of getting a Tivo in the first place?

  47. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by GigsVT · · Score: 1

    You can divx tivo content, but it's a little more roundabout process.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  48. I would suggest by hungrygrue · · Score: 1

    MythTv, I haven't tried it myself - actually I haven't bothered watching any form of TV much in the last few years - but BS like this would never be an issue.

  49. good bye tivo by jrwillis · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've had a tivo since shortly after they launched their service. I've been a beta tester for them on several occasions. I've sold many friends on the product, but no more. I'm closing my account as I type this. Go fuck yourself Tivo.

    --
    Keep Austin Weird!
    1. Re:good bye tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I have your TiVo?

  50. Curious.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #ifdef TIN_FOIL_HAT

    I recently noticed a boat-load of job openings at Tivo. Makes one wonder if there wasn't a mass exodus because of this....

    #endif

  51. Open Source by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, you hackers all use open source software exclusively, so you aren't at the mercy of some company. With your technical skills, it's trivial to disable the protection and get everything just the way you like it. /sarcasm

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Open Source by KillShill · · Score: 1

      actually only people like RMS have the restraint and insight to only use Free software and hardware.

      some of us are working towards a future where selling products really means you own it after the sale. that includes software as well as hardware.

      give us some time. we'll educate enough people to counter the DRM propoganda to get a citizenry that is vehemently anti-aftersale control.

      DRM is only compatible with renting and not selling. thus currently DRM breaks the rules of commerce. and we as customers and ugh, "consumers" have the right to tell them to fuck off.

      i admire RMS' position. he isn't at the mercy of those a**holes but eventually he won't have the right to read. DRM is slowly creeping in into every product and service in the world. the day will come when everything is hardended down against "ownership", including physical items. and nobody really cared until it was too late. they didn't understand the issues until it was already well integrated into their lives.

      education is the key.

      you want to rent? be my guest. that is a legal business model.

      want to sell? you better make sure the customer has FULL control over the product otherwise you are the thief. and you have broken the laws of commerce. common sense and otherwise tells us that you will be fucked financially and in mind share. people talk... like the MPAA wanting movie goers not to talk negatively about movies they've seen so that they can continue to get revenue.

      people will get fed up with it. the DIVX fiasco of the 90s gives us just enough hope that it might be possible to have the right to read... someday at least.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  52. MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1

    There are no real affordable do it yourself HDTV PVR solutions.

    1. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there are, just use a pcHDTV HD-3000 http://www.pchdtv.com/hd_3000.html

    2. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by Se7enLC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depends on your definition of affordable.

      It takes a fast PC to be able to decode in real time (2.0 ghz or so is recommended), but just recording HDTV off-the-air or from firewire doesn't take any more than recording normal TV.

      For the price of a 2ghz PC (how cheap are they, now, $300-$400 for a cheapo?), you can get an HDTV mythbox. Use firewire to record and you don't need a capture card. Use an nvidia card or external converter ($100-$200, maybe?) and you can plug an HDTV right in. Bingo. Add a remote control if you're feeling saucy.

    3. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by enrico_suave · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV"

      uh yes it does... HD-3000 PCHDTV

      And affordability varies on what you want to do... but if you have an existing reasonably spec'd spare PC... a 90 dollar hauppauge wintv pvr 150 hardawre encoding card with remote/ir blaster is pretty reasonable. Especially if you don't have to deal with recurring subscription costs.

      although the real reason to build a DIY PVR is NOT to save $$$, it's for freedom/control over your box and content and the flexibility to add functionality without waiting for Tivo to ask permission from content providers/FCC first (e.g. tivo2go). Commercial flagging/deletion, DVD ripping, cool parsing of closed captioning, etc...

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    4. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried Myth TV..I hated it. It has its own bizzare format, needs jfs or xfs, and makes riduculously huge capture files. Compared to something like windvr (for recording) its total crap. I wonder why people swear by it...

    5. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Why?

      You assume that everyone who wants the ability to digitally record TV also wants to mess around with building their own PVR rather than get a fully functioning working one. I don't. I have a lot of other things to spend time on and I'm not very interested in the parts prior to recording and watching the shows, so I'm very happy with my Brighthouse HD-DVR. Can't transfer shows to PC or DVD/CD? I don't need to and frankly I don't really care. As long as I can see the program when i want to see it, I'm happy and I delete the shows after watching them anyway. If there is a movie i really want, I prefer to get a DVD of it. Oh yes, that is true, I pay the big bad boys. Why? Why should I expect other peoples work for free no matter how much of a fat cow you think they are. You always have the choice to not pay if you don't want to, but don't expect free lunches... they don't exist.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    6. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by Golias · · Score: 1

      There are no real affordable do it yourself HDTV PVR solutions.

      Only if you are a rabid anti-Mac bigot.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Can a MythTV box control and record from my Comcast HDTV cable box via its Firewire port? I get HBO and would need to go through my cable box. Actually, for any HD channels, I have to go through my cable box.

    8. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume that everyone who wants the ability to digitally record TV also wants to mess around with building their own PVR rather than get a fully functioning working one. I don't. I have a lot of other things to spend time on and I'm not very interested in the parts prior to recording and watching the shows, so I'm very happy with my Brighthouse HD-DVR. Can't transfer shows to PC or DVD/CD? I don't need to and frankly I don't really care. As long as I can see the program when i want to see it, I'm happy and I delete the shows after watching them anyway. If there is a movie i really want, I prefer to get a DVD of it. Oh yes, that is true, I pay the big bad boys. Why? Why should I expect other peoples work for free no matter how much of a fat cow you think they are. You always have the choice to not pay if you don't want to, but don't expect free lunches... they don't exist.

      Wow! How big is that chip on your shoulder?

    9. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      That's hardly affordable since you have to buy a $3000 mac to make it work. You can not be a anti-mac bigot and still not have a mac.

    10. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by Golias · · Score: 1

      Works great with my $500 Mac mini (once I added enough memory.)

      In spite of the published box specs, it handles it just fine.

      Even if you believe their blurb about needing a "Dual G5", that spec was published back when dual G5 systems were well under 2 GHz. Systems which you can pick up on eBay for a little over $1000.

      If you can't afford a $1000 computer, you are probably not wealthy enough to need an HDTV PVR anyway, because you don't own a high-def television set.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    11. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by radish · · Score: 1

      Well, it does OTA HDTV. My HDTV comes from cable, and there isn't any way (that I know of) to capture that for MythTV or any other third party PVR (including Tivo). That's why I'm using a PVR from my cable company. It's pretty sucky interface wise, and not 100% reliable, but it has two tuners, a large disk, and records SD and HD streams directly, preserving full picture quality and digital audio. I like it, and it's cheap ($10 a month, no up fron cost).

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    12. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      well, just to be contentious: you *can* get unencrypted HD (and presumably SD) channels via QAM256 with an HDTV card (the HD-3000 does do this).

      You can also use mythtv to pull HD (and SD) channels into mythtv from your cable box via firewire, but it's a little hit or miss as to what channels have the 5c copy flag enabled or not (or if your cable box will have the appropriate firmware/active firewire ports... you can ask for a box with firewire port per FCC rulings from what I understand)

      You're right though... there's no good, clear way to reliably get digital content into any external PVR (especially PC based) that isn't made/sanctioned by your cable/satellite company, and it sucks... especially when it comes to HD.

      Allegedly windows vista MCE flavor will get sanctioned to be able to have enough drm to meet cablecard specifications and then we'll get it, but it'll be with M$, DRM, and blah!

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    13. Re:MythTV Doesn't Do HDTV by radish · · Score: 1

      Oh don't get me wrong, I'd love to dump the Cable Co's box and got for MythTV. I'm just not willing to forgo HD and the WAF of a firewire solution seems fairly low (heaven help me if it messes up an episode of CSI!).

      One option I have been looking at is HD component video capture, but the cards are very expensive.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  53. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by VAXcat · · Score: 0

    You haev a ReplayTV DVR? Is it right next to your Betamax VCR?

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  54. Ah, I've been waiting for this... by jonesvery · · Score: 1

    ...so that I could point out that in Corporate America, TiVo owns you!

    --

    * * *
    It is a dada story -- it has no moral.

    1. Re:Ah, I've been waiting for this... by suitepotato · · Score: 1

      ...so that I could point out that in Corporate America, TiVo owns you!

      Obligatory Nitpick: that should be "...pwns joo!"

      Just so you cover all the comedy reference bases...

      --
      If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  55. Information wants to be free, but... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    the media doesn't want it to (you wouldn't expect the **AA to help you in this, would you?).
    I guess, that if you REALLY want information to be free, you have to set it free using YOUR resources (i.e. MythTV).

    There's no other way.

  56. yes it does by RelliK · · Score: 1

    Have you bothered to RTFM?

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  57. ReplayTV is better by waynegoode · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have two ReplayTVs. I don't have any of the problems you read about with TiVo--and I can skip past commercials, not just fast-forward. I don't understand why TiVo is more popular that ReplayTV. It is certainly is not as good.

    1. Re:ReplayTV is better by Spackler · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why TiVo is more popular that ReplayTV. It is certainly is not as good.

      Is that you Steve Jobs?

    2. Re:ReplayTV is better by waynegoode · · Score: 1
      I don't understand why TiVo is more popular that ReplayTV. It is certainly is not as good.

      Is that you Steve Jobs?

      Nope. It's is me, William Safire.

    3. Re:ReplayTV is better by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "I have two ReplayTVs. I don't have any of the problems you read about with TiVo--and I can skip past commercials, not just fast-forward. I don't understand why TiVo is more popular that ReplayTV. It is certainly is not as good."

      Its the whole Windows vs. Mac argument all over again, but with a role reversal. Replay's GUI and menus were inferior to TiVo's GUI, and in this case, TiVo won. Replay was the first in the incubator, but TiVo was the first to market. TiVo also had different subscription options from the very start, whereas the original Replay units cost $200 more upfront because there was no monthly subscription option. And from the start, TiVo had Philips and Sony making units for them and the DirecTV contract. Replay had none of that for various reasons. TiVo gave away units to Hollywood personalities and thus "TiVoing" became a phrase in popular culture. Despite only being profitable recently, TiVo is still the same company. The Replay product line has been owned by three different companies now and is very close to being scrapped. Its currently owned by D&M Holdings who recently scrapped Rio because Apple had overwhelming marketshare in the MP3 player market. As I posted already, the writing is on the wall for ReplayTV. The only market it has left is the technically proficient crowd and they have enough skill to build their own PC/DVRs. And as a commercial entity as well as a hardware/software innovator, it is irrelevant.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    4. Re:ReplayTV is better by Trixter · · Score: 1

      Nice long paragraph, but nowhere do you explain why it is better to buy the more inferior product.

      I don't care about pretty GUIs or who was first to market -- I want a cheap unit that works well, and dammit, ReplayTV is that unit. It's almost ludicrous how much better ReplayTV is than TiVo, and that's not "mac vs. ibm" advocacy BS, it really is the factual truth. It's cheaper, easier to hack, and has more features. So why should I buy TiVo again?

  58. Re:MythTV for MacOS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wish someone would bring us MythTV for MacOS X.. not just a front end, but the whole shabang.. Have 2 spare Macs that I'd love to hack into Myth boxes for myself and family. Using that existing kit is fine, but buying an Intel box just for this, right now, isn't doable $$$-wise...

    Shrug.

  59. IIT'S FRAUD -- Demand refunds by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Insightful
    TiVo owners should be demanding refunds for the reduced functionality of this purchased device!

    How would you like it if you took your car in for factory service and they downloaded an update to the car's computer that restricted your speeds to 55mph because of pressure from your state highway patrol?

    Don't tell me that because there was some fine print in some d@mn license agreement that you've already agreed to this ahead of time. I sincerely doubt that the TiVo license agreement clearly states: We absoutely will reduce the functionality of your purchased and owned equipment in the near future without your consent to appease the broadcasting and content creation industries.

    You bought the box for what it would do at the time of purchase, and have a right to continue to expect it to perform to at least those levels in the future!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  60. This is not encouraging by mcc · · Score: 1

    So instead of being a "feature" that potentially allows your time-shifting abilities to be blocked by the whims of media companies, it's a "feature" that potentially allows your time shifting abilities to be blocked by the whims of media companies or random electromagnetic interference???

    That's even worse...

  61. Suck it up and solve the problem yourselves... by pla · · Score: 1

    and as such are upset that TiVo has restricted the capabilities of the receivers they bought and subscribed to use

    Surprised? Upset? Gimme a break! Companies do that, because we let them get away with it.

    Best solution here? A mass returning of TiVos for lying to their customers (arguably a violation of their end of the contract for not acting in good faith? Don't know how well that would hold up in court, though, IANAL). Then set up your own Myth box.


    However, for those who don't want the hassle of trying to explain DRM to a service desk clerk who couldn't care less, just patch your TiVo software to not encrypt the content, install Samba on it, and mount the drive from any other machine in your house. Poof, the idea of automatically deleting content after a certain time becomes moot.

    Permission to use hardware I own, and monthly payments to keep it working? Hah! Once you have the hardware in-hand, their ability to stop you from using it however you want vanishes.

  62. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by dmnic · · Score: 1

    I agree.
    over the past 2 years, I am increasingly glad I went with ReplayTV over Tivo. whether its the phone line requirement of Tivo, or the delayed inability to transfer content to my pc/mac from Tivo to the broadcast flags now showing up on Tivo...

    if only ReplayTV had the channel guide layout or the remote from Tivo...then it would be the best of both worlds!

  63. Wow by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

    I'm glad ReplayTV's been left to dangle without an update for so long ... it's probably not worth DM's effort to put this in now.

    But still, once my ReplayTV finally dies, I'll be building a myth box. Or maybe getting a Mac Mini and an eyeTV unit.

    --
    -EvilMagnus
  64. OT Anyone Know How to Transfer From HDTivo to PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a way to transfer recorded shows from the DirectTV Hi-Def Tivo to a PC?

  65. I don't think you get it... by Tetris+Ling · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What makes TiVo a great product isn't its PVR functionality, it's the thoughtfully designed interface. This is something I don't think people who havn't used TiVo really understand. From the way it rewinds a little after you stop fast forwarding to the schedule tables, TiVo constantly does things that make me happy. It's like TiVo is my friend. This, I think, is the reason that so many people (myself included) are fanaticaly devoted to their TiVo.

    I'm not saying MythTV doesn't have its benefits, but it certainly isn't a replacement for my TiVo.

    1. Re:I don't think you get it... by darrylo · · Score: 1
      I'm not saying MythTV doesn't have its benefits, but it certainly isn't a replacement for my TiVo.
      While I certainly agree with what you say, TiVo doing stuff like this is why I'm not buying more TiVo boxes. I've been thinking about buying a TiVo DVD recorder, but I think I'll buy a plain DVD recorder instead.

      I've built a couple of MythTV boxes and, while they are NOWHERE near as nice as a TiVo (not even close), they're good enough for me.

      I'm going to vote with my wallet, and TiVo isn't going to get any more of my money.

    2. Re:I don't think you get it... by interiot · · Score: 5, Interesting
      TiVo constantly does things that make me happy. It's like TiVo is my friend.
      So how does TiVo's periodic reduction in features, in a way that's completely out of your control, fit into your conception of Tivo as your friend?

      MythTV is like a lifelong friend. It may not be as soft and curvy, and it might not flirt with you. But it won't wake up one morning and start deleting your belongings either.

    3. Re:I don't think you get it... by digitallife · · Score: 1

      Well, I've never used a Tivo so I can't directly compare it to MythTV (which I do use). However, the one feature you list, it rewinds a little after you stop fast forwarding, is also on MythTV. And truth be told, the MythTV interface is really easy to use, even right when you first sit down with it. In fact I find using it to be a pretty much invisible process... which is good since what I want to do is watch my tv shows!

