I know she's a fraud and I know you hate women, but calling her a whore isn't necessary.
Sigh. Sometimes I wish homosexuals such as yourself could just accept it instead of shitting on women.
If I were a homosexual I doubt she would have sucked enough dick to have more resources than me. The fact is she has no skills, no product and a bunch of bullshit. Logically the only conclusion is she got that vast wealth from sex-starved nerds by taking a lot of dick, she has no actual skills so there is no other explanation for it. If using the term "whore" in this context were a knock on all women as you suggest it would not be logically sound as for it to be so all women would have vastly more wealth than me. The whore is a whore, all women aren't whores.
Wouldn't that would make him an engineer and not a scientist? Of course, he's still significantly more intelligent than Palin or any of her kinfolk, he's just not a scientist.
He hasn't done any engineering, he's an actor. Like any other actor he ranks below anyone that isn't a sales or marketing guy.
It's possible this is an Enron type scam, but I think it's more likely that Holmes kept thinking they were on the verge of the big breakthrough, and was able to sell that to lots of investors who should've done more homework. It's like Curt Schilling with 38 Studios, the video game maker that convinced the state of Rhode Island to cosign $75 million in loans in exchange for relocating there and hiring hundreds of engineers.
Nope, she gave people fake healthcare information leading to misinformed self-care while promoting self-care based on that bad data. She's probably responsible for more deaths than anyone could even accurately account for along with everyone else at that sham of a company.
So, what's stopping you ? You can start with the IPCC reports and all of its references to supporting literature. You can download source code of the models, and raw temperature data. If you don't believe in consensus, that's your right, but don't claim there's no evidence provided, and that it's all based on trust.
Every time someone has done that without political bias they've found holes in the research on this subject.
The pharmaceutical industry did not create the dosage problem. They are responsible for plenty of problems, but the variety of sizes of humans is not one of them.
Maybe so, but they didn't solve the problem either, MIT did.
I do.
They are grown using sunlight, water, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and various other carbon compounds.
I also know how non-gmo food is made. Wanna take a fucking guess as to how?
Hand-waving isn't a fucking argument, you dumb fuck.
You clearly have no knowledge of synthetic biology and you are in fact evil for speaking on the subject without it.
Do you have any evidence that GMO is dangerous to those who consume them?
Examples of things that have harmed people after 5, 10, 20, 50 or generations away from their use exist throughout Human history. Lack of proven danger over such a finite span of time is not an argument by any stretch of the imagination. This on top of the fact every single GMO change is distinct. Go ahead and think about that a moment, consider just how many GMO products are out there, the average lifecycle for new changes in any given product line and the basic fact that any artificial adjustment to genes may produce adverse results that don't even manifest themselves for generations. You can fly blind if you like, don't presume to believe you have the right to force that on everyone, especially those of us with experience in synthetic biology. Let the developing world test it, they need the surpluses of food.
It sounds like this article is mixing up “smart people” with “introverts.” What about the really smart extraverts? Richard Feynman was very extraverted, he had lots of friends, hung around with them a lot, and was very successful.
Introverts can act in a not-introverted manner. Feynman's bongo obsession should be enough to confirm him as an introverted autist that got placed in a lot of social situations. From the FBI files on Feynman:
...the appointee's wife was granted a divorce from him because of appointee's constantly working calculus problems in his head as soon as awake, while driving car, sitting in living room, and so forth, and that his one hobby was playing his African drums. His ex-wife reportedly testified that on several occasions when she unwittingly disturbed either his calculus or his drums he flew into a violent rage, during which time he attacked her, threw pieces of bric-a-brac about and smashed the furniture.
A lot of people opposing these laws do so because these laws are promoting ignorance and stupidity.
Question for you: do you know how GMO foods are made? I'll give you a hint: we don't actually have genetic engineering cracked, it's "copy this from this thing into this other thing, did it do something that looks right for a finite subset of tests?" There is absolutely good reason to label GMO foods, people need to be every bit as informed as if they had a surgeon about to perform heart surgery on them that just roughly knows what location of the body the heart is in.
No, it's not being done in Vermont. The Vermont statute controls foods produced elsewhere and sold in Vermont: it's a major interstate commerce demand, and will add its burden to a broad swath of folk who couldn't vote in that state. Sadly, it's probably enforceable: state liquor laws have long created similar schisms, which is why a favorite pastime of yesteryear was to load up a few cases of a favorite beer from state A to take home to state B.
So, I wonder how long it will take to certify non-GMO status for pepper from India? Coffee from Brazil? Will stocks of unlabeled seed from before the law came into effect be presumed GMO untill proven otherwise? Will liars prosper, or will false claims actually be investigated? How?
I think the law reeks. What information I would like to have, won't be on the label. And learning that
the poppy seeds in my salad dressing were genetically modified... is worthless, a waste of ink and paper.
I disagree and so do others. Thankfully this isn't an instance where you get to push your insane ideas on others (and in their bodies.)
It's funny how nobody who ever says that then supports the idea of labelling foods "This food picked by Mexican immigrants", even though that's information that some people would certainly like to use in their purchase decisions.
