What did you honestly expect when facebook bought them? That the facebook lawyers, experienced in social media, would handle this with the delicate touch of an up and coming industry?
It was funded by the DOD and CIA as a method for spies to reliably communicate with their handlers without any way for the hosting state to intercept or read the communications.It was opened to the public so that the use of this network wouldn't be justification in itself to investigate.
That contract and agreement allows T-Mobile to pick the winners and losers in Video. Do you really want T-Mobile being the arbiter of which video services survive?
Because I sure as hell don't, just like I don't want Verizon, ATT or Sprint doing it either. This is what net-neutrality is about. If you allow these companies to make these contracts it won't be very long before they are the ones deciding which companies succeed and which fail and shortly after that they will put a toll on that selection. This is all inevitable. Though T-Mobiles plan right now may not being harming anything I guarantee it hangs around and gains power and it will.
Lying ted cruz was said in speeches and tweets by trump about 300 times, and each instance generated a dozen news stories at all the major publications including the same phrase 3 or 4 times along with thousands of disscussions. The result is the page rank for that phrase is massive, all because of Trump. There has been no such use of "crooked clinton" to generate such a comparable page rank.
His complaint about this is a complaint about phrases being used in society and he's blaming google for what Trump popularized. He's a fucking crackpot.
Everyone one of those scams is implicitly asking someone to assist with money laundering, which is illegal. But people get tunnel vision thinking about the cash and don't really consider that what they have agreed to do is illegal if real.
You shouldn't have sympathy for the idiot trying to commit money laundering. If all those scams were actually real that is what you would be doing, money laundering. I've never had sympathy of the people that do it for that reason, it's clearly illegal to do what you are asked to do you people follow through because of their greed.
People would probably learn quicker if they prosecuted everyone that got scammed for money laundering.
Who are you kidding. With civil forfeiture your little craiglist scam doesn't pay as well as the guy buying a dime bag of weed so the cops would much rather focus on that.
The Ironic thing is that speakers and audio are analog signals and require analog inputs. With a "digital" headphone all you are doing is moving the DAC out to the headphones where the digital signal is converted to analog and pumped to the speakers. I see little point in a system that moves the DAC out onto the headphones and will probably require charging the headphones.
Putin's just showing he likes Trump, after all one dictator can recognize a rising dictator. He'd love to see America in Trumps meglomaniac hands, the US would alienate all it's traditional allies and he's destroy our military power in short order invading countries that insult him.
Disney doesn't own a cable company. Almost everything licensed to Netflix is stuff that's not owned by a cable company (or other television provider). Almost without exception all the cable company owned content is not available to license by Netflix, they refuse to license at any price. Netflix would happily pay to license if they let them at a reasonable price.
This is a deliberate anti-competitive move by the cable companies and I would be surprised if they colluded together before doing it. Congress should mandate compulsory licensing for content owned by a television provider.
You are wrong. They will license anything they can that's being offered at reasonable prices. There are studio's that refuse to license anything and there are others that offer it at such a high price that it's economically impossible for Netflix to license the material. They've moved to producing their own content to act as a counter this licensing problem.
Personally I'd like to see congress make licensing compulsory if the content is owned by a internet provider (ie cable or telephone company). Many of these companies are the ones that are refusing to provide licenses because they are using it to actively harm the competition Netflix provides. These actions are anti-competitive and harm the free market. Until there is compulsory licensing at a fixed price regardless of size the market will remain broken and Netflix can only develop their own content to use as leverage in these deals.
Typical. You didn't even bother to read what you posted a link to did you? It states unequivocally that the private company that contracts to do the government launches (ULA) uses russian engines but the US government itself has never used them. Just like I said. Of course you didn't bother to read that either.
NASA has never purchased a Russian Engine. ULA (United Launch Alliance) purchases Russian engines for their Atlas rockets. By 2018 ULA isn't going to be doing launches because SpaceX is going to be 20X cheaper and is already validated to carry crew. That doesn't even factor in the other private launchers like Blue Origin that are gearing up as alternatives too.