    4. Re:I don't think you get it... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's like TiVo is my friend.

      A friend who deletes your programs from your TiVo when he feels like it. I have a feeling you haven't tried MythTV lately though. All the features you mentioned (and many more than TiVo has) are in MythTV today. My wife has absolutely no problems using it and any married guy will tell you the wife-acceptance-factor is one of the primary selling points of any consumer electronics device.

    5. Re:I don't think you get it... by bburton · · Score: 1

      You don't own the content, the copyright holders do.

      TiVo is just enforcing the law...

      --
      Slashdot = ((Technology + Politics) / Trolls) % Grammar Nazis
    6. Re:I don't think you get it... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I too plan to build a MythTV box. I've been planning to do it before this event.

      Thing is, I don't have much to complain about in this situation. Of my six TiVos, the three Series1 units don't have this restriction and likely never will, two of them having $6.95/month service and the third having never been subscribed (and is full and idle). Of the three Series2 units, two of them are lifetime service ($199 ea. transferred from the Series1 units) and the other is prepaid for 1 year of service (equating to 22+ months of service at $6.95/mo.).

      There's no reason for me to discontinue guide data service on the units unaffected by this change and less reason to give up service already paid for on the others.

      I can however use the Series1 units preferentially over the Series2 units for any programming that seeks to exert control over my retention habits and look into boxes that filter out this variation of the Macrovision copy protection or otherwise disable the TiVo's ability to recognize it.

      So far I've seen no restrictions on HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher, the most likely show to be affected by restrictions in my set of recorded shows with HBO threatening to protect all their shows. Sports? I'd rather listen to the game on the radio than pay for PPV sports.

      (Normally service is $12.95/mo., but up to 5 additional units in the same home are only $6.95/mo. each, but a one year commitment is now attached. Lifetime service fee is now $299.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    7. Re:I don't think you get it... by north.coaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's wrong with wanting an appliance to be easy to use?

      It has nothing to do with pretty buttons, and everything to do with having an intuitive user interface. My six year old daughter figured it out in no time flat, and she barely even knows how to read.

      TiVo is also trivial to set up. Before I bought my TiVo, I spent a couple months studying my options for building a MythTV or similar box, and finally concluded that I didn't have the spare time or the patience to build one.

      I wanted a box that I could just plug and have it work. TiVo came within 99% of meeting this goal. Nothing else that I have seen even comes close. I will worry about the DRM capabilities when a broadcaster or studio actually intentionally uses it.

    8. Re:I don't think you get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't own the content, the copyright holders do.

      And that was OK, for the longest time, because I didn't need to own the content in order to watch it on my own terms.

      Now I do.

      So I will.

      Yay, DRM!

    9. Re:I don't think you get it... by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Insightful? Damn... where is the Shrill BS mod when you need one.

      He might as well have said... "OOOhhhh! Pretty buttons! Weeee!!! Look! They so shiny! Me likey the pretty buttons!"

      But he didn't say that. He said the UI was "thoughtfully designed" and he's exactly correct. Just because you don't like TiVo's interface (I've got some small bones to pick with it, but have been consistently pleased with how it behaves, and the ease with which you can get into a rythm with skipping annoying segments, etc) doesn't mean that someone who does find it well designed isn't thinking about the larger picture.

      You seem to be implying that the presence of a pleasant UI somehow precludes real functionality. So... non-hardcore-geeks who like the way a Mac interface looks/feels should be considered losers, and the Mac itself must therefore be trash? Extend your lame car analogy to iPod shopping, while you're at it. A lot of people would consider the iPod to have severly limited, or misplaced resources/UI. So, the people that find it just right, as it is and for what it costs, are... what... part of the great unwashed "so many of you" that you're stooping to lecture? I'd be curious to hear what OS you use. No, never mind. I'd be more curious to hear what your "rocket scientist" grandmother uses (for, surely she must be one, right?).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    10. Re:I don't think you get it... by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I was going to just mod you down as flamebait, but decided posting would be better...

      The car analogy is COMPLETELY wrong. COMPLETELY. If you want to use that analogy, it would be more like this: "Well, this car doesn't have a V6 engine or great acceleration, but it does have excellent reliablity scores, terrific safety features, automatic speed adjusting cruise control, built in low tire pressure gauges, built in GPS navigation with voice prompting, and it gets 40mpg!", to which the car salesmen replies "but this one has a V8 and a towing package and a DVD player in the back seat!", to which the wife replies "how does any of that help him get to work, save any money, time being lost, or frustration having to fix the damn thing?"

      The TiVo is great because it JUST WORKS. If I didn't know better I would think it's an Apple product. It has an interface that is simple yet elegant, and it does exactly what it is supposed to do (until this out content protection system came on line, that's a whole different story).

    11. Re:I don't think you get it... by interiot · · Score: 1
      Tivo is enforcing extra restrictions that publishers want. Copyright law isn't usually involved when you're doing things in your own home (eg. when you're not redistributing, and you're not doing a public performance).

      If you signed a contract or clicked through a EULA that says you'll only use content for X number of days, then you need to comply with the law. However, if 90% of content starts being published like this, then everone should and will start ignoring those contracts.

    12. Re:I don't think you get it... by Darby · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying MythTV doesn't have its benefits, but it certainly isn't a replacement for my TiVo.

      I'm really curious what it is that you can do with Tivo that you can't do with MythTV.

      As far as I can tell having only played around with other people's Tivos, Myth does far more, and does it better than Tivo.

      I have one backend box which does all the recordings and plays on the TV, and 4 other computers that we can watch the shows on.
      If I'm in the living room watching a show, I can hit one button to mark my location then stop playing it. Then I can go into the kitchen start the same show and it will continue where I left off in the other room.
      I can add capacity when and how I choose.
      I can do what I want with the shows I record.
      It runs my DVD burner.
      The interface allows far more flexibility in scheduling shows.
      It flags and automatically skips commercials.
      It can automatically transcode files to more or less whatever format you want.
      I can get my local weather updates with moving radar.
      It has an RSS application that lets you browse the web using just the remote.

      So, I can certainly understand that you like your Tivo, and it wins out on convenience since you just have to plunk down some cash. I'm really curious though as to what it does that Myth doesn't do and, in fact, do better?

    13. Re:I don't think you get it... by Suppafly · · Score: 1


      TiVo is just enforcing the law...


      Which law would that be? Legal precedence allows how recording of tv shows.

    14. Re:I don't think you get it... by endoplasmicMessenger · · Score: 1

      TiVo's UI is probably a lot better than Myth's. However, MythTV does "rewind a little after you stop fast forwarding", and it does have "schedule tables." So you'll need to be more specific about what you like about these features. But the best thing that MythTV has is automatic commercial deletion. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think TiVo has (or will ever have) this feature.

      --
      Evolution is a fact. Darwinism is a joke.
    15. Re:I don't think you get it... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      "What makes TiVo a great product isn't its PVR functionality, it's the thoughtfully designed interface. This is something I don't think people who havn't used TiVo really understand. From the way it rewinds a little after you stop fast forwarding to the schedule tables, TiVo constantly does things that make me happy"

      I have both a series 2 Tivo and have a DIY PVR and regularly evaluate/try 3rd party PVR/HTPC software.

      Tivo is certainly the gold standard for ease of use UI and design (including the remote!), but I think they've long since lost their first mover advantage in the UI department. SageTV and BeyondTV (3rd party commercial windows PVR solutions) both come really close to Tivo usability/attractiveness AND offer DRM-less files and other functionality TiVo doesn't have.

      With that said, if you're TiVo stops listening to you and won't "keep until I delete" certain shows down the line because of a flag/glitch by content providers it's not gonna matter how pretty or easy to use the interface is if it's no longer "TV your way" Will Tivo be your friend still after that?

      *shrug* YMMV =P

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    16. Re:I don't think you get it... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      The copyright holders own copyright on the content, but that is irrelevant. You might not be allowed to distribute the content, but if it's sitting on your hard drive (ie your property), it's no one's business to vandalize your files. Once you've received the content through legal means, no one can tell you what to do with it (short of re-distribution, which is already illegal).

      Tivo is not enforcing any laws; this is an arbitrary and malicious action against their customers. When you record something, you haven't broken the law. Besides, the fact that other programs can be saved to tape or DVD can be construed to state that Tivo is also aiding and abetting copyright violation...you can't have it both ways.

    17. Re:I don't think you get it... by DougWebb · · Score: 1

      I'm a MythTV user, and I've never used Tivo, so maybe that's why I don't understand this...

      Why in the world do you need six Tivo boxes, and five subscriptions to the same guide data?

      I can think of two reasons for having multiple boxes: multiple tuners to record more than one show at a time, and to let you hook up to multiple TVs so you can watch more than one show at a time. I don't see any justification for the multiple subscriptions, except that Tivo forces you to do that because you have multiple boxes.

      With MythTV, you can have multiple tuner cards in a single box, and you can have one big server box for recording and smaller/cheaper boxes for playback at each TV. You also only need one subscription to guide data, which gets downloaded into a central database that would be shared by multiple recorder boxes if you wanted/needed to have more than one.

      Guide data is currently free, of course, but even if it weren't you would still only need one subscription.

      Tivo's interface may be better than MythTV's interface (or not; MythTV is pretty easy to use) but MythTV is improving while Tivo is being whittled away. I know where I'll be spending my money...

    18. Re:I don't think you get it... by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      It's true. My wife has gone from complaining about my expensive computer hardware purchases to giving me her pay bonuses (which used to go to clothes and books) to purchase more computer equipment.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    19. Re:I don't think you get it... by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      You seem to be implying that the presence of a pleasant UI somehow precludes real functionality.

      But he didn't say that. What he said was that prioritizing a pleasant UI over basic functionality is to completely disregard that basic functionality in the first place. The car analogy communicated this quite well: it doesn't matter (to him) if a widgit has a great interface, if it doesn't do what he needs it to do.

      Nobody's said that the Tivo is bad because it has a good UI. Several people have stated that to them, a good UI is not by itself sufficient to justify a purchase. I fail to see how this is objectionable or surprising.

    20. Re:I don't think you get it... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're right and wrong.

      Copyright law is involved even when you're doing things in your own home.

      However, there is no law that mandates this particular action. Recording any copyrighted material from TV for any amount of time is infringing, unless the particular act of recording in question is exempted somehow, e.g. as a fair use. (n.b. that fair use depends, each time, on the circumstances; there is no blanket rule permitting time shifting, etc.)

      If it is exempted, then there's no time limit. If not exempted, then you'd need permission from the copyright holder, with whatever restrictions they'd include, if they even permitted it at all.

      In any event, it's none of Tivo's business, and they shouldn't be involved. The reason is just that they're knuckling under.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    21. Re:I don't think you get it... by Darby · · Score: 1

      "OOOhhhh! Pretty buttons! Weeee!!! Look! They so shiny!

      But he didn't say that. He said the UI was "thoughtfully designed" and he's exactly correct.

      Then add in the fact that MythTV has a much prettier, shinier interface and (IMHO) a much more functional one and it looks like the OPs argument has been reduced to a smoking pile of rubble.

    22. Re:I don't think YOU get it... by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      What makes MythTV a great product isn't its thoughtfully designed interface, it's the ability to record what you want without asking Big Brother for permission. This is something I don't think people who havn't been screwed over by draconian copyright restrictions which eliminate fair use rights really understand. From the way it deliberately fails to implement DRM flags to the ability to export whatever you want to whatever platform, MythTV constantly does things that would make me happy. It's like MythTV is my friend rather than my parent. This, I think, is the reason that so many people (hopefully to some day include myself) are fanaticaly devoted to their MythTV.

      I'm not saying Tivo doesn't have its benefits, but it certainly isn't a replacement for a DVR you can actually use the way you want to.

      I own a Tivo. You are right that the interface is far better than all the competition. But the previous poster wasn't bragging on the interface. He just wants to use his DVR.

    23. Re:I don't think you get it... by scribblej · · Score: 1

      I have a Tivo series 2 and a MythTV box. I will agree that the Tivo interface is sexyier in some areas, but not in the two that you mentioned:

      You don't say what you like about the program guide, so let me contrast the two:

      The Tivo program guide obscures the image of the channel you are watching, but in MythTV, the program you are watching is shrunk to fit. Also, in MythTV, there is a highlight in the columns of programs to tell you where in the grid the current time is. For the Tivo, you've got to keep track of that yourself. Other than that, they're functionally equivalent, and the ability to fine-tune the MythTV display to contain more rows and columns of info thant he Tivo makes it a sure winner.

      Secondly, you mention the feature that the TiVo automatically rewinds a bit for you when you finish fast-fowarding. I suggest you try MythTV before you knock it -- it does exactly the same. It's a configurable option, so if you did try the MythTV, you didn't take a good look at all the options. I believe if you do, you'll find it just as useable as a Tivo, but with far, far, far more functionality.

      -Chris

    24. Re:I don't think you get it... by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't own the content, the copyright holders do.

      Timeshifting is legal. There are no expiration restrictions on time shifting. Tivo is blocking legal access to material I have a right to use.

    25. Re:I don't think you get it... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Please cite the law by which the copyright holders are authorized to delete my recordings of anything, ever.

      If they want to own the content, they ought not broadcast it.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    26. Re:I don't think you get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't own the _COPYRIGHT_ to the content. You may do as you wish with the content, apart from commit copyright infringment (i.e. distributing said content without the permission of the copyright holders). I think you need to factor in a little something called fair use which TiVO is helping to infringe upon.

    27. Re:I don't think you get it... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Why in the world do you need six Tivo boxes, and five subscriptions to the same guide data?

      It all started when TiVo had one $100 rebate and Circuit City had two $100 rebates on a 14-hour Series1 TiVo. Getting two then-$299 units for free after rebate made me willing to get $200 lifetime service on each of them. I'm not sure how much time passed between each unit's purchase.

      I also got a 30-hour unit for my mother, but not with so many rebates, which allowed me to also image her drive and up the primary drive to 30-hour capacity (that being the only way to expand the primary drive at the time).

      Then the Series2 boxes were coming out which were locked down harder against hacking and service was made a requirement for them even to do manual recordings. So I sought out another Series1 unit before they all disappeared and picked up a 20hr unit. To keep a monitor on any policy changes on unsubscribed boxes, it was never subscribed.

      Then for a short period TiVo had an offer to Series1 owners to upgrade to a Series2 box which would transfer lifetime service from the Series1 to the Series2. (Only certain grandfathered boxes could have a single transfer of lifetime service to a new box, for which mine didn't qualify.) You didn't have to give up your old hardware. Since the older boxes didn't require service and the new ones did, I took the offer and got two Series2 boxes and the lifetime service transferred. Then I resubscribed the two Series1 units to monthly.

      The Series2 boxes had the Home Media Option available to move recordings between them. I bought it... before it became free to all Series2 subscribers.

      TiVo raised their monthly subscription price, but dropped the price for up to 5 additional monthly subscribed boxes to $6.95/mo. Lifetime boxes counted as qualifying subscriptions.

      Then recently came the offer to existing subscribers to get a refurbished Series2 box for free and free shipping with purchase of 1 year of service ($12.95 * 12). The new box would enjoy the lower monthly rate as another additional unit, so that 1-year subscription stretches to 1.86 years.

      And that's the story on how I ended up with 6 TiVos with 5 subscriptions.

      If I had instead bought DirecTV with TiVo Service boxes, each would have had two tuners and TiVo guide fees would not be charged for every unit. But then I'd have to have DirecTV service, and DirecTV is switching to MPEG-4 and obsoleting the TiVo combo boxes.

      The individual units don't share their guide data. The Series1 units even ignore the presence of any other unit. There are those that have hacked in their own free guide data, but I've chosen to support TiVo and not cut out their revenue stream on my two monthly boxes.

