Skinner: Ah, there's nothing more exciting than science. You get all
the fun of sitting still, being quiet, writing down numbers,
paying attention...[chuckles] Science has it all.
ASAP with some caution. Best to do at least _some_ QA on a patch that supposedly received QA from your vendor. You never know what they might have bungled.
That said, you should assume that attackers already have the capability to exploit the problem. Implementing mitigating strategies to keep yourself at least somewhat safe while you work out the QA is a good idea too.
Slashdot Mirror
No one said the brand would change.
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
a (soon-to-be) Rich samaritan?
Worst contest ever.
Need electronic paper.
"as it's a bit different here in the Windows world where Apple doesn't own the OS and hardware."
And soon you won't even own your own hardware in the Windows world.
-- Christopher Null, FILMCRITIC.COM (seen on rottentomatoes)
"The Wachowski brothers have delivered a dud so disappointing, they may as well have bussed in Ewoks to save Zion"
I don't recall ever being gob-smacked over voting though.
"Dr. Tatiana" ?
She clearly changed her name to garner sales.
Lindows isn't aimed at taking care of the needs of geeks.
Skinner: Ah, there's nothing more exciting than science. You get all
the fun of sitting still, being quiet, writing down numbers,
paying attention...[chuckles] Science has it all.
Will these counterattacks get better QA testing than MS patches?
Hibbert: Aaah. Diagnosis -- delicious.
Homer: I've got the presciption for you, another hot beef injection!
..."GPL is dead" ?
And things like VNC imply access to the machine. If all you have is physical access, this is decent, albeit expensive.
Sure. This one is cross-platform: http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/security/5a05/
...the hp 49g+ replaces you.
Subject suitability
* Engineering
* Surveying
* Math
* Science
* Statistics
I love my TI-86. I loved my 82 too.
Microsoft has started talking smack about their own products, instead of those of their competitors
I guess when you are so proficient at talking smack you are likely to hit one of your own at some point.
Someone should sue X10 for using an X in their name because Xs are really getting lame.
They can put 192MB into a phone but they can't make the phone any smaller.
Call me when it fits in my pocket.
Ranier Wolfcastle: Up and at them!
ASAP with some caution. Best to do at least _some_ QA on a patch that supposedly received QA from your vendor. You never know what they might have bungled.
That said, you should assume that attackers already have the capability to exploit the problem. Implementing mitigating strategies to keep yourself at least somewhat safe while you work out the QA is a good idea too.