It's funny, the Russians, French and ULA all laughed when SpaceX launched. They aren't laughing anymore, SpaceX is projected to take almost 30% of the launches next year and it's only going to get worse from there as they can beat everyone else on cost. All the national launch programs have never considered cost and will likely be priced right out of the market.
I don't understand even going to concerts these days. 99% of the time the artists is lip synching so they don't disappoint the fans with a performance that can't match the totally unrealistic material they get out of recording studio's these days. I don't see much point in a "concert" where all they are doing is playing the same version you can buy on CD.
Your understanding is wrong. Electing judges is a very uncommon practice. As this constituted a federal crime he would have went before a federal judge, who have lifetime untouchable positions once nominated to the bench.
The Chinese ability to reverse engineer being a superpower is a hoax. They can't even design jet engines and still have to buy them from Russia, because in the very high tech it's about understanding the basis, not just copying a layout.
It's not NIMBY that stops nukes. It's an electricity price of 14 cents/kwh and that's with the government providing free insurance. Gas can do electricity at less than half that, wind is at 4cents and solar will be cheaper than gas by 2020. Why would you build a power plant that produces power at 2-4 times the price of other sources? Because the only ones that are building these new nukes are the ones that are forcing their rate payers to pick up the cost.
Without a public utilities commission that's willing to bend their rate payers over and fuck them good and dry, a nuke isn't even feasible. And it's astonishing that there are two states willing to let their utility companies fuck their residents six ways to Sunday. If I was a rate payer in Georgia I'd be fucking livid that I'm being committed to paying 2 times the price for power for the remainder of my life unless I move.
You don't need a breeder (which are dangerous for far more reasons than proliferation) to clean up nuclear waste, you just need fuel reprocessing. The only time the US tried reprocessing it ended up one of the most contaminated sites in the US. That is why Carter banned reprocessing in any form, its an environmental and OSHA disaster of epic proportions. Hanford and Oak ridge are still contaminated from barely 3 years of minor industrial reprocessing and they've spent billions to try to clean them up. There is a stream at one of the sites (can't remember if it's Hanford or Oak Ridge) that's still got so many radioactive isotopes in it that its not safe to even put your feet in the water.
Any form of fuel reprocessing is just plain dangerous. You're operating chemical processes, often using highly corrosive acids and bases with radioactive and highly dangerous isotopes, the kind of processes that turn things like Cobalt 60 into gases and that if you take even one breath of it you will get a lethal dose of radiation.
Good luck with that, the US would simply threaten to stop sharing intelligence information and EU countries would buckle under in about 30 seconds. EU spying apparatuses are entirely dependent on data supplied by the US and the 5 eyes program just like the EU is totally dependent on the US to guarantee their defense. That's the complication of relying on the US to fund these activities for you as the EU is unwilling to pay the cost to do this themselves.
For the entirety of Human History up until the industrial revolution atmospheric CO2 level has fluctuated between 280 to 220 ppm. This planet hasn't seen 400pm of C02 in the atmosphere for millions of years. Long before the oldest Human ancestor species even existed. Our species was born of the ice ages that came about due to some of the lowest C02 levels the planet ever saw.
We are pushing C02 levels up to range that existed when dinosaurs were alive and there were tropical swamps in the arctic circle.
Your right, installing solar panels north of a certain latitude is just nuts, you know like Germany, that's at the latitude as Quebec and cloudy all the time, it would be just stupid to install solar panels there.
Coal isn't being destroyed by the stroke of a Pen. Fracking is destroying coal. The new coal regulations aren't even into effect yet and coal has already been devastated by competition with gas. Coal has gotten a free pass for nearly 300 years to dump uranium, mercury and dozens of other heavy metals all over our cities and crops. It's high time that changed, regardless of the impact to the industry. There is so much mercury in fish these days that you probably shouldn't even eat it.
What you see with Trump is selling the narrative that the coal companies would like to see sold. That is the idea that government regulations are destroying their industry, not competition with cheap gas.
Slashdot Mirror
What did you honestly expect when facebook bought them? That the facebook lawyers, experienced in social media, would handle this with the delicate touch of an up and coming industry?