      And still, the primary purpose I'll put my MythTV box to will not be recording television but rather managing my DVD library, interleaving TV show DVDs so that crossover episodes play in order, trailers for the next episode inserted before the credits, and getting me on a schedule to get my whole collection watched.

      And I plan to contribute code to MythTV that will make it useful beyond personal television viewing where the quality of the current user interface won't matter.

      And if TiVo were to go away without throwing the big switch to unlock all boxes for recording without service or providing for another service provider, enough is already known about them to turn TiVos into front-ends for MythTV systems, so the investment in TiVos is still not wasted.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    28. Re:I don't think you get it... by jackbird · · Score: 3, Informative

      Aren't you forgetting the Betamax decision? It set a strong precedent that recording for time-shifting purposes is non-infringing.

    29. Re:I don't think you get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah... but I am a mythtv user who has tried Tivo. I can safely say that FOR ME (note: opinion) the controls/configuration/skins of mythtv can match Tivo blow for blow; and more besides; as EVERY control can be configured for whatever remote button you desire. Or keyboard button. Or whatever peripheral you want.

      Of course the obvious con would be the setup; but with good guides and stable distros and well-known cards popping up left and right this is becoming less and less of an issue and more and more of a myth... bad pun sort of intended.

      I think with this move Tivo have consigned themselves to the dustbin of gadgetry, along with betamax, walkmans and such. Time will tell...

    30. Re:I don't think you get it... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "MythTV is like a lifelong friend. It may not be as soft and curvy, and it might not flirt with you. But it won't wake up one morning and start deleting your belongings either."

      Like in that song by the Skatellites:

      "If you wanna be happy for the rest of your life,
      never make a pretty woman your wife.
      So from my personal point of view,
      get an ugly girl to marry you!"

      "Hey man, I saw your wife the other day!"
      "uh huh?"
      "Man, is she *ugly*!"
      "Yeah shes ugly but she sure can cook!"

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    31. Re:I don't think you get it... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "The car analogy is COMPLETELY wrong. COMPLETELY"

      Reminds me of that article the other day...

      "GMC to Begin Remotely Scanning Cars for Trouble"

      If GMC start changing the cars behavior through this system, removing features or, lets say adding a a feature, say a limiter on the engine through this 'service', that would be an analogy to the Tivo.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    32. Re:I don't think you get it... by bnenning · · Score: 1

      From the way it rewinds a little after you stop fast forwarding

      Of course, that's only necessary because they caved to advertisers and removed the 30-second skip. With my EyeTV I hit skip 4-6 times, get back to the show, and hit the 7-second back button 1-3 times.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    33. Re:I don't think you get it... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      No, it said that time shifting could be a fair use.

      But there continues to be no such thing as a blanket fair use. Each individual occurrence must be considered on its own merits. Therefore, when person A timeshifts show 1, we have to go through the fair use analysis. When person B timeshifts show 1, we have to go through the fair use analysis. And so on.

      For what is a fair use for one person, in one circumstance, with one work, may not be if we change any or all of the parties involved, the circumstances, or the work in question.

      That fair use is some magic invocation, or can be absolutely relied upon, is a myth.

      I would encourage you to carefully read 17 U.S.C. 107, which describes fair use. Original sources are far superior to Internet myths.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    34. Re:I don't think you get it... by interiot · · Score: 1
      Well, I personally disagreed with this notion, all the way back to the my.mp3.com case.

      It's absurd. It should be okay to change purchased .wma's to .mp3's for use on another device that you own, no matter what. Maybe there's some reasonable legal argument for why things have to be that way, but if it flies completely in the face of reason, then it should be rejected.

    35. Re:I don't think you get it... by KillShill · · Score: 1

      you control your MythTV, TiVO controls the box you paid for.

      that's as much as i and others need to know.

      if you don't control it, someone else does.

      DRM is all about control, especially after a sale has been made. if that doesn't disgust you, i have a state to sell you and you are permitted to cleanse it ethnically.

      people have been propogandized so thoroughly, they think DRM is for their benefit. that's something we informed geeks need to help educate the public about.

      this is the same "business model" that the console industry practices. they control access to the physical machine you paid for through the use of encryption to prevent you using the chips you own.

      ALL DRM is bad. period. notice i said DRM and not access mechanisms like file system permissions and having locks on doors so don't try that ;-)

      education is the key and i'll keep saying it until i die.

      you want control over something, then sign a real contract, written on paper, using a real signature with a pen, with an employee of the company in question. don't try to trojan horse your EULA into the equation. people don't believe bullshit like that and i'll keep bringing it up until it becomes mainstream.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    36. Re:I don't think you get it... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      If it is exempted, then there's no time limit.

      Actually, no. That would go directly towards the fourth factor of the fair use test. A temporary copy (e.g. time-shifting) is unlikely to hurt DVD sales. A permanent copy, building a video library could be. The only reason no distinction has been made is that it's been impossible to determine how you actually use the tape - until now. I imagine this will end up in court once DRM-crippled recorders become common.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    37. Re:I don't think you get it... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      An interesting idea, but pretty novel. And I think it might be difficult to reconcile with copyright operating in terms of exclusive rights to actions. That is, copying might be illegal or not, but the resulting copy is not inherently legal or illegal.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  66. Re:It's a bug. It's also a feature! Reconsideratio by jonogibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love my TiVo, and despite reading stuff about TiVo placing ads over content, I've never seen it myself. And I'm good enough with the remote that I never watch commercials unless I want to.

    But this is simply poor engineering... something I've never said about TiVo before. I understand that if I buy a Pay Per View movie for a buck, I'm not supposed to be able to watch it over and over forever... for that I have to buy the $20 DVD. So, why don't they just charge me per view? I should be able to keep it as long as I want as long as I haven't watched it. Then, after I watch it, it could be deleted, or stay on the hard drive and charge me another buck if I watch it again.

    That's pay-per-view!

  67. BitTorrent by inmate · · Score: 1

    Damn!
    I really hope they don't implement this Macrovision stuff on my BitTorrent Client.
    Now that would be unfortuanate!

    --
    --- blackironprison, where ignorance is bliss....
  68. roll your own TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TiVo has been steadily going downhill lately. The best thing you can do: get a card for your PC and make your own TiVo. It gives you much more flexibility.

  69. I want to shit and vomit all over them by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Seriously I want to go to all the 'holders' and vomit and shit all over them for a finite amount of time at the end of which time they have to clean it up or face penalities.

    I want content providers to copywrite my colonoscopy movie and licence it back to me.

    Fuck you in the plutonium flames of hell.

    1. Re:I want to shit and vomit all over them by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      I want content providers to copywrite my colonoscopy movie and licence it back to me.

      Funny you're saying that, since I'm getting mine this afternoon. :^(

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  70. Diving Sales! by HangingChad · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    TIVO is trying to maintain that it was the content provider who made them do it. They can't pass the buck that easy. If TIVO stops doing what people want, it's not the provider they're going to take it out on, they'll drop TIVO. And it doesn't matter who was at fault.

    If TIVO thinks viewers will make that fine of a distinction, let me remind you that this is the same general public who couldn't tell the difference between a real war hero and a dope-smoking, draft-dodging Connetitcut Yankee pretending to be a religious fighter pilot from Texas.

    Don't toss that old VCR just yet.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Diving Sales! by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "If TIVO thinks viewers will make that fine of a distinction, let me remind you that this is the same general public who couldn't tell the difference between a real war hero and a dope-smoking, draft-dodging Connetitcut Yankee pretending to be a religious fighter pilot from Texas."

      I'll give you points if by "real war hero" you were referring to Senator John McCain losing out to Bush in the primaries for Republican Presidential nomination for the 2000 election. If instead you are referring to that opportunist John Kerry, then you lose points.

      And when I refer to points, I mean in terms of general principle, and not in terms of moderator points here on Slashdot.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    2. Re:Diving Sales! by HangingChad · · Score: 1
      If instead you are referring to that opportunist John Kerry, then you lose points.

      No, I meant John Kerry. He had the same silver spoon ticket out and took his chances in the shit. That means more to me than some gutless poser who had "other priorities" at the time.

      Kerry's got more guts than that incompetent you backed and he's a better man. And, for the record, you can take your points and stick 'em right up your godless, corrupt Republican ass.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    3. Re:Diving Sales! by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Kerry's got more guts than that incompetent you backed and he's a better man. And, for the record, you can take your points and stick 'em right up your godless, corrupt Republican ass."

      My point is that McCain is a *real* war hero. So if you want to cite that (war hero) as a great quality for a candidate, then you should be lamenting that McCain failed to receive the nomination for the 2000 campaign.

      Kerry went into that "war" so that he could make a name for himself and run against it. Kinda like how he voted against the Kyoto Treaty when it was in the Senate and then later criticized Bush for not supporting that very same treaty. Yep, that makes him quite a man now doesn't it?

      And continuing, I don't think it was Bush who married a billionnaire to get access to easy campaign money to further his political career. But I might be wrong. Oh wait, he (Bush) married a school teacher. My bad.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  71. The free market can't work... by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...if you have no way of knowing what you bought.

    The most insidious thing about DRM-enabled devices is their ability to change the deal long after you've made your purchase decision.

    No doubt there is a legal fiction that you agreed to some fine print somewhere that says, in effect, "I know I'm buying a pig in a poke."

    We need a "truth-in-DRM" law. If there were a conspicuous sticker saying "Warning: this device may not actually record the programs you want to record. There is no way for you to know in advance which programs you can or can't record. The fact that you can record your favorite programs now does not mean you will be able to record them in the future," then purchasers would know what they were buying and the free marker could operate.

    1. Re:The free market can't work... by KillShill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the free market is like dehydrated water.

      it simply ceased to exist a long time ago.

      in a free market, chinese companies would be able to sell you a device to bypass the HDCP restrictions on your TV.

      a European company would be able to sell you a ppc box to install Mac OS on.

      a Canadian company could sell you a modified Tivo to record and transfer video into and out of it and to enable all features.

      an Indian company could sell you a region free DVD player legally, in let's say Circuit City stores.

      a Russian Company could sell you a playstation3 or xbox360 modified to allow you to actually have access to the chips inside the box.

      a Brazilian company would be legally allowed to sell you a monitor that would enable you to play high definition video and audio without the OS crippling the output.

      and the list goes on and on.

      that free market died.. a few days after it was born, when they found out that in a free market, customers got a fair deal and that they couldn't milk and control the customers and products after the sale.

      we are in a quagmire in these modern times.

      we have to fight for every little right that we had just, relatively, a while ago.

      we had property rights and we liked it that way.

      we had honest commerce and we liked it.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  72. Re:It's a bug. It's also a feature! Reconsideratio by iainl · · Score: 1

    So, given that the whole point of this is that a bug caused a 'normal' program to inadvertently get flagged as a PPV one, you'd have rather the box messed up and charged you money to watch it, rather than just messed up and made the recording less viewable (though not completely useless) than normal?

    That's your call, I guess. Personally, I accept that Tivo would never get a box past the networks that completely bypassed the Macrovision etc. on PPV broadcasts, and this seems to be the best compromise available.

    Not that any of it even directly affects me, as Tivo don't sell boxes in the UK. So I'm just speaking hypothetically.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  73. Replay TV here I come .... by Luscious868 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If TiVo implements this, I'm throwing my TiVo out the door. I think TiVo is by far the best PVR out there, but I'd much rather settle for a less elegant UI and move to something like Replay TV. Replay TV has got some pretty sweet features of it's own and I was considering it as my next DVR but I really do (or did anyway) love my TiVo.

    1. Re:Replay TV here I come .... by Akoma+The+Immortal · · Score: 1

      Man I geting tired of linking to this:

      See my earlier post here!!

      Can you do a fact checking before spooting marketing speak to us??

      --
      assert(expired(knowldege)); core dump
  74. EFF by scaverdilly · · Score: 1

    The walkthrough on Electronic Frontier Foundation says that to legally do this, you have to do it before July 30, 2005.

    It seems that "biting the bullet" in this case could mean putting your lips around the barrel and try to catch it as it comes out?

    1. Re:EFF by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      That deadline was pushed back by the FCC, IIRC its June 30 2006 now, but donm't hold me to it.

      That being said, I want a Hauppage HDTV card on a PCIe 1x slot. The 350 is the gold standard amongSD tuners but they don't have an HD product and the number of PCI slots on new motherboards is shrinking quickly.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    2. Re:EFF by Phillup · · Score: 1

      The walkthrough on Electronic Frontier Foundation says that to legally do this, you have to do it before July 30, 2005.

      That was true when the article was written... but no more.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
  75. In a recent press release... by Brass+Cannon · · Score: 1

    Tivo exec Ignatius Given announced that the company recently struck an agreement which will allow Tivo units to play back recorded programs only when those shows are actually airing on live television.

    Mr. Given was quoted as likening this agreement to releasing a directors cut of a movie. "Now viewers can be certain that they are viewing content exactly during the timeslot intended by the shows creator."

    This news followed the previous release stating that Tivo would be replacing the skipped commercials with 30 second banner ads.

  76. if this is true by yagu · · Score: 1

    (For those who don't read all of the references, as a preamble to my post, an example of what is happening is some tivo owner had a two year old episode of "King of the Hill" deleted from his tivo without his permission!)

    If this is true, and the direction turns to restrictions of what, when, and how I can use my tivo, I will be canceling that subscription, and ebaying the hardware while (and if) it retains any value. I have owned six tivos now, each time I've upgraded (I actually own two), I've "turned on" others to tivo by sending my oldest machine to them for free, they only had to pay the subscription fee.

    I'm a huge fan of tivo, ergonomically, their system is as close to right as it comes. It's a great concept, implemented wonderfully.

    But my relationship with television in general is already a tenuous thread and tivo is what's made it palatable. If they start putting restrictions like this in new releases, fuck them... I'm outta there.

    I sometimes wonder who the fuckbrains are that think they're improving their IP situation by applying screws to customers this way.

  77. Who Cares About You? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Lest there have been any doubt before, TiVo clearly does not care about its customers.

    TiVo website blame macrovision and even go so far as to say "Please do not contact TiVo Customer Support regarding copy protection related issues" is a total cop-out.

    I think every TiVo owner should precisely be contacting Customer Support about this. Jam up the telephone lines. How else is the company every going to know how their customers truly feel.

    Old saying: If you don't take care of the customer, someone else will.

    update: I just wanted to reiterate that yes, this was the result of a mistake on the part of the station providing syndicated shows.

    Don't consider this an update -- consider a warning! Your local stations already have this switch in place, and all they need to do is flip it now!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Who Cares About You? by KillShill · · Score: 1

      old saying: "if you don't control it, someone else does".

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  78. I don't see the point by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

    This "protection" seems a little too harsh to me. Why should copyright holders care if a show is stored on your TiVo? I can see them adding a flag to disable the feature of copying the shows to your own PC, and in effect the internet.

    I, for one, would be very pissed if I were a TiVo subscriber and basically the terms of service have changed. I go on vacation for a month, and all of a sudden TiVo can't keep my recorded shows because of the almighty copyright.

    --
    I got nothin'
  79. Interesting read, but... by thetelepath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It was an interesting read, but not really newsworthy, in my opinion. Mostly, it boiled down to "much ado about nothing". Sure, they support content protection flags. Right now, only PPV actively uses them. And the one example of misuse was the mistake of a local broadcast television station over the antenna signal. So, if they support content protection flags for analog signals, which can apparently be easily removed, what does it really matter to us? There's the potential for abuse, but until that happens, it's not a problem. Just keep a watch on it.

    --
    Because it's about grace. It really is about grace.
    1. Re:Interesting read, but... by randyest · · Score: 1

      Right. But with a replayTV or a mythTV, even PPV doesn't expire or get deleted. And you can automatically skip commercials (with the replayTV, at least.) People need to know they have choices.