You are drawing a comparison between a process and the thing derived from a process. People have a fundamental right to know what they are putting in their body.
Because people are lazy and people with money would rather throw money at things to meet their desires and go back to whatever they were doing prior than to sift through people and all their associated bullshit trying to determine who is actually qualified. Plus one person can only do so much, you'd end up getting celebrities instead of coders.
Not that I'm making excuses for the most loathed company in the United States, but California is the most backwards state in the Union when it comes to building and permitting, and it is not only plausible, but quite likely that they actually *were* stuck in the permitting queue that they claimed.
Welcome to beautiful Commifornia, breadlines coming soon.
If you use a backup utility other than copy+paste to an external drive or a backup script you wrote yourself (or by extension one your company wrote) it is already insecure. Data is too valuable to be treated by anyone getting a pittance for a backup utility as private. Don't even consider the cloud or network based backups outside your own intranet.
The democrats have plenty of welfare themselves. The fact is we aren't automated enough for socialism to work and we're too automated for pure capitalism to work. Frankly, the republican corporate welfare does more for sci/tech and society as a whole than the democratic form of welfare so if you don't like it you should at the very least not be on a site for nerds. "Corporate welfare" as you put it funds the bulk of science, hence feeding most of the people here.
To make it "pneumonic", or airborne and spreadable by coughing for those without The CDC apparently has some fascinating war game style test scenarios of exactly that sort of change in a known, highly lethal pathogen. They;re quite frightening: once the infection rate progresses beyond certain quite low levels, there is _no way_ to contain the diseases effectively in today's modern, highly mobile economy's and travel practices.
Anyone that has been on/. for a few years knows that. There was a whole debacle about how the government tried to ban a research paper because you don't need CRISPR to do it, just a dozen or ferrets.
We're talking to a fucking machine. There shouldn't be any sexual harassment when talking to a machine.. It's not like you're actually calling a person and asking them about their sex life.
I think you over-estimate the competency of a bunch of Indian H1B's that write everything in piecemeal. Cortana is likely just a mechanical-turk style assistant staffed by the equivalent of a call center.
Slashdot Mirror
I know she's a fraud and I know you hate women, but calling her a whore isn't necessary.
Sigh. Sometimes I wish homosexuals such as yourself could just accept it instead of shitting on women.
If I were a homosexual I doubt she would have sucked enough dick to have more resources than me. The fact is she has no skills, no product and a bunch of bullshit. Logically the only conclusion is she got that vast wealth from sex-starved nerds by taking a lot of dick, she has no actual skills so there is no other explanation for it. If using the term "whore" in this context were a knock on all women as you suggest it would not be logically sound as for it to be so all women would have vastly more wealth than me. The whore is a whore, all women aren't whores.
Wouldn't that would make him an engineer and not a scientist? Of course, he's still significantly more intelligent than Palin or any of her kinfolk, he's just not a scientist.
He hasn't done any engineering, he's an actor. Like any other actor he ranks below anyone that isn't a sales or marketing guy.
It's possible this is an Enron type scam, but I think it's more likely that Holmes kept thinking they were on the verge of the big breakthrough, and was able to sell that to lots of investors who should've done more homework. It's like Curt Schilling with 38 Studios, the video game maker that convinced the state of Rhode Island to cosign $75 million in loans in exchange for relocating there and hiring hundreds of engineers.
Nope, she gave people fake healthcare information leading to misinformed self-care while promoting self-care based on that bad data. She's probably responsible for more deaths than anyone could even accurately account for along with everyone else at that sham of a company.
Why not life in jail? How does the whore get to keep millions of dollars for doing nothing and giving people fake health data?
And why does it sound like a woman when it's name is "Watson"
So, what's stopping you ? You can start with the IPCC reports and all of its references to supporting literature. You can download source code of the models, and raw temperature data. If you don't believe in consensus, that's your right, but don't claim there's no evidence provided, and that it's all based on trust.
Every time someone has done that without political bias they've found holes in the research on this subject.
Should've gone to DeVry.
Might as well have, they're all scams anyway. Even the Ivy leagues are only worth a shit if you happen to party with a rich kid and he likes you.
The pharmaceutical industry did not create the dosage problem. They are responsible for plenty of problems, but the variety of sizes of humans is not one of them.
Maybe so, but they didn't solve the problem either, MIT did.
I do. They are grown using sunlight, water, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and various other carbon compounds. I also know how non-gmo food is made. Wanna take a fucking guess as to how? Hand-waving isn't a fucking argument, you dumb fuck.
You clearly have no knowledge of synthetic biology and you are in fact evil for speaking on the subject without it.
Do you have any evidence that GMO is dangerous to those who consume them?
