Microsoft's made BILLIONs under his leadership. It's REALLY hard to argue against those numbers. But we're now witnessing what happens when short term profits are traded for long term innovation.
This is why the immigration problem won't be solved anytime soon. The issue is too valuable a demonization tool used by partisans against folks who may slightly disagree with him.
...not necessarily newspapers. Information vehicles (newspaper, radio, TV) that support liberal ideas are failing and the challenge is how to prop them up, like NPR/PBS. Conservative information vehicles require no such support. Naturally attacking and handicapping those conservative vehicles must be a central part of any liberal media support plan executed by the government and Google.
It all depends on your view of humanity. Are we sheep requiring strict shepherding buy our Harvard educated betters, judging what risks should be allowed and forbidden? Or are we free, equal people allow to pursue liberty as we see fit, and being able to defend ourselves, family, neighbors, and property.
In the former, gun ownership by the citizenry MUST be STRICTLY forbidden. The later, encouraged.
I see nothing by idiots. The president SETS NASA'S DIRECTION. W set it to be massive new undertaking, but then grossly underfunded it (just like everything he did).
You must be looking in the mirror. The president doesn't fund anything. Congress does.
Is your definition of 'regulation:' 'forcing it to buy Merrill under protest and against the CEO's judgement?' BoA was successful and would have nicely survived the crisis had the government not imposed your 'regulation.'
Joe Stalin, and the Khmer Rouge implemented a solution for these "Vile, disgusting, angry, small-minded, pathetic people." Sounds like you'd have a home with them.
Maybe consider finding common ground, assuming your opponents motives are noble, and convincing them of your ideas would be a better strategy.
Agreed. The American Military is capable of deploying a terrific volume of horrific violence. A volume and ferocity inconceivable to most. That's their job and they do an excellent job of it.
Slashdot Mirror
In the last century Atheists slaughtered more people than Christians and Muslims combined, so there's that.
That's a pretty strong indictment of the Democrats that put this together. Are you sure you want to go there?
Brilliant! Let's build it. I get to pick the 'sane citizens.'
Microsoft's made BILLIONs under his leadership. It's REALLY hard to argue against those numbers. But we're now witnessing what happens when short term profits are traded for long term innovation.
Where are these 'non-partisan' people you talk about? Are they like people without an opinion? They don't care? They're to run elections?
Or are they really people who agree with you?
This is why the immigration problem won't be solved anytime soon. The issue is too valuable a demonization tool used by partisans against folks who may slightly disagree with him.
I'm not a big fan of dumping more money into our science budgets when young women can't get free contraception.
That's the last thing I can think of that's lacking...
...not necessarily newspapers. Information vehicles (newspaper, radio, TV) that support liberal ideas are failing and the challenge is how to prop them up, like NPR/PBS. Conservative information vehicles require no such support. Naturally attacking and handicapping those conservative vehicles must be a central part of any liberal media support plan executed by the government and Google.
Yeah, sounds a bit like "climate scientists"
Perfect setup! Now who's biases should we support? The parent posts or GP?
GP is right. Make the decisions locally.
If you don't forget, you haven't forgiven.
Which moral high ground?
The US defends western civilization so it's military is right sized.
This is what Boeing does with fantastic success.
It all depends on your view of humanity. Are we sheep requiring strict shepherding buy our Harvard educated betters, judging what risks should be allowed and forbidden? Or are we free, equal people allow to pursue liberty as we see fit, and being able to defend ourselves, family, neighbors, and property.
In the former, gun ownership by the citizenry MUST be STRICTLY forbidden. The later, encouraged.
This 'Basic Human Nature' you speak of, is there evidence of that or is that an article of faith?
Actually, I think that would be totalitarianism.
I see nothing by idiots. The president SETS NASA'S DIRECTION. W set it to be massive new undertaking, but then grossly underfunded it (just like everything he did).
You must be looking in the mirror. The president doesn't fund anything. Congress does.
Wouldn't the 'Justice System' be about justice? It doesn't have anything to do with blame, safety, or rehab...
Is your definition of 'regulation:' 'forcing it to buy Merrill under protest and against the CEO's judgement?' BoA was successful and would have nicely survived the crisis had the government not imposed your 'regulation.'
The US government messed up Bank of America, not the CEO.
Joe Stalin, and the Khmer Rouge implemented a solution for these "Vile, disgusting, angry, small-minded, pathetic people." Sounds like you'd have a home with them.
Maybe consider finding common ground, assuming your opponents motives are noble, and convincing them of your ideas would be a better strategy.
Agreed. The American Military is capable of deploying a terrific volume of horrific violence. A volume and ferocity inconceivable to most. That's their job and they do an excellent job of it.
A tax break is NOT 'flat-out gift money.' It's keeping the money you've earned.
You should get a job and earn some money. You'll quickly understand the difference.