      --
      everything in moderation
  80. Take advantage of this to get half-price service by jhsewell · · Score: 1

    A few weeks ago, I called Tivo and asked that they cancel my service due to lack of Mac OS support and these DRM issues (it's been known for a while that Tivo would honor the broadcast flag with or without a legislative requirement to do so).

    They transfered me to a customer retention specialist who offered me a free month of service. I declined the offer. He then offered me half price service for life. I took the offer.

    So even if you don't care about these DRM issues or Mac OS support, call Tivo and threaten to cancel so that you can get half price service. It'll save you about $80 a year.

    -J

  81. TiVo downgrade removes viewing rights by davidwr · · Score: 1

    HOLLYWOOD, CA, USA

    In a surprise move, TiVo annouced it was screwing its customers by adding expiration dates and export restrictions to its shows.

    Speaking off the record, a high-ranking TiVo executive commented "BWUHAHAHAHAHA all your shows are belong to us BWUHAHAHAHAHA." His assistant later clarified the remark, saying "Only North Koreans need freedom to watch TV without restrictions."

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  82. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by brakk · · Score: 1

    Tivo doesn't require a phone line. You can hook up an external USB NIC to it, but that added about $40 (at the time) to the price tag and was a big reason I went with ReplayTV. I am also glad I did.

  83. It was a good run, but... by jdehnert · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, I have been a longtime Tivo user. I hacked my series 1 box to add more space, and I bought a series 2 box pre hacked.
    This initial incident seems to have been caused by a big that has highlighted a legitimate feature, but the cat is out of the bag now.

    Here is my problem with this.

    Tivo changed the way I watch TV, but perhaps it changed it more than they thought it would. I have no problem recording a show and not watching it for a few weeks, then sitting down on night and catching up on a months worth of new episodes. If the show gets dumped after 5 days, well, then I'm not going to see it.

    So now, depending on the network's whims, my Tivo box may have just become much less usefull. I can tell you 2 things that I will NOT be doing.

    1) Changing my TV viewing habits back to where I work around the shows schedule. There are precious few shows that I;m now going to rearrange my schedule around.

    2) Buy another Tivo. I was considering replacing my lifetime service series 1 with a lifetime service hacked series 2 (waiting for HDTV), however, it looks like this will be much less useful than what I am used to having.

    Sorry Tivo. It was a good run, but the other options are looking better and better all the time.

    --
    Eschew Obfuscation
  84. does this surprise anybody by suezz · · Score: 1

    this has been coming for months - DRM, TCPA - isn't it great - now there is going to be great iptv with the same drm crap that probably the MPAA and RIAA are forcing on the content providers.

    I say don't buy the crap - show them we will not stand for are rights being digitally managed - make them go bankrupt and spend the money on doing some family fun stuff. screw them and their movies we don't need them and never did. I hope the sob's go bankrupt and have to sell at least two of their houses.

  85. Relevant answer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at the links provided by other posters, I see that they suggest pre-built MythTV units at either $700 or $1800. As an exercise for the student, compare and contrast to the $49 price of a Tivo and describe why either of the units is worth two to four times the price of the Tivo plus a lifetime subscription.

    1. Re:Relevant answer.... by Fratz · · Score: 1
      compare and contrast to the $49 price of a Tivo and describe why either of the units is worth two to four times the price of the Tivo plus a lifetime subscription.

      Sure thing. From the Dragon product page:

      As of this writing, the HD Tivo is only offered through DirecTV, and their HD service requires special equipment and costs $10.99 month in addition to their standard service. On top of that, the HD Tivo costs $549 after rebate and has a monthly Program Guide fee of $5.99. $50 extra gets you a "local channel kit" which is an off-the-air antenna. The cost of all of this for the first year is $802.76 for a specialized, locked-down system that only stores up to 30 hours of HD content.

      When you consider the fact that an HD Tivo is a specialized piece of equipment that you cannot modify, cannot use for general-purpose computing, and it brings with it a monthly expense, the value Dragon offers becomes clear by contrast.

      Dragon has no ongoing fees, it stores a minimum(*) of 28 hours of HD content, and it is a powerful general-purpose computer built with off-the-shelf components. If you decide you no longer want to use MythTV on Dragon, you can turn Dragon into a workstation, a desktop PC, a file server, or put another PVR suite on it. It's your choice. If you decide that you no longer want to use your HD Tivo, you have no such options.

      (*) based on partition sizes of auto-installed KnoppMyth and 1080i content, with no other data using up HDD space

      --
      -- Fratz, human
    2. Re:Relevant answer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answers presuming that I see a value in having HD recording capability are null and void. I do not have an HD TV and see only very little probability of getting one in the next 3 or 4 years. Also, citing the value of a competitive unit as a PC is null and void. I have all the PCs I can possibly use (1 new desktop plus 3 prior generations in the garage and 1 new laptop plus 5 prior generations in the same garage). What I want is a unit which is foolproof, quiet, and generally fits in with other home entertainment components. Therefore I Tivo.

    3. Re:Relevant answer.... by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      Answers presuming that I see a value in having HD recording capability are null and void.

      I didn't notice any requirement that you see the value. The request said "describe why either of the units is worth two to four times the price of the Tivo plus a lifetime subscription". The response gave one scenario where a prebuilt MythTV box is cost-competitive with a Tivo. Whether or not you value that scenario is irrelevant; it exists.

    4. Re:Relevant answer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but the MythTV box is cost competitive with a Tivo unit only if we presume that PC capability or HD capability are worth a premium of $400 to $1400 over the price of the Tivo. Neither are.

    5. Re:Relevant answer.... by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      The example showed that an HD MythTV box is cost competitive with an HD Tivo, regardless of whether or not HD is worth the price premium.

      For me, MythTV with an HD card is cost competitive with an analog Tivo because I watch most of my TV on my computer monitor, which has HD-like resolution (unlike my TV.) Since I already have the display and the computer, the additional cost to me is time + $170 for an HD-3000 vs $50 + subscription fees for the Tivo.

  86. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by dmnic · · Score: 1

    at the time I purchased my DVR(3 years ago), Tivo would ONLY do initial setup via land line...after initial setup, it could use the usb NIC.
    since I only have cell service, I went with Replay.

  87. What kind of logic? by CausticPuppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can't maintain control over things you sold. If you want to maintain control, don't sell it.

    So if you purchase your cable modem from your cable provider, you shouldn't have to pay for monthly cable service? It is, after all, your cable modem. You should not have to pay to keep using something that you already own.

    If you purchased your cell phone from a cell phone provider, you shouldn't have to pay for monthly service. After all, you own the cell phone.. and now they want more of your money just so you can use it?

    Oh wait... in both of those examples, you use the company's resources in order to use the product that you own. Kind of like how you pay Tivo to use their guide service that they maintain and operate.

    By the way, you can use Tivo without the guide. It just becomes an expensive digital VCR. But a Tivo without a subscription is still far more useful than a cable modem without a subscription.

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    1. Re:What kind of logic? by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So if you purchase your cable modem from your cable provider, you shouldn't have to pay for monthly cable service?

      Not quite... more like if you own your cable modem, your are free to tell your current provider to take a hike and hook up with a different provider.

      If someone were to setup a free provider, you would be within your right to switch to them - though I already know this isn't going to happen, I'm just continuing with your point.

      Meaning that if someone out there DOES set up free TiVo guides, you are within your rights to use it.

      Obligatory IANAL.

    2. Re:What kind of logic? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So if you purchase your cable modem from your cable provider, you shouldn't have to pay for monthly cable service? It is, after all, your cable modem. You should not have to pay to keep using something that you already own.

      You're muddying the waters here. There are two items being sold a Tivo and a subscription, just like a cable modem and a subscription to cable internet. Your analogy breaks, however, because if I buy a cable modem I can do whatever I want to it, and the cable company cannot. They can't come over and fill the USB port with glue and they can't remotely turn that USB port off.

      The problem is, in addition to changing their service, they are remotely disabling features in the hardware box they sold you. They are stopping you from using a specialty computer you bought by remotely turning off functionality. That is called hacking most of the time.

      The second problem is that if you sell a service, especially when you sell a lifetime subscription to that service, it is unethical and probably illegal to remove parts of that service from customers who have already paid.

      Of course as soon as Tivo started to introduce this DRM crap and tech-savvy user should have known this crap was coming. When a company starts introducing anti-features that make things harder for their customers (because they want to get an account with big cable company and sell bulk) then they have sold you out. That is one of the main reasons I did not buy a Tivo. The interface was nicer and the guide was easier to use than the EyeTV unit/old computer solution I did go with, but I can still record, store on my hard drive, burn to DVD, or transfer over the network anything I want. I archive my favorite shows to DVD, just like I used to save some on VCR tapes. I bought my hardware and while software updates from the vendor may be useful, I won't install any that remove functionality.

      As for a subscription, I get my guide information from TitanTV. It is free (banner ad supported) and if I ever need to I can go with a competing service.

      you can use Tivo without the guide.

      The question is not whether you can use the Tivo without the guide. The question is can you use the Tivo without the guide and store any program you record indefinitely or will it automatically delete via this DRM software they just loaded onto your bought and paid for machine, without your consent?

    3. Re:What kind of logic? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      Crap, I forgot where I put my clue-bat. Probably not worth the effort it would take to hit you with it anyway.

      I'm glad this hasn't affected my TiVo (and therefore me), probably becuase it's too old for version 7. I'm on version 3.something.

      OTOH, this will affect the TiVo company. When time comes for me to get an HDTV PVR, I'll have to take TiVo's commitment to the customer vs. their commitment to big money into account. Sure, they're within their rights to suck up to media producers, but I'm within my rights not to buy another TiVo product.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    4. Re:What kind of logic? by harryk · · Score: 1

      Unlike your cell phone, or your cable modem, you cannot choose which service you get through a TiVo device (atleats without hacking it, if I understand the tech correctly).

      If there was an option to program the Tivo box to retrieve its listings from an alternate source that would be one thing, but since you cannot choose, your analogy doesn't hold.

      Atleast with cell phone service you can choose which provider you use it with, and the same applies (albeit more limited) to the purchased cable modem.

      If the TiVo service you purchased was better than what is available freely, then thats one thing, but at this point its becomming crippling to continue to use the TiVo box.

      I'd rather have the option of a free basic guide listing, and the option to purchase guide listings that added value, maybe a free guid only contained 2 days worth of data, whereas a purhcased guide contained 5 days, or something...

      Just my 2 cents.

      --
      think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
    5. Re:What kind of logic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can take my cable modem and use it with another cable company. I can use my Nokia on a different cell service provider.

      Can I use my Tivo with another provider???

      How dumb is the parent post?

    6. Re:What kind of logic? by calzones · · Score: 2, Insightful

      afaik, you canNOT use TiVo without the subscription. The box will not do anything without the subscription (except, supposedly, replay stuff you already recorded, until,it ahem, expires).

      Without a subscription, you have a large, ugly paperweight.

      And my cable company provides me with listings for free, why should I pay monthly for listings? TiVo is not charging you for the listings, that's a ruse. They're charging you to make money and pretending it's the listings. There are plenty of other ways for a box to get listings, but TiVo won't let you use anything but their service.

      Now they turn around and use this "service" to further cripple the functionality you paid for.

      I agree with the parent/grandparent who pointed out: either rent something or sell something. There can be no in between.

      --
      Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    7. Re:What kind of logic? by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

      By the way, you can use Tivo without the guide. It just becomes an expensive digital VCR. But a Tivo without a subscription is still far more useful than a cable modem without a subscription.

      Actually you can't with a Series 2 tivo, it won't let you past the setup unless you connect up to the tivo service.

      Though in my current tivo setup, it did let me do the initial setup without a subscription but then it kept telling me to subscribe. The manual also states it won't work without a subscription.

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    8. Re:What kind of logic? by CausticPuppy · · Score: 2, Informative
      The problem is, in addition to changing their service, they are remotely disabling features in the hardware box they sold you. They are stopping you from using a specialty computer you bought by remotely turning off functionality. That is called hacking most of the time.

      The second problem is that if you sell a service, especially when you sell a lifetime subscription to that service, it is unethical and probably illegal to remove parts of that service from customers who have already paid.


      From the Tivo terms of service:

      6. Changes to Your TiVo Service. TiVo may at its discretion and from time to time change, add, or remove features and functionality of the TiVo service or the TiVo DVR without notice. If you are dissatisfied with any such changes to the TiVo service, you may immediately cancel your use of the TiVo service as provided in Section 14 ("Termination of Service"). TiVo reserves the right to discontinue one, some, or all of the features of the TiVo service you receive at any time at its discretion. TiVo may at its discretion discontinue the provision of software updates to certain TiVo DVRs. This means that while other TiVo DVRs may receive continued software updates and functionality; TiVo is not required to provide such updates to your TiVo DVR. Additionally, the level of service TiVo provides may not be the same on each TiVo DVR; a given TiVo DVR may support different features and functionality, and TiVo is under no obligation to provide all features and functionality to your TiVo DVR.


      It's actually been over two years since I subscribed to Tivo (through DirecTV) so I don't know if this is a new addition or not. In fact DirecTV probably had its own version. But suffice to say that this is the agreement that (presumably) every Tivo user agreed to when they set up their service initially.

      I'm not saying it's necessarily good, but... legally Tivo isn't doing anything that the subscriber hasn't agreed to let them do.
      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    9. Re:What kind of logic? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      The text in the ToS notwithstanding, isn't it generally a point of contract law that a party can't unilaterally change the terms of the contract without consideration? If TiVo chooses to rescind part of their service without giving a corresponding break on the price (the aforementioned consideration), it seems to me that they could be at the losing end of a lawsuit, and that the applicable parts of the ToS could be held as unenforceable.

      Anyone that knows anything about law want to chime in here?

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    10. Re:What kind of logic? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it's necessarily good, but... legally Tivo isn't doing anything that the subscriber hasn't agreed to let them do.

      ...and how many people read that agreement or any of the other hundreds of multi-page pseudo-legal documents they are required to sign every year? Did they include on the outside of the box a disclaimer under where it says, "allows you to watch your favorite programs when you want" something along the lines of, "unless we decide to delete it after a while because the network asked us to" ???

      If not then they misled their customers with false advertising. Maybe they can get away with it, legally, although I think that is very questionable. You see companies put all sorts of unenforceable clauses in their contracts all the time and they often lose in court regardless.

      Common sense and consumer protection acts say that if you sell a service you can't change the terms later on without compensating the other party, even if your contract says you can. Ethically, we all know this is crap and what Tivo is doing is screwing their customers in order to get big contracts from the cable companies for a few years until they get bought out or replaced. It is sad, but that is the way it is.

      Who knows what the courts will decide, or even if it will ever go to court. Most likely Tivo will settle with a few upset people and the majority will just deal with it. The important thing is, Tivo, you suck.

    11. Re:What kind of logic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally speaking that is correct, if there are no provisions within the contract that specifically address changes to the contract. In this case, however, there are specific terms with in the contract (the EULA or TOS) that address TiVo's right to modify said contract (the EULA or TOS).

      However that doesn't apply here. TiVo is not modifying the terms of service, they are modifying the components of the service itself. As the specific service components are not specified within the TOS, they are not modifying the contract itself.

      Think of it the same way you would a rental agreement for an apartment. You're apartment may come with hardwood floors that you love. They may have been the deciding factor in your decision to sign a lease. Unless your lease specifically covers the inclusion of hardwood floors in the apartment the landlord would be free at anytime to cover said floors with wall to wall carpeting and you have no recourse.

    12. Re:What kind of logic? by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      By the way, you can use Tivo without the guide. It just becomes an expensive digital VCR.

      No, you can't. That was only true with the original Series 1 Tivos. Any Tivo bought in the last few years (Series 2) *HAS* to have the service to work, period. A Series 2 without the service isn't a "Digital VCR," it's a doorstop.