Examples of things that have harmed people after 5, 10, 20, 50 or generations away from their use exist throughout Human history. Lack of proven danger over such a finite span of time is not an argument by any stretch of the imagination. This on top of the fact every single GMO change is distinct. Go ahead and think about that a moment, consider just how many GMO products are out there, the average lifecycle for new changes in any given product line and the basic fact that any artificial adjustment to genes may produce adverse results that don't even manifest themselves for generations. You can fly blind if you like, don't presume to believe you have the right to force that on everyone, especially those of us with experience in synthetic biology. Let the developing world test it, they need the surpluses of food.
It sounds like this article is mixing up “smart people” with “introverts.” What about the really smart extraverts? Richard Feynman was very extraverted, he had lots of friends, hung around with them a lot, and was very successful.
Introverts can act in a not-introverted manner. Feynman's bongo obsession should be enough to confirm him as an introverted autist that got placed in a lot of social situations. From the FBI files on Feynman:
...the appointee's wife was granted a divorce from him because of appointee's constantly working calculus problems in his head as soon as awake, while driving car, sitting in living room, and so forth, and that his one hobby was playing his African drums. His ex-wife reportedly testified that on several occasions when she unwittingly disturbed either his calculus or his drums he flew into a violent rage, during which time he attacked her, threw pieces of bric-a-brac about and smashed the furniture.
A lot of people opposing these laws do so because these laws are promoting ignorance and stupidity.
Question for you: do you know how GMO foods are made? I'll give you a hint: we don't actually have genetic engineering cracked, it's "copy this from this thing into this other thing, did it do something that looks right for a finite subset of tests?" There is absolutely good reason to label GMO foods, people need to be every bit as informed as if they had a surgeon about to perform heart surgery on them that just roughly knows what location of the body the heart is in.
No, it's not being done in Vermont. The Vermont statute controls foods produced elsewhere and sold in Vermont: it's a major interstate commerce demand, and will add its burden to a broad swath of folk who couldn't vote in that state. Sadly, it's probably enforceable: state liquor laws have long created similar schisms, which is why a favorite pastime of yesteryear was to load up a few cases of a favorite beer from state A to take home to state B. So, I wonder how long it will take to certify non-GMO status for pepper from India? Coffee from Brazil? Will stocks of unlabeled seed from before the law came into effect be presumed GMO untill proven otherwise? Will liars prosper, or will false claims actually be investigated? How? I think the law reeks. What information I would like to have, won't be on the label. And learning that the poppy seeds in my salad dressing were genetically modified... is worthless, a waste of ink and paper.
I disagree and so do others. Thankfully this isn't an instance where you get to push your insane ideas on others (and in their bodies.)
It's funny how nobody who ever says that then supports the idea of labelling foods "This food picked by Mexican immigrants", even though that's information that some people would certainly like to use in their purchase decisions.
You are drawing a comparison between a process and the thing derived from a process. People have a fundamental right to know what they are putting in their body.
i said, Windows is equivalent to the incandescent light bulb. Linux approximates the CFL, and OS X could be the LED.
Or people using Apple products are just full of themselves and think they can program.
Before it beats them at Starcraft.
Because people are lazy and people with money would rather throw money at things to meet their desires and go back to whatever they were doing prior than to sift through people and all their associated bullshit trying to determine who is actually qualified. Plus one person can only do so much, you'd end up getting celebrities instead of coders.
Not that I'm making excuses for the most loathed company in the United States, but California is the most backwards state in the Union when it comes to building and permitting, and it is not only plausible, but quite likely that they actually *were* stuck in the permitting queue that they claimed.
Welcome to beautiful Commifornia, breadlines coming soon.
If you use a backup utility other than copy+paste to an external drive or a backup script you wrote yourself (or by extension one your company wrote) it is already insecure. Data is too valuable to be treated by anyone getting a pittance for a backup utility as private. Don't even consider the cloud or network based backups outside your own intranet.
When you go with majority rule the minority still get fucked over. When the "majority" is 51% it's not even a majority, it's a statistical fluke.
The democrats have plenty of welfare themselves. The fact is we aren't automated enough for socialism to work and we're too automated for pure capitalism to work. Frankly, the republican corporate welfare does more for sci/tech and society as a whole than the democratic form of welfare so if you don't like it you should at the very least not be on a site for nerds. "Corporate welfare" as you put it funds the bulk of science, hence feeding most of the people here.
Flamebait/10
The "safety driver" has just been overriding all other would-be accidents.
To make it "pneumonic", or airborne and spreadable by coughing for those without The CDC apparently has some fascinating war game style test scenarios of exactly that sort of change in a known, highly lethal pathogen. They;re quite frightening: once the infection rate progresses beyond certain quite low levels, there is _no way_ to contain the diseases effectively in today's modern, highly mobile economy's and travel practices.
Anyone that has been on /. for a few years knows that. There was a whole debacle about how the government tried to ban a research paper because you don't need CRISPR to do it, just a dozen or ferrets.
We're talking to a fucking machine. There shouldn't be any sexual harassment when talking to a machine.. It's not like you're actually calling a person and asking them about their sex life.
I think you over-estimate the competency of a bunch of Indian H1B's that write everything in piecemeal. Cortana is likely just a mechanical-turk style assistant staffed by the equivalent of a call center.