The funny bit is claiming Valve supported the gambling sites with money. It's a ridiculous assertion he has no evidence for and that didn't happen.
It was funded by the DOD and CIA as a method for spies to reliably communicate with their handlers without any way for the hosting state to intercept or read the communications.It was opened to the public so that the use of this network wouldn't be justification in itself to investigate.
That contract and agreement allows T-Mobile to pick the winners and losers in Video. Do you really want T-Mobile being the arbiter of which video services survive?
Because I sure as hell don't, just like I don't want Verizon, ATT or Sprint doing it either. This is what net-neutrality is about. If you allow these companies to make these contracts it won't be very long before they are the ones deciding which companies succeed and which fail and shortly after that they will put a toll on that selection. This is all inevitable. Though T-Mobiles plan right now may not being harming anything I guarantee it hangs around and gains power and it will.
Lying ted cruz was said in speeches and tweets by trump about 300 times, and each instance generated a dozen news stories at all the major publications including the same phrase 3 or 4 times along with thousands of disscussions. The result is the page rank for that phrase is massive, all because of Trump. There has been no such use of "crooked clinton" to generate such a comparable page rank.
His complaint about this is a complaint about phrases being used in society and he's blaming google for what Trump popularized. He's a fucking crackpot.
Everyone one of those scams is implicitly asking someone to assist with money laundering, which is illegal. But people get tunnel vision thinking about the cash and don't really consider that what they have agreed to do is illegal if real.
You shouldn't have sympathy for the idiot trying to commit money laundering. If all those scams were actually real that is what you would be doing, money laundering. I've never had sympathy of the people that do it for that reason, it's clearly illegal to do what you are asked to do you people follow through because of their greed.
People would probably learn quicker if they prosecuted everyone that got scammed for money laundering.
Who are you kidding. With civil forfeiture your little craiglist scam doesn't pay as well as the guy buying a dime bag of weed so the cops would much rather focus on that.
The Ironic thing is that speakers and audio are analog signals and require analog inputs. With a "digital" headphone all you are doing is moving the DAC out to the headphones where the digital signal is converted to analog and pumped to the speakers. I see little point in a system that moves the DAC out onto the headphones and will probably require charging the headphones.
Putin's just showing he likes Trump, after all one dictator can recognize a rising dictator. He'd love to see America in Trumps meglomaniac hands, the US would alienate all it's traditional allies and he's destroy our military power in short order invading countries that insult him.
Disney doesn't own a cable company. Almost everything licensed to Netflix is stuff that's not owned by a cable company (or other television provider). Almost without exception all the cable company owned content is not available to license by Netflix, they refuse to license at any price. Netflix would happily pay to license if they let them at a reasonable price.
This is a deliberate anti-competitive move by the cable companies and I would be surprised if they colluded together before doing it. Congress should mandate compulsory licensing for content owned by a television provider.
You are wrong. They will license anything they can that's being offered at reasonable prices. There are studio's that refuse to license anything and there are others that offer it at such a high price that it's economically impossible for Netflix to license the material. They've moved to producing their own content to act as a counter this licensing problem.
Personally I'd like to see congress make licensing compulsory if the content is owned by a internet provider (ie cable or telephone company). Many of these companies are the ones that are refusing to provide licenses because they are using it to actively harm the competition Netflix provides. These actions are anti-competitive and harm the free market. Until there is compulsory licensing at a fixed price regardless of size the market will remain broken and Netflix can only develop their own content to use as leverage in these deals.
Typical. You didn't even bother to read what you posted a link to did you? It states unequivocally that the private company that contracts to do the government launches (ULA) uses russian engines but the US government itself has never used them. Just like I said. Of course you didn't bother to read that either.
NASA has never purchased a Russian Engine. ULA (United Launch Alliance) purchases Russian engines for their Atlas rockets. By 2018 ULA isn't going to be doing launches because SpaceX is going to be 20X cheaper and is already validated to carry crew. That doesn't even factor in the other private launchers like Blue Origin that are gearing up as alternatives too.