      So a more accurate analogy would be:

      1. You buy your own cable modem which can only work with your particular cable company
      2. You cancel your cable company's service
      3. Your cable modem is now worthless (unless you can find someone else willing to pay for the service to buy it)

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:What kind of logic? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      You're apartment may come with hardwood floors that you love. They may have been the deciding factor in your decision to sign a lease. Unless your lease specifically covers the inclusion of hardwood floors in the apartment the landlord would be free at anytime to cover said floors with wall to wall carpeting and you have no recourse.

      At least in this state, the landlord substantially modifying a dwelling by, say, replacing the flooring, is grounds for a penalty-free re-negotiation of the lease. That is to say, they have to give you your deposit back and any rent you have paid in advance and you can walk.

      I imagine their are plenty of customer protection laws on the books that will cover Tivo changing the nature service after it is paid for and misrepresenting said service in their advertisements. I think you're making the mistake of assuming all clauses in a contract are necessarily enforceable. That is not so, there are many laws that restrict what can and cannot be specified in a contract and I'd bet dollars to donuts a clause that says they can change the service at any time in the future would run afoul of more than one of them.

    14. Re:What kind of logic? by rujholla · · Score: 1

      The question is not whether you can use the Tivo without the guide. The question is can you use the Tivo without the guide and store any program you record indefinitely or will it automatically delete via this DRM software they just loaded onto your bought and paid for machine, without your consent?


      In short -- No

      If you stop paying for service after a while your TIVO locks up and you cant even record things that you manually program via time and chanell.

    15. Re:What kind of logic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're muddying the waters here. There are two items being sold a Tivo and a subscription, just like a cable modem and a subscription to cable internet. Your analogy breaks, however, because if I buy a cable modem I can do whatever I want to it, and the cable company cannot. They can't come over and fill the USB port with glue and they can't remotely turn that USB port off.


      They can however cut your service if you attempt to do something they don't like, such as attempting to "uncap" your cable modem. That would have been a beter analogy for GP to use. What your doing is modifying your OWN equipment, but since your cable company probably doesn't like it..

    16. Re:What kind of logic? by BlueHands · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There really isn't 2 separate items being sold. With a series 2 tivo the service is mandatory. Just because someone didn't realize this doesn't change what is being done.

      Part of that agreement is to allow them to update you machine (which includes service). Some updates you will like, others you won't. The scope of what they can legally do is going to be pretty wide (since they wrote the contract). They could probably delete all you shows 5 minutes after they air, legally.

      The question of whether or not it is SMART is very different. All this means is that a open source all-in-one package will come out that much faster, presuming that the legislature doesn't make it illegal.

      I was a VERY early tivo series 1 adopter. More and more it looks like my next PVR will have to be open source. When my current tivo dies, or when they cripple it too much, I will move on to another device and miss the friendly tivo sounds. I will curse them much like I do many other companies that had an amazing brand and then flushed it down the toilet.

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
  88. Bit of a knee-jerk post by jgercken · · Score: 1

    Yes the technology is in place but is believed to have been activated due to the incompetence of a single broadcaster who erroneously set flags on all of its programming. Read the blogs, most come to this conclusion.

    --
    Never ascribe to malice what can be adequately attributed to ignorance. -Napoleon
  89. what a shame by bravo369 · · Score: 1

    i don't have tivo but I have to say that this is a shame that tivo has done this. I hate having my rights infringed upon and told what to do when I'm doing nothing wrong. If I want to keep an episode or a movie for months or years then I should be allowed to. I guess it's a paid service so you have to live with it but it still doesn't make it right.

  90. This just in... by kahei · · Score: 1


    ReplayTV sued to the waterline after recieving publicity on Slashdot.

    This is exactly what happened with WinMX -- somebody told the world about it and it stopped working.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  91. Obviously not listening to their customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps someone else would care to release an update that fixes the bugs introduced in this software release.

  92. Congrats TIVO - VCR now more functional... by TheRealStyro · · Score: 1

    With this update the old VCRs I have laying around are now more functional than a TIVO. At least with a VCR I know that if I go away for a month the shows I want recorded will still be waiting for me. This update for TIVO is a death toll for what was once a very promising device/company.

    --
  93. Books/Video in the library by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    If you borrow books or video from the library, are you allowed to make a copy to keep.

    How is this content protection different? The chap who owns the TV show doesn't want you to copy it for keeps. It's his show & he decides whether it can be copied or not & how long the copy can be kept.

    I don't see anything unfair in this.

    1. Re:Books/Video in the library by ilyaaohell · · Score: 1

      TiVo isn't a rental service.

      --
      UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
  94. Why are they doing this? by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

    I see what the Tivo folks are doing, but I can't understand why. Are they trying to preempt regulation? What's in it for them to cripple their products?

  95. New customer - possibly new cancellation by skalogre · · Score: 1

    Bloody great. I just got my new Humax the day before yesterday and now they pull this crap on me? What is the point of having the machine if I cannot store things???

  96. You miss the point by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He's not saying the problem is that they are selling boxes that then you have to buy service for.

    He's saying that they are selling boxes and then expect you cannot modify the boxes in any way you see fit.

    It's like cell-phone companies (to use your example) locking a phone to one service - users have figured out how to unlock many phones, or activate features the carriers do not want you do have.

    In the case of a cable modem, you bought it and can modfy how it does routing as you see fit. Yes you have to pay a monthly service to get a connection through it, but you can still modify the box.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:You miss the point by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really.
      I am saying I don't expect THEM to modify the boxes and take things away from me after I bought their product, and expect me to continue paying them.
      Luckily I didn't buy their product.

      --
      .
    2. Re:You miss the point by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

      It's like cell-phone companies (to use your example) locking a phone to one service - users have figured out how to unlock many phones, or activate features the carriers do not want you do have.

      And the phone carriers aren't supposed to have an issue with that?

      In the case of a cable modem, you bought it and can modfy how it does routing as you see fit. Yes you have to pay a monthly service to get a connection through it, but you can still modify the box.

      And the cable providers aren't supposed to have an issue with that? Most cable companies will immediately suspend your service if you have modified your modem (which typically involves trying to uncap it).

      You can modify your cable modem, cell phone, or Tivo however you want. It's your hardware. That does not mean the service provider is still obligated to provide you with services.

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    3. Re:You miss the point by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's like cell-phone companies (to use your example) locking a phone to one service - users have figured out how to unlock many phones, or activate features the carriers do not want you do have.

      And the phone carriers aren't supposed to have an issue with that?

      Since this is the slow class . . .

      First. I buy a cellphone. Not rent, lease, or recieve as part of service, but buy. Purchase. Exchange money for. Not a subsidised purchase, an outright sale. Am I clear enough?

      Second, my service agreement with the carrier expires, lapses, ceases to be in effect, and I decide to shop around for new service.

      Now, I find another carrier with service compatible with the instrument that I own, you know, hold title to, legally possess. I decide to use this new carrier's service with my instrument. Is my old carrier supposed to have an issue with that? Maybe, but I don't care. It's my instrument. If they try to prevent me from using my instrument with another carrier, then perhaps they need to be investigated under the RICO act (in US). Get it? Or do I need to "dumb it down a shade"?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    4. Re:You miss the point by tolkienfan · · Score: 1

      You think it's ok when my carrier disables a function built into the phone, and provides a crappy version of their own, AND THEN CHARGES EXTRA FOR IT?

    5. Re:You miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the case of a cable modem, you bought it and can modfy how it does routing as you see fit. Yes you have to pay a monthly service to get a connection through it, but you can still modify the box.

      Wrong.

      Uncap a cable modem and the FBI raids your house and you go to jail. It happened here in Toledo, Ohio. Several local teenagers are now felons because they increased their available bandwidth by roughly 50%. The story was covered here on /.

    6. Re:You miss the point by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      You mean like Verizon disabled the Transflash slot on the Motorola V710 phones after you bought it, so now you have to pay them 25 cents to get YOUR pictures off YOUR phone?
      Yep. Exactly.
      Sleazy, huh?
      But Verizon has a cover story: The picture quality is now "better".
      As if that's an excuse.

      --
      .
    7. Re:You miss the point by servognome · · Score: 1

      First. I buy a cellphone. Not rent, lease, or recieve as part of service, but buy.

      If you buy a cellphone from a carrier by signing onto a plan, it is subsidized, therefore your are receiving the cellphone as part of the service. Pay full price for a cellphone and they come unlocked. So pay $59 for a cellphone from a carrier and deal with the restrictions imposed, or $499 and do whatever you want with your purchased hardware.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    8. Re:You miss the point by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem was not that they uncapped it. If they owned it they are free to uncap it.
      The problem is that they used it.

      --
      .
    9. Re:You miss the point by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you buy a cellphone from a carrier by signing onto a plan, it is subsidized, therefore your are receiving the cellphone as part of the service. Pay full price for a cellphone and they come unlocked. So pay $59 for a cellphone from a carrier and deal with the restrictions imposed, or $499 and do whatever you want with your purchased hardware.

      The carriers subsidize the price for their service based on the contract. You do buy it outright, whether or not you pay $59 or $499. The only difference is that with one, you have a cancellation fee of $440 and the other you don't have a cancellation fee. Either way, you do pay the full price for the phone. Also, I have bought phones outright from carriers for the $499 figure, and they did come locked. I still had to go out of my way to unlock the phones to work on other networks.

      So, you are wrong on both acounts. You do own the phone without restriction in both cases, regardless of the price you are charged, and the carriers do not have "locked" and "unlocked" phones which they distribute depending on how you buy the phone. They are either all locked or all unlocked for any specific model (some do make exceptions, but not automatically based on price paid, only based off customer requests).

    10. Re:You miss the point by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Pay full price for a cellphone and they come unlocked.

      Walk into a Cingular store (or whatever carrier) and buy a phone. Unless you are signing up for a new contract (or renewing one), you will pay full price. And you will get a locked phone.

      Carriers only subsidize phones when they need to do so for customer acquisition or customer retention. But they will be all too happy to sell you a full-priced phone at any other time - and one that's just as locked as any subsidized phone.

    11. Re:You miss the point by killercoder · · Score: 1

      Okay - allow me to dispel this popular urban myth. I've spent 12 years working in the Telco Industry. Specifically with the marketing and roll out of new products.

      If you buy a phone in North America and it has a carriers name on it (ie. Cingular, Telus, Bell South, Bell Mobility, Rogers, etc.) that phone was subsidized. Period. Now the amount of subsidy depends on situation (new customer/customer retention), but any phone with the branding is subsidized.

    12. Re:You miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ah, but 95% of in-store deals include a subsidy of some sort. Hence, why a replacement phone during a contract costs roughly what buying a non-contract phone outright. Part of the reason why you see companies like Circuit City turning the former retail space into rental for carriers is that they were being eaten alive on product line turnovers. That phone that would sell for $100 in the papers (e.g., Verizon's LG VX6000 was one I dealt with in retail) would actually cost the vendor $175 per unit to get; the service provider would then provide the vendor paybacks for each new contract activation. Elsewise, you got charged $250 for the handset outright.

      After your contract expires and/or you buy the phone outright, you are indeed correct that the unit is yours to use. However, to say that cell phone providers in this country do not provide any form of subsidy in purchasing is patently false.

      To be frank, if you're the kind of person who will take a one- to two-year-old phone and reuse it on another provider, your old provider would probably be glad to see you go as they couldn't milk you on a new handset with your contract renewal (unless, of course, you're on the $150/month business plan).

      All in all, be sure to check the agreement you sign with a new handset purchase. You'll notice that a new contract with a new handset requires two signatures; take a minute and read the fine print before you talk about racketeering. "A sucker is born every minute" or some such.

    13. Re:You miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I've spent 12 years working in the Telco Industry. Specifically with the marketing and roll out of new products.

      Well done! Having the courage to admit that you have a problem is the first step on the road to recovery. Once on that road, may you and each member of your vile coven be hit by speeding busses.

  97. Does this impact save to DVD? by RickMuller · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know whether the copy protection also limits the ability to save the program to DVD? We have a series 1 TiVo, and had been thinking about upgrading to a new TiVo with a DVD burner. But if I can't save shows to the DVD, there isn't much point if I can't actually save shows to it.

  98. Content Flags = Illegal by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Sorry but the courts struck down content flags so Tivo implementing this may be illegal and if content providers are trying to sneak this into television this way then I'm sure the EFF will get onto them for this.

  99. Re:It's a bug. It's also a feature! Reconsideratio by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Because then TiVo would need to be able to communicate with every cable networks PPV system and billing system - thats something that will never happen. If you want to view the PPV again, just buy it again from your cable network.

  100. even as a TiVo enthusiast, this crosses the line by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1


    This story really cheesed me off this morning prior to work. I like TiVo, and up until this point, my only criticism about the company has been with their snail-pace movement towards adding necessary features to their product (CableCard 1.0/2.0 support, HD support, etc.), but this is inexcusable. I would understand DRM inclusion to PPV content and I would accept that. I would even accept this DRM for TiVo software updates to the Comcast DVRs scheduled for next year since Comcast already has such *understandings* with the content companies...but to add this to existing TiVo Series2 set-top boxes for general programming? No frakkin' way.

    Its time for a shareholder revolt against TiVo's obviously inept management team.

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  101. BYOPVR by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    I was just contemplating whether it's better for me to go through the expense and time to build a decent PVR myself, or just go the easy route and buy a TiVo. The TiVo would be cheaper, and would "just work", but without the freedom and control it's not worth the savings. MythTV, here I come...

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  102. Funny, I feel the same way about Ultimate TV by bill_kress · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've got an old Ultimate TV box and I have yet to see a pvr (including TIVO) that comes anywhere near it.

    The menus are much simplier to navigate, the +30/-7 second skip is perfect, the keyboard has a nice layout (A little bulky, but comes in handy for searches). Nothing else comes close.

    Maybe it's just that we like what we are used to?

    1. Re:Funny, I feel the same way about Ultimate TV by Goldenhawk · · Score: 1

      Ditto. We bought a TiVo for my wife's mother, but I'd never trade give up my UTV for a TiVo. The skip and guide are MUCH more responsive and well-designed. Imagine, a M$ product I actually like.

      One gripe (a common problem) with the UTV boxes is the high failure rate of the dual tuners. I have had two units lose one of the two tuners now. I finally bought a few spare units on eBay, so I've got a hardware backup.

      The real problem will be the service. At some point M$ can simply decide to stop supporting the guide service, or stop sending out the "allow you to keep using the PVR features" flag, and the UTV will stop being useful overnight. That's right, if you don't have a valid access card you can't play back recorded shows. And older units don't have the latest software updates (that have some really valuable changes). So even the UTV is a slowly-dying breed. I really dread the day I can no longer keep it running.

      --
      --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  103. This could change the whole Tivo experience by Control-Z · · Score: 1


        If many shows start getting flagged Tivo is in trouble. I leave many shows on Tivo for weeks, months, even a year before I watch them. That's what I like about Tivo, if I decide I want to watch The Simpsons at any given time I have several episodes to choose from.

        The biggest reason to have Tivo is to watch TV on your own terms. This is the sort of thing that would inspire me to build a MythTV box.

  104. But like the good lil' crack-addicts they are... by rahyl · · Score: 1

    You'll complain up and down until you're blue in the face but at the end of the day, if you still subscribe to the service, you're no different than a crack addict complaining about a price increase.

    The only difference any of you can make is by cancelling the service. This is the only thing they will understand which is really very convenient.

    The only question that remains: are [i]you[/i] going to behave like a crack addict or are you going to step up to the plate and cancel the service?

  105. Try SageTV by World+War+II+Online · · Score: 1

    http://www.sage.tv/ All of the features of tivo for a one time price. It uses windows so you don't have to spend alot of time tinkering with linux to get it working.

  106. For all the TiVo sucks, MythTV is better people... by caffeinex36 · · Score: 1

    get your parents and grandparents a MythTV box. tell them to call when there is a problem or they dont understand something. add up the money you spent on a MythTV box, setting it up, etc. etc. teaching them how to use it, then gas money, then the money you had to spend buying a TiVo to replace the mythTV box, that your parents and gradnparents actually setup themselves. yes. i am a TiVo and mythTV user, both. the reason why TiVo does well is because of the reason i said above. my grandmother can record her soaps without having to call me or program a VCR. if your a power user, ok, biuld a mthTV box to be cool.

  107. Re:I don't see the point -- obviously!! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This "protection" seems a little too harsh to me. Why should copyright holders care if a show is stored on your TiVo? I can see them adding a flag to disable the feature of copying the shows to your own PC, and in effect the internet.

    You clearly don't understand copyright holders. If they could, they'd charge you for each time you view their program!

    When movies were shown in theaters, you had to buy a ticket anew for each viewing. (I won't tell you how many tickets I bought to the original Star Wars, but George Lucas is a rich man as a result.)

    The first pre-recorded movies cost in the $80 range 20 years ago (make that equivalent to $150) now, because of the argument that you could view them until the tape wore out. Finally someone realized that lower markups on greater volumes = higher profits overall. But while the technology was to force a pay-per-view existed in a few thousand theaters, it still wasn't feasible in tens of millions of homes.

    Technology marches forward. Napster now rents you music on a monthly subscription. Quit paying and all that music disappears no matter how much you paid them along the way. The content providers see the light at the end of the tunnel of true pay-per-use.

    Of course, the next step on that road means you can't be saving recordings you've made for free and having unlimited viewing opportunities for them afterwards. That's the step you are seeing here for the first time in the mass market.

    And this is a Big Deal because this is not a simple do-not-record flag. With it's expiration date it has become a vast expansion into limiting how and what you can timeshift. They have already put in place the framework to limit your viewing to a specific time. If you accept this, then how much harder is it to say you are limited to not only the specific short period of time, but also a limited number of viewings during that time? How does it feel to know that a person with a simple Betamax in 1977 had more freedom to timeshift and share recordings than you do with the latest TiVo?

    That's why they care, and that's why they hope this one step at a time will keep your outrage at their admittedly harsh measures and denial of Fair Use low enough that eventually they'll get everything they want. And then look at how much you start paying them!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  108. Liable by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Well, "wrong" is one word to use. The word I'd use is "liable". I think we'll see a class-action lawsuit soon.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Liable by geekee · · Score: 1

      " Well, "wrong" is one word to use. The word I'd use is "liable". I think we'll see a class-action lawsuit soon."

      I think Tivo is more worried about Hollywood than consumers.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    2. Re:Liable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then maybe we need to show them we are, collectively, more to be concerned about than Hollywood.

  109. Re:Content Flags = Illegal -- Not Exactly! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Sorry but the courts struck down content flags

    All the court struck down was the FCC making adherence to such flags mandatory in consumer electronic equipment. The court ruled that the FCC's mandate from Congress did not give them this authority -- yet!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  110. Re:It's a bug. It's also a feature! Reconsideratio by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

    If I lose that, TIVO loses me as a customer and no amount of lifetime memberships

    They could probably care less if they lose lifetime members - they already have all the money from them they're ever going to get.

  111. TiVo Stock plummets (I hope) (eom) by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    eom

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  112. Snapstream alternative by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

    A few folks have mentioned MythTV as a TIVO alternative. I actually built a system using Snapstream Beyond TV as a replacement for my TIVO. It is Windows based, supports a wide range of off-the-shelf hardware (you can even have more than 1 tuner for recording multiple programs at once, not that there is ever that much worth recording), and there is no monthly fee to access program data. All in all it works pretty well - it shares alot of the usability of TIVO (they copied well I think). However, that said, I have been unable to convince my wife to stop using TIVO and start using the homebrew. She really loves her TIVO. I have to admit TIVO is slightly easier to use and more friendly for the non-techie. And boy is it reliable (Linux inside) - we are on our third year and the thing just keeps on going and going (well, I did have to replace the hard drive - thank you TIVO hacking sites). Anyhow, sometimes there is more to a product than the simple checkbox specifications.

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  113. I thought you people were Linux hackers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon people, it's not like it's really difficult to hack a Tivo for file extraction with NO DRM (although an even simpler solution is just to buy a ReplayTV, which is pre-hacked for your convenience).

    Yes, I agree, Tivo and the MPAA are trying to screw us, but what the hell--we're smarter than they are! Just hack your box, extract to your heart's content, and laugh at them.

    1. Re:I thought you people were Linux hackers! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      "just to buy a ReplayTV"

      Or build your own PVR.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  114. MythTV wastes power by geekee · · Score: 1

    "Just one more good reason to bite the bullet, sit down, and build yourself a MythTV box."

    MythTV runs on general purose PC hardware only, and therefore wastes a lot of power. It would be much better if it ran on dedicated hardware.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
    1. Re:MythTV wastes power by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      Myth can be setup to automatically power up to record (using the BIOS), and then shut the computer down again marking the new wakeup time to start recording again once it's finished. Any regular use of Myth (watching pre-recorded shows, live TV, etc.) delays the shutdown.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
  115. Open up to Tivo Hacking? by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 1

    People buy Tivo- the box is theirs. Where are the people hacking stuff onto it? I've seen plenty of links/books based on hacking into the Tivo, but I can't remember any that involved totally replacing the whole OS. Can it be done? Has it been done?

  116. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyway to use Replay without purchase of a subscription?

    Can it be used as a Digital VCR?

  117. Macrovision is PEOPLE! by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    "Try reading more closely. This is a bug in the Tivo software, caused by a noisy signal, not actual content protection being used."

    I'm going to have to wrap my Tivo in tinfoil, me thinks =P

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  118. This will prob. push me over to MythTV by Bodhammer · · Score: 1

    I have been a long time Tivo user and I have generally loved it.

    I have been waiting to see what Tivo and Comcast had planned for a HDTV/Digital Cable/PVR box. This just let me know.

    I had resisted doing a MythTV box because with HDTV tuners and the capacity I wanted it would be about $600-700 (correct me if I'm wrong) but methinks I will revist the project.

    Can anyone suggest a good recipe site for a HDTV OTA MythTV box?

    Thanks,
    Bod

    --
    "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
  119. Bye Bye TiVO by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    No thanks, id prefer to retain control of my legally recorded media.

    Once the general public gets wind of this, there will be hell to pay. ( i hope ).

    'They' cant keep hiding this stuff from the general consumer for ever... People are more aware then they were 10 years ago.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  120. time shifting vs. archiving and GPL by geekee · · Score: 1

    I think this article brings up an interesting copyright issue. If it's ok to time shift tv shows to watch them when you want, does that also mean you get to archive the show and watch it as many shows as you want? Now that it has been shown that there is a market for DVD copies of tv shows, clearly this material, which should be protected by copyright, has value. Therefore archiving should be illegal since it is a violation of copyright.

    Now many people argue that "they beamed it into my home, I should be able to do with it whatever I want." However GPLed code is freely available for download, so therefore, I should be able to ignore the GPL agreement as well, since the arguement is essentially the same. Broadcast tv doesn't exempt copyright. The idea of pushing vs pulling is irrelevent in this case because either way, you've chosen to buy a device to receive the signal/code.

    So my point is, although time shifting is copying in a literal sense, it doesn't violate the spirit of copyright, since you watch the show once and then delete it. Archiving does violate copyright because you've made a copy, which you've kept. And I know about the hone recording act, but I think in the digital age it is overly permissive and unconstitutional.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
    1. Re:time shifting vs. archiving and GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good, well-reasoned post until the last two words, those threw all your credibility straight out the window. Have you ever even read the US constitution?

  121. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by IronChef · · Score: 1

    It is fantatic to be a smug ReplayTV user. :)

    Now if you will excuse me, I need to get on the web interface and schedule some shows to record.

  122. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by Alsee · · Score: 2, Informative

    REPLAYTV SIGNED THE SAME MACROVISION LICENSE AND THEREFORE WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE EXACT SAME RESTRICTIONS.

    If anyone is avoiding TiVo because of this, well you sure as hell do not want to get a ReplayTV either. It seems the only option is to buy or build a Myth box.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  123. I love my Tivo, but it sucks... by wardk · · Score: 1

    in that they could give a damn about Mac users.

    we don't exist except to take our money.

    I was one who paid the extra $99 for the home networking shit, now it doesn't even work unless I use a hack from a 3rd party.
    (and no, they did not volunteer a rebate, nor provide one when asked for it)

    as soon as there is something to replace it, it's replaced

  124. there's a magic #4, too by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    involving 4xxx series, 50xx series, and 55xx series under certain controlled conditions, but we won't mention that here on /., will we? :)

  125. My Myth box company by Free_Trial_Thinking · · Score: 1

    This event makes me feel that my idea for a myth box company is more viable. Here's my idea:

    Start a company that builds Myth boxes and sells them. If I buy the PC parts in bulk and standardize the hardware I use, then loading myth/linux onto each one would be simple.

    I just don't know where to start. Could this sort of business make money?

    Thanks,

    Starting a Myth box company in MD

    1. Re:My Myth box company by barfy · · Score: 1

      First this is not a simple problem space. One need only compare Tivo to things like Dish and Comcast boxes to see how bad most are, and how much TiVo still needs to go. Which means, other than a check list, a Myth box as being useful, is still that a Myth. It is not ready for grandma yet. (Installation is only part of the problem).

      That said, thanks to the bureacrats, the vast majority of possible solutions and implementations are locked in the patent portfolios of Creative/TiVo/and Microsoft. And if you get any traction at all, expect to be hauled into court and have your life made very miserable.

  126. Return it - demand a refund by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1
    In the UK something that is sold has to do what it claims to do, if it does not you can take it back and get a refund. If it later fails to perform you can also take it back (usually limited to the first year). It is the retailer who is responsible, they cannot make you deal with the manufacturer.

    Everyone who is upset about their machine no longer doing what they bought it for - should take it back to the shop that you bought it from and demand your money back. Either TiVo refund the shop or the shop will stop stocking TiVo.

    Consumers: use the power of your wallets!

  127. eff by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    "I'm sure the EFF will get onto them for this" But is that enough? Does the EFF's power compare, even in your wildest dreams, with the networks/studios' power?

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  128. Re:Take advantage of this to get half-price servic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He then offered me half price service for life. I took the offer.

    Way to stick it The Man....

  129. Premade HTPCs are available too by scronline · · Score: 1

    My company actually builds htpcs and will even come and install them for you (if you're close enough). We can build them to your specific requirements or for a general purpose. We don't use anything that's proprietary and you're free to do with your media what you wish, including PPV.

    A starting kit is only $800 with starting specs of:

    AMD Athlon 2600+
    Windows XP Home
    Hauppauge PVR150 with Remote and USB-UIRT
    SageTV
    512 MB of RAM
    80 GB SATA HDD
    Wireless Keyboard and mouse

    Flat panel plasma and LCD TVs, Surround sound, everything is available for the complete Home Theater.

    We can also build using MythTV or whatever configuration a user wishes. However support doesn't necessarily come directly from us for everything, it's a great start without too much of a pricetag and no "extra" monthly fees.

    So if you're not tech savvy (HAW this is /.) you can come to our site and contact us and we'll get you the hook up. I'm completing a massive Home Theater for a client right now. They built the theater, I brought the equipment to fit and configured it. I only WISH I could have a theater like this in my home.

  130. Re:Driving Stockprices into the floor by lantenon · · Score: 1

    3%, on a stock priced at approximately $5.10 per share, is statistical noise.

  131. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    "I use ReplayTV and have never had any problems with content protection. There is even a great open source tool called DVArchive (at sourceforge) that lets one copy shows to/from the ReplayTV units and even stream content directly from the ReplayTV to any machine that supports HTTP streaming."

    Suggesting people buy ReplayTV units in order to increase ReplayTV owner numbers by capitalizing on a mistake committed by TiVo is like suggesting people buy Rio branded MP3 players at this point instead of an Apple iPod over something like Ogg support.

    ReplayTV is owned by D&M Holdings. D&M Holdings was the owner of Rio until they recently abandoned the MP3 player market, sold off all the IP, and retained the brand name. D&M sold off Rio because they couldn't make a decent profit in the market due to Apple's overwhelming marketshare. Similarly, Replay has been on the market since 1999/2000 and has only a fraction of the installed user base of TiVo. Connect the dots.

    Building a MythTV player, a Windows Media Center PC, or an EyeTV unit for Mac owners would be a far more beneficial suggestion as suitable TiVo replacements. To advocate for Replay now is like advocating for Betamax.

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  132. Linux-specific hardware? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Wait, how can we get Linux-specific video capture cards (a moderately specialty device), and no designed-for-Linux video cards? What the crap is this?

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Linux-specific hardware? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      "Wait, how can we get Linux-specific video capture cards (a moderately specialty device), and no designed-for-Linux video cards? What the crap is this?"

      that's not exactly fair. Someone took the initiative to take a reference ATSC tuner design from conexant and write linux drivers for it and market it/sell it to linux/mythtv enthusiasts.

      You can feel free to do the same (or organize a cooperative to do so) for video cards...

      e.

      That's my understanding of PCHDTV, my assumptions and recollection could be wrong/off.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  133. MythTV and DVDR by baboon · · Score: 1

    Ok, I have MythTV and a DVDR-DL. My drive is about 50% full of kid shows I want on hand and wouldn't let expire. Amazon either doesn't sell them or wants something like $20 per hour.

    I would like to just select several shows and hit click 'Burn DVD'. I don't care if it creates simple B&W text-only menus, but picking a frame as a snapshot would be a cool bonus.

    There is a description of how to do it by hand, but it isn't in my interest to go through the effort. Is anyone planning on scripting this up and making a plugin for it?

  134. Here in Canada... by Bob+Hearn · · Score: 1

    TiVo has not deigned to offer service. So those of us who moved here with TiVo boxes have had to go to extraordinary lengths to make them work.

    After that effort, though - basically running a TiVo server on a home machine - we're free not only of the monthly payments, but also annoying stuff like this that TiVo adds now and then.

    Still, if I were in the US, I'd rather pay than deal with the periodic configuration hassles. Similar to MythTV, I imagine. But at least we get the nice TiVo interface. :-)

  135. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by randyest · · Score: 1

    Link to your source please?

    I doubt this will be added to old replay's in any case, since they haven't even reomoved the automatic commerical skip or sharing shows over the net feature from the 54xx series that got the original owner (SonicBlue) sued into bankruptcy.

    YMMV on the new 55xx models, but it's still possible to get the 54xx's on ebay and such. Moreover, it's possible to cut replay's mothership out of the loop entirely, so there's always a solution, though I prefer to pay my ($10) monthly fee because it's worth it and right.

    --
    everything in moderation
  136. UltimateTV by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

    All these Tivo things make me never want to get one. Once DirectTV cuts out support for my UltimateTV units (which were once made by the evil Microsoft, and I pay $10 a month to use, but I have one on 3 different TVs and the 3 units cost me $75 total), I highly doubt I'll accept any kind of upgrade deal to get DTV Tivo unit.

  137. Yes, people will care. For them Tivo is a jukebox by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1
    So they DRM the shows on your Tivo after a month.. by then people have either wiped it, or bought the damn thing on DVD.

    A significant proportion of Tivo users employ Tivo as not just a time-shifter/instant replay box, but as a sort of digital video jukebox. They leave shows present and watch them again and again. Some users up the capacity to 1000+ hours for just this reason. I use the Tivo in this way myself for certain shows. If stuff starts vanishing, so will my Tivo, and I'll switch to MythTV or an equivalent.