It's funny, the Russians, French and ULA all laughed when SpaceX launched. They aren't laughing anymore, SpaceX is projected to take almost 30% of the launches next year and it's only going to get worse from there as they can beat everyone else on cost. All the national launch programs have never considered cost and will likely be priced right out of the market.
I don't understand even going to concerts these days. 99% of the time the artists is lip synching so they don't disappoint the fans with a performance that can't match the totally unrealistic material they get out of recording studio's these days. I don't see much point in a "concert" where all they are doing is playing the same version you can buy on CD.
Your understanding is wrong. Electing judges is a very uncommon practice. As this constituted a federal crime he would have went before a federal judge, who have lifetime untouchable positions once nominated to the bench.
The Chinese ability to reverse engineer being a superpower is a hoax. They can't even design jet engines and still have to buy them from Russia, because in the very high tech it's about understanding the basis, not just copying a layout.
Using western licensed IP of course. These chips are based on MIPS.
It's not NIMBY that stops nukes. It's an electricity price of 14 cents/kwh and that's with the government providing free insurance. Gas can do electricity at less than half that, wind is at 4cents and solar will be cheaper than gas by 2020. Why would you build a power plant that produces power at 2-4 times the price of other sources? Because the only ones that are building these new nukes are the ones that are forcing their rate payers to pick up the cost.
Without a public utilities commission that's willing to bend their rate payers over and fuck them good and dry, a nuke isn't even feasible. And it's astonishing that there are two states willing to let their utility companies fuck their residents six ways to Sunday. If I was a rate payer in Georgia I'd be fucking livid that I'm being committed to paying 2 times the price for power for the remainder of my life unless I move.
You don't need a breeder (which are dangerous for far more reasons than proliferation) to clean up nuclear waste, you just need fuel reprocessing. The only time the US tried reprocessing it ended up one of the most contaminated sites in the US. That is why Carter banned reprocessing in any form, its an environmental and OSHA disaster of epic proportions. Hanford and Oak ridge are still contaminated from barely 3 years of minor industrial reprocessing and they've spent billions to try to clean them up. There is a stream at one of the sites (can't remember if it's Hanford or Oak Ridge) that's still got so many radioactive isotopes in it that its not safe to even put your feet in the water.
Any form of fuel reprocessing is just plain dangerous. You're operating chemical processes, often using highly corrosive acids and bases with radioactive and highly dangerous isotopes, the kind of processes that turn things like Cobalt 60 into gases and that if you take even one breath of it you will get a lethal dose of radiation.
Good luck with that, the US would simply threaten to stop sharing intelligence information and EU countries would buckle under in about 30 seconds. EU spying apparatuses are entirely dependent on data supplied by the US and the 5 eyes program just like the EU is totally dependent on the US to guarantee their defense. That's the complication of relying on the US to fund these activities for you as the EU is unwilling to pay the cost to do this themselves.
For the entirety of Human History up until the industrial revolution atmospheric CO2 level has fluctuated between 280 to 220 ppm. This planet hasn't seen 400pm of C02 in the atmosphere for millions of years. Long before the oldest Human ancestor species even existed. Our species was born of the ice ages that came about due to some of the lowest C02 levels the planet ever saw.
We are pushing C02 levels up to range that existed when dinosaurs were alive and there were tropical swamps in the arctic circle.
Practical fusion power has been 10-20 years away for 50 years. And it will probably still be 10-20 years away in another 50.
Your right, installing solar panels north of a certain latitude is just nuts, you know like Germany, that's at the latitude as Quebec and cloudy all the time, it would be just stupid to install solar panels there.
Coal isn't being destroyed by the stroke of a Pen. Fracking is destroying coal. The new coal regulations aren't even into effect yet and coal has already been devastated by competition with gas. Coal has gotten a free pass for nearly 300 years to dump uranium, mercury and dozens of other heavy metals all over our cities and crops. It's high time that changed, regardless of the impact to the industry. There is so much mercury in fish these days that you probably shouldn't even eat it.
What you see with Trump is selling the narrative that the coal companies would like to see sold. That is the idea that government regulations are destroying their industry, not competition with cheap gas.