  138. direct links to the screenshots by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    Here's the now playing list. (yes yes, I know, Oprah and Dharma, what can I say, it's a shared TiVo.)

    Here's the program info.

    Here's the keep until screen.

    Here's the show details screen.

    Oh yeah, Bah! Bah, I say!

  139. I (really) don't understand... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    My lifetime-subscription ReplayTV 5040 links into my LAN and automagically pulls down schedule updates just fine via cablemodem, while a betamax VCR isn't even capable of playing current tapes.

    If you're suggesting that a ReplayTV is somehow obsolete, perhaps you should take a closer look at one. Even though it only has a single tuner and doesn't do hi def video, it does what I want it to do extremely well. I put it on the Vid2 port, anyway, so I use my TV's own dual tuners if I want live PIP! :-)

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    1. Re:I (really) don't understand... by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      Ummmm...the whole point is, that Betamax was technically superior to VHS, yet VHS won hands down, and Betamax withered away in the market...ya get the point now? ReplayTV, technically superior, market share approaching 0...now do ya dig where I was coming from? If you are tempted to further explain the superiority of ReplayTV to me, you are still missing the point...

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    2. Re:I (really) don't understand... by KillShill · · Score: 1

      and the difference is that replaytv units will continue to work without modification even if replay goes out of business.

      series 2 and newer tivos won't work at all without the service.

      and if you can crack the lockouts and DRM then maybe you can coax it to get back some of the features you paid for. it will certainly be crippled enough that you'd have regretted not buying a Free solution.

      this is the problem with ALL DRM. you don't own it and if something goes wrong, you have no recourse.

      imagine a world full of DRM...

      and what's the saying... Rome wasn't built in a day... yeah that DRM world won't be built in one day but it will boil the frog slowly.

      remember kids, every DRM product you buy, God brings our dystopic future closer.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    3. Re:I (really) don't understand... by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      Sigh...like I said, if you feel compelled to keep explaining that ReplayTV is superior to Tivo, yer still missing my point... I remember a time on the Internet, when simple concepts didn't whoosh over the heads of people like the Space Station...but it was a long time ago...

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    4. Re:I (really) don't understand... by KillShill · · Score: 1

      i didn't miss it.

      i just ignored it slightly and allowed myself to explain the situation and implications further.

      in this case, both are inferior. being slightly less evil and restrictive doesn't really correspond to the beta vs vhs debate.

      and i've been on the internet a long time too... it's degraded badly but i'd rather everyone have a voice, no matter how much it may be disagreed with. the alternative is to go back to the bad old days.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  140. Re: 13 bucks a month by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    I think it's idiotic that I need to pay 13 bucks a month just so it can know when a TV show is on.


    Speak for yourself. I pay $5/month for my DirectTivo, and I'd happily pay 5 times that to keep my Tivo. Think of it as a "TV Guide" subscription in electronic format.

    Now if this stupid DRM does go into effect on my beloved Tivo, I'm going shopping - and the Tivo's going on eBay.

  141. I assure you, it's not my idea. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Well, Tim Miller has a plan to do so. People are excited. It's even been covered on Slashdot, after he was interviewed by Kerneltrap.

    My question is---what are the obstacles in the way of an open source-friendly video card that were not in the way of an open source-friendly capture card? Why do we have one and not the other, when clearly more people have video cards than TV tuners? (Probably even not counting onboard video.)

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  142. another incorrect use of "content" by brre · · Score: 1
    The flags prevent copying of bits, not content. The content (if any) expressed in video encoded by those bits, is another matter.

    For instance, consider a news segment in which a talking head reports that a serious storm is approaching New Orleans. It is entirely legal to pass along the content: a serious storm is approaching New Orleans. The bits that are a specific expression of that content may indeed by copyrighted or otherwise protected. The content is not.

  143. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by Zepalesque · · Score: 1

    No there is not. If you drop your monthly payments your DVR turns into a brick.

  144. Yep. by bmajik · · Score: 1

    I was a long-time DirecTV subscriber, and when the Series2 DirecTivo (HDR2) came out i bought one immediately.

    We loved Tivo and I had always liked DirecTV.

    But a little over a year ago we cancelled our service, and put the HDR2 back in its box. (I have an odd habit of saving the original packaging for "expensive" electronics)

    You see, as much as I liked the Tivo, i found that there really wasn't all that much on that I wanted to watch, and the more stuff it stored, the more i felt obligated to spend time watching TV. Then there was the issue of my wife and I having totally incompatible program preferences, but only one Tivo. DirecTV has been pretty good about NOT including any of the cool Tivo features (no home network, etc).

    After living without TV for a while, when i visit someone with a TV on, i like watcing for a few minutes and then the commercial breaks come, and i ask myself "how the f@#$ does anyone put up with this? I feel myself getting dumber with each passing second..."

    The other thing i dislike is the airing schedules/habits of the various channels. On the rare chance that i find something i like (like, Samauri Champloo or whatever), i dont want to wait multiple days to see if Tivo has recorded a new episode. If the story is good, i want to watch all the episodes back to back, to see how the story turns out. Theres no reason to wait a week to see "the new episode" - i want it all at once (and without commercials, and without stupid Americanizations, i.e. what happens to the BBC Top Gear episodes that make it stateside - cut down, and a year or more delayed from British Airing..)

    The answer, of course, is Bittorrent. If i get interested in a program, I'll just download the _entire season_, usually in its native language (if its Anime, it's been subbed for me by the time i download it). I get the original versions of the content, i get no commercials, i get instant gratification, and i can watch it on my computer - or any computer i own.

    I'm actually thinking of building an HTPC with no tuner/capture card.. just to play DVDs and BT downloads on in my theater room, instead of on my main workstation.

    My wife has also adjusted well to no TV. She gets a lot more done at home and when there's a show she discovers that she likes, she gets the entire season of it on DVD.. either by getting it from the library (free!), borrowing it from a friend, or just buying the set for $20-$50 for a season. If you figure there are 3 or fewer series of show you like in a given year, you can buy them outright with no commercials for less than a year of _any_ TV service will cost you. And you get the material on your own terms, with no hassles.

    TV content is simply not good enough to accept it on terms you don't set yourself. If i have to put up with inconvenient terms, i just wont watch. That's why i got rid of DirecTV. That's why i see almost no movies, and its why i am looking to go to a software-only DVD player that lets me fastforward/skip anything i damn well please.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  145. "Please do not contact TiVo Customer Support regar by skryche · · Score: 1

    It's true! How obnoxious. Here's the link.

  146. Re:For all the TiVo sucks, MythTV is better people by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

    Can I get a mythtv box for $70?

    --
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  147. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by rsadelle · · Score: 1

    Which is exactly why I don't want to buy a ReplayTV or TiVo box. I don't have cable. I get a grand total of five TV stations. I'm perfectly happy programming the DVR myself, just the way I now program my VCR. I just don't want to have to mess with tapes anymore.

    I've been investigating non-subscription PVRs/DVRs, but I've yet to find any kind of useful comparison of features and such, and my knowledge is not yet up to the level where I can do any effective Googling.

  148. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by Akoma+The+Immortal · · Score: 1
    Straight from the horse mouth:

    "ReplayTV 5500 requires a broadband Internet connection or a analog phone line. A home network is required for room-to-room video streaming. A PC connected to a home network is required to store and view digital photos with ReplayTV. ReplayTV reserves the right to automatically add, modify, or disable any features in the operating software when your ReplayTV 5500 connects to our server."(emphasis mine)


    Dont believe me? check it for yourself.
    Seems like a Tivo thing waiting to happen!!
    --
    assert(expired(knowldege)); core dump
  149. Good luck. I'd buy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I'd buy one.

    My only useful suggestion to you would be to partner with WisChip to use their go7007 based capture device. Unlike Hauppage, WisChip have released and support an open source GPL'd Linux driver for their hardware. I use a Plextor M402U USB in my Myth box and aside from the inconvenience of an external capture device, it works extremely well.

  150. all the more reason by Dr+Floppy · · Score: 1

    to build your own DVR if you have the resources and access to the 'net.

  151. All the more reason to call them by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

    If it'll annoy them to be flooded with calls regarding this, it'll annoy them twice as much if they're flooded with calls when they've said they don't want to be called.

    Harrass them into submission.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  152. Argh! My eyes! by Lifewish · · Score: 1

    I've taken another fstab at it

    Bad slashdotter! No dupes for you!

    --
    For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
  153. One word to describe the people still addicted to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the idiot box.

    Baaaaa.

  154. here comes the pay-per-view box by E8086 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "What is this crap? Fox broadcasting down eight"

    How long until that red flag is accompanied by a nice big shiny "$" that will allow you to pay a TDB amount to let you keep the program a little longer?

    I'm not a copyright lawyer, but doesn't it allow you to keep something you bought, in this case in the form of TiVo hardware and subscription? This has to be a violation of fair-use consumer rights, right, those don't exist anymore. This is like going to a kid Potter fan and saying Rowling called, she wants her book back or to one of those people you saw waiting in line for Star Wars III and saying Lucas called, he wants his toy light saber back and you're not getting a refund. Copyright law says once you own something you can keep it for as long as you want, give it away or resell it or even burn shoot or blow it up, anything other than making and selling copies for profit and showing it at a public performance. There may be some clause in the TiVo EULA that might allow this "upgrade".

    This sounds too much like the Broadcast Flag and as last I checked it was thrown out by the courts.

    --
    F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
  155. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by JCY2K · · Score: 1

    G-d willing it isn't. I was this close to buying a ReplayTV and after reading this I put in another call to pre-sale support. Funny story about that later. But I asked for, in writing, a promise that they won't pull a TiVo on me. If they give me what I ask for I'm buying a Replay, if not, maybe a MythTV is in my future.

    I think Replay has one of the smallest call centers in the Info-Tech world. I called half a dozen times yesterday and 5 of them got the same woman. By the end of the day we were on a first name basis. My last call of the day, saddly, didn't get routed to her. I really freaked the guy who got my call out by asking him to say hi to my other CSR.

    Pax,
    ~J.C.

  156. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by KillShill · · Score: 1

    but then won't replaytv still work without calling home? sure you won't get the scheduling features but it will still provide basic recording.

    as i hear it, series 2 and above tivos won't work at all without an updated schedule.

    anyway.

    the best solution as always, is never to buy (you can rent if you think it's worth it) any DRM products. you don't own it but are paying for it.

    and maybe get congress to represent us citizens and not allow companies to SELL you products which you cannot fully own. it already is illegal in common sense and old fashioned PROPERTY laws before the lobbyists and their money-hungry congress handlers came to town.

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  157. MythTV Transcoding SUCKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    it would mysteriously power down with no warning during long transcoding jobs.

    These things happen. I myself tried setting up a MythTV box myself within the last month or so from KnoppMyth; sometimes the transcoding monitoring daemon or one of the transcoding jobs would die.

    Fine, the software's still under development. However, no log was written indicating where in the transcoding process it failed. Heck, it couldn't even tell which show it was on when either the rip or transcoding process failed (I was converting a DVD) to automatically feed forward to the next run after a reboot/restart.

    This lack of failure recovery in a core feature leads me to suspect the quality/testing of the product, and hence that MythTV won't be ready for primetime for a while. Of course, I could have known that from the '.18' version number :-)

  158. Downloading Media Streams? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    This is not completely on topic, but it fits better in this thread than in many others.

    I'm looking for some software (preferably simple command line utilities) that can download media streams such as RealVideo and Windows Media Video.

    This is because many of the TV shows I like to watch are archived online, but I would like to have a local copy for watching on the road, and as a backup for when the show or archive disappears from the site.

    I would like to know the alternatives that are available. Searching on Google did not yield many results; mostly a few Xine hacks. Since there is so much software that can play these streams, I'm surprised at how difficult it is to find software that can download them.

    I can play at least the RealVideo streams (haven't tried WMV yet), so a tool that can capture the output from the player would also get the job done. It even has the advantage of being more generically applicable. Still, I prefer just downloading the original streams.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  159. It might get that way eventually... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    ...but it certainly isn't there today.

    Also, unlike video tape recorders or operating systems, there isn't a strong drive for consumers to "standardize" on a single player in the market, so it's quite possible that alternatives like ReplayTV will never go away.

    I think your analogy is somewhat misplaced.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  160. Free market might work by riversky · · Score: 1

    Only problem is in the license agreement you sign or agree to in order to use the product clear states that the terms can be changed on you. It is kind of like a cell contract. They can change the agreement at anytime. Your only recourse is to agree or stop using the device and go to another product. The free market would in this case develop an alternative product free of DRM. The only problem there is the content providers might not license their content which they have the right to do.

  161. MythTV Setup: video walkthrough by dwntwnboi · · Score: 1

    the guys at systm recently did a video podcast (search in iTMS) (also available from their site) on setting up a mythBox.

    plain and easy to understand, yet not dumbed-down, this video quickly and easily walks you through setting up a myth box, with plenty of other relevant information such as minimum reqs as well as recommended hardware (especially for recording hdtv content), and everything else you could think of.

  162. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by NuShrike · · Score: 1

    I have a series 1 with the LAN card. I never have to use the land line.

  163. IT'S infair -- Demand changes by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Don't tell me that because there was some fine print in some d@mn license agreement that you've already agreed to this ahead of time. I sincerely doubt that the TiVo license agreement clearly states: We absoutely will reduce the functionality of your purchased and owned equipment in the near future without your consent to appease the broadcasting and content creation industries.

    Uh, yes they do. From he TiVo Service and the Privacy Policy, par. 6:

    "Changes to Your TiVo Service:

    TiVo may at its discretion and from time to time change, add, or remove features and functionality of the TiVo service or the TiVo DVR without notice. If you are dissatisfied with any such changes to the TiVo service, you may immediately cancel your use of the TiVo service as provided in Section 14 ("Termination of Service"). TiVo reserves the right to discontinue one, some, or all of the features of the TiVo service you receive at any time at its discretion. TiVo may at its discretion discontinue the provision of software updates to certain TiVo DVRs. This means that while other TiVo DVRs may receive continued software updates and functionality; TiVo is not required to provide such updates to your TiVo DVR. Additionally, the level of service TiVo provides may not be the same on each TiVo DVR; a given TiVo DVR may support different features and functionality, and TiVo is under no obligation to provide all features and functionality to your TiVo DVR."

  164. You can't have two masters by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    Software either tries to serve the needs and desires of its users, or it tries to serve the needs and desires of someone else. As no user has asked for this "feature", it's not hard to figure out where Tivo's loyalties lie.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  165. No question by HBI · · Score: 1

    You are right. But if the business of that geeky person gets big enough, he'll be stomped on by the content industries through whatever means they can. He'll be forced to insert in the same DRM or be basically forced out of existence.

    Then my mom has either a crippled or unsupported PVR. The second is preferable, I think.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  166. He hasn't forgotten it by BlueHands · · Score: 1

    .. but the MPAA, Macrovision and others would REALLY like you to forget....

    HEY LOOK! A PONY!!

    --
    I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
  167. Should detection "fail" in our favor? by swb · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: I'm not an RF engineer, and outside of maybe 1k of Perl code I'm not a programmer either (and many wags would have you believe Perl isn't programming, but I digress).

    I can only assume that detection of the copy protect flag involves some software routine that has to do some kind of error checking to be sure that the flag is actually present.

    Why can't that routine assume the flag *isn't* present unless there is really good detection of it? Why assume that "maybe" cases DO have the flag?

  168. Illusory Promises by chub_mackerel · · Score: 1
    If there were a conspicuous sticker saying "Warning: this device may not actually record the programs you want to record. There is no way for you to know in advance which programs you can or can't record. The fact that you can record your favorite programs now does not mean you will be able to record them in the future," then purchasers would know what they were buying and the free marker could operate.

    Actually, this wouldn't help the "free market" much either. It sounds an awful lot like an "illusory contract" or "illusory promise" under the common law.

    Basically that's when party A agrees to do something and party B agrees to do something in return, but with conditions which, when examined, amount to fake promises.

    "A agrees to mow B's lawn and B agrees to give A $10 if he can." etc.

    Putting aside whether this law would actually apply to the TIVO situation, it's clear that the underlying principles apply. In a transaction where you pay for something/take on an obligation into the future, but the product you buy/terms of service can be changed at any time, you are basically unaware of what you're buying.

    This is why your "free market" statement rings so true. :)

  169. No Tivo For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was thinking about one. now I'm not.

  170. If you don't own the phone, why not return it? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    So if when buying a subsidized plan you do not really "own" the phone, then why is it you do not send them the phone at the end of the contract?

    The answer is that infact you are buying the phone by installment plan, which happens to include service.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  171. YES! by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Yes you can.

    Simply hook the firewire up to your PC. Run any application that can capture MPEG2-TS (like dvgrab on linux, or windows video editing apps, or quicktime on macosx).

    You use MythTV to control an IR device or serial input to the cable box to remotely change the channel at the appropriate time. Note that the MPEG2-TS that the firewire gives you contains no program information...
    Also I'm noting the MythTV 0.18.1 changes includes the following: "Internal channel-change over firewire support for DCT-6200 series cable boxes - no external program required like before."

    So it seems MythTV has the infrastructure already set up.

    If your cable box has the firewire features of the firmware disabled, it may still support external firewire HD attachment. If this is the case, you can record to the HD with the cable DVR features, then load it up on your PC. You should see .TSP files (which are just the file-based MPEG2-TS mentioned earlier) on FAT or ext2 partitions.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  172. Timeslots and digital cable by tepples · · Score: 1

    1. Find a show you're interested in
    2. Set your VCR to record that given timeslot

    What if you're trying to follow a show whose network keeps moving it into a different timeslot every few weeks or so? If you've ever watched any of several science fiction series whose name starts with F, you know what I mean. Can your VCR follow that? Replay and TiVo can. Or what if basketball delays or pre-empts a show?

    Now take the fact I can buy a VCR for $40 or so and I'm not paying monthly fees.

    Can your VCR control an external digital cable or satellite decoder box? Once NTSC broadcasts cease sometime within the next few years, your VCR's built-in analog cable decoder won't be able to pick up local networks anymore. Or do newer VCRs have a built-in digital cable decoder compatible with the CableCARD spec?

  173. Why promotion matters by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's almost ludicrous how much better ReplayTV is than TiVo

    But if it's no longer manufactured, it doesn't matter how good it was, past tense, because you can't buy it anymore. A poorly promoted brand is more likely to become no longer manufactured than a well promoted brand.

    1. Re:Why promotion matters by Trixter · · Score: 1

      At what point did you think ReplayTVs weren't made any more? The company isn't going anywhere, the units are still made and sold... Why do you think it's no longer being made?

    2. Re:Why promotion matters by tepples · · Score: 1

      At what point did you think ReplayTVs weren't made any more?

      I didn't say that. I was pointing out that the gist of this comment was that "The company isn't going anywhere" might not be as true as you think:

      Its currently owned by D&M Holdings who recently scrapped Rio because Apple had overwhelming marketshare in the MP3 player market.
      At this rate, TiVo has enough momentum and brand awareness that the ReplayTV division of D&M is likely to become no longer profitable within the next few years.
  174. Mod parent troll! by goldfndr · · Score: 1
    If you look at the actual ToS, you'll see that section 6 says
    TiVo may at its discretion and from time to time change, add, or remove features and functionality of the TiVo service or the TiVo DVR without notice. ... TiVo reserves the right to discontinue one, some, or all of the features of the TiVo service you receive at any time at its discretion.

    Has your section 6 ever not said that?

    (I would've modded you troll myself [I have mod points], but I didn't want you wondering why and my moderation potentially metamoderated down.)

    --
    Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
    1. Re:Mod parent troll! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Well, it is a little confusing about what in there is ToS for the TiVo service and the TiVo DVR.

      But I must concur that the ToS do make is clear that you wish to be screwed if you buy a TiVo. They can turn off all services on your TiVo service, and if you do not like the service you are being provided, you are free to cancel the service. Though, if you agreed to a term and they cut off your service (by providing a service with no features), you will still have to pay $150 to cancel a useless service. Oh, and they retain the right to disable only your service, even if they leave your neighbor alone. They also only address what you may do if you are dissatisfied with changes in the service, but not what you may do if you are dissatisfied with changes in the DVR. Since you are free to cancel your service (of course, all advance fees paid are lost, and you are responsible for any penalties for canceling because they eliminated all features), I would presume you are free to stop using the DVR if they remove all features from it as well. Though, since it isn't specified in the ToS, it would be actionable. The other thing missing is that I did not find where the ToS may be modified. Perhaps you must agree to it every time you renew your service, but then it is a service ToS and not ToS for the DVR. You also agree to only sue under the courts local to them, though if you contest other parts of the contract, you may as well contest that part as well, and since the sale was between me and a seller in my state, I shouldn't need to travel to California to take action based on that wholely local sale in my state.

  175. You like shooting messengers? by goldfndr · · Score: 1
    I think every TiVo owner should precisely be contacting Customer Support about this. Jam up the telephone lines. How else is the company every going to know how their customers truly feel.
    When you're recording a show, you're not TiVo's customer - for all the TiVo receiver cares, you could've chosen the wrong lineup and it'll record the wrong show. You're actually a customer of the copyright "owner" and advertisers - tell the channel operators you're boycotting the show due to the restrictions, and if you've seen the show at least once, notify the advertisers you're boycotting their products until they don't have such egregious policies.

    This is just like harrassing a meter maid. In that case, you should send your complaints to the legislature (the people who decide what the law will be) or city planners (the ones who decided against free parking).

    --
    Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
  176. TiVo is officially dead, it was suicide by Dot_Killer · · Score: 1

    I saw this coming
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=135231&cid=112 85033

    TiVo as a last ditch effort have cast their lot with the content makers. WHAT HAPPENED TO TIME SHIFTING. This whole 7 day limit defeats the purpose. I still have a TiVO Series 1 with shows I recorded back in 2001 on it. People are buying the TiVo outright, why are they acting as if you are renting it. If a PVR in you cable box did this that would be understandable but not this.

    There is now going to be network and movie people telling TiVo what you can and can't record, even the non-pay-per-view stuff. Their revenue is from the customers and maybe some of the adds I hear they add, but mostly the customers.

    The company seems to forget that the consumer has the right to time shift shows. They seem to be of the opinion that if they pander to the content makers enough there will be some kind of windfall for them. I cannot see what TiVo is getting for screwing the customers. The company does not require the permission of the content makers to allow the customer the function in the product they bought to record their show or movie. Does your VCR ask permission before it records a show, why should a digital VCR.

    Soon you won't be able to record LIVE events or season premieres.
    The market is wide open now for a company that would make a PVR that can get its channel guide from free sources on the internet that is not crippled about which shows can be recorded, is there a company brave enough.
    An HD TiVo is no longer relevant if the TiVo is more crippled than a paraplegic.

    --
    Euphemism, what is that a euphemism for something.
  177. Or... by Panaphonix · · Score: 1

    You could get rid of your TV altogether!

  178. Please quit whining by evilviper · · Score: 1

    For all the Tivo users, stop whining about this. Tivo has been adding more and more restrictions for years and years now. You can't be a /. reader and claim you didn't see it comming.

    I'll admit, I'm happy about this announcement. Maybe people will stop burying their head in the sand when confronted with devices that you BUY, but you don't really OWN. It also makes me all the more happy that I ignored the Tivo zealots and spent about $500 and a week's worth of time putting together a Linux DVR about 4 years ago now. Instead of losing features and being more restricted, it is GAINING features and flexibility as time passes and I upgrade software, add new hardware, etc. It's still fast enough box to become an HDTV DVR when content becomes available. I shouldn't even need any new hardware, except a 'free' cable/satellite reciever (FCC requires firewire ports on them!).

    If you'll humor me as I have an 'rms' moment, here, I'd like to put all the converts to OS X on notice. Besides Tivo, I've been mentioning Apple for quite some time now. You can be quite sure that once OS X gets a decent-sized foothold, they will adopt similarly restrictive tactics. You saw the beginnings of this when they excluded all DVD-Recorders (except their own overpriced and under-featured "Superdrive") from being used with their mastering/recording software. The only big difference between Microsoft and Apple is that the former is big and rich enough that they are already enacting their lock-in and other shady techniques, while the latter is still small enough that they need to hid their plans and aspirations for future lock-in, stronger DRM, forced upgrades, higher fees, etc. So don't act surprised when Apple does this to you, either!

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Please quit whining by (1+-sqrt(5))*(2**-1) · · Score: 1
      It also makes me all the more happy that I ignored the Tivo zealots and spent about $500 and a week's worth of time putting together a Linux DVR about 4 years ago now.
      Do you mind if I ask whether you went the MythTV route, or do your ventures pre-date even it?
    2. Re:Please quit whining by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Do you mind if I ask whether you went the MythTV route, or do your ventures pre-date even it?

      I'm really don't know if MythTV was around at the time, but I certainly hadn't heard about it when I got started. I did try it out a couple years ago, after hearing so much hype about it, and was completely mystified as to why people were so enamored by it. Today, just as it was a couple years ago, it's a very disjointed, slow and clunky interface, IMHO.

      My own solution is a set of about a dozen simple scripts, which have been modified numerous times now to support newer capture tools, a new remote, and a few other basic upgrades. Tools like fxtv and nuppelvideo were the only real options at the time. I don't remember exactly when, but I believe it was quite early on that I switched to using mencoder (MPlayer) for TV capture as well as reencoding, and used that for perhaps 2 years. It was only in the past year or so that TV capture cards with hardware MPEG2 encoders got reasonably cheap, and I bought one to free-up my CPU from capture, so encodes would go more quickly, and I could do other CPU-intensive tasks and not worry about the capture dropping frames and such.

      I certainly don't enjoy using up a lot of CPU time for captures, but I think the mencoder way was the best over-all. The quality was a little better (at 1/4 the bitrate) than my MPEG2 capture card can manage, and it's scene-change detection made commercial-skiping just work PERFECTLY every time, and unlike MythTV, seeking was practically instantaneous. Still, now that I did spend the money to get this capture card, I'm using it, and have just grown to accept it's few drawbacks.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  179. I'll bite... by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    I'd love to run a Myth box but... How would it replace my DTIVO? I can watch one and record two or watch\record one while recording another. OTA bites in my area and cable isn't somethnig I want to deal with. So, how would Myth handle what I'm doing short of a ton of receivers and ugly IRDA dongles to control them?

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    1. Re:I'll bite... by Darby · · Score: 1

      So, how would Myth handle what I'm doing short of a ton of receivers and ugly IRDA dongles to control them?

      Well, I don't think it can handle that without those.
      Depending upon your area and provider, you might be able to avoid the IR Blasters and use firewire or a serial cable, but that probably doesn't even address your actual issue it just changes the cable type.

      If we could actually get the dipshit cable/satellite operators to release their codes then it wouldn't be an issue, but they aren't so it is.

      I'm actually looking at adding a second tuner, but what you pointed out is the major hurdle to address.

    2. Re:I'll bite... by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Appreciate the response! Honestly without two tuners any PVR is pretty much useless to me. I have and had used a ReplayTV box w/auto commercial skip. It worked GREAT for extraction, and recorded with decent but not terrific quality off of my DISH. However a single tuner is close to useless as if I'm in front of the TV recording is silly, I might as well watch it! I researched the DISH PVR, found it SERIOUSLY lacking and unable to do extraction without pulling the drive, so I called DIRECT and grabbed a CHEAP DTivo. I promptly hacked the snot out of it and I am NO Linux "expert". Networked, HMO enabled, extraction working if I want it.

      Nowadays there are frequently 2 or 3 shows at once I want to watch at the same time. I have ONE TV, one DTivo, no way will I put a TV in my bedroom so one is IT. I would build a Myth box in a heartbeat IF it could handle what I want which is massive stuff off of Direct. As it is I'll probably try the KnopMyth for funsies. For the shows I cannot record I use Torrents to a hacked Linkstation played back on my Linktheater.

      I'm not YET doing HD, when I switch I don't know what I'll do. When Direct switches encoding I also don't know what I'll do. The HDTivo is interesting, and hacked now, but expensive and the apparent coming format change may make it obsolete. :-( I'd like a box to postprocess my DVDs for clearer viewing or even to store some of them (not all, I have 400+).

      In the UK there are SAT cards for PCs, I've researched them. Here there's nothing of the sort, WTF! Let me guess, content providers won't allow it right? I can hardly wait for the DRM to bite these idiots in the ass!

      *IF* I decided to use cable instead, are there *dual* tuners for Myth that will work for this? For HBO? Showtime? PPV and other premiums? For digital cable? No IRDA dongle? If not (and I'll research this, not to worry) then sorry Myth is a novelty to me, a toy. I stopped with the rabbit ears and ugly crap on my roof years ago. Going back, even for "free" reception, is a BIG step backwards. OTA won't cut it and neither will simple Basic cable.

      So far a seperate Linux distro for TIVO hardware sounds like a great idea to me! However any changes that break the hacked DTivo I have now will likely prevent such a Distro from being viable anyway. These new changes won't hit me, I'm not worried right now. However the future sure looks mighty murky as to what I'll be watching! At least I'm not alone in this problem...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  180. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Link to your source please?

    Did you follow the Slashdot story link and read the replies there? There are several replies mentioning that Replay actually signed on to these terms before TiVo did, and I also came across it in other stories during further reading. I don't recall where it was, but someone at TiVo was quoted that this misfeature would not put TiVo at a "competitive disadvantage" becuase it would be "standard industry practice".

    I have no idea what, if any, remote software modification mechanisms there are in the old Replay units, but the Macrovision contract certainly would have required the maximum deployment and compliance possible. It will certainly apply to any new Replay units, at least as of a year ago.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  181. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by randyest · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Dead and/or unfounded FUD. I'm afraid you're wrong. This is already in TiVo. My replays are still unaffected (54xx and 55xx.) And, given that one can simulate a replayTV "mother-ship" (though I'm not -- yet, but I do have my current firmware backed up just in case) it will never happen to a moderately-savvy replayTV owner.

    Sorry about that TiVO choice you made. Better luck next time.

    --
    everything in moderation
  182. Re:ReplayTV Tivo by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Sorry about that TiVO choice you made.

    Uhhhh... I'm sorry about that anal-sex-with-little-boys choice you made?

    Hmmm... were did I get the idea that you have anal sex with little boys? I dunno. Must have been the same random cosmic rays that gave you the odd notion that I had a TiVo.

    My replays are still unaffected (54xx and 55xx.)

    I don't know the Replay models and dates, but as I explicitly said old units may not be affected and I don't know what (if any) remote update features they contain. Old units may or may not contain it, but all new units certainly will certainly need to.

    It is also very possible for you to have a unit with this these misfeatures and not even know it. It doesn't get triggered and you wouldn't have seen it unless you actually record something that has been flagged. The flag is not being used much yet.

    Oh, and here's Macrovision press release on Replay contracting Macrovisions DRM systems. TiVo and Replay are including these systems because the Macrovison and DVD licenses require it.

    Why would TiVo screw over their product in this way if they weren't arm-twisted into doing so? And what makes you think Replay would somehow not face the same issues?

    A good step in avoiding this crap would be not to include integrated CSS DVD playing in the system. Then they can say 'screw you' to the CSS license which allows them to say 'screw you' to the Macrovision license which allows them to say 'screw you' to this DRM crap. You can get a separate DVD player for like $30.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  183. Our sales would plummet